1: \documentclass[%

2: aps,%

3: 12pt,%

4: final,%

5: notitlepage,%

6: oneside,%

7: onecolumn,%

8: nobibnotes,%

9: nofootinbib,%

10: superscriptaddress,%

11: noshowpacs,%

12: centertags]%

13: {revtex4}

14: %

15: \def\DD {{\!}_{DD}}

16: %

17: \usepackage[koi8-r]{inputenc}

18: \usepackage[english,russian]{babel}

19: \usepackage[T2A,T1]{fontenc}

20: \usepackage{epsfig}

21: \usepackage[centerlast,normalsize]{caption2}

22: %

23: \setcounter{footnote}{0}

24: \setcounter{equation}{0}

25: \setcounter{table}{0}

26: \thispagestyle{myheadings}

27: %\allerton

28: \setcounter{figure}{0}

29: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.05}

30: \begin{document} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

31: %\noindent \parbox[t]{25em}{\titlehe}

32: %\hfill \parbox[t]{\ahead}{\titlehr \\ pp. 3 -- 7, UDC 539.126}

33: 

34: ~\hfill {\it Bulletin of the Lebedev Physics Institute, No. 12, 2006}

35: \rule{\textwidth}{0.1mm}

36: 

37: \vspace{5mm}

38: \begin{center}

39: % § £« ¢¨¥ áâ âì¨

40: {\large\bf ON A POSSIBLE MECHANISM}\\

41: {\large\bf OF THE PRODUCTION OF PENTAQUARK STATES 

42: $\Theta$(ud${\rm \bar s}$ud)}

43: \\ \vspace{3mm}

44: \label{st1}

45: %  ¢â®àë

46: S. P. Baranov\\

47: {\sl P.N.Lebedev Institute of Physics, Moscow 119991}

48: \\ \vspace{5mm}

49: 

50: \begin{minipage}{135mm}

51: {\bf

52: % ­ ¯¥ç â âì  ­­®â æ¨î

53: A new mechanism of the production of hypothetical

54: $\Theta({\bf ud{\bar s}ud})^+$ pentaquark state is suggested. 

55: The considered mechanism is based on the exchange by exotic Regge 

56: trajectories in the ${\bf t}$ channel. It is shown that the momentum 

57: distributions of $\Theta^+$ baryons can differ significantly from the 

58: ones of the ordinary hyperons. 

59: } \end{minipage} \end{center}

60: \rule{\textwidth}{0.1mm}

61: 

62: %⥪áâ áâ âì¨

63: \large

64: Data in favor of the discovery of pentaquark states, and, in particular,

65: states of the $(ud{\bar s}ud)$ quark composition [1] are yet disputable 

66: and not generally acknowledged. The question on the character of 

67: kinematic distributions for these exotic baryons remains of the urgent

68: interest nowadays. Comparing results of the search for pentaquark states,

69: which are obtained in different experiments, we should allow for the fact

70: that the expected signal can correspond to different acceptance 

71: conditions of the experimental arrangements.

72: 

73: The expected characteristics of the pentaquark production are usually

74: considered to be similar to those of the $\Lambda$(1520) hyperon because 

75: they both are baryons and carry the strangeness. This analogy is true

76: for the kaon-exchange mechanism analyzed in [2]. However, this mechanism

77: is, generally speaking, may not be the only mechanism contributing to the 

78: pentaquark production, although it is necessary by virtue of the existence 

79: of the $\Theta pK$ interaction vertex responsible for the pentaquark decay. 

80: In the given case, this mechanism can even be not the dominant one.

81: 

82: In order to assemble the $\Theta^+$ pentaquark from a proton and a kaon, 

83: a rather complicated rearrangement of color fluxes is required. This 

84: complication, in a certain extent, explains the low probability of the 

85: inverse process, i.e., the small width of the decay

86: $\Theta^+ \to p {\bar K}^0$. On the other hand,

87: if we reject the condition of the indispensable use of all quarks from 

88: the incoming proton (and restrict our consideration only to one quark 

89: or diquark), then the color structure of the interaction is essentially

90: simplified. However, in this case, we have to additionally pick up the

91: missing quarks from the $t$ channel. Hence, the interaction must be

92: mediated by not a single kaon but a multiquark complex.

93: 

94: In the framework of the initial assumption that the exotic states do

95: exist, the hypothesis that interactions also can be mediated by exotic

96: hadrons seems to be quite natural. Assuming the parameters of the

97: corresponding Regge trajectories to be known, we can calculate both 

98: the energy dependence of the interaction cross section and the kinematic 

99: distributions of the produced particles. The absolute normalization of 

100: the cross section remains uncertain, since the interaction constants of 

101: exotic hadrons are unknown.%

102: \footnote{The $\Theta pK$ interaction vertex in the kaon exchange 

103: mechanism is considered to be known since it can be extracted from 

104: the $\Theta^+ \to p{\bar K}^0$ decay width.} 

105: In order to find the relevant parameters of exotic trajectories, one can

106: employ the hypothesis of the intercept additivity with respect to the 

107: quark composition. According to this hypothesis, every addition or 

108: subtraction of a quark shifts the trajectory by the same value. 

109: The application of this hypothesis is illustrated in Fig. 1. 

110: By adding and subtracting two quark-antiquark pairs, the pentaquark state 

111: is reduced to a set of two nucleons, one hyperon, and two mesons. Hence 

112: follows the relationship between the intercept of the exotic trajectory 

113: and the intercepts of the known non-exotic trajectories:

114: $\alpha_\Theta = 2\alpha_N + \alpha_\Lambda - 2\alpha_R$.

115: Thus, we manage to establish the functional form of the fragmentation 

116: functions for quarks and diquarks.

117: 

118: \begin{figure}

119: %\hspace*{25mm} \special {em:graph 12_1_1.pcx}

120: \epsfig{figure=12_1_1.eps, width=8.cm}

121: %\vspace{38mm}

122: \caption{

123: Graphical method illustrating the derivation of the relationship 

124: $\alpha_\Theta = 2\alpha_N + \alpha_\Lambda - 2\alpha_R$.

125: } \end{figure}

126: 

127: The calculations were carried out within the formulism of the 

128: Quark--Gluon String model [3 -- 10]. For the sake of convenience, we 

129: here present the short list of the relevant formulas without repeating 

130: their derivations. The inclusive differential production cross section 

131: for a hadron of the type $h$ can be written in the form

132: %

133: \begin{equation}

134: \frac{d\sigma^h}{dp_{Tx} dp_{Tz}\,dy}=\sigma_{DD} \varphi_{DD}^h +

135:  \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\,\sigma_n\varphi_n^h \label{sigma H},

136: \end{equation}

137: %

138: \noindent where $p_{Tx}$ and $p_{Tz}$ are the transverse momentum 

139: components, $y$ is the rapidity, and $\sigma_{DD}$ is the contribution 

140: of the diffraction dissociation (not taken into account in the present 

141: study). The summation over $n$ corresponds to the contributions of the 

142: $n$-Pomerons configurations in the exchange channel. The corresponding 

143: cross sections $\sigma_n$ have been calculated in [4]. The functions 

144: $\varphi_n$ describe the fragmentation of color strings into hadrons:

145: %

146: \begin{eqnarray}

147: \varphi_n^h&=&

148: a^h\,\bigl[ F_{val}^h(x_{+},n)F_{\overline{val}}^h(x_{-},n) \label{phi}

149:            +F_{\overline{val}}^h(x_{+},n)F_{val}^h(x_{-},n) + \nonumber \\

150: &&   +(n-1)[F_{sea}^h(x_{+},n)F_{\overline{sea}}^h(x_{-},n)

151:            +F_{\overline{sea}}^h(x_{+},n)F_{sea}^h(x_{-},n)]\bigr].

152: \end{eqnarray}

153: %

154: \noindent 

155:    Here, $x_{\pm}=\frac{1}{2}[(x_{\perp}^2+x_F^2)^{1/2} \pm x_F],\quad

156:        x_{\perp}=2m^h_{\perp}/\sqrt{s},$ \quad

157:       $x_{+}x_{-}=(m^h_{\perp})^2/s$, \quad $x_{+}-x_{-}=x_F.$\\

158: Each term in expression (2) corresponds to an individual color string

159: stretched between valence or sea partons of the interacting hadrons. The

160: contribution of each of the strings is represented in the form of the

161: product of two independent functions $F_i(x_{+})$ and $F_i(x_{-})$ 

162: corresponding to end partons of the given string. In turn, the functions  

163: $F(x_{\pm})$ are calculated as the convolution of parton distribution 

164: function $f_i(x,n)$, parton fragmentation function 

165: $D_i^h(x_{\pm}/x',\,p_T)$, and the weight function 

166: $T(x_F/x',\,p_T,\,n)$ modelling the transverse momentum:

167: %

168: \begin{equation}

169: F^h(x_{\pm},n)=\sum_i

170: \int_{x_{\pm}}^1

171: f_i(x',n)\,D_i^h(x_{\pm}/x',\,p_T)\,T(x_F/x',\,p_T,\,n)\,dx'.

172: \end{equation}

173: %

174: \noindent As in the usual parton model, the distribution function 

175: determines the probability to find in the original hadron a parton 

176: of the type $i$ carrying the longitudinal momentum fraction $x$, while 

177: the fragmentation function determines the probability of transforming 

178: the given parton into the hadron $h$ of the final state.

179: 

180: In the case of the $\Theta(ud\bar{s}ud)^+$-pentaquark production which 

181: we are interested in, the calculations were performed as for a usual 

182: baryon, e.g., the charmed $\Lambda_c^+$ hyperon where the charmed quark 

183: is substituted with the $(\bar{s}ud)$ triquark complex. In this case, 

184: in accordance with the above considerations related to the intercepts of 

185: exotic trajectories, the quark and diquark fragmentation functions take

186: the form

187: %

188: \begin{eqnarray}

189: D_{q\to\Theta+X}(z,p_T) &=& c_1\,(1-z)^{\alpha_R-2\alpha_\Theta+\lambda}, \\

190: D_{qq\to\Theta+X}(z,p_T) &=& c_2\,(1-z)^{-\alpha_Q+\lambda}.

191: \end{eqnarray}

192: %

193: \noindent Here, $\alpha_\Theta = 2\alpha_N + \alpha_\Lambda - 2\alpha_R$

194: and $\alpha_Q = 2(\alpha_N + \alpha_\Lambda) - 3\alpha_R$,\quad where 

195: $\alpha_N$, $\alpha_\Lambda$, and $\alpha_R$ are the intercepts of the 

196: nucleon, hyperon and $\rho$-meson trajectories, 

197: $\lambda=2\alpha'_Rp_T^2$, and $\alpha'_R=1$ GeV$^{-2}$ is the slope

198: of the Reggeon trajectory. The normalization coefficients $c_1$ and $c_2$ 

199: are not determined in the theory and remain to be free parameters. The 

200: full list of parton distribution functions and parton fragmentation 

201: functions for non-exotic states can be found in [9, 10]. The calculations

202: were performed using the Fortran code HIPPOPO described in detail in [11].

203: 

204: \begin{figure}

205: %\hspace*{-4mm} \special {em:graph 12_1_2.pcx}

206: %\epsfig{figure=penta.eps, width=12.cm}

207: \epsfig{figure=12_1_2.eps, width=18.5cm}

208: %\vspace{82mm}

209: \caption{

210: Kinematic distributions of $\Theta^+$ pentaquarks produced in $pp$

211: collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 12$ GeV over (a) the Feynman variable $x_F$;

212: (b) the transverse momentum $p_T$; (c) the rapidity $y$; and (d) the

213: cosine cos$(\theta$) of the pentaquark emission angle $(\theta)$ in 

214: the $pp$ center-of-mass system. Dotted and dashed curves correspond to

215: the contribution of the quark and diquark fragmentation, respectively;

216: solid curves represent the sum of all contributions.

217: } \end{figure}

218: 

219: 

220: In Fig. 2, predictions are shown for the $\Theta^+$-pentaquark momentum 

221: distributions as functions of the Feynman variable $x_F$, transverse 

222: momentum $p_T$, rapidity $y$, and the cosine $\cos(\theta)$ of the 

223: emission angle $\theta$ in the colliding protons center-of-mass system 

224: at the total initial energy $\sqrt{s} = 12$ GeV. The relation between 

225: the coefficients $c_1$ and $c_2$ responsible for the quark and diquark 

226: fragmentation contributions was taken to be $c_1$:$c_2$ = 1:10, i.e., 

227: approximately the same as it had been obtained from the data related 

228: to the production of ordinary baryons. The exchange by a heavier Regge 

229: trajectory results in an essential shift of the $\Theta^+$-pentaquark 

230: spectrum compared to both the $\Lambda$ hyperon spectrum and the 

231: predictions of the kaon exchange model [2]. In the latter case, the 

232: maximum of the momentum distribution lies in the region $x_F\simeq 0.85$. 

233: With the increase in the beam energy, the spectrum displaces to the 

234: region of lower $x_F$ values. This is the consequence of just the 

235: kinematics (translating the Lorentz-invariant cross section 

236: $d\sigma/dy$ into the noninvariant cross section $d\sigma/dx_F$).

237: 

238: Thus, we can see that using the hypothesis on the exchange by exotic 

239: heavy trajectories leads to a significant variation in the shape of 

240: momentum distribution for the state being considered. This fact should 

241: be taken unto account in the analysis of experimental data. 

242: Whether our prediction correspond to the truth, is the question 

243: that should be solved in the future together with the confirmation 

244: of the very existence of pentaquark baryons.

245: 

246: The author is grateful to P. F. Ermolov for initiating interest in the

247: study.

248: 

249: \begin{thebibliography}{xx}

250: 

251: \bibitem{a} A. Aleev et al., \, The SVD Collaboration, Phys. At.

252: Nucl., vol. 68, p. 974, 2005.

253: 

254: \bibitem{b} I. M. Narodetskii and M. A. Trusov, \,

255: Proc. Int. Conf. PANIC'05, Santa-Fe, NM, USA (October 2005); hep-ph/0512363.

256: 

257: \bibitem{c} A. Capella et al., \, Zeit. Phys., vol. C3, p. 329, 1970.

258: 

259: \bibitem{d} K. A. Ter--Martirosyan, \, Phys. Lett., vol. B44,

260: p. 377, 1973.

261: 

262: \bibitem{e} M. Ciafaloni, G. Marchesini, and G. Veneziano, 

263: \, Nucl. Phys., vol. B98, p. 472, 1975.

264: 

265: \bibitem{f}  A. Capella and J. Tran Tranh Van, \,

266: Zeit. Phys., vol. C10, p. 249, 1981.

267: 

268: \bibitem{g} A. B. Kaidalov, \, Phys. Lett., vol. B116, p. 459, 1982.

269: 

270: \bibitem{h} A. B. Kaidalov and K. A. Ter--Martirosyan,

271: \, Phys. Lett., vol. B117, p. 247, 1982.

272: 

273: \bibitem{j} A. B. Kaidalov and O. I. Piskunova, \, Yad. Fiz., vol. 41, p. 

274: 1278, 1985.

275: 

276: \bibitem{k} A. V. Kaidalov, \, Yad. Fiz., vol. 45, p. 1450, 1987.

277: 

278: \bibitem{l} A. P. Baranov, \, Preprint FIAN No. 42 (Lebedev

279: Physical Institute, Moscow, 1998); hep-ph/0209363.

280: 

281: \end{thebibliography}

282: \end{document}

283: 

284: \begin{figure}

285: %\hspace*{-4mm} \special {em:graph 12_1_2.pcx}

286: %\epsfig{figure=penta.eps, width=12.cm}

287: \epsfig{figure=12_1_2.eps, width=18.5cm}

288: %\vspace{82mm}

289: \caption{

290: Kinematic distributions of $\Theta^+$ pentaquarks generated in $pp$

291: collisions for $\sqrt{s} = 12$ GeV over (a) the Feynman variable $x_F$;

292: (b) the transverse momentum $p_T$; (c) the rapidity $y$; and (d) the 

293: cosine cos$(\theta$) of the proton emission angle $(\theta)$ in the proton

294: center-of-mass coordinate system. Dotted and dashed curves correspond to

295: the contribution of the quark and diquark fragmentation, respectively;

296: solid curves are the overall results.

297: } \end{figure}

298: 

299: \end{document}

300: