1: %#! platex ms.tex && platex ms.tex && platex ms.tex && dvips ms.dvi
2:
3: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
5: \documentclass{emulateapj}
6: \usepackage{color}
7:
8: \slugcomment{Accepted 2008 March 19}
9:
10: \shorttitle{Lack of O-line excess in the Coma outskirts}
11: \shortauthors{Takei et al.}
12:
13: \newcommand{\NH}{N_\mathrm{H}}
14: \newcommand{\nele}{n_\mathrm{e}}
15: \newcommand{\nH}{n_\mathrm{H}}
16: \newcommand{\DA}{D_\mathrm{A}}
17: \newcommand{\LU}{\mathrm{LU}}
18: %\newcommand{\red}[1]{{\textcolor{red}{\bf #1}}}
19: %\newcommand{\blue}[1]{{\textcolor{blue}{\bf #1}}}
20:
21: \begin{document}
22: \title{
23: On the lack of strong O-line excess in the Coma cluster
24: outskirts from {\it Suzaku}}
25:
26: \email{Y.Takei@sron.nl}
27:
28:
29: \author{
30: Yoh Takei\altaffilmark{1},
31: Eric D. Miller \altaffilmark{2},
32: Joel N. Bregman\altaffilmark{3},
33: Shunsuke Kimura\altaffilmark{4},
34: Takaya Ohashi\altaffilmark{5},
35: Kazuhisa Mitsuda\altaffilmark{4},
36: Takayuki Tamura\altaffilmark{4},
37: Noriko Y. Yamasaki\altaffilmark{4},
38: Ryuichi Fujimoto\altaffilmark{6}
39: }
40:
41: \altaffiltext{1}{SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research,
42: Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584CA, Utrecht, The Netherlands}
43: \altaffiltext{2}{Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
44: Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Science,
45: 77 Massachusetts Ave 37-551, Cambridge, MA 02139}
46: \altaffiltext{3}{
47: University of Michigan, Department of Astronomy,
48: 500 Church St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109
49: }
50: \altaffiltext{4}{
51: Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS),
52: Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA),
53: 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 229-8510, Japan}
54: \altaffiltext{5}{
55: Department of Physics, Tokyo Metropolitan University,
56: 1-1 Minami-Osawa, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan
57: }
58: \altaffiltext{6}{
59: Department of Physics, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi,
60: Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan
61: }
62:
63:
64: \begin{abstract}
65: About half of the baryons in the local Universe are thought to reside in
66: the so-called warm-hot intergalactic medium (WHIM) at temperatures of
67: 0.1-10 million K. Thermal soft excess emission in the spectrum of some
68: cluster outskirts that contains OVII and/or OVIII emission lines is
69: regarded as evidence of the WHIM, although the
70: origin of the lines
71: is controversial due to strong Galactic and solar system
72: foreground emission.
73: We observed the Coma-11 field, where
74: the most prominent thermal soft excess has ever been reported,
75: with Suzaku XIS in order to make clear the origin of the excess.
76: We did not confirm OVII or OVIII excess emission.
77: The OVII and OVIII intensity in
78: Coma-11 is more than 5$\sigma$ below that reported before and we
79: obtained $2\sigma$ upper limits of
80: 2.8 and 2.9~$\mathrm{photons~ cm^{-2}~ s^{-1}~ sr^{-1}}$
81: for \ion{O}{7} and \ion{O}{8},
82: respectively.
83: The intensities are consistent with those
84: in another field (Coma-7) that we measured,
85: and with other measurements in the Coma outskirts
86: (Coma-7 and X Com fields with XMM-Newton).
87: We did not confirm the
88: spatial variation within Coma outskirts.
89: The strong
90: oxygen emission lines previously
91: reported are likely due to solar wind charge
92: exchange.
93: \end{abstract}
94:
95: \keywords{
96: clusters: individual: Coma ---
97: intergalactic medium ---
98: large-scale structure of universe}
99:
100: \section{Introduction}
101:
102: Based on N-body simulations of cosmological
103: large-scale structure formation
104: \citep[e.g.,][]{2006ApJ...650..560C},
105: a significant (30--50\%) fraction of baryons are thought to reside
106: in a `warm-hot' gaseous phase ($T=10^{5-7}$~K), which is hard to
107: detect with the instruments currently in operation. This warm-hot
108: gas, whose density is $10^{-6}$--$10^{-4}\mathrm{~cm^{-3}}$, is called
109: the warm-hot intergalactic medium (WHIM). Firm detection of the
110: WHIM is important because it is the most promising candidate for the
111: ``missing baryons''; i.e., it is thought to explain the discrepancy
112: between the baryon density observed in the local universe
113: \citep{fukugita98:_cosmic_baryon_budget} and that in the
114: distant universe
115: \citep{rauch97:_opacit_ly_fores_implic_omega} or that calculated from
116: the observed fluctuations of the cosmic microwave background
117: \citep{2007ApJS..170..377S}.
118: Although $\sim10\%$ of the baryons has been resolved as the WHIM
119: in the temperature range $T=10^{5-6}$~K through
120: \ion{O}{6} absorption features observed with
121: {\it FUSE} and {\it HST} \citep{2007arXiv0709.4030D},
122: more baryons are
123: thought to reside in a hotter phase at $T=10^{6-7}$~K.
124: The WHIM of
125: this temperature may be detected via emission or absorption lines from
126: highly ionized elements in X-ray spectra, such as \ion{O}{7} and
127: \ion{O}{8}.
128:
129: Despite many observations so far, the
130: existence of the WHIM in the hotter phase is not yet confirmed
131: \citep[see review of][and references therein]{2007ARA&A..45..221B}.
132: Studies of the WHIM using absorption lines only lead to
133: one disputed detection toward Mkn~421
134: \citep{2005Natur.433..495N}, a result
135: which was not confirmed later and was thus questioned
136: \citep{2007ApJ...656..129R,2006ApJ...652..189K}.
137: Possible detections of emission from the WHIM
138: have been reported in cluster outskirts, as a soft X-ray
139: ($E\lesssim 0.5$~keV) excess containing \ion{O}{7} and \ion{O}{8}
140: lines
141: \citep{2003A&A...397..445K,finoguenov03:_xmm_newton_x_coma}.
142: The origin of O line emission is, however, controversial
143: due to strong Galactic and
144: solar system foreground emission, which has a spectral shape similar
145: to the WHIM
146: \citep{2005A&A...443...29B,2006ApJ...644..167B}.
147: In particular, X-rays induced by solar wind charge exchange (SWCX)
148: could produce serious contamination because of its high variability
149: \citep[e.g.,][]{2000ApJ...532L.153C,2007PASJ...59S.133F}.
150: Note that there has been no detection of redshifted emission lines
151: from the WHIM so far.
152:
153: The most prominent thermal soft excess ever reported is in the Coma
154: outskirts, especially in the Coma-11 field
155: \citep[][hereafter FBH03]{finoguenov03:_xmm_newton_x_coma}.
156: FBH03 also observed spatial variation within the Coma
157: outskirts; Coma-7 shows roughly five
158: times smaller intensity than Coma-11.
159: Not only O lines, but also an EUV excess \citep{2003ApJ...585..722B}
160: and marginal detection of \ion{Ne}{9} emission and absorption lines
161: \citep[][hereafter T07]{2007ApJ...655..831T}
162: are reported in the Coma outskirts. These results
163: may support the existence of the WHIM.
164:
165: We observed the Coma-11 and Coma-7 fields with the XIS
166: \citep{2007PASJ...59S..23K}
167: onboard {\it Suzaku} \citep{2007PASJ...59S...1M},
168: in order to make clear the origin of the excess.
169: The XIS is an ideal instrument to study the emission lines from
170: the WHIM, because it
171: does not show a large
172: low-energy tail in the pulse-height distribution function, even in the
173: very soft ($E\lesssim 0.5~\mathrm{keV}$) band.
174:
175: We assume a Hubble constant of 70 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ or $h_{70}=1$
176: and $\Omega_\mathrm{m} = 0.3$, $\Omega_\mathrm{\Lambda} = 0.7$.
177: The solar metal abundance is given by \citet{2003ApJ...591.1220L}.
178: Unless otherwise
179: stated, errors and upper limits
180: are at the 68~\% confidence level in the figures, and at
181: the 90~\% confidence level in the text and tables.
182: The emission line intensities are quoted in line units (LU) defined
183: as $\mathrm{photons~ cm^{-2}~ s^{-1}~ sr^{-1}}$.
184: One LU corresponds to
185: $8.46\times10^{-8}~\mathrm{photons~ cm^{-2}~ s^{-1}~ arcmin^{-2}}$.
186:
187: \section{Observations and data reduction}
188:
189: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
190: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
191: \tablecaption{Observation Information\label{tab-obsinfo}}
192: \tablewidth{0pt}
193: \tablehead{
194: & \colhead{Coordinates }
195: & \colhead{Exposure\tablenotemark{a}}
196: \\
197: & \colhead{(J2000.0)} & &
198: }
199: \startdata
200: Coma-11 &
201: (12$^{\rm h}$58$^{\rm m}$31.7$^{\rm s}$, 28$^\circ$24$'$13.2$''$)
202: & 53.02 ks
203: \\
204: Coma-7 &
205: (12$^{\rm h}$57$^{\rm m}$22.9$^{\rm s}$, 28$^\circ$08$'$58.1$''$)
206: & 25.26 ks
207: \\
208: ComaBKG &
209: (13$^{\rm h}$15$^{\rm m}$00.0$^{\rm s}$, 31$^\circ$39$'$28.0$''$)
210: & 30.78 ks
211: \enddata
212: \tablenotetext{a}{After screening as described in the text}
213: \end{deluxetable}
214:
215:
216: We observed three fields from 2007 Jun 19 to 2007 Jun 22;
217: two of them are in the Coma outskirts,
218: namely Coma-11 and Coma-7
219: that FBH03
220: observed with {\it XMM-Newton}, and
221: the other is an offset observation (hereafter we call
222: it ComaBKG) of 5.0-degree distance
223: from the Coma center (NGC 4874).
224: The coordinates and net exposure times
225: are summarized in Table~\ref{tab-obsinfo}.
226: The XIS was operated in the normal mode and with the
227: spaced-row charge injection (SCI).
228: We analysed the clean-event data of
229: Ver~2.0 processing with standard parameters,
230: but with the latest gain calibration (Ver~2.6.1.16).
231: We excised the last 6.7 ks of the Coma-7 observation, during which
232: the XIS suffered a problem with zero-level determination.
233:
234: We excluded the regions where point sources are found or
235: which are irradiated by the $^{55}$Fe calibration sources.
236: The point sources were identified
237: using the
238: XMM-Newton Serendipitous Source Catalogue
239: \citep[2XMM;][]{watsonCatalogue}, as well as
240: by examining the XIS images by eyes.
241: Response files were created using Suzaku ftools xisrmfgen
242: version 2007-05-14 and xissimarfgen version 2007-09-22
243: with CALDB released on 2008-01-14.
244: We assumed uniform emission from the sky.
245: The spectra and response files of the two XIS-FIs (XIS0 and 3) are
246: added using ftools mathpha, marfrmf, and addrmf.
247: X-ray spectra are analysed with XSPEC~12.4.0.
248:
249: \section{Spectral analysis}
250:
251: \subsection{ComaBKG field}
252:
253:
254: ComaBKG is observed in order to precisely determine the foreground
255: and background emission, in particular
256: O and Ne line intensities around the Coma cluster.
257: The instrumental background,
258: estimated using a ftool xisnxbgen version 2007-11-23
259: with COR2 as the sorting parameter \citep{2008PASJ...60S..11T},
260: were subtracted from the ComaBKG spectra.
261:
262: We modeled the spectra with a sum of two thin thermal
263: plasma models (APEC in XSPEC) and a power-law to represent emission from
264: the local hot bubble (LHB), Milky-Way halo (MWH) and extragalactic
265: cosmic X-ray background (CXB), respectively. MWH and CXB were
266: convolved with absorption in the Galaxy (WABS in XSPEC).
267: We fitted the spectra
268: in the energy range 0.5--5.0~keV for the
269: XIS-FI and 0.35--5.0~keV for XIS1 (XIS-BI).
270: The spectra of XIS-FI and XIS-BI were fitted simultaneously.
271: We ignored 1.40--1.55~keV
272: where a relatively large uncertainty exists in the instrument background
273: \citep{2008PASJ...60S..11T}
274: The redshift and abundance of the two thermal plasma models were fixed
275: to 0 and 1.0 solar, respectively. The
276: temperature of the LHB was also fixed to 0.07~keV, while the temperature
277: of the MWH was allowed to vary.
278: The column density of the Galactic hydrogen gas was fixed to
279: $1.0\times10^{20}~\mathrm{cm^{-2}}$ \citep{2005A&A...440..775K}.
280: Figure~\ref{fig-bkgspectra} and Table~\ref{tab-bestfitBKG} show
281: the best-fit model.
282:
283: \begin{deluxetable}{llc}
284: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
285: \tablecaption{Best-fit parameters of ComaBKG.\label{tab-bestfitBKG}}
286: \tablewidth{0pt}
287: \tablehead{
288: \colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{Unit}
289: & \colhead{Value}
290: }
291: \startdata
292: Galactic $N_H$ & $\mathrm{cm^{-2}}$ &
293: $1.0\times10^{20}$ (fixed) \\
294: LHB temperature & keV & 0.07 (fixed) \\
295: LHB emission measure& $\mathrm{pc~cm^{-6}}$&
296: $(3.0\pm3.0)\times10^{-2}$\\
297: MWH temperature & keV & $0.144^{+0.021}_{-0.027}$\\
298: MWH emission measure & $\mathrm{pc~cm^{-6}}$&
299: $(8.5^{+7.8}_{-3.0})\times10^{-3}$\\
300: CXB photon index & & $1.52\pm0.09$\\
301: CXB normalization\tablenotemark{a} &
302: & $7.7\pm0.5$\\
303: $\chi^2/dof$ thermal model& & 153.40/113=1.36\\
304: \tableline
305: \ion{O}{7} intensity & LU &
306: $6.5\pm1.0$\\
307: \ion{O}{8} intensity & LU &
308: $1.1^{+0.9}_{-0.5}$ \\
309: \ion{Ne}{9} intensity & LU &
310: $0.15^{+0.15}_{-0.14}$\\
311: \ion{Ne}{10} intensity & LU &
312: $0~(<0.2)$ \\
313: $\chi^2/dof$ with lines& & 140.22/105=1.34
314: \enddata
315: \tablenotetext{a}{
316: In a unit of
317: $\mathrm{photons~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}~keV^{-1}~sr^{-1}}$
318: at 1~keV}
319: \end{deluxetable}
320:
321: \begin{figure}
322: \epsscale{0.95}
323: \plotone{f1.eps}
324: \caption{Spectra and best-fit models (top)
325: and residuals in units of sigma (bottom) of ComaBKG.
326: Red and black show BI and FI, respectively.
327: Instrumental background is subtracted.
328: \label{fig-bkgspectra}}
329: \end{figure}
330:
331:
332: We also fitted the spectra with another model in order to
333: determine \ion{O}{7}, \ion{O}{8}, \ion{Ne}{9} and \ion{Ne}{10}
334: intensity more precisely.
335: Four Gaussians were added
336: to represent
337: the four line emissions, while O and Ne
338: abundance of the LHB and MWH were fixed to zero.
339: The energies of the Gaussians were allowed to vary
340: $\pm35~\mathrm{eV}$ around the resonance line energy
341: (0.574~keV for \ion{O}{7}, 0.653~keV for \ion{O}{8},
342: 0.922~keV for \ion{Ne}{9} and 1.022~keV for \ion{Ne}{10})
343: in order to compensate the uncertainty in the energy-scale calibration,
344: while we fixed the line width to zero.
345: The intensities of the four lines
346: are also shown in Table~\ref{tab-bestfitBKG}.
347: The relatively large $\chi^2$ value may be due to incorrect
348: calibration of the energy resolution. The $\chi^2$
349: improved to 128.18
350: when we added 50~eV (FWHM) additional width
351: into the model with lines.
352: The best-fit parameters were not sensitive
353: to this calibration uncertainty;
354: they stay the same within the error at 90\% confidence level.
355: We confirmed that the fitting is not improved when we allow $\NH$ to vary.
356:
357: \begin{deluxetable*}{llcc}
358: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
359: \tablecaption{Best-fit parameters of Coma11 and Coma7.
360: \label{tab-fitspectraComa11-7}}
361: \tablewidth{0pt}
362: \tablehead{
363: \colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{Unit}
364: & \colhead{Coma-11} & \colhead{Coma-7}
365: }
366: \startdata
367: Galactic $\NH$ & $\mathrm{cm^{-2}}$ &
368: $1.0\times10^{20}$ (fixed) &
369: $1.0\times10^{20}$ (fixed) \\
370: Temperature & keV & $6.7^{+0.4}_{-0.3}$ & $8.3^{+0.8}_{-0.6}$\\
371: Abundance & solar & $0.36\pm0.11$ & $0.21\pm0.15$\\
372: Redshift & & 0.0231 (fixed) & 0.0231 (fixed) \\
373: EM & $\mathrm{pc~cm^{-6}}$&
374: $0.100\pm0.002$ & $0.110\pm0.002$\\
375: $\chi^2/dof$ without lines & & 307.51/275=1.12 & 295.40/281=1.05\\
376: \tableline
377: \ion{O}{7} intensity & LU &
378: $0.0~(<0.9)$ & $0.2~(<2.1)$\\
379: \ion{O}{8} intensity & LU &
380: $1.1\pm0.8$ & $1.7\pm1.1$\\
381: \ion{Ne}{9} intensity & LU &
382: $0.1~(<0.4)$ & $0.4~(<0.8)$\\
383: \ion{Ne}{10} intensity & LU &
384: $0.3\pm0.2$ & $0.3~(<0.6)$ \\
385: $\chi^2/dof$ with lines & & 297.71/271=1.10 & 284.92/277=1.03
386: \enddata
387: \end{deluxetable*}
388:
389: \begin{figure*}[htb]
390: \epsscale{.95}
391: \begin{center}
392: \plottwo{f2a.eps}{f2b.eps}
393: \caption{Spectra of Coma-11 (left) and Coma-7 (right).
394: Red and black data correspond to BI and FI respectively.
395: ComaBKG spectra were subtracted to correct the background emission.
396: }
397: \label{fig-spectra-woexcess}
398: \end{center}
399: \end{figure*}
400:
401: \subsection{Coma-11 and Coma-7 fields}
402:
403:
404: The back- and foreground emission of Coma-11 and Coma-7
405: were corrected by subtracting
406: the ComaBKG spectra that were extracted
407: from the same region as Coma-11
408: or Coma-7 in the detector coordinates.
409: We then fitted the spectra
410: 0.5--7.5~keV for XIS-FI and 0.35--7.5~keV for XIS-BI)
411: by the emission
412: of the intracluster medium (ICM), i.e.,
413: a thin thermal plasma model (APEC) convolved with Galactic absorption (wabs).
414: The spectra of XIS-FI and XIS-BI were again fitted together.
415: The spectra and the best-fit models are shown in
416: Figure~\ref{fig-spectra-woexcess}, and the best-fit parameters are in
417: Table~\ref{tab-fitspectraComa11-7}.
418: We did not see a soft excess, i.e., emission from the WHIM.
419: Next, we added four Gaussians to the model,
420: corresponding to lines of \ion{O}{7},
421: \ion{O}{8}, \ion{Ne}{9} and \ion{Ne}{10} at the cluster redshift,
422: in order to investigate possible contributions of the WHIM.
423: The central energy of each line was fixed to that of the
424: resonance lines at redshift $z=0.0231$, and the width of the line was
425: fixed to zero.
426: The results are shown in Table~\ref{tab-fitspectraComa11-7}.
427: The fit is slightly improved ($\Delta \chi^2\sim10$) by
428: adding the lines. However, the significance of each line is
429: less than $3\sigma$.
430: The fitting without FI also gave
431: the same results within the statistical errors, which excludes
432: the possible systematic bias due to the low statistics of the
433: FI data below 1~keV.
434: We also tried to fit the spectra with
435: two thin thermal plasma models, i.e., one for the intracluster
436: medium and one for the WHIM. This did not improve the fit.
437: To obtain robust upper limits of line intensities,
438: we consider systematic uncertainties in calibration:
439: the centroid energy ($\pm35$~eV),
440: the energy resolution (10--80~eV FWHM),
441: energy scale ($\pm50$~eV),
442: and the contamination thickness
443: ($\pm5\times10^{-17}~ \mathrm{cm^{-2}}$).
444: The $2\sigma$ upper limits we obtained
445: for \ion{O}{7}, \ion{O}{8},
446: \ion{Ne}{9}, and \ion{Ne}{10} are
447: 1.4, 2.7, 0.5, and 0.9~LU for Coma-11 and
448: 2.6, 3.7, 1.2, and 1.1~LU for Coma-7, respectively.
449: The uncertainty in Galactic O intensity
450: should also be taken into account.
451: From the variation among background fields in T07, we adopted
452: $\pm1.2$~LU for \ion{O}{7} and $\pm0.6$~LU for \ion{O}{8} as $1\sigma$.
453: Then, \ion{O}{7} and \ion{O}{8} $2\sigma$ upper limits are
454: 2.8 and 2.9~LU for Coma-11 and
455: 3.5 and 3.9~LU for Coma-7, respectively.
456:
457: \section{Discussion}
458:
459: \begin{figure*}[htb]
460: \epsscale{.95}
461: \begin{center}
462: \plottwo{f3a.eps}{f3b.eps}
463: %\vspace{15mm}
464: \caption{Solar wind proton flux as a function of time,
465: around Coma-11 and Coma-7 observations with {\it XMM-Newton} (left)
466: and around our observations with {\it Suzaku} (right),
467: measured with ACE SWEPAM instrument.
468: The time of {\it XMM-Newton} and {\it Suzaku} observations
469: is indicated with vertical lines.
470: }
471: \label{fig-solarwind}
472: \end{center}
473: \end{figure*}
474:
475:
476: We measured the spectra of Coma-11 and Coma-7 with
477: the Suzaku XIS.
478: The spectra were
479: fitted with a single thin thermal plasma model and the emission
480: from the WHIM was not confirmed.
481: Here we compare our results with previous
482: {\it XMM-Newton} observations.
483: We do not discuss the lower energy excess ($E<0.5$~keV)
484: observed with ROSAT and EUVE,
485: because the XIS is not sensitive in the energy.
486:
487: FBH03 observed Coma-11 and Coma-7 with {\it XMM-Newton}.
488: The \ion{O}{7} and \ion{O}{8} intensity measured in FBH03 are
489: $6.4\pm0.8$ and $6.2\pm0.8$ LU in Coma-11, and
490: $1.4\pm0.8$ and $0.9\pm0.6$ LU in Coma-7, respectively.
491: The intensities of Coma-7 in FBH03
492: are consistent with our {\it Suzaku} observation,
493: while those of Coma-11 are discrepant at the $5\sigma$ level.
494: The best-fit ICM temperature and abundance
495: in Coma-11 are also inconsistent.
496: Even if we fixed the temperature and abundance to the
497: best-fit values of FBH03,
498: the discrepancies of the O line intensities remain as large.
499: The O intensities observed with {\it Suzaku} are
500: similar to those of Coma-7; we did not confirm the spatial
501: variation.
502:
503: T07 measured \ion{O}{7}, \ion{O}{8}
504: and \ion{Ne}{9} emission line intensities with
505: {\it XMM-Newton} in the field
506: of X Com and four background fields whose distance from
507: NGC~4874 is 46.2--162.7~arcmin.
508: The intensities of \ion{O}{7}, \ion{O}{8} and \ion{Ne}{9}
509: lines measured by T07 are
510: $6.6\pm0.2$,
511: $1.8\pm0.2$,
512: and $0.7\pm0.1$~LU in the X Com field and
513: $7.4\pm1.2$,
514: $2.6\pm0.6$,
515: and $0.4\pm0.1~\LU$,
516: in the (averaged) background fields, respectively.
517: The values of the X Com field shown above
518: contain contributions of the background emission.
519: The intensities of the X Com field are consistent within
520: 90\% confidence range with
521: those of the Coma-11 and Coma-7 measured in this work,
522: and those of the background field of T07 are also consistent
523: with those of ComaBKG.
524:
525: The origin of the large discrepancy in Coma-11
526: O intensities between this work and FBH03 could be
527: contamination by SWCX emission.
528: The solar wind proton flux
529: observed with
530: ACE (Advanced Composition Explorer\footnote{
531: http://www.srl.caltech.edu/ACE/ASC})
532: showed flares
533: both during Coma-11 observation
534: of FBH03 (2.5$\times10^{9}~\mathrm{cm^{-2}~s^{-1}}$) and
535: during ComaBKG observation of this work
536: (1.5$\times10^{9}~\mathrm{cm^{-2}~s^{-1}}$)
537: as shown in Figure~\ref{fig-solarwind}.
538: Both are $\sim8$ times larger than the quiescent state
539: around each observation time.
540: Hence, two possibilities should be considered:
541: O intensities of Coma-11 in FBH03 are
542: overestimated, or those of ComaBKG in this work are
543: overestimated and thus those of Coma-11 in this work are
544: underestimated.
545: However, the latter case is not likely because the O-line
546: intensities
547: are consistent with or even smaller than T07 measurements of
548: background fields around the Coma cluster.
549: There is no indication of the geocoronal SWCX emission;
550: the first point in the line of sight (LOS)
551: where the geomagnetic field started open
552: was always higher than 10 times Earth
553: radius\footnote{
554: Calculated using the software GEOPACK-2005 and T96 magnetic field model
555: ({\tt
556: http://geo.phys.spbu.ru/$\sim$tsyganenko/modeling.html
557: }),
558: with CDAWeb solar-wind parameters
559: ({\tt http://cdaweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/cdaweb/sp\_phys/})
560: }
561: \citep{2007PASJ...59S.133F,2005JGRA..11003208T},
562: and there was no variation in the \ion{O}{7} and
563: \ion{O}{8} flux during the ComaBKG observation.
564: The heliospheric SWCX emission could be weak since
565: it is faint at solar minimum
566: on the high ecliptic lattitude line of sight
567: \citep{2007A&A...475..901K}.
568: Moreover, even in the case that
569: the ComaBKG observation was heavily
570: contaminated with the SWCX emission,
571: the $2\sigma$ upper limits of Coma-11
572: \ion{O}{7} and \ion{O}{8}
573: intensity would be no larger than
574: 4.8~LU and 3.5~LU, respectively, which
575: are still lower than values of FBH03.
576: These values are calculated by assuming
577: the lower limits of \ion{O}{7} and \ion{O}{8}
578: intensities as the LHB contribution
579: without any MWH contribution,
580: measured toward a molecular cloud MBM~12
581: \citep[3.5~LU and 0~LU, respectively;][]{2007PASJ...59S.141S}.
582: On the other hand,
583: it is more likely that the FBH03 observation suffered
584: heliospheric SWCX contamination, since
585: a similar solar wind flare during {\it
586: XMM-Newton} observation of the Hubble deep field north
587: increased the \ion{O}{7} and \ion{O}{8} flux by $6.25\pm0.67$
588: and $5.53\pm2.87$ LU, respectively
589: \citep{2004ApJ...610.1182S,2007A&A...475..901K}.
590: The solar cycle at the observations,
591: the position of the Earth and the LOS,
592: which also
593: affects the X-ray flux induced by SWCX, are similar
594: between the two observations.
595: Note that the observation of FBH03 was performed at solar
596: maximum, while our observation was at solar minimum.
597: The field-to-field variation of \ion{O}{7} and \ion{O}{8}
598: flux reported by FBH03
599: might also be due to the variation of the SWCX flux.
600:
601: \acknowledgments
602: YT and SK thank T. Hagihara for his instruction on
603: the calculation of the geomagnetic field distribution.
604: YT is financially supported by the Dutch Organization for Scientific
605: Research (NWO).
606: EDM and JNB gratefully acknowledge support for Suzaku activities from
607: NASA.
608:
609: \clearpage
610: \begin{thebibliography}{27}
611: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
612:
613: \bibitem[{{Bonamente} {et~al.}(2003){Bonamente}, {Joy}, \&
614: {Lieu}}]{2003ApJ...585..722B}
615: {Bonamente}, M., {Joy}, M.~K., \& {Lieu}, R. 2003, \apj, 585, 722
616:
617: \bibitem[{{Bonamente} {et~al.}(2005){Bonamente}, {Lieu}, \&
618: {Kaastra}}]{2005A&A...443...29B}
619: {Bonamente}, M., {Lieu}, R., \& {Kaastra}, J. 2005, \aap, 443, 29
620:
621: \bibitem[{{Bregman}(2007)}]{2007ARA&A..45..221B}
622: {Bregman}, J.~N. 2007, \araa, 45, 221
623:
624: \bibitem[{{Bregman} \& {Lloyd-Davies}(2006)}]{2006ApJ...644..167B}
625: {Bregman}, J.~N., \& {Lloyd-Davies}, E.~J. 2006, \apj, 644, 167
626:
627: \bibitem[{{Cen} \& {Ostriker}(2006)}]{2006ApJ...650..560C}
628: {Cen}, R., \& {Ostriker}, J.~P. 2006, \apj, 650, 560
629:
630: \bibitem[{{Cravens}(2000)}]{2000ApJ...532L.153C}
631: {Cravens}, T.~E. 2000, \apjl, 532, L153
632:
633: \bibitem[{{Danforth} \& {Shull}(2007)}]{2007arXiv0709.4030D}
634: {Danforth}, C.~W., \& {Shull}, J.~M. 2007, astro-ph/0709.4030
635:
636: \bibitem[{Finoguenov {et~al.}(2003)Finoguenov, Briel, \&
637: Henry}]{finoguenov03:_xmm_newton_x_coma}
638: Finoguenov, A., Briel, U.~G., \& Henry, J.~P. 2003, A\&A, 410, 777
639:
640: \bibitem[{{Fujimoto} {et~al.}(2007){Fujimoto}, {Mitsuda}, {Mccammon}, {Takei},
641: {Bauer}, {Ishisaki}, {Porter}, {Yamaguchi}, {Hayashida}, \&
642: {Yamasaki}}]{2007PASJ...59S.133F}
643: {Fujimoto}, R., {Mitsuda}, K., {Mccammon}, D., {Takei}, Y., {Bauer}, M.,
644: {Ishisaki}, Y., {Porter}, S.~F., {Yamaguchi}, H., {Hayashida}, K., \&
645: {Yamasaki}, N.~Y. 2007, \pasj, 59, 133
646:
647: \bibitem[{Fukugita {et~al.}(1998)Fukugita, Hogan, \&
648: Peebles}]{fukugita98:_cosmic_baryon_budget}
649: Fukugita, M., Hogan, C.~J., \& Peebles, P. J.~E. 1998, ApJ, 503, 518
650:
651: \bibitem[{{Kaastra} {et~al.}(2003){Kaastra}, {Lieu}, {Tamura}, {Paerels}, \&
652: {den Herder}}]{2003A&A...397..445K}
653: {Kaastra}, J.~S., {Lieu}, R., {Tamura}, T., {Paerels}, F.~B.~S., \& {den
654: Herder}, J.~W. 2003, \aap, 397, 445
655:
656: \bibitem[{{Kaastra} {et~al.}(2006){Kaastra}, {Werner}, {Herder}, {Paerels}, {de
657: Plaa}, {Rasmussen}, \& {de Vries}}]{2006ApJ...652..189K}
658: {Kaastra}, J.~S., {Werner}, N., {Herder}, J.~W.~A.~d., {Paerels}, F.~B.~S., {de
659: Plaa}, J., {Rasmussen}, A.~P., \& {de Vries}, C.~P. 2006, \apj, 652, 189
660:
661: \bibitem[{{Kalberla} {et~al.}(2005){Kalberla}, {Burton}, {Hartmann}, {Arnal},
662: {Bajaja}, {Morras}, \& {P{\"o}ppel}}]{2005A&A...440..775K}
663: {Kalberla}, P.~M.~W., {Burton}, W.~B., {Hartmann}, D., {Arnal}, E.~M.,
664: {Bajaja}, E., {Morras}, R., \& {P{\"o}ppel}, W.~G.~L. 2005, \aap, 440, 775
665:
666: \bibitem[{{Koutroumpa} {et~al.}(2007){Koutroumpa}, {Acero}, {Lallement},
667: {Ballet}, \& {Kharchenko}}]{2007A&A...475..901K}
668: {Koutroumpa}, D., {Acero}, F., {Lallement}, R., {Ballet}, J., \& {Kharchenko},
669: V. 2007, \aap, 475, 901
670:
671: \bibitem[{{Koyama} {et~al.}(2007){Koyama}, {Tsunemi}, {Dotani}, {Bautz},
672: {Hayashida}, {Tsuru}, {Matsumoto}, {Ogawara}, {Ricker}, {Doty}, {Kissel},
673: {Foster}, {Nakajima}, {Yamaguchi}, {Mori}, {Sakano}, {Hamaguchi},
674: {Nishiuchi}, {Miyata}, {Torii}, {Namiki}, {Katsuda}, {Matsuura}, {Miyauchi},
675: {Anabuki}, {Tawa}, {Ozaki}, {Murakami}, {Maeda}, {Ichikawa}, {Prigozhin},
676: {Boughan}, {Lamarr}, {Miller}, {Burke}, {Gregory}, {Pillsbury}, {Bamba},
677: {Hiraga}, {Senda}, {Katayama}, {Kitamoto}, {Tsujimoto}, {Kohmura}, {Tsuboi},
678: \& {Awaki}}]{2007PASJ...59S..23K}
679: {Koyama}, K., {Tsunemi}, H., {Dotani}, T., {Bautz}, M.~W., {Hayashida}, K.,
680: {Tsuru}, T.~G., {Matsumoto}, H., {Ogawara}, Y., {Ricker}, G.~R., {Doty}, J.,
681: {Kissel}, S.~E., {Foster}, R., {Nakajima}, H., {Yamaguchi}, H., {Mori}, H.,
682: {Sakano}, M., {Hamaguchi}, K., {Nishiuchi}, M., {Miyata}, E., {Torii}, K.,
683: {Namiki}, M., {Katsuda}, S., {Matsuura}, D., {Miyauchi}, T., {Anabuki}, N.,
684: {Tawa}, N., {Ozaki}, M., {Murakami}, H., {Maeda}, Y., {Ichikawa}, Y.,
685: {Prigozhin}, G.~Y., {Boughan}, E.~A., {Lamarr}, B., {Miller}, E.~D., {Burke},
686: B.~E., {Gregory}, J.~A., {Pillsbury}, A., {Bamba}, A., {Hiraga}, J.~S.,
687: {Senda}, A., {Katayama}, H., {Kitamoto}, S., {Tsujimoto}, M., {Kohmura}, T.,
688: {Tsuboi}, Y., \& {Awaki}, H. 2007, \pasj, 59, 23
689:
690: \bibitem[{{Lodders}(2003)}]{2003ApJ...591.1220L}
691: {Lodders}, K. 2003, \apj, 591, 1220
692:
693: \bibitem[{{Mitsuda} {et~al.}(2007){Mitsuda}, {Bautz}, {Inoue}, {Kelley},
694: {Koyama}, {Kunieda}, {Makishima}, {Ogawara}, {Petre}, {Takahashi}, {Tsunemi},
695: {White}, {Anabuki}, {Angelini}, {Arnaud}, {Awaki}, {Bamba}, {Boyce}, {Brown},
696: {Chan}, {Cottam}, {Dotani}, {Doty}, {Ebisawa}, {Ezoe}, {Fabian}, {Figueroa},
697: {Fujimoto}, {Fukazawa}, {Furusho}, {Furuzawa}, {Gendreau}, {Griffiths},
698: {Haba}, {Hamaguchi}, {Harrus}, {Hasinger}, {Hatsukade}, {Hayashida}, {Henry},
699: {Hiraga}, {Holt}, {Hornschemeier}, {Hughes}, {Hwang}, {Ishida}, {Ishisaki},
700: {Isobe}, {Itoh}, {Iyomoto}, {Kahn}, {Kamae}, {Katagiri}, {Kataoka},
701: {Katayama}, {Kawai}, {Kilbourne}, {Kinugasa}, {Kissel}, {Kitamoto}, {Kohama},
702: {Kohmura}, {Kokubun}, {Kotani}, {Kotoku}, {Kubota}, {Madejski}, {Maeda},
703: {Makino}, {Markowitz}, {Matsumoto}, {Matsumoto}, {Matsuoka}, {Matsushita},
704: {McCammon}, {Mihara}, {Misaki}, {Miyata}, {Mizuno}, {Mori}, {Mori}, {Morii},
705: {Moseley}, {Mukai}, {Murakami}, {Murakami}, {Mushotzky}, {Nagase}, {Namiki},
706: {Negoro}, {Nakazawa}, {Nousek}, {Okajima}, {Ogasaka}, {Ohashi}, {Oshima},
707: {Ota}, {Ozaki}, {Ozawa}, {Parmar}, {Pence}, {Porter}, {Reeves}, {Ricker},
708: {Sakurai}, {Sanders}, {Senda}, {Serlemitsos}, {Shibata}, {Soong}, {Smith},
709: {Suzuki}, {Szymkowiak}, {Takahashi}, {Tamagawa}, {Tamura}, {Tamura},
710: {Tanaka}, {Tashiro}, {Tawara}, {Terada}, {Terashima}, {Tomida}, {Torii},
711: {Tsuboi}, {Tsujimoto}, {Tsuru}, {Turner}, {Ueda}, {Ueno}, {Ueno}, {Uno},
712: {Urata}, {Watanabe}, {Yamamoto}, {Yamaoka}, {Yamasaki}, {Yamashita},
713: {Yamauchi}, {Yamauchi}, {Yaqoob}, {Yonetoku}, \&
714: {Yoshida}}]{2007PASJ...59S...1M}
715: {Mitsuda}, K., {Bautz}, M., {Inoue}, H., {Kelley}, R.~L., {Koyama}, K.,
716: {Kunieda}, H., {Makishima}, K., {Ogawara}, Y., {Petre}, R., {Takahashi}, T.,
717: {Tsunemi}, H., {White}, N.~E., {Anabuki}, N., {Angelini}, L., {Arnaud}, K.,
718: {Awaki}, H., {Bamba}, A., {Boyce}, K., {Brown}, G.~V., {Chan}, K.-W.,
719: {Cottam}, J., {Dotani}, T., {Doty}, J., {Ebisawa}, K., {Ezoe}, Y., {Fabian},
720: A.~C., {Figueroa}, E., {Fujimoto}, R., {Fukazawa}, Y., {Furusho}, T.,
721: {Furuzawa}, A., {Gendreau}, K., {Griffiths}, R.~E., {Haba}, Y., {Hamaguchi},
722: K., {Harrus}, I., {Hasinger}, G., {Hatsukade}, I., {Hayashida}, K., {Henry},
723: P.~J., {Hiraga}, J.~S., {Holt}, S.~S., {Hornschemeier}, A., {Hughes}, J.~P.,
724: {Hwang}, U., {Ishida}, M., {Ishisaki}, Y., {Isobe}, N., {Itoh}, M.,
725: {Iyomoto}, N., {Kahn}, S.~M., {Kamae}, T., {Katagiri}, H., {Kataoka}, J.,
726: {Katayama}, H., {Kawai}, N., {Kilbourne}, C., {Kinugasa}, K., {Kissel}, S.,
727: {Kitamoto}, S., {Kohama}, M., {Kohmura}, T., {Kokubun}, M., {Kotani}, T.,
728: {Kotoku}, J., {Kubota}, A., {Madejski}, G.~M., {Maeda}, Y., {Makino}, F.,
729: {Markowitz}, A., {Matsumoto}, C., {Matsumoto}, H., {Matsuoka}, M.,
730: {Matsushita}, K., {McCammon}, D., {Mihara}, T., {Misaki}, K., {Miyata}, E.,
731: {Mizuno}, T., {Mori}, K., {Mori}, H., {Morii}, M., {Moseley}, H., {Mukai},
732: K., {Murakami}, H., {Murakami}, T., {Mushotzky}, R., {Nagase}, F., {Namiki},
733: M., {Negoro}, H., {Nakazawa}, K., {Nousek}, J.~A., {Okajima}, T., {Ogasaka},
734: Y., {Ohashi}, T., {Oshima}, T., {Ota}, N., {Ozaki}, M., {Ozawa}, H.,
735: {Parmar}, A.~N., {Pence}, W.~D., {Porter}, F.~S., {Reeves}, J.~N., {Ricker},
736: G.~R., {Sakurai}, I., {Sanders}, W.~T., {Senda}, A., {Serlemitsos}, P.,
737: {Shibata}, R., {Soong}, Y., {Smith}, R., {Suzuki}, M., {Szymkowiak}, A.~E.,
738: {Takahashi}, H., {Tamagawa}, T., {Tamura}, K., {Tamura}, T., {Tanaka}, Y.,
739: {Tashiro}, M., {Tawara}, Y., {Terada}, Y., {Terashima}, Y., {Tomida}, H.,
740: {Torii}, K., {Tsuboi}, Y., {Tsujimoto}, M., {Tsuru}, T.~G., {Turner},
741: M.~J.~L.~., {Ueda}, Y., {Ueno}, S., {Ueno}, M., {Uno}, S., {Urata}, Y.,
742: {Watanabe}, S., {Yamamoto}, N., {Yamaoka}, K., {Yamasaki}, N.~Y.,
743: {Yamashita}, K., {Yamauchi}, M., {Yamauchi}, S., {Yaqoob}, T., {Yonetoku},
744: D., \& {Yoshida}, A. 2007, \pasj, 59, 1
745:
746: \bibitem[{{Nicastro} {et~al.}(2005){Nicastro}, {Mathur}, {Elvis}, {Drake},
747: {Fang}, {Fruscione}, {Krongold}, {Marshall}, {Williams}, \&
748: {Zezas}}]{2005Natur.433..495N}
749: {Nicastro}, F., {Mathur}, S., {Elvis}, M., {Drake}, J., {Fang}, T.,
750: {Fruscione}, A., {Krongold}, Y., {Marshall}, H., {Williams}, R., \& {Zezas},
751: A. 2005, \nat, 433, 495
752:
753: \bibitem[{{Rasmussen} {et~al.}(2007){Rasmussen}, {Kahn}, {Paerels}, {Herder},
754: {Kaastra}, \& {de Vries}}]{2007ApJ...656..129R}
755: {Rasmussen}, A.~P., {Kahn}, S.~M., {Paerels}, F., {Herder}, J.~W.~d.,
756: {Kaastra}, J., \& {de Vries}, C. 2007, \apj, 656, 129
757:
758: \bibitem[{Rauch {et~al.}(1997)Rauch, Miralda-Escude, Sargent, Barlow, Weinberg,
759: Hernquist, Katz, Cen, \& Ostriker}]{rauch97:_opacit_ly_fores_implic_omega}
760: Rauch, M., Miralda-Escude, J., Sargent, W. L.~W., Barlow, T.~A., Weinberg,
761: D.~H., Hernquist, L., Katz, N., Cen, R., \& Ostriker, J.~P. 1997, ApJ, 489, 7
762:
763: \bibitem[{{Smith} {et~al.}(2007){Smith}, {Bautz}, {Edgar}, {Fujimoto},
764: {Hamaguchi}, {Hughes}, {Ishida}, {Kelley}, {Kilbourne}, {Kuntz}, {McCammon},
765: {Miller}, {Mitsuda}, {Mukai}, {Plucinsky}, {Porter}, {Snowden}, {Takei},
766: {Terada}, {Tsuboi}, \& {Yamasaki}}]{2007PASJ...59S.141S}
767: {Smith}, R.~K., {Bautz}, M.~W., {Edgar}, R.~J., {Fujimoto}, R., {Hamaguchi},
768: K., {Hughes}, J.~P., {Ishida}, M., {Kelley}, R., {Kilbourne}, C.~A., {Kuntz},
769: K.~D., {McCammon}, D., {Miller}, E., {Mitsuda}, K., {Mukai}, K., {Plucinsky},
770: P.~P., {Porter}, F.~S., {Snowden}, S.~L., {Takei}, Y., {Terada}, Y.,
771: {Tsuboi}, Y., \& {Yamasaki}, N.~Y. 2007, \pasj, 59, 141
772:
773: \bibitem[{{Snowden} {et~al.}(2004){Snowden}, {Collier}, \&
774: {Kuntz}}]{2004ApJ...610.1182S}
775: {Snowden}, S.~L., {Collier}, M.~R., \& {Kuntz}, K.~D. 2004, \apj, 610, 1182
776:
777: \bibitem[{{Spergel} {et~al.}(2007){Spergel}, {Bean}, {Dor{\'e}}, {Nolta},
778: {Bennett}, {Dunkley}, {Hinshaw}, {Jarosik}, {Komatsu}, {Page}, {Peiris},
779: {Verde}, {Halpern}, {Hill}, {Kogut}, {Limon}, {Meyer}, {Odegard}, {Tucker},
780: {Weiland}, {Wollack}, \& {Wright}}]{2007ApJS..170..377S}
781: {Spergel}, D.~N., {Bean}, R., {Dor{\'e}}, O., {Nolta}, M.~R., {Bennett}, C.~L.,
782: {Dunkley}, J., {Hinshaw}, G., {Jarosik}, N., {Komatsu}, E., {Page}, L.,
783: {Peiris}, H.~V., {Verde}, L., {Halpern}, M., {Hill}, R.~S., {Kogut}, A.,
784: {Limon}, M., {Meyer}, S.~S., {Odegard}, N., {Tucker}, G.~S., {Weiland},
785: J.~L., {Wollack}, E., \& {Wright}, E.~L. 2007, \apjs, 170, 377
786:
787: \bibitem[{{Takei} {et~al.}(2007){Takei}, {Henry}, {Finoguenov}, {Mitsuda},
788: {Tamura}, {Fujimoto}, \& {Briel}}]{2007ApJ...655..831T}
789: {Takei}, Y., {Henry}, J.~P., {Finoguenov}, A., {Mitsuda}, K., {Tamura}, T.,
790: {Fujimoto}, R., \& {Briel}, U.~G. 2007, \apj, 655, 831
791:
792: \bibitem[{{Tawa} {et~al.}(2008){Tawa}, {Hayashida}, {Nagai}, {Nakamoto},
793: {Tsunemi}, {Yamaguchi}, {Ishisaki}, {Miller}, {Mizuno}, {Dotani}, {Ozaki}, \&
794: {Katayama}}]{2008PASJ...60S..11T}
795: {Tawa}, N., {Hayashida}, K., {Nagai}, M., {Nakamoto}, H., {Tsunemi}, H.,
796: {Yamaguchi}, H., {Ishisaki}, Y., {Miller}, E.~D., {Mizuno}, T., {Dotani}, T.,
797: {Ozaki}, M., \& {Katayama}, H. 2008, \pasj, 60, 11
798:
799: \bibitem[{{Tsyganenko} \& {Sitnov}(2005)}]{2005JGRA..11003208T}
800: {Tsyganenko}, N.~A., \& {Sitnov}, M.~I. 2005, Journal of Geophysical Research
801: (Space Physics), 110, 3208
802:
803: \bibitem[{{Watson} {et~al.}(2008){Watson} et~al.}]{watsonCatalogue}
804: {Watson}, M., \& et~al. 2008 in prep.
805:
806: \end{thebibliography}
807: \end{document}
808:
809: