1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
3: \usepackage{lscape}
4:
5: \usepackage{amsmath}
6: \newcommand{\myemail}{cooke@uci.edu }
7: \newcommand{\lya}{Ly-$\alpha$ }
8: \newcommand{\mc}{$10^{12}M_{\odot}$ }
9: \newcommand{\lb}{Lyman break }
10: \newcommand{\zzz}{$z\sim 3$ }
11: \addtolength{\topmargin}{0.5in}
12:
13: \shorttitle{Candidate $z=3.03$ Brightest Proto-Cluster Galaxy}
14: \shortauthors{Cooke et al.}
15:
16: \begin{document}
17:
18: \title{A Candidate Brightest Proto-Cluster Galaxy at $z=3.03$}
19:
20: \author{Jeff Cooke\altaffilmark{1} \altaffilmark{2}, Elizabeth
21: J. Barton\altaffilmark{1}, James S. Bullock\altaffilmark{1}, and Kyle
22: R. Stewart\altaffilmark{1}} \affil{The Center for Cosmology and the
23: Department of Physics \& Astronomy, The University of California,
24: Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697-4575} \email{cooke@uci.edu, ebarton@uci.edu,
25: bullock@uci.edu, stewartk@uci.edu}
26:
27: \author{and}
28:
29: \author{Arthur M. Wolfe\altaffilmark{1}} \affil{Center for
30: Astrophysics and Space Sciences and the Department of Physics, The
31: University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0424}
32: \email{awolfe@ucsd.edu}
33:
34: \altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, W. M. Keck Telescope. The Keck
35: Observatory is a joint facility of the University of California, the
36: California Institute of Technology, and NASA and was made possible
37: by the generous financial support of the W. M. Keck Foundation.}
38: \altaffiltext{2}{Gary McCue Postdoctoral Fellow}
39:
40: %*********************************************************************
41:
42: \begin{abstract}
43:
44: We report the discovery of a very bright (m$_R=22.2$) Lyman break
45: galaxy at $z=3.03$ that appears to be a massive system in a late stage
46: of merging. Deep imaging reveals multiple peaks in the brightness
47: profile with angular separations of $\sim$$0.''8$ ($\sim$25 $h^{-1}$
48: kpc comoving). In addition, high signal-to-noise ratio rest-frame UV
49: spectroscopy shows evidence for $\sim5$ components based on stellar
50: photospheric and ISM absorption lines with a velocity dispersion of
51: $\sigma \sim 460$ km s$^{-1}$ for the three strongest components.
52: Both the dynamics and high luminosity, as well as our analysis of a
53: $\Lambda$CDM numerical simulation, suggest a very massive system with
54: halo mass $M \sim10^{13} M_\odot$. The simulation finds that all
55: halos at $z=3$ of this mass contain sub-halos in agreement
56: with the properties of these observed components and that such systems
57: typically evolve into $M \sim 10^{14} M_{\odot}$ halos in
58: groups and clusters by $z=0$. This discovery provides a rare
59: opportunity to study the properties and individual components of \zzz
60: systems that are likely to be the progenitors to brightest cluster
61: galaxies.
62:
63: \end{abstract}
64:
65: \keywords{galaxies: high redshift --- galaxies: mergers --- galaxies:
66: evolution --- galaxy clusters: high redshift clusters}
67:
68: %*********************************************************************
69:
70: \section{Introduction}%Section 1
71:
72: Massive galaxies and galaxy clusters at high redshift provide strong
73: constraints on cosmological models and galaxy formation scenarios.
74: The \lb galaxies (LBGs) are a widespread population of high redshift
75: galaxies selected by their rest-frame FUV colors \citep{s96,s98}.
76: LBGs at $z\sim3$ tend to reside in massive halos $\langle M_{DM}
77: \rangle \sim 10^{11.5} M_\odot$ \citep{a05} and are therefore believed
78: to evolve into present-day massive elliptical galaxies. Although
79: $\sim3000$ color-selected $z>2$ LBGs have spectroscopic confirmations
80: \citep[e.g.][]{s03,s04,c05,c08}, only two systems, selected by their
81: radio emission, have been spectroscopically identified as potential
82: brightest cluster galaxies \citep{zirm05,miley06}.
83:
84: We report the discovery of a bright, m$_R=22.2$, rest-frame FUV
85: color-selected LBG (hereafter LBG-2377) at $z=3.03$. Ground-based
86: imaging and spectroscopy finds no evidence for AGN activity or
87: gravitational lensing making this the most luminous $z\gtrsim3$ LBG
88: discovered to date. The deep images and high signal-to-noise ratio
89: (SNR) spectroscopy show evidence for multiple massive components
90: indicative of a system in the late stage of merging. We show that the
91: component velocity dispersion and integrated FUV luminosity suggest
92: that LBG-2377 resides in a very massive halo ($\sim10^{13} M_\odot$)
93: and is likely to evolve into a present-day massive brightest cluster
94: galaxy (\S~\ref{sim}). Therefore, LBG-2377 provides a rare
95: opportunity to study the dynamics and properties of a massive LBG halo
96: in the process of formation.
97:
98: All $z\gtrsim3$ LBGs with $R<23$ discovered to date are magnified by
99: gravitational lensing. Because all of these show \lya in absorption,
100: they are representative of the spectral properties observed in
101: $\sim$25-50\% of the LBG population \citep{aes03}. LBG-2377 displays
102: strong \lya in emission in two of its components and, because of its
103: brightness, is the only system of its kind. The luminosity of
104: LBG-2377 enables high SNR study of its individual components and
105: thereby a means to constrain the observed range of LBG spectral
106: properties. We briefly describe the imaging and spectroscopic
107: observations of LBG-2377 in \S\ref{obs}, highlight the initial
108: analysis of the data in \S\ref{analysis}, and present a discussion
109: in \S\ref{disc}. All magnitudes are in the AB \citep{f96} magnitude
110: system unless otherwise noted and we assume an $\Omega_M=0.3$,
111: $\Omega_\Lambda=0.7$ cosmology and use comoving units throughout.
112:
113: %*********************************************************************
114:
115: \section{Observations}\label{obs}%Section 2
116:
117: \subsection{Imaging}\label{imaging}%Section 2.1
118:
119: The deep images of the QSO PC1643+4631A field were obtained on 2001
120: April 18 using the Low-Resolution Imaging Spectrometer \citep{o95}
121: mounted on the Keck I telescope as part of a multi-field survey for
122: LBGs associated with damped \lya systems at \zzz \citep{c05}.
123: Specifically, the field containing LBG-2377 was imaged in the
124: $u'$BVR$_S$\footnote{R$_s$ is the H. Spinrad high-throughout night-sky
125: R filter publicly available at the W. M. Keck Observatory. The
126: transformation from Spinrad night-sky R$_S$ into Johnson VR is (R$_S$
127: - R) = -0.004 - 0.072(V - R) + 0.073(V - R)$^2$ \citep{stern99}. All
128: R$_S$ magnitudes presented here have been transformed into the Johnson
129: R bandpass.}I filters with seeing of $0.7-0.9$ arcsec and a depth of
130: $u'=28.8$ and BVRI $\ge28.1$ ($1\sigma$). We discovered LBG-2377 as
131: an R $=22.2$ $z\sim3$ LBG candidate at R.A. 16:44:48.3,
132: Dec.+46:27:08.2 (J2000.0) toward one edge of the imaged field. The
133: isophotal magnitudes as determined using $SExtractor$ \citep{ba96}
134: source extraction code are: $u'=26.5 \pm0.46$, B $=24.3 \pm0.10$, V
135: $=22.6 \pm0.03$, R $=22.2 \pm0.06$, and I $=22.3 \pm0.07$.
136:
137: LBGs at \zzz have a half-light radius of $\lesssim0.''3$
138: \citep[e.g.,][]{g01}. As illustrated in the contour plot shown in
139: Figure~\ref{fig:contour}, LBG-2377 spans $\sim2''\times3''$ and has a
140: morphology that can be interpreted as a single extended system
141: exhibiting multiple vigorous star forming regions or multiple separate
142: near-point sources. The ratio of the peaks of the three strongest
143: identified components is approximately 10:5:1 with separations of
144: $\sim$$0.''6-1''.0$ ($\sim20-30h^{-1}$ kpc, comoving). Inspection of
145: the deep images shows that there are no significant lensing-source
146: candidates within $\sim10''$. A potential candidate $20''$ from
147: LBG-2377 (R.A. 16:44:46.5, Dec +46:27:04.1) does have an effective
148: redshift for lensing ($z_{phot}=0.41\pm0.2$), but would need a halo
149: mass of $M\gtrsim7\times10^{14} M_\odot$ to provide a significant
150: ($\gtrsim2-3\times$) magnification boost \citep{minor07}. Moreover,
151: such a geometry would result in a large distortion of the LBG-2377
152: image. We see no evidence for this in the deep ground-based images.
153:
154: \subsection{Spectroscopy}\label{spectroscopy}%Section 2.2
155:
156: LBG-2377 was confirmed to be a $z=3.03$ galaxy from low-resolution
157: discovery multi-object spectroscopy on 2004 February 18 \citep{c05}.
158: The data were taken using the 300 line mm$^{-1}$ grism on LRIS with a
159: spectral resolution of $\sim10$\AA~ FWHM. We acquired follow-up
160: higher resolution, higher SNR longslit spectroscopic observations with
161: LRIS on 21 May 2007 using the 600 line mm$^{-1}$ grism blazed at
162: 4000\AA~with the blue arm and the 1200 line mm$^{-1}$ blazed at 7500
163: \AA~with the red arm. We used five 1800s exposures in our final
164: combined spectrum that resulted in a SNR of $10-15$ and a resolution
165: of $\sim2-3$\AA (Figure~\ref{fig:600}). Details of the observations
166: will appear in a forthcoming paper.
167:
168: The spectrum of LBG-2377 is dominated by O and B star continua and
169: displays strong \lya emission and little reddening. These features
170: are consistent with the general properties of the $z\sim3$ LBG
171: population that display \lya in emission \citep{aes03,c05}. Although
172: the \lya feature appears as a single emission line in the
173: low-resolution discovery spectrum, the higher-resolution high SNR
174: spectroscopy reveals two strong peaks with two possible weak peaks
175: more evident in the individual spectra. The rest-frame FUV shows a
176: complex series of interstellar atomic lines exhibiting gas absorption
177: over velocities $\gtrsim2000$ km s$^{-1}$ and evidence for $\sim5$
178: components. Over 20 FUV ISM absorption lines were used to identify
179: and study individual components.
180:
181: %*********************************************************************
182:
183: \section{Analysis}\label{analysis}%Section 3
184:
185: \subsection{Components}\label{velocities}%Section 3.1
186:
187: We identified $\ge$5 photospheric lines (to varying confidence levels)
188: of each component to estimate their systemic redshifts. These lines
189: include\footnote{For consistency with future analyses and because our
190: observations are of similar quality, we use the stellar photospheric
191: values listed in Table 1 of \citet{pet00}.}: Si\textsc{iii}
192: $\lambda1294.54$, 1296.73, 1417.24, C\textsc{iii} $\lambda1175.26,
193: 1296.33$, 1427.85 C\textsc{ii} $\lambda$1323.93, N\textsc{iii}
194: $\lambda1324.32$, O\textsc{iv} $\lambda1343.35$, and S\textsc{v}
195: $\lambda1501.76$. The strongest components have redshifts $z=3.0385,
196: 3.0289$, and 3.0244. We find a 1-D velocity dispersion of $\sigma =
197: 460$ km s$^{-1}$ for these three components and $\sigma = 705$ km
198: s$^{-1}$ for the five components. The details of the identified
199: components are listed in Table~\ref{comp}.
200:
201: We note that the \lya emission and ISM absorption lines of the LBG
202: population show observed velocity offsets of $\sim+650$ and $\sim-200$
203: km sec$^{-1}$ from their systemic velocities, respectively
204: \citep{pet02,a03,c05}. The \lya and ISM offsets in the identified
205: components are consistent with that of the LBG population. The
206: accepted interpretation is that these offsets are caused by the
207: presence of an expanding galactic-scale shell of gas and dust driven
208: by supernovae and stellar winds. \lya photons are largely absorbed in
209: the approaching shell but are resonantly scattered off the receding
210: portion and survive. In this scenario, the two prominent \lya peaks
211: observed in the spectrum of LBG-2377 would trace two distinct
212: expanding galactic-scale shells with a systemic velocity difference
213: of $\sim550$ km sec$^{-1}$. Our fit to the components in
214: Table~\ref{comp} is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:spectra}. Although the
215: spectra of the components are superposed, the ISM absorption-line
216: strengths and behavior of each component appear internally consistent
217: with being separate systems.
218:
219: \subsection{Theoretical expectations}\label{sim}%Section 3.2
220:
221: The high luminosity and complex structure of LBG-2377 suggest that
222: this system may be a brightest cluster galaxy in formation. Here we
223: investigate this possibility in the context of $\Lambda$CDM. We
224: estimate the dark matter halo mass of LBG-2377 using both its measured
225: kinematics and luminosity. Encouragingly, both estimates suggest a
226: group-scale mass $\sim 10^{13} M_\odot$. If we assume an NFW halo,
227: our measured $\sigma \sim 460$ km s$^{-1}$ 1-D velocity dispersion
228: corresponds to a halo maximum circular velocity of $V_{\rm max} \simeq
229: 1.5 \sigma$, or $V_{\rm max} \sim 700$ km s$^{-1}$ \citep{klypin99}.
230: At $z \sim 3$ this implies $M_{\rm vir} \sim 10^{13} \, M_\odot$
231: \citep[e.g.][]{bullock01}. Alternatively, if we assume a simple
232: monotonic relationship between galaxy luminosity and dark matter halo
233: $V_{\rm max}$ \citep[e.g.][]{berrier06} and use the \zzz LBG
234: luminosity function \citep{s99,saw06}, the number density of objects
235: similar to LBG-2377 (m$_R=22.2$) is $\sim 10^{-7}$ Mpc$^{-3}
236: h^{3}$. This number density corresponds to halos with $V_{\rm max}
237: \sim700$ km s$^{-1}$ at $z=3$ \citep{berrier06}. The agreement
238: between these two estimates suggests that LBG-2377 does indeed
239: sit within a massive $V_{\rm max} \sim 700$ km s$^{-1}$ halo.
240:
241: Halos that are this massive at $z=3$ almost certainly contain
242: substructure. We illustrate this explicitly by examining the
243: high-resolution 80 $h^{-3}$ Mpc$^{-3}$ $\Lambda$CDM N-body simulation
244: described in \cite{stewart07}. There are three halos in this box with
245: $V_{\rm max} > 600$ km s$^{-1}$ at $z=3$ (specifically, $V_{\rm max} =
246: 620, 645,$ and $740$ km sec$^{-1}$). These objects have between five
247: and eight $10^{11} h^{-1} M_\odot < M < 10^{12.5} h^{-1} M_\odot$
248: sub-halos within their (physical) virial radii $R_{\rm vir} \simeq 90
249: h^{-1}$ kpc $(M/10^{13} h^{-1} M_\odot)^{1/3}$. Note that this
250: substructure mass is typical of that expected for LBG hosts at \zzz
251: \citep[$\langle M_{LBG}\rangle \sim$10$^{11.5} M_\odot$][]{a05}. If
252: we look at simulated halos that are significantly smaller than our
253: estimate, we find that only two out of 16 objects with $V_{\rm max} >
254: 450$ km sec$^{-1}$ in the simulation have no sub-halos with $M >
255: 10^{11} h^{-1} M_\odot$. We conclude that it would be very unlikely
256: for an object like LBG-2377 to exist {\em without} multiple
257: components.
258:
259: By following the merger trees of our three $V_{max} \gtrsim 600$ km
260: sec$^{-1}$ halos, we find that they evolve from $M=10^{13.0-13.5}
261: h^{-1} M_\odot$ halos at $z=3$ to cluster-mass systems with
262: $M=10^{13.9-14.3} h^{-1} M_\odot$ at $z=0$. These are among the $12$
263: most massive halos in the box at $z=0$ and contain $\sim 10-50$
264: sub-halos larger than $10^{11} h^{-1} M_\odot$. This analysis
265: suggests that LBG-2377 will evolve into the dominant galaxy within a
266: large group or cluster by the present day.
267:
268: \subsection{\lya emission}%Section 3.3
269:
270: The double peak nature of the \lya feature in LBG-2377 was only
271: detected with higher resolution and SNR. However, multiple \lya peaks
272: are not unique to LBG-2377. In the LBG spectroscopic survey of
273: \citet{c05}, we find $\sim3$\% of the low-resolution spectra to
274: display double \lya emission peaks and resolved double peaks in their
275: deep image profiles. We can only assume that this fraction increases
276: with higher resolution or SNR. One example of this effect may be
277: found in the sample of \citet{aes06}. Of the nine deep high SNR LBG
278: spectra with \lya in emission, three have double peaks. Two of the
279: remaining six have redshifts within $\Delta z = 0.01$ and a separation
280: of $\sim2''$ and are consistent with a double-peak system at a larger
281: angular separation. Interestingly, upon inspection of the average
282: internal velocity differences between the \lya emission and ISM
283: absorption features ($\Delta z = z_{em} - z_{abs}$), the single peak
284: systems are reported to have $\langle\Delta z\rangle \sim$550 km
285: sec$^{-1}$, whereas the double peak systems have $\langle\Delta
286: z\rangle \sim1200$ km sec$^{-1}$
287: \footnote{This value omits the system C32 that shows a higher redshift
288: for absorption than emission for one of the two components. Including
289: this system results in a $\Delta z \sim900$ km sec$^{-1}$. If the
290: absorption features of the lower redshift systems are weak or narrow
291: in this interpretation, adopting a typical $\Delta z$ for the that
292: system would result in $\Delta z \sim1100$ km sec$^{-1}$ for the
293: assumed two components.}. One plausible interpretation of this
294: discrepancy is the result of the velocity separations, and consequent
295: spectral blending, of two individual interacting systems. Confirming
296: separate components in LBGs showing only \lya in absorption is more
297: difficult. However, there are indications of separate components in
298: the intermediate-resolution, high SNR spectrum of MS1512-cB58
299: \citep{pet02}. The prediction implied is that with higher SNR and/or
300: resolution, a significant fraction, possibly as high as $\sim30$\%, of
301: LBGs with \lya in emission have multiple massive components and may
302: indeed be separate interacting or merging systems. This result would
303: be consistent with the fraction of expected major mergers at $z\sim3$
304: from numerical simulations \citep[e.g.][] {wechsler01,ryan07}), and
305: with galaxy formation theories that suggest mergers are an important
306: contributor to the star formation activity in LBGs
307: \citep{kolatt99,somerville01}.
308:
309: %*********************************************************************
310:
311: \section{Discussion}\label{disc}%Section 4
312:
313: What is the nature of LBG-2377? Possible interpretations are that
314: LBG-2377 represents either (1) a single extended LBG with $M
315: \sim10^{13}M_\odot$ exhibiting multiple regions of vigorous star
316: formation, (2) a single, extended LBG with mass more typical of LBGs
317: ($M\sim10^{12}M_\odot$) that appears over-luminous due to
318: exceptionally high bursts of star formation, (3) multiple unbound $M
319: \sim10^{12}M_\odot$ LBGs in near proximity, or (4) multiple LBGs in a
320: $M \sim10^{13}M_\odot$ halo observed in a late stage of merging. We
321: discuss each scenario below and show that the evidence gathered to
322: date favors interpretation 4.
323:
324: If the component stellar photospheric lines are misidentified and the
325: complex nature of the ISM absorption and \lya emission lines are
326: ascribed to violent mixing of the ISM and discrete star forming
327: regions separated by $\ge 25h^{-1}$ kpc, interpretation 1 may hold.
328: However, a single $M\sim10^{13}M_\odot$ halo with no massive sub-halos
329: is in conflict with simulation results. In this interpretation,
330: LBG-2377 is indeed a massive and extended system that appears to be
331: experiencing a monolithic burst of star formation. Under
332: interpretation 2, LBG-2377 would be in less conflict with simulations
333: yet the above assumptions for stellar and ISM lines must hold. In
334: this case, LBG-2377 is a single system undergoing an unusually strong
335: star formation episode at a level that has not been witnessed in any
336: other LBG. In addition, this exceptional star formation must be
337: occurring in multiple regions separated by $\ge 25h^{-1}$ kpc. If the
338: velocity offsets are interpreted as redshifts, as in interpretation 3,
339: the systems would have separations of $\sim5h^{-1}$ Mpc comoving. An
340: event of three or more unbound systems with $M\sim10^{12}M_\odot$,
341: $\le 1.''0$ angular separations, and an LBG density of
342: $\sim10^{-3}-10^{-4}h^{3}$ Mpc$^-3$ has a vanishingly low probability,
343: even if the systems were given reasonable peculiar velocities. The
344: most likely scenario is interpretation 4 because it is consistent with
345: the extended nature and multiple peaks seen in the images, the
346: superposed spectra of multiple identified components, the observed
347: velocity dispersion, and the expectations from the simulation. In
348: addition, this interpretation provides a natural driver for the
349: observed star formation and bright integrated luminosity.
350: Furthermore, the double \lya emission peak of LBG-2377 is also seen in
351: other LBGs which exhibit two distinct components in their deep images
352: and \lya emission-line velocity differences consistent with close
353: galaxy pairs.
354:
355: LBG-2377 is a fortuitous discovery that enables detailed study of the
356: individual components of a candidate massive galaxy in the late stage
357: of merging. Study of the relationships between the spectral and
358: spatial properties of this single system will constrain the formation
359: processes of the LBG population and lend insight into the fraction of
360: LBGs detected as a result of merger induced star formation. Future
361: high-resolution ground-based IFU data on existing instruments, such as
362: OSIRIS on Keck, have the capability to resolve the velocity structure
363: of LBG-2377 and hence its true nature.
364:
365: %*********************************************************************
366:
367: \acknowledgments
368:
369: J.C. is supported in part by a Gary McCue postdoctoral fellowship
370: through the Center for Cosmology at the University of California,
371: Irvine. E.J.B. and J.S.B. are supported by the Center for Cosmology at
372: the University of California, Irvine and J.S.B. and K.S. are supported
373: by NSF grant AST-0507816. The authors wish to recognize and
374: acknowledge the very significant cultural role and reverence that the
375: summit of Mauna Kea has always had within the indigenous Hawaiian
376: community. We are most fortunate to have the opportunity to conduct
377: observations from this mountain.
378:
379: %*********************************************************************
380:
381: \begin{thebibliography}{}
382:
383: \bibitem[Adelberger et al.(2003)]{a03} Adelberger, K. L., Steidel,
384: C. C., Shapley, A. E., \& Pettini, M. 2003, ApJ, 584, 45
385: \bibitem[Adelberger et al.(2005)]{a05} Adelberger, K. L., Steidel,
386: C. C., Pettini, M., Shapley, A. E., Reddy, N. A., \& Erb,
387: D. K. 2005, ApJ, 619, 697
388: \bibitem[Berrier et al.(2006)]{berrier06} Berrier, J., Bullock, J. S.,
389: Zentner, A. R., Guenther, H., Barton, E. J., Kravtsov, A. V., \&
390: Wechsler, R. H. 2006, ApJ, 652, 56
391: \bibitem[Bertin \& Arnouts(1996)]{ba96} Bertin, E. \& Arnouts,
392: S. 1996, A\&AS, 117, 393
393: \bibitem[Bullock et al.(2001)]{bullock01} Bullock, J.~S., Kolatt,
394: T.~S., Sigad, Y., Somerville, R.~S., Kravtsov, A.~V., Klypin, A.~A.,
395: Primack, J.~R., \& Dekel, A.\ 2001, \mnras, 321, 559
396: \bibitem[Cooke et al.(2005)]{c05} Cooke, J., Wolfe, A. M., Gawiser,
397: E., \& Prochaska, J. X. 2005, ApJ, 621, 596
398: \bibitem[Cooke et al.(2008)]{c08} Cooke, J., Barton, E., Barbour,
399: E. Gawiser, E., \& Wolfe, A. 2008 in preparation
400: \bibitem[Fukugita et al.(1996)]{f96} Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn,
401: J. E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K., \& Schneider, D. P. 1996, AJ, 111,
402: 1748
403: \bibitem[Gardner et al.(2001)]{g01} Gardner, J. P., Brown, T. M., \&
404: Ferguson, H. C. 2000, ApJ, 542L, 79
405: \bibitem[Klypin et al.(1999)]{klypin99} Klypin, A.; Gottlöber, S.,
406: Kravtsov, A. V., \& Khokhlov, A. M. 1999, ApJ, 516, 530
407: \bibitem[Kolatt et al.(1999)]{kolatt99} Kolatt, T. S., Bullock, J. S.,
408: Somerville, R. S., Sigad, Y., Jonsson, P., Kravtsov, A. V., Klypin,
409: A. A., Primack, J. R., Faber, S. M., \& Dekel, A. 1999, ApJ, 523,
410: 109
411: \bibitem[Law et al.(2007)]{law07} Law, D. R., Steidel, C. C., Erb,
412: D. K., Pettini, M., Reddy, N. A., Shapley, A. E., Adelberger, K. L.,
413: \& Simenc, D. J. 2007, ApJ, 656, 1
414: \bibitem[Miley et al.(2006)]{miley06} Miley, George K., Overzier,
415: Roderik A., Zirm, Andrew W., Ford, Holland C., Kurk, Jaron,
416: Pentericci, Laura, Blakeslee, John P., Franx, Marijn, Illingworth,
417: Garth D., Postman, Marc, Rosati, Piero, R\"{o}ttgering, Huub J. A.,
418: Venemans, Bram P., \& Helder, Eveline 2006, ApJ, 650, 29
419: \bibitem[Minor(2007)]{minor07} Minor, Q. 2007, private communication.
420: \bibitem[LRIS; Oke et al.(1995)]{o95} Oke, J. B., Cohen, J. G., Carr,
421: M., Cromer, J., Dingizian, A., Harris, F. H., Labrecque, S.,
422: Lucinio, R., Schaal, W., Epps, H., \& Miller, J. 1995, PASP, 107,
423: 375
424: %\bibitem[Papovich et al.(2001)]{pap01} Papovich, C., Dickinson, M. \&
425: % Ferguson, Henry C. 2001, ApJ, 559, 620
426: \bibitem[Pettini et al.(2000)]{pet00} Pettini, M., Steidel, C. C.,
427: Adelberger, K. L., Dickinson, M., \& Giavalisco, M. 2000, ApJ, 528,
428: 96
429: \bibitem[Pettini et al.(2002)]{pet02} Pettini, M., Rix, S. A.,
430: Steidel, C. C., Adelberger, K. L., Hunt, M. P., \& Shapley,
431: A. E. 2002, ApJ, 569, 742
432: \bibitem[Ryan et al.(2007)]{ryan07} Ryan, R. E., Cohen, S. H.,
433: Windhorst, R. A., \& Silk, J. 2007, arXiv:0712.0416
434: \bibitem[Sawicki \& Thompson(2006)]{saw06} Sawicki, M. \& Thompson,
435: D. 2006, ApJ, 642, 653
436: \bibitem[Shapley et al.(2003)]{aes03} Shapley, A. E., Steidel, C. C.,
437: Adelberger, K. L., \& Pettini, M. 2003, ApJ, 588, 65
438: \bibitem[Shapley et al.(2006)]{aes06} Shapley, A. E., Steidel, C. C.,
439: Pettini, M., Adelberger, K. L., \& Erb, D. K. 2006, ApJ, 651, 688
440: \bibitem[Somerville, Primack \& Faber(2001)]{somerville01} Somerville,
441: R. S., Primack, J. R., \& Faber, S. M. 2001 MNRAS, 320, 504
442: \bibitem[Steidel et al.(1996)]{s96} Steidel, C. C., Giavalisco, M.,
443: Pettini, M., Dickinson, M., \& Adelberger, K. L. 1996, ApJ, 462, 17
444: \bibitem[Steidel et al.(1998)]{s98} Steidel, C. C., Adelberger, K. L.,
445: Giavalisco, M., Dickinson, M., Pettini, M., \& Kellogg, M. 1998,
446: \apj, 492, 428
447: \bibitem[Steidel et al.(1999)]{s99} Steidel, C. C, Adelberger, K. L.,
448: Giavalisco, M., Dickinson, M., \& Pettini, M. 1999, ApJ, 519, 1
449: \bibitem[Steidel et al.(2003)]{s03} Steidel, C. C., Adelberger, K. L.,
450: Shapley, A. E., Pettini, M., Dickinson, M., \& Giavalisco, M. 2003,
451: ApJ, 592, 728
452: \bibitem[Steidel et al.(2004)]{s04} Steidel, C. C., Shapley, A. E.,
453: Pettini, M., Adelberger, K. L., Erb, D. K., Reddy, N. A., \& Hunt,
454: M. P. 2004, ApJ, 604, 534
455: \bibitem[Stern et al.(1999)]{stern99} Stern, D., Dey, A., Spinrad, H.,
456: Maxfield, L., Dickinson, M., Schlegel, D., \& González,
457: R. A. 1999, AJ, 117, 1122
458: \bibitem[Stewart et al.(2007)]{stewart07} Stewart, K. R., Bullock,
459: J. S., Wechsler, R. H., Maller, A. H., \& Zentner,
460: A. R.2007, arXiv:0711.5027
461: \bibitem[Wechsler et al.(2001)]{wechsler01} Wechsler, R. H.,
462: Somerville, R. S., Bullock, J. S., Kolatt, T. S., Primack, J. R.,
463: Blumenthal, G. R., \& Dekel, A. 2001, ApJ, 554, 85
464: \bibitem[Zirm et al.(2005)]{zirm05} Zirm, A. W., Overzier, R. A.,
465: Miley, G. K., Blakeslee, J. P., Clampin, M., De Breuck, C., Demarco,
466: R., Ford, H. C., Hartig, G. F., Homeier, N., Illingworth, G. D.,
467: Martel, A. R., R\"{o}ttgering, H. J. A., Venemans, B., Ardila,
468: D. R., Bartko, F., Ben\'{i}tez, N., Bouwens, R. J., Bradley, L. D.,
469: Broadhurst, T. J., Brown, R. A., Burrows, C. J., Cheng, E. S.,
470: Cross, N. J. G., Feldman, P. D., Franx, M., Golimowski, D. A., Goto,
471: T., Gronwall, C., Holden, B., Infante, L., Kimble, R. A., Krist,
472: J. E., Lesser, M. P., Mei, S., Menanteau, F., Meurer, G. R., Motta,
473: V., Postman, M., Rosati, P., Sirianni, M., Sparks, W. B., Tran,
474: H. D., Tsvetanov, Z. I., White, R. L., \& Zheng, W. 2005, ApJ, 630,
475: 68
476:
477: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}
478: \tabletypesize{\small}
479: \tablecaption{LBG-2377 Components
480: \label{comp}}
481: \tablewidth{0pt}
482: \tablehead{\colhead{Comp.} & \colhead{$z_{Phot}$} &
483: \colhead{$z_{ISM}$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{$z_{Ly\alpha}$} &
484: \colhead{$\Delta v_{ISM}$\tablenotemark{a}\tablenotemark{b}} &
485: \colhead{$\Delta v_{Ly\alpha}$\tablenotemark{b}}}
486: \startdata
487: A & 3.0385 & 3.0354 & (3.0488)\tablenotemark{c} & -230 &
488: (765)\tablenotemark{c}\\
489: B & 3.0343 & 3.0308 & \ldots & -260 & \ldots\\
490: C & 3.0289 & 3.0258 & 3.0416 & -230 & 945 \\
491: D & 3.0244 & 3.0209 & 3.0341 & -260 & 725 \\
492: E & (3.0161)\tablenotemark{c} & (3.0143)\tablenotemark{c} &
493: (3.0263)\tablenotemark{c} & (-135)\tablenotemark{c} &
494: (760)\tablenotemark{c}\\
495: %IGM-A & 2.9972 & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots \\ %-2545
496: %IGM-B & 2.9825 & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & ~~\ldots\\ %-3640
497: \enddata
498: \tablenotetext{a}{Averaged fit to multiple features.}
499: \tablenotetext{b}{Approximate velocity offset with respect to the
500: stellar photospheric velocities in km sec$^{-1}$.}
501: \tablenotetext{c}{Features are weak and respective values have a
502: lower confidence level.}
503: \end{deluxetable}
504:
505: \begin{figure}
506: \begin{center}
507: \scalebox{0.6}[0.7]{\rotatebox{90}{\includegraphics{f1.ps}}}
508: %\scalebox{0.6}[0.7]{\rotatebox{90}{\includegraphics{f1_BW.ps}}}
509: \caption
510: {Contour plots of LBG-2377. The 2-D plot indicates a primary peak
511: located slightly to the E of the object centroid. Secondary and
512: tertiary peaks are detected W and SE of the centroid, respectively.
513: Three 3-D contour plots are inset with rotations (clockwise from
514: upper-right), $185^\circ$, $335^\circ$, and $30^\circ$
515: (S$=0^\circ$).}
516: \label{fig:contour}
517: \end{center}
518: \end{figure}
519:
520: \begin{figure}
521: \begin{center}
522: \scalebox{0.75}[0.65]{\rotatebox{90}{\includegraphics{f2.ps}}}
523: %\scalebox{0.75}[0.65]{\rotatebox{90}{\includegraphics{f2_BW.ps}}}
524: \caption
525: {Spectrum of LBG-2377. This section is shown to illustrate both the
526: double-peak \lya emission feature and broad, complex interstellar
527: absorption features [vertical {\it (blue)} dashed lines]. In all
528: sepctra in this paper, the green line indicates zero flux and the red
529: line is the error array.}
530: \label{fig:600}
531: \end{center}
532: \end{figure}
533:
534: \begin{figure}
535: \begin{center}
536: \scalebox{0.35}[0.40]{\rotatebox{90}{\includegraphics{f3a.ps}}}
537: \scalebox{0.35}[0.40]{\rotatebox{90}{\includegraphics{f3b.ps}}}
538: \scalebox{0.35}[0.40]{\rotatebox{90}{\includegraphics{f3c.ps}}}
539: \scalebox{0.35}[0.40]{\rotatebox{90}{\includegraphics{f3d.ps}}}
540: %\scalebox{0.35}[0.40]{\rotatebox{90}{\includegraphics{f3a_BW.ps}}}
541: %\scalebox{0.35}[0.40]{\rotatebox{90}{\includegraphics{f3b_BW.ps}}}
542: %\scalebox{0.35}[0.40]{\rotatebox{90}{\includegraphics{f3c_BW.ps}}}
543: %\scalebox{0.35}[0.40]{\rotatebox{90}{\includegraphics{f3d_BW.ps}}}
544: \caption
545: {Spectrum of LBG-2377 showing five tentative components (A - E in
546: Table~\ref{comp}) identified using 21 ISM features. Velocities.
547: are with respect to the average of components A, C, \& D. {\it
548: Upper left:} The two strong \lya emission lines (components C \& D)
549: and three potential weak \lya lines [A, B, \& E]. {\it Clockwise
550: from the upper right:} Fits for the ISM transitions Si\textsc{ii},
551: C\textsc{ii}, and O\textsc{i}. Also shown are the stellar
552: photospheric features Si\textsc{iii} 1294.5, 1296.7, C\textsc{iii}
553: 1296.3, C\textsc{ii} 1323.9, N\textsc{iii} 1324.3, and O\textsc{iv}
554: 1343.4 (not labeled for clarity) indicated by short vertical lines.
555: The signal-to-noise ratio is $\sim15$ in these regions, therefore the
556: more prominant features are real. Each absorption feature is in
557: agreement with their respective systemic redshift to within the
558: spectral resolution ($\sim150$ km sec$^{-1}$).}
559: \label{fig:spectra}
560: \end{center}
561: \end{figure}
562:
563:
564: \end{thebibliography}
565:
566: \end{document}
567: