1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \begin{document}
3:
4: \title{Seoul National University Bright Quasar Survey in Optical (SNUQSO) II:
5: Discovery of 40 Bright Quasars near the Galactic Plane}
6:
7: \author{Myungshin Im\altaffilmark{1,2}, Induk Lee\altaffilmark{1,3},
8: Yunseok Cho\altaffilmark{1}, Changsu Choi\altaffilmark{1},
9: Jongwan Ko\altaffilmark{1}, and Mimi Song\altaffilmark{1}}
10:
11: \altaffiltext{1}{Astronomy Program, Department of Physics and Astronomy, FPRD,
12: Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea}
13: \altaffiltext{2}{mim@astro.snu.ac.kr}
14: \altaffiltext{3}{idlee@astro.snu.ac.kr}
15:
16: \newcommand{\oiii}{[$\ion{O}{3}$]}
17: \newcommand{\hb}{$H\beta$}
18: \newcommand{\ha}{$H\alpha$}
19:
20:
21:
22: \begin{abstract}
23: We report the discovery of 40 bright quasars and active galactic nuclei
24: (AGNs) at low Galactic latitude ($b < \vert 20\degr \vert$).
25: The low galactic latitude region has been considered as a place
26: to avoid when searching for extragalactic sources,
27: because of the high Galactic extinction as well as a large number of
28: stars contaminating the sample selection.
29: Bright quasars ($R \lesssim 17$) suffer more from such difficulties
30: because they look like bright stars, which are numerous at low $b$, yet their
31: surface number density is very low.
32: In order to find quasars in this region of the sky less explored
33: for extragalactic sources, we have started a survey of low Galactic
34: latitude bright quasars as a part of the Seoul National University Quasar
35: Survey in Optical (SNUQSO).
36: Quasar candidates have been selected from radio and near-infrared (NIR) data.
37: Out of 88 targets, we identify 29 bright quasars/AGNs around
38: the antigalactic center, and 11 bright quasars/AGNs in the outskirts
39: of the Galactic center, from two observing runs in 2006 at
40: the Bohyunsan Optical Astronomical Observatory (BOAO) in Korea
41: Our finding demonstrates that quasars/AGNs can be discovered effectively
42: even at low Galactic latitude using multi-wavelength data.
43: \end{abstract}
44:
45:
46: \keywords{quasars: general --- galaxies: active --- techniques: spectroscopic --- surveys
47: }
48:
49:
50:
51: \section{INTRODUCTION}
52:
53: Since the discovery of quasar 3C273 in 1963 (Schmidt 1963),
54: more than 100,000 quasars and active galactic nuclei have been found
55: to date (Schneider et al. 2005; Croom et al. 2004;
56: Hagen et al. 1995; Hewett et al. 1995;
57: Becker et al. 2001; Schmidt \& Green 1983;
58: Veron-Cetty \& Veron 2006).
59: Despite of the rapid increase in the number of known quasars,
60: however, only a small number of quasars have been discovered
61: near the Galactic plane.
62: The dots and crosses in Figure. 1 represent the positions of quasars
63: discovered to date, taken from Veron-Cetty \& Veron (2006).
64: Clearly, there is a lack of quasars/AGNs at low Galactic latitude
65: ($b \lesssim \vert 20 \vert$).
66: There are two reasons for this paucity of quasars at low Galactic latitude.
67: First, there are simply too many stars that look like quasars
68: at low Galactic latitude so that it is much more challenging to select quasar
69: candidates in such a region than at a high Galactic latitude region.
70: High Galactic extinction in the Galactic plane also causes
71: a trouble when searching for quasars. Not only does Galactic extinction
72: dim the light from quasars by several magnitudes or more, but it also
73: affects the optical colors of quasars, making it
74: difficult to isolate quasar candidates with otherwise highly efficient
75: quasar selection methods employing optical color-color diagrams
76: (e.g., Richards et al. 2004).
77:
78:
79: Among quasars, bright quasars ($V \lesssim 17$ mag) get special attention.
80: Because of their brightness, they are easy to use
81: to investigate the intergalactic medium
82: (e.g., Weymann et al. 1981;
83: Rauch 1998; Fan et al. 2006), the properties of supermassive
84: blackholes and their host galaxies (e.g., Kaspi et al. 2000;
85: Kim et al. 2006),
86: and the physical state and distribution of gas in our Galaxy
87: (Sternberg 2003; Sembach et al. 2003; Savage \& Sembach 1996).
88: Because of their usefulness,
89: bright quasars have been searched for extensively in
90: high Galactic latitude regions, especially in the northern hemisphere
91: (Schmidt \& Green 1983; Hagen et al. 1995; Hewett et al. 1995;
92: Becker et al. 2001; Schneider et al. 2005).
93: These surveys appear to have found the majority of bright quasars
94: in their respective search areas, although a small number of bright quasars
95: are still waiting to be discovered (Lee et al. 2008).
96:
97: Bright quasars at low Galactic latitude also have many
98: astrophysical applications. They can allow us to study
99: the gaseous component of matter in our galaxy from a unique point of view
100: through their absorption lines, and offer an opportunity to study
101: their host galaxies using bright stars close to them as guide stars for
102: adaptive optics. They can also serve as reference points to examine
103: the motion of stars in our Galaxy.
104: However, finding bright quasars at low Galactic latitude
105: seems to be a daunting job considering the aforementioned difficulties.
106: A simple quantitative argument is given below to demonstrate how
107: difficult it is to identify bright quasars at low Galactic latitude.
108: The surface number density of bright quasars at $V < 17$ mag is
109: 0.1 $deg^{-2}$, while the number density of stars at low Galactic
110: latitude ranges from a few thousand (anti-galactic center) to
111: a few tens of thousand per square degree at around $l=0^{\circ}$
112: and $b=10^{\circ}$ (Robin et al.2003). This is 10 to 100 times more than
113: the number density of stars at high Galactic latitude (Spagna et al. 1996).
114: These numbers become even worse if we take into account Galactic
115: extinction which dims the light from extragalactic
116: objects by more than a magnitude in most areas at low Galactic latitude.
117: Assuming 1 magnitude extinction,
118: the apparent magnitude cut of $V < 17$ mag at low Galactic latitude
119: would actually sample quasars with $V < 16$ mag if they were at high Galactic
120: latitude.
121: At $V < 17$ mag, the number density of quasars is only 0.01 $deg^{-2}$.
122: Therefore, the quasar-to-star ratio of an apparent magnitude-limited sample
123: at $V < 17$ mag becomes 1 in a few hundred thousand to a few million,
124: or 100 to 1000 times worse than at high Galactic latitude.
125: At $V \lesssim 17$, the optical multi-color selection gives a
126: quasar identification efficiency of about 90\%, but at low Galactic
127: latitude this efficiency would drop to 9\% to 0.9\% following the above
128: argument. Clearly an alternative
129: method is needed for selecting bright quasars at low Galactic latitude.
130:
131: In order to broaden our knowledge of bright quasars toward
132: the zone of avoidance, we have started a survey of bright quasars
133: at low Galactic latitude regions, as a part of the Seoul National University
134: Quasar Survey in Optical (SNUQSO). Here, we report the discovery of
135: 40 bright quasars/AGNs at low Galactic latitude, using a selection
136: algorithm designed to efficiently sample low Galactic latitude quasars.
137: Throughout the paper, the magnitudes are Vega-based, unless otherwise
138: mentioned. Also, we adopt the cosmological parameters of $\Omega_{m} = 0.3$,
139: $\Lambda = 0.7$, and $H_{0} = 70~km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}$.
140:
141: \section{SELECTION OF CANDIDATES}
142:
143:
144: \subsection{Method}
145:
146: The key to successfully finding low Galactic latitude quasars lies in
147: an efficient algorithm that can distinguish quasars from
148: the plethora of stars and dust in the Galactic plane.
149: To achieve such a goal, we use a combination of radio
150: and near-infrared (NIR) data. For the radio data,
151: we use the NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS; Condon et al. 1998) data set,
152: and for the NIR data, we use the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) data set
153: (Skrutskie et al. 2006).
154: These data sets are chosen because they provide nearly complete coverage
155: of the Galactic plane to the depth sufficient for finding a fair number
156: of bright quasars. The NVSS data covers the whole sky above
157: $\delta = -40^{\circ}$ to the depth of 2.5 mJy in 21cm. The 2MASS data
158: covers the entire sky to the depth of $K = 15$ mag.
159: The reason for the use of the radio and NIR data sets is elaborated
160: below.
161:
162: Our selection of candidates starts with identifying radio sources at
163: $\vert b \vert < 20$. As the name ``quasar'' originates from the word
164: ``quasi-stellar radio star,'' it has been widely recognized that
165: radio emitting point sources are very likely to be quasars or AGNs.
166: The usual procedure for finding quasars using radio data is to find
167: an optical counterpart to the radio source and perform spectroscopic
168: observation to determine whether it is a quasar.
169: In high Galactic latitude
170: regions, it is not very difficult to identify the optical counterpart
171: of a radio source, given that the radio data have a reasonably good
172: positional accuracy. For example, the FIRST survey data show that
173: the matching radius of 1\arcsec~ is sufficiently good for finding an optical
174: counterpart (White et al. 2000).
175: However, that approach is not directly applicable in this case.
176: The beam size of the NVSS data is large (FWHM = 45\arcsec)
177: compared to FIRST, and the quoted positional accuracy of point sources
178: varies from $rms \sim 1\arcsec$ (for sources brighter than 15 mJy)
179: to 7 \arcsec ~(at the survey limit of 2.5 mJy), forcing us
180: to adopt a conservative 2-$\sigma$ radius of 15\arcsec~
181: as a search radius to identify the optical counterpart.
182: However, within a 15\arcsec~ radius circle of a NVSS radio source
183: at low Galactic latitude, there are on average $\sim$6 point
184: sources down to the optical magnitude of $R \lesssim 19$ mag
185: and sometimes more.
186:
187: In order to improve the quasar selection efficiency by weeding out
188: stars near the radio position, we add a NIR selection method.
189: Low redshift quasars are known to have
190: red $J-K$ colors due to a steeply rising NIR spectra
191: (e.g., Glikman et al. 2006), and NIR colors
192: have been used previously to select quasars and AGNs (e.g., Figure 5 in
193: Barkhouse \& Hall 2001; see also, Nelson et al. 1998;
194: Cutri et al. 2000; Maddox \& Hewett 2006). Therefore, we applied a NIR
195: color cut on point sources near the radio position and selected
196: objects with $J-K > 1.4$ as quasar candidates.
197: The NIR cut of $J-K > 1.4$ has been found to be the optimal
198: cut for minimizing the contamination from stars and galaxies by
199: performing the above selection method on known quasars/galaxies/stars
200: in the fourth data release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS;
201: Adelman-McCarthy, et al. 2006).
202: In general, the selected candidates have $K < 14$ mag
203: and an optical magnitude of $R < 19$.
204: With the NIR cut, the contamination rate of stars/galaxies
205: on the SDSS sample with the above method is found to be on the order
206: of a few percent or less, but at the expense of preferentially selecting
207: low redshift quasars at $z \lesssim 0.4$ (see also, Chiu et al. 2007).
208: A more complete description of the sample selection and its
209: efficiency will appear in I. Lee et al. (2008, in preparation).
210:
211:
212: Although our method can be applied to a very crowded region in
213: the Galactic plane, we have limited the initial survey area to the following
214: region so that we get a reasonably high quasar identification efficiency
215: of $\sim 50$\%.
216:
217: \[ \begin{array}{ll}
218: \vert b \vert < 20^{\circ} & \mbox{at $120^{\circ} < l < 240^{\circ}$}\\
219: 5^{\circ} < \vert b \vert < 20^{\circ} & \mbox{at $40^{\circ} < l < 120^{\circ}$ \& $240^{\circ} < l < 320^{\circ}$}\\
220: 10^{\circ} < \vert b \vert < 20^{\circ} & \mbox{at $0^{\circ} < l < 40^{\circ}$ \& $320^{\circ} < l < 360^{\circ}$}
221: \end{array}
222: \]
223:
224:
225: Using this selection method, we identify 601 candidates
226: in the above area covering 10919.9 $deg^{2}$, 88 of which were
227: observed over $\sim$ 2700 $deg^{2}$ during 2006, as described
228: in the next section.
229:
230:
231:
232: \section{OBSERVATION}
233:
234: For spectroscopic confirmation of quasars,
235: we observed the quasar candidates
236: using the longslit low-resolution spectrograph mounted
237: on the Bohyunsan Observatory Eschelle Spectrograph (BOES) of
238: the 1.8m telescope at Bohyunsan Optical Astronomical Observatory
239: (BOAO; Kim et al. 2003).
240: The spectroscopic observations were carried out on 2006 June 17 - 24 and
241: 2006 December 20 - 25, among which about four nights were
242: in observable condition under the seeing of $2$ -- $3$\arcsec.
243: Using a 150 per mm grating and a slit width of 3.6\arcsec,
244: we covered the wavelength range of 4200 - 8400 \AA~ at the spectral
245: resolution of $\lambda/\delta\lambda \sim 366$, or $\delta v \sim 820
246: ~km\, s^{-1}$. The observational setting is basically identical to
247: the default observational setting of SNUQSO, which is described in
248: more detail in Lee et al. (2008).
249: The June run targeted bright quasar candidates in the outskirts
250: of the Galactic center, while in the December run, we observed targets near
251: the anti-galactic center.
252: We observed 33 candidates in June, and 55 candidates in December.
253: The observed data were reduced with IRAF\footnote{IRAF is
254: distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatory, which
255: is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in
256: Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National
257: Science Foundation.} packages, following a standard
258: procedure including flux calibration. We estimate the accuracy of
259: the relative flux calibration (as a function of
260: wavelength) to be roughly 15\% (Lee et al. 2007a).
261: We originally took optical magnitudes from the USNO-A2.0 catalog
262: (Monet et al. 1998) for the quasar
263: candidates, but some of the apparent magnitudes appeared to be too bright.
264: In order to check the USNO magnitudes, we performed the
265: multi-band imaging observation of objects that are identified as
266: quasars/AGNs using the 1.5m telescope at the Mt. Maidanak Observatory
267: in Uzbekistan during 2006 August 1 - 12 and also in 2006 June/July
268: (M. Im et al. 2008, in preparation). The median seeing during the
269: imaging run hovered around 0.7\arcsec to 1.0\arcsec, and the observations
270: were carried out in photometric condition.
271: Our imaging observation reveals that the USNO magnitudes are
272: too bright by more than 1 mag for the four objects with
273: USNO magnitude $R < 15$ (object numbers, 33, 36, 37, and 39 in
274: Table 1), and we have revised the $R$-band and $B$-band
275: magnitude accordingly. In other cases, we find that
276: the average difference in $R$-band magnitude
277: is $R$(USNO) - $R$(Maidanak) $\simeq$ 0.12 mag.
278: Table 1 lists the apparent magnitudes of the low Galactic
279: latitude quasars/AGNs.
280: The $R$-band and $B$-band magnitude of objects 29-39 in Table 1 are from
281: our imaging observation, while the rest come from the USNO catalog.
282: For some of the problematic cases, the blending of objects might be
283: responsible for the bright USNO magnitude since we find neighbors
284: within $\sim$6\arcsec of the quasar.
285: For the rest, it is not clear why the USNO magnitudes are so bright.
286: Monitoring of the quasars/AGNs may reveal the temporal variation of
287: brightness of such quasars/AGNs.
288: Based on our imaging data of 11 objects,
289: we note that the magnitudes in Table 2 originating from the USNO
290: catalog may be too bright when $R < 15$ mag.
291:
292:
293: \section{RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS}
294:
295:
296: From the observed spectra, quasars were identified as objects with
297: redshifted, broad Balmer emission lines with their FWHM line widths
298: exceeding 1000 $km\,s^{-1}$ (White et al. 2000; Schneider et al. 2003).
299: With such a criterion, we find 40 quasars among 88 candidates. Application
300: of an absolute magnitude cut of $M_{i} < -22$ AB magnitude
301: (Schneider et al. 2003) reduces this number to
302: 37\footnote{$M_{i}$ can be calculated from the $R$-band absolute magnitude
303: listed in Table 1, by applying the color correction of
304: $R$(Vega) - $i_{AB}$ $\simeq$ -0.1 mag, which we derived using
305: a template quasar spectrum from Vanden Berk et al. (2001). Here,
306: $R$(Vega) - $i_{AB}$ would be $\sim$ -0.2 mag for the $R$-band
307: magnitudes from USNO based on the comparison of the USNO $R$-band magnitude
308: to our data.}
309:
310: Figure 1 shows the distribution of the 40 new quasars/AGNs in Galactic
311: coordinates (triangles and squares).
312: Also plotted in the figure are quasars and active galaxies
313: listed in Veron-Cetty \& Veron (2006). We also plot quasars brighter
314: than $V = 17$ mag as crosses.
315: The lack of bright quasars at low Galactic latitude is apparent from
316: this figure. Especially in the Galactic plane near the anti-galactic
317: center ($120^{\circ} < l < 240^{\circ}$
318: and $\vert b \vert < 8^{\circ}$), only 7 bright
319: quasars/AGNs have been reported previously. We more than double
320: this number now by discovering 13 additional quasars/AGNs in this
321: region.
322:
323: In Figure 2, we present the spectra of the 40 quasars/AGNs, while
324: Table 1 summarizes the basic observed properties of these quasars.
325: The extinction corrected absolute $R$-band magnitude, $M_{R}$,
326: is calculated with the formula,
327:
328: \[M_{R} = m_{R} - 5 \times log(d_{L}(z)) - 25 - K_{R}(z) - A_{R}. \]
329:
330: Here, $m_{R}$ is the $R$-band apparent magnitude
331: before extinction correction (col. [8] in Table 1), $d_{L}$ is the
332: luminosity distance, $K_{R}(z)$ is
333: the $K$-correction,\footnote{Note that
334: the correction is calculated assuming the Bessel $R$-band filter
335: response on the 4k x 4k CCD Camera installed on the 1.5m
336: telescope at the Maidanak Observatory (Ko et al. 2007,
337: in preparation).
338: Application of this
339: $K$-correction to the photographic $R$-band magnitude from USNO may
340: result in a difference on the order of $\sim$0.1 mag.}
341: derived from the composite spectrum of SDSS quasars
342: (Vanden Berk et al. 2001), and $A_{R}$ is the Galactic extinction
343: toward the position of the quasar/AGN taken from NASA/IPAC Extragalactic
344: Database, which is based on
345: the reddening map of Schlegel et al. (1998).
346: %Im
347: Figure 2 shows a clear detection of redshifted H$\alpha$, H$\beta$,
348: and [OIII] lines. Redshifts of these quasars/AGNs range from $z = 0.05$
349: to $0.3$, and the rest-frame FWHMs are all measured to be well above
350: 1000 $km\,s^{-1}$, ranging from 1300 to 8000 $km\,s^{-1}$, showing that
351: they belong in the category of quasars and active galaxies
352: (White et al. 2000; Schneider et al. 2003). We also find that
353: 13 are X-ray sources and 27 are infrared sources.
354: In particular, SNUQSO J210931.9-353258 has been previously identified as
355: a gamma-ray blazar source by Sowards-Emmerd et al. (2005),
356: but without redshift identification.
357: We now identify this object to be a quasar at $z=0.202$.
358:
359: The $E(B-V)$ values in the direction of quasars/AGNs
360: range from 0.1 to 0.9 with the median value at
361: $E(B-V) = 0.214$.
362: We examined whether there is a correlation between
363: the Balmer decrement and the $E(B-V)$ value. To do so, spectra are
364: arranged according to the order of increasing $E(B-V)$ value in Figure 2.
365: The figure shows that there is a general tendency of weakening of \hb~ flux
366: with respect to \ha~ flux as the $E(B-V)$ values increase.
367: We have plotted the \hb~ to \ha~ ratio versus $E(B-V)$ and confirmed this
368: general trend, but find a large scatter in the relation too.
369: Detailed model-fitting of spectra and the observation during photometric
370: nights may reduce the scatter,
371: but it may not help much, since the large scatter could indicate
372: that the line ratios of some of the quasars/AGNs do not reflect
373: the simple case B recombination
374: (e.g., Glickman et al. 2006; Soifer et al. 2004).
375: The intrinsic scatter in this ratio due to dust absorption
376: within quasars/AGNs and their host galaxies also complicates the interpretation.
377:
378: The radio-to-optical ratios ($R^{*}$) of the newly discovered quasars/AGNs
379: range between 0.1 and 282 with the median value at 1.9. The radio-to-optical
380: flux ratio is defined to be the ratio of flux at the rest-frame
381: 6 cm to 0.44 $\mu$m (Stocke et al. 1992).
382: The 6cm flux is derived from the 21cm flux assuming a power-law
383: of $f_{\nu} \sim \nu^{-0.46}$ (Ho \& Ulvestad 2001), and applying
384: a corresponding power-law $K$-correction in the form of
385: $K(z) = -2.5\,(\alpha + 1)\,log(1+z)$ where $\alpha=-0.46$.
386: The 0.44 $\mu$m
387: flux is derived from the $B$-band apparent magnitude in Table 1,
388: corrected for
389: Galactic extinction (Schlegel et al. 1998), as well as for the
390: $K$-correction derived from the SDSS quasar composite spectrum of
391: Vanden Berk et al. (2001).
392: We find six radio-loud quasars ($R^{*} > 10$) which corresponds
393: to 16\% of our sample, excluding three AGNs. This number is slightly higher
394: than the often-quoted value of 10\% from more complete surveys
395: at the magnitude range of our sample (e.g., Figure 18
396: in Ivezic et al. 2002; Hewett et al. 2001). The difference appears to
397: be at least partially related to the radio selection of our sample.
398:
399: In Figure 3, we plot the $R$-band magnitude distribution of
400: the newly discovered quasars/AGNs, before and after applying
401: the extinction correction assuming the reddening map of
402: Schlegel et al. (1998). Before applying the extinction correction,
403: the distribution peaks at $R \sim 16$ mag, with a wide tail
404: toward $R \sim 18$ mag, showing that our
405: sample completeness is skewed toward the brighter magnitude of
406: $R < 16$ mag.
407: After applying the extinction correction,
408: many $R > 16$ mag quasars/AGNs move toward the $R < 16$ mag area, making
409: our sample appear as if it were selected to be $R \lesssim 16$ mag.
410: Note that the Galactic extinctions, $A_{R}$ and $A_{B}$, range from
411: 0.22 to 2.57 mag and 0.25 to 4.04 mag, respectively,
412: toward the quasars/AGNs.
413:
414: Some of the quasars are found to be fairly bright. If USNO apparent
415: magnitudes are accurate (see Section 3),
416: SNUQSO J035657.03+425540.6 and SNUQSO J062355.21+001843.4 would have
417: $R \lesssim 14$ after Galactic extinction correction, making them
418: two of the brightest quasars discovered to date.
419:
420: The 40 quasars/AGNs are discovered over about 2700 $deg^{2}$ of the sky,
421: and therefore their surface number density is $0.014$ $deg^{-2}$
422: down to $R \lesssim 16$ mag. We compare this number to the surface
423: density of optically selected quasars/AGNs at high Galactic latitude
424: from La Franca \& Cristiani (1997), and also to the radio selected
425: quasars from White et al. (2000).
426: Assuming $B-R \simeq 0.7$ mag for
427: quasars (Becker et al. 2001), our effective magnitude cut of
428: $R < 16$ mag can be converted to
429: $B \lesssim 17$ mag. At that magnitude limit, La Franca \& Cristiani
430: (1997) find the surface number density of quasars to be roughly
431: 0.05 $deg^{-2}$ (See also Croom et al. 2004).
432: On the other hand, White et al. (2000) find about 70 quasars at
433: $R \lesssim 16$ over 2682 $deg^{2}$
434: which gives the surface density of 0.026 $deg^{-2}$.
435: Our surface number density is nearly one half of the radio-selected
436: sample of White et al. (2000).
437: The major reason for the discrepancy is our
438: preferential selection of lower redshift quasars/AGNs with the adopted
439: $J-K$ cut, which leads to the exclusion of about 50\% of $R < 16$
440: quasars at $z \gtrsim 0.4$
441: (see Figure 8 in White et al. 2000). Also, a part of the discrepancy
442: can be explained with the difference in the depth of the radio data
443: (2.5 mJy versus our 1 mJy).
444: The discrepancy in the surface number density from the optically
445: selected sample can be explained by the radio selection as well as
446: the reasons mentioned above.
447: In any case, we expect that our sample is close to
448: complete at the NVSS radio flux limit only for quasars at $R < 16$ and $z \lesssim 0.4$.
449:
450: Objects which are not classified as quasars are mostly Galactic
451: objects, but some have featureless spectra similar to BL Lac objects.
452: These objects will be discussed in a future work.
453:
454:
455:
456: \section{CONCLUSION}
457:
458: By combining the radio and NIR quasar selection algorithm,
459: we have derived an algorithm which is efficient for
460: selecting quasars with a minimal contamination rate.
461: We applied this algorithm to search for quasars in
462: low Galactic latitude regions which are crowded with stars. From
463: the first two observing runs in 2006, we discovered 40 bright quasars/AGNs
464: out of 88 candidates.
465: The newly discovered quasars/AGNs will be useful for various
466: astronomical studies
467: such as the distribution of Galactic matter and the check of reddening
468: maps, and the quasar host galaxy study using a nearby bright star
469: as a guide star.
470:
471:
472: \acknowledgements
473: This work was supported by grant R01-2005-000-10610-0 from the Basic
474: Research Program of the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation.
475: This work uses a CCD camera purchased by a special research
476: grant from the College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University.
477: We thank the staff at BOAO, especially Kang-Min Kim
478: Byeong-Cheol Lee, and Youngbom Jeon for their professional aid
479: during our observing runs, and
480: the staff and scientists at the Maidanak Observatory,
481: especially Rivkat Karimov and Mansur Ibrahimov for their assistance
482: during the imaging observation. We also thank Patrick Hall, Luis C. Ho,
483: Roc Cutri, and Alastair Edge for useful discussions.
484:
485: Facilities: BOAO:1.8m, Maidanak:1.5m
486:
487:
488: \begin{references}
489: \reference{dr4} Adelman-McCarthy, J., et al. 2006, \apjs, 162, 38
490: \reference{bark01} Barkhouse, W. A., \& Hall, P. B. 2001, \aj, 121, 2843
491: \reference{bec2001} Becker, R. H., et al. 2001, \apjs, 135, 227
492: \reference{} Chiu, K., et al. 2007, \mnras, 375, 1180
493: \reference{condon98} Condon, J. J., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 1693
494: \reference{croom2004} Croom, S. M., et al. 2004, \mnras, 349, 1397
495: \reference{cutri00} Cutri, R. M., et al. 2000, in The New Era
496: of Wide-Field Astronomy, ed. R. Clowes (San Francisco : ASP), 232
497: \reference{fan2006} Fan, X, Carilli, C. L., \& Keating, B. 2006, \araa, 44, 415
498: \reference{} Glickman, E., Helfand, D. J., \& White, R. L. 2006, \apj, 640, 579
499: \reference{hag1995} Hagen. H.-J. et al. 1995, \aaps, 111, 195
500: \reference{} Hewett, P. C., Foltz, C. B., \& Chaffee, F. H. 1995, \apj, 109, 1498
501: \reference{} Hewett, P. C., Foltz, C. B., \& Chaffee, F. H. 2001, \aj, 122, 518
502: \reference{} Ho, L. C., \& Ulvestad, J. S. 2001, \apjs, 133, 77
503: \reference{} Ivezic, Z., et al. 2002, \aj, 124, 2364
504: \reference{kaspi2000} Kaspi, S., et al. 2000, \apj, 533, 631
505: \reference{kim2003} Kim, K.-M., et al. 2003, Publ. Korean Astron. Soc. , 18, 81
506: \reference{kim06} Kim, M., H. L. C., \& Im, M. \apj, 642, 702
507: \reference{} La Franca, F., Cristiani, S. 1997, \aj, 113, 1517
508: \reference{} Lee, I., et al. 2008, \apjs, 175, 116
509: \reference{} Maddox, N., \& Hewett, P. C. 2006, \mnras, 367, 717
510: \reference{} Monet, D., et al. 1998, The USNO-A2.0 Catalogue (U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington DC)
511: \reference{nel98} Nelson, B., et al. 1998, in AAS Meeting, 193, 8104
512: \reference{rauch98} Rauch, M. 1998, \araa, 36, 267
513: \reference{ric2004} Richards, G. T., et al. 2004, \apjs, 155, 257
514: \reference{} Robin, A. C., Reyle, C., Derriere, S, \& Picaud, S. 2003, \aa, 409, 523
515: \reference{ss96} Savage, B., D., \& Sembach K. R. 1996, \araa, 34, 279
516: \reference{schlegel98} Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., \& Davis, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
517: \reference{schmidt1963} Schmidt, M., 1963 \nat, 197, 1040S
518: \reference{sg1983} Schmidt, M., \& Green, R. F. 1983, \apj, 269, 352
519: \reference{schn2005} Schneider, D. P., et al. 2005, \aj, 130, 367
520: \reference{schn2005} Schneider, D. P., et al. 2003, \aj, 126, 2579
521: \reference{sembach03} Sembach, K. R., et al. \apjs, 146, 165
522: \reference{skr06} Skrutskie, M. F., et al. 2006, \aj, 131, 1163
523: \reference{} Soifer, B. T., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 151
524: \reference{} Sowards-Emmerd, D., Romani, R. W., Michelson, P. F., Healey, S. E., \& Nolan, P. L. 2005, \apj, 626, 95
525: \reference{} Spagna, A. et al. 1996, \aa, 311, 758
526: \reference{sterngerg03} Sternberg, A. 2003, Nature, 421, 708
527: \reference{} Stocke, J. T., Morris, S. L., Weymann, R. J., \& Foltz, C. B. 1992, \apj, 396, 487
528: \reference{} Vanden Berk, D. E., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 549
529: \reference{vv06} Veron-Cetty, M.-P., Veron, P. 2006, \aap, 455, 773
530: \reference{weymann81} Weymann, R. J., Carswell, R. F., \& Smith, M. G. 1981, \araa, 19 41
531: \reference{whi2000} White, R. L., et al. 2000, \apjs, 126, 133
532: \end{references}
533:
534: \clearpage
535: \begin{deluxetable}{rllrrrllllllrrrrc}
536: \tablecolumns{17}
537: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
538: \rotate
539: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.03in}
540: \tablewidth{8.0in}
541: \tablenum{1}
542: \tablecaption{Properties of the newly discovered quasars/AGNs.}
543: \tablehead{
544: \colhead{ID} &
545: \colhead{SNUQSO Name} &
546: \colhead{R.A.} &
547: \colhead{Decl.} &
548: \colhead{{\it l}} &
549: \colhead{{\it b}} &
550: \colhead{$z$}&
551: \colhead{$R$} &
552: \colhead{$B$} &
553: \colhead{$K$} &
554: \colhead{$J-K$} &
555: \colhead{$M_{R}$}&
556: \colhead{$F$}&
557: \colhead{Ext.}&
558: \colhead{$A_B$}&
559: \colhead{$A_R$}&
560: \colhead{{\it Comm.}}\\
561: \colhead{} &
562: \colhead{} &
563: \colhead{(J2000)} &
564: \colhead{(J2000)} &
565: \colhead{(deg)} &
566: \colhead{(deg)} &
567: \colhead{} &
568: \colhead{(mag)} &
569: \colhead{(mag)} &
570: \colhead{(mag)} &
571: \colhead{(mag)} &
572: \colhead{(mag)} &
573: \colhead{(mJy)} &
574: \colhead{(mag)} &
575: \colhead{(mag)} &
576: \colhead{(mag)} &
577: \colhead{} \\
578: \colhead{(1)} &
579: \colhead{(2)} &
580: \colhead{(3)} &
581: \colhead{(4)} &
582: \colhead{(5)} &
583: \colhead{(6)} &
584: \colhead{(7)} &
585: \colhead{(8)} &
586: \colhead{(9)} &
587: \colhead{(10)} &
588: \colhead{(11)} &
589: \colhead{(12)} &
590: \colhead{(13)} &
591: \colhead{(14)} &
592: \colhead{(15)} &
593: \colhead{(16)} &
594: \colhead{(17)}
595: }
596:
597: \startdata
598: 1&J010629.99+461935.1&01:06:29.99 &46:19:35.1&125.64242 &-16.46592 & 0.1243 &16.3 &18.0 &12.81 &1.78 &-23.0 &10.8 & 0.12 & 0.43 & 0.33 &\\
599: 2&J022540.43+583457.1&02:25:40.43 &58:34:57.1&134.96545 &-2.06997 & 0.0971 &17.0 &18.2 &12.75 &1.61 &-23.9 &8.5 &0.95 & 4.04 & 2.57&IR\\
600: 3&J035657.03+425540.6&03:56:57.03 &42:55:40.6&155.29287 &-7.99082 & 0.0659 &15.0 &16.1 &11.08 &2.17 &-23.9 &14.7 &0.54 & 2.20 & 1.42 &IR, X\\
601: 4&J041239.56+582518.2&04:12:39.56 &58:25:18.2&146.79854 &5.20963 & 0.0675 &16.0 & 17.1 &12.26 &1.69 &-23.7 &3.0 &0.82 & 3.46 & 2.21&\\
602: 5&J042533.12+344719.5&04:25:33.12 &34:47:19.5&165.05205 &-10.03833 & 0.0578 &15.4 &16.6 &11.30 &2.17 &-22.5 &5.8 &0.30 & 1.18 & 0.79&X\\
603: 6&J045458.67+694945.6&04:54:58.67 &69:49:45.6&141.21285 &16.18279 & 0.1401 &15.2 &15.8 &12.10 &2.23 &-24.4 &3.5 &0.14 & 0.49 & 0.36&IR\\
604: 7&J050322.13+592656.0&05:03:22.13 &59:26:56.0&150.38249 &10.78847 & 0.0963 &17.3 &19.0 &12.18 &2.19 &-20.9 &4.7 &0.66 & 2.75 & 1.76&IR\\
605: 8&J051148.53+282127.4&05:11:48.53 &28:21:27.4&176.38036 &-6.50323 & 0.1331 &17.6 &19.3 &12.89 &1.80 &-23.4 &19.0 &0.73 & 3.02 & 1.93&\\
606: 9&J051832.42+031609.4&05:18:32.42 &03:16:09.4&198.84259 &-18.92777 & 0.0572 &15.6 &17.1 &12.64 &1.86 &-21.8 &9.0 &0.11 & 0.38 & 0.30&\\
607: 10&J052807.06+054011.7&05:28:07.06 &05:40:11.7&197.92783 &-15.65704 & 0.1012 &16.5 &17.2 &12.71 &1.83 &-22.9 &28.1 &0.35 & 1.45 & 0.96&IR\\
608: 11&J052901.65+105709.8&05:29:01.65 &10:57:09.8&193.36578 &-12.75781 & 0.0764 &15.8 &16.6 &12.84 &1.56 &-22.9 &3.7 &0.35 & 1.37 & 0.91&X\\
609: 12&J053221.32+393922.1&05:32:21.32 &39:39:22.1&169.46582 &3.39566 & 0.0720 &18.3 &17.8 &12.51 &1.55 &-21.3 &2.8 &0.72 & 3.07 & 1.97&IR\\
610: 13&J054706.34+442026.7&05:47:06.34 &44:20:26.7&166.90147 &8.18474 & 0.1190 &17.0 &16.8 &13.23 &1.60 &-22.7 &4.0 &0.34 & 1.35 & 0.90 &IR\\
611: 14&J054854.50+363250.6&05:48:54.50 &36:32:50.6&173.83374 &4.52368 & 0.0745 &17.2 &19.1 &13.58 &1.54 &-22.4 &5.8 &0.68 & 2.86 & 1.83&IR\\
612: 15&J055447.25+662043.8&05:54:47.25 &66:20:43.8&147.27239 &19.28736 & 0.1859 &14.5 &14.6 &11.41 &2.17 &-25.8 &5.6 &0.16 & 0.59 & 0.43&X\\
613: 16&J060040.11+000618.6&06:00:40.11 &00:06:18.6&206.97350 &-11.22760 & 0.1147 &17.6 &19.0 &11.75 &2.19 &-23.2 &212.7 &0.74 & 3.20 & 2.04&IR\\
614: 17&J061713.50+285138.3&06:17:13.50 &28:51:38.3&183.48294 &5.97938 & 0.1036 &16.4 &17.3 &12.01 &2.04 &-23.9 &10.7 &0.68 & 2.82 & 1.81&IR,X\\
615: 18&J061717.30+430056.0&06:17:17.30 &43:00:56.0&170.68829 &12.38432 & 0.2067 &17.1 &17.3 &13.36 &1.73 &-23.5 &20.9 &0.15 & 0.54 & 0.40&IR\\
616: 19&J062355.21+001843.4&06:23:55.21 &00:18:43.4&209.50422 &-5.97636 & 0.0940 &14.8 &15.4 &11.09 &1.92 &-25.2 &46.7 &0.65 & 2.68 & 1.72 &IR\\
617: 20&J063100.52+503046.2&06:31:00.52 &50:30:46.2&164.56062 &17.54972 & 0.1805 &16.8 &16.7 &13.08 &1.92 &-23.4 &2.7 &0.13 & 0.45 & 0.34&IR\\
618: 21&J063652.52$-$081048.6&06:36:52.52 &$-$08:10:48.6&218.59605 &-6.93935 & 0.2328 &15.7 &15.6 &13.23 &1.64 &-26.1 &2.7&0.48 & 2.00 & 1.30&X\\
619: 22&J064139.37+451002.0&06:41:39.37 &45:10:02.0&170.45824 &17.25334 & 0.2973 &16.3 &16.4 &12.84 &2.08 &-25.1 &24.3 &0.11 & 0.39 & 0.30&X\\
620: 23&J064410.86+354644.6&06:44:10.86 &35:46:44.6&179.66110 &14.10731 & 0.0772 &14.3 &15.9 &11.83 &1.80 &-23.9 &53.7 &0.16 & 0.60 & 0.43 &\\
621: 24&J064856.41+352206.6&06:48:56.41 &35:22:06.6&180.44495 &14.83466 & 0.1193 &15.8 &16.2 &12.90 &1.75 &-23.4 &4.1 &0.12 & 0.42 & 0.32 &X\\
622: 25&J071014.55+131535.2&07:10:14.55 &13:15:35.2&203.12061 &10.11274 & 0.1411 &15.8 &16.2 &12.32 &2.11 &-23.7 &6.7 &0.08 & 0.25 & 0.22&IR\\
623: 26&J071215.61+153930.3&07:12:15.61 &15:39:30.3&201.12942 &11.58509 & 0.1656 &15.3 &16.1 &12.42 &1.79 &-25.0 &4.1 &0.23 & 0.99 & 0.68&X\\
624: 27&J071645.09+002749.8&07:16:45.09 &00:27:49.8&215.41248 &5.84219 & 0.0519 &15.1 &16.3 &12.13 &1.56 &-22.3 &4.1 &0.21 & 0.79 & 0.55&IR\\
625: 28&J073939.54$-$094456.2&07:39:39.54&$-$09:44:56.2&227.16980 &6.08370 & 0.1007 &15.7 &16.1 &12.20 &2.11 &-23.2 &15.2 &0.17 & 0.66 & 0.47 &IR\\
626: 29&J170631.57$-$064638.6&17:06:31.57&$-$06:46:38.6&14.02261 &19.67993 & 0.1046 &16.5 &17.8 &13.03 &1.66 &-23.5 &7.2 &0.55 & 2.34 & 1.45 &IR, X\\
627: 30&J175925.57+171513.5&17:59:25.57 &17:15:13.5&43.04643 &19.05558 & 0.1454 &16.0 &16.8 &13.11 &1.81 &-23.6 &14.3 &0.10 & 0.44 & 0.27 &X\\
628: 31&J180508.94+124253.9&18:05:08.94 &12:42:53.9&39.30022 &15.93342 & 0.1707 &16.7 &17.8 &13.44 &1.82 &-23.6 &12.8 &0.22 & 0.97 & 0.60 &IR\\
629: 32&J193013.80+341049.5&19:30:13.80 &34:10:49.5&67.57943 &7.59368 & 0.0616 &15.9 &17.7 &11.81 &2.32 &-21.9 &3.9 &0.19 & 0.84 & 0.52 &IR\\
630: 33&J193347.16+325426.0&19:33:47.16 &32:54:26.0&66.79822 &6.34119 & 0.0565 &14.5 &15.5 &11.34 &1.70 &-23.3 &4.0 &0.27 & 1.16 & 0.72 &IR, X\\
631: 34&J193521.19+531411.9&19:35:21.19 &53:14:11.9&85.40431 &15.29883 & 0.2478 &15.8 &16.5 &13.15 &1.54 &-25.1 &10.4 &0.11 & 0.50 & 0.31 &IR\\
632: 35&J203332.03+214622.3&20:33:32.03 &21:46:22.3&64.38411 &-10.77715 & 0.1735 &16.2 &17.7 &13.05 &1.74 &-23.9 &340.4 &0.14 & 0.59 & 0.36&\\
633: 36&J210931.88+353257.6&21:09:31.88 &35:32:57.6&80.28167 &-8.35288 & 0.2023 &14.7 &15.7 &13.03 &1.49 &-25.8 &1195.7 &0.16 & 0.61 & 0.38 &IR, X, GB\\
634: 37&J212235.46+273846.5&21:22:35.46 &27:38:46.5&76.26527 &-15.75300 & 0.0909 &16.0 &17.2 &13.23 &1.52 &-22.6 &5.6 &0.13 & 0.59 & 0.36&IR\\
635: 38&J212756.45+271905.8&21:27:56.45 &27:19:05.8&76.86721 &-16.84005 & 0.1974 &16.3 &18.3 &12.64 &2.21 &-24.1 &6.4 &0.12 & 0.50 & 0.31 &IR\\
636: 39&J222719.04+400550.2&22:27:19.04 &40:05:50.2&95.18443 &-14.88447 & 0.0659 &15.6 &16.9 &11.91 &2.19 &-22.2 &6.9 &0.15 & 0.63 & 0.39&IR\\
637: 40&J230329.93+453740.4&23:03:29.93 &45:37:40.4&103.90851 &-13.21915 & 0.3007 &16.5 &17.1 &13.27 &1.89 &-25.6 &5.0 &0.35 & 1.40 & 0.93 &IR\\
638: \enddata
639: \tablenotetext{(8) - (10)}{$R$, $B$, and $K$-band apparent magnitudes, not corrected for Galactic extinction.}
640: \tablenotetext{(11)}{$J-K$ color, not corrected for Galactic extinction.}
641: \tablenotetext{(12)}{$R$-band absolute magnitude, corrected for Galactic extinction}
642: \tablenotetext{(13)}{Flux at $1.4 ~GHz$ from NVSS.}
643: \tablenotetext{(14)}{Reddening parameter, $E(B-V)$}
644: \tablenotetext{(15),(16)}{Extinction at $B$ and $R$-bands in magnitude unit, respectively. $B$-band extinction is
645: calculated using $A_{B} = 3.91\, E(B-V)$ for USNO magnitudes,
646: and $A_{B} = 4.3 \, E(B-V)$ for the Maidanak data. For $A_{R}$, we used
647: $A_{R} = 2.93\,E(B-V)$ for both cases, since the difference in the extinction correction
648: arising from a small discrepancy in conversion factor is less than 0.01 mag
649: between USNO-II $R$ magnitude and the Maidanak $R$ magnitude.}
650: \tablenotetext{(17)}{Comments. `X' stands for X-ray source, and `GB' for Gamma-ray Blazar Candidate.}
651: \end{deluxetable}
652:
653: \clearpage
654: \begin{figure}
655: \label{fig1}
656: \figurenum{1}
657: \plotone{f1.eps}
658: \caption{Distribution of quasars and AGNs in the sky, plotted
659: in Galactic coordinates.
660: Small dots represent the quasars/AGNs brighter than $V < 23$ mag
661: discovered to date, while crosses represent quasars/AGNs brighter than
662: $V = 17$ mag. Note a gap in the distribution
663: between the northern and southern Galactic hemispheres. The newly
664: discovered quasars are marked with squares (from 2006 June run)
665: and triangles (from 2006 December run). {\bf [High quality image is available on electronic journal]}
666: }
667: \end{figure}
668:
669: \clearpage
670: \begin{figure}
671: \label{fig2}
672: \figurenum{2}
673: \plotone{f2.eps}
674: \caption{
675: Optical spectra of the newly discovered quasars, plotted in the order of
676: increasing $E(B-V)$ values. The $E(B-V)$ values increase
677: from top to bottom, left to right.
678: Broad Balmer emission lines and $\oiii$ lines are visible
679: for most of the quasars except for
680: those at the location where the Galactic extinction is high.
681: }
682: \end{figure}
683:
684: \clearpage
685: \begin{figure}
686: \label{fig3}
687: \figurenum{3}
688: \plotone{f3.eps}
689: \caption{
690: $R$-band apparent magnitude of the newly discovered quasars
691: before (squares and solid line) and after (circles and dashed line)
692: the extinction correction. From this figure and
693: the analysis of the surface number density (see text), we find that
694: our sample has an effective optical magnitude cut of $R < 16$ mag.
695: }
696: \end{figure}
697:
698:
699:
700: \end{document}
701: