1: %%

2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'

3: %%

4: %% Modified 2004 January 9

5: %%

6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the

7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.

8: 

9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document

10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore

11: %% any data that comes before this command.

12: 

13: %% The command below calls the preprint style

14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.

15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use

16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.

17: %%

18: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

19: 

20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:

21: 

22: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

23: 

24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:

25: 

26: %%\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

27: 

28: %%\documentclass{emulateapj}

29: 

30: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the

31: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,

32: %% use the longabstract style option.

33: 

34: \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}

35: 

36: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so

37: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before

38: %% the \begin{document} command.

39: %%

40: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts

41: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing

42: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide

43: %% for information.

44: 

45: 

46: \def\hst{\textsl{HST}}

47: \def\rosat{\textsl{ROSAT}}

48: \def\hri{\textsl{HRI}}

49: \def\ein{\textsl{Einstein}}

50: \def\chandra{\textsl{Chandra}}

51: \def\deg{\hbox{$^\circ$}}

52: \def\sun{\hbox{$\odot$}}

53: \def\farcm{\hbox{$.\mkern-4mu^\prime$}}

54: \def\farcs{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\prime\prime}$}}

55: 

56: 

57: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

58: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}

59: 

60: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.

61: 

62: \slugcomment{Accepted by the Astronomical Journal.}

63: 

64: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although

65: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.

66: %% The left head contains a list of authors,

67: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.).  The right

68: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.

69: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.

70: 

71: \shorttitle{The Accretion Tail of Arp 285}

72: \shortauthors{Smith et al.}

73: 

74: %% This is the end of the preamble.  Indicate the beginning of the

75: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.

76: 

77: \begin{document}

78: 

79: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than

80: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if

81: %% you desire.

82: 

83: \title{Stochastic `Beads on a String' in the Accretion Tail of Arp 285}

84: 

85: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format

86: %% author and affiliation information.

87: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command

88: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address

89: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.

90: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.

91: 

92: \author{Beverly J. Smith}

93: \affil{Department of Physics, Astronomy, and Geology, East Tennessee

94: State University, Johnson City TN  37614}

95: \email{smithbj@etsu.edu}

96: 

97: \author{Curtis Struck}

98: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames IA  50011}

99: \email{curt@iastate.edu}

100: 

101: \author{Mark Hancock}

102: \affil{Department of Physics, Astronomy, and Geology, East Tennessee

103: State University, Johnson City TN  37614}

104: \email{hancockm@etsu.edu}

105: 

106: \author{Mark L. Giroux}

107: \affil{Department of Physics, Astronomy, and Geology, East Tennessee

108: State University, Johnson City TN  37614}

109: \email{girouxm@etsu.edu}

110: 

111: \author{Philip N. Appleton}

112: \affil{NASA Herschel Science Center, 

113: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA  91125}

114: \email{apple@ipac.caltech.edu}

115: 

116: \author{Vassilis Charmandaris\footnote{IESL/Foundation

117: for Research and Technology - Hellas, GR-71110, Heraklion, Greece

118: and 

119: Chercheur Associ\'e, Observatoire

120: de Paris, F-75014, Paris, France}}

121: \affil{Department of Physics, University of Crete, Heraklion Greece 71003}

122: \email{vassilis@physics.uoc.gr}

123: 

124: \author{William Reach}

125: \affil{Spitzer Science Center, 

126: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA  91125}

127: \email{reach@ipac.caltech.edu}

128: 

129: \author{Sabrina Hurlock}

130: \affil{Department of Physics, Astronomy, and Geology, East Tennessee

131: State University, Johnson City TN  37614}

132: \email{zshh7@imail.etsu.edu}

133: 

134: \and

135: 

136: \author{Jeong-Sun Hwang}

137: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames IA  50011}

138: \email{jshwang@iastate.edu}

139: 

140: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which

141: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name.  Specify alternate

142: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each

143: %% affiliation.

144: 

145: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript

146: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the

147: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author

148: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the

149: %% editorial office after submission.

150: 

151: \begin{abstract}

152: We present Spitzer infrared, 

153: GALEX UV, and SDSS and SARA optical images 

154: of the peculiar interacting

155: galaxy pair Arp 285 (NGC 2856/4), and compare with a

156: new numerical model of the interaction.  We estimate the ages of clumps

157: of star formation in these galaxies

158: using population synthesis models, carefully considering the uncertainties

159: on these ages.

160: This system contains a striking example of `beads on a string': a series of

161: star formation complexes $\sim$1 kpc apart.

162: These `beads' are found in a tail-like feature that is perpendicular to

163: the disk of NGC 2856, which implies that it was formed from material accreted

164: from the companion NGC 2854.

165: The extreme blueness of the optical/UV colors and redness of the mid-infrared

166: colors implies very young stellar ages ($\sim$ 4 $-$ 20 Myrs)

167: for these star forming regions.

168: Spectral decomposition of these `beads' shows excess emission 

169: above the modeled stellar continuum

170: in the 3.6 $\mu$m

171: and 4.5 $\mu$m bands,

172: indicating either contributions from interstellar matter

173: to these fluxes or

174: a second older stellar population.

175: These clumps have 

176: $-$12.0 $<$ M$_{\rm B}$

177: $<$ $-$10.6, thus they are less luminous than most dwarf galaxies.

178: Our model 

179: suggests that

180: bridge material falling into the

181: potential of the companion overshoots

182: the companion.  The gas then

183: piles up at apo-galacticon before

184: falling back onto the companion, and 

185: star formation occurs in the pile-up.  There was a time delay

186: of $\sim$500 Myrs 

187: between the point of closest approach between the two galaxies and the

188: initiation of star formation in this feature.

189: A luminous (M$_{\rm B}$ $\sim$ $-$13.6) extended (FWHM $\sim$ 1.3 kpc)

190: `bright spot' is visible at the northwestern edge

191: of the NGC 2856 disk, with an intermediate stellar population

192: (400 $-$ 1500 Myrs).

193: Our model suggests that this feature is part of a expanding

194: ripple-like

195: `arc' created by an off-center ring-galaxy-like collision between the

196: two disks.

197: 

198: \end{abstract}

199: 

200: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented

201: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors

202: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine

203: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.

204: 

205: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper

206: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so in the

207: %% subject header.  Objects should be in the appropriate "individual"

208: %% headers (e.g. quasars: individual, stars: individual, etc.) with the

209: %% additional provision that the total number of headers, including each

210: %% individual object, not exceed six.  The \objectname{} macro, and its

211: %% alias \object{}, is used to mark each object.  The macro takes the object

212: %% name as its primary argument.  This name will appear in the paper

213: %% and serve as the link's anchor in the electronic edition if the name

214: %% is recognized by the data centers.  The macro also takes an optional

215: %% argument in parentheses in cases where the data center identification

216: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper.

217: 

218: \keywords{galaxies: starbursts ---

219: galaxies: interactions---

220: galaxies: individual (\objectname{Arp 285}).

221: }

222: 

223: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.

224: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep

225: %% and \citet commands to identify citations.  The citations are

226: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds

227: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have

228: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus

229: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for

230: %% each reference.

231: 

232: \section{Introduction}

233: Galaxy evolution is strongly driven by interactions and mergers

234: between galaxies.

235: Interactions can

236: produce tidal tails and bridges

237: \citep{toomre72},

238: increase

239: star formation rates \citep{kennicutt87, bushouse88},

240: and trigger

241: the formation of 

242: young super-star clusters \citep{holtzman92, holtzman96}.

243: Tidal material

244: can contribute to the intergalactic medium 

245: \citep{morris94} and to intergalactic starlight \citep{feldmeier02}.

246: Gas-rich galaxy mergers can produce

247: ultra-luminous

248: infrared galaxies 

249: \citep{soifer87, smith87, sanders88},

250: while

251: concentrations of stars and gas in tidal features may become independent

252: dwarf galaxies 

253: \citep{barnes92, elmegreen93}.

254: 

255: The key to understanding these processes

256: is careful comparison of

257: multi-wavelength observations of nearby galaxies with 

258: dynamical models.

259: Since

260: interactions and mergers are even more common

261: at high redshift

262: than in the local Universe 

263: (e.g., \citealp{abraham01}),

264: detailed studies of nearby interacting

265: systems

266: are important for interpreting high redshift surveys.

267: Such studies 

268: can provide information on the timescale of the interaction,

269: the history of gas compression in different

270: regions, 

271: star formation triggering, dissipation in the gas,

272: multiple bursts of star formation,

273: and mass transfer between galaxies

274: \citep{struck03, struck05, smith05b, hancock07}.

275: Computer simulations

276: can provide predictions of the distribution of star formation,

277: which can be compared to observational results to

278: estimate the effects of compression strength, duration, and other

279: factors (e.g., \citealp{struck03}).

280: 

281: To study star formation enhancement in pre-merger interacting systems,

282: we obtained mid-infrared observations

283: with the Spitzer telescope \citep{werner04}

284: for three dozen interacting galaxies selected

285: from the \citet{arp66}

286: Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies (the `Spirals, Bridges,

287: and Tails' (SB\&T) sample; \citealp{smith07}).

288: We have completed detailed multi-wavelength studies

289: of three of the galaxy pairs in the SB\&T sample, and have constructed

290: matching hydrodynamical models of their encounters:

291: Arp 284 

292: \citep{smith97, struck03, smith05a},

293: Arp 107 \citep{smith05b},

294: and Arp 82 \citep{hancock07}.

295: A similar study of the interacting pair IC 2163/NGC 2207 was presented 

296: by \citet{struck05} and \citet{elmegreen06}, while 

297: Arp 24 was studied by

298: \citet{chen07}.

299: 

300: In the current paper, we describe a multi-wavelength study

301: of another of the SB\&T systems,

302: the interacting galaxy pair Arp 285 (NGC 2856/4), and compare

303: with a new numerical model of the interaction.

304: The more northern galaxy in this widely separated pair, NGC 2856,

305: has a peculiar tail-like feature extending out perpendicular to the disk

306: (Figure 1).  \citet{toomre72} suggested that this feature  

307: is material from the southern galaxy NGC 2854, 

308: which has accreted onto NGC 2856 via the bridge.

309: The presence of a massive HI counterpart to this tail

310: and the HI velocity field support this hypothesis

311: \citep{chengalur94, chengalur95}.

312: The Spitzer 3.6 $\mu$m $-$ 8.0 $\mu$m broadband infrared color of the

313: NGC 2856 tail

314: is the reddest of all the tidal features

315: in the SB\&T sample

316: \citep{smith07},

317: implying a very young stellar population. 

318: 

319: In the current study, we 

320: investigate star formation in Arp 285 

321: by combining our Spitzer 

322: mid-infrared images 

323: with 

324: ultraviolet

325: images from the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) mission 

326: \citep{martin05} and optical images from the Sloan Digitized Sky Survey (SDSS) 

327: \citep{abazajian03}

328: and the Southeastern

329: Association for Research in Astronomy (SARA) 

330: telescope\footnote{http://astro.fit.edu/sara/sara.html}.

331: We also compare with the 2MASS Atlas near-infrared images of

332: Arp 285 \citep{cutri06}.

333: Arp 285 is relatively nearby,

334: at a distance of 39 Mpc (H$_0$ = 75 km~s$^{-1}$Mpc$^{-1}$).

335: 

336: \section{Observations}

337: 

338: The Spitzer infrared observations and data reductions are described

339: in detail in \citet{smith07}.  The data used includes broadband

340: 3.6 $\mu$m, 4.5 $\mu$m, 5.8 $\mu$m and 8.0 $\mu$m images from

341: the Infrared Array Camera (IRAC; \citealp{fazio04}),

342: with spatial resolutions of 1\farcs5 $-$ 2\farcs0, a pixel size

343: of 1\farcs2, and a field of view of 7\farcm8 $\times$ 12\farcm6.

344: A 24 $\mu$m image of Arp 285 was also obtained 

345: with the Multiband

346: Imaging Photometry

347: for Spitzer (MIPS;

348: \citealp{rieke04}), however, it has pronounced artifacts from the 

349: point spread function (see image in \citealp{smith07}).

350: Because of these

351: artifacts, this image is 

352: only useful for determining total galaxian fluxes, not fluxes for individual clumps

353: or tidal features.  Thus it is not used in this analysis.

354: 

355: Arp 285 was observed 

356: as part of the Sloan Digitalized Sky Survey (SDSS)

357: in the ugriz optical

358: filters 

359: (effective wavelengths 3560\AA, 4680\AA,

360: 6180\AA, 7500\AA, and 8870\AA, respectively).

361: These images have a pixel size of 0\farcs40 and a field of view of 13\farcm5 $\times$

362: 9\farcm8.

363: The two galaxies in the pair are in two different SDSS

364: fields of view.

365: The FWHM point spread function is $\sim$1\farcs2, based on stars in the field.

366: 

367: Arp 285 was also observed with the SARA 0.9m optical telescope on 2006 Jan 29,

368: in partly cloudy weather.

369: An 1152$\times$770

370: Apogee Alta

371: CCD with

372: a pixel size of 0\farcs64~pixel$^{-1}$ was used, giving a field of view of 

373: 12\farcm3 $\times$ 8\farcm2.

374: A total of three 600 second exposures were made in a broadband R

375: filter,

376: along with seven 600 second images in a redshifted

377: H$\alpha$ filter centered at 664 nm with a FWHM of 7 nm.

378: For Arp 285, this filter contains

379: both H$\alpha$ and the [N~II] $\lambda$$\lambda$6548,6583 line.

380: The SARA data were reduced in the standard way using the Image

381: Reduction and Analysis Facility 

382: (IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the National 

383: Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated 

384: by the Association of Universities for Research 

385: in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National

386: Science Foundation.})

387: software.  Continuum subtraction was accomplished using the scaled 

388: R band image.

389: 

390: 

391: Arp 285 was observed 

392: in a 

393: near-ultraviolet

394: (NUV) broadband filter (1750 $-$ 2800 \AA) 

395: by 

396: GALEX as part of the GALEX 

397: Medium Imaging Survey (MIS)

398: \citep{martin05}.

399: The MIS image had a total integration time of 813 sec.

400: Arp 285 was also observed in the 

401: far-ultraviolet (FUV) (1350 $-$ 1705 \AA)

402: as part of the 

403: GALEX All-Sky Survey \citep{martin05}, 

404: with a shorter exposure

405: time

406: of  

407: 112 

408: seconds.

409: The GALEX spatial resolution is $\sim$5$''$,

410: with a pixel size of 1\farcs5.  The field of view is circular,

411: with 

412: a 1.2{\deg} diameter.

413: 

414: The total magnitudes 

415: for NGC 2854 and NGC 2856

416: in the various

417: filters 

418: are given in Table 1.

419: 

420: \section{The Morphology of Arp 285}

421: 

422: \subsection{NGC 2856}

423: 

424: In Figure 2,

425: we present

426: a montage of the UV, optical, and infrared images of NGC 2856, the northern galaxy

427: in the Arp 285 pair.

428: In the optical images, a dusty spiral

429: pattern and a central bar-like feature are seen in the disk.

430: A series of four clumps are visible along the northern tail

431: in all of the optical images, except for the u image (only 

432: two clumps detected)

433: and the z image (only one clump detected).

434: These clumps are labeled on the g image in the last panel in Figure 2.

435: From south to north, the 

436: separations between the clumps are

437: 7\farcs6 (1.4 kpc), 6\farcs9 (1.3 kpc), and 5\farcs1 (1.0 kpc).

438: Clumps 1 and 2 have bright unresolved or marginally-resolved

439: cores (FWHM $<$ 1\farcs3 = 250 pc) in the g image; clumps 3 and 4 are 

440: fainter in g,

441: with multiple peaks.

442: 

443: The

444: Spitzer 

445: 5.8 $\mu$m and 8.0 $\mu$m images are affected by `banding', where bright

446: point sources (such as galactic nuclei) cause horizontal `bands' in the images

447: (Spitzer Infrared Array Camera Data Manual, Version 2.0, 2005).

448: As discussed in \citet{smith07}, 

449: we corrected for these artifacts by interpolating from nearby clean regions.

450: Unfortunately, the correction was not perfect for NGC 2856, 

451: leaving a residual

452: diagonal

453: `stripe' across the rotated image near the tail (see Figure 2).

454: In spite of this, however,

455: clump 3 is detected in all four Spitzer bands, and clump 2 is detected

456: at 3.6 $\mu$m and 4.5 $\mu$m.

457: Clump 1 is not detected in any of the Spitzer filters, while clump 4

458: has only a marginal detection at 8.0 $\mu$m.

459: Note that clump 2 is brightest in the SDSS data, but clump

460: 3 is brightest at 8 $\mu$m.

461: 

462: The northern tail is also visible in both the FUV and NUV images.

463: In the longer exposure NUV image, clumps 1 $-$ 3 are bright,

464: while clump 4 is marginally detected.

465: In the short exposure FUV image,

466: with the low resolution spatial resolution of GALEX

467: the individual clumps are not well-resolved.

468: The northern tail is not detected in the 2MASS 

469: near-infrared images.

470: 

471: In the SARA H$\alpha$ map (Figure 3), only clump 2 is detected in

472: the northern tail.  

473: This implies that clump 3, the brightest clump

474: at 8 $\mu$m, is more extincted.  

475: This is consistent with the 

476: $\sim$12$''$ resolution

477: C Array 

478: HI map of 

479: \citet{chengalur94}.  In this map,

480: two HI peaks are clearly

481: visible in the northern tail.  The brightest HI peak

482: is approximately coincident

483: with clump 1, while the second is near clump 3.

484: Thus clump 2 may be less extincted than these other clumps.

485: This is consistent with our analysis of the optical

486: colors (see Section 4.2).

487: 

488: In the u through 4.5 $\mu$m images of NGC 2856,

489: a `bright spot' is visible in the northwestern edge of

490: the disk of NGC 2856 (see Figure 2).

491: This `bright spot' is also visible in the Arp image (Figure 1),

492: and is marginally detected in the 2MASS H and K$_s$ images.

493: However, it is not seen as a discrete source

494: at 5.8 $\mu$m, 8.0 $\mu$m, or in the FUV, NUV, 

495: H$\alpha$, or 2MASS J images (Figures 2 and 3).

496: Unlike the clumps in the northern tail, this `bright spot' is smoothly

497: extended in the SDSS images, 

498: with a FWHM $\sim$ 7$''$ (1.3 kpc) in the g filter, 

499: without a compact core or cores.

500: 

501: Within the inner disk of NGC 2856, bright 8 $\mu$m and 

502: H$\alpha$ sources are visible

503: at the ends of the bar and 

504: the nucleus (Figures 2 and 3).  The bar is asymmetric,

505: with 

506: the clump near the southern end of the bar

507: being brighter than the northern source in both 8 $\mu$m and H$\alpha$.

508: In the higher resolution

509: SDSS images, the sources at the ends of the bar are resolved into

510: 2 $-$ 4 peaks separated by 2$''$ $-$ 3$''$ (0.4 $-$ 0.6 kpc).  

511: 

512: In Figure 4, a band-merged approximately true-color optical SDSS image of

513: NGC 2856 is presented.  This shows that the clumps in the northern tail

514: are bluer than the

515: main disk of the galaxy.  The dust features and the spiral pattern

516: are also visible in this picture.

517: The northeastern spiral arm is bluer than the southwestern

518: portion of the disk.  This is also apparent in Figure 2.

519: In the FUV, NUV, and u

520: images, the northeastern

521: portion of the disk is brighter than

522: the southwestern section, but in the longer wavelength images, the disk is more 

523: symmetric.  This

524: suggests that the difference at shorter wavelengths is due

525: to extinction.

526: This implies that the northeastern side of NGC 2856 is closest to us. This

527: is consistent with the sense of rotation indicated by the HI velocity

528: field \citep{chengalur94}, assuming the northwestern spiral arm is trailing.

529: 

530: A connecting bridge between the two

531: galaxies is visible in the smoothed g and r SDSS images (see Figure 5),

532: but is not seen in u, i, or z.

533: This bridge is aligned with the `bright spot' in the disk.

534: In Figure 5, 

535: the northern tail is visible out to $\approx$72$''$ (14 kpc) from the disk.

536: A 

537: bend and a sudden drop-off in brightness is evident in this tail

538: just north of the four bright clumps of star formation.

539: Another possible faint clump is visible in the smoothed g image 

540: $\sim$7.9$''$ (1.5 kpc) northwest of clump 4, north of the bend.

541: This bend and the bridge are also visible in the Arp image (Figure 1).

542: 

543: \subsection{NGC 2854}

544: 

545: In Figure 6, a montage of the UV, optical, and infrared images

546: of the southern galaxy NGC 2854 is shown.

547: On-going star formation 

548: is detected

549: along the spiral arms and at the ends of the bar.

550: The base of the northern tail/bridge appears double in the u, g, r, 5.8 $\mu$m,

551: and 8.0 $\mu$m images.

552: A series of clumps are visible in the spiral arms in both

553: the optical and the infrared images, and 8 $\mu$m-bright sources

554: are seen at the ends of the bar.

555: For some clumps, there are 1$''$ $-$ 2$''$ offsets between the optical

556: and 8 $\mu$m peaks; for others, including the nuclear source, there is no 

557: clear optical peak associated with the 8 $\mu$m source.

558: In the last panel of Figure 6, we identify eight clumps selected based on

559: the 8 $\mu$m image.

560: 

561: The SARA H$\alpha$ and R maps of NGC 2854 are presented in Figure 7, with

562: the H$\alpha$ superimposed on the g and 8 $\mu$m images.

563: All of the 8 $\mu$m clumps except clump 6 were detected in H$\alpha$.

564: In addition, possible H$\alpha$ emission is seen associated with 

565: the western portion of the double bridge.

566: 

567: An approximately true-color optical SDSS image of NGC 2854 is displayed in

568: Figure 8.  The double bridge structure is visible in this image.

569: The knots along the northern arm are visible.  The southern

570: end of the bar is bluer than the northern end, and the southern arm/tail

571: is bluer than the northern arm.

572: The southwestern end of the bar is particularly bright in the UV, but

573: less so in the mid-infrared (Figure 6).

574: NGC 2854 appears more symmetric in the Spitzer images

575: than 

576: at shorter wavelengths.

577: This implies that the color variations seen in the optical/UV

578: are due to extinction.  The color variations suggest that the southern side of 

579: NGC 2854 is the near side, consistent with the HI velocity field of

580: \citet{chengalur94} and trailing

581: spiral arms.

582: 

583: The smoothed g image of NGC 2854 is presented in Figure 9.

584: A faint optical tail is detected, extending 1\farcm8 (20 kpc) to the south,

585: coincident with the long HI tail seen by \citet{chengalur94}.

586: This tail is also visible in the smoothed FUV and NUV images.

587: 

588: Approximately 3$'$ due north of NGC 2854, at 9$^{\rm h}$ 24$^{\rm m}$

589: 2.9$^{\rm s}$, 49$^{\circ}$ 14$'$ 41$''$ (J2000), a small angular size

590: galaxy is visible on the Arp image (Figure 1).  This galaxy is

591: detected in all of the GALEX and SDSS bands, as well

592: as the Spitzer 3.6 $\mu$m and 4.5 $\mu$m filters.  At the

593: present time, no redshift is available for this source, so it 

594: is unknown whether it is associated with Arp 285.

595: Its proximity to a very bright star (see Figure 1) prevents a reliable

596: H$\alpha$ detection.

597: The magnitudes of this galaxy in the various filters are given in 

598: Table 1.  The UV/optical colors are quite blue, consistent with

599: a young stellar population.

600: 

601: \section{Clump Analysis}

602: 

603: \subsection{Photometry }

604: 

605: The positions, SDSS, and GALEX 

606: magnitudes and Spitzer flux densities of the clumps 

607: in the NGC 2856 tail and the two disks of Arp 285

608: are given in Table 2 in R.A. order.

609: The 

610: photometry was done using the IRAF 

611: {\it daophot} routine.

612: For the tail and the `bright spot',

613: the positions were determined by eye based

614: on the g image, while the disk positions

615: are the 8 $\mu$m peaks.

616: These positions are marked in the last panels of Figures 2 and 6.

617: The apertures 

618: we utilized are given in Table 3, along with the aperture corrections used

619: to correct to total magnitudes.

620: Since the clumps in the northern tail are separated by only $\sim$5$''$

621: $-$ 7$''$, we 

622: used relatively small apertures for the tail clump photometry.

623: For the disk clumps, we used larger apertures because of

624: less crowding, and 

625: because there are sometimes multiple

626: optical peaks associated with a single Spitzer source.

627: 

628: For background subtraction, the local galaxian background 

629: was determined using the

630: mode in an annulus surrounding the source (see Table 3).

631: To estimate the uncertainty in the colors of the clumps

632: due to background subtraction,

633: in addition to the statistical uncertainties determined

634: from the rms in the background annuli, in calculating the colors

635: we added in quadrature a

636: second uncertainty term,

637: determined from comparing the 

638: clump colors obtained with the above method with those

639: obtained with slightly larger annulus.

640: 

641: We also extracted approximate J, H, and K$_s$ photometry

642: for the clumps from the 2MASS Atlas images.   

643: These near-infrared fluxes were not used in the population synthesis

644: modeling (Section 4.2), but were only used for comparison with the

645: Spitzer data (Section 4.3), thus we did not include the second

646: sky annulus.

647: 

648: We also obtained the total FUV and NUV flux for a

649: 25\farcs8 $\times$ 9\farcs7 region containing the four knots.

650: These magnitudes are also given in Table 2, along with 

651: the SDSS and Spitzer magnitudes for the same region.

652: The uncertainties given in Table 2 for this region were calculated as in

653: \citet{smith07}, including both statistical uncertainties

654: and the uncertainty in the sky level.

655: The total g flux in this rectangular region is $\sim$3$\times$

656: the sum of the g fluxes for the four clumps (see Table 2), thus there

657: is significant diffuse emission in this tail.

658: 

659: 

660: \subsection{Ages}

661: 

662: In Figure 10, 

663: we plot the SDSS 

664: g $-$ r colors

665: for both the tail and disk clumps vs.\

666: their u $-$ g colors. 

667: In 

668: Figure 11,

669: NUV $-$ g is plotted against

670: g $-$ r.

671: Similar plots of 

672: r $-$ i vs.\ g $-$ r,

673: i $-$ z vs.\

674: r $-$ i, 

675: and FUV $-$ NUV vs.\ g $-$ r

676: are presented in the Appendix.

677: These Figures also include

678: the colors for the 

679: 25\farcs8 $\times$

680: 9\farcs7 

681: rectangular region that includes the four clumps in the northern tail.

682: 

683: To estimate the ages of these clumps, we calculated theoretical colors

684: for star forming regions

685: using version 5.1 of the 

686: Starburst99 

687: population synthesis code

688: \citep{leitherer99}. 

689: This version

690: includes the Padova

691: asymptotic giant branch stellar

692: models \citep{vaz05}.

693: These models assume an instantaneous burst with a Kroupa

694: (2002)

695: initial mass function (IMF)

696: and an initial mass range of 0.1 $-$ 100 M$_{\sun}$.  

697: We calculated colors for a range of ages $\tau$ from 1 Myr to 10 Gyrs.

698: We used a time step size

699: of 

700: $\Delta$$\tau$ = 1 Myrs for 0 $<$ $\tau$ $<$ 1 Gyr,

701: and 

702: $\Delta$$\tau$ = 100 Myrs for 1.1 $<$ $\tau$ $<$ 10 Gyr.

703: The \citet{calzetti94} starburst dust reddening law was assumed.

704: We also generated models using a Salpeter IMF, and found the colors

705: differed only slightly from those with the Kroupa IMF.  This is

706: consistent with earlier studies

707: \citep{macarthur04}.

708: To the broadband fluxes, we added in the contributions from H$\alpha$

709: emission, which can be substantial in the r filter.  For a 1 Myr 

710: star forming region, H$\alpha$ decreases the r magnitude

711: by 1.1 magnitude; at 5 Myrs, H$\alpha$ contributes $\sim$0.25 magnitudes

712: (see Figure 10).

713: 

714: To systematically estimate ages and extinctions for the clumps in

715: Table 2,

716: we used 

717: a 

718: $\chi^2$ minimization calculation (e.g., \citealp{pas03}) to

719: determine the fit of the observed colors to that of the models:

720: 

721: $$\chi^2 = \sum^{N}_{i=1}\left(\frac{obs_{i} -

722: model_{i}}{\sigma_{i}}\right)^2$$

723: 

724: \noindent In this equation, N is the number of colors used in the analysis,

725: obs$_i$ is the observed color,  model$_i$ is the corresponding model

726: color, and $\sigma_i$ is the uncertainty in the obs$_i$ color.  

727: A good fit is indicated by 

728: $\chi$$^2$ $<$ N.

729: In these calculations, we did not include filters with non-detections.

730: In a few cases, it was not possible to

731: find a good fit when the low

732: S/N FUV or z fluxes were included.  In these cases, they were 

733: not used in determining the ages.

734: 

735: To estimate the uncertainties in the best-fit parameters, we used

736: the $\Delta$$\chi^2$ method \citep{press92} to determine

737: 68.3\% confidence levels for the parameters.

738: The best-fit parameters and their uncertainties 

739: are given in Table 4, along with 

740: the colors used in the fits.

741: We assumed 

742: solar

743: metallicity in these models.

744: In the Appendix, we give results assuming

745: 1/5 solar metallicity.

746: The derived age ranges for the two metallicities 

747: are similar, thus the assumed metallicity has little effect on the

748: derived ages.

749: We note that, because 

750: the clump masses are relatively low (see Section 4.4),

751: stochastic sampling of the IMF can affect

752: the age determinations (e.g., \citealp{cervino02}).

753: We do not include this effect in

754: our calculations. 

755: 

756: On the color-color plots of the clump colors,

757: we superimpose the 

758: solar metallicity models.

759: Using only optical colors, it is often difficult to distinguish between

760: reddening due to age and reddening due to extinction 

761: (see Figure 10).

762: Fortunately, however, some clumps were detected in the UV,

763: which in some cases can

764: constrain the ages further (see Table 4).

765: The clumps in the tail have very blue optical/UV colors,

766: thus 

767: they have both low extinctions and young ages, with

768: E(B $-$ V) $\sim$ 0.1 and ages $\sim$ 4 $-$ 20 Myrs (Table 4).

769: Clump 1 is slightly redder than the other clumps, 

770: implying a slightly older

771: age and/or a higher extinction.

772: 

773: As noted previously,

774: in the HI map of 

775: \citet{chengalur94}, 

776: two peaks are visible in the tail,

777: near clumps 1 and 3.

778: The brightest peak has an HI column density 

779: $\approx$ 2 $\times$ 10$^{21}$ atoms~cm$^{-2}$, while 

780: the second has N(HI)

781: $\approx$ 10$^{21}$ atoms~cm$^{-2}$.

782: Assuming the standard Galactic N(H)-to-extinction ratio

783: of N(H)/E(B$-$V) = 5.8 $\times$ 10$^{21}$ atoms~cm$^{-2}$~mag$^{-1}$

784: \citep{bohlin78}

785: and neglecting possible molecular gas, these imply

786: E(B $-$ V) $\approx$ 0.3 to clump 1 and 

787: E(B $-$ V) $\approx$ 0.15 to clump 3. 

788: These are consistent with the population synthesis results

789: (Table 4).

790: 

791: In the optical colors (Figure 10), the nuclei of the two

792: galaxies (cyan open diamond 3 and open black circle 7)

793: are quite red, meaning high extinctions and/or age.  

794: Since they were undetected with GALEX,

795: we are not able to tightly constrain

796: their ages (see Table 4).

797: In the case of the `bright spot' in the NGC 2856 disk, 

798: the optical colors can 

799: only constrain the age to between 5 $-$ 1500 Myrs.

800: The lack of a detection in the NUV, however, further constrains

801: the age to be 

802: $^{>}_{\sim}$400 Myrs (see Figure 11).  

803: 

804: We also attempted to model the ages of the diffuse

805: emission in the two galaxian disks and the northern tail

806: by subtracting the clump light from the total emission.

807: We modeled the star formation history

808: of the diffuse emission

809: in two ways: as an instantaneous burst

810: and as continuous star formation.  

811: With the exception of ruling out

812: extremely young ages (1 $-$ 5 Myrs),

813: we cannot strongly constrain the age of the diffuse

814: emission.

815: For 

816: the instantaneous burst models,

817: we get upper limits to the ages of

818: the diffuse emission in the NGC 2854 and NGC 2856 disks

819: of

820: 1.5 Gyrs and 400 Myrs, respectively.

821: This implies that there are some recently formed stars in the disks

822: outside of the regions

823: we defined as clumps.  This does not, however, rule out an additional

824: underlying older stellar population in the disks.

825: 

826: %We investigated the effect of varying the metallicity on

827: %the age derivations.  We found that decreasing the 

828: %metallicity in the models to 0.5 solar had 

829: %little effect on the derived ages

830: %of these clumps.  

831: %This is consistent with

832: %our work on 

833: %well-studied Galactic

834: %star clusters, which showed that age estimates from population synthesis

835: %models 

836: %change very little when the metallicity of the models

837: %was varied by a factor of two

838: %\citep{hancock08}.

839: 

840: \subsection{Spitzer Colors}

841: 

842: Figure 12 shows the 

843: Spitzer [3.6 $\mu$m] $-$ [4.5 $\mu$m] 

844: vs. [4.5 $\mu$m] $-$ [5.8 $\mu$m] colors for the clumps in the

845: NGC 2856 tail (magenta

846: diamonds), the NGC 2856 disk (cyan open diamonds), and the NGC 2854 disk (black

847: open circles).  

848: A similar plot for 

849: [4.5] $-$ [5.8] vs.\ [5.8] $-$ [8.0] is provided in the Appendix.

850: These colors are compared to the colors

851: of 

852: %quasars (red circles, from \citealp{hatz05}), 

853: the Arp 107 

854: and Arp 82 clumps (green diamonds,

855: from \citealp{smith05b} and \citealp{hancock07}), 

856: Galactic interstellar dust (blue X's; from \citealp{flagey06}), 

857: M0III stars (open blue square, from Cohen 2005, private communication),

858: and field stars (magenta open triangle, from \citealp{whitney04}), as well

859: as the total colors for the NGC 2856 tail region (red filled triangle).

860: 

861: As show in Figure 12, [3.6] $-$ [4.5] $\approx$ 0.0 for both stars

862: and Galactic dust.  Global values for both interacting and 

863: spiral galaxy disks are also close to this value \citep{smith07},

864: as are the clumps in the disks of Arp 285, 107, and 82 (Figure 12).

865: The [5.8] $-$ [8.0] colors of most of the clumps 

866: in the three Arp systems

867: are similar to those

868: of interstellar matter and redder than 

869: stars, as expected since these

870: bands are likely dominated by interstellar dust emission.

871: The 

872: [4.5] $-$ [5.8] colors of the Arp clumps 

873: are 

874: mainly

875: between those of stars

876: and interstellar matter (Figure 12), suggesting contributions from both.

877: The very red [4.5] $-$ [5.8] color

878: of clump 3 in the Arp 285 tail compared to the

879: clumps in Arp 107 and Arp 82 and the

880: other clumps in Arp 285 (Figure 12) implies 

881: more contributions from interstellar matter.

882: This is consistent with the very young age determined from the optical

883: colors (Table 4).

884: 

885: To disentangle the contributions from 

886: starlight and dust to the Spitzer bands, the results of our

887: stellar population synthesis (Section 5) are helpful.

888: In Figure 13, we plot the full optical-mid-infrared spectral

889: energy distribution (SED) for tail clump 3.  We superimpose

890: on this plot our best-fit Starburst99 model (4 Myrs, E(B$-$V) = 0.1),

891: along with models that span

892: our 1$\sigma$ uncertainty (68\% confidence)

893: in the age (3 $-$ 6 Myrs).

894: In addition, we include a theoretical dust spectrum from

895: \citet{dl07}.  This dust spectrum shows the broad polycyclic

896: aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) mid-infrared emission features,

897: as well as a `hot dust' continuum.  The plotted dust

898: spectrum was calculated with the solar neighborhood interstellar

899: radiation field, scaled up by a factor of U = 100. It uses

900: a PAH-to-total-dust mass ratio of q$_{PAH}$ = 4.6$\%$.

901: The dust SED in our wavelength range does not vary much with U;

902: lowering q$_{PAH}$ weakens the PAH features \citep{dl07}.

903: The dust model has been scaled to fit the observed 8 $\mu$m flux.

904: The solid line in this plot is the combined stellar-dust

905: spectrum.  

906: The H$\alpha$ contribution to the SDSS r band is clearly visible in

907: this plot.  A contribution to 

908: the broadband 3.6 $\mu$m

909: Spitzer flux from the 3.3 $\mu$m PAH feature is also apparent.

910: 

911: Figure 13 indicates that, in addition to the PAH contribution to the

912: 3.6 $\mu$m band and the modeled stellar component, 

913: the 3.6 $\mu$m and 4.5 $\mu$m fluxes of tail clump 3

914: also include another component.

915: Either there is 

916: a significant `hot dust' contribution to these bands, as 

917: indicated by the \citet{dl07} model, or there

918: is a second underlying older stellar component that is not revealed

919: by

920: the optical/UV population synthesis.

921: 

922: For comparison to tail clump 3, 

923: in Figure 14 we plot the 

924: SED of clump 2 in the NGC 2856 disk.

925: Although this also has a very young stellar population (see Table 4),

926: it has a much more reddened SED than the tail clump because of much

927: higher extinction.   Also, although PAH emission is clearly

928: present at 8 $\mu$m, in the 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m bands 

929: most of the emission is stellar, in contrast to clump 3 in the tail.

930: 

931: The `bright spot' in the NGC 2856 disk (cyan clump 1) is undetected

932: at 5.8 $\mu$m and 8.0 $\mu$m, with a very blue

933: [4.5] $-$ [5.8] 

934: upper limit compared to

935: the other clumps (Figure 12).

936: This suggests that this region has an older stellar population than the

937: other disk clumps.

938: As noted earlier, 

939: with the available optical data we could not strongly constrain the age

940: of this clump (Table 4), however, the lack of an NUV detection

941: points to an older age (see Section 4.2).   

942: The Spitzer results are consistent with this conclusion.

943: This shows that Spitzer mid-infrared data may

944: be useful for breaking the age-extinction degeneracy

945: in optical colors.

946: In Figure 15, we plot the SED for the `bright spot', with the

947: best fit from the optical data shown.  The NUV limit plotted

948: shows the additional constraint on the age.

949: The SED plot shows that the 3.6 $\mu$m and 4.5 $\mu$m

950: emission is dominated by starlight, with very little if any 

951: dust contributing.

952: 

953: The two Arp 285 nuclei have 

954: [4.5] $-$ [5.8] and [5.8] $-$ [8.0] colors similar to the other clumps,

955: implying nuclear starbursts. 

956: This is in contrast to 

957: the Arp 107 nuclei (Figure 12), 

958: which have older stellar populations \citep{smith05b}.

959: The two nuclei in Arp 82, like those in Arp 285,

960: have Spitzer colors of star forming regions

961: \citep{hancock07}.

962: 

963: \subsection{Absolute Magnitudes and Masses }

964: 

965: In Table 5, we compare the absolute optical magnitudes of the NGC 2856

966: tail clumps with dwarf galaxies, candidate tidal dwarf galaxies (TDGs),

967: `super star clusters' (SSCs), and the tail clumps in Arp 82.

968: The Arp 285 tail clumps are lower luminosity than

969: most nearby irregular galaxies and tidal dwarf galaxies,

970: and are

971: near the lower end of the range for 

972: SSCs.

973: The faintest Arp 285 tail clump, clump 4, is somewhat 

974: less luminous than R136, the

975: bright star cluster in 30 Doradus in the Large Magellanic Cloud

976: \citep{oconnell94}.

977: In contrast, the `bright spot' in the NGC 2856 disk is near the

978: median for dwarf irregular galaxies.

979: 

980: For the Arp 285 clumps,

981: in Table 6 we give the range of

982: stellar masses 

983: inferred

984: from the Starburst99 models. 

985: In this table, we also provide 

986: stellar masses of various other objects for comparison.

987: The tail clumps are similar in mass to Galactic globular clusters,

988: but have lower stellar masses than

989: those inferred for tidal dwarf galaxies and dwarf irregular galaxies.

990: The mass of the 

991: NGC 2856 disk `bright spot' is near the median for dwarf irregular

992: galaxies.

993: 

994: The 3.6 $\mu$m Spitzer band

995: is sometimes used as a 

996: tracer of stellar mass (e.g., \citealp{li07}).  However,

997: our SED plots (Figures 13 $-$ 15)

998: show that the stellar mass-to-3.6 $\mu$m

999: luminosity varies significantly from clump to clump, depending

1000: upon the star formation rate and gas-to-star ratio.

1001: This is illustrated in Figure 16, where we plot the 

1002: stellar mass of the clump determined from the population synthesis

1003: model against the 3.6 $\mu$m luminosity.  

1004: We have also included values for

1005: the clumps in Arp 82 \citep{hancock07}.

1006: On this curve, we have superimposed

1007: lines of constant stellar mass-to-light ratios 

1008: of M/L$_{3.6}$ =

1009: 1 M$_{\sun}$/L$_{\sun}$ (solid line) and 

1010: M/L$_{3.6}$ =

1011: 10 M$_{\sun}$/L$_{\sun}$ (dotted line), where

1012: L$_{\sun}$ is the bolometric luminosity of the Sun.

1013: This plot shows that the NGC 2856 tail clumps

1014: and four clumps in NGC 2854 (clumps 1, 3, 5, and 6,

1015: in the outer parts of the spiral arms)

1016: have lower 

1017: M/L$_{3.6}$ ratios than the other clumps, which are

1018: close to the 

1019: M/L$_{3.6}$ =

1020: 10 M$_{\sun}$/L$_{\sun}$ line.

1021: This indicates that contributions from hot dust

1022: and/or the 3.3 $\mu$m PAH feature

1023: to the 3.6 $\mu$m flux

1024: are significant 

1025: in the tail and outer spiral

1026: arm regions.

1027: Thus caution

1028: should be used in utilizing the Spitzer 3.6 $\mu$m

1029: band to estimate stellar masses in star forming

1030: regions.  For example, for clump 3 in the tail,

1031: the stellar mass is $\sim$1/30th that expected based

1032: on the  

1033: M/L$_{3.6}$ =

1034: 10 M$_{\sun}$/L$_{\sun}$ relationship.

1035: 

1036: 

1037: \section{A Numerical Model of the Encounter}

1038: 

1039: To interpret these observational results in terms of the 

1040: dynamical and star forming history of Arp 285,

1041: we have constructed a numerical simulation of the Arp 285 interaction 

1042: using the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) code of \citet{struck97}.

1043: This code was previously used to model Arp 284 \citep{struck03},

1044: IC 2163/NGC 2207 \citep{struck05}, Arp 107 \citep{smith05b},

1045: and Arp 82 \citep{hancock07}.  

1046: 

1047: \subsection{Constraints on the Model}

1048: 

1049: Arp 285 is less 

1050: symmetric than the ring galaxies or planar fly-by encounters 

1051: like M51, NGC 2207/IC2163, and Arp 82. 

1052: The collisional morphology of Arp 285

1053: appears somewhat similar to that of Arp 284, an asymmetric ring/tail 

1054: galaxy (NGC 7714) with an edge-on companion (NGC 7715).

1055: The substantial bridge and tail of NGC 2854, like those of NGC 7715,

1056: lead us to believe that it suffered 

1057: a strong prograde encounter. 

1058: There are also similarities between NGC 7714 and NGC 2856.

1059: The optical images show that the `bright spot' in the northwestern

1060: section of the NGC 2856 disk (disk clump 1) 

1061: is part of an arc-like structure (see Figures 1 and 2).

1062: This arc is 

1063: reminiscent of the partial ring in NGC 7714 (see the \citet{arp66}

1064: photograph of Arp 284), which has

1065: been successfully modeled by an off-center collision \citep{struck03}.

1066: It is also reminiscent of 

1067: the `ripples' in Arp 227, 

1068: which were also modeled by a ring galaxy-like collision 

1069: by \citet{wallin88}.

1070: 

1071: There are some differences between NGC 2856 and NGC 7714, however.

1072: In contrast to NGC 7714,

1073: NGC 2856 lacks strong tidal tails, 

1074: except for the northern tail perpendicular to the disk and 

1075: a short HI extension to the northwest \citep{chengalur94}.

1076: This suggests that NGC 

1077: 2856 did not experience the encounter as very prograde. 

1078: It also does not have the fan-like form common to strong 

1079: retrograde encounters.

1080: This suggests that the orbital path of the two galaxies

1081: is at a large angle to the plane of the NGC 2856 disk.

1082: 

1083: These considerations give us some idea of the type of 

1084: collision that produced the current morphologies. 

1085: %However, 

1086: %since we cannot easily deconvolve the tidal distortions of 

1087: %the disks from projection effects, we do not know the 

1088: %disk orientations. Kinematics could be helpful 

1089: %in determining these, but the HI observations of \citet{chengalur94}

1090: %are of modest resolution. 

1091: %Thus, it seems premature to attempt a very detailed model 

1092: %of the two galaxies and the interaction until higher resolution 

1093: %observations are available. For this reason we have 

1094: In our simulation of this encounter,

1095: we have 

1096: limited ourselves to the goal of reproducing the large-scale 

1097: morphological structures,

1098: but have not 

1099: attempted to simulate internal disk structures 

1100: nor match the system kinematics

1101: in any 

1102: detail.

1103: 

1104: One key feature we would like the models to help us 

1105: understand are the beads in the tail north of NGC 2856.

1106: We have considered several conceptual ideas for the origin of this material. The HI morphology suggests that this material is an extension of the bridge from NGC 2854, though the optical observations look as though the bridge curves away from that direction before connecting to the bead region. It may be that the ‘bridge’ is in fact a tidal tail, which is merely projected onto NGC 2856, not connected. However, the HI kinematics indicate that this is unlikely. Moreover, the bead material seems strongly affected by the gravitational potential of NGC 2856. 

1107: 

1108: Thus, it seems likely that the bead material is accreting onto 

1109: the halo of NGC 2856 from the bridge. There 

1110: two possibilities for how this occurs:

1111: i) as infall through the disk of NGC 2856 and out the other side, or 

1112: ii) by swinging around that disk to the other side. 

1113: It is difficult to distinguish between these two scenarios 

1114: observationally.

1115: In option i) we can imagine that clouds pushing through the 

1116: NGC 2856 disk are shocked and compressed.  This may

1117: trigger star cluster formation, accounting for the beads. 

1118: We would naively expect this process to be sequential, so 

1119: that the beads furthest from the disk are oldest. 

1120: In contrast,

1121: in option ii), a group of inflowing clouds pile up in the halo of 

1122: NGC 2856 and collide with material that arrived earlier.

1123: This could 

1124: trigger star formation simultaneously at several locations. 

1125: Thus option i) would predict an age gradient, while for

1126: option ii)

1127: we would expect roughly coeval clumps.

1128: With the available data, we cannot distinguish between

1129: these two possibilities, since the expected

1130: age gradient for option i) is too small to measure.

1131: Assuming a nominal velocity for the tidal material

1132: away from the disk 

1133: of $\sim$300 km~s$^{-1}$ and motion in the plane of the sky,

1134: for scenario i)

1135: we would expect an age difference

1136: of $\sim$12 Myrs between the first and fourth clumps

1137: in the tail, and $\sim$4 Myrs between clumps 2 and 3.   

1138: This is smaller than the uncertainties on the ages of

1139: these clumps (Table 4).

1140: 

1141: Another way to distinguish between these two scenarios

1142: is with numerical models of the interaction.

1143: For option i),

1144: we were not able to construct a viable simulation

1145: with a small number of trial runs.

1146: The fundamental difficulty is that in order to 

1147: produce the spirals and other tidal structures in 

1148: NGC 2854 the collision must have a substantial prograde 

1149: fly-by component with respect to NGC 2854.

1150: In that case,

1151: however, material accreted onto 

1152: NGC 2856 from NGC 2854 generally has too much 

1153: relative angular momentum to fall directly onto the NGC 2856 disk. 

1154: Because of this, we suspect that such models occupy a small 

1155: volume of the collision parameter space.

1156: We have therefore chosen to focus on models for option ii).

1157: These are discussed in the next two sections.

1158: 

1159: \subsection{Model Details}

1160: 

1161: In the SPH

1162: code, hydrodynamical forces are calculated

1163: on a grid with fixed spacing. Gravitational forces are computed between particles in adjacent cells, to capture local gravitational instabilities. 

1164: The model galaxies have disks containing both gas particles and collisionless star particles, as well as rigid dark halo potentials (see 

1165: \citet{struck97} 

1166: for details). 

1167: Gas particles with densities exceeding a constant density threshold

1168: are identified as star-forming particles.

1169: These generally exceed the local Jeans critical mass.

1170: A number of simulations were run; we will only present the 

1171: results of the best model.

1172: 

1173: The evolution of our numerical model for the Arp 285 system is 

1174: presented in Figure 17, with additional timesteps provided

1175: in the Appendix.

1176: We adopt the convention that the model primary 

1177: corresponds to the southern galaxy NGC 2854 and the companion to NGC 2856. 

1178: The particles in Figure 17 are color-coded according to their galaxy of

1179: origin, with red particles originating from the primary disk

1180: and green from the companion.

1181: A total of 13,590 star 

1182: and 42,900 gas particles were used in the 

1183: primary disk and 5640 star and 5640 gas particles in 

1184: the secondary disk. 

1185: In this model, the length unit = 1.0 kpc, and the time unit is 200 Myr. 

1186: Figure 17 shows four timesteps in the simulation.

1187: The first plot (top left) shows the appearance in the plane

1188: of the sky near the time

1189: of closest approach, 

1190: where the separation between the two galaxies is $\sim$12 kpc.

1191: The second plot (top right) shows the system

1192: 370 Myrs

1193: after

1194: closest approach, while the third (bottom left) shows its

1195: appearance 510 Myrs after closest approach.

1196: These two plots match approximately the observed appearance

1197: at the present time.

1198: The last plot shows the appearance 740 Myrs after closest approach,

1199: the predicted appearance in the future.

1200: 

1201: The radii of the primary star and gas disks are 

1202: 6.0 and 10.8 kpc, respectively. The companion star and gas disk radii are both 3.6 kpc. 

1203: The primary disk was set up in the x-y plane. The companion disk is first set up in the x-y plane, then rotated $40^{\circ}$ around a y-axis through its center, and then $–90^{\circ}$ around the z-axis passing through its center. The relative orbit of the companion is in the x-y plane, so from 

1204: the point of view of the companion disk, the primary approaches at a fairly steep angle.  

1205: In the companion disk of the model in Figure 17, the south side is

1206: the near side.

1207: 

1208: The orbit is counter-clockwise, as is the rotation of the primary, so it sees the encounter as very prograde. The companion disk rotation, in the x-y plane before the tilts are applied, is clockwise. The initial (x,y,z) position of the companion relative to the primary center is  ($-$8.9, $-$20.0, 0.0) 

1209: kpc. Its initial relative velocity 

1210: is (250, 75, 0) km~s$^{-1}$.

1211: 

1212: The form of the halo potential of the two galaxies is such that the acceleration of a test particle in this halo is 

1213: 

1214: \begin{equation}

1215: a =

1216: \frac{G{M_h}}{{\epsilon}^2}\

1217: \frac{r/{\epsilon}}{(1 + r^2/{\epsilon}^2)^{n_h}},

1218: \end{equation}

1219: 

1220: \noindent

1221: where $M_h$ is a halo mass scale, $\epsilon$ is a core radius (set to 2.0 and 4.0 kpc for the primary and companion, respectively), and the index $n_h$ specifies the compactness of the halo. For the primary we 

1222: use $M_{h} = 1.3 \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$ and $n_h = 1.2$, which gives a slightly declining rotation curve at large radii. For the companion we take $M_{h} = 2.8 \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$ and $n_h = 1.35$, 

1223: which gives a more rapidly declining rotation curve. The 

1224: model includes the effects of dynamical friction with a Chandrasekhar-like frictional term (see \citealp{struck03}). 

1225: The effects of this term are small except near closest approach.

1226: 

1227: With these potentials, the halo masses for the primary and 

1228: companion out to a radius of 12 kpc 

1229: (about the separation at closest approach) are 3.7 $\times$ $10^{10}$ 

1230: M$_{\odot}$ and 

1231: 3.4 $\times$ $10^{10}$ M$_{\odot}$, respectively,

1232: with a ratio of about 0.92. This 

1233: is in accord with the near equality of the r and i band 

1234: luminosities of the two galaxies (Table 1).

1235: 

1236: \subsection{Model Results}

1237: 

1238: The general morphology of the system is quite well reproduced by the model, including the moderate countertail on NGC 2854

1239: and the bridge (see Figure 17). 

1240: A very close encounter is required to produce a bridge as 

1241: massive as observed. 

1242: On the other hand, the moderate-sized tail of the primary galaxy is the result of a prograde perturbation that was not prolonged. These facts, and the relatively large separation between the galaxies, argue that the relative orbit of the companion is quite elliptical, as in the model. 

1243: 

1244: The model primary disk is more circular in appearance than that of NGC 2854. There are several possible reasons for the difference. The first is simply that the model disk should have a greater tilt relative to the plane of observation (here the x-y plane). 

1245: The primary disk in the model is in the x-y plane of the sky.

1246: However, as noted in Section 3.2, based on extinction arguments and

1247: the HI velocity field,

1248: the real disk is somewhat

1249: inclined to the line of sight, with the south side closest.  

1250: It is also possible that tidal stretching is responsible for the shape of the primary disk. However, in that case we might expect a longer and more massive tidal tail. This is a rather soft argument at present, but it does appear that the 

1251: bar and the spiral arms of the primary disk are disproportionately strong relative to the tail. This suggests that the bar and spiral arms were present in 

1252: the NGC 2854

1253: disk before the encounter. This possibility was not included in the modeling. 

1254: 

1255: In addition to the bridge, the model companion galaxy has two

1256: tidal tails, one made of material originating from the companion galaxy itself,

1257: and one from material accreted from the primary galaxy along the bridge

1258: (see Figure 17).

1259: The 

1260: tidal plume drawn off the companion 

1261: disk is visible as the green

1262: feature extending northward in the last three panels of Figure 17. 

1263: We equate 

1264: this structure 

1265: with the HI emission extending to the northwest in the

1266: \citet{chengalur94} HI maps, 

1267: though it is not at the same position angle as in the observations,

1268: being oriented about 45$^{\circ}$ too much to the north compared to

1269: the data.

1270: The red feature extending to the northeast in Figure 17 

1271: we associate with the northern HI tail containing

1272: the `beads' of star formation.

1273: As with the other feature, the position angle

1274: of the model tail is somewhat

1275: off from the observed orientation.

1276: 

1277: In the model, the disk of the companion was

1278: tilted relative to the direction of the encounter, 

1279: so the perturbation had both an 

1280: orthogonal, ring-galaxy-like component, 

1281: and a retrograde component. 

1282: Waves with circular arc-like components 

1283: develop in the disk of the companion.

1284: This behavior might account for the 

1285: northwest arc-like structure in NGC 2856

1286: containing the `bright spot'.

1287: 

1288: As with NGC 2854,

1289: the observed structure of NGC 2856 also shows a bar and internal arms. 

1290: However, in this galaxy the structure of the bar 

1291: is rather irregular. 

1292: The simulation shows that a large mass of gas loses 

1293: angular momentum 

1294: as a result of the encounter, and forms 

1295: a compressed inner disk or bar. 

1296: Thus, the bar in NGC 2856 may be the result of the collision, and

1297: may not have existed before the encounter.

1298: 

1299: The evolution of the bridge in this model 

1300: is especially interesting. Because of its elliptical 

1301: trajectory, the companion speeds past its point of closest 

1302: approach as the bridge begins to form. As the bridge 

1303: initially stretches outward from the primary center, 

1304: it lags behind the companion. Later, the companion 

1305: nears its apogalacticon relative to the primary, and slows, 

1306: so the bridge catches up to it. The bridge material has 

1307: significant angular momentum relative to the companion center, 

1308: so the outermost points swing around to the far side of the companion. 

1309: Shortly thereafter the bridge material

1310: begins to pile-up at an outer radius 

1311: northeast of the companion. 

1312: As time goes on, more bridge material 

1313: streams 

1314: into this pile-up region,

1315: and 

1316: compression 

1317: drives star formation. 

1318: In 

1319: Figure 17, star-forming gas particles are marked with cyan astericks. 

1320: In the second panel, one asterisk is visible in the pile-up region. 

1321: Comparison of different timesteps and different models 

1322: shows that the star formation there is quite stochastic. 

1323: Sometimes there are a number of star-forming particles there, 

1324: and occasionally they line up like the observed `beads'. 

1325: Since the model does not accurately represent 

1326: the effects of self-gravity across this 

1327: pile-up region, the real environment 

1328: may trigger more such star formation than in the model.

1329: 

1330: 

1331: Material from both the accretion tail and the companion's

1332: plume 

1333: eventually

1334: accrete onto the companion.

1335: Gas in the companion is compressed by 

1336: the tidal perturbation, and experiences prolonged accretion. 

1337: In the model, the density threshold for star formation 

1338: is easily exceeded, and central star formation continues for

1339: some time. 

1340: This is consistent with

1341: the uncertainties on the age of the stellar population 

1342: in disk clump 3 (the nucleus) of NGC 2856 (Table 4).

1343: 

1344: Our simulation

1345: somewhat resembles models of polar ring formation via

1346: accretion 

1347: from a companion \citep{resh06},

1348: however, the two

1349: model galaxies merge

1350: before this polar ring proceeds

1351: very far in its development (see later timesteps in Appendix).

1352: The star clusters formed 

1353: in the pile-up region will eventually be 

1354: carried with the companion halo into the merger with the primary. 

1355: They are likely to end up orbiting in the inner halo of 

1356: the merger remnant and possibly adding to the globular cluster 

1357: population there. This is in contrast to dwarf galaxies 

1358: formed at the end of tidal tails, which may spend 

1359: long periods in the outer halo. 

1360: 

1361: 

1362: 

1363: 

1364: \section{Discussion}

1365: 

1366: The clumps in the northern tail of NGC 2856

1367: are a striking example of the `beads on a string' phenomenon,

1368: in which star forming regions are regularly spaced $\sim$1 kpc

1369: apart along spiral arms and in tidal features 

1370: \citep{elmegreen96}.

1371: Such a `beads on a string' morphology may be indicative of the gravitational

1372: collapse of interstellar gas clouds under self-gravity 

1373: \citep{elmegreen96}.

1374: Similar `bead strings' are also seen in 

1375: the interacting systems IC 2163/NGC 2207

1376: \citep{elmegreen06}

1377: and Arp 82 \citep{hancock07}.  

1378: In IC 2163/NGC 2207, 

1379: the `beads' resolve

1380: into associations of star clusters in higher resolution Hubble Space

1381: Telescope (HST) images \citep{elmegreen06}.

1382: In general, HST images of nearby

1383: galaxies show that young star clusters

1384: themselves tend to be clustered into complexes with 

1385: typical sizes of $\sim$1 kpc \citep{zhang01, larsen04, bastian05}.

1386: As noted earlier, clumps 3 and 4 in the NGC 2856 tail have multiple peaks

1387: visible in the SDSS images.

1388: It is possible that the other two tail clumps,

1389: clumps 1 and 2, which

1390: are unresolved in the SDSS

1391: images, 

1392: will also resolve into multiple star clusters at higher

1393: resolution.

1394: 

1395: The optical-UV colors of the clumps 

1396: in the NGC 2856 tail are very blue,

1397: and 

1398: imply ages of only $\sim$4 $-$ 20

1399: Myrs.

1400: This is much younger than the time since the point of closest

1401: approach between the two galaxies,

1402: showing that there is a time delay between the initiation of star 

1403: formation and the time of closest approach between the two galaxies.

1404: According

1405: to our numerical model of this system, there should be 

1406: an underlying older stellar component in this tail, made of 

1407: stars stripped from the NGC 2854 disk.

1408: Diffuse optical light is clearly present between the clumps,

1409: and the stellar tail extends 41$''$ (7.8 kpc) to the north

1410: beyond clump 4.  However, we are not able to tightly

1411: constrain the age of this diffuse

1412: stellar population.  Thus it is unclear from the available data

1413: whether

1414: a stellar component to the tail existed

1415: before the current star forming episode.

1416: 

1417: The tail clumps are lower mass than concentrations in other

1418: tails previously classified as tidal dwarf galaxies (see Table 6).

1419: They are more similar in mass to globular clusters than dwarf

1420: irregular galaxies.  Because of their low mass and the lack of

1421: 24 $\mu$m detections and calibrated H$\alpha$ measurements,

1422: it is not possible to get accurate star formation rates

1423: for these clumps.  Very roughly, using the 8 $\mu$m

1424: luminosity 

1425: for 

1426: clump 3 in the northern tail, 

1427: and assuming the 

1428: 8 $\mu$m $-$ 24 $\mu$m

1429: relationship found for M51 clumps of \citet{calzetti05} and their

1430: correlation between star formation rate 

1431: and 24 $\mu$m luminosity, we find a

1432: star formation rate for this clump of $\sim$10$^{-3}$ M$_{\sun}$~yr$^{-1}$.

1433: This value is very uncertain due to the low mass

1434: and the bootstrapping from the 8 $\mu$m flux.

1435: 

1436: In our model, gas from the bridge falling into the potential

1437: of the companion overshoots the companion, piling up in an accretion

1438: tail on the far side of the companion.

1439: Star formation occurs in this region.   Our model suggests that 

1440: the `beads on the string'

1441: may be the result of stochastic processes, albeit in a density

1442: enhanced pileup zone.

1443: It is

1444: possible

1445: that local self gravity is pulling clumps together. The spacing between

1446: the star forming regions in the model

1447: is comparable to the scale of local self-gravity in the code.

1448: At most timesteps, the star formation is found in a couple of

1449: isolated

1450: clumps,

1451: without any `beads' appearance.

1452: Thus it appears we are seeing this feature at a favorable time.

1453: 

1454: The Arp 285 tail is not unique.

1455: Accretion from a companion along a bridge

1456: may have 

1457: produced

1458: the

1459: star forming

1460: `countertails' 

1461: in Arp 105 \citep{duc94, duc97}

1462: and Arp 104 \citep{roche07}.

1463: In addition,

1464: the inner tail on the western side of NGC 7714, which also

1465: has strong star formation \citep{smith97},

1466: may have formed from accretion from the companion

1467: \citep{struck03}.

1468: 

1469: Our model suggests that the so-called `bright spot' in the northwestern

1470: portion of the NGC 2856 disk, and its associated arc, were likely 

1471: caused by a ring-like perturbation of the disk by an encounter 

1472: which was mainly perpendicular to the plane of the NGC 2856 disk.

1473: The age of the stellar population in this region is estimated

1474: to be between 400 $-$ 1500 Myrs, while the interaction model

1475: indicates that the point of closest approach between the galaxies 

1476: occurred between about 300 $-$ 500 Myrs ago.   This is consistent 

1477: with the idea that the brightness of this `spot' 

1478: may be due to past star formation

1479: triggered by the encounter.

1480: 

1481: \section{Summary}

1482: 

1483: We have investigated star formation in the interacting galaxy

1484: pair Arp 285 using Spitzer infrared, GALEX ultraviolet, and ground-based

1485: optical data, and have constructed a numerical model

1486: of the interaction.  The northern galaxy in this

1487: pair contains an unusual tail-like feature extending perpendicular

1488: to the disk.  Our model suggests that this structure was created

1489: by gas from the companion falling into the gravitational potential

1490: of the disk and overshooting the disk.

1491: 

1492: A series of regularly-spaced knots of recent star formation are seen

1493: in this tail.  Stellar population synthesis suggests that

1494: these knots have ages of $\sim$4 $-$ 20 Myrs and

1495: masses 

1496: in the range of globular clusters.

1497: The Spitzer 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m fluxes from these tail clumps

1498: are higher than expected from the population synthesis,

1499: indicating that either a second older 

1500: stellar population

1501: is present, or there are significant contributions

1502: to these bands from

1503: hot dust.

1504: 

1505: The `bright spot' in the NGC 2856 disk has an intermediate-age

1506: stellar population (400 $-$ 1500 Myrs).  This feature

1507: and its associated arc

1508: may have been caused by a ring-like disturbance from an encounter

1509: almost perpendicular to the plane of the disk.

1510: Its brightness might be due to past star formation triggered

1511: by the interaction.

1512: 

1513: \acknowledgements

1514: 

1515: 

1516: %% In this section, we use  the \subsection command to set off

1517: %% a subsection.  \footnote is used to insert a footnote to the text.

1518: 

1519: %% Observe the use of the LaTeX \label

1520: %% command after the \subsection to give a symbolic KEY to the

1521: %% subsection for cross-referencing in a \ref command.

1522: 

1523: %% In this section, we use  the \subsection command to set off

1524: %% a subsection.  \footnote is used to insert a footnote to the text.

1525: 

1526: %% Observe the use of the LaTeX \label

1527: %% command after the \subsection to give a symbolic KEY to the

1528: %% subsection for cross-referencing in a \ref command.

1529: %% You can use LaTeX's \ref and \label commands to keep track of

1530: %% cross-references to sections, equations, tables, and figures.

1531: %% That way, if you change the order of any elements, LaTeX will

1532: %% automatically renumber them.

1533: 

1534: %% This section also includes several of the displayed math environments

1535: %% mentioned in the Author Guide.

1536: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,

1537: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments

1538: %% command.

1539: 

1540: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the

1541: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]

1542: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,

1543: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the

1544: %% text to be printed in the second.

1545: 

1546: \acknowledgments

1547: 

1548: We thank the Spitzer, GALEX, and SDSS teams for making this research possible.

1549: This research was supported by NASA Spitzer grant 1263924, NSF

1550: grant AST-0097616, NASA LTSA grant NAG5-13079

1551:  and NASA GALEX grant GALEXGI04-0000-0026.

1552: V. C. acknowledges partial support from the EU ToK grant 39965.

1553: We thank Jayaram Chengalur for providing us with an electronic copy

1554: of the HI data.   We also acknowledge Amanda Moffett and Chris Carver

1555: for help with system administration.

1556: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

1557: 

1558: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their

1559: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope

1560: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches

1561: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be

1562: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes

1563: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.

1564: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX

1565: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.

1566: 

1567: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the

1568: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research

1569: %% for the paper.  Each keyword will be checked against the master list during

1570: %% copy editing.  Individual instruments can be provided in parentheses,

1571: %% after the keyword, but they will not be verified.

1572: 

1573: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.

1574: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix

1575: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.

1576: 

1577: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.

1578: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix

1579: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.

1580: 

1581: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.

1582: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.

1583: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of

1584: %% curly braces.  If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error

1585: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".

1586: %%

1587: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite

1588: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a

1589: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds

1590: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).

1591: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the

1592: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain

1593: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in

1594: %% place of the \cite commands.

1595: 

1596: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.

1597: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.

1598: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.

1599: 

1600: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly

1601: %% different from previous examples.  The natbib system solves a host

1602: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly

1603: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.

1604: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.

1605: 

1606: \begin{thebibliography}{}

1607: 

1608: \bibitem[Abazajian et al.(2003)]{abazajian03}

1609: Abazajian, K., et al.\ 2003, AJ, 126, 2081

1610: 

1611: \bibitem[Abraham \& van den Bergh(2001)]{abraham01}

1612: Abraham, R. G., \& van den Bergh, S. 2001, Science, 293, 1273

1613: 

1614: \bibitem[Arp(1966)]{arp66}

1615: Arp, H. 1966, Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies (Pasadena: Caltech)

1616: 

1617: \bibitem[Barnes \& Hernquist(1992)]{barnes92}

1618: Barnes, J. E., \& Hernquist, L. 1992, Nature, 360, 715

1619: 

1620: \bibitem[Bastian et al.(2005)]{bastian05}

1621: Bastian, N., Gieles, M., Efremov, Y. N.,

1622: \&

1623: Lamers, H. J. G. L. M.

1624: 2005, A\&A, 443, 79

1625: 

1626: %\bibitem[Bell \& de Jong(2001)]{bell01}

1627: %Bell, E. F., \& de Jong, R. S. 2001, ApJ, 550, 212

1628: 

1629: \bibitem[Bloemen et al.(1986)]{bloemen86}

1630: Bloemen, J. B. G. M., et al. 1986, A\&A, 154, 25

1631: 

1632: \bibitem[Bohlin, Savage, \& Drake(1978)]{bohlin78}

1633: Bohlin, R. C., Savage, B. D., \& Drake, J. F.

1634: 1978, ApJ, 224, 132

1635: 

1636: \bibitem[Braine et al.(2001)]{braine01}

1637: Braine, J., Duc, P.-A., Lisenfeld, U., Charmandaris, V., 

1638: Vallejo, O., Leon, S., \& Brinks, E. 2001, 

1639: A\&A, 378, 51

1640: 

1641: \bibitem[Bushouse, Lamb, \& Werner(1988)]{bushouse88}

1642: Bushouse, H. A., Lamb, S. A., \& Werner, M. W. 1988, 

1643: ApJ, 335, 74

1644: 

1645: \bibitem[Calzetti et al.(2005)]{calzetti05}

1646: Calzetti, D., et al.\ 2005, ApJ, 633, 871

1647: 

1648: \bibitem[Calzetti, Kinney, \& Storchi-Bergmann(1994)]{calzetti94}

1649: Calzetti, D., Kinney, A. L., \& Storchi-Bergmann, T. 1994, ApJ, 429, 582

1650: 

1651: \bibitem[Cervi\~no et al.(2002)]{cervino02}

1652: Cervi\~no, M., Valls-Gabaud, D., Luridiana, V., \& Mas-Hess, J. M.

1653: 2002, A\&A, 381, 51

1654: 

1655: \bibitem[Chen \& Wu(2007)]{chen07}

1656: Chen, C. \& Wu, H. 2007, AJ, 133, 1710

1657: 

1658: \bibitem[Chengalur, Salpeter, \& Terzian(1994)]{chengalur94}

1659: Chengalur, J. N., Salpeter, E. E., \& Terzian, Y. 1994, AJ, 107, 1984

1660: 

1661: \bibitem[Chengalur, Salpeter, \& Terzian(1995)]{chengalur95}

1662: Chengalur, J. N., Salpeter, E. E., \& Terzian, Y. 1995, AJ, 110, 167

1663: 

1664: \bibitem[Cox(2000)]{cox00}

1665: Cox, A. N., Allen's Astrophysical Quantities, 4th Edition (Springer).

1666: 

1667: 

1668: \bibitem[Cutri et al.(2006)]{cutri06}

1669: Cutri, R. M., et al.\ 2006, Explanatory Supplement to the 

1670: 2MASS All Sky Release and Extended Mission Products,

1671: http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/2mass/

1672: 

1673:                                                                                               

1674: \bibitem[Dale et al.(2005)]{dale05}

1675: Dale, D. A., et al.\ 2005, ApJ, 633, 857

1676:                                                                                               

1677: \bibitem[Draine \& Li(2007)]{dl07}

1678: Draine, B. T., \& Li, A. 2007, ApJ, 657, 810

1679: 

1680: \bibitem[Duc \& Mirabel(1994)]{duc94}

1681: Duc, P.-A. \& Mirabel, I. F. 1994, A\&A, 289, 83

1682: 

1683: \bibitem[Duc et al.(1997)]{duc97}

1684: Duc, P.-A., Brinks, E., Wink, J. E., \& Mirabel, I. F. 1997, A\&A, 326, 537

1685: 

1686: \bibitem[Elmegreen \& Efremov(1996)]

1687: {elmegreen96}

1688: Elmegreen, B. G. \& Efremov, Y. N.

1689: 1996, ApJ, 466, 802

1690: 

1691: \bibitem[Elmegreen, Kaufman, \& Thomasson(1993)]{elmegreen93}

1692: Elmegreen, B. G., Kaufman, M., \& Thomasson, M.

1693: 1993, ApJ, 412, 90

1694: 

1695: \bibitem[Elmegreen et al.(2006)]{elmegreen06}

1696: Elmegreen, D. M., Elmegreen, B. G., Kaufman, M., Sheth, K., Struck, C.,

1697: Thomasson, M., \& Brinks, E. 2006, ApJ, 642, 158

1698: 

1699: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{fazio04}

1700: Fazio, G. G., et al.\ 2004, ApJS, 154, 10

1701: 

1702: \bibitem[Feldmeier et al.(2002)]{feldmeier02}

1703: Feldmeier, J. J. et al.\ 2002, ApJ, 575, 779

1704: 

1705: \bibitem[Flagey et al.(2006)]{flagey06}

1706: Flagey, N., Boulanger, F., Vrestraete, L.,

1707: Miville Desch\^enes, M. A.,

1708: Noriega Crespo, A., \& Reach, W. T.

1709: 2006, A\&A, 453, 969

1710: 

1711: \bibitem[Hancock et al.(2007)]{hancock07}

1712: Hancock, M., Smith, B. J., Struck, C., Giroux, M. L., Appleton, P. N.,

1713: Charmandaris, V., \& Reach, W. T. 2007, AJ, 133, 676

1714: 

1715: %\bibitem[Hancock et al.(2008)]{hancock08}

1716: %Hancock, M., Smith, B. J., Giroux, M. L., \& Struck, C.

1717: %AJ, submitted

1718: 

1719: %\bibitem[Hatziminaoglou et al.(2005)]{hatz05}

1720: %Hatziminaoglou, E., et al. 2005, AJ, 129, 1198

1721: 

1722: \bibitem[Hibbard \& van Gorkom(1996)]{hibbard96}

1723: Hibbard, J. E. \& van Gorkom, J. H. 1996, AJ,

1724: 111, 655

1725: 

1726: \bibitem[Higdon, Higdon, \& Marshall(2006)]{higdon06}

1727: Higdon, S. J. U., Higdon, J. L., \& Marshall, J. 2006, ApJ, 640

1728: 768

1729: 

1730: \bibitem[Holtzman et al.(1992)]{holtzman92}

1731: Holtzman, J. A., et al.\ 1992, AJ, 103, 691

1732:                                                                                 

1733: \bibitem[Holtzman et al.(1996)]{holtzman96}

1734: Holtzman, J. A., et al.\ 1996, AJ, 112, 416

1735: 

1736: \bibitem[Hunter \& Gallagher(1985)]{hunter85}

1737: Hunter, D. A., \& Gallagher, J. S. III, 1985, ApJS, 58, 533

1738: 

1739: \bibitem[Jester et al.(2005)]{jester05}

1740: Jester, S., et al.\ 2005, AJ, 130, 873

1741: 

1742: \bibitem[Karachentsev et al.(2004)]{kar04}

1743: Karachentsev, I. D., Karachentseva, V. E., 

1744: Huchtmeier, W. K., \&

1745: Makarov, D. I. 2004,

1746: AJ, 127, 2031

1747: 

1748: \bibitem[Kennicutt et al.(1987)]{kennicutt87}

1749: Kennicutt, R. C., Jr., et al.\ 1987, AJ, 93, 1011.

1750: 

1751: \bibitem[Kroupa(2002)]{kroupa02}

1752: Kroupa, P. 2002, Science, 295, 85

1753: 

1754: \bibitem[Larsen(2004)]{larsen04}

1755: Larsen, S. S. 2004, A\&A, 416, 537

1756: 

1757: \bibitem[Leitherer et al.(1999)]{leitherer99}

1758: Leitherer, C., et al. 1999, ApJS, 123, 3

1759: 

1760: \bibitem[Li et al.(2007)]{li07}

1761: Li, H., Wu, H., Cao, C., \& Zhu, Y. 2007, AJ, 134, 1315

1762: 

1763: \bibitem[Longmore et al.(1979)]{longmore79}

1764: Longmore, A. J., Hawarden, T. G., Cannon, R. D., Allen, D. A.,

1765: Mebold, U., \& Goss, W. M. 1979, MNRAS, 188, 285

1766: 

1767: \bibitem[MacArthur et al.(2004)]{macarthur04}

1768: MacArthur, L. A., Courteau, S., Bell, E., \& Holtzman, J. A. 2004, 

1769: ApJS, 152, 175

1770: 

1771: \bibitem[Martin et al.(2005)]{martin05}

1772: Martin, D. C., et al.\ 2005, ApJ, 619, L1

1773: 

1774: \bibitem[McLaughlin \& van der Marel(2005)]{mclaughlin05}

1775: McLaughlin, D., \& van der Marel, R. P. 2005, ApJ, 161, 304

1776: 

1777: \bibitem[Morris \& van den Bergh(1994)]{morris94} 

1778: Morris, S. L., \& van den Bergh, S. 1994, ApJ, 427, 696

1779: 

1780: \bibitem[O'Connell, Gallagher, \& Hunter(1994)]{oconnell94}

1781: O'Connell, R. W., Gallagher, J. S., \& Hunter, D. A. 1994, ApJ, 433, 65

1782: 

1783: \bibitem[Pasquali, de Grijs, \& Gallagher(2003)]{pas03}Pasquali, A. de Grijs, R., \& Gallagher, J. S.,

1784: 2003, \mnras, 345, 161

1785: 

1786: \bibitem[Patterson \& Thuan(1996)]{patterson96}

1787: Patterson, R. J., \& Thuan, T. X. 1996, ApJS, 107, 103

1788: 

1789: \bibitem[Press et al.(1992)]{press92}

1790: Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., \& Flannery, B. P.

1791: 1992, Numerical Recipes in Fortran, Second Edition (Cambridge

1792: University Press, Cambridge), p. 692.

1793: 

1794: %\bibitem[Pryor

1795: %\& Meylan(1993)]{pryor93}

1796: %Pryor, C. \& Meylan, G.

1797: %1993, in ASP Conf. Ser. 50, Structure

1798: %and Dynamics of Globular Clusters,

1799: %ed. S. G. Djorgovski \& G. Meylan,

1800: %(San Francisco: ASP), 357

1801: 

1802: \bibitem[Reshetnikov et al.(2006)]{resh06}

1803: Reshetnikov, V., 

1804: Bournaud, F., Combe, F., 

1805: Fa\'undez-Abans, M., \& de Oliveira-Abans, M.

1806: 2006, A\&A, 446, 447

1807: 

1808: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2004)]{rieke04}

1809: Rieke, G. H., et al.\ 2004, ApJS, 154, 25

1810: 

1811: \bibitem[Roche(2007)]{roche07}

1812: Roche, N. 2008, RMxAA, in press (astro-ph/0605015)

1813: 

1814: \bibitem[Sanders et al.(1988)]{sanders88}

1815: Sanders, D. B., Soifer, B. T., Elias, J. H.,

1816: Madore, B. F., Matthews, K., Neugebauer, G., 

1817: \& Scoville, N. Z. 1988, ApJ, 325, 74

1818: 

1819: \bibitem[Schweizer et al.(1996)]{schweizer96}

1820: Schweizer, F., Miller, B. W., Whitmore, B. C., \& Fall, S. M. 1996, AJ, 112, 1839

1821: 

1822: %\bibitem[Skillman, Kennicutt, \& Hodge(1989)]{skillman89}

1823: %Skillman, E. D., Kennicutt, R. C., \& Hodge, P. W. 1989, ApJ, 347, 875

1824: 

1825: \bibitem[Smith et al.(1987)]{smith87}

1826: Smith, B. J., Kleinmann, S. G., Huchra, J. P., \&

1827: Low, F. 1987, ApJ, 318, 161

1828: 

1829: \bibitem[Smith, Struck, \& Pogge(1997)]{smith97}

1830: Smith, B. J., Struck, C., \& Pogge, R. W. 1997, ApJ, 483, 754

1831: 

1832: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2005a)]{smith05a}

1833: Smith, B. J., Struck, C., \& Nowak, M. A. 2005a, AJ,

1834: 129, 1350

1835: 

1836: 

1837: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2005b)]{smith05b}

1838: Smith, B. J., Struck, C., Appleton, P. N., Charmandaris, V., 

1839: Reach, W., \& Eitter, J. J. 2005b, AJ, 130, 2117

1840: 

1841: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2007)]{smith07}

1842: Smith, B. J., Struck, C., Hancock, M., Appleton, P. N., Charmandaris, V., 

1843: \&

1844: Reach, W. 2007, AJ, 133, 791

1845: 

1846: \bibitem[Soifer et al.(1987)]{soifer87}

1847: Soifer, B. T., 

1848: Sanders, D. B., Madore, B. F., Neugebauer,

1849: G., Danielson, G. E., Elias, J. H.,

1850: Lonsdale, C. J., \& Rice, W. L. 1987,

1851: ApJ, 320, 238

1852: 

1853: \bibitem[Struck(1997)]{struck97}

1854: Struck, C. 1997, ApJS, 113, 269

1855: 

1856: \bibitem[Struck \& Smith(2003)]{struck03}

1857: Struck, C. \& Smith, B. J. 2003, ApJ, 589, 157

1858: 

1859: \bibitem[Struck et al.(2005)]{struck05}

1860: Struck, C., 

1861: Kaufman, M., Brinks, E., Thomasson, M., Elmegreen, B. G.,

1862: \& Elmegreen, D. M.

1863: 2005, MNRAS, 364, 69

1864: 

1865: \bibitem[Toomre \& Toomre(1972)]{toomre72}

1866: Toomre, A. \& Toomre, J. 1972, ApJ, 178, 623

1867: 

1868: %\bibitem[van Zee, Skillman, \& Haynes(2006)]{vanzee06}

1869: %van Zee, L., Skillman, E. D., \& Haynes, M. P. 2006, ApJ,

1870: %637, 269

1871: 

1872:                                                                                                        

1873: \bibitem[V\'{a}zquez \& Leitherer(2005)]{vaz05}V\'{a}zquez, G. A. \& Leitherer, C. 2005, ApJ, 621, 695

1874: 

1875: \bibitem[Wallin \& Struck-Marcell(1988)]{wallin88}

1876: Wallin, J. F. \& Struck-Marcell, C. 1988, AJ,

1877: 96, 1850

1878: 

1879: 

1880: \bibitem[Watson et al.(1996)]{watson96}

1881: Watson, A. M., et al.\ 1996, AJ, 112, 534

1882: 

1883: \bibitem[Weilbacher, Duc, \& Fritze-v.\ Alvensleben(2003)]{weilbacher03}

1884: Weilbacher, P. M., Duc, P. A., \& Fritze-v.\ Alvensleben, U. 2003,

1885: A\&A, 397, 545

1886: 

1887: \bibitem[Werner et al.(2004)]{werner04}

1888: Werner, M. W., et al.\ 2004, ApJS, 154, 1

1889: 

1890: \bibitem[Whitmore \& Schweizer(1995)]{whitmore95}

1891: Whitmore, B. C. \& Schweizer, F. 1995, AJ, 109, 960

1892: 

1893: \bibitem[Whitmore et al.(1993)]{whitmore93}

1894: Whitmore, B. C., Schweizer, F., Leitherer, C., Borne, K., \& Robert, C.

1895: 1993, AJ, 106, 1354

1896: 

1897: \bibitem[Whitney et al.(2004)]{whitney04}

1898: Whitney, B. A., et al.\ 2004, ApJS, 154, 315

1899: 

1900: \bibitem[York et al.(2000)]{york00}

1901: York, D. G., et al.\ 2000, AJ, 120, 1579

1902: 

1903: \bibitem[Zhang, Fall, \& Whitmore(2001)]{zhang01}

1904: Zhang, Q., Fall, S. M., \& Whitmore, B. C. 2001,

1905: ApJ, 561, 727

1906: 

1907: 

1908: \end{thebibliography}

1909: 

1910: \clearpage

1911: 

1912: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include

1913: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.

1914: %% To embed the sample graphics in

1915: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and

1916: %% \includegraphics commands

1917: %%

1918: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or

1919: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the

1920: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,

1921: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the

1922: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,

1923: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.

1924: %%

1925: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of

1926: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check

1927: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to

1928: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from

1929: %% journal to journal.

1930: 

1931: 

1932: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to

1933: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption

1934: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be

1935: %% available in the electronic journal.

1936: 

1937:  \begin{figure*}

1938: %\plotone{f1.eps}

1939: \includegraphics[width=6.3in]{f1.eps}

1940: \caption{

1941:   \small 

1942: The Arp (1966) image of the wide galaxy pair Arp 285 (NGC 2856/4).  

1943: The northern galaxy NGC 2856 has an unusual

1944: `tail' like feature extending out perpendicular to the disk

1945: from the middle of the disk.

1946: \citet{toomre72}

1947: suggested that this is 

1948: material from the bridge/companion,

1949: which is accreting onto NGC 2856.  Note that this tail

1950: appears clumpy in this image.

1951: Note the `bright spot' in the northwestern edge of the NGC 2856 disk.

1952: }

1953: \end{figure*}

1954: 

1955:  \begin{figure*}

1956: %\plotone{f2.eps}

1957: %\includegraphics[width=6.3in]{f2.eps}

1958: \caption{

1959:   \small 

1960: A montage of the GALEX, SDSS, and Spitzer images of NGC 2856,

1961: the northern galaxy

1962: in Arp 285. North is up and east to the left.

1963: The field of view is 1\farcm1 $\times$ 0\farcm9.

1964: Notice the series of clumps in the northern tail.

1965: The tail clumps are enclosed by 1\farcs61 black circles in the last panel 

1966: on the g image, and labeled as in Table 2.  

1967: The NGC 2856 disk clumps listed in Table 2 are marked in the last panel

1968: by 4$''$ radius white circles.  

1969: }

1970: \end{figure*}

1971: 

1972: \clearpage

1973: 

1974:  \begin{figure}

1975: %\plotone{f3.eps}

1976: \caption{

1977:   \small 

1978: Upper left: The SARA H$\alpha$ map of NGC 2856.

1979: Upper right: The SARA R band map of NGC 2856.

1980: Lower left: The SARA H$\alpha$ map of

1981: NGC 2856 (contours) superimposed on the Spitzer

1982: 8 $\mu$m map (greyscale).

1983: Lower right: The SARA H$\alpha$ map of NGC 

1984: 2856 (contours) plotted on the SDSS g map

1985: (greyscale).

1986: North is up and east to the left.

1987: This map has been smoothed by a Gaussian with FWHM = 4\farcs5.

1988: The field of view is 1\farcm0 $\times$ 0\farcm9.

1989: }

1990: \end{figure}

1991: 

1992:  \begin{figure}

1993: %\plotone{f4.eps}

1994: \caption{

1995:   \small 

1996: An approximately true color multi-filter optical SDSS image of NGC 2856.

1997: Note that the clumps in the tail are blue, and the northeastern spiral

1998: arm is bluer than the southwestern disk.

1999: The field of view is 1\farcm1 $\times$ 0\farcm9.

2000: }

2001: \end{figure}

2002: 

2003:  \begin{figure}

2004: %\plotone{f5.eps}

2005: \caption{

2006:   \small 

2007: The smoothed SDSS g image of NGC 2856 (color), with

2008: 21 cm HI contours (from \citealp{chengalur94}) superimposed.

2009: North is up and east to the left.

2010: Notice the bridge connecting

2011: this galaxy to its southern companion NGC 2854.

2012: Also note the bend in the northern tail north of the 

2013: clumps marked in Figure 2.

2014: The field of view is 3\farcm0 $\times$ 3\farcm3.

2015: The HI beamsize is 29$''$ $\times$ 29$''$, and the HI

2016: contours are (2.6, 4.6, 8.1, 14, 25, 43, and 76) $\times$

2017: 10$^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$.

2018: }

2019: \end{figure}

2020: 

2021:  \begin{figure*}

2022: %\plotone{f6.eps}

2023: %\includegraphics[width=6.3in]{f6.eps}

2024: \caption{

2025:   \small 

2026: A montage of images of the southern galaxy in Arp 285, NGC 2854.

2027: North is up and east to the left.

2028: The field of view is 1\farcm2 $\times$ 1\farcm0.

2029: Notice the series of clumps in the northern spiral arm.

2030: In the UV and optical, the southern end of the bar is brighter than the

2031: northern end.  At longer wavelengths, the disk is more symmetrical.

2032: The positions of the 

2033: 8 $\mu$m-selected clumps in Table 2 are circled on the 8 $\mu$m

2034: image in the last panel.

2035: The circles have 2\farcs8 radii.

2036: }

2037: \end{figure*}

2038: 

2039: \clearpage

2040: 

2041: 

2042:  \begin{figure}

2043: %\plotone{f7.eps}

2044: \caption{

2045:   \small 

2046: Upper left: The SARA H$\alpha$ map of NGC 2854.

2047: Upper right: The SARA R band map of NGC 2854.

2048: Lower left: The SARA H$\alpha$ map of

2049: NGC 2854 (contours) superimposed on the Spitzer

2050: 8 $\mu$m map (greyscale).

2051: Lower right: The SARA H$\alpha$ map of NGC 

2052: 2854 (contours) plotted on the SDSS g map

2053: (greyscale).

2054: North is up and east to the left.

2055: This map has been smoothed by a Gaussian with FWHM = 4\farcs5.

2056: The field of view is 1\farcm1 $\times$ 1\farcm1.

2057: }

2058: \end{figure}

2059: 

2060:  \begin{figure}

2061: %\plotone{f8.eps}

2062: \caption{

2063:   \small 

2064: An approximately true color multi-filter optical SDSS image of NGC 2854.

2065: North is up and east to the left.

2066: Note that the clumps in the northern arm are blue, and the southeastern

2067: end of the bar is bluer than the northern end.

2068: The southern arm/tail is also bluer than that in the north.

2069: The field of view is 1\farcm2 $\times$ 1\farcm0.

2070: }

2071: \end{figure}

2072: 

2073:  \begin{figure}

2074: %\plotone{f9.eps}

2075: \caption{

2076:   \small 

2077: The smoothed g image of NGC 2854, with 21 cm HI contours

2078: from \citet{chengalur94} superimposed.

2079: North is up and east to the left.

2080: The field of view is 3\farcm4 $\times$ 4\farcm2.

2081: Note the long tidal tail extending 1\farcm8 to the south.

2082: The HI beamsize is 29$''$ $\times$ 29$''$, and the HI

2083: contours are (2.6, 4.6, 8.1, 14, 25, 43, and 76) $\times$

2084: 10$^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$.

2085: }

2086: \end{figure}

2087: 

2088:  \begin{figure}

2089: \plotone{f10.eps}

2090: \caption{

2091:   \small 

2092: The 

2093: g $-$ r 

2094: vs.\ 

2095: u $-$ g 

2096: colors of the 

2097: clumps in the NGC 2856 tail (magenta open diamonds), the

2098: NGC 2856 disk (cyan open diamonds), and the NGC 2854 disk (black open circles).

2099: The clumps are identified by their numbers in Table 2, labeled in

2100: the same color.

2101: These data are compared

2102: with solar metallicity Kroupa IMF instantaneous burst

2103: population synthesis models with extinction of E(B $-$ V) = 0

2104: (black filled triangles),

2105: 0.5 (blue open squares), and 

2106: 1.0 (red open squares).

2107: To show the effect of H$\alpha$ on the g $-$ r color, for the zero

2108: extinction model two curves are shown: with (solid line) and 

2109: without (dotted line) H$\alpha$.

2110: The model ages start with an age

2111: of 1 Myr for the point on the left end of the curve, increasing

2112: by 1 Myr steps to 20 Myr, then by 5 Myr steps to 50 Myrs, 10 Myr steps

2113: to 100 Myrs, 100 Myr steps to 1 Gyr, and 500 Myr steps to 10 Gyr.

2114: The red filled

2115: triangle shows the colors of the 25\farcs6 $\times$ 9\farcs7 region

2116: enclosing all four knots in the northern tail.

2117: }

2118: \end{figure}

2119: 

2120: 

2121:  \begin{figure}

2122: \plotone{f11.eps}

2123: \caption{

2124:   \small 

2125: The NUV $-$ g color of the 

2126: 25\farcs6 $\times$ 9\farcs7 region in the 

2127: northern tail, plotted against g $-$ r (red filled triangle).

2128: The clumps in the tail (magenta open diamonds),

2129: the NGC 2856 disk (cyan open diamonds), and 

2130: the NGC 2854 disk (black open circles) are also plotted.

2131: Solar metallicity Kroupa IMF instantaneous burst

2132: population synthesis model colors are also shown,

2133: with extinction of E(B $-$ V) = 0

2134: (black diamonds),

2135: 0.5 (blue open squares), and 1.0 (red open circles).

2136: The model ages start with an age

2137: of 1 Myr for the point at lower left end of the curve, increasing

2138: by 1 Myr steps to 20 Myr, then by 5 Myr steps to 50 Myrs, then 10 Myr steps

2139: to 100 Myrs, 100 Myr steps to 1 Gyr, and 500 Myr steps to 10 Gyr.

2140: All models include H$\alpha$.

2141: }

2142: \end{figure}

2143: 

2144: 

2145:  \begin{figure}

2146: \plotone{f12.eps}

2147: \caption{

2148:   \small 

2149: The Spitzer 

2150: [4.5] $-$ [5.8] 

2151: vs. 

2152: [3.6] $-$ [4.5] 

2153: color-color

2154: plot, showing the location of 

2155: the clumps in the NGC 2856 tail (magenta open 

2156: diamonds), the NGC 2856 disk (cyan open diamonds), and

2157: the NGC 2854 disk (black open circles).

2158: The clumps are labeled.

2159: The colors of

2160: M0III stars (open dark blue square), from M. Cohen (2005, private 

2161: communication), and the mean colors of the 

2162: field stars of \citet{whitney04} (magenta open triangle) are also shown.

2163: The colors of normal stars all lie within 0.5 magnitudes of 0, 0 in this

2164: plot (M. Cohen 2005, private communication).

2165: %The \citet{hatz05} colors of quasars are also plotted (red circles).

2166: We have also plotted 

2167: the locations of the clumps in Arp 107

2168: and Arp 82

2169: as green asterisks

2170: \citep{smith05a, hancock07},

2171:  excluding likely

2172: foreground stars, background quasars, upper limits,

2173: and point with uncertainties $>$ 0.5 magnitudes.

2174: The observed Spitzer colors \citep{flagey06} for diffuse dust towards several positions in

2175: the Milky Way are also plotted (blue X's).

2176: The red diamond shows the colors of the 

2177: 25\farcs6 $\times$ 9\farcs7 region

2178: enclosing all four knots in the northern tail.

2179: The errorbars include both statistical uncertainties and an uncertainty

2180: in the colors due to varying the sky annuli (see text).

2181: }

2182: \end{figure}

2183: 

2184:  \begin{figure}

2185: \plotone{f13.eps}

2186: \caption{

2187:   \small 

2188: The UV-mid-infrared spectral energy distribution of

2189: clump 3 in the northern tail (filled squares), including the upper limit

2190: in the SDSS z band (arrow).

2191: The 2MASS upper limits are also shown.

2192: The long dashed black curve is

2193: the best fit solar metallicity

2194: population synthesis model (4 Myrs, E(B$-$V)=0.1).

2195: The dot-dashed blue and short dashed

2196: red curves show the youngest and oldest solar metallicity

2197: models respectively, with

2198: their associated best-fit extinctions.

2199: All of the models have

2200: been normalized to the g band flux.

2201: The red dotted curve is the \citet{dl07} Milky Way dust model

2202: with U = 100 and q$_{PAH}$ = 4.6$\%$, scaled to the 8 $\mu$m flux.

2203: The solid black

2204: curve is the sum of these three components.

2205: Note the contribution from the 3.3 $\mu$m PAH feature to the 

2206: 3.6 $\mu$m Spitzer band, and the H$\alpha$ contribution to 

2207: the r band.   Also note that the 3.6 $\mu$m and 4.5 $\mu$m

2208: fluxes are much higher than expected from the stellar population

2209: synthesis model, suggesting contributions from either hot dust,

2210: as in the dust model shown, or a second colder stellar population

2211: undetected in the population synthesis.

2212: }

2213: \end{figure}

2214: 

2215: \vfill

2216: \eject

2217: ~~~

2218: 

2219:  \begin{figure}

2220: \plotone{f14.eps}

2221: \caption{

2222:   \small 

2223: The UV-mid-infrared spectral energy distribution of

2224: clump 2 in the NGC 2856 disk.   Symbols and curves are as in Figure 13.

2225: Note that, although the age is

2226: similar to that of tail clump 3 (Table 4), the SED is very 

2227: different because of the higher extinction.  Starlight contributes

2228: a higher fraction of the 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m flux in this clump

2229: than in tail clump 3.

2230: }

2231: \end{figure}

2232: 

2233: \newpage

2234: \vfill

2235: \eject

2236: 

2237:  \begin{figure}

2238: \plotone{f15.eps}

2239: \caption{

2240:   \small 

2241: The UV-mid-infrared spectral energy distribution of

2242: the `bright spot' at the edge of the NGC 2856 disk.

2243: Symbols and curves are as in Figure 13.

2244: Note the upper limits at 5.8 $\mu$m and 8.0 $\mu$m, as well

2245: as the GALEX upper limits.

2246: Starlight can account for the 3.6 $\mu$m and 4.5 $\mu$m

2247: emission.

2248: }

2249: \end{figure}

2250: 

2251: \clearpage

2252: 

2253:  \begin{figure}

2254: \plotone{f16.eps}

2255: \caption{

2256:   \small 

2257: The 3.6 $\mu$m luminosity of the Arp 285 clumps, compared to

2258: their masses implied by the population synthesis models.

2259: The magenta open squares are the tail clumps, the blue filled

2260: triangles are 

2261: clumps 

2262: in the NGC 2856 disk, and the green crosses are the NGC 2854 disk

2263: clumps.  The black open circles are the Arp 82 clumps, from

2264: \citet{hancock07}.

2265: A constant 

2266: M/L$_{3.6}$ ratio of 1 M$_{\sun}$/L$_{\sun}$

2267: is represented by the solid black line, while the dotted line

2268: is 

2269: M/L$_{3.6}$ = 10 M$_{\sun}$/L$_{\sun}$.

2270: The 3.6 $\mu$m luminosity

2271: was calculated assuming the FWHM of the bandpass 

2272: $\Delta$$\nu$

2273: of 

2274: 16.23 $\times$ 10$^{12}$ Hz.   

2275: }

2276: \end{figure}

2277: 

2278: \clearpage

2279: 

2280: 

2281: \begin{figure*}

2282: %\includegraphics[width=6.3in]{f17.eps}

2283: \caption{

2284: \small 

2285: Snapshots of the model gas disks. The stellar appearance is similar.

2286: Red particles originated in the primary galaxy,

2287: green in the companion.

2288: The top left panel shows a time near closest approach (T = 0 Myrs).

2289: The companion has swung in from the lower left, and 

2290: swings around to an apogalacticon point at later times. 

2291: The upper right panel and the lower left are at times 

2292: near the present (T = 370 Myrs and 510 Myrs, respectively). 

2293: The lower right panel is at a 

2294: later time (T = 740 Myrs), when the companion begins to fall 

2295: back to merge with the primary. In the first

2296: three panels every third gas particle is plotted with a dot. 

2297: In the second and third panels blue astericks 

2298: mark star-forming particles, except those within 5 kpc of

2299: the primary center, which were omitted for clarity. 

2300: The star forming region in the northern tail was produced

2301: from gas accreted from the companion, while the star forming

2302: regions in the central region of the northern galaxy

2303: were produced from gas that originated in the northern galaxy.

2304: The star forming regions in the bridge, southern galaxy,

2305: and southern tail were formed from gas that originated in the southern galaxy.

2306: In the final panel only every fifth particle was plotted, to 

2307: show the persistent spiral in the primary disk.

2308: The motion of the companion around the point of greatest separation

2309: is very slow, so little positional change is evident in

2310: the last three panels.  Later timesteps are shown in the Appendix.

2311: }

2312: \end{figure*}

2313: 

2314: 

2315: 

2316: 

2317: \clearpage

2318: 

2319: %% Here we use \plottwo to present two versions of the same figure,

2320: %% one in black and white for print the other in RGB color

2321: 

2322: 

2323: \clearpage

2324: 

2325: %% Here we use \plottwo to present two versions of the same figure,

2326: %% one in black and white for print the other in RGB color

2327: %% for online presentation. Note that the caption indicates

2328: 

2329: \clearpage

2330: 

2331: %% Here we use \plottwo to present two versions of the same figure,

2332: %% one in black and white for print the other in RGB color

2333: %% for online presentation. Note that the caption indicates

2334: %% that a color version of the figure will be available online.

2335: 

2336: \clearpage

2337: 

2338: %% Here we use \plottwo to present two versions of the same figure,

2339: %% one in black and white for print the other in RGB color

2340: %% for online presentation. Note that the caption indicates

2341: %% that a color version of the figure will be available online.

2342: %%

2343: 

2344: 

2345: %% If you are not including electonic art with your submission, you may

2346: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the

2347: %% User Guide for details.

2348: %%

2349: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,

2350: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage

2351: %% after every seventh one.

2352: 

2353: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before

2354: %% each one.

2355: 

2356: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables:  the

2357: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX

2358: %% table environment.  Use of deluxetable is preferred.

2359: %%

2360: 

2361: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,

2362: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.

2363: 

2364: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}

2365: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.

2366: %% We also use the \rotate command to rotate the table to

2367: %% landscape orientation since it is very wide even at the

2368: %% reduced font size.

2369: %%

2370: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed

2371: %% inside the \tablecaption.

2372: 

2373: %% This table also includes a table comment indicating that the full

2374: %% version will be available in machine-readable format in the electronic

2375: %% edition.

2376: %%

2377: 

2378: \input{tab1.tex}

2379: \clearpage

2380: \input{tab2.tex}

2381: \input{tab3.tex}

2382: \input{tab4.tex}

2383: \input{tab5.tex}

2384: \input{tab6.tex}

2385: 

2386: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text

2387: %% that appears after it.

2388: 

2389: \end{document}

2390: 

2391: 

2392: \bibitem[Lynds \& Toomre(1976)]{lynds76}

2393: Lynds, R., \& Toomre, A. 1976, ApJ, 209, 382

2394: 

2395: \bibitem[Toomre(1978)]{toomre78}

2396: Toomre, A. 1978, Proceedings of the I. A. U. 

2397: Symposium `The Large Scale Structure

2398: of the Universe' (Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.), 79, 109

2399: 

2400: \bibitem[Bushouse(1987)]{bushouse87}

2401: Bushouse, H. A. 1987, ApJ, 320, 49

2402: 

2403: These observations include infrared imaging

2404: with NASA's Spitzer space telescope (Smith et al.\ 2005b, 2007;

2405: Hancock et al.\ 2007), ultraviolet imaging

2406: with the GALEX ultraviolet spacecraft (Giroux et al.\ 2005;

2407: Hancock et al.\ 2007), 

2408: BVRI H$\alpha$ optical imaging

2409: with the Southeastern Association for Research in Astronomy

2410: (SARA) optical telescope (Hancock et al.\ 2007), 

2411: and

2412: X-ray imaging with Chandra

2413: (Smith et al.\ 2005a).  

2414: 

2415: Furthermore, the 24 $\mu$m emission from the Arp galaxies

2416: is more centrally-concentrated than in the spirals (Smith

2417: et al.\ 2007), suggesting that

2418: gas is being concentrated into the inner regions and fueling

2419: central star formation.  

2420: For our Arp galaxies,

2421: the tidal features contribute $\le$10$\%$ of

2422: the total Spitzer fluxes of these galaxies on average (Smith et al.\ 2007).

2423: The tidal features are often more prominent

2424: in the GALEX images 

2425: than in the mid-infrared, and in some cases gas-rich tidal features

2426: not previously detected in the visible are bright in the UV

2427: (Giroux et al.\ 2005; Hancock et al.\ 2007).

2428: 

2429: These colors are a measure of the relative number of young

2430: and old stars, with redder (dustier) colors indicating a younger 

2431: population.  

2432: 

2433: As discussed above,

2434: we propose a 

2435: multi-wavelength

2436: observational study

2437: in conjunction with the proposed 

2438: modeling studies.

2439: Some of the 

2440: issues we propose to address in the observational

2441: portion of the project include:

2442: 

2443: Tidal interactions, collisions, and mergers 

2444: of galaxies play a major role

2445: in the evolution of galaxies, drastically modifying both the morphology

2446: and the star formation rates of galaxies (see review

2447: by \citealp{struck99}).  Interaction-induced star

2448: formation was first investigated by \citet{larson76}

2449: and \citet{struckmarcell78}, who provided evidence

2450: that interacting 

2451: galaxies have a larger scatter in star formation properties

2452: than isolated galaxies.  The Infrared

2453: Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) 

2454: revealed a new population of high

2455: infrared luminosity galaxies with large star formation rates

2456: \citep{soifer87, smith87}

2457: that are the result of mergers 

2458: \citep{sanders88}.

2459: 

2460: 

2461: \bibitem[Larson \& Tinsley(1976)]{larson76}

2462: Larson, R. B. \& Tinsley, B. M. 1976, ApJ, 219, 46

2463: 

2464: \bibitem[Struck-Marcell \& Tinsley(1978)]{struckmarcell78}

2465: Struck-Marcell, C., \& Tinsley, B. M. 1978, ApJ, 221, 562

2466: 

2467: \bibitem[Struck(1999)]{struck99}

2468: Struck, C. 1999, Phys. Rep., 321, 1

2469: 

2470: \bibitem[Sellgren et al.(1990)]{sellgren90}

2471: Sellgren, K., Luan, L., \& Werner, M. W. 1990, ApJ, 359, 384

2472: 

2473: \bibitem[Uchida, Sellgren, \& Werner(1998)]{uchida98}

2474: Uchida, K. I., Sellgren, K., \& Werner, M. W. 1998, ApJ, 493, L109

2475: 

2476: \bibitem[Uchida et al.(2000)]{uchida00}

2477: Uchida, K. I., Sellgren, K., Werner, M. W., \& Houdashelt, M. L. 2000,

2478: ApJ, 530, 817

2479: 

2480: The mid-infrared emission is dominated by broad dust emission

2481: features, which are believed to be due to polycyclic aromatic

2482: hydrocarbons (PAHS) \citep{leger84, allamandola85}.

2483: 

2484: With 

2485: the advent of the Spitzer infrared telescope 

2486: \citep{werner04}, higher angular

2487: resolution mid-infrared imaging of galaxies is now possible,

2488: making feasible the detailed study of individual

2489: star formation complexes in

2490: interacting systems.

2491: 

2492: {***SB\&T results****

2493: ***Arp 107, 82 results****

2494: ***Elmegreen results****}

2495: 

2496: In Arp 284 (NGC 7714/5), a pronounced gas/star offset is visible in

2497: the bridge, with star formation active in the gaseous bridge 

2498: (Smith et al.\ 1997).

2499: Our models show that

2500: this offset

2501: is due to dissipative evolution in the gas, while the band of

2502: star formation in this bridge is likely due to the interaction of two

2503: tidal components drawn from different regions (Struck \& Smith 2003).

2504: The star-forming inner southwestern tail is likely the result

2505: of material transferred from NGC 7715 (Struck \& Smith 2003).

2506: Our hydrodynamical models of the core suggest 

2507: multiple starbursts in the last 300 Myrs, consistent with 

2508: multiwavelength observational studies (Lan\c{c}on et al.\ 2001).

2509: 

2510: \bibitem[Smith \& Wallin(1992)]{smith92}

2511: Smith, B. J., \& Wallin, J. F. 1992, ApJ, 393, 544

2512: 

2513: Our numerical model of Arp 107 matches the general

2514: morphology of the system, and explains the age variation along

2515: the arm as the 

2516: 

2517: In our GALEX UV images of Arp 82,

2518: we have detected starlight for the first time in the large HI arc to

2519: the east.

2520: 

2521: about the time of an earlier

2522: close encounter between the two disks according to our numerical

2523: model.  We conclude that the progenitors of

2524: Arp 82 were late-type or low surface brightness, and 

2525: Arp 82 was a `late-bloomer', in that its evolution 

2526: was minimal until these close encounters.

2527: 

2528: The distinctive morphology of Arp 285 along with kinematic

2529: information from the published 21 cm HI data provide strong 

2530: constraints on

2531: the parameters of the interaction.  In conjunction with the proposed

2532: observations of Arp 285, we propose to construct such a dynamical model.

2533: Comparison of these models with the proposed HST observations will provide clues

2534: to cluster formation and destruction mechanisms. 

2535: 

2536: \bibitem[Regan et al.(2004)]{regan04}

2537: Regan, M. W., et al.\ 2004, ApJS, 154, 204

2538: 

2539: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2004)]{rieke04}

2540: Rieke, G. H., et al.\ 2004, ApJS, 154, 25

2541: 

2542: Thus, the whole process is complicated, and deserves some further study.

2543: 

2544: \bibitem[Schombert, Wallin, \& Struck-Marcell(1990)]

2545: {schombert90}

2546: Schombert, J. M., Wallin, J. F., \& Struck-Marcell, C. 1990,

2547: AJ, 99, 497

2548: 

2549: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{fazio04}

2550: Fazio, G. G., et al.\ 2004, ApJS, 154, 10

2551: 

2552: \bibitem[Keel(1996)]{keel96}

2553: Keel, W. C. 1996, AJ, 111, 696

2554: 

2555: \bibitem[Keel et al.(1985)]{keel85}

2556: Keel, W. C., Kennicutt, R. C., Jr., Hummel, E., \& van der Hulst, J. M.

2557: 1985, AJ, 90, 708

2558: 

2559: \bibitem[Marston \& Appleton(1995)]{marston95}

2560: Marston, A. P., \& Appleton, P. N. 1995, AJ, 109, 1002

2561: 

2562: \bibitem[Charmandaris, Appleton, \& Marston(1993)]{charmandaris93}

2563: Charmandaris, V., Appleton, P. N., \& Marston, A. P. 1993,

2564: ApJ, 414, 154

2565: 

2566: \bibitem[Allamandola, Tielens, \& Barker(1985)]{allamandola85}

2567: Allamandola, L. J., Tielens, A. G. G. M., \& Barker, J. R. 1985, 

2568: ApJ, 290, L25

2569: 

2570: \bibitem[Appleton \& Struck-Marcell(1987)]{asm}

2571: Appleton, P. N., \& Struck-Marcell, C. 1987, ApJ, 312, 382

2572: 

2573: 

2574: \bibitem[Appleton \& Struck(1996)]{appleton96}

2575: Appleton, P. N. \& Struck, C. 1996,

2576: Fun. Cosmic Phys., 16, 111

2577: 

2578: \bibitem[Boselli, Lequeux, \& Gavazzi(2004)]{boselli04}

2579: Boselli, A., Lequeux, J., \& Gavazzi, G. 2004,

2580: A\&A, 428, 409

2581: 

2582: \bibitem[Peeters, Spoon, \& Tielens(2004)]{peeters04}

2583: Peeters, E., Spoon, H. W. W., \& Tielens, A. G. G. M.

2584: 2004, ApJ, 613, 986

2585: 

2586: \bibitem[Struck-Marcell \& Appleton(1987)]{sma}

2587: Struck-Marcell, C., \& Appleton, P. N. 1987, ApJ, 323, 480

2588: 

2589: \bibitem[Struck-Marcell(1990)]{struck90}

2590: Struck-Marcell, C. 1990, AJ, 99, 71

2591: 

2592: \bibitem[Theys \& Spiegel(1977)]{theys77}

2593: Theys, J. C., \& Spiegel, E. A. 1977, ApJ, 212, 616

2594: 

2595: \bibitem[Young et al.(1996)]{young96}

2596: Young, J. S., Allen, L., Kenney, J. D. P., Lesser, A.,

2597: \& Rownd, B. 1996, AJ, 112, 1903

2598: 

2599: \bibitem[Zhu et al.(1999)]{zhu99}

2600: Zhu, M., Seaquist, E. R., Davoust, E., Frayer, O. T., \& Bushouse, H. A.

2601: 1999, AJ, 118, 145

2602: 

2603: For the GALEX data, we used 

2604: an aperture of 2 pixel (3$''$) radius, and determined aperture

2605: corrections from bright stars in the field.  In the FUV band,

2606: we found an aperture correction of 0.45 magnitudes; in the NUV, the correction

2607: was 0.69 magnitudes.

2608: 

2609: \citep{hunter06},

2610: \citep{hunter06},

2611: 

2612: ****These clumps are unresolved or barely resolved at

2613: the resolution of the GALEX and Spitzer images, 

2614: but ??? in SDSS (????). 

2615: ***CHECK RESOLUTION ISSUE****

2616: 

2617: The red circles 

2618: show the locations of the Sloan Digitized Sky Survey

2619: quasars in the Spitzer Wide-Area Infrared Extragalactic Survey (SWIRE)

2620: Elais N1 field \citep{hatz05}.

2621: 

2622: \bibitem[Li \& Draine(2001)]{li01}

2623: Li, A. \& Draine, B. T. 2001, ApJ, 554, 778

2624: 

2625: \bibitem[Li \& Draine(2002)]{li02}

2626: Li, A. \& Draine, B. T. 2002, 572, 232

2627: 

2628: The predicted Spitzer colors for interstellar dust \citep{li01}

2629: are also plotted (green diamonds), for ISRF 

2630: strengths that vary from 0.3 $-$ 10,000 $\times$ that in the

2631: solar neighborhood.  As the ISRF increases, the Spitzer colors

2632: of dust

2633: become redder.  Note that the predicted dust colors vary very little

2634: for this wide range in ISRF.

2635: 

2636: For Arp 284 (NGC 7714/5), our models show that the star-forming inner

2637: southwestern tail of NGC 7714 is likely the result of mass transfer

2638: from NGC 7715, while the gas/star offset and the star formation in the bridge 

2639: were probably caused by dissipation in the gas and the interaction of two

2640: different tidal components \citep{struck03}.

2641: Our model also produces multiple starbursts in the core, consistent

2642: with previous observations \citep{lancon01}.

2643: In Arp 107, our simulations indicate that the azimuthal 

2644: age gradient 

2645: along the strong tidal arm/ring of the primary

2646: galaxy 

2647: implied by the Spitzer colors

2648: is a consequence 

2649: of differences in the time of maximum

2650: compression along the arm \citep{smith05b}.

2651: In Arp 82, our data imply $\sim$9 Myr old clumps of star formation

2652: in the disk and along the tidal features,

2653: superimposed on a

2654: $\sim$2 billion years old

2655: underlying stellar population \citep{hancock07}.

2656: This

2657: is consistent with

2658: our numerical model of this system, which 

2659: produces a lag between the time

2660: of last closest

2661: approach ($\sim$200 Myrs ago) and an enhancement in the star formation rate.

2662: Our model also implies an 

2663: earlier encounter, which may have triggered the first burst of star formation.

2664: ***Reference to IC 2163/NGC 2207 papers \citep{struck05, elmegreen06}.****

2665: 

2666: \bibitem[Lan\c{c}on et al.(2001)]{lancon01}

2667: Lan\c{c}on, A., et al. 2001, ApJ, 552, 150

2668: 

2669: the nucleus of NGC 2856 (cyan clump 3), and no strong constraints

2670: for the nucleus of NGC 2854 (black circle 7).

2671: 

2672: Spatial peaks of cluster formation are also seen

2673: in the Tadpole galaxy, separated by

2674: large gaps \citep{tran03}.

2675: 

2676: \bibitem[Tran et al.(2003)]{tran03}

2677: Tran, H. D.,  et al.\ 2003, ApJ, 585, 750.

2678: 

2679: A possible H$\alpha$ extension is visible to the north of the tail,

2680: without an optical continuum counterpart.  If real, this may

2681: be due to a superwind from the starburst nucleus, as

2682: in NGC 891.

2683: 

2684: These studies provided evidence for star formation induced by

2685: gas transfer between galaxies \citep{struck03},

2686: gas/star offsets in tidal features produced

2687: by 

2688: gas dissipation \citep{struck03}, multiple bursts of star formation

2689: triggered by mass transfer or multiple passages of the companion

2690: \citep{struck03, hancock07}, and an azimuthal 

2691: age gradient along a tidal arm/tail \citep{smith05b}.

2692: 

2693: In the case of the `bright spot' in the NGC 2856 disk, however,

2694: the availability of the UV data helps to break the degeneracy.

2695: This `spot' (the cyan open diamond

2696: labeled `1') is clearly redder in FUV $-$ NUV compared

2697: to the other non-nuclear disk clumps (see Figure 12), 

2698: in spite of having similar u $-$ g, g $-$ r, and r $-$ i colors

2699: (Figures 10 $-$ 12 and Table 2).   This implies an older stellar population.

2700: Its position in the FUV $-$ NUV vs.\ g $-$ r plot implies an extinction

2701: of E(B $-$ V) = 0.4 $\pm$ 0.1 and an age of 3 $-$ 4 $\times$ 10$^8$ years.

2702: Thus this is a relatively old region, in contrast to the other non-nuclear

2703: clumps in the disks, which appear younger and more obscured.

2704: 

2705: These colors

2706: imply an extinction of E(B $-$ V)

2707: $\approx$ 0.3 $\pm$ 0.2, and an age of $\approx$1 

2708: $-$ 2 $\times$ 10$^7$ years.

2709: The relatively blue FUV $-$ NUV color (Figure 12) is

2710: consistent with these ranges.

2711: 

2712: In general, the 

2713: [3.6] $-$ [4.5] colors of spiral galaxies and of clumps within those

2714: galaxies are

2715: similar to those of stars, indicating those bands are

2716: dominated by starlight \citep{smith05b, smith07, hancock07}.

2717: For clump 3 in the Arp 285 tail, however, this color is slightly redder

2718: than that of the field stars studied by \citet{whitney04} (Figure 14).

2719: Such a reddening is seen in the global [3.6] $-$ [4.5] colors of

2720: irregular/Sm galaxies \citep{pahre04, smith07}.   This may be

2721: due to younger stars \citep{pahre04} which are slightly

2722: redder at these colors \citep{reach05}, or

2723: contributions from hot dust at 

2724: 4.5 $\mu$m 

2725: \citep{hunter06}.

2726: 

2727: \bibitem[Pahre et al.(2004)]{pahre04}

2728: Pahre, M. A., Ashby, M. L. N., Fazio, G. G., \& Willner, S. P. 

2729: 2004, ApJS, 154, 235

2730: 

2731: \bibitem[Reach et al.(2005)]{reach05}

2732: Reach, W. T., et al. 2005, PASP, 117, 978

2733:                                                                                 

2734: \bibitem[Hunter, Elmegreen, \& Martin(2006)]{hunter06}

2735: Hunter, D. A., Elmegreen, B. G., \& Martin, E. 2006, 

2736: AJ, 132, 801

2737: 

2738: This color is a measure of the relative amounts of

2739: photospheric and dust emission,

2740: with younger clumps being redder.

2741: 

2742: \bibitem[Papovich et al.(2005)]{papovich05}

2743: Papovich, C., Dickinson, M., Giavalisco, M., Conselice, C. J.,

2744: \& Ferguson, H. C. 2005, ApJ, 631, 101

2745: 

2746: These results are 

2747: given in Table 3.  

2748: For the continuous burst models,

2749: the age given is the time since the beginning of the burst.

2750: 

2751: If the minimum $\chi^2$ $>$ N,

2752: we concluded that no fit

2753: was possible for a single-age population for the clump.

2754: 

2755: \bibitem[L\'eger \& Puget(1984)]{leger84}

2756: L\'eger, A., \& Puget, J. L. 1984, A\&A 137, L5

2757: 

2758: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(2006)]{skrutskie06}

2759: Skrutskie, M. F., et al.\ 2006, AJ, 131, 1163

2760: 

2761: \bibitem[Lavery et al.(2004)]{lavery04}

2762: Lavery, R. J., Remijan, A., Charmandaris, V.,

2763: Hayes, R. D., \& Ring, A. A. 2004, ApJ, 612, 679

2764: 

2765: Such comparisons can provide clues to

2766: the processes that gather

2767: and compress gas and create luminous star forming complexes, such as

2768: shock compression, gravitational agglomeration,

2769: gas infall, and threshold effects.

2770: 

2771: Mid-infrared luminosities are good

2772: measures of the global star formation rate in galaxies

2773: \citep{roussel01, forster04, calzetti05}.

2774: We compared these Arp galaxies with a sample of `normal' spirals

2775: selected from the SINGS sample \citep{kennicutt03, dale05}, after

2776: eliminating SINGS galaxies with nearby companions.

2777: The Spitzer

2778: [3.6 $\mu$m] $-$ [24 $\mu$m] 

2779: colors 

2780: of these optically-selected 

2781: interacting galaxies

2782: are $\sim$0.8 magnitudes redder on average than those of the 

2783: spirals \citep{smith07}.  Since the 3.6 $\mu$m band

2784: traces old stars and the 24 $\mu$m emission arises from dust heated by

2785: young stars, 

2786: these results imply enhancements

2787: to the mass-normalized star formation rates of the interacting

2788: galaxies of a factor of $\sim$2

2789: on average.  

2790: These results are consistent with earlier H$\alpha$ and far-infrared

2791: studies \citep{kennicutt87, bushouse87, bushouse88}.

2792: 

2793: 

2794: \bibitem[Roussel et al.(2001)]{roussel01}

2795: Roussel, H., Sauvage, M., Vigroux, L., \& Bosma, A. 2001,

2796: A\&A, 372, 427

2797: 

2798: \bibitem[F\"orster Schreiber et al.(2004)]{forster04}

2799: F\"orster Schreiber, N. M., Roussel, H., Sauvage, M., \& Charmandaris, V.

2800: 2004, A\&A, 419, 501

2801: 

2802:                                                                                 

2803: \bibitem[Kennicutt et al.(2003)]{kennicutt03} 

2804: Kennicutt, R. C., Jr., et al.\ 2003, PASP, 115, 928

2805:                                                                                 

2806: \bibitem[Bushouse(1987)]{bushouse87}

2807: Bushouse, H. A. 1987, ApJ, 320, 49

2808: 

2809: At the northwestern end of the bar, the brightest source

2810: in g is offset about 2$''$ from the 8 $\mu$m peak, however,

2811: the brightest source in r and 3.6 $\mu$m is aligned with

2812: the 8 $\mu$m source.  This

2813: suggests that the g-8 $\mu$m positional offset is due

2814: to extinction.

2815: 

2816: Since the metallicity of Arp 285 is unknown, and since tidal

2817: features sometimes have lower metallicities than inner disks,

2818: we ran two different sets of Starburst99 models, one with solar

2819: metallicity and one with 1/5 solar.  We calculated ages for both

2820: sets of metallicities.

2821: 

2822: For the continuous burst models, 

2823: the upper limits to the possible ages are unconstrained.

2824: This is also the case for the instantaneous burst models

2825: of the diffuse emission in the tail.

2826: 

2827: However, if it was tilted much more relative to the orbital plane, then the tidal perturbation of the companion would be reduced, and it would be harder to produce the bridge and tail. 

2828: 

2829: and trailing arms, 

2830: 

2831: Another

2832: of our models had the primary tilted up in the south by 30$^{\circ}$,

2833: and the companion tilted up by 40$^{\circ}$, more in accord with

2834: the observations.  However, except for an unrealistically long companion

2835: tail due to a larger companion disk, the appearance of this model

2836: was nearly identical to that shown in Figure 20.  Thus the morphological

2837: structures do not seem sensitive to modest changes in the disk orientations.

2838: 

2839: In the run shown in Figure 20, the companion disk was

2840: relatively small compared to the impact parameter.

2841: In other runs with a larger companion disk (not shown), 

2842: these `ripple-like' features are more easily seen.

2843: 

2844: This possibility 

2845: will require high-resolution 

2846: kinematic observations to 

2847: confirm.

2848: 

2849: Bridge overflow into 

2850: the companion halo is not an uncommon process in 

2851: interactions, but it has been much less studied than 

2852: star formation in tidal tails. The present example 

2853: suggests that it may deserve more study.

2854: 

2855: Unfortunately, with the available data, we are not able to 

2856: confirm this.

2857: 

2858: 

2859: %($\lambda$L$_{\lambda}$) of 1.8 $\times$ 10$^{40}$ erg~s$^{-1}$

2860: 

2861: we infer an 24 $\mu$m luminosity 

2862: of this clump of 3 $\times$ 10$^{39}$ erg~s$^{-1}$

2863: ($\lambda$L$_{\lambda}$). 

2864: This is lower luminosity than any of the M51 clumps studied

2865: by \citet{calzetti05}, or the clumps

2866: in Arp 82 studied by \citet{hancock07}.  

2867: 

2868: The disk positions in NGC 2854 are slightly more crowded than

2869: those in NGC 2856, so we

2870: used somewhat smaller apertures. 

2871: 

2872: , adding the step size

2873: to the estimate of the uncertainty.

2874: 

2875: , and increase

2876: the uncertainties in the ages.

2877: