1:
2:
3: \section{\label{sec:intr} Introduction}
4:
5:
6:
7: A molecule of the DNA can attain several hundred $\mu m$ in
8: length. If we neglect details that have a size of one thousand
9: $\AA$, or less, we can visualize it as a soft shapeless line and
10: conclude that on this scale it behaves like an ordinary polymer.
11: In contrast, looking at its smaller segments, of one hundred $\AA$
12: or less, we observe that it tends to be straight. Thus, borrowing
13: a comparison from everyday life, we may say that a molecule of the
14: DNA looks like a piece of steel wire whose long segments are
15: flexible and the short ones are stiff. The elastic properties of
16: the DNA are intimately related to its being a double helix. The
17: latter imposes severe constraints on deformations which can be
18: effected without destroying the molecule and to a large extent
19: determines its mechanical properties. In fact, the two strands
20: comprising the molecule of DNA have just small bending rigidities,
21: just as usual polymers. But the formation of the two-stranded
22: structure drastically changes the DNA by making it both stiff and
23: capable of forming sophisticated spatial shapes. Similarly, the
24: dynamics of the DNA is largely determined by the relative motion
25: of its strands. The functioning of the DNA also involves the
26: charge transport in the molecule. The latter may be related either
27: to the motion of electrons along the strands, or to the tunneling
28: of protons inside the hydrogen bonds connecting the bases. The
29: problem that still waits its answer is whether there is any
30: interaction between the elastic dynamics of the double helix and
31: the tunneling dynamics of charge.
32:
33:
34: The diameter of the DNA is about $20 \AA$, and taking into account
35: its enormous length we may consider it both a microscopical and
36: macroscopical object. Thus, the DNA requires a special means for
37: analysis of its physical properties. Important, the approach from
38: 'first principles' aimed at conformational dynamics , for example
39: using the methods of quantum chemistry, often comes across very
40: serious difficulties, which do not have just technical character,
41: but correspond to the need for a physical picture to rely upon.
42: Therefore, the theoretical study of the DNA is to utilize models,
43: which are necessarily based on extremely crude simplifications.
44: Their connection with the microscopical structure of the DNA, is a
45: matter of intuition rather than of rigorous demonstration. Yet it
46: would not be quite appropriate to accept only rigorously
47: demonstrated facts and to ignore ideas that could motivate the
48: development of the DNA theory and provide a stimulus to further
49: experimentation.
50:
51: Owing to the large stiffness of the molecule of DNA, described by
52: the persistence length of about $500 \AA$ at which it strongly
53: resists strains caused by heat fluctuations, one may try to
54: visualize it as an elastic rod. The above model serves the basis
55: for a number of theoretical approaches, but even though it has
56: turned out to be successful, for example for the topological
57: analysis of the DNA conformations, there are situations in which
58: it does not work properly; specifically, when external charges are
59: to be taken into account. It is also important that it does not
60: allow for the internal degrees of freedom due to the two-stranded
61: helical structure. The latter imposes stringent constraints on
62: possible strains of a molecule of the DNA, which result in the
63: specific structure of its vibrational modes, very important for
64: understanding its functioning. Therefore, we shall consider
65: consequences that may be inferred from the basic properties of the
66: DNA, aiming at a qualitative approach that uses simple theoretical
67: models that may accommodate the internal degrees of freedom. At
68: this point we should like to note that since different problems
69: require the use of appropriate approximations and specific choice
70: of dynamical variables, there is no unique form of the energy
71: functional, even though the object of our study remains a
72: molecular of the DNA. Indeed, we shall choose various forms of
73: the energy owing to the necessity to accommodate conformations of
74: the DNA under consideration and external conditions in action.
75:
76: Let us recall that the double helix of DNA consists of long
77: chains, or strands, which have the backbones composed of sugar and
78: phosphate residues, and special chemicals, bases, keeping the two
79: strands together. The fundamental building blocks of the strands
80: are nucleotides, joined to each other in polynucleotide chains.
81: The nucleotide consists of a phosphate joined to a sugar
82: (2'-deoxyribose), to which a base is attached. The sugar and base
83: alone are called a nucleoside. The chains, or strands, of the DNA
84: wind round each other in a spiral forming a double helix, the
85: bases being arranged in pairs: adenine - thymine (AT), guanine -
86: cytosine (GC), so that the sequence of bases in one strand
87: determines the complimentary sequence of bases in the other and
88: constitutes the genetic code stored by the molecule of DNA. There
89: are several forms of the DNA, denoted by A,B, and Z. The most
90: common one in nature, is the so-called B-form. One turn of the
91: helix of the B-form, corresponds approximately to $10.5$
92: base-pairs, and the distance between adjacent pairs of bases is
93: approximately $3.4 \AA$. In real life there are considerable
94: deviations from the canonical B-form of the DNA. Therefore, there
95: is a need for a special nomenclature for describing its
96: conformations (see \cite{calladine} for the details). In fact, it
97: is easy to see that generally a considerable set of parameters are
98: required to this end. For example, even if we assume a simple
99: picture of base pairs as flat plates, we still need to use vector
100: quantities for describing their distance from each other and
101: angles for mutual orientation, that is on the whole nine
102: parameters. The most common one, Roll and Tilt, shall describe the
103: planes of successive base pairs not being parallel, as is
104: prescribed for the B-form. In fact, it is necessary to introduce
105: the so-called propeller angle for defining the measure for
106: deviations of the normals to the bases inside a base-pair. It is
107: worth noting that the deviations from the canonical form are by no
108: means small, and may have a size of tens of degrees.
109:
110:
111: In contrast to the sugar-phosphate backbone of a single strand of
112: DNA, which is formed by strong covalent forces, the double helix
113: of the DNA is due to the interplay of {\it weak} chemical forces.
114: In fact, the two chains of the DNA are held together by the
115: hydrogen bonds between complementary bases and the stacking
116: interactions between adjacent bases attached to the same
117: sugar-phosphate strand above each other in neighbouring pairs, so
118: that on the whole it requires the energy of order $10 Kcal/mol$ or
119: several $k_B T$, whereas the covalent bonds are by orders of
120: magnitude larger, see \cite{Saenger}. The main contribution to the
121: thermodynamic stability of the double helix is due to the hydrogen
122: bonds which require the specific choice of the pairs, adenine -
123: thymine, guanine-cytosine. The important point about it is that
124: there is a competition between the hydrogen bonds formed by
125: base-pairs and the hydrogen bonds of the molecule with water in
126: aqueous solution\label{Hbonds}. It is generally believed, even
127: though it is worthwhile to mention that there are no adequate
128: theoretical estimates to the effect (see p.\pageref{HWcomp}, where
129: we discuss a rough qualitative model of the phenomenon) that the
130: competition makes for the increase of entropy, and thus the
131: stability of the DNA. The stacking interaction is due to the bases
132: being flat water-insoluble molecules, lying above each other
133: roughly perpendicular to the direction of the helical axis so as
134: to enable electron clouds between bases to contribute to the
135: helical stability. This is again only a plausible hypothesis, or
136: even simply an intuitive picture that needs careful investigating.
137: The energy of the interaction between complementary base pairs has
138: been estimated by various means which rely on experimental data
139: and computer calculations within the framework of the quantum
140: chemistry, \cite{SantaLucia}. It is generally falls within $10
141: Kcal/mol$ (see \cite{SantaLucia} for more recent results).
142:
143:
144: The large persistence length of the DNA, $\approx 500 \AA$, which is more than $20$ times larger its
145: diameter, serves the main, and essentially intuitive, argument for considering it as an elastic rod
146: and employing the methods of continuum mechanics for its study. Strictly speaking, this is not
147: correct, for the cross section of this 'rod' corresponding just to a base-pair comprises only several
148: tens of atoms. The main argument in favour of such approach is generally the pragmatic one, "the truth
149: is useful" . In fact, as follows from numerical simulation within the framework of this approach, the
150: above model appears to be acceptable for many regimes that involve functioning of the DNA ,
151: \cite{marko}, \cite{sig1}. It needs some modifications so as to take into account the important
152: effects of the anisotropy due to unsymmetrical positions of constituent nucleoside, and thus requires
153: the use of anisotropic elastic modulii. Equally important, there is also a geometrical asymmetry
154: generated by the relative positions of nucleosides inside a base pair. The asymmetry can be
155: visualized as two groves on the surface of the rod. The grooves are helpful in describing the
156: interactions of the DNA with external charges by allowing the graphic representation of their
157: distribution on the surface of a molecule of DNA. It should be noted as well that a molecule of the
158: DNA is itself negatively charged. Therefore, the emerging picture of the DNA conformation due to
159: elastic and electrostatic forces is generally very complicated, and should be treated within the
160: framework of electro-elasticity theory. But the available experimental values of elastic stretch
161: constants and the dependence of persistence lengths on the ionic strength of aqueous solution,
162: indicate that, strictly speaking, a molecule of the DNA does not behave like an elastic rod,
163: \cite{bloomfield}. The effect could be due to the backbones of the two DNA strands, which contain
164: phosphoric groups carrying negative charge that may cause the strands to repel each other, facilitate
165: the separation of the strands, and make for the double-helix being less stable, at low ionic strength,
166: \cite{bloomfield}. The overall picture strongly depends on the specific arrangement of the constituent
167: base pairs, because the forces keeping a base-pair together depend on the choice of constituent
168: nucleotides, the number of the hydrogen bonds involved being different, e.g. 2 for adenine - thymine
169: and 3 for guanine - cytosine. It is also important, that the relative positions of bases change from
170: pair to pair. Obviously, we are very far from the simple elastic rod model. Therefore, there is a need
171: for a semi-microscopical theory that could accommodate the elasticity of the DNA and take into account
172: its micro-structure.
173:
174:
175: The current approach to the problem relies on the hypothesis that
176: it is possible to separate the dynamical modes of the bases and
177: the sugar-phosphate backbone by considering the coupling between
178: them as perturbation. The backbone modes are suggested to be
179: strongly overdamped, whereas the modes due to the motion of the
180: bases, or inter-strand modes, are assumed to be less sensitive to
181: the viscosity of ambient liquid. The theoretical calculations of
182: paper \cite{georghiou} support the statement, whereas the
183: experiments on Raman scattering, \cite{urabe2},\cite{urabe},
184: indicate that the attenuation of the modes is substantial, see
185: also \cite{proh1} for the theoretical treatment of the
186: inter-strand modes.\label{attenuation}
187:
188: The approaches commonly used to manufacture qualitative models
189: that could give an adequate picture of the dynamics of the DNA,
190: are generally based on the concept of lattice ( see paper
191: \cite{kovaleva1}, \cite{kovaleva2}, \cite{us} in which a
192: coarse-grained model is considered), that is one considers the
193: molecule of DNA as a regular structure similar to a
194: one-dimensional crystal. It is necessary to take into account
195: that: (1) the DNA comprises the two strands; (2) the strands are
196: bound together by certain forces determining inter-strand motions;
197: (3)the relative position of the strands verify the helical
198: symmetry. But, the DNA is not totally symmetrical structure due to
199: the choice of base-pairs, which is generally random. This
200: circumstance results in considerable theoretical complications.
201: Important, the helical structure supposes the existence of the
202: preferred local system of coordinates for every base-pair, and
203: these coordinate systems should change from one base-pair to
204: another, the neighbouring one. Constructions accommodating the
205: phenomenon utilize the concept of gauge field, following its
206: current use in field theory and condensed matter physics. In the
207: case of the DNA dynamics, it allows for at least qualitative
208: description of its elastic modes.
209:
210:
211: Using the lattice has also the advantage of allowing for
212: tautomeric forms of the base pairs. There are of two classes of
213: the DNA bases, purine (adenine, guanine )and pyrimidine (cytosine,
214: thymine). Under the ordinary circumstances adenine and cytosine
215: are in amino form, and only rarely in the imino one, whereas
216: guanine and thymine prefer the keto form, and rarely the enol one.
217: Inside the base-pairs the transformation of the tautomeric forms
218: correspond to the tunneling transitions of protons in the hydrogen
219: bonds keeping the bases together. It is alleged that the
220: transitions may result in mutations, \cite{CW1}, \cite{CW2},
221: \cite{Loew}, \cite{Crick}. The intriguing question is whether
222: there is an interplay among the elastic properties of the DNA and
223: the tautomeric transitions.
224: