1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
3: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
4:
5: \shorttitle{Absence of BL AGNs in CGs}
6: \shortauthors{Mart\'{\i}nez et al.}
7:
8: \begin{document}
9:
10: \title{Deficiency of Broad Line AGNs in Compact Groups of Galaxies}
11:
12:
13: \author{M. A. Mart\'{\i}nez\altaffilmark{1} and A. Del Olmo\altaffilmark{1}}
14: \affil{Instituto de Astrof\'{\i}sica de Andaluc\'{\i}a, CSIC, Apdo. 3004,
15: 18080 Granada, Spain}
16: \email{geli@iaa.es, chony@iaa.es}
17: \author{R. Coziol\altaffilmark{2} }
18: \affil{Departamento de Astronom\'{\i}a, Universidad de Guanajuato,
19: Apdo. 144, 36000 Guanajuato, Mexico}
20: \email{rcoziol@astro.ugto.mx}
21: \and
22: \author{P. Focardi\altaffilmark{3}}
23: \affil{Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universit{\`a} di Bologna, via
24: Ranzani 1, 40127 Bologna, Italy}
25: \email{paola.focardi@unibo.it}
26:
27: \begin{abstract}
28: Based on a new survey of AGN activity in Compact Groups of Galaxies,
29: we report a remarkable deficiency of Broad Line AGNs as compared to
30: Narrow Line AGNs. The cause of such deficiency could be related to
31: the average low luminosity of AGNs in CGs: $10^{39}$ erg s$^{-1}$.
32: This result may imply lower accretion rates in CG AGNs, making Broad
33: Line Regions (BLR) undetectable, or may indicate a genuine absence
34: of BLRs. Both phenomena are consistent with gas stripping through
35: tidal interaction and dry mergers.
36: \end{abstract}
37:
38: \keywords{galaxies: active --- galaxies: Seyfert --- galaxies:
39: nuclei --- galaxies: evolution}
40:
41: \section{Introduction}
42: From the optical spectra of AGNs, one can generally distinguish two
43: main types: those that show broad emission lines (BLAGNs) and those
44: that show only narrow emission lines (NLAGNs). With an absolute
45: magnitude M$_V\geq -23$, the local BLAGNs are called Seyfert~1 (Sy1),
46: while the NLAGNs are called Seyfert~2 (Sy2). In the literature, one
47: can also find other types of Seyfert galaxies: Sy1.2, Sy1.5, Sy1.8,
48: and Sy1.9, all of them being some sort of Sy1 and consequently
49: BLAGNs. NLAGNs may also come into the form of Low Ionization Nuclear
50: Emission-line Regions (LINERs).
51:
52: Phenomenologically, it is unclear why AGNs come in different types.
53: Based on spectral variation, the Narrow Line Region (NLR) is thought
54: to be located farther out from the central Black Hole accretion disk
55: than the Broad Line Region (BLR), and to be spatially much more
56: extended. Within the unification model \citep{ant93}, which assumes
57: all AGNs to be intrinsically the same, the BLR in NLAGNs is hidden
58: behind an optically thick torus of gas and dust. Consistent with
59: this model, many observations of NLAGNs have revealed hidden BLRs
60: through polarized spectroscopy \citep{ant02}. However, not all
61: NLAGNs observed with this technique have shown such structures
62: \citep{tra01,tra03,lao03,shu07}, suggesting that in some NLAGNs the
63: BLR might simply be absent. This last finding is consistent with
64: alternative models in which the accretion rate and, consequently,
65: AGN luminosity plays a direct role in determining the presence of
66: the BLR \citep{nic00,nic03,eli06}.
67:
68: One possible way how to solve this dilemma is to explore the
69: connection of AGNs with their environment. According to the
70: unification model, for example, one does not expect to find any
71: differences in the number of AGNs in different environments.
72: Unfortunately, such studies are usually controversial. While some
73: authors found Sy2 to inhabit richer environments than Sy1
74: \citep{rob98}, others claimed the opposite \citep[and references
75: therein]{sch01}. Recently, \citet{kou06} have found no differences
76: in the environment of Sy1 and Sy2 over large scales ($\lesssim$ 1
77: Mpc), but a higher fraction of Sy2 with close companion than Sy1 in
78: systems with spatial scales smaller than 100 kpc (using H$_0$=70 km
79: s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$). These results agree with \citet{sor06} who
80: found two times more Sy2 than Sy1 in local ($\lesssim$ 100 kpc)
81: environment.
82:
83: To explore further the possible conection between AGN activity and
84: environment we have undertaken a new survey to determine the nature
85: and frequency of nuclear activity in two different samples of
86: Compact Groups of galaxies (CGs): the Hickson Compact Groups
87: \citep[HCGs]{hic82} and a sample of CGs from the Updated Zwicky
88: Catalog \citep[UZC-CG]{foc02}. Previous studies on CGs revealed a
89: high percentage of low luminosity AGNs in these structures, but very
90: few luminous ones \citep{coz98,coz00,mar06,mar07}. Having in hand a
91: statistically significant sample of CGs with complete information on
92: the nuclear activity of their members, allows us to better quantify
93: the frequency of BLAGNs in these systems.
94:
95:
96: \section{Data and Results}
97: \label{sec2}
98:
99: Among the HCGs, we have selected the groups with redshifts
100: $z\leq0.045$, having a surface brightness $\mu_G\leq24.4$. These
101: criteria provided us with a statistically complete sample of 283
102: galaxies in 65 groups. We have obtained medium resolution
103: spectroscopy for 238 of these galaxies. The spectra of 71 galaxies
104: come from previous observations made by \citet{coz98,coz00,coz04}.
105: The remaining 167 galaxies were observed by our group using four
106: different telescopes: the 2.5m NOT\footnote{ALFOSC is owned by the
107: IAA and operated at the Nordic Optical Telescope (NOT), under
108: agreement between IAA and the NBIfAFG of the Astronomical
109: Observatory of Copenhagen.} in ``El Roque de los Muchachos'' (RM,
110: Spain), the 2.2m in Calar Alto (CAHA\footnote{The Centro
111: Astron{\'o}mico Hispano Alem\'an is operated jointly by the
112: Max-Planck Institut fur Astronomie and the IAA-CSIC.}, Spain), the
113: 2.12m in San Pedro M{\'a}rtir (SPM, Mexico) and the 1.5m telescope
114: in Sierra Nevada Observatory (OSN, Spain).
115:
116: For all the galaxies, broad components search and activity
117: classification were done only after template subtraction, to correct
118: for absorption features produced by the underlying stellar
119: population. Detailed of the template subtraction method used can be
120: found in \citet{coz98,coz04}. Preliminary results have already been
121: published in \citet{mar07}. Complete description of observations,
122: reduction and analysis method will be published elsewhere.
123:
124: For the UZC-CG sample, we have collected spectra from three
125: spectroscopic archives: the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-DR4), the
126: Z-Machine and the FAST Spectrograph Archives. We have found spectra
127: for all the galaxy members of 215 groups (720 galaxies): 210 spectra
128: are from the SDSS, 187 from FAST and 323 from Z-Machine
129: \citep{mar06}. Because
130: the Z-Machine spectra have too low S/N ratios to measure broad
131: components, we restrict our analysis to the 397 spectra found in the
132: SDSS and FAST databases. Spectra from the SDSS survey
133: were template subtracted using \citet[H05]{hao05} eigenspectra and
134: their PCA method. No correction was applied to the galaxies in the
135: FAST sample, due to the non availability of suitable spectra to be used
136: as templates.
137:
138:
139: Emission lines were found in 153 of the 238 galaxies in the HCG
140: sample (64\%) and 274 of the 397 galaxies (69\%) in the UZC-CG
141: sample. The identification of broad components was done by fitting a
142: multi-components Gaussian on the emission lines, using the IRAF
143: task NGAUSSFIT. The FWHM of [SII] (or [OIII] when the [SII] lines
144: were too faint or noisy) have been used to model the narrow
145: components of the H$_{\alpha}$ and [NII] lines. When a broad fourth
146: component was necessary, it was centered on H$_{\alpha}$. A $\chi^2$
147: criterion, as described in H05, was applied to choose the fourth
148: component parameters, establishing in this way its presence and
149: characteristics. Examples of fitting plots for three BLAGNs are
150: shown in Fig~\ref{fig1}.
151:
152: Following \citet{ost89} we classified BLAGNs galaxies having FWHM
153: $\ge 500$ km s$^{-1}$. Our analysis revealed only 1 BLAGN in the HCG
154: sample and 8 in the UZC-CG sample. For each of these galaxies we give,
155: in Table ~\ref{tbl1} the FWHM of the broad
156: component and activity classification according to
157: \citet{ost89}: a Sy1.9 shows a broad component only in H$_{\alpha}$,
158: while a Sy1.8 shows also a weak broad component in H$_{\beta}$. None
159: of our BLAGNs are classified as Sy1, Sy1.2 or Sy1.5. Based on our
160: analysis, BLAGNs represent only 1\% (1/153) of emission line
161: galaxies in the HCG sample and 3\% (8/274) in the UZC-CG one.
162:
163: To classify NLAGNs we used the diagnostic diagram
164: based on the four most intense emission lines: H$_{\beta}$,
165: [OIII]5007\AA\ , H$_{\alpha}$, and [NII]6583\AA\ and criteria
166: similar to those employed by \citet{kew06}. Galaxies located above
167: the theoretical maximum sequence for star formation are classified
168: as AGNs. We also distinguished between Sy2 and LINERs using the
169: classical upper limit log([OIII]5007\AA/H$_{\beta}$) $<$ 0.4 for
170: LINER. Both CG samples are rich in galaxies having only
171: [NII]6583\AA\ and H$_{\alpha}$, we classified these cases as Low
172: Luminosity AGNs (LLAGNs) when log([NII]/H$_{\alpha}$)$>-0.1$
173: \citep{coz98,sta06}.
174:
175: A summary of the nuclear classification for the AGN galaxies in our
176: two samples are presented in Table~\ref{tbl2}. For each sample
177: (column 1) we give the number of Sy2, LINERs and LLAGNs (columns 2
178: to 4), which, put together, constitute the total NLAGN populations.
179: In column 5 we report the fractions of BLAGNs over NLAGNs and in
180: column 6 the fraction of Sy1 over Sy2, considering all BLAGNs as Sy1
181: like.
182:
183: \subsection{Lower ratio of BLAGNs to NLAGNs in CGs than in the field}
184:
185: The fraction of BLAGNs over NLAGNs in our two CG samples is
186: extremely low: 1\% for the HCGs and 6\% for the UZC-CGs. Also
187: noticeably low are the ratios of Sy1 to Sy2: 4\% in the HCG and 19\%
188: in the UZC-CG. To realize how low these ratios are one has to
189: compare with what is usually found in other surveys.
190:
191: The mean H$_{\alpha}$ luminosity of both NLAGNs and BLAGNs in our two
192: samples is about $10^{39}$ erg s$^{-1}$, which is typical of the faint
193: end of the luminosity function of AGNs. This value is comparable with
194: the mean H$_{\alpha}$ luminosity of AGNs observed in the local
195: universe by \citet[HFS97]{ho97a}. Except for some galaxies in Virgo,
196: all the galaxies in the HFS97 sample are located in low density
197: environments (either loose groups or isolated). In Table~\ref{tbl2} we
198: compare their results (395 galaxies, excluding the galaxies in Virgo)
199: with ours. In the HFS97 sample, the BLAGNs were classified as such by
200: \citet{ho97b}, based on the detection of a broad H$_{\alpha}$
201: component. To be consistent with our definition, all these galaxies
202: were classified as Sy1. Also for comparison sake, the narrow emission
203: lines galaxies in the HFS97 sample were reclassified using the
204: criteria described in sect.~\ref{sec2}.
205:
206: The fraction BLAGN/NLAGN in the HFS97 sample is 22\% and the ratio
207: Sy1/Sy2 is 61\%. There is consequently a clear deficiency of BLAGNs
208: in CGs. This also appears as an extremely large difference in the
209: number of Sy1 as compared to Sy2 galaxies. This phenomenon is quite
210: intriguing considering that there is no deficit of AGNs as a whole
211: in CGs: 46\% AGNs in the HCG, 51\% in the UZC-CG compared to 44\% in
212: the HFS97 sample.
213:
214: Comparable ratios (Sy1/Sy2 $\backsim$ 60\%) were obtained by
215: \citet[SRR06]{sor06} in the field, with a slight increase in ``loose
216: groups'' (Sy1/Sy2 $\backsim$ 69\%). In the nearby (z$<$0.33) sample
217: of SDSS AGN galaxies covering four orders of luminosity and similar
218: environments as SRR06, H05 determined a ratio BLAGN/NLAGN of 43\%
219: and a ratio Sy1/Sy2 of 54\%. Assuming BLAGNs are slightly favored at
220: higher luminosity these high ratios are comparable to those found by
221: HFS97.
222:
223: \section{Discussion}
224:
225: \subsection{Quantifying biases and detection limits}
226:
227: Our results suggest there is an important deficit of BLAGNs in our
228: two CG samples as compared to similar surveys in the field. This
229: result confirm the tendency first encountered by
230: \citet{coz98,coz00}. To verify that the lack of BLAGNs in CGs can not
231: be induced by differences in observation, reduction or
232: analysis methods we have investigated thoroughly these
233: possibilities.
234:
235: Comparison of the UZC-CG sample with the survey made by H05 is safe,
236: because our SDSS data derive from the same telescope, reduction and
237: analysis methods (including template subtraction) as theirs. The ratio
238: BLAGN/NLAGN is 8\% in our sample compared to 43\% for the sample of
239: H05, which is already a huge difference.
240:
241: A possible effect due to difference in spectral resolution can also be
242: excluded. \citet{ho97b} have used high resolution (2.5 \AA) spectra,
243: but made tests with two others low resolution set-ups (5\AA\ and
244: 10\AA) obtaining similar results. These are comparable to our own
245: observations: CAHA and OSN (4\AA), NOT and SPM (8\AA), SDSS (3.5\AA)
246: and FAST (6\AA). Both H05 and SRR06 have 3.5\AA.
247:
248: The S/N continuum levels of the different surveys are also
249: comparable. On average the S/N of AGNs in our spectra is 60 with a
250: maximum of the order of 120. This is comparable to H05 and SRR06
251: spectra (they both used SDSS). HFS97 did not published their values.
252: However their BLAGNs rates are comparable to those of H05 and SRR06,
253: suggesting this is not an issue.
254:
255: There is no evidence either for a higher galaxy contamination (the
256: amount of galaxy falling into the aperture) in our samples. Taking
257: into account the slit aperture and distances of the host galaxies in
258: each sample we find medians of 1 kpc and 1.3 kpc for the HCG and
259: UZC-CG, respectively. Although the median for HFS97 is lower (0.5
260: kpc) than for H05 (7 kpc) the results are similar. Obviously,
261: template subtraction (like we also did) alleviates the
262: differences. We may note also that no relation is observed, in any
263: of these surveys (including ours), between the frequency of BLAGNs
264: and the redshift of the galaxies where they are found, which means
265: that nearby galaxies are not more likely BLAGNs than remote ones.
266:
267: To test if our low number of Sy1 could be due to a difference in
268: morphologies \citep{sch01}, we have divided our two samples and the
269: HFS97 one in three morphology classes: E for early-type galaxies
270: (E-S0), Se for early-type spirals (S0a-Sbc), and Sl for late-type
271: spirals (Sc and later). For homogeneity sake, all the morphologies
272: have been taken from the Hyperleda database \citep{pat03}. In
273: Table~\ref{tbl3} we give for each morphology class the fraction of
274: galaxy and the ratios BLAGN/NLAGN and Sy1/Sy2. There are no BLAGNs
275: in late-type spirals in any sample. In the HFS97 sample, the ratio
276: of BLAGN/NLAGN is marginally higher in the E class while the ratio
277: Sy1/Sy2 is significantly higher, which indicates a definitive
278: increase in BLAGNs in early-type galaxies. In the two CG samples we
279: almost see an inverse trend: the ratios of BLAGN/NLAGN and Sy1/Sy2
280: are both larger in the Se class than in the
281: E one. Moreover there is a definite rise
282: in the number of early-type galaxies in CGs. Following the HFS97
283: trend, this should have produced more BLAGNs in CGs instead of less.
284: This eliminates a difference in morphologies as a possible
285: explanation.
286:
287: We also reject the hypothesis of lower sensitivity. Comparing the
288: median luminosity in H$\alpha$ of the different types of galaxies in
289: our samples with those in the HFS97 sample, lower sensitivity would
290: have translated into higher values in our samples. This is not
291: observed. In the HFS97 sample the median H$\alpha$ luminosity of the
292: NLAGNs is log(L$_{H\alpha} =38.72 $ ergs s$^{-1}$). Our values are
293: comparable: 38.69 for the HCG and 38.79 for the UZC-CG.
294:
295:
296: Finally we have determined the detection limits in our samples as in
297: \citet{ho97b}. Different simulations were performed adding to each
298: set-up spectra a grid of synthetic spectra with broad gaussian
299: components of various widths and amplitudes centered on H$\alpha$. We
300: then applied our template and extraction analysis to deduce the
301: following limits. For the CAHA and OSN spectra, broad components
302: equivalent to 15\% or higher of the total blended flux in
303: H$\alpha+$[NII] were recovered. Using medians of AGN blended flux and
304: redshfit this transforms into a detection limit in H$\alpha$ broad
305: luminosity of $3.5\times10^{38}$ ergs s$^{-1}$. We find slightly
306: higher fraction (20\%) for the NOT and SPM spectra, equivalent to a
307: detection limit in luminosity of $4.0\times10^{38}$ ergs
308: s$^{-1}$. Only three BLAGNs in the HFS97 sample have a luminosity
309: lower than these limits. Obviously, the lack of BLAGNs encountered in
310: our samples cannot be explain by a higher detection limits in our
311: samples.
312:
313: There seem to be no obvious observational biases or differences in
314: reduction and analysis methods capable of reproducing the lack of
315: BLAGNs in CGs as compared to lower density environments. It is
316: consequently reasonable to conclude that this phenomenon must be
317: related to the environment typical of CGs.
318:
319: \subsection{The disappearance of BLRs in CGs}
320:
321: In the unification model for AGNs, a torus of matter is assumed to
322: be responsible for hiding the BLR from the observer. To be
323: consistent with our analysis, this mechanism should be much more
324: efficient in CGs. However, this assumption goes against the evidence
325: of tidal stripping: in CGs the infall of gas in the disk seem to be
326: stopped, generally diminishing the amount of star formation
327: \citep{coz98,coz00,ver01,ros07,dur08}. At the same time, the number
328: of early-type galaxies in CGs is observed to increase. Therefore, a
329: possible reason why no BLRs appear in AGNs in CGs may be because any
330: amount of gas that has reached the center was consumed into stars,
331: building larger bulges \citep{car99}. Alternatively, the bulges of
332: galaxies in CGs may have grown without gas, through dry mergers
333: \citep{coz07}.
334:
335: The fact that the average luminosity of the AGNs in CGs is low is
336: another argument in favor of the dissolution hypothesis for the BLR.
337: According to recent results obtained by reverberation mapping, the
338: size of the BLR in AGNs is correlated to the optical luminosity at
339: 5100\AA\ \citep{kas05}. It is consequently possible to imagine the
340: size of the BLR shrinking almost to zero at some low threshold
341: luminosity \citep{eli06}. The luminosity at 5100\AA\ in our samples
342: range from log($\lambda$L$_{\lambda}$(5100\AA)) 40.7 to 43.1 (in
343: units of erg s$^{-1}$); comparing with data of \citet{pet04} we are
344: in the lower luminosity part of their distribution, where few
345: objects with broad lines have been observed. We also are at the
346: lower limit where no hidden BLRs have been found
347: \citep{shu07,bia07}. Using the relation log(L$_{bol}$/L$_{Edd}$),
348: most of our galaxies are below -1.37, which suggests that broad
349: features may simply not exist in these LLAGNs.
350:
351: According to \citet{nic00} and \citet{nic03} low accretion rates
352: rather than smaller mass black holes are responsible in explaining
353: the absence of BLRs in Low Luminosity AGNs which is fully compatible
354: with our observations.
355:
356: \section{Conclusion}
357:
358: Based on the above statistics, we confirm that there is a remarkable
359: deficiency of BLAGNs as compared to NLAGNs in CGs. This result
360: suggests that BLRs in AGN CGs are directly affected by tidal or
361: group interaction effects, which make them shrink below detection or
362: completely disappear.
363:
364: In CGs environment, galaxies are undergoing morphological
365: transformations and the main mechanisms for such transformations are
366: tidal interactions and mergers \citep{coz07}. Our analysis suggests
367: that the combined effects of these two mechanisms also result in an
368: important decrease in the amount of gas that can reach the nucleus
369: to form a BLR in AGNs.
370:
371:
372: \acknowledgments We are grateful to Lei Hao for making available her
373: eigenspectra and to Jaime Perea for his PCA software and helpful
374: discussion. MAM acknowledges Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia for
375: financial support grant FPU AP2003-4064. MAM and AdO are partially
376: supported by spanish research projects AYA2006-1325 and TIC114. RC was
377: partially supported by the CONACyT, under grant
378: No. 47282. P.F. acknowledges financial contribution from MIUR and from
379: the contract ASI-INAF I/023/05/0. We thank the referee for
380: constructive comments. We also thank the TAC of the Observatorio
381: Astron\'omico Nacional at San Pedro M\'artir for time allocations. We
382: thank the SDSS collaboration for providing the extraordinary database
383: and processing tools that made part of this work possible. The SDSS
384: Web Site is http://www.sdss.org/. We acknowledge also the usage of the
385: Hyperleda database (http://leda.univ-lyon1.fr).
386:
387:
388: \begin{thebibliography}{}
389:
390: \bibitem[Antonucci(1993)]{ant93} Antonucci, R. 1993, ARA\&A, 31, 473
391: \bibitem[Antonucci(2002)]{ant02} Antonucci, R. 2002, Astrophysical Spectropolarimetry,
392: (Cambridge, CUP), 151 (astro-ph/010348)
393: \bibitem[Bian \& Gu(2007)]{bia07} Bian, W., \& Gu, Q. 2007, \apj, 657, 159
394: \bibitem[Caon et al.(1994)]{cao94} Caon, N., Capaccioli, M., D'Onofrio, M., \& Longo, G. 1994, \aap, 286, 39
395: \bibitem[Coziol et al.(1998)]{coz98} Coziol, R., Ribeiro, A. L. B., Capelato, H. V., \& de~Carvalho, R. R. 1998, \apj, 493, 563
396: \bibitem[Coziol et al.(2000)]{coz00} Coziol, R., Iovino, A., \& de~Carvalho, R. R. 2000, \aj, 120, 47
397: \bibitem[Coziol et al.(2004)]{coz04} Coziol, R., Brinks, E., \& Bravo-Alfaro, H. 2004, \aj, 128, 68
398: \bibitem[Coziol \& Plauchu-Frayn(2007)]{coz07} Coziol, R., \& Plauchu-Frayn 2007, \aj, 133, 2630
399: \bibitem[de~Carvalho \& Coziol(1999)]{car99} de~Carvalho, R. R., \& Coziol, R. 1999, \aj, 117, 1657
400: \bibitem[de la Rosa et al.(2007)]{ros07} de la Rosa, I. G., de Carvalho, R. R., Vazdekis, A., \& Barbuy, B 2007, \aj, 133, 330
401: \bibitem[de Robertis et al.(1998)]{rob98} de Robertis, M. M., Yee, H. K. C., \& Hayhoe, K. 1998, \apj, 496, 93
402: \bibitem[Durbala et al.(2008)]{dur08} Durbala, A., et al. 2008, \aj, 135, 130
403: \bibitem[Elitzur \& Shlosman(2006)]{eli06} Elitzur, M., \& Shlosman, I. 2006, \apj, 648, L101
404: \bibitem[Focardi \& Kelm(2002)]{foc02} Focardi, P., \& Kelm, B.\ 2002, \aap, 391, 35
405: \bibitem[Hao et al.(2005)]{hao05} Hao, L., et al.\ 2005, \aj, 129, 1783 (H05)
406: \bibitem[Hickson(1982)]{hic82} Hickson, P.\ 1982, \apj, 255, 382
407: \bibitem[Hickson et al.(1988)]{hic88} Hickson, P., Kindl, E., \& Huchra J. P. 1988, \apj, 331, 64
408: \bibitem[Ho et al.(1997a)]{ho97a} Ho, L.~C., Filippenko, A.~V., \& Sargent, W.~L.~W.\ 1997a, \apjs, 112, 315 (HFS97)
409: \bibitem[Ho et al.(1997b)]{ho97b} Ho, L.~C., Filippenko, A.~V., Sargent, W.~L.~W., \& Peng, C.~Y. \ 1997b, \apjs, 112, 414
410: \bibitem[Kaspi et al.(2005)]{kas05} Kaspi, S., Maoz, D., Netzer, H., Peterson, B. M., Vestergaard, M., \& Jannuzi, B. T. 2005, \apj, 629, 61
411: \bibitem[Kewley et al.(2006)]{kew06} Kewley, L.~J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., \& Heckman, T.\ 2006, \mnras, 372, 961
412: \bibitem[Koulouridis et al.(2006)]{kou06} Koulouridis, E., Plionis, M., Chavushyan, V., Dultzin-Hacyan,D., Krongold, Y., \& Goudis, C. 2006, \apj, 639, 37
413: \bibitem[Laor(2003)]{lao03} Laor, A.\ 2003, \apj, 590, 86
414: \bibitem[Mart\'{\i}nez et al.(2006)]{mar06} Mart\'{\i}nez, M. A., del Olmo, A., Focardi, P., \& Perea J. 2006, VII Scientific Meeting of SEA (astro-ph/0611099)
415: \bibitem[Mart\'{\i}nez et al.(2007)]{mar07} Mart\'{\i}nez, M. A., del Olmo, A., Perea, J., \& Coziol, R. 2007, ESO Astro. Symp., Springer-Verlag, 163
416: \bibitem[Mendes de Oliveira \& Hickson(1994)]{men94} Mendes de Oliveira, C., \& Hickson, P. 1994, \apj, 427, 684
417: \bibitem[Nicastro(2000)]{nic00} Nicastro, F.\ 2000, \apjl, 530, L65
418: \bibitem[Nicastro et al.(2003)]{nic03} Nicastro, F., Martocchia, A., \& Matt, G.\ 2003, \apjl, 589, L13
419: \bibitem[Osterbrock(1989)]{ost89} Osterbrock, D.~E.\ 1989, in Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei, University Science Books
420: \bibitem[Paturel et al.(2003)]{pat03} Paturel, G., et al.\ 2003, \aap, 412, 45
421: \bibitem[Peterson et al.(2004)]{pet04} Peterson, B.~M., et al.\ 2004, \apj, 613, 682
422: \bibitem[Peterson et al.(2005)]{pet05} Peterson, B.~M., et al.\ 2005, \apj, 632, 799
423: \bibitem[Shu et al.(2007)]{shu07} Shu, X.~W., Wang, J.~X., Jiang, P., Fan, L.~L., \& Wang, T.~G.\ 2007, \apj, 657, 167
424: \bibitem[Schmitt(2001)]{sch01} Schmitt, H.~R.\ 2001, \aj, 122, 2243
425: \bibitem[Sorrentino et al.(2006)]{sor06} Sorrentino, G., Radovich, M., \& Rifatto, A. 2006, \aap, 451, 809 (SRR06)
426: \bibitem[Stasi{\'n}ska et al.(2006)]{sta06} Stasi{\'n}ska, G., Cid Fernandes, R., Mateus, A., Sodr{\'e}, L., \& Asari, N.~V.\ 2006, \mnras, 371, 972
427: \bibitem[Tran(2001)]{tra01} Tran, H. D. 2001, \apj, L554, 19
428: \bibitem[Tran(2003)]{tra03} Tran, H. D. 2003, \apj, 583, 632
429: \bibitem[Verdes-Montenegro et al.(2001)]{ver01} Verdes-Montenegro et al. 2001,\aap, 377, 812
430: \end{thebibliography}
431:
432: \clearpage
433:
434: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
435: \tablewidth{0pt}
436: \tablecaption{BLAGNs identification\label{tbl1}}
437: \tablehead{
438: Name & Source & Type & FWHM(H$_{\alpha}$) & FWHM(H$_{\beta}$)\\
439: & & & (km/s) & (km/s)
440: }
441: \startdata
442: HCG 5a & CAHA & 1.9 & 1056 &\nodata \\
443: UZC-CG 84c & SDSS & 1.9 & 2727 &\nodata\\
444: UZC-CG 89b & SDSS & 1.9 & 2159 &\nodata\\
445: UZC-CG 109b & SDSS & 1.8 & 1902 & 1499 \\
446: UZC-CG 117a & SDSS & 1.9 & 2351 &\nodata\\
447: UZC-CG 132b & FAST & 1.9 & 3055 &\nodata\\
448: UZC-CG 139b & SDSS & 1.9 & 1941 &\nodata \\
449: UZC-CG 232c & SDSS & 1.8 & 2258 & 1689 \\
450: UZC-CG 234b & FAST & 1.9 & 1328 &\nodata\\
451: \enddata
452: \end{deluxetable}
453:
454: \clearpage
455:
456: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}
457: \tablecaption{Nuclear classification for the AGN galaxies\label{tbl2}}
458: \tablewidth{0pt}
459: \tablehead{
460: Sample & \multicolumn{3}{c}{NLAGN} & BLAGN & $\frac{\rm{BLAGN}}{\rm{NLAGN}}$ & $\frac{\rm{Sy1}}{\rm{Sy2}}$ \\ \cline{2-4}
461: & Sy2 & LINER & LLAGN & & \% & \% }
462: \startdata
463: HCG & 28 & 23 & 19 & 1 & 1 & 4\\
464: UZC-CG & 43 & 11 & 79 & 8 & 6 & 19 \\
465: HFS97 & 46 & 80 &\nodata & 28 & 22 & 61 \\
466: H05 & 2424 & 650 &\nodata & 1317 & 43 & 54 \\
467: SRR06 & 1104 &\nodata &\nodata & 725 & \nodata & 66 \\
468: \enddata
469: \end{deluxetable}
470:
471: \clearpage
472:
473: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccc}
474: \tablecaption{Activity types and morphological distribution\label{tbl3}}
475: \tablewidth{0pt} \tablehead{
476: Sample &\multicolumn{3}{c}{E-S0}&& \multicolumn{3}{c}{S0a-Sbc} & Sc-Irr\\ \cline{2-4}\cline{6-8}
477: & f$_{E}$ &$\frac{\rm{BLAGN}}{\rm{NLAGN}}$ & $\frac{\rm{Sy1}}{\rm{Sy2}}$& & f$_{Se}$& $\frac{\rm{BLAGN}}{\rm{NLAGN}}$ & $\frac{\rm{Sy1}}{\rm{Sy2}}$ & f$_{Sl}$}
478: \startdata
479: HCG &54\% & \nodata & \nodata & &32\% & 3\% & 10\% & 14\%\\
480: UZC &34\% & 2\% & 8\% & &55\% & 9\% & 25\% & 11\%\\
481: HFS97 &25\% & 25\% & 86\% & &39\% & 19\% & 56\% & 36\% \\
482: \enddata
483: \end{deluxetable}
484:
485: \clearpage
486:
487: \begin{figure}
488: \epsscale{1.1}
489: \plotone{f1.ps}
490: \caption{Examples of BLAGNs in
491: our sample with multi-components Gaussian decompositions centered on
492: H$\alpha$. \label{fig1}}
493: \end{figure}
494:
495: \end{document}
496: