1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %%% AAS Staff Scientist, Greg Schwarz, added object macros %%%
3: %%% and facility keywords on 8/07/06. %%%
4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
5: \documentclass{emulateapj}
6: \usepackage{apjfonts}
7: \bibliographystyle{apj}
8: \usepackage{longtable}
9: %\usepackage{lscape}
10:
11: % \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-0.375in}
12: % \setlength{\textwidth}{7.25in}
13: % \setlength{\topmargin}{-0.5in}
14: % \setlength{\headheight}{0.0in}
15: % \setlength{\textheight}{9.75in}
16:
17: \def\kms{km~s$^{-1}$}
18: \def\lya{Ly$\alpha$}
19: \def\lyb{Ly$\beta$}
20: \def\ly{Ly$\alpha$}
21: \def\nfv{N~{\sc v}}
22: \def\sitw{Si~{\sc ii}}
23: \def\onsitw{O~{\sc i}/Si~{\sc ii}}
24: \def\osx{O~{\sc vi}}
25: \def\ctw{C~{\sc ii}}
26: \def\sifrofr{Si~{\sc iv}/O~{\sc iv}]}
27: \def\cfr{C~{\sc iv}}
28: \def\cthr{C~{\sc iii}]}
29: \def\mgtw{Mg~{\sc ii}}
30: \def\nefva{[Ne~{\sc v}]$_1$}
31: \def\nefvb{[Ne~{\sc v}]$_2$}
32: \def\sithrfethr{Si~{\sc iii}]/Fe~{\sc iii}}
33: \def\althr{Al~{\sc iii}}
34:
35: \slugcomment{}
36:
37: \shorttitle{QSO Pair Spectroscopy}
38: \shortauthors{Marble et al.}
39: \journalinfo{Published in the Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (2008, \apjs, 175, 29)}
40:
41: \begin{document}
42:
43: \title{The Flux Auto- and Cross-Correlation of the Ly$\alpha$ Forest.
44: \\I. Spectroscopy of QSO Pairs with Arcminute Separations and Similar Redshifts$^1$}
45: \footnotetext[1]{Observations reported here were obtained at the MMT Observatory,
46: a joint facility of the University of Arizona and the Smithsonian
47: Institution, and with the 6.5m Magellan Telescopes
48: located at Las Campanas Observatory, Chile.}
49:
50: \author{Andrew R. Marble, Kristoffer A. Eriksen, Chris D. Impey, Lei Bai}
51: \affil{Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721}
52: \and
53: \author{Lance Miller}
54: \affil{Department of Physics, Oxford University, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK}
55:
56: \begin{abstract}
57:
58: The \lya\ forest has opened a new redshift regime for cosmological investigation.
59: At $z>2$ it provides a unique probe of cosmic geometry and an
60: independent constraint on dark energy that is not subject to standard
61: candle or ruler assumptions.
62: In Paper I of this series on using the \lya\ forest observed in pairs of QSOs
63: for a new application of the Alcock-Paczy\'{n}ski test,
64: we present and discuss the results of a campaign to
65: obtain moderate-resolution spectroscopy (FWHM $\simeq$ 2.5\AA) of the
66: \lya\ forest in pairs of QSOs with small redshift
67: differences ($\Delta z<0.25$, $z>2.2$) and arcminute separations
68: ($\theta<5\arcmin$).
69: This data set,
70: composed of seven individual QSOs, 35 pairs, and one triplet,
71: is also well-suited for future investigations of the coherence of \lya\
72: absorbers on $\sim1$ Mpc transverse scales and the transverse
73: proximity effect. We note seven revisions for previously published
74: QSO identifications and/or redshifts.
75: \end{abstract}
76:
77: \keywords{cosmology: observations --- errata, addenda --- intergalactic medium
78: --- quasars: absorption lines}
79:
80: \section{Introduction}\label{intro}
81:
82: Forty years after its existence was first predicted \citep{1965gun142apj1633,
83: 1965sch207nat963, 1965shk8sva638,1965bah142apj1677}, the \lya\ forest has
84: emerged as a powerful cosmological tool
85: (see \citealt{1998rau36araa267} for a review). Observed indirectly in
86: the spectra of bright background sources, generally QSOs, non-uniform
87: neutral hydrogen gas along the line of sight results in varying
88: degrees of absorption caused by the redshifted \lya\ transition line.
89: The opacity of the gas maps onto the underlying mass distribution via
90: the fluctuating Gunn-Peterson model. Remarkable agreement between cosmological
91: simulations and high-resolution observations has confirmed the
92: robustness of this relatively simple formalism
93: \citep{1994cen437apjl9, 1995zha453apjl57, 1996her457apjl51,
94: 1998the301mnras478}.
95:
96: \lya\ forest observations along individual lines of sight are limited
97: in that they provide only one-dimensional information. This can be
98: extended to the transverse direction when two or more sufficiently
99: bright QSOs happen to lie in close angular proximity.
100: Approximately a dozen pairs and a triplet have been previously used
101: to constrain the size and nature of \lya\ absorbers
102: \citep{1994bec437apjl83, 1994din437apjl87, 1996fan462apj77,
103: 1998cro502apj16, 1998dod339aap678, 2000wil532apj77,
104: 2000lis311mnras657, 2003rol341mnras1279}.
105: The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey \citep[2QZ;][]{2004cro349mnras1397} and Sloan
106: Digital Sky Survey \citep[SDSS;][]{2006ade162apjs38} have greatly
107: increased the number of known QSOs. The fainter spectroscopic limiting
108: magnitude of 2QZ ($B<21$) has also resulted in the identification of relatively
109: rare pairs of QSOs with arcminute separations and similar redshifts, whereas follow-up
110: spectroscopy is generally required to confirm candidates
111: identified photometrically in SDSS. In addition to studies of the
112: nature of \lya\ forest absorbers, such pairs are useful for the
113: transverse proximity effect and the Alcock-Paczy\'{n}ski (AP) test
114: for dark energy.
115:
116: Motivated by the latter application, we have used the MMT and Magellan
117: telescopes to obtain science-grade spectra for QSO pairs with
118: arcminute separations and similar redshifts. In \S\ref{pairs}
119: we define the sample criteria, and detail the observations and data
120: reduction in \S\S\ \ref{obs} and \ref{redux}, respectively.
121: The final data set is presented and discussed in \S\ref{sample}.
122: In \S\ref{errata} we
123: note seven revisions to identifications and/or redshifts
124: found in previously published QSO catalogues, before summarizing in
125: \S\ref{summary}.
126: However, first we briefly discuss the
127: primary science motivators for this new data set.
128:
129: \subsection{Alcock-Paczy\'{n}ski Test}\label{aptest}
130:
131: If some supernovae are indeed true standard candles, then
132: observations of their light curves as a function of redshift reveal
133: that the expansion of the Universe is presently accelerating,
134: following a period of deceleration in the distant past
135: \citep{2003wan590apj944, 2003ton594apj1}. This
136: inflection in the expansion rate provides the only direct evidence for
137: a nonzero cosmological constant, as $\Omega_{\Lambda}$ cannot be
138: measured directly from the cosmic microwave background
139: \citep{2003spe148apjs175}. However, alternative models, characterized by supernova
140: with evolving properties and no cosmological constant, are also in
141: agreement with the supernovae data. The merits of an independent
142: test for dark energy in a different redshift
143: regime ($z>2$) and subject to unrelated systematic errors are clear.
144:
145: \citet{1999mcd518apj24} and \citet{1999hui511apjl5} proposed a new application
146: of the AP test \citep{1979alc281nat358}
147: using the \lya\ forests of QSO pairs separated by several arcminutes or
148: less. The AP test is a purely geometric method for measuring
149: cosmological parameters, which at $z>1$ is particularly sensitive to
150: $\Omega_{\Lambda}$. Simply stated, spherical objects
151: observed at high redshift will only appear spherical if the correct
152: cosmology is used to convert from angular to physical scales.
153: More generally, this test can be applied to the correlation function
154: of any isotropic tracer, such as the \lya\ forest.
155: \citet{2003mcd585apj34} investigated this application of the AP test in
156: detail and found that neither high signal-to-noise ratio (S/N $>$ 10) nor high
157: resolution (FWHM $\lesssim$ 2\AA) are necessary. Rather, a large number
158: of moderate quality data pairs is needed to reduce the effects of
159: sample variance (approximately $13\theta^2$ pairs with
160: separation less than $\theta$ arcminutes for a measurement of
161: $\Omega_\Lambda$ to within 5\%).
162: The more similar the redshifts of the paired QSOs, the
163: greater the overlap in the portion of the \lya\ forest unaffected by
164: \lyb\ absorption ($\Delta z \gtrsim 0.6$ provides no overlap at
165: $z=2.25$).
166:
167: \subsection{Transverse Proximity Effect}\label{tpe}
168:
169: There are two methods for measuring the intensity of the background
170: radiation responsible for ionizing the intergalactic medium. Provided
171: that the mean baryon density, gas temperature and power spectrum amplitude
172: are known, it can be derived from a comparison between numerical
173: simulations and the observed distribution of transmitted flux in the
174: \lya\ forest \citep{2001mcd549apj11, 2003sch584apj110}. This approach
175: yields lesser values in disagreement with the proximity effect,
176: which measures the relative decrement in \lya\ absorption blueward of a
177: QSO's emission redshift caused by the increased ionizing background
178: from the QSO itself \citep{1982car198mnras91, 1986mur309apj19,
179: 1988bat327apj570, 2000sco130apjs67, 2002scp571apj665}.
180:
181: The transverse proximity effect is a variant on the latter method, in
182: which the decrement caused by a QSO is not measured from its own
183: spectrum but rather from the spectrum of a background QSO with a small
184: projected separation. This has the advantage, assuming a sufficient
185: redshift difference [$\Delta z \gtrsim (1+z) / 30$], of moving the
186: measurement away from the wings of
187: the broad \lya\ emission line where the continuum is often poorly
188: constrained. To date, there have been several observational
189: studies involving
190: three or fewer pairs \citep{1989cro336apj550, 1991dob377apjl69,
191: 1992mol258aap234, 1995fer277mnras235, 2001lis328mnras653,
192: 2003jak397aap891, 2004sch610apj105}, and no
193: unambiguous detection of the transverse proximity effect has been made.
194: This may be in part due to increased gas density associated with QSO
195: environments, as well as beaming and variability of QSO emission
196: \citep{2004sch610apj105}. The effects of anisotropy and variability can
197: be investigated with a large sample of pairs spanning a range of
198: angular separations. Ideally, these paired QSOs would be physically
199: unassociated ($\Delta v \gtrsim 2500$ km s$^{-1}$) but with
200: sufficiently small redshift differences ($\Delta z \lesssim 0.4$ for $z=2.25$)
201: that the region of analysis falls redward of the onset of \lyb\
202: absorption.
203:
204: \section{Pair Selection}\label{pairs}
205:
206: Our initial sample of known QSO pairs was drawn from the literature,
207: according to the following criteria tailored for the AP test.
208: The angular separation was limited
209: to be less than five arcminutes (5.7 $h_{100}^{-1}$ comoving Mpc at $z=2.2$,
210: assuming $\Omega_m = 0.27$ and $\Omega_{\Lambda} = 0.73$) due to
211: the rapid decline in correlation of the \lya\ forest on
212: megaparsec scales. In order to ensure overlapping coverage
213: of the forest redward of the onset of Lyman$-\beta$ absorption, a
214: redshift difference of $\Delta z<0.25$ was required. A minimum
215: redshift of $z>2.2$ was necessitated by diminishing
216: atmospheric transmission and spectrograph efficiency blueward of
217: 3300\AA.
218:
219: We applied these criteria in 2002 to the 10$^{\mathrm{th}}$ edition of
220: the \citet{2001ver374aap92} catalogue of quasars and active
221: galactic nuclei (VCV) and the completed, but unpublished, 2QZ catalogue.
222: The limiting magnitude of the
223: latter ($B<21$) is well matched for our purposes: faint enough for
224: finding relatively rare QSO pairs, but bright enough for obtaining
225: spectra of sufficient quality with 6.5m telescopes. The Sloan
226: Digital Sky Survey's spectroscopic QSO sample, on the other hand, has a
227: limiting magnitude of $i^{\prime}_{PSF}<19.1$. A repeat query applied
228: to the 11$^{\mathrm{th}}$ edition of the VCV \citep{2003ver412aap399}
229: in late 2003 (which includes the full 2QZ release) resulted in
230: approximately 200 QSO pairs.
231:
232: \section{Observations}\label{obs}
233:
234: Optical spectroscopy was obtained in the northern and southern
235: hemispheres with the 6.5m MMT at Mount Hopkins, Arizona, and the
236: twin 6.5m Magellan telescopes at Las Campanas, Chile. All
237: observations were made between 2002 April 12 and 2004 May 18.
238: Telescope scheduling and observing conditions largely determined which
239: QSOs were observed. However, when possible, precedence was
240: given to pairs with smaller separations and redshift differences. In
241: the case of the triplet KP~1623+26.8A, KP~1623+26.8B, and
242: KP~1623.9+26.8, high quality spectra with superior resolution were
243: already available in the literature \citep{1989cro336apj550}; however, we
244: reobserved them in the interest of a homogeneous data set.
245:
246: \subsection{MMT Configuration}\label{mmt}
247:
248: All MMT data were taken with the Blue Channel spectrograph, the 800
249: grating, a 1$\arcsec\times$180$\arcsec$ slit and no filters. This
250: configuration yields a dispersion of
251: 0.75\AA\ per pixel, a nominal FWHM resolution of 2.2\AA\ and approximately
252: 2000\AA\ of wavelength coverage redward of 3300\AA.
253: For calibration purposes, the helium-argon
254: and neon arc lamps were used as well as the ``bright'' incandescent
255: lamp, all of which are located in the MMT Top Box.
256:
257: \subsection{Magellan Configuration}\label{mag}
258:
259: Observations during two runs at Magellan in 2002 and 2003 were made
260: with the Clay and
261: Baade telescopes, respectively. In both cases, the Boller \&
262: Chivens (B\&C) spectrograph was used, along with the 1200 grating blazed at
263: 4000\AA, a 1$\arcsec\times$72$\arcsec$ slit and no filters. The
264: resulting spectra span approximately 1600\AA\ redward of 3300\AA\ with 0.8\AA\ pixels and
265: have a nominal FWHM resolution of 2.4\AA. In 2002, calibration was
266: carried out using the helium arc, argon arc and incandescent lamps
267: that are mounted to the exterior of the telescope and illuminate a
268: screen placed in front of the secondary mirror. For the subsequent
269: run, helium and argon arc lamps located within the spectrograph
270: were used instead, due to their increased abundance and strength of
271: bluer lines.
272:
273: \subsection{Modus Operandi}
274:
275: The same protocol was followed for each night of observations. Bias
276: frames, sky flats and flat field lamp images were taken during the lighter
277: hours prior to or following $12\degr$ twilight. Sky
278: flats were primarily necessary due to the significant difference in the chip
279: illumination patterns of the sky and the MMT Top Box incandescent
280: lamp. Multiple standard stars, characterized by minimal absorption and
281: spectral energy distributions peaking in the blue, were observed
282: between $12\degr$ and $18\degr$ twilight.
283:
284: The QSOs were generally placed at the center of the slit; however, in
285: rare cases, both pair members were observed simultaneously.
286: Exposure times were selected to yield a desired minimum
287: S/N of 10 per pixel in the final combined spectra. Consecutive
288: exposures were made in order to identify outlier pixels affected by
289: cosmic rays. Arc lamps were observed at each telescope pointing for
290: the most reliable wavelength calibration.
291:
292: Observing conditions were not generally photometric. In many cases,
293: absolute flux calibration was affected by clouds and/or slit loss.
294: Relative flux calibration was benefited by observing QSOs at an
295: airmass less than 1.5 and with the slit at or near the parallactic
296: angle. However, this minimizes, rather than eliminates,
297: wavelength-dependent light loss due to differential refraction and the
298: latter precaution is not applicable to cases in which the slit was
299: rotated to observe two QSOs simultaneously. Because correlation
300: measurements in the \lya\ forest require the flux spectrum to
301: be normalized by the underlying QSO continuum, neither absolute nor
302: relative flux calibration errors affect the primary science objectives
303: of this data set.
304:
305: \section{Data Reduction}\label{redux}
306:
307: Data from all observing runs were processed in a uniform manner using
308: {\tt iSPEC2d}, a long-slit spectroscopy data reduction package
309: written in IDL. {\tt iSPEC2d} utilizes many standard techniques
310: similar to those found in other packages (\emph{e.g.}, IRAF),
311: as well as additional features including error propagation, bad pixel
312: tracking, two-dimensional sky subtraction and minimal interpolation.
313: Here we detail the data reduction steps followed for each night of
314: observing.
315:
316: A bad pixel map was created in order to mask and exclude deviant
317: pixels/regions on the CCD. A master bias frame was constructed from
318: $\gtrsim20$
319: zero-integration exposures by taking the median for each pixel after
320: discarding the highest and lowest two values. A master sky flat and
321: master dome flat were constructed in the same manner after
322: normalizing the median counts of the corresponding exposures.
323: For the latter, approximately 100 exposures were used to
324: compensate for relatively few UV photons emitted by the incandescent
325: lamps.
326:
327: Raw data frames were bias-subtracted, flat-fielded and illumination
328: corrected using the master calibration files. Sky apertures were
329: interactively selected and two-dimensional sky subtraction was
330: performed, the advantages of which are discussed by
331: \citet{2003kel115pasp688}. Rectification and wavelength calibration was
332: carried out using the two-dimensional wavelength solution
333: corresponding to the comparison lamp image taken at the same telescope
334: pointing. Atmospheric extinction and reddening as a function of
335: air mass were corrected for using either the Kitt Peak or CTIO extinction
336: curve. Effective exposure times were calculated for observations made
337: through variable cloud cover, assuming wavelength-independent
338: obscuration. This was done by normalizing the flux
339: rate of consecutive exposures to the highest such value. Subexposures
340: were then combined, and, in the process, cosmic ray events were
341: identified and excluded.
342:
343: A sensitivity curve, derived from standard stars observed at the
344: beginning or end of the night, was used for flux calibration.
345: One-dimensional spectra were then optimally extracted \citep{1986hor98pasp609}
346: using variance
347: weighting. When relevant, multiple observations for the same target
348: were weighted by their effective exposure times and combined.
349:
350: \section{Spectroscopic Sample}\label{sample}
351:
352: Figure~\ref{fig_spec} shows the resulting final, one-dimensional,
353: wavelength and flux calibrated spectra for \emph{all} objects observed
354: as part of this project. These data, as well as the continuum fits
355: described in \S~\ref{sec_cont}, are also provided in
356: Table~\ref{tab_data} (the unabridged version is available in the electronic version of \apjs\ or upon request).
357: Incorrect published redshifts for one or both pair members
358: resulted in the invalidation of four pairs. In three other
359: cases, only one pair member was observed. The observed QSOs with
360: $z>2.2$ are
361: detailed in Table~\ref{tbl_qsos} and comprise 35 pairs, one
362: triplet and six single lines of sight (an additional individual QSO
363: has $z=2.11$). The latter are useful for
364: calculation of the autocorrelation function used in the AP test.
365: Although no formal maximum redshift was used and QSOs
366: with redshifts as high as $z\gtrsim3$ are included, the decrease in
367: QSO number density beyond $z\sim2$ yields a mean redshift of
368: $\bar{z}=2.5$ and an effective upper limit of $z=2.8$.
369: As this paper was being
370: prepared for submission, we became aware of a complementary data set
371: \citep{2006cop370mnras1804} produced by a concurrent program using the
372: VLT telescopes. Eleven pairs are shared in common with this sample.
373:
374: \subsection{Resolution}
375:
376: The AP analysis presented in subsequent papers in this series
377: requires accurate knowledge of the spectral resolution of the data and assumes a Gaussian
378: line spread function (LSF). Comparison lamp spectra taken immediately
379: before or after individual observations were used to
380: measure the former and verify the latter. For each lamp spectrum, Gaussian
381: fits were made to sufficiently strong and unblended lines (see
382: Table~\ref{tbl_lines}), and the median width was taken to be the
383: spectral resolution of the corresponding QSO spectrum. A composite
384: LSF was then created by aligning the lines from every
385: lamp after normalizing them by these fits (affecting the amplitude and
386: width, but not the shape). Figure~\ref{fig_lsf} shows the composite median
387: for the B\&C and Blue Channel spectrographs. In both cases, the LSF is indeed well parameterized as Gaussian.
388:
389: The resulting spectral resolution for each QSO spectrum is included in
390: Table~\ref{tbl_qsos}. In those cases in which multiple observations were
391: combined to form the final spectrum, the larger of the values is listed.
392: Generally, the variance in resolution is the result of normal
393: spectrograph focus degradation. However, in rare cases, the measured
394: resolution were significantly broader than expected.
395: Inspection of the observing logs indicates
396: that these instances occurred only at the MMT and always subsequent to
397: rotation of the grating carousel. Where sufficient unaffected data
398: was available, these observations were not included in the final QSO
399: spectrum, resulting in slightly
400: lower S/N from what was originally anticipated.
401:
402: \subsection{Data Quality}
403:
404: The eighth column of Table~\ref{tbl_qsos}
405: lists the mean S/N per pixel in the unabsorbed portions of the
406: ``pure'' \lya\ forest lying between the wings of the QSO's \lya\ and
407: Lyman$-\beta$/O~VI emission lines. This is, of course, only a figure of
408: merit, as the S/N varies across each spectrum. The target S/N in
409: this wavelength range was 10 per pixel, or greater. The actual values
410: vary significantly due to factors such as deteriorated observing
411: conditions, fainter than expected QSOs, changed object priorities and
412: exclusion of exposures for various reasons. In cases in which the target
413: S/N is met in at least a portion of the pure \lya\
414: forest (78 QSOs comprising 29 pairs and the one triplet), those
415: portions remain useful for the AP test. For the transverse proximity
416: effect, only the S/N of the background QSO spectrum at the redshift of
417: the foreground QSO is important. Of the relevant pairs, 17
418: have a mean S/N $>$ 5 in this region.
419:
420: \subsection{Flat-Fielding Anomaly}
421:
422: Previously undocumented anomalous emission features were detected in
423: the dome flats taken at the MMT (see Fig.~\ref{fig_anomaly}).
424: These features persist throughout the 3 years of observations.
425: Although the origin is not known, we confirm that they occur at fixed
426: wavelengths and are unique to the 800 grating. Such a spectral
427: response cannot be fit sufficiently without also partially removing
428: the pixel to pixel variations that the dome flats are designed to
429: characterize. Our solution is to replace the affected region with a
430: smooth polynomial function. As a result, the wavelength range falling
431: roughly between 4330 and 4440\AA\ in our MMT data has not been
432: flat-fielded (indicated by the last column in Table~\ref{tab_data}).
433: This affects the \lya\ forest in only
434: one QSO spectrum in this data set.
435:
436: \section{Preamble To An AP Analysis}
437:
438: \subsection{Continuum Fitting}\label{sec_cont}
439:
440: The Alcock-Paczy\'{n}ski test relies on continuous flux statistics rather than
441: identification of discrete absorption lines. However, all analysis of
442: spectral absorption requires knowledge of
443: the underlying, unabsorbed continuum. This was estimated for the QSOs
444: in the sample using
445: {\tt ANIMALS} \citep{2006pet132aj2046}, a continuum-fitting code based on the methodology employed
446: by the \emph{HST} QSO Absorption Line Key Project
447: \citep{1993bah87apjs1}. Essentially, the spectrum is block-averaged and
448: fit with a cubic spline, which is then used to identify and mask
449: areas of absorption. These steps are repeated until the fit
450: converges.
451:
452: Despite this relatively simple algorithm, obtaining a
453: credible continuum fit is generally a time-consuming and interactive
454: process. The smoothing scale is determined by the user and can be
455: adjusted across the spectrum as needed to compensate for varying
456: degrees of change in the slope of the continuum. The threshold for
457: masking pixels that lie below the fit is a free parameter that
458: effectively raises or lowers the continuum. If needed, the user can
459: manually mask or unmask pixels and lock some portions of the fit while
460: allowing others to be refined. The continuum can even be set by hand in areas
461: where the fit is not satisfactory, such as boundaries between
462: different smoothing scales, heavily absorbed regions, or emission
463: features where the continuum changes rapidly.
464:
465: In order to gauge the uncertainty in the rather subjective placement
466: of the continua, all of the QSOs were fit independently by authors ARM and
467: KAE. Both fits are provided in Table~\ref{tab_data}, and are shown in
468: Figure~\ref{fig_contfit} for a typical spectrum with S/N~$\approx10$ per pixel in the
469: \lya\ forest. One difference evident here (but also consistent
470: throughout the sample) is the lower continuum
471: placement of the latter ($c_{KAE}$) relative to the former ($c_{ARM}$). Note also that
472: the continuum fits become increasingly unreliable with decreasing S/N
473: (\emph{e.g.}, S/N$<10$ at $\lambda < $3500\AA) and in close proximity to
474: emission features (\emph{e.g.}, \lya\ at $\lambda\approx
475: 4200$\AA\ and the \lyb/\osx\ blend at $\lambda\approx 3600$\AA). In
476: some cases, the combination of \lya\ emission and strong absorption makes
477: estimation of the continuum impossible. For
478: this reason, and others, analysis of the \lya\ forest is generally
479: restricted to wavelengths less than $\sim3000$ km s$^{-1}$ blueward of
480: the \lya\ emission line.
481:
482: \subsection{Auto and Cross-Correlation}
483:
484: The autocorrelation ($\xi_{\parallel}$) is measured in the radial
485: direction and can be obtained independently from each QSO spectrum, although with
486: significant variance from one line of sight to another. The
487: cross-correlation, on the otherhand, samples the transverse direction
488: and must be pieced together from pairs of QSOs at different separations:
489:
490: \begin{eqnarray}
491: \xi_{\parallel}(\Delta v) & = &
492: \left<
493: \left( \hat{f}(v)\,/\,\langle \hat{f} \rangle - 1 \right)
494: \left( \hat{f}(v+\Delta v)\,/\,\langle \hat{f} \rangle - 1\right)
495: \right>
496: \label{eq_auto}
497: \\
498: \xi_{\perp}\left(\Delta v\right) & = &
499: \left<
500: \left( \hat{f}(v)\,/\,\langle \hat{f} \rangle - 1 \right)
501: \left( \hat{f}_{\Delta v}(v)\,/\,\langle \hat{f} \rangle - 1 \right)
502: \right>
503: \label{eq_cross}
504: \end{eqnarray}
505:
506: \noindent In equations~(\ref{eq_auto}) and (\ref{eq_cross}), $\hat{f}$ and
507: $\hat{f}_{\Delta v}$ correspond to
508: lines of sight separated on the sky by $\Delta v$, where $\hat{f}$ is the flux
509: divided by the continuum. Figure~\ref{fig_correlation} shows
510: correlation measurements for one redshift bin ($2.1 < z_{Ly\alpha} <
511: 2.3$), assuming the $c_{KAE}$ continua, the observationally determined
512: value of $\langle \hat{f} \rangle$ from \citet{1993pre414apj64},
513: $\Omega_m = 0.268$, and $\Omega_\Lambda = 0.732$. The agreement
514: between the autocorrelation and cross-correlation for the currently
515: preferred cosmological model \citep{2007spe}
516: is, in part, a coincidence. Two sources
517: of anisotropy in the \lya\ flux correlation function must be accounted
518: for before a reliable AP analysis can be carried out. First, the line
519: spread function of the spectrograph smooths the spectra along the line
520: of sight and therefore affects autocorrelation and
521: cross-correlation measurements differently. Second, peculiar
522: velocities caused by the expansion of the universe, gravitational
523: collapse, and thermal broadening make the correlation function
524: anisotropic in redshift (observed) space \citep{1987kai227mnras1}. Modelling these effects
525: with cosmological hydrodynamic simulations is the subject of Paper II
526: in this series.
527:
528: \section{QSO Catalog Corrections}\label{errata}
529:
530: In the course of our observations, five QSOs were found to have
531: incorrect published redshifts and two additional objects turned
532: out not to be QSOs at all. These errors were the result of
533: misidentification based on inferior data available
534: at the time, with one exception. \citet{2006cop370mnras1804}
535: and this
536: paper present spectra for the same QSO, 2QZ~J102827.1$-$013641, which
537: are clearly different and yield disparate redshifts ($z=2.393$ and
538: 1.609, respectively). The original redshift ($z=2.31$) obtained by
539: \citet{2004cro349mnras1397}
540: disagrees with both follow-up studies,
541: but appears to result from the \cfr\ emission line being
542: mistakenly identified as \ly. The fact that their discovery spectrum
543: is consistent with being a much noisier version of the spectrum
544: presented in this paper, leads us to conclude that our redshift is
545: correct and that the \citet{2006cop370mnras1804} spectrum is
546: for a QSO at different coordinates.
547:
548: Table~\ref{tbl_newz} details these errors
549: and provides corrections based on our observations.
550: The fourth column lists the mean and standard deviation of redshifts
551: determined from the emission lines recorded in the fifth column.
552: Gaussian curves were fit to each line, and the corresponding central
553: wavelengths were compared to the observationally determined rest
554: wavelengths reported by \citet{2001van122aj549}.
555:
556: \section{Summary}\label{summary}
557:
558: We have carried out a 3 year observational campaign to obtain
559: optical spectroscopy for pairs of previously known
560: QSOs with $z>2.2$, $\Delta z < 0.25$ and separations less than 5
561: arcminutes$^2$:
562:
563: 1) We present 86 spectra comprising 35 QSO pairs, one triplet,
564: 11 individual QSOs (four of which have $z\lesssim1.7$), and two objects
565: previously misidentified as QSOs.
566:
567: 2) Seven previously catalogued QSOs were found to have incorrect
568: published identifications and/or redshifts, for which we provide
569: revised redshift values.
570:
571: 3) We note one aspect of observing with the MMT Blue Channel
572: spectrograph that may be relevant for future users. The otherwise
573: smooth spectral response of the incandescent lamp in the Top Box
574: exhibits anomalous emission features at $\lambda\approx4380$\AA\
575: when the 800 grating is used.
576:
577: 4) We have created a new spectroscopic dataset of 78 QSOs with
578: sufficient data quality for an Alcock-Paczy\'{n}ski
579: measurement of $\Omega_{\Lambda}$; 29 pairs and one triplet for measuring the
580: cross-correlation of transmitted flux in the \lya\ forest,
581: and 17 additional individual QSOs for measuring the
582: autocorrelation.
583:
584: 5) In addition, 17 of the QSO pairs are both unassociated and
585: have sufficient data quality for an investigation of the transverse
586: proximity effect.
587:
588: \acknowledgements
589:
590: We gratefully acknowledge the operators and staff at the MMT and
591: Magellan telescopes for their assistance and expertise that made this
592: observational program possible, Daniel Christlein for helping observe
593: during the winter holiday in 2002, and John Moustakas for countless
594: conversations regarding the {\tt iSPEC2d} reduction package.
595: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED)
596: which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute
597: of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
598:
599: %%!%% Facilities added
600: {\it Facilities:} \facility{MMT (Blue Channel spectrograph)},
601: \facility{Magellan:Baade (Boller and Chivens spectrograph)},
602: \facility{Magellan:Clay (Boller and Chivens spectrograph)}
603:
604:
605: \begin{thebibliography}{77}
606: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
607:
608: \bibitem[{{Adelman-McCarthy} {et~al.}(2006)}]{2006ade162apjs38}
609: {Adelman-McCarthy}, J.~K., {et~al.} 2006, \apjs, 162, 38
610:
611: \bibitem[{{Alcock} \& {Paczynski}(1979)}]{1979alc281nat358}
612: {Alcock}, C., \& {Paczynski}, B. 1979, \nat, 281, 358
613:
614: \bibitem[{{Bahcall} \& {Salpeter}(1965)}]{1965bah142apj1677}
615: {Bahcall}, J.~N., \& {Salpeter}, E.~E. 1965, \apj, 142, 1677
616:
617: \bibitem[{{Bahcall} {et~al.}(1993)}]{1993bah87apjs1}
618: {Bahcall}, J.~N., {et~al.} 1993, \apjs, 87, 1
619:
620: \bibitem[{{Bajtlik} {et~al.}(1988){Bajtlik}, {Duncan}, \&
621: {Ostriker}}]{1988bat327apj570}
622: {Bajtlik}, S., {Duncan}, R.~C., \& {Ostriker}, J.~P. 1988, \apj, 327, 570
623:
624: \bibitem[{{Bechtold} {et~al.}(1994){Bechtold}, {Crotts}, {Duncan}, \&
625: {Fang}}]{1994bec437apjl83}
626: {Bechtold}, J., {Crotts}, A.~P.~S., {Duncan}, R.~C., \& {Fang}, Y. 1994, \apjl,
627: 437, L83
628:
629: \bibitem[{{Becker} {et~al.}(1991){Becker}, {White}, \&
630: {Edwards}}]{1991bec75apjs1}
631: {Becker}, R.~H., {White}, R.~L., \& {Edwards}, A.~L. 1991, \apjs, 75, 1
632:
633: \bibitem[{{Boyle} {et~al.}(1990){Boyle}, {Fong}, {Shanks}, \&
634: {Peterson}}]{1990boy243mnras1}
635: {Boyle}, B.~J., {Fong}, R., {Shanks}, T., \& {Peterson}, B.~A. 1990, \mnras,
636: 243, 1
637:
638: \bibitem[{{Carswell} {et~al.}(1982){Carswell}, {Whelan}, {Smith}, {Boksenberg},
639: \& {Tytler}}]{1982car198mnras91}
640: {Carswell}, R.~F., {Whelan}, J.~A.~J., {Smith}, M.~G., {Boksenberg}, A., \&
641: {Tytler}, D. 1982, \mnras, 198, 91
642:
643: \bibitem[{{Cen} {et~al.}(1994){Cen}, {Miralda-Escud{\'e}}, {Ostriker}, \&
644: {Rauch}}]{1994cen437apjl9}
645: {Cen}, R., {Miralda-Escud{\'e}}, J., {Ostriker}, J.~P., \& {Rauch}, M. 1994,
646: \apjl, 437, L9
647:
648: \bibitem[{{Condon} {et~al.}(1998){Condon}, {Cotton}, {Greisen}, {Yin},
649: {Perley}, {Taylor}, \& {Broderick}}]{1998con115aj1693}
650: {Condon}, J.~J., {Cotton}, W.~D., {Greisen}, E.~W., {Yin}, Q.~F., {Perley},
651: R.~A., {Taylor}, G.~B., \& {Broderick}, J.~J. 1998, \aj, 115, 1693
652:
653: \bibitem[{{Coppolani} {et~al.}(2006){Coppolani}, {Petitjean}, {Stoehr},
654: {Rollinde}, {Pichon}, {Colombi}, {Haehnelt}, {Carswell}, \&
655: {Teyssier}}]{2006cop370mnras1804}
656: {Coppolani}, F., {et~al.} 2006, \mnras, 370, 1804
657:
658: \bibitem[{{Crampton} {et~al.}(1985){Crampton}, {Schade}, \&
659: {Cowley}}]{1985cra90aj987}
660: {Crampton}, D., {Schade}, D., \& {Cowley}, A.~P. 1985, \aj, 90, 987
661:
662: \bibitem[{{Croom} {et~al.}(2004){Croom}, {Smith}, {Boyle}, {Shanks}, {Miller},
663: {Outram}, \& {Loaring}}]{2004cro349mnras1397}
664: {Croom}, S.~M., {Smith}, R.~J., {Boyle}, B.~J., {Shanks}, T., {Miller}, L.,
665: {Outram}, P.~J., \& {Loaring}, N.~S. 2004, \mnras, 349, 1397
666:
667: \bibitem[{{Crotts}(1989)}]{1989cro336apj550}
668: {Crotts}, A.~P.~S. 1989, \apj, 336, 550
669:
670: \bibitem[{{Crotts} \& {Fang}(1998)}]{1998cro502apj16}
671: {Crotts}, A.~P.~S., \& {Fang}, Y. 1998, \apj, 502, 16
672:
673: \bibitem[{{Cutri} {et~al.}(2003)}]{2003cut2246ycat0}
674: {Cutri}, R.~M., {et~al.} 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 2246, 0
675:
676: \bibitem[{{Dinshaw} {et~al.}(1994){Dinshaw}, {Impey}, {Foltz}, {Weymann}, \&
677: {Chaffee}}]{1994din437apjl87}
678: {Dinshaw}, N., {Impey}, C.~D., {Foltz}, C.~B., {Weymann}, R.~J., \& {Chaffee},
679: F.~H. 1994, \apjl, 437, L87
680:
681: \bibitem[{{Dobrzycki} \& {Bechtold}(1991)}]{1991dob377apjl69}
682: {Dobrzycki}, A., \& {Bechtold}, J. 1991, \apjl, 377, L69
683:
684: \bibitem[{{D'Odorico} {et~al.}(1998){D'Odorico}, {Cristiani}, {D'Odorico},
685: {Fontana}, {Giallongo}, \& {Shaver}}]{1998dod339aap678}
686: {D'Odorico}, V., {Cristiani}, S., {D'Odorico}, S., {Fontana}, A., {Giallongo},
687: E., \& {Shaver}, P. 1998, \aap, 339, 678
688:
689: \bibitem[{{Douglas} {et~al.}(1996){Douglas}, {Bash}, {Bozyan}, {Torrence}, \&
690: {Wolfe}}]{1996dou111aj1945}
691: {Douglas}, J.~N., {Bash}, F.~N., {Bozyan}, F.~A., {Torrence}, G.~W., \&
692: {Wolfe}, C. 1996, \aj, 111, 1945
693:
694: \bibitem[{{Drinkwater}(1987)}]{1987driphdt}
695: {Drinkwater}, M.~J. 1987, Ph.D.~Thesis
696:
697: \bibitem[{{Fang} {et~al.}(1996){Fang}, {Duncan}, {Crotts}, \&
698: {Bechtold}}]{1996fan462apj77}
699: {Fang}, Y., {Duncan}, R.~C., {Crotts}, A.~P.~S., \& {Bechtold}, J. 1996, \apj,
700: 462, 77
701:
702: \bibitem[{{Fernandez-Soto} {et~al.}(1995){Fernandez-Soto}, {Barcons},
703: {Carballo}, \& {Webb}}]{1995fer277mnras235}
704: {Fernandez-Soto}, A., {Barcons}, X., {Carballo}, R., \& {Webb}, J.~K. 1995,
705: \mnras, 277, 235
706:
707: \bibitem[{{Gaston}(1983)}]{1983gas272apj411}
708: {Gaston}, B. 1983, \apj, 272, 411
709:
710: \bibitem[{{Gould} {et~al.}(1993){Gould}, {Bahcall}, \&
711: {Maoz}}]{1993gou88apjs53}
712: {Gould}, A., {Bahcall}, J.~N., \& {Maoz}, D. 1993, \apjs, 88, 53
713:
714: \bibitem[{{Gregory} {et~al.}(1996){Gregory}, {Scott}, {Douglas}, \&
715: {Condon}}]{1996gre103apjs427}
716: {Gregory}, P.~C., {Scott}, W.~K., {Douglas}, K., \& {Condon}, J.~J. 1996,
717: \apjs, 103, 427
718:
719: \bibitem[{{Gunn} \& {Peterson}(1965)}]{1965gun142apj1633}
720: {Gunn}, J.~E., \& {Peterson}, B.~A. 1965, \apj, 142, 1633
721:
722: \bibitem[{{Hernquist} {et~al.}(1996){Hernquist}, {Katz}, {Weinberg}, \&
723: {Miralda-Escud{\'e}}}]{1996her457apjl51}
724: {Hernquist}, L., {Katz}, N., {Weinberg}, D.~H., \& {Miralda-Escud{\'e}}, J.
725: 1996, \apjl, 457, L51
726:
727: \bibitem[{{Horne}(1986)}]{1986hor98pasp609}
728: {Horne}, K. 1986, \pasp, 98, 609
729:
730: \bibitem[{{Hui} {et~al.}(1999){Hui}, {Stebbins}, \& {Burles}}]{1999hui511apjl5}
731: {Hui}, L., {Stebbins}, A., \& {Burles}, S. 1999, \apjl, 511, L5
732:
733: \bibitem[{{Jakobsen} {et~al.}(2003){Jakobsen}, {Jansen}, {Wagner}, \&
734: {Reimers}}]{2003jak397aap891}
735: {Jakobsen}, P., {Jansen}, R.~A., {Wagner}, S., \& {Reimers}, D. 2003, \aap,
736: 397, 891
737:
738: \bibitem[{{Kaiser}(1987)}]{1987kai227mnras1}
739: {Kaiser}, N. 1987, \mnras, 227, 1
740:
741: \bibitem[{{Kelson}(2003)}]{2003kel115pasp688}
742: {Kelson}, D.~D. 2003, \pasp, 115, 688
743:
744: \bibitem[{{Korista} {et~al.}(1993){Korista}, {Voit}, {Morris}, \&
745: {Weymann}}]{1993kor88apjs357}
746: {Korista}, K.~T., {Voit}, G.~M., {Morris}, S.~L., \& {Weymann}, R.~J. 1993,
747: \apjs, 88, 357
748:
749: \bibitem[{{Large} {et~al.}(1981){Large}, {Mills}, {Little}, {Crawford}, \&
750: {Sutton}}]{1981lar194mnras693}
751: {Large}, M.~I., {Mills}, B.~Y., {Little}, A.~G., {Crawford}, D.~F., \&
752: {Sutton}, J.~M. 1981, \mnras, 194, 693
753:
754: \bibitem[{{Liske} {et~al.}(2000){Liske}, {Webb}, {Williger},
755: {Fern{\'a}ndez-Soto}, \& {Carswell}}]{2000lis311mnras657}
756: {Liske}, J., {Webb}, J.~K., {Williger}, G.~M., {Fern{\'a}ndez-Soto}, A., \&
757: {Carswell}, R.~F. 2000, \mnras, 311, 657
758:
759: \bibitem[{{Liske} \& {Williger}(2001)}]{2001lis328mnras653}
760: {Liske}, J., \& {Williger}, G.~M. 2001, \mnras, 328, 653
761:
762: \bibitem[{{MacAlpine} \& {Williams}(1981)}]{1981mac45apjs113}
763: {MacAlpine}, G.~M., \& {Williams}, G.~A. 1981, \apjs, 45, 113
764:
765: \bibitem[{{Maza} {et~al.}(1992){Maza}, {Ruiz}, {Gonzalez}, \&
766: {Wischnjewsky}}]{1992maz24rmxaa147}
767: {Maza}, J., {Ruiz}, M.~T., {Gonzalez}, L.~E., \& {Wischnjewsky}, M. 1992,
768: Rev. Mex. AA, 24, 147
769:
770: \bibitem[{{Maza} {et~al.}(1995){Maza}, {Wischnjewsky}, {Antezana}, \&
771: {Gonzalez}}]{1995maz31rmxaa119}
772: {Maza}, J., {Wischnjewsky}, M., {Antezana}, R., \& {Gonzalez}, L.~E. 1995,
773: Rev Mex AA, 31, 119
774:
775: \bibitem[{{McDonald}(2003)}]{2003mcd585apj34}
776: {McDonald}, P. 2003, \apj, 585, 34
777:
778: \bibitem[{{McDonald} \& {Miralda-Escud{\'e}}(1999)}]{1999mcd518apj24}
779: {McDonald}, P., \& {Miralda-Escud{\'e}}, J. 1999, \apj, 518, 24
780:
781: \bibitem[{{McDonald} \& {Miralda-Escud{\'e}}(2001)}]{2001mcd549apj11}
782: {McDonald}, P., \& {Miralda-Escud{\'e}}, J. 2001, \apjl, 549, L11
783:
784: \bibitem[{{Moller} \& {Kjaergaard}(1992)}]{1992mol258aap234}
785: {Moller}, P., \& {Kjaergaard}, P. 1992, \aap, 258, 234
786:
787: \bibitem[{{Morris} {et~al.}(1991){Morris}, {Weymann}, {Anderson}, {Hewett},
788: {Francis}, {Foltz}, {Chaffee}, \& {MacAlpine}}]{1991mor102aj1627}
789: {Morris}, S.~L., {Weymann}, R.~J., {Anderson}, S.~F., {Hewett}, P.~C.,
790: {Francis}, P.~J., {Foltz}, C.~B., {Chaffee}, F.~H., \& {MacAlpine}, G.~M.
791: 1991, \aj, 102, 1627
792:
793: \bibitem[{{Murdoch} {et~al.}(1986){Murdoch}, {Hunstead}, {Pettini}, \&
794: {Blades}}]{1986mur309apj19}
795: {Murdoch}, H.~S., {Hunstead}, R.~W., {Pettini}, M., \& {Blades}, J.~C. 1986,
796: \apj, 309, 19
797:
798: \bibitem[{{Pocock} {et~al.}(1984){Pocock}, {Penston}, {Pettini}, \&
799: {Blades}}]{1984poc210mnras373}
800: {Pocock}, A.~S., {Penston}, M.~V., {Pettini}, M., \& {Blades}, J.~C. 1984,
801: \mnras, 210, 373
802:
803: \bibitem[{{Press} {et~al.}(1993){Press}, {Rybicki}, \&
804: {Schneider}}]{1993pre414apj64}
805: {Press}, W.~H., {Rybicki}, G.~B., \& {Schneider}, D.~P. 1993, \apj, 414, 64
806:
807: \bibitem[{{Petry} {et~al.}(2006){Petry}, {Impey}, \&
808: {Fenton}, {Foltz}}]{2006pet132aj2046}
809: {Petry}, C.~E., {Impey}, C.~D., {Fenton}, J.~L., \& {Foltz}, C.~B. 2006, \aj, 132, 2046
810:
811: \bibitem[{{Rauch}(1998)}]{1998rau36araa267}
812: {Rauch}, M. 1998, \araa, 36, 267
813:
814: \bibitem[{{Rengstorf} {et~al.}(2004)}]{2004ren618apj184}
815: {Rengstorf}, A.~W., {et~al.} 2004, \apj, 617, 184
816:
817: \bibitem[{{Rollinde} {et~al.}(2003){Rollinde}, {Petitjean}, {Pichon},
818: {Colombi}, {Aracil}, {D'Odorico}, \& {Haehnelt}}]{2003rol341mnras1279}
819: {Rollinde}, E., {Petitjean}, P., {Pichon}, C., {Colombi}, S., {Aracil}, B.,
820: {D'Odorico}, V., \& {Haehnelt}, M.~G. 2003, \mnras, 341, 1279
821:
822: \bibitem[{{Scheuer}(1965)}]{1965sch207nat963}
823: {Scheuer}, P.~A.~G. 1965, \nat, 207, 963
824:
825: \bibitem[{{Schirber} \& {Bullock}(2003)}]{2003sch584apj110}
826: {Schirber}, M., \& {Bullock}, J.~S. 2003, \apj, 584, 110
827:
828: \bibitem[{{Schirber} {et~al.}(2004){Schirber}, {Miralda-Escud{\'e}}, \&
829: {McDonald}}]{2004sch610apj105}
830: {Schirber}, M., {Miralda-Escud{\'e}}, J., \& {McDonald}, P. 2004, \apj, 610,
831: 105
832:
833: \bibitem[{{Schneider} {et~al.}(2005)}]{2005sch130aj367}
834: {Schneider}, D.~P., {et~al.} 2005, \aj, 130, 367
835:
836: \bibitem[{{Scott} {et~al.}(2000){Scott}, {Bechtold}, {Dobrzycki}, \&
837: {Kulkarni}}]{2000sco130apjs67}
838: {Scott}, J., {Bechtold}, J., {Dobrzycki}, A., \& {Kulkarni}, V.~P. 2000, \apjs,
839: 130, 67
840:
841: \bibitem[{{Scott} {et~al.}(2002){Scott}, {Bechtold}, {Morita}, {Dobrzycki}, \&
842: {Kulkarni}}]{2002scp571apj665}
843: {Scott}, J., {Bechtold}, J., {Morita}, M., {Dobrzycki}, A., \& {Kulkarni},
844: V.~P. 2002, \apj, 571, 665
845:
846: \bibitem[{{Shklovskii}(1965)}]{1965shk8sva638}
847: {Shklovskii}, I.~S. 1965, Soviet Astron,, 8, 638
848:
849: \bibitem[{{Sirola} {et~al.}(1998)}]{1998sir495apj659}
850: {Sirola}, C.~J., {et~al.} 1998, \apj, 495, 659
851:
852: \bibitem[{{Spergel} {et~al.}(2003)}]{2003spe148apjs175}
853: {Spergel}, D.~N., {et~al.} 2003, \apjs, 148, 175
854:
855: \bibitem[{{Spergel} {et~al.}(2007)}]{2007spe}
856: {Spergel}, D.~N., {et~al.} 2007, \apj, 170, 377
857:
858: \bibitem[{{Sramek} \& {Weedman}(1978)}]{1978sra221apj468}
859: {Sramek}, R.~A., \& {Weedman}, D.~W. 1978, \apj, 221, 468
860:
861: \bibitem[{{Theuns} {et~al.}(1998){Theuns}, {Leonard}, {Efstathiou}, {Pearce},
862: \& {Thomas}}]{1998the301mnras478}
863: {Theuns}, T., {Leonard}, A., {Efstathiou}, G., {Pearce}, F.~R., \& {Thomas},
864: P.~A. 1998, \mnras, 301, 478
865:
866: \bibitem[{{Tonry} {et~al.}(2003)}]{2003ton594apj1}
867: {Tonry}, J.~L., {et~al.} 2003, \apj, 594, 1
868:
869: \bibitem[{{Vanden Berk} {et~al.}(2001)}]{2001van122aj549}
870: {Vanden Berk}, D.~E., {et~al.} 2001, \aj, 122, 549
871:
872: \bibitem[{{V{\' e}ron-Cetty} \& {V{\' e}ron}(2001)}]{2001ver374aap92}
873: {V{\' e}ron-Cetty}, M.-P., \& {V{\' e}ron}, P. 2001, \aap, 374, 92
874:
875: \bibitem[{{V{\' e}ron-Cetty} \& {V{\' e}ron}(2003)}]{2003ver412aap399}
876: {V{\' e}ron-Cetty}, M.-P., \& {V{\' e}ron}, P. 2003, \aap, 412, 399
877:
878:
879: \bibitem[{{Veron} \& {Hawkins}(1995)}]{1995ver296aap665}
880: {Veron}, P., \& {Hawkins}, M.~R.~S. 1995, \aap, 296, 665
881:
882: \bibitem[{{Wang} {et~al.}(2003){Wang}, {Goldhaber}, {Aldering}, \&
883: {Perlmutter}}]{2003wan590apj944}
884: {Wang}, L., {Goldhaber}, G., {Aldering}, G., \& {Perlmutter}, S. 2003, \apj,
885: 590, 944
886:
887: \bibitem[{{Weedman}(1985)}]{1985wee57apjs523}
888: {Weedman}, D.~W. 1985, \apjs, 57, 523
889:
890: \bibitem[{{White} {et~al.}(1997){White}, {Becker}, {Helfand}, \&
891: {Gregg}}]{1997whi475apj479}
892: {White}, R.~L., {Becker}, R.~H., {Helfand}, D.~J., \& {Gregg}, M.~D. 1997,
893: \apj, 475, 479
894:
895: \bibitem[{{White} {et~al.}(2000)}]{2000whi126apjs133}
896: {White}, R.~L., {et~al.} 2000, \apjs, 126, 133
897:
898: \bibitem[{{Williger} {et~al.}(2000){Williger}, {Smette}, {Hazard}, {Baldwin},
899: \& {McMahon}}]{2000wil532apj77}
900: {Williger}, G.~M., {Smette}, A., {Hazard}, C., {Baldwin}, J.~A., \& {McMahon},
901: R.~G. 2000, \apj, 532, 77
902:
903: \bibitem[{{Zamorani} {et~al.}(1999)}]{1999zam346aap731}
904: {Zamorani}, G., {et~al.} 1999, \aap, 346, 731
905:
906: \bibitem[{{Zhang} {et~al.}(1995){Zhang}, {Anninos}, \&
907: {Norman}}]{1995zha453apjl57}
908: {Zhang}, Y., {Anninos}, P., \& {Norman}, M.~L. 1995, \apjl, 453, L57
909:
910: \bibitem[{{Zitelli} {et~al.}(1992){Zitelli}, {Mignoli}, {Zamorani}, {Marano},
911: \& {Boyle}}]{1992zit256mnras349}
912: {Zitelli}, V., {Mignoli}, M., {Zamorani}, G., {Marano}, B., \& {Boyle}, B.~J.
913: 1992, \mnras, 256, 349
914:
915: \end{thebibliography}
916:
917: \clearpage
918: \begin{figure}[t]
919: \includegraphics[scale=0.96]{f1a.eps}
920: \caption{Final combined, calibrated spectra for all observed
921: objects are shown in black, plotted as flux (erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$
922: \AA$^{-1}$) vs. observed wavelength. The corresponding 1 $\sigma$
923: errors are shown in grey. Each spectrum is identified by an object
924: number, the right
925: ascension ($\alpha$) and declination ($\delta$) as J2000.0
926: coordinates, and its redshift.}
927: \label{fig_spec}
928: \end{figure}
929: \clearpage
930: \begin{center}
931: \includegraphics[scale=0.96]{f1b.eps}\\[5mm]
932: \centerline{Fig. 1. --- continued...}
933: \clearpage
934: \includegraphics[scale=0.96]{f1c.eps}\\[5mm]
935: \centerline{Fig. 1. --- continued...}
936: \clearpage
937: \includegraphics[scale=0.96]{f1d.eps}\\[5mm]
938: \centerline{Fig. 1. --- continued...}
939: \clearpage
940: \includegraphics[scale=0.96]{f1e.eps}\\[5mm]
941: \centerline{Fig. 1. --- continued...}
942: \clearpage
943: \includegraphics[scale=0.96]{f1f.eps}\\[5mm]
944: \centerline{Fig. 1. --- continued...}
945: \clearpage
946: \includegraphics[scale=0.96]{f1g.eps}\\[5mm]
947: \centerline{Fig. 1. --- continued...}
948: \clearpage
949: \includegraphics[scale=0.96]{f1h.eps}\\[5mm]
950: \centerline{Fig. 1. --- continued...}
951: \clearpage
952: \includegraphics[scale=0.96]{f1i.eps}\\[5mm]
953: \centerline{Fig. 1. --- continued...}
954: \clearpage
955: \includegraphics[scale=0.96]{f1j.eps}\\[5mm]
956: \centerline{Fig. 1. --- continued...}
957: \end{center}
958: \clearpage
959: \begin{figure}[t]
960: \begin{center}
961: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f2.eps}
962: \caption{Median LSFs for the B\&C and
963: Blue Channel (shifted upward 0.2 for clarity) spectrographs are well
964: parameterized as Gaussian.}
965: \label{fig_lsf}
966: \end{center}
967: \end{figure}
968:
969: \begin{figure}[t]
970: \begin{center}
971: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f3.eps}
972: \caption{Anomalous emission features present in spectra of the MMT Top
973: Box incandescent lamp, when observed with the 800 grating, prevent
974: reliable flat-fielding for the wavelength range 4330 \AA\ $< \lambda <$
975: 4440 \AA.}
976: \label{fig_anomaly}
977: \end{center}
978: \end{figure}
979:
980: \begin{figure}[t]
981: \begin{center}
982: \includegraphics[width=7.25in]{f4.eps}
983: \caption{Continua were fit independently by authors ARM ($c_{\rm ARM}$)
984: and KAE ($c_{\,{\rm KAE}}$) in order to gauge the systematic error
985: associated with the methodology for continuum estimation. The
986: example shown here is for a spectrum with mean ${\rm S/N} \approx 10$ per
987: pixel in the
988: \lya\ forest.}
989: \label{fig_contfit}
990: \end{center}
991: \end{figure}
992:
993: \begin{figure}[t]
994: \begin{center}
995: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f5.eps}
996: \caption{Autocorrelation ($\xi_\parallel$) and cross-correlation
997: ($\xi_\perp$) measurements for the redshift range
998: $2.1 < z_{Ly\alpha} < 2.3$, assuming $\Omega_m = 0.268$ and
999: $\Omega_{\Lambda} = 0.732$. Anisotropies due to redshift-space
1000: distortions and
1001: spectral resolution must be accounted for prior to an AP analysis.
1002: }\label{fig_correlation}
1003: \end{center}
1004: \end{figure}
1005:
1006: \clearpage
1007: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1008: \input{tab1}
1009:
1010: %\thispagestyle{empty}
1011: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1012: \input{tab2}
1013:
1014: %\thispagestyle{empty}
1015: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1016: \input{tab3}
1017:
1018: %\thispagestyle{empty}
1019: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1020: \input{tab4}
1021:
1022: \end{document}
1023:
1024:
1025:
1026: