1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{epsf}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{amssymb}
5: \def\uu{\langle \bar u u \rangle}
6: \def\dd{\langle \bar d d \rangle}
7: \def\ss{\langle \bar s s \rangle}
8: \def\qq{\langle \bar q q \rangle}
9: \def\ds{\displaystyle}
10: \title{ {Magnetic Moments of Heavy $\Xi_{Q}$ Baryons in Light Cone QCD Sum Rules }}
11: \author{
12: T. M. Aliev \thanks{ e-mail: taliev@metu.edu.tr},
13: % \and
14: K. Azizi\thanks {e-mail:e146342@metu.edu.tr},
15: % \and
16: A. Ozpineci \thanks {e-mail:ozpineci@metu.edu.tr} \\
17: \small Physics
18: Department, Middle East Technical University, 06531, Ankara, Turkey }
19: \date{}
20: \begin{document}
21: \setlength{\baselineskip}{24pt} \maketitle
22: \setlength{\baselineskip}{7mm}
23: \begin{abstract}
24: The magnetic moments of heavy $\Xi_{Q}$ baryons containing a single charm or
25: bottom quark are calculated in the framework of light cone QCD sum
26: rules method. A comparison of our results with the predictions of other approches, such as relativistic and nonrelativistic quark models, hyper central model, Chiral perturbation theory, soliton and skyrmion models is presented.
27: \end{abstract}
28: PACS: 11.55.Hx, 13.40.Em, 14.20.Lq, 14.20.Mr
29: \thispagestyle{empty}
30: \newpage
31: \setcounter{page}{1}
32: %%%
33: %%%
34: \section{Introduction}
35: During the last few years, exciting experimental results are obtained in
36: the baryon sector containing a single b-quark. The CDF Collaboration
37: observed the states $\Sigma^{\pm}_{b}$ and $\Sigma^{\ast\pm}_{b}$
38: \cite{Aaltonen1}, while both DO \cite{Abazov} and CDF \cite
39: {Aaltonen2} Collaborations have seen $\Xi_{b}$. Recently, BaBar
40: Collaboration reported the discovery of $\Omega^{\ast}_{c}$ with
41: mass splitting
42: $m_{\Omega^{\ast}_{c}}-m_{\Omega_{c}}=(70.8\pm1.0\pm1.1) MeV$
43: \cite{Aubert}.
44:
45: The masses of the heavy baryons have been studied in the framework of
46: various phenomenological models \cite{Capstick}- \cite{Karliner3}
47: and also in the framework of QCD sum rules method \cite{Shifman}-
48: \cite{Liu}. Along with their masses, another static parameter of the heavy
49: baryons is their magnetic moment. Study of the magnetic moments
50: can give valuable information about the internal structures of hadrons.
51:
52: The magnetic moments of heavy baryons have been studied in the framework
53: of different methods. In \cite{ Choudhury, Lic} the magnetic moments
54: of charmed baryons are calculated within naive quark model. In \cite{
55: Glozman, Julia}, magnetic moments of charmed and bottom baryons are
56: analyzed in quark model and in \cite{Schollamd} heavy baryon
57: magnetic moments are studied in bound state approach.
58: Magnetic moments of heavy baryons are calculated in the relativistic three-quark
59: model \cite{Faessler}, hyper central model \cite{Patel}, Chiral perturbation model \cite{Savage},
60: soliton model \cite{DOR}, skyrmion model \cite{Oh} and nonrelativistic constituent quark model with light and strange $\bar qq$ pairs \cite{An}. In \cite{Zhu2} the magnetic
61: moments of $\Sigma_{c}$ and $\Lambda_{c}$ baryons are calculated in
62: QCD sum rules in external electromagnetic field. In \cite{Aliev1,
63: Aliev2}, the light cone QCD sum rules method is applied to study the
64: magnetic moments of the $\Lambda_{Q}$, $(Q=c,b)$ and
65: $\Sigma_{Q}\Lambda_{Q}$ transitions (more about this
66: method can be found in \cite{Colangelo , Braun1, Balitsky, Braun2} and
67: references therein ).
68:
69: The aim of the present work is the calculation of the magnetic moments of
70: the $\Xi_{b}$ baryons recently observed by DO and CDF Collaborations
71: within the light cone QCD sum rules framework. The plan of the paper is as follows.
72: In section 2, using the general form of the the baryon current, the
73: light cone QCD sum rules for $\Xi_{b}$ and $\Xi_{c}$ baryons are
74: calculated. In section 3 we present our numerical calculations on
75: the $\Xi_{b}$ and $\Xi_{c}$ baryons. In this section we also
76: present a comparison of our results with the predictions of other approaches.
77: %%%
78: %%%
79: \section{Light cone QCD sum rules for the $\Xi_{Q}$ magnetic moments }
80: %
81: In order to calculate the magnetic moments of $\Xi_{Q}$ $(Q=b, c)$
82: in the framework of the light cone QCD sum rules, we need the expression for
83: the interpolating current of $\Xi_{Q}$. To construct it, we follow
84: \cite{Karliner2}, i.e. we assume that the strange and light quarks (sq) in
85: $\Xi_{Q}$ are in a relative spin zero state (scalar or pseudo scalar
86: diquarks). Therefore, the most general current without derivatives and
87: with the quantum numbers of $\Xi_{Q}$ can be constructed from the
88: combination of aforementioned scalar or pseudoscalar diquarks in the
89: following way
90: \begin{equation}\label{cur.xi}
91: \eta_{Q}=\varepsilon_{abc}[(q^{aT}Cs^{b})\gamma_{5}+\beta(q^{aT}C\gamma_{5}s^{b})]Q^{c},
92: \end{equation}
93: here a, b and c are color indices, C is the charge conjugation
94: operator, $Q=b$, or $c$, $q=u$, or $d$ and $\beta$ is an arbitrary parameter.
95: Having the explicit expression for the interpolating current, our
96: next task is to construct light cone QCD sum rules for the magnetic
97: moments of $\Xi_{Q}$ baryons. It is constructed from the following
98: correlation function:
99: \begin{equation}\label{T}
100: \Pi(p,q)=i\int d^{4}xe^{ipx}<\gamma\mid
101: T\{\eta_{Q}(x)\bar{\eta}_{Q}(0)\mid \}0>.
102: \end{equation}
103:
104:
105: The calculation of the phenomenological side at the hadronic level proceeds by inserting into the correlation function a
106: complete set of hadronic states with the quantum numbers of $\Xi_{Q}$. We get
107: \begin{equation}\label{corr.func1}
108: \Pi=\sum_{i}\frac{<0\mid \eta_{Q}\mid
109: \Xi_{Q_{i}}(p_{2})>}{p_{2}^{2}-m_{\Xi_{Q}}^{2}}<\Xi_{Q_{i}}(p_{2})\mid
110: \Xi_{Q_{i}}(p_{1})>_\gamma \frac{<\Xi_{Q_{i}}(p_{1})\mid
111: \bar\eta_{Q}\mid 0>}{p_{1}^{2}-m_{\Xi_{Q}}^{2}}.
112: \end{equation}
113: Isolating the ground state's contributions, Eq. (\ref{corr.func1}) can be written as
114: \begin{eqnarray}\label{corr.func2}
115: \Pi&=&\frac{<0\mid \eta_{Q}\mid
116: \Xi_{Q}(p_{2})>}{p_{2}^{2}-m_{\Xi_{Q}}^{2}}<\Xi_{Q}(p_{2})\mid
117: \Xi_{Q}(p_{1})>_\gamma\frac{<\Xi_{Q}(p_{1})\mid
118: \bar\eta_{Q}\mid 0>}{p_{1}^{2}-m_{\Xi_{Q}}^{2}}\nonumber\\
119: &+& \sum_{h_{i}}\frac{<0\mid \eta_{Qi}\mid
120: h_{i}(p_{2})>}{p_{2}^{2}-m_{h_{i}}^{2}}<h_{i}(p_{2})\mid
121: h_{i}(p_{1})>_\gamma\frac{<h_{i}(p_{1})\mid
122: \bar\eta_{Q}\mid 0>}{p_{1}^{2}-m_{h_{i}}^{2}},\nonumber\\
123: \end{eqnarray}
124: where $p_{1}=p+q$, $p_{2}=p$ and q is the photon momentum. The second term in
125: Eq. (\ref{corr.func2}) describes the higher resonances and continuum
126: contributions. The coupling of the interpolating current with the
127: baryons $\Xi_{Q}$ is determined as
128: \begin{equation}\label{lambda}
129: <0\mid \eta_{Q}\mid \Xi_{Q}(p)>=\lambda_{Q}u_{\Xi_{Q}}(p),
130: \end{equation}
131: where $u_{\Xi_{Q}}(p)$ is a spinor describing the baryon $\Xi_{Q}$ with four momentum p and $\lambda_{Q}$ is the corresponding residue.
132:
133: The last step for obtaining the expression for the physical part of the correlator function is to write down the matrix
134: element $<\Xi_{Q}(p_{2})\mid
135: \Xi_{Q}(p_{1})>_{\gamma}$ in terms of the form factors. Using Lorentz covariance,
136: this matrix element can be written as
137: \begin{eqnarray}\label{mat.el}
138: <\Xi_{Q}(p_{1})\mid \Xi_{Q}(p_{2})>_{\gamma}&=&
139: \varepsilon^{\mu}\overline{u}_{\Xi_{Q}}(p_{1})\left[f_{1}\gamma_{\mu}-i\frac{\sigma_{\mu\alpha}q_{\alpha}}{2m_{\Xi_{Q}}}f_{2}\right]u_{\Xi_{Q}}(p_{2})\nonumber\\&=&
140: \overline{u}_{\Xi_{Q}}(p_{1})\left[(f_{1}+f_{2})\gamma_{\mu}+\frac{(p_{1}+p_{2})_{{\mu}}}{2m_{\Xi_{Q}}}f_{2}\right]u_{\Xi_{Q}}(p_{2})\varepsilon^{\mu},\nonumber\\
141: \end{eqnarray}
142: where $f_{1}(q^{2})$ and $f_{2}(q^{2})$ are the form factors and
143: $\varepsilon^{\mu}$ is the photon polarization vector.
144:
145: For calculation of the $\Xi_{Q}$ magnetic moments, the values of the
146: form factors only at $q^2=0$ are needed because the photon is real
147: in our problem. Using Eqs. (\ref{corr.func2}-\ref{mat.el}) for
148: physical part of the correlator and summing over the spins of initial and final $\Xi_{Q}$ baryons, the correlation function becomes
149: \begin{eqnarray}\label{corr.func3}
150: \Pi&=&-\lambda_{Q}^{2}\varepsilon^{\mu}\frac{\not\!p_{2}+m_{\Xi_{Q}}}{p_{2}^{2}-m_{\Xi_{Q}}^{2}}
151: \left[(f_{1}+f_{2})\gamma_{\mu}+\frac{(p_{1}+p_{2})_{{\mu}}}{2m_{\Xi_{Q}}}f_{2}\right]\frac{\not\!p_{1}+m_{\Xi_{Q}}}{p_{1}^{2}-m_{\Xi_{Q}}^{2}}.\nonumber\\
152: \end{eqnarray}
153: From this expression, we see that there are various structures which
154: can be chosen for studying the magnetic moments of $\Xi_{Q}$. In the present work following \cite{ref}, we choose the structure
155: $\not\!p_{2}\not\!\varepsilon\not\!q$ that contains magnetic form
156: factor $f_{1}+f_{2}$ and at $q^2=0$ it gives the magnetic moment of
157: $\Xi_{Q}$ in units of $e\hbar/2m_{\Xi_{Q}}$. Choosing this structure
158: in the physical part of the correlator, for the magnetic moments of
159: $\Xi_{Q}$ we obtain
160: \begin{eqnarray}\label{corr.func4}
161: \Pi&=&-\lambda_{Q}^{2}\frac{1}{p_{1}^{2}-m_{\Xi_{Q}}^{2}}
162: \mu_{\Xi_{Q}}\frac{1}{p_{2}^{2}-m_{\Xi_{Q}}^{2}},\nonumber\\
163: \end{eqnarray}
164: where $\mu_{\Xi_{Q}}=(f_{1}+f_{2})\mid_{q^2=0}$ are the magnetic
165: moments of $\Xi_{Q}$ in units of $e\hbar/2m_{\Xi_{Q}}$.
166:
167: In order to calculate the magnetic moments of $\Xi_{Q}$ baryons, the
168: expression of the theoretical part of the correlation function is
169: needed. After simple calculations for the theoretical part of the
170: correlation function in QCD we obtain
171: \begin{eqnarray}\label{mut.m}
172: \Pi&=&-i\epsilon_{abc}\epsilon_{a'b'c'}\int
173: d^{4}xe^{ipx}\langle\gamma(q)\mid\{\gamma_{5}S_{Q}^{cc'}
174: \gamma_{5}Tr(S_{q}^{ba'}S'^{ab'}_{s})\nonumber\\&+& \beta\gamma_{5}S_{Q}^{cc'}
175: Tr(S_{q}^{ba'}\gamma_{5}S'^{ab'}_{s})+\beta S_{Q}^{cc'}
176: \gamma_{5}Tr(\gamma_{5}S_{q}^{ba'}S'^{ab'}_{s})\nonumber\\&+& \beta^{2}S_{Q}^{cc'}
177: Tr(\gamma_{5}S^{ab'}_{s}\gamma_{5}S'^{ba'}_{q})\}\mid 0\rangle
178: \end{eqnarray}
179: where $S'_{i}=CS^{T}_{i}C$ and C and T are the charge conjugation and
180: transposition operators, respectively and $S_{Q}$ and $S_{q(s)}$ are the
181: heavy and light(strange) quark propagators.
182:
183: The correlation function from QCD part receives three different
184: contributions: a) perturbative contributions, b) nonperturbative
185: contributions, where photon is emitted from the freely propagating
186: quark (in other words at short distance) c) nonperturbative
187: contributions, when photon is radiated at long distances. To obtain the expression for the contribution from the emission of photon at short distances, the following procedure can be used: Each one of the quarks can emit the photon, and hence each term in Eq. (\ref{mut.m}) corresponds to three terms in which the propagator of the photon emitting quark is replaced by:
188: \begin{equation}\label{rep1}
189: S^{ab}_{\alpha \beta} \Rightarrow- \frac{1}{2} \left\{ \int d^4 y
190: F^{\mu \nu} y_\nu S^{free} (x-y) \gamma_\mu
191: S^{free}(y)\right\}^{ab}_{\alpha \beta} ,
192: \end{equation}
193: where the Fock-Schwinger gauge,
194: $x_\mu A^\mu(x)=0$ has been used. Note that the explicit expressions
195: of free light and heavy quark propagators in x representation are:
196: \begin{eqnarray}\label{free1}
197: S^{free}_{q} &=&\frac{i\not\!x}{2\pi^{2}x^{4}}-\frac{m_{q}}{4\pi^{2}x^{2}},\nonumber\\
198: S^{free}_{Q}
199: &=&\frac{m_{Q}^{2}}{4\pi^{2}}\frac{K_{1}(m_{Q}\sqrt{-x^2})}{\sqrt{-x^2}}-i
200: \frac{m_{Q}^{2}\not\!x}{4\pi^{2}x^2}K_{2}(m_{Q}\sqrt{-x^2}),\nonumber\\
201: \end{eqnarray}
202: where $K_{i}$ are Bessel functions, $m_{u, d}=0$ and $m_{s}\neq0$.
203: The expression for the nonperturbative contributions to the
204: correlation function can be obtained from Eq.
205: (\ref{mut.m}) by replacing one of the light quark propagator by
206: \begin{equation}\label{rep2}
207: \label{rep} S^{ab}_{\alpha \beta} \rightarrow - \frac{1}{4} \bar q^a
208: \Gamma_j q^b ( \Gamma_j )_{\alpha \beta}~,
209: \end{equation}
210: where $\Gamma_j = \Big\{
211: 1,~\gamma_5,~\gamma_\alpha,~i\gamma_5 \gamma_\alpha, ~\sigma_{\alpha
212: \beta} /\sqrt{2}\Big\}$ and sum over $\Gamma_j$ is implied, and the
213: other two propagators are the full propagators involving both
214: perturbative and nonperturbative contributions. In order to calculate
215: the correlation function from QCD side, we need the explicit
216: expressions of the heavy and light quark propagators in the presence
217: of external field.
218:
219: The light cone expansion of the propagator in external field is
220: obtained in \cite{Balitsky}. It receives contributions from various $\bar q
221: G q$, $\bar q G G q$, $\bar q q \bar q q$ nonlocal operators , where
222: $G$ is the gluon field strength tensor. In this work, we consider
223: operators with only one gluon field and contributions coming from
224: three particle nonlocal operators and neglect terms with two
225: gluons $\bar q GG q$, and four quarks $\bar q q \bar q q$
226: \cite{Braun2}. In this approximation the expressions for the heavy and
227: light quark propagators are:
228: \begin{eqnarray}\label{heavylight}
229: i S_Q (x)& =& i S_Q^{free} (x) - i g_s \int \frac{d^4 k}{(2\pi)^4}
230: e^{-ikx} \int_0^1 dv \Bigg[\frac{\not\!k + m_Q}{( m_Q^2-k^2)^2}
231: G^{\mu\nu}(vx)
232: \sigma_{\mu\nu} \nonumber \\
233: &+& \frac{1}{m_Q^2-k^2} v x_\mu G^{\mu\nu} \gamma_\nu \Bigg],
234: \nonumber \\
235: S_q(x) &=& S_q^{free} (x) - \frac{m_q}{4 \pi^2 x^2} - \frac{\langle
236: \bar q q \rangle}{12} \left(1 - i \frac{m_q}{4} \not\!x \right) -
237: \frac{x^2}{192} m_0^2 \langle \bar q q \rangle \left( 1 - i
238: \frac{m_q}{6}\not\!x \right) \nonumber \\ &&
239: - i g_s \int_0^1 du \left[\frac{\not\!x}{16 \pi^2 x^2} G_{\mu \nu} (ux) \sigma_{\mu \nu} - u x^\mu
240: G_{\mu \nu} (ux) \gamma^\nu \frac{i}{4 \pi^2 x^2} \right. \nonumber
241: \\ && \left. - i \frac{m_q}{32 \pi^2} G_{\mu \nu} \sigma^{\mu \nu}
242: \left( \ln \left( \frac{-x^2 \Lambda^2}{4} \right) + 2 \gamma_E
243: \right) \right],
244: \end{eqnarray}
245: where $\Lambda$ is the energy cut off separating
246: perturbative and nonperturbative domains.
247:
248: In order to calculate the theoretical part, from Eqs.
249: (\ref{mut.m})-(\ref{heavylight}) it follows that the matrix
250: elements of nonlocal operators $\bar q \Gamma_{i}q$ between the photon
251: and vacuum states are needed, i.e.$ \langle\gamma(q)\mid\bar q(x_{1})
252: \Gamma_{i}q(x_{2})\mid0\rangle$. These matrix elements can be
253: expanded near the light cone $x^2=0$ in terms of
254: the photon distribution amplitudes \cite{Ball}.
255: \begin{eqnarray}
256: &&\langle \gamma(q) \vert \bar q(x) \sigma_{\mu \nu} q(0) \vert 0
257: \rangle = -i e_q \bar q q (\varepsilon_\mu q_\nu - \varepsilon_\nu
258: q_\mu) \int_0^1 du e^{i \bar u qx} \left(\chi \varphi_\gamma(u) +
259: \frac{x^2}{16} \mathbb{A} (u) \right) \nonumber \\ &&
260: -\frac{i}{2(qx)} e_q \qq \left[x_\nu \left(\varepsilon_\mu - q_\mu
261: \frac{\varepsilon x}{qx}\right) - x_\mu \left(\varepsilon_\nu -
262: q_\nu \frac{\varepsilon x}{q x}\right) \right] \int_0^1 du e^{i \bar
263: u q x} h_\gamma(u)
264: \nonumber \\
265: &&\langle \gamma(q) \vert \bar q(x) \gamma_\mu q(0) \vert 0 \rangle
266: = e_q f_{3 \gamma} \left(\varepsilon_\mu - q_\mu \frac{\varepsilon
267: x}{q x} \right) \int_0^1 du e^{i \bar u q x} \psi^v(u)
268: \nonumber \\
269: &&\langle \gamma(q) \vert \bar q(x) \gamma_\mu \gamma_5 q(0) \vert 0
270: \rangle = - \frac{1}{4} e_q f_{3 \gamma} \epsilon_{\mu \nu \alpha
271: \beta } \varepsilon^\nu q^\alpha x^\beta \int_0^1 du e^{i \bar u q
272: x} \psi^a(u)
273: \nonumber \\
274: &&\langle \gamma(q) | \bar q(x) g_s G_{\mu \nu} (v x) q(0) \vert 0
275: \rangle = -i e_q \qq \left(\varepsilon_\mu q_\nu - \varepsilon_\nu
276: q_\mu \right) \int {\cal D}\alpha_i e^{i (\alpha_{\bar q} + v
277: \alpha_g) q x} {\cal S}(\alpha_i)
278: \nonumber \\
279: &&\langle \gamma(q) | \bar q(x) g_s \tilde G_{\mu \nu} i \gamma_5 (v
280: x) q(0) \vert 0 \rangle = -i e_q \qq \left(\varepsilon_\mu q_\nu -
281: \varepsilon_\nu q_\mu \right) \int {\cal D}\alpha_i e^{i
282: (\alpha_{\bar q} + v \alpha_g) q x} \tilde {\cal S}(\alpha_i)
283: \nonumber \\
284: &&\langle \gamma(q) \vert \bar q(x) g_s \tilde G_{\mu \nu}(v x)
285: \gamma_\alpha \gamma_5 q(0) \vert 0 \rangle = e_q f_{3 \gamma}
286: q_\alpha (\varepsilon_\mu q_\nu - \varepsilon_\nu q_\mu) \int {\cal
287: D}\alpha_i e^{i (\alpha_{\bar q} + v \alpha_g) q x} {\cal
288: A}(\alpha_i)
289: \nonumber \\
290: &&\langle \gamma(q) \vert \bar q(x) g_s G_{\mu \nu}(v x) i
291: \gamma_\alpha q(0) \vert 0 \rangle = e_q f_{3 \gamma} q_\alpha
292: (\varepsilon_\mu q_\nu - \varepsilon_\nu q_\mu) \int {\cal
293: D}\alpha_i e^{i (\alpha_{\bar q} + v \alpha_g) q x} {\cal
294: V}(\alpha_i) \nonumber \\ && \langle \gamma(q) \vert \bar q(x)
295: \sigma_{\alpha \beta} g_s G_{\mu \nu}(v x) q(0) \vert 0 \rangle =
296: e_q \qq \left\{
297: \left[\left(\varepsilon_\mu - q_\mu \frac{\varepsilon x}{q x}\right)\left(g_{\alpha \nu} -
298: \frac{1}{qx} (q_\alpha x_\nu + q_\nu x_\alpha)\right) \right. \right. q_\beta
299: \nonumber \\ && -
300: \left(\varepsilon_\mu - q_\mu \frac{\varepsilon x}{q x}\right)\left(g_{\beta \nu} -
301: \frac{1}{qx} (q_\beta x_\nu + q_\nu x_\beta)\right) q_\alpha
302: \nonumber \\ && -
303: \left(\varepsilon_\nu - q_\nu \frac{\varepsilon x}{q x}\right)\left(g_{\alpha \mu} -
304: \frac{1}{qx} (q_\alpha x_\mu + q_\mu x_\alpha)\right) q_\beta
305: \nonumber \\ &&+
306: \left. \left(\varepsilon_\nu - q_\nu \frac{\varepsilon x}{q.x}\right)\left( g_{\beta \mu} -
307: \frac{1}{qx} (q_\beta x_\mu + q_\mu x_\beta)\right) q_\alpha \right]
308: \int {\cal D}\alpha_i e^{i (\alpha_{\bar q} + v \alpha_g) qx} {\cal T}_1(\alpha_i)
309: \nonumber \\ &&+
310: \left[\left(\varepsilon_\alpha - q_\alpha \frac{\varepsilon x}{qx}\right)
311: \left(g_{\mu \beta} - \frac{1}{qx}(q_\mu x_\beta + q_\beta x_\mu)\right) \right. q_\nu
312: \nonumber \\ &&-
313: \left(\varepsilon_\alpha - q_\alpha \frac{\varepsilon x}{qx}\right)
314: \left(g_{\nu \beta} - \frac{1}{qx}(q_\nu x_\beta + q_\beta x_\nu)\right) q_\mu
315: \nonumber \\ && -
316: \left(\varepsilon_\beta - q_\beta \frac{\varepsilon x}{qx}\right)
317: \left(g_{\mu \alpha} - \frac{1}{qx}(q_\mu x_\alpha + q_\alpha x_\mu)\right) q_\nu
318: \nonumber \\ &&+
319: \left. \left(\varepsilon_\beta - q_\beta \frac{\varepsilon x}{qx}\right)
320: \left(g_{\nu \alpha} - \frac{1}{qx}(q_\nu x_\alpha + q_\alpha x_\nu) \right) q_\mu
321: \right]
322: \int {\cal D} \alpha_i e^{i (\alpha_{\bar q} + v \alpha_g) qx} {\cal T}_2(\alpha_i)
323: \nonumber \\ &&+
324: \frac{1}{qx} (q_\mu x_\nu - q_\nu x_\mu)
325: (\varepsilon_\alpha q_\beta - \varepsilon_\beta q_\alpha)
326: \int {\cal D} \alpha_i e^{i (\alpha_{\bar q} + v \alpha_g) qx} {\cal T}_3(\alpha_i)
327: \nonumber \\ &&+
328: \left. \frac{1}{qx} (q_\alpha x_\beta - q_\beta x_\alpha)
329: (\varepsilon_\mu q_\nu - \varepsilon_\nu q_\mu)
330: \int {\cal D} \alpha_i e^{i (\alpha_{\bar q} + v \alpha_g) qx} {\cal T}_4(\alpha_i)
331: \right\}
332: \end{eqnarray}
333: where $\chi$ is the magnetic susceptibility of the quarks,
334: $\varphi_\gamma(u)$ is the leading twist 2, $\psi^v(u)$,
335: $\psi^a(u)$, ${\cal A}$ and ${\cal V}$ are the twist 3 and
336: $h_\gamma(u)$, $\mathbb{A}$, ${\cal T}_i$ ($i=1,~2,~3,~4$) are the
337: twist 4 photon distribution amplitudes (DA's), respectively. The explicit expressions of DA's are presented in numerical analysis section.
338:
339: The theoretical part of the correlation function can be obtained in
340: terms of QCD parameters by substituting photon DA's and expressions
341: for heavy and light quarks propagators in to Eq. (\ref{mut.m}). Sum
342: rules for the $\Xi_{Q}$ magnetic moments are obtained by equating
343: two representations of the correlation function. The higher states
344: and continuum contributions are modeled using the hadron-quark
345: duality. Applying double Borel transformations on the variables
346: $p_{1}^{2}=(p+q)^{2}$ and $p_{2}^{2}=p^{2}$ on both sides of the
347: correlator, for the $\Xi_{Q}$ baryon magnetic moments we get:
348: \begin{eqnarray}\label{buneya}
349: &-&\lambda_{Q}^{2}(\beta)\mu_{\Xi_{Q}}e^{-m_{\Xi_{Q}}^{2}/M_{B}^{2}}=\int_{m_{Q}^{2}}^{s_{0}}e^{\frac{-s}{M_{B}^{2}}}\rho(s)ds\nonumber\\&+&\frac{(\beta^2-1)e^{\frac{-m_{Q}^{2}}{M_{B}^{2}}}}{288\pi^{2}}
350: \left\{\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\gamma_{E}(6e_{Q}+e_{s})m_{s}m_{0}^{2}<\bar
351: qq>\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right\}\nonumber\\&-&\frac{(\beta^2-1)e^{\frac{-m_{Q}^{2}}{M_{B}^{2}}}m_{Q}^2}
352: {72M_{B}^{4}}\left\{(e_{s}+e_{q})m_{0}^{2}<\bar
353: ss><\bar
354: qq>\eta_{1}\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right\}\nonumber\\
355: &+&\frac{e^{\frac{-m_{Q}^{2}}{M_{B}^{2}}}m_{Q}^{2}}{432M_{B}^{4}}\left\{\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}(\beta^2-1)m_{0}^{2}<\bar
356: ss><\bar qq>\left[\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}36e_{Q}+(e_{s}+e_{q})\mathbb{A}(u_{0})\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right]\right.\nonumber\\
357: &+&\left.(\beta^2+1)f_{3\gamma}e_{q}m_{s}m_{0}^{2}<\bar
358: ss>(\eta_{2}+\psi^{a}(u_{0}))\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right\}\nonumber\\
359: &+&\frac{e^{\frac{-m_{Q}^{2}}{M_{B}^{2}}}}{72}\left\{\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}(1-\beta^2)<\bar
360: ss><\bar qq>\left[\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}12e_{Q}-(e_{s}+e_{q})[\eta_{1}-m_{0}^{2}\chi_{i}\varphi_{\gamma}(u_{0})]\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right]\right.\nonumber\\
361: &-&3e_{q}(\beta^2+1)f_{3\gamma}m_{s}<\bar
362: ss>\eta_{2}\left.\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right\}\nonumber\\
363: &-&\frac{(\beta^2-1)e^{\frac{-m_{Q}^{2}}{M_{B}^{2}}}M_{B}^{2}m_{s}}{96\pi^{2}m_{Q}^{2}}
364: \left[\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}(6e_{Q}+e_{s})\gamma_{E}m_{0}^{2}<\bar qq>\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right]\nonumber\\
365: &-&
366: \frac{e^{\frac{-m_{Q}^{2}}{M_{B}^{2}}}m_{s}}{288\pi^2}\left(\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}3(\beta^2-1)e_{Q}m_{0}^{2}<\bar
367: qq>\left\{\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}-3+2\gamma_{E}+2ln[\frac{\Lambda^{2}}{m_{Q}^{2}}]\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right\}\right.\nonumber\\
368: &+&e_{q}m_{0}^{2}<\bar
369: ss>(1+\beta^2)+e_{s}m_{0}^{2}<\bar
370: qq>\left[\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}(1-\beta^2)(\gamma_{E}+ln[\frac{\Lambda^{2}}{m_{Q}^{2}}])\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right]
371: \left.\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right)\nonumber\\
372: &+&\frac{9e_{Q}m_{Q}^{2}m_{s}}{144\pi^2}\left\{\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}
373: <\bar ss>(1+\beta^2)+2<\bar qq>(1-\beta^2)\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right\}
374: ,\nonumber\\
375: \end{eqnarray}
376: where $M_{B}^{2}=\frac{M_{1}^{2}M_{2}^{2}}{M_{1}^{2}+M_{2}^{2}}$ and
377: $u_{0}=\frac{M_{1}^{2}}{M_{1}^{2}+M_{2}^{2}}$. Since the masses of
378: the initial and final baryons are the same, we will set
379: $M_{1}^{2}=M_{2}^{2}$ and $u_{0}=1/2$. The functions appearing in
380: Eq. (\ref{buneya}) are defined as:
381: \begin{eqnarray}\label{functions1}
382: \eta_{1} &=& \int {\cal D}\alpha_i \int_0^1 dv {\cal S}(\alpha_i)
383: \delta(\alpha_{ q} + v \alpha_g - u_0),
384: \nonumber \\
385: \eta_{2} &=& \int {\cal D}\alpha_i \int_0^1 dv {\cal V}(\alpha_i)
386: \delta'(\alpha_{ q} + v \alpha_g - u_0),
387: \nonumber \\
388: \rho(s)&=&\frac{(\beta^2-1)}
389: {144\pi^{2}M_{B}^{2}}\left\{\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}m_{0}^{2}(6e_{Q}+e_{s})m_{s}<\bar qq>\ln (\frac{-{m_{Q}}^2 + s}{{\Lambda}^2})\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right\}\nonumber\\
390: &+&\frac{3(1+\beta^2)e_{Q}m_{Q}^{4}}{64\pi^{4}}
391: \left\{\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\frac{13}{2}+\psi_{10}-\frac{1}{6}\psi_{20}-\frac{1}{6}\psi_{30}
392: +[\psi_{10}+\frac{3}{2}]ln(\frac{s}{m_{Q}^{2}})+\frac{1}{6}\psi_{41}
393: \vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right\}
394: \nonumber\\
395: &+&\frac{(1-\beta^2)m_{s}
396: <\bar qq>\psi_{10}}{48\pi^{2}m_{Q}^{2}}\left\{\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}2e_{q}m_{Q}^{2}\eta_{1}-(e_{s}+e_{q})
397: m_{0}^{2}\left[\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}8+ln(\frac{s-m_{Q}^{2}}{{\Lambda}^2})\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right]
398: \vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right\}\nonumber\\
399: &-&\frac{m_{s}}{288\pi^{2}m_{Q}^{2}}\left\{\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}(\beta^2-1)m_{0}^{2}(e_{s}+6e_{Q})<\bar
400: qq>\right.\left[\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}3ln(\frac{s-m_{Q}^{2}}{{\Lambda}^2})-(4\gamma_{E}
401: +ln[\frac{\Lambda^{2}}{m_{Q}^{2}}])
402: \vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right]\nonumber\\
403: &+&6e_{Q}\left[\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}3m_{Q}^{2}\{(1+\beta^2)<\bar
404: ss>+2(1-\beta^2)<\bar qq>\}\psi_{10}
405: \vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right]\left.
406: \vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right\}\nonumber\\
407: &+&\frac{m_{Q}^{2}}{576\pi^2}\left(\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}(e_{s}+12e_{Q})
408: \left\{\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right.\right.\frac{(\beta^2-1)}{m_{Q}^{4}}m_{0}^{2}m_{s}<\bar
409: qq>\left[\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}-(1+\gamma_{E})(\psi_{22}+2\psi_{12})\right.\nonumber\\
410: &-&\left.\left.\psi_{02}-\psi_{32}-\psi_{22}-\frac{\gamma_{E}}{2}\psi_{20}+3(2\psi_{32}+3\psi_{22}+\psi_{02})ln(\frac{s-m_{Q}^{2}}{{\Lambda}^2})-ln(\frac{\Lambda^2}{m_{Q}^2})
411: \vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right]\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right\}\nonumber\\
412: &+&12e_{q}\left\{\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\frac{2}{m_{Q}^{2}}(\beta^2-1)m_{s}<\bar
413: qq>\eta_{1}\psi_{21}\right.\nonumber\\
414: &+&\left.\left.(1+\beta^2)f_{3\gamma}\eta_{2}\left[\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\psi_{21}-\psi_{10}+\frac{1}{2}\psi_{20}+\frac{1}{2}\psi_{00}
415: +ln(\frac{m_{Q}^{2}}{s})\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right]\vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right\}
416: \vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\right),\nonumber \\
417: \end{eqnarray}
418: where,
419: \begin{eqnarray}\label{functions1}
420: \int {\cal D} \alpha_i& = &\int_0^1 d \alpha_{\bar q} \int_0^1 d
421: \alpha_q \int_0^1 d \alpha_g \delta(1-\alpha_{\bar
422: q}-\alpha_q-\alpha_g),
423: \end{eqnarray}
424: and functions $\psi_{nm}$ are defined as
425: \begin{eqnarray}\label{functions2}
426: \psi_{nm}&=&\frac{{( {s-m_{Q}}^2 )
427: }^n}{s^m{(m_{Q}^{2})}^{n-m}},\nonumber \\
428: \end{eqnarray}
429: Note that the contributions of the terms $\sim <G^2>$ are also calculated, but their numerical values are very small and therefore for customary in Eq. (\ref{buneya}) these terms are omitted.
430: From Eq. (\ref{buneya}) it follows that for the determination of the
431: $\Xi_{Q}$ baryon magnetic moments, we need to know the residue
432: $\lambda_{Q}$. The residue can be obtained from the two-point sum
433: rules and is calculated in \cite{Duraes}. For the current given in eq.
434: (\ref{cur.xi}) it takes the following form:
435: \begin{eqnarray}\label{resediue}
436: \lambda^2_{Q}(\beta)&=&e^{{m_{\Xi_{Q}}}^2/M_{B}^2}\left(
437: \vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}\int_{m_Q^2}^{s_0}ds~ e^{-s/M_{B}^2}\left\{
438: \vphantom{\int_0^{x_2}}
439: {(1+\beta^2)m_Q^4\over
440: 2^{9}\pi^4}\left[(1-x^2)\left({1 \over x^2}-{8\over
441: x}+1\right)-12\ln{x}\right] \right.\right.\nonumber\\&+&
442: {m_s\over2^4\pi^2}(1-x^2)\left[(1-\beta^2)\qq+{(1+b^2)\ss \over2}\right]
443: \nonumber\\&+&\left. {(1+\beta^2)<g^{2}G^{2}>\over 2^{10}3
444: \pi^4}(1-x)(1+5x)\right\}
445: \nonumber\\
446: &+&{m_s\over2^5\pi^2}\left\{\frac{(1+\beta^2)m_{0}^{2}<\bar ss>}{6}
447: e^{-m_Q^2/M_{B}^2}-(1-\beta^2)m_{0}^{2}<\bar
448: qq>\left[e^{-m_Q^2/M_{B}^2}\right.\right.\nonumber\\
449: &+&\left.\left.\left.\int_0^1d\alpha(1-\alpha)
450: e^{-m_Q^2\over(1-\alpha)M_{B}^2}\right]\right\}
451: -\frac{\qq\ss}{6}(1-\beta^2)e^{-m_Q^2/M_{B}^2}\right),
452: \nonumber \\
453: \end{eqnarray}
454: where, $ x = m_{Q}^{2} /s $.
455: %%%
456: %%%
457: \section{Numerical analysis}
458: The present section is devoted to the numerical analysis of the magnetic
459: moments of $\Xi_{Q}$ baryons. The values of the input parameters,
460: appearing in the sum rules expression for magnetic moments are:
461: $\uu(1~GeV) = \dd(1~GeV)= -(0.243)^3~GeV^3$, $\ss(1~GeV) = 0.8
462: \uu(1~GeV)$, $m_0^2(1~GeV) = 0.8~GeV^2$ \cite{Belyaev}, , $\Lambda =
463: 300~MeV$ and $f_{3 \gamma} = - 0.0039~GeV^2$ \cite{Ball}. The value
464: of the magnetic susceptibility $\chi(1~GeV)=-3.15\pm0.3~GeV^{-2}$ was
465: obtained by a combination of the local duality approach and QCD sum
466: rules \cite{Ball}. Recently, from the analysis of radiative heavy meson
467: decay, $\chi(1~GeV)=-(2.85\pm0.5)~GeV^{-2}$ was obtained
468: \cite{Rohrwild}, which is in good agreement with the instanton liquid model prediction \cite{Dorokov}, but slightly below the QCD sum rules prediction \cite{Ball}. Note that firstly the magnetic susceptibility in the framework of QCD sum rules is calculated in \cite{Kogan} and it is obtained that $\chi(1~GeV)=-4.4~GeV^{-2}$. In the numerical analysis, we have used all three value of $\chi$ existing in the litrature and obtained that the values of the magnetic moments of $\Xi_{Q}$ baryons are practically insensitive to the value of $\chi$. The photon DA's entering the sum rules for the magnetic moments of $\Xi_{Q}$ are calculated in \cite{Ball} and their expressions are:
469: \begin{eqnarray}
470: \varphi_\gamma(u) &=& 6 u \bar u \left( 1 + \varphi_2(\mu)
471: C_2^{\frac{3}{2}}(u - \bar u) \right),
472: \nonumber \\
473: \psi^v(u) &=& 3 \left(3 (2 u - 1)^2 -1 \right)+\frac{3}{64} \left(15
474: w^V_\gamma - 5 w^A_\gamma\right)
475: \left(3 - 30 (2 u - 1)^2 + 35 (2 u -1)^4
476: \right),
477: \nonumber \\
478: \psi^a(u) &=& \left(1- (2 u -1)^2\right)\left(5 (2 u -1)^2 -1\right)
479: \frac{5}{2}
480: \left(1 + \frac{9}{16} w^V_\gamma - \frac{3}{16} w^A_\gamma
481: \right),
482: \nonumber \\
483: {\cal A}(\alpha_i) &=& 360 \alpha_q \alpha_{\bar q} \alpha_g^2
484: \left(1 + w^A_\gamma \frac{1}{2} (7 \alpha_g - 3)\right),
485: \nonumber \\
486: {\cal V}(\alpha_i) &=& 540 w^V_\gamma (\alpha_q - \alpha_{\bar q})
487: \alpha_q \alpha_{\bar q}
488: \alpha_g^2,
489: \nonumber \\
490: h_\gamma(u) &=& - 10 \left(1 + 2 \kappa^+\right) C_2^{\frac{1}{2}}(u
491: - \bar u),
492: \nonumber \\
493: \mathbb{A}(u) &=& 40 u^2 \bar u^2 \left(3 \kappa - \kappa^+
494: +1\right) \nonumber \\ && +
495: 8 (\zeta_2^+ - 3 \zeta_2) \left[u \bar u (2 + 13 u \bar u) \right.
496: \nonumber \\ && + \left.
497: 2 u^3 (10 -15 u + 6 u^2) \ln(u) + 2 \bar u^3 (10 - 15 \bar u + 6 \bar u^2)
498: \ln(\bar u) \right],
499: \nonumber \\
500: {\cal T}_1(\alpha_i) &=& -120 (3 \zeta_2 + \zeta_2^+)(\alpha_{\bar
501: q} - \alpha_q)
502: \alpha_{\bar q} \alpha_q \alpha_g,
503: \nonumber \\
504: {\cal T}_2(\alpha_i) &=& 30 \alpha_g^2 (\alpha_{\bar q} - \alpha_q)
505: \left((\kappa - \kappa^+) + (\zeta_1 - \zeta_1^+)(1 - 2\alpha_g) +
506: \zeta_2 (3 - 4 \alpha_g)\right),
507: \nonumber \\
508: {\cal T}_3(\alpha_i) &=& - 120 (3 \zeta_2 - \zeta_2^+)(\alpha_{\bar
509: q} -\alpha_q)
510: \alpha_{\bar q} \alpha_q \alpha_g,
511: \nonumber \\
512: {\cal T}_4(\alpha_i) &=& 30 \alpha_g^2 (\alpha_{\bar q} - \alpha_q)
513: \left((\kappa + \kappa^+) + (\zeta_1 + \zeta_1^+)(1 - 2\alpha_g) +
514: \zeta_2 (3 - 4 \alpha_g)\right),\nonumber \\
515: {\cal S}(\alpha_i) &=& 30\alpha_g^2\{(\kappa +
516: \kappa^+)(1-\alpha_g)+(\zeta_1 + \zeta_1^+)(1 - \alpha_g)(1 -
517: 2\alpha_g)\nonumber \\&+&\zeta_2
518: [3 (\alpha_{\bar q} - \alpha_q)^2-\alpha_g(1 - \alpha_g)]\},\nonumber \\
519: \tilde {\cal S}(\alpha_i) &=&-30\alpha_g^2\{(\kappa -
520: \kappa^+)(1-\alpha_g)+(\zeta_1 - \zeta_1^+)(1 - \alpha_g)(1 -
521: 2\alpha_g)\nonumber \\&+&\zeta_2 [3 (\alpha_{\bar q} -
522: \alpha_q)^2-\alpha_g(1 - \alpha_g)]\}.
523: \end{eqnarray}
524: The constants appearing in the wave functions are given as
525: \cite{Ball} $\varphi_2(1~GeV) = 0$, $w^V_\gamma = 3.8 \pm 1.8$,
526: $w^A_\gamma = -2.1 \pm 1.0$, $\kappa = 0.2$, $\kappa^+ = 0$,
527: $\zeta_1 = 0.4$, $\zeta_2 = 0.3$, $\zeta_1^+ = 0$ and $\zeta_2^+ =
528: 0$.
529:
530: From the explicit expressions of the magnetic moments of $\Xi_{Q}$
531: baryons, it follows that it contains three auxiliary parameters:
532: Borel mass squared $M_{B}^{2}$, continuum threshold $s_{0}$ and $\beta$
533: which enters the expression of the interpolating current for
534: $\Xi_{Q}$. The physical quantity, magnetic moment $\mu_{\Xi_{Q}}$,
535: should be independent of these auxiliary parameters. In other words we
536: should find the "working regions" of these auxiliary parameters,
537: where the magnetic moments are independent of them.
538:
539: The value of the continuum threshold is fixed from the analysis of the two-
540: point sum rules, where the mass and residue $\lambda_{\Xi_{Q}}$ of
541: the $\Xi_{Q}$ baryons are determined \cite{Duraes}, which leads to
542: the value $s_{0}=6.5^2~GeV^2$ for $\Xi_{b}$ and $s_{0}=3.0^2~GeV^2$ for
543: $\Xi_{c}$. If we choose the value $s_{0}=6.4^2~GeV^2$ for $\Xi_{b}$
544: and $s_{0}=8~GeV^2$ for $\Xi_{c}$. the results remain practically
545: unchanged. Next, we try to find the working region of $M_{B}^{2}$
546: where $\mu_{\Xi_{Q}}$ are independent of it at fixed value of $\beta$
547: and the above mentioned values of $s_{0}$. The upper bound of $M_{B}^{2}$
548: is obtained requiring that the continuum contribution should be less than
549: the contribution of the first resonance. The lower bound
550: of $M_{B}^{2}$ is determined by requiring that the highest power of
551: $1/M_{B}^{2}$ be less than $30^0/_{0}$ of the highest
552: power of $M_{B}^{2}$. These two conditions are both satisfied in the
553: region $15~GeV^2\leq M_{B}^{2}\leq20~GeV^2 $ and $5~GeV^2\leq
554: M_{B}^{2}\leq8~GeV^2 $ for $\Xi_{b}$ and $\Xi_{c}$, respectively.
555:
556: In Figs. 1 and 2, we depict the dependence of $\mu_{\Xi_{b}^{0}}$
557: and $\mu_{\Xi_{b}^{-}}$ on $M_{B}^{2}$ at fixed value of $\beta$ and
558: $s_{0}=6.5^2~GeV^2$. In Figs. 3 and 4, we present the dependence of $\mu_{\Xi_{c}^{0}}$
559: and $\mu_{\Xi_{c}^{+}}$ on $M_{B}^{2}$ at fixed value of $\beta$ and
560: $s_{0}=3.0^2~GeV^2$. From these figures, we see that the values of the magnetic moments of $\Xi_{b}$ and $\Xi_{c}$ exhibit good stability when $M_{B}^{2}$ varies in the region $15~GeV^2\leq M_{B}^{2}\leq20~GeV^2 $ and $5~GeV^2\leq
561: M_{B}^{2}\leq8~GeV^2 $, respectively. The last step of our analysis is the determination of
562: the working region for the auxiliary parameter $\beta$. For this aim,
563: in Figs. 5, 6, 7, and 8 we present the dependence of the magnetic
564: moments of $\Xi_{Q}$ baryons on $\cos\theta$ where $\tan\theta=\beta$, using the values of
565: $M_{B}^{2}$ from the "working region" which we already determined
566: and at fixed values of $s_{0}$.
567:
568: From these figures we obtained that the prediction of the magnetic moment $\mu_{\Xi_{b}}$
569: ($\mu_{\Xi_{c}}$) is practically independent of the value of the auxiliary parameter $\beta$. From
570: all these analysis we deduce the final results for the
571: magnetic moments in Table 1 for $\chi=-3.15~GeV^2$.
572: Comparison of our results on the magnetic moments of $\Xi_{Q}$ baryons with predictions of other approaches, as we already noted, is also presented in
573: Table1.
574: \begin{table}[h]
575: \centering
576: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline
577: &$\mu_{\Xi_{b}^{0}}$ & $\mu_{\Xi_{b}^{-}}$& $\mu_{\Xi_{c}^{0}}$&$\mu_{\Xi_{c}^{+}}$ \\\cline{1-5}
578: Our results &$-0.045\pm0.005$&$-0.08\pm0.02$ &$0.35\pm0.05 $&$0.50\pm0.05 $\\\cline{1-5}
579: RQM \cite{Faessler}&-0.06 &-0.06 &0.39&0.41\\\cline{1-5}
580: NQM \cite{Faessler}&-0.06&-0.06&0.37&0.37\\\cline{1-5}
581: \cite{Patel}&-&-&$-1.02\div-1.06$&$0.45\div0.48$\\\cline{1-5}
582: \cite{Savage}&-&-&0.32&0.42\\\cline{1-5}
583: \cite{DOR}&-&-&0.38&0.38\\\cline{1-5}
584: \cite{Oh}&-&-&0.28&0.28\\\cline{1-5}
585: \cite{An}&-&-&$0.28\div0.34$&$0.39\div0.46$\\\cline{1-5}
586: \end{tabular}
587: \vspace{0.8cm}
588: \caption{Results for the magnetic moments of $\Xi_{Q}$ baryons in different approaches.
589: }\label{tab:1}
590: \end{table}
591:
592:
593: We see that within errors our predictions on the magnetic moments are in
594: good agreement with the quark model predictions. Our results on the magnetic moments of $\Xi_{c}$ are also close to the predictions of the other approaches except the prediction of \cite{Patel} on $\mu_{\Xi_{c}^{0}}$.
595:
596: In summary, the magnetic moments of $\Xi_{Q}$ baryons, which
597: were discovered recently (more precisely $\Xi_{b}$ was discovered) are
598: calculated in framework of light cone QCD sum rules. Our results on
599: magnetic moments are close to the predictions of the other approaches existing in the literature.
600: \section{Acknowledgment}
601: Two of the authors (K. A. and A. O.), would like to thank TUBITAK,
602: Turkish Scientific and Research Council, for their partial financial
603: support both through the scholarship program and also through the
604: project number 106T333. One of the authors (A. O. ) would like to thank TUBA for funds provided through the GEBIP program.
605: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
606: \bibitem{Aaltonen1} T. Aaltonen et. al, CDF Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 99} (2007) 202001.
607: \bibitem{Abazov} V. Abazov et. al, DO Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 99} (2007) 052001.
608: \bibitem{Aaltonen2} T. Aaltonen et. al, CDF Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 99} (2007) 052002.
609: \bibitem{Aubert} B. Aubert et. al, BaBar Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97} (2006) 232001.
610: \bibitem{Capstick} S. Capstick, N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D
611: {\bf34} (1986) 2809.
612: \bibitem{Roncaglia} R. Roncaglia, D. B. Lichtenberg, E. Predazzi, Phys. Rev.
613: D {\bf52} (1995) 1722.
614: \bibitem{Jenkins} E. Jenkins, Phys. Rev.
615: D {\bf54} (1996) 4515.
616: \bibitem{Mathur} N. Mathur, R. Lewis , R. M. Woloshyn,
617: Phys. Rev. D {\bf66} (2002) 014502.
618: \bibitem{Ebert} D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, V. O. Galkin, Phys. Rev.
619: D {\bf72} (2005) 034026.
620: \bibitem{Karliner1} M. Karliner, H. J. Lipkin, arXiv:
621: 0307343 (hep-ph), 0611306 (hep-ph).
622: \bibitem{Karliner2} M. Karliner, B. Kereu-Zura, H. J. Lipkin, J. L. Rosner, arXiv:
623: 0706.2163 (hep-ph).
624: \bibitem{Rosner} J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev.
625: D {\bf75} (2007) 013009.
626: \bibitem{Karliner3} M. Karliner, H. J. Lipkin, Phys. Lett. B {\bf575} (2003) 249.
627: \bibitem{Shifman} M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, V. I. Zakharov,
628: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 147} (1979) 385.
629: \bibitem{Bagan} E. Bagan, M. Chabab, H. G. Dosch, S. Narison, Phys. Lett. B {\bf278} (1992) 367; ibid; Phys. Lett. B {\bf287} (1992) 176; ibid;
630: Phys. Lett. B {\bf301} (1993) 243.
631: \bibitem{Navarra} C. S. Navarra, M. Nielsen, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 443} (1998) 285.
632: \bibitem{Shuryak} E. V. Shuryak, Nucl. Phys. B
633: {\bf 198} (1982) 83.
634: \bibitem{Grozin} A. G. Grozin, O. I. Yakovlev, Phys.
635: Lett. B {\bf 285} (1992) 254.
636: \bibitem{Dai} Y. B. Dai, C. S. Huang, C. Liu, C. D. Lu, Phys. Lett. B {\bf371} (1996)
637: 99.
638: \bibitem{Wang1} D. W. Wang, M. Q. Huang, C. Z. Li, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 65} (2002) 094036.
639: \bibitem{Zhu1} S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 61} (2000) 114019.
640: \bibitem{Huang} C. S. Huang, A. L. Zhang, S. L. Zhu, Phys. Lett. B {\bf492} (2000)
641: 288.
642: \bibitem{Wang2} D. W. Wang, M. Q. Huang, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 68} (2003) 034019.
643: \bibitem{Wang3} Z. G. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 54} (2008) 231.
644: \bibitem{Duraes} F. O. Duraes, M. Nielsen, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 658} (2007) 40.
645: \bibitem{Liu} X. Liu, H. X. Chen, Y. R. Liu, A. Hosaka, S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 77} (2008) 014031.
646: \bibitem{Choudhury} A. L. Choudhury, V. Joshi, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 13} (1976) 3115.
647: \bibitem{Lic} D. B. Lichtenberg, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 15} (1977) 345.
648: \bibitem{Glozman} L. Y. Glozman, D. O. Riska, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf603} (1996) 326.
649: \bibitem{Julia} B. Julia-Diaz, D. O. Riska, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf739} (2004) 69.
650: \bibitem{Schollamd} S. Scholl, H. Weigel, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf735} (2004) 163.
651: \bibitem{Faessler} A. Faessler et. al, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 73} (2006) 094013.
652: \bibitem{Patel} B. Patel, A. K. Rai, P. C. Vinodkumar, arXiv:
653: 0803.0221 (hep-ph).
654: \bibitem{Savage} M. Savage, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 326} (1994) 303.
655: \bibitem{DOR} D. O. Riska, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B {\bf 119} (1996) 259.
656: \bibitem{Oh} Y. Oh, D. P. Min, M. Rho, N. N. Scoccola, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf534} (1991) 493.
657: \bibitem{An} C. S. An, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf797} (2007) 131, Erratum-ibid; A {\bf801} (2008) 82.
658: \bibitem{Zhu2} S. L. Zhu, W. Y. Hwang, Z. S. Yang, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 56} (1997) 7273.
659: \bibitem{Aliev1} T. M. Aliev, A. Ozpineci, M. Savci, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 65} (2002) 096004.
660: \bibitem{Aliev2} T. M. Aliev, A. Ozpineci, M. Savci, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 65} (2002) 056008.
661: \bibitem {Colangelo } P. Colangelo and A.
662: Khodjamirian, in "At the Frontier of Particle Physics/Handbook of
663: QCD", edited by M. Shifman (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001), Vol.
664: 3, p. 1495.
665: \bibitem{Braun1} V. M. Braun, Prep. arXiv:
666: 9801222 (hep-ph).
667: \bibitem{Balitsky} I. I. Balitsky, V. M. Braun, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf311} (1989) 541.
668: \bibitem{Braun2} V. M. Braun, I. E. Filyanov, Z. Phys. C {\bf48} (1990) 239.
669: \bibitem{ref} T. M. Aliev, A. Ozpineci, M. Savci, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 66} (2002) 016002, Erratum-ibid; D {\bf 67} (2003) 039901.
670: \bibitem{Ball} P. Ball, V. M. Braun, N. Kivel, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf649} (2003) 263.
671: \bibitem{Belyaev} V. M. Belyaev, B. L. Ioffe, JETP {\bf56} (1982) 493.
672: \bibitem{Rohrwild} J. Rohrwild, JHEP {\bf0709} (2007) 073.
673: \bibitem{Dorokov} A. E. Dorokhov, Eur. J. Phys. C {\bf42} (2005) 309.
674: \bibitem{Kogan} V. M. Belyaev, I. I. Kogan, Yad. Fiz. {\bf40} (1984) 1035.
675: \end{thebibliography}
676: \clearpage
677: \begin{figure}[h!]
678: \begin{center}
679: \includegraphics[width=13cm]{xib0.MBsq.eps}
680: \end{center}
681: \caption{The dependence of magnetic moment $\mu_{\Xi_{b}^{0}}$ on
682: $M_{B}^{2}$ at $s_{0}=6.5^2~GeV^2$ and $\beta=\pm5,~-1$.} \label{fig1}
683: \end{figure}
684: \begin{figure}[h!]
685: \begin{center}
686: \includegraphics[width=13cm]{xibm.MBsq.eps}
687: \end{center}
688: \caption{The same as Fig. 1 but for $\mu_{\Xi_{b}^{-}}$.}
689: \label{fig2}
690: \end{figure}
691: \begin{figure}[h!]
692: \begin{center}
693: \includegraphics[width=13cm]{xic0.MBsq.eps}
694: \end{center}
695: \caption{The same as Fig. 1 but for $\mu_{\Xi_{c}^{0}}$ and at $s_{0}=3.0^2~ GeV^2$ .}
696: \label{fig3}
697: \end{figure}
698: \begin{figure}[h!]
699: \begin{center}
700: \includegraphics[width=13cm]{xicp.MBsq.eps}
701: \end{center}
702: \caption{The same as Fig.3 but for $\mu_{\Xi_{c}^{+}}$.}
703: \label{fig4}
704: \end{figure}
705: \begin{figure}[h!]
706: \begin{center}
707: \includegraphics[width=13cm]{xib0.cos.eps}
708: \end{center}
709: \caption{The dependence of the magnetic moment $\mu_{\Xi_{b}^{0}}$ on
710: $cos\theta$ at $s_{0}=6.5^2~ GeV^2$ and for $M_{B}^2=15~GeV^2$ and $M_{B}^2=20~GeV^2$.}\label{fig5}
711: \end{figure}
712: \begin{figure}[h!]
713: \begin{center}
714: \includegraphics[width=13cm]{xibm.cos.eps}
715: \end{center}
716: \caption{The same as Fig. 5 but for $\mu_{\Xi_{b}^{-}}$.}
717: \label{fig6}
718: \end{figure}
719: \begin{figure}[h!]
720: \begin{center}
721: \includegraphics[width=13cm]{xic0.cos.eps}
722: \end{center}
723: \caption{The same as Fig. 5 but for $\mu_{\Xi_{c}^{0}}$ and $s_{0}=3.0^2~ GeV^2$ and for $M_{B}^2= 5~GeV^2$ and $M_{B}^2= 8~GeV^2$.}
724: \label{fig7}
725: \end{figure}
726: \begin{figure}[h!]
727: \begin{center}
728: \includegraphics[width=13cm]{xicp.cos.eps}
729: \end{center}
730: \caption{The same as Fig. 7 but for $\mu_{\Xi_{c}^{+}}$.}
731: \label{fig8}
732: \end{figure}
733: \end{document}
734: %%%
735: %%%
736: