1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %version 21.08.2006
3: \documentclass{emulateapj}
4: \usepackage{apjfonts}
5:
6: \def\be{\begin{equation}}
7: \def\ee{\end{equation}}
8: \def\mdot{\dot{m}}
9: \def\ergs{{\rm\,erg\,s^{-1}}}
10: \newcommand{\msun}{{\rm M}_{\sun}}
11: \def\ergscc{\rm \ \ erg \ cm^{-3} \ s^{-1}}
12: \def\gs{\rm \,g\,s^{-1}}
13: \catcode`\@=11 % This allows us to modify PLAIN macros.
14: \def\@versim#1#2{\vcenter{\offinterlineskip
15: \ialign{$\m@th#1\hfil##\hfil$\crcr#2\crcr\sim\crcr } }}
16: \def\mpy{M_\odot \ {\rm yr^{-1}}}
17: \newcommand{\xte}{{\em RXTE}}
18:
19: %\slugcomment{Submitted to The Astrophysical Journal}
20: \shorttitle{****}
21: \shortauthors{****}
22: %\received{}
23: %\received{2003 December 30}
24: \begin{document}
25: %\date{}
26:
27: \title{Global Compton heating and cooling in hot accretion flows}
28:
29: \author{Feng Yuan\altaffilmark{1, 2}, Fuguo Xie\altaffilmark{1, 3},
30: Jeremiah P. Ostriker\altaffilmark{4}}
31: \altaffiltext{1}{Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
32: 80 Nandan Road, Shanghai 200030, China; fyuan@shao.ac.cn}
33: \altaffiltext{2}{Joint Institute for Galaxy and Cosmology (JOINGC) of
34: SHAO and USTC}
35: \altaffiltext{3}{Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences,
36: Beijing 100039, China}
37: \altaffiltext{4}{Princeton University Observatory, Princeton, USA}
38:
39: \begin{abstract}
40:
41: The hot accretion flow (such as advection-dominated accretion flow)
42: is usually optically thin in the radial direction,
43: therefore the photons produced at one radius
44: can travel for a long distance without being absorbed. These photons
45: thus can heat or cool electrons at other radii via Compton scattering.
46: This effect has been ignored in most previous works on hot accretion flows
47: and is the focus of this paper. If the mass accretion rate is described by
48: $\dot{M}=\dot{M}_0(r/r_{\rm out})^{0.3}$ and $r_{\rm out}=10^4r_{\rm s}$,
49: we find that the Compton scattering will play a cooling and heating role
50: at $r\la 5\times 10^3 r_{\rm s}$ and $r\ga 5\times 10^3 r_{\rm s}$,
51: respectively. Specifically, when $\dot{M}_0>0.1L_{\rm Edd}/c^2$, the
52: Compton cooling rate is larger than the local viscous heating rate at
53: certain radius; therefore the cooling effect is important.
54: When $\dot{M}_0>2L_{\rm Edd}/c^2$,
55: the heating effect at $r_{\rm out}$ is important. We can obtain
56: the self-consistent steady solution with the global Compton effect included
57: only if $\dot{M}_0\la L_{\rm Edd}/c^2$ for $r_{\rm out}=50r_{\rm s}$,
58: which corresponds to $L\la 0.02L_{\rm Edd}$. Above this rate the Compton
59: cooling is so strong at the inner region that hot solutions can not exist.
60: On the other hand, for $r_{\rm out}= 10^5r_{\rm s}$, we can only
61: get the self-consistent solution when $\dot{M}_0\la L_{\rm Edd}/c^2$ and
62: $L<0.01L_{\rm Edd}$. The
63: value of this critical accretion rate is anti-correlated with the value of
64: $r_{\rm out}$. Above this accretion rate the equilibrium temperature of
65: electrons at $r_{\rm out}$ is higher than the virial temperature
66: as a result of strong Compton heating, so the accretion is suppressed.
67: In this case the activity of the black hole will likely ``oscillate''
68: between an active and an inactive phases, with the oscillation
69: timescale being the radiative timescale of the gas at $r_{\rm out}$.
70:
71: \end{abstract}
72:
73: \keywords{accretion, accretion disks --- black hole physics ---
74: galaxies: active --- quasars: general --- X-rays: general}
75:
76: \section{Introduction}
77:
78: Compton scattering between photons and electrons
79: is an important process in astrophysics.
80: If the photons are not produced at the same place where the electrons
81: are located, we call it ``global Compton scattering''.
82: Momentum and energy of photons and electrons can be exchanged in this process
83: and these two aspects often play an
84: important role in determining the dynamics of the gas flow.
85: On the galactic scale, this so-called radiative
86: feedback mechanism now is believed to be
87: crucial for understanding AGN feedback on galaxy formation and evolution
88: (e.g., Ciotti \& Ostriker 2001, 2007;
89: Murray et al. 2005; Hopkins et al. 2005). On a smaller scale, the
90: effect of Compton scattering on the dynamics of gas flows surrounding
91: a strongly radiating quasar has been investigated and outflow is
92: produced as a consequence of Compton heating (e.g., Proga, Ostriker \&
93: Kurosawa 2008). Following the earlier work of
94: Krolik et al. (1981), Mathews \& Ferland (1987) considered the Compton heating
95: effect for the broad-line region of quasar.
96: This effect is also important for
97: the standard thin disk, if the disk is warped or
98: irradiated by a source above the disk plane (e.g., Shakura \& Sunyaev 1973;
99: Begelman, McKee \& Shields 1983; Dubus et al. 1999). If the accretion flow is
100: geometrically thick and optically thin,
101: the photons can travel a large distance without being absorbed,
102: therefore the global Compton scattering effect is in principle important.
103: This is the case for spherical accretion and hot accretion flows. The latter
104: includes the advection-dominated accretion flow (ADAF; Narayan \& Yi 1994;
105: 1995) and luminous hot accretion flow (LHAF; Yuan 2001; 2003),
106: two types of hot accretion flows corresponding to low and high accretion
107: rates, respectively.
108:
109: For spherical accretion, the interaction of momentum between photons and
110: electrons sets up a largest possible luminosity the accretion flow
111: could reach, namely the Eddington luminosity $L_{\rm Edd}$
112: (but this limit does not apply when the accretion flow has
113: a non-zero angular momentum; see, e.g., Ohsuga \& Mineshige 2007).
114: The effect of the energy interaction between photons and electrons
115: in a spherical accretion flow has been investigated by Ostriker et al.
116: (1976). It was found that when the luminosity is
117: larger than a certain value the outward energetic
118: photons could heat gas flow significantly so that the local sound speed
119: is larger than the escape speed, or, in other words, the temperature
120: is higher than the virial temperature, thus the accretion is suppressed;
121: and this effect due to energy input from the outgoing radiation field
122: occurs for much lower luminosities than the momentum (Eddington) limit.
123:
124: In almost all of the previous work on the dynamics of hot accretion
125: flows, only the ``local'' Compton scattering effect has been
126: considered while the global Compton effect has been neglected.
127: Here ``local'' means that photons are
128: produced at the same region with where the electrons locate. This
129: local Compton scattering serves as the main cooling mechanism of
130: electrons (Compton cooling) and the main mechanism of producing
131: X-ray emission (thermal Comptonization). The only works to our
132: knowledge considering the global Compton scattering are Esin (1997)
133: and Park \& Ostriker (1999; 2001; 2007). Esin (1997) deals with a
134: one-dimensional ADAF and finds that the global Compton
135: heating/cooling is not important and can be neglected. Park \&
136: Ostriker (2001; 2007) deal with a two-dimensional flow and focus
137: on the possible production of outflow in the polar region because of
138: strong Compton heating there. Their conclusion is that Compton
139: heating effect is important in many cases, which is quite different
140: from Esin's result. They do not attempt to obtain the
141: self-consistent solutions.
142:
143: All their work are based on the self-similar solution of ADAF (Narayan \&
144: Yi 1994; 1995). The discrepancy between Esin and Park \& Ostriker
145: is likely due to the additional but different assumptions adopted.
146: While the self-similar approximation is quite
147: successful in catching the main spirit of an ADAF, it is not a good
148: approximation when we want to calculate the radiation since
149: order of magnitude error could be produced. This is because the self-similar
150: approximation breaks down
151: at the inner region of the ADAF where most of the radiation comes from.
152: When we consider the effect of global Compton heating/cooling,
153: obviously it is crucial to calculate the exact spectrum from the
154: exact global solution of the accretion flow. This is the main motivation
155: of the present paper. In addition, important theoretical progress on
156: ADAF solutions have been made since its discovery.
157: The two most important ones are the presence of outflow (e.g.,
158: Stone \& Pringle 2001) and significant direct
159: electron heating by turbulent dissipation (e.g., Quataert \& Gruzinov 1999),
160: which is much stronger than the heating by Coulomb collisions between ions
161: and electrons. Both of them are important in
162: determining the dynamics of ADAFs while they have not been properly
163: taken into account in the above works.
164: In the present paper we will focus on the one-dimensional case,
165: given that the uncertainty of our understanding to two-dimensional structure of
166: accretion flow is still large. Of course,
167: a full understanding to the two-dimensional case is obviously important
168: and should be a topic of future research.
169:
170: \section{The importance of Compton heating or cooling in hot accretion flows}
171:
172: \subsection{Calculation Method}
173:
174: Consider a canonical hot accretion flow without taking into account the
175: global Compton heating or cooling. Outflow is taken into account by adopting
176: the following radius-dependent mass accretion rate (e.g.,
177: Blandford \& Begelman 1999):
178: \be
179: \dot{M}=-4\pi r H\rho v=\dot{M}_0\left(\frac{r}{r_{\rm out}}\right)^s,
180: \ee
181: where $\dot{M}_0$ is the mass accretion rate at the outer boundary
182: $r_{\rm out}$. The value of index $s$ describes the strength of the outflow
183: and we use $s=0.3$ from the detailed modeling of Sgr A*, the supermassive
184: black hole in our Galactic center (Yuan, Quataert \& Narayan 2003).
185: The energy equations for ions and electrons are
186: \be \rho v
187: \left(\frac{d \varepsilon_{\rm i}}{dr}- {p_{\rm i} \over \rho^2} \frac{d \rho}{dr}
188: \right) =(1-\delta)q^+-q_{\rm ie},
189: \ee
190: \be \rho v
191: \left(\frac{d \varepsilon_{\rm e}}{dr}- {p_{\rm e} \over \rho^2} \frac{d
192: \rho}{dr}\right) =\delta q^++q_{\rm ie}-q^-, \ee
193: where $\varepsilon_{\rm {e,i}}$
194: is the internal energy of electrons and ions per unit mass of the gas,
195: $q_{\rm ie}$ is the Coulomb energy exchange rate between electrons and ions,
196: $q^-$ is the electron cooling rate, including synchrotron and bremsstrahlung
197: emissions and their local Comptonization, $q^+$ is the net turbulent
198: heating rate, the value of $\delta$ describes the fraction of turbulent
199: heating which directly heats electrons and we use $\delta=0.5$ again
200: from the modeling of Sgr A* (see also Sharma et al. 2007).
201:
202: We first get the exact global solution of the hot accretion flow so that
203: we know all the quantities such as density
204: and temperature as a function of radius. This requires us to solve
205: the set of equations describing the conservations of mass (eq. 1),
206: energy (eqs. 2 \& 3), and momentum (ref. Yuan, Quataert \& Narayan 2003).
207: The global solution should satisfy the outer boundary condition
208: at the outer boundary $r_{\rm out}$, the inner boundary
209: condition at the horizon, and a sonic point condition at the sonic point. To
210: calculate the rate of ``global'' Compton heating/cooling of electrons
211: at a given radius $r$, we need to know the spectrum received
212: at $r$ emitted by the whole
213: flow. This requires us to solve the radiative transfer equations along
214: the radial direction, which is complicated when scattering is important.
215: For simplicity, here we deal with the scattering in
216: a simple way and write the received spectrum at $r$ emitted by
217: the flow inside of $r$ as,
218: \be
219: F_{\nu}^{\rm in}(r)=\int^{r}_{r_{\rm s}}e^{-\tau}\frac{1}{4\pi r^2}
220: \frac{{\rm d}L_{\nu}(r')}{{\rm d}r'}{\rm d}r'
221: \ee
222: Here $\tau$ is the scattering
223: optical depth from $r'$ to $r$, $\tau=\int^r_{r'}\sigma_{\tiny T} n_e dr'$,
224: and $dL_{\nu}(r')$ is the emitted monochromatic luminosity from a shell at $r'$
225: with thickness $dr'$ and height $H(r')$. It includes synchrotron
226: and bremsstrahlung emissions and their local Comptonization.
227: We approximate the calculation of the unscattered part of
228: $dL_{\nu}(r')$ by solving the radiative transfer along the vertical direction
229: of ADAFs adopting a two-stream approximation
230: (Manmoto, Mineshige \& Kusunose 1997):
231: \be
232: dL_{\nu}^{\rm un}(r')=
233: \frac{4\pi^2}{\sqrt{3}}B_{\nu}[1-{\rm exp}(-2\sqrt{3}\tau_{\nu}^*)]r'dr'
234: \ee
235: Here $B_{\nu}$ denotes the Planck spectrum, $\tau_{\nu}^*\equiv
236: (\pi/2)^{1/2}\kappa_{\nu}(0)H(r')$ is the optical depth for absorption in the
237: vertical direction with $\kappa_{\nu}(0)$ being the absorption coefficient
238: on the equatorial plane. The free-free absorption and synchrotron
239: self-absorption are included in
240: this way. The strength of the magnetic field in the accretion flow is determined
241: by a parameter $\beta$ defined as the ratio of the gas pressure to the
242: magnetic pressure and we set $\beta=9$.
243: For the calculation of the Compton scattered part of $dL_{\nu}(r')$,
244: we use the approach of Coppi \& Blandford (1990; eq. 2.2).
245: The integration in eq. (4) begins from the black hole horizon $r_{\rm s}\equiv 2GM/c^2$.
246:
247: The spectrum received at $r$ emitted by the
248: flow outside of $r$ is (Park \& Ostriker 2007),
249: \be
250: F_{\nu}^{\rm out}(r)=\int^{r_{\rm out}}_{r}\frac{e^{-\tau}}
251: {4\pi r' H(r')}\frac{r'}{r}
252: {\rm ln} \sqrt{\frac{r'+r}{r'-r}}\frac{dL_{\nu}(r')}{dr'}dr'
253: \ee
254: The total spectrum received at $r$ is the sum of $F_{\nu}^{\rm in}(r)$
255: and $F_{\nu}^{\rm out}(r)$.
256:
257: \begin{figure} \epsscale{1.} \plotone{f1.eps} \vspace{.2in}
258: \caption{{\it Left panel}: The ratio of the Compton heating/cooling
259: rate to the turbulent heating rate of electrons in hot accretion
260: flows for $\dot{M}=\dot{M}_0(r/10^4r_s)^{0.3}$ with three accretion
261: rates $\dot{M}_0=0.1~\dot{M}_{\rm Edd}$ (dashed), $1~\dot{M}_{\rm
262: Edd}$ (dotted) and $2~\dot{M}_{\rm Edd}$ (solid). {\it Right panel}:
263: The ratio of the radiation temperature $\theta_{\rm x}$ (see text
264: for definition) and the electron temperature $\theta_e$.
265: When $\theta_{\rm x}$ is larger (smaller) than $\theta_e$,
266: Compton scattering plays a heating (cooling) role.}
267: \end{figure}
268:
269: We assume that the electrons have a Maxwell distribution with
270: temperature $T_e$ ($\theta_e\equiv kT_e/m_ec^2$) and the energy of
271: the photon before scattering is $\epsilon \equiv h\nu/m_ec^2$. Since
272: the electrons in the hot accretion flow are relativistic at the
273: innermost region and the peak photon energy $\epsilon > 1$, to
274: calculate the average energy of a scattered photon, we use the
275: following exact form which is valid for any photon energy and
276: electrons temperature (Guilbert 1986):
277: \begin{equation}
278: \begin{array}{l}
279: <\epsilon_1>=\epsilon + \\
280: \frac{\sigma_T}{2K_2(1/\theta_e)\sigma}\int^{+\infty}_
281: {-\infty} \left(\theta_e+{\rm sinh}~\phi-\epsilon \right) G(\epsilon
282: e^{\phi})e^{2\phi} {\rm exp}\left(\frac{-{\rm cosh~\phi}}{\theta_e}
283: \right)d\phi,
284: \end{array}
285: \end{equation} with $G(\epsilon)\equiv
286: g_0(\epsilon)-g_1(\epsilon)$ and the cross-section for scattering
287: \be \sigma(\epsilon,\theta_e)=\frac{\sigma_T}{2K_2(1/\theta_e)}
288: \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}g_0(\epsilon e^{\phi}) e^{2\phi}{\rm
289: exp}\left(\frac{-{\rm cosh}~\phi}{\theta_e}\right)d\phi. \ee Here
290: $K_2(x)$ is a modified Bessel function of second order and: \be
291: g_n(y) \equiv \frac{3}{8}\int^2_0\left( t(t-2)+1+ty+\frac{1}{1+ty}
292: \right)\frac{dt}{(1+ty)^{n+2}}. \ee In the Thompson limit, eqs. (7)
293: \& (8) are transformed into the familiar form of \be<\epsilon_1>
294: =\epsilon+\epsilon \frac{4kT_e-\epsilon~m_ec^2}{m_ec^2}, \ee and
295: \be\sigma(\epsilon,\theta_e)=\sigma_T.\ee
296:
297: The number of scattering in a region of the accretion flow with unit
298: width in the radial direction and scattering optical depth
299: $\tau_{es}\equiv \sigma(\epsilon,\theta_e)n_e$ is \be N=\tau_{es},
300: \ee with $\theta_e$ and $n_e$ are the temperature and number density
301: of electrons in that region. The Compton heating (cooling) rate in
302: that region (with unit radial length) is then \be q_{\rm comp}=\int
303: N~[F_{\nu}^{\rm in}(r)+F_{\nu}^{\rm out}(r)]
304: \frac{\epsilon-<\epsilon_1>}{\epsilon} d\nu. \ee
305: Note that in the above equation we actually use the moment of
306: intensity ``$J$'' not ''$F$''.
307: Following Park \& Ostriker (2007), we formally define a ``radiation
308: temperature'' (or ``Compton temperature''; see also Levich \& Sunyaev
309: 1970; Krolik, McKee \& Tarter 1981): \be \theta_{\rm x}\equiv \frac{\int
310: [F_{\nu}^{\rm in}(r)+F_{\nu}^{\rm out}(r)]h\nu d\nu} {4m_ec^2\int
311: [F_{\nu}^{\rm in}(r)+F_{\nu}^{\rm out}(r)] d\nu}.\ee
312: %then eq. (9) can be rewritten as,
313: %\be q_{\rm comp}=4(\tau_{es}+\tau_{es}^2)(\theta_{\rm x}-\theta_e)
314: %\int [F_{\nu}^{\rm in}(r)+F_{\nu}^{\rm out}(r)] d\nu.\ee
315: %Here $\theta_e\equiv kT_e/m_e c^2$.
316: Under this definition, whether the Compton scattering plays a
317: heating or cooling effect roughly depends on whether the electron
318: temperature $\theta_e$ is larger or smaller than $\theta_{\rm x}$.
319: In the Thompson limit, the Compton heating/cooling rate is exactly
320: proportional to $(\theta_{\rm x}-\theta_e)$.
321:
322: It is important to note here that the radiation temperature
323: is obtained from the flux distribution by weighting with the factor
324: $h\nu$. It physically represents the equilibrium between Compton
325: heating and cooling. For a typical quasar spectrum, it corresponds
326: to $2\times 10^7~$K or several keV where the bulk of the
327: radiation is emitted in the UV or, in some cases, IR portions of the
328: spectrum (Mathews \& Ferland 1987; Sazonov, Ostriker \& Sunyaev 2004).
329: As we will see below (e.g., ref. Fig. 3 (c)), the radiation temperature of an
330: ADAF spectrum is much higher because of its different spectrum.
331:
332: \subsection{Results}
333:
334: \begin{figure*}
335: \epsscale{0.5} \plotone{f2a.eps} \\
336: \epsscale{0.45} \plotone{f2b.eps} \epsscale{0.45} \plotone{f2c.eps}
337: %\vspace{0.5in}
338: \caption{The Compton effect for a stellar mass black hole with black hole
339: mass of $M=10~\msun$ and mass accretion rate
340: $\dot{M}=\left(\frac{r}{50r_s}\right)^{0.3}\dot{M}_{\rm Edd}$.
341: The solid and dashed lines are for the solutions before and after the global
342: Compton effect is taken into account. (a) The electron temperature profile.
343: (b) The ratio of the rate of Compton heating/cooling and the turbulent
344: heating of electrons. (c) The spectrum of the accretion flows.}
345: \end{figure*}
346:
347: The dominant heating term of electrons in eq. (3) is $q_{\rm vis,e}
348: \equiv \delta q^+$. We compare the rate of global Compton heating/cooling
349: with $q_{\rm vis,e}$ and the results are shown in Fig. 1
350: for $\dot{M}=\dot{M}_0(r/10^4r_{\rm s})^{0.3}$ with
351: $\dot{M}_0=0.1, 1$, and $2\dot{M}_{\rm Edd}$ ($\dot{M}_{\rm Edd}
352: \equiv L_{\rm Edd}/c^2$). At large radii, $r\ga 5\times 10^3 r_{\rm s}$,
353: Compton scattering heats electrons; while at small radii,
354: $r\la 5\times 10^3r_{\rm s}$, it cools electrons. This is of course because the
355: radiation temperature $\theta_{\rm x}$ is lower (higher) than the electron
356: temperature $\theta_{\rm e}$ at the small (large) radii, as shown by
357: the right panel of Fig. 1.
358:
359: \begin{figure*}
360: \epsscale{0.5} \plotone{f3a.eps} \\
361: \epsscale{0.45} \plotone{f3b.eps} \epsscale{0.45} \plotone{f3c.eps}
362: %\vspace{0.5in}
363: \caption{Compton effect for a supermassive black hole, with
364: black hole mass $M=10^8~\msun$ and mass accretion rate
365: $\dot{M}=0.5\left(\frac{r}{10^4r_s}\right)^{0.3}\dot{M}_{\rm Edd}$.
366: The solid and dashed lines are for the solutions before and after the global
367: Compton effect is taken into account. (a) The electron temperature
368: profile. (b) The ratio of the rate of Compton heating/cooling and the turbulent
369: heating of electrons. (c) The spectrum of the accretion flows.
370: The two arrows show the values of the average energy and energy-weighted
371: energy of photons emitted by the self-consistent solution.}
372: \end{figure*}
373:
374: We can see from the left panel of Fig. 1 that the Compton effect is
375: important when $\dot{M}_0\ga 0.1 \dot{M}_{\rm Edd}$. In this case,
376: its cooling effect can not be neglected. The corresponding accretion
377: rate at the black hole horizon is $\sim 10^{-2}\dot{M}_{\rm Edd}$
378: and the corresponding luminosity is $\sim 5\times 10^{-4}L_{\rm
379: Edd}$. The ``lowest'' value of $\dot{M}_0$ above which Compton
380: heating effect is important is a function of $r_{\rm out}$. For
381: $r_{\rm out}=10^4 r_{\rm s}$, this value is $\sim 2\dot{M}_{\rm
382: Edd}$ and the corresponding luminosity is $\sim 2 \times 10^{-2}
383: L_{\rm Edd}$. When $r_{\rm out}$ is larger, the value of critical
384: $\dot{M}_0$ is lower. In reality $r_{\rm out}$ usually has a largest
385: feasible value. If the ADAF starts out from a transition from a
386: standard thin disk, $r_{\rm out}$ equals to the transition radius.
387: If on the other hand the accretion flow starts out as an ADAF such
388: as in our Galactic center, $r_{\rm out}$ should be determined by the
389: Bondi radius. Outside of Bondi radius, the effect of Compton heating
390: is not so clear, because matching an ADAF solution to one with
391: proper boundary condition at infinity is an unsolved problem.
392:
393: Our result that Compton scattering heats electrons at large radii while cools
394: electrons at small radii is qualitatively consistent with both Esin (1997) and
395: Park \& Ostriker (2001; 2007). However, Esin (1997) found that Compton heating
396: rate is always even smaller than the Coulomb collision heating rate therefore
397: is negligible. This is different from our results and Park \& Ostriker
398: (2001; 2007). The reason may comes from some over-simplifications
399: and the different (old) ADAF model adopted in Esin (1997).
400: Overall, we see that for extended solutions ($r_{\rm out}>10^4r_{\rm s}$),
401: both Compton cooling in the inner parts and Compton heating in the
402: outer parts dramatically alter the solutions when $L\ga 10^{-2}L_{\rm Edd}$.
403:
404:
405: \section{The self-consistent solutions}
406:
407: The above result indicates that we should take into account the
408: effect of global Compton heating/cooling when we calculate the
409: global solution of the hot accretion flow when $\dot{M}$ is
410: relatively large. This has not been studied in Esin (1997) and Park
411: \& Ostriker (1999; 2001; 2007). We use an iteration method to
412: achieve this. We first solve the global solution without considering
413: the global Compton effect, calculating the rate of Compton
414: heating/cooling at each radius as described above, $q_{\rm comp}$.
415: We then include this term in the energy equations of electrons: \be
416: \rho v \left(\frac{d \varepsilon_e}{dr}- {p_e \over \rho^2} \frac{d
417: \rho}{dr}\right) =\delta q^+ + q_{\rm ie}-q^- + q_{\rm comp}, \ee
418: and calculate the ``new'' global solution of the accretion flow
419: based on this ``new'' equation. Then we get a new Compton
420: heating/cooling rate. If the new rate is not equal to the guessed
421: value we replace the guessed value with the new one and repeat this
422: procedure until they are equal. However, we must emphasize that the
423: solution obtained by the above approach is actually not exactly
424: ``self-consistent''. We use eq. (13) to calculate $q_{\rm comp}$.
425: But in eq. (13), only the local Compton scattering is considered
426: when calculating $F_{\rm \nu}^{\rm in}+F_{\rm \nu}^{\rm out}$, and
427: the global scattering is difficult to include because we don't know
428: the spectrum emitted at other radii which again requires to consider
429: global scattering. This is difficult to deal with even using the
430: iteration approach. The best way to solve this problem is by Monte
431: Carlo simulation combined with iteration method. This is beyond the
432: scape of this paper and will be our next work. On the other hand, we
433: believe our result should be a good zeroth-order approximation to the
434: real solution.
435:
436: Bearing this in mind, Figs. 2\&3 show the calculation results. Figs. 2 (a--c) are
437: for a stellar mass black hole with black hole mass
438: $M=10~\msun$ and $\dot{M}=(r/50~r_{\rm s})^{0.3}
439: \dot{M}_{\rm Edd}$. Fig. 2(a) shows the electron temperature of the
440: global solution without (solid line) and with (dashed line) the global
441: Compton scattering effect included. Because Compton scattering plays
442: a cooling role at small radii, we see that the electron temperature decreases after
443: the Compton effect is taken into account as we expect.
444:
445: Fig. 2(b) shows the ratio of Compton heating and local viscous
446: heating of the electrons, $q_{\rm comp}/q_{\rm vis,e}$, before
447: (solid line) and after (dashed line) the global Compton effect is
448: included. It is interesting to note that at $r\ga 4r_s$, the
449: absolute value of this ratio is between $1-4$. Since we typically
450: have $q_{\rm ie} \ll q_{\rm vis,e}$, this implies that the
451: right-hand-side of eq. (15) is negative in that region, i.e., the
452: viscous heating of electrons is smaller than its radiative cooling
453: ($q^--q_{\rm comp})$. In another words, the energy advection of
454: electrons plays a heating role, just like the ions in the LHAF
455: solution (Yuan 2001). In the inner region of $r\la 4r_s$, where most
456: of the radiation comes from, the absolute value of $q_{\rm
457: comp}/q_{\rm vis,e}\sim 0.5$. We find in this case $(-q_{\rm
458: comp})\sim q^-$. So in the innermost region the viscous heating of
459: electrons is equal to its radiative cooling ($q^--q_{\rm comp})$.
460:
461: Obviously, after taking into account the global Compton cooling, the
462: radiative efficiency will increase for a given accretion rate. But
463: this does not mean that the highest luminosity $L_{\rm max}$ a hot
464: accretion flow can produce will increase. The main heating mechanism
465: of electrons are viscous heating and compression work (the second
466: term in the right-hand side of eq. 15) while the main cooling comes
467: from ($q^--q_{\rm comp}$). The highest accretion rate beyond which a
468: hot solution no longer exists is determined by the balance between
469: heating and cooling. The heating term is roughly proportional to
470: $\dot{M}$ while the cooling term roughly to $\dot{M}^2$ since
471: Compton scattering is a two-body collision process. This is why a
472: hot accretion solution has a highest $\dot{M}$. Obviously, when the
473: global Compton cooling $q_{\rm comp}$ is included, the cooling
474: becomes stronger compared to the case of only local cooling $q^-$,
475: thus the balance between cooling and heating will occur at a lower
476: $\dot{M}$. Actually $\dot{M}_0=L_{\rm Edd}/c^2$ as shown in Fig. 2
477: is almost the highest accretion rate at which we can get the
478: self-consistent hot solution, which is a factor of 2-3 lower than
479: the highest rate when the global Compton effect is not taken into
480: account. When $\dot{M}_0$ is higher, we find that we are not able to
481: get the self-consistent solution since the flow will collapse due to
482: the strong radiative cooling. The decrease of the highest $\dot{M}$
483: results in the decrease of $L_{\rm max}$. Our calculation shows that
484: $L_{\rm max}$ decreases by a factor of $\sim $ 2, i.e., we now have
485: $L_{\rm max}\sim 3\%L_{\rm Edd}$.
486:
487: We now check how different the spectrum produced by the
488: self-consistent solution is compared to the spectrum produced by the
489: ``old'' solution. Fig. 2(c) shows the spectra from the hot accretion
490: flow before (solid line) and after (dashed line) the Compton effect
491: is taken into account. We see that both the luminosity and the
492: cutoff energy of the spectrum (i.e., the corresponding frequency of
493: the peak of the spectrum) decrease because of the global Compton
494: cooling. This is of course because the electron temperature of the
495: self-consistent solution decreases compared to the ``old'' solution.
496: We would like to emphasize again that only local seed photons are
497: considered when we calculate the spectrum although we do consider
498: the global scattering in calculating the dynamics. Our calculation
499: shows that $-q_{\rm comp} \sim q^-$, so we expect that when the
500: global Compton scattering is considered the luminosity of the
501: ``exact'' self-consistent solution will be $\sim 2$ times higher
502: than that shown by the dashed line in Fig. 2(c). But the slope and
503: the cutoff energy will not change because they are irrelevant to the
504: amount of seed photons.
505:
506: Figs. 3 (a--c) are similar to Figs. 2 (a--c), but are for a supermassive black hole
507: with $M=10^8~\msun$ and accretion rate
508: $\dot{M}=0.5(r/10^4r_s)^{0.3}\dot{M}_{\rm Edd}$.
509: We see from the figures that the electron temperature decreases
510: after the global Compton scattering effect is taken into account as
511: we expect, because in most region the Compton scattering will cool
512: the electrons. Correspondingly, the luminosity of the accretion flow
513: also decreases by roughly a factor of 2 and the cutoff energy of the
514: spectrum also becomes smaller.
515:
516: We have also calculated the average energy of the photons emitted by
517: the self-consistent solution shown in Fig. 3 (c), $h<\nu> ~\equiv
518: \int L_{\nu}d\nu/\int (L_{\nu}/h\nu)d\nu$, and the corresponding
519: energy of the radiation temperature $\theta_{\rm x}$ at $r_{\rm
520: out}$, $h\nu_{\rm x} \equiv m_ec^2\theta_{\rm x}$. The results are
521: $\sim$ 1~eV and 100~keV respectively, and they are shown by two
522: arrows in Fig. 3 (c). These values are much higher than that of a
523: typical quasar spectrum where, e.g., $h\nu_{\rm x}$ is only several
524: keV (Mathews \& Ferland 1987; Sazonov et al. 2004).
525:
526: The spectrum shown in Fig. 3 (c) extends to very high energy, $\ga$ MeV.
527: Observationally, the $e$-folding energy of the average power-law X-ray spectrum
528: observed by {\it Ginga}, OSSE, and {\it EXSOSAT} of radio-quiet Seyfert 1s
529: is $E_c=0.7^{+2.0}_{-0.3}$ MeV (Zdziarski et al. 1995; Gondek et al. 1996),
530: which is consistent with the model given the (large) error bar.
531: Better data is required to constrain the theoretical model.
532:
533: %For $M=10^8\msun$ we have tried to obtain the self-consistent global solution for
534: %$\dot{M}_0 = \dot{M}_{\rm Edd}$ and $r_{\rm out}=10^4r_s$ but
535: %have failed. The reason is because that at that high accretion rate
536: % the Compton cooling at the inner region of the accretion flow is so strong
537: %that the flow fails to maintain a hot solution thus collapses.
538: %But as we have shown in Fig. 2, for a stellar mass black hole, we have
539: %obtained succesfully a self-consistent solution
540: %for $\dot{M}_0 = \dot{M}_{\rm Edd}$, although we also fail
541: %when $\dot{M}_0$ is larger. We find that the discrepancy is because
542: %in the case of a stellar mass black hole the electron temperature of
543: %the accretion flow is slightly lower compared to the supermassive black hole
544: %for a same $\dot{M}$ thus the Compton cooling is weaker.
545:
546: As we state in \S2.2, Compton heating effect at large radii is
547: another obstacle for us to obtain the self-consistent solution. For
548: $\dot{M}_0=\dot{M}_{\rm Edd}$, if $r_{\rm out} \ga 10^5r_s$, we find
549: that the Compton heating effect around $r_{\rm out}$ is so strong
550: that the equilibrium temperature of electrons would be higher than
551: the virial value defined as $5/2~k~T_{\rm vir} = GMm_p/r$, which
552: will in turn make the ion temperature also higher than the virial
553: one due to the Coulomb coupling between them. In this case, the gas
554: is unbound thus can not be accreted. The corresponding highest
555: luminosity in this case is $\sim 2 \% L_{\rm Edd}$.
556: This value is similar to that obtained by Ostriker et al. (1976) and
557: Park \& Ostriker (2001). From Figs. 1 \& 3(b), we expect that
558: $\dot{M}_0$ and the critical $r_{\rm out}$ (signed as $r_{\rm
559: virial}$) beyond which the equilibrium temperature is higher than
560: the virial temperature are roughly anti-correlated, i.e., a lower
561: $\dot{M}_0$ corresponds to a larger $r_{\rm virial}$. Exact
562: estimation of the relation between $\dot{M}_0$ and $r_{\rm virial}$
563: is not straightforward. This is because we need to know the
564: radiation temperature $\theta_{\rm x}$ as a function of $\dot{M}_0$
565: which requires numerical calculations. Note that from Figs. 1 \&
566: 3(b) the minimum value of $r_{\rm virial}$ should be larger than
567: $\sim 5 \times 10^3 r_{\rm s}$.
568:
569: Although no steady self-consistent solution exists due to the strong Compton
570: heating at and beyond $r_{\rm virial}$, an ``oscillation'' of
571: the activity of the black hole
572: is expected (e.g., Cowie, Ostriker, \& Stark 1978;
573: Ciotti \& Ostriker 2007). When the accretion rate is high,
574: only the gas inside of $r_{\rm virial}$ can be accreted. This active phase will
575: last for a timescale of the accretion timescale at $r_{\rm virial}$.
576: Then all the gas will be used up and the active phase stops. In this case,
577: Compton heating also stops so the gas outside of
578: $r_{\rm virial}$ will be cooled by radiation and
579: be accreted again and the cycle repeats.
580: The time the non-active phase will last is determined by the
581: radiative timescale of the gas at $r_{\rm virial}$,
582: since it is longer than the accretion timescale there. An alternative
583: consequence of the strong Compton heating at large radii is that
584: the accretion can be self-regulated by irradiating the outer flow
585: (Shakura \& Sunyaev 1973). That is, the strong Compton heating
586: will not completely stop the accretion, but only decrease the accretion rate.
587: This then reduces the energy release in the inner part, which in turn
588: reduces the irradiation. A multi-dimensional numerical simulation is
589: required to solve this issue and accurate time-dependence is needed
590: as well since steady solutions may not be stable.
591:
592: For the massive black holes seen in the nuclei of most
593: galaxies the Compton heated interruption of the high luminosity
594: states should be typical if a hot accretion flow exists there.
595: We now know that the accretion flow in low-luminosity AGNs
596: is of this type (see Yuan 2007 and Ho 2008 for reviews). For luminous
597: AGNs such as quasars, although people incline to think it is
598: a standard thin disk which is optically thick, many problems remain
599: for this model (e.g., Shlosman, Begelman, \& Frank 1990; Koratkar
600: \& Blaes 1999). If the actual accretion flow is radially optically
601: thin to Compton scattering, similar to the hot accretion flow,
602: our analysis applies.
603:
604: This kind of oscillation does not apply
605: to stellar mass black holes in our Galaxy. This is because the prerequisite
606: for such oscillation is that the accretion rate is large and the hot
607: accretion flow extends to large radii. For a stellar mass black hole, the
608: accretion material comes from the companion star and it starts out
609: as a standard thin disk. In the hard state the standard disk does
610: not extend to the innermost stable circular orbit but is replaced by
611: a hot accretion flow within a transition radius $r_{\rm tr}$. However,
612: when the accretion rate is high, $r_{\rm tr}$ is small (Yuan \& Narayan 2004).
613: So Compton scattering cools rather than heats the hot accretion flow. But on
614: the other hand, the photons emitted by the hot accretion flow will heat
615: the cool electrons in the standard disk at $r_{\rm tr}$
616: and thus will change the dynamics of the transition.
617: This effect has never been noted and could be a topic of future work.
618: %However, for the massive black holes seen in the nuclei of most
619: %galaxies the Compton heated interruption of the high luminosity
620: %states should be typical if a hot accretion flow exists there.
621:
622: \section{Summary and Discussion}
623:
624: For a geometrically thick and optically thin hot accretion flow,
625: the photons can travel for a long distance without being
626: absorbed, and thus be able to heat or cool electrons via Compton
627: scattering. We investigate this global Compton scattering
628: effect and find that for an accretion rate described by
629: $\dot{M}=\dot{M}_0(r/r_{\rm out})^{0.3}$ the Compton cooling effect will
630: be important when $\dot{M}_0 \ga 0.1L_{\rm Edd}/c^2$;
631: while the Compton heating effect will be important when
632: $\dot{M}_0 \ga 2L_{\rm Edd}/c^2$ and $r_{\rm out}=10^4r_{\rm s}$.
633: Specifically, the scattering heats electrons at $r>5 \times
634: 10^3 r_{\rm s}$ while cools electrons at $r<5 \times 10^3 r_{\rm s}$.
635: If $r_{\rm out}$ is larger, the critical $\dot{M}_0$ above which
636: the Compton heating effect is important will become lower.
637:
638: We have successfully obtained the self-consistent steady solution with
639: this effect included for $\dot{M}_0 \la L_{\rm Edd}/c^2$
640: and $r_{\rm out}=50r_s$. But when $\dot{M}_0\ga L_{\rm Edd}/c^2$
641: and $L>2\%L_{\rm Edd}$ we fail because of the strong
642: radiative cooling (local plus global Compton scattering).
643: It is also difficult to get the self-consistent solution when
644: $\dot{M}_0\ga L_{\rm Edd}/c^2$ ($L>1\%L_{\rm Edd}$)
645: and $r_{\rm out}\ga 10^5 r_s$. This is because
646: in this case the Compton heating is so strong at and beyond $r_{\rm out}$
647: that the equilibrium electron temperature there will be higher
648: than the virial temperature. More generally we expect that the radius where
649: the equilibrium temperature due to the Compton heating is equal
650: to the virial temperature, $r_{\rm virial}$, is anti-correlated with
651: $\dot{M}_{\rm out}$. We argue that
652: the black hole will manifest an oscillation of the activity in the case that
653: we fail to get the steady solution. The period
654: will be the radiative timescale of the gas at $r_{\rm virial}$.
655:
656: All our discussions so far are for a one-dimensional (but not spherical)
657: accretion flow. Although
658: big uncertainties exist for the vertical structure of accretion flow,
659: we are certain that when $\dot{M}$ is high, the scattering will be important,
660: and consequently much of the luminosity will ``leak out'' perpendicular
661: to the accretion flow as in the standard thin disk. This will have two
662: effects. One is that the highest luminosity up to which we can get the
663: self-consistent solution with the global Compton effect included will be higher.
664: In addition, the Compton heating will be stronger in the vertical direction
665: than in the equatorial plane of the flow. As a result strong wind will
666: be launched as pointed out by Park \& Ostriker (2001; 2007) and
667: found by Proga et al. (2008). All of the described effects are likely
668: to become significant for AGN accretion flows having $L>10^{-2}L_{\rm Edd}$
669: and optically thin (ref. \S 3 for discussion of this possibility in
670: luminous AGNs), which, we know from recent applications of the
671: Soltan argument (Yu \& Tremaine 2002), are the phases during which most
672: massive black hole growth occurs.
673:
674: \acknowledgements
675:
676: We thank Ramesh Narayan, Myeong-Gu Park, Eliot Quataert, and the
677: referee, Andrzej Zdziarski, for their useful comments on the work.
678: This work was supported in part by the Natural Science Foundation of China
679: (grants 10773024, 10833002, and 10825314), One-Hundred-Talent Program
680: of Chinese Academy of Sciences,
681: and the National Basic Research Program of China (grant 2009CB824800).
682:
683: \begin{thebibliography}{}
684: \bibitem[]{514} Begelman, M. C., McKee, C. F. \& Shields, G. A. 1983, \apj, 271, 70
685:
686: \bibitem[]{514} Blandford, R. D., Begelman, M. C. 1999, \mnras, 303, L1
687:
688: \bibitem[]{516} Ciotti, L.,\& Ostriker, J. P. 1997, \apj, 487, L105
689:
690: \bibitem[]{518} Ciotti, L.,\& Ostriker, J. P. 2001, \apj, 551, 131
691:
692: \bibitem[]{520} Ciotti, L.,\& Ostriker, J. P. 2007, \apj, 665, 1038
693:
694: \bibitem[]{522} Coppi, P. S., \& Blandford, R. 1990, \mnras, 245, 453
695:
696: \bibitem[]{522} Cowie, L. L., Ostriker, J. P. \& Stark, A. A. 1978, \apj, 226, 1041
697:
698: \bibitem[]{522} Dubus, G. et al. 1999, \mnras, 303, 139
699:
700: \bibitem[]{524} Esin, A. 1997, \apj, 482, 400
701:
702: \bibitem[]{524} Gondek, D. et al. 1996, \mnras, 282, 646
703:
704: \bibitem[]{526} Ho, L. C. 2008, \araa, in press (arxiv:08032268)
705:
706: \bibitem[]{526} Hopkins, P. F. et al. 2005, \apj, 630, 705
707:
708: \bibitem[]{526} Krolik, J. H., McKee, C. F., \& Tarter, C. B. 1981, \apj, 249, 422
709:
710: \bibitem[]{526} Koratkar, A. \& Blaes, O. 1999, \pasp, 111, 1
711:
712: \bibitem[]{526} Levich, E. V. \& Sunyaev, R. A. 1970, ApL, 7, 69
713:
714: \bibitem[]{528} Manmoto, T., Mineshige, S. \& Kusunose, M. 1997, \apj, 489, 791
715:
716: \bibitem[]{528} Mathews, W. G. \& Ferland, G. J. 1987, \apj, 323, 456
717:
718: \bibitem[]{530} Murray, N., Quataert, E., \& Thompson, T. A. 2005, \apj, 618, 569
719:
720: \bibitem []{n94} Narayan, R. \& Yi, I. 1994, \apj, 428, L13
721:
722: \bibitem []{n95} Narayan, R. \& Yi, I. 1995, \apj, 452, 710
723:
724: \bibitem[]{536} Ohsuga, K. \& Mineshige, S. 2007, \apj, 670, 1283
725:
726: \bibitem[]{538} Ostriker, J. P., McCray, R., Weaver, R., \& Yahil, A.
727: 1976, \apj, 208, L61
728:
729: \bibitem[]{541} Park, M., \& Ostriker, J. P. 1999, \apj, 527, 247
730:
731: \bibitem[]{543} Park, M., \& Ostriker, J. P. 2001, \apj, 549, 100
732:
733: \bibitem[]{545} Park, M., \& Ostriker, J. P. 2007, \apj, 655, 88
734:
735: \bibitem[]{547} Proga, D., Ostriker, J. P., \& Kurosawa, R. 2008, \apj, 676, 101
736:
737: \bibitem[]{547} Quataert, E. \& Gruzinov, A. 1999, \apj, 520, 248
738:
739: \bibitem[]{551} Sazonov, S. Y., Ostriker, J. P., \& Sunyaev, R. A. 2004, \mnras,
740: 347, 144
741:
742: \bibitem[]{549} Sharma, P. et al. 2007, \apj, 667, 714
743:
744: \bibitem[]{551} Shakura, N. I. \& Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A\&A, 24, 337
745:
746: \bibitem[]{551} Shlosman, I., Begelman, M. \& Frank, J. 1990, 345, 679
747:
748: \bibitem[]{551} Stone, J.~M. \& Pringle, J.~E. 2001, \mnras, 322, 461
749:
750: \bibitem[]{551} Yu, Q. \& Tremain, S. 2002, \mnras, 335, 965
751:
752: \bibitem[]{554} Yuan, F. 1999, \apj, 521, L55
753:
754: \bibitem[]{556} Yuan, F. 2001, \mnras, 324, 119
755:
756: \bibitem[]{558} Yuan, F. 2003, \apj, 594, L99
757:
758: \bibitem[]{558} Yuan, F. in The Central Engine of Active Galactic Nuclei,
759: ASP Conference Series, Edited by Luis C. Ho and Jian-Min Wang, Vol. 373, p95
760:
761: \bibitem[]{560} Yuan, F. \& Narayan, R. 2004, \apj, 612, 724
762:
763: \bibitem[]{562} Yuan, F., Quataert, E., \& Narayan, R. 2003, \apj, 598, 301
764:
765: \bibitem[]{562} Zdziarski, A. A., et al. 1995, \apj, 438, L63
766:
767: \end{thebibliography}{}
768:
769: \clearpage
770:
771: \end{document}
772: