1: \documentclass[preprint,floats,aps,epsfig,nofootinbib,amssymb]{revtex4}
2: %\documentclass[showpacs,preprintnumbers,amssymb]{revtex4}
3: %\documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amssymb]{revtex4}
4: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
5: \usepackage{epsfig}
6: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
7: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
8: %
9: \def\gsim{\lower0.5ex\hbox{$\:\buildrel >\over\sim\:$}}
10: \def\lsim{\lower0.5ex\hbox{$\:\buildrel <\over\sim\:$}}
11: \def \rp{{R\hspace{-0.22cm}/}_P}
12: \def \lp{{L\!\!\!/}}
13: \def \n{\noindent}
14:
15: \begin{document}
16:
17: \preprint{
18: {\vbox {
19: \hbox{\bf UCI-TR-2008-12}
20: \hbox{\bf MADPH--08--1507}
21: \hbox{\bf NSF-KITP-08-37}
22: \hbox{\bf BNL-HET-08/6}
23: % \hbox{hep-ph/yymmnnn}
24: }}}
25: %
26: \vspace*{1cm}
27:
28: \title{Charged Higgs Boson Effects\\ in the Production and Decay
29: of a Heavy Majorana Neutrino at the LHC}
30: %\title{Heavy Majorana neutrinos and same-sign lepton pair production at the LHC - revisited}
31:
32: %\author{David Atwood$^a$}%
33: %\email{atwood@iastate.edu}
34: \author{Shaouly Bar-Shalom$^{a,b}$}
35: \email{shaouly@physics.technion.ac.il}
36: \author{Gad Eilam$^a$}
37: \email{eilam@physics.technion.ac.il}
38: \author{Tao Han$^{c,d}$}
39: \email{than@hep.wisc.edu}
40: \author{Amarjit Soni$^e$}%
41: \email{soni@bnl.gov}
42: \affiliation{$^a$ Physics Department, Technion-Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel\\
43: $^b$Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA\\
44: $^c$Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA\\
45: $^d$KITP, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93107, USA\\
46: $^e$Theory Group, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA}
47:
48: \date{\today}
49:
50: \begin{abstract}
51: We consider a new interaction between a
52: heavy Majorana neutrino ($N$) and a charged Higgs boson ($H^\pm$),
53: and show that it can have drastic implications on lepton number violating (LNV)
54: signal of same-sign dileptons at the LHC.
55: The LNV signal of heavy Majorana neutrinos previously considered
56: at the LHC, $pp \to \ell^+ N \to \ell^+ \ell^+ W^-$,
57: may be overwhelmed by $pp \to \ell^+ N \to \ell^+ \ell^+ H^-$.
58: With the subsequent decays $H^- \to \bar t b$ or $H^- \to W^- H^0$, the heavy Majorana
59: neutrino production leads to the spectacular events of $\ell^+ \ell^+\ b \bar b$ + 2 jets.
60: %
61: We also explore the case $m_N < m_{H^+}$,
62: where the decay $H^+ \to \ell^+ N$ can become the dominant
63: $N$-production mechanism at the LHC. In particular, we show that the process
64: $g b \to t H^-$ followed by $t \to b W^+$ and $H^- \to \ell^- N \to \ell^- \ell^- W^+$ could lead to another type of spectacular events of $\ell^- \ell^-\ b$ + 4 jets.
65: \end{abstract}
66:
67: \pacs{??,??,??,??}
68:
69: \maketitle
70:
71: \section{Introduction}
72:
73: The discovery of neutrino oscillations stands as the first direct
74: evidence for physics beyond the Standard Model (SM),
75: indicating that neutrinos are massive and that their flavors mix.
76: The minimal realization of beyond the SM physics that can account for the observed
77: sub-eV neutrino masses and mixings is constructed simply by adding heavy
78: right-handed neutrino fields, $N$, to the SM Lagrangian (we will denote this minimal setup by
79: $\nu$SM):
80: %
81: \begin{eqnarray}
82: {\cal L}_{\nu SM} \equiv {\cal L}_{SM} + {1\over 2} M N N + (Y_{H} L H N + h.c.), \label{nSMF}
83: \end{eqnarray}
84: %
85: where $M$ is the right-handed Majorana neutrino mass scale,
86: $L$ is an SU(2) leptonic doublet and $H$ is the SM Higgs doublet.
87: The $\nu$SM Lagrangian gives rise to the light neutrinos mass matrix through the
88: classic seesaw mechanism:
89: %
90: \begin{eqnarray}
91: m_\nu = - m_D M^{-1} m_D^T \label{seesawmass}~,
92: \end{eqnarray}
93: %
94: where $m_D=v Y_H$ and $v= \langle H \rangle \sim 175$ GeV.
95: Thus, $m_\nu \sim {\cal O}(10^{-2}$ eV) implies that
96: either $m_N \sim 10^{15}$ GeV, $Y_H \sim {\cal O}(1)$;
97: or $m_N \sim m_W$ and $Y_H \sim 10^{-7}$. Evidently, if
98: there are heavy Majorana neutrinos at the electroweak (EW) scale,
99: then the seesaw mechanism would seem to be somewhat unnatural and
100: physics beyond the classic seesaw would be needed
101: in order to understand the very small Yukawa couplings associated
102: with the neutrino mass generation.
103:
104: In this minimal $\nu$SM framework, $N$ can interact with the SM gauge bosons and Higgs
105: through its mixing with the light SM SU(2) $\nu_L$
106: fields (see e.g., \cite{book}):
107: %
108: \begin{eqnarray}
109: {\cal L}_{W} &=& -\frac{g}{\sqrt{2}} U_{\ell N} \bar \ell
110: \gamma^\mu P_L N W^-_\mu + h.c. \label{YWln} ~, \\
111: {\cal L}_{Z} &=& -\frac{g}{2 c_W} U_{\ell N} \overline{\nu_\ell} \gamma^\mu
112: P_L N Z_\mu + h.c. \label{YZNn} ~, \\
113: {\cal L}_{H} &=& -\frac{g}{2} \frac{m_N}{m_W} U_{\ell N} \overline{\nu_\ell}
114: P_R N H^0 + h.c. \label{YHNn} ~,
115: \end{eqnarray}
116: %
117: where $P_{L,R} \equiv (1 \mp \gamma_5)/2$ and
118: $U_{\ell N}$ are the $\nu_{\ell,L} - N$ mixing elements.
119: However, with no additional assumptions or symmetries imposed on the
120: $\nu$SM Lagrangian in (\ref{nSMF}),
121: these heavy-to-light mixing elements are restricted to be vanishingly small
122: by the seesaw mechanism itself.
123: In particular, the seesaw relation in (\ref{seesawmass}) leads
124: to $U_{\ell N} \sim \sqrt{m_\nu/m_N}$. Therefore,
125: we have $U_{\ell N} \to 0$ in order to successfully
126: generate $m_{\nu}$ in the sub-eV range, irrespective of
127: whether $m_N \sim m_W$ or $m_N \sim 10^{15}$ GeV.
128: It follows that, within the minimal seesaw setup embedded in the $\nu$SM,
129: the heavy Majorana neutrinos completely decouple and no signals of $N$
130: are expected in collider experiments.
131:
132: On the other hand, as argued above, naturalness (i.e., requiring
133: the neutrino Yukawa terms to be of order 1)
134: implies that there is new physics beyond
135: the minimal seesaw mechanism of the $\nu$SM type
136: if indeed $m_N \sim m_W$. In this case
137: it is, therefore, phenomenologically viable to expect that the
138: interactions of $N$ with the EW degrees of freedom
139: are not necessarily suppressed, leading to very interesting lepton-number-violating
140: (LNV) phenomenology mediated by $N$ at high-energy colliders
141: such as the Tevatron, the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the International Linear Collider (ILC).
142:
143: Indeed, collider phenomenology of heavy Majorana neutrinos
144: has regained interest in the past decade due to their potential role
145: in generating the observed sub-eV light neutrino masses.
146: With the upcoming LHC and the future ILC $e^+e^-$ collider,
147: the search for LNV signals mediated by heavy Majorana neutrinos
148: is particularly well motivated. This had led to some extensive studies of heavy Majorana neutrinos
149: in $pp$ and $p{\bar p}$ collisions \cite{delAguila1,delAguila2,han,Wpapers,oldpp},
150: at an $e^+ e^-$ \cite{delAguila2,buch1}, $e^-e^-$ \cite{rizzo,ourseetohmhm}
151: and $e^- \gamma$ collisions
152: \cite{delAguila2,pilaftsis1}
153: and at an $e p$ machine \cite{delAguila2,buch1,ali2}.
154: In addition, LNV decays mediated by exchanges of heavy
155: Majorana neutrinos were studied in top-quark and $W$-boson decays \cite{ourtWpaper} and in rare
156: charged meson and lepton decays \cite{ali1}.
157:
158: It should be clear that, although not always explicitly stated,
159: the assumption which underlies {\it all} the above studies is that at least one heavy Majorana
160: neutrino has an unsuppressed coupling/mixing with the SM gauge bosons
161: and Higgs and that $N$ production (and decays) at high-energy colliders is
162: induced by this coupling. That is, that $U_{\ell N} \sim {\cal O}(1)\ - $ many orders of magnitudes
163: larger than its naively expected size within the classic seesaw, which necessarily
164: implies new physics beyond the minimal $\nu$SM.
165:
166: In general such new physics
167: can be parametrized by corrections to the $\nu$SM Lagrangian represented
168: as a series of effective operators ${\cal O}_i$ which are constructed using the $\nu$SM fields and whose
169: coefficients are suppressed by powers of $1/\Lambda$, where $\Lambda$ is the scale of
170: the new physics:
171: \begin{eqnarray}
172: {\cal L} = {\cal L}_{\nu SM} + \sum_{n=5}^\infty \frac{1}{\Lambda^{n-4}} \alpha_i {\cal O}_i^n \label{eff}~.
173: \end{eqnarray}
174: %
175: For example, the dimension 6 operator \cite{our-effectiveN}:
176: %
177: \begin{eqnarray}
178: {\cal O}_{N e \phi} = i \left(\bar N \gamma^\mu \ell_R \right) \left(\phi^T \epsilon D_\mu \phi \right)~,
179: \end{eqnarray}
180: %\noindent
181: can generate the new V+A charged interaction:
182: \begin{eqnarray}
183: {\cal L}_{W} &=& \alpha_{\ell N} \bar N \gamma^\mu P_R \ell W^+_\mu + h.c. \label{YWlnR} ~,
184: \end{eqnarray}
185: %\noindent
186: with $\alpha_{\ell N} \sim {\cal O}(v^2/\Lambda^2)$ (i.e., when the coefficient
187: in front of ${\cal O}_{N e \phi}$ is naturally $\alpha_{N e \phi} \sim {\cal O}(1)$) \cite{our-effectiveN}.
188: Thus, if the new physics is around the TeV scale we can expect $\alpha_{\ell N} \lsim 0.1$.
189: However, even with this generic parametrization of new physics it is hard to see
190: how the unsuppressed SM-like $N \gamma^\mu P_L \ell W_\mu^+$ interaction in (\ref{YWln})
191: can be generated, when the new heavy Majorana fields are right-handed.
192: To generate such a large SM-like coupling one has to assume that other non-seesaw
193: or seesaw-like mechanisms exist which utilize some fine-tuned relations or extra symmetries
194: in the neutrino sector \cite{beyond1,beyond2,ma,beyondss,deGouvea:2006gz}
195:
196: Here we will take a phenomenological approach towards the V-A coupling of
197: $\ell N W^+$, governed by the mixiing parameter $U_{\ell N}$,
198: assumed to be of ${\cal O}(1)$ a priori. EW precision data from LEP imply that
199: $U_{\ell N} \lsim 0.1$ if $m_N > m_Z$ \cite{kagan,LEP92} and
200: $U_{\ell N} \lsim 0.01$ if $m_N < m_Z$ \cite{LEP92}.
201: Indeed, the leading $N$ signature at the LHC is traditionally assumed
202: to be driven by the unsuppressed $N \ell^+ W^-$ interaction
203: vertex as in Eq.~(\ref{YWln}) \cite{delAguila1,delAguila2,han,Wpapers}
204: $p p \to W^{+\star} \to \mu^+ N \to \mu^+ \mu^+ W^- \to \mu^+ \mu^+ j j$,
205: where $j$ stands for a light-quark jet.
206: In recent analyses \cite{han,delAguila1}, it was found
207: that this process may be observed at the LHC at the $5\sigma$ level,
208: with an integrated luminosity of 30$-$100 fb$^{-1}$,
209: if $U_{\ell N} \lsim 0.1$ and $m_N \lsim 200-250$ GeV.
210: The signal and background estimates in these studies
211: %\cite{delAguila1}
212: only apply to the specific final state $\mu^+ \mu^+ j j$ with no missing energy.
213: In general, however,
214: the $N$-production and decay patterns may be drastically altered due to additional
215: operators involving the interactions of $N$ with the other low-energy
216: degrees of freedom of the underlying new physics. This can lead to interesting new
217: LNV signatures which may be easier to trace.
218: For example,
219: the above Drell-Yan like process, $p p \to \mu^+ N$,
220: may not be the dominant $N$-production mechanism at the LHC, in which case
221: new strategies for $N$-discovery should be adopted.
222: %The results obtained in \cite{delAguila1} may be, therefore, viewed only as a
223: %yardstick for the future prospects of the discovery potential of $N$ at the LHC.
224:
225: In this paper we wish to explore one specific example of
226: beyond the $\nu$SM physics, in which $N$-production
227: and decays may be completely altered.
228: Since non-zero neutrino mass necessarily requires new physics beyond the SM and since
229: the extension for the SM Higgs sector is well motivated in many theories
230: beyond the SM, it is natural to consider the interplay of both. In particular,
231: we will focus on a heavy Majorana neutrino potentially accessible at the LHC
232: with a mass in the range $10~{\rm GeV} \lsim m_N \lsim 500~{\rm GeV}$,
233: and the observation feasibility through its interactions with a generic new charge Higgs
234: boson.
235:
236: The paper is organized as follows: in section II we lay out the theoretical
237: setup. In sections III - V we discuss $N$-phenomenology at the LHC in the presence
238: of the new $N-H^+$ interaction in the two cases $m_N > m_{H^+}$ and $m_N < m_{H^+}$, and
239: in section VI we summarize and give our concluding remarks.
240:
241: \section{The Charged Higgs Boson and a Heavy Majorana Neutrino}
242:
243: We first introduce a generic new $\ell N H^+$ interaction in a relative model-independent
244: approach
245: %
246: \begin{equation}
247: % {\cal L}_{\ell N H^+ } = \frac{g}{2 \sqrt{2}} \xi_{\ell N} \frac{m_N}{m_W} \bar N (1-\gamma_5) \ell H^+ + h.c. \label{YHln2}~,
248: {\cal L}_{\ell N H^+ } = \frac{g}{ \sqrt{2}} \xi_{\ell N} \frac{m_N}{m_W} \bar N P_L \ell H^+ + h.c. \label{YHln2}~,
249: \end{equation}
250: %
251: where $\xi_{\ell N}$ are dimensionless parameters whose size
252: depend on the underlying new physics.
253:
254: In particular,
255: since ${\cal L}_{\ell N H^+ }$ is a typical dimension 4 Yukawa-like term, one naturally
256: expects $\xi \sim {\cal O}(1)$ if the new physics contains EW-scale new scalar fields
257: as well as heavy Majorana neutrinos.
258: Alternatively, such an effective interaction can be generated
259: in the underlying theory by exchanges of heavy gauge-bosons or heavy fermions. In this case,
260: guided by the effective Lagrangian prescription
261: in (\ref{eff}) and by naturalness (i.e., $\alpha_i \sim {\cal O}(1)$), when these
262: heavy particles are integrated out we expect:
263: \begin{eqnarray}
264: \xi \sim \frac{\sqrt{2}}{g} \frac{m_W}{m_N}\ \frac{v^2}{\Lambda^2},
265: \end{eqnarray}
266: where $\Lambda$ is roughly the mass of the new heavy particle
267: that gives rise to the $\ell N H^+$ interaction in (\ref{YHln2}).
268: Thus, when $m_N \sim m_W$ we can expect e.g., $\xi \gsim 0.1$ if $\Lambda \sim 1$ TeV.
269:
270: Since there is no direct experimental constraint on $\xi$ that we know of,
271: we will take a phenomenological approach towards the new
272: $\xi_{\ell N}$, exploring the implications of ${\cal L}_{\ell N H^+}$ for
273: $\xi$ in the range $0 < \xi < 1$ (note that $\xi \sim {\cal O}(1)$ is also consistent with
274: perturbative unitarity if $m_N \lsim 700$ GeV, as was noted in \cite{ourseetohmhm}).
275: Then, depending on its exact size, these new $\ell N H^+$ interactions
276: can have surprising implications on $N$-phenomenology at high-energy colliders.
277: For instance, in \cite{ourseetohmhm} it was shown that such a coupling can drive a
278: LNV same-sign charged Higgs pair-production signal, $e^- e^- \to H^- H^-$,
279: at an observable rate at an ILC even if $m_N \sim 1000$ TeV.
280:
281: As for collider phenomenology of N in the presence of the interactions
282: (\ref{YWln})-(\ref{YHNn}), (\ref{YWlnR}) and (\ref{YHln2}),
283: we adopt a ``one-coupling scheme" for simplicity,
284: assuming that only one of the mixing angles dominates,
285: e.g., $U_{\mu N} \gg U_{e N},\ U_{\tau N}$ and similarly, $\xi_{\mu N} \gg \xi_{e N},~\xi_{\tau N}$.
286: These elements will be denoted hereafter by $U \equiv U_{\mu N}$ and
287: $\xi \equiv \xi_{\mu N}$.
288:
289: \subsection{$N$ decay in the presence of $H^\pm$}
290:
291: In the framework where a new $\mu N H^+$ interaction is present,
292: $N$ will predominantly decay via the kinematically accessible channels
293: \begin{equation}
294: N \to W^\mp \mu^\pm ,~Z \nu_\mu,~H^0 \nu_\mu,~H^\mp \mu^\pm .
295: \end{equation}
296: The partial widths for these decay channels are given by
297: \begin{eqnarray}
298: \Gamma(N \to \mu^\pm W^\mp) &\approx& \frac{U^2 m_N^3}{16 \pi v^2}\
299: (1 + 2 r_W^{}) (1 - r_W^{})^2,\nonumber \\
300: \Gamma(N \to \nu_\mu Z) & \approx & \frac{U^2 m_N^3}{16 \pi v^2}\
301: (1 + 2 r_Z^{}) (1 - r_Z^{})^2, \nonumber \\
302: \Gamma(N \to \nu_\mu H^0) & \approx & \frac{U^2 m_N^3}{16 \pi v^2}\
303: (1 - r_{H^0}^{})^2, \nonumber \\
304: \Gamma(N \to \mu^\pm H^\mp) & \approx & \frac{\xi^2 m_N^3}{16 \pi v^2}\
305: (1 - r_{H^+}^{})^2,
306: \label{partial}
307: \end{eqnarray}
308: where $r_i=m_i^2/m_N^2$.
309: %
310: A useful limit for illustrating
311: that is $m_N^2 \gg m_W^2, m_Z^2, m_{H^0}^2, m_{H^+}^2$,
312: in which case the total decay width of $N$ can be conveniently written as:
313: \begin{equation}
314: \Gamma_N \approx \Gamma_N^0 \cdot \left(4U^2 + 2 \xi^2 \right),\quad
315: \Gamma_N^0 \equiv \frac{g^2}{64 \pi} \frac{m_N^2}{m_W^2} m_N = \frac{m_N^3}{16 \pi v^2}.
316: \label{width0}
317: \end{equation}
318: %
319:
320: \begin{figure}[t]
321: \epsfig{file=fig1.eps,height=8cm,width=8.1cm,angle=0}
322: \epsfig{file=fig2.eps,height=8cm,width=8.1cm,angle=0}
323: %\vspace{-0.8cm}
324: \caption{\emph{(a).
325: The branching fractions for the decays $N \to \mu^+ W^-$ (solid line) and
326: $N \to \mu^+ H^-$ (dashed line)
327: as a function of $\xi$, for $m_N=150$ GeV, $m_{H^+}=100$ GeV, $m_{H^0}=200$ GeV and $U=0.1$.
328: (b). The branching fractions for the decays $N \to \mu^+ W^-$ (solid line) and
329: $N \to \mu^+ H^-$ (dashed line)
330: as a function of $m_N$, for $m_{H^+}=150$ GeV, $m_{H^0}=200$ GeV, $\xi=1$, with
331: $U=0.1$ for $m_N>m_Z$ and $U=0.01$ for $m_N<m_Z$.
332: When $m_N < m_{H^+}$ or $m_N < m_{W}$ the curves correspond to
333: decays to off-shell $H^+$ or $W^+$, respectively.}}
334: \label{fig12}
335: \end{figure}
336: %
337:
338: Clearly then, $N$ can become ``W/Z/$H^0$-phobic'' if $\xi^2 \gg U^2$, since in this case
339: its width is dominated by its decays to the new charged Higgs.
340: To demonstrate the effect of the $\mu N H^+$ coupling $\xi$ on the pattern of
341: the $N$-decays, we plot in Fig.~\ref{fig12}(a) the BR's for the decays
342: $N \to \mu^+ W^-$ and $N \to \mu^+ H^-$ as a function of $\xi$, for $m_N=150$ GeV
343: and $m_{H^+}=100$ GeV, and setting $U=0.1$ and $m_{H^0}=200$ GeV.
344: We can indeed see the sharp drop of the $BR(N \to \mu^+ W^-)$ as $\xi$ increases.
345: In particular, for $\xi \sim {\cal O}(1)$, we obtain $BR(N \to \mu^+ W^-) \sim 0.01$ while
346: $BR(N \to \mu^+ H^-,\ \mu^- H^+)$ saturate the decay.
347:
348: In Figs.~\ref{fig12}(b) we further plot the decays
349: $N \to \mu^+ W^-$ and $N \to \mu^+ H^-$ as a function of $m_N$, for $\xi=1$ and for
350: $m_{H^+}=150$ GeV, $m_{H^0}=200$ GeV and setting $U$ to its largest allowed values
351: depending on $m_N$, i.e., $U=0.1$ for $m_N>m_Z$
352: and $U=0.01$ for $m_N<m_Z$.
353: Below the threshold $m_N < m_{H^+},\ m_W$, the off-shell effects have been taken
354: into account. Way above the threshold, the relative branchings for
355: $N \to \mu^+ H^-$ and $N \to \mu^+ W^-$ is governed by $\xi^2/U^2$.
356:
357: \subsection{Including $H^\pm$ decays}
358:
359: \begin{figure}[t]
360: \epsfig{file=fig3.eps,height=8cm,width=8.1cm,angle=0}
361: \epsfig{file=fig4.eps,height=8cm,width=8.1cm,angle=0}
362: %\vspace{-0.8cm}
363: \caption{\emph{(a). The branching fractions for the decays $N \to \mu^+ W^-$ (solid line),
364: $N \to \mu^+ \bar t b$ (dashed line) and
365: $N \to \mu^+ j j$ from $W$ decay (dotted line)
366: as a function of $\xi$, for $m_N=220$ GeV, $m_{H^+}=200$ GeV, $m_{H^0}=200$ GeV, $U=0.1$
367: and $f_v^t=1$ (see text).
368: (b). The branching fractions for the decays $N \to \mu^+ \bar t b$ (solid line)
369: $N \to \mu^+ j j$ (dashed line) and $N \to \mu^+ W^- H^0$ (dotted line)
370: as a function of $m_N$, for $m_{H^+}=200$ GeV, $m_{H^0}=100$ GeV, $\xi=1$, $U=0.01$
371: and $f_v^t=0.1$.}}
372: \label{fig34}
373: \end{figure}
374:
375: As a concrete example for illustration,
376: let us assume that the $H^+$-SM couplings have similar structure as
377: the charged Higgs couplings in generic multi Higgs doublet models:
378: \begin{eqnarray}
379: {\cal L}_{H^+u d} &=& \frac{g}{\sqrt{2}} \bar u \left(
380: f_v^u \frac{m_{u}}{m_W} P_L + f_v^d \frac{m_{d}}{m_W} P_R \right) d H^+ + h.c. \label{YHud} ~, \\
381: {\cal L}_{H^+ \nu_\ell \ell} &=& \frac{g}{\sqrt{2}} f_v^\ell \frac{m_{\ell}}{m_W} \bar\nu_\ell
382: P_R \ell H^+ + h.c. \label{YHln} ~, \\
383: {\cal L}_{H^+ H^0 W^-} &=& \frac{i g}{2} f_{W} W^+ \cdot \left( H^0 \partial H^- - \partial H^0 H^- \right) +
384: h.c. \label{YHHW} ~,
385: \end{eqnarray}
386: and that the dominant $H^+$ decays channels are
387: \begin{equation}
388: H^+ \to \tau^+ \nu,~c \bar s,~t \bar b,~\mu^+ N,~W^+ H^0,
389: \end{equation}
390: when kinematically allowed.
391: As an example, in Fig.~\ref{fig34}(a) we show the expected BR's for the decays
392: $N \to \mu^+ W^-$ and $N \to \mu^+ \bar t b$ as a function of the
393: $\mu N H^+$ coupling strength $\xi$, setting $U=0.1$, $m_N=220$ GeV and
394: $m_{H^+}=m_{H^0}=200$ GeV. For the $H^+$ couplings we took
395: $f_v^c=f_v^t=f_v^\tau=f_{W}=1$ and $f_v^d=0$.
396: The channel $N \to \mu^+ j j$ from $W\to jj$ is also plotted for comparison
397: by the dotted curve.
398: We see that for this set of masses and couplings,
399: the channel $N \to \mu^+ \bar t b$ dominates over the previously
400: studied $N \to \mu^+ jj$ one when
401: $\xi \gsim 0.5$.
402:
403: To further explore the potential deviations from ``standard'' $N$-phenomenology at future
404: colliders, we plot
405: in Fig.~\ref{fig34}(b) the BR's for the decays
406: $N \to \mu^+ \bar t b$,
407: $N \to \mu^+ j j$ and
408: $N \to \mu^+ W^- H^0$ for another set of inputs
409: and find that the $WH^0$ mode can be dominant, when $m_{H^+} > m_{H^0}$ and
410: if the $H^+tb$ coupling is suppressed.
411:
412: In the next section we will show that these new decay channels of
413: N via an intermediate $H^+$, can have interesting implication for
414: N-phenomenology at the LHC.
415:
416: \section{Same-sign di-muons signals: $pp \to \mu^+ \mu^+ W^-$ versus $pp \to \mu^+ \mu^+ H^-$}
417:
418: As reiterated recently, a heavy Majorana neutrino may be searched for at the LHC
419: via the Drell-Yan production in \cite{delAguila1,delAguila2,han,Wpapers,oldpp}
420: \begin{eqnarray}
421: p p \to \mu^+ N + h.c. ~,
422: \end{eqnarray}
423: with $N \to \mu^\pm W^\mp$, leading to the spectacular signal of $\mu^\pm \mu^\pm+$ 2 jets.
424: As discussed above, the existence of the $\ell N H^+$ interaction in (\ref{YHln2}) may
425: change the $N$ decay pattern significantly, possibly resulting in $N \to \mu^\pm H^\mp$ as
426: the dominant mode. We will study this effect in more detail below.
427:
428:
429: Denoting the cross-section $\sigma_N \equiv \sigma(pp \to \mu^+ N)$,
430: we can generically study the unknown couplings as parameterized in
431: Eqs.~(\ref{YWln}) and (\ref{YWlnR}), and expect $\sigma_N = U^2 \sigma_{V-A} $
432: or $\sigma_N = \alpha_{\mu N}^2 \sigma_{V+A} $ if $U \ll \alpha_{\mu N}$, where
433: $U$ and $\alpha_{\mu N}$ are generic (V-A) and (V+A) $~$ $\mu N W$ couplings, respectively.
434: Since $\sigma_{V-A} = \sigma_{V+A}$ (up to
435: factors that linearly depend on the cosine of the center of mass scattering angle,
436: $\cos\theta$, which vanish after symmetrically integrating over phase-space),
437: we will generically denote
438: $\sigma_N \propto U^2$ regardless of whether it is generated by
439: the $V-A$ or the $V+A$ coupling.
440: In particular, for $U \sim 0.1$ (i.e., at its upper limit value), one gets
441: $\sigma_N \sim 100$ fb or $\sigma_N \sim 10$ fb for $m_N \sim 100$ or 200 GeV,
442: respectively, with no cuts \cite{delAguila1,delAguila2,han,Wpapers}.
443: The kinematical cuts applied to the final state particles
444: after the $N$ decays, e.g., to $\mu^+ \mu^+ j j$ when $N \to \mu^+ W^- \to \mu^+ j j$,
445: are expected to reduce these cross-sections by less than an order of magnitude
446: \cite{delAguila1,han}.
447:
448: For $m_N$ in the range of several hundreds GeV, the total $N$ width is at most a
449: few percents of $m_N$. Thus, we can take the narrow width approximation (NWA):
450: %\begin{widetext}
451: \begin{eqnarray}
452: \sigma(pp \to \mu^+ \mu^+ W^\mp) &\sim& \sigma(pp \to \mu^+ N) \times BR(N \to \mu^+ W^-) ~, \nonumber \\
453: \sigma(pp \to \mu^+ \mu^+ H^\mp) &\sim& \sigma(pp \to \mu^+ N) \times BR(N \to \mu^+ H^-) ~,
454: \end{eqnarray}
455: % \end{widetext}
456: as a good estimate of the total same-sign di-muon cross-sections above.
457: Using the NWA, in Table~\ref{tab1} we give some sample results which compare
458: between the above two signals, for the case $m_N > m_{H^+} > m_W$ and when $\xi=1$, $U=0.1$,
459: without applying any kinematical cuts. To give a complete picture for the expected
460: same-sign di-muons signal at the LHC, we list in Table~\ref{tab1} the total
461: cross-sections summing the contributions from
462: both the $\mu^+ \mu^+$ and the $\mu^- \mu^-$ channels. We denote these total
463: cross-sections by
464: $\sigma(pp \to \mu \mu W) \equiv \sigma(pp \to \mu^+ \mu^+ W^-) +
465: \sigma(pp \to \mu^- \mu^- W^+)$ and similarly for $\sigma(pp \to \mu \mu H)$,
466: reminding the reader that at the LHC the positively charged di-muons rate
467: is about 1.5 times larger than the negatively charged dimuons one.
468: As seen from Table~\ref{tab1}, the cross-section for $\mu^+ \mu^+ H^-$ can become more than
469: an order of magnitude larger than that of $\mu^+ \mu^+ W^-$
470: (similar for the $\mu^- \mu^-$ channels), if $m_N > m_{H^+}$ and $\xi \sim 1$,
471: even if one assumes the largest possible cross-section for $\mu^+ \mu^+ W^-$, i.e., taking $U =0.1$.
472: In such a case, heavy Majorana neutrinos should be searched
473: for at the LHC through their decay to a charged Higgs boson.
474: The representative cross section can be the order of $1-100$ fb, leading to $10^2-10^4$ events
475: with an integrated luminosity of 100 fb$^{-1}$ before acceptance cuts on the final states.
476:
477: \begin{table}[tb]
478: \begin{center}
479: %\begin{tabular}{||c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c||}
480: \begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
481: %\hline
482: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
483: \hline
484: $m_N$ & $m_{H^+}$ & $pp \to \mu^+ N$ & $pp \to \mu^- N$& $N \to \mu^\pm W^\mp$ & $N \to \mu^\pm H^\mp$ & $pp \to \mu \mu W$ & $pp \to \mu \mu H$ \\
485: ~[GeV] & [GeV] & $\sigma$ [fb] & $\sigma$ [fb] & BR & BR & $\sigma$ [fb] & $\sigma$ [fb] \\
486: \hline
487: ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & \\
488: 100 & 80 & 155.6 & 106.9 & 0.008 & 0.49 & 2.1 & 128.6 \\
489: %
490: ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & \\
491: 150 & 120 & 29.4 & 18.9 & 0.022 & 0.46 & 1.1 & 22.2\\
492: %
493: ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & \\
494: 200 & 150 & 10.4 & 6.3 & 0.02 & 0.47 & 0.33 & 7.9 \\
495: %
496: ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & \\
497: 220 & 200 & 7.4 & 4.4 & 0.07 & 0.25 & 0.83 & 2.95 \\
498: %
499: ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & \\
500: \hline
501: \end{tabular}
502: \caption{Branching fractions (BR) for the two-body decays $N \to \mu^\pm W^\mp,~\mu^\pm H^\mp$ and
503: cross-sections in fb for the Drell-Yan $N$-production $pp \to \mu^\pm N$ and for
504: the total same-sign dimuon signals at the LHC: $\sigma(pp \to \mu \mu W) \equiv \sigma(pp \to \mu^+ \mu^+ W^-) + \sigma(pp \to \mu^- \mu^- W^+)$ and similarly for $\sigma(pp \to \mu \mu H)$, see also text.
505: The cross-sections are evaluated using the CTEQ6M parton distribution functions
506: and results are given for various sets of
507: $N$ and $H^+$ masses, for $\xi=1$, $U=0.1$ and for $m_{H^0}=200$ GeV.
508: No cuts are applied.}
509: \label{tab1}
510: \end{center}
511: \end{table}
512:
513: Of particular interest is the situation of $H^\pm$ decay above the thresholds.
514: For $m_{H^+} > m_t+m_b$,
515: the single-top production in association with a pair of same-sign di-muons will become
516: the dominant channel
517: \begin{eqnarray}
518: pp \to \mu^+ N \to \mu^+ \mu^+ H^- \to \mu^+ \mu^+ \bar t b \label{mmtb}~,
519: \end{eqnarray}
520: with a BR to be about 25\% (see Fig.~\ref{fig34}(a)) $-$
521: almost an order of magnitude larger than that of
522: $pp \to \mu^+ N \to \mu^+ \mu^+ j j$.
523: After the top decays, this single-top LNV channel is manifest through
524: $\mu^+ \mu^+ \bar t b \to \mu^+ \mu^+ b b j j$, i.e., a pair of same-sign di-muons in association
525: with a pair of light jets and a pair of $b$-jets, where the two light jets reconstruct $m_W$,
526: which combine with one $b$-jet to reconstruct the top mass.
527: Along with the second $b$-jet, the whole $b\bar b jj$ system further reconstructs
528: the charged Higgs mass.
529: % Furthermore, f
530: For $m_{H^+} > m_W+m_{H^0}$, the new channel
531: \begin{eqnarray}
532: pp \to \mu^+ N \to \mu^+ \mu^+ H^- \to \mu^+ \mu^+ W^- H^0 ~,
533: \end{eqnarray}
534: can become even more important, having a BR at the level of 10\% and dominating over
535: the $pp \to \mu^+ N \to \mu^+ \mu^+ \bar t b$ and
536: $pp \to \mu^+ N \to \mu^+ \mu^+ j j$ ones, if for example: $m_{H^+}=200$ GeV, $m_{H^0}=100$ GeV,
537: $U=0.01$, $\xi=1$ and the $H^+$ couplings:
538: $f_v^c=f_v^t=f_v^\tau=0.1$, $f_v^d=0$ and $f_{W}=1$ (see Fig.~\ref{fig34}(b)).\footnote{Note that
539: $f_{W}=1$ correspond, for example, to the coupling
540: in a two Higgs doublets model (e.g., in the MSSM) when $\alpha=\beta$,
541: where $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are the neutral Higgs mixing angles in the
542: CP-even and CP-odd sectors, respectively.}
543: %
544: Similar to the single-top LNV signal of Eq.~(\ref{mmtb}),
545: the LNV $\mu^+ \mu^+ W^- H^0$ channel can also induce the
546: signature $\mu^+ \mu^+ W^- H^0 \to \mu^+ \mu^+ b b j j$,
547: but with different kinematics of the final state, namely
548: %the pair of light jets reconstruct $m_W$, and
549: the pair of $b$-jets reconstruct $m_{H^0}$.
550: %
551:
552: As for the signal identification, we note that there are no SM processes with $\Delta L=2$.
553: All backgrounds are due to some misidentification of certain sources.
554: Recent studies demonstrated that with judicious acceptance cuts, the SM backgrounds
555: to the $\mu^+ \mu^+ j j$ signal can be effectively suppressed \cite{han,delAguila1}
556: %
557: With the presence of two more $b$-jets coming from a top-quark decay
558: or from a Higgs decay, along with a pair of same-sign di-muons in the final state,
559: we expect to significantly improve the signal to background ratio, in comparison
560: with the $\mu^+ \mu^+ j j$ one. We do not plan to further quantify the signal identification
561: in this work.
562:
563: \section{New contribution when $m_N < m_{H^+}$}
564: Although the spectacular decay of $N\to H^\pm \ell^\mp$ is kinematically not allowed for this case,
565: the inverted process $H^+ \to \ell^+ N$ can become the leading
566: $N$-production mechanism.
567: %
568: %Consider for example the $H^+$ interaction terms in Eqs.~(\ref{YHud})-(\ref{YHHW}), which
569: %represent a rather conventional set of $H^+$ couplings, typical to multi Higgs models such as
570: %the MSSM. Let us further assume that $m_{H^+} > m_t$ and that the $H^+ tb$ couplings are
571: %$f_v^b \ll f_v^t \sim 1$ (this will correspond e.g., to $\tan\beta \sim 1$ in a two Higgs doublets model
572: %type scenario such as the MSSM).
573: %
574: In this case the leading $H^+$ production mechanism will be
575: $g \bar b \to \bar t H^+$ (and similarly $g b \to t H^-$),
576: with a cross-section at the LHC ranging from ${\cal O}$(1000 fb) if $m_{H^+} \sim 200$ GeV to
577: ${\cal O}$(100 fb) if $m_{H^+} \sim 600$ GeV \cite{Berger:2003sm}.
578: This channel has been considered as a promising channel for the discovery of a charged
579: Higgs boson \cite{0710.1761}.
580: %
581: Therefore, after $H^+$ decays via $H^+ \to \ell^+ N$, we expect the $tN$-associated
582: production rate at the LHC to be:
583: \begin{eqnarray}
584: \sigma_N (g \bar b \to \bar t H^+ \to \bar t \mu^+ N) \sim (100 -1000 ~{\rm fb})
585: \times {\rm BR}(H^+ \to \mu^+ N)
586: \label{Nt}~,
587: \end{eqnarray}
588: for $m_{H^+}$ of several hundreds GeV.
589: Then, if $\xi \sim f_v^t \sim 1$,
590: we expect ${\rm BR}(H^+ \to \mu^+ N) \sim
591: {\rm BR}(H^+ \to t \bar b) \sim {\cal O}(1)$, in which case
592: the $N$-signal top associated production
593: channel in (\ref{Nt}) can have a cross-section at the order of 100 fb, even
594: if $m_N \sim 500$ GeV. This is to be compared with the Drell-Yan $pp \to \mu^+ N$ production rate
595: which is $\sigma(pp \to W^{+\star} \to \mu^+ N) \sim 0.1$ fb for $m_N \sim 500$ GeV. Thus,
596: while no signal of heavy Majorana neutrinos with a mass around 500 GeV is expected at the LHC through the traditionally assumed Drell-Yan production mechanism, its production rate through $H^+$
597: decays can be as much as 3 orders of magnitude larger than the Drell-Yan one, possibly leading
598: to hundreds-thousends of heavy Majorana neutrinos
599: in association with a pair of $t \mu^+$ at the LHC.
600:
601: When the $N$ further decays there are several interesting signatures that arise from
602: the above $\bar t \mu^+ N$ (or $t \mu^- N$) final state,
603: depending on its couplings to the SM particles.
604: Perhaps the simplest example is $pp \to \mu^+ \bar t N$ followed by $N \to \mu^+ W^-$, which will lead
605: to the new LNV signature
606: \begin{equation}
607: \mu^+ \mu^+ \bar t W^- \to \mu^+ \mu^+ W^- W^- b,
608: \end{equation}
609: i.e., same sign di-muons
610: accompanied by an opposite sign $W$-pair and a hard $b$-jet, which reconstructs
611: the top-quark and the $H^+$. The hadronic decays of the $W^-W^-$ may be desirable
612: for the confirmation of the lepton-number violation as well as for the $m_t$ and
613: $m_{H^+}$ reconstruction.
614: A comprehensive analysis of such new $N$-mediated LNV signal as well as
615: the SM backgrounds is beyond the scope of this work, although once again we do
616: not expect it too difficult for a signal identification.
617: Clearly, though, such new LNV signals deserve
618: to be separately addressed, since their kinematics and background
619: completely depart from the ones expected for the widely studied $\mu^+ \mu^+ j j$ one,
620: and, in particular, since hundreds to thousends of such events
621: are expected at the LHC if $\xi \sim 1$.
622:
623: Finally, to conclude this section we note that if $m_N < m_W < m_{H^+}$, then
624: one might expect an enhancement in the Drell-Yan process $pp \to W^+ \to \mu^+ N$ since
625: the s-channel $W^+$ can resonate, giving rise to a peak in the invariant $\mu^+ N$ mass, which
626: might be easier to handle due to its simplicity. However, since
627: the limits on the $\mu W N$ coupling are more stringent in this $N$-mass range,
628: i.e., $U \lsim 0.01$ for $m_N \lsim m_W$ \cite{LEP92}, one expects at most (when $U \sim 0.01$)
629: $\sigma (pp \to W^+ \to \mu^+ N) \sim 0.1 - 10$ [fb] for
630: $m_N \sim 40 -80$ GeV, respectively, after applying typical LHC cuts, see e.g.,
631: \cite{delAguila1}. Evidently, even in the case $m_N < m_W < m_{H^+}$ we expect
632: $H^+ \to \mu^+ N$ to be the dominant $N$-production mechanism at the LHC.
633:
634: \section{Summary and discussion}
635:
636: We have argued that naturalness of the seesaw mechanism, in the sense
637: of having ${\cal O}(1)$ neutrino Yukawa terms, requires that either
638: $m_N \sim 10^{16}$ GeV or that new physics beyond the classic seesaw mechanism
639: exist in the neutrino sector if $m_N$ is close to the EW-scale.
640: Therefore, in the latter case when e.g., $m_N \sim 100 -1000$ GeV, we expect
641: that the new physics will generate ${\cal O}(1)$ couplings
642: between the heavy Majorana neutrinos and the SM particles as well as
643: between the heavy Majorana neutrinos and the other EW-scale degrees of freedom
644: of the underlying new physics. These new couplings
645: can then be manifest through new LNV signals, mediated by the heavy Majorana neutrinos,
646: at future high-energy
647: colliders such as the LHC and the ILC.
648:
649: In this note we have considered one fairly model-independent
650: example of such TeV scale new physics that can
651: drastically change what is considered to be
652: the conventional $N$-phenomenology at the LHC.
653: In particular, we have assumed that there is
654: an ${\cal O}(1)$ coupling between the heavy Majorana neutrino
655: and a new charged Higgs of the underlying theory.
656: We then showed that such a new interaction term can have
657: interesting new implications on LNV same-sign lepton pair signals at the LHC.
658:
659: For example, we found that the frequently-studied
660: leading LNV signal of heavy Majorana neutrinos
661: at the LHC, $pp \to W^+ \to \ell^+ N \to \ell^+ \ell^+ W^-$,
662: can become irrelevant in the presence of a sizable $\ell N H^+$ coupling,
663: since if ${\rm BR}(N \to \ell^+ H^-) \gg {\rm BR}(N \to \ell^+ W^-)$,
664: the LNV signal of a pair of same-sign charged leptons
665: in association with a charged Higgs, $pp \to \ell^+ N \to \ell^+ \ell^+ H^-$ become
666: dominant and can lead to new
667: LNV signatures such as $pp \to \ell^+ N \to \ell^+ \ell^+ \bar t b$ and
668: $pp \to \ell^+ N \to \ell^+ \ell^+ W^- H^0$.
669:
670: We have also shown that, in the case $m_N < m_{H^+}$,
671: the decay $H^+ \to \ell^+ N$ is expected to become the dominant
672: $N$-production mechanism at the LHC, possibly leading to
673: hundreds-thousends LNV events mediated by the heavy Majorana neutrinos,
674: e.g., such as a new $N$-single top
675: associated production $pp \to \ell^- \ell^- t W^+ \to \ell^- \ell^- W^+ W^+ b$.
676:
677: We did not perform any signal to background analysis, as our goal was
678: only to emphasize that new physics associated with heavy Majorana
679: neutrinos can be manifest in various, sometimes unexpected,
680: signals and, as such,
681: may call for new strategies in the search for lepton number violation
682: at future colliders. However, due to the additional $b$-quarks and light jets
683: on top of the spectacular $\mu^\pm \mu^\pm jj$ signal, we expect that the
684: SM backgrounds will be even easier to deal with than commonly studied
685: $\mu\mu jj$ channel.
686:
687: \section{Acknowledgment}
688:
689: SBS thanks the hospitality of the theory group in Brookhaven National
690: Laboratory where part of this study was performed.
691: The work of SBS was supported in part by NSF Grants No. PHY-0653656 (UCI),
692: PHY-0709742 (UCI) and by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.
693: The work of TH is supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy under
694: grant No. DE-FG02-95ER40896, by the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation.
695: %
696: The work at the KITP was supported in part by the National Science Foundation
697: under Grant No. PHY05-51164.
698: %
699: The work of AS was supported in part by US DOE Contract No.
700: DE-AC02-98CH10886 (BNL).
701:
702: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
703:
704: %%%%% REFERENCES FOR COLLIDER SIGNATURES OF N %%%%%
705:
706:
707: \bibitem{book} R.~N.~Mohapatra and P.~B.~Pal, {\tt Massive Neutrinos
708: in Physics and Astrophysics}, World Scientific (1998);
709: %\bibitem{ADatta},
710: %\cite{Datta:1991mf}
711: %\bibitem{Datta:1991mf}
712: A.~Datta and A.~Pilaftsis,
713: %``Revealing the Majorana nature of heavy neutrinos via a heavy Higgs boson,''
714: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 278}, 162 (1992).
715: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B278,162;%%
716:
717: \bibitem{oldpp}
718: %\cite{Ho:1990dt}
719: %\bibitem{Ho:1990dt}
720: %\cite{Keung:1983uu}
721: %\bibitem{Keung:1983uu}
722: W.~Y.~Keung and G.~Senjanovic,
723: %``Majorana Neutrinos And The Production Of The Right-Handed Charged Gauge
724: %Boson,''
725: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 50}, 1427 (1983);
726: %%CITATION = PRLTA,50,1427;%%
727: T.~H.~Ho, C.~R.~Ching and Z.~J.~Tao,
728: %``Production of right-handed gauge boson and heavy Majorana neutrino in
729: %SSC,''
730: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 42}, 2265 (1990);
731: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D42,2265;%%
732: D.A. Dicus and D.D. Karatas, Phys. Rev. {\bf D44}, 2033 (1991).
733: A. Datta, M. Guchait and D.P. Roy,
734: Phys. Rev. {\bf D47}, 961 (1993);
735: A. Datta, M. Guchait and A. Pilaftsis,
736: Phys. Rev. {\bf D50}, 3195 (1994).
737:
738: \bibitem{han}
739: T. Han and B. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97}, 171804 (2006).
740: %hep-ph/0604064.
741:
742: \bibitem{delAguila2} F. del Aguila, J.A. Aguilar Saavedra and R. Pittau,
743: J. Phys. Conf. Ser. {\bf 53}, 506 (2006).
744: %hep-ph/0606198.
745:
746: \bibitem{Wpapers}
747: F.M.L. Almeida {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. {\bf D62}, 075004 (2000);
748: A. Ferrari {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. {\bf D62}, 013001 (2000);
749: O. Panella {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. {\bf D65}, 035005 (2002);
750: S. Bray, J. S. Lee and A. Pilaftsis, arXiv: hep-ph/0702294.
751:
752: \bibitem{delAguila1}
753: F. del Aguila, J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra and R. Pittau,
754: JHEP 0710:047 (2007).
755: % arXiv: hep-ph/0703261.
756:
757: \bibitem{buch1}
758: F. del Aguila, E. Laermann, P. M. Zerwas, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B297}, 1 (1988);
759: W. Buchm\"{u}ller and C. Greub,
760: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B363}, 345 (1991);
761: J. Gluza, M. Zralek, Phys. Rev. {\bf D48}, (1993);
762: G. Azuelos, A. Djouadi, Z. Phys. {\bf C63}, 327 (1994);
763: J. Gluza {\it et al.}, Phys. Lett. {\bf B407}, 45 (1997);
764: F.M.L. Almeida {\it et al.},
765: Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C30}, 327 (2003).
766:
767: \bibitem{rizzo}
768: T.G. Rizzo, Phys Let. {\bf B116}, 23 (1982) and hep-ph/9501261;
769: G. Belanger {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. {\bf D53}, 6292 (1996).
770:
771: \bibitem{ourseetohmhm} D. Atwood, S. Bar-Shalom and A. Soni,
772: Phys. Rev. {\bf D76}, 033004 (2007).
773:
774: \bibitem{pilaftsis1} S. Bray, J.S. Lee and A. Pilaftsis,
775: Phys. Lett. {\bf B628}, 250 (2005).
776:
777: \bibitem{ali2}
778: W. Buchm\"{u}ller and C. Greub,
779: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B256}, 465 (1991);
780: G. Ingelman, J. Rathsman, Z. Phys. {\bf C60}, 243 (1993);
781: M. Flanz, W. Rodejohann and K. Zuber, Phys. Lett. {\bf B473}, 324 (2000),
782: Erratum-{\it ibid.} {\bf B480}, 418 (2000);
783: A. Ali, A.V. Borisov and D.V. Zhuridov, hep-ph/0512005.
784:
785: \bibitem{ourtWpaper} S. Bar-Shalom {\it et al.},
786: Phys. Lett. {\bf B643}, 342 (2006).
787: %hep-ph/0608309
788:
789: \bibitem{ali1}
790: A. Ali, A.V. Borisov and N.B. Zamorin, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C21}, 123 (2001);
791: X.-G. He, G. Valencia and Y. Wili, Phys. Rev. {\bf D70}, 113011 (2004).
792:
793: \bibitem{our-effectiveN} F. del Aguila, S. Bar-Shalom, A. Soni and J. Wudka,
794: "Heavy Majorana Neutrinos In The Effective Lagrangian Description", in preparation.
795:
796: %% REFRENCES FOR BEYOND THE SEESAW SCENARIOS WITH NON-SUPPRESSED MIXINGS %%%%%
797:
798: \bibitem{beyond1} For a recent overview on non-minimal seesaw-like models see,
799: J.~W.~F. Valle, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. {\bf 53}, 473 (2006).
800:
801: \bibitem{beyond2} F. del Aguila and M. Zralek, Acta Phys. Polon. {\bf B33}, 2585 (2002); F. del Aguila, M. Masip and J.~L. Padilla, Phys. Lett. {\bf B627}, 131 (2005).
802:
803: \bibitem{ma} E. Ma, Phys. Rev. {\bf D73}, 077301 (2006).
804:
805: \bibitem{beyondss} A. Pilaftsis,
806: Z. Phys. {\bf C55}, 275 (1992) (also in hep-ph/9901206);
807: D. Tommasini {it et al}, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B444}, 451 (1995);
808: J. Gluza Acta Phys. Polon. {\bf B33}, 1735 (2002);
809: %J. Kersten and A. Y. Smirnov, arXiv: hep-ph/0705.3221.
810: %\cite{Kersten:2007vk}
811: %\bibitem{Kersten:2007vk}
812: J.~Kersten and A.~Y.~Smirnov,
813: %``Right-Handed Neutrinos at LHC and the Mechanism of Neutrino Mass
814: %Generation,''
815: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 76}, 073005 (2007)
816: [arXiv:0705.3221 [hep-ph]].
817: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D76,073005;%%
818:
819: %\cite{deGouvea:2006gz}
820: \bibitem{deGouvea:2006gz}
821: A.~de Gouvea, J.~Jenkins and N.~Vasudevan,
822: %``Neutrino phenomenology of very low-energy seesaws,''
823: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 75}, 013003 (2007) [arXiv:hep-ph/0608147].
824: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D75,013003;%%
825: %%%%% REFERENCES ON LIMITS ON THE HEAVY NEUTRINO MIXINGS %%%%%
826:
827: \bibitem{kagan} S. Bergmann and A. Kagan, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B538}, 368 (1999).
828:
829: \bibitem{LEP92} O. Adriani {\it et al.} for the L3 Collaboration, Phys. Lett. {\bf B295}, 371 (1992).
830:
831: \bibitem{limit2} For a recent analysis of the $\beta \beta_{0\nu}$ bound see
832: e.g., P. Benes {\it et al}, Phys. Rev. {\bf D71}, 077901 (2005).
833:
834: \bibitem{sigmas} See e.g., S. Komamiya, Phys. Rev. {\bf D38}, 2158 (1988);
835: A. Djouadi {\it et al.}, Z. Phys. {\bf C74}, 93 (1997).
836:
837: %\cite{Berger:2003sm}
838: \bibitem{Berger:2003sm}
839: E.~L.~Berger, T.~Han, J.~Jiang and T.~Plehn,
840: %``Associated production of a top quark and a charged Higgs boson,''
841: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 115012 (2005)
842: [arXiv:hep-ph/0312286].
843: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D71,115012;%%
844:
845: \bibitem{0710.1761}
846: %\cite{Belyaev:2002eq}
847: %\bibitem{Belyaev:2002eq}
848: A.~Belyaev, D.~Garcia, J.~Guasch and J.~Sola,
849: %``Prospects for heavy supersymmetric charged Higgs boson searches at hadron
850: %colliders,''
851: JHEP {\bf 0206}, 059 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0203031];
852: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0206,059;%%
853: See also, M. Flechl (for the ATLAS and CMS collaborations), hep-ph/0710.1761.
854:
855: \end{thebibliography}
856:
857: \end{document}