1: %Version 18, March. 17, 2008

2: \documentstyle{ar}

3: 

4: \newbox\grsign \setbox\grsign=\hbox{$>$} \newdimen\grdimen \grdimen=\ht\grsign

5: \newbox\simlessbox \newbox\simgreatbox

6: \setbox\simgreatbox=\hbox{\raise.5ex\hbox{$>$}\llap

7:      {\lower.5ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}\ht1=\grdimen\dp1=0pt

8: \setbox\simlessbox=\hbox{\raise.5ex\hbox{$<$}\llap

9:      {\lower.5ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}\ht2=\grdimen\dp2=0pt

10: \def\simgreat{\mathrel{\copy\simgreatbox}}

11: \def\simless{\mathrel{\copy\simlessbox}}

12: \def\nhi{\noindent \hangindent=0.3cm}

13: 

14: \input psfig.sty

15: 

16: %Luis's definitions

17: \def\aa{{A\&A}}

18: \def\aas{{ A\&AS}}

19: \def\aj{{AJ}}

20: \def\al{$\alpha$}

21: \def\alphaox{$\alpha_{\rm ox}$}

22: \def\bet{$\beta$}

23: \def\amin{$^\prime$}

24: \def\annrev{{ARA\&A}}

25: \def\apj{{ApJ}}

26: \def\apjs{{ApJS}}

27: \def\asec{$^{\prime\prime}$}

28: \def\baas{{BAAS}}

29: \def\cc{cm$^{-3}$}

30: \def\deg{$^{\circ}$}

31: \def\ddeg{{\rlap.}$^{\circ}$}

32: \def\dsec{{\rlap.}$^{\prime\prime}$}

33: \def\cc{cm$^{-3}$}

34: \def\e#1{$\times$10$^{#1}$}

35: \def\etal{{et al. }}

36: \def\farcm{\hbox{$.\mkern-4mu^\prime$}}

37: \def\farcs{\hbox{$.\mkern-4mu^{\prime\prime}$}}

38: \def\flamb{ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ \AA$^{-1}$}

39: \def\flux{ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$}

40: \def\fnu{ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ Hz$^{-1}$}

41: \def\hal{H$\alpha$}

42: \def\hst{{\it HST}}

43: \def\kms{km s$^{-1}$}

44: \def\lamb{$\lambda$}

45: \def\lax{{$\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$<$}}}$}}

46: \def\gax{{$\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$>$}}}$}}

47: \def\simlt{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}}

48: \def\simgt{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}}

49: \def\lum{ergs s$^{-1}$}

50: %\def\mbh{{$M_{\bullet}$}}

51: \def\mbh{{$M_{\rm BH}$}}

52: \def\micron{{$\mu$m}}

53: \def\mnras{{MNRAS}}

54: \def\nat{{Nature}}

55: \def\pasj{{PASJ}}

56: \def\pasp{{PASP}}

57: \def\perang{\AA$^{-1}$}

58: \def\percm2{cm$^{-2}$}

59: \def\peryr{yr$^{-1}$}

60: \def\pp{\parshape 2 0truein 6.1truein .3truein 5.5truein}

61: \def\reference{\noindent\pp}

62: \def\refindent{\par\noindent\parskip=2pt\hangindent=3pc\hangafter=1 }

63: \def\solum{$L_\odot$}

64: \def\solmass{$M_\odot$}

65: \def\civ{C~{\sc IV}}

66: \def\fei{Fe~{\sc I}}

67: \def\feii{Fe~{\sc II}}

68: \def\feiii{Fe~{\sc III}}

69: \def\hei{He~{\sc I}}

70: \def\heii{He~{\sc II}}

71: \def\hi{H~{\sc I}}

72: \def\hii{H~{\sc II}}

73: \def\mgii{Mg~{\sc II}}

74: \def\oi{[O~{\sc I}]}

75: \def\oii{[O~{\sc II}]}

76: \def\oiii{[O~{\sc III}]}

77: \def\oiv{[O~{\sc IV}]}

78: \def\ni{[N~{\sc I}]}

79: \def\nii{[N~{\sc II}]}

80: \def\nv{[N~{\sc V}]}

81: \def\neii{[Ne~{\sc II}]}

82: \def\neiii{[Ne~{\sc III}]}

83: \def\neiv{[Ne~{\sc IV}]}

84: \def\nev{[Ne~{\sc V}]}

85: \def\sii{[S~{\sc II}]}

86: \def\siii{[S~{\sc III}]}

87: 

88: \def\lhal{$L_{{\rm H}\alpha}$}

89: \def\lbol{$L_{{\rm bol}}$}

90: \def\ledd{$L_{{\rm Edd}}$}

91: 

92: \def\mhi{$M_{{\rm H~I}}$}

93: \def\lb{$L_B$}

94: \def\vc{${\upsilon_c}$}

95: \def\vm{${\upsilon_m}$}

96: \def\vrot{$\upsilon_{{\rm rot}}$}

97: \def\sig{$\sigma_0$}

98: 

99: \begin{document}

100: \title{Nuclear Activity in Nearby Galaxies}

101: \markboth{Ho}{Nuclear Activity in Nearby Galaxies}

102: \author{Luis C. Ho

103: \affiliation{The Observatories of the Carnegie

104: Institution of Washington, 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA 91101;

105: e-mail: lho@ociw.edu}}

106: \begin{keywords}

107: accretion disks, active galactic nuclei, black holes, LINERs, radio galaxies, 

108: Seyfert galaxies

109: \end{keywords}

110: 

111: %\noindent{Send Proofs to:}

112: %

113: %\noindent{Luis C. Ho} \\

114: %The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington\\

115: %813 Santa Barbara St. \\

116: %Pasadena, CA 91101 \\

117: %Phone: (626)-304-0248 \\

118: %Fax: (626)-795-8136 \\

119: %e-mail: lho@ociw.edu \\

120: 

121: \begin{abstract}

122: A significant fraction of nearby galaxies show evidence of weak nuclear 

123: activity unrelated to normal stellar processes.  Recent high-resolution, 

124: multiwavelength observations indicate that the bulk of this activity derives 

125: from black hole accretion with a wide range of accretion rates.  The low 

126: accretion rates that typify most low-luminosity active galactic nuclei induce 

127: significant modifications to their central engine.  The broad-line region and 

128: obscuring torus disappear in some of the faintest sources, and the optically 

129: thick accretion disk transforms into a three-component structure consisting of 

130: an inner radiatively inefficient accretion flow, a truncated outer thin disk, 

131: and a jet or outflow.  The local census of nuclear activity supports the 

132: notion that most, perhaps all, bulges host a central supermassive black hole, 

133: although the existence of active nuclei in at least some late-type 

134: galaxies suggests that a classical bulge is not a prerequisite to seed a 

135: nuclear black hole.  

136: \end{abstract}

137: 

138: \maketitle

139: 

140: \section{INTRODUCTION}

141: 

142: Far from being rare, exotic entities that inhabit only a tiny fraction of 

143: galaxies, central black holes (BHs) are now believed to be basic constituents 

144: of most, if not all, massive galaxies (Magorrian et al. 1998; Kormendy 2004).

145: Although less common in low-mass systems, central BHs also have been 

146: identified in some late-type, even dwarf, galaxies (Filippenko \& Ho 

147: 2003; Barth et al. 2004; Greene \& Ho 2004, 2007b; Dong et al. 2007; Greene, 

148: Ho \& Barth 2008).  The realization that BH mass correlates strongly with the 

149: properties of the host galaxy (Kormendy 1993; Kormendy \& Richstone 1995; 

150: Magorrian et al.  1998; Gebhardt et al. 2000; Ferrarese \& Merritt 2000; 

151: Barth, Greene \& Ho 2005; Greene \& Ho 2006) has generated intense interest in 

152: linking BH growth 

153: with galaxy formation, as attested by the increasing number of conferences 

154: focusing on this theme (e.g., Schmitt, Kinney \& Ho 1999; Ho 2004a; 

155: Storchi-Bergmann, Ho \& Schmitt 2004; Merloni, Nayakshin \& Sunyaev 2005; 

156: Fiore 2006).  As a direct manifestation of BH accretion, and therefore BH 

157: growth, active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and the consequences of their energy 

158: feedback have figured prominently in most current ideas of structure formation 

159: (e.g., Granato et al.  2004; Springel, Di~Matteo \& Hernquist 2005; Hopkins et 

160: al. 2006).  At the same time, the community's heightened awareness of the 

161: importance of BHs has galvanized broad interest in the study of 

162: the AGN phenomenon itself.  With the BH mass known---arguably the most 

163: fundamental parameter of the system---what once rested on phenomenological 

164: analysis can now be put on a more secure physical basis.  

165: 

166: This review focuses on nuclear activity in nearby galaxies.  By selection, 

167: most of the objects occupy the faintest end of the AGN luminosity function 

168: and have very low accretion rates. While energetically

169: unimpressive, low-luminosity AGNs (LLAGNs) deserve scrutiny for several 

170: reasons.  By virtue of the short duty cycle of BH accretion ($\sim 10^{-2}$; 

171: Greene \& Ho 2007a), most AGNs spend their lives in a low state, such that the 

172: bulk of the population has relatively modest luminosities.  Over the past 

173: several decades, this attribute has led to considerable controversy regarding 

174: the physical origin of LLAGNs.  As absolute luminosity can no longer be used 

175: as a defining metric of nonstellar activity, many alternative excitation 

176: mechanisms have been proposed to explain LLAGNs.  Fortunately, the advent of 

177: new telescopes and new analysis techniques have yielded many fresh insights 

178: into this thorny old problem.  A major goal of this review is to summarize 

179: these recent developments.  Along the way, I will emphasize how the collective 

180: properties of LLAGNs can shed light on a poorly understood regime of the 

181: central engine, namely that governed by low mass accretion rate.  A key point 

182: I will stress is that LLAGNs are not simply scaled-down versions of their more 

183: familiar cousins, the classical Seyfert galaxies and quasars.  

184: 

185: Despite the impressive progress made in the direct detection of central BHs in 

186: nearby inactive galaxies, our knowledge of the 

187: demographics of BHs remains highly incomplete.  Direct measurements of BH 

188: masses based on resolved gas or stellar kinematics are still far from routine 

189: and are available only for about three dozen galaxies.  Certainly 

190: nothing approaching a ``complete'' sample exists yet.  More importantly, it is 

191: not obvious that the current statistics are unbiased.  As discussed by Barth 

192: (2004), most nearby galaxies possess chaotic gas velocity fields that defy 

193: simple analysis.  Stellar kinematics provide a powerful alternative, but in 

194: practice this technique has been limited to relatively dust-free systems and, 

195: for practical reasons, to galaxies of relatively high central surface 

196: brightness.  The latter restriction selects against the most luminous, giant 

197: ellipticals.  Present surveys also severely underrepresent disk-dominated 

198: galaxies, because the bulge component in these systems is inconspicuous and 

199: star formation tends to perturb the velocity field of the gas.  Finally, apart 

200: from galaxies within the Local Group, even the highest angular resolution 

201: currently achieved is inadequate to directly detect BHs with masses \lax\ 

202: $10^6$ \solmass.  Consequently we are nearly completely ignorant about the low 

203: end of the BH mass function.  Given the above limitations, it is 

204: desirable to consider alternative constraints on BH demography.  The commonly 

205: held and now well-substantiated premise that AGNs derive their energy 

206: output from BH accretion implies that an AGN signifies the presence of a 

207: central BH in a galaxy.  The AGN signature in and of itself provides little 

208: direct information on BH masses, but AGN statistics can inform us, effectively 

209: and efficiently, of some key aspects of BH demography.  For example, what 

210: fraction of all galaxies contain BHs?  Do BHs exist preferentially in galaxies 

211: of certain types?  Does environment matter?  I will discuss how studies of 

212: nearby AGNs have begun to answer some of these important questions.

213: 

214: This review is structured as follows.  I begin with an overview of the basic

215: methodology of the spectral classification of emission-line nuclei (\S~2) by

216: describing the currently adopted system, its physical motivation, the

217: complications of starlight subtraction, and some practical examples.  Section

218: 3 summarizes past and current spectroscopic surveys and introduces the 

219: Palomar survey, covering detection rates, measurement of weak broad emission 

220: lines, and issues of robustness and completeless.  Host galaxy properties are

221: the subject of \S~4, where in addition to global and environmental effects 

222: I also cover results on nuclear stellar populations.  In Section 5, I devote 

223: considerable attention to the nuclear properties of LLAGNs in general and 

224: LINERs in particular, focusing on modern results obtained from 

225: high-resolution, multiwavelength observations from radio to hard-X-ray 

226: energies.  I use these data to draw inferences concerning the broad-line 

227: region (BLR), torus, narrow-line region (NLR), spectral energy distribution 

228: (SED), luminosity function, bolometric luminosities, and Eddington ratios.  

229: This section contains many technical details, but these will be 

230: essential ingredients for formulating the big picture at the end.  Section 6 

231: covers the controversial subject of the excitation mechanism of LINERs, the 

232: growing puzzle concerning the energy budget in these systems, and the nature 

233: of narrow-line nuclei.  The implications of LLAGNs for BH demographics are 

234: discussed in Section 7. Section 8 attempts to synthesize the disparate lines 

235: of evidence into a coherent physical framework for LLAGNs and their relation 

236: to other classes of objects.  Finally, Section 9 concludes with some personal 

237: perspectives and suggestions for future directions.

238: 

239: \section{SPECTRAL CLASSIFICATION OF GALACTIC NUCLEI}

240: 

241: \subsection{Physical Motivation}

242: 

243: AGNs can be identified by a variety of methods.  Most AGN surveys rely on some

244: aspect of the distinctive AGN spectrum, such as the presence of strong or

245: broad emission lines, an unusually blue continuum, or strong radio or X-ray

246: emission.  All of these techniques are effective, but none is free from

247: selection effects.  To search for AGNs in nearby galaxies, where the

248: nonstellar signal of the nucleus is expected to be weak relative to the host

249: galaxy, the most effective and least biased method is to conduct a

250: spectroscopic survey of a complete, optical-flux limited sample of galaxies.

251: To be sensitive to weak emission lines, the survey must be deep and of

252: sufficient spectral resolution.  To obtain reliable line intensity ratios on

253: which the principal nuclear classifications are based, the data must have

254: accurate relative flux calibration, and one must devise a robust scheme to

255: correct for the starlight contamination. 

256: 

257: The most widely used system of spectral classification of emission-line nuclei

258: follows the method promoted by Baldwin, Phillips \& Terlevich (1981), and

259: later modified by Veilleux \& Osterbrock (1987).  The basic idea is that the

260: relative strengths of certain prominent emission lines can be used to probe

261: the nebular conditions of a source.  In the context of the present discussion,

262: the most important diagnostic is the source of excitation, which broadly falls

263: into two categories: stellar photoionization or photoionization by a centrally

264: located, spectrally hard radiation field, such as that produced by the

265: accretion disk of a massive BH.  How does one distinguish between the two?  The

266: forbidden lines of the doublet \oi\ \lamb\lamb 6300, 6364 arise from

267: collisional excitation of O$^0$ by hot electrons.  Since the ionization

268: potential of O$^0$ (13.6 eV) is nearly identical to that of hydrogen, in an

269: ionization-bounded nebula \oi\ is produced predominantly in the ``partially

270: ionized zone,'' wherein both neutral oxygen and free electrons coexist.  In

271: addition to O$^0$, the conditions of the partially ionized zone are also

272: favorable for S$^+$ and N$^+$, whose ionization potentials are 23.3 eV and

273: 29.6 eV, respectively.  Hence, in the absence of abundance anomalies, \nii\

274: \lamb\lamb 6548, 6583 and \sii\ \lamb\lamb 6716, 6731 are strong (relative to,

275: say, H\al) whenever \oi\ is strong, and {\it vice versa}.

276: 

277: In a nebula photoionized by young, massive stars, the partially ionized zone

278: is very thin because the ionizing spectrum of OB stars contains few photons

279: with energies greater than 13.6 eV.  Hence, in the optical spectra of \hii\

280: regions and starburst nuclei (hereinafter \hii\ nuclei\footnote{As originally

281: defined (Weedman et al. 1981), a star{\it burst}\ nucleus is one whose current 

282: star formation rate is much higher than its past average rate.  Since in 

283: general we do not know the star formation history of any individual object, I 

284: will adopt the more general designation of ``\hii\ nucleus.''}) the 

285: low-ionization transitions \nii, \sii, and especially \oi\ are very weak.  By 

286: contrast, a harder radiation field, such as that of an AGN power-law continuum 

287: that extends into the extreme-ultraviolet (UV) and X-rays, penetrates much 

288: deeper into an optically thick cloud, creating an extensive partially ionized 

289: zone and hence strong low-ionization forbidden lines.  A hard AGN radiation 

290: field also boosts the production of collisionally excited forbidden line 

291: emission because its high thermal energy deposition rate enhances the gas 

292: temperature.

293: 

294: \begin{figure}

295: %%BoundingBox: 60 50 580 750

296: \psfig{figure=fig1.ps,width=14cm,angle=270}

297: \caption{Sample optical spectra of the various classes of emission-line 

298: nuclei.  Prominent emission lines are identified.  (Based on Ho, Filippenko \& 

299: Sargent 1993 and unpublished data.)

300: }

301: \end{figure}

302: 

303: \subsection{Sample Spectra}

304: The spectra shown in Figure~1 illustrate the empirical distinction between

305: AGNs and \hii\ nuclei.  In NGC~7714, which has a well-known starburst nucleus

306: (Weedman et al. 1981), \oi, \nii, and \sii\ are weak relative to H\al.  The

307: \oiii\ \lamb\lamb 4959, 5007 doublet is quite strong compared to \oii\ \lamb

308: 3727 or H\bet\ because the metal abundance of NGC~7714's nucleus is rather

309: low, although the ionization level of \hii\ nuclei can span a wide range,

310: depending on metallicity (Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 1997c; Kewley et al. 

311: 2001; Groves, Heckman \& Kauffmann 2006).  On the other hand, the 

312: low-ionization lines are markedly stronger in the other two objects shown, 

313: both of which qualify as AGNs.  NGC~1358 has a

314: ``high-ionization'' AGN or ``Seyfert'' nucleus.  NGC~1052 is the prototype of 

315: the class known as ``low-ionization nuclear emission-line regions'' or 

316: LINERs (Heckman 1980b). The ionization level can be judged by the relative

317: strengths of the oxygen lines, but in practice is most easily gauged by the

318: \oiii/H\bet\ ratio.  In the commonly adopted system of Veilleux \& Osterbrock

319: (1987), the division between Seyferts and LINERs occurs at \oiii\ \lamb

320: 5007/H\bet\ = 3.0.  Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent (2003) stress, however, that

321: this boundary has no strict physical significance.  The ionization level of the

322: NLR in large, homogeneous samples of AGNs spans a wide and

323: apparently continuous range; there is no evidence for any clear-cut transition 

324: between Seyferts and LINERs (Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 2003), although with 

325: sufficient numbers, the two classes do delineate two distinct loci in optical 

326: diagnostic diagrams (Kewley et al. 2006).

327: 

328: The classification system discussed above makes no reference to the profiles

329: of the emission lines.  Luminous AGNs such as quasars and many classical

330: Seyfert galaxies exhibit permitted lines with a characteristically broad

331: component, with  full width at half-maximum (FWHM) widths of $\sim 1000$ to 

332: $10,000$ \kms.  This component arises from the BLR, which is thought to be 

333: physically distinct from the NLR responsible for the narrow lines.  Following 

334: Khachikian \& Weedman (1974), it is customary to refer to Seyferts with and 

335: without (directly) detectable broad lines as ``type~1'' and ``type~2'' 

336: sources, respectively.   As discussed in \S~3.4, this nomenclature can also be 

337: extended to include LINERs.

338: 

339: \begin{figure}

340: %%BoundingBox: 200 30 480 750

341: \psfig{figure=fig2.ps,width=14cm,angle=270}

342: \caption{Diagnostic diagrams plotting ({\it a}) log \oiii\ \lamb 5007/H\bet\

343: versus log \nii\ \lamb 6583/H\al, ({\it b}) log \oiii\ \lamb 5007/H\bet\

344: versus log \sii\ \lamb\lamb 6716, 6731/H\al, and ({\it c}) log \oiii\ \lamb

345: 5007/H\bet\ versus log \oi\ \lamb 6300/H\al.  

346: (Adapted from Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 1997a.)

347: }

348: \end{figure}

349: 

350: \subsection{Diagnostic Diagrams}

351: 

352: The classification system of Veilleux \& Osterbrock (1987), which I

353: adopt throughout this paper, is based on two-dimensional line-intensity ratios

354: constructed from \oiii\ \lamb 5007, H\bet\ \lamb 4861, \oi\ \lamb 6300, H\al\

355: \lamb6563, \nii\ \lamb 6583, and \sii\ \lamb\lamb 6716, 6731 (here H\bet\ and

356: H\al\ refer only to the narrow component of the line).  The main virtues of

357: this system, shown in Figure~2, are (1) that it uses relatively strong lines,

358: (2) that the lines lie in an easily accessible region of the optical spectrum,

359: and (3) that the line ratios are relatively insensitive to reddening

360: corrections because of the close separation of the lines.  The definitions of 

361: the various classes of emission-line objects are given in Ho, Filippenko \& 

362: Sargent (1997a)\footnote{The classification criteria adopted here differ 

363: slightly from those proposed by Kewley et al. (2001), Kauffmann et al. (2003),

364: or Stasi\'nska et al. (2006), but this difference has little effect on the 

365: general conclusions.}.  In addition to the three main classes 

366: discussed thus far---\hii\ nuclei, Seyferts, and LINERs---Ho, Filippenko \& 

367: Sargent (1993) identified a group of ``transition objects'' whose \oi\ 

368: strengths are intermediate between those of \hii\ nuclei and LINERs.  Since 

369: they tend to emit weaker \oi\ emission than classical LINERs, previous authors 

370: have called them ``weak-\oi\ LINERs'' (Filippenko \& Terlevich 1992; 

371: Ho \& Filippenko 1993).  Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent (1993) postulated 

372: that transition objects are composite systems having both an \hii\ region and 

373: a LINER component; I will return to the nature of these sources in \S~6.5.

374: 

375: Note that my definition of LINERs differs from that originally proposed by

376: Heckman (1980b), who used solely the oxygen lines: \oii\ \lamb 3727 $>$

377: \oiii\ \lamb 5007 and \oi\ \lamb 6300 $>$ 0.33 \oiii\ \lamb 5007.  The two

378: definitions, however, are nearly equivalent.  Inspection of the full optical

379: spectra of Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent (1993), for example, reveals that 

380: emission-line nuclei classified as LINERs based on the Veilleux \& Osterbrock 

381: diagrams almost always also satisfy Heckman's criteria.  This is a consequence 

382: of the inverse correlation between \oiii/H\bet\ and \oii/\oiii\ in 

383: photoionized gas with fairly low excitation.

384: 

385: \subsection{Starlight Subtraction}

386: 

387: The scheme described above, while conceptually simple, overlooks one key

388: practical complication.  The integrated spectra of galactic nuclei include

389: starlight, which in most nearby systems overwhelms the nebular line

390: emission (Figure~1).  Any reliable measurement of the emission-line spectrum of 

391: galactic nuclei, therefore, {\it must}\ properly account for the starlight 

392: contamination.

393: 

394: An effective strategy for removing the starlight from an integrated spectrum

395: is that of ``template subtraction,'' whereby a template spectrum devoid of

396: emission lines is suitably scaled to and subtracted from the spectrum of

397: interest to yield a continuum-subtracted, pure emission-line spectrum.  A

398: number of approaches have been adopted to construct the template.  These

399: include using (1) the spectrum of an off-nuclear position within the same

400: galaxy (e.g., Storchi-Bergmann, Baldwin \& Wilson 1993); (2) the spectrum of 

401: a different galaxy devoid of emission lines (e.g., Costero \& Osterbrock 1977; 

402: Filippenko \& Halpern 1984; Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 1993); (3) a weighted 

403: linear combination of the spectra of a number different galaxies, chosen to 

404: best match the stellar population and velocity dispersion (Ho, Filippenko \& 

405: Sargent 1997a); (4) a variant of (3), but employing a stellar library and 

406: simultaneously fitting for the emission lines and accounting for dust 

407: reddening (Sarzi et al. 2007); (5) a mean spectrum derived from a 

408: principal-component analysis of a large set of galaxies (Hao et al. 2005a); 

409: and (6) a model spectrum constructed from population synthesis techniques, 

410: using as input a library of spectra of either individual stars (e.g., Keel 

411: 1983c), synthesis models (e.g., Tremonti et al. 2004; Sarzi et al. 2005), or 

412: star clusters (e.g., Bonatto, Bica \& Alloin 1989).  Some studies (e.g., Kim 

413: et al. 1995) implicitly assume that only the hydrogen Balmer lines are 

414: contaminated by starlight and that the absorption-line component can be 

415: removed by assuming a constant equivalent width (EW = $2-3$ \AA).  This 

416: procedure is inadequate for a number of reasons.  First, the stellar 

417: population of nearby galactic nuclei, although relatively 

418: 

419: \clearpage

420: \begin{figure}

421: %%BoundingBox: 60 50 580 750

422: \psfig{figure=fig3.ps,width=13.7cm,angle=270}

423: \caption{Illustration of starlight removal for NGC~3998 using the template

424: galaxy NGC~3115.  Prominent emission lines are labeled. The insert shows an 

425: expanded view of the H\al+\nii\ region and a multi-Gaussian decomposition 

426: leading to the detection of a broad H\al\ component.  (Adapted from Ho, 

427: Filippenko \& Sargent 1993 and Ho et al. 1997e.)

428: }

429: \end{figure}

430: 

431: \noindent

432: uniform, is by no 

433: means invariant (Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 2003).  Second, the equivalent 

434: widths of the different Balmer absorption lines within each galaxy are 

435: generally not constant.  Third, the Balmer absorption lines affect not only 

436: the strength but also the shape of the Balmer emission lines.  And finally, 

437: starlight contaminates more than just the Balmer lines.

438: 

439: Figure~3 illustrates the starlight subtraction process for the LINER NGC~3998.  Note that in the original observed spectrum, many of the weaker emission lines 

440: were hardly visible, whereas after starlight subtraction, they can easily be 

441: measured.  The intensities of even strong lines such H\bet\ and \oiii\ 

442: \lamb\lamb4959, 5007 are modified. Importantly, starlight correction is 

443: essential for properly identifying the weak broad H\al\ component in NGC~3998.

444: 

445: \subsection{Other Classification Criteria}

446: 

447: Although the traditional optical classification system described above is 

448: the most widely used, there are instances when features in other spectral 

449: regions may be more practical or useful.  Surveys of intermediate-redshift 

450: galaxies, for example, cannot routinely access the H\al\ region, and under 

451: such circumstances it is desirable to devise a classification system based 

452: only on the blue part of the spectrum.  Diagnostic diagrams proposed by 

453: Rola, Terlevich \& Terlevich (1997) based on the strong lines \oii\ 

454: \lamb3727, \neiii\ \lamb\lamb 3869, 3968, H\bet, and \oiii\ \lamb\lamb 4959, 

455: 5007 provide moderately effective discrimination between starbursts and 

456: AGNs.  A number of redshift surveys have searched for narrow-line AGNs based 

457: on the presence of \nev\ \lamb\lamb 3346, 3426 (e.g., Hall et al. 2000; Barger 

458: et al.  2001; Szokoly et al. 2004).  With an ionization potential of 97 eV, 

459: \nev\ unambiguously arises from nonstellar excitation, but the practical 

460: difficulty is that these lines are quite weak (strength $\sim$10\% of 

461: \oiii\ \lamb5007) and often can only be detected with confidence in 

462: stacked spectra (e.g., Zakamska et al. 2003).

463: 

464: The long-standing controversy over the relevance of shock excitation also 

465: has led to the development of line diagnostics outside of the traditional 

466: optical window.  D\'\i az, Pagel \& Wilson (1985; see also D\'\i az, Pagel 

467: \& Terlevich 1985; Kirhakos \& Phillips 1989) suggested that \siii\ 

468: \lamb\lamb9069, 9532, in combination with the optical lines of \oii, \oiii, 

469: and \sii, are effective in identifying shock-excited nebula.  Since shock 

470: heating on average achieves higher equilibrium electron temperatures than 

471: photoionization, high-ionization UV lines such as \nv\ \lamb 1240 and 

472: \civ\ \lamb 1549 can serve as a powerful discriminant between these two 

473: processes (e.g., Allen, Dopita \& Tsvetanov 1998).  The limited availability 

474: of UV spectra, however, has restricted the wide use of these diagnostics.

475: 

476: Rapid progress in infrared (IR) technology has offered an important new window 

477: that is not only less affected by dust but also potentially has distinctive 

478: diagnostic power.  Alonso-Herrero et al. (1997) show that 

479: \feii\ 1.644/Br$\gamma$ can serve as an effective substitute for the 

480: conventional \oi\ \lamb6300/H\al\ ratio.  Unfortunately, other strong near-IR 

481: features, notably the vibrational lines of H$_2$, are less useful because they 

482: can be excited by multiple mechanisms (Larkin et al. 1998).  The mid-IR regime 

483: is much more promising, particularly with the sensitivity and wide bandpass 

484: afforded by {\it Spitzer}.  For the first time, many of the diagnostic lines 

485: previously discussed in a theoretical context (Spinoglio \& Malkan 1992; Voit 

486: 1992) actually can now be measured (e.g., Bendo et al. 2006; Dale et al. 2006; 

487: Sturm et al. 2005, 2006; Rupke et al.  2007).  In addition to high-ionization 

488: lines such as \neiii\ \lamb15.5 \micron, \nev\ \lamb14.3 \micron, and \oiv\ 

489: \lamb 25.9 \micron, the low-ionization transitions of \feii\ \lamb26.0 

490: \micron\ and [Si~{\sc II}] \lamb34.8 \micron\ may prove to be especially useful as 

491: they can constrain models of photo-dissociation and X-ray dissociation 

492: regions.  The hard radiation field of AGNs, even of low-luminosity objects 

493: such as LINERs, appears to leave an imprint on the detailed emission spectrum 

494: of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (Sturm et al. 2006; Smith et al. 2007).

495: 

496: Finally, a comment on nomenclature.  It is important to stress that the 

497: classification scheme outlined above, physically motivated by the desire to 

498: separate objects by their source of excitation, is based strictly on the 

499: characteristics of the narrow emission lines and not on ancillary attributes 

500: such as luminosity, presence of broad emission lines, galaxy morphology, or 

501: radio properties.  Although one still customarily draws a quaint distinction 

502: between quasars and Seyferts based on luminosity, it is widely acknowledged 

503: that this division is largely historical.  In terms of their position on the 

504: line-ratio diagrams, quasars fall on the high-ionization branch and thus can be 

505: classified as Seyferts.  The same holds for many broad-line and narrow-line 

506: radio galaxies, including most Fanaroff \& Riley (FR; 1974) type~II radio 

507: sources, whose high luminosities generally translate directly into a high 

508: degree of ionization.  By the same token, most FR~I sources, because of their 

509: low luminosity, typically have fairly low-ionization spectra, and hence 

510: technically qualify as LINERs.  FR~I radio galaxies and LINERs are not 

511: separate beasts (cf. Falcke, K\"ording \& Markoff 2004; Chiaberge, Capetti 

512: \& Macchetto 2005).  Strong historical prejudice also compels many to regard 

513: Seyfert nuclei as invariably radio-quiet sources that reside exclusively in 

514: spiral hosts, when, in fact, neither rule strictly holds (Ho \& Peng 2001).  

515: Despite claims to the contrary (Krolik 1998; Sulentic, Marziani \& 

516: Dultzin-Hacyan 2000), broad emission lines emphatically are {\it not}\ 

517: solely confined to Seyfert nuclei (\S~3.4).  This misconception has led 

518: some people to define the Seyfert and LINER classes by their presence or 

519: absence of broad emission lines.

520: 

521: \section{SURVEYS OF NEARBY GALACTIC NUCLEI}

522: 

523: \subsection{The Palomar Survey}

524: 

525: The earliest redshift surveys already indicated that the spectra of galaxy 

526: centers often show strong emission lines (e.g., Humason, Mayall \& Sandage 

527: 1956).  In many instances, the spectra revealed abnormal line-intensity 

528: ratios, most notably the unusually great strength of \nii\ relative to H\al\ 

529: (Burbidge \& Burbidge 1962, 1965; Rubin, Ford \& Thonnard 1980; Rose \& Searle 

530: 1982).  That the optical emission-line spectra of some nuclei show patterns of 

531: low ionization was noticed from time to time, primarily by Osterbrock and his 

532: colleagues (e.g., Osterbrock \& Dufour 1973; Osterbrock \& Miller 1975; Koski 

533: \& Osterbrock 1976; Costero \& Osterbrock 1977; Grandi \& Osterbrock 1978; 

534: Phillips 1979), but also by others (e.g., Disney \& Cromwell 1971; Danziger, 

535: Fosbury \& Penston 1977; Fosbury \etal 1977, 1978; Penston \& Fosbury 1978; 

536: Stauffer \& Spinrad 1979).

537: 

538: The activity in this field culminated in the 1980s, beginning with the

539: recognition (Heckman, Balick \& Crane 1980; Heckman 1980b) of LINERs as a

540: major constituent of the extragalactic population, and then followed by further

541: systematic studies of larger samples of galaxies (Stauffer 1982a, 1982b; Keel

542: 1983b, 1983c; Phillips \etal 1986; V\'eron \& V\'eron-Cetty 1986; 

543: V\'eron-Cetty \& V\'eron 1986; see Ho 1996 for more details).  These surveys 

544: established three important results. (1) A large fraction of local galaxies 

545: contain emission-line nuclei. (2) Many of these sources are LINERs.  And (3) 

546: LINERs may be accretion-powered systems.

547: 

548: Despite the successes of these seminal studies, there was room for improvement.

549: Although most of the surveys attempted some form of starlight subtraction, the

550: accuracy of the methods used was limited (see discussion in

551: Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 1997a), the procedure was sometimes inconsistently 

552: applied, and in some of the surveys, starlight subtraction was altogether 

553: neglected.  The problem is exacerbated by the fact that the apertures used for 

554: the observations were quite large, thereby admitting an unnecessarily large 

555: amount of starlight.  Furthermore, most of the data were collected with rather 

556: low spectral resolution (FWHM $\approx$ 10 \AA).  Besides losing useful

557: kinematic information, blending between the emission and absorption

558: components further compromises the ability to separate the two.

559: 

560: Thus, it was clear that much would be gained from a survey having greater

561: sensitivity to the detection of emission lines.  The sensitivity could be

562: improved in at least four ways: by taking spectra with higher signal-to-noise 

563: ratio and spectral resolution, by using a narrower slit to better isolate the 

564: nucleus, and by employing more effective methods to handle the starlight 

565: correction.

566: 

567: The Palomar spectroscopic survey of nearby galaxies (Filippenko \& Sargent

568: 1985; Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 1995, 1997a, 1997b, 1997c, 1997d, 2003; Ho 

569: et al. 1997e) was designed with these goals in mind.  Using a double CCD 

570: spectrograph mounted on the Hale 5-m reflector, high-quality, 

571: moderate-resolution, long-slit spectra were obtained for a magnitude-limited 

572: ($B_T\,\leq$ 12.5 mag) sample of 486 northern ($\delta$ $>$ 0\deg) galaxies.  

573: Drawn from the Revised Shapley-Ames (RSA) Catalog of Bright Galaxies (Sandage 

574: \& Tammann 1981), the bright magnitude limit ensured that the sample had a 

575: high degree of completeness.  The spectra simultaneously cover the wavelength 

576: ranges $6210-6860$ \AA\ with $\sim$2.5 \AA\ resolution (FWHM) and $4230-5110$ 

577: \AA\ with $\sim$4 \AA\ resolution.  Most of the observations were obtained 

578: with a narrow (1\asec$-$2\asec) slit, and relatively long exposure times 

579: gave high signal-to-noise ratios.  This survey still contains 

580: the largest database to date of homogeneous and high-quality optical spectra 

581: of nearby galaxies.  It is also the most sensitive; the detection limit for 

582: emission lines is EW $\approx$ 0.25 \AA, roughly an order-of-magnitude 

583: improvement compared to previous or subsequent work.  The selection criteria 

584: ensure that the sample gives a fair representation of the local 

585: ($z\,\approx\,0$) galaxy population, and the proximity of the objects (median 

586: distance = 17 Mpc) results in relatively good spatial resolution (typically 

587: \lax\ 200 pc)\footnote{A distance scale based on $H_0$ = 75 \kms~Mpc$^{-1}$ is 

588: assumed throughout}.  These properties of the Palomar survey make it 

589: ideally suited to address issues on the demographics and physical properties 

590: of nearby, and especially low-luminosity, AGNs.  Unless otherwise noted, most 

591: of the results presented in this paper will be taken from the Palomar survey.  

592: 

593: The Palomar survey has one other virtue that is not widely appreciated.

594: Because the sample is large and essentially unbiased with respect to 

595: nuclear or global properties, it is ideally suited for comparative studies 

596: of various subpopulations.  Examples include efforts to discern differences 

597: between type~1 versus type~2 sources to test AGN unification, to ascertain the 

598: influence of bars or environment on nuclear activity, or to test for subtle 

599: differences between the different AGN classes.  The robustness of these and 

600: similar studies almost always hinges on the availability of proper control 

601: samples.  With the Palomar survey, there is no need to construct a separate 

602: control sample, which is always a difficult and somewhat dubious undertaking, 

603: because the control sample is built into the survey.

604: 

605: \subsection{Other Surveys} 

606: 

607: For completeness, I mention several other sources of nearby AGNs that have 

608: been widely used by the community.  The AGN sample culled from the CfA 

609: Redshift Survey (Huchra \& Burg 1992) has been an important resource for a 

610: long time.  Comprising 47 relatively bright Seyferts and a handful of LINERs, 

611: the CfA sample in many ways complements the Palomar sample at the bright end 

612: of the luminosity function.  However, as discussed in Ho \& Ulvestad (2001), 

613: the selection effects of the CfA sample are not easy to quantify because of 

614: the subjective and somewhat nonstandard manner in which AGNs were picked from 

615: the parent survey.  Prior to the full publication of the Palomar survey, 

616: Maiolino \& Rieke (1995) assembled a compilation of 91 Seyferts from a 

617: literature search of the galaxies in the RSA.  These ``RSA Seyferts'' have 

618: subsequently been used in a number of follow-up studies.  The substantial 

619: improvement in the data quality and analysis of the Palomar survey has 

620: resulted in many revised classifications of the RSA galaxies.  Lastly, a 

621: cautionary note. Many investigators rely on literature compilations, such as 

622: those assembled in V\'eron-Cetty \& V\'eron's (2006) catalog or the

623: NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database, as their source for AGN classifications.  

624: This is dangerous.  The classifications in these compilations are 

625: highly heterogeneous and in some cases wrong.

626: 

627: The sample of nearby AGNs emerging from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS)

628: (Kauffmann et al. 2003; Hao et al. 2005b; Kewley et al. 2006) far surpasses 

629: that of the Palomar survey in number but not in sensitivity.  Moreover, 

630: because SDSS samples more distant galaxies, the 3\asec-diameter fibers used in 

631: the survey subtend a physical scale of $\sim$5.5 kpc at the typical redshift 

632: $z \approx 0.1$, 30 times larger than in the Palomar survey.  The SDSS spectra 

633: therefore include substantial contamination from off-nuclear emission, which 

634: dilutes and, in some cases, inevitably confuses the signal from the nucleus.  

635: Contamination by host galaxy emission has two consequences.  First, only 

636: relatively bright nuclei have enough contrast to be detected.  But second, 

637: contamination can introduce a more pernicious systematic effect 

638: that can be hard to quantify.  Apart from normal \hii\ regions, galactic disks 

639: are known to contain {\it extended}\ emission-line regions that exhibit 

640: low-ionization, LINER-like spectra.  They can be confused with genuine {\it 

641: nuclear}\ LINERs.  Examples include gas shocked by supernova remnants (e.g., 

642: Dopita \& Sutherland 1995), ejecta from starburst-driven winds (Armus, Heckman 

643: \& Miley 1990), and diffuse, warm ionized plasma (e.g., Collins \& 

644: Rand 2001).  Massive, early-type galaxies, though generally lacking in ongoing 

645: star formation, also often possess X-ray emitting atmospheres that exhibit 

646: extended, low-ionization emission-line nebulae (e.g., Fabian et al. 1986; 

647: Heckman et al. 1989).  These physical processes, while interesting in their 

648: own right, are not directly related, and thus irrelevant, to the AGN 

649: phenomenon.  Thus, LINERs selected from samples of distant galaxies should be 

650: regarded with considerable caution. This comment applies also 

651: to LINERs selected from samples of IR-bright galaxies (e.g., Kim et 

652: al. 1995; Kewley et al. 2001; Corbett et al. 2003), which, in addition to being 

653: relatively distant and maximally confused with starburst processes, have the 

654: additional disadvantage of often being merging or interacting systems, wherein 

655: shocks undoubtedly generate extended LINER-like emission.  I strongly 

656: recommend that researchers avoid IR-selected samples if they are interested in 

657: investigating LINERs as an accretion phenomenon.  Many of the objects in the 

658: catalog of LINERs compiled by Carrillo et al. (1999), which has been the basis 

659: of several recent studies (Satyapal, Sambruna \& Dudik 2004; Dudik et al. 

660: 2005; Gonz\'alez-Mart\'\i n et al. 2006), suffer precisely from this 

661: complication and should be used judiciously.

662: 

663: \begin{figure}

664: %%BoundingBox: 30 200 570 620

665: \hskip 0.0truein

666: \psfig{figure=fig4a.ps,width=6.9cm,angle=0}

667: \hskip -0.2truein

668: \psfig{figure=fig4b.ps,width=6.9cm,angle=0}

669: \caption{{\it Left}: Detection rate of emission-line nuclei as a function of 

670: Hubble type.  The different classes of nuclei are marked as follows: Seyferts = 

671: blue squares, LINERs = red circles, transition objects = green triangles,

672: LINERs + transition objects + Seyferts = black stars, \hii\ nuclei = magenta 

673: crosses.  {\it Right}: Distribution of bulge-to-total ($B/T$) light ratios, 

674: derived from the morphological type and its statistical dependence on $B/T$. 

675: The histograms have been shifted vertically for clarity.

676: (Adapted from Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 1997a, 1997b.)

677: }

678: \end{figure}

679: 

680: \subsection{Detection Rates}

681: 

682: In qualitative agreement with early work, the Palomar survey shows that a 

683: substantial fraction (86\%) of all galaxies contain detectable emission-line 

684: nuclei (Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 1997b).  The detection rate is essentially 

685: 100\% for all disk (S0 and spiral) galaxies, and $>$50\% for elliptical 

686: galaxies.  One of the most surprising results is the large fraction of objects 

687: classified as AGNs or AGN candidates, as summarized in Figure~4.  

688: Summed over all Hubble types, 43\% of all galaxies that fall in the survey 

689: limits can be considered ``active.'' This percentage becomes even more 

690: remarkable for galaxies with an obvious bulge component, rising to 

691: $\sim$50\%$-$70\% for Hubble types E$-$Sb.  By contrast, the detection rate 

692: of AGNs drops dramatically toward later Hubble types (Sc and later), which 

693: almost invariably (80\%) host \hii\ nuclei.  This strong dependence of nuclear 

694: spectral class on Hubble type has been noticed in earlier studies (Heckman 

695: 1980a; Keel 1983b), and further confirmed in SDSS (Kauffmann et al. 2003; 

696: Miller et al. 2003).  A qualitatively similar conclusion, cast in terms of 

697: host galaxy stellar mass rather than Hubble type, is reached by Gallo et al. 

698: (2008) and Decarli et al. (2007).  Decarli et al. also claim that the 

699: occurrence of AGN activity in Virgo cluster spirals does not depend on 

700: morphological type, but it must be noted that the sources of spectroscopy and 

701: nuclear classification employed in that study are very heterogeneous.

702: 

703: Within the parent galaxy sample, 11\% have Seyfert nuclei, at least doubling 

704: estimates based on older (Stauffer 1982b; Keel 1983b; Phillips, Charles \& 

705: Baldwin 1983) or shallower (Huchra \& Burg 1992; Maia, Machado \& Willmer 

706: 2003; Gronwall et al. 2004; Hao et al. 2005a) surveys.  LINERs constitute the 

707: dominant population of AGNs.  ``Pure'' LINERs are present in $\sim$20\% of all 

708: galaxies, whereas transition objects, which by assumption also contain a LINER 

709: component, account for another $\sim$13\%. Thus, if all LINERs can be regarded 

710: as genuine AGNs (see \S~6), they truly are the most populous constituents, 

711: making up 1/3 of all galaxies and 2/3 of the AGN population (here taken to 

712: mean all objects classified as Seyferts, LINERs, and transition objects).

713: 

714: Within the magnitude range $14.5 < r < 17.7$ in SDSS, Kauffmann et al. (2003) 

715: report an overall AGN fraction (for narrow-line sources) of $\sim$40\%, of 

716: which $\sim$10\% are Seyferts.  The rest are LINERs and transition objects.  

717: Using a different method of starlight subtraction, Hao et al. (2005b) obtain 

718: very similar statistics for their sample of Seyfert galaxies.  Roughly 30\% of 

719: the galaxies on the red sequence in SDSS exhibit LINER-like emission (Yan et 

720: al.  2006).  Although these detection rates broadly resemble those of the 

721: Palomar survey, one should recognize important differences between the two 

722: surveys.  The Palomar objects extend much farther down the luminosity function 

723: than the SDSS.  The emission-line detection limit of the Palomar survey, EW = 

724: 0.25 \AA, is roughly 10 times fainter than the cutoff chosen by Hao et al. 

725: (2005b). The faint end of the Palomar H\al\ luminosity function reaches 

726: $\sim$1\e{37} \lum\ (\S~5.9), again a factor of 10 lower than the SDSS 

727: counterpart.  Given that LINERs selected from SDSS are highly susceptible to 

728: extranuclear contamination, as discussed earlier, it is in fact quite 

729: surprising---and perhaps fortuitous---that the detection rates of these 

730: objects agree so well between the two surveys.  

731: 

732: \subsection{Broad Emission Lines}

733: 

734: Broad emission lines, a defining attribute of classical Seyferts and quasars,

735: are also found in nuclei of much lower luminosities.  The well-known case of

736: the nucleus of M81 (Peimbert \& Torres-Peimbert 1981; Filippenko \& Sargent 

737: 1988), for example, has a broad (FWHM $\approx$ 3000 \kms) H\al\ line with a 

738: luminosity of $2 \times\,10^{39}$ \lum\ (Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 

739: 1996), and many other less conspicuous cases have been discovered in the 

740: Palomar survey (Ho et al. 1997e).  Searching for broad H\al\ emission in 

741: nearby nuclei is nontrivial, because it entails measurement of a (generally) 

742: weak, low-contrast, broad emission feature superposed on a complicated stellar 

743: background.  Thus, the importance of careful starlight subtraction cannot be 

744: overemphasized.  Moreover, even if this could be accomplished perfectly, 

745: one still has to contend with deblending the H\al +\nii\ complex.  The narrow 

746: lines in this complex are often heavily blended together, and rarely do the 

747: lines have simple profiles.  The strategy adopted by Ho \etal (1997e) is to 

748: use the empirical line profile of the \sii\ lines to model \nii\ and the 

749: narrow component of H\al.  The case of NGC~3998 is shown in Figure~3.

750: 

751: Of the 221 emission-line nuclei in the Palomar survey classified as LINERs,

752: transition objects, and Seyferts, 33 (15\%) definitely have broad H\al\ and an

753: additional 16 (7\%) probably do.  Questionable detections were found in

754: another 8 objects (4\%).  Thus, approximately 20\%$-$25\% of all nearby AGNs

755: are type~1 sources.  These numbers, of course, should be regarded as lower

756: limits, since undoubtedly there must exist AGNs with even weaker broad-line

757: emission that fall below the detection threshold.  Although the numbers are 

758: meager, direct comparison with small-aperture {\it Hubble Space Telescope

759: (HST)}\ spectra (e.g., Nicholson et al. 1998; Barth et al. 2001b; Shields et 

760: al. 2007) reveals that the Palomar statistics on broad H\al\ detections seem 

761: to be quite robust.  The type~1.9 classification of almost every 

762: object with overlapping \hst\ data turns out to survive.  More surprising 

763: still, no new cases of broad H\al\ emission have turned up from \hst\ 

764: observations.  Given the difficulty of measuring the weak broad H\al\ feature 

765: on top of the dominant stellar continuum, it is likely that in general the 

766: line widths may have been systematically underestimated from the ground-based 

767: spectra.   Circumstantial support for this conjecture comes from Zhang, 

768: Dultzin-Hacyan \& Wang (2007), who find that Palomar LLAGNs tend to have 

769: smaller BH virial masses (estimated from the H\al\ linewidth and a BLR 

770: size-luminosity relation) than predicted from their bulge stellar velocity 

771: dispersion.  They conclude that the BLR size in LLAGNs may be larger than 

772: normal given their luminosity, but an equally plausible explanation is that 

773: the H\al\ linewidths have been systematically underestimated.

774: 

775: It is illuminating to consider the incidence of broad H\al\ emission as

776: a function of spectral class.  Among objects formally classified as Seyferts,

777: $\sim$40\% are Seyfert~1s.  The implied ratio of Seyfert~1s to Seyfert~2s 

778: (1:1.6) has important consequences for some models concerning the evolution 

779: and small-scale geometry of AGNs (e.g., Osterbrock \& Shaw 1988).  Within the 

780: Palomar sample, nearly 25\% of the ``pure'' LINERs have detectable broad H\al\ 

781: emission.  By direct analogy with the historical nomenclature established for 

782: Seyferts, LINERs can be divided into ``type~1'' and ``type~2'' sources 

783: according to the presence or absence of broad-line emission, respectively (Ho,

784: Filippenko \& Sargent 1997a; Ho et al. 1997e).  The detection rate of broad 

785: H\al, however, drops drastically for transition objects.  The cause for this 

786: dramatic change is unclear.  In these objects the broad-line component may 

787: simply be too weak to be detected in the presence of substantial contamination 

788: from the \hii\ region component, or it may be intrinsically absent (\S\S~5.5, 

789: 6.5).

790: 

791: \subsection{Robustness and Completeness}

792: 

793: To gain confidence in the AGN statistics based on optical spectroscopy, one 

794: must have some handle on whether the existing AGN detections are trustworthy 

795: and whether there are many AGNs that have been missed.  The robustness issue 

796: hinges on the question of whether the weak, nearby sources classified as AGNs 

797: are truly accretion-powered.  As I argue in \S~6, this appears largely to be the

798: case.  The completeness issue can be examined in two regimes.  Among galaxies 

799: with prominent bulges (Sbc and earlier), for which the spectroscopic AGN 

800: fractions are already very high ($\sim$50\%$-$75\%), there is not much room 

801: for a large fraction of missing AGNs, although it is almost certain that some 

802: have indeed eluded detection in the optical (e.g., Tzanavaris \& 

803: Georgantopoulos 2007).  The same does not necessarily hold for galaxies of 

804: Hubble types Sc and later.  While the majority of these systems are 

805: spectroscopically classified as \hii\ nuclei, one must be wary that weak AGNs, 

806: if present, may be masked by brighter off-nuclear \hii\ regions or \hii\ 

807: regions projected along the line of sight.  After all, some very late-type 

808: galaxies {\it do}\ host {\it bona fide}\ AGNs (see \S~7).

809: 

810: The AGN content of late-type galaxies can independently be assessed by using

811: a diagnostic less prone to confusion by star-forming regions, namely by 

812: looking for compact, nuclear radio or X-ray cores.  Ulvestad \& Ho (2002) 

813: performed a Very Large Array (VLA) survey for radio cores in a 

814: distance-limited sample of 40 Palomar Sc galaxies classified as hosting \hii\ 

815: nuclei.  To a sensitivity limit of $P_{\rm rad} \approx 10^{18}-10^{20}$ 

816: W~Hz$^{-1}$ at 5~GHz, and a resolution of $\Delta \theta$ = 1\asec, they found 

817: that {\it none} of the galaxies contains a compact radio core.  The VLA study 

818: of Filho, Barthel \& Ho (2000) also failed to detect radio cores in a more 

819: heterogeneous sample of 12 \hii\ nuclei.

820: 

821: Information on nuclear X-ray cores in late-type galaxies is much more limited

822: because to date there has been no systematic investigation of these systems

823: with {\it Chandra}.  A few studies, however, have exploited the High

824: Resolution Imager (HRI) on {\it ROSAT} to resolve the soft X-ray (0.5$-$2 keV)

825: emission in late-type galaxies (Colbert \& Mushotzky 1999; Lira, Lawrence \&

826: Johnson 2000; Roberts \& Warwick 2000).  Although the resolution of the HRI

827: ($\sim$5\asec) is not ideal, it is nonetheless quite effective for identifying

828: point sources given the relatively diffuse morphologies of late-type galaxies.

829: Compact X-ray sources, often quite luminous (\gax\ 10$^{38}$ \lum), are

830: frequently found, but generally they do {\it not} coincide with the galaxy 

831: nucleus; the nature of these off-nuclear ``ultraluminous X-ray sources'' is 

832: discussed by Fabbiano (2006).

833: 

834: To summarize: unless \hii\ nuclei in late-type galaxies contain radio and

835: X-ray cores far weaker than the current survey limits---a possibility worth

836: exploring---they do not appear to conceal a significant population of

837: undetected AGNs.

838: 

839: \section{HOST GALAXY PROPERTIES}

840: 

841: \subsection{Global Parameters}

842: 

843: The near dichotomy in the distribution of Hubble types for galaxies hosting

844: active versus inactive nuclei (Figure~4) leads to the expectation that the two

845: populations ought to have fairly distinctive global, and perhaps even nuclear,

846: properties.  Moreover, a detailed examination of the host galaxies of AGNs

847: may shed light on the origin of their spectral diversity.  These issues were

848: examined by Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent (2003) using the database from the 

849: Palomar survey.  The host galaxies of Seyferts, LINERs, and transition objects 

850: display a remarkable degree of homogeneity in their large-scale properties, 

851: {\it after} factoring out spurious differences arising from small mismatches 

852: in Hubble type distribution.  The various nuclear types have slightly different

853: Hubble distributions, which largely control many of the statistical properties 

854: of the host galaxies.  Unless this effect is taken into account, one can 

855: arrive at erroneous conclusions about the intrinsic differences of the AGN 

856: populations.  This is a crucial step, one that is often not appreciated.

857: All three classes have essentially identical total luminosities ($\sim L^*$), 

858: bulge luminosities, sizes, and neutral hydrogen content.  Moreover, no obvious 

859: differences are found in terms of integrated optical colors or far-IR

860: luminosities and colors, which implies very similar global stellar content and 

861: current star formation rates.  No clear differences in environment can be 

862: seen either.  The only exception is that, relative to LINERs, transition 

863: objects may show a mild enhancement in the level of global star formation, and 

864: they may be preferentially more inclined.  This is consistent with the 

865: hypothesis that the transition class arises from spatial blending of emission 

866: from a LINER and \hii\ regions.  The velocity field of the ionized gas within 

867: the nuclear region, as measured by the width and asymmetry of the narrow 

868: emission lines, is crudely similar among the three AGN classes, an observation 

869: that argues against the proposition that fast shocks primarily drive the 

870: spectral variations (\S~6.2).

871: 

872: \subsection{Nuclear Stellar Populations}

873: 

874: The uniformity in the global stellar populations among the three AGN classes 

875: extends to circumnuclear and even nuclear scales.  The Palomar spectra cover a 

876: suite of stellar absorption-line indices and nuclear continuum colors, which 

877: collectively can be used to obtain crude constraints on the age and 

878: metallicity of the stars within the central 2\asec\ ($\sim 200$ pc).  After 

879: isolating a subsample that mitigates the Hubble type dependence, Ho, Filippenko,

880: \& Sargent (2003) find that Seyferts, LINERs, and transition objects have very 

881: similar stellar content.  The same holds true when comparing type~1 and type~2 

882: objects, both for LINERs and Seyferts.  With a few notable exceptions such as 

883: NGC~404 and NGC~4569 (Maoz et al. 1998; Barth \& Shields 2000; Gabel \& 

884: Bruhweiler 2002) or NGC~4303 (Colina et al. 2002), the stellar population 

885: always appears evolved.  Similar findings have been reported for smaller 

886: samples of LINERs, based on both optical (Boisson et al. 2000; Serote-Roos \& 

887: Gon\c{c}alves 2004; Zhang, Gu \& Ho 2008) and near-IR spectroscopy (Larkin et 

888: al. 1998; Bendo \& Joseph 2004).  The optical regime is not well suited to 

889: detect very young, ionizing stars.  However, the Palomar spectra do cover the 

890: broad \heii\ \lamb4686 emission bump, a feature indicative of Wolf-Rayet stars 

891: commonly seen in very young ($3-6$ Myr) starbursts.  Notwithstanding the 

892: difficulty of detecting this feature on top of a dominant old population, it 

893: is noteworthy that not a {\it single}\ case has been seen among the sample of 

894: over 200 Palomar LLAGNs.  By contrast, the Wolf-Rayet bump has been found in a 

895: number of the \hii\ nuclei (Sargent \& Filippenko 1991; Ho, Filippenko \& 

896: Sargent 1995), which, as a class compared to the LLAGNs, exhibit markedly 

897: younger stars, as evidenced by their blue continuum, strong H\bet\ and 

898: H$\delta$ absorption, and weak metal lines (Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 2003).  

899: The general dearth of young, massive stars in LLAGNs presents a serious 

900: challenge to proposals that seek to account for the excitation of their line 

901: emission in terms of starburst models.

902: 

903: Closer in, on scales \lax\ 10 pc accessible by {\it HST},

904: Sarzi et al.  (2005) studied the nuclear stellar population for a 

905: distance-limited subsample of 18 Palomar LLAGNs.  Their population synthesis 

906: analysis shows that the majority (80\%) of the objects have predominantly old 

907: (\gax\ 5 Gyr), mildly reddened stars of near-solar metallicity, the only 

908: exceptions being 3 out of 6 transition objects and 1 out of 4 LINER~2s that 

909: require a younger (\lax\ 1 Gyr) component.  In no case, however, is the younger 

910: component ever energetically dominant, falling far short of being able to 

911: account for the ionization budget for the central region.  

912: 

913: The results of Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent (2003) have been disputed by 

914: Cid~Fernandes et al.  (2004), who obtained new ground-based spectra for a 

915: subset of the Palomar LINERs and transition objects.  Gonz\'alez~Delgado et 

916: al. (2004), in a study similar to that of Sarzi et al. (2005), further 

917: analyzed STIS spectra of some of these.  An important improvement of their 

918: ground-based data is that they extend down to $\sim 3500$ \AA, covering the 

919: 4000~\AA\ break and the higher-order Balmer lines, which are sensitive probes 

920: of intermediate-age ($\sim 10^7-10^9$ yr) stars.  While LINERs are 

921: predominantly old, roughly half of the transition nuclei show significant 

922: higher-order Balmer lines.  Again, there are virtually no traces of Wolf-Rayet 

923: features.  These authors propose that the ionization mechanism of transition 

924: sources must be somehow linked to the intermediate-age stellar population.  

925: 

926: I disagree with their assessment.  Figure~1 of Cid~Fernandes et al. (2004) 

927: clearly shows that, as in the parent Palomar sample, the Hubble type 

928: distribution of the LINERs is skewed toward much earlier types than that of the 

929: transition objects.  Any meaningful comparison of the stellar population, which 

930: strongly depends on Hubble type, must take this into account.  The strategy 

931: employed by Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent (2003) is to restrict the two-sample 

932: comparisons to a relatively narrow range of Hubble types (Sab$-$Sbc). Within 

933: this domain, LINERs and transition objects (as well as Seyferts) have 

934: statistically indistinguishable stellar indices and continuum colors.  Given 

935: the limited size of Cid~Fernandes et al.'s sample, it is not possible to adopt 

936: the same strategy.  To minimize the Hubble type bias, I examined the subsample 

937: of 30 spiral galaxies in their study.  Out of 17 transition objects, 15 (88\%) 

938: contain intermediate-age stars according to their Table~3; but so do 10 out of 

939: the 13 (77\%) LINERs in this subgroup.  This simple exercise underscores the 

940: importance of sample selection effects, and leaves me unconvinced 

941: that transition objects have a younger stellar population than LINERs.  True, 

942: both classes evidently do contain detectable amounts of intermediate-age 

943: stars---a qualitatively different conclusion than was reached in the Palomar 

944: survey, whose spectral coverage was not well-suited to detect this 

945: population---but the fact remains that in a {\it relative}\ sense all three 

946: LLAGN classes in the Palomar survey have statistically similar populations.

947: If the poststarburst component is responsible for the nebular emission in 

948: LLAGNs, we might expect the intensity of the two to be correlated, by analogy

949: with what has been found for higher luminosity AGNs (Kauffmann et al. 2003).

950: I searched for this effect in the final sample presented in Gonz\'alez~Delgado 

951: et al. (2004), but did not find any correlation.  Clearly we wish to know what 

952: factors drive the spectral variations in LLAGNs; whatever they are (\S~6), 

953: they are unlikely to be related to stellar population.

954: 

955: \subsection{Influence of Bars and Environment}

956: 

957: Numerical simulations (e.g., Heller \& Shlosman 1994; see review in Kormendy 

958: \& Kennicutt 2004) suggest that large-scale 

959: stellar bars can be highly effective in delivering gas to the central few 

960: hundred parsecs of a spiral galaxy, thereby potentially leading to rapid star 

961: formation.  Further instabilities result in additional inflow to smaller 

962: scales, which may lead to increased BH fueling and hence elevated nonstellar 

963: activity in barred galaxies compared to unbarred galaxies.  As discussed in 

964: \S~3.1, the Palomar sample is ideally suited for statistical comparisons of 

965: this nature, which depend delicately on issues of sample 

966: completeness and the choice of control sample.  Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 

967: (1997d) find that while the presence of a bar indeed does enhance both the 

968: probability and rate of star formation in galaxy nuclei, it appears to have no 

969: impact on either the frequency or strength of AGN activity.  Bearing in mind 

970: the substantial uncertainties associated with sample selection, as well as the 

971: method and wavelength used to identify bars (Laurikainen, Salo \& Buta 2004), 

972: other studies broadly come to a similar conclusion (see review by Combes 2003), 

973: although Maia, Machado \& Willmer (2003) claim, on the basis of a 

974: significantly larger and somewhat more luminous sample drawn from the Southern 

975: Sky Redshift Survey, that Seyfert galaxies are preferentially more barred.

976: 

977: In the same vein, dynamical interactions with neighboring companions should

978: lead to gas dissipation, enhanced nuclear star formation, and perhaps central

979: fueling (e.g., Hernquist 1989).  Schmitt (2001) and Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 

980: (2003) studied this issue using the Palomar data, parameterizing the nearby 

981: environment of each object by its local galaxy density and the distance to its 

982: nearest sizable neighbor.  After accounting for the well-known 

983: morphology-density relation, it was found that the local environment, like 

984: bars, has little impact on AGNs, at least in the low-luminosity regime sampled 

985: locally.  These findings broadly agree with the results from SDSS (Miller et 

986: al. 2003; Li et al. 2008).  Kauffmann et al. (2004), Wake et al. (2004), and 

987: Constantin \& Vogeley (2006), in fact, report a drop in the fraction of 

988: high-luminosity AGNs for dense environments.

989: 

990: \section{NUCLEAR PROPERTIES}

991: 

992: \subsection{Ionizing Continuum Radiation}

993: 

994: AGNs, at least when unobscured, reveal themselves as pointlike nuclear sources 

995: with power-law spectra at optical and UV wavelengths, typically described

996: by a continuum flux density $f_\nu \propto \nu^{\alpha}$, with $\alpha \approx 

997: -0.5$ (e.g., Vanden~Berk et al. 2001).  In unbeamed sources, this featureless 

998: continuum traces the low-frequency tail of the ``big blue bump'' (Shields 

999: 1978; Malkan \& Sargent 1982), which supplies the bulk of the ionizing 

1000: photons.  This feature is extremely difficult to detect in LLAGNs, both 

1001: because the big blue bump is weak or absent (\S~5.8) and because the sources 

1002: are exceedingly faint.  The optical nuclei of LINERs can have $M_B$ \gax\ 

1003: $-10$ mag (Ho 2004b), at least $10^{4}$ times fainter than their (usually 

1004: bulge-dominated) hosts ($M_B \simeq M^* \approx -20$ mag).  To overcome this 

1005: contrast problem, searches for nuclear point sources in the optical and 

1006: near-IR have relied on \hst\ images (e.g., Chiaberge, Capetti \& Celotti 1999; 

1007: Quillen et al. 2001; Verdoes~Kleijn et al. 2002; Chiaberge, Capetti \& 

1008: Macchetto 2005; Balmaverde \& Capetti 2006; Gonz\'alez-Mart\'\i n et al. 

1009: 2006).  But resolution alone is not enough.  Given the extreme faintness of 

1010: the nucleus, the intrinsic cuspiness of the underlying bulge profile, 

1011: complexities of the point-spread function, and the often irregular background 

1012: marred by circumnuclear dust features, one must pay very close attention to 

1013: {\it how}\ the measurements are made.  Simple aperture photometry or searching 

1014: for central excess emission can yield very misleading results.  The most robust 

1015: technique to extract faint nuclei in the presence of these complications 

1016: employs two-dimensional, multi-component fitting (Ho \& Peng 2001; 

1017: Ravindranath et al.  2001; Peng et al. 2002).  Using this method, nuclear 

1018: sources with optical magnitudes as faint as $\sim 20$ have been measured, with 

1019: limits down to $\sim 22-23$ mag possible for nearby galaxies.  Due to the 

1020: computational requirements of two-dimensional fitting, however, not many 

1021: LLAGNs have yet been analyzed in this manner, and fewer still have enough 

1022: photometric points to define even a crude spectral slope.

1023: 

1024: In a few cases, the optical featureless continuum has been detected 

1025: spectroscopically.  From the ground, this was only possible for a couple of 

1026: the brightest sources.  The stellar features of NGC~7213 (Halpern \& 

1027: Filippenko 1984) and Pictor~A (Carswell et al. 1984; Filippenko 1985) show 

1028: dilution by a featureless continuum, which can be described approximately by a 

1029: power law with a spectral index of $\alpha \approx -1.5$.  The 

1030: nuclear continuum is much more readily seen in small-aperture spectra that 

1031: help to reject the bulge starlight.  \hst\ spectra have isolated the optical 

1032: continuum in several LINERs (Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 1996; Nicholson et al.  

1033: 1998; Ho et al. 2000; Shields et al. 2000; Barth et al.  2001a; Sabra et al. 

1034: 2003), although in most objects it remains too faint to be detected 

1035: spectroscopically (Sarzi et al. 2005).  In all well-studied cases, the optical 

1036: continuum is quite steep, with $\alpha \approx -1$ to $-2$.  This range 

1037: in spectral slopes is consistent with the broad-band optical (Verdoes~Kleijn 

1038: et al. 2002) and optical-UV colors (Chiaberge et al. 2002) of the cores 

1039: frequently detected in the LINER nuclei of FR~I radio galaxies.

1040: 

1041: The predominantly old population of present-day bulges ensures that the 

1042: stellar contamination largely disappears in the UV, especially at high 

1043: resolution.  A number of attempts have been made to detect UV emission in 

1044: LINERs using {\it IUE}, but most of these efforts yielded ambiguous results 

1045: (see review in Filippenko 1996), and real progress had to await the {\it HST}.

1046: Two dedicated \hst\ UV ($\sim 2300$ \AA) imaging studies have been completed.  

1047: Using the pre-COSTAR FOC, Maoz et al. (1996) surveyed a complete sample of 110 

1048: large, nearby galaxies, and among the subset with spectral classifications 

1049: from Palomar, Maoz et al. (1995) discovered that $\sim$25\% of the LINERs show 

1050: an unresolved UV core.  Barth et al. (1998) found similar statistics in a more 

1051: targeted WFPC2 study.  They also made the suggestion, later 

1052: confirmed by Pogge et al. (2000), that dust obscuration is probably the main 

1053: culprit for the nondetection of UV emission in the majority of LINERs.  The 

1054: implication is that UV emission is significantly more common in LINERs than 

1055: indicated by the detection rates.  In some type~2 objects (e.g., NGC~4569 

1056: and NGC~6500), the UV emission is spatially extended and presumably not 

1057: related to the nuclear source.  Second-epoch UV observations with the 

1058: ACS/HRC revealed that nearly all of the UV-bright sources exhibit long-term 

1059: variability (Maoz et al. 2005), an important result that helps assuage fears 

1060: that the UV emission might arise mainly from young stars (Maoz et al. 1998).  

1061: Importantly, both type~1 {\it and}\ type~2 LINERs vary.  UV variability has 

1062: also been discovered serendipitously in a few other sources (Renzini et al. 

1063: 1995; O'Connell et al. 2005).

1064: 

1065: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1066: %%BoundingBox: 80 150 350 770

1067: \begin{figure*}[t]

1068: \centerline{\psfig{file=table1.ps,width=14.0cm,angle=90}}

1069: \end{figure*}

1070: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1071: 

1072: \subsection{Radio Cores}

1073: 

1074: AGNs, no matter how weak, are almost never silent in the radio.  Barring 

1075: chance superposition with a supernova remnant, the presence of a compact radio 

1076: core is therefore a good AGN indicator.  Because of the 

1077: expected faintness of the nuclei, however, any search for core emission must 

1078: be conducted at high sensitivity, and arcsecond-scale angular resolution or 

1079: better is generally needed to isolate the nucleus from the surrounding host, 

1080: which emits copious diffuse synchrotron radiation.  In practice, this 

1081: requires an interferometer such as the VLA.

1082: 

1083: The prevalence of weak AGNs in nearby early-type galaxies has been established

1084: from the VLA radio continuum studies of Sadler, Jenkins \& Kotanyi (1989) and 

1085: Wrobel \& Heeschen (1991), whose 5~GHz surveys with $\Delta \theta \approx$

1086: 5\asec\ report a high incidence ($\sim30$\%--40\%) of radio cores in complete, 

1087: optical flux-limited samples of elliptical and S0 galaxies.  Interestingly, 

1088: the radio detection rate is similar to the detection rate of optical 

1089: emission lines (Figure~4), and the optical counterparts of the radio cores are 

1090: mostly classified as LINERs (Phillips et al. 1986; Ho 1999a).  Conversely, 

1091: Heckman (1980b) showed that LINERs tend to be associated with compact radio 

1092: sources.  The radio powers are quite modest, generally in the range of 

1093: $10^{19}-10^{21}$ W Hz$^{-1}$ at 5 GHz.  When available, the spectral indices 

1094: tend to be relatively flat (e.g., Wrobel 1991; Slee et al. 1994).  With the 

1095: exception of a handful of well-known radio galaxies with extended jets (Wrobel 

1096: 1991), most of the radio emission is centrally concentrated.   

1097: 

1098: No comparable radio survey has been done for spiral galaxies.  Over the last 

1099: few years, however, a number of studies, mostly using the VLA, have 

1100: systematically targeted sizable subsets of the Palomar galaxies, to the point 

1101: that by now effectively the entire Palomar AGN sample has been surveyed at 

1102: arcsecond ($\Delta \theta \approx$ 0\farcs15$-$2\farcs5) resolution (Filho, 

1103: Barthel \& Ho 2000, 2002a, 2006; Nagar et al. 2000, 2002; Ho \& Ulvestad 

1104: 2001; Filho et al. 2004; Nagar, Falcke \& Wilson 2005; Krips et al. 2007).  

1105: Because the sensitivity, resolution, and observing frequency varied from study 

1106: to study, each concentrating on different subclasses of objects, it is 

1107: nontrivial to combine the literature results.  The only survey that samples a 

1108: significant fraction of the three LLAGN classes at a uniform sensitivity and 

1109: resolution is that by Nagar et al. (2000, 2002; Nagar, Falcke \& Wilson 

1110: 2005), which was conducted at 15~GHz and $\Delta \theta$ = 0\farcs15.  The 

1111: main drawback is that the sensitivity of this survey (rms $\approx$ 0.2 mJy) 

1112: is rather modest, and mJy-level sources can be missed if they possess 

1113: relatively steep spectra.  Despite these limitations, Nagar et al. detected a 

1114: compact core, to a high level of completeness, in 44\% of the LINERs. 

1115: Importantly, to the same level of completeness, the Seyferts exhibit a very 

1116: similar detection rate (47\%).  LINER~2s have a lower detection rate than 

1117: LINER~1s (38\% versus 63\%; see Table~1), but the same pattern is reflected 

1118: almost exactly within the Seyfert population (detection rate 30\% for type~2s 

1119: versus 72\% for type~1s).  Transition objects, on the other hand, clearly 

1120: differ, showing a markedly lower detection rate of only 16\%, consistent with 

1121: the 8.4~GHz survey of Filho, Barthel \& Ho (2000, 2002a, 2006), where the 

1122: detection rate is $\sim 25$\%.  The statistical differences in the Hubble type 

1123: distributions of the three AGN classes (Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 2003) 

1124: slightly complicate the interpretation of these results.  To the extent that 

1125: radio power shows a mild dependence on bulge strength or BH mass (Nagar, 

1126: Falcke \& Wilson 2005; see Ho 2002a), the detection rates, strictly speaking, 

1127: should be renormalized to account for the differences in morphological types 

1128: among the three classes.  This effect, however, will not qualitatively change 

1129: the central conclusion: if a compact radio core guarantees AGN pedigree, then 

1130: LINERs, of either type~1 or type~2, are just as AGN-like as Seyferts, whereas 

1131: a significant fraction of transition objects (roughly half) may be unrelated 

1132: to AGNs.

1133: 

1134: The detection rates from the Nagar et al. survey can be viewed as firm lower 

1135: limits.  At $\Delta \theta$ = 1\asec\ and rms = 0.04 mJy at 1.4 and 5 GHz, for 

1136: example, the detection rate for the Palomar Seyferts rises to 75\% (Ho \& 

1137: Ulvestad 2001).  Although no lower frequency survey of LINERs has been 

1138: completed so far (apart from the lower resolution studies of Sadler, Jenkins, 

1139: \& Kotanyi 1989 and Wrobel \& Heeschen 1991 confined to early-type galaxies), 

1140: the preliminary study by Van~Dyk \& Ho (1998) of 29 LINERs at 5 and 3.6 GHz 

1141: ($\Delta \theta$ = 0\farcs5; rms = 0.05$-$0.1 mJy) yielded a detection rate of 

1142: over 80\%, again suggesting that LINERs and Seyferts have a comparably high 

1143: incidence of radio cores.

1144: 

1145: Importantly, a sizable, flux-limit subset of the 15 GHz detections has been 

1146: reobserved with the Very Long Baseline Array at 5 GHz, and essentially 

1147: {\it all}\ of them have been detected at milliarcsecond resolution (Nagar, 

1148: Falcke \& Wilson 2005).  The high brightness temperatures (\gax\ 

1149: $10^6-10^{11}$~K) leaves no doubt that the radio cores are nonthermal and 

1150: genuinely associated with AGN activity.

1151: 

1152: Where multifrequency data exist, their spectra tend to be flat or even mildly 

1153: inverted ($\alpha \approx -0.2$ to $+0.2$; Ho et al. 1999b; Falcke et al. 2000; 

1154: Nagar et al. 2000; Nagar, Wilson \& Falcke 2001; Ulvestad \& Ho 2001b; 

1155: Anderson, Ulvestad \& Ho 2004; Doi et al. 2005; Krips et al. 2007), seemingly 

1156: more optically thick than Seyferts (median $\alpha = -0.4$; Ulvestad \& Ho 

1157: 2001a), and variability on timescales of months is common (Nagar et al. 2002; 

1158: Anderson \& Ulvestad 2005).   Both of these characteristics suggest that the 

1159: radio emission in LINERs is mainly confined to a compact core or base of a 

1160: jet.  Seyfert galaxies contain radio cores as well, but they are often 

1161: accompanied by linear, jetlike features resolved on arcsecond scales (e.g., 

1162: Ulvestad \& Wilson 1989; Kukula et al. 1995; Ho \& Ulvestad 2001; Gallimore et 

1163: al. 2006).  This extended component appears to be less prevalent in LINERs, 

1164: although a definitive comparison must await a survey matched in resolution, 

1165: sensitivity, and wavelength with that performed for the Seyferts (Ho \& 

1166: Ulvestad 2001).  Higher resolution images on milliarcsecond scales

1167: do resolve elongated structures akin to subparsec-scale jets, but most of the 

1168: power is concentrated in a compact, high-brightness temperature core 

1169: (Bietenholz, Bartel \& Rupen 2000; Falcke et al. 2000; Ulvestad \& Ho 2001b; 

1170: Filho, Barthel \& Ho 2002b; Anderson, Ulvestad \& Ho 2004; Filho et al. 2004; 

1171: Krips et al.  2007).  The comprehensive summary presented in Nagar, Falcke \& 

1172: Wilson (2005) indicates that the incidence of milliarcsecond-scale radio cores 

1173: is similar for LINERs and Seyferts, but that subparsec-scale jets occur more 

1174: frequently in LINERs.

1175: 

1176: \subsection{X-ray Cores}

1177: 

1178: X-ray observations provide another very effective tool to isolate LLAGNs and 

1179: to diagnose their physical properties.  Ultra-faint LLAGNs can be identified 

1180: where none was previously known in the optical (e.g., Loewenstein et al. 

1181: 2001; Ho, Terashima \& Ulvestad 2003; Fabbiano et al. 2004; Pellegrini et al. 

1182: 2007; Wrobel, Terashima \& Ho 2008).  Here, too, sensitivity and resolution 

1183: are critical, as the central regions of galaxies contain a plethora of 

1184: discrete nonnuclear sources, often suffused with a diffuse thermal plasma.  

1185: {\it Chandra}, whose ACIS camera delivers $\sim$0\farcs5 images, is the 

1186: instrument of choice, although in some instances even data at $\sim$5\asec\ 

1187: resolution (e.g., {\it ROSAT} HRI) can still provide meaningful constraints, 

1188: especially if accompanied by spectral information (e.g., {\it XMM-Newton}).

1189: 

1190: As in the radio, no truly unbiased high-resolution X-ray survey has yet been 

1191: performed of an optical flux-limited sample of nearby galaxies.  The closest 

1192: attempt was made by Roberts \& Warwick (2000), who searched for X-ray nuclear 

1193: sources in 83 Palomar galaxies ($\sim 20$\% of the total sample) having 

1194: archival {\it ROSAT}\ HRI data.  This subset is probably not unbiased, but it 

1195: does encapsulate all the nuclear spectral classes in the Palomar survey.  

1196: In total, X-ray cores were detected in 54\% of the sample, with Seyferts and 

1197: LINERs (including transition objects) both showing a higher detection rate 

1198: ($\sim$70\%) than absorption (30\%) or \hii\ nuclei (40\%).  The high detection

1199: rate among the optically classified LLAGNs agrees well with other {\it ROSAT}\ 

1200: studies of Palomar sources (Koratkar et al. 1995; Komossa, B\"ohringer \&

1201: Huchra 1999; Halderson et al. 2001; Roberts, Schurch \& Warwick 2001), but 

1202: the nonnegligible detection rate among the inactive members suggests that 

1203: a significant fraction of the ``core'' flux may be nonnuclear emission [X-ray 

1204: binaries (XRBs) and diffuse gas] insufficiently resolved by {\it ROSAT}.  

1205: 

1206: Observations with {\it Chandra}\ (e.g., Ho et al. 2001;  Eracleous et al. 2002)

1207: confirm the suspicion that earlier X-ray studies may have suffered from 

1208: confusion with extranuclear sources (Figure~5).  Importantly, the sharp 

1209: resolution and low background noise of ACIS enable faint point sources to be 

1210: detected with brief (few ks) exposures.  This makes feasible, for the first 

1211: time, X-ray surveys of large samples of galaxies selected at non-X-ray 

1212: wavelengths.  In a snapshot survey of a distance-limited sample of Palomar 

1213: LLAGNs, Ho et al. (2001) find that $\sim$75\% of LINERs, both type~1 and 

1214: type~2, contain X-ray cores, some as faint as $\sim 10^{38}$ \lum\ in the 

1215: $2-10$ keV band.  Terashima \& Wilson (2003b) report an even 

1216: 

1217: \begin{figure}

1218: %%BoundingBox: 250 55 500 785

1219: \psfig{figure=fig5.ps,width=13.7cm,angle=0}

1220: \caption{{\it Chandra}/ACIS images of three LLAGNs, illustrating the diversity

1221: and complexity of the X-ray morphologies of their circumnuclear regions.

1222: The cross marks the near-IR position of the nucleus.  (Courtesy of H.M.L.G.

1223: Flohic and M. Eracleous.)

1224: }

1225: \end{figure}

1226: 

1227: \noindent

1228: higher detection 

1229: rate (100\%) for a sample of LINERs chosen for having a flat-spectrum radio 

1230: core.  To date, roughly 50\% of the entire Palomar sample, among them 40\% of 

1231: the AGNs, have been observed by {\it Chandra}.  This rich archival resource 

1232: has been the basis of a number of recent investigations focused on quantifying 

1233: the AGN content of LINERs, chief among them Satyapal, Sambruna \& Dudik 

1234: (2004), Dudik et al.  (2005), Pellegrini (2005), Satyapal et al. (2005),

1235: Flohic et al. (2006), and Gonz\'alez-Mart\'\i n et al. (2006).  A common 

1236: conclusion that can be distilled from these studies is that the incidence of 

1237: X-ray cores among LINERs is quite high, ranging from $\sim$50\% to 70\%, down 

1238: to luminosity limits of $\sim 10^{38}$ \lum.  The incidence of X-ray cores in 

1239: LINERs is somewhat lower than, but still compares favorably to, that found in 

1240: Palomar Seyferts ($\sim 90$\%), the vast majority of which now have suitable 

1241: X-ray observations, as summarized in Cappi et al. (2006) and Panessa et al. 

1242: (2006).  While the impact of selection biases cannot be assessed easily,

1243: they are probably not very severe because most of the observations 

1244: were not originally intended to study LINERs, nor were they targeting famous 

1245: X-ray sources.

1246: 

1247: It is of interest to ask whether the incidence of X-ray cores in LINERs 

1248: depends on the presence of broad H\al\ emission.  The moderate-resolution 

1249: {\it ROSAT}/HRI studies of Roberts \& Warwick (2000) and Halderson et al. 

1250: (2001) showed roughly comparable detection rates for type~1 and type~2 

1251: LINERs, suggesting that the two classes are intrinsically similar and that 

1252: obscuration plays a minor role in differentiating them.  On the other hand, 

1253: detailed X-ray spectral analysis has raised the suspicion that LINER~2s may be 

1254: a highly heterogeneous class, with the bulk of the X-ray emission possibly 

1255: arising from stellar processes.  An important caveat is that these studies 

1256: were based on large-beam observations, mostly using {\it ASCA}\ (Terashima, 

1257: Ho \& Ptak 2000; Terashima et al. 2000a, 2002; Roberts, Schurch \& Warwick 

1258: 2001) and the rest using {\it BeppoSAX}\ (Georgantopoulos et al. 2002; 

1259: Pellegrini et al. 2002).  A clearer, more consistent picture emerges from the 

1260: recent {\it Chandra}\ work cited above.  Although the individual samples 

1261: remain small, most {\it Chandra}\ surveys detect LINER~2s with roughly similar 

1262: frequency as LINER~1s, $\sim$50\%$-$60\%.  To gain a more comprehensive 

1263: census, I have assembled {\it Chandra}\ measurements for all Palomar LINERs 

1264: from the literature, along with unpublished material for a significant number 

1265: of additional objects in public archives, which were analyzed following Ho 

1266: et al. (2001).  Although clearly heterogeneous and incomplete, the final 

1267: collection of 64 LINERs (20 type~1, 44 type~2) does constitute 70\% of the 

1268: entire Palomar sample.  The detection rate among all LINERs is 86\%, broken 

1269: down into 95\% for LINER~1s and 74\% for LINER~2s.  For completeness, note 

1270: that a similar exercise for 36 transition objects (55\% of the parent sample) 

1271: yields a detection rate of 74\%, identical to that of LINER~2s and only 

1272: marginally lower than that of Seyfert~2s (86\%; Table~1).

1273: 

1274: The X-ray spectral properties of LLAGNs, particularly LINERs, have most 

1275: thoroughly been investigated using {\it ASCA}\ (Yaqoob et al. 1995; Ishisaki et 

1276: al. 1996; Iyomoto et al. 1996, 1997, 1998a, 1998b; Ptak et al. 1996, 1999; 

1277: Terashima et al. 1998a, 1998b, 2000a, 2000b, 2002; Ho et al. 1999a; Terashima, 

1278: Ho \& Ptak 2000; Roberts, Schurch \& Warwick 2001), with important 

1279: contributions from {\it BeppoSAX} (Pellegrini et al.  2000a, 2000b, 2002; 

1280: Iyomoto et al.  2001; Georgantopoulos et al. 2002; Ptak et al. 2004).  A

1281: seminal study on M81 was done using {\it BBXRT}\ (Petre et al. 1993). Although 

1282: the nuclear 

1283: component was not spatially isolated because of the poor angular resolution of 

1284: these telescopes, they had sufficient effective area to yield good photon 

1285: statistics over the energy range $\sim 0.5-10$ keV to {\it spectrally}\ 

1286: isolate the hard, power-law AGN signal.  The most salient properties are the 

1287: following.  (1) Over the region $\sim 0.5-10$ keV, the continuum can be fit 

1288: with a power law with an energy index of $\alpha \approx -0.4$ to $-1.2$.  

1289: Although this range overlaps with that seen in more luminous sources, the 

1290: typical value of $\sim -0.8$ in LLAGNs may be marginally flatter than in 

1291: Seyfert~1s ($\langle\alpha\rangle = -0.87\pm0.22$; Nandra et al. 1997b) or 

1292: radio-quiet quasars ($\langle\alpha\rangle = -0.93\pm0.22$; Reeves \& Turner 

1293: 2000), perhaps being more in line with radio-loud quasars ($\langle \alpha 

1294: \rangle = -0.6\pm0.16$; Reeves \& Turner 2000). (2) With a few notable 

1295: exceptions (e.g., M51: Fukazawa et al. 2001, Terashima \& Wilson 2003a; 

1296: NGC~1052: Weaver et al. 1999, Guainazzi et al. 2000; NGC~4258: Makishima et 

1297: al. 1994, Fiore et al. 2001; NGC~4261: Matsumoto et al.  2001), the power-law 

1298: component shows very little intrinsic absorption.  This trend conflicts with 

1299: the tendency for the degree of obscuration to increase with decreasing 

1300: luminosity (e.g., Lawrence \& Elvis 1982).  (3) Signatures of X-ray 

1301: reprocessing by material from an optically thick accretion disk, in the form 

1302: of Fe~K$\alpha$ emission or Compton reflection (Lightman \& White 1988; George

1303: \& Fabian 1991), are weak or absent; the weakness of the Fe~K$\alpha$ line in 

1304: LLAGNs runs counter to the inverse correlation between iron line strength and 

1305: luminosity observed in higher luminosity AGNs (Nandra et al. 1997b). (4) In 

1306: the few cases where Fe~K$\alpha$ emission has been detected, it is always 

1307: narrow.  (5) Apart from the hard power law, most objects require an extra soft 

1308: component at energies \lax\ 2 keV that can be fit by a thermal plasma model 

1309: with a temperature of $kT \approx 0.4-0.8$ keV and near-solar abundances.  (6) 

1310: Contrary to the trend established for luminous sources (Nandra et al. 1997a), 

1311: short-term, large-amplitude X-ray variability is rare in LLAGNs (Ptak et al. 

1312: 1998).

1313: 

1314: More recent observations with {\it Chandra}\ and {\it XMM-Newton}\ have 

1315: refined, but not qualitatively altered, the above results.  Where detailed 

1316: spectral analysis is possible (e.g., B\"ohringer et al. 2001; Kim \& Fabbiano 

1317: 2003; Pellegrini et al. 2003a; Terashima \& Wilson 2003b; Filho et al. 2004; 

1318: Page et al. 2004; Starling et al. 2005; Flohic et al. 2006; 

1319: Gonz\'alez-Mart\'\i n et al. 2006; Soria et al. 2006), the hard power-law 

1320: component (except in objects previously known to be heavily absorbed) 

1321: continues to be relatively unabsorbed, even among many type~2 sources, and to 

1322: show little signs of reflection.  No convincing case of a relativistic 

1323: Fe~K$\alpha$ line has yet surfaced in an LLAGN.  The marginally broad iron 

1324: lines discovered with {\it ASCA}\ in M81 (Ishisaki et al. 1996) and NGC~4579 

1325: (Terashima et al. 1998a) has now been resolved into multiple components 

1326: (Dewangan et al. 2004; Page et al. 2004; Young et al. 2007), none of which can 

1327: be associated with a canonical disk.  At the same time, the equivalent width 

1328: limits for even the narrow component have become impressively low (e.g., Ptak 

1329: et al. 2004).  Interestingly, a soft thermal component is still required in 

1330: many objects (\S~5.4), but there is no evidence for blackbody-like soft excess 

1331: emission commonly seen in Seyferts and quasars (e.g., Turner \& Pounds 1989; 

1332: Inoue, Terashima \& Ho 2007).

1333: 

1334: \subsection{Circumnuclear Thermal Plasma}

1335: 

1336: Early X-ray observations of LLAGNs using {\it ASCA}\ have consistently revealed

1337: the presence of a diffuse, thermal component, typically with a temperature of 

1338: $kT \approx 0.5$ keV (Ptak et al. 1999; Terashima et al. 2002).  The uniform 

1339: analysis of {\it ROSAT}\ data by Halderson et al. (2001) concluded that $\sim 

1340: 80$\% of the Palomar sources contain an extended component.  However, without 

1341: better resolution, it was impossible to know the extent of confusion with 

1342: point sources, how much of the gas is truly associated with the nuclear region 

1343: of the galaxy, or the density and temperature profile of the gas.

1344: 

1345: Our view of the diffuse component in the nuclear region has been dramatically 

1346: sharpened with {\it Chandra}\ and {\it XMM-Newton}.  Not only has the near 

1347: ubiquity of diffuse gas been confirmed in many nearby galaxies (Ho et al. 

1348: 2001; Eracleous et al. 2002; Terashima \& Wilson 2003b; Pellegrini 2005;  

1349: Rinn, Sambruna \& Gliozzi 2005; Cappi et al. 2006; Gonz\'alez-Mart\'\i n et 

1350: al. 2006; Soria et al. 2006), including

1351: our own (Muno et al. 2004) and our close neighbor M31 (Garcia et al. 

1352: 2005), but quantitative, statistical properties of the gas are now becoming 

1353: available.  In the comprehensive investigation of 19 LINERs by Flohic et al. 

1354: (2006), the diffuse emission, detected in 70\% of the sample, is concentrated 

1355: within the central few hundred pc.  With an average 0.5$-$2 keV luminosity of 

1356: $\sim 10^{38}$ \lum, it accounts for more than half of the total central 

1357: luminosity in most cases.  The average spectrum is similar to that seen in 

1358: normal galaxies: it can be described by a thermal plasma with $kT = 0.5$ keV 

1359: plus a power-law component with $\alpha = -0.3$ to $-0.5$.  I will return to 

1360: the nature of the hard component in \S~6.5.  What is the origin of the thermal 

1361: plasma?  Given what we know about the stellar populations (\S~4.2), a starburst

1362: origin, as suggested by Gonz\'alez-Mart\'\i n et al. (2006), seems improbable.  

1363: In normal elliptical galaxies, the X-ray--emitting gas represents the 

1364: repository of thermalized stellar ejecta generated from mass loss from evolved 

1365: stars and Type~Ia supernovae (e.g., Awaki et al. 1994).  There is no reason 

1366: not to adopt the same picture to explain the hot plasma in LINERs and other 

1367: LLAGNs.  High-resolution X-ray spectroscopy of the highly ionized gas around 

1368: the nucleus of M81 (Page et al. 2003; Young et al. 2007) and NGC~7213 

1369: (Starling et al. 2005) reveals that the plasma is collisionally ionized.  

1370: Starling et al. note that this may be a property unique to LINERs, as thermal 

1371: gas in luminous Seyferts is usually photoionized rather than collisionally 

1372: ionized (e.g., Kinkhabwala et al. 2002).

1373: 

1374: \subsection{Broad-line Region}

1375: 

1376: Luminous, unobscured AGNs distinguish themselves unambiguously by their

1377: characteristic broad permitted lines.  The detection of broad H\al\ emission

1378: in 

1379: 

1380: \clearpage

1381: \begin{figure}

1382: %%BoundingBox: 50 10 590 760

1383: \psfig{figure=fig6.ps,width=13.7cm,angle=270}

1384: \caption{LINERs with broad, double-peaked H\al\ emission discovered with 

1385: {\it HST}.  A model fit for the disk profile in NGC 4450 is shown for 

1386: illustration (green curve).  (Adapted from Ho et al. 2000, Shields et al. 

1387: 2000, and Barth et al. 2001a.)

1388: }

1389: \end{figure}

1390: 

1391: \noindent

1392: $\sim$25\% of LINERs (Ho et al. 1997e) thus constitutes strong evidence in

1393: favor of the AGN interpretation of these sources.  LINERs, like Seyferts,

1394: come in two flavors---some have a visible BLR (type~1), and others do not

1395: (type~2).  The broad component becomes progressively more difficult to detect

1396: in ground-based spectra for permitted lines weaker than H\al.  However, \hst\

1397: spectra of LINERs, when available, show broad higher-order Balmer lines as

1398: well as UV lines such as Ly$\alpha$, \civ\ \lamb1549, \mgii\ \lamb2800, and

1399: \feii\ multiplets (Barth \etal 1996; Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 1996).

1400: A subset of LINERs contain broad lines with {\it double-peaked}\ profiles

1401: (Figure~6), analogous to those seen in a minority of radio galaxies (Eracleous

1402: \& Halpern 1994), where they are often interpreted as a kinematic signature of

1403: a relativistic accretion disk (Chen \& Halpern 1989).  Most

1404: of the nearby cases have been discovered serendipitously, either as a result

1405: of the broad component being variable (NGC~1097: Storchi-Bergmann, Baldwin \&

1406: Wilson 1993; M81: Bower et al. 1996; NGC~3065: Eracleous \& Halpern 2001) or

1407: because of the increased sensitivity to weak, broad features afforded by

1408: small-aperture measurements made with {\it HST}\ (NGC~4450: Ho et al. 2000;

1409: NGC~4203: Shields et al. 2000; NGC~4579: Barth et al. 2001a).  Double-peaked

1410: broad-line AGNs may be more common than previously thought, especially among

1411: LLAGNs, perhaps as a consequence of their accretion disk structure (\S~8).

1412: 

1413: A pressing question, however, is: What fraction of the more numerous LINER~2s

1414: are AGNs?  By analogy with the Seyfert~2 class, do LINER~2s contain a hidden

1415: LINER~1 nucleus?  At first sight, it might seem that there is no

1416: {\it a priori}\ reason why the orientation-dependent unification model, which

1417: has enjoyed much success in the context of Seyfert galaxies, should not apply

1418: equally to LINERs.  If we suppose that the ratio of LINER~2s to LINER~1s is

1419: similar to the ratio of Seyfert~2s to Seyfert~1s---1.6:1 in the Palomar

1420: survey---we can reasonably surmise that the AGN fraction in LINERs may be as

1421: high as $\sim$60\%.  That at least some LINERs {\it do}\ indeed contain a

1422: hidden BLR was demonstrated by the deep Keck spectropolarimetric observations

1423: of Barth, Filippenko \& Moran (1999a, 1999b).  In a survey of 14 LLAGNs,

1424: mostly LINERs, these authors detected broad H\al\ emission in three objects

1425: ($\sim 20$\%) polarized at a level of 1\%$-$3\%.  Interestingly, all three

1426: objects are elliptical galaxies with double-sided radio jets.  NGC~315 and

1427: NGC~1052 technically qualify as type~1.9 LINERs (Ho et al. 1997e), whereas

1428: NGC~4261 is a LINER~2.  Although the sample is small, these observations 

1429: prove two important points: (1) the weak broad H\al\ features detected in

1430: direct light is not always scattered emission (Antonucci 1993), since

1431: polarized emission was not detected in several other LINER~1.9s included in 

1432: Barth, Filippenko \& Moran's survey; (2) an obscured nucleus does lurk in 

1433: some LINER~2s.

1434: 

1435: At the same time, other bright LINER~2s have resisted detection by 

1436: spectropolarimetry.  As in the case of Seyferts (Tran 2001), however, the 

1437: nondetection of polarized broad lines does not necessarily imply that there is 

1438: no hidden BLR.  Nevertheless, the BLR in some type~2 AGNs, especially LINERs 

1439: but also Seyferts, may be intrinsically absent, not obscured.  In the case of 

1440: some Seyferts, mostly weak sources, the evidence comes from low absorbing 

1441: X-ray column densities (Bassani et al. 1999; Pappa et al. 2001; Panessa \& 

1442: Bassani 2002; Gliozzi et al. 2004; Cappi et al. 2006; Gliozzi, Sambruna \& 

1443: Foschini 2007; Bianchi et al. 2008; but see Ghosh et al. 2007) as well as 

1444: optical variability (Hawkins 2004).  LINERs, as a class, very much conform to 

1445: this picture.  As discussed further below, LINERs of either type generally 

1446: show very little sign of absorbing or reprocessing material, and UV 

1447: variability is common.  A few exceptions exist (e.g., NGC~1052: Guainazzi et 

1448: al. 2000; NGC~4261: Sambruna et al. 2003, Zezas et al. 2005), but, 

1449: interestingly, these are precisely the very ones for which Barth, Filippenko, 

1450: \& Moran discovered hidden BLRs.  NGC~4258, also highly absorbed in the X-rays 

1451: (Fiore et al. 2001), shows polarized narrow lines rather than broad lines 

1452: (Barth et al. 1999).

1453: 

1454: An excellent of a LINER with a naked type~2 nucleus is the Sombrero galaxy.  

1455: Although clearly an AGN, it shows no trace of a broad-line component, neither 

1456: in direct light (Ho et al.  1997e), not even when very well isolated with a 

1457: small \hst\ aperture (Nicholson et al. 1998), nor in polarized light (Barth, 

1458: Filippenko \& Moran 1999b).  Its Balmer decrement indicates little reddening 

1459: to the NLR.  For all practical purposes, the continuum emission from the 

1460: nucleus looks unobscured. It is detected as a variable UV source (Maoz et al. 

1461: 1995, 2005) and in the soft and hard X-rays (Nicholson et al. 1998; Ho et al. 

1462: 2001).  The X-ray spectrum is only very mildly absorbed (Nicholson et al. 

1463: 1998; Pellegrini et al. 2002, 2003a; Terashima et al. 2002), with no signs of 

1464: Fe~K$\alpha$ emission expected from reprocessed material, consistent with the 

1465: modest mid-IR emission reported by Bendo et al. (2006).  In short, there is no 

1466: sign of anything being hidden or much doing the hiding.  So where is the BLR?  

1467: It is just not there.  

1468: 

1469: The lack of a BLR in very low-luminosity sources may be related to a physical 

1470: upper limit in the broad-line width (Laor 2003).  If LLAGNs obey the same 

1471: BLR-luminosity relation as in higher luminosity systems, their BLR velocity 

1472: depends on the BH mass and luminosity.  At a limiting bolometric luminosity of 

1473: $L_{\rm bol} \approx 10^{41.8} (M_{\rm BH}/10^8\,M_\odot)^2$ \lum, $\Delta 

1474: v\approx 25,000$ \kms, above which clouds may not survive due to excessive 

1475: shear or tidal forces.  Alternatively, if BLR clouds arise from condensations 

1476: in a radiation-driven, outflowing wind (Murray \& Chiang 1997), a viewpoint 

1477: now much espoused, then it is reasonable to expect that very low-luminosity 

1478: sources would be incapable of generating a wind, and hence of sustaining a 

1479: BLR.  For example, the clumpy torus model of Elitzur \& Shlosman (2006) 

1480: predicts that the BLR can no longer be sustained for $L_{\rm bol}$ \lax\ 

1481: $10^{42}$ \lum.  In the scenario of Nicastro (2000), the BLR originates from a 

1482: disk outflow formed at the transition radius between regions dominated by gas 

1483: and radiation pressure.  As this radius shrinks with decreasing 

1484: $L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm Edd}$, where $L_{\rm Edd} = 1.3\times 10^{38}\,(M_{\rm BH}/

1485: M_{\odot})$ \lum, the BLR is expected to disappear for 

1486: $L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm Edd}$ \lax\ $10^{-3}$.  The apparent correlation between 

1487: BLR line width and $L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm Edd}$ qualitatively supports this 

1488: picture (Xu \& Cao 2007).  Although the existing data are sparse, they 

1489: indicate that LINERs generally lack UV resonance absorption features 

1490: indicative of nuclear outflows (Shields et al. 2002).  The models by Elitzur 

1491: \& Shlosman and Nicastro are probably correct in spirit but not in detail, 

1492: because many of the Palomar LLAGNs plainly violate their proposed thresholds 

1493: (\S~5.10). 

1494: 

1495: Nonetheless, the statistics within the Palomar survey already provide tentative

1496: support to the thesis that the BLR vanishes at the lowest luminosities or 

1497: Eddington ratios. Which of the two is the controlling variable is 

1498: still difficult to say.  For both Seyferts and LINERs, type~1 sources are 

1499: almost a factor of 10 more luminous than type~2 sources in terms of their 

1500: median total H\al\ luminosity (Table~1).  (The statistical differences between 

1501: type~1 and type~2 sources cannot be ascribed to sensitivity differences in the 

1502: detectability of broad H\al\ emission.  Type~1 objects do have stronger line 

1503: emission compared to the type~2s, but on average their narrow H\al\ flux and 

1504: equivalent width are only $\sim 50$\% higher, and the two types overlap 

1505: significantly.  Moreover, as noted in \S 3.4, the broad H\al\ detection rates 

1506: turn out to be quite robust even in light of the much higher sensitivity 

1507: afforded by \hst.) The differences persist after normalizing by the Eddington 

1508: luminosities: adopting a bolometric correction of $L_{\rm bol} \approx 16 

1509: L_{\rm X}$, $L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm Edd}=1.1\times10^{-3}$ and $5.9\times10^{-6}$ 

1510: for Seyfert~1s and Seyfert~2s, respectively, whereas the corresponding values 

1511: for LINER~1s and LINER~2s are $1.0\times10^{-5}$ and $4.8\times10^{-6}$.  Two 

1512: caveats are in order.  First, while most of the type~1 sources have X-ray 

1513: data, only 60\% of the LINER~2s and 70\% of the Seyfert~2s do.  Second, the 

1514: X-ray luminosities, which pertain to the $2-10$ keV band, have been corrected 

1515: for intrinsic absorption whenever possible, but many sources are too faint for 

1516: spectral analysis.  The lower X-ray luminosities for the type~2 sources must 

1517: be partly due to absorption, but considering the generally low absorbing 

1518: columns, particularly among the LINERs (Georgantopoulous et al. 2002; 

1519: Terashima et al. 2002), it is unclear if absorption alone can erase the 

1520: statistical difference between the two types.  The tendency for Seyfert~2s to 

1521: have lower Eddington ratios than Seyfert~1s has previously been noted, for the 

1522: Palomar sample (Panessa et al. 2006) and others (Middleton, Done \& Schurch 

1523: 2008).

1524: 

1525: Several authors have raised the suspicion that LINER~2s may not be

1526: accretion-powered.  Large-aperture X-ray spectra of LINER~2s, like those of 

1527: LINER~1s, can be fit with a soft thermal component plus a power law with 

1528: $\alpha \approx -0.7$ to $-1.5$ (Georgantopoulos et al. 2002; Terashima et al. 

1529: 2002). But this alone does not provide enough leverage to distinguish AGNs from 

1530: starburst galaxies, many of which look qualitatively similar over the limited 

1531: energy range covered by these observations.  We cannot turn to the iron K\al\ 

1532: line or variability for guidance, because LLAGNs generally exhibit neither 

1533: (\S~5.3).  The hard X-ray emission in LINER~2s is partly extended (Terashima 

1534: et al. 2000a; Georgantopoulos et al.  2002), but the implications of this 

1535: finding are unclear.  Just because the X-ray emission surrounding the LLAGN is 

1536: morphologically complex and there is evidence for circumnuclear star formation 

1537: (e.g., NGC~4736; Pellegrini et al. 2002) does not necessarily imply that there 

1538: is a causal connection between the starburst and the LLAGN.  Roberts, Schurch 

1539: \& Warwick (2001) advocate a starburst connection from the observation that 

1540: LINER~2s have a mean flux ratio in the soft and hard X-ray band ($\sim 0.7$) 

1541: similar to that found in NGC~253.  This interpretation, however, conflicts 

1542: with the stellar population constraints discussed in \S~4.2.  It is also not 

1543: unique.  Luminous, AGN-dominated type~1 sources themselves exhibit a tight 

1544: correlation between soft and hard X-ray luminosity, with a ratio not 

1545: dissimilar from the quoted value (Miniutti et al. 2008).

1546: 

1547: An important clue comes from the fact that many LINER~2s have a lower

1548: $L_{\rm X}/L_{{\rm H}\alpha}$ ratio than LINER~1s (Ho et al. 2001). In 

1549: particular, the observed X-ray luminosity from the nucleus, when extrapolated 

1550: to the UV, does not have enough ionizing photons to power the H\al\ emission 

1551: (Terashima et al.  2000a).  This implies that (1) the X-rays are heavily 

1552: absorbed, (2) nonnuclear processes power much of the optical line emission, 

1553: or (3) the ionizing SED is different than assumed.  As discussed in \S~6.4, this

1554: energy budget discrepancy appears to be symptomatic of all LLAGNs in general,

1555: not just LINER~2s, and most likely results from a combination of the second and

1556: third effect.  There are some indications that the SEDs of LINER~2s indeed 

1557: differ systematically from those of LINER~1s (e.g., Maoz et al. 2005; Sturm et 

1558: al. 2006).  In light of the evidence given in \S\S~5.3, 5.6, I consider the

1559: first solution to be no longer tenable.  One can point to objects such as

1560: NGC~4261 (Zezas et al. 2005) as examples of LINER~2s with strong obscuration, 

1561: but such cases are rare.

1562: 

1563: From the point of view of BH demographics, the most pressing issue is what 

1564: fraction of the LINER~2s should be included in the AGN tally.  Some cases are 

1565: beyond dispute (M84, M87, Sombrero).  What about the rest?  The strongest 

1566: argument that the majority of LINER~2s are AGN-related comes from the 

1567: detection frequency of radio (\S~5.2) and X-ray (\S~5.3) cores, which is 

1568: roughly 60\% of that of LINER~1s.  On the other hand, the detection rate of 

1569: Seyfert~2s are similarly lower compared to Seyfert~1s, most likely reflecting 

1570: the overall reduction of nuclear emission across all bands in type~2 LLAGNs 

1571: as a consequence of their lower accretion rates.  In summary, the AGN fraction 

1572: among LINER~2s is at least 60\%, and possibly as high as 100\%.

1573: 

1574: \subsection{Torus}

1575: 

1576: In line with the absence of a BLR discussed above and using very much the 

1577: same set of evidence, a convincing case can be made that the torus also 

1578: disappears at very low luminosities.  In a large fraction of nearby LINERs, 

1579: the low absorbing column densities and weak or undetected Fe~K$\alpha$ emission 

1580: (\S~5.3) strongly indicate that we have a direct, unobstructed view of the 

1581: nucleus.  Ghosh et al. (2007) warn that absorbing columns can be underestimated 

1582: in the presence of extended soft emission, especially when working with 

1583: spectra of low signal-to-noise ratio.  While this bias no doubt enters at some 

1584: level, cases like the Sombrero (\S~5.3) cannot be so readily dismissed.  By 

1585: analogy with situation in luminous AGNs (e.g., Inoue, Terashima \& Ho 2007; 

1586: Nandra et al. 2007), type~1 LLAGNs, if they possess tori, should also show 

1587: strong, narrow fluorescent Fe~K$\alpha$ emission.  This expectation is not 

1588: borne out by observations.  NGC~3998, which has excellent X-ray data, offers 

1589: perhaps the most dramatic example.  Apart from showing no signs whatsoever for 

1590: intrinsic photoelectric absorption, it also possesses one of the tightest 

1591: upper limits to date on Fe~K$\alpha$ emission: EW $<$ 25 eV (Ptak et al. 

1592: 2004).  Our sight line to the nucleus is as clean as a whistle.  Satyapal, 

1593: Sambruna \& Dudik (2004) claim that many LINERs have obscured nuclei, but 

1594: this conclusion is based on IR-bright, dusty objects chosen from Carrillo et 

1595: al. (1999); as I have discussed in \S~3.2, I regard these objects not only as 

1596: biased, but also confusing with respect to their nuclear properties.

1597: 

1598: Palomar Seyferts, whose luminosities and Eddington ratios are about an order 

1599: of magnitude higher than those of LINERs (\S~5.10), show markedly larger 

1600: absorbing column densities and stronger Fe~K$\alpha$ lines.  In an 

1601: {\it XMM-Newton}\ study of a 

1602: distance-limited sample of 27 Palomar Seyferts, Cappi et al. (2006) detect 

1603: strong Fe~K$\alpha$ emission in over half of objects.  The distribution of 

1604: absorbing columns is nearly continuous, from $N_{\rm H} \approx 10^{20}$ to 

1605: $10^{25}~{\rm cm}^{-2}$, with 30\%$-$50\% of the type~2 sources being 

1606: Compton-thick (Panessa et al. 2006).  This seems consistent with the tendency 

1607: for Seyferts to be more gas-rich than LINERs, to the extent that this is 

1608: reflected in their higher NLR densities (Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 2003).

1609: 

1610: The trend of increasing absorption with increasing luminosity or Eddington 

1611: ratio observed in Palomar LLAGNs has an interesting parallel among radio 

1612: galaxies.  A substantial body of recent work indicates that the nuclei of FR~I 

1613: sources, most of which are, in fact, LINERs, are largely unobscured (e.g., 

1614: Chiaberge, Capetti \& Celotti 1999; Donato, Sambruna \& Gliozzi 2004; 

1615: Balmaverde \& Capetti 2006). In contrast, FR~II systems, especially those with 

1616: broad or high-excitation lines (analogs of Seyferts), show clear signs of 

1617: absorption and Fe~K$\alpha$ emission (Evans et al. 2006).

1618: 

1619: Even if we are fooled by the X-ray observations, substantial absorption 

1620: must result in strong thermal reemission of ``waste heat'' in the IR.  While 

1621: sources such as Cen~A provide a clear reminder that every rule has its 

1622: exception (Whysong \& Antonucci 2004), the existing data do suggest that, 

1623: as a class, FR~I radio galaxies tend to be weak mid-IR or far-IR sources 

1624: (Haas et al. 2004; M\"uller et al. 2004).  The same holds for more nearby 

1625: LINERs.  Their SEDs do show a pronounced mid-IR peak (\S~5.8), but as I will 

1626: argue later, it is due to emission from the accretion flow rather than from 

1627: dust reemission.

1628: 

1629: \subsection{Narrow-line Region Kinematics}

1630: 

1631: The kinematics of the NLR are complex.  At the smallest scales probed by \hst, 

1632: Verdoes~Kleijn, van~der~Marel \& Noel-Storr (2006) find that the velocity 

1633: widths of the ionized gas in the LINER nuclei of early-type galaxies can be 

1634: modeled as unresolved rotation of a thin disk in the gravitational potential 

1635: of the central BH.  The subset of objects with FR~I radio morphologies, on the 

1636: other hand, exhibit line broadening in excess of that expected from purely 

1637: gravitational motions; these authors surmise that the super-virial motions may 

1638: be related to an extra source of energy injection by the radio jet.  

1639: Walsh et al. (2008) use multiple-slit STIS observations to map the 

1640: kinematics of the inner $\sim 100$ pc of the NLR in a sample of 14 LLAGNs, 

1641: mostly LINERs.  Consistent with earlier findings (Ho et al. 2002; Atkinson et 

1642: al. 2005),  the velocity fields are generally quite disorganized, rarely 

1643: showing clean signatures of dynamically cold disks undergoing circular rotation.

1644: Nevertheless, two interesting trends can be discerned.  The emission line 

1645: widths tend to be largest within the sphere of influence of the BH, 

1646: progressively decreasing toward large radii to values that roughly match the 

1647: stellar velocity dispersion of the bulge.  The luminous members of the sample, 

1648: on the other hand, show more chaotic kinematics, as evidenced by large velocity 

1649: splittings and asymmetric line profiles, reminiscent of the pattern observed 

1650: by Rice et al. (2006) in their sample of Seyfert galaxies.  Walsh et al. 

1651: suggest that above a certain luminosity threshold---one that perhaps coincides 

1652: with the LINER/Seyfert division---AGN outflows and radio jets strongly perturb 

1653: the kinematics of the NLR.  

1654: 

1655: A large fraction ($\sim 90$\%) of the Palomar LLAGNs have robust measurements 

1656: of integrated \nii\ \lamb6583 line widths, which enable a crude assessment of 

1657: the dynamical state of the NLR and its relation to the bulge.  Consistent with 

1658: what has been established for more powerful systems (Nelson \& Whittle 1996; 

1659: Greene \& Ho 2005a), the kinematics of the ionized gas are dominated by random 

1660: motions that, to first order, trace the gravitational potential of the stars 

1661: in the bulge.  Among the objects with available central stellar velocity 

1662: dispersions, $\sigma_{\rm NLR}/\sigma_* \approx 0.7-0.8$ for the weakest 

1663: sources ($L_{{\rm H}\alpha} \approx 10^{38}$ \lum), systematically rising to 

1664: $\sigma_{\rm NLR}/\sigma_* \approx 1.2$ in the more luminous members 

1665: ($L_{{\rm H}\alpha} \approx 10^{41.5}$ \lum).  L.C. Ho (in preparation)

1666: speculates that the central AGN injects a source of dynamical heating of 

1667: nongravitational origin to the NLR, either in the form of radiation pressure 

1668: from the central continuum or mechanical interaction from radio jets.   Given 

1669: the empirical correlation between optical line luminosity and radio power 

1670: (e.g., Ho \& Peng 2001; Ulvestad \& Ho 2001a; Nagar, Falcke \& Wilson 2005), 

1671: and the near ubiquity of compact radio sources, it is {\it a priori}\ 

1672: difficult to determine which of these two sources acts as the primary driver. 

1673: The tendency for extended radio emission to be more prevalent in Seyferts 

1674: (\S~5.2) suggests that jets may be more important.

1675: 

1676: \subsection{Spectral Energy Distribution}

1677: 

1678: The broad-band SED provides one of the most fundamental probes of the physical 

1679: processes in AGNs.  Both thermal and nonthermal emission contribute to the 

1680: broad-band spectrum of luminous AGNs such as quasars and classical Seyfert 

1681: galaxies.  In objects whose intrinsic spectrum has not been modified severely 

1682: by relativistic beaming or absorption, the SED can be separated into several

1683: distinctive components (e.g., Elvis et al. 1994): radio synchrotron emission 

1684: from a jet, which may be strong (``radio-loud'') or weak (``radio-quiet''); an 

1685: IR excess, now generally considered to be predominantly thermal 

1686: reradiation by dust grains; a prominent optical to UV ``big blue bump,'' 

1687: usually interpreted to be pseudo-blackbody emission from an optically thick, 

1688: geometrically thin accretion disk (Shields 1978; Malkan \& Sargent 1982); a 

1689: soft X-ray excess, whose origin is still highly controversial (Done et al. 

1690: 2007; Miniutti et al. 2008); and an underlying power law, which is most 

1691: conspicuous at hard X-ray energies but is thought to extend down to IR 

1692: wavelengths, that can be attributed to Comptonization of softer seed photons.

1693: 

1694: Within this backdrop, there were already early indications that the SEDs of 

1695: LINERs may deviate from the canonical form.  Halpern \& Filippenko (1984) 

1696: succeeded in detecting the featureless optical continuum in NGC~7213, and 

1697: while these authors suggested that a big blue bump may be present in this 

1698: object, they also noted that it possesses an exceptionally high 

1699: X-ray--to--optical flux ratio, although perhaps one not inconsistent with the 

1700: extrapolation of the trend of increasing X-ray--to--optical flux ratio with 

1701: decreasing luminosity seen in luminous sources (Zamorani et al. 1981; Avni \& 

1702: Tananbaum 1982).  A more explicit suggestion that LINERs may possess a weak UV 

1703: continuum was made in the context of double-peaked broad-line AGNs such as 

1704: Arp~102B and Pictor~A, whose narrow-line spectra share many characteristics 

1705: with LINERs (Chen \& Halpern 1989; Halpern \& Eracleous 1994).  The {\it HST}\

1706: spectrum of Arp~102B, in fact, shows an exceptionally steep optical-UV 

1707: nonstellar continuum ($\alpha \approx -2.1$ to $-2.4$; Halpern et al. 1996).

1708: Halpern \& Eracleous (1994) further suggested that the SEDs are flat in the 

1709: far-IR.  In an important study of M81, Petre et al. (1993) proposed that the 

1710: relative weakness of the UV continuum compared to the X-rays is a consequence 

1711: of a change in the structure of the central accretion flow, from a standard 

1712: thin disk to an ion-supported torus (see \S~8.3).  Parameterizing the 

1713: two-point spectral index between 2500 \AA\ and 2 keV by \alphaox\ $\equiv\, 

1714: [\log L_\nu({\rm 2500~\AA}) - \log L_\nu({\rm 2~keV})]/

1715: [\log \nu({\rm 2500~\AA}) - \log \nu({\rm 2~keV})]$, M81 and possibly other 

1716: LINERs (Mushotzky 1993) have \alphaox\ \gax\ $-1$, to be compared with 

1717: \alphaox\ $\approx -1.4$ for quasars and \alphaox\ $\approx -1.2$ for Seyferts 

1718: (Mushotzky \& Wandel 1989).

1719: 

1720: The full scope of the spectral uniqueness of LLAGNs only became evident once 

1721: the modern, albeit still fragmentary, multiwavelength data could be assembled. 

1722: The initial studies concentrated on individual objects, emphasizing the 

1723: weakness of the UV bump (M81: Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 1996; Sombrero: 

1724: Nicholson et al. 1998) and the overall consistency of the SED with spectral 

1725: models generated from advection-dominated accretion flows (ADAFs; see Narayan 

1726: 2002 and Yuan 2007 for reviews) as unique attributes of systems with low 

1727: Eddington ratios (NGC~4258: Lasota et al. 1996, Chary et al. 2000; M87: 

1728: Reynolds et al. 1996; M60: Di~Matteo \& Fabian 1997).  Ho (1999b) 

1729: systematically investigated the SEDs of a small sample of seven LLAGNs with 

1730: available BH mass estimates and reliable small-aperture fluxes from radio to 

1731: X-ray wavelengths.  This was followed by a study of another 

1732: five similar objects, which have the additional distinction of having

1733: double-peaked broad emission lines (Ho et al. 2000; Ho 2002b).  Figure~7 gives

1734: the latest update from a comprehensive analysis of the SEDs of 150 nearby

1735: type~1 AGNs spanning 4 dex in BH mass ($M_{\rm BH}\approx 10^5-10^9$ \solmass)

1736: and 6.5 dex in Eddington ratio ($L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm Edd} \approx 10^{-6} -

1737: 10^{0.5}$).  Let us focus on two regimes: $L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm Edd} = 0.1$ to

1738: 1, typical of classical, luminous AGNs, and $L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm Edd} <

1739: 10^{-3.0}$, which characterizes most nearby LLAGNs (\S~5.10).  I defer the

1740: discussion of the physical implications until \S~8, but for now list the most

1741: notable features concerning the LLAGN SED, some of which are also apparent in 

1742: the composite LINER SED assembled by Eracleous, Hwang \& Flohic (2008a).  (1) 

1743: The big blue bump is conspicuously absent. (2) Instead, a broad excess is 

1744: shifted to the mid-IR, forming a ``big red bump''; this component is probably 

1745: related to the mid-IR excess previously noted by Lawrence et al. (1985), 

1746: Willner et al. (1985), and Chen \& Halpern (1989), and more recently from 

1747: {\it Spitzer}\ observations (e.g., Willner et al. 2004; Bendo et al. 2006; Gu 

1748: et al. 2007).  (3) As a consequence of this shift, the optical-UV slope is 

1749: exceptionally steep, generally in the range $\alpha_{\rm ou} \approx -1$ to 

1750: $-2.5$, to be compared with $\alpha_{\rm ou} \approx -0.5$ to $-0.7$ for 

1751: luminous AGNs 

1752: (Vanden~Berk et al. 2001; Shang et al. 2005); the X-ray--to--optical ratio is 

1753: large, resulting in \alphaox\ \gax\ $-1$. (4) There is no evidence for a soft 

1754: X-ray excess. (5) Lastly, the overall SED can be considered radio-loud, 

1755: defined here by the convention that the radio-to-optical luminosity ratio 

1756: exceeds a value 

1757: 

1758: \clearpage

1759: \begin{figure}

1760: %%BoundingBox: 60 5 550 760

1761: \hskip -0.2cm

1762: \psfig{figure=fig7.ps,width=14cm,angle=270}

1763: \caption{Composite SEDs for radio-quiet AGNs binned by Eddington

1764: ratio.  The SEDs are normalized at 1 \micron. (Adapted from L.C. Ho, in

1765: preparation.)

1766: }

1767: \end{figure}

1768: 

1769: \noindent

1770: of $R_o \equiv\,L_{\nu}({\rm 5~GHz})/L_{\nu}(B) = 10$.  

1771: Radio-loudness, in fact, seems to be a property common to essentially 

1772: {\it all}\ nearby weakly active nuclei (Ho 1999b, 2002a; Ho et al. 2000) and a 

1773: substantial fraction of Seyfert nuclei (Ho \& Peng 2001).  Defining 

1774: radio-loudness based on the relative strength of the radio and X-ray emission, 

1775: $R_{\rm X} \equiv\,\nu L_{\nu}({\rm 5~GHz})/ L_{\rm X}$, Terashima \& Wilson 

1776: (2003b) also find that LINERs tend to be radio-loud, here taken to be 

1777: $R_{\rm X} > 10^{-4.5}$.  Moreover, the degree of radio-loudness scales 

1778: inversely with $L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm Edd}$ (Ho 2002a; Terashima \& Wilson 2003b; 

1779: Wang, Luo \& Ho 2004; Greene, Ho \& Ulvestad 2006; Panessa et al. 2007; 

1780: Sikora, Stawarz \& Lasota 2007; L.C. Ho, in preparation; see Figure~10{\it b}).

1781: 

1782: In a parallel development, studies of the low-luminosity, often LINER-like 

1783: nuclei of FR~I radio galaxies also support the notion that they lack a UV 

1784: bump.  M84 (Bower et al. 2000) and M87 (Sabra et al. 2003) are two familiar 

1785: examples, but it has been well documented that FR~I nuclei tend to exhibit 

1786: flat \alphaox\ (Donato, Sambruna \& Gliozzi 2004; Balmaverde, Capetti \& 

1787: Grandi 2006; Gliozzi et al. 2008) and steep slopes in the optical (Chiaberge, 

1788: Capetti \& Celotti 1999; Verdoes~Kleijn et al. 2002) and optical-UV (Chiaberge 

1789: et al. 2002).

1790: 

1791: Finally, I note that the UV spectral slope can be indirectly constrained

1792: from considering the strength of the \heii\ \lamb4686 line.  While this 

1793: line is clearly detected in Pictor~A (Carswell et al. 1984; Filippenko 1985), 

1794: its weakness in NGC~1052 prompted P\'equignot (1984) to deduce that the 

1795: ionizing spectrum must show a sharp cutoff above the He$^+$ ionization limit 

1796: (54.4 eV).  In this respect, NGC~1052 is quite representative of LINERs in 

1797: general.  \heii\ \lamb4686 was not detected convincingly in a {\it single}\ 

1798: case among a sample of 159 LINERs in the entire Palomar survey (Ho, 

1799: Filippenko \& Sargent 1997a).  Starlight contamination surely contributes 

1800: partly to this, but the line has also eluded detection in {\it HST}\ spectra 

1801: (e.g., Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 1996; Nicholson et al. 1998; Barth et al. 

1802: 2001b; Sabra et al. 2003; Sarzi et al. 2005; Shields et al. 2007), which 

1803: indicates that it is truly intrinsically very weak.  To a first 

1804: approximation, the ratio of \heii\ \lamb4686 to H\bet\ reflects the relative 

1805: intensity of the ionizing continuum between 1 and 4 Ryd.  For an ionizing 

1806: spectrum $f_\nu \propto \nu^{\alpha}$, case~B recombination predicts 

1807: \heii\ \lamb4686/H\bet\ = $1.99 \times 4^\alpha$ (Penston \& Fosbury 1978).  

1808: The current observational limits of \heii\ \lamb4686/H\bet\ \lax\ 0.1 thus 

1809: imply $\alpha$ \lax\ $-2$, qualitatively consistent with the evidence from the 

1810: SED studies.  

1811: 

1812: Maoz (2007) has offered an alternative viewpoint to the one presented above. 

1813: Using a sample of 13 LINERs with variable UV nuclei, he argues that their 

1814: SEDs do not differ appreciably from those of more luminous AGNs, and hence that

1815: LINERs inherently have very similar accretion disks compared to powerful AGNs.  

1816: Maoz does not disagree that LINERs have large X-ray--to-UV flux ratios or that 

1817: they tend to be radio-loud; his data show both trends.  Rather, he contends 

1818: that because LINERs lie on the low-luminosity extrapolation of the well-known 

1819: relation between \alphaox\ and luminosity (Zamorani et al. 1981; Avni \& 

1820: Tananbaum 1982; Strateva et al.  2005) they do not form a distinct population.

1821: And while LINERs do have large values of $R_o$, they nonetheless occupy the 

1822: ``radio-quiet'' branch of the $R_o$ versus $L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm Edd}$ plane 

1823: (Sikora, Stawarz \& Lasota  2007).  In my estimation, the key point is not, 

1824: and has never been, whether LINERs constitute a disjoint class of AGNs, but 

1825: whether they fit into a physically plausible framework in which their 

1826: distinctive SEDs, among other properties, find a natural, coherent 

1827: explanation.  Section 8 attempts to offer such a framework.

1828: 

1829: It should be noted that Maoz's results strongly depend on his decision to 

1830: exclude all optical and near-IR data from the SEDs, on the grounds that they 

1831: may be confused by starlight.  I think this step is too draconian, as it 

1832: throws away valuable information.  While stellar contamination is certainly a

1833: concern, one can take necessary precautions to try to isolate the nuclear 

1834: emission as much as possible, either through high-resolution imaging (e.g., Ho 

1835: \& Peng 2001; Ravindranath et al. 2001; Peng et al. 2002) or spectral 

1836: decomposition.  In well-studied sources, there is little doubt that the 

1837: optical continuum is truly both featureless and nonstellar (e.g., Halpern \& 

1838: Filippenko 1984; Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 1996; Ho et al. 2000; Bower et al. 

1839: 2000; Sabra et al. 2003).  Given what we know about the nuclear stellar 

1840: population, we cannot assign the featureless continuum to young stars.  In a 

1841: few cases, the nonstellar nature of the nucleus can even be established 

1842: through variability in the optical (Bower et al. 2000; Sabra et al. 2003; 

1843: O'Connell et al. 2005) and mid-IR (Rieke, Lebofsky \& Kemp 1982; Grossan et 

1844: al. 2001; Willner et al. 2004).

1845: 

1846: While the SEDs of LINERs differ from those of traditional AGNs, it is

1847: important to recognize that they are decidedly {\it nonstellar}\ and approximate

1848: the form predicted for radiatively inefficient accretion flows (RIAFs)

1849: onto BHs, often coupled to a jet (Quataert et al. 1999; Yuan, Markoff \& 

1850: Falcke 2002; Yuan et al. 2002; Fabbiano et al. 2003; Pellegrini et al. 2003b; 

1851: Ptak et al. 2004; Nemmen et al. 2006; Wu, Yuan \& Cao 2007).  They bear 

1852: little resemblance to SEDs characteristic of normal stellar systems.  

1853: Inactive galaxies or starburst systems not strongly affected by dust 

1854: extinction emit the bulk of their radiation in the optical--UV and in the 

1855: thermal IR regions, with only an energetically miniscule contribution from 

1856: X-rays.

1857: 

1858: \clearpage

1859: \begin{figure}

1860: %%BoundingBox: 20 10 600 760

1861: \psfig{figure=fig8.ps,width=13.5cm,angle=270}

1862: \caption{The H\al\ nuclear luminosity function of nearby AGNs derived from the

1863: Palomar survey.  The top axis gives an approximate conversion to absolute

1864: magnitudes in the $B$ band, using the H\al-continuum correlation of Greene \&

1865: Ho (2005b).  The unfilled circles include only type~1 sources, while the

1866: filled circles represent both type~2 and type~1 sources.  The luminosities

1867: have been corrected for extinction, and in the case of type~1 nuclei, they

1868: include both the narrow and broad components of the line.  For

1869: comparison, I show the  $z < 0.35$ luminosity function for SDSS Seyfert

1870: galaxies (types 1 and 2; dashed line; Hao et al. 2005b).  (Adapted from

1871: L.C. Ho, A.V. Filippenko \& W.L.W.  Sargent, in preparation.)

1872: }

1873: \end{figure}

1874: 

1875: \subsection{Luminosity Function}

1876: 

1877: Many astrophysical applications of AGN demographics benefit from knowing

1878: the AGN luminosity function, $\Phi(L,z)$.  Whereas $\Phi(L,z)$ has been 

1879: reasonably well charted at high $L$ and high $z$ using quasars, it is very 

1880: poorly known at low $L$ and low $z$.  Indeed, until very recently there has 

1881: been no reliable determination of $\Phi(L,0)$.  The difficulty in determining 

1882: $\Phi(L,0)$ can be ascribed to a number of factors, as discussed in Huchra \& 

1883: Burg (1992).  First and foremost is the challenge of securing a reliable, 

1884: spectroscopically selected sample.  Since nearby AGNs are expected to be faint 

1885: relative to their host galaxies, most of the traditional techniques used to 

1886: identify quasars cannot be applied without introducing large biases.  The 

1887: faintness of nearby AGNs presents another obstacle, namely how to disentangle 

1888: the nuclear emission---the only component relevant to the AGN---from the 

1889: usually much brighter contribution from the host galaxy.  Finally, most 

1890: optical luminosity functions of bright, more distant AGNs are specified in 

1891: terms of the nonstellar optical continuum (usually the $B$ band), whereas 

1892: spectroscopic surveys of nearby galaxies generally only reliably measure 

1893: optical line emission (e.g., H\al) because the featureless nuclear continuum 

1894: is often impossible to detect in ground-based, seeing-limited apertures.

1895: 

1896: A different strategy can be explored by taking advantage of the fact that

1897: H\al\ luminosities are now available for nearly all of the AGNs in the Palomar

1898: survey.  Figure~8 shows the H\al\ luminosity function for the Palomar sources, 

1899: computed using the $V/V_{\rm max}$ method (L.C. Ho, A.V. Filippenko \& W.L.W. 

1900: Sargent, in preparation).  Two versions are shown, each representing an 

1901: extreme view of what kind of sources should be regarded as {\it bona fide}\ 

1902: AGNs.  The open symbols include only type~1 nuclei, whose AGN status is 

1903: incontrovertible.  This may be regarded as the most conservative assumption 

1904: and a lower bound, since we know that genuine narrow-line AGNs do exist.  The 

1905: filled symbols lump together all sources classified as LINERs, transition 

1906: objects, and Seyferts, both type~1 and type~2.  This represents the most 

1907: optimistic view and an upper bound, if some type~2 sources are in fact AGN 

1908: impostors, although, as I argue in \S~6.5, this is likely to 

1909: be a small effect.  The true space density of local AGNs

1910: lies between these two possibilities.  In either case, the differential

1911: luminosity function can be approximated by a single power law from

1912: $L_{{\rm H}\alpha} \approx 10^{38}$ to $3\times 10^{41}$ \lum, roughly of the

1913: form $\Phi \propto L^{-1.2\pm0.2}$.  The slope seems to flatten below

1914: $L_{{\rm H}\alpha} \approx 10^{38}$ \lum, but the luminosity function is

1915: highly uncertain at the faint end because of density fluctuations in our local

1916: volume.  Nevertheless, it is remarkable that the Palomar luminosity function

1917: formally begins at $L_{{\rm H}\alpha} \approx 6 \times 10^{36}$ \lum,

1918: roughly the luminosity of the Orion nebula (Kennicutt 1984).  In units more 

1919: familiar to the AGN community, this corresponds to an absolute $B$-band 

1920: magnitude of roughly $-8$ (using the H\al-optical continuum conversion of 

1921: Greene \& Ho 2005b), no brighter than a single supergiant star. 

1922: 

1923: For comparison, I have overlaid the H\al\ luminosity function of $z$ \lax\ 

1924: 0.35 Seyfert galaxies derived from the SDSS by Hao et al. (2005b).  The 

1925: Palomar survey reaches $\sim 2$ orders of magnitude fainter in H\al\ 

1926: luminosity than SDSS, but the latter extends a factor of 10 higher at the 

1927: bright end.  Over the region of overlap, the two surveys show reasonably good 

1928: agreement, especially considering the small number statistics of the Palomar 

1929: survey and the fact that Hao et al.'s sample only includes Seyferts.

1930: 

1931: \subsection{Bolometric Luminosities and Eddington Ratios}

1932: 

1933: \begin{figure}

1934: %%BoundingBox: 20 150 550 670

1935: \vbox{\hbox{

1936: \psfig{figure=fig9a.ps,width=6.7cm,angle=0}

1937: \hskip -0.2 cm

1938: \psfig{figure=fig9b.ps,width=6.7cm,angle=0}

1939: }}

1940: \caption{Distribution of ({\it a}) bolometric luminosity, $L_{\rm bol}$, and

1941: ({\it b}) ratio of bolometric luminosity to the Eddington luminosity,

1942: $L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm Edd}$, for all objects, Seyferts (S), LINERs (L),

1943: transition objects (T), and absorption-line nuclei (A).  $L_{\rm bol}$ is

1944: based on the X-ray ($2-10$ keV) luminosity.  The hatched and open histograms

1945: denote detections and upper limits, respectively; type~1 objects are plotted

1946: in blue, type~2 objects in red.  (Adapted from L.C. Ho, in preparation.)

1947: }

1948: \end{figure}

1949: 

1950: 

1951: To gain further insight into the physical nature of LLAGNs, it is more

1952: instructive to examine their bolometric luminosities rather than their

1953: luminosities in a specific band or emission line.  Because AGNs emit a very

1954: broad spectrum, their bolometric luminosities ideally should be measured

1955: directly from their full SEDs.  In practice, however, complete SEDs are not 

1956: readily available for most AGNs, and one commonly estimates $L_{\rm bol}$

1957: by applying bolometric corrections derived from a set of well-observed 

1958: calibrators.  As discussed in \S~5.8, the SEDs of LLAGNs differ quite markedly 

1959: from those of conventionally studied AGNs.  Nonetheless, they do exhibit a 

1960: characteristic shape, which enables bolometric corrections to be calculated.  

1961: The usual practice of choosing the optical $B$ band as the reference point 

1962: should be abandoned for LLAGNs, not only because reliable optical continuum 

1963: measurements are scarce but also because the optical/UV region of the SED 

1964: shows the maximal variance with respect to accretion rate (\S~5.8) and depends 

1965: sensitively on extinction.  What is available, by selection, is nuclear 

1966: emission-line fluxes, and upper limits thereon.  Although the H\al\ luminosity 

1967: comprises only a small percentage of the total power, its fractional 

1968: contribution to $L_{\rm bol}$ turns out to be fairly well defined: from the 

1969: SED study of L.C. Ho (in preparation), $L_{\rm bol} \approx 220 

1970: L_{{\rm H}\alpha}$, with an rms scatter of $\sim 0.4$ dex, consistent with the 

1971: calibration given in Greene \& Ho (2005b, 2007a).  Because of the wide range 

1972: of ionization levels among LLAGNs, a bolometric correction based on H\al\ 

1973: should be more stable than one tied to \oiii\ \lamb 5007 (e.g., Heckman et al. 

1974: 2005).  Nevertheless, in light of the nonnuclear component of the nebular 

1975: flux in LLAGNs (\S~6.4), the luminosity of the narrow H\al\ line will tend to 

1976: overestimate $L_{\rm bol}$.  I recommend that, whenever possible, $L_{\rm bol}$

1977: should be based on the hard X-ray ($2-10$ keV) luminosity, bearing in mind the 

1978: added complication that the bolometric correction in this band is 

1979: luminosity-dependent.  Making use again of the database from L.C. Ho (in 

1980: preparation), I estimate $L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm X} \approx 83$, 28, and 16 for 

1981: quasars, luminous Seyferts, and LLAGNs, respectively.

1982: 

1983: Figure~9 shows the distributions of $L_{\rm bol}$ and their values normalized 

1984: with respect to the Eddington luminosity for Palomar galaxies with 

1985: measurements of $L_{\rm X}$ and central stellar velocity dispersion. The 

1986: $M_{\rm BH} - \sigma$ relation of Tremaine et al. (2002) was used to obtain

1987: \ledd.  Although there is substantial overlap, the four spectral classes 

1988: clearly delineate a luminosity sequence, with $L_{\rm bol}$ decreasing 

1989: systematically as S$\rightarrow$L$\rightarrow$T$\rightarrow$A.  The 

1990: differences become even more pronounced in terms of $L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm Edd}$, 

1991: with Seyferts having a median value (1.3\e{-4}) 20 times higher than in LINERs 

1992: (5.9\e{-6}), which in turn are higher than transition objects by a factor of 

1993: $\sim 5$.  Among Seyferts and LINERs, type~1 sources are systematically more

1994: luminous than type~2s.  Notably, the vast majority of nearby nuclei have 

1995: highly sub-Eddington luminosities.  The total distribution of Eddington ratios 

1996: is characterized by a prominent peak at $L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm Edd} \approx 

1997: 10^{-5}$ dominated by Seyfert~2s, LINERs, and transition objects, and a 

1998: precipitous drop toward larger Eddington ratios.  Contrary to previous claims 

1999: (Wu \& Cao 2005; Hopkins \& Hernquist 2006) based on the smaller sample of Ho 

2000: (2002a), the distribution of Eddington ratios shows no bimodality.  The 

2001: systematic difference in Eddington ratios between LINERs and Seyferts has been 

2002: noticed before in the Palomar survey (Ho 2002b, 2003, 2005) and in SDSS 

2003: (Kewley et al. 2006), but this is the first time that the more subtle 

2004: differences among the different subclasses can be discerned.

2005: 

2006: \section{EXCITATION MECHANISMS}

2007: 

2008: \subsection{Nonstellar Photoionization}

2009: 

2010: The origin and excitation of the ionized gas in the central regions of nearby 

2011: galaxies has been a longstanding problem (Minkowski \& Osterbrock 1959; 

2012: Osterbrock 1960).  Ever since the early suggestion of Ferland \& Netzer (1983) 

2013: and Halpern \& Steiner (1983), photoionization by a central AGN has surfaced 

2014: as the leading candidate for the excitation mechanism of LINERs.  Given the 

2015: success with which more luminous sources have been explained within this 

2016: framework, and the growing realization that BHs are commonplace, extending 

2017: photoionization models to LINERs is both natural and appealing.  The requisite 

2018: relative strengths of the low-ionization lines in LINERs can be achieved by 

2019: lowering the ionization parameter, commonly defined as $U = Q_{\rm ion}/4\pi 

2020: r^2 c n$, where $Q_{\rm ion}$ is the number of photons s$^{-1}$ capable of 

2021: ionizing hydrogen, $r$ is the distance of the inner face of the cloud from the 

2022: central continuum, $n$ the hydrogen density, and $c$ the speed of light.  While 

2023: Seyfert line ratios can be matched with $\log U \approx -2\pm0.5$ (e.g., 

2024: Ferland \& Netzer 1983; Stasi\'nska 1984; Ho, Shields \& Filippenko 1993), 

2025: LINERs require $\log U \approx -3.5\pm0.5$ (Ferland \& Netzer 1983; Halpern \& 

2026: Steiner 1983; P\'equignot 1984; Binette 1985; Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 1993; 

2027: Groves, Dopita \& Sutherland 2004).  

2028: 

2029: An issue that has not been properly addressed is which of the primary variables 

2030: --- $Q_{\rm ion}$, $r$, or $n$ --- conspire to reduce $U$ in LINERs to the 

2031: degree required by the models.  The answer seems to be all three. The dominant 

2032: factor comes from the luminosity, as LINERs emit an order of magnitude less 

2033: ionizing luminosity than do Seyferts: $\langle L_{{\rm H}\alpha} \rangle = 3 

2034: \times 10^{39}$ \lum\ versus $29 \times 10^{39}$ \lum\ (Ho, Filippenko \& 

2035: Sargent 2003).  Given the gas-poor environments of LINERs (see \S~5.6), we can 

2036: now say with some certainty that the reduction in ionizing luminosity is {\it 

2037: intrinsic}\ and not due to obscuration (as proposed by Halpern \& Steiner 

2038: 1983).  But this is unlikely to be the end of the story.  The electron density 

2039: of LINERs ($\langle n_e \rangle \approx 280$ \cc), at least as probed by the 

2040: relatively low-density tracer \sii\ \lamb\lamb6716, 6731, is $\sim 50$\% lower 

2041: than in Seyferts ($\langle n_e \rangle \approx 470$ \cc).  Very little is 

2042: known about the detailed morphology and spatial distribution of the NLR in 

2043: LINERs, or for that matter in low-luminosity Seyferts.  Whereas the NLR in 

2044: luminous Seyferts span $\sim 50-1000$ pc in radius, scaling roughly as 

2045: $L^{0.5}$ (Bennert et al. 2006), LINERs seem to be significantly more compact.  

2046: This is perhaps not surprising, if the NLR size-luminosity relation extends to 

2047: LLAGNs.  At typical ground-based resolution, narrow-band imaging studies find 

2048: that the ionized gas in LINERs tends to be quite centrally peaked, with typical 

2049: dimensions of $r$ \lax\ $50-100$ pc (Keel 1983a; Pogge 1989).  In the 

2050: instances where narrow-band images or slit spatial profiles are available from 

2051: \hst\ (Bower et al. 2000; Pogge et al. 2000; Cappellari et al. 2001; 

2052: Verdoes~Kleijn et al.  2002; Gonz\'alez Delgado et al. 2004; Walsh et al. 2008),

2053: the line-emitting gas appears even more concentrated still, 

2054: with scales \lax\ tens pc, although some of it clearly extends to scales of at 

2055: least $\sim 200$ pc (Shields et al. 2007).  The covering factor is high, on 

2056: average $\sim 0.3$ for the LINER nuclei of the radio galaxies studied by 

2057: Capetti, Verdoes~Kleijn \& Chiaberge (2005).  With very few exceptions (e.g., 

2058: NGC~1052; Pogge et al. 2000), extended, elongated structures analogous to 

2059: classical ionization cones in Seyferts do not exist in LINERs.  Interestingly, 

2060: both of these trends (smaller $n_e$ and $r$) would naively drive $U$ in the 

2061: opposite direction needed to explain LINERs.  On the other hand, we know that 

2062: the NLRs of AGNs in general, and perhaps of LINERs especially, contain a wide 

2063: range of densities not probed by \sii\ and that this material is highly 

2064: stratified radially (Wilson 1979; Pelat, Alloin \& Fosbury 1981; Carswell et 

2065: al. 1984; Filippenko \& Halpern 1984; P\'equignot 1984; Binette 1985; 

2066: Filippenko 1985; Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 1993, 1996; Barth et al.  2001b; 

2067: Laor 2003; Shields et al.  2007; Walsh et al. 2008).  The 

2068: effective ionization parameter, therefore, depends on the detailed spatial 

2069: distribution of the gas.  

2070: 

2071: Whereas basic single-zone photoionization models can match many of the strong 

2072: lines, it is well-known that more complex, multi-component models, especially

2073: ones that incorporate a range of densities, are required to achieve a 

2074: satisfactory fit (Binette 1985; Gabel et al. 2000; Sabra et al. 2003).  A 

2075: notorious deficiency of single-zone models has been their inability to 

2076: reproduce the high values of the temperature-sensitive ratio 

2077: \oiii\ \lamb4363/\oiii\ \lamb5007.  However, because of the different critical 

2078: densities of these two transitions, they need not originate cospatially, making

2079: \oiii\ \lamb4363/\oiii\ \lamb5007 no longer a valid thermometer.  The 

2080: discovery that these two lines indeed have different line widths removed one 

2081: of the principal objections to photoionization models (Filippenko \& Halpern 

2082: 1984; Filippenko 1985).  

2083: 

2084: The observed weakness of \heii\ \lamb4686/H\bet\ (see also \S~5.8) has also 

2085: been a thorny problem.  P\'equignot (1984) achieved a consistent fit to the 

2086: spectrum of NGC~1052 by invoking a modified ionizing spectrum consisting of an 

2087: 80,000 K blackbody coupled with an X-ray tail extending to higher energies.  

2088: The main difficulty with this proposal is that the observed SEDs of LINERs do 

2089: not have a blackbody component peaked in the UV, nor is P\'equignot's 

2090: specific model unique because Gabel et al. (2000) achieved an equally good---if 

2091: not better---fit using a simple power-law continuum with $\alpha = -1.2$.  

2092: Since we now have ample evidence that the SEDs of LINERs are {\it not}\ the 

2093: same as those of more luminous AGNs, future photoionization calculations 

2094: should adopt empirically motivated input spectra.  Important steps in these 

2095: directions have been taken (e.g., Nicholson et al. 1998; Gabel et al. 2000; 

2096: Nagao et al. 2002; Lewis, Eracleous \& Sambruna 2003), but much more can be 

2097: done.  One fruitful avenue to pursue is to incorporate the {\it full}\ observed

2098: SED, which is noteworthy not only because of its hard ionizing spectrum but, 

2099: due to its radio-loudness, also because it presents a copious supply of 

2100: relativistic, synchrotron-emitting particles, which can dramatically alter the 

2101: excitation of the NLR (Aldrovandi \& P\'equignot 1973; Ferland \& Mushotzky 

2102: 1984; Gruenwald \& Viegas-Aldrovandi 1987). ``Cosmic ray heating'' boosts the 

2103: strengths of low-ionization lines such as \nii\ \lamb\lamb6548, 6583 and 

2104: \sii\ \lamb\lamb6716, 6731 (Viegas-Aldrovandi \& Gruenwald 1990), which are 

2105: normally underpredicted (e.g., Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 1993; Lewis, 

2106: Eracleous \& Sambruna 2003), and thereby help to constrain alternative 

2107: solutions that invoke selective abundance enhancement of N and S 

2108: (Storchi-Bergmann \& Pastoriza 1990) or dust grain depletion (Gabel et al. 

2109: 2000).  

2110: 

2111: \subsection{Contribution from Fast Shocks}

2112: 

2113: Despite the natural appeal of AGN photoionization, alternative excitation

2114: mechanisms for LINERs have been advanced.  Collisional ionization by shocks

2115: has been a popular contender from the outset (Burbidge, Gould \& Pottasch 1963;

2116: Osterbrock 1971; Osterbrock \& Dufour 1973; Koski \& Osterbrock 1976; 

2117: Danziger, Fosbury \& Penston 1977; Fosbury et al. 1978; Ford \& Butcher 1979; 

2118: Heckman 1980b; Baldwin, Phillips \& Terlevich 1981).  Shocks continue to be 

2119: invoked (Bonatto, Bica \& Alloin 1989; Dopita \& Sutherland 1995; 

2120: Alonso-Herrero et al. 2000; Sugai \& Malkan 2000) even after concerns over the 

2121: \oiii\ \lamb 4363 temperature problem had been dispelled as a result of either

2122: revised measurements (Keel \& Miller 1983; Rose \& Tripicco 1984) or 

2123: complications arising from density stratification (Filippenko \& Halpern 1984).

2124: Dopita \& Sutherland (1995) showed that the diffuse radiation field 

2125: generated by fast ($\upsilon\, \approx 150-500$ \kms) shocks can reproduce the 

2126: optical narrow emission lines seen in both LINERs and Seyferts.  In their 

2127: models, LINER-like spectra are realized under conditions in which the 

2128: precursor \hii\ region of the shock is absent, as might be the case in 

2129: gas-poor environments.  The postshock cooling zone attains a much higher 

2130: equilibrium electron temperature than a photoionized plasma; consequently, a 

2131: robust prediction of shock models is that shocked gas should produce a 

2132: higher excitation spectrum, most readily discernible in the UV, than 

2133: photoionized gas.  In all the cases studied so far, however, the UV spectra 

2134: are inconsistent with the fast-shock scenario because the observed intensities 

2135: of high-excitation lines such as \civ\ \lamb1549 and \heii\ \lamb1640 are much 

2136: weaker than predicted (Barth \etal 1996, 1997; Maoz \etal 1998; Nicholson 

2137: \etal 1998; Gabel et al. 2000).  Dopita \etal (1997) used the spectrum of the 

2138: circumnuclear {\it disk} of M87 to advance the view that LINERs are 

2139: shock-excited.  This argument is misleading because their analysis deliberately 

2140: avoids the nucleus.  Sabra et al. (2003) demonstrate that the UV--optical 

2141: spectrum of the {\it nucleus}\ of M87 is best explained by a multi-component 

2142: photoionization model.

2143: 

2144: Analysis of the emission-line profiles of the Palomar nuclei further casts 

2145: doubt on the viability of the fast-shock scenario (Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent 

2146: 2003).  The velocity dispersions of the nuclear gas generally fall short of 

2147: the values required for fast-shock excitation to be important.  Furthermore, 

2148: the close similarity between the velocity field of LINERs and Seyferts as 

2149: deduced from their line profiles contradicts the basic premise that shocks 

2150: are primarily responsible for the spectral differences between the two classes 

2151: of objects.  For a given bulge potential, LINERs, if anything, have {\it 

2152: smaller}, not larger, gas velocity dispersions than Seyferts (L.C. Ho, in 

2153: preparation).  And as discussed in \S~5.2, the incidence of extended radio 

2154: jets, the most likely source of kinetic energy injection into the NLR, is 

2155: actually lower in LINERs than in Seyferts, again contrary to naive expectations.

2156: 

2157: Notwithstanding these complications, it is inconceivable that mechanical 

2158: heating, especially by lower velocity ($\sim 50-100$ \kms) shocks, does not 

2159: play some role in the overall excitation budget of LINERs.  The velocities 

2160: of the line-emitting gas are, after all, highly supersonic, turbulent, and 

2161: most likely pressure-dominated (L.C. Ho, in preparation).  The trick is to 

2162: figure out what is the balance between shocks and photoionization, and what 

2163: physical insights can be gained from knowing the answer. It would be 

2164: worthwhile to revisit composite shock plus photoionization models, such as 

2165: those developed by Viegas-Aldrovandi \& Gruenwald (1990) and Contini (1997) 

2166: with the latter component maximally constrained by observations so that 

2167: robust, quantitative estimates can be placed on the former.  Such an approach 

2168: might yield meaningful measurements of the amount of mechanical energy 

2169: deposited into the host galaxy by AGN feedback.

2170: 

2171: \subsection{Contribution from Stellar Photoionization}

2172: 

2173: Another widely discussed class of models invokes hot stars formed in a

2174: short-duration burst of star formation to supply the primary ionizing

2175: photons.  Ordinary O-type stars with effective temperatures typical of those

2176: found in giant \hii\ regions in galactic disks do not produce sufficiently

2177: strong low-ionization lines to account for the spectra of LINERs.  The

2178: physical conditions in the centers of galaxies, on the other hand, may be more

2179: favorable for generating LINER-like spectra.  For example, Terlevich \&

2180: Melnick (1985) postulate that the high-metallicity environment of galactic

2181: nuclei may be particularly conducive to forming very hot, $T \approx (1-2)

2182: \times 10^5$ K, luminous Wolf-Rayet stars whose ionizing spectrum would

2183: effectively mimic the power-law continuum of an AGN. The models of Filippenko

2184: \& Terlevich (1992) and Shields (1992) appeal to less extreme conditions.

2185: These authors show that photoionization by ordinary O stars, albeit of 

2186: somewhat higher effective temperature than normal (but see Schulz \& Fritsch 

2187: 1994), embedded in an environment with high density and low ionization 

2188: parameter can explain the spectral properties of transition objects.  Barth \& 

2189: Shields (2000) extended this work by modeling the ionizing source not as single

2190: O-type stars but as a more realistic evolving young star cluster.  They

2191: confirm that young, massive stars can indeed generate optical emission-line

2192: spectra that match those of transition objects, and, under some plausible

2193: conditions, even those of {\it bona fide} LINERs.  But there is an important 

2194: caveat: the star cluster must be formed in an instantaneous burst, and its age 

2195: must coincide with the brief phase ($\sim$3$-$5 Myr after the burst) during 

2196: which sufficient Wolf-Rayet stars are present to supply the extreme-UV photons 

2197: necessary to boost the low-ionization lines.  The necessity of a sizable 

2198: population of Wolf-Rayet stars is also emphasized in the study by Gabel 

2199: \& Bruhweiler (2002).  As discussed in Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent (2003), the 

2200: main difficulty with this scenario, and indeed with all models that appeal to 

2201: young or intermediate-age stars (e.g., Engelbracht et al.  1998; 

2202: Alonso-Herrero et al. 2000; Taniguchi, Shioya \& Murayama 2000), is that the 

2203: nuclear stellar population of the host galaxies of the majority of nearby 

2204: AGNs, irrespective of spectral class, is demonstrably {\it old}\ (\S~4.2).  

2205: Stellar absorption indices indicative of young or intermediate-age stars are 

2206: seldom seen, and the telltale emission features of Wolf-Rayet stars are 

2207: notably absent, both in ground-based and {\it HST}\ spectra.  Sarzi et al. 

2208: (2005) find that young stars can account for at most a few percent of the blue 

2209: light within the central few parsecs of nearby LLAGNs, in most cases incapable 

2210: of providing enough ionizing photons to account for the observed H\al\ 

2211: emission.  Post-starburst scenarios face another serious dilemma: if most 

2212: LLAGNs, which constitute the majority of nearby AGNs and a large percentage of 

2213: all galaxies, are described by this scenario, then where are their precursors?

2214: They do not exist.  These empirical facts seriously undermine the viability of 

2215: starburst or post-starburst models for LLAGNs.

2216: 

2217: Evolved, low-mass stars, on the other hand, probably contribute at some level 

2218: to the ionization.  This idea was advocated by Binette et al. (1994), who 

2219: proposed that post-asymptotic giant branch (post-AGB) stars, which can attain 

2220: effective temperatures as high as $\sim 10^5$ K, might be responsible for 

2221: photoionizing the extended ionized gas often observed in elliptical galaxies.  

2222: The emission-line spectrum of these nebulae, in fact, tend to be of relatively 

2223: low ionization (Demoulin-Ulrich, Butcher \& Boksenberg 1984; Phillips et al. 

2224: 1986).   Invoking evolved stars has the obvious appeal of not violating the 

2225: stellar population constraints discussed above.  This mechanism, however, 

2226: cannot be the dominant contributor to compact LINERs.  The line emission tends 

2227: to be very centrally concentrated (\S~6.1), much more so than the underlying 

2228: stellar density profile.  Moreover, the line strengths in most LLAGNs are 

2229: simply too high.  The calculations of Binette et al. predict H\al\ equivalent 

2230: widths of EW $\approx$ 1 \AA, whereas the LINERs and transition objects in the 

2231: Palomar survey have an average EW 3$-$4 times higher (Ho, Filippenko \& 

2232: Sargent 2003), with over 70\% of the sample having EW $>$ 1 \AA.  

2233: 

2234: To obtain a quantitative estimate of the contribution of post-AGB stars to the 

2235: ionization budget of the weaker emission-line nuclei, I convert the nuclear 

2236: stellar magnitudes ($m_{44}$) given in Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent (1997a) to 

2237: stellar masses assuming a mass-to-light ratio of $M/L_B = 8(M/L_B)_\odot$ and 

2238: that post-AGB stars have a specific ionization rate of $Q_{\rm ion} = 7.3 

2239: \times 10^{40} (M/M_\odot)\, {\rm s}^{-1}$ (Binette et al.  1994).  Within the 

2240: $100 \times 200$ pc aperture of the Palomar spectra, the integrated stellar 

2241: mass is $\sim 10^7$ to $10^{10}$ \solmass, with a median 

2242: value of $2\times10^9$ \solmass, which corresponds to an ionizing photon rate 

2243: of $Q_{\rm ion} = 1.5 \times 10^{50}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$.  These estimates depend 

2244: on the choice of the stellar initial mass function, and, most importantly, on 

2245: detailed processes during the late stages of stellar evolution that are still 

2246: not fully understood (see, e.g., O'Connell 1999).   Nevertheless, taking the

2247: fiducial estimates as a rough guide, the predicted values of $Q_{\rm ion}$ can 

2248: be compared to the actually observed, extinction-corrected H\al\ luminosity.  

2249: Assuming complete reprocessing of the ionizing continuum and that on average it 

2250: takes 2.2 Lyman continuum photons to produce one H\al\ photon, I estimate that 

2251: the nebular line emission in roughly one-third of the Palomar sources can be 

2252: powered by photoionization from post-AGB stars.  The fraction is higher for 

2253: LINERs (39\%) than Seyferts (16\%), being most prevalent for LINER~2s (44\%) 

2254: and transition objects (33\%).  Eracleous, Hwang \& Flohic (2008b) performed a 

2255: similar analysis for a handful of LINERs with central stellar luminosity 

2256: profiles available from \hst, concluding also that post-AGB stars can 

2257: alleviate the ionizing photon deficit in some objects. 

2258: 

2259: \begin{figure}

2260: %%BoundingBox: 20 150 550 670

2261: \vbox{\hbox{

2262: \psfig{figure=fig10a.ps,width=6.7cm,angle=0}

2263: \hskip -0.2 cm

2264: \psfig{figure=fig10b.ps,width=6.7cm,angle=0}

2265: }}

2266: \caption{({\it a}) Correlation between (total) H\al\ luminosity and X-ray

2267: ($2-10$ keV) luminosity.  The dotted lines mark $L_{\rm X}/L_{{\rm H}\alpha}$

2268: = 1, 5, and 25.  ({\it b}) Distribution of radio-loudless parameter versus

2269: Eddington ratio, with the bolometric luminosity estimated assuming

2270: $L_{\rm bol} = 16  L_{\rm X}$.  

2271: }

2272: \end{figure}

2273: 

2274: \subsection{Energy Budget}

2275: 

2276: In luminous AGNs, important confirmation of the basic photoionization

2277: paradigm comes from the strong empirical scaling and correlated variability 

2278: between line flux and the strength of the ionizing continuum.  Although very 

2279: little information exists in terms of line-continuum variability for LLAGNs,

2280: enough X-ray observations have now been amassed to examine the correlation 

2281: between optical line luminosity and X-ray luminosity.  The X-ray band

2282: is only indirectly coupled to the bulk of the Lyman continuum, but 

2283: in LLAGNs, it offers the most reliable probe of the high-energy spectrum.  

2284: Studies in the soft X-ray band suggest that LLAGNs roughly follow the 

2285: extrapolation of the $L_{{\rm H}\alpha}-L_{\rm X}$ correlation established for 

2286: higher luminosity sources (Koratkar et al. 1995; Roberts \& Warwick 2000; 

2287: Halderson et al. 2001).  Intriguingly, no clear differences could be discerned 

2288: between LINERs and Seyferts, confirming preliminary evidence presented in 

2289: Halpern \& Steiner (1983).  A more complex picture, however, emerges at higher 

2290: energies ($2-10$ keV).  Terashima, Ho \& Ptak (2000) and Terashima et al. 

2291: (2000) note that LINER~2s, unlike LINER~1s, suffer from a deficit of ionizing 

2292: photons: the X-ray emission of the nucleus, when extrapolated to the UV, 

2293: underpredicts the observed H\al\ luminosity by a factor of $\sim 10-100$.  This 

2294: trend persists in more recent {\it Chandra}\ observations (Terashima \& Wilson 

2295: 2003b; Flohic et al. 2006; Eracleous, Hwang \& Flohic 2008b), one that seems 

2296: to be especially endemic to transition objects (Ho et al. 2001; Filho et al. 

2297: 2004).  

2298: 

2299: Figure~10{\it a}\ shows an update of the $L_{{\rm H}\alpha}-L_{\rm X}$ relation 

2300: for all Palomar sources with high-resolution (\lax\ 5\asec) X-ray measurements.

2301: For comparison, I also include $z < 0.5$ Palomar-Green (PG; Schmidt \& Green 

2302: 1983) quasars and luminous Seyfert~1s with 

2303: well-determined SEDs (Figure~7; L.C. Ho, in preparation).  All broad-line 

2304: sources follow an approximately linear relation over nearly 7 orders of 

2305: magnitude in luminosity. In detail, $L_{{\rm H}\alpha}\propto L_{\rm X}^{1.1}$,

2306: such that quasars and luminous Seyferts have a median ratio 

2307: $L_{\rm X}/L_{{\rm H}\alpha} \approx 2$, to be compared with 

2308: $L_{\rm X}/L_{{\rm H}\alpha} \approx 7$ for Palomar Seyfert~1s.  Ignoring the 

2309: possible effect of a luminosity-dependent covering factor, this can be 

2310: interpreted as the consequence of a decrease in the ratio of UV radiation to 

2311: X-rays with decreasing luminosity, reflecting a pattern familiar from samples 

2312: of bright AGNs (e.g., Strateva et al. 2005), now extended down to lower 

2313: luminosities by $\sim 3$ orders of magnitude.  Since LINER~1s are weaker than 

2314: Seyfert~1s and their SEDs lack a UV bump, it is surprising that they actually 

2315: have a somewhat {\it lower}\ $L_{\rm X}/L_{{\rm H}\alpha}$ ratio ($\sim 5$) 

2316: than Seyfert~1s.  This suggests that at least some of the H\al\ emission in 

2317: LINER~1s, presumably in the narrow component, is not powered by AGN 

2318: photoionization.  In fact, this turns out to be a property symptomatic of 

2319: {\it all}\ type~2 LLAGNs (Table~1).  The most extreme manifestation can be 

2320: seen among transition objects, with $L_{\rm X}/L_{{\rm H}\alpha} \approx 0.4$, 

2321: but both LINER~2s and Seyfert~2s also exhibit an ionizing photon deficit.  

2322: For conditions typical of LLAGNs, Eracleous, Hwang \& Flohic (2008b) use 

2323: photoionization calculations to infer $L_{\rm ion} = 18 L_{{\rm H}\alpha}\,

2324: f_c^{-1}$, where $L_{\rm ion}$ is the ionizing luminosity between 1 Ryd and 10 

2325: keV and $f_c$ is the covering factor of the line-emitting gas.  Since 

2326: $L_{\rm ion} \approx 3 L_{\rm X}$ for a power-law spectrum with $\alpha = 

2327: -0.1$ to $-0.9$, $L_{\rm X}/L_{{\rm H}\alpha} \approx 6 f_c^{-1}$.  It is 

2328: clear that most narrow-line LLAGNs violate this energy balance condition, even 

2329: for the optimistic assumption of $f_c = 1$.

2330: 

2331: There are several possible solutions to the ionization deficit problem. (1) The 

2332: X-rays could be highly obscured, perhaps even Compton-thick.  In light of the 

2333: evidence given in \S\S~5.3, 5.6, I consider this solution to be untenable for 

2334: LINER~2s; highly absorbed sources do exist (e.g., NGC~4261; Zezas et al. 

2335: 2005), but they are in the minority.  Moreover, many of the X-ray measurements 

2336: have already been corrected for absorption.  The situation is more complex for 

2337: Seyfert~2s.  Some of the sources with low $L_{\rm X}/L_{{\rm H}\alpha}$ indeed 

2338: show direct evidence for Compton thickness from their X-ray spectra (Cappi et 

2339: al. 2006).  Others, however, are too faint for spectral analysis, and for 

2340: these, their status as Compton-thick sources was based on the observed ratio of 

2341: 2$-$10 keV flux to \oiii\ \lamb5007 flux (Bassani et al. 1999; Panessa \& 

2342: Bassani 2002).  Applying an average correction factor of 60 to the X-ray 

2343: luminosity would bring the Seyfert~2s into agreement with the Seyfert~1s on the 

2344: $L_{{\rm H}\alpha}-L_{\rm X}$ relation (Panessa et al. 2006). But this 

2345: procedure {\it assumes}\ that the low values of $L_{\rm X}/L_{{\rm H}\alpha}$ 

2346: are due to a reduction of the X-rays by absorption rather than an enhancement 

2347: of H\al\ (see below).  (2) The SED could be drastically different, 

2348: specifically in having a much more prominent UV component.  This proposition 

2349: can be promptly dismissed because the SEDs of LLAGNs generically lack a UV 

2350: bump.  There is certainly no indication that type~2 sources are preferentially 

2351: brighter in the UV; in the case of LINERs, type~2 sources, if anything, tend 

2352: to be redder than type~1 sources (Maoz et al. 2005).  (3) Lastly, and most 

2353: plausibly, a significant fraction of the ionization for the narrow-line gas 

2354: comes from nonnuclear sources.  As discussed in connection with the preceding 

2355: two subsections, young, massive stars and fast shocks are generally not viable 

2356: options.  There are a number of candidate sources of ``extra'' ionization, 

2357: including hot, evolved stars, turbulent mixing layers, diffuse X-ray emitting 

2358: plasma, low-mass XRBs, cosmic ray heating, and mechanical heating 

2359: from radio jets.  As all of these sources probably contribute at some level, 

2360: efforts to single out any dominant mechanism may be hopelessly challenging.

2361: Nevertheless, as discussed in \S~6.3, post-AGB stars appear especially 

2362: promising.  Taking the calculations of Binette et al. (1994) as a guide, the 

2363: stellar mass within the central $100-200$ pc region generates sufficient Lyman 

2364: continuum photons to account for the H\al\ emission in $\sim 30\%-40\%$ of the 

2365: LINER~2s and transition objects.  This estimate is crude and admittedly 

2366: optimistic, as it assumes a covering factor of unity for the NLR, but it 

2367: serves as a useful illustration of the types of effects that should be 

2368: included in any complete treatment of the energy budget problem in LLAGNs.

2369: 

2370: \subsection{The Nature of Transition Objects and a Unified View of LLAGNs}

2371: 

2372: The physical origin of transition nuclei continues to be a thorny, unresolved 

2373: problem.  In standard line-ratio diagrams (Figure~3), transition nuclei are 

2374: empirically defined to be those sources that lie sandwiched between the loci 

2375: of ``normal'' \hii\ regions and LINERs.  This motivated Ho, Filippenko \& 

2376: Sargent (1993) to propose that transition objects may be composite systems 

2377: consisting of a LINER nucleus plus an \hii\ region component.  The latter 

2378: could arise from neighboring circumnuclear \hii\ regions or from \hii\ regions 

2379: randomly projected along the line of sight.  A similar argument, based on 

2380: decomposition of line profiles, was made by V\'eron, Gon\c{c}alves \& 

2381: V\'eron-Cetty (1997).  If transition objects truly are LINERs sprinkled with a 

2382: frosting of star formation, one would expect that their host galaxies should 

2383: be similar to those of LINERs, modulo minor differences due to extra 

2384: contaminating star formation.  The study of Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent (2003) 

2385: tentatively supports this picture.  The host galaxies of transition nuclei 

2386: exhibit systematically higher levels of recent star formation, as indicated by 

2387: their far-IR emission and broad-band optical colors, compared to LINERs of 

2388: matched morphological types.  Moreover, the hosts of transition nuclei tend to 

2389: be slightly more inclined than LINERs.  Thus, all else being equal, 

2390: transition-type spectra seem to be found precisely in those galaxies whose 

2391: nuclei have a higher probability of being contaminated by extra-nuclear 

2392: emission from star-forming regions.

2393: 

2394: This story, however, has some holes.  If spatial blending of circumnuclear 

2395: \hii\ regions is sufficient to transform a regular LINER into a transition 

2396: object, the LINER nucleus should reveal itself unambiguously in spectra taken 

2397: with angular resolution sufficiently high to isolate it.  This test was 

2398: performed by Barth, Ho \& Filippenko (2003), who obtained {\it HST}/STIS 

2399: spectra, taken with a 0\farcs2-wide slit, of a well-defined subsample of 15 

2400: transition objects selected from the Palomar catalog.  To their surprise, the 

2401: small-aperture spectra of the nuclei, for the most part, look very similar to 

2402: the ground-based spectra; they are {\it not} more LINER-like.  Shields et al. 

2403: (2007) reached the same conclusion from their STIS study of Palomar nuclei, 

2404: which included six transition objects, showing that even at \hst\ 

2405: resolution these objects do not reveal the expected excitation gradients. 

2406: 

2407: The ``masqueraded-LINER'' hypothesis can be further tested by searching for

2408: compact radio and X-ray cores using high-resolution images.  Recall that this

2409: is a highly effective method to filter out weak AGNs (\S\S~5.2, 5.3).  Filho,

2410: Barthel \& Ho (2000, 2002a; Filho et al. 2004) have systematically surveyed 

2411: the full sample of Palomar transition objects using the VLA at 8.4~GHz.  They 

2412: find that $\sim$25\% of the population contains arcsecond-scale radio cores.  

2413: These cores appear to be largely nonstellar in nature.  The brighter subset of

2414: these sources that are amenable to follow-up Very Long Baseline Interferometry 

2415: (VLBI) observations (Filho et al.  2004) all reveal more compact 

2416: (milliarcsecond-scale) cores with flat radio

2417: spectra and high brightness temperatures (\gax\ $10^7$ K).  These radio 

2418: statistics are hard to interpret, however, in the absence of a control sample 

2419: of other LLAGNs surveyed to the same depth, resolution, and wavelength.  The 

2420: Nagar, Falcke \& Wilson (2005) 15~GHz survey satisfies these criteria.  As 

2421: Table~1 shows, the frequency of radio cores in transition objects is roughly 

2422: half of that in Seyfert~2s and LINER~2s.  On the other hand, the detection 

2423: rate of X-ray cores is actually remarkably high---74\%---identical to that of 

2424: LINER~2s and similar to that of Seyfert~2s.  This observation strongly 

2425: suggests that the majority of transition objects indeed {\it do}\ harbor AGNs.

2426: 

2427: In light of these recent developments, the basic picture for the physical 

2428: nature of transition objects needs to be revised.  Inspection of the 

2429: statistical properties in Table~1 offers the following clues, which help not

2430: only to explain transition objects but provide a unified view to relate the 

2431: different classes of LLAGNs.  

2432: 

2433: \begin{enumerate}

2434: 

2435: {\item 

2436: Seyferts, LINERs, and transition objects define a sequence of decreasing 

2437: accretion rate.  This is most evident from $L_{\rm X}$ and 

2438: $L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm Edd}$, but it is also seen in $L_{{\rm H}\alpha}$ 

2439: and $P_{\rm rad}$.

2440: }

2441: 

2442: {\item 

2443: As noted in \S~5.10, type~1 sources have significantly higher luminosities and 

2444: Eddington ratios than type~2 systems.  The basic premise of the conventional 

2445: orientation-based unification scenario does not hold for LLAGNs.  The 

2446: systematic reduction in accretion rate along the sequence 

2447: S$\rightarrow$L$\rightarrow$T also provides a viable explanation for the 

2448: systematic decrease in the detection rate of broad H\al\ emission, especially 

2449: the precipitous drop among transition sources ($f_b$ in Table~1).

2450: }

2451: 

2452: {\item 

2453: Transition objects appear to be anomalously strong in their H\al\ emission.

2454: In light of the \hst\ evidence for a distributed source of ionization, I 

2455: suspect that a significant fraction of the H\al\ emission in these objects in 

2456: fact is {\it not}\ photoionized by the central AGN.  This leads to misleading 

2457: values of $L_{\rm X}/L_{{\rm H}\alpha}$ and $R_o$ (which is based on 

2458: $L_{{\rm H}\alpha}$).  For this class either the X-ray or radio core provides 

2459: a cleaner measure of the AGN power.  

2460: }

2461: 

2462: {\item

2463: The loose inverse correlation between radio-loudness and accretion rate, best 

2464: seen by comparing $R_{\rm X}$ versus either $L_{\rm X}$ or 

2465: $L_{\rm X}/L_{\rm Edd}$, mirrors the trends found by Ho (2002a) and 

2466: Terashima \& Wilson (2003b).

2467: }

2468: 

2469: {\item

2470: Focusing on the type~2 sources, note that LINER~2s are very similar to 

2471: Seyfert~2s, the former being $\sim 1/3-1/2$ as strong as the latter in terms 

2472: of H\al\ luminosity and radio power.  The two groups have almost identical 

2473: $L_{\rm X}$ and $L_{\rm X}/L_{\rm Edd}$, although this may be an artifact of 

2474: incomplete absorption correction for Seyfert~2s, some of which are highly

2475: absorbed (Panessa et al. 2006).  In the same vein, I propose that transition 

2476: objects represent the next step in the luminosity sequence. Judging by their 

2477: X-ray luminosity, radio power, $L_{\rm X}/L_{\rm Edd}$, and radio detection 

2478: fraction, the AGN component in transition objects is $\sim$1/4 to 1/2 as 

2479: strong as that in LINER~2s. 

2480: }

2481: \end{enumerate}

2482: 

2483: According to the picture just outlined, most, if not all, type~2 sources are 

2484: genuinely accretion powered.  Using the accretion rate as the metric for 

2485: the level of AGN activity, Seyfert~1s rank at the top of the scale, followed 

2486: by Seyfert~2s, LINER~1s, LINER~2s, and finally ending with transition objects. 

2487: This scenario, which in broad-brush terms explains a wide range of data 

2488: summarized in Table~1, has the virtue of simplicity.  It is also physically 

2489: appealing, given the broad spectrum of accretion rates anticipated in nearby 

2490: galaxies.

2491: 

2492: There is, however, one loose end that needs to be tied.  What powers the 

2493: spatially extended, ``excess'' optical line emission in transition objects?  

2494: For the reasons explained before, the source of the ionization is unlikely to 

2495: be shock heating or photoionization by hot, massive stars, notwithstanding the 

2496: success with which such models have been applied to some individual objects

2497: (Engelbracht et al. 1998; Barth \& Shields 2000; Gabel \& Bruhweiler 2002).  

2498: Shields et al. (2007) suggest two candidates for a spatially extended source 

2499: of ionization: hot, evolved stars and turbulent mixing layers in the 

2500: interstellar medium (Begelman \& Fabian 1990).  In \S~6.3, I showed that

2501: the stellar mass in the central 100--200 pc indeed seems to provide enough 

2502: post-AGB stars to account for the correct level of H\al\ emission in a 

2503: significant fraction of the transition objects.  I would like to suggest two 

2504: other sources, ones that have the advantage of being empirically well 

2505: motivated by recent observations.  These processes probably operate in all 

2506: nuclear environments all the time, maintaining a ``baseline'' level of weak 

2507: optical line emission that is only noticeable after the AGN has subsided to a 

2508: very low level.  

2509: 

2510: As discussed in \S\S~5.3, 5.4, the X-ray morphology of the central few hundred 

2511: parsecs of galaxies can be quite complex.  The nucleus, if present, is often 

2512: encircled by other point sources, mostly XRBs (Fabbiano 2006).

2513: With X-ray luminosities ranging from $\sim 10^{37}$ to $10^{39}$ \lum\ (Flohic 

2514: et al. 2006), XRBs individually or collectively can outshine the nucleus 

2515: itself (Ho et al. 2001; Eracleous et al. 2002; Ho, Terashima \& Ulvestad 2003; 

2516: see Figure~5).  The discrete sources themselves are embedded in extended 

2517: emission, consisting of an optically thin thermal plasma with $kT \approx 0.5$ 

2518: keV and a spectrally harder diffuse component, which contributes a luminosity 

2519: of $\sim (5-9)\times 10^{38}$ \lum\ in the 0.5$-$10 keV band (Flohic et al. 

2520: 2006).  The hard diffuse component most likely represents the cumulative 

2521: emission from faint, unresolved low-mass XRBs, although this interpretation 

2522: seems somewhat at odds with the spectrum derived by Flohic et al. (power 

2523: law with $\alpha = -0.3$ to $-0.5$).  Low-mass XRBs typically can be fit by a

2524: thermal bremsstrahlung model with $kT = 5-10$ keV or a power law with $\alpha

2525: = -0.6$ to $-0.9$ (e.g., Makishima et al. 1989).  High-mass XRBs would provide 

2526: a better match to the observed spectrum, but in view of what we know about the 

2527: stellar populations (\S~4.2), they are probably untenable.  A possible 

2528: solution is to invoke a multi-temperature plasma (M. Eracleous, private 

2529: communications); a hotter component ($kT \approx$ few keV), when added to the 

2530: cooler $kT = 0.5$ keV component, would presumably permit a significant 

2531: contribution from low-mass XRBs without violating the spectral constraints.

2532: We can estimate the expected X-ray output from low-mass XRBs from the 

2533: correlation between optical and X-ray luminosity established for normal 

2534: galaxies (Fabbiano \& Trinchieri 1985).  Using again the nuclear stellar 

2535: magnitudes from the Palomar survey, I obtain a median $L_{\rm X}$($2-10$ keV) 

2536: = $(3\pm1)\times10^{38}$ \lum\ within the central 2\asec$\times$4\asec\ 

2537: aperture, which falls within the ballpark of the value measured by Flohic et 

2538: al. (2006).  The combination of hot gas and XRB emission, therefore, supplies 

2539: $\sim10^{39}$ \lum\ in X-rays, comparable to the amount coming from the 

2540: nucleus alone for Seyfert~2s and LINER~2s, and double the amount from 

2541: transition nuclei (Table~1).  Voit \& Donahue (1997) suggest that hot plasma 

2542: additionally may transfer heat conductively to the line-emitting gas in 

2543: LINERs, in a manner analogous to the situation in cooling flow filaments in 

2544: galaxy clusters.

2545: 

2546: Lastly, cosmic ray heating (\S~6.1) by the central radio core will further 

2547: enhance the optical line luminosity (Ferland \& Mushotzky 1984).  The very 

2548: source of the fast particles, namely compact radio jets, itself probably 

2549: injects an additional source of mechanical heating, although this is more 

2550: difficult to model concretely.  Both processes---photoionization by off-nuclear

2551: X-rays and cosmic ray heating---have a convenient virtue: they will tend to 

2552: produce low-ionization spectra and therefore provide a natural match to the 

2553: spectral characteristics of nearby LLAGNs.  

2554: 

2555: \section{IMPLICATIONS FOR BLACK HOLE DEMOGRAPHICS}

2556: 

2557: As summarized by Kormendy (2004), spatially resolved kinematical observations

2558: have convincingly measured BH masses in a sizable number of nearby galaxies, 

2559: to the point that important inferences on their demographics can be drawn 

2560: (Richstone 2004).  Following an argument first due to So\l tan (1982), 

2561: comparison of the integrated radiation density from quasars to the integrated

2562: mass density in local BHs shows that BHs have grown mostly via a radiatively 

2563: efficient mode of accretion during their bright AGN phase (e.g., Yu \& 

2564: Tremaine 2002).  Nearby galaxies, therefore, should be home to AGN relics.  

2565: 

2566: The LLAGNs summarized in this review provide an important confirmation of this

2567: basic prediction.  Not only are weakly accreting BHs found in great abundance 

2568: in the local Universe, but they are found where prevailing wisdom says that 

2569: they should be found, namely in the centers of galaxies that contain bulges.

2570: Among E, S0, and Sb galaxies, the AGN detection rate is $\sim 50$\%, 

2571: increasing to over 70\% among Sa galaxies.  Since sensitivity and confusion 

2572: impact the detection rates, these statistics are not inconsistent with the 

2573: notion that BHs are ubiquitous in essentially {\it all}\ E$-$Sb galaxies.  

2574: 

2575: Notably, the incidence of AGNs plummets for galaxies with Hubble types 

2576: Sc and later, precisely at the point where classical ($r^{1/4}$ profile) 

2577: bulges effectively cease to exist and secular dissipation processes begin 

2578: to kick in (Kormendy \& Kennicutt 2004).  Although the AGN fraction is low for 

2579: late-type spirals, it is also not zero.  Careful scrutiny of this minority 

2580: population addresses two important questions: (1) Are there

2581: central (nonstellar) BHs with masses below $10^6$ \solmass?  (2) Must central 

2582: BHs always be encased in a bulge?

2583: 

2584: \begin{figure}

2585: \vbox{\hbox{

2586: \psfig{figure=fig11a.ps,width=0.465\columnwidth,angle=0}

2587: \hskip +0.2 cm

2588: \psfig{figure=fig11b.ps,width=0.465\columnwidth,angle=0}

2589: }}

2590: \caption{

2591: Two examples of AGNs in late-type galaxies.  The {\it left}\ panel shows an

2592: optical image of NGC 4395, adapted from the {\it Carnegie Atlas of Galaxies}\

2593: (Sandage \& Bedke 1994); the image is $\sim$15\amin\ (17 kpc) on a side.

2594: The {\it right}\ panel shows an {\it HST}\ $I$-band image of POX 52, adapted 

2595: from C.E. Thornton, A.J. Barth, L.C. Ho, R.E. Rutledge, J.E. Greene (in 

2596: preparation); the image is $\sim$11\asec\ (5 kpc) on a side.

2597: }

2598: \end{figure}

2599: 

2600: Two remarkable galaxies give the clearest testimony that low-mass BHs do, in 

2601: fact, exist.  Within the Palomar survey, the nearby ($\sim$4 Mpc) galaxy 

2602: NGC~4395 contains all the usual attributes of a self-respecting AGN: broad 

2603: optical and UV emission lines (Filippenko \& Sargent 1989; Filippenko, Ho \& 

2604: Sargent 1993), a compact radio core (Ho \& Ulvestad 2001) of high brightness 

2605: temperature (Wrobel, Fassnacht \& Ho 2001; Wrobel \& Ho 2006), and rapidly 

2606: variable hard X-ray emission (Shih, Iwasawa \& Fabian 2003; Moran et al. 2005).

2607: Contrary to expectations, however, NGC~4395 is an extremely late-type

2608: (Sdm) spiral (Figure~11, {\it left}), whose central stellar velocity

2609: dispersion does not exceed $\sim 30$ \kms\ (Filippenko \& Ho 2003).  If

2610: NGC~4395 obeys the $M_{\rm BH}-\sigma$ relation, its central BH should have a

2611: mass \lax\ $10^5$ \solmass.  This limit agrees surprisingly well with the value

2612: of \mbh\ estimated from its broad H\bet\ line width or X-ray variability

2613: properties ($\sim 10^4-10^5$ \solmass; Filippenko \& Ho 2003), or from 

2614: reverberation mapping (3.6\e{5} \solmass; Peterson et al. 2005).  POX~52 

2615: (Figure~11, {\it right}) presents another interesting case.  As first noted by 

2616: Kunth, Sargent \& Bothun (1987), the presence of a Seyfert-like nucleus in 

2617: POX~52 is unusual because of the low luminosity of the host galaxy.  Barth et 

2618: al. (2004) show that POX~52 bears a close spectroscopic resemblance to 

2619: NGC~4395.  Based on the broad profile of H\bet, these authors derive a virial 

2620: BH mass of 1.6\e{5} \solmass\ for POX~52, again surprisingly close to the 

2621: value of 1.3\e{5} \solmass\ predicted from the $M_{\rm BH} - \sigma$ relation 

2622: given the measured central stellar velocity dispersion of 35 \kms.  

2623: 

2624: The two objects highlighted above demonstrate that the mass spectrum of nuclear

2625: BHs indeed does indeed extend below $10^6$ \solmass, providing great leverage 

2626: for anchoring the $M_{\rm BH} - \sigma$ at the low end.  Furthermore, they 

2627: shed light on the variety of environments in which nuclear BHs can form, 

2628: providing much-needed empirical clues to the conditions that fostered the 

2629: formation of the seeds for supermassive BHs.  NGC~4395 has little or no bulge, 

2630: but it does have a compact, central star cluster in which the BH is embedded 

2631: (Filippenko \& Ho 2003).  Interestingly, G1, a massive star cluster in M31 

2632: that to date contains the best direct detection of an intermediate-mass 

2633: ($\sim 20,000$ \solmass) BH (Gebhardt, Rich \& Ho 2002, 2005; Ulvestad, Greene

2634: \& Ho 2007), is thought to be the stripped nucleus of a once small galaxy. The 

2635: same holds for the Galactic cluster $\omega$ Cen, for which Noyola, Gebhardt 

2636: \& Bergmann (2008) report a central dark mass of $5\times10^4$ \solmass.

2637: POX~52 is equally striking.  Deep images reveal POX~52 to be most akin to a 

2638: spheroidal galaxy (Barth et al. 2004; C.E. Thornton, A.J. Barth, L.C. 

2639: Ho, R.E. Rutledge, J.E. Greene, in preparation), to date an unprecedented 

2640: morphology for an AGN host galaxy.   This is quite unexpected because 

2641: spheroidal galaxies, while technically hot stellar systems, bear little 

2642: physical resemblance to classical bulges.  Spheroidals occupy a distinct 

2643: locus on the fundamental plane (e.g., Geha, Guhathakurta \& van~der~Marel 

2644: 2002; Kormendy et al. 2008), and they may originate from harassment 

2645: and tidal stripping of late-type disk galaxies (e.g., Moore et al. 1996).  

2646: Thus, like NGC~4395, POX~52 stands as testimony that a classical bulge is not 

2647: a prerequisite for the formation of central BH.

2648: 

2649: But how common are such objects?  AGNs hosted in high-surface brightness,

2650: late-type spirals appear to be quite rare in the nearby Universe.  Within the

2651: comprehensive Palomar survey, NGC~4395 emerges as a unique case of an 

2652: unambiguous broad-line AGN hosted in a late-type system.  The majority of 

2653: late-type spirals do possess compact, photometrically distinct nuclei (B\"oker 

2654: et al. 2002), morphologically not dissimilar from that in NGC~4395, but, with 

2655: few exceptions (Shields et al. 2008), these nuclei are compact star clusters 

2656: with no compelling evidence for an accompanying accreting central BH (Walcher 

2657: et al. 2006).  Nuclear star clusters do not appear to directly impact a 

2658: galaxy's ability to host an AGN (Seth et al. 2008).  Several serendipitous 

2659: cases of AGNs in late-type galaxies have recently been found from analysis of 

2660: {\it Spitzer}\ mid-IR spectra (Satyapal et al. 2007, 2008), as well as a 

2661: number of AGN candidates from inspection of {\it Chandra}\ images (Desroches 

2662: \&  Ho 2008).  Among earlier Hubble types, Gallo et al. (2008) report the 

2663: detection of X-ray nuclei in two low-luminosity early-type galaxies.

2664: 

2665: To assess the true incidence of AGNs like NGC~4395 and POX~52 requires a 

2666: spectroscopic survey much larger than Palomar.  Greene \& Ho (2007b) 

2667: performed a systematic spectral analysis of over 500,000 SDSS spectra with $z < 

2668: 0.35$ to search for broad-line AGNs, producing not only a detailed BH mass 

2669: function for low-redshift AGNs (Greene \& Ho 2007a) but also a comprehensive 

2670: catalog of $\sim 200$ low-mass ($M_{\rm BH} < 10^6$ \solmass) objects.  Not 

2671: much is known yet about the host galaxies, except that on average they are 

2672: about 1 mag fainter than $L^*$.   {\it HST}\ imaging of the initial sample of 

2673: 19 objects discovered by Greene \& Ho (2004) reveal that the host galaxies are 

2674: either mid- to late-type spirals (although none seems as late-type as 

2675: NGC~4395) or compact, spheroidal-looking systems not unlike POX~52 (Greene, Ho 

2676: \& Barth 2008).  When projected onto the galaxy fundamental plane, the 

2677: ``bulge'' component in some systems resides within the locus of spheroidal

2678: galaxies.   Follow-up high-dispersion spectroscopy shows that these 

2679: objects approximately follow the $M_{\rm BH} - \sigma$ relation (Barth, Greene 

2680: \& Ho 2005).

2681: 

2682: \section{IMPLICATIONS FOR ACCRETION PHYSICS}

2683: 

2684: \subsection{Why Are LLAGNs So Dim?}

2685: 

2686: This review highlights a class of galactic nuclei that are extraordinary 

2687: for being so ordinary.  At their most extreme manifestation, LLAGNs emit a 

2688: billion times less light than the most powerful known quasars.  When quasars 

2689: were first discovered, the challenge then was to explain their tremendous 

2690: luminosities.  Ironically, more than four decades later, the problem has been 

2691: reversed: the challenge now is to explain how dead quasars can remain so 

2692: dormant.  The luminosity deficit problem was noted by Fabian \& Canizares 

2693: (1988), who drew attention to the fact that elliptical galaxies, despite being 

2694: suffused with a ready supply of hot gas capable of undergoing spherical 

2695: accretion, have very dim nuclei.  We can no longer speculate that these 

2696: systems lack supermassive BHs, for we now know that they are there, at least 

2697: in galaxies with bulges.  And as I have shown in this review, the problem is 

2698: by no means confined to ellipticals either.

2699: 

2700: Explanations of the luminosity paradox fall in several categories.

2701: 

2702: \begin{itemize}

2703: 

2704: {\item

2705: {\underbar{\it Obscuration}} \ \ \ This trivial possibility can be summarily 

2706: dismissed as a general solution in light of the evidence presented in 

2707: \S\S~5.3, 5.6.

2708: }

2709: 

2710: {\item

2711: {\underbar{\it Low accretion rate}} \ \ \ A more plausible strategy is to 

2712: starve the BH.  Present-day massive galaxies, after all, should be relatively 

2713: gas-poor, especially in their central regions, which are largely devoid of 

2714: significant ongoing star formation.  This argument quickly falls apart when 

2715: one realizes just how little material is needed to light up the nuclei.  The 

2716: bolometric luminosities of nearby nuclei span $\sim 10^{38}-10^{44}$ \lum, 

2717: with a median value of $L_{\rm bol} = 3\times 10^{40}$ \lum\ and half of the 

2718: sample lying between $3\times 10^{39}$ and $3\times 10^{41}$ \lum.  For a 

2719: canonical radiative efficiency of $\eta = 0.1$, the required accretion rate is 

2720: merely $\dot M=L_{\rm bol}/\eta c^2=5\times10^{-6\pm1}$ \solmass\ \peryr.  

2721: This is a pitifully miniscule amount, in comparison with the amount of fuel 

2722: actually available to be accreted.  Galactic nuclei unavoidably receive fuel

2723: from two sources: ordinary mass loss from evolved stars and gravitational 

2724: capture of gas from the hot interstellar medium.

2725: 

2726: During the normal course of stellar evolution, evolved stars return a

2727: significant fraction of their mass to the ISM through mass loss.  For a

2728: Salpeter stellar initial mass function with a lower-mass cutoff of 0.1

2729: \solmass, an upper-mass cutoff of 100 \solmass, solar metallicities, and an

2730: age of 15 Gyr, Padovani \& Matteucci (1993) estimate that

2731: 

2732: \begin{displaymath}

2733: \dot M_*\,\approx\,3\times10^{-11} \, \left(\frac{L}{L_{\odot, V}}\right)

2734: \,\,\,\,\,\,\, M_{\odot}\,{\rm yr}^{-1}.  

2735: \end{displaymath}

2736: 

2737: \noindent

2738: This result is consistent, within a factor of $\sim$2, with the work of Ciotti 

2739: et al. (1991) and Jungwiert, Combes \& Palous (2001). {\it HST}\ images reveal

2740: that galaxies contain central density concentrations, either in the form of 

2741: nuclear cusps or photometrically distinct, compact stellar nuclei. The

2742: cusp profiles continue to rise to the resolution limit of \hst\ (0\farcs1),

2743: which is $r \approx 10$ pc at a distance of 20 Mpc, where 

2744: $\rho\, \approx\, 10-10^3$ $L_{\odot, V}$ pc$^{-3}$ for the ``core''

2745: ellipticals and $\rho\, \approx\, 10^2-10^4$ $L_{\odot, V}$ pc$^{-3}$ for the

2746: ``power-law'' ellipticals and bulges of early-type spirals and S0s (e.g.,

2747: Faber et al. 1997).   Within a spherical region of $r = 10$ pc, the diffuse

2748: cores have $L \approx 4\times 10^4 - 4\times 10^6\, L_{\odot, V}$, which

2749: yields $\dot M_*\,\approx\,1\times10^{-6} - 1\times10^{-4}$ \solmass\

2750: \peryr; for the denser power-law cusps, $L \approx 4\times 10^5 -

2751: 4\times 10^7\, L_{\odot, V}$, or $\dot M_*\,\approx\,1\times10^{-5} -

2752: 1\times10^{-3}$ \solmass\ \peryr.  Centrally dominant nuclear star clusters,

2753: present in a large fraction of disk galaxies, typically have luminosities

2754: $L \approx 10^7$ \solum\ (Carollo et al. 1997; B\"oker et al. 2002), and hence 

2755: $\dot M_*\,\approx\,10^{-3}$ \solmass\ \peryr.

2756: 

2757: Diffuse, hot gas in the central regions of galaxies holds another potential

2758: fuel reservoir.  Low-angular momentum gas sufficiently close to a BH can

2759: accrete spherically in the manner described by Bondi (1952). To estimate the

2760: Bondi accretion rate, one needs to know the gas density and temperature at the 

2761: accretion radius, $R_a \approx GM_{\rm BH}/c_s^2$, where $c_s \approx 0.1 

2762: T^{1/2}$ \kms\ is the sound speed of the gas at temperature $T$.  The mass 

2763: accretion rate follows from the continuity equation, $\dot M_{\rm B}\,=\,4\pi 

2764: R_a^2 \rho_a c_s$, where $\rho_a$ is the gas density at $R_a$.   Expressed in 

2765: terms of typical observed parameters (see below),

2766: 

2767: \begin{displaymath}

2768: \dot M_{\rm B}\,\approx\,7.3\times 10^{-4}\,

2769: \left(\frac{M_{\rm BH}}{10^8\, M_{\odot}}\right)^2\,

2770: \left(\frac{n}{0.1\, {\rm cm}^{-3}}\right)\,

2771: \left(\frac{200\, {\rm km\,s}^{-1}}{c_s}\right)^3\,

2772: \,M_{\odot}\,{\rm yr}^{-1}.

2773: \end{displaymath}

2774: 

2775: {\it Chandra}\ observations with sufficient resolution to resolve $R_a$ find 

2776: that the diffuse gas in the central regions of elliptical galaxies typically 

2777: has temperatures of $kT\,\approx\,0.3-1$ keV and densities of $n\,\approx\,

2778: 0.1-0.5$ \cc\ (e.g., Di~Matteo et al. 2001, 2003; Loewenstein et al. 2001;

2779: Pellegrini 2005).  Our knowledge of the hot gas 

2780: content in the central regions of the bulges of spiral and S0 galaxies is more 

2781: fragmentary.  {\it Chandra}\ has so far resolved the hot gas in the centers of

2782: a handful of bulges (Milky Way: Baganoff et al. 2003; M31: Garcia et al. 2005; 

2783: M81: Swartz et al. 2002; NGC~1291: Irwin, Sarazin \& Bregman 2002; NGC~1553: 

2784: Blanton, Sarazin \& Irwin 2001; Sombrero: Pellegrini et al. 2003a).  These 

2785: studies suggest that bulges typically have gas temperatures of $kT\,\approx\,

2786: 0.3-0.6$ keV.  Information on gas densities is sketchier, but judging from the 

2787: work on M81 and the Sombrero, a fiducial value might be $n\,\approx\,0.1$ \cc.

2788: 

2789: If, for simplicity, we assume that the hot gas in most bulges is characterized

2790: by $n\,=\,0.1$ \cc\ and $kT\,=\,0.3$ keV, then $\dot M_{\rm B}\,\approx\,

2791: 10^{-5}-10^{-3}$ \solmass\ \peryr\ for \mbh\ = $10^7-10^8$ \solmass.  In

2792: elliptical galaxies \mbh\ $\approx\,10^8-10^9$ \solmass, and for $n\,=\,0.2$

2793: \cc\ and $kT\,=\,0.5$ keV, $\dot M_{\rm B}\,\approx\, 10^{-4}-10^{-2}$

2794: \solmass\ \peryr.  We note that these estimates of the Bondi accretion rates, 

2795: which fall within the range given in recent compilations (e.g., Donato, 

2796: Sambruna \& Gliozzi 2004; Pellegrini 2005; Soria et al. 2006), are probably 

2797: lower limits because the actual densities near $R_a$ are likely to be higher 

2798: than we assumed.  For the above fiducial temperatures and BH masses, 

2799: $R_a\,\approx\,1-10$ pc for bulges and $\sim 10-100$ pc for ellipticals, 

2800: roughly an order of magnitude smaller than the typical linear resolution 

2801: achieved by {\it Chandra}\ for nearby galaxies.  In well-resolved cases, the 

2802: gas temperature profile generally remains constant to within $\sim 50$\% 

2803: whereas the density typically increases by a factor of a few toward the center 

2804: (e.g., Milky Way: Baganoff et al. 2003; M31: Garcia et al. 2005; M87: 

2805: Di~Matteo et al. 2003; NGC~1316: Kim \& Fabbiano 2003).

2806: 

2807: Although the above estimates are very rough, and they are valid only in a 

2808: statistical sense, one cannot escape the conclusion that in general in the 

2809: central few parsecs of nearby galaxies $\dot M_{\rm B} + \dot M_* \gg \dot M$.

2810: Although meager, the joint contributions from stellar mass loss and Bondi 

2811: accretion, if converted to radiation with $\eta = 0.1$, would generate nuclei 

2812: far more luminous than actually observed.  The net accretion from the Bondi 

2813: flow would be considerably reduced if the gas possesses some angular momentum 

2814: at large radii (Proga \& Begelman 2003)---as inevitably it must---but even so 

2815: it seems likely that the BH still has plenty of food at its disposal.  LLAGNs 

2816: are by no means fuel-starved.  Moreover, the above estimates have erred on 

2817: the conservative side.  For example, I have assumed that all of the stars are 

2818: evolved, although in reality most nuclei have composite populations and hence 

2819: larger mass loss rates.  Furthermore, I have neglected additional dissipation 

2820: from larger scales (e.g., due to nuclear bars or spirals), as well as 

2821: discrete, episodic events such as stellar tidal disruptions, which can provide 

2822: a significant source of fuel, especially for BHs with masses \lax\ $10^{7}$ 

2823: \solmass\ (Milosavljevi\'c, Merritt \& Ho 2006).  All of these additional 

2824: sources will only exacerbate the fuel surplus crisis.

2825: }

2826: 

2827: {\item

2828: {\underbar{\it Low radiative efficiency}} \ \ \ If accretion does proceed 

2829: at a reasonable fraction of the supply rate, then one has no option but to 

2830: conclude that the radiative efficiency is much less than $\eta = 0.1$, the 

2831: standard value for an optically thick, geometrically thin disk.  This type of 

2832: argument has been invoked to explain the apparent conflict between the nuclear 

2833: luminosities and Bondi accretion rates in many early-type galaxies (e.g., 

2834: Fabian \& Rees 1995; Reynolds et al. 1996; Di~Matteo \& Fabian 1997; Mahadevan 

2835: 1997; Di~Matteo et al. 2001, 2003; Loewenstein et 

2836: al. 2001; Ho, Terashima \& Ulvestad 2003; Pellegrini et al. 2003a; Donato, 

2837: Sambruna \& Gliozzi 2004;  Evans et al. 2006).  Accretion flows with low 

2838: radiative efficiency, of which the most popular version is the ADAF (see 

2839: reviews in Narayan 2002; Yuan 2007), arise when the accreting medium is 

2840: sufficiently tenuous that its cooling time exceeds the accretion timescale.  

2841: RIAFs are predicted to exist for accretion rates below a critical threshold of 

2842: $\dot M_{\rm crit} \approx 0.3\alpha^2 \dot M_{\rm Edd} \approx 0.01 \dot 

2843: M_{\rm Edd}$, where the Shakura \& Sunyaev (1973) viscosity parameter is taken 

2844: to be $\alpha \approx 0.1-0.3$ and $\dot M_{\rm Edd} \equiv L_{\rm Edd}/\eta 

2845: c^2 = 0.22 \left(\eta/0.1\right) \left(M_{\rm BH}/10^8\, M_{\odot}\right)$ 

2846: \solmass\ \peryr.  LLAGNs lie comfortably below this threshold.

2847: }

2848: 

2849: {\item

2850: {\underbar{\it Inefficient accretion/jet feedback}} \ \ \ Precisely how low 

2851: $\eta$ can become depends on how much of the native fuel supply actually gets 

2852: accreted.  In the presence of some rotation in the ambient medium, numerical 

2853: simulations find that the amount of material accreted is much less than is 

2854: available at large radii (e.g., Stone \& Pringle 2001; Igumenshchev, Narayan 

2855: \& Abramowicz 2003).  Since the gravitational binding energy in a RIAF cannot 

2856: be radiated efficiently, it must be lost by nonradiative means (Blandford \& 

2857: Begelman 1999), either through convective transport of energy and angular 

2858: momentum to large radii or through a global outflowing wind (see review by 

2859: Quataert 2003).  The net effect of either process is to flatten the density 

2860: profile near the center and to dramatically reduce the accretion rate.  At 

2861: very low accretion rates \lax\ $(10^{-5}-10^{-6}) \,\dot M_{\rm Edd}$, such as 

2862: in Sgr~A$^*$ and some giant elliptical galaxies, electron heat conduction will 

2863: further suppress the accretion rate (Johnson \& Quataert 2007).  While these 

2864: effects will ease the burden of invoking extremely small and perhaps 

2865: physically unrealistic radiative efficiencies, it is important to note that 

2866: these more recent models are {\it still}\ radiatively inefficient.

2867: 

2868: Whether the outflows generated in RIAFs can lead directly to relativistic jets 

2869: is unclear, but what observations have established is the tendency for lowly 

2870: accreting systems to become increasingly jet-dominated.  We see this not only 

2871: in FR~I radio galaxies (Chiaberge, Capetti \& Celotti 1999; Donato, Sambruna 

2872: \& Gliozzi 2004; Kharb \& Shastri 2004; Chiaberge, Capetti \& Macchetto 2005; 

2873: Balmaverde \& Capetti 2006; Wu, Yuan \& Cao 2007), but it is also reflected in 

2874: the nuclear properties of more run-of-the-mill LLAGNs (\S\S~5.3, 5.8), as well 

2875: as in nearly quiescent nuclei (Pellegrini et al. 2007; Wrobel, Terashima \& Ho 

2876: 2008).  Detailed analysis of some sources, in fact, indicates that most of the 

2877: accretion power is not radiated but instead channeled into the kinetic energy 

2878: of relativistic jets (M87: Di~Matteo et al. 2003; IC~1459: Fabbiano et al. 

2879: 2003; IC~4296: Pellegrini et al. 2003b).  By analogy with the situation in 

2880: cooling flows in galaxy clusters, the propensity for LLAGNs to become 

2881: radio-loud opens up the possibility that the kinetic energy from small-scale 

2882: jets or collimated outflows provides a major source of ``feedback'' into the 

2883: circumnuclear environment, perhaps to the extent that accretion can be 

2884: significantly interrupted or curtailed (Binney \& Tabor 1995; Di~Matteo et al. 

2885: 2003; Pellegrini et al. 2003a; Omma et al. 2004).  Indeed, calculations by 

2886: K\"ording, Jester \& Fender (2008; see also Heinz, Merloni \& Schwab 2007) 

2887: show that the total kinetic energy injected by LLAGN jets is very substantial.

2888: Given the prominent hard X-ray component in LLAGN spectra, inverse-Compton 

2889: scattering of the hard photons might also provide another avenue to heat the 

2890: ambient medium (Ciotti \& Ostriker 2001).  Either form of energy 

2891: injection---mechanical or radiative---can lead to unsteady, intermittent 

2892: accretion with a short duty cycle.

2893: }

2894: 

2895: {\item

2896: {\underbar{\it Subluminous disk}} \ \ \  A thin disk can be tolerated if it 

2897: can be made extremely subluminous during periods of intermittent activity 

2898: (Shields \& Wheeler 1978).  This situation would arise if accretion disks in 

2899: AGNs undergo the thermal-viscous ionization instability (Lin \& Shields 1986; 

2900: Siemiginowska, Czerny \& Kostyunin 1996), in which case they spend most of 

2901: their time in quiescence, punctuated by brief episodes of intense outbursts.  

2902: Menou \& Quataert (2001) questioned the applicability of the ionization 

2903: instability in AGNs, but they suggested that low-luminosity systems (with 

2904: $\dot M$ \lax\ $10^{-3}$ \solmass\ \peryr) may contain disks in which mass 

2905: accumulates in a stable, nonaccreting ``dead zone.''  Others have managed 

2906: to stall accretion by condensing the hot flow into an inner cold, inert disk 

2907: (Nayakshin 2003; Tan \& Blackman 2005; Jolley \& Kuncic 2007), which may form 

2908: naturally from Compton cooling of the corona (Liu et al. 2007).  Finally, 

2909: Merloni \& Fabian (2002) proposed that LLAGNs do contain a cold thin disk, but 

2910: because of their low mass accretion rates, they liberate a large fraction of 

2911: their gravitational energy in a strongly magnetized, unbound corona.  Since a 

2912: cold disk component is present in all these models, they face a serious, and 

2913: in my opinion insurmountable, challenge because LLAGNs generally do not show 

2914: fluorescent Fe~K\al\ emission or reflection features in their X-ray spectra.  

2915: The Merloni \& Fabian model may be spared of this criticism, as the disk may 

2916: be highly ionized, but it does predict strong and rapid X-ray variability, 

2917: which is generally {\it not}\ observed in LLAGNs (\S~5.3; Ptak et al. 1998).

2918: }

2919: \end{itemize}

2920: 

2921: \subsection{The Disk-Jet Connection}

2922: 

2923: As the mass accretion rate drops and the radiative efficiency declines, an 

2924: increasing fraction of the accretion power gets channeled into a relativistic 

2925: jet whose energy release is mainly kinetic rather than radiative.  The 

2926: principal evidence for the growing importance of jets in LLAGNs comes from the 

2927: broad-band SEDs, which invariably are prominent in the radio, with the degree 

2928: of radio-loudness rising systematically (albeit with significant scatter) with 

2929: decreasing Eddington ratio (\S~5.8; Figure~10{\it b}).  Where available, VLBI 

2930: imaging on milliarcsecond scales reveals unresolved cores with nonthermal 

2931: brightness temperatures and a flat or slightly inverted spectrum---classical 

2932: signposts of a relativistic jet (Blandford \& K\"onigl 1979).  Detailed 

2933: modeling of the SEDs of individual sources often shows that the accretion flow 

2934: itself does not produce enough radio emission to match the data: that extra 

2935: ``something else'' is most plausibly attributed to the jet component (Quataert 

2936: et al. 1999; Ulvestad \& Ho 2001b; Fabbiano et al.  2003; Pellegrini et al.  

2937: 2003b; Anderson, Ulvestad \& Ho 2004; Ptak et al. 2004; Wu \& Cao 2005; Nemmen 

2938: et al. 2006; Wu, Yuan \& Cao 2007).  Moreover, RIAF models predict radio 

2939: spectral indices of $\alpha \approx +0.4$ (Mahadevan 1997), whereas the 

2940: observed values more typically fall in the range $\alpha \approx -0.2$ to 

2941: $+0.2$.

2942: 

2943: The jet may contribute substantially outside of the radio band, especially 

2944: in the optical and X-rays.  Some advocate that the jet, in fact, accounts 

2945: for most or even all of the emission across the broad-band SED.  For example, 

2946: Yuan et al. (2002) successfully fitted the multiwavelength data of NGC~4258 

2947: with effectively a jet-only model.  In their picture, a radiative shock at the 

2948: base of the jet gives rise to synchrotron emission in the near-IR and optical 

2949: regions, whose self-Compton component then explains the X-rays; the 

2950: flat-spectrum radio emission comes from further out in the jet.  Similar 

2951: models have been devised for the Galactic Center source Sgr~A$^*$ (Falcke \& 

2952: Markoff 2000; Yuan, Markoff \& Falcke 2002).  The gross similarity between the 

2953: SEDs of some FR~I nuclei and BL Lac objects, which are jet-dominated sources 

2954: but otherwise also low-accretion rate systems (Wang, Staubert \& Ho 2002), has 

2955: also been noted (e.g., Bower et al. 2000; Capetti et al. 2000; Chiaberge 

2956: et al.  2003; Meisenheimer et al. 2007).  

2957: 

2958: Statistical samples that are larger but more limited in spectral coverage have 

2959: come from combining radio data with high-resolution optical or X-ray 

2960: observations. 

2961: Studies that specifically target radio galaxies, particularly FR~I sources 

2962: and weak-line FR~IIs, report that the core radio power scales tightly with the 

2963: optical and/or X-ray continuum luminosity, a finding often taken to support a 

2964: common nonthermal, jet origin for the broad-band emission (Worrall \& 

2965: Birkinshaw 1994; Canosa et al. 1999; Chiaberge, Capetti \& Celotti 1999, 2000; 

2966: Capetti et al. 2002; Verdoes~Kleijn et al. 2002; Donato, Sambruna \& Gliozzi 

2967: 2004; Balmaverde \& Capetti 2006; Balmaverde, Capetti \& Grandi 2006; Evans 

2968: et al. 2006; for a counterargument, see Rinn, Sambruna \& Gliozzi 2005 and 

2969: Gliozzi et al. 2008).  A similar radio-optical correlation, after correcting 

2970: for Doppler boosting, is also seen among BL Lac objects (Giroletti et al. 

2971: 2006), strengthening the case that FR~I radio galaxies and BL Lac objects are 

2972: intrinsically the same but misoriented siblings.  Many FR~II systems, on the 

2973: other hand, especially those with broad lines, deviate systematically from the 

2974: baseline FR~I correlations, by exhibiting stronger optical and 

2975: X-ray emission for a given level of radio emission (Chiaberge, Capetti \& 

2976: Celotti 2000, 2002; Varano et al. 2004).  In concordance with the frequent 

2977: detection of X-ray absorption and Fe~K$\alpha$ emission (Evans et al. 2006), 

2978: this suggests that FR~IIs have higher accretion rates and a much more dominant 

2979: accretion flow component, relative to the jet, than FR~Is.

2980: 

2981: Any attempt to explain the broad-band spectrum of LLAGNs with either just a

2982: RIAF or just a jet runs the risk of oversimplification.  Clearly both are 

2983: required. The trick is to figure out a reliable way to divvy up the two 

2984: contributions to the SED.  We cannot deny that there is a jet, because we see 

2985: it directly in the radio at a strength far greater than can be attributed to 

2986: the RIAF. The jet emission must contribute at some level outside of the radio 

2987: band.  At the same time, the jet cannot exist in isolation; it is anchored to 

2988: and fed by some kind of accretion flow, of which a promising configuration is 

2989: a vertically thick RIAF (Livio, Ogilvie \& Pringle 1999; Meier 1999).  An 

2990: outstanding problem is that the interpretation of the data is not unique.  

2991: Because many of the model parameters are poorly constrained and the broad-band 

2992: data remain largely fragmentary and incomplete, the SEDs often can be fit with 

2993: pure jet models, pure accretion flow models, or some combination of the two.  

2994: The recent detection of high levels of polarization in the optical nuclei of 

2995: FR~Is (Capetti et al. 2007) strongly points toward a synchrotron origin in the 

2996: jet for the optical continuum, but even this observation cannot be considered 

2997: definitive, because a RIAF can also produce nonthermal flares (e.g., in 

2998: Sgr~A$^*$; Quataert 2003).

2999: 

3000: The so-called BH fundamental plane---a nonlinear correlation among radio 

3001: luminosity, X-ray luminosity, and BH mass---offers a promising framework to 

3002: unify accreting BHs over a wide range in mass and accretion rates.  Merloni, 

3003: Heinz \& Di~Matteo (2003) first demonstrated that the correlation between 

3004: $L_{\rm rad}$ and $L_{\rm X}$ tightens considerably after including \mbh\ as a 

3005: third variable.  Combining observational material for several Galactic stellar 

3006: BHs and a large sample of nearby LLAGNs, they find that

3007: 

3008: \begin{displaymath}

3009: \log L_{\rm rad} = 0.60 \log L_{\rm X} + 0.78 \log M_{\rm BH}.

3010: \end{displaymath}

3011: 

3012: \noindent

3013: This empirical correlation agrees well with the theoretical relations between 

3014: radio flux, BH mass, and accretion rate derived from the scale-invariant 

3015: disk-jet model of Heinz \& Sunyaev (2003).  The BH fundamental plane, however,

3016: appears to be a very blunt tool.  In an independent analysis, Falcke, 

3017: K\"ording \& Markoff (2004) obtained a similar empirical relation, but unlike 

3018: Merloni, Heinz \& Di~Matteo these authors explained the scaling coefficients 

3019: entirely in terms of a jet-dominated model.  Moreover, as emphasized by 

3020: K\"ording, Falcke \& Corbel (2006), objects with very different emission 

3021: processes, including luminous quasars and BL Lac objects, sit on the same 

3022: correlation, albeit with larger scatter.

3023: 

3024: \begin{figure}

3025: %%BoundingBox: 20 150 550 670

3026: \vbox{\hbox{

3027: \hskip -0.2 cm

3028: \psfig{figure=fig12a.ps,width=6.7cm,angle=0}

3029: \hskip -0.0 cm

3030: \psfig{figure=fig12b.ps,width=6.7cm,angle=0}

3031: }}

3032: \caption{({\it a}) Fundamental plane correlation among core radio luminosity,

3033: X-ray luminosity, and BH mass.  ({\it b}) Deviations from the fundamental

3034: plane as a function of Eddington ratio.  

3035: }

3036: \end{figure}

3037: 

3038: I illustrate this point in Figure~12{\it a}, which includes all Palomar LLAGNs 

3039: with suitable data, along with the collection of high-luminosity sources from 

3040: L.C. Ho (in preparation).  With the exception of a handful of radio-loud 

3041: quasars, the vast 

3042: majority of the objects fall on a well-defined swath spanning $\sim 10$ orders 

3043: of magnitude in luminosity.  There are no obvious differences among the various

3044: subclasses of LLAGNs, except that the type~1 sources appear more tightly 

3045: correlated.  Plotting the residuals of the fundamental plane relation versus 

3046: the Eddington ratio reveals two interesting points (Figure~12{\it b}).  First, 

3047: although the intrinsic scatter of the relation is quite large, it markedly 

3048: increases for objects with high Eddington ratios, at $L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm Edd} 

3049: \approx 10^{-1\pm1}$, as already noted by Maccarone, Gallo \& Fender (2003) 

3050: and Merloni, Heinz \&  Di~Matteo (2003).  The scatter flares up because the 

3051: radio-loud quasars lie offset above the relation and the radio-quiet quasars 

3052: on average lie offset below the relation.  At the opposite extreme, sources 

3053: with $L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm Edd}$ \lax\ $10^{-6.5}$ may also show a systematic 

3054: downturn, in possible agreement with the proposal by Yuan \& Cui (2005) that 

3055: below a critical threshold, $L_{\rm X} \approx 10^{-5.5} L_{\rm Edd}$, both 

3056: the radio {\it and}\ the X-rays should be dominated by emission from the jet.  

3057: M31 (Garcia et al. 2005), NGC~821 (Pellegrini et al. 2007), and NGC~4621 and 

3058: NGC~4697 (Wrobel, Terashima \& Ho 2008) seem to conform to Yuan \& Cui's 

3059: prediction, but M32 and especially Sgr~A$^*$ clearly do not.  Additional deep 

3060: radio and X-ray observations of ultra-low-luminosity nuclei would be very 

3061: valuable to clarify the situation in this regime.

3062: 

3063: If, as surmised, the relative proportions between jet and disk output depend 

3064: on accretion rate, with the bulk of the radiated power, even in the X-rays, 

3065: originating from the former in the lowest accretion rate systems, two 

3066: important consequences ensue. With respect to the microphysics of RIAFs, it 

3067: implies that the radiative efficiencies are even lower than previously 

3068: inferred under the assumption that the X-rays emanate solely from the accretion 

3069: flow.  On a more global, environmental scale, shifting the emphasis from 

3070: the disk to the jet changes the balance between kinetic versus radiative 

3071: output, with important implications for prescriptions of AGN feedback in models

3072: of galaxy formation because BHs spend most of their lives in a low-state.  

3073: From empirical and theoretical considerations (Heinz, Merloni \& Schwab 2007; 

3074: K\"ording, Jester \& Fender 2008), the jet carries a substantial fraction 

3075: of the accreted rest mass energy: 

3076: $P_{\rm jet} \approx 0.2 \eta \dot M c^2 \approx 7.2\times10^{36} 

3077: (L_{\rm rad}/10^{30}\,{\rm ergs\,\,s}^{-1})^{12/17}$ \lum.  In 

3078: fact, the total kinetic energy injected by LLAGN jets is comparable to or 

3079: perhaps even greater than the contribution from supernovae.  At low 

3080: redshifts, radiative feedback from quasars, which is commonly assumed to 

3081: operate with an efficiency of $\sim 5$\%, may 

3082: 

3083: \clearpage

3084: \begin{figure}

3085: \psfig{figure=fig13.ps,width=13.5cm,angle=0}

3086: \caption{

3087: A cartoon of the central engine of LLAGNs, consisting of three

3088: components: an inner, radiatively inefficient accretion flow (RIAF), an outer,

3089: truncated thin disk, and a jet or outflow.  (Courtesy of S. Ho.)

3090: }

3091: \end{figure}

3092: 

3093: \noindent

3094: be less important then 

3095: jet-driven feedback from LLAGNs (K\"ording, Jester \& Fender 2008).

3096: 

3097: \subsection{The Central Engine of LLAGNs}

3098: 

3099: The preceding sections argue that the weak nuclear activity seen in the 

3100: majority of nearby galaxies traces low-level BH accretion akin to the more 

3101: familiar form observed in powerful AGNs.  However, multiple lines of evidence 

3102: indicate that LLAGNs are not simply scaled-down versions of their more luminous 

3103: cousins. They are qualitatively different.  From the somewhat fragmentary clues 

3104: presented in this review, we can piece together a schematic view of the 

3105: structure of the central engine in LLAGNs (Ho 2002b, 2003, 2005).  As sketched 

3106: in Figure~13, it has three components.

3107: 

3108: \begin{enumerate}

3109: \item{{\underbar{\it Radiatively inefficient accretion flow}} \ \ \ 

3110: In the present-day Universe, and especially in the centers of big bulges, the 

3111: amount of material available for accretion is small, resulting in mass 

3112: accretion rates that fall far below $10^{-2} \dot M_{\rm Edd}$.  In such a 

3113: regime, the low-density, tenuous material is optically thin and cannot cool

3114: efficiently.  Rather than settling into a classical optically thick, 

3115: geometrically thin, radiatively efficient disk---the normal configuration for

3116: luminous AGNs---the accretion flow puffs up into a hot, quasi-spherical, 

3117: radiatively inefficient distribution, whose dynamics may be dominated by 

3118: advection, convection, or outflows.  This is an area of active ongoing 

3119: theoretical research.  In the interest of brevity, I will gloss over the 

3120: technical details and simply follow Quataert (2003) by calling these RIAFs.  

3121: The existence of RIAFs, or conversely the absence of a standard thin disk 

3122: extending all the way to small radii (a few Schwarzschild radii $R_{\rm S}$), 

3123: is suggested by the feeble luminosities of LLAGNs, by their low Eddington 

3124: ratios, and especially by their low inferred radiative efficiencies.  The great disparity between the available fuel supply and the actually observed accretion 

3125: luminosity demands that the radiative efficiency of the accretion flow be much 

3126: less than $\eta = 0.1$ (\S~8.1).   Additional support for RIAFs comes from 

3127: considerations of the SED, particularly the absence of the big blue bump, a 

3128: classical signature of the thin disk, and the preponderance of intrinsically 

3129: hard X-ray spectra.

3130: }

3131: 

3132: \item{{\underbar{\it Truncated thin disk}} \ \ \ 

3133: Beyond a transition radius $R_{\rm tr} \approx 100-1000 R_{\rm S}$, the RIAF

3134: switches to a truncated optically thick, geometrically thin disk.  The 

3135: observational evidence for this component comes in three forms.  First, the 

3136: SEDs of some well-studied LLAGNs require a truncated thin disk to explain the 

3137: big red bump---the prominent mid-IR peak and the steep fall-off of the 

3138: spectrum in the optical--UV region (\S~5.8).  The thermal disk emission is 

3139: cool (red) not only because of a low accretion rate (Lawrence 2005) but also 

3140: because the inner radius of the disk does not extend all the way in to a few 

3141: $R_{\rm S}$ as in luminous AGNs.  Second, the very same truncated disk 

3142: structure employed to model the SED simultaneously accounts for the 

3143: relativistically broadened, double-peaked emission-line profiles observed in 

3144: some sources (\S~5.5).  Indeed, in the case of NGC~1097 (Nemmen et al. 2006), 

3145: the transition radius derived from modeling the SED ($R_{\rm tr} = 225 

3146: R_{\rm S}$) agrees remarkably well with the inner radius of the disk obtained 

3147: from fitting the double-peaked broad H\al\ profile.  Ho et al. (2000) suggested 

3148: that double-peaked broad emission lines are commonplace in LLAGNs. By 

3149: implication, the truncated disk configuration inferred from this special class 

3150: of line profiles must be commonplace too.  Lastly, the striking absence of 

3151: broad Fe~K\al\ emission in the X-ray spectra of LLAGNs (\S~5.3), a feature 

3152: commonly attributed to X-ray fluorescence off of a cold accretion disk 

3153: extending inward to a few $R_{\rm S}$ in bright Seyfert~1 nuclei (e.g., Nandra 

3154: et al. 1997b, 2007), strongly suggests that in low-luminosity sources such a 

3155: structure is either absent or truncated interior to some radius, such that it 

3156: subtends a significantly smaller solid angle.  Similar lines of reasoning have 

3157: been advanced for broad-line radio galaxies that show weak Fe~K\al\ emission 

3158: and weak Compton reflection (Wo\'zniak et al. 1998; Eracleous, Sambruna \& 

3159: Mushotzky 2000; Lewis et al. 2005), although these characteristics can be 

3160: mimicked by an ionized but otherwise untruncated disk (Ballantyne, Ross \& 

3161: Fabian 2002).

3162: }

3163: 

3164: \item{{\underbar{\it Jet/outflow}} \ \ \ The empirical connection between 

3165: LLAGNs and jets has been established unequivocally from radio observations.  

3166: Not only are the SEDs of LLAGNs generically radio-loud, but the strength of the

3167: radio emission generally cannot be fit without recourse to a jet component, 

3168: which in many cases can be seen directly from VLBI-scale radio images.  From a 

3169: theoretical point of view, jets may share a close physical connection with 

3170: RIAFs. As emphasized by Narayan \& Yi (1995) and Blandford \& Begelman (1999), 

3171: RIAFs have a strong tendency to drive bipolar outflows due to the high thermal 

3172: energy content of the hot gas.  Whether such outflows can develop into highly 

3173: collimated, relativistic ejections remains to be seen, but they at least 

3174: provide a promising starting point.  RIAFs may be additionally conducive to 

3175: jet formation because its vertically thick structure enhances the large-scale 

3176: poloidal component of the magnetic field, which plays a critical role in 

3177: launching jets (Livio, Ogilvie \& Pringle 1999; Meier 1999; Ballantyne \& 

3178: Fabian 2005; Ballantyne 2007).  It is interesting to recall that the original 

3179: motivation for ion-supported tori (Rees et al. 1982), an early incarnation of 

3180: RIAFs, was to explain the low luminosity of radio galaxies. Rees et al.  

3181: postulated that the puffed-up structure of the ion torus may help facilitate 

3182: the collimation of the jet.

3183: }

3184: \end{enumerate}

3185: 

3186: The above-described three-component structure has been applied to model the 

3187: broad-band spectrum of a number of LLAGNs, including NGC~4258 (Lasota et al. 

3188: 1996; Gammie, Narayan \& Blandford 1999), M81 and NGC~4579 (Quataert et al. 

3189: 1999), NGC~3998 (Ptak et al. 2004), and NGC~1097 (Nemmen et al. 2006).  For the 

3190: handful of LLAGNs with available estimates of the transition radii, 

3191: $R_{\rm tr}$ seems to scale roughly inversely with $L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm Edd}$ 

3192: (Yuan \& Narayan 2004).  This trend may be in agreement with models 

3193: for disk evaporation (Liu \& Meyer-Hofmeister 2001).  As the latter authors

3194: note, however, disks attain their maximum evaporation efficiency at 

3195: $R_{\rm tr} \approx 300 R_{\rm S}$, making sources such as M81 and NGC~4579, 

3196: both with $R_{\rm tr} \approx 100 R_{\rm S}$ (Quataert et al. 1999), difficult 

3197: to explain.  At a qualitative level, at least, the general idea that the thin

3198: disk recedes to larger and larger radii as the accretion rate drops is 

3199: probably correct.  In an analysis of 33 PG quasars with Fe~K\al\ emission 

3200: detected in {\it XMM-Newton}\ spectra, Inoue, Terashima \& Ho (2007) find 

3201: that the iron line profile varies systematically with Eddington ratio. 

3202: Specifically, the Fe~K\al\ profile becomes narrower with decreasing 

3203: $L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm Edd}$, a result that can be interpreted as a systematic 

3204: increase in the inner radius of the accretion disk at low accretion rates.

3205: 

3206: The basic schematic proposed in Figure~13 is hardly new.  To my knowledge, a 

3207: hybrid model consisting of a RIAF---then called an ion-supported torus---plus 

3208: a truncated thin disk was most clearly articulated in a prescient paper by 

3209: Chen \& Halpern (1989) in their description of Arp~102B, later elaborated by 

3210: Eracleous \& Halpern (1994) in the general context of double-peaked broad-line 

3211: radio galaxies.  Chen \& Halpern identified the 25 \micron\ peak in the SED 

3212: with the turnover frequency of the synchrotron peak from the RIAF, whose 

3213: elevated structure illuminates an outer thin disk that emits the double-peaked 

3214: broad optical lines. The overall weakness of the UV continuum in Arp~102B 

3215: (Halpern et al.  1996) further corroborates a truncated thin disk structure 

3216: and potentially provides an explanation for the low-ionization state of the 

3217: emission-line spectrum.  As for the jet component, it was assumed to be 

3218: present, at least implicitly, insofar as the double-peaked broad-line AGNs 

3219: were thought to reside preferentially in radio-loud AGNs, and the very concept 

3220: of ion-supported tori was invented with reference to radio galaxies (Rees et 

3221: al. 1982).

3222: 

3223: Recent developments add important refinements and modifications to Chen \& 

3224: Halpern's original picture.  First, the mid-IR peak in most objects is 

3225: dominated by thermal emission from the truncated thin disk rather than by the 

3226: synchrotron peak of the RIAF.  Second, the jet component, which was once 

3227: regarded as somewhat incidental, has emerged as a natural and perhaps inevitable

3228: outgrowth of the inner accretion flow itself.  Third, although the original 

3229: model was invented to explain a small minority of the AGN population 

3230: (double-peaked radio-loud sources), now we have good reason to believe that 

3231: similar physical conditions prevail in LINERs as a class (Ho et al. 2000), 

3232: and, by extension, in the majority of nearby accreting BHs.

3233: 

3234: The physical picture outlined above for LLAGNs shares strong similarities with 

3235: that developed for X-ray binaries in their hard state (see Maccarone, Fender 

3236: \& Ho 2005 and references therein), suggesting that the basic architecture

3237: of the central engine around accreting BHs---across 10 orders of magnitude in 

3238: mass---is essentially scale-invariant (Meier 2001; Maccarone, Gallo \& 

3239: Fender 2003; Merloni, Heinz \& Di~Matteo 2003; Falcke, K\"ording \& Markoff 

3240: 2004; Ho 2005; K\"ording, Jester \& Fender 2006).

3241: 

3242: \section{CONCLUDING REMARKS}

3243: 

3244: The topics covered in this article are both very old and very new.  It has been 

3245: known for over three decades that a large segment of the galaxy population 

3246: exhibits signs of unusual activity in their nuclei, and for nearly as long 

3247: people have puzzled over the physical origin of this activity.  Over time the 

3248: observational material at optical wavelengths has improved markedly, 

3249: especially with the completion of the Palomar survey, but the debate has only 

3250: intensified.  Given their abundance, most of the controversy has centered, not 

3251: surprisingly, on LINERs.  While the nonstellar nature of a sizable fraction of 

3252: LINERs is now incontrovertible (e.g., those with broad H\al\ emission), the 

3253: AGN content in the majority of the class remains unsettled.  Determining the 

3254: physical origin of these systems is more than of mere phenomenological 

3255: interest.  Because LINERs are so numerous---being the dominant constituent of 

3256: the local LLAGN population and a sizable fraction of all galaxies---they have 

3257: repercussions on virtually every issue related to AGN and BH demographics.  

3258: 

3259: The main source of contention stems from the fact that Mother Nature knows too 

3260: many ways of generating nebular conditions that qualitatively look similar to 

3261: the low-ionization characteristics of LINERs at optical wavelengths.  A 

3262: dizzying array of excitation mechanisms has been proposed to explain LINERs, 

3263: ranging from variants of conventional AGN photoionization, to shocks of 

3264: various flavors, to interstellar processes such as cooling flows and turbulent 

3265: mixing layers, to stellar-based photoionization by populations both young and 

3266: old, prosaic and exotic.  This field has suffered not from a shortage of 

3267: ideas, but from too many.  As a consequence, whenever LINERs are discussed, it 

3268: is customary to end with the pessimistic mantra that they are a mixed-bag, 

3269: heterogeneous class of objects, a statement with somewhat dismissive 

3270: connotations that is often taken to mean that we have no idea what they are 

3271: and that they are too messy to deal with.  This is an unfair characterization 

3272: of the progress that has been made, and I think that there is good reason to 

3273: sound a more positive note.  

3274: 

3275: As summarized in this review, a number of developments during the last few 

3276: years shed considerable light on the physical origin of LLAGNs in general and 

3277: LINERs in particular.  The key advances have come from the broader 

3278: perspective afforded by observations outside of the traditional optical 

3279: window, especially in the radio and X-rays, although important 

3280: insights can also be credited to optical and UV data taken with \hst.  In all 

3281: instances, high angular resolution has been a critical factor to disentangle 

3282: the weak nuclear emission from the blinding host galaxy background.  

3283: 

3284: Other developments have been instrumental in forging a coherent view of nuclear

3285: activity in the nearby Universe.  On the theoretical side, rapid advances

3286: in the study of radiatively inefficient accretion flows, originally primarily

3287: motivated by applications to X-ray binaries and to the Galactic Center source

3288: Sgr~A$^*$, has led to a growing appreciation that they are also relevant to

3289: LLAGNs in general.  Many investigators have sharpened the physical analogy 

3290: between the spectral states of X-ray binaries and certain classes of AGNs, an 

3291: effort that has resulted in a more holistic picture of BH accretion, 

3292: especially as it concerns the evolution of the accretion flow in response to 

3293: variations in mass accretion rate and the mechanism for generating jets or 

3294: outflows.  Meanwhile, the dynamical detection of supermassive BHs, their 

3295: ubiquity, and the discovery of scaling relations between BHs and their host 

3296: galaxies have given a major boom to studies of AGNs in all their multi-faceted 

3297: manifestations.  More than ever, in the grand scheme of things, AGNs are no 

3298: longer viewed as rare and exotic oddities but as natural episodes during the 

3299: life cycle of galaxies during which their BHs accrete, grow, and shine.  The 

3300: impact of BH growth and AGN feedback have emerged forcefully as major new 

3301: themes in galaxy formation.  LLAGNs gain an even greater prominence within 

3302: this context.  Although the bulk of the mass density of BHs was accreted in a 

3303: luminous, radiatively efficient mode, it behooves us to understand how BHs 

3304: spend most of their lives.   The detection of supermassive BHs has also 

3305: fundamentally altered the character of the discourse on LLAGNs.  We can now 

3306: shift our attention from the question of {\it whether}\ LLAGNs contain 

3307: BHs---an implicit or explicit motivation for much of the past discussion on 

3308: the nature of these sources---to {\it why}\ these BHs have the properties that 

3309: they do.  Among other things, LLAGNs can be used as an effective platform for 

3310: exploring accretion physics in highly sub-Eddington systems and for 

3311: investigating physical processes in the circumnuclear regions of galaxies that 

3312: are normally masked by brighter nuclei.

3313: 

3314: The following is a list of the ``top ten'' results from this paper.

3315: 

3316: \begin{enumerate}

3317: 

3318: \item{Approximately 2/3 of local E--Sb galaxies exhibit weak nuclear activity 

3319: incompatible with normal stellar processes; in contrast, only about 15\% of 

3320: Sc--Sm galaxies show AGN activity (\S 3). }

3321: 

3322: \item{The vast majority of LINERs, and, by implication, most nearby weakly 

3323: active nuclei, are genuine, accretion-powered AGNs (\S\S 6.1, 6.5).}

3324: 

3325: \item{The ubiquity of LLAGNs in galaxies with bulges strongly supports the

3326: current paradigm derived from dynamical studies that all bulges contain BHs.

3327: However, the detection of AGNs in some bulgeless, even dwarf, galaxies proves

3328: that bulges are not necessary for the formation of central BHs (\S 7).}

3329: 

3330: \item{The luminosity function of nearby LLAGNs follows $\Phi \propto

3331: L^{-1.2\pm0.2}$ from $L_{{\rm H}\alpha} \approx 3\times 10^{41}$ to $10^{38}$

3332: \lum, below which it appears to flatten down to $L_{{\rm H}\alpha} \approx 6 

3333: \times 10^{36}$ \lum\ or $M_B \approx -8$ mag (\S 5.9).}

3334: 

3335: \item{Stellar photoionization by young or intermediate-stars and shock heating

3336: can be ruled out as the excitation mechanisms for LLAGNs (\S\S 6.2, 6.3).}

3337: 

3338: \item{Despite the overall success of AGN photoionization models, many LLAGNs,

3339: especially type~2 sources, have a shortage of ionizing photons.  The energy 

3340: deficit problem could be solved with cosmic ray heating and extra ionization 

3341: from evolved (post-AGB) stars, diffuse thermal plasma, and the cumulative 

3342: X-ray emission from low-mass X-ray binaries (\S 6.4).}

3343: 

3344: \item{Variations in the mass accretion rate give rise to the different classes 

3345: of emission-line nuclei.  LINERs are the low-luminosity, low-accretion rate 

3346: extension of Seyferts, followed by transition nuclei, and ending with 

3347: absorption-line nuclei at the end of the BH starvation sequence (\S 6.5).}

3348: 

3349: \item{LLAGNs are not simply scaled-down versions of powerful AGNs.  Their 

3350: central engines undergo fundamental changes when the accretion rate drops to 

3351: extremely sub-Eddington values.  In this regime, the BLR and obscuring torus 

3352: disappear (\S\S 5.5, 5.6).  LLAGNs do not follow the standard AGN unification 

3353: model.}

3354: 

3355: \item{Below a characteristic luminosity of $\sim$1\% Eddington, the

3356: canonical optically thick, geometrically thin accretion disk transforms

3357: into a three-component structure consisting of an inner vertically thick and 

3358: radiatively inefficient accretion flow, a truncated outer thin disk, and a jet 

3359: or outflow (\S\S 5.8, 8.3).}

3360: 

3361: \item{At the lowest accretion rates, an increasing fraction of the accretion

3362: energy gets channeled into a relativistic jet.  The emitted energy is mainly

3363: kinetic rather than radiative.  Since radiation and kinetic jets interact

3364: differently with the surrounding gas, this has important implications for

3365: AGN feedback into galaxy formation (\S 8.2).}

3366: 

3367: \end{enumerate}

3368: 

3369: \vskip 0.2cm

3370: My research is supported by the Carnegie Institution of Washington and by NASA 

3371: grants from the Space Telescope Science Institute (operated by AURA, Inc., 

3372: under NASA contract NAS5-26555).  I would like to recognize my collaborators 

3373: who have contributed to the work covered in this review, especially A.J. Barth,

3374: M. Eracleous, M.E. Filho, A.V. Filippenko, J.E. Greene, D. Maoz, E.C. Moran, 

3375: C.Y.  Peng, A. Ptak, E. Quataert, H.-W. Rix, W.L.W. Sargent, M.  Sarzi, J.C. 

3376: Shields, Y. Terashima, J.S. Ulvestad, and J.M.  Wrobel.  Several of them

3377: (A.J. Barth, M. Eracleous, J.E. Greene, M. Sarzi, J.C. Shields, Y. Terashima) 

3378: read an early draft of the manuscript and provided useful feedback that helped 

3379: to improve it.  Some of the concepts expressed in the review were sharpened 

3380: after correspondence with M. Eracleous, G. Ferland, J.C. Shields, and Y. 

3381: Terashima.  I thank A.J. Barth, A.V. Filippenko, and W.L.W. 

3382: Sargent for permission to cite material in advance of publication, H.M.L.G. 

3383: Flohic and M. Eracleous for providing the images for Figure 5, and Salvador Ho 

3384: for drafting Figure 13.  I am grateful to J. Kormendy for his steadfast 

3385: encouragement, wise counsel, and meticulous editing.

3386: 

3387: \vskip 0.5cm

3388: 

3389: %\begin{thebibliography}{99}

3390: 

3391: \noindent {LITERATURE CITED}

3392: 

3393: \frenchspacing

3394: 

3395: \vskip 0.5cm

3396: 

3397: \nhi 

3398: Aldrovandi SMV, P\'equignot D. 1973. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 26:33

3399: 

3400: \nhi 

3401: Allen MG, Dopita, MA, Tsvetanov ZI. 1998. {\it Ap. J.} 493:571

3402: 

3403: \nhi 

3404: Alonso-Herrero A, Rieke MJ, Rieke GH, Ruiz M. 1997. {\it Ap. J.} 482:74

3405: 

3406: \nhi 

3407: Alonso-Herrero A, Rieke MJ, Rieke GH, Shields JC. 2000. {\it Ap. J.} 530:688

3408: 

3409: \nhi 

3410: Anderson JM, Ulvestad JS. 2005. {\it Ap. J.} 627:674

3411: 

3412: \nhi 

3413: Anderson JM, Ulvestad JS, Ho LC. 2004. {\it Ap. J.} 603:42

3414: 

3415: \nhi 

3416: Antonucci R. 1993.  {\it Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.} 31:473

3417: 

3418: \nhi 

3419: Armus L, Heckman TM, Miley GK. 1990. {\it Ap. J.} 364:471

3420: 

3421: \nhi 

3422: Atkinson JW, Collett JL, Marconi A, Axon DJ, Alonso-Herrero A, et al. 2005. 

3423: {\it MNRAS} 359:504

3424: 

3425: \nhi 

3426: Avni Y, Tananbaum H. 1982. {\it Ap. J.} 262:L17

3427: 

3428: \nhi 

3429: Awaki H, Mushotzky R, Tsuru T, Fabian AC, Fukazawa Y, et al. 1994. {\it PASJ} 

3430: 46:L65

3431: 

3432: \nhi 

3433: Baganoff FK, Maeda Y, Morris M, Bautz MW, Brandt WN, et al. 2003. {\it Ap. J.} 

3434: 591:891

3435: 

3436: \nhi 

3437: Baldwin JA, Phillips MM, Terlevich R. 1981. {\it PASP} 93:5

3438: 

3439: \nhi 

3440: Ballantyne DR. 2007. {\it Mod. Phys. Lett. A} 22:2397

3441: 

3442: \nhi 

3443: Ballantyne DR, Fabian AC. 2005. {\it Ap. J.} 622:L97

3444: 

3445: \nhi 

3446: Ballantyne DR, Ross RR, Fabian AC. 2002. {\it MNRAS} 332:L45

3447: 

3448: \nhi 

3449: Balmaverde B, Capetti A. 2006.  {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 447:97

3450: 

3451: \nhi 

3452: Balmaverde B, Capetti A, Grandi P. 2006. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 451:35

3453: 

3454: \nhi

3455: Barger AJ, Cowie LL, Mushotzky RF, Richards EA. 2001. {\it Astron. J.} 121:662

3456: 

3457: \nhi 

3458: Barth AJ. 2004. In {\it Carnegie Observatories Astrophysics Series, Vol 1:

3459: Coevolution of Black Holes and Galaxies}, ed. LC Ho, p. 21. Cambridge:

3460: Cambridge Univ. Press

3461: 

3462: 

3463: \nhi 

3464: Barth AJ, Filippenko AV, Moran EC. 1999a. {\it Ap. J.} 515:L61

3465: 

3466: \nhi 

3467: Barth AJ, Filippenko AV, Moran EC. 1999b. {\it Ap. J.} 525:673

3468: 

3469: \nhi 

3470: Barth AJ, Greene JE, Ho LC. 2005.  {\it Ap. J.} 619:L151

3471: 

3472: \nhi 

3473: Barth AJ, Ho LC, Filippenko AV. 2003.  In {\it Active Galactic Nuclei: from 

3474: Central Engine to Host Galaxy}, ed. S Collin, F Combes, I Shlosman, p. 387.

3475: San Francisco: ASP

3476: 

3477: \nhi 

3478: Barth AJ, Ho LC, Filippenko AV, Rix H-W, Sargent WLW 2001a. {\it Ap. J.} 546:205

3479: 

3480: \nhi 

3481: Barth AJ, Ho LC, Filippenko AV, Sargent WLW. 1998. {\it Ap. J.} 496:133

3482: 

3483: \nhi 

3484: Barth AJ, Ho LC, Rutledge RE, Sargent WLW. 2004. {\it Ap. J.} 607:90

3485: 

3486: \nhi 

3487: Barth AJ, Reichert GA, Filippenko AV, Ho LC, Shields JC, Mushotzky RF, 

3488: Puchnarewicz EM. 1996. {\it Astron. J.} 112:1829

3489: 

3490: \nhi 

3491: Barth AJ, Reichert GA, Ho LC, Shields JC, Filippenko AV, Puchnarewicz EM. 

3492: 1997. {\it Astron. J.} 114:2313

3493: 

3494: \nhi 

3495: Barth AJ, Sarzi M, Rix H-W, Ho LC, Filippenko AV, Sargent WLW. 2001b. 

3496: {\it Ap. J.} 555:685

3497: 

3498: \nhi 

3499: Barth AJ, Shields JC. 2000. {\it PASP} 112:753

3500: 

3501: \nhi 

3502: Barth AJ, Tran H, Brotherton MS, Filippenko AV, Ho LC, et al. 1999. 

3503: {\it Astron. J.} 118:1609

3504: 

3505: \nhi

3506: Bassani L, Dadina M, Maiolino R, Salvati M, Risaliti G, et al.

3507: 1999.  {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 121:473

3508: 

3509: \nhi 

3510: Begelman MC, Fabian AC. 1990. {\it MNRAS} 244:36P

3511: 

3512: \nhi 

3513: Bendo GJ, Dale DA, Draine BT, Engelbracht CW, Kennicutt RC Jr, et al. 2006. 

3514: {\it Ap. J.} 645:134

3515: 

3516: \nhi 

3517: Bendo GJ, Joseph RD. 2004. {\it Astron. J.} 127:3338

3518: 

3519: \nhi 

3520: Bennert N, Jungwiert B, Komossa S, Haas M, Chini R. 2006. 

3521: {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 456:953

3522: 

3523: \nhi 

3524: Bianchi S, Corral A, Panessa F, Barcons X, Matt G, et al. 2008. {\it MNRAS} 

3525: 385:195

3526: 

3527: \nhi 

3528: Bietenholz MF, Bartel N, Rupen NP. 2000. {\it Ap. J.} 532:895

3529: 

3530: \nhi 

3531: Binette L. 1985. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 143:334

3532: 

3533: \nhi 

3534: Binette L, Magris CG, Stasi\'nska G, Bruzual AG. 1994. 

3535: {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 292:13

3536: 

3537: \nhi 

3538: Binney J, Tabor G. 1995. {\it MNRAS} 276:663

3539: 

3540: \nhi 

3541: Blandford RD, Begelman MC. 1999. {\it MNRAS} 303:L1

3542: 

3543: \nhi 

3544: Blandford RD, K\"onigl A. 1979. {\it Ap. J.} 232:34

3545: 

3546: \nhi 

3547: Blanton EL, Sarazin CL, Irwin JA. 2001. {\it Ap. J.} 552:106

3548: 

3549: \nhi 

3550: B\"ohringer H, Belsole E, Kennea J, Matsushita K, Molendi S, et al. 2001. 

3551: {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 365::181

3552: 

3553: \nhi 

3554: Boisson C, Joly M, Moultaka J, Pelat D, Serote-Roos M. 2000.  

3555: {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 357:850

3556: 

3557: \nhi 

3558: B\"{o}ker T, van~der~Marel RP, Laine S, Rix H-W, Sarzi M, Ho LC, Shields JC. 

3559: 2002. {\it Astron. J.} 123:1389

3560: 

3561: \nhi 

3562: Bonatto C, Bica E, Alloin D. 1989. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 226:23

3563: 

3564: \nhi 

3565: Bondi H. 1952. {\it MNRAS} 112:195

3566: 

3567: \nhi 

3568: Bower GA, Green RF, Quillen AC, Danks A, Gull T, et al. 2000. {\it Ap. J.} 

3569: 534:189

3570: 

3571: \nhi 

3572: Bower GA, Wilson AS, Heckman TM, Richstone DO. 1996. {\it Astron. J.} 111:1901

3573: 

3574: \nhi 

3575: Burbidge EM, Burbidge G. 1962. {\it Ap. J.} 135:694

3576: 

3577: \nhi 

3578: Burbidge EM, Burbidge G. 1965. {\it Ap. J.} 142:634

3579: 

3580: \nhi 

3581: Burbidge G, Gould RJ, Pottasch SR. 1963. {\it Ap. J.} 138:945

3582: 

3583: \nhi 

3584: Canosa CM, Worrall DM, Hardcastle MJ, Birkinshaw M. 1999. {\it MNRAS} 310:30

3585: 

3586: \nhi 

3587: Capetti A, Axon DJ, Chiaberge M, Sparks WB, Macchetto FD, et al.

3588: 2007. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 471:137

3589: 

3590: \nhi 

3591: Capetti A, Celotti A, Chiaberge M, de Ruiter HR, Fanti R, et al.

3592: 2002. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 383:104

3593: 

3594: \nhi 

3595: Capetti A, Trussoni E, Celotti A, Feretti L, Chiaberge M. 2000. {\it MNRAS} 

3596: 318:493

3597: 

3598: \nhi 

3599: Capetti A, Verdoes Kleijn G, Chiaberge M. 2005. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 

3600: 439:935

3601: 

3602: \nhi 

3603: Cappellari M, Bertola F, Burstein D, Buson LM, Greggio L, Renzini A. 2001. 

3604: {\it Ap. J.} 551:197

3605: 

3606: \nhi 

3607: Cappi M, Panessa F, Bassani L, Dadina M, Dicocco G, et al. 2006. 

3608: {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 446:459

3609: 

3610: \nhi 

3611: Carollo CM, Stiavelli M, de Zeeuw PT, Mack, J. 1997. {\it Astron. J.} 114:2366

3612: 

3613: \nhi 

3614: Carrillo R, Masegosa J, Dultzin-Hacyan D, Ordo\~{n}ez R. 1999.  {\it Rev. Mex. 

3615: Astron. Astrof.} 35:187

3616: 

3617: \nhi 

3618: Carswell RF, Baldwin JA, Atwood B, Phillips MM. 1984. {\it Ap. J.} 286:464

3619: 

3620: \nhi 

3621: Chary R, Becklin EE, Evans AS, Neugebauer G, Scoville NZ, et al.

3622: 2000. {\it Ap. J.} 531:756

3623: 

3624: \nhi 

3625: Chen K, Halpern JP. 1989. {\it Ap. J.} 344:115

3626: 

3627: \nhi 

3628: Chiaberge M, Capetti A, Celotti A. 1999.  {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 349:77

3629: 

3630: \nhi 

3631: Chiaberge M, Capetti A, Celotti A. 2000.  {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 355:873

3632: 

3633: \nhi 

3634: Chiaberge M, Capetti A, Celotti A. 2002.  {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 394:791

3635: 

3636: \nhi 

3637: Chiaberge M, Capetti A, Macchetto FD. 2005. {\it Ap. J.} 625:716

3638: 

3639: \nhi 

3640: Chiaberge M, Gilli R, Capetti A, Macchetto FD. 2003. {\it Ap. J.} 597:166

3641: 

3642: \nhi 

3643: Chiaberge M, Macchetto FD, Sparks W, Capetti A, Allen MG, Martel AR. 2002.

3644: {\it Ap. J.} 571:247

3645: 

3646: \nhi 

3647: Cid Fernandes R Jr, Golz\'alez Delgado RM, Schmitt H, Storchi-Bergmann T, Martins LP, et al. 2004. {\it Ap. J.} 605:105

3648: 

3649: \nhi 

3650: Ciotti L, D'Ercole A, Pellegrini S, Renzini A. 1991. {\it Ap. J.} 376:380

3651: 

3652: \nhi 

3653: Ciotti L, Ostriker JP. 2001. {\it Ap. J.} 551:131

3654: 

3655: \nhi 

3656: Colbert EJM, Mushotzky RF. 1999. {\it Ap. J.} 519:89

3657: 

3658: \nhi 

3659: Colina L, Golz\'alez Delgado RM, Mas-Hesse JM, Leitherer C. 2002. {\it Ap. J.} 

3660: 579:545

3661: 

3662: \nhi 

3663: Collins JA, Rand RJ. 2001. {\it Ap. J.} 551:57

3664: 

3665: \nhi 

3666: Combes F. 2003. In {\it Active Galactic Nuclei: from Central Engine to Host 

3667: Galaxy}, ed. S Collin,  F Combes, I Shlosman, p. 411. San Francisco: ASP

3668: 

3669: \nhi 

3670: Constantin A, Vogeley MS. 2006. {\it Ap. J.} 650:727

3671: 

3672: \nhi 

3673: Contini M. 1997. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 323:71

3674: 

3675: \nhi 

3676: Corbett EA, Kewley L, Appleton PN, Charmandaris V, Dopita MA, et al.

3677: 2003. {\it Ap. J.} 583:670

3678: 

3679: \nhi 

3680: Costero R, Osterbrock DE. 1977. {\it Ap. J.} 211:675

3681: 

3682: \nhi 

3683: Dale DA, Smith JDT, Armus L, Buckalew BA, Helou G, et al. 2006. {\it Ap. J.} 

3684: 646:161

3685: 

3686: \nhi 

3687: Danziger IJ, Fosbury RAE, Penston MV. 1977. {\it MNRAS} 179:41P

3688: 

3689: \nhi 

3690: Decarli R, Gavazzi G, Arosio I, Cortese L, Boselli A, et al. 2007. {\it MNRAS} 

3691: 381:136

3692: 

3693: \nhi 

3694: Demoulin-Ulrich M-H, Butcher HR, Boksenberg A. 1984. {\it Ap. J.} 285:527

3695: 

3696: \nhi 

3697: Desroches L-B, Ho LC. 2008. {\it Ap. J.}, submitted

3698: 

3699: \nhi 

3700: Dewangan GC, Griffiths RE, Di Matteo T, Schurch NJ. 2004. {\it Ap. J.} 607:788

3701: 

3702: \nhi 

3703: D\'\i az AI, Pagel BEJ, Wilson IRG. 1985. {\it MNRAS} 212:737

3704: 

3705: \nhi 

3706: D\'\i az AI, Pagel BEJ, Terlevich E. 1985. {\it MNRAS} 214:41P

3707: 

3708: \nhi 

3709: Di Matteo T, Allen SW, Fabian AC, Wilson AS, Young AJ. 2003. {\it Ap. J.} 

3710: 582:133

3711: 

3712: \nhi 

3713: Di Matteo T, Fabian AC. 1997. {\it MNRAS} 286:L50

3714: 

3715: \nhi 

3716: Di Matteo T, Johnstone RM, Allen SW, Fabian AC. 2001. {\it Ap. J.} 550:L19

3717: 

3718: \nhi 

3719: Disney MJ, Cromwell RH. 1971. {\it Ap. J.} 164:L35

3720: 

3721: \nhi 

3722: Doi A, Kameno S, Kohno K, Nakanishi K, Inoue M. 2005. {\it MNRAS} 363:692

3723: 

3724: \nhi 

3725: Donato D, Sambruna RM, Gliozzi M. 2004. {\it Ap. J.} 617:915

3726: 

3727: \nhi 

3728: Done C., Gierli\'nski M, Sobolewska M, Schurch N.  2007. In {\it The Central 

3729: Engine of Active Galactic Nuclei}, ed.  LC Ho, J-M Wang, p. 121. San 

3730: Francisco: ASP

3731: 

3732: \nhi 

3733: Dong X-B, Wang T, Yuan W, Shan H, Zhou H, et al. 2007. {\it Ap. J.} 657:700

3734: 

3735: \nhi 

3736: Dopita MA, Koratkar AP, Allen MG, Tsvetanov ZI, Ford HC, et al.

3737: 1997. {\it Ap. J.} 490:202

3738: 

3739: \nhi 

3740: Dopita MA, Sutherland RS. 1995. {\it Ap. J.} 455:468

3741: 

3742: \nhi 

3743: Dudik RP, Satyapal S, Gliozzi M, Sambruna RM. 2005. {\it Ap. J.} 620:113

3744: 

3745: \nhi 

3746: Elitzur M, Shlosman I. 2006. {\it Ap. J.} 648:L101

3747: 

3748: \nhi 

3749: Elvis M, Wilkes BJ, McDowell JC, Green RF, Bechtold J, et al. 1994. 

3750: {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 95:1

3751: 

3752: \nhi 

3753: Engelbracht CW, Rieke MJ, Rieke GH, Kelley DM, Achtermann JM. 1998. 

3754: {\it Ap. J.} 505:639

3755: 

3756: \nhi 

3757: Eracleous M, Halpern JP. 1994. {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 90:1

3758: 

3759: \nhi 

3760: Eracleous M, Halpern JP. 2001. {\it Ap.~J.} 554:240

3761: 

3762: \nhi 

3763: Eracleous M, Hwang JA, Flohic HMLG. 2008a. {\it Ap.~J.} submitted

3764: 

3765: \nhi 

3766: Eracleous M, Hwang JA, Flohic HMLG. 2008b. {\it Ap.~J.} submitted

3767: 

3768: \nhi 

3769: Eracleous M, Sambruna R, Mushotzky RF. 2000. {\it Ap. J.} 537:654

3770: 

3771: \nhi 

3772: Eracleous M, Shields JC, Chartas G, Moran EC. 2002. {\it Ap.~J.} 565:108

3773: 

3774: \nhi 

3775: Evans DA, Worrall DM, Hardcastle MJ, Kraft RP, Birkinshaw M. 2006. 

3776: {\it Ap.~J.} 642:96

3777: 

3778: \nhi 

3779: Fabbiano G. 2006. {\it Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.} 44:323

3780: 

3781: \nhi 

3782: Fabbiano G, Baldi A, Pellegrini S, Siemiginowska A, Elvis M, et al.

3783: 2004. {\it Ap.~J.} 616:730

3784: 

3785: \nhi 

3786: Fabbiano G, Elvis M, Markoff S, Siemiginowska A, Pellegrini S, et al.

3787: 2003. {\it Ap.~J.} 588:175

3788: 

3789: \nhi 

3790: Fabbiano G, Trinchieri G. 1985. {\it Ap. J.} 296:430

3791: 

3792: \nhi 

3793: Faber SM, Tremaine S, Ajhar EA, Byun Y-I, Dressler A, et al. 1997. 

3794: {\it Astron. J.} 114:1365

3795: 

3796: \nhi 

3797: Fabian AC, Arnaud KA, Nulsen PEJ, Mushotzky RF. 1986. {\it Ap. J.} 305:9

3798: 

3799: \nhi 

3800: Fabian AC, Canizares CR. 1988. {\it Nature} 333:829

3801: 

3802: \nhi 

3803: Fabian AC, Rees MJ. 1995. {\it MNRAS} 277:L55

3804: 

3805: \nhi 

3806: Falcke H, K\"ording E, Markoff S. 2004. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 414:895

3807: 

3808: \nhi 

3809: Falcke H, Markoff S. 2000. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 362:113

3810: 

3811: \nhi 

3812: Falcke H, Nagar NM, Wilson AS, Ulvestad JS. 2000. {\it Ap. J.} 542:197

3813: 

3814: \nhi 

3815: Fanaroff BL, Riley JM. 1974. {\it MNRAS} 167:31P

3816: 

3817: \nhi 

3818: Ferrarese L, Merritt D. 2000. {\it Ap. J.} 539:L9

3819: 

3820: \nhi 

3821: Ferland GJ, Mushotzky RF. 1984. {\it Ap. J.} 286:42

3822: 

3823: \nhi 

3824: Ferland GJ, Netzer H. 1983. {\it Ap. J.} 264:105

3825: 

3826: \nhi 

3827: Filho ME, Barthel PD, Ho LC. 2000. {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 129:93

3828: 

3829: \nhi 

3830: Filho ME, Barthel PD, Ho LC. 2002a. {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 142:223

3831: 

3832: \nhi 

3833: Filho ME, Barthel PD, Ho LC. 2002b. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 385:425

3834: 

3835: \nhi 

3836: Filho ME, Barthel PD, Ho LC. 2006. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 451:71

3837: 

3838: \nhi 

3839: Filho ME, Fraternali F, Nagar NM, Barthel PD, Markoff S, et al. 2004. 

3840: {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 418:429

3841: 

3842: \nhi 

3843: Filippenko AV. 1985. {\it Ap. J.} 289:475

3844: 

3845: \nhi 

3846: Filippenko AV. 1996. In {\it The Physics of LINERs in View of Recent 

3847: Observations}, ed.  M Eracleous, A Koratkar, C Leitherer, LC Ho, p. 17. 

3848: San Francisco: ASP

3849: 

3850: \nhi 

3851: Filippenko AV, Halpern JP. 1984. {\it Ap. J.} 285:458

3852:  

3853: \nhi 

3854: Filippenko AV, Ho LC. 2003. {\it Ap. J.} 588:L13

3855: 

3856: \nhi 

3857: Filippenko AV, Ho LC, Sargent WLW. 1993. {\it Ap. J.} 410:L75

3858: 

3859: \nhi 

3860: Filippenko AV, Sargent WLW. 1985. {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 57:503 

3861:  

3862: \nhi 

3863: Filippenko AV, Sargent WLW. 1988. {\it Ap. J.} 324:134

3864: 

3865: \nhi 

3866: Filippenko AV, Sargent WLW. 1989. {\it Ap. J.} 342:L11

3867: 

3868: \nhi 

3869: Filippenko AV, Terlevich R. 1992. {\it Ap. J.} 397:L79

3870:  

3871: \nhi 

3872: Fiore F, ed. 2006. {\it AGNs and Galaxy Evolution}. {\it MmSAI} 77

3873: 

3874: \nhi 

3875: Fiore F, Pellegrini S, Matt G, Antonelli LA, Comastri A, et al. 2001. 

3876: {\it Ap. J.} 556:150

3877: 

3878: \nhi 

3879: Flohic HMLG, Eracleous M, Chartas G, Shields JC, Moran EC. 2006. {\it Ap. J.} 

3880: 647:140

3881: 

3882: \nhi 

3883: Ford HC, Butcher H. 1979. {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 41:147

3884: 

3885: \nhi 

3886: Fosbury RAE, Melbold U, Goss WM, Dopita MA. 1978. {\it MNRAS} 183:549

3887: 

3888: \nhi 

3889: Fosbury RAE, Melbold U, Goss WM, van Woerden H. 1977. {\it MNRAS} 179:89

3890: 

3891: \nhi 

3892: Fukazawa Y, Iyomoto N, Kubota A, Matsumoto Y, Makishima K. 2001. 

3893: {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 374:73

3894: 

3895: \nhi 

3896: Gabel JR, Bruhweiler FC. 2002. {\it Astron. J.} 124:737

3897: 

3898: \nhi 

3899: Gabel JR, Bruhweiler FC, Crenshaw DM, Kraemer SB, Miskey CL. 2000. 

3900: {\it Ap. J.} 532:883

3901: 

3902: \nhi 

3903: Gallimore JF, Axon DJ, O'Dea CP, Baum SA, Pedlar A. 2006. {\it Astron. J.} 

3904: 132:546

3905: 

3906: \nhi 

3907: Gallo E, Treu T, Jacob J, Woo J-H, Marshall RJ, Antonucci R. 2008. {\it Ap. J.}

3908:  in press

3909: 

3910: \nhi 

3911: Gammie CF, Narayan R, Blandford RD. 1999. {\it Ap. J.} 516:177

3912: 

3913: \nhi 

3914: Garcia MR, Williams BF, Yuan F, Kong AKH, Primini FA, et al.

3915: 2005. {\it Ap. J.} 632:1042

3916: 

3917: \nhi 

3918: Gebhardt K, Bender R, Bower G, Dressler A, Faber SM, et al. 2000. 

3919: {\it Ap. J.} 539:L13

3920: 

3921: \nhi 

3922: Gebhardt K, Rich RM, Ho LC. 2002. {\it Ap. J.} 578:L41

3923: 

3924: \nhi 

3925: Gebhardt K, Rich RM, Ho LC. 2005. {\it Ap. J.} 634:1093

3926: 

3927: \nhi 

3928: Geha M, Guhathakurta P, van~der~Marel RP. 2002. {\it Astron. J.} 124:3073

3929: 

3930: \nhi 

3931: Georgantopoulos I, Panessa F, Akylas A, Zezas A, Cappi M, Comastri A. 2002. 

3932: {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 386:60

3933: 

3934: \nhi 

3935: George IM, Fabian AC. 1991. {\it MNRAS} 249:352

3936: 

3937: \nhi 

3938: Ghosh H, Pogge RW, Mathur S, Martini P, Shields JC. 2007. {\it Ap. J.} 656:105

3939: 

3940: \nhi 

3941: Giroletti M, Giovannini G, Taylor GB, Falomo R. 2006. {\it Ap. J.} 646:801

3942: 

3943: \nhi 

3944: Gliozzi M, Foschini L, Sambruna RM, Tavecchio F. 2008. 

3945: {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 478:723

3946: 

3947: \nhi 

3948: Gliozzi M, Sambruna RM, Brandt WN, Mushotzky RF, Eracleous M. 2004. 

3949: {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 413:139

3950: 

3951: \nhi 

3952: Gliozzi M, Sambruna RM, Foschini L. 2007. {\it Ap. J.} 662:878

3953: 

3954: \nhi 

3955: Gonz\'alez Delgado RM, Cid Fernandes R, Per\'ez E, Martins LP, 

3956: Storchi-Bergmann T, et al. 2004. {\it Ap. J.} 605:127

3957: 

3958: \nhi 

3959: Gonz\'alez-Mart\'\i n O, Masegosa J, M\'arquez I, Guerrero MA, Dultzin-Hacyan 

3960: D. 2006. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 460:45

3961: 

3962: \nhi 

3963: Granato GL, De Zotti G, Silva L, Bressan A, Danese L. 2004. {\it Ap. J.} 600:580

3964: 

3965: \nhi 

3966: Grandi SA, Osterbrock DE. 1978. {\it Ap. J.} 220:783

3967: 

3968: \nhi 

3969: Greene JE, Ho LC. 2004. {\it Ap. J.} 610:722

3970: 

3971: \nhi 

3972: Greene JE, Ho LC. 2005a. {\it Ap. J.} 627:721

3973: 

3974: \nhi 

3975: Greene JE, Ho LC. 2005b. {\it Ap. J.} 630:122

3976: 

3977: \nhi 

3978: Greene JE, Ho LC. 2006. {\it Ap. J.} 641:L21

3979: 

3980: \nhi 

3981: Greene JE, Ho LC. 2007a. {\it Ap. J.} 667:131

3982: 

3983: \nhi 

3984: Greene JE, Ho LC. 2007b. {\it Ap. J.} 670:92

3985: 

3986: \nhi 

3987: Greene JE, Ho LC, Barth AJ. 2008. {\it Ap. J.} submitted

3988: 

3989: \nhi 

3990: Greene JE, Ho LC, Ulvestad JS. 2006. {\it Ap. J.} 636:56

3991: 

3992: \nhi 

3993: Gronwall C, Jangren A, Salzer JJ, Werk JK, Ciardullo R. 2004. {\it Astron. J.}

3994: 128:644

3995: 

3996: \nhi 

3997: Grossan B, Gorjian V, Werner M, Ressler M. 2001. {\it Ap. J.} 563:687

3998: 

3999: \nhi 

4000: Groves BA, Dopita MA, Sutherland RS. 2004. {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 153:75

4001: 

4002: \nhi 

4003: Groves B, Heckman T, Kauffmann G. 2006. {\it MNRAS} 371:1559

4004: 

4005: \nhi 

4006: Gruenwald RB, Viegas-Aldrovandi SM. 1987. {\it Astron. Astrophys. Suppl.} 70:143

4007: 

4008: \nhi 

4009: Gu Q-S, Huang J-S, Wilson G, Fazio GG. 2007. {\it Ap.~J.} 671:L105

4010: 

4011: \nhi 

4012: Guainazzi M, Oosterbroek T, Antonelli LA, Matt G. 2000.  

4013: {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 364:L80

4014: 

4015: \nhi 

4016: Haas M, M\"uller SAH, Bertoldi F, Chini R, Egner S, et al. 2004. 

4017: {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 424:531

4018: 

4019: \nhi 

4020: Halderson EL, Moran EC, Filippenko AV, Ho LC. 2001. {\it Astron. J.} 122:637

4021: 

4022: \nhi 

4023: Hall PB, Yee HKC, Lin H, Morris SL, Patton DR, et al. 2000. {\it Astron. J.} 

4024: 120:2220

4025: 

4026: \nhi 

4027: Halpern JP, Eracleous M. 1994. {\it Ap. J.} 433:L17

4028: 

4029: \nhi 

4030: Halpern JP, Eracleous M, Filippenko AV, Chen K. 1996. {\it Ap. J.} 464:704

4031: 

4032: \nhi 

4033: Halpern JP, Filippenko AV. 1984. {\it Ap. J.} 285:475

4034: 

4035: \nhi 

4036: Halpern JP, Steiner JE. 1983. {\it Ap. J.} 269:L37

4037: 

4038: \nhi 

4039: Hao L, Strauss MA, Fan XH, Tremonti CA, Schlegel DJ, et al. 2005a. 

4040: {\it Astron. J.} 129:1783

4041: 

4042: \nhi 

4043: Hao L, Strauss MA, Tremonti CA, Schlegel DJ, Heckman TM, et al. 2005b. 

4044: {\it Astron. J.} 129:1795

4045: 

4046: \nhi 

4047: Hawkins MRS. 2004. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 424:519

4048: 

4049: \nhi 

4050: Heckman TM. 1980a. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 87:142

4051: 

4052: \nhi 

4053: Heckman TM. 1980b. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 87:152

4054:  

4055: \nhi 

4056: Heckman TM, Balick B, Crane PC. 1980. {\it Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. } 40:295

4057: 

4058: \nhi 

4059: Heckman TM, Baum SA, van Breugel WJM, McCarthy P. 1989. {\it Ap. J.} 338:48

4060: 

4061: \nhi 

4062: Heckman TM, Ptak A, Hornschemeier A, Kauffmann G. 2005. {\it Ap. J.} 634:161

4063: 

4064: \nhi 

4065: Heinz S, Merloni A, Schwab J. 2007. {\it Ap. J.} 658:L9

4066: 

4067: \nhi 

4068: Heinz S, Sunyaev R. 2003. {\it MNRAS} 343:L59

4069: 

4070: \nhi 

4071: Heller CH, Shlosman I. 1994. {\it Ap. J.} 424:84

4072: 

4073: \nhi 

4074: Hernquist L. 1989. {\it Nature}. 340;687

4075: 

4076: \nhi 

4077: Ho LC. 1996. In {\it The Physics of LINERs in View of Recent Observations}, 

4078: ed.  M Eracleous, A Koratkar, C Leitherer, LC Ho, p. 103. San Francisco: ASP

4079: 

4080: \nhi 

4081: Ho LC. 1999a. {\it Ap. J.} 510:631

4082: 

4083: \nhi 

4084: Ho LC. 1999b. {\it Ap. J.} 516:672

4085: 

4086: \nhi 

4087: Ho LC. 2002a. {\it Ap. J.} 564:120

4088: 

4089: \nhi 

4090: Ho LC. 2002b. In {\it Issues in Unification of AGNs}, ed. R Maiolino, 

4091: A Marconi, N Nagar, p. 165. San Francisco: ASP

4092: 

4093: \nhi 

4094: Ho LC. 2003. In {\it Active Galactic Nuclei: from Central Engine to Host 

4095: Galaxy}, ed. S Collin,  F Combes, I Shlosman, p. 379. San Francisco: ASP

4096: 

4097: \nhi 

4098: Ho LC, ed. 2004a. {\it Carnegie Observatories Astrophysics Series, Vol. 1: 

4099: Coevolution of Black Holes and Galaxies} Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press

4100: 

4101: \nhi 

4102: Ho LC. 2004b. In {\it Carnegie Observatories Astrophysics Series, Vol. 1: 

4103: Coevolution of Black Holes and Galaxies}, ed. LC Ho, p. 293. Cambridge: 

4104: Cambridge Univ. Press

4105: 

4106: \nhi 

4107: Ho LC. 2005. In {\it From X-ray Binaries to Quasars: Black Hole Accretion on 

4108: All Mass Scales}, ed. TJ Maccarone, RP Fender, LC Ho, p. 219. Dordrecht: Kluwer

4109: 

4110: \nhi 

4111: Ho LC, Feigelson ED, Townsley LK, Sambruna RM, Garmire GP, et al. 2001. 

4112: {\it Ap. J.} 549:L51

4113: 

4114: \nhi 

4115: Ho LC, Filippenko AV. 1993. {\it Astrophys. Space Sci.} 205:19

4116: 

4117: \nhi 

4118: Ho LC, Filippenko AV, Sargent WLW. 1993. {\it Ap. J.} 417:63

4119:  

4120: \nhi 

4121: Ho LC, Filippenko AV, Sargent WLW. 1995. {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 98:477

4122: 

4123: \nhi 

4124: Ho LC, Filippenko AV, Sargent WLW. 1996. {\it Ap. J.} 462:183  %M81

4125: 

4126: \nhi 

4127: Ho LC, Filippenko AV, Sargent WLW. 1997a. {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 112:315

4128: 

4129: \nhi 

4130: Ho LC, Filippenko AV, Sargent WLW. 1997b. {\it Ap. J.} 487:568 %stats

4131: 

4132: \nhi 

4133: Ho LC, Filippenko AV, Sargent WLW. 1997c. {\it Ap. J.} 487:579 %HII

4134: 

4135: \nhi 

4136: Ho LC, Filippenko AV, Sargent WLW. 1997d. {\it Ap. J.} 487:591 %bars

4137: 

4138: \nhi 

4139: Ho LC, Filippenko AV, Sargent WLW. 2003. {\it Ap. J.} 583:159 %HFSVI

4140: 

4141: \nhi 

4142: Ho LC, Filippenko AV, Sargent WLW, Peng CY. 1997e. {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 

4143: 112:391

4144: 

4145: \nhi 

4146: Ho LC, Peng CY. 2001. {\it Ap. J.} 555:650

4147: 

4148: \nhi 

4149: Ho LC, Ptak A, Terashima Y, Kunieda H, Serlemitsos PJ, et al.

4150: 1999a. {\it Ap. J.} 525:168

4151: 

4152: \nhi 

4153: Ho LC, Rudnick G, Rix H-W, Shields JC, McIntosh DH, et al.

4154: 2000. {\it Ap. J.} 541:120

4155: 

4156: \nhi 

4157: Ho LC, Sarzi M, Rix H-W, Shields JC, Rudnick G, et al. 2002. {\it PASP} 114:137

4158: 

4159: \nhi 

4160: Ho LC, Shields JC, Filippenko AV. 1993. {\it Ap. J.} 410:567

4161: 

4162: \nhi 

4163: Ho LC, Terashima Y, Ulvestad JS. 2003. {\it Ap. J.} 589:783

4164: 

4165: \nhi 

4166: Ho LC, Ulvestad JS. 2001. {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 133:77

4167: 

4168: \nhi 

4169: Ho LC, Van Dyk SD, Pooley GG, Sramek RA, Weiler KW. 1999b. {\it Astron. J} 

4170: 118:843

4171: 

4172: \nhi 

4173: Hopkins PF, Hernquist L. 2006. {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 166:1

4174: 

4175: \nhi 

4176: Hopkins PF, Hernquist L, Cox TJ, Di Matteo T,  Martini P, et al.

4177: 2006.  {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 163:1

4178: 

4179: \nhi 

4180: Huchra JP, Burg R. 1992. {\it Ap. J.} 393:90

4181: 

4182: \nhi 

4183: Humason ML, Mayall NU, Sandage AR. 1956. {\it Astron. J.} 61:97

4184: 

4185: \nhi 

4186: Igumenshchev IV, Narayan R, Abramowicz MA. 2003. {\it Ap. J.} 592:1042

4187: 

4188: \nhi 

4189: Inoue H, Terashima Y, Ho LC. 2007. {\it Ap. J.} 662:860

4190: 

4191: \nhi 

4192: Irwin JA, Sarazin CL, Bregman JN. 2002. {\it Ap. J.} 570:152

4193: 

4194: \nhi 

4195: Ishisaki Y, Makishima K, Iyomoto N, Hayashida K, Inoue H, et al. 1996. 

4196: {\it PASJ} 48:237

4197: 

4198: \nhi 

4199: Iyomoto N, Fukazawa Y, Nakai N, Ishihara Y. 2001. {\it Ap. J.} 561:L69

4200: 

4201: \nhi 

4202: Iyomoto N, Makishima K, Fukazawa Y, Tashiro M, Ishisaki Y, et al.

4203: 1996. {\it PASJ}, 48:231

4204: 

4205: \nhi 

4206: Iyomoto N, Makishima K, Fukazawa Y, Tashiro M, Ishisaki Y. 1997. {\it PASJ}

4207: 49:425

4208: 

4209: \nhi 

4210: Iyomoto N, Makishima K, Matsushita K, Fukazawa Y, Tashiro M, Ohashi T. 1998a. 

4211: {\it Ap. J.} 503:168

4212: 

4213: \nhi 

4214: Iyomoto N, Makishima K, Tashiro M, Inoue S, Kaneda H, et al.

4215: 1998b. {\it Ap. J.} 503:L31

4216: 

4217: \nhi 

4218: Jolley EJD, Kuncic Z. 2007. {\it Ap\&SS} 310:327

4219: 

4220: \nhi 

4221: Johnson BM, Quataert E. 2007. {\it Ap. J.} 660:1273

4222: 

4223: \nhi 

4224: Jungwiert B, Combes F, Palous J. 2001. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 376:85

4225: 

4226: \nhi 

4227: Kauffmann G, Heckman TM, Tremonti C, Brinchmann J, Charlot S, et al. 2003. 

4228: {\it MNRAS} 346:1055

4229: 

4230: \nhi 

4231: Kauffmann G, White SDM, Heckman TM, Me\'nard B, Brinchmann J, et al.

4232: 2004. {\it MNRAS} 353:713

4233: 

4234: \nhi 

4235: Keel WC. 1983a. {\it Ap. J.} 268:632

4236:  

4237: \nhi 

4238: Keel WC. 1983b. {\it Ap. J.} 269:466

4239:  

4240: \nhi 

4241: Keel WC. 1983c. {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 52:229

4242: 

4243: \nhi 

4244: Keel WC, Miller JS. 1983. {\it Ap. J.} 266:L89

4245: 

4246: \nhi 

4247: Kennicutt RC Jr. 1984. {\it Ap. J.} 287:116

4248: 

4249: \nhi 

4250: Kewley LJ, Groves B, Kauffmann G, Heckman T. 2006. {\it MNRAS} 372:961

4251: 

4252: \nhi 

4253: Kewley LJ, Heisler CA, Dopita MA, Lumsden S. 2001. {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 132:37

4254: 

4255: \nhi 

4256: Khachikian EY, Weedman DW. 1974. {\it Ap. J.} 192:581

4257: 

4258: \nhi 

4259: Kharb P, Shastri P. 2004. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 425:825

4260: 

4261: \nhi 

4262: Kim D-C, Sanders DB, Veilleux S, Mazzarella JM, Soifer BT. 1995. 

4263: {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 98:129

4264: 

4265: \nhi 

4266: Kim D-W, Fabbiano G. 2003. {\it Ap.~J.} 586:826

4267: 

4268: \nhi 

4269: Kinkhabwala A, Sako M, Behar E, Kahn SM, Paerels F, et al. 2002. 

4270: {\it Ap. J.} 575:732

4271: 

4272: \nhi 

4273: Kirhakos S, Phillips MM. 1989. {\it PASP} 101:949

4274: 

4275: \nhi 

4276: Komossa S, B\"ohringer H, Huchra JP. 1999. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 349:88

4277: 

4278: \nhi 

4279: Koratkar AP, Deustua S, Heckman TM, Filippenko AV, Ho LC, Rao M. 1995. 

4280: {\it Ap. J.} 440:132

4281: 

4282: \nhi 

4283: K\"ording E, Falcke H, Corbel S. 2006. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 456:439

4284: 

4285: \nhi 

4286: K\"ording E, Jester S, Fender R. 2006. {\it MNRAS} 372:1366

4287: 

4288: \nhi 

4289: K\"ording E, Jester S, Fender R. 2008. {\it MNRAS} 383:277

4290: 

4291: \nhi 

4292: Kormendy J. 1993. In {\it The Nearest Active Galaxies}, ed. J Beckman,

4293: L Colina, H Netzer, p. 197. (Madrid: CSIC)

4294: 

4295: \nhi 

4296: Kormendy J. 2004. In {\it Carnegie Observatories Astrophysics Series, Vol 1:

4297: Coevolution of Black Holes and Galaxies}, ed. LC Ho, p. 1. Cambridge:

4298: Cambridge Univ. Press

4299: 

4300: \nhi 

4301: Kormendy J, Fisher DB, Cornell ME, Bender R. 2008. {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} submitted

4302: 

4303: \nhi 

4304: Kormendy J, Kennicutt RC. 2004. {\it Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.} 42:603

4305: 

4306: \nhi 

4307: Kormendy J, Richstone DO. 1995. {\it Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.} 33:581

4308: 

4309: \nhi 

4310: Koski AT, Osterbrock DE. 1976. {\it Ap. J.} 203:L49

4311: 

4312: \nhi 

4313: Krips M, Eckart A, Krichbaum TP, Pott J-U, Leon S, et al. 2007. {\it Astron. 

4314: Astrophys.} 464:553

4315: 

4316: \nhi 

4317: Krolik JH. 1998. {\it Active Galactic Nuclei}. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press

4318: 

4319: \nhi 

4320: Kukula MJ, Pedlar A, Baum SA, O'Dea CP. 1995. {\it MNRAS} 276:1262

4321: 

4322: \nhi 

4323: Kunth D, Sargent WLW, Bothun GD. 1987. {\it Astron. J.} 92:29

4324: 

4325: \nhi 

4326: Laor A. 2003. {\it Ap. J.} 590:86

4327: 

4328: \nhi 

4329: Larkin JE, Armus L, Knop RA, Soifer BT, Matthews K. 1998. {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.}

4330: 114:59

4331: 

4332: \nhi 

4333: Lasota J-P, Abramowicz MA, Chen X, Krolik J, Narayan R, Yi I. 1996. 

4334: {\it Ap. J.} 462:142

4335: 

4336: \nhi 

4337: Laurikainen E, Salo H, Buta R. 2004. {\it Ap. J.} 607:103

4338: 

4339: \nhi 

4340: Lawrence A. 2005. {\it MNRAS} 363:57

4341: 

4342: \nhi 

4343: Lawrence A, Elvis M. 1982. {\it Ap. J.} 256:410

4344: 

4345: \nhi 

4346: Lawrence A, Ward M, Elvis M, Fabbiano G, Willner SP, et al. 1985. 

4347: {\it Ap. J.} 291:117

4348: 

4349: \nhi

4350: Lewis KT, Eracleous M, Gliozzi M, Sambruna RM, Mushotzky RF. 2005. {\it Ap. J.} 

4351: 622:816

4352: 

4353: \nhi

4354: Lewis KT, Eracleous M, Sambruna RM. 2003. {\it Ap. J.} 593:115

4355: 

4356: \nhi

4357: Li C, Kauffmann G, Heckman TM, White SDM, Jing YP. 2008. {\it MNRAS} in press

4358: 

4359: \nhi

4360: Lightman AP, White TR. 1988. {\it Ap. J.} 335:57

4361: 

4362: \nhi

4363: Lin DC, Shields GA. 1986. {\it Ap. J.} 305:28

4364: 

4365: \nhi

4366: Lira P, Lawrence A, Johnson RA. 2000. {\it MNRAS} 319:17

4367: 

4368: \nhi

4369: Liu BF, Meyer-Hofmeister E. 2001. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 372:386

4370: 

4371: \nhi

4372: Liu BF, Taam RE, Meyer-Hofmeister E, Meyer F. 2007. {\it Ap. J.} 671:695

4373: 

4374: \nhi

4375: Livio M, Ogilvie GI, Pringle JE. 1999. {\it Ap. J.} 512:100

4376: 

4377: \nhi

4378: Loewenstein M, Mushotzky RF, Angelini L, Arnaud KA, Quataert E. 2001. 

4379: {\it Ap. J.} 555:L21

4380: 

4381: \nhi

4382: Maccarone TJ, Fender RP, Ho LC, eds. 2005. {\it From X-ray Binaries to 

4383: Quasars: Black Hole Accretion on All Mass Scales} Dordrecht: Kluwer

4384: 

4385: \nhi

4386: Maccarone TJ, Gallo E, Fender RP. 2003. {\it MNRAS} 345:L19

4387: 

4388: \nhi

4389: Magorrian J, Tremaine S, Richstone D, Bender R, Bower G, et al. 1998. 

4390: {\it Astron. J.} 115:2285

4391: 

4392: \nhi

4393: Mahadevan R. 1997. {\it Ap. J.} 477:585

4394: 

4395: \nhi

4396: Maia MAG, Machado RS, Willmer CNA. 2003. {\it Astron. J.} 126:1750

4397: 

4398: \nhi

4399: Maiolino R, Rieke GH. 1995.  {\it Ap. J.} 454:95

4400: 

4401: \nhi

4402: Makishima K, Fujimoto R, Ishisaki Y, Kii T, Loewenstein M, et al. 1994. 

4403: {\it PASJ} 46:L77

4404: 

4405: \nhi

4406: Makishima K, Ohashi T, Hayashida K, Inoue H, Koyama K, et al. 1989. {\it PASJ}

4407: 41:697

4408: 

4409: \nhi

4410: Malkan MA, Sargent WLW. 1982. {\it Ap. J.} 254:22

4411: 

4412: \nhi

4413: Maoz D. 2007. {\it MNRAS} 377:1696

4414: 

4415: \nhi

4416: Maoz D, Filippenko AV, Ho LC, Macchetto FD, Rix H-W, Schneider DP. 1996.

4417: {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 107:215

4418: 

4419: \nhi

4420: Maoz D, Filippenko AV, Ho LC, Rix H-W, Bahcall JN, et al. 1995. 

4421: {\it Ap. J.} 440:91

4422: 

4423: \nhi

4424: Maoz D, Koratkar AP, Shields JC, Ho LC, Filippenko AV, Sternberg A. 1998. 

4425: {\it Astron. J.} 116:55

4426: 

4427: \nhi

4428: Maoz D, Nagar NM, Falcke H, Wilson AS. 2005. {\it Ap. J.} 625:699

4429: 

4430: \nhi

4431: Matsumoto Y, Fukazawa Y, Nakazawa K, Iyomoto N, Makishima K. 2001. {\it PASJ} 

4432: 53:475

4433: 

4434: \nhi

4435: Meier DL. 1999. {\it Ap. J.} 522:753

4436: 

4437: \nhi

4438: Meier DL. 2001. {\it Ap. J.} 548:L9

4439: 

4440: \nhi

4441: Meisenheimer K, Tristram KRW, Jaffe W, Israel F, Neumayer N, et al. 2007. 

4442: {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 471:453

4443: 

4444: \nhi

4445: Menou K, Quataert E. 2001. {\it Ap. J.} 552:204

4446: 

4447: \nhi

4448: Merloni A, Fabian AC. 2002. {\it MNRAS} 332:165

4449: 

4450: \nhi

4451: Merloni A, Heinz S, Di Matteo T. 2003. {\it MNRAS} 345:1057

4452: 

4453: \nhi

4454: Merloni A, Nayakshin S, Sunyaev R, eds. 2005. {\it Growing Black Holes: 

4455: Accretion in a Cosmological Context} Berlin: Springer-Verlag

4456: 

4457: \nhi

4458: Middleton M, Done C, Schurch N. 2008. {\it MNRAS} 383:1501

4459: 

4460: \nhi

4461: Miller CJ, Nichol RC, Gomez PL, Hopkins AM, Bernardi M. 2003. {\it Ap. J.} 

4462: 597:142

4463: 

4464: \nhi

4465: Milosavljevi\'c M, Merritt D, Ho LC. 2006. {\it Ap. J.} 652:120

4466: 

4467: \nhi

4468: Minkowski R, Osterbrock DE. 1959. {\it Ap. J.} 129:583

4469: 

4470: \nhi

4471: Miniutti G, Ponti G, Greene JE, Ho LC, Fabian AC, Iwasawa K. 2008. {\it MNRAS} 

4472: in press

4473: 

4474: \nhi

4475: Moore B, Katz N, Lake G, Dressler A, Oemler A. 1996. {\it Nature} 379:613

4476: 

4477: \nhi

4478: Moran EC, Eracleous M, Leighly KM, Chartas G, Filippenko AV, et al.

4479: 2005. {\it Astron. J.} 129:2108

4480: 

4481: \nhi

4482: M\"{u}ller SAH, Haas M, Siebenmorgen R, Klaas U, Meisenheimer K, et al.

4483: 2004.  {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 426:L29

4484: 

4485: \nhi

4486: Muno MP, Baganoff FK, Bautz MW, Feigelson ED, Garmire GP, et al. 2004. 

4487: {\it Ap. J.} 613:326

4488: 

4489: \nhi

4490: Murray N, Chiang J. 1997. {\it Ap. J.} 474:91

4491: 

4492: \nhi

4493: Mushotzky RF. 1993. In {\it The Nearest Active Galaxies}, ed. J Beckman,

4494: L Colina, H Netzer, p. 47. Madrid: CSIC Press

4495: 

4496: \nhi

4497: Mushotzky RF, Wandel A. 1989. {\it Ap. J.} 339:674

4498: 

4499: \nhi

4500: Nagao T, Murayama T, Shioya Y, Taniguchi Y. 2002. {\it Ap. J.} 567:73

4501: 

4502: \nhi

4503: Nagar NM, Falcke H, Wilson AS. 2005. {\it Ap. J.} 435:521

4504: 

4505: \nhi

4506: Nagar NM, Falcke H, Wilson AS, Ho LC. 2000. {\it Ap. J.} 542:186

4507: 

4508: \nhi

4509: Nagar NM, Falcke H, Wilson AS, Ulvestad JS. 2002. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 

4510: 392:53

4511: 

4512: \nhi

4513: Nagar NM, Wilson AS, Falcke H. 2001. {\it Ap. J.} 559:L87

4514: 

4515: \nhi

4516: Nandra K, George IM, Mushotzky RF, Turner TJ, Yaqoob T. 1997a. {\it Ap. J.} 

4517: 476:70

4518: 

4519: \nhi

4520: Nandra K, George IM, Mushotzky RF, Turner TJ, Yaqoob T. 1997b. {\it Ap. J.} 

4521: 477:602

4522: 

4523: \nhi

4524: Nandra K, O'Neill PM, George IM, Reeves JN. 2007. {\it MNRAS} 382:194

4525: 

4526: \nhi

4527: Narayan R. 2002. In {\it Lighthouses of the Universe}, ed. M Gilfanov et al.,

4528: p. 405. Berlin: Springer

4529: 

4530: \nhi

4531: Narayan R, Yi I. 1995. {\it Ap. J.} 444:231

4532: 

4533: \nhi

4534: Nayakshin S. 2003. {\it Astron. Nachr. Suppl.} 324:3

4535: 

4536: \nhi

4537: Nelson CH, Whittle M. 1996. {\it Ap. J.} 465:96

4538: 

4539: \nhi

4540: Nemmen RS, Storchi-Bergmann T, Yuan F, Eracleous M, Terashima Y, Wilson AS. 

4541: 2006. {\it Ap. J.} 643:652

4542: 

4543: \nhi

4544: Nicastro F. 2000. {\it Ap. J.} 530:L65

4545: 

4546: \nhi

4547: Nicholson KL, Reichert GA, Mason KO, Puchnarewicz EM, Ho LC, et al.

4548: 1998. {\it MNRAS} 300:893

4549: 

4550: \nhi

4551: Noyola E, Gebhardt K, Bergmann M. 2008. {\it Ap. J.} in press

4552: 

4553: \nhi

4554: O'Connell RW. 1999. {\it Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.} 37:603

4555: 

4556: \nhi

4557: O'Connell RW, Martin JR, Crane JD, Burstein D, Bohlin RC, et al.

4558: 2005. {\it Ap. J.} 635:305

4559: 

4560: \nhi

4561: Omma H, Binney J, Bryan G, Slyz A. 2004. {\it MNRAS} 348:1105

4562: 

4563: \nhi 

4564: Osterbrock DE. 1960. {\it Ap. J.} 132:325

4565: 

4566: \nhi 

4567: Osterbrock DE. 1971. In {\it Nuclei of Galaxies}, ed. DJK O'Connell, p. 151.

4568: Amsterdam: North Holland

4569: 

4570: \nhi 

4571: Osterbrock DE, Dufour RJ. 1973. {\it Ap. J.} 185:441

4572: 

4573: \nhi 

4574: Osterbrock DE, Miller JS. 1975. {\it Ap. J.} 197:535

4575: 

4576: \nhi 

4577: Osterbrock DE, Shaw RA. 1988. {\it Ap. J.} 327:89

4578: 

4579: \nhi

4580: Padovani P, Matteucci F. 1993. {\it Ap. J.} 416:26

4581: 

4582: \nhi

4583: Page MJ, Breeveld AA, Soria R, Wu K, Branduardi-Raymont G, et al.

4584: 2003. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 400:145

4585: 

4586: \nhi

4587: Page MJ, Soria R, Zane S, Wu K, Starling R. 2004. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 

4588: 422:77

4589: 

4590: \nhi

4591: Panessa F, Barcons X, Bassani L, Cappi M, Carrera FJ, et al.

4592: 2007. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 467:519

4593: 

4594: \nhi 

4595: Panessa F, Bassani L. 2002. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 394:435

4596: 

4597: \nhi 

4598: Panessa F, Bassani L, Cappi M, Dadina M, Barcons X, et al.

4599: 2006. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 455:173

4600: 

4601: \nhi 

4602: Pappa A, Georgantopoulos I, Stewart GC, Zezas AL. 2001. {\it MNRAS} 326:995

4603: 

4604: \nhi 

4605: Peimbert M, Torres-Peimbert S. 1981. {\it Ap. J.} 245:845

4606: 

4607: \nhi 

4608: Pelat D, Alloin D, Fosbury RAE. 1981. {\it MNRAS} 195:787

4609: 

4610: \nhi 

4611: Pellegrini S. 2005. {\it Ap. J.} 624:155

4612: 

4613: \nhi 

4614: Pellegrini S, Baldi A, Fabbiano G, Kim D-W. 2003a. {\it Ap. J.} 597:175

4615: 

4616: \nhi 

4617: Pellegrini S, Cappi M, Bassani L, Della Ceca R, Palumbo GGC. 2000a. 

4618: {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 360:878

4619: 

4620: \nhi 

4621: Pellegrini S, Cappi M, Bassani L, Malaguti G, Palumbo GGC, Persic M. 2000b.

4622: {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 353:447

4623: 

4624: \nhi 

4625: Pellegrini S, Fabbiano G, Fiore F, Trinchieri G, Antonelli A. 2002. 

4626: {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 383:1

4627: 

4628: \nhi 

4629: Pellegrini S, Siemiginowska A, Fabbiano G, Elvis M, Greenhill L, et al. 2007. 

4630: {\it Ap. J.} 667:749

4631: 

4632: \nhi 

4633: Pellegrini S, Venturi T, Comastri A, Fabbiano G, Fiore F, et al.

4634: 2003b. {\it Ap. J.} 585:677

4635: 

4636: \nhi 

4637: Peng CY, Ho LC, Impey CD, Rix H-W. 2002. {\it Astron. J.} 124:266

4638: 

4639: \nhi 

4640: Penston MV, Fosbury RAE. 1978. {\it MNRAS} 183:479

4641: 

4642: \nhi

4643: P\'equignot D. 1984. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 131:159

4644: 

4645: \nhi 

4646: Peterson BM, Bentz MC, Desroches L-B, Filippenko AV, Ho LC, et al.  2005. 

4647: {\it Ap. J.} 632:799.  Erratum. 2005. {\it Ap. J.} 641:638

4648: 

4649: \nhi 

4650: Petre R, Mushotzky RF, Serlemitsos PJ, Jahoda K, Marshall FE. 1993. 

4651: {\it Ap. J.} 418:644

4652: 

4653: \nhi 

4654: Phillips MM. 1979. {\it Ap. J.} 227:L121

4655: 

4656: \nhi 

4657: Phillips MM, Charles PA, Baldwin JA. 1983. {\it Ap. J.} 266:485

4658: 

4659: \nhi 

4660: Phillips MM, Jenkins CR, Dopita MA, Sadler EM, Binette L. 1986. 

4661: {\it Astron. J.} 91:1062

4662:  

4663: \nhi 

4664: Pogge RW. 1989. {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 71:433

4665: 

4666: \nhi 

4667: Pogge RW, Maoz D, Ho LC, Eracleous M. 2000. {\it Ap. J.} 532:323

4668: 

4669: \nhi 

4670: Proga D, Begelman MC. 2003. {\it Ap. J.} 592:767

4671: 

4672: \nhi 

4673: Ptak A, Serlemitsos PJ, Yaqoob T, Mushotzky R. 1999. {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.}

4674: 120:179

4675: 

4676: \nhi 

4677: Ptak A, Terashima Y, Ho LC, Quataert E. 2004. {\it Ap. J.} 606:173 

4678: 

4679: \nhi 

4680: Ptak A, Yaqoob T, Mushotzky R, Serlemitsos P, Griffiths R. 1998. {\it Ap. J.} 

4681: 501:L37

4682: 

4683: \nhi 

4684: Ptak A, Yaqoob T, Serlemitsos PJ, Kunieda H, Terashima Y. 1996. {\it Ap. J.} 

4685: 459:542

4686: 

4687: \nhi 

4688: Quataert E. 2003. {\it Astron. Nachr. Suppl.} 324:435

4689: 

4690: \nhi 

4691: Quataert E, Di Matteo T, Narayan R, Ho LC. 1999. {\it Ap. J.} 525:L89

4692: 

4693: \nhi 

4694: Quillen AC, McDonald C, Alonso-Herrero A, Lee A, Shaked S, et al.

4695: 2001. {\it Ap. J.} 547:129

4696: 

4697: \nhi 

4698: Ravindranath S, Ho LC, Peng CY, Filippenko AV, Sargent WLW. 2001. 

4699: {\it Astron. J.} 122:653

4700: 

4701: \nhi 

4702: Rees MJ, Phinney ES, Begelman MC, Blandford RD. 1982. {\it Nature} 295:17

4703: 

4704: \nhi 

4705: Reeves JN, Turner MJL. 2000. {\it MNRAS} 316:234

4706: 

4707: \nhi 

4708: Renzini A, Greggio L, di Serego Alighieri S, Cappellari M, Burstein

4709:  D, Bertola F. 1995. {\it Nature} 378:39

4710: 

4711: \nhi 

4712: Reynolds CS, Di Matteo T, Fabian AC, Hwang U, Canizares CR. 1996. {\it MNRAS} 

4713: 283:L111

4714: 

4715: \nhi 

4716: Rice MS, Martini P, Greene JE, Pogge RW, Shields JC, et al. 2006. {\it Ap. J.} 

4717: 636:654

4718: 

4719: \nhi 

4720: Richstone DO. 2004. In {\it Carnegie Observatories Astrophysics Series, Vol 1:

4721: Coevolution of Black Holes and Galaxies}, ed. LC Ho, p. 280. Cambridge:

4722: Cambridge Univ. Press

4723: 

4724: \nhi 

4725: Rieke GH, Lebofsky MJ, Kemp JC. 1982. {\it Ap. J.} 252:L53

4726: 

4727: \nhi 

4728: Rinn AS, Sambruna RM, Gliozzi M. 2005. {\it Ap. J.} 621:167

4729: 

4730: \nhi 

4731: Roberts TP, Schurch NJ, Warwick RS. 2001. {\it MNRAS} 324:737

4732: 

4733: \nhi 

4734: Roberts TP, Warwick RS. 2000. {\it MNRAS} 315:98

4735: 

4736: \nhi 

4737: Rola C, Terlevich E, Terlevich R. 1997. {\it MNRAS} 289:419

4738: 

4739: \nhi 

4740: Rose JA, Searle L. 1982. {\it Ap. J.} 253:556

4741: 

4742: \nhi 

4743: Rose JA, Tripicco MJ. 1984. {\it Ap. J.} 285:55

4744: 

4745: \nhi 

4746: Rubin VC, Ford WK Jr, Thonnard N. 1980. {\it Ap. J.} 238:471

4747: 

4748: \nhi 

4749: Rupke D, Veilleux S, Kim D-C, Sturm E, Contursi A, et al. 2007. In {\it The 

4750: Central Engine of Active Galactic Nuclei}, ed. LC Ho, J-M Wang, p. 525.

4751: San Francisco: ASP

4752: 

4753: \nhi 

4754: Sabra BM, Shields JC, Ho LC, Barth AJ, Filippenko AV 2003. {\it Ap. J.} 584:164

4755: 

4756: \nhi 

4757: Sadler EM, Jenkins CR, Kotanyi CG. 1989. {\it MNRAS} 240:591

4758: 

4759: \nhi 

4760: Sambruna RM, Gliozzi M, Eracleous M, Brandt WN, Mushotzky RF. 2003. 

4761: {\it Ap. J.} 586:L37

4762: 

4763: \nhi 

4764: Sandage A, Bedke J. 1994. {\it The Carnegie Atlas of Galaxies}.

4765: Washington, DC: Carnegie Inst. of Washington

4766: 

4767: \nhi 

4768: Sandage A, Tammann, GA. 1981. {\it A Revised Shapley-Ames Catalog of

4769:  Bright Galaxies}.  Washington, DC: Carnegie Inst. of Washington

4770: 

4771: \nhi 

4772: Sargent WLW, Filippenko AV. 1991. {\it Astron. J.} 102:107

4773: 

4774: \nhi 

4775: Sarzi M, Shields JC, Pogge RW, Martini P. 2007.  In {\it The Central Engine of 

4776: Active Galactic Nuclei}, ed. LC Ho, J-M Wang, p. 643.  San Francisco: ASP

4777: 

4778: \nhi 

4779: Sarzi M, Rix H-W, Shields JC, Ho LC, Barth AJ, et al.

4780: 2005. {\it Ap. J.} 628:169

4781: 

4782: \nhi 

4783: Satyapal S, Dudik RP, O'Halloran B, Gliozzi M. 2005. {\it Ap. J.} 633:86

4784: 

4785: \nhi 

4786: Satyapal S, Sambruna RM, Dudik RP. 2004. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 414:825

4787: 

4788: \nhi 

4789: Satyapal S, Vega D, Dudik RP, Abel NP, Heckman T. 2008. {\it Ap. J.} in press

4790: 

4791: \nhi 

4792: Satyapal S, Vega D, Heckman T, O'Halloran B, Dudik R. 2007. {\it Ap. J.} 663:L9

4793: 

4794: \nhi 

4795: Schmidt M, Green RF. 1983. {\it Ap. J.} 269:352

4796: 

4797: \nhi 

4798: Schmitt HR. 2001. {\it Astron. J.} 122:2243

4799: 

4800: \nhi 

4801: Schmitt HR, Kinney AL, Ho LC, eds. 1999. {\it The AGN/Normal Galaxy 

4802: Connection} Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.

4803: 

4804: \nhi 

4805: Schulz H, Fritsch C. 1994. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 291:713

4806: 

4807: \nhi

4808: Serote-Roos M, Gon\c{c}alves AC. 2004. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 413:91

4809: 

4810: \nhi 

4811: Seth AC, Ag\"ueros M, Lee D, Basu-Zych A. 2008. {\it Ap. J.} in press

4812: 

4813: \nhi 

4814: Shakura NI, Sunyaev RA. 1973. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 24:337

4815: 

4816: \nhi 

4817: Shang Z, Brotherton MS, Green RF, Kriss GA, Scott J, et al. 2005. 

4818: {\it Ap. J.} 619:41

4819: 

4820: \nhi 

4821: Shields GA. 1978. {\it Nature}. 272:706

4822: 

4823: \nhi 

4824: Shields GA, Wheeler JC. 1978. {\it Ap. J.} 222:667

4825: 

4826: \nhi 

4827: Shields JC. 1992. {\it Ap. J.} 399:L27

4828: 

4829: \nhi 

4830: Shields JC, Rix H-W, McIntosh DH, Ho LC, Rudnick G, et al.

4831: 2000. {\it Ap. J.} 534:L27

4832: 

4833: \nhi 

4834: Shields JC, Rix H-W, Sarzi M, Barth AJ, Filippenko AV, et al. 2007. 

4835: {\it Ap. J.} 654:125

4836: 

4837: \nhi 

4838: Shields JC, Sabra BM, Ho LC, Barth AJ, Filippenko AV. 2002. In {\it Mass 

4839: Outflow in Active Galactic Nuclei: New Perspectives}, ed. DM Crenshaw, SB 

4840: Kraemer, IM George, p. 105. San Francisco: ASP

4841: 

4842: \nhi 

4843: Shields JC, Walcher CJ, B\"oker, T, Ho LC, Rix H-W, van~der~Marel RP. 2008. 

4844: {\it Ap. J.} in press

4845: 

4846: \nhi 

4847: Shih DC, Iwasawa K, Fabian AC. 2003. {\it MNRAS} 341:973

4848: 

4849: \nhi 

4850: Siemiginowska A, Czerny B, Kostyunin V. 1996. {\it Ap. J.} 458:491

4851: 

4852: \nhi 

4853: Sikora M, Stawarz L, Lasota J-P. 2007. {\it Ap. J.} 658:815

4854: 

4855: \nhi 

4856: Slee OB, Sadler EM, Reynolds JE, Ekers RD. 1994. {\it MNRAS} 269:928

4857: 

4858: \nhi

4859: Smith JDT, Draine BT, Dale DA, Moustakas J, Kennicutt RC, et al. 2007. 

4860: {\it Ap. J.} 656:770

4861: 

4862: \nhi

4863: So\l tan A. 1982. {\it MNRAS} 200:115

4864: 

4865: \nhi

4866: Soria R, Fabbiano G, Graham A, Baldi A, Elvis M, et al.

4867: 2006. {\it Ap. J.} 640:126

4868: 

4869: \nhi

4870: Spinoglio L, Malkan MA. 1992. {\it Ap. J.} 399:504

4871: 

4872: \nhi

4873: Springel V, Di~Matteo T, Hernquist L. 2005. {\it MNRAS} 361:776

4874: 

4875: \nhi

4876: Starling RLC, Page MJ, Branduardi-Raymont G, Breeveld AA, Soria R, Wu K. 2005. 

4877: {\it MNRAS} 356:727

4878: 

4879: \nhi

4880: Stasi\'nska G. 1984. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 135:341

4881: 

4882: \nhi 

4883: Stasi\'nska G, Cid Fernandes R, Mateus A, Sodr\'e L Jr, Asari NV. 2006. 

4884: {\it MNRAS} 371:972

4885: 

4886: \nhi 

4887: Stauffer JR. 1982a. {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 50:517

4888: 

4889: \nhi 

4890: Stauffer JR. 1982b. {\it Ap. J.} 262:66

4891: 

4892: \nhi 

4893: Stauffer JR, Spinrad H. 1979. {\it Ap. J.} 231:L51

4894: 

4895: \nhi 

4896: Stone JD, Pringle JE. 2001. {\it MNRAS} 322:461

4897: 

4898: \nhi 

4899: Storchi-Bergmann T, Baldwin JA, Wilson AS. 1993. {\it Ap. J.} 410:L11

4900: 

4901: \nhi 

4902: Storchi-Bergmann T, Ho LC, Schmitt HR, eds. 2004. {\it IAU Symp. 222, 

4903: Interplay among Black Holes, Stars and ISM in Galactic Nuclei} Cambridge: 

4904: Cambridge Univ. Press

4905: 

4906: \nhi

4907: Storchi-Bergmann T, Pastoriza MG. 1990. {\it PASP} 102:1359

4908: 

4909: \nhi

4910: Strateva IV, Brandt WN, Schneider DP, Vanden Berk DG, Vignali C. 2005. 

4911: {\it Astron. J.} 130:387

4912: 

4913: \nhi

4914: Sturm E, Rupke D, Contursi A, Kim D-C, Lutz D, et al. 2006. {\it Ap. J.} 

4915: 653:L13

4916: 

4917: \nhi

4918: Sturm E, Schweitzer M, Lutz D, Contursi A, Genzel R, et al. 2005. 

4919: {\it Ap. J.} 629:L21

4920: 

4921: \nhi

4922: Sugai H, Malkan MA. 2000. {\it Ap. J.} 529:219

4923: 

4924: \nhi 

4925: Sulentic JW, Marziani P, Dultzin-Hacyan D. 2000. 

4926: {\it Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.} 38:521

4927: 

4928: \nhi 

4929: Swartz DA, Ghosh KK, Suleimanov V, Tennant AF, Wu K. 2002. {\it Ap. J.} 574:382

4930: 

4931: \nhi 

4932: Szokoly GP, Bergeron J, Hasinger G, Lehmann I, Kewley L, et al. 2004.

4933: {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 155:271

4934: 

4935: \nhi 

4936: Tan JC, Blackman EG. 2005. {\it MNRAS} 362:983

4937: 

4938: \nhi 

4939: Taniguchi Y, Shioya Y, Murayama T. 2000. {\it Astron. J.} 120:1265

4940: 

4941: \nhi 

4942: Terashima Y, Ho LC, Ptak AF. 2000. {\it Ap. J.} 539:161

4943: 

4944: \nhi 

4945: Terashima Y, Ho LC, Ptak AF, Mushotzky RF, Serlemitsos PJ, et al.

4946: 2000a. {\it Ap. J.} 533:729

4947: 

4948: \nhi 

4949: Terashima Y, Ho LC, Ptak AF, Yaqoob T, Kunieda H, et al.

4950: 2000b. {\it Ap. J.} 535:L79

4951: 

4952: \nhi 

4953: Terashima Y, Iyomoto N, Ho LC, Ptak AF. 2002. {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 139:1

4954: 

4955: \nhi 

4956: Terashima Y, Kunieda H, Misaki K, Mushotzky RF, Ptak AF, Reichert GA. 1998a.

4957: {\it Ap. J.} 503:212

4958: 

4959: \nhi 

4960: Terashima Y, Ptak A, Fujimoto R, Itoh M, Kunieda H, et al.

4961: 1998b. {\it Ap. J.} 496:210

4962: 

4963: \nhi 

4964: Terashima Y, Wilson AS. 2003a. {\it Ap. J.} 560:139

4965: 

4966: \nhi 

4967: Terashima Y, Wilson AS. 2003b. {\it Ap. J.} 583:145

4968: 

4969: \nhi 

4970: Terlevich R, Melnick J. 1985. {\it MNRAS} 213:841

4971: 

4972: \nhi 

4973: Tran HD. 2001. {\it Ap. J.} 554:L19

4974: 

4975: \nhi 

4976: Tremaine S, Gebhardt K, Bender R, Bower G, Dressler A, et al. 2002. 

4977: {\it Ap. J.} 574:740

4978: 

4979: \nhi 

4980: Tremonti CA, Heckman TM, Kauffmann G, Brinchmann J, Charlot S, et al. 

4981: 2004. {\it Ap. J.} 613:898

4982: 

4983: \nhi 

4984: Turner TJ, Pounds KA. 1989. {\it MNRAS} 240:833

4985: 

4986: \nhi 

4987: Tzanavaris P, Georgantopoulos I. 2007. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 468:129

4988: 

4989: \nhi 

4990: Ulvestad JS, Greene JE, Ho LC. 2007. {\it Ap. J.} 661:L159

4991: 

4992: \nhi 

4993: Ulvestad JS, Ho LC. 2001a. {\it Ap. J.} 558:561

4994: 

4995: \nhi 

4996: Ulvestad JS, Ho LC. 2001b. {\it Ap. J.} 562:L133

4997: 

4998: \nhi 

4999: Ulvestad JS, Ho LC. 2002. {\it Ap. J.} 581:925

5000: 

5001: \nhi 

5002: Ulvestad JS, Wilson AS. 1989. {\it Ap. J.} 343:659

5003: 

5004: \nhi 

5005: Vanden Berk DE, Richards GT, Bauer A, Strauss MA, Schneider DP, et al. 2001. 

5006: {\it Astron. J.} 122:549

5007: 

5008: \nhi 

5009: Van Dyk SD, Ho LC. 1998. In {\it IAU Symp. 184, The Central Regions of the 

5010: Galaxy and Galaxies}, ed. Y Sofue, p. 489. Dordrecht: Kluwer

5011: 

5012: \nhi 

5013: Varano S, Chiaberge M, Macchetto FD, Capetti A. 2004. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 

5014: 428:401

5015: 

5016: \nhi 

5017: Veilleux S, Osterbrock DE. 1987. {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 63:295

5018: 

5019: \nhi 

5020: Verdoes Kleijn GA, Baum SA, de Zeeuw PT, O'Dea CP. 2002. 

5021: {\it Astron. J.} 123:1334

5022: 

5023: \nhi 

5024: Verdoes Kleijn GA, van~der~Marel RP, Noel-Storr J. 2006. 

5025: {\it Astron. J.} 131:1961

5026: 

5027: \nhi 

5028: V\'eron P, Gon\c{c}alves AC, V\'eron-Cetty M-P. 1997. 

5029: {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 319:52

5030: 

5031: \nhi 

5032: V\'eron P, V\'eron-Cetty M-P. 1986. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 161:145

5033: 

5034: \nhi

5035: V\'eron-Cetty M-P, V\'eron P. 1986. {\it Astron. Astrophys. Suppl.} 66:335

5036: 

5037: \nhi 

5038: V\'eron-Cetty M-P, V\'eron P. 2006. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 455:773

5039: 

5040: \nhi 

5041: Viegas-Aldrovandi SM, Gruenwald RB. 1990. {\it Ap. J.} 360:474

5042: 

5043: \nhi 

5044: Voit GM. 1992. {\it Ap. J.} 399:495

5045: 

5046: \nhi 

5047: Voit GM, Donahue M. 1997. {\it Ap. J.} 486:242

5048: 

5049: \nhi 

5050: Wake DA, Miller CJ, Di~Matteo T, Nichol RC, Pope A, et al. 2004. 

5051: {\it Ap. J.} 610:L85

5052: 

5053: \nhi 

5054: Walcher CJ, B\"oker T, Charlot S, Ho LC, Rix H-W, et al. 

5055: 2006. {\it Ap. J.} 649:692

5056: 

5057: \nhi 

5058: Walsh JL, Barth AJ, Ho LC, Filippenko AV, Rix H-W, et al. 2008. {\it Ap. J.} 

5059: submitted

5060: 

5061: \nhi 

5062: Wang J-M, Luo B, Ho LC. 2004. {\it Ap. J.} 615:L5

5063: 

5064: \nhi 

5065: Wang J-M, Staubert R, Ho LC. 2002. {\it Ap. J.} 579:554

5066: 

5067: \nhi 

5068: Weaver KA, Wilson AS, Henkel C, Braatz JA. 1999. {\it Ap. J.} 520:130

5069: 

5070: \nhi 

5071: Weedman DW, Feldman FR, Balzano VA, Ramsey LW, Sramek RA, Wu C-C. 1981. 

5072: {\it Ap. J.} 248:105

5073: 

5074: \nhi 

5075: Whysong D, Antonucci R. 2004. {\it Ap. J.} 602:116

5076: 

5077: \nhi 

5078: Willner SP, Ashby MLN, Barmby P, Fazio GG, Pahre M, et al. 2004. 

5079: {\it Ap.~J.~Suppl.} 154:222 

5080: 

5081: \nhi 

5082: Willner SP, Elvis M, Fabbiano G, Lawrence A, Ward MJ. 1985. {\it Ap. J.} 299:443

5083: 

5084: \nhi 

5085: Wilson AS 1979. {\it Proc. Roy. Soc. London} A366:461

5086: 

5087: \nhi 

5088: Worrall DM, Birkinshaw M. 1994. {\it Ap. J.} 427:134

5089: 

5090: \nhi 

5091: Wo\'zniak PR, Zdziarski AA, Smith D, Madejski GM, Johnson WN. 1998. {\it MNRAS}

5092: 299:449

5093: 

5094: \nhi 

5095: Wrobel JM. 1991. {\it Astron. J.} 101:127

5096: 

5097: \nhi 

5098: Wrobel JM, Fassnacht CD, Ho LC. 2001. {\it Ap. J.} 553:L23

5099: 

5100: \nhi 

5101: Wrobel JM, Heeschen DS. 1991. {\it Astron. J.} 101:148

5102: 

5103: \nhi 

5104: Wrobel JM, Ho LC. 2006. {\it Ap. J.} 646:L95

5105: 

5106: \nhi 

5107: Wrobel JM, Terashima Y, Ho LC. 2008. {\it Ap. J.} in press

5108: 

5109: \nhi 

5110: Wu Q, Cao X. 2005. {\it Ap. J.} 621:130

5111: 

5112: \nhi 

5113: Wu Q, Yuan F, Cao X. 2007. {\it Ap. J.} 669:96

5114: 

5115: \nhi 

5116: Xu Y, Cao X-W. 2007. {\it ChJAA} 7:63

5117: 

5118: \nhi 

5119: Yan R, Newman JA, Faber SM, Konidaris N, Koo D, Davis M. 2006. {\it Ap. J.} 

5120: 648:281

5121: 

5122: \nhi 

5123: Yaqoob T, Serlemitsos PJ, Ptak A, Mushotzky RF, Kunieda H, Terashima Y. 1995. 

5124: {\it Ap. J.} 455:508

5125: 

5126: \nhi 

5127: Young AJ, Nowak MA, Markoff S, Marshall HL, Canizares CR. 2007. {\it Ap. J.} 

5128: 669:830

5129: 

5130: \nhi 

5131: Yu Q, Tremaine S. 2002. {\it MNRAS} 335:965

5132: 

5133: \nhi 

5134: Yuan F. 2007. In {\it The Central Engine of Active Galactic Nuclei}, ed. LC 

5135: Ho, J-M Wang, p. 95.  San Francisco: ASP

5136: 

5137: \nhi 

5138: Yuan F, Cui W. 2005. {\it Ap. J.} 629:408

5139: 

5140: \nhi 

5141: Yuan F, Markoff S, Falcke H. 2002. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 383:854

5142: 

5143: \nhi 

5144: Yuan F, Markoff S, Falcke H, Biermann PL. 2002. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 

5145: 391:139

5146: 

5147: \nhi 

5148: Yuan F, Narayan R. 2004. {\it Ap. J.} 612:724

5149: 

5150: \nhi 

5151: Zakamska NL, Strauss MA, Krolik JH, Collinge MJ, Hall PB, et al. 2003. 

5152: {\it Astron. J.} 126:2125

5153: 

5154: \nhi 

5155: Zamorani G, Henry JP, Maccacaro T, Tananbaum H, So\l tan A, et al. 1981. 

5156: {\it Ap. J.} 245:357

5157: 

5158: \nhi 

5159: Zezas A, Birkinshaw M, Worrall DM, Peters A, Fabbiano G. 2005. {\it Ap. J.} 

5160: 627:711

5161: 

5162: \nhi 

5163: Zhang X-G, Dultzin-Hacyan D, Wang T-G. 2007. {\it MNRAS} 374:691

5164: 

5165: \nhi 

5166: Zhang Y, Gu Q-S, Ho LC. 2008. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} submitted

5167: 

5168: %\end{thebibliography}

5169: 

5170: \vfill\eject

5171: 

5172: %\listoffigures

5173: 

5174: \end{document}

5175: