1: \documentclass[showkeys,twocolumn,citeautoscript,showpacs,amsmath,amssymb,epsf,prl]{revtex4}
2: %\documentclass[floatfix,showkeys,preprint,citeautoscript,showpacs,amsmath,amssymb,epsf,prl]{revtex4}
3: \usepackage{dcolumn}
4: \usepackage{epsfig}
5: %\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.4}
6:
7: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
8: %\usepackage{longtable}% Include figure files
9: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
10: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
11:
12:
13: \def\etal{{\em et al. }}
14: \def\ocm{ cm$^{-1}$ }
15: \def\BBE{ B$_{80}$ }
16: \def\cm{ cm$^{-1}$ }
17: \def\AAA{\AA$^3$}
18: \def\thp{ $\theta_{p}$ }
19: \def\af{ $\alpha$ }
20: \def\asos{ $\alpha_{SOS}$}
21: \def\asp{ $\alpha_{RPA}$}
22: \def\arpa{ $\alpha_{RPA}$ }
23: \def\appp{ $\alpha_{PPP}$ }
24: \def\apen{ $\alpha_{Penn}$ }
25: \def\aff{ $\alpha_{FF}$}
26: \def\rm{ $\overline{r}$}
27: \def\rmc{ ${\overline{r}}^3$}
28: \def\Rat{ $\frac{\alpha_{RPA}}{\overline{r}^3}$}
29: \def\silyA{(CH$_3)_{24}$Si$_{14}$}
30: \def\rbar{ $\overline{r}$}
31: \def\cmin{ \cm$^{-1}$}
32:
33:
34: \begin{document}
35: \preprint{UTEP/005}
36:
37: \title{ The vibrational stability and electronic structure of B$_{80}$ fullerene-like cage}
38:
39: \author{Tunna Baruah$^1$, Mark R. Pederson$^2$, , and
40: Rajendra R. Zope$^{1,3}$}
41:
42: \affiliation{$^1$Department of Physics, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79958, USA }
43:
44:
45: \affiliation{$^2$Center for Computational Materials Science, US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, USA}
46:
47: \affiliation{$^3$NSF CREST Center for Nanomaterials Characterization Science and Process Technology \\
48: Howard University, School of Engineering, 2300 Sixth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20059, USA}
49:
50: \date{\today }
51:
52:
53:
54:
55: \begin{abstract}
56: %
57:
58: We investigate the vibrational stability and the electronic structure of the proposed icosahedral
59: fullerene-like cage structure of B$_{80}$ [Szwacki, Sadrzadeh, and Yakobson, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 98}, 166804 (2007)] by an all
60: electron density functional theory using polarized Gaussian basis functions containing
61: 41 basis functions per atom. The vibrational analysis of B$_{80}$ indicates that the icosahedral structure
62: is vibrationally unstable with 7 imaginary frequencies. The equilibrium structure has $T_h$ symmetry
63: and a {\em smaller} gap of 0.96 eV between the highest occupied and lowest unoccupied
64: molecular orbital energy levels compared to the icosahedral structure. The static dipole polarizability
65: of B$_{80}$ cage is 149 \AAA and the first ionization energy is 6.4 eV. The B$_{80}$ cage has rather large
66: electron affinity of 3 eV making it useful candidate as electron acceptor if it is synthesized.
67: The infra-red and Raman spectra of the highly symmetric structure are characterized by a few absorption peaks.
68: \end{abstract}
69:
70:
71:
72:
73: \maketitle
74:
75:
76:
77: Since the discovery of C$_{60}$, several studies have reported possible
78: existence of hollow inorganic cage-like structures. Recent work by Szwacki etal\cite{RF:455}
79: added boron to the list of elements that can form fullerene-like
80: hollow cage structure. While several
81: studies\cite{RF:456,RF:459,RF:458,RF:457,RF:454,PhysRevB.68.035414,lau:212111,boustani:3176,BQ97}
82: have reported stable clusters, rings, and nanotubes of boron, a hollow fullerene-like
83: cage cluster containing only boron has not yet been found.
84: Using density functional
85: theory Szwacki etal\cite{RF:455}, showed that a boron cluster containing 80 atoms can
86: form a stable hollow cage. The basic structure of this cluster is similar
87: to that of C$_{60}$ with 12 pentagonal and 20 hexagonal rings. The B$_{80}$
88: cluster has an additional boron atom at the center of each hexagon (Cf. \ref{fig1}).
89: It is known that the boron analogue of C$_{60}$ is not a stable structure. However, these additional 20
90: boron atoms at the centers of the hexagonal rings stabilize the B$_{60}$ to form a
91: stable B$_{80}$ fullerene with a binding
92: energy of 5.77 eV per atom.
93: The structure of B$_{80}$ cluster has been suggesteded by Szwacki etal.
94: to maintain the same
95: icosahedral point group symmetry as in C$_{60}$ fullerene. They also predicted that the
96: icosahedral B$_{80}$, as in the case of C$_{60}$, has the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of
97: t$_{1u}$ symmetry. However they find that the highest molecular orbital (HOMO) however belongs to the
98: t$_{2u}$ irreducible representation\cite{RF:455}.
99: \begin{figure}
100: \epsfig{file=B80.eps,width=6.0cm,clip=true}
101: \caption{\label{fig:str} (Color online) Optimized geometry
102: of B$_{80}$ cage.
103: }
104: \label{fig1}
105: \end{figure}
106:
107:
108:
109:
110: The purpose of the present article is to further investigate the electronic
111: structure of this novel boron cluster, focusing particularly on its
112: response to applied electric field. To this end, we calculate the dipole
113: polarizability of the B$_{80}$ cluster using the linear combination of
114: atomic orbital approach within the density functional formalism. In
115: addition to the dipole polarizability we also compute the first ionization
116: energies and the electron affinity. We also provide the infra-red and Raman
117: spectra for possible detection. We use large polarized Gaussian
118: basis sets to express the Kohn-Sham
119: molecular orbitals\cite{RF:181}. The exchange-correlation effects are treated
120: within the generalized gradient approximation using the
121: Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof\cite{RF:183} parametrization. We have first
122: optimized the structure of B$_{80}$ using the icosahedral point group
123: by the NRLMOL code\cite{RF:69,RF:185}. The resultant electronic
124: structure shows some discrepancy with respect to the
125: previous study by Szwacki\cite{RF:455}. The HOMO level is
126: 5 fold degenerate and belongs to the h$_u$ irreducible representation
127: instead of t$_{2u}$ as reported earlier.
128: %Given that it is, in principle impossible to
129: %avoid breaking I$_h$ symmetry within a supercell calculation, the statement that
130: %the HOMO has t$_{2u}$ symmetry could simply be a manifestion of slight symmetry breaking
131: %due to cell boundaries. However, an alternative possibility is that the simulation of
132: %Szwacki et al did indeed find a T$_h$ structure.
133: Besides, this small discrepancy, the present calculation also revealed that a more stable B$_{80}$
134: cluster has symmetry lower than the icosahedral symmetry as reported by Swazcki
135: \etal. To verify if this lower symmetry structure is due to symmetry
136: breaking distortion of icosahedral cage, full vibrational frequency
137: calculations were performed within the harmonic approximation.
138: These calculations show that the icosahedral B$_{80}$ cluster
139: is vibrationally unstable with two sets of imaginary frequencies.
140: One of the two sets of modes is four fold degenerate and
141: the the other one is a three fold degenerate mode. The vibrational
142: motions of atoms in these two modes are depicted in Fig. \ref{fvib2}. These modes
143: are the out of plane motion of the boron atoms capping hexagons.
144:
145:
146:
147: Full symmetry unconstrained relaxation of B$_{80}$ cluster show that
148: the cluster has $T_h$ symmetry. The $T_h$ cluster is vibrationally
149: stable.
150: The $T_h$ B$_{80}$ cluster has five inequivalent atoms whose
151: positions in Bohr are
152: (0.0000, 7.9117, 1.6024),
153: (4.3303, 4.3303, 4.3303),
154: (2.6304, 6.8420, 3.2061),
155: (5.1888, -5.8587, -1.6209), and
156: (0.0000, 2.5093, 6.6176).
157: The position of all atoms in B$_{80}$ cluster can be obtained using the
158: position of the nonequivalent atoms and using the symmetry
159: operations of $T_h$. The 4 three fold symmetry axes are along
160: the 111 directions.
161:
162: The energy of T$_h$ structure is
163: lower by 0.05 eV compared to the icosahedral structure.
164: Its electronic structure is
165: 7a$_{u}$ 12a$_{g}$ 22e$_{g}$ 22t$_{g}$ 27t$_{u}$ 12e$_{u}$.
166: The h$_u$ symmetry of the HOMO of the icosahedral structure is split into a three-fold
167: degenerate t$_u$ and a two fold degenerate e$_u$ level in the $T_h$ structure. The
168: splitting also reduces the HOMO-LUMO gap in the $T_h$ structure.
169: The HOMO is two fold degenerate and belongs to $e_u$ irreducible
170: representation. The LUMO is three fold degenerate is of $t_u$
171: type.
172: The HOMO and LUMO orbital densities are shown in Fig.\ref{MO:fig}.
173:
174: \begin{figure}
175: \epsfig{file=b80vib.eps,width=8.5cm,clip=true}
176: \caption{ (Color online) Unstable
177: vibrational modes of icosahedral B$_{80}$ cage.}
178: \label{fvib2}
179: \end{figure}
180:
181:
182: The static dipole polarizability is an important
183: physical property that characterizes the system's response
184: to an applied static electric field to the first order. A number of
185: methods have been developed to compute the dipole and higher
186: polarizabilities. In this work, we use the finite-field
187: method. In the finite-field method the total energies and/or dipole moments
188: are computed self-consistently for various values of the applied electric
189: field\cite{cohen:s34,Bartlett_FF,Kurtz82,Salahub_Pol,Na_Pol,Jackson}.
190: The polarizability tensor is then built from well converged
191: total energies or dipole moments using the finite-difference
192: approximation. An accurate estimate of the polarizability
193: using the linear combination of atomic orbitals requires the use of a large basis set
194: supplemented with diffuse functions. The Gaussian basis
195: set used in this work consists of 5 $s-$, 4 $p-$, and 3 $d-$ type Gaussians each
196: contracted from 12 primitive functions. This basis is augmented with 6
197: $d-$ type functions. Thus, in total 3280 basis functions are
198: used in polarizability calculation. More details about construction
199: and the performance of basis set can be found
200: in Ref. \onlinecite{RF:181,PBAS05,PB_POL}.
201: Due to the quasi spherical symmetry of B$_{80}$ cluster, the off-diagonal
202: elements of the polarizability tensor are zero. The mean polarizability
203: obtained by finite-field method is 149 \AAA. The mean
204: polarizability of C$_{60}$ fullerene determined using the same set
205: of approximations is 82 \AAA. The larger polarizability
206: of B$_{80}$ cluster is principally due to
207: its larger volume. Using classical electrostatics, the polarizability of
208: a spherical shell of radius R can be shown to be R$^3$. Unlike the
209: C$_{60}$ fullerene where in all atoms are at same distance
210: from its center of mass, the atoms in B$_{80}$ cluster are at slightly
211: different distances (3.74-4.27\AA) from the center of B$_{80}$ cluster.
212: Using the radius of the outermost atoms, the volume of B$_{80}$ cluster can be estimated to
213: be roughly 1.74 times that of the C$_{60}$ fullerene. Using 1.74 as a scaling factor, the
214: polarizability of C$_{60}$ fullerene can be used to estimate polarizability of B$_{80}$
215: cluster. This rough estimate is 143\AAA, in good agreement with the polarizability
216: obtained by finite-field method.
217: %
218: %The first dipole allowed transition in the B$_{80}$ corresponds to electronic
219: %transition from the e$_{u}$ HOMO to the $t_g$ LUMO+2 state. The Kohn-Sham
220: %eigenvalue difference corresponding to this transition is 1.14 eV. This
221: %is smaller than the 2.7 eV Kohn-Sham energy gap for the lowest dipole
222: %allowed transition in C$_{60}$.
223: %
224: The finite-field (screened) polarizability does
225: not change due to symmetry lowering of the B$_{80}$ cluster. The unscreend
226: polarizability however show significant change upon symmetry lowering.
227: It increases from 631\AAA to 897 \AAA due to the decrease in the HOMO-LUMO
228: gap and due to changes in low-lying dipole allowed transitions. These
229: transitions must be strongly screened to give identical values
230: of polarizability for $I_h$ and $T_h$ clusters.
231:
232: The calculation of the vibrational frequencies establishes the stability
233: of the T$_h$ structure.
234: The vibrational density of states of the B$_{80}$ cluster are shown in
235: fig. \ref{vib}.
236: The bottom panel shows the density of states and the upper two panels
237: show respectively the infrared and Raman activity of the B$_{80}$ cluster. The cluster
238: shows a very strong infrared peak at 991 cm$^{-1}$. The other significant peaks
239: occur at 446, 759, 771, 912, and 1012 cm$^{-1}$. The Raman spectrum shows a few
240: low frequency modes with strong peaks at 112, 174, 176, and 312 \cmin.
241: Another prominent peak is seen at 963 \cmin.
242:
243:
244: \begin{figure}
245: \epsfig{file=vib.eps,width=8.5cm,clip=true}
246: \caption{ (Color online) The vibrational density of states, Infrared absorption
247: intensity and the Raman scattering intensities of the B$_{80}$ cluster with T$_h$ structure.
248: \label{vib}}
249: \end{figure}
250:
251: The vibrational frequencies
252: determined in analysis of the vibrational stability of B$_{80}$ cluster can be
253: also be used to compute the vibrational contribution to the dipole
254: polarizability.
255: In general, the vibrational polarizability is the second largest contribution
256: to the total polarizability tensor.
257: For the case of ionic and hydrogen bonded systems, the vibrational contribution
258: may be comparable to or even larger than the electronic contribution.
259: The vibrational contribution to the polarizability tensor within
260: the double harmonic approximation\cite{PBAS05} is given as
261: $$\alpha^{vib}_{i,j} = \sum_{\mu} Z_{i,\mu} \omega_{\mu}^{-2} Z_{j,\mu}^T.$$
262: Here, $\omega_{\mu}^{-2}$ is the frequency of the $\mu$th vibrational mode,
263: $ Z_{i,\mu}$ is the effective charge tensor (See. Ref. \onlinecite{PBAS05} for more details).
264: The vibrational contribution to polarizability is 5.5 \AAA which
265: is much smaller the electronic contribution but is
266: larger than that observed in carbon fullerenes\cite{PBAS05}.
267:
268: \begin{figure}[b]
269: \epsfig{file=b80mo.eps,width=8.5cm,clip=true}
270: \caption{ (Color online) The orbital densities
271: of the HOMO (left) and LUMO (right) of the B$_{80}$ cluster.
272: \label{MO:fig}}
273: \end{figure}
274:
275: To understand the reactivity of the B$_{80}$ cluster, we have calculated its
276: ionization potential and the electron affinity. The first ionization energy
277: is the minimum energy required to remove an electron. It can
278: be determined from the self-consistent total
279: energy difference of the B$_{80}$ cluster and its singly charged cation\cite{RF:321}. The
280: calculated ionization energy is 6.5 eV and is smaller than that of
281: C$_{60}$ (7.6eV). Similarly, the electron affinity can be computed from
282: self-consistent total energy difference of neutral cluster and its anion.
283: The calculated electron affinity is 3 eV. Our calculations also indicated that
284: the cluster reorganization upon addition of an electron is also small
285: in this highly symmetric cluster.
286: %
287: The chemical hardness is an indicator of the reactivity of the molecule.
288: It can be approximated as half of the difference between the
289: ionization potential and electron affinity\cite{hardness}. This definition immediately
290: points out that the B$_{80}$ cluster is more reactive than the
291: C$_{60}$ fullerene.
292: %
293: The rather large electron
294: affinity makes B$_{80}$ cluster, if synthesized, an interesting candidate
295: as an electron receptor. The larger electron affinity also suggests
296: possibility of coating these cluster with alkali or transition atoms, which
297: then can be tested as hydrogen storage materials. Other possibilities are
298: using it as a building block in ionic cluster assembled materials or as an
299: electron receptor in a photovoltaic device.
300:
301: To summarize, the vibrational stability of recently reported B$_{80}$
302: cluster is examined by computing the harmonic vibrational frequencies.
303: The B$_{80}$ cluster is found to be unstable in icosahedral symmetry but stable in
304: the reduced $T_h$ symmetry. The electronic structure of B$_{80}$ cluster changes upon
305: symmetry lowering. The symmetry lowering decreases the HOMO-LUMO gap from 1.1 eV (in I$_h$ structure)
306: to 0.97 eV.
307: Its static dipole polarizability (149\AAA) however does not alter appreciably.
308: Its ionization potential is 6.5 eV. The $T_h$ structure
309: has large electron affinity of 3 eV making it a candidate as an
310: electron receptor. Using the chemical hardness as an indicator
311: of reactivity the B$_{80}$ is found to be larger than
312: the C$_{60}$ fullerene. The infra-red and Raman spectra are provided.
313:
314:
315: This work is supported in part by
316: the National Science Foundation through CREST grant,
317: by the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP startup funds, University research institute grant) and partly
318: the Office of Naval Research, directly and through the Naval Research Laboratory.
319: Authors acknowledge the computer time at the UTEP Cray
320: acquired using ONR 05PR07548-00 grant.
321:
322:
323:
324:
325: %\bibliography{pol,b80,fpol,refs,list1,dunlap,list2,delta_scf,ADFT,diamondoid,C70_ref}
326:
327: \begin{thebibliography}{24}
328: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
329: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibnamefont\endcsname\relax
330: \def\bibnamefont#1{#1}\fi
331: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibfnamefont\endcsname\relax
332: \def\bibfnamefont#1{#1}\fi
333: \expandafter\ifx\csname citenamefont\endcsname\relax
334: \def\citenamefont#1{#1}\fi
335: \expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax
336: \def\url#1{\texttt{#1}}\fi
337: \expandafter\ifx\csname urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi
338: \providecommand{\bibinfo}[2]{#2}
339: \providecommand{\eprint}[2][]{\url{#2}}
340:
341: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Szwacki et~al.}(2007)\citenamefont{Szwacki, Sadrzadeh,
342: and Yakobson}}]{RF:455}
343: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{N.~G.} \bibnamefont{Szwacki}},
344: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Sadrzadeh}},
345: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.~I.}
346: \bibnamefont{Yakobson}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Physical Review Letters}
347: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{98}}, \bibinfo{pages}{166804}
348: (\bibinfo{year}{2007}), \bibinfo{note}{pT: J}.
349:
350: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Dadashev et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont{Dadashev,
351: Gindulyte, Lipscomb, Massa, and Squire}}]{RF:456}
352: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{V.}~\bibnamefont{Dadashev}},
353: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Gindulyte}},
354: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~N.} \bibnamefont{Lipscomb}},
355: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Massa}}, \bibnamefont{and}
356: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Squire}},
357: \bibinfo{journal}{Structures and Mechanisms: from Ashes to Enzymes}
358: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{827}}, \bibinfo{pages}{79} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}),
359: \bibinfo{note}{pT: S}.
360:
361: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Derecskeikovacs
362: et~al.}(1994)\citenamefont{Derecskeikovacs, Dunlap, Lipscomb, Lowrey,
363: Marynick, and Massa}}]{RF:459}
364: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Derecskeikovacs}},
365: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.~I.} \bibnamefont{Dunlap}},
366: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~N.} \bibnamefont{Lipscomb}},
367: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Lowrey}},
368: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~S.} \bibnamefont{Marynick}},
369: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Massa}},
370: \bibinfo{journal}{Inorganic chemistry} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{33}},
371: \bibinfo{pages}{5617} (\bibinfo{year}{1994}), \bibinfo{note}{pT: J}.
372:
373: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Gindulyte
374: et~al.}(1998{\natexlab{a}})\citenamefont{Gindulyte, Krishnamachari, Lipscomb,
375: and Massa}}]{RF:458}
376: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Gindulyte}},
377: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{N.}~\bibnamefont{Krishnamachari}},
378: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~N.} \bibnamefont{Lipscomb}},
379: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Massa}},
380: \bibinfo{journal}{Inorganic chemistry} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{37}},
381: \bibinfo{pages}{6546} (\bibinfo{year}{1998}{\natexlab{a}}),
382: \bibinfo{note}{pT: J}.
383:
384: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Gindulyte
385: et~al.}(1998{\natexlab{b}})\citenamefont{Gindulyte, Lipscomb, and
386: Massa}}]{RF:457}
387: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Gindulyte}},
388: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~N.} \bibnamefont{Lipscomb}},
389: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Massa}},
390: \bibinfo{journal}{Inorganic chemistry} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{37}},
391: \bibinfo{pages}{6544} (\bibinfo{year}{1998}{\natexlab{b}}),
392: \bibinfo{note}{pT: J}.
393:
394: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Tang and Ismail-Beigi}(2007)}]{RF:454}
395: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Tang}} \bibnamefont{and}
396: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Ismail-Beigi}},
397: \bibinfo{journal}{Physical Review Letters} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{99}},
398: \bibinfo{pages}{115501} (\bibinfo{year}{2007}), \bibinfo{note}{pT: J}.
399:
400: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Chacko et~al.}(2003)\citenamefont{Chacko, Kanhere, and
401: Boustani}}]{PhysRevB.68.035414}
402: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Chacko}},
403: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~G.} \bibnamefont{Kanhere}},
404: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{I.}~\bibnamefont{Boustani}},
405: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{68}},
406: \bibinfo{pages}{035414} (\bibinfo{year}{2003}).
407:
408: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Lau et~al.}(2006)\citenamefont{Lau, Pandey, Pati, and
409: Karna}}]{lau:212111}
410: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~C.} \bibnamefont{Lau}},
411: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Pandey}},
412: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Pati}}, \bibnamefont{and}
413: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~P.} \bibnamefont{Karna}},
414: \bibinfo{journal}{Applied Physics Letters} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{88}},
415: \bibinfo{eid}{212111} (pages~\bibinfo{numpages}{3}) (\bibinfo{year}{2006}),
416: \urlprefix\url{http://link.aip.org/link/?APL/88/212111/1}.
417:
418: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Boustani et~al.}(1999)\citenamefont{Boustani, Quandt,
419: Hern\'{a}ndez, and Rubio}}]{boustani:3176}
420: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{I.}~\bibnamefont{Boustani}},
421: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Quandt}},
422: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Hern\'{a}ndez}},
423: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Rubio}},
424: \bibinfo{journal}{The Journal of Chemical Physics}
425: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{110}}, \bibinfo{pages}{3176} (\bibinfo{year}{1999}),
426: \urlprefix\url{http://link.aip.org/link/?JCP/110/3176/1}.
427:
428: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Boustani and Quandt}(1997)}]{BQ97}
429: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{I.}~\bibnamefont{Boustani}} \bibnamefont{and}
430: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Quandt}},
431: \bibinfo{journal}{EPL (Europhysics Letters)} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{39}},
432: \bibinfo{pages}{527} (\bibinfo{year}{1997}),
433: \urlprefix\url{http://stacks.iop.org/0295-5075/39/527}.
434:
435: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Porezag and Pederson}(1999)}]{RF:181}
436: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Porezag}} \bibnamefont{and}
437: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~R.} \bibnamefont{Pederson}},
438: \bibinfo{journal}{Physical Review a} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{60}},
439: \bibinfo{pages}{2840} (\bibinfo{year}{1999}), \bibinfo{note}{pT: J}.
440:
441: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Perdew et~al.}(1996)\citenamefont{Perdew, Burke, and
442: Ernzerhof}}]{RF:183}
443: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~P.} \bibnamefont{Perdew}},
444: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Burke}}, \bibnamefont{and}
445: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Ernzerhof}},
446: \bibinfo{journal}{Physical Review Letters} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{77}},
447: \bibinfo{pages}{3865} (\bibinfo{year}{1996}), \bibinfo{note}{pT: J}.
448:
449: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Pederson and Jackson}(1991)}]{RF:69}
450: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~R.} \bibnamefont{Pederson}} \bibnamefont{and}
451: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~A.} \bibnamefont{Jackson}},
452: \bibinfo{journal}{PHYSICAL REVIEW B.CONDENSED MATTER}
453: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{43}}, \bibinfo{pages}{7312} (\bibinfo{year}{1991}),
454: \bibinfo{note}{pUBM: Print; ppublish}.
455:
456: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Pederson and Jackson}(1990)}]{RF:185}
457: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~R.} \bibnamefont{Pederson}} \bibnamefont{and}
458: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~A.} \bibnamefont{Jackson}},
459: \bibinfo{journal}{Physical Review B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{41}},
460: \bibinfo{pages}{7453} (\bibinfo{year}{1990}), \bibinfo{note}{pT: J}.
461:
462: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Blundell et~al.}(2000)\citenamefont{Blundell, Guet, and
463: Zope}}]{Na_Pol}
464: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~A.} \bibnamefont{Blundell}},
465: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Guet}}, \bibnamefont{and}
466: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~R.} \bibnamefont{Zope}},
467: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{84}},
468: \bibinfo{pages}{4826} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}).
469:
470: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Jackson et~al.}(1999)\citenamefont{Jackson, Pederson,
471: Wang, and Ho}}]{Jackson}
472: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Jackson}},
473: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Pederson}},
474: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.-Z.} \bibnamefont{Wang}}, \bibnamefont{and}
475: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.-M.} \bibnamefont{Ho}},
476: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. A} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{59}},
477: \bibinfo{pages}{3685} (\bibinfo{year}{1999}).
478:
479: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Cohen and Roothaan}(1965)}]{cohen:s34}
480: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.~D.} \bibnamefont{Cohen}} \bibnamefont{and}
481: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~C.~J.} \bibnamefont{Roothaan}},
482: \bibinfo{journal}{The Journal of Chemical Physics}
483: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{43}}, \bibinfo{pages}{S34} (\bibinfo{year}{1965}).
484:
485: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Bartlett and Purvis}(1979)}]{Bartlett_FF}
486: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~J.} \bibnamefont{Bartlett}} \bibnamefont{and}
487: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.~D.} \bibnamefont{Purvis}},
488: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. A} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{20}},
489: \bibinfo{pages}{1313} (\bibinfo{year}{1979}).
490:
491: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Kurtz et~al.}(1982)\citenamefont{Kurtz, Stewart, and
492: Dieter}}]{Kurtz82}
493: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.~A.} \bibnamefont{Kurtz}},
494: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~J.~P.} \bibnamefont{Stewart}},
495: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~M.}
496: \bibnamefont{Dieter}}, \bibinfo{journal}{J. Comput. Chem.}
497: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{11}} (\bibinfo{year}{1982}).
498:
499: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Guan et~al.}(1995)\citenamefont{Guan, Casida, K\"oster,
500: and Salahub}}]{Salahub_Pol}
501: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Guan}},
502: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~E.} \bibnamefont{Casida}},
503: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~M.} \bibnamefont{K\"oster}},
504: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~R.}
505: \bibnamefont{Salahub}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. B}
506: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{52}}, \bibinfo{pages}{2184} (\bibinfo{year}{1995}).
507:
508: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Pederson and Baruah}(2005)}]{PB_POL}
509: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~R.} \bibnamefont{Pederson}} \bibnamefont{and}
510: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Baruah}},
511: \bibinfo{journal}{Lecture Series in Computer and Computational Sciences}
512: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{3}}, \bibinfo{pages}{156} (\bibinfo{year}{2005}).
513:
514: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Pederson et~al.}(2005)\citenamefont{Pederson, Baruah,
515: Allen, and Schmidt}}]{PBAS05}
516: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Pederson}},
517: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Baruah}},
518: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Allen}}, \bibnamefont{and}
519: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Schmidt}},
520: \bibinfo{journal}{Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation}
521: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{1}}, \bibinfo{pages}{590} (\bibinfo{year}{2005}),
522: ISSN \bibinfo{issn}{1549-9618},
523: \urlprefix\url{http://pubs3.acs.org/acs/journals/doilookup?in_doi=10.1021/ct%
524: 050061t}.
525:
526: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Jones and Gunnarsson}(1989)}]{RF:321}
527: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~O.} \bibnamefont{Jones}} \bibnamefont{and}
528: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{O.}~\bibnamefont{Gunnarsson}},
529: \bibinfo{journal}{Reviews of Modern Physics} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{61}},
530: \bibinfo{pages}{689} (\bibinfo{year}{1989}), \bibinfo{note}{pT: J}.
531:
532: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Parr and Pearson}(1983)}]{hardness}
533: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~G.} \bibnamefont{Parr}} \bibnamefont{and}
534: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~G.} \bibnamefont{Pearson}},
535: \bibinfo{journal}{Journal of the American Chemical Society}
536: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{105}}, \bibinfo{pages}{7512} (\bibinfo{year}{1983}),
537: ISSN \bibinfo{issn}{0002-7863},
538: \urlprefix\url{http://pubs3.acs.org/acs/journals/doilookup?in_doi=10.1021/ja%
539: 00364a005}.
540:
541: \end{thebibliography}
542:
543:
544: \end{document}
545:
546:
547: