1: \documentclass[preprint,aps,prd,showpacs,groupedaddress,superscriptaddress,%
2: floatfix,nofootinbib]{revtex4}%
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{amsmath}
5: \usepackage{bm}
6: \setlength\arraycolsep{2pt}
7: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
8: \begin{document}
9: %\preprint{ANL-HEP-PR-07-48}
10: \title{Cornell Potential Parameters for $\bm{S}$-wave Heavy Quarkonia
11: }
12: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
13: \author{Hee~Sok~Chung}
14: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea}
15: \author{Jungil~Lee}
16: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea}
17: \author{Daekyoung~Kang}
18: \affiliation{Physics Department, Ohio State University,
19: Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA}
20:
21: %\date{\today}
22: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
23: \begin{abstract}
24: We compute derived quantities for various values of the model parameter
25: of the Cornell potential
26: model for the $S$-wave heavy quarkonia with radial quantum numbers $n=1$,
27: $2$, and $3$. Our results can be used to determine leading
28: and relative-order-$v^2$ nonrelativistic quantum chromodynamics matrix
29: elements for $S$-wave charmonia and bottomonia such as $\psi(2S)$,
30: $\eta_c(2S)$, and $\Upsilon(nS)$ for $n=1$, $2$, and $3$. These matrix
31: elements will be essential ingredients for resumming relativistic
32: corrections to processes involving those $S$-wave heavy quarkonium states.
33: \end{abstract}
34: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
35: % insert suggested PACS numbers in braces on next line
36: \pacs{12.38.-t, 12.39.Pn, 14.40.Gx}
37:
38:
39: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
40: % insert suggested keywords - APS authors don't need to do this
41: %\keywords{}
42: \maketitle
43:
44: %===========================================================
45: \section{Introduction\label{intro}}
46: %===========================================================
47:
48: One of the most interesting recent developments in heavy-quarkonium
49: phenomenology is the introduction of a new technique for resumming
50: relativistic corrections to $S$-wave quarkonium production
51: and decay rates. The technique resums corrections to all orders in the
52: heavy-quark velocity $v$ in the heavy-quark-antiquark ($Q\bar{Q}$)
53: rest frame~\cite{Bodwin:2006dn,Bodwin:2007fz} within the color-singlet
54: mechanism of the nonrelativistic quantum chromodynamics (NRQCD)
55: factorization approach~\cite{Bodwin:1994jh}. With the method,
56: the relative-order-$v^2$ NRQCD matrix element for the $S$-wave
57: charmonium, which has a power-ultraviolet divergence and needs
58: subtraction, has been evaluated with improved
59: accuracy~\cite{Bodwin:2006dn,Bodwin:2007fz}
60: compared with lattice calculations~\cite{bks} and with the
61: determination~\cite{Braaten:2002fi}
62: obtained by using the Gremm-Kapustin relation~\cite{Gremm:1997dq}.
63: In Ref.~\cite{Bodwin:2006dn}, the generalized version of the
64: Gremm-Kapustin relation within the Cornell
65: potential model~\cite{Eichten:1978tg} was derived.
66: The generalized Gremm-Kapustin relation allows one to resum a
67: class of relativistic corrections in a potential-model color-singlet
68: $Q\bar{Q}$ wave function. The resummation method has also been applied
69: to determine leading-order NRQCD matrix elements for the $1S$ charmonium
70: states. The resultant values for the matrix elements are significantly
71: greater than those known previously~\cite{Bodwin:2006dn,Bodwin:2007fz}.
72: In addition, the method has provided a reasonable
73: solution~\cite{Bodwin:2007ga} to the long-standing puzzle
74: of the cross section for $e^+e^-\to J/\psi+\eta_c$
75: measured at the $B$-factories~\cite{puzzle},
76: which has been one of the greatest discrepancies between theory and
77: experiment within the Standard Model.
78:
79:
80:
81: Therefore, it is worthwhile to extend this method to study radially
82: excited $S$-wave charmonia, $\psi(2S)$ and $\eta_c(2S)$, and
83: spin-triplet $S$-wave bottomonia, $\Upsilon(nS)$, with radial
84: quantum numbers $n=1$, $2$, and $3$. Unfortunately, the potential-model
85: parameters and derived quantities reported in
86: Ref.~\cite{Bodwin:2006dn} are only for the $1S$ and the $2S$ states.
87: The tabulation of the parameters in Ref.~\cite{Bodwin:2006dn} is
88: not convenient to use in combination with the improved version of
89: the resummation method reported in Ref.~\cite{Bodwin:2007fz}, which
90: considered only the $1S$ charmonium states.
91:
92:
93: In this paper, we compute derived quantities for various values of the
94: model parameter
95: of the Cornell potential model for $S$-wave heavy quarkonia
96: with radial quantum numbers $n=1$, $2$, and $3$. The Cornell potential
97: is a linear combination of the Coulomb and linear potentials.
98: Following Ref.~\cite{Eichten:1978tg}, we rescale the Schr\"odinger
99: equation and solve the equation numerically
100: for various values of the model parameter $\lambda$, which determines
101: the strength of the Coulomb potential relative to the linear potential.
102: To achieve improved accuracies in calculating energy eigenvalues, we use
103: the numerical method\footnote{
104: In previous calculations in Refs.~\cite{Bodwin:2006dm,Bodwin:2006dn},
105: the authors quoted the energy eigenvalues determined in
106: Ref.~\cite{Eichten:1978tg}. A recently improved analysis given in
107: Ref.~\cite{Bodwin:2007fz} employed the numerical method used in the
108: present work.}
109: given in Refs.~\cite{Kang:2006jd,Aichinger:2005}.
110: The potential-model parameters and derived quantities are listed as
111: functions of $\lambda$. These parameters are ready for use to
112: determine leading and relative-order-$v^2$ color-singlet NRQCD matrix
113: elements for both $S$-wave charmonia and bottomonia.
114:
115: The remainder of this paper is organized as follows.
116: In Sec.~\ref{sec:model}, we give a brief description of the Cornell
117: potential model. Our numerical results are given in Sec.~\ref{sec:result},
118: which is followed by a discussion in Sec.~\ref{sec:discussion}.
119:
120: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
121: \section{Potential Model\label{sec:model}}
122: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
123: In order to compute leading and higher-order color-singlet NRQCD
124: matrix elements for an $S$-wave heavy quarkonium with the radial
125: quantum number $n=1$, $2$, or $3$, we need to compute the binding
126: energy $\epsilon_{nS}$ of the $nS$ state that appears in the
127: generalized Gremm-Kapustin relation~\cite{Bodwin:2006dn,Gremm:1997dq}.
128: In this section, we describe briefly the Cornell potential
129: model~\cite{Eichten:1978tg} that we use to compute $\epsilon_{nS}$.
130: We refer the reader to Refs.~\cite{Bodwin:2006dn,Bodwin:2007fz}
131: which contain more complete descriptions of the model in conjunction
132: with the NRQCD factorization formalism and the resummation technique
133: for relativistic corrections to quarkonium processes.
134:
135:
136: We employ the Cornell potential~\cite{Eichten:1978tg},
137: which parametrizes the $Q\bar Q$ potential $V(r)$ as a linear combination
138: of the Coulomb and linear potentials:
139: %---------------
140: \begin{equation}
141: V(r)=-\frac{\kappa}{r}+\sigma r,
142: \label{model-V}%
143: \end{equation}
144: %---------------
145: where $\kappa$ is a model parameter for the Coulomb
146: strength and $\sigma$ is the string tension. The relation between
147: the string tension $\sigma$ and the corresponding parameter $a$
148: in the original formulation of the Cornell potential model
149: \cite{Eichten:1978tg} is $a=1/\sqrt{\sigma}$.
150: By varying the parameters in the Cornell potential, one can obtain good
151: fits to lattice measurements of the $Q\bar Q$ static potential
152: \cite{Bali:2000gf}. Therefore, we assume that the use of the Cornell
153: parametrization of the $Q\bar Q$ potential should result in errors that are
154: much less than the order-$v^2$ errors (about 30\% for a charmonium and
155: about 10\% for a bottomonium) that are inherent in the leading-potential
156: approximation to NRQCD~\cite{Bodwin:2006dn,Bodwin:2007fz}.
157:
158: The Schr\"{o}dinger equation for the $S$-wave radial wave function
159: $R_{nS}(r)$ with the radial quantum number $n$ is
160: %---------------
161: \begin{equation}
162: \left[
163: -\frac{1}{mr^2} \frac{d}{dr}\left( r^2 \frac{d}{dr}\right)
164: +V(r)
165: \right]R_{nS}(r)=\epsilon_{nS} R_{nS}(r),
166: \label{radial}%
167: \end{equation}
168: %---------------
169: where $m$ is the quark mass and $\epsilon_{nS}$ is the binding energy for
170: the $nS$ state. The model parameter $m$ is distinguished
171: from the heavy-quark mass $m_Q$ that appears in the short-distance
172: coefficients of NRQCD factorization formulas. For an $S$-wave state,
173: the wave function is $\psi_{nS}(r)=R_{nS}(r)/\sqrt{4\pi}$.
174:
175: The Schr\"{o}dinger equation in Eq.~(\ref{radial}) depends on
176: the model parameters $m$ and $\kappa$, where
177: we assume that the string tension $\sigma$ is common to both
178: charmonium and bottomonium states and that the value for $\sigma$ can be
179: determined from lattice measurements of the $Q\bar{Q}$ static
180: potential.
181: Then, the dependence on the flavor appears through $m$ and $\kappa$.
182: Introducing the scaled radius $\rho$ and scaled coupling
183: $\lambda$~\cite{Eichten:1978tg},
184: %---------------
185: \begin{subequations}
186: \begin{eqnarray}
187: \rho&=&(\sigma m)^{1/3}\, r,
188: \label{r-rho}%
189: \\
190: \lambda&=&\frac{\kappa}{(\sigma/m^2)^{1/3}},
191: \label{kappa-lambda}%
192: \end{eqnarray}
193: \label{dimensionless}%
194: \end{subequations}
195: %---------------
196: which are dimensionless, one can rewrite the radial equation
197: in Eq.~(\ref{radial}) as~\cite{Eichten:1978tg}
198: %----------------
199: \begin{equation}
200: \left[
201: \frac{d^2}{d\rho^2}
202: +\frac{\lambda}{\rho}-\rho+\zeta_{nS}
203: \right]u_{nS}(\rho)=0,
204: \label{eq:u}%
205: \end{equation}
206: %----------------
207: where $u_{nS}(\rho)$ and $\zeta_{nS}$ are the dimensionless radial
208: wave function and the dimensionless energy eigenvalue of the $nS$
209: state, respectively. The relation between $R_{nS}(r)$ and
210: $u_{nS}(\rho)$ is
211: %----------------
212: \begin{equation}
213: \label{eq:psir}%
214: R_{nS}(r)=
215: \sqrt{\sigma m}
216: \, \frac{u_{nS}(\rho)}{\rho},
217: \end{equation}
218: %----------------
219: where the wave functions are normalized according to
220: %----------------
221: \begin{equation}
222: \int_0^\infty |u_{nS}(\rho)|^2 d\rho
223: =\int_0^\infty |R_{nS}(r)|^2 r^2dr=1.
224: \end{equation}
225: %----------------
226: The binding energy is related to the dimensionless eigenvalue
227: $\zeta_{nS}$ as
228: %----------------
229: \begin{equation}
230: \epsilon_{nS}=
231: [\sigma^2/m]^{1/3}\zeta_{nS}(\lambda).
232: \label{eq:ezeta}%
233: \end{equation}
234: %----------------
235:
236: Note that Eq.~(\ref{eq:u}) depends only on $\lambda$. Therefore,
237: the scaled equation can be solved for a given $\lambda$ to get
238: the wave function $u_{nS}(\rho)$ and the eigenvalue $\zeta_{nS}$.
239: The flavor dependence appears when we invert them to get the radial
240: wave function $R_{nS}(r)$ and the energy eigenvalue $\epsilon_{nS}$.
241: In this step, $m$ looks independent of the model parameter $\lambda$.
242: However, we can express $m$ in terms of $\sigma$, $\lambda$,
243: and the $1S$-$2S$ mass
244: splitting~\cite{Eichten:1978tg,Bodwin:2006dn,Bodwin:2007fz}:
245: %----------------
246: \begin{equation}
247: m (\lambda)=
248: \sigma^2 \left[\frac{\zeta_{2S}(\lambda)-\zeta_{1S}(\lambda)}
249: {m_{2S}-m_{1S}}\right]^3.
250: \label{m-lam}%
251: \end{equation}
252: %----------------
253: For $S$-wave states, the wave function at the origin
254: $\psi_{nS}(0)=R_{nS}(0)/\sqrt{4\pi}$ can be expressed
255: as~\cite{Eichten:1978tg,Bodwin:2006dn,Bodwin:2007fz}
256: %----------------
257: \begin{equation}
258: |\psi_{nS}(0)|^2
259: =\frac{m}{4\pi}\int d^3r
260: |\psi_{nS}(r)|^2
261: \frac{\partial V(r)}{\partial\, r}
262: =\frac{\sigma\, m(\lambda)}{4\pi}
263: \left[
264: 1+\lambda F_{nS}(\lambda)
265: \right]
266: ,
267: \label{eq:psi0rhom2}%
268: \end{equation}
269: %----------------
270: where $F_{nS}(\lambda)$ is the expectation value of $1/\rho^2$
271: for the $nS$ state:
272: %----------------
273: \begin{equation}
274: F_{nS}(\lambda)=
275: \int_0^\infty \frac{d\rho}{\rho^2} \,\left|u_{nS}(\rho)\right|^2.
276: \label{eq:rhom2}%
277: \end{equation}
278: %----------------
279:
280: For purposes of computation of the NRQCD matrix elements, it is
281: convenient to express those matrix elements in terms of the
282: potential-model parameters listed above.
283: A convenient parametrization can
284: be found in Ref.~\cite{Bodwin:2007fz}.
285: According to Ref.~\cite{Bodwin:2007fz},
286: the leading-order NRQCD matrix element for the $S$-wave
287: heavy quarkonium depends on $\lambda$, $m(\lambda)$,
288: and $F_{nS}(\lambda)$.
289: The ratio of the relative-order-$v^2$ NRQCD matrix element to the
290: leading-order one is proportional to $\zeta_{nS}(\lambda)$.
291: The electromagnetic decay rate for the quarkonium, in which
292: relativistic corrections to all orders in $v$ are resummed, is
293: expressed in terms of these NRQCD matrix elements~\cite{Bodwin:2007fz}.
294: Because $m(\lambda)$, $F_{nS}(\lambda)$, and $\zeta_{nS}(\lambda)$
295: depend on $\lambda$, the decay rate is completely determined by $\lambda$.
296: Determination of the best value for $\lambda$ can be made by imposing
297: a requirement that the resummed formula for the decay rate should reproduce
298: the measured rate. Therefore, the leading-order and the relative-order-$v^2$
299: NRQCD matrix elements are completely determined~\cite{Bodwin:2007fz}.
300:
301: %===========================================================
302: \section{Numerical Results \label{sec:result}}
303: %===========================================================
304: %--------------------------------------------------------
305: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
306: % tables should appear as floats within the text
307: % Here is an example of the general form of a table:
308: % Fill in the caption in the braces of the \caption{} command. Put the label
309: % that you will use with \ref{} command in the braces of the \label{} command.
310: % Insert the column specifiers (l, r, c, d, etc.) in the empty braces of the
311: % \begin{tabular}{} command.
312: % The ruledtabular enviroment adds doubled rules to table and sets a
313: % reasonable default table settings.
314: % Use the table* environment to get a full-width table in two-column
315: % Add \usepackage{longtable} and the longtable (or longtable*}
316: % environment for nicely formatted long tables. Or use the [H]
317: % placement option to break a long table (with less control than
318: % in longtable).
319: \begin{table}%[H] add [H] placement to break table across pages
320: \caption{\label{table:param}
321: Scaled energy eigenvalues $\zeta_{nS}$ and $F_{nS}$ of the $S$-wave
322: heavy quarkonium with radial quantum numbers $n=1$, $2$, and $3$
323: as functions of the Coulomb strength parameter $\lambda$.}
324: \begin{ruledtabular}
325: \begin{tabular}{crrrrrr}
326: $\lambda$ &
327: $\zeta_{1S}$\mbox{\hspace{2.7ex}}& $F_{1S}$\mbox{\hspace{1.2ex}}&
328: $\zeta_{2S}$\mbox{\hspace{2.7ex}}& $F_{2S}$\mbox{\hspace{1.2ex}}&
329: $\zeta_{3S}$\mbox{\hspace{2.7ex}}& $F_{3S}$\mbox{\hspace{1.2ex}}
330: \\
331: \hline
332: 0.0& 2.338107&1.1248&4.087949&0.8237&5.520560&0.6983\\[-0.8ex]
333: 0.1& 2.253678&1.1869&4.029425&0.8525&5.473169&0.7178\\[-0.8ex]
334: 0.2& 2.167316&1.2532&3.970286&0.8821&5.425462&0.7375\\[-0.8ex]
335: 0.3& 2.078949&1.3237&3.910531&0.9125&5.377441&0.7576\\[-0.8ex]
336: 0.4& 1.988504&1.3989&3.850160&0.9437&5.329112&0.7780\\[-0.8ex]
337: 0.5& 1.895904&1.4789&3.789174&0.9756&5.280478&0.7987\\[-0.8ex]
338: 0.6& 1.801074&1.5641&3.727575&1.0083&5.231545&0.8196\\[-0.8ex]
339: 0.7& 1.703935&1.6546&3.665364&1.0417&5.182316&0.8408\\[-0.8ex]
340: 0.8& 1.604409&1.7507&3.602543&1.0758&5.132798&0.8622\\[-0.8ex]
341: 0.9& 1.502415&1.8527&3.539116&1.1105&5.082996&0.8837\\[-0.8ex]
342: 1.0& 1.397876&1.9608&3.475087&1.1459&5.032914&0.9054\\[-0.8ex]
343: 1.1& 1.290709&2.0753&3.410458&1.1818&4.982560&0.9272\\[-0.8ex]
344: 1.2& 1.180834&2.1965&3.345233&1.2183&4.931938&0.9492\\[-0.8ex]
345: 1.3& 1.068171&2.3246&3.279418&1.2552&4.881053&0.9712\\[-0.8ex]
346: 1.4& 0.952640&2.4599&3.213016&1.2927&4.829913&0.9933\\[-0.8ex]
347: 1.5& 0.834162&2.6026&3.146031&1.3306&4.778522&1.0155\\[-0.8ex]
348: 1.6& 0.712658&2.7529&3.078468&1.3689&4.726886&1.0377\\[-0.8ex]
349: 1.7& 0.588049&2.9110&3.010330&1.4077&4.675010&1.0598\\[-0.8ex]
350: 1.8& 0.460260&3.0773&2.941621&1.4468&4.622899&1.0820\\[-0.8ex]
351: 1.9& 0.329215&3.2518&2.872344&1.4862&4.570560&1.1041\\[-0.8ex]
352: 2.0& 0.194841&3.4348&2.802503&1.5260&4.517996&1.1262\\[-0.8ex]
353: 2.1& 0.057065&3.6264&2.732099&1.5662&4.465212&1.1482\\[-0.8ex]
354: 2.2&$-$0.084182&3.8269&2.661134&1.6066&4.412212&1.1702\\[-0.8ex]
355: 2.3&$-$0.228969&4.0364&2.589611&1.6474&4.359001&1.1921\\[-0.8ex]
356: 2.4&$-$0.377362&4.2550&2.517529&1.6885&4.305582&1.2139\\[-0.8ex]
357: 2.5&$-$0.529425&4.4829&2.444888&1.7299&4.251959&1.2356\\[-0.8ex]
358: 2.6&$-$0.685221&4.7202&2.371688&1.7716&4.198135&1.2573\\[-0.8ex]
359: 2.7&$-$0.844808&4.9670&2.297928&1.8137&4.144112&1.2788\\[-0.8ex]
360: 2.8&$-$1.008244&5.2235&2.223605&1.8561&4.089893&1.3002\\[-0.8ex]
361: 2.9&$-$1.175584&5.4897&2.148718&1.8989&4.035481&1.3216\\[-0.8ex]
362: 3.0&$-$1.346882&5.7657&2.073261&1.9421&3.980877&1.3428
363: \end{tabular}
364: \end{ruledtabular}
365: \end{table}
366: % Surround table environment with turnpage environment for landscape
367: % table
368: % \begin{turnpage}
369: % \begin{table}
370: % \caption{\label{}}
371: % \begin{ruledtabular}
372: % \begin{tabular}{}
373: % \end{tabular}
374: % \end{ruledtabular}
375: % \end{table}
376: % \end{turnpage}
377: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
378:
379: In this section, we list our numerical values for the parameters and
380: derived quantities for the $S$-wave heavy quarkonia with radial
381: quantum numbers $n=1$, $2$, and $3$. In order to provide a set of
382: parameters that can be used for both charmonia and bottomonia,
383: we list the values for $\zeta_{nS}$ and $F_{nS}$ that are common
384: to both cases. In Table \ref{table:param}, we tabulate those values
385: as functions of the model parameter $\lambda$, whose range
386: has been chosen so that the parameters can be used to determine
387: the NRQCD matrix elements for both charmonia and bottomonia.
388: The dependence of the eigenvalues $\zeta_{nS}$ and $F_{nS}$ on $\lambda$
389: are shown in Figs.~\ref{figure1} and \ref{figure2}, respectively.
390:
391: In Ref.~\cite{Kang:2006jd}, the authors solved the Schr\"odinger equation
392: in Eq.~(\ref{radial}) numerically by using the inverse iteration
393: method introduced in Ref.~\cite{Aichinger:2005}.
394: The method uses a trial wave packet which is a
395: linear combination of the eigenfunctions for a given system and
396: the amplification operator of the form $(H-\zeta_{\rm trial})^{-1}$,
397: where $H$ is the Hamiltonian of the system and
398: $\zeta_{\rm trial}$ is a trial eigenvalue. If this operator acts on
399: an eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian, then the operator yields
400: a multiplicative factor $(\zeta-\zeta_{\rm trial})^{-1}$,
401: where $\zeta$ is the eigenvalue of that eigenfunction.
402: As $\zeta_{\rm trial}$ gets closer to $\zeta$, the multiplicative
403: factor blows up. Therefore, if this operator acts on
404: a wave packet, then an eigenfunction, whose eigenvalue is the nearest
405: to $\zeta_{\rm trial}$, is selectively amplified. Therefore,
406: by applying the operator repeatedly, one could obtain the eigenfunction
407: and the corresponding eigenvalue from the expectation value of the
408: Hamiltonian. By varying $\zeta_{\rm trial}$, one could also obtain
409: the energy spectrum. The details of the numerical method can be found in
410: Refs.~\cite{Kang:2006jd,Aichinger:2005}.
411: Here, we use this method to generate Table \ref{table:param}.
412: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
413: \begin{figure}[t]
414: \begin{center}
415: \includegraphics[width=11.0cm]{fig1.eps}
416: \vspace{0.2cm}
417: \caption{Eigenvalues $\zeta_{nS}$ as functions of $\lambda$.
418: }
419: \label{figure1}
420: \end{center}
421: \end{figure}
422: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
423:
424: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
425: \begin{figure}[t]
426: \begin{center}
427: \includegraphics[width=11.0cm]{fig2.eps}
428: \vspace{0.2cm}
429: \caption{$F_{nS}$ as functions of $\lambda$.
430: }
431: \label{figure2}
432: \end{center}
433: \end{figure}
434: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
435:
436: If one substitutes $\zeta_{nS}(\lambda)$ listed in Table \ref{table:param}
437: and the measured $1S$-$2S$ mass splitting for either the charmonium
438: or the bottomonium into Eq.~(\ref{m-lam}), one can obtain the mass
439: parameter $m(\lambda)$ as a function of $\lambda$.
440: $\epsilon_{nS}$ and $\psi_{nS}(0)$ are calculable by substituting
441: the parameters $\zeta_{nS}(\lambda)$, $m(\lambda)$, and
442: $F_{nS}(\lambda)$ into Eqs.~(\ref{eq:ezeta}) and (\ref{eq:psi0rhom2}),
443: respectively. A convenient way to determine the optimal value for
444: the parameter $\lambda$ is given in
445: Refs.~\cite{Bodwin:2006dn,Bodwin:2007fz}.
446:
447:
448:
449: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
450: %===========================================================
451: \section{Discussion \label{sec:discussion}}
452: %===========================================================
453: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
454:
455: We have computed derived quantities for various values of the model parameter
456: of the Cornell potential model for the $S$-wave heavy quarkonia
457: with radial quantum numbers $n=1$, $2$, and $3$. The scaled Schr\"odinger
458: equation is solved numerically for various values for the model parameter
459: $\lambda$ which determines the strength of the Coulomb potential relative
460: to the linear potential. The scaled energy eigenvalue $\zeta_{nS}$ and
461: a derived potential quantity $F_{nS}$ are computed as functions of
462: $\lambda$. These numbers are useful in determining the leading and
463: relative-order-$v^2$ NRQCD matrix elements for both $S$-wave charmonia
464: and bottomonia with radial quantum numbers $n=1$, $2$, and $3$.
465: As an application, the leading-order NRQCD matrix elements for the
466: $\Upsilon(nS)$ have already been calculated and used to determine
467: the branching fractions and charm-momentum distributions for the
468: inclusive charm production in $\Upsilon(nS)$ decays, which are being
469: analyzed by the CLEO Collaboration~\cite{Kang:2007uv}. The result
470: listed in this paper can also be used to determine the NRQCD matrix
471: elements for the $2S$ charmonium states.
472: Once recent studies~ \cite{Chung:2007ke,Lee:2007kf,Lee:2007kg}
473: to compute relativistic corrections to the leptonic width of the $S$-wave
474: spin-triplet quarkonium are extended to complete the resummation of
475: relativistic corrections to the process at next-to-leading order in
476: $\alpha_s$, our results can also be used to determine the leading-order
477: and relative-order-$v^2$ NRQCD matrix elements for the $S$-wave quarkonium
478: with accuracies better than the best available values in
479: Ref.~\cite{Bodwin:2007fz}.
480:
481:
482:
483: %--------------------------------------------------------------------
484: \begin{acknowledgments}
485: %--------------------------------------------------------------------
486: % put your acknowledgments here.
487: We wish to thank Geoff Bodwin for checking the values of the parameters for
488: the $1S$ state, which were published in Refs.\cite{Bodwin:2006dn,%
489: Bodwin:2007fz}, and useful discussions.
490: We also express our gratitude to Eunil Won for a useful discussion on the
491: numerical method in Ref.~\cite{Kang:2006jd}. Critical reading of the
492: manuscript by Chaehyun Yu is also acknowledged.
493: %
494: The work of HSC was supported by the Korea Research Foundation
495: under MOEHRD Basic Research Promotion grant KRF-2006-311-C00020.
496: %
497: The work of DK was supported by the Basic Research Program of the
498: Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) under Grant No.
499: R01-2005-000-10089-0.
500: %
501: The work of JL was supported by the Korea Research Foundation
502: under Grant No. KRF-2004-015-C00092.
503: \end{acknowledgments}
504:
505:
506: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
507: \begin{thebibliography}{}
508: %\cite{Bodwin:2006dn}
509: \bibitem{Bodwin:2006dn}
510: G.~T.~Bodwin, D.~Kang, and J.~Lee,
511: %``Potential-model calculation of an order-v**2 NRQCD matrix element,''
512: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 74}, 014014 (2006)
513: [arXiv:hep-ph/0603186].
514: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D74,014014;%%
515: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
516:
517: %\cite{Bodwin:2007fz}
518: \bibitem{Bodwin:2007fz}
519: G.~T.~Bodwin, H.~S.~Chung, D.~Kang, J.~Lee, and C.~Yu,
520: %``Improved determination of color-singlet nonrelativistic
521: % QCD matrix elements
522: %for S-wave charmonium,''
523: arXiv:0710.0994 [hep-ph].
524: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0710.0994;%%
525:
526: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
527: %\cite{Bodwin:1994jh}
528: \bibitem{Bodwin:1994jh}
529: G.~T.~Bodwin, E.~Braaten, and G.~P.~Lepage,
530: %``Rigorous QCD analysis of inclusive annihilation and production
531: % of heavy quarkonium,''
532: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51}, 1125 (1995);
533: {\bf 55}, 5853(E) (1997)
534: [arXiv:hep-ph/9407339].
535:
536: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
537: \bibitem{bks}
538: G.~T.~Bodwin, S.~Kim, and D.~K.~Sinclair,
539: %``Matrix elements for the decays of S and P wave quarkonium:
540: %An exploratory study,''
541: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B, Proc.\ Suppl. {\bf 34}, 434 (1994);
542: %%CITATION = NUPHZ,34,434;%%
543: %\bibitem{bks-2}
544: %G.~T.~Bodwin, S.~Kim and D.~K.~Sinclair,
545: %``Decays rates for S wave and P wave bottomonium,''
546: %Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\
547: {\bf 42}, 306 (1995)
548: [arXiv:hep-lat/9412011];
549: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9412011;%%
550: %\bibitem{bks-3}
551: G.~T.~Bodwin, D.~K.~Sinclair, and S.~Kim,
552: %``Quarkonium decay matrix elements from quenched lattice QCD,''
553: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 77}, 2376 (1996)
554: [arXiv:hep-lat/9605023];
555: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9605023;%%
556: %\bibitem{bks-4}
557: %G.~T.~Bodwin, D.~K.~Sinclair and S.~Kim,
558: %``Lattice calculation of quarkonium decay matrix elements,''
559: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 12}, 4019 (1997)
560: [arXiv:hep-ph/9609371];
561: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9609371;%%
562: %\bibitem{bks-4}
563: %G.~T.~Bodwin, D.~K.~Sinclair and S.~Kim,
564: %``Bottomonium decay matrix elements from lattice QCD with two light
565: %quarks,''
566: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 054504 (2002)
567: [arXiv:hep-lat/0107011].
568: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0107011;%%
569:
570: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
571: %\cite{Braaten:2002fi}
572: \bibitem{Braaten:2002fi}
573: E.~Braaten and J.~Lee,
574: %``Exclusive double-charmonium production in e+ e- annihilation,''
575: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 054007 (2003);
576: {\bf 72}, 099901(E) (2005)
577: [arXiv:hep-ph/0211085].
578:
579: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
580: %\cite{Gremm:1997dq}
581: \bibitem{Gremm:1997dq}
582: M.~Gremm and A.~Kapustin,
583: %``Annihilation of S-wave quarkonia and the measurement of alpha(s),''
584: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 407}, 323 (1997)
585: [arXiv:hep-ph/9701353].
586: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B407,323;%%
587:
588: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
589: %\cite{Eichten:1978tg}
590: \bibitem{Eichten:1978tg}
591: E.~Eichten, K.~Gottfried, T.~Kinoshita, K.~D.~Lane, and T.~M.~Yan,
592: %``Charmonium: The Model,''
593: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 17}, 3090 (1978);
594: {\bf 21}, 313(E) (1980).
595: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D17,3090;%%
596:
597: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
598: %\cite{Bodwin:2007ga}
599: \bibitem{Bodwin:2007ga}
600: G.~T.~Bodwin, J.~Lee, and C.~Yu,
601: %``Resummation of Relativistic Corrections to e+ e- -> J/psi+eta_c,''
602: arXiv:0710.0995 [hep-ph].
603: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0710.0995;%%
604:
605: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
606: %\cite{puzzle}
607: \bibitem{puzzle}
608: See, for example,
609: G.~T.~Bodwin,
610: %``Inclusive quarkonium production and the NRQCD-factorization approach,''
611: J.\ Korean Phys.\ Soc.\ {\bf 45}, S306 (2004)
612: [arXiv:hep-ph/0312173];
613: J.~Lee,
614: %``Exclusive two-charmonium vs. charmonium-glueball production at BELLE,''
615: J.\ Korean Phys.\ Soc.\ {\bf 45}, S354 (2004)
616: [arXiv:hep-ph/0312251] and references therein.
617: %%CITATION = JKPSD,45,S354;%%
618:
619: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
620: %\cite{Bodwin:2006dm}
621: \bibitem{Bodwin:2006dm}
622: G.~T.~Bodwin, D.~Kang, and J.~Lee,
623: %``Reconciling the light-cone and NRQCD approaches to calculating e+ e- -->
624: %J/psi + eta/c,''
625: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 74}, 114028 (2006)
626: [arXiv:hep-ph/0603185].
627: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D74,114028;%%
628:
629: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
630: %\cite{Kang:2006jd}
631: \bibitem{Kang:2006jd}
632: D.~Kang and E.~Won,
633: %``Precise Numerical Solutions of Potential Problems Using Crank-Nicholson
634: %Method,''
635: arXiv:physics/0609176.
636: %%CITATION = PHYSICS/0609176;%%
637:
638: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
639: %\cite{Aichinger:2005}
640: \bibitem{Aichinger:2005}
641: M. Aichingera and E. Krotscheck,
642: %``A fast configuration space method for solving local Kohn?“Sham equations,''
643: Comput.\ Mater.\ Sci.\ {\bf 34}, 188 (2005).
644:
645: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
646: %\cite{Bali:2000gf}
647: \bibitem{Bali:2000gf}
648: G.~S.~Bali,
649: %``QCD forces and heavy quark bound states,''
650: Phys.\ Rep.\ {\bf 343}, 1 (2001)
651: [arXiv:hep-ph/0001312].
652: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0001312;%%
653:
654:
655: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
656: %\cite{Kang:2007uv}
657: \bibitem{Kang:2007uv}
658: D.~Kang, T.~Kim, J.~Lee, and C.~Yu,
659: %``Inclusive Charm Production in Upsilon(nS) Decay,''
660: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 76}, 114018 (2007)
661: [arXiv:0707.4056 [hep-ph]].
662: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D76,114018;%%
663:
664: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
665: %\cite{Chung:2007ke}
666: \bibitem{Chung:2007ke}
667: H.~S.~Chung, J.~Lee, and C.~H.~Yu,
668: %``Resumming relativistic corrections to Gamma [J/psi $\to$ e+ e-],''
669: J.\ Korean Phys.\ Soc.\ {\bf 50}, L357 (2007).
670: %%CITATION = JKPSD,50,L357;%%
671: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
672: %\cite{Lee:2007kf}
673: \bibitem{Lee:2007kf}
674: J.~Lee, H.~K.~Noh, and C.~H.~Yu,
675: %``One-loop master integral for order-v**2n relativistic corrections to
676: %Gamma[J/psi $\to$ e+ e-],''
677: J.\ Korean Phys.\ Soc.\ {\bf 50}, 398 (2007).
678: %%CITATION = JKPSD,50,398;%%
679:
680: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
681: %\cite{Lee:2007kg}
682: \bibitem{Lee:2007kg}
683: J.~Lee, H.~K.~Noh, and C.~H.~Yu,
684: %``One-loop scalar integrals contributing to resummation of relativistic
685: %corrections to Gamma[J/psi $\to$ e+ e-],''
686: J.\ Korean Phys.\ Soc.\ {\bf 50}, 403 (2007).
687: %%CITATION = JKPSD,50,403;%%
688:
689: \end{thebibliography}{}
690:
691: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
692:
693: \end{document}
694:
695: