1: \documentclass[useAMS,usenatbib]{mn2e}
2: \usepackage{epsfig}
3: \usepackage{longtable}
4: \usepackage{times}
5:
6: \def\mo{M$_\odot$}
7: \def\sun{\hbox{$\odot$}}
8: \def\cm3{cm$^{-3}$}
9: \def\kms{km~s$^{-1}$}
10: \def\msunyr{M$_{\odot}$\,yr$^{-1}$}
11: \def\lsun{L$_{\odot}$}
12: \def\rsun{R$_{\odot}$}
13: \def\mdot{$\dot{\rm M}$}
14: \def\edot{$\dot{\rm E}$}
15: \def\msun{M$_{\odot}$}
16: \def\mbol{M$_{\rm bol}$}
17: \let\ts=\thinspace
18: \def\etal{et al.}
19: \def\one{\ts {\,\sc i}}
20: \def\two{\ts {\,\sc ii}}
21: \def\three{\ts {\,\sc iii}}
22: \def\four{\ts {\,\sc iv}}
23: \def\five{\ts {\sc v}}
24: \def\six{\ts {\sc vi}}
25: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}
26: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}
27: \def\Rstar{R_{\ast}}
28: \def\Rsun{R_{\odot}}
29: \def\sles{\lower2pt\hbox{$\buildrel {\scriptstyle <}
30: \over {\scriptstyle\sim}$}}
31: \def\sgreat{\lower2pt\hbox{$\buildrel {\scriptstyle >}
32: \over {\scriptstyle\sim}$}}
33:
34: \def\aj{AJ}
35: \def\apj{ApJ}
36: \def\apjl{ApJL}
37: \def\apjs{ApJS}
38: \def\aap{A\&A}
39: \def\araa{ARA\&A}
40: \def\aaps{A\&AS}
41: \def\mnras{MNRAS}
42: \def\nat{Nature}
43: \def\pra{Phys.~Rev.~A}
44: %
45: % 18May2008: updated fig 15 to include more models with small vcores.
46: % Updated corresponding caption
47:
48: \voffset=-1.5cm % +0.0pc
49:
50: %\title[SN 1994W: a Type IIn Supernova without Core Collapse?]{SN 1994W: a Type IIn Supernova without Core Collapse?}
51:
52: \title[SN 1994W: An Interacting Supernova or Two Interacting Shells?]{SN 1994W:
53: An Interacting Supernova or Two Interacting Shells?}
54:
55: %[Spectroscopic Modeling of Interacting Supernovae: The Type IIn SN 1994W]
56: % {Spectroscopic Modeling of Interacting Supernovae: The Type IIn SN 1994W}
57:
58: \author[Luc Dessart, D. John Hillier, Suvi Gezari, St\'ephane Basa, and Tom Matheson]
59: {Luc Dessart$^{1,2}$\thanks{E-mail: luc@as.arizona.edu}, D. John Hillier$^3$,
60: Suvi Gezari$^4$, St\'ephane Basa$^5$, and Tom Matheson$^6$\\
61: $^1$ Department of Astronomy and Steward Observatory,
62: The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721\\
63: $^2$ Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544\\
64: $^3$ Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, PIttsburgh, PA 15260 \\
65: $^4$ California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 \\
66: $^5$ Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, France \\
67: $^6$ NOAO Gemini Science Center, 950 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85719
68: }
69:
70: \begin{document}
71:
72: \date{Accepted . Received }
73:
74: \pagerange{\pageref{firstpage}--\pageref{lastpage}} \pubyear{2007}
75:
76: \maketitle
77:
78: \label{firstpage}
79:
80: \begin{abstract}
81:
82: We present a multi-epoch quantitative spectroscopic analysis of the Type IIn SN 1994W, an event
83: interpreted by Chugai et al. as stemming from the interaction between the ejecta of a
84: SN and a 0.4\,\mo\ circumstellar shell ejected 1.5\,yr before core collapse.
85: During the brightening phase, our models suggest that the source of optical radiation
86: is not unique, perhaps associated with an inner optically-thick Cold Dense Shell (CDS) and
87: outer optically-thin shocked material. During the fading phase, our models support a {\it single}
88: source of radiation, an hydrogen-rich optically-thick
89: layer with a near-constant temperature of $\sim$7000\,K that recedes from a radius
90: of 4.3$\times$10$^{15}$ at peak to 2.3$\times$10$^{15}$\,cm 40 days later.
91: We reproduce the hybrid narrow-core broad-wing line profile shapes of SN 1994W
92: at all times, invoking an optically-thick photosphere exclusively (i.e., without any
93: external optically-thick shell). In SN 1994W, slow expansion makes scattering with thermal electrons
94: a key escape mechanism for photons trapped in optically-thick line cores, and allows the resulting
95: broad incoherent electron-scattering wings to be seen around narrow line cores.
96: In SNe with larger expansion velocities, the thermal broadening due to incoherent
97: scattering is masked by the broad profile and the dominant frequency redshift
98: occasioned by bulk motions. Given the absence of broad lines at all times and the very
99: low $^{56}$Ni yields, we speculate whether SN 1994W could have resulted from an interaction
100: between two ejected shells without core collapse. The high conversion efficiency of kinetic
101: to thermal energy may not require a SN-like energy budget for SN1994W.
102:
103: % {\bf if the progenitor is a very massive star, or from the interaction between SN ejecta
104: %and a pre-expelled shell, if the progenitor is a low mass massive star}.
105:
106: \end{abstract}
107:
108: \begin{keywords}
109: radiative transfer -- stars: atmospheres -- stars:
110: supernovae: individual: 1994W
111: \end{keywords}
112:
113: \section{Introduction}
114:
115: Understanding the diversity of supernova (SN) spectra and light curves is a considerable challenge.
116: Although some SN classes suffer less and less ambiguity, as in the thermonuclear incineration
117: of a Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarf leading to a Type Ia SN, or as in the collapse of the degenerate
118: Chandrasekhar-mass Fe or O/Ne/Mg core of a massive star leading to Type II or Type Ib/c SNe,
119: a unified picture of stellar explosions
120: is compromised by the growing number of atypical SNe that emerge from deeper and more frequent
121: searches for transient phenomena in the local and distant Universe. One such type of peculiar SNe
122: are ``n''-suffixed (i.e. IIn, Ibn, Ian), in reference to their atypical narrow line profiles.
123: This suggests that despite the bright,
124: supernova-like, visual display, the expansion rate of the radiating layer is small, i.e. of a few 100\,\kms,
125: in contrast with the large ejecta velocities, of a few 1000\,\kms, associated with SN explosions.
126: Paradoxically, these events can boast a huge bolometric luminosity --- a few 10$^9$\,\lsun\,
127: sustained for weeks (as in SN 1994W) but associated with a spectral energy distribution (SED)
128: typical of a 10,000\,K blackbody, hence implying ``photospheric'' radii of a few 10$^{15}$\,cm
129: ($ L \sim 2 \times 10^9 (R_{15})^2 (T_4)^4 L_{\odot}$, where $R_{15}$ is the radius in units of
130: 10$^{15}$\,cm and $T_4$ the temperature in units of 10$^4$\,K).
131:
132: All SN ejecta yield photospheric radii of 10$^{15}$\,cm a few weeks after explosion, but the
133: remarkable property of Type IIn SNe is that they achieve this with an apparent slow expansion.
134: The common interpretation is that Type IIn SNe interact with material present in the direct
135: environment of the exploding star, forming the ``photosphere'' where that external material resides,
136: at a few 10$^{15}$\,cm. If its mass is on the order of the ejecta mass, this outer material
137: can cause a significant deceleration of the ejecta, with an efficient conversion of kinetic
138: energy into internal and radiative energy.
139:
140: The narrow line cores are accompanied, in a subset of Type IIn SNe, by broad (and symmetric) line
141: wings which are generally interpreted as arising from multiple electron-scattering of line
142: photons in the circumstellar (CS) shell with which the ejecta collide (Chugai 2001).
143: These optical ``peculiarities''
144: are also often associated with the detection of X-ray and/or radio emission, as well as significant
145: spectral variations. Although interaction is evident in many SNe (see, e.g.,
146: Chevalier \& Fransson 1994, 2001; Fransson et al. 1996), Type IIn SNe are objects
147: in which the interaction is central, and perhaps ``makes'' the SN (i.e., the interaction
148: can increase the luminosity so that it is easier to detect).
149:
150: Given the rich mass loss history and the many alternate channels of evolution, massive stars
151: are the prime candidates for such interactions, in particular the hydrogen-rich, Type II, SNe.
152: A few well-documented examples that reveal the wealth and the diversity of phenomena hosted by such
153: IIn events are SN 1988Z (Stathakis \& Sadler 1991; van Dyk et al. 1993; Turatto et al. 1993;
154: Chugai \& Danziger 1994; Fabian \& Terlevich 1996; Aretzaga et al. 1999; Williams et al. 2002;
155: Schlegel \& Petre 2006), SN 1994W (Sollerman et al. 1998, hereafter SCL; Tsvetkov 1995; Schlegel 1999;
156: Chugai et al. 2004a, hereafter C04), SN 1995G (Pastorello et al. 2002; Chugai \& Danziger 2003),
157: SN 1995N (Fox et al. 2000; Fransson et al. 2002; Mucciarelli et al. 2006;
158: Chandra et al. 2005; Zampieri et al. 2005), SN 1997eg (Salamanca et al. 2002; Hoffman et al. 2007),
159: SN 1998S (Bowen et al. 2000; Gerardy et al. 2000; Leonard et al. 2000; Liu et al. 2000;
160: Anupama et al. 2001; Chugai 2001; Lentz et al. 2001; Fassia et al. 2000,2001;
161: Chugai et al. 2002; Pooley et al. 2002; Fransson et al. 2005; Pozzo et al. 2004,2005).
162: Despite the common IIn SN type, the above sample of SNe do not boast a uniform set of properties,
163: some being bright for weeks, some for months or even years; some showing a clear brightness
164: plateau after peak, others fading by a few magnitudes in just a few weeks, etc.
165: Objects classified as ``n-''type SNe are in fact shaking the common understanding of what makes a SN.
166:
167: The Type IIn SN 2006gy, the most luminous SN ever seen, may have originated from a
168: pair-instability explosion (Smith et al. 2007; Ofek et al. 2007; Smith \& McCray 2007),
169: or consecutive pair-instability pulsations (Woosley et al. 2007) in a super-massive star.
170: Also recently, SN 2006jc joined SN 1999cq and SN 2002ao to consolidate the rare SN Ibn type, characterized
171: by narrow lines of helium instead of hydrogen, an interpretation that conflicts with the notion that pre-SN
172: mass ejections are generally associated with hydrogen-rich stars (e.g., Luminous Blue Variables, LBVs,
173: see Davidson \& Humphreys 1997; Matheson et al. 2000; Foley et al. 2007; Pastorello et al. 2007).
174: Interaction with CS material has also been invoked in the Type Ia SN 2002ic following
175: the observations of narrow hydrogen-line emission in the optical spectrum
176: % LUC: I get rid of this sentence. Hamuy et al. pushed the idea that this proved the AGB status
177: % of the exploding star, or else the companion
178: % , in apparent conflict with the hydrogen-deficiency of the C/O white-dwarf progenitor
179: (Hamuy et al. 2003; Chugai \& Yungelson 2004; Chugai et al. 2004b; Deng et al. 2004;
180: Kotak et al. 2004; Wang et al. 2004; Wood-Vasey et al. 2004; Benetti et al. 2006; Han \& Podsialowski 2006;
181: Wood-Vasey \& Sokoloski 2006; Chugai \& Chevalier 2007).
182:
183: Modeling such an interaction is a complicated radiation hydrodynamics problem, in which
184: the uncertainties in the properties of both shells prior to interaction
185: add to those of the interaction itself. The diversity of observations,
186: suggests that a similar diversity is to be found in the circumstances of the interaction.
187: Focusing from now on on the massive star progeny, the outer, CS, material may arise
188: from the pre-SN steady-state wind mass loss, an LBV outburst,
189: perhaps a violent pair-instability pulsation, or some yet unidentified ejection mechanism
190: occurring recurrently (and without core collapse)
191: or immediately prior to core-collapse. The inner shell that rams into this CS shell
192: may arise from a core collapse SN explosion (which may be neutrino-, acoustic-,
193: or magnetically-driven; see Woosley \& Janka 2005 for a review),
194: a pair-instability pulsation, a pair-instability explosion, or some other form of explosion.
195: For a SN-like display to occur, the inner shell must be fast to catch up with the CS material
196: and cause a violent shock. A short delay between the two mass
197: ejections will raise the probability for detection. A large kinetic energy is involved, and the conversion
198: of kinetic to thermal energy supplies the internal/radiant energy inferred from the bolometric light curve.
199: Moreover, mass/energy distribution of both shells may not be spherical (Leonard et al. 2000; Hoffman et al. 2007)
200: and thus, viewing effects may complicate further the dynamics of the interaction and the interpretation of the
201: emitted light. Finally, the bolometric display may be altered by an additional contribution
202: from radioactive decay of unstable isotopes, which are normally associated with SN ejecta.
203:
204: %if such elements have indeed polluted the ejecta.
205:
206: An attempt to quantitatively interpret the Type IIn SN 1994W was undertaken by
207: C04 who performed radiation-hydrodynamics and radiative-transfer calculations
208: to model very high quality multi-epoch spectroscopic and photometric observations (see also
209: SCL). For SN 1994W, C04 associate the narrow line core with
210: an expanding CS envelope. The broad line wings arise from a combination of shocked cool gas in
211: the forward post-shock region, and multiple electron scattering in the CS envelope. They associate
212: the absence of
213: broad P~Cygni line profiles with obscuration by an optically-thick cold dense shell (CDS)
214: that forms at the interface of SN ejecta and a CS envelope. They infer a CS envelope with
215: a particle density $n \sim 10^9$\,cm$^{-3}$, a radial extent of a few 10$^{15}$\,cm,
216: an electron-scattering optical depth of $\sgreat$2.5, explosively ejected $\sim$1.5\,yr prior to the
217: SN explosion. The light curve shows a rise time to peak of about 30 days (after the reference date
218: 1994 July 14), followed by a slow decline by about two magnitudes until 110\,days,
219: and a sudden decline beyond that date (see Fig.~1 in SCL).
220:
221: Despite all the complexities that surround this ejecta/CS-envelope interaction, the
222: inferred presence by C04 of an optically-thick CDS suggests that the approach we follow
223: for the modeling of photospheric-phase Type II-Plateau (II-P) SNe (Dessart \& Hillier 2005ab, 2006, 2008;
224: Dessart et al. 2008) may also apply here. In this work, we provide insights into the
225: spectroscopic and light-curve evolutions of SN 1994W between day 20 and 100, thus
226: covering from $\sim$10 days before peak, through to the slow decline that follows
227: until 10 days before the steep brightness drop.
228:
229: The main results from this work are that although the outward-moving CDS is likely opaque until
230: the peak of the light curve, the photosphere recedes both in mass and radius for post-peak
231: times as the material cools and recombines. In this context, the sharp drop at 110 days is
232: the transition to the nebular phase, when the ejecta/CSM is entirely optically-thin,
233: analogous to the end of the plateau phase in Type II-P SNe. We also
234: find that the broad wings on the Balmer lines can be explained by multiple electron scattering
235: in the photosphere --- we do not need multiple density structures to explain the observed spectrum.
236:
237: %We also find that the broad wings on, e.g. Balmer lines, can be explained by multiple electron scattering
238: %not in the CS envelope, but in the photospheric region where the lines form.
239:
240: In the next section, we discuss the reddening and distance used in our study of SN 1994W.
241: In Section \ref{sect_time}, we evaluate various timescales that characterize Type IIn SNe. We then
242: summarize our modeling approach in Section \ref{sect_model}, presenting the various approximations
243: we make to mimic as best we can the complicated configuration of the interacting SN 1994W.
244: In Section \ref{sect_results}, we present the ejecta properties we infer from the modeling of
245: the photometric and spectroscopic observations at multiple epochs during its optically-bright phase.
246: We reproduce the narrow line core and the broad line wings by invoking a single
247: region of emission/absorption (the photosphere), rather than the CDS and CS-envelope configuration.
248: In Section \ref{sect_es}, we discuss the line formation process in our models
249: of SN 1994W, and emphasize the important role of electron-scattering in some Type IIn SN photospheres
250: that are characterized by low, and perhaps nearly constant, expansion velocities. We finally present
251: our conclusions and discuss the implication of our results for interacting SNe in a more general
252: context in Section \ref{sect_discussion}.
253:
254: %and perhaps and often with perhaps with smaloften near-constant (near-zero gradient)velocity.
255: % \section{Quantities of Interest}
256: %
257: %$$ E_{\rm kin} \sim 10^{49} (M/M_{\odot}) v_8^2 {\rm erg} \,\,$$.
258: %
259: %$$ E_{\rm rad} \sim 10^{49} L_9 \left(t/1 month\right) $$
260: %
261: %In the SN ejecta of the 15-\mo model of Woosley (2007; described in Dessart et al. 2007),
262: %the variation of the ejecta kinetic energy with velocity in excess of $v_e$, i.e.,
263: %$E_{\rm kin}(v \ge v_e)$, shows that about 50\% of the total kinetic energy is
264: %contained in ejecta travelling faster than 4200\,\kms (or having velocity between
265: %3000\,\kms and 5000\,\kms), while only $\sim$10\% of the total is contained in regions travelling
266: %faster than $\sim$6000\,\kms.
267: %During an interaction with outer circumstellar material, a large fraction of
268: %the ejecta kinetic energy may thus not be available to power the interaction,
269: %due to the remoteness of these regions and their slow velocity contrast with the
270: %outer, CSM, material.
271: %
272: %Work energy loss due to expansion: nkT dVol, with dVol = 4$\pi$ r$^2$ dr
273: %Work out internal energy of 1Msun at 10000\,K
274: %
275: %Density of a wind from a Rstar star with a Mdot mass loss. Compute the density
276: %at 10$^{15}$\,cm. How does this compare with the density of 10$^9$\,cm$^{-3}$
277: %estimated by Chugai et al. (2004) from the electron-scattering optical depth.
278: %
279:
280: \section{Reddening \& Distance\label{sect_red_dist}}
281:
282: Following SCL we adopt a distance to SN 1994W of 25.4\,Mpc which is based on
283: $H_0=65$\,\kms\,Mpc$^{-1}$ and the Virgo infall model of Kraan-Korteweg (1986). This is somewhat larger
284: than the distance estimate of 18.0\,Mpc by Gao \& Solomon (2004) which used
285: $H_0=75$\,\kms\,Mpc$^{-1}$ and was corrected for motion of the local group. While the choice of distance
286: will affect the adopted luminosity and inferred photospheric radii, other conclusions in this paper
287: (including $T_{\rm phot}$) are not affected.
288: The reddening is more problematical since it can affect the relative flux distribution.
289: SCL find $E(B-V)=0.17 \pm 0.06$\,mag based on the equivalent width of the Na{\sc i}D doublet and its correlation
290: with $E(B-V)$ while C04 estimate 0.15\,mag from blackbody fits to spectra at
291: several different dates. As the galactic extinction in the direction of SN 1994W is low,
292: most of the reddening must be internal to the host galaxy (SCL). Our present model, particularly
293: of spectra past the peak, supports the SCL reddening although values of 0.15 to 0.20\,mag are also
294: compatible with the observations. In this work, we employ a reddening of 0.15-0.17, but also explore
295: the effects of reducing the reddening to 0.07 on day 21.
296:
297: \section{Timescales}
298: \label{sect_time}
299:
300: A typical expansion velocity for SN 1994W, as measured from the narrow
301: line profiles, is ~800\,\kms. We can use this to define an expansion timescale
302: using a typical photospheric radius of $4 \times 10^{15}$\,cm. This gives
303: an expansion timescale of 1.6 years. As noted earlier, this, together with the large luminosity,
304: and the difficulty of creating SNe with a low expansion velocity,
305: are reasons for the argument that the 800\,\kms\, is not an intrinsic SN
306: expansion velocity. C04 suggest it is the velocity of CS material that was ejected prior to the SN explosion.
307: Alternatively, it could reflect the velocity of a shell of gas
308: that has arisen from the interaction of circumstellar gas with the SN ejecta.
309: The largest red-supergiants have radii of $~10^{14}$ cm
310: (see, e.g., Levesque et al. 2005), significantly smaller than the inferred photospheric radius.
311:
312: The light travel time across the SN is $2R/c \sim 3.1$ days. This is marginally
313: significant, and indicates that the observed light curve will be averaged
314: over this timescale. The diffusion time is of order $\tau R/cn$, where $n$ is the exponent
315: of the power law density. This will also have a significant impact on the observed light curve,
316: although it is less clear whether it will affect our spectroscopic modeling in which we
317: fix the luminosity at the base of the photosphere.
318:
319: \begin{table*}
320: \centering
321: \begin{minipage}{170mm}
322: \caption{Model Characteristics for SN 1994W.
323: For each date in our sample of observations, we provide the following
324: CMFGEN model parameters: Base comoving-frame luminosity $L_{{\rm CMF},R_0}$ and
325: emergent observer-frame luminosity $L_{{\rm OBS},R_{\rm Max}}$ (in 10$^8$\,\lsun),
326: photospheric conditions describing
327: the electron temperature $T_{\rm phot}$ (in K), the radius $R_{\rm phot}$ (in 10$^{15}$\,cm),
328: the velocity $V_{\rm phot}$ (in \kms), the mass density (in 10$^{-14}$\,g\,cm$^{-3}$), and
329: the free-electron density $N_{\rm e, phot}$ (in 10$^9$\,cm$^{-3}$).
330: In all models, a density exponent $n=10$ characterizes the density law
331: $\rho(R) = \rho_{\rm phot} (R_{\rm phot}/R)^n$.
332: $M_V$ and $m_V$ correspond to $V$-band absolute, and reddened plus distance-diluted (using a distance of
333: 25.4\,Mpc and a reddening of 0.17 with $R_V=3.1$), synthetic magnitudes.
334: Because there are clear inconsistencies between our model and the observations on days 21 and 31,
335: we quote the corresponding model parameters on those dates only for completeness -
336: we do not suggest they accurately describe SN 1994W on these two dates.
337: % The last column gives the normalization scaling at 7000\,\AA\ between the observed and
338: % the synthetic flux at each date.
339: $^a$: Days after 14.0 July 1994.
340: $^b$: So-called hot model, used to fit observations on the 4th and the 14th of August, both poorly.
341: $^c$: So-called cool model, used to fit observations on the 4th and on the 14th of August (but poorly
342: for both dates), and on September 1 (satisfactorily).
343: \label{tab_model_94W}
344: }
345: \begin{tabular}{lcccrcccccc}
346: \hline
347: Day & Phase$^a$ & $L_{{\rm CMF},R_0}$ & $L_{{\rm OBS},R_{\rm Max}}$& $T_{\rm phot}$ &
348: $R_{\rm phot}$ & $V_{\rm phot}$ & $\rho_{\rm phot}$ & $N_{\rm e, phot}$ & $M_V$ & $m_V$ \\ % & F$_{\rm Obs}$/F$_{\rm Model}$ \\
349: YY--MM--DD & Days & \multicolumn{2}{c}{(10$^8$ $L_{\odot}$)}& (K)& (10$^{15}$\,cm) &(\kms) &
350: (10$^{-14}$\,g\,cm$^{-3}$) & (10$^9$\,cm$^{-3}$) & \multicolumn{2}{c}{synthetic} \\
351: \hline
352: % Day Phase L_CMF_R0 L_OBS_RMAX Tphot Rphot Vphot rhophot Scaling MODEL
353: 1994-08-04$^b$ & 21.5 & 66.0 & 61.7 & 10350 & 2.86 & 830 & 0.82 & 3.3 & -18.78 & 13.37 \\ % ... e1_v2_s2_10_Bs
354: 1994-08-14$^b$ & 31.5 & 66.0 & 61.7 & 10350 & 2.86 & 830 & 0.82 & 3.3 & -18.78 & 13.37 \\ % ... e1_v2_s2_10_Bs
355: 1994-09-01$^c$ & 49.5 & 47.0 & 42.0 & 7480 & 4.32 & 830 & 0.62 & 2.1 & -18.80 & 13.75 \\ % & 0.87 e1_v2_s2_7_Bs3
356: 1994-09-09 & 56.9 & 27.0 & 24.0 & 7450 & 3.33 & 840 & 0.84 & 2.7 & -18.37 & 14.18 \\ % & 1.02 e1_v2_s2_5_B_0s1
357: 1994-10-01 & 79.5 & 9.8 & 8.7 & 6310 & 2.37 & 790 & 2.7 & 5.2 & -17.61 & 14.94 \\ % & 1.00 e1_v2_s2_12_0s1
358: 1994-10-11 & 89.5 & 9.0 & 8.0 & 6020 & 2.32 & 712 & 7.6 & 7.5 & -17.59 & 14.96 \\ % & 0.87 e1_v2_s2_12_0s
359: \hline
360: \hline
361: \end{tabular}
362: \end{minipage}
363: \end{table*}
364:
365: \section{Model Presentation}
366: \label{sect_model}
367:
368: % As discussed previously in the introduction, there is diverse evidence that Type IIn
369: % SNe result from an interaction, and recent observations suggest that this
370: % interaction could take place under very different configurations, i.e. ejecta/wind
371: % (Chevalier 1979???, Weiler), ejecta/shell (Chugai et al. 1994), or shell/shell collisions
372: % (Woosley et al. 2007). The key here is that a large fraction of the kinetic energy
373: % of the colliding material is channeled into radiative energy.
374:
375: % In the general setup presented by Chevalier (1982) or C04, an ejecta
376: % collides with a CS envelope (taken in a broad sense). A forward shock travels down the CSM and
377: % heats/ionizes the material, giving rise to some X-ray and radio emission.
378: % In parallel, a reverse shock travels up the ejecta, decelerating, ionizing and heating it.
379: % At the interface, a cold dense shell (CDS) forms that is optically thick, and likely subject
380: % to fragmentation through Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities.
381:
382: In hydrogen-rich environments, having an optically-thick layer simplifies considerably the
383: radiative transfer problem. The associated large bound-free opacities ensure that the
384: radiation is thermalized before escaping through the photosphere ---
385: all photons at depth will be absorbed and re-emitted according to a blackbody distribution
386: characterized by the local electron temperature, irrespective of the details of the interaction.
387: Hence, we have a setup that is analogous to that of a typical stellar atmosphere.
388: Not accounted for in this configuration is the potential contribution
389: from the optically-thin layers above the photosphere that have been
390: shocked. These regions can contribute to the electromagnetic display
391: directly, as they often do in the X-ray and radio ranges, or alter the photospheric conditions
392: through external irradiation. How well we reproduce the observations may be a gauge on how much
393: these regions contribute to the total SN luminosity and affect the photospheric conditions.
394: In the case of SN 1994W we can reproduce the observations after the peak by photospheric
395: radiation alone. However before the peak we cannot fully reproduce the observations accurately,
396: possibly indicating that optically-thin gas makes an important contribution. Alternatively,
397: neglected effects such as departures from spherical symmetry and time dependent effects,
398: may be important at such early times (Dessart \& Hillier 2008).
399:
400: %In the case of SN 1994W, we find that they may represent a sizable fraction of the optical
401: %radiation emanating from the photosphere at epochs prior to the peak of the light curve,
402: %but after the peak, we can reproduce the optical observations by invoking photospheric
403: %radiation alone.
404:
405: %Assuming a distance to SN 1994W of 25.4\,Mpc and a reddening $E(B-V)=$0.17\,mag (SCL;
406: %our present work supports this estimate, although values between 0.15 and 0.20 are compatible
407: %with observations),
408:
409: We model the observations with the non-LTE steady-state one-dimensional radiative transfer code CMFGEN
410: (Hillier \& Miller 1998; Dessart \& Hillier 2005a) which solves self-consistently the radiative transfer
411: equation and the statistical equilibrium equations under the constraint of radiative equilibrium.
412: Of particular relevance for this work, CMFGEN treats accurately the electron-scattering source function.
413: With our adopted distance and a reddening of $E(B-V)=0.17$\,mag a blackbody emitter, with a temperature
414: of 10$^4$\,K and a radius of 10$^{15}$\,cm, would have an observed V-band magnitude of $\sim$14.5,
415: in close agreement with the observed value around day 50 (see Fig.~1 of SCL98).
416: We therefore started our model analysis with a typical Type II-P SN model just prior to hydrogen
417: recombination (as in Dessart \& Hillier 2005a,2006 or Dessart et al. 2008), and modified the radius
418: and luminosity to agree with the above brightness estimate. We also adopt a supergiant-like composition,
419: i.e. $X_{\rm H}=$0.55, $X_{\rm He}=$0.44, $X_{\rm C}=$5.3$\times$10$^{-4}$,
420: $X_{\rm N}=$2$\times$10$^{-3}$, $X_{\rm O}=$2.8$\times$10$^{-3}$. Metal abundances are taken
421: at the solar value. We use the same model atom for all investigations presented here, with
422: H{\sc i}, He{\sc i}, C{\sc i}, C{\sc ii}, N{\sc i}, N{\sc ii}, Na{\sc i}, Mg{\sc ii}, Si{\sc ii},
423: Ca{\sc ii}, Al{\sc ii}, Al{\sc iii}, O{\sc i}, O{\sc ii}, S{\sc ii}, S{\sc iii}, Cr{\sc ii}, Cr{\sc iii},
424: Mn{\sc ii}, Mn{\sc iii}, Ti{\sc ii}, Ti{\sc iii}, Co{\sc ii}, Co{\sc iii}, Ni{\sc ii},
425: Ni{\sc iii}, Fe{\sc ii}, Fe{\sc iii}, Fe{\sc iv} (details on the levels treated are omitted, but our
426: choice is such that increasing the number of levels does not alter the computed ejecta properties nor
427: the emergent synthetic spectrum).
428:
429: The atomic data come from a wide variety of sources, the Opacity Project (Seaton 1987;
430: The Opacity Project Team 1995, 1997), the Iron Project (Pradhan et al. 1996; Hummer et al. 1993),
431: Kurucz (1995), and the Atomic Spectra Database at NIST Physical Laboratory being the principal sources.
432: Much of the Kurucz data was obtained directly from the Center for Astrophsyics (Kurucz 1988, 2002).
433: Individual sources of atomic data include the following: Bautista \& Pradhan (1997),
434: Becker \& Butler (1995), Butler et al. (1993), Fuhr et al. (1988), Kingdon \& Ferland (1996),
435: Luo \& Pradhan (1989), Luo et al. (1989), Mendoza (1983), Mendoza et al. (1995), Nahar (1995, 1996),
436: Nahar \& Pradhan (1996), Neufeld \& Dalgarno (1987), Nussbaumer \& Storey (1983, 1984),
437: Peach et al. (1988), Storey (1988), Tully et al. (1990), Wiese et al. (1966), Wiese et al.
438: (1969), Zhang \& Pradhan (1995, 1997).
439:
440: %References to the atomic data used in this work are given in Dessart \& Hillier (2005a).
441:
442: Dynamical simulations by Chevalier (1982) and C04 suggest that in the present
443: context a very steep density fall-off would prevail above the CDS, while the velocity would be
444: decreasing from the CDS outward into the shocked CS envelope.
445: Adopting a power-law density distribution
446: of the form $\rho(R)=\rho_0 (R_0/R)^n$, where $\rho_0$ and $R_0$ are, respectively, the density
447: and the radius at the optically-thick model base, we enforce a steep density fall off by taking a
448: density exponent $n$ equal to 10. Flatter density distributions, as in a wind solution with $n=2$,
449: yield optical line fluxes that are systematically stronger than observed. Steeper density
450: distributions lead to weaker line fluxes and/or absorption lines. With our current
451: approach and from extensive experimentation, we indeed find that the density distribution
452: at the photosphere has to be steep, in fact comparable to that used for the modeling of
453: Type II-P SNe.\footnote{Note that recombination to a neutral state may attenuate
454: the spectral dependence on the density distribution above the photosphere.}
455:
456: \begin{figure*}
457: % \epsfig{file=sn1994W_19940804_e1_v2_s2_10_Bs_INCOH.eps,width=5.5cm}
458: % \epsfig{file=sn1994W_19940804_e1_v2_s2_7_Bs2_INCOH_ebv0pt17.eps,width=5.5cm}
459: % \epsfig{file=sn1994W_19940804_e1_v2_s2_7_Bs2_INCOH_ebv0pt05.eps,width=5.5cm}
460: \epsfig{file=f1a.eps,width=5.5cm}
461: \epsfig{file=f1b.eps,width=5.5cm}
462: \epsfig{file=f1c.eps,width=5.5cm}
463: \caption{{\it Left:} Comparison between the reddened (E(B-V)=0.17\,mag) full (red) and continuum-only (blue)
464: synthetic spectrum and the observations of SN 1994W on the 4th of August 1994 (day 21; black).
465: The synthetic flux is scaled by a factor of 1.06 to adjust to the absolute level
466: of the observed flux.
467: The ejecta ionization predicted with our model parameters reproduces the slope of the SED
468: adequately, but it over-estimates the strength of He{\sc i}\,5875\,\AA\ and underestimates
469: the strength of Fe{\sc ii} lines. Note however the good fit to the Balmer lines.
470: {\it Middle:} Same as left, but now with a cooler model used to fit observations
471: on 1994 September 1 (see Fig.~\ref{fig_94W_0901}; we use a flux scaling of 0.93).
472: Note the bad fit to the SED slope, but the improved fit to observed line profiles.
473: {\it Right:} Same as middle, but using a reddening of 0.05 instead of 0.17.
474: Now, the fit to both the continuum and lines is good. What causes this combination
475: of blue continuum and lines of low-ionization species is unclear. Being short-lived,
476: it may be related to shocked material above the photosphere, rather than to large
477: changes in photospheric conditions.
478: Reducing the reddening is only a proxy for getting a good fit, for exploratory purposes,
479: to the data taken on this date.\label{fig_94W_0804}
480: }
481: \end{figure*}
482:
483: The transfer equation solver in CMFGEN
484: requires {\it monotonically} expanding ejecta. In SN ejecta, the steep density profile
485: tends to make the line and continuum formation quite confined in space, so the material
486: properties on a large scale tend to matter little compared to the properties in the
487: immediate vicinity of the photosphere. In our approach, we assume homologous expansion for
488: simplicity, and adjust the ejecta velocity to match the observed line profile widths.
489: Note that in the line transfer problem, it is the magnitude of the velocity gradient
490: at the photosphere, rather than its sign, that matters; (see Sobolev 1960, Castor et~al. 1975).
491: Obviously, this is a numerical convenience and we do not suggest that in reality the velocity increases linearly
492: with radius outwards, although it might. Later on, to test the dependence on the velocity gradient
493: at the photosphere, we try out different values for the exponent $\beta$ entering our parameterized velocity law,
494: i.e. $V(R) = V_0 (R/R_0)^{\beta}$, with $\beta$ varying from 1 (homologous expansion) to 0.2,
495: and 0.01 (near-constant velocity ejecta; here, $V_0$ is the model-base velocity).
496: % see Fig.~\ref{fig_comp_flux_beta}).
497: Moreover, to ensure the radiation is thermalized
498: at the inner boundary, we extend our grid inwards to a radius where the Rosseland optical depth is $\sim$100.
499: Finally, when comparing to observations, we first redden our synthetic spectra with the
500: Cardelli law (Cardelli et al. 1989), and then adjust the synthetic flux (at most by a few percent)
501: to get the desired overlap. This is a convenience, equivalent to a change in photospheric radius or distance
502: (scaling with the square root of that scaling factor), that saves us from re-running a model that would
503: otherwise have the same properties and spectrum (see discussion in Dessart \& Hillier 2005a).
504:
505: \section{Results}
506: \label{sect_results}
507:
508: We have performed a spectroscopic analysis of the data presented in SCL and C04 for the
509: observations taken on 1994 August 4 and 14 (Section \ref{sect_pre_peak}), September 1 and 9,
510: and October 1 and 11 (the last four dates are presented in
511: Section \ref{sect_post_peak}), which correspond to days 21, 31, 49, 57, 79, and 89 after the
512: 14th of July 1994 (we adopt that reference date for compatibility with SCL, who associate
513: it with the ``optical outburst'' of SN 1994W).
514:
515: These observations correspond to a phase of optical brightening
516: prior to day 30, followed by an 80-day long phase of slow optical fading
517: ($\Delta m \sim 1.5$\,mag), eventually followed by a sudden fading of the SN past day 110.
518: We omit from our sample the lower quality data obtained on day 18,
519: as well as the late time, nebular spectrum obtained on day 121.
520: Model parameters for each epoch are stored in Table~1, although we stress that the results
521: for days 21 and 31 are uncertain, and are given for completeness only.
522:
523: All observed spectra have been de-redshifted assuming a heliocentric velocity of 1249\,\kms (C04).
524: Using the Cardelli et al. (1989) law, we redden our synthetic spectra to match observations,
525: using $E(B-V)=$0.17\,mag, unless otherwise stated.
526: %This value agree with the estimate of SCL and C04, and is also supported by our detailed fits.
527: We also provide, as online material, the list of all lines
528: between 3200\,\AA\ and 10500\,\AA\ that contribute an equivalent width (approximate since
529: computed using the Sobolev approximation, and quoted merely to indicate the main contributors;
530: Sobolev 1960) of at least 1\,\AA\ (in absolute value).
531: Each line, in absorption, emission, or both, may appear as a single feature, or may overlap
532: with neighboring lines to yield a complicated feature.
533:
534: \begin{figure}
535: % \epsfig{file=sn1994W_19940814_e1_v2_s2_10_Bs_INCOH.eps,width=9cm}
536: % \epsfig{file=sn1994W_19940814_e1_v2_s2_7_Bs2_INCOH.eps,width=9cm}
537: \epsfig{file=f2a.eps,width=9cm}
538: \epsfig{file=f2b.eps,width=9cm}
539: \caption{{\it Top:} Comparison between the reddened (E(B-V)=0.17\,mag) full (red) and continuum-only (blue)
540: synthetic spectra for a hot model and the observations of SN 1994W on the 14th of August 1994 (day 31; black).
541: The synthetic flux is scaled by a factor of 1.37 to adjust to the absolute level
542: of the observed flux.
543: {\it Bottom:} Same as left, but now with the (cooler) model employed for the observations
544: of September 1 (we apply a flux scaling of 1.2).
545: Notice how the Mg{\sc ii}\,7877--7896\,\AA\ (He{\sc i}\,7065\,\AA) line is well fitted with
546: the cool (hot) model, but not both at the same time, suggesting two different sites/mechanisms
547: for the origin of these lines.
548: By contrast, the electron scattering wings are well reproduced in both models, despite
549: the ejecta ionization changes.
550: }\label{fig_94W_0814}
551: \end{figure}
552:
553: \subsection{Observations pre-peak optical brightness: Days 21 and 31\label{sect_pre_peak}}
554:
555: To highlight the spectroscopic peculiarities of SN 1994W, we first review the spectral evolution of Type II-P SNe
556: which are governed by ejecta cooling and the increased effects of metal line blanketing.
557: % at and above the photosphere.
558: The SED is blue during the first 10 days after shock breakout
559: % LUC: John, I am talking about II-P SN to make the contrast with IIn. Breakout is not really
560: % ambiguous for Type II-P SNe.
561: % John: {\bf 10 days relative to what. As we start at day 21 are you referring to earlier observations,
562: % and if so what's the ref. I would omit shock breakout as not classical SN.}
563: %or so after shock breakout,
564: and reddens dramatically as hydrogen recombines in the ejecta. Balmer lines are
565: the strongest lines at all times, initially accompanied by He{\sc i} lines
566: (5875\,\AA\ is the most conspicuous, but other optical He{\sc i} lines are present)
567: % that overlap, in particular, with Balmer lines),
568: and then by Fe{\sc ii} lines. These proceed in a monotonic sequence, so that He{\sc i} and Fe{\sc ii}
569: lines are not seen simultaneously.
570:
571: In Type IIn SNe, and by contrast with Type II-P SNe, such smooth and monotonic evolution does not systematically hold.
572: The spectrum of SN 1994W on day 21 shows the simultaneous presence of
573: both Fe{\sc ii} and He{\sc i} optical lines (with absorption and emission components),
574: in combination with a blue continuum.
575: To illustrate this peculiarity, we show in Fig.~\ref{fig_94W_0804} three different fits
576: to the observations of SN 1994W on day 21.
577: In the left panel, we use a ``hot model'' with the following properties:
578: $R_{\rm phot}=2.86 \times 10^{15}$\,cm, $V_{\rm phot}=$830\,\kms, $T_{\rm phot}=$10350\,K,
579: $\rho_{\rm phot} = 8.2 \times 10^{-15}$\,g\,cm$^{-3}$,
580: $N_{\rm e,phot} = 3.3 \times 10^9$\,cm$^{-3}$, and $L_{{\rm OBS},R_{\rm Max}}= 6.17 \times 10^9$\,\lsun.
581: (We have scaled the synthetic flux by a factor of 1.06.)
582: The model ejecta are relatively hot, nearly fully ionized (only helium is partially ionized
583: just above the photosphere). The observed shape of the SED
584: is approximately matched, but there are severe discrepancies. He{\sc i}\,5875\,\AA\
585: is too strong, both in the emission strength and width (note that using
586: a solar composition for hydrogen and helium reduces, but does not resolve, this discrepancy).
587: Numerous lines around 4500\,\AA\ (Ti{\sc ii} and Fe{\sc ii}),
588: as well as around 5200\,\AA\ (mostly Fe{\sc ii}), are strongly underestimated.
589: Balmer lines are underestimated in strength, but well fitted in width.
590: The absorption at $\sim$-800\,\kms\ from line center is also well reproduced.
591:
592: In the middle panel of Fig.~\ref{fig_94W_0804}, we show the fits to the same observations,
593: but using a cooler model ($T_{\rm phot}=$7480\,K; we have scaled the synthetic flux by a
594: factor of 0.93), the one that fits the observations of SN 1994W
595: on 1994 September 1 (see Table~1 for characteristics). The slope
596: of the synthetic SED is now in greater disagreement, but the ionization seems more adequate,
597: as we predict all the observed lines, merely shifted vertically due to a redder/weaker continuum.
598: As an experimentation, we reduced the reddening from 0.17 to 0.05, and, as evident in the right
599: panel of Fig.~\ref{fig_94W_0804}, the fits to both the continuum and the lines become excellent.
600: We do not support this reddening, as it is incompatible with past works (SCL, C04) and with the
601: modeling done for later dates, even within the uncertainties. But, this experimentation suggests
602: that two distinct regions contribute, one to form a blue nearly-featureless SED (as we do not see
603: high-ionization lines), and another to produce the lines from low-ionization species (Fe{\sc ii}).
604: This is a distinctive feature of SN 1994W, not seen in Type II-P SNe, and only visible
605: on this day and on day 31.
606:
607: On day 31, the optical spectroscopic observations of SN 1994W undergo a drastic and atypical
608: change, with the SED becoming bluer (C04 stress that this change is genuine, and not the result
609: of a poor relative flux calibration), the narrow lines of Fe{\sc ii} appearing weaker
610: at, e.g., 5018\,\AA\ and 5169\,\AA. We identify H{\sc i} Balmer lines, He{\sc i}\,5875\,\AA,
611: He{\sc i}\,6678\,\AA, and He{\sc i}\,7065\,\AA, and Mg{\sc ii}\,7877--7896\,\AA.
612: In the cool model (same as that used to model observations on the 1994 September 1)
613: shown in the bottom panel of Fig.~\ref{fig_94W_0814}, the Mg{\sc ii} lines and
614: He{\sc i}\,5875\,\AA\ are well reproduced, but He{\sc i}\,7065\,\AA\ is not. By contrast, in the hot model
615: (same as the hot model used on day 21 presented above) shown in the top panel, the reverse is true.
616:
617: Overall, our fits to these pre-peak brightness observations are very poor.
618: The apparent increase in ionization between days 21 and 31 is a unique feature
619: of SN 1994W, never quite seen in standard SN ejecta (of any type), which are governed
620: by the cooling associated with expansion, typically mitigated by the release of stored internal
621: energy. The non-monotonic SED evolution of SN 1994W between days 21 and 31,
622: and the simultaneous presence of lines suggestive of both
623: high and low ejecta temperatures point towards two distinct radiating regions (or material),
624: of distinct properties.
625:
626: As there are clear inconsistencies between our model and the observations on days 21 and 31,
627: the quoted model parameters do not accurately describe SN 1994W on these two dates.
628: It is possible, for example, that the photospheric radius and temperature derived for day 49
629: also apply at the earlier dates; the extra luminosity would then arise from an optically thin,
630: and more highly ionized, outer region.
631:
632: % {\bf Need to adjust the above slightly in view of the revised fits. Your explanation
633: % is obviously viable although I also wonder whether other effects such
634: % as sphericity, time dependence, the CDS becoming thicker at more wavelengths,
635: % could also contribute.}
636: %
637: % 6678.15 & 3.05 & He{\sc i}\,(1s3d$^1$D--1s2p$^1$P)\\
638: % 7065.25 & 5.11 & He{\sc i}\,(1s3s$^3$S--1s2p$^3$P)\\
639: % 7281.35 & 2.01 & He{\sc i}\,(1s3s$^1$S--1s2p$^1$P)\\
640: % 7877.05 & 3.40 & Mg{\sc ii}\,(4d$^2$D$_{3/2}$-4p$^2$P$_{1/2}$)\\
641: % 7896.04 & 1.22 & Mg{\sc ii}\,(4d$^2$D$_{3/2}$-4p$^2$P$_{3/2}$)\\
642: % 7896.37 & 4.29 & Mg{\sc ii}\,(4d$^2$D$_{5/2}$-4p$^2$P$_{3/2}$)\\
643: % 8234.64 & 1.25 & Mg{\sc ii}\,(5s$^2$S$_{1/2}$-4p$^2$P$_{3/2}$)\\
644: %
645:
646: \subsection{Observations post-peak optical brightness: days 49, 57, 79, and 89.\label{sect_post_peak}}
647:
648: \begin{figure}
649: % \epsfig{file=sn1994W_19940901_e1_v2_s2_7_Bs2_numes20_vt10.eps,width=8cm}
650: % \epsfig{file=sn1994W_19940901_e1_v2_s2_7_Bs2_INCOH.eps,width=9cm}
651: \epsfig{file=f3.eps,width=9cm}
652: \caption{Comparison between the reddened (E(B-V)=0.15\,mag) full (red) and continuum-only (blue)
653: synthetic spectra and the observations of SN 1994W on 1994 September 1 (day 49; black).
654: The synthetic flux is scaled by a factor of 0.87 to adjust to the absolute level
655: of the observed flux.
656: }
657: \label{fig_94W_0901}
658: \end{figure}
659:
660: \begin{figure}
661: % \epsfig{file=sn1994W_19940909_e1_v2_s2_5_B_0s1_numes20_vt10.eps,width=8cm}
662: % \epsfig{file=sn1994W_19940909_e1_v2_s2_5_B_0s1_INCOH.eps,width=9cm}
663: \epsfig{file=f4.eps,width=9cm}
664: \caption{Comparison between the reddened (E(B-V)=0.15\,mag; this is to reduce a slight discrepancy around
665: 4000-5000\,\AA) full (red) and continuum-only (blue)
666: synthetic spectra and the observations of SN 1994W on 1994 September 9 (day 57; black).
667: The synthetic flux is scaled by a factor of 1.02 to adjust to the absolute level
668: of the observed flux.
669: }
670: \label{fig_94W_0909}
671: \end{figure}
672:
673: \begin{figure}
674: % \epsfig{file=sn1994W_19941001_e1_v2_s2_12_0s1_numes20_vt10.eps,width=8cm}
675: % \epsfig{file=sn1994W_19941001_e1_v2_s2_12_0s1_INCOH.eps,width=9cm}
676: \epsfig{file=f5.eps,width=9cm}
677: \caption{Comparison between the reddened (E(B-V)=0.17\,mag) full (red) and continuum-only (blue)
678: synthetic spectra and the observations of SN 1994W on 1994 October 1 (day 79; black).
679: % The synthetic flux is scaled by a factor of 1.0 to adjust to the absolute level
680: % of the observed flux.
681: }
682: \label{fig_94W_1001}
683: \end{figure}
684:
685: \begin{figure}
686: % \epsfig{file=sn1994W_19941011_e1_v2_s2_12_0s_numes20_vt10.eps,width=8cm}
687: % \epsfig{file=sn1994W_19941011_e1_v2_s2_12_0s_INCOH.eps,width=9cm}
688: \epsfig{file=f6.eps,width=9cm}
689: \caption{Comparison between the reddened (E(B-V)=0.17\,mag) full (red) and continuum-only (blue)
690: synthetic spectra and the observations of SN 1994W on 1994 October 11 (day 89; black).
691: The synthetic flux is scaled by a factor of 0.87 to adjust to the absolute level
692: of the observed flux.
693: }
694: \label{fig_94W_1011}
695: \end{figure}
696:
697: From day 49 onwards, the visual brightness of SN 1994W decreases slowly, from $\sim$13.5
698: on that day down to $\sim$15 on day 110 (SCL). Over that time, the observed spectral evolution
699: is smooth and slow, analogous to
700: that of Type II-P SNe during the plateau phase, and our fits are satisfactory.
701: We present synthetic fits to observations in Fig.~\ref{fig_94W_0901} for day 49,
702: in Fig.~\ref{fig_94W_0909} for day 57, in Fig.~\ref{fig_94W_1001} for day 79,
703: and in Fig.~\ref{fig_94W_1011} for day 89. We also give the corresponding
704: model parameters in Table~1.
705: These spectra are dominated by lines of low-ionization species, such as H{\sc i}, Fe{\sc ii},
706: Na{\sc i}, Ca{\sc ii}, Mg{\sc ii}, with He{\sc i}\,5875\,\AA\ disappearing after day 59
707: (see tables provided as online material for a complete census of all contributing lines).
708: Observations and our synthetic SED now agree well, suggesting both lines and continuum form
709: in the same region of space, i.e., under similar conditions of density and temperature.
710: %, and velocity.
711: As on days 21 and 31, Balmer lines continue to show conspicuous
712: narrow line cores with extended wings. Our fits to the line cores tend to be underestimated
713: (by up to a factor of two on day 89), but we can reproduce well the strength and width of the profile wings.
714: These profile wings stem from multiple electron-scattering events of photons originally
715: trapped in the line core, a phenomenon, in our approach, which occurs in the photospheric
716: region (see \S\ref{sect_es}). We also predict the absorption dip at $\sim$-700\,\kms, coincident
717: for all lines within $\pm$100\,\kms. This latter feature is also associated here with absorption
718: internal to the photospheric region. We go back to these two intriguing characteristics
719: in \S\ref{sect_es}. The underestimate of the narrow line H$\alpha$ flux
720: could be due to the neglect of time dependent effects (Dessart \& Hillier 2008),
721: or might be due to a change in the density distribution within the SN envelope
722: (as characterized by the exponent $n$).
723:
724: In the top panel of Figs.~\ref{fig_94W_line1}--\ref{fig_94W_line3}, we reproduce the fit shown
725: in Fig.~\ref{fig_94W_1001} but this time zooming in on the 3100--4800\,\AA\ region
726: (Fig.~\ref{fig_94W_line1}), the 4800 to 6800\,\AA\ region (Fig.~\ref{fig_94W_line2}), and the
727: 6800 to 9800\,\AA\ region (Fig.~\ref{fig_94W_line3}). Moreover, in the bottom panels, we
728: present the contributions of individual species by plotting the rectified synthetic spectra
729: obtained by accounting for bound-bound transitions of individual species, labeled at right.
730: At such a late time, besides Balmer and a few isolated Mg{\sc ii}, Na{\sc i}, Si{\sc ii}, and
731: Ca{\sc ii} lines, we note the presence of a forest of Fe{\sc ii} and Ti{\sc ii} lines
732: blueward of $\sim$4500\,\AA. The strengthening contribution of line emission and
733: absorption is also evident in Figs.~\ref{fig_94W_0901}--\ref{fig_94W_1011}, where the
734: blue curve describing the continuum SED departs more and more with time from the
735: red curve including all absorption and emission processes, the more so at shorter wavelengths.
736: This makes the continuum level difficult to assess, and the comparison with a blackbody
737: increasingly inadequate. This complication should be kept in mind when using blackbody
738: arguments.
739:
740: %
741: % These ladder plots are based on model e1_v2_s2_12_0s1_numes20_vt10
742: %
743: \begin{figure}
744: % \epsfig{file=sn1994W_19941001_line1.eps,width=9cm}
745: \epsfig{file=f7.eps,width=9cm}
746: \caption{
747: {\it Top:} Comparison between the reddened (E(B-V)=0.17\,mag) synthetic spectrum (red) and
748: the observations of SN 1994W on 1994 October 1 (day 79; black), between 3100 and 4800\,\AA.
749: {\it Bottom:} Rectified synthetic spectra for the model shown at top, but including bound-bound
750: transitions only of the individual species labeled on the right.
751: }
752: \label{fig_94W_line1}
753: \end{figure}
754:
755: \begin{figure}
756: % \epsfig{file=sn1994W_19941001_line2.eps,width=9cm}
757: \epsfig{file=f8.eps,width=9cm}
758: \caption{
759: Same as Fig.~\ref{fig_94W_line1}, but for the range 4800 to 6800\,\AA.
760: \label{fig_94W_line2}
761: }
762: \end{figure}
763:
764: \begin{figure}
765: % \epsfig{file=sn1994W_19941001_line3.eps,width=9cm}
766: \epsfig{file=f9.eps,width=9cm}
767: \caption{
768: Same as Fig.~\ref{fig_94W_line1}, but for the range 6800 to 9800\,\AA.
769: \label{fig_94W_line3}
770: }
771: \end{figure}
772:
773: Over this period from day 49 to 89, which covers the visual fading of the SN by $\sim$1.3\,mag,
774: we find a modest reduction in the photospheric temperature, of $\sim$1400\,K ($\sles$20\%), but a
775: large reduction in the photospheric radius, by $\sim$2$\times$10$^{15}$\,cm (a factor of 2 reduction
776: compared to the value on day 49). In the observer's frame and over these 40 days,
777: this corresponds to a motion of the photosphere inward at an average velocity of $\sim$6000\,\kms.
778: This is analogous to the reduction in the photospheric radius at the end of the plateau phase of Type II-P
779: SNe, in which an ejecta extending out to a few times 10$^{15}$\,cm becomes entirely optically-thin in
780: just $\sim$2 weeks. Heuristically, the photometric fading and the strongly correlated $B$ and $V$ magnitudes
781: support a reduction in the photospheric radius and a fairly constant photospheric temperature, respectively.
782:
783: The dynamics of the CDS is that of linear expansion with time (C04). Our findings suggest that
784: the photosphere does not track the CDS, otherwise this linear expansion in time
785: at near constant photospheric temperature would correspond to a phase of
786: brightening. We instead observe a fading of the SN over that period. C04 associate the broad wings with
787: the CDS deducing an expansion velocity of 4000\,\kms. Over 100 days, the CDS would expand by
788: $\sim$3.5$\times$10$^{15}$\,cm, compared to our inferred reduction in $R_{\rm phot}$ of
789: $\sim$2$\times$10$^{15}$\,cm .
790: % However, we deduce a photosphere velocity of only 800\,\kms.
791: % With that expansion speed the photosphere would change by only $\sim$7$\times$10$^{14}$ cm,
792: % giving rise to a much smaller change in the radius of the CDS.
793:
794:
795: %So while the CDS is likely optically thick up to the epoch of peak brightness, the
796: %brightness decline is consistent with the thinning of the CDS and the recession of
797: %the photosphere into the SN ejecta during the SN fading phase. At later times, the photosphere
798: %resides in the SN ejecta rather than in the pre-SN ejected material.
799:
800: Our models suggest that as time progresses, the photosphere recedes to deeper and deeper layers in a
801: cold shell --- probably the SN ejecta (or more generally the inner shell) but possibly also associated
802: with the CDS initially. We surmise that, as time goes on, the emitting material radiates and expands
803: sufficiently to cause ejecta cooling and recombination. The photosphere is completely slaved to the
804: layer of ionized material above which free electrons are too scarce to provide any sizable optical
805: depth.
806: % (this layer {\it is} the photosphere).
807: Lines, which form above the photosphere, tend also to track this region of high density
808: and high ionization, in particular those that form primarily through recombination, e.g. Balmer lines.
809: Since the ejecta are hydrogen-rich,
810: this occurs at a temperature of $\sim$7000\,K, and that temperature is essentially fixed.
811: With further cooling, it is not the temperature of the photosphere but instead the radius of the
812: photosphere that adjusts, shrinking to deeper layers.
813:
814: This process has already been identified as the primary cause for the plateau phase of Type II-P SNe:
815: the photospheric temperature remains fixed at $\sim$7000\,K, with a recession in mass coordinate of the
816: photosphere, compensated in this case by the fast expansion of the ejecta so that the photospheric
817: radius remains roughly constant during that phase (see Fig.~16 in Dessart et al. 2008).
818: The end of the plateau phase and the fast drop into the nebular phase will correspond to the time
819: when the inward-traveling photosphere no longer sustains a high enough density and ionization to
820: remain optically thick. In other words, the end of the plateau phase would not correspond to the
821: time when the CDS reaches the outer edge of the outer shell (C04), but to the time when the
822: photosphere eventually reaches the cold, fully-recombined, inner layers of the SN ejecta/inner-shell.
823:
824: Since the CDS seems to be optically thin after the epoch of peak-brightness, it cannot obscure
825: the SN ejecta buried at depth. The absence of broad SN-like spectral features may then result
826: from the ejecta deceleration by the reverse shock. Some deceleration is expected if conversion
827: of kinetic energy into internal energy is to power the SN brightness, but the exact circumstances
828: that cause the absence of ejecta material with velocity at the photosphere greater than $\sim$800\,\kms
829: at all times are unclear. Even at day 121, in the nebular phase, the expansion velocities indicated
830: by H$\alpha$ are consistent with an expansion of $\sim$800\,\kms (C04). This is consistent with the idea
831: that we are observing a shell of material moving with near constant velocity, but which is now in
832: the nebular phase.
833:
834: %State later
835: %This will be the subject for future radiation-hydrodynamics studies of Type IIn SNe.
836:
837: % This interpretation may have broader implications.
838: % In an helium-rich environment (Type Ib SN), the same would occur, but at the
839: % helium-recombination temperature of $\sgreat$10000\,K,
840: % leading to an SED that would appear much bluer, as is observed in the Type Ibn SN 2006jc.
841: % By contrast, in ejecta where carbon and oxygen dominate (with hydrogen and helium underabundant)
842: % the recombination temperature would again be closer to $\sim$7000\,K since these species
843: % have a similar ionization potential of their neutral state as H{\sc i}, i.e. $\sim$15\,eV,
844: % while He{\sc i} is $\sim$25\,eV. This is an intriguing property that requires further thought, but it
845: % naturally arises from the fact that electron-scattering is a fundamental source of continuum
846: % opacity in SN ejecta.
847:
848:
849: \section{Discussion of line profile formation and the electron scattering wings}
850: \label{sect_es}
851:
852: \subsection{Observational aspects}
853:
854: The distinctive feature of Type IIn SNe is the presence of narrow, and usually symmetric,
855: line cores at all times. In some cases, as for SN 1994W, these are accompanied by broad, and relatively
856: symmetric line wings, giving the overall line profile a triangular shape (see Fig.~\ref{fig_94W_ha_hb}).
857: These are in stark contrast with the broad and P-Cygni profiles, observed in Type Ia/b/c and Type II-P SNe,
858: associated with optically-thick line formation in an
859: expanding medium. As shown in the preceding sections, our modeling approach allows us to
860: reproduce this hybrid morphology of a narrow line core and extended line wings, as illustrated more
861: clearly in our fit to the H$\alpha$ line profile on 1994 September 1 (Fig.~\ref{fig_CMFGEN_obs_Halpha}).
862:
863: \begin{figure*}
864: % \epsfig{file=hbeta_obs.ps,width=8cm}
865: % \epsfig{file=halpha_obs.ps,width=8cm}
866: \epsfig{file=f10a.eps,width=8cm}
867: \epsfig{file=f10b.eps,width=8cm}
868: \caption{
869: Montage of the evolution (a label gives the date) of the observed H$\beta$ ({\it left})
870: and H$\alpha$ ({\it right}) line profiles versus Doppler velocity (we correct for a redshift of
871: 1249\,km\,s$^{-1}$)
872: for SN 1994W (the spectra are normalized to unity at +2000\,km\,s$^{-1}$ and shifted
873: vertically for visibility). Note the extended wings of the narrow-peak Balmer line profiles,
874: with a blue-wing emission contribution that decays with time, by contrast with
875: the strengthening of the red contribution.
876: Note also the velocity blueshift of the emission peak at early times (see Dessart \& Hillier 2005a
877: for a physical interpretation), as well as the near-constancy of the velocity location of maximum absorption.
878: \label{fig_94W_ha_hb}
879: }
880: \end{figure*}
881:
882: In Type IIn's, the narrow line core has been interpreted as line emission from a slowly expanding
883: region. C04 argue that the lack of SN features in the optical spectrum of SN 1994W is in support
884: of the presence of an {\it optically-thick} CDS, whose velocity is on the order of $\sim$4000\,\kms.
885: The narrow line core flux then stems from the region between the CDS and the outer slowly
886: moving circumstellar shell. The broad wings, according to C04, may stem from various mechanisms/regions.
887: Turbulent, clumpy, and fast moving material above the CDS and underneath the outer shell may contribute.
888: Radiation-driving may also cause some acceleration of the material just above the CDS, which could
889: then be the origin of some line broadening.
890:
891: C04 also argue for multiple scattering of line photons by electrons in
892: an optically-thick CS envelope. Such non-coherent electron scatterings redistribute
893: line photons in frequency space, and if multiple, can cause a spreading of the line core flux (see below).
894: Because multiple-scattering of line photons occurs when the electron-scattering optical depth is large,
895: %at the line photon production site,
896: the presence of such wings has been associated with the presence of an external optically-thick CS envelope.
897: The decrease of the strength of these wings as time progresses (Fig.~\ref{fig_94W_ha_hb}) would then follow
898: from the decrease in the shell thickness above the outward-migrating CDS.\footnote{
899: Note that as the optically-thick radiating layer migrates outward,
900: the optical-thickness of that external shell above it should decrease and
901: eventually vanish. By contrast, line profiles always show narrow line cores
902: and broad line wings, over the 80-day period covering the bright phase of the
903: supernova.}
904:
905: Insights into the source of electron scattering can be provided by studying different H
906: lines. For example, a test for the presence of a shell external to the line formation region is that
907: the strength of the electron scattering wings should be directly proportional to the line
908: flux. Indeed, given the electron scattering optical-depth of the external shell, the number of line
909: photons that end up in the electron-scattering wings of each line should scale with the
910: number of line photons injected at the base of this optically-thick layer.
911: In the {\it top-left} panel of Fig.~\ref{fig_CMFGEN_Balmer_model_obs}, we show the
912: observed (rectified and scaled) Balmer line profiles on 1994 September 1.
913: Having normalized each peak line flux to unity, it is apparent that the flux in the profile wings
914: increases as we progress up the Balmer series, although for H$\delta$ the rectification may be somewhat
915: in error (there is a background of overlapping lines contributing in the H$\delta$ region).
916: This argues against an external shell as the sole source of electron scattering. However, the observed
917: behavior can be explained if the regions of line formation and electron scattering overlap.
918:
919: In the {\it top-right} panel, we show the corresponding synthetic Balmer line profiles produced
920: with the models described in the previous section. These exhibit
921: the same correlation as the observed profiles --- the wings extend $\sim$3000\,\kms away
922: from line center, even for the weaker lines in the series, and are strongest for the higher series members.
923: Hence, we do not identify a clear (linear) flux correlation between line core and line wing.
924: By contrast, we find that the synthetic line wing strength scales with the electron-scattering
925: optical depth in the formation region of the corresponding line. In Fig.~\ref{fig_ep_tau_hi},
926: we plot for Balmer lines (black; the thickness of the line distinguishes the transition)
927: the variation of the quantity $\zeta(R)$ (which corresponds to the emission interior to $R$
928: in the line through the integral $\int_{R_0}^{R} \zeta(R') d \log R'$)
929: with respect to the electron-scattering optical depth
930: integrated inwards from the outer grid radius.
931: The relatively weak (strong) line wings of H$\alpha$ (H$\beta$)
932: correlate with the relatively low (high) electron-scattering
933: optical depth in the formation region of the line. In this plot, the situation is most
934: severe for H$\gamma$, which forms deepest. Hence, despite the large H$\alpha$ flux, the wing flux in both
935: the blue and the red is relatively weaker than in the other lines.
936:
937: For completeness, we have also included in the bottom panels the predictions for the Paschen and
938: Brackett series. The enhanced scattered flux for high series members is also seen in the Paschen series,
939: but is not so obvious in the Brackett series. This is a key result --- Br$\alpha$ has a higher
940: optical depth and forms further out in the envelope than does H$\alpha$, and thus exhibits much
941: less obvious electron scattering wings. Observations of Paschen and Brackett lines would help provide
942: key information as to the nature of the broad wings. If the layer is external the fraction of flux
943: in the line wings relative to the line core will be similar for the Balmer and Brackett series,
944: whereas if the electron scattering layer overlaps the line formation region the fraction of line
945: flux in the line wings will be greatest for the Balmer series. In addition, if a significant fraction
946: of the broad wings arise from intrinsic emission by a fast moving shell/envelope, one would anticipate
947: that the broad wings should be easily discernible in Br$\alpha$.
948:
949: %This trend is also present, although weaker, for members of the
950: %Paschen and Brackett series, for which we show synthetic line profiles in
951: %Fig.~\ref{fig_CMFGEN_Balmer_model_obs} ({\it bottom left} and {\it bottom right} panels, respectively)
952: %and sites of emission in Fig.~\ref{fig_ep_tau_hi} (red and blue lines, respectively).
953:
954: To conclude, we find that the strength of the Balmer line profile wings correlates
955: with the electron-scattering optical depth in the corresponding line formation region,
956: the lines forming at greater depths having relatively stronger flux in their wings.
957: In our approach, the broad line wings are thus formed within the photosphere rather than caused by
958: an external optically-thick shell.\footnote{Another effect could have arisen from
959: the alternate decay channels into transitions that have a lower optical depth.
960: For H$\alpha$, there is no alternate decay route for the upper state but to go into $n=2$.
961: An H$\beta$ photon can yield a couple of P$\alpha$-H$\alpha$ photons. For H$\gamma$, there are more
962: options with P$\beta$-H$\alpha$, Br$\alpha$-H$\beta$, or Br$\alpha$-P$\alpha$-H$\alpha$.
963: The potential escape allowed through non-coherent electron-scattering for H$\alpha$ could thus be more
964: important compared to higher transitions that have alternate decay routes. If this effect prevailed,
965: the flux in the electron-scattering wings of H$\alpha$ would be stronger relative to higher transitions
966: in the series, and this is not supported by observations.} In addition, and unlike C04,
967: we find no need for an extra emission source to contribute to the strength of the broad wings.
968:
969: \begin{figure}
970: % \epsfig{file=e1_v2_s2_7_Bs2_flux_vel_halpha.ps,width=8cm}
971: \epsfig{file=f11.eps,width=8cm}
972: \caption{
973: Comparison between the observed (black) and synthetic (red) H$\alpha$ line profile
974: for 1994 September 1 (see also Fig.~\ref{fig_94W_0901}).
975: Our model of a single formation region for the continuum and lines
976: reproduces the presence both of a narrow line core (somewhat underestimated)
977: and broad line wings. Numerous line profiles in the spectrum of SN 1994W share this morphology.
978: % With a photospheric velocity of only $\sim$800\,\kms,
979: % these wings, extending out to beyond $\pm$3000\,\kms arise primarily from
980: % the frequency redistribution occasioned by multiple scattering of H$\alpha$ line photons
981: % by free electrons located, in our approach, {\it in the photosphere region}
982: % (the effect operates, but with a variable magnitude, for all lines and is well captured
983: % by our simulations).
984: % Because of expansion, a redistribution to longer wavelengths further stretches the
985: % H$\alpha$ line profile to the red.
986: To illustrate the stronger red wing flux, we mirror the red part of the
987: H$\alpha$ profile and draw it in blue on the blue side.
988: \label{fig_CMFGEN_obs_Halpha}
989: }
990: \end{figure}
991:
992: \begin{figure*}
993: % \epsfig{file=flux_core_wing_obs.ps,width=8cm}
994: % \epsfig{file=flux_core_wing_Balmer_model.ps,width=8cm}
995: % \epsfig{file=flux_core_wing_Paschen_model.ps,width=8cm}
996: % \epsfig{file=flux_core_wing_Brackett_model.ps,width=8cm}
997: \epsfig{file=f12a.eps,width=8cm}
998: \epsfig{file=f12b.eps,width=8cm}
999: \epsfig{file=f12c.eps,width=8cm}
1000: \epsfig{file=f12d.eps,width=8cm}
1001: \caption{{\it Top:} Observed ({\it left}) and theoretical ({\it right})
1002: Balmer line profiles versus Doppler velocity
1003: for the first four terms of the series ($\alpha$:black; $\beta$: red; $\gamma$: blue; $\delta$: green).
1004: For a better comparison, we use the same ordinate range for all panels.
1005: We also rectify the spectra and normalize to the peak flux for the corresponding line.
1006: {\it Bottom:} Same as {\it top right}, but this time for the
1007: Paschen ({\it bottom left}) and Brackett ({\it bottom right}) series.
1008: For this illustration, we use the model for the observations of SN 1994W on 1994 September
1009: 1, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig_94W_0901}, but include only the bound-bound transitions of
1010: hydrogen (among the first 30 atomic levels).
1011: Note how the flux in the line-profile wings gets relatively stronger compared to the peak value
1012: as we move up the Balmer series, from H$\alpha$ to H$\delta$. We find that electron scattering wings
1013: are stronger for lines that form at higher optical depth (see Fig.~\ref{fig_ep_tau_hi}).
1014: If the profile wings were due to an {\it external} scattering layer, the flux in the profile wings
1015: would instead scale linearly with the line flux. Note that the blueshifted absorption at $\sim$-3000\,\kms
1016: of Br$\alpha$ and at $\sim$-2000\,\kms of Br$\beta$ (right panel) are due to H{\sc i}\,4.0198\,$\mu$m and
1017: H{\sc i}\,2.6119\,$\mu$m, respectively.\label{fig_CMFGEN_Balmer_model_obs}
1018: }
1019: \end{figure*}
1020:
1021: %As in C04, multiple electron-sattering is the cause for the broad line wings on otherwise
1022: %narrow line cores in observed spectra of SN 1994W, but, in our view, these scatterings are now
1023: %internal, rather than external, to the photosphere.
1024: % Free electrons can cause frequency redistribution:
1025: % 1) Because of expansion (either linear with radius or constant), electron-scattering introduces a systematic
1026: % redshift of line photons in the observer's frame.
1027: % This is both observed and predicted, with electron-scattering
1028: % red wings that are systematically stronger than the blue component (the non-coherent frequency
1029: % redistribution by thermal electrons operates equally to the blue and to the red of line center, while
1030: % expansion causes only a redshift of line photons).
1031: % What is causing such large line wing flux in our models originates from the effect free electrons
1032: % have on line photons. Typically,
1033:
1034: \subsection{Electron scattering theory}
1035:
1036: In expanding media, electron-scattering introduces a systematic redshift of line photons
1037: in the observer's frame. This is particularly evident in strong spectral lines observed in
1038: SNe and hot star spectra. However, to the steep density fall-off in SN ejecta corresponds
1039: a steep drop-off in the electron-scattering optical depth, so that generally only a little
1040: velocity contrast exists between the emission site of a line photon and the location where
1041: it is scattered by a free-electron. Free streaming of such line photons prevails soon above
1042: the photosphere. The extent of the red-wing electron-scattering in SN spectral lines is
1043: therefore modest, at least in comparison with what is seen in hot star winds and their
1044: characteristic $1/R^2$ density distribution.
1045:
1046: A second effect, present even in a medium that is globally at rest, is caused by the relatively
1047: large thermal velocity ($V_{\rm th,e}= 550 \sqrt{T/10^4}$\,\kms) of free electrons, even
1048: at moderate temperatures.
1049: % i.e., $V_{\rm th,e} = 550 \sqrt{T_4}$\,\kms.
1050: % where $T_4$ is $T/10^4$\,K.
1051: %
1052: %sqrt(2.0D0 * 1.38D-16 * 1.D4 /9.109389D-28) * sqrt(0.75)
1053: %
1054: Scattering with free electrons will lead to appreciable Doppler shifts of line photons relative
1055: to the narrow intrinsic width of the line which is typically a few \kms (for an ion with atomic
1056: weight $A$, $V_{\rm Dop}=12 (T/A10^4)$\,\kms).
1057: %the scaling is $\sqrt{m_e/Am_u}$, where $m_e$ is the mass of the electron and $m_u$ is the atomic mass unit).
1058: Upon scattering out of the line core, the photon may be redistributed in frequency into the line wing
1059: where the line optical depth is lower, and thus escape entirely from the line. It is then subject
1060: to the electron-scattering opacity which prevents it from free-streaming to infinity; the photon
1061: may experience multiple scatterings with free electrons (with blueshifts/redshifts) before escaping.
1062: The frequency shifts may add or cancel but the cumulative statistical effect will be to lead
1063: to an appreciable flux at many electron Doppler widths from line center, the more so for larger
1064: electron-scattering optical depth at the emission site of the photon.
1065:
1066: In fast moving SN ejecta, thermal motions are small relative to the expansion velocity; thus the influence
1067: on the observed line profiles of incoherent scattering due to the electron thermal motions is small.
1068: However, in slower moving SN ejecta the frequency shifts due to the thermal motions of the electrons
1069: dominate over that due to expansion, and strong red and blue wings are observed. Lines forming deeper
1070: in the photosphere, at higher electron-scattering optical depth, show the strongest wing to peak flux
1071: ratio, as observed. Here, these numerous electron-scattering events occur internally to the photosphere,
1072: rather than in an outer optically-thick shell.
1073:
1074: %Because the incoherent scattering is due to the thermal motions of the electrons, the frequency
1075: %shifts are much larger than the steep density fall off is not important, and the
1076:
1077: In our SN models for SN 1994W, two important effects were observed --- the profile shape, and
1078: to a lesser extent the equivalent width (EW), were strongly dependent on the number of electron scattering iterations
1079: that were performed. To understand this finding we first need to explain the computational procedure
1080: used to compute the line profiles.
1081:
1082: To compute the line profiles we first solve for the atmospheric structure and level populations.
1083: These are then used by a separate program, CMF\_FLUX (Busche \& Hillier 2005), to compute the
1084: observed spectrum. For the first iteration, coherent scattering in the comoving frame is assumed.
1085: This assumption ``conserves'' scattered line photons and allows for redistribution effects due
1086: to the expansion of the SN envelope. Using the newly computed mean intensity J we now allow for
1087: the effects of frequency redistribution by electron scattering using the technique of
1088: Rybicki \& Hummer (1994), and recompute the mean intensity
1089: in the comoving frame. To allow for the effects multiple scattering has on the frequency redistribution
1090: of line photons, it is necessary to iterate. For fast moving SNe, two iterations is generally sufficient,
1091: but for the slow moving SNe, we sometimes had to perform 10 to 20 iterations to get converged line profiles.
1092: For accurate calculations the same Doppler width should be used for both the line-source function and
1093: the line profile calculations. However, for normal SNe changes in the adopted Doppler width have only
1094: a minor (and well understood) effect on the line profile.
1095:
1096: %Electron scattering plays a critical role in the ionized ejecta of all SNe. However, it has
1097: %such a critical impact on line profiles only for slow moving (or near-constant velocity) photospheres,
1098: %as in the Type IIn SN 1994W.
1099:
1100: To further assist in understanding the observed behavior we also need to consider the relevant scales
1101: for both line formation and electron scattering. Since we have a power law density distribution,
1102: with exponent $n$, the characteristic length scale for electron scattering is $\sim R/(n-1)$.
1103: A characteristic scale over which a photon interacts with a line in an expanding medium is the
1104: Sobolev length (Sobolev 1960) defined by
1105: \begin{equation}
1106: L_{\rm SOB} = V_{\rm th, eff}/|dV/dR|,
1107: \end{equation}
1108: where
1109: \begin{equation}
1110: V_{\rm th, eff} = \sqrt{ V_{\rm th,i}^2 + V_{\rm turb}^2}
1111: \end{equation}
1112: is the effective ion thermal velocity, $V_{\rm th,i}$ is the ion thermal velocity, and $V_{\rm turb}$
1113: is a microturbulent velocity that accounts for small-scale turbulent motions. The Sobolev length gives
1114: the radial scale over which the velocity changes by $V_{\rm th, eff}$. In other words, it is the approximate
1115: size of the resonance zone in which a photon is trapped in a line. In our simulations, we typically
1116: adopt $V_{\rm turb}=$50\,\kms, which spreads the line over a broader frequency range than that given by
1117: its intrinsic width of a few \kms.
1118:
1119: In the SN context, we have $L_{\rm SOB}/R_{\rm phot} \approx V_{\rm th, eff}/\beta V_{\rm phot}$.
1120: The Sobolev length may thus vary through changes in the velocity gradient (controlled by the parameter
1121: $\beta$) or in the ejecta velocity (controlled by $V_{\rm phot}$)\footnote{The Sobolev length, in general,
1122: varies with direction of photon travel, and for photons traveling perpendicular to the radius vector
1123: it is always $R V_{\rm th, eff} / V$, independent of the velocity gradient. For simplicity
1124: we retain the formulation above but stress that the average Sobolev length has a much weaker dependence
1125: on $\beta$ than does the radial Sobolev length.}. In the Type II-P SN 1999em after a few weeks,
1126: $V_{\rm phot}$ is on the order of $\sim$4000\,\kms, compared to $\sim$800\,\kms in SN 1994W.
1127: Normalized to $R_{\rm phot}$ and assuming homologous expansion ($\beta=$1), $L_{\rm SOB}$ is five times
1128: larger in SN 1994W compared to SN 1999em.
1129:
1130: %Line photons have thus a harder time escaping from a given optically-thick line in SN IIn photospheres.
1131:
1132: For SN1994W, $L_{\rm SOB}/R_{\rm phot}$=50/800$=$1/16 which is only slightly smaller than the
1133: electron scattering scale length. As this path length is comparable to the electron scattering scale height,
1134: there is a significant probability that a photon will be scattered by an electron within the resonance zone.
1135: Further, this can facilitate the escape of line photons as the scattering can effectively ``shift'' the photon
1136: out of the resonance zone by altering its frequency. As we increase $L_{\rm SOB}$, and assuming a fixed line
1137: source function, more photons will be incoherently scattered by electrons in the resonance zone. As most of
1138: these photons would normally be destroyed, more photons will escape and the line EW will increase.
1139: Moreover, since these photons can be subsequently scattered elsewhere, it is necessary to run many iterations
1140: to follow their redistribution in frequency space. Because the line EW depends on the adopted Doppler width
1141: (and hence Sobolev length) the line source function should be computed using the same Doppler
1142: width.\footnote{All synthetic spectra shown here are computed with a value of 10\,\kms for the turbulent velocity.
1143: Note that to limit the computation time, this choice only applies when computing the emergent spectrum
1144: from a formal solution of the transfer equation. When solving for the full radiation transport problem
1145: including level populations, we assume a turbulent velocity of 50\,\kms, and generally assume that
1146: electron-scattering is coherent in the comoving-frame (i.e., we ignore redistribution effects due to
1147: the thermal motions of the electrons), so as to allow the linearization of the electron-scattering source
1148: function (see Hillier \& Miller 1998 for details).
1149: Tests we performed show that there is a weak sensitivity of the level populations and
1150: the emergent radiation field to variations in the turbulent velocity from 10 to 50\,\kms -- the choice
1151: of 50\,\kms minimizes computational effort and is numerically advantageous.}
1152:
1153: A critical characteristic of Type IIn SNe compared with more normal Type II SNe is their small photospheric
1154: velocity, which leads to both a larger Sobolev length, and a larger ratio of $V_{\rm th,eff}/V_{\rm phot}$.
1155: Both effects facilitate the appearance of broad wings. The larger Sobolev length facilitates the escape
1156: of line photons by electron scattering,
1157: even from locations where line photons might not normally escape, and potentially at
1158: depths where the electron scattering optical depth is still significant. The larger ratio
1159: $V_{\rm th,eff}/V_{\rm phot}$ makes the incoherent wings due to the thermal motions of the
1160: electrons more apparent relative to the observed line width as set by the SN expansion velocity.
1161:
1162: We now illustrate these two effects. In Fig.~\ref{fig_comp_vcore}, we show a comparison between
1163: synthetic H$\alpha$ line profiles obtained with the model used to fit observations on 1994 October 11,
1164: but differing in the adopted values of the base velocity $V_0$ (the ratio $V_{\rm phot}/V_0$ is the same
1165: in all models; $\beta=1$ in all cases). Increasing $V_0$ yields broader line cores, the red wing becomes
1166: stronger than the blue wing, and the profile looks increasingly asymmetric. Hence, by merely decreasing
1167: $V_0$ from 1500\,\kms to 150\,\kms, we go from a broad P-Cygni profile typical for a Type II-P SN to a
1168: symmetric line profile with a narrow line core and broad wings typical for a Type IIn SN.
1169:
1170: In Fig.~\ref{fig_comp_flux_beta}, we show models with different
1171: velocity distributions but varying the exponent $\beta$ entering the velocity law.
1172: Recall that reducing $\beta$ first reduces the maximum velocity, but it also increases the Sobolev
1173: length. Hence, by reducing $\beta$ one can reduce the redistribution of line photons to the red associated
1174: with expansion, and increase the importance of electron scattering as a means of escape for line photons.
1175: All three models shown in Fig.~\ref{fig_comp_flux_beta}
1176: yield a quasi-symmetric profile that extends from line center out to $\pm$3000\,\kms, although the
1177: maximum expansion velocity in the ejecta varies from 4000, to 1364, and 1123\,\kms, as we
1178: reduce $\beta$ from 1, to 0.2, and 0.01, respectively.
1179: Non-coherent electron scattering is thus the primary line
1180: broadening mechanism, so that, paradoxically, the broad line wings testify for slow rather than fast
1181: expansion. For smaller $\beta$, the blue-wing emission strengthens and arises exclusively from
1182: redistribution to the blue of photons in the line core. This occurs at the expense of the line core flux,
1183: which indeed decreases correspondingly.
1184:
1185: \begin{figure}
1186: % \epsfig{file=ep_hi_lines.ps,width=8cm}
1187: \epsfig{file=f13.eps,width=8cm}
1188: \caption{Variation of the emission $\zeta$ (Hillier 1987) versus the Log of the electron-scattering optical
1189: depth for Balmer (black; scaling of unity), Paschen (red; scaling of 2/3), and
1190: Brackett (blue; scaling of 1/3) lines for the model shown in Fig.~\ref{fig_94W_0901}.
1191: We draw higher series members with thinner lines.
1192: The quantity $\zeta(R)$ relates to the total emission interior to $R$ in the line through the integral
1193: $\int_{R_0}^{R} \zeta(R') d \log R'$. $\zeta(R_{\rm Max})$ is the total emission in the line.
1194: Note how the site of emission resides deeper in, i.e., at higher optical depth, for higher
1195: energy transitions in each series. There appears to be an increasing outward shift
1196: from the Balmer to the Paschen and to the Brackett series.
1197: In our synthetic spectra, electron scattering effects are stronger for lines that form deeper
1198: in, as observed, and are internal to the photospheric region.\label{fig_ep_tau_hi}}
1199: \end{figure}
1200: %
1201: % The following figure needs to be updated using the same core model
1202: % as used in the flux_vel_halpha.ps figure, model e1_v2_s2_7_Bs2_beta1 on grendel
1203: %
1204: \begin{figure}
1205: % \epsfig{file=coherent_vs_incoherent_es_halpha.ps,width=8cm}
1206: \epsfig{file=f14.eps,width=8cm}
1207: \caption{
1208: Comparison between the synthetic H$\alpha$ line profile
1209: obtained assuming incoherent (black) or coherent (red) electron scattering in the comoving-frame.
1210: In blue, we show the effect of using the continuum (rather than the line)
1211: mean intensity when computing the electron-scattering source function, which shows
1212: that a large fraction of line photons suffer at least one scattering
1213: with free electrons as they escape from their emitting region.
1214: For this illustration, we use the same model that fits the observations of SN 1994W on
1215: 1994 September 1, whose characteristics are given in Table~1.
1216: % sqrt(2.0D0 * 1.38D-16 * 1.D4 /9.109389D-28) * sqrt(0.75)
1217: \label{fig_CMFGEN_Halpha_es}
1218: }
1219: \end{figure}
1220:
1221:
1222: % \begin{figure*}
1223: % \epsfig{file=comp_flux_Z.ps,width=18cm}
1224: % \caption{Comparison between synthetic spectra based on models differing
1225: % only in metal content. We adopt a solar mixture, but apply a scaling on all metal
1226: % abundances of 0.5 (black), 1 (red), and 2 (blue).
1227: % [See text for discussion.]\label{fig_comp_Z}
1228: % }
1229: % \end{figure*}
1230:
1231: Another element of interest in the observed Balmer line profiles shown in the top left panel
1232: of Fig.~\ref{fig_CMFGEN_Balmer_model_obs} is the location of the P~Cygni profile dip, which ranges
1233: from $-900$\,\kms\ for H$\alpha$ to $-500$\,\kms\ for H$\delta$ on 1994 September 1.
1234: The velocity shift of this absorption component is well reproduced by our synthetic line profiles,
1235: as shown in the top-right panel of Fig.~\ref{fig_CMFGEN_Balmer_model_obs}.
1236: In our modeling approach, which assumes a linearly-increasing
1237: velocity with radius, the more optically thick line forms further out, in a region that moves faster,
1238: thereby showing a P~Cygni profile absorption further to the blue from line center. In other words,
1239: the velocity shift of the absorption minimum amongst the Balmer lines suggests the velocity increases outwards
1240: from the photosphere. This is different from the narrow absorption (and sometimes
1241: associated narrow emission) that is sometimes seen on top of the strong and broad H$\alpha$ line
1242: profile and that is associated with the CS material exclusively (see Kotak et al. 2004 for the
1243: Type Ia SN 2002ic, Smith et al. 2007 for SN 2006gy, and Salamanca et al. 2002 for SN 1997eg).
1244:
1245: \section{Discussion and conclusions}
1246: \label{sect_discussion}
1247:
1248: In this work, we have performed a quantitative spectroscopic analysis of the interacting
1249: Type IIn SN 1994W, an unusual Type II event that exhibited narrow line cores with broad line wings in the optical,
1250: was unusually luminous, showed erratic spectral behavior prior to peak brightness,
1251: and synthesized an extremely low amount of $^{56}$Ni.
1252: Our study covers specifically from 10-20 days prior to peak until 50 days afterwards, and makes
1253: use of a radiative-transfer modeling approach that is one dimensional and steady-state,
1254: assumes a (steep) power-law density distribution and a linear velocity law.
1255: Importantly, it incorporates non-LTE effects and accurately treats the electron-scattering
1256: source function.
1257:
1258: During the brightening phase, also characterized by strong spectral variability,
1259: we suspect the presence of multiple radiating regions,
1260: split between an optically-thick layer contributing to the bulk of the optical light,
1261: and shocked (and perhaps clumpy) material above contributing a smaller and rapidly-variable fraction.
1262: This fraction is subdominant in the optical but could be much larger in the UV and X-ray ranges.
1263: % Because this outer material has been shocked to high temperatures, it has a lower density
1264: % and is thus optically-thin and radiatively less efficient (see Fransson et al. 1996).
1265: Because this outer, low-density, material has been shocked to high temperatures, it
1266: is optically thin and, thus, radiatively less efficient (see Fransson et al. 1996).
1267: Such a dichotomy is also supported by the {\it simultaneous} presence of optical spectral
1268: features testifying for both relatively low and high ionization conditions (i.e., Fe{\sc ii} and He{\sc i}).
1269: Our models during this brightening phase are mostly exploratory, but suggestive of a complex
1270: interaction configuration. Observations over a broad spectral band, and extending into at least the
1271: near UV, are crucial for understanding these earlier phases.
1272:
1273: \begin{figure}
1274: % \epsfig{file=e1_v2_s2_7_Bs2_numes20_vt10_halpha_vcore.ps,width=8cm}
1275: \epsfig{file=f15.eps,width=8cm}
1276: \caption{Comparison between synthetic H$\alpha$ line profiles versus Doppler velocity obtained
1277: with the model used to fit observations on 1994 October 11, but differing in the adopted
1278: values of the base velocity $V_0$ (the velocity law is of the form $v(R) = V_0 (R/R_0){^\beta}$).
1279: By decreasing $V_0$ from 1500\,\kms to 150\,\kms, we go from a broad P-Cygni profile typical
1280: for a Type II-P SN to a symmetric line profile with a narrow line core and broad wings typical
1281: for a Type IIn SN. (See text for discussion.)
1282: \label{fig_comp_vcore}
1283: }
1284: \end{figure}
1285:
1286: During the monotonic and slow fading phase, our fits are by contrast very satisfactory.
1287: We find that the bolometric light must emerge entirely from a
1288: single hydrogen-rich optically-thick layer moving at a near-constant velocity of $\sim$800\,\kms.
1289: This photosphere recedes in both mass and radius with time, its extent shrinking from 4.3$\times$10$^{15}$
1290: at peak to 2.3$\times$10$^{15}$\,cm 50 days later, while cooling modestly from
1291: $\sim$7300 to $\sim$6300\,K over that same period.
1292: As in Type II-P SNe, we find that the photosphere is slaved to the region of full ionization,
1293: which, as the material expands and radiates, can only shrink. The steep
1294: fading 50 days after the peak is, thus, naturally associated with the emitting material
1295: becoming completely optically thin. The near-constant photospheric velocity of $\sim$800\,\kms,
1296: for an extended period (over 60 days), places strong constraints on dynamical models.
1297:
1298: The above parameters result from the radiative transfer modeling of the
1299: spectroscopic and photometric evolution of SN 1994W, and represent what is required
1300: to reproduce observations. These properties should therefore be matched by any radiation hydrodynamics
1301: modeling of SN 1994W - they represent an important guide.
1302: In the context of an interaction between inner and outer ejecta, this photosphere
1303: would likely reside somewhere between the reverse shock (located in the inner ejecta) and the forward shock
1304: (located in the outer ejecta). The inferred photospheric velocity cannot be associated with CSM alone
1305: since a large over-density and full-ionization is required to create this optically-thick layer,
1306: a condition that is met only between the reverse and forward shocks (it cannot reside inside of the
1307: reverse shock since this would be the inner fast ejecta and all emission profiles would appear
1308: much broader than they do).
1309:
1310: As this was a preliminary study, each epoch was modeled independently --- we did
1311: not attempt to get consistency in the parameters between
1312: different dates (i.e., the photospheric density at day 90 is lower
1313: than what would be inferred by a power law extrapolation of the
1314: photospheric density at day 50). Whether a consistent density/velocity
1315: set could be obtained will require a more consistent approach, possibly
1316: in conjunction with dynamical modeling. The results of such an
1317: investigation would provide crucial constraints on the
1318: dynamical model of the emitting region.
1319:
1320: By contrast with C04, we do not find that the CDS represents such a key landmark for the understanding
1321: of the light coming from SN 1994W.
1322: The CDS may be optically thick at early times, but it must be optically thin after the peak to explain
1323: the fading phase of the SN, which would otherwise be a brightening phase given the small photospheric
1324: temperature decrease. A corollary is that the steep fading at late times corresponds to the onset
1325: of the nebular phase rather than to the CDS leaving the external shell.
1326:
1327: We reproduce successfully the narrow-core broad-wing line profile
1328: morphology in the optical spectra of SN 1994W at all epochs, thus downplaying
1329: the alleged role of an optically-thick external shell in causing this profile shape.
1330: Instead, we find that this hybrid morphology results from the conditions at the
1331: photosphere alone. Indeed, we argue that the small photospheric velocity of SN 1994W at all times
1332: recorded makes electron scattering a key escape mechanism for line photons. The
1333: associated frequency kicks redistribute photons from the optically-thick line cores
1334: where they are trapped into the more optically-thin line wings, from where they can escape
1335: after several scatterings with free electrons. The resulting flux in the wings increases
1336: at the expense of the flux in the line core. Paradoxically, the slower the photospheric
1337: velocity, the broader and more evident the line wings, which thus reflect the slow rather than the
1338: fast expansion of the flow. As C04, we find that the effect is more pronounced for high
1339: electron-scattering optical depth, but we associate this effect with the photosphere exclusively,
1340: where both lines and continuum form, rather than with an external shell.
1341: C04 estimated the properties of the external shell based on estimates of its
1342: electron-scattering optical depth through the effect on line profiles. This needs
1343: revision since the observed narrow line cores and broad line wings can be understood
1344: from multiple-scattering internal to the photosphere. Indeed, we can explain the entire
1345: optical spectrum by a single emitting region. To avoid any misunderstanding, let us stress again. We are not proposing that there
1346: is no external shell. Rather, we find that the multiple electron-scattering events
1347: at the origin of the broad line wings do not occur
1348: in the external shell, but are instead internal to that localized, optically-thick, layer where most
1349: photons are produced and which, we demonstrated, exists unambiguously.
1350:
1351: %seen in the Type IIn SN 1994W
1352:
1353: %This result implies that the estimate of the outer shell mass of 0.4\,\mo by C04 is unfounded,
1354: %since it is based on the interpretation that broad H$\alpha$ line wings are due to
1355: %multiple-scattering events {\it in the external shell}, which is unsupported by our detailed radiative transfer calculations. Note that this estimate of 0.4\,\mo for the outer shell mass is also unphysical, since it can in no way be at the origin of the deceleration of SN ejecta endowed with 1\,B of kinetic energy, as proposed by C04. Their proposition is therefore unfounded for two independent reasons, each alone being sufficient.}
1356:
1357: \begin{figure*}
1358: % \epsfig{file=e1_v2_s2_5_B_0s1comp_flux_beta_yvariable.ps,width=18cm}
1359: % \epsfig{file=e1_v2_s2_5_B_0s1comp_flux_HBalmer.ps,width=18cm}
1360: \epsfig{file=f16.eps,width=18cm}
1361: \caption{
1362: {\it Left:} Variation of the H$\gamma$ line profile computed for different assumptions
1363: on the ejecta velocity distribution, i.e. characterized by $v(R) = V_0 (R/R_0){^\beta}$, with
1364: $\beta$ equal to 1 (black; $V_{\rm Max}=$4000\,\kms), 0.2 (red; $V_{\rm Max}=$1364\,\kms), and 0.01
1365: (blue; $V_{\rm Max}=$1123\,\kms). {\it Middle:} Same as left, but this time for H$\beta$.
1366: {\it Right:} Same as left, but this time for H$\alpha$.
1367: The reference model with $\beta=1$ is that
1368: used to fit observations of SN 1994W on 1994 September 1 (see Fig.~\ref{fig_94W_0901}
1369: and Table~1). For the latter two models, the base velocity is adjusted so that the photospheric
1370: velocity is within 10\% of 830\,\kms, thence, producing a similar line core width.
1371: Expansion causes little red-wing broadening since these three models, which differ so much in
1372: maximum ejecta velocity $V_{\rm Max}$, show a similar red-wing extent.
1373: Effects of non-coherent and multiple scattering by thermal electrons
1374: is the primary cause of the extended wings. Note how the profile becomes more symmetric,
1375: i.e. shows a stronger blue electron-scattering wing, as $\beta$ (or the velocity gradient,
1376: which controls the escape probability of a photon trapped in the line) is
1377: reduced.\label{fig_comp_flux_beta}
1378: }
1379: \end{figure*}
1380:
1381: Let us now {\it speculate} on what may be at the origin of the SN 1994W event.
1382: This speculation is motivated by two recent observations that show that Type IIn SNe are associated with widely different progenitors. First, objects like the Type IIn SN 2006gy, are
1383: associated with a large bolometric luminosity (a rate in excess of 10$^{10}$\,\lsun\ sustained for months),
1384: a large kinetic energy (there is interaction, hence deceleration, but still the line profiles are much broader than for SN 1994W),
1385: and a large amount of mass in both the inner and outer ejecta that interact (because the ejecta remain optically thick
1386: for months). These objects must be associated with very massive stars, losing considerable amounts
1387: of mass in at least two events, and exploding with a prodigious energy which seems to require either
1388: gravitational collapse or thermonuclear burning. Second, the Type IIn SN 2008S progenitor is identified on pre-explosion images as a star of $\sim$10\,\mo\ (Prieto et al. 2008). That two SNe with the same type be associated with
1389: progenitors of such different properties suggests that such interactions can occur in a wide variety of
1390: circumstances. Further, the observations (e.g., SN 2008S; Prieto et al. 2008) show that SN IIn are not necessarily associated with
1391: LBVs. Note that stars in the mass range 8-10\,\mo\
1392: are considerably more numerous than high mass progenitors at the origin of SN 2006gy-like events.
1393: Moreover, they do not build degenerate Fe cores, but ONeMg ones.
1394:
1395: In the speculative statements we present below,
1396: we wish to raise the issue that
1397: 1) given an interaction has to occur to explain the combination
1398: of large photospheric radii and small expansion velocities (inferred from line profile widths), and
1399: 2) given that Type II SNe have typically 100 times more kinetic energy than radiant energy
1400: (1\,B compared to 0.01\,B; 1B$\equiv$10$^{51}$\,erg), conversion efficiencies of a few
1401: to a few tens of percent from kinetic to internal energy can satisfy the energetics of
1402: most Type IIn SNe.
1403: With such a huge kinetic energy reservoir, any modest conversion to internal energy can give rise
1404: to SN-like displays. And indeed, the fact that statistically, the brightest SNe known are of Type IIn is compelling.
1405: Hence, the kinetic energy and mass budget, the conversion efficiency from kinetic to internal energy,
1406: and the expected variety of circumstellar material configurations, offer a natural way to explain
1407: both the brightness and the diversity of Type IIn SNe (see introduction for a short synopsis of this diversity).
1408: Our speculation, now, is that one may not systematically need 1\,B of kinetic energy to power a Type IIn SN
1409: bolometric display.
1410:
1411:
1412: Turning to SN 1994W, and adopting a representative
1413: luminosity of 2$\times$10$^9$\,\lsun\, over a 100-day period, the time-integrated bolometric light
1414: for SN 1994W is $E_{\rm rad} \approx 0.066$\,B. With a conversion efficiency of 30\%
1415: (which is at the upper end of what Chevalier (1983) proposes for driven waves;
1416: variations of a few percent can be accommodated given the speculative level
1417: meant in the present discussion), this would require
1418: a kinetic energy of $E_{\rm kin} \approx 0.2$\,B, which can be matched by, for example,
1419: a 2\,\mo\ shell moving at 3000\,\kms. One can try different combinations of mass and velocity, but the point here is
1420: that this does not represent so much energy. This may not be what happens in SN 19994W, but it demonstrates
1421: that modest kinetic energies, i.e. less than standard core-collapse SN explosion energies,
1422: do not violate any of the energetics to power the bolometric displays like that of SN 1994W. Whether they
1423: do in practice needs to be demonstrated.
1424: In this context, it seems that a shell-shell interaction could explain in principle the radiation budget
1425: of SN 1994W, and that a powerful core-collapse SN explosion may not be needed.
1426: Additionally, the absence of core collapse and potential nickel production would satisfy the
1427: very low nickel yields inferred for this SN, a record low of 0.0026--0.015\,\mo\ (SCL).
1428: It also can more easily explain the absence of broad lines at all times.
1429: The mechanism for the ejection of the second shell would also be the same
1430: one as for the first shell, but the second ejection would have to expand faster to catch up the first.
1431: We note that no
1432: massive star is known to have a radius larger than 10$^{14}$\,cm (RSG, see Levesque et al. 2005),
1433: so there should be ample time to detect and thoroughly observe the expansion of the inner shell prior to
1434: interaction, in fact about 100/$V_3$ days (assuming constant velocity expansion), and determine its properties.
1435: Note however that none of these observations alone are sufficient to rule out a core collapse, but they do suggest that
1436: other mechanisms should also be examined.
1437: For example, a low Ni yield, by itself, does not rule out a core collapse SN.
1438: Recent theoretical simulations of 8-10\,\mo\ stars indicate that the resulting SN can give low Ni yields
1439: ($<0.015\,$\mo)(e.g., Kitaura et al. 2006). SN 2005cs is regarded as a low luminosity SN,
1440: is considered to have arisen from a low mass progenitor (e.g., Eldridge et~al 2007),
1441: and had a low Ni yield of $\sim 0.01\,$\mo\ (Pastorello et~al. 2006; Tsvetkov et al. 2006).
1442: Fall-back may also truncate the inner, nickel-rich ejecta (Woosley \& Timmes 1996), but the quantitative
1443: aspects of this process are uncertain, and one may wonder why these Type IIn SNe,
1444: whose properties are really set by external interaction, would also have experienced significant fallback.
1445:
1446: % to have that special property affecting the core.}
1447:
1448: %The odds of all such extraordinary events being observed in one object
1449: %are indeed dangerously low to have any generic value.}
1450:
1451: % Very low luminosity SN are also known. An extreme case is provided by M85 OT2006-1, a SN-like
1452: % event that occurred in M85. Kulkarni et~al (2006) originally proposed that this may have been
1453: % the result of a stellar merger, since no luminous blue star was present at the event location
1454: % in archival images. As an alternative, Pastorello et~al. (2007) suggested that it is an extreme
1455: % example of a low-luminosity type II-plateau supernova, and originated from the explosion of a
1456: % M-K supergiant, with mass around 8 \,\mo. Such a progenitor would satisfy archival magnitude
1457: % constraints. M85 OT2006-1 had an absolute R magnitude of only -12, about 1.5 magnitudes
1458: % fainter than the previous record holder for the faintest low-luminosity type II-plateau
1459: % supernovae (Pastorello et~al. 2007).
1460:
1461: % The observations thus suggest that there might not be any SN ejecta associated with the SN 1994W.
1462: C04 inferred the presence of a 0.4\,\mo\ CS envelope, while we know that core-collapse SN ejecta
1463: have at least 6\,\mo, typically endowed with 1\,B kinetic energy.\footnote{Only stars more
1464: massive than 8\,\mo\ on the main sequence undergo core collapse, so, leaving aside 2\,\mo\ for
1465: the neutron star and fallback material leaves us with at least 6\,\mo. More generic values
1466: may be 10-15\,\mo.}
1467: Given this unequal mass configuration, it is unlikely the SN ejecta could be decelerated
1468: throughout to velocities below 1000\,\kms. A more favorable configuration for deceleration,
1469: supported by the narrow lines at all times, is for two shells of comparable mass. The mechanism causing the shell ejections is unknown, but may be related to pulsations or
1470: nuclear flashes in the last stages of core burning. For example, within $\sim$2\,yr of core collapse,
1471: 20\,\mo\ main-sequence stars go through a $\sim$1.5\,yr-long oxygen core-burning phase: Instabilities associated
1472: with that phase that led to an explosive shell ejection would provide a reproducible time delay before collapse
1473: and an attractive mechanism at the origin of some Type IIn SNe like 1994W.
1474: Woosley et al. (2007) have invoked the same mechanism,
1475: the collision between ejected shells, to explain the extremely luminous supernova SN 2006gy.
1476: In the model of Woosley et al. (2007) pair-instability pulsations in massive stars (e.g,
1477: $M \sgreat 110\,$\mo) eject multiple shells which later collide.
1478:
1479: %{\bf The
1480: %low mass of the CS envelope proposed by C04 is inconsistent. Allowing the outer shell to
1481: %have a few solar masses, a low mass progenitor like SN 2008S would require the entire ejection
1482: %of the envelope for an efficient interaction, while a more massive progenitor could
1483: %merely have a second powerful mass ejections (note that it already had one so; if it can happen once,
1484: %there is no fundamental principle that would prevent it from happening a second time.).}
1485: %Currently, the mechanism causing the first shell ejection is unknown, so this would be like
1486: %hitting two birds with one stone, but may be related to pulsations or nuclear flashes in the last
1487: %stages of core burning. Note that a similar setup has been invoked in a different context for
1488: %pair-instability pulsations in massive stars (Woosley et al. 2007).
1489:
1490: %LBV outbursts are possible, but not the best candidates because they tend to yield velocities
1491: %that are quite low, close to the escape speed from massive inflated stars.
1492:
1493: Circumstellar envelopes with kinetic energies with $>$0.01\,B ergs are known.
1494: In the 1840's, Eta Carinae underwent a major outburst ejecting over 10\,\mo\ of material
1495: at a velocity of ~650\kms, with kinetic energy $\sgreat$0.04\,B (Smith et al. 2003).
1496: Unfortunately, the duration of the ejection event is not well constrained, and
1497: there is no consensus as to the cause of the event. More interestingly, Eta Carinae underwent a second
1498: eruption, most likely in the 1890's, although the event was much less significant
1499: (0.1\,\mo, $V\sim200$\,\kms,
1500: 10$^{-4}$\,B; Smith 2003). While the dynamics and kinematics don't satisfy the requirements for a bright
1501: circumstellar interaction, they are in the least suggestive that such an interaction might occur.
1502: A potential issue with shell ejections from LBVs and similar stars is that the ejection velocities
1503: tend to scale with the escape speed. For SN 1994W, it is likely the second shell needed speeds of
1504: order 1500\,\kms, or larger. A direct corollary of the shell interaction scenario is that the
1505: progenitor star would not be destroyed (although it might be difficult to detect in the optical if
1506: dust formed), and this offers a direct means of distinguishing between the core-collapse and
1507: multiple shell-ejection scenarios. Similarly,
1508: direct confirmation of Ni/Co decay could be used to distinguish between the two models.
1509:
1510: Type IIn SNe gather a very heterogeneous group and our findings should not be applied blindly
1511: to other Type IIn SNe. In some cases (e.g, SN 1988Z, Stathakis \& Sadler 1991; van Dyk et al. 1993;
1512: Turatto et al. 1993; Chugai \& Danziger 1994) it is readily apparent that core-collapse SN ejecta,
1513: interacting with circumstellar matter, can explain the observed spectral variations. To make further
1514: progress, detailed radiation hydrodynamics of the interaction and detailed radiative transfer
1515: calculations of emergent spectra need to be performed in partnership, and for a wide range of
1516: configurations. Allowance for time-dependent effects and departures from sphericity may also
1517: be needed. Observations in the blue (as far to the UV as
1518: possible), red, and near IR would provide critical constraints on the models. As a key probe
1519: of shocks, X-ray observations are crucial. Finally, public availability of all observational
1520: data would help reveal fully the diversity of Type IIn spectra and light curves, thereby helping
1521: understand this challenging group of SNe.
1522:
1523: % By contrast with Type Ia SNe, the negligible amount of $^{56}$Ni processed in the
1524: % IIn event suggests, however, little contribution from radioactive decay. Instead, the luminosity
1525: % is drawn from the conversion of kinetic energy into internal energy in the shock-heated material.
1526: % In the process, one goes from a fast cool ejecta to a hot slow one. The inferred time-integrated
1527: % SN IIn bolometric luminosity is on the order of 1\,B (1\,Bethe $\equiv$ 10$^{51}$\,erg [1\,B]),
1528: % thus compatible with the overall energetics of Type II SN ejecta.
1529:
1530: % Review Chugai et al stuff, CSM, electron scattering effects. Diversity of IIn spectra.
1531: % CDS stuff. Some spectral variability on a timescale of just days is observed, in contrast with the flow time
1532: % $t_{\rm flow}=R/V \sim 115 \, R_{15}/V_8$\,days, or the recombination time
1533: % $t_{\hbox{rec}} = 1/\alpha n_e \sim 4.47 \times 10^7 / n_e \,\, {\rm days.}$
1534: % (here, $\alpha$ is the recombination coefficient, i.e.
1535: % $\alpha=\alpha_B=2.59 \times 10^{-13}$\,cm$^{3}$\,s$^{-1}$ at 10,000K (Osterbrock 1974)).
1536: % This likely stems from a combination of events, first the quasi-steady expansion of
1537: % the bulk of the material, and the dynamical evolution of the shocked material,
1538: % Rayleigh-Taylor unstable regions, radiative acceleration of the CSM etc...
1539: % Given the smoothness of the light curve, it seems however that the bulk of the emission
1540: % comes from material in a quasi steady-state
1541:
1542: \section*{Acknowledgments}
1543:
1544: We thank Adam Burrows, Rubina Kotak, Jeremiah Murphy, and Steve Smartt
1545: for discussion,
1546: Robert Cumming for providing the SN 1994W spectroscopic data used here,
1547: Nikolai Chugai for his comments,
1548: and St\'ephane Blondin for a thorough reading of a draft of this paper and for his suggestions.
1549: L.D. acknowledges support for this work from the Scientific Discovery
1550: through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program of the DOE, under grant numbers
1551: DOE-FC02-01ER41184 and DOE-FC02-06ER41452, and from the NSF under grant
1552: number AST-0504947.
1553:
1554:
1555: % Move END DOCUMENT WHEN PAPER FNISHED TO INCLUDE ALL THE TABLES!
1556: %\end{document}
1557:
1558: \appendix
1559: \section{}
1560:
1561: The following tables provide a summary of the spectral lines important for fitting SN 1994W at different
1562: dates. Line EWs were computed assuming isolated lines, and using a modified form of the Sobolev approximation.
1563: They are meant to provide a guide to the relative importance of various features in the spectrum, and should NOT be
1564: used for quantitative analysis. Level name notation is based on the notation of levels in CMFGEN which in turn is based
1565: on the notation from NIST (Ralchenko et al. 2008).
1566:
1567: \clearpage
1568:
1569: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1570: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1571: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TABLE 1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1572: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1573:
1574: \onecolumn
1575:
1576: \begin{center}
1577: \begin{longtable}{lrll}
1578: \caption{Line list for model used to match observations on 1994 September 1} \label{tab_linelist} \\
1579:
1580: \hline \hline \\[-2ex]
1581: $\lambda$ (\,\AA) & $W_{\lambda}$ (\,\AA) & Species & Transition (upper level -- lower level) \\[0.5ex] \hline
1582: \\[-1.8ex]
1583: \endfirsthead
1584:
1585: \multicolumn{4}{c}{{\tablename} \thetable{} -- Continued} \\[0.5ex]
1586: \hline \hline \\[-2ex]
1587: $\lambda$ (\,\AA) & $W_{\lambda}$(\,\AA) & Species & Transition (upper level -- lower level) \\[0.5ex] \hline
1588: \\[-1.8ex]
1589: \endhead
1590:
1591: %This is the footer for all pages except the last page of the table...
1592: \\[0.5ex] \hline
1593: \\[-1.8ex]
1594: \multicolumn{4}{l}{{Continued on Next Page\ldots}}
1595: \endfoot
1596:
1597: %This is the footer for the last page of the table...
1598: \\[-1.8ex] \hline \hline
1599: \endlastfoot
1600: % FILE ewdata_e1_v2_s2_7_Bs3_cut_latex
1601:
1602: 3213.3 & -1.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
1603: 3227.7 & -1.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
1604: 3662.3 & 1.2 & H{\,\sc i}& 30 -- 2 \\
1605: 3663.4 & 1.4 & H{\,\sc i}& 29 -- 2 \\
1606: 3664.7 & 1.5 & H{\,\sc i}& 28 -- 2 \\
1607: 3666.1 & 1.7 & H{\,\sc i}& 27 -- 2 \\
1608: 3667.7 & 1.9 & H{\,\sc i}& 26 -- 2 \\
1609: 3669.5 & 2.2 & H{\,\sc i}& 25 -- 2 \\
1610: 3671.5 & 2.4 & H{\,\sc i}& 24 -- 2 \\
1611: 3673.8 & 2.6 & H{\,\sc i}& 23 -- 2 \\
1612: 3676.4 & 2.9 & H{\,\sc i}& 22 -- 2 \\
1613: 3679.4 & 3.2 & H{\,\sc i}& 21 -- 2 \\
1614: 3682.8 & 3.5 & H{\,\sc i}& 20 -- 2 \\
1615: 3686.8 & 4.0 & H{\,\sc i}& 19 -- 2 \\
1616: 3691.6 & 4.6 & H{\,\sc i}& 18 -- 2 \\
1617: 3697.1 & 5.0 & H{\,\sc i}& 17 -- 2 \\
1618: 3703.9 & 5.4 & H{\,\sc i}& 16 -- 2 \\
1619: 3705.0 & 3.0 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s7d$\,\,^3$D -- 1s2p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1620: 3708.0 & 1.3 & Cr{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^3$\,($^4$F) 4p$\,\,^3$D$^{\rm o}_{2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,($^2$P) 4s$\,\,^3$P$_{1}$ \\
1621: 3712.0 & 5.7 & H{\,\sc i}& 15 -- 2 \\
1622: 3721.9 & 6.1 & H{\,\sc i}& 14 -- 2 \\
1623: 3732.9 & 1.1 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s7s$\,\,^3$S -- 1s2p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1624: 3734.4 & 6.5 & H{\,\sc i}& 13 -- 2 \\
1625: 3750.1 & 6.9 & H{\,\sc i}& 12 -- 2 \\
1626: 3769.5 & 2.8 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^1$D) 4s$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
1627: 3770.6 & 7.4 & H{\,\sc i}& 11 -- 2 \\
1628: 3797.9 & 8.1 & H{\,\sc i}& 10 -- 2 \\
1629: 3819.6 & 3.3 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s6d$\,\,^3$D -- 1s2p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1630: 3835.4 & 9.0 & H{\,\sc i}& 9 -- 2 \\
1631: 3853.7 & 1.5 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3s3p$^2\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
1632: 3856.0 & 6.1 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3s3p$^2\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
1633: 3862.6 & 4.9 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3s3p$^2\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
1634: 3867.5 & 1.8 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s6s$\,\,^3$S -- 1s2p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1635: 3888.6 & 6.8 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s3p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ -- 1s2s$\,\,^3$S \\
1636: 3889.1 & 10.4 & H{\,\sc i}& 8 -- 2 \\
1637: 3933.7 & 3.0 & Ca{\,\sc ii}& 3p$^6$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3p$^6$4s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ \\
1638: 3964.7 & 2.7 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s 4p$\,\,^1$P$^{\rm o}$ -- 1s 2s$\,\,^1$S \\
1639: 3968.5 & 3.3 & Ca{\,\sc ii}& 3p$^6$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3p$^6$4s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ \\
1640: 3970.1 & 12.9 & H{\,\sc i}& 7 -- 2 \\
1641: 4005.0 & 2.1 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^4$G) 4p$\,\,^3$F$^{\rm o}_{4}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^2$F1) 4s$\,\,^3$F$_{4}$ \\
1642: 4009.3 & 1.5 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s7d$\,\,^1$D -- 1s2p$\,\,^1$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1643: 4022.4 & 1.8 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^4$G) 4p$\,\,^3$F$^{\rm o}_{3}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^2$F1) 4s$\,\,^3$F$_{3}$ \\
1644: 4026.2 & 4.0 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s5d$\,\,^3$D -- 1s2p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1645: 4039.2 & 1.5 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^4$G) 4p$\,\,^3$F$^{\rm o}_{2}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^2$F1) 4s$\,\,^3$F$_{2}$ \\
1646: 4101.7 & 18.1 & H{\,\sc i}& 6 -- 2 \\
1647: 4120.8 & 2.8 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s5s$\,\,^3$S -- 1s2p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1648: 4128.1 & 2.9 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$4f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3s$^2$3d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
1649: 4130.9 & 3.6 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$4f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3s$^2$3d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
1650: 4143.8 & 1.7 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s6d$\,\,^1$D -- 1s2p$\,\,^1$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1651: 4173.5 & 1.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
1652: 4233.2 & 2.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
1653: 4340.5 & 28.0 & H{\,\sc i}& 5 -- 2 \\
1654: 4351.8 & 2.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
1655: 4352.6 & 2.3 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{1}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$P) 4s$\,\,^5$P$_{2}$ \\
1656: 4365.6 & 1.3 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{1}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$P) 4s$\,\,^5$P$_{1}$ \\
1657: 4371.3 & 2.4 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{2}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$P) 4s$\,\,^5$P$_{3}$ \\
1658: 4388.1 & 2.1 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s5d$\,\,^1$D -- 1s2p$\,\,^1$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1659: 4395.8 & 2.3 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{2}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$P) 4s$\,\,^5$P$_{1}$ \\
1660: 4419.6 & 3.2 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{3}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$P) 4s$\,\,^5$P$_{3}$ \\
1661: 4431.0 & 2.4 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{3}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$P) 4s$\,\,^5$P$_{2}$ \\
1662: 4471.5 & 5.0 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s4d$\,\,^3$D -- 1s2p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1663: 4481.1 & 3.0 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 4f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
1664: 4481.3 & 2.7 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 4f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
1665: 4508.3 & 1.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{3/2}$ \\
1666: 4522.6 & 2.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
1667: 4549.5 & 3.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
1668: 4555.9 & 1.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
1669: 4583.8 & 2.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
1670: 4629.3 & 1.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
1671: 4713.2 & 3.6 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s4s$\,\,^3$S -- 1s2p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1672: 4815.5 & 1.4 & S{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$3p$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p$\,\,^4$S$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3s$^2$3p$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s$\,\,^4$P$_{5/2}$\\
1673: 4861.3 & 47.7 & H{\,\sc i}& 4 -- 2 \\
1674: 4921.9 & 2.4 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s4d$\,\,^1$D -- 1s2p$\,\,^1$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1675: 4923.9 & 2.9 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,a$^6$S$_{5/2}$ \\
1676: 5014.0 & 1.4 & S{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$3p$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3s$^2$3p$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s$\,\,^2$P$_{3/2}$\\
1677: 5015.7 & 4.6 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s3p$\,\,^1$P$^{\rm o}$ -- 1s2s$\,\,^1$S \\
1678: 5018.4 & 3.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$P$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,a$^6$S$_{5/2}$ \\
1679: 5041.0 & 3.2 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$ 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ -- 3s$^2$ 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ \\
1680: 5047.7 & 1.4 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s4s$\,\,^1$S -- 1s2p$\,\,^1$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1681: 5056.0 & 5.0 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$ 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ -- 3s$^2$ 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ \\
1682: 5063.4 & 1.3 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{1}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$D) 4s$\,\,^5$D$_{0}$ \\
1683: 5073.9 & 2.1 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{1}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$D) 4s$\,\,^5$D$_{1}$ \\
1684: 5086.7 & 1.8 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{1}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$D) 4s$\,\,^5$D$_{2}$ \\
1685: 5114.6 & 1.1 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{2}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$D) 4s$\,\,^5$D$_{1}$ \\
1686: 5127.4 & 3.0 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{2}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$D) 4s$\,\,^5$D$_{3}$ \\
1687: 5127.6 & 2.3 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{2}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$D) 4s$\,\,^5$D$_{2}$ \\
1688: 5156.1 & 4.0 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{3}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$D) 4s$\,\,^5$D$_{4}$ \\
1689: 5169.0 & 4.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$P$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,a$^6$S$_{5/2}$ \\
1690: 5193.9 & 2.1 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{3}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$D) 4s$\,\,^5$D$_{3}$ \\
1691: 5197.6 & 1.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{5/2}$ \\
1692: 5234.6 & 1.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{7/2}$ \\
1693: 5276.0 & 1.8 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{9/2}$ \\
1694: 5316.6 & 2.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{11/2}$ \\
1695: 5640.0 & 2.7 & S{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$ 3p$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p$\,\,^2$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3s$^2$ 3p$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s$\,\,^2$P$_{3/2}$\\
1696: 5647.0 & 1.9 & S{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$ 3p$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p$\,\,^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3s$^2$ 3p$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s$\,\,^2$P$_{1/2}$\\
1697: 5875.7 & 7.4 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s3d$\,\,^3$D -- 1s2p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1698: 5978.9 & 1.7 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$ 5s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ -- 3s$^2$ 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ \\
1699: 6562.8 & 104.7 & H{\,\sc i}& 3 -- 2 \\
1700: 6578.0 & 5.9 & C{\,\sc ii}& 2s$^2$3p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 2s$^2$3s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ \\
1701: 6582.9 & 4.1 & C{\,\sc ii}& 2s$^2$3p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 2s$^2$3s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ \\
1702: 6678.1 & 3.0 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s3d$\,\,^1$D -- 1s2p$\,\,^1$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1703: 7065.3 & 5.1 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s3s$\,\,^3$S -- 1s2p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1704: 7281.4 & 2.0 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s3s$\,\,^1$S -- 1s2p$\,\,^1$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1705: 7771.9 & -1.5 & O{\,\sc i}& 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3p$\,\,^5$P$_{3}$ -- 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3s$\,\,^5$S$^{\rm o}_{2}$ \\
1706: 7774.2 & -1.1 & O{\,\sc i}& 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3p$\,\,^5$P$_{2}$ -- 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3s$\,\,^5$S$^{\rm o}_{2}$ \\
1707: 7849.7 & 1.1 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$ 5f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3s$^2$ 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
1708: 7877.0 & 5.2 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ -- 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ \\
1709: 7896.0 & 1.1 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ -- 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ \\
1710: 7896.4 & 8.6 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ -- 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ \\
1711: 8214.0 & 2.2 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 5s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ -- 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ \\
1712: 8234.6 & 5.3 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 5s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ -- 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ \\
1713: 8446.4 & 1.9 & O{\,\sc i}& 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3p$\,\,^3$P$_{2}$ -- 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3s$\,\,^3$S$^{\rm o}_{1}$ \\
1714: 8446.8 & 1.2 & O{\,\sc i}& 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3p$\,\,^3$P$_{1}$ -- 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3s$\,\,^3$S$^{\rm o}_{1}$ \\
1715: 8467.3 & 1.1 & H{\,\sc i}& 17 -- 3 \\
1716: 8502.5 & 1.3 & H{\,\sc i}& 16 -- 3 \\
1717: 8545.4 & 1.6 & H{\,\sc i}& 15 -- 3 \\
1718: 8598.4 & 1.9 & H{\,\sc i}& 14 -- 3 \\
1719: 8665.0 & 2.3 & H{\,\sc i}& 13 -- 3 \\
1720: 8750.5 & 2.8 & H{\,\sc i}& 12 -- 3 \\
1721: 8862.8 & 3.6 & H{\,\sc i}& 11 -- 3 \\
1722: 8927.4 & 1.4 & Ca{\,\sc ii}& 3p$^6$4f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3p$^6$4d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
1723: 9014.9 & 4.7 & H{\,\sc i}& 10 -- 3 \\
1724: 9218.3 & 15.5 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 4s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ \\
1725: 9229.0 & 6.6 & H{\,\sc i}& 9 -- 3 \\
1726: 9244.3 & 10.3 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 4s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ \\
1727: 9297.3 & 1.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^5$\,($^4$P) 4s4p\,($^3$P) $\,\,^6$D$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 5s\,\, e$\,^6$D$_{9/2}$ \\
1728: 9463.6 & 1.1 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s5p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ -- 1s3s$\,\,^3$S \\
1729: 9546.0 & 9.5 & H{\,\sc i}& 8 -- 3 \\
1730: 9631.9 & 1.8 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 5f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
1731: 9632.4 & 1.3 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 5f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
1732: 9997.6 & 2.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,b$^4$G$_{11/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ \\
1733: 10049.4 & 14.8 & H{\,\sc i}& 7 -- 3 \\
1734: 10501.5 & 1.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,b$^4$G$_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ \\
1735: \end{longtable}
1736: \end{center}
1737:
1738:
1739: \clearpage
1740:
1741: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1742: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1743: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TABLE 2 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1744: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1745:
1746: % \begin{center}
1747: \begin{longtable}{lrll}
1748: \caption{Line list for model used to match observations on 1994 September 9} \label{tab_linelist} \\
1749:
1750: \hline \hline \\[-2ex]
1751: $\lambda$ (\,\AA) & $W_{\lambda}$ (\,\AA) & Species & Transition (upper level -- lower level) \\[0.5ex] \hline
1752: \\[-1.8ex]
1753: \endfirsthead
1754:
1755: \multicolumn{4}{c}{{\tablename} \thetable{} -- Continued} \\[0.5ex]
1756: \hline \hline \\[-2ex]
1757: $\lambda$ (\,\AA) & $W_{\lambda}$(\,\AA) & Species & Transition (upper level -- lower level) \\[0.5ex] \hline
1758: \\[-1.8ex]
1759: \endhead
1760:
1761: %This is the footer for all pages except the last page of the table...
1762: \\[0.5ex] \hline
1763: \\[-1.8ex]
1764: \multicolumn{4}{l}{{Continued on Next Page\ldots}}
1765: \endfoot
1766:
1767: %This is the footer for the last page of the table...
1768: \\[-1.8ex] \hline \hline
1769: \endlastfoot
1770: % FILE ewdata_e1_v2_s2_5_B_0s1_cut_latex
1771:
1772: 3210.4 & -1.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{1/2}$ \\
1773: 3213.3 & -2.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
1774: 3227.7 & -2.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
1775: 3408.8 & -1.2 & Cr{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^4$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^4$\,($^5$D) 4s\,\,a$^4$D$_{7/2}$ \\
1776: 3422.7 & -1.0 & Cr{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^4$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^4$\,($^5$D) 4s\,\,a$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
1777: 3442.0 & -1.1 & Mn{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p\,\,z$^5$P$^{\rm o}_{3}$ -- 3d$^6$\,\,a$^5$D$_{4}$ \\
1778: 3514.0 & -1.3 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^3$P) 4s$\,\,^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
1779: 3662.3 & 1.2 & H{\,\sc i}& 30 -- 2 \\
1780: 3663.4 & 1.4 & H{\,\sc i}& 29 -- 2 \\
1781: 3664.7 & 1.6 & H{\,\sc i}& 28 -- 2 \\
1782: 3666.1 & 1.8 & H{\,\sc i}& 27 -- 2 \\
1783: 3667.7 & 2.0 & H{\,\sc i}& 26 -- 2 \\
1784: 3669.5 & 2.2 & H{\,\sc i}& 25 -- 2 \\
1785: 3671.5 & 2.5 & H{\,\sc i}& 24 -- 2 \\
1786: 3673.8 & 2.7 & H{\,\sc i}& 23 -- 2 \\
1787: 3676.4 & 3.0 & H{\,\sc i}& 22 -- 2 \\
1788: 3679.4 & 3.2 & H{\,\sc i}& 21 -- 2 \\
1789: 3682.8 & 3.5 & H{\,\sc i}& 20 -- 2 \\
1790: 3686.8 & 4.0 & H{\,\sc i}& 19 -- 2 \\
1791: 3691.6 & 4.5 & H{\,\sc i}& 18 -- 2 \\
1792: 3697.1 & 4.9 & H{\,\sc i}& 17 -- 2 \\
1793: 3703.9 & 5.3 & H{\,\sc i}& 16 -- 2 \\
1794: 3705.0 & 2.2 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s7d$\,\,^3$D -- 1s2p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1795: 3712.0 & 5.6 & H{\,\sc i}& 15 -- 2 \\
1796: 3721.9 & 6.0 & H{\,\sc i}& 14 -- 2 \\
1797: 3734.4 & 6.4 & H{\,\sc i}& 13 -- 2 \\
1798: 3736.9 & 1.0 & Ca{\,\sc ii}& 3p$^6$5s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ -- 3p$^6$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ \\
1799: 3748.5 & 1.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4p\,\,z$^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^1$D2) 4s\,\,c$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
1800: 3750.1 & 6.8 & H{\,\sc i}& 12 -- 2 \\
1801: 3769.5 & 4.6 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^1$D) 4s$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
1802: 3770.6 & 7.2 & H{\,\sc i}& 11 -- 2 \\
1803: 3797.9 & 7.8 & H{\,\sc i}& 10 -- 2 \\
1804: 3819.6 & 2.5 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s6d$\,\,^3$D -- 1s2p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1805: 3835.4 & 8.7 & H{\,\sc i}& 9 -- 2 \\
1806: 3853.7 & 2.1 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3s3p$^2\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
1807: 3856.0 & 6.4 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3s3p$^2\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
1808: 3862.6 & 5.6 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3s3p$^2\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
1809: 3867.5 & 1.4 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s6s$\,\,^3$S -- 1s2p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1810: 3888.6 & 5.1 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s3p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ -- 1s2s$\,\,^3$S \\
1811: 3889.1 & 10.1 & H{\,\sc i}& 8 -- 2 \\
1812: 3933.7 & 3.1 & Ca{\,\sc ii}& 3p$^6$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3p$^6$4s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ \\
1813: 3964.7 & 1.9 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s4p$\,\,^1$P$^{\rm o}$ -- 1s2s$\,\,^1$S \\
1814: 3968.5 & 3.4 & Ca{\,\sc ii}& 3p$^6$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3p$^6$4s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ \\
1815: 3970.1 & 12.5 & H{\,\sc i}& 7 -- 2 \\
1816: 4005.0 & 1.4 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^4$G) 4p$\,\,^3$F$^{\rm o}_{4}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^2$F1) 4s$\,\,^3$F$_{4}$ \\
1817: 4009.3 & 1.0 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s7d$\,\,^1$D -- 1s2p$\,\,^1$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1818: 4022.4 & 1.2 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^4$G) 4p$\,\,^3$F$^{\rm o}_{3}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^2$F1) 4s$\,\,^3$F$_{3}$ \\
1819: 4026.2 & 2.9 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s5d$\,\,^3$D -- 1s2p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1820: 4039.2 & 1.0 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^4$G) 4p$\,\,^3$F$^{\rm o}_{2}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^2$F1) 4s$\,\,^3$F$_{2}$ \\
1821: 4067.0 & 1.4 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^1$G) 4s$^2$Ge$_{9/2}$ \\
1822: 4101.7 & 17.8 & H{\,\sc i}& 6 -- 2 \\
1823: 4120.8 & 2.0 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s5s$\,\,^3$S -- 1s2p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1824: 4128.1 & 2.9 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$4f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3s$^2$3d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
1825: 4130.9 & 3.6 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$4f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3s$^2$3d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
1826: 4143.8 & 1.2 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s6d$\,\,^1$D -- 1s2p$\,\,^1$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1827: 4173.5 & 2.8 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
1828: 4178.9 & 1.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
1829: 4233.2 & 4.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
1830: 4303.2 & 1.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
1831: 4340.5 & 27.7 & H{\,\sc i}& 5 -- 2 \\
1832: 4351.8 & 3.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
1833: 4352.6 & 1.7 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{1}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$P) 4s$\,\,^5$P$_{2}$ \\
1834: 4371.3 & 1.8 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{2}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$P) 4s$\,\,^5$P$_{3}$ \\
1835: 4385.4 & 1.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{1/2}$ \\
1836: 4388.1 & 1.4 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s5d$\,\,^1$D -- 1s2p$\,\,^1$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1837: 4395.8 & 1.7 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{2}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$P) 4s$\,\,^5$P$_{1}$ \\
1838: 4416.8 & 1.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{1/2}$ \\
1839: 4419.6 & 2.5 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{3}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$P) 4s$\,\,^5$P$_{3}$ \\
1840: 4431.0 & 1.7 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{3}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$P) 4s$\,\,^5$P$_{2}$ \\
1841: 4471.5 & 3.6 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s4d$\,\,^3$D -- 1s2p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1842: 4481.1 & 2.4 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 4f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
1843: 4481.3 & 2.2 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 4f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
1844: 4508.3 & 2.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{3/2}$ \\
1845: 4515.3 & 1.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
1846: 4520.2 & 1.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
1847: 4522.6 & 3.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
1848: 4549.5 & 5.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
1849: 4555.9 & 2.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
1850: 4583.8 & 3.8 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
1851: 4629.3 & 2.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
1852: 4713.2 & 2.6 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s4s$\,\,^3$S -- 1s2p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1853: 4815.5 & 1.2 & S{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$3p$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p$\,\,^4$S$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3s$^2$3p$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s$\,\,^4$P$_{5/2}$\\
1854: 4861.3 & 47.2 & H{\,\sc i}& 4 -- 2 \\
1855: 4921.9 & 1.6 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s4d$\,\,^1$D -- 1s2p$\,\,^1$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1856: 4923.9 & 3.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,a$^6$S$_{5/2}$ \\
1857: 5014.0 & 1.3 & S{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$3p$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3s$^2$3p$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s$\,\,^2$P$_{3/2}$\\
1858: 5015.7 & 3.3 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s3p$\,\,^1$P$^{\rm o}$ -- 1s2s$\,\,^1$S \\
1859: 5018.4 & 3.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$P$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,a$^6$S$_{5/2}$ \\
1860: 5041.0 & 3.0 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$ 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ -- 3s$^2$ 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ \\
1861: 5047.7 & 1.0 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s4s$\,\,^1$S -- 1s2p$\,\,^1$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1862: 5056.0 & 4.5 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$ 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ -- 3s$^2$ 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ \\
1863: 5073.9 & 1.5 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{1}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$D) 4s$\,\,^5$D$_{1}$ \\
1864: 5086.7 & 1.3 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{1}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$D) 4s$\,\,^5$D$_{2}$ \\
1865: 5127.4 & 2.3 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{2}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$D) 4s$\,\,^5$D$_{3}$ \\
1866: 5127.6 & 1.7 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{2}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$D) 4s$\,\,^5$D$_{2}$ \\
1867: 5156.1 & 3.2 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{3}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$D) 4s$\,\,^5$D$_{4}$ \\
1868: 5169.0 & 3.9 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$P$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,a$^6$S$_{5/2}$ \\
1869: 5193.9 & 1.5 & Fe{\,\sc iii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4p$\,\,^5$P$^{\rm o}_{3}$ -- 3d$^5$\,($^4$D) 4s$\,\,^5$D$_{3}$ \\
1870: 5197.6 & 2.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{5/2}$ \\
1871: 5234.6 & 2.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{7/2}$ \\
1872: 5276.0 & 3.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{9/2}$ \\
1873: 5316.6 & 3.9 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{11/2}$ \\
1874: 5640.0 & 2.4 & S{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$3p$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p$\,\,^2$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3s$^2$3p$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s$\,\,^2$P$_{3/2}$\\
1875: 5647.0 & 1.7 & S{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$3p$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p$\,\,^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3s$^2$3p$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s$\,\,^2$P$_{1/2}$\\
1876: 5875.7 & 5.1 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s3d$\,\,^3$D -- 1s2p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1877: 5978.9 & 1.6 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$ 5s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ -- 3s$^2$ 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ \\
1878: 6456.4 & 1.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{7/2}$ \\
1879: 6562.8 & 103.6 & H{\,\sc i}& 3 -- 2 \\
1880: 6578.0 & 4.3 & C{\,\sc ii}& 2s$^2$3p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 2s$^2$3s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ \\
1881: 6582.9 & 2.9 & C{\,\sc ii}& 2s$^2$3p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 2s$^2$3s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ \\
1882: 6678.1 & 1.8 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s3d$\,\,^1$D -- 1s2p$\,\,^1$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1883: 7065.3 & 3.3 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s3s$\,\,^3$S -- 1s2p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1884: 7281.4 & 1.2 & He{\,\sc i}& 1s3s$\,\,^1$S -- 1s2p$\,\,^1$P$^{\rm o}$ \\
1885: 7771.9 & -1.7 & O{\,\sc i}& 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3p$\,\,^5$P$_{3}$ -- 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3s$\,\,^5$S$^{\rm o}_{2}$ \\
1886: 7774.2 & -1.3 & O{\,\sc i}& 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3p$\,\,^5$P$_{2}$ -- 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3s$\,\,^5$S$^{\rm o}_{2}$ \\
1887: 7848.8 & 1.0 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$ 5f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3s$^2$ 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
1888: 7849.7 & 1.4 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$ 5f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3s$^2$ 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
1889: 7877.0 & 5.8 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ -- 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ \\
1890: 7896.0 & 1.3 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ -- 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ \\
1891: 7896.4 & 9.4 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ -- 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ \\
1892: 8214.0 & 2.3 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 5s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ -- 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ \\
1893: 8234.6 & 5.3 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 5s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ -- 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ \\
1894: 8438.0 & 1.0 & H{\,\sc i}& 18 -- 3 \\
1895: 8446.4 & 2.0 & O{\,\sc i}& 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3p$\,\,^3$P$_{2}$ -- 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3s$\,\,^3$S$^{\rm o}_{1}$ \\
1896: 8446.8 & 1.2 & O{\,\sc i}& 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3p$\,\,^3$P$_{1}$ -- 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3s$\,\,^3$S$^{\rm o}_{1}$ \\
1897: 8467.3 & 1.2 & H{\,\sc i}& 17 -- 3 \\
1898: 8502.5 & 1.4 & H{\,\sc i}& 16 -- 3 \\
1899: 8545.4 & 1.6 & H{\,\sc i}& 15 -- 3 \\
1900: 8598.4 & 1.9 & H{\,\sc i}& 14 -- 3 \\
1901: 8665.0 & 2.3 & H{\,\sc i}& 13 -- 3 \\
1902: 8750.5 & 2.8 & H{\,\sc i}& 12 -- 3 \\
1903: 8862.8 & 3.5 & H{\,\sc i}& 11 -- 3 \\
1904: 8912.1 & 1.1 & Ca{\,\sc ii}& 3p$^6$4f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3p$^6$4d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
1905: 8927.4 & 1.6 & Ca{\,\sc ii}& 3p$^6$4f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3p$^6$4d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
1906: 9014.9 & 4.5 & H{\,\sc i}& 10 -- 3 \\
1907: 9218.3 & 15.3 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 4s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ \\
1908: 9229.0 & 6.3 & H{\,\sc i}& 9 -- 3 \\
1909: 9244.3 & 10.8 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 4s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ \\
1910: 9297.3 & 2.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^5$\,($^4$P) 4s4p\,($^3$P) $\,\,^6$D$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 5s\,\,e$^6$D$_{9/2}$ \\
1911: 9546.0 & 9.1 & H{\,\sc i}& 8 -- 3 \\
1912: 9631.9 & 2.2 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 5f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
1913: 9632.4 & 1.6 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 5f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
1914: 9997.6 & 4.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,b$^4$G$_{11/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ \\
1915: 10049.4 & 14.2 & H{\,\sc i}& 7 -- 3 \\
1916: 10087.7 & 1.0 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 5\,\,z$^2$Z -- 4f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ \\
1917: 10366.2 & 1.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,y$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{11/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,b$^4$G$_{11/2}$ \\
1918: 10501.5 & 3.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,b$^4$G$_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ \\
1919:
1920: \end{longtable}
1921: % \end{center}
1922:
1923: \clearpage
1924:
1925: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1926: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1927: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TABLE 3 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1928: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1929:
1930: % \begin{center}
1931: \begin{longtable}{lrll}
1932: \caption{Line list for model used to match observations on 1994 October 1} \label{tab_linelist} \\
1933:
1934: \hline \hline \\[-2ex]
1935: $\lambda$ (\,\AA) & $W_{\lambda}$ (\,\AA) & Species & Transition (upper level -- lower level) \\[0.5ex] \hline
1936: \\[-1.8ex]
1937: \endfirsthead
1938:
1939: \multicolumn{4}{c}{{\tablename} \thetable{} -- Continued} \\[0.5ex]
1940: \hline \hline \\[-2ex]
1941: $\lambda$ (\,\AA) & $W_{\lambda}$(\,\AA) & Species & Transition (upper level -- lower level) \\[0.5ex] \hline
1942: \\[-1.8ex]
1943: \endhead
1944:
1945: %This is the footer for all pages except the last page of the table...
1946: \\[0.5ex] \hline
1947: \\[-1.8ex]
1948: \multicolumn{4}{l}{{Continued on Next Page\ldots}}
1949: \endfoot
1950:
1951: %This is the footer for the last page of the table...
1952: \\[-1.8ex] \hline \hline
1953: \endlastfoot
1954: % FILE ewdata_e1_v2_s2_12_0s1_cut_latex
1955:
1956: 3202.5 & -3.4 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4s\,\,a$^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
1957: 3203.4 & -1.4 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{3/2}$ \\
1958: 3210.4 & -5.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{1/2}$ \\
1959: 3211.1 & -1.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,x$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,b$^2$F$_{5/2}$ \\
1960: 3212.0 & -2.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p\,\,z$^4$I$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,b$^2$G$_{9/2}$ \\
1961: 3213.3 & -6.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
1962: 3214.8 & -2.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
1963: 3217.1 & -4.1 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
1964: 3218.3 & -2.4 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4p\,\,y$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$ a$^2$H$_{9/2}$ \\
1965: 3222.8 & -4.4 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
1966: 3224.2 & -2.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4p\,\,y$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^3$ a$^2$H$_{11/2}$ \\
1967: 3227.7 & -6.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
1968: 3228.6 & -3.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,z$^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4s\,\,a$^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
1969: 3229.2 & -4.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{3/2}$ \\
1970: 3229.4 & -3.1 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$ a$^2$G$_{9/2}$ \\
1971: 3231.3 & -1.8 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
1972: 3231.7 & -2.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p\,\,z$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
1973: 3232.3 & -2.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$a$^2$G$_{7/2}$ \\
1974: 3232.8 & -2.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,z$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^1$G2) 4s\,\,c$^2$G$_{7/2}$ \\
1975: 3234.5 & -6.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
1976: 3234.9 & -1.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4s\,\,a$^4$D$_{7/2}$ \\
1977: 3236.1 & -2.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4s\,\,a$^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
1978: 3236.6 & -6.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
1979: 3237.4 & -1.8 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,y$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
1980: 3237.8 & -2.8 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,y$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{1/2}$ \\
1981: 3239.0 & -5.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
1982: 3239.7 & -2.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4s\,\,a$^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
1983: 3242.0 & -5.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{3/2}$ \\
1984: 3243.7 & -2.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,z$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^1$G2) 4s\,\,c$^2$G$_{9/2}$ \\
1985: 3247.2 & -3.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,y$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
1986: 3247.4 & -1.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,z$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^1$G2) 4s\,\,c$^2$G$_{7/2}$ \\
1987: 3248.6 & -4.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,y$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
1988: 3248.7 & -1.1 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
1989: 3249.4 & -2.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4s\,\,a$^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
1990: 3249.7 & -1.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,y$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
1991: 3249.9 & -1.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4p\,\,z$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
1992: 3250.3 & -1.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4p\,\,z$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{1/2}$ \\
1993: 3251.9 & -3.9 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
1994: 3252.9 & -4.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
1995: 3252.9 & -2.7 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4s\,\,a$^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
1996: 3254.3 & -3.9 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
1997: 3255.9 & -4.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4s\,\,a$^4$D$_{7/2}$ \\
1998: 3258.0 & -1.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4s4p $\,\,^3$P \,\,y$^6$P$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
1999: 3258.8 & -3.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,y$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2000: 3259.1 & -3.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,y$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{7/2}$ \\
2001: 3261.6 & -3.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4p\,\,z$^2$H$^{\rm o}_{11/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4s\,\,b$^2$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2002: 3261.6 & -3.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,y$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2003: 3263.7 & -1.4 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,z$^4$S$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2004: 3264.8 & -2.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4s\,\,a$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2005: 3266.9 & -1.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p\,\,z$^4$H$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,b$^2$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2006: 3268.5 & -1.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,y$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^1$G2) 4s\,\,c$^2$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2007: 3271.7 & -2.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,y$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2008: 3272.1 & -2.4 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,y$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2009: 3276.6 & -1.8 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p\,\,z$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,b$^2$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2010: 3276.8 & -1.9 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,z$^4$S$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2011: 3277.4 & -4.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4s\,\,a$^4$D$_{7/2}$ \\
2012: 3278.3 & -2.7 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,y$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2013: 3278.9 & -3.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,z$^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4s\,\,a$^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2014: 3280.0 & -1.7 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$a$^2$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2015: 3281.3 & -4.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4s\,\,a$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2016: 3282.3 & -2.4 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,y$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2017: 3285.4 & -2.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4s\,\,a$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2018: 3287.7 & -3.1 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4p\,\,z$^2$H$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4s\,\,b$^2$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2019: 3289.4 & -2.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p\,\,z$^4$H$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,b$^2$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2020: 3295.2 & -1.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4p\,\,y$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2021: 3295.8 & -3.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4s\,\,a$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2022: 3296.8 & -1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p\,\,z$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,b$^2$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2023: 3297.9 & -1.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4p\,\,z$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,b$^2$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2024: 3302.9 & -2.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4s\,\,a$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2025: 3303.5 & -3.9 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4s\,\,a$^4$D$_{1/2}$ \\
2026: 3308.8 & -2.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2027: 3314.0 & -1.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4s\,\,a$^4$D$_{1/2}$ \\
2028: 3315.3 & -1.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,z$^4$S$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2029: 3318.0 & -2.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2030: 3321.7 & -2.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,z$^4$S$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2031: 3322.9 & -4.9 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2032: 3323.1 & -2.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p\,\,z$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,b$^2$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2033: 3326.8 & -2.4 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{3/2}$ \\
2034: 3329.1 & -1.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p\,\,z$^4$I$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{7/2}$ \\
2035: 3329.4 & -4.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2036: 3332.1 & -2.9 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,z$^4$S$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2037: 3335.2 & -4.1 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2038: 3338.5 & -1.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4p\,\,y$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2039: 3340.4 & -3.8 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{3/2}$ \\
2040: 3341.9 & -4.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^2$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2041: 3343.8 & -2.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2042: 3346.8 & -2.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2043: 3348.9 & -2.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2044: 3349.0 & -4.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^2$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2045: 3349.4 & -5.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{11/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2046: 3350.4 & -1.2 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^1$D) 4s$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2047: 3361.2 & -5.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2048: 3372.2 & -1.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^2$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2049: 3372.8 & -4.7 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2050: 3374.0 & -1.8 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^3$P) 4s$\,\,^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2051: 3380.3 & -3.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2052: 3381.4 & -1.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$P$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2053: 3383.8 & -4.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{3/2}$ \\
2054: 3387.3 & -1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p z$^4$I$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,b$^2$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2055: 3387.9 & -3.4 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2056: 3394.6 & -3.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2057: 3407.3 & -1.7 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^4$D$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^3$P) 4s$\,\,^4$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2058: 3416.0 & -2.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2059: 3425.6 & -1.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$P$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2060: 3436.1 & -1.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4p\,\,z$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,b$^2$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2061: 3443.8 & -1.8 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2062: 3444.3 & -2.7 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{11/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2063: 3454.2 & -1.5 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^1$D) 4s$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2064: 3456.4 & -1.7 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,y$^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2065: 3456.9 & -1.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4p\,\,y$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{7/2}$ \\
2066: 3461.5 & -2.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2067: 3465.6 & -1.6 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^3$P) 4s$\,\,^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2068: 3468.7 & -1.8 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p z$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^1$G2) 4s\,\,c$^2$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2069: 3471.4 & -1.6 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^3$P) 4s$\,\,^4$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2070: 3475.7 & -1.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2071: 3477.2 & -2.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2072: 3479.9 & -1.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2073: 3488.0 & -1.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2074: 3491.1 & -2.1 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{3/2}$ \\
2075: 3493.5 & -2.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p z$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^1$G2) 4s\,\,c$^2$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2076: 3494.7 & -2.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2077: 3503.5 & -1.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$F$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2078: 3504.9 & -2.8 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4p\,\,y$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4s\,\,b$^2$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2079: 3507.4 & -1.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^2$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2080: 3510.8 & -2.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4p\,\,y$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4s\,\,b$^2$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2081: 3514.0 & -2.4 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^3$P) 4s$\,\,^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2082: 3520.3 & -1.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,x$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^2$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2083: 3535.4 & -1.8 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,x$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2084: 3564.5 & -1.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p\,\,z$^4$I$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^1$G2) 4s\,\,c$^2$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2085: 3573.7 & -1.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^2$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2086: 3576.8 & -1.8 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^3$P) 4s$\,\,^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2087: 3596.1 & -1.9 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^2$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2088: 3608.8 & -1.0 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^1$D) 4s$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2089: 3624.8 & -1.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,z$^2$S$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^2$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2090: 3641.3 & -2.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,z$^2$S$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2091: 3662.3 & 1.0 & H{\,\sc i}& 30 -- 2 \\
2092: 3663.4 & 1.2 & H{\,\sc i}& 29 -- 2 \\
2093: 3664.7 & 1.4 & H{\,\sc i}& 28 -- 2 \\
2094: 3666.1 & 1.6 & H{\,\sc i}& 27 -- 2 \\
2095: 3667.7 & 1.8 & H{\,\sc i}& 26 -- 2 \\
2096: 3669.5 & 1.9 & H{\,\sc i}& 25 -- 2 \\
2097: 3671.5 & 2.1 & H{\,\sc i}& 24 -- 2 \\
2098: 3673.8 & 2.2 & H{\,\sc i}& 23 -- 2 \\
2099: 3676.4 & 2.3 & H{\,\sc i}& 22 -- 2 \\
2100: 3679.4 & 2.4 & H{\,\sc i}& 21 -- 2 \\
2101: 3682.8 & 2.5 & H{\,\sc i}& 20 -- 2 \\
2102: 3686.8 & 2.6 & H{\,\sc i}& 19 -- 2 \\
2103: 3691.6 & 2.7 & H{\,\sc i}& 18 -- 2 \\
2104: 3697.1 & 2.8 & H{\,\sc i}& 17 -- 2 \\
2105: 3703.9 & 2.8 & H{\,\sc i}& 16 -- 2 \\
2106: 3706.0 & 1.9 & Ca{\,\sc ii}& 3p$^6$5s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ -- 3p$^6$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ \\
2107: 3712.0 & 2.8 & H{\,\sc i}& 15 -- 2 \\
2108: 3721.9 & 2.8 & H{\,\sc i}& 14 -- 2 \\
2109: 3734.4 & 2.8 & H{\,\sc i}& 13 -- 2 \\
2110: 3736.9 & 2.6 & Ca{\,\sc ii}& 3p$^6$5s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ -- 3p$^6$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ \\
2111: 3748.5 & 1.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4p\,\,z$^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^1$D2) 4s\,\,c$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2112: 3750.1 & 2.8 & H{\,\sc i}& 12 -- 2 \\
2113: 3769.5 & 2.8 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^1$D) 4s$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2114: 3770.6 & 2.8 & H{\,\sc i}& 11 -- 2 \\
2115: 3783.4 & 1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2116: 3797.9 & 3.0 & H{\,\sc i}& 10 -- 2 \\
2117: 3835.4 & 3.3 & H{\,\sc i}& 9 -- 2 \\
2118: 3845.2 & 1.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4p\,\,z$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2119: 3849.6 & 1.5 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^1$G) 4s$^2$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2120: 3853.7 & 2.1 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3s3p$^2\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2121: 3856.0 & 1.5 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3s3p$^2\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2122: 3862.6 & 1.8 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3s3p$^2\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2123: 3888.6 & 1.6 & H{\,\sc i}& 1s3p$\,\,^3$P$^{\rm o}$ -- 1s2s$\,\,^3$S \\
2124: 3889.1 & 3.9 & H{\,\sc i}& 8 -- 2 \\
2125: 3914.5 & 1.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2126: 3930.3 & 1.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2127: 3933.7 & 3.0 & Ca{\,\sc ii}& 3p$^6$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3p$^6$4s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ \\
2128: 3938.3 & 2.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2129: 3945.2 & 1.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2130: 3968.5 & 3.4 & Ca{\,\sc ii}& 3p$^6$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3p$^6$4s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ \\
2131: 3969.4 & 2.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2132: 3970.1 & 5.2 & H{\,\sc i}& 7 -- 2 \\
2133: 3974.2 & 1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2134: 4002.1 & 1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2135: 4015.5 & 1.0 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^2$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^1$G) 4s $^2$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2136: 4024.6 & 1.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4p\,\,z$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2137: 4067.0 & 2.3 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^1$G) 4s $^2$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2138: 4075.9 & 1.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2139: 4101.7 & 7.9 & H{\,\sc i}& 6 -- 2 \\
2140: 4122.7 & 1.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2141: 4128.8 & 1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2142: 4173.5 & 2.9 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2143: 4177.7 & 1.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2144: 4178.9 & 2.9 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2145: 4181.0 & 2.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4p\,\,z$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^1$D2) 4s\,\,c$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2146: 4233.2 & 3.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2147: 4258.1 & 2.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2148: 4273.3 & 2.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2149: 4278.2 & 1.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4s\,\,a$^4$H$_{7/2}$ \\
2150: 4290.2 & 1.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2151: 4296.6 & 2.9 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2152: 4300.0 & 1.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2153: 4303.2 & 3.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2154: 4314.3 & 1.9 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4s\,\,a$^4$H$_{9/2}$ \\
2155: 4340.5 & 13.5 & H{\,\sc i}& 5 -- 2 \\
2156: 4351.8 & 4.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2157: 4369.4 & 1.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2158: 4384.3 & 2.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4s\,\,a$^4$H$_{11/2}$ \\
2159: 4385.4 & 3.9 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2160: 4395.0 & 1.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4s\,\,a$^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2161: 4413.6 & 1.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4s\,\,a$^4$H$_{9/2}$ \\
2162: 4416.8 & 4.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2163: 4443.8 & 1.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4s\,\,a$^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2164: 4468.5 & 1.4 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$ a$^2$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2165: 4472.9 & 2.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2166: 4481.1 & 1.3 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 4f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2167: 4481.3 & 1.4 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 4f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2168: 4489.2 & 3.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2169: 4491.4 & 3.9 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{3/2}$ \\
2170: 4501.3 & 1.4 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^2$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2171: 4508.3 & 4.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{3/2}$ \\
2172: 4515.3 & 4.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2173: 4520.2 & 4.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2174: 4522.6 & 4.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2175: 4534.0 & 2.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2176: 4534.2 & 2.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{3/2}$ \\
2177: 4541.5 & 3.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{3/2}$ \\
2178: 4549.5 & 4.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2179: 4549.6 & 2.9 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^2$H$_{11/2}$ \\
2180: 4555.9 & 4.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2181: 4563.8 & 1.9 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^2$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2182: 4572.0 & 2.8 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^2$H$_{9/2}$ \\
2183: 4576.3 & 3.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2184: 4580.1 & 2.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$P$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2185: 4582.8 & 3.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2186: 4583.8 & 4.9 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2187: 4620.5 & 3.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2188: 4629.3 & 4.9 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2189: 4657.0 & 1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,a$^6$S$_{5/2}$ \\
2190: 4666.8 & 3.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2191: 4670.2 & 1.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2192: 4731.5 & 1.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,a$^6$S$_{5/2}$ \\
2193: 4861.3 & 24.0 & H{\,\sc i}& 4 -- 2 \\
2194: 4871.3 & 1.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2195: 4923.9 & 2.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,a$^6$S$_{5/2}$ \\
2196: 4993.4 & 2.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$P$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2197: 5018.4 & 2.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$P$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,a$^6$S$_{5/2}$ \\
2198: 5041.0 & 1.2 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$ 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ -- 3s$^2$ 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ \\
2199: 5056.0 & 1.2 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$ 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ -- 3s$^2$ 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ \\
2200: 5132.7 & 1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2201: 5146.1 & 1.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2202: 5154.4 & 1.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2203: 5169.0 & 2.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$P$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,a$^6$S$_{5/2}$ \\
2204: 5188.7 & 1.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2205: 5197.6 & 6.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{5/2}$ \\
2206: 5234.6 & 6.9 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2207: 5254.9 & 3.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{5/2}$ \\
2208: 5264.8 & 3.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{5/2}$ \\
2209: 5276.0 & 7.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2210: 5284.1 & 3.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,a$^6$S$_{5/2}$ \\
2211: 5316.6 & 7.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{11/2}$ \\
2212: 5316.8 & 5.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2213: 5325.5 & 6.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2214: 5337.7 & 1.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{5/2}$ \\
2215: 5362.9 & 5.8 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2216: 5414.1 & 1.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2217: 5425.3 & 3.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2218: 5427.8 & 1.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4p w$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,b$^4$G$_{11/2}$ \\
2219: 5433.0 & 1.8 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4s\,\,b$^2$H$_{9/2}$ \\
2220: 5534.9 & 5.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4s\,\,b$^2$H$_{11/2}$ \\
2221: 5991.4 & 3.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{11/2}$ \\
2222: 6084.1 & 1.8 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2223: 6147.7 & 4.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2224: 6149.3 & 4.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{1/2}$ \\
2225: 6238.4 & 4.9 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2226: 6240.0 & 1.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{1/2}$ \\
2227: 6247.6 & 6.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2228: 6416.9 & 4.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2229: 6432.7 & 2.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,a$^6$S$_{5/2}$ \\
2230: 6456.4 & 7.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{7/2}$ \\
2231: 6516.1 & 3.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,a$^6$S$_{5/2}$ \\
2232: 6562.8 & 55.6 & H{\,\sc i}& 3 -- 2 \\
2233: 7222.4 & 2.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2234: 7224.5 & 2.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{1/2}$ \\
2235: 7289.0 & 1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2236: 7308.1 & 3.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2237: 7310.2 & 2.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{1/2}$ \\
2238: 7320.6 & 2.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2239: 7449.3 & 2.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2240: 7462.4 & 5.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2241: 7479.7 & 1.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2242: 7515.8 & 1.8 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{7/2}$ \\
2243: 7655.5 & 1.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2244: 7711.7 & 6.8 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{7/2}$ \\
2245: 7771.9 & -2.8 & O{\,\sc i}& 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3p$\,\,^5$P$_{3}$ -- 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3s$\,\,^5$S$^{\rm o}_{2}$ \\
2246: 7774.2 & -2.5 & O{\,\sc i}& 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3p$\,\,^5$P$_{2}$ -- 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3s$\,\,^5$S$^{\rm o}_{2}$ \\
2247: 7775.4 & -1.9 & O{\,\sc i}& 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3p$\,\,^5$P$_{1}$ -- 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3s$\,\,^5$S$^{\rm o}_{2}$ \\
2248: 7841.4 & 1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{7/2}$ \\
2249: 7849.7 & 1.1 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$ 5f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3s$^2$ 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2250: 7877.0 & 3.4 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ -- 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ \\
2251: 7896.0 & 1.2 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ -- 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ \\
2252: 7896.4 & 4.2 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ -- 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ \\
2253: 8234.6 & 1.2 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 5s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ -- 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ \\
2254: 8446.4 & 2.3 & O{\,\sc i}& 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3p$\,\,^3$P$_{2}$ -- 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3s$\,\,^3$S$^{\rm o}_{1}$ \\
2255: 8446.8 & 1.6 & O{\,\sc i}& 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3p$\,\,^3$P$_{1}$ -- 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3s$\,\,^3$S$^{\rm o}_{1}$ \\
2256: 8498.0 & -1.2 & Ca{\,\sc ii}& 3p$^6$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3p$^6$3d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2257: 8542.1 & -2.5 & Ca{\,\sc ii}& 3p$^6$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3p$^6$3d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2258: 8545.4 & 1.0 & H{\,\sc i}& 15 -- 3 \\
2259: 8598.4 & 1.0 & H{\,\sc i}& 14 -- 3 \\
2260: 8662.1 & -2.3 & Ca{\,\sc ii}& 3p$^6$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3p$^6$3d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2261: 8665.0 & 1.2 & H{\,\sc i}& 13 -- 3 \\
2262: 8750.5 & 1.3 & H{\,\sc i}& 12 -- 3 \\
2263: 8862.8 & 1.7 & H{\,\sc i}& 11 -- 3 \\
2264: 8912.1 & 1.2 & Ca{\,\sc ii}& 3p$^6$4f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3p$^6$4d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2265: 8927.4 & 1.8 & Ca{\,\sc ii}& 3p$^6$4f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3p$^6$4d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2266: 8981.1 & 1.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p z$^2$H$^{\rm o}_{11/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,b$^4$G$_{11/2}$ \\
2267: 9014.9 & 2.1 & H{\,\sc i}& 10 -- 3 \\
2268: 9218.3 & 4.4 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 4s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ \\
2269: 9229.0 & 3.1 & H{\,\sc i}& 9 -- 3 \\
2270: 9244.3 & 4.2 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 4s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ \\
2271: 9297.3 & 1.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^5$\,($^4$P) 4s4p\,($^3$P) $\,\,^6$D$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 5s\,\,e$^6$D$_{9/2}$ \\
2272: 9546.0 & 4.7 & H{\,\sc i}& 8 -- 3 \\
2273: 9550.3 & 1.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{11/2}$ -- 3d$^6$ $\,\,^3$F$_1$ 4s\,\,c$\,\,^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2274: 9631.9 & 3.6 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 5f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2275: 9632.4 & 2.6 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 5f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2276: 9956.3 & 1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,b$^4$G$_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ \\
2277: 9997.6 & 8.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,b$^4$G$_{11/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ \\
2278: 10049.4 & 8.1 & H{\,\sc i}& 7 -- 3 \\
2279: 10245.5 & 1.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,y$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,b$^4$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2280: 10332.9 & 2.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,y$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,b$^4$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2281: 10366.2 & 3.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,y$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{11/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,b$^4$G$_{11/2}$ \\
2282: 10490.9 & 1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,b$^4$G$_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ \\
2283: 10501.5 & 6.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,b$^4$G$_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ \\
2284:
2285: \end{longtable}
2286: % \end{center}
2287:
2288: \clearpage
2289:
2290: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2291: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2292: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TABLE 4 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2293: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2294:
2295: % \begin{center}
2296: \begin{longtable}{lrll}
2297: \caption{Line list for model used to match observations on 1994 October 11} \label{tab_linelist} \\
2298:
2299: \hline \hline \\[-2ex]
2300: $\lambda$ (\,\AA) & $W_{\lambda}$ (\,\AA) & Species & Transition (upper level -- lower level) \\[0.5ex] \hline
2301: \\[-1.8ex]
2302: \endfirsthead
2303:
2304: \multicolumn{4}{c}{{\tablename} \thetable{} -- Continued} \\[0.5ex]
2305: \hline \hline \\[-2ex]
2306: $\lambda$ (\,\AA) & $W_{\lambda}$(\,\AA) & Species & Transition (upper level -- lower level) \\[0.5ex] \hline
2307: \\[-1.8ex]
2308: \endhead
2309:
2310: %This is the footer for all pages except the last page of the table...
2311: \\[0.5ex] \hline
2312: \\[-1.8ex]
2313: \multicolumn{4}{l}{{Continued on Next Page\ldots}}
2314: \endfoot
2315:
2316: %This is the footer for the last page of the table...
2317: \\[-1.8ex] \hline \hline
2318: \endlastfoot
2319:
2320: 3202.5 & -4.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4s\,\,a$^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2321: 3203.4 & -2.7 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{3/2}$ \\
2322: 3210.4 & -4.8 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2323: 3212.0 & -2.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p\,\,z4I$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,b$^2$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2324: 3213.3 & -6.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2325: 3214.8 & -3.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2326: 3216.9 & -1.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$ a$^2$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2327: 3217.1 & -5.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2328: 3218.3 & -3.1 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4p\,\,y$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$ a$^2$H$_{9/2}$ \\
2329: 3222.8 & -5.8 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2330: 3224.2 & -3.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4p\,\,y$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^3$ a$^2$H$_{11/2}$ \\
2331: 3226.8 & -2.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2332: 3227.7 & -6.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2333: 3228.6 & -3.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,z$^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4s\,\,a$^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2334: 3229.2 & -5.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{3/2}$ \\
2335: 3229.4 & -3.7 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$a$^2$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2336: 3231.3 & -3.1 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2337: 3231.7 & -1.8 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p\,\,z$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2338: 3232.3 & -3.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$a$^2$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2339: 3232.8 & -1.9 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,z$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^1$G2) 4s\,\,c$^2$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2340: 3234.5 & -8.4 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2341: 3234.9 & -1.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4s\,\,a$^4$D$_{7/2}$ \\
2342: 3236.1 & -3.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4s\,\,a$^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2343: 3236.6 & -7.8 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2344: 3237.4 & -1.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,y$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2345: 3237.8 & -2.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,y$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{1/2}$ \\
2346: 3239.0 & -7.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2347: 3239.7 & -2.8 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4s\,\,a$^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2348: 3242.0 & -6.9 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{3/2}$ \\
2349: 3243.7 & -2.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,z$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^1$G2) 4s\,\,c$^2$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2350: 3247.2 & -2.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,y$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2351: 3247.4 & -1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,z$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^1$G2) 4s\,\,c$^2$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2352: 3248.6 & -4.8 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,y$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2353: 3248.7 & -2.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2354: 3249.4 & -2.8 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4s\,\,a$^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2355: 3249.7 & -1.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,y$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2356: 3249.9 & -1.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4p\,\,z$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2357: 3250.3 & -1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4p\,\,z$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{1/2}$ \\
2358: 3251.9 & -5.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2359: 3252.9 & -5.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2360: 3252.9 & -3.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4s\,\,a$^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2361: 3254.3 & -5.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2362: 3255.9 & -4.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4s\,\,a$^4$D$_{7/2}$ \\
2363: 3258.0 & -1.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^5$\,($^6$S) 4s4p\,($^3$P)\,\,y$^6$P$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2364: 3258.8 & -2.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,y$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2365: 3259.1 & -2.8 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,y$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{7/2}$ \\
2366: 3260.3 & -2.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,z$^4$S$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^4$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2367: 3261.6 & -3.9 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4p\,\,z$^2$H$^{\rm o}_{11/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4s\,\,b$^2$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2368: 3261.6 & -4.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,y$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2369: 3263.7 & -2.4 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,z$^4$S$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2370: 3264.8 & -2.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4s\,\,a$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2371: 3266.4 & -1.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,y$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2372: 3266.9 & -1.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p\,\,z$^4$H$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,b$^2$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2373: 3269.7 & -1.4 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,y$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^2$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2374: 3271.7 & -3.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,y$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2375: 3272.1 & -3.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,y$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2376: 3276.6 & -1.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p\,\,z$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,b$^2$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2377: 3276.8 & -2.7 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,z$^4$S$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2378: 3277.4 & -4.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4s\,\,a$^4$D$_{7/2}$ \\
2379: 3278.3 & -3.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,y$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2380: 3278.9 & -3.9 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,z$^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4s\,\,a$^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2381: 3280.0 & -1.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,y$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^2$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2382: 3280.0 & -2.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$a$^2$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2383: 3281.3 & -4.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4s\,\,a$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2384: 3282.3 & -3.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,y$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2385: 3283.2 & -1.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,y$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2386: 3285.4 & -2.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4s\,\,a$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2387: 3287.7 & -3.7 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4p\,\,z$^2$H$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4s\,\,b$^2$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2388: 3288.1 & -1.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2389: 3288.4 & -1.8 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,y$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2390: 3288.6 & -2.1 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,y$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2391: 3289.4 & -1.9 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p\,\,z$^4$H$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,b$^2$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2392: 3295.2 & -1.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4p\,\,y$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2393: 3295.8 & -3.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4s\,\,a$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2394: 3297.9 & -1.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4p\,\,z$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,b$^2$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2395: 3302.1 & -1.7 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2396: 3302.9 & -2.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4s\,\,a$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2397: 3303.5 & -3.9 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4s\,\,a$^4$D$_{1/2}$ \\
2398: 3308.8 & -3.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2399: 3312.9 & -1.4 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,z$^4$S$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^2$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2400: 3314.0 & -1.9 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4s\,\,a$^4$D$_{1/2}$ \\
2401: 3315.3 & -2.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,z$^4$S$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2402: 3318.0 & -3.9 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2403: 3321.7 & -3.4 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,z$^4$S$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2404: 3322.9 & -6.4 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2405: 3323.1 & -1.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p\,\,z$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,b$^2$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2406: 3326.8 & -3.7 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{3/2}$ \\
2407: 3326.9 & -1.1 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2408: 3329.1 & -1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p\,\,z4I$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{7/2}$ \\
2409: 3329.4 & -6.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2410: 3332.1 & -3.7 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,z$^4$S$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2411: 3335.2 & -5.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2412: 3337.9 & -1.8 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2413: 3338.5 & -1.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4p\,\,y$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2414: 3340.4 & -5.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{3/2}$ \\
2415: 3341.9 & -5.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^2$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2416: 3343.8 & -3.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2417: 3346.8 & -3.8 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2418: 3348.9 & -3.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2419: 3349.0 & -5.4 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^2$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2420: 3349.4 & -7.1 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{11/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2421: 3350.4 & -1.0 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^1$D) 4s$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2422: 3352.1 & -1.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,z$^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^2$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2423: 3361.2 & -6.7 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2424: 3366.2 & -1.8 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,z$^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2425: 3372.2 & -2.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^2$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2426: 3372.8 & -6.4 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2427: 3374.0 & -1.5 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^3$P) 4s$\,\,^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2428: 3374.4 & -1.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2429: 3380.3 & -4.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2430: 3381.4 & -1.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$P$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2431: 3383.8 & -6.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{3/2}$ \\
2432: 3387.9 & -4.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2433: 3388.8 & -1.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2434: 3394.6 & -4.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2435: 3402.4 & -1.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,z$^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^2$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2436: 3407.2 & -1.8 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2437: 3407.3 & -1.5 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^4$D$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^3$P) 4s$\,\,^4$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2438: 3409.8 & -2.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2439: 3416.0 & -2.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2440: 3417.0 & -1.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,z$^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2441: 3425.6 & -1.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$P$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2442: 3443.8 & -1.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2443: 3444.3 & -3.8 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{11/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2444: 3452.5 & -1.7 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,y$^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^2$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2445: 3454.2 & -1.2 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^1$D) 4s$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2446: 3456.4 & -2.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,y$^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2447: 3456.9 & -1.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4p\,\,y$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{7/2}$ \\
2448: 3461.5 & -3.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2449: 3465.6 & -1.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,y$^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2450: 3465.6 & -1.4 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^3$P) 4s$\,\,^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2451: 3468.7 & -1.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p z$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^1$G2) 4s\,\,c$^2$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2452: 3471.4 & -1.4 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^3$P) 4s$\,\,^4$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2453: 3475.7 & -1.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2454: 3477.0 & -1.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2455: 3477.2 & -3.4 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2456: 3479.9 & -1.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2457: 3480.9 & -1.1 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,z$^2$S$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4s\,\,a$^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2458: 3488.0 & -1.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2459: 3489.7 & -1.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2460: 3491.1 & -3.1 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{3/2}$ \\
2461: 3493.5 & -1.8 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p z$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^1$G2) 4s\,\,c$^2$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2462: 3494.7 & -1.8 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2463: 3500.3 & -1.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2464: 3503.5 & -1.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$F$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^4$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2465: 3504.9 & -3.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4p\,\,y$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4s\,\,b$^2$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2466: 3507.4 & -1.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^2$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2467: 3509.8 & -1.1 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4p\,\,y$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4s\,\,b$^2$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2468: 3510.8 & -3.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4p\,\,y$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4s\,\,b$^2$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2469: 3514.0 & -2.0 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^3$P) 4s$\,\,^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2470: 3520.3 & -2.1 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,x$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^2$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2471: 3535.4 & -2.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,x$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2472: 3561.6 & -1.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^2$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2473: 3564.5 & -1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4p\,\,z$^4$I$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^1$G2) 4s\,\,c$^2$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2474: 3566.0 & -1.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,z$^2$S$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2475: 3573.7 & -2.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^2$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2476: 3576.8 & -1.5 & Ni{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^8$\,($^3$F) 4p$\,\,^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^8$\,($^3$P) 4s$\,\,^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2477: 3587.1 & -1.9 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^2$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2478: 3596.1 & -2.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^2$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2479: 3624.8 & -2.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,z$^2$S$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^2$P$_{1/2}$ \\
2480: 3635.3 & -1.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,z$^2$S$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2481: 3641.3 & -2.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,z$^2$S$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,a$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2482: 3659.8 & -3.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2483: 3662.2 & -2.8 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2484: 3679.7 & -2.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2485: 3685.2 & -4.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^2$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2486: 3685.2 & -4.9 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^2$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2487: 3706.2 & -2.4 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2488: 3721.6 & -2.6 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^2$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2489: 3741.6 & -2.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,y$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2490: 3748.0 & -1.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4p\,\,x$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^2$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2491: 3757.7 & -1.7 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$D) 4p\,\,z$^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2492: 3759.3 & -4.7 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^2$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2493: 3761.3 & -4.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^2$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2494: 3761.9 & -1.4 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^1$G) 4p\,\,x$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^2$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2495: 3764.1 & -1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$P2) 4s\,\,b$^4$P$_{5/2}$ \\
2496: 3783.4 & -1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^7$\,\,a$^2$P$_{3/2}$ \\
2497: 3814.6 & -1.5 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^2$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2498: 3836.1 & -1.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4s\,\,a$^2$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2499: 3900.6 & -2.2 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^3$a$^2$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2500: 3913.5 & -2.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$G$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$a$^2$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2501: 3933.7 & -1.7 & Ca{\,\sc ii}& 3p$^6$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3p$^6$4s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ \\
2502: 3968.5 & -1.2 & Ca{\,\sc ii}& 3p$^6$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3p$^6$4s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ \\
2503: 4101.7 & 1.2 & H{\,\sc i}& 6 -- 2 \\
2504: 4163.6 & -1.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,x$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^2$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2505: 4171.9 & -1.1 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$P) 4p\,\,x$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^2$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2506: 4340.5 & 3.5 & H{\,\sc i}& 5 -- 2 \\
2507: 4576.3 & 1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2508: 4582.8 & 1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{5/2}$ \\
2509: 4620.5 & 1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2510: 4629.3 & 1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2511: 4666.8 & 1.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2512: 4861.3 & 8.5 & H{\,\sc i}& 4 -- 2 \\
2513: 4993.4 & 1.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$P$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{9/2}$ \\
2514: 5146.1 & 1.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4s\,\,b$^4$F$_{7/2}$ \\
2515: 5188.7 & 1.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2516: 5197.6 & 2.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{5/2}$ \\
2517: 5226.5 & 1.3 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2518: 5234.6 & 2.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2519: 5254.9 & 1.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{5/2}$ \\
2520: 5264.8 & 1.8 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{5/2}$ \\
2521: 5276.0 & 2.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2522: 5284.1 & 1.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,a$^6$S$_{5/2}$ \\
2523: 5316.6 & 2.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{11/2}$ \\
2524: 5316.8 & 2.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2525: 5325.5 & 2.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{7/2}$ \\
2526: 5336.8 & 1.0 & Ti{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^2$\,($^3$F) 4p\,\,z$^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^3$\,\,b$^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2527: 5362.9 & 2.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2528: 5425.3 & 1.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2529: 5433.0 & 1.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4s\,\,b$^2$H$_{9/2}$ \\
2530: 5534.9 & 2.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$H) 4s\,\,b$^2$H$_{11/2}$ \\
2531: 5890.0 & -1.0 & Na{\,\sc i}& 3p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ \\
2532: 5991.4 & 1.9 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{11/2}$ \\
2533: 6084.1 & 1.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$G) 4s\,\,a$^4$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2534: 6147.7 & 2.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2535: 6149.3 & 2.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{1/2}$ \\
2536: 6238.4 & 2.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2537: 6247.6 & 3.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2538: 6347.1 & -1.1 & Si{\,\sc ii}& 3s$^2$ 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3s$^2$ 4s$\,\,^2$S$_{1/2}$ \\
2539: 6416.9 & 2.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2540: 6432.7 & 1.8 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,a$^6$S$_{5/2}$ \\
2541: 6456.4 & 3.8 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$P$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{7/2}$ \\
2542: 6516.1 & 2.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^6$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,a$^6$S$_{5/2}$ \\
2543: 6562.8 & 26.1 & H{\,\sc i}& 3 -- 2 \\
2544: 7222.4 & 1.6 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2545: 7224.5 & 1.8 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{1/2}$ \\
2546: 7308.1 & 2.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2547: 7310.2 & 1.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{1/2}$ \\
2548: 7320.6 & 1.9 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2549: 7449.3 & 1.7 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2550: 7462.4 & 3.4 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2551: 7479.7 & 1.0 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2552: 7515.8 & 1.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{7/2}$ \\
2553: 7655.5 & 1.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2554: 7711.7 & 4.2 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$D$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^3$D) 4s\,\,b$^4$D$_{7/2}$ \\
2555: 7771.9 & -2.4 & O{\,\sc i}& 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3p$\,\,^5$P$_{3}$ -- 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3s$\,\,^5$S$^{\rm o}_{2}$ \\
2556: 7774.2 & -2.2 & O{\,\sc i}& 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3p$\,\,^5$P$_{2}$ -- 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3s$\,\,^5$S$^{\rm o}_{2}$ \\
2557: 7775.4 & -1.8 & O{\,\sc i}& 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3p$\,\,^5$P$_{1}$ -- 2s$^2$2p$^3$\,($^4$S$^{\rm o}$) 3s$\,\,^5$S$^{\rm o}_{2}$ \\
2558: 7896.4 & 1.1 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ -- 4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ \\
2559: 8498.0 & -3.0 & Ca{\,\sc ii}& 3p$^6$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3p$^6$3d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2560: 8542.1 & -4.0 & Ca{\,\sc ii}& 3p$^6$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ -- 3p$^6$3d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2561: 8662.1 & -3.8 & Ca{\,\sc ii}& 3p$^6$4p$\,\,^2$P$^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ -- 3p$^6$3d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2562: 9546.0 & 1.5 & H{\,\sc i}& 8 -- 3 \\
2563: 9631.9 & 1.7 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 5f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ -- 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{5/2}$ \\
2564: 9632.4 & 1.4 & Mg{\,\sc ii}& 5f$\,\,^2$F$^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ -- 4d$\,\,^2$D$_{3/2}$ \\
2565: 9997.6 & 3.3 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,b$^4$G$_{11/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ \\
2566: 10049.4 & 3.4 & H{\,\sc i}& 7 -- 3 \\
2567: 10332.9 & 1.1 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,y$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,b$^4$G$_{9/2}$ \\
2568: 10366.2 & 1.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^6$\,($^3$F2) 4p\,\,y$^4$G$^{\rm o}_{11/2}$ -- 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,b$^4$G$_{11/2}$ \\
2569: 10501.5 & 2.5 & Fe{\,\sc ii}& 3d$^5$4s$^2$\,\,b$^4$G$_{9/2}$ -- 3d$^6$\,($^5$D) 4p\,\,z$^4$F$^{\rm o}_{7/2}$ \\
2570:
2571: \end{longtable}
2572: % \end{center}
2573:
2574: \twocolumn
2575:
2576: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2577: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2578: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2579: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2580:
2581: \thebibliography{}
2582:
2583: % \bibitem[Alard \& Lupton (1998)]{al98}
2584: % Alard, C. \& Lupton, R.~H.~1998, ApJ, 503, 325
2585:
2586: \bibitem[Anupama et al.(2001)]{2001A&A...367..506A} Anupama, G.~C.,
2587: Sivarani, T., \& Pandey, G.\ 2001, \aap, 367, 506
2588: % Early time optical spectroscopy of supernova SN 1998S
2589:
2590: \bibitem[Aretxaga et al.(1999)]{1999MNRAS.309..343A} Aretxaga, I., Benetti,
2591: S., Terlevich, R.~J., Fabian, A.~C., Cappellaro, E., Turatto, M., \& della
2592: Valle, M.\ 1999, \mnras, 309, 343
2593: % SN 1988Z: spectro-photometric catalogue and energy estimates
2594:
2595: \bibitem[Bautista \& Pradhan(1997)]{1997A&AS..126..365B} Bautista, M.~A., \& Pradhan, A.~K.\ 1997, \aaps, 126, 365
2596:
2597: \bibitem[Becker \& Butler(1995)]{1995A&A...301..187B} Becker, S.~R., \& Butler, K.\ 1995, \aap, 301, 187
2598:
2599: \bibitem[Benetti et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...653L.129B} Benetti, S.,
2600: Cappellaro, E., Turatto, M., Taubenberger, S., Harutyunyan, A., \& Valenti,
2601: S.\ 2006, \apjl, 653, L129
2602: % Supernova 2002ic: The Collapse of a Stripped-Envelope, Massive Star in a Dense Medium?
2603:
2604: \bibitem[Bowen et al.(2000)]{2000ApJ...536..225B} Bowen, D.~V., Roth,
2605: K.~C., Meyer, D.~M., \& Blades, J.~C.\ 2000, \apj, 536, 225
2606: % nterstellar and Circumstellar Optical and Ultraviolet Lines Toward SN 1998S
2607:
2608: \bibitem[Brown \etal (2007)]{brown07}
2609: Brown, P.~J., \etal 2007, ApJ, 659, 1488
2610:
2611: \bibitem[Busche \& Hillier (2005)]{BH05_2D}
2612: Busche, J.~R., Hillier, D.~J., 2005, AJ, 129, 454
2613: %Spectroscopic Effects of Rotation in Extended Stellar Atmospheres
2614:
2615: \bibitem[Butler et al.(1993)]{1993JPhB...26.4409B} Butler, K., Mendoza, C.,
2616: \& Zeippen, C.~J.\ 1993, Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular Physics, 26, 4409
2617:
2618: \bibitem[Chandra et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...629..933C} Chandra, P., Ray, A.,
2619: Schlegel, E.~M., Sutaria, F.~K., \& Pietsch, W.\ 2005, \apj, 629, 933
2620: % Chandra's Tryst with SN 1995N
2621:
2622: \bibitem[]{} Chevalier, R. 1982, \apj, 258, 790
2623:
2624: % \bibitem[]{} Chevalier, R. 1982, \apj, 259, 302
2625:
2626: \bibitem[]{} Chevalier, R. 1983, \apj, 272, 765
2627:
2628: \bibitem[Chevalier \& Fransson(1994)]{1994ApJ...420..268C} Chevalier,
2629: R.~A., \& Fransson, C.\ 1994, \apj, 420, 268
2630: % Emission from circumstellar interaction in normal Type II supernovae
2631:
2632: \bibitem[Chevalier \& Fransson(2001)]{2001astro.ph.10060C} Chevalier,
2633: R.~A., \& Fransson, C.\ 2001, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints,
2634: arXiv:astro-ph/0110060
2635: % Supernova Interaction with a Circumstellar Medium
2636:
2637: \bibitem[Chugai \& Danziger(1994)]{1994MNRAS.268..173C} Chugai, N.~N., \&
2638: Danziger, I.~J.\ 1994, \mnras, 268, 173
2639: % Supernova 1988Z - Low-Mass Ejecta Colliding with the Clumpy Wind
2640:
2641: \bibitem[Chugai(2001)]{2001MNRAS.326.1448C} Chugai, N.~N.\ 2001, \mnras,
2642: 326, 1448
2643: % Broad emission lines from the opaque electron-scattering environment of SN 1998S
2644:
2645: \bibitem[Chugai et al.(2002)]{2002MNRAS.330..473C} Chugai, N.~N.,
2646: Blinnikov, S.~I., Fassia, A., Lundqvist, P., Meikle, W.~P.~S., \& Sorokina,
2647: E.~I.\ 2002, \mnras, 330, 473
2648: % The origin of the high-velocity circumstellar gas around SN 1998S
2649:
2650: \bibitem[Chugai \& Danziger(2003)]{2003AstL...29..649C} Chugai, N.~N., \&
2651: Danziger, I.~J.\ 2003, Astronomy Letters, 29, 649
2652: % A Massive Circumstellar Envelope around the Type-IIn Supernova SN 1995G
2653:
2654: \bibitem[Chugai et al.(2004)]{2004MNRAS.352.1213C} Chugai, N.~N., et al.\
2655: 2004a, \mnras, 352, 1213 (C04)
2656: % The Type IIn supernova 1994W: evidence for the explosive ejection of a circumstellar envelope
2657:
2658: \bibitem[Chugai et al.(2004)]{2004MNRAS.355..627C} Chugai, N.~N.,
2659: Chevalier, R.~A., \& Lundqvist, P.\ 2004b, \mnras, 355, 627
2660: % Circumstellar interaction of the type Ia supernova 2002ic
2661:
2662: \bibitem[Chugai \& Yungelson(2004)]{2004AstL...30...65C} Chugai, N.~N., \&
2663: Yungelson, L.~R.\ 2004, Astronomy Letters, 30, 65
2664: % Type-Ia Supernovae in Dense Circumstellar Gas
2665:
2666: \bibitem[Chugai \& Chevalier(2007)]{2007ApJ...657..378C} Chugai, N.~N., \&
2667: Chevalier, R.~A.\ 2007, \apj, 657, 378
2668: % Moderate Asphericity of the SN 2002ic Circumstellar Envelope
2669:
2670: \bibitem[Davidson \& Humphreys(1997)]{1997ARA&A..35....1D} Davidson, K., \&
2671: Humphreys, R.~M.\ 1997, \araa, 35, 1
2672:
2673: \bibitem[Deng et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...605L..37D} Deng, J., et al.\ 2004,
2674: \apjl, 605, L37
2675: % Subaru Spectroscopy of the Interacting Type Ia Supernova SN 2002ic:
2676: % Evidence of a Hydrogen-rich, Asymmetric Circumstellar Medium
2677:
2678: \bibitem[Dessart \& Hillier(2005)]{2005A&A...437..667D} Dessart, L., \&
2679: Hillier, D.~J.\ 2005a, \aap, 437, 667
2680:
2681: \bibitem[Dessart \& Hillier(2005)]{2005A&A...439..671D} Dessart, L., \&
2682: Hillier, D.~J.\ 2005b, \aap, 439, 671
2683:
2684: \bibitem[Dessart \& Hillier(2006)]{2006A&A...447..691D} Dessart, L., \&
2685: Hillier, D.~J.\ 2006, \aap, 447, 691
2686:
2687: \bibitem[Dessart \& Hillier(2008)]{2008MNRAS.383...57D} Dessart, L., \& Hillier,
2688: D.~J.\ 2008, \mnras, 383, 57
2689:
2690: \bibitem[Dessart et al.(2008)]{2007arXiv0711.1815D} Dessart, L., et al.\
2691: 2008, ApJ, 675, 644, ArXiv e-prints, 711, arXiv:0711.1815
2692:
2693: \bibitem[Eldridge et al. 2007]{SM07_SN2005cs}
2694: {Eldridge}, J.~J., {Mattila}, S. \& {Smartt}, S.~J. 2007, \mnras, 376, L52
2695: %Ruling out a massive asymptotic giant-branch star as the progenitor of supernova 2005cs
2696:
2697: \bibitem[Fabian \& Terlevich(1996)]{1996MNRAS.280L...5F} Fabian, A.~C., \&
2698: Terlevich, R.\ 1996, \mnras, 280, L5
2699: % X-ray detection of Supernova 1988Z with the ROSAT High Resolution Imager
2700:
2701: \bibitem[Fassia et al.(2000)]{2000MNRAS.318.1093F} Fassia, A., et al.\
2702: 2000, \mnras, 318, 1093
2703: % Optical and infrared photometry of the Type IIn SN 1998S: days 11-146
2704:
2705: \bibitem[Fassia et al.(2001)]{2001MNRAS.325..907F} Fassia, A., et al.\
2706: 2001, \mnras, 325, 907
2707: % Optical and infrared spectroscopy of the type IIn SN 1998S: days 3-127
2708:
2709: \bibitem[Foley et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...657L.105F} Foley, R.~J., Smith, N.,
2710: Ganeshalingam, M., Li, W., Chornock, R., \& Filippenko, A.~V.\ 2007, \apjl,
2711: 657, L105
2712: % SN 2006jc: A Wolf-Rayet Star Exploding in a Dense He-rich Circumstellar Medium
2713:
2714: \bibitem[Fox et al.(2000)]{2000MNRAS.319.1154F} Fox, D.~W., et al.\ 2000,
2715: \mnras, 319, 1154
2716: % The X-ray spectrum and light curve of Supernova 1995N
2717:
2718: \bibitem[Fransson et al.(1996)]{1996ApJ...461..993F} Fransson, C.,
2719: Lundqvist, P., \& Chevalier, R.~A.\ 1996, \apj, 461, 993
2720: % Circumstellar Interaction in SN 1993J
2721:
2722: \bibitem[Fransson et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...572..350F} Fransson, C., et al.\
2723: 2002, \apj, 572, 350
2724: % Optical and Ultraviolet Spectroscopy of SN 1995N: Evidence for Strong Circumstellar Interaction
2725:
2726: \bibitem[Fransson et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...622..991F} Fransson, C., et al.\
2727: 2005, \apj, 622, 991
2728: % Hubble Space Telescope and Ground-based Observations of SN 1993J and SN 1998S:
2729: % CNO Processing in the Progenitors
2730:
2731: \bibitem[Fuhr et al.(1988)]{1988atps.book.....F} Fuhr, J.~R., Martin, G.~A.,
2732: \& Wiese, W.~L.\ 1988, New York: American Institute of Physics (AIP) and American Chemical Society, 1988,
2733:
2734: \bibitem[Gao \& Solomon (2004)]{GS04} Gao, Y., Solomon, P. M. 2004, ApJS, 153, 62
2735: %HCN Survey of Normal Spiral, Infrared-luminous, and Ultraluminous Galaxies
2736:
2737: \bibitem[Gerardy et al.(2000)]{2000AJ....119.2968G} Gerardy, C.~L., Fesen,
2738: R.~A., H{\"o}flich, P., \& Wheeler, J.~C.\ 2000, \aj, 119, 2968
2739: % Detection of CO and Dust Emission in Near-Infrared Spectra of SN 1998S
2740:
2741: % \bibitem[Gezari \etal (2007)]{gez07}
2742: % Gezari, S., \etal 2007, ApJ, in press
2743:
2744: \bibitem[Hamuy et al.(2003)]{2003Natur.424..651H} Hamuy, M., et al.\ 2003,
2745: \nat, 424, 651
2746: % An asymptotic-giant-branch star in the progenitor system of a type Ia supernova
2747: % LUC: They refer to 2002ic
2748:
2749: \bibitem[Han \& Podsiadlowski(2006)]{2006MNRAS.368.1095H} Han, Z., \&
2750: Podsiadlowski, P.\ 2006, \mnras, 368, 1095
2751: % A single-degenerate model for the progenitor of the Type Ia supernova 2002ic
2752:
2753: \bibitem[Hillier(1987)]{Hillier_1987} Hillier, D.~J.\ 1987, ApJs, 63, 965
2754:
2755: % \bibitem[Hillier(1991)]{Hillier_1991} Hillier, D.~J.\ 1991, \aap, 247, 455
2756:
2757: \bibitem[Hillier \& Miller(1998)]{1998ApJ...496..407H} Hillier, D.~J., \&
2758: Miller, D.~L.\ 1998, \apj, 496, 407
2759:
2760: \bibitem[Hoffman et al.(2007)]{2007arXiv0709.3258H} Hoffman, J.~L.,
2761: Leonard, D.~C., Chornock, R., Filippenko, A.~V., Barth, A.~J., \& Matheson,
2762: T.\ 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 709, arXiv:0709.3258
2763: % The Dual-Axis Circumstellar Environment of the Type IIn Supernova 1997eg
2764:
2765: \bibitem[Howell \etal (2005)]{how05} Howell, D.~A., et al. 2005, ApJ, 634, 1190
2766:
2767: % \bibitem[Hummer \& Mihalas(1967)]{1967ApJ...150L..57H} Hummer, D.~G., \&
2768: % Mihalas, D.\ 1967, \apjl, 150, L57
2769:
2770: \bibitem[Hummer et al.(1993)]{1993A&A...279..298H} Hummer, D.~G., Berrington, K.~A., Eissner, W., Pradhan, A.~K., Saraph, H.~E., \& Tully, J.~A.\ 1993, \aap, 279, 298
2771:
2772: \bibitem[Kingdon \& Ferland(1996)]{1996ApJS..106..205K} Kingdon, J.~B., \& Ferland, G.~J.\ 1996, \apjs, 106, 205
2773:
2774: \bibitem[Kitaura et al. (2006)]{KJH06}
2775: {Kitaura}, F.~S., {Janka}, H.-T., {Hillebrandt}, W. 2006, \aap, 450, 345
2776: %Explosions of O-Ne-Mg cores, the Crab supernova, and subluminous type II-P supernovae
2777:
2778: \bibitem[Kotak et al.(2004)]{2004MNRAS.354L..13K} Kotak, R., Meikle,
2779: W.~P.~S., Adamson, A., \& Leggett, S.~K.\ 2004, \mnras, 354, L13
2780: % On the nature of the circumstellar medium of the remarkable Type Ia/IIn
2781: % supernova SN 2002ic
2782:
2783: \bibitem[Kurucz(2002)]{2002AIPC..636..134K} Kurucz, R.~L.\ 2002, Atomic and
2784: Molecular Data and Their Applications, 636, 134
2785:
2786: \bibitem[Kurucz \& Bell(1995)]{1995all..book.....K} Kurucz, R.~L., \& Bell, B.\ 1995, Kurucz CD-ROM, Cambridge, MA: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, 1995, April 15, 1995,
2787:
2788: % \bibitem[Leguillou (2003)]{leg03} Leguillou, L.~2003, PhD at Paris 6 University
2789:
2790: \bibitem[Lentz et al.(2001)]{2001ApJ...547..406L} Lentz, E.~J., et al.\
2791: 2001, \apj, 547, 406
2792: % Analysis of Type IIn SN 1998S: Effects of Circumstellar Interaction on Observed Spectra
2793:
2794: \bibitem[Leonard et al.(2000)]{2000ApJ...536..239L} Leonard, D.~C.,
2795: Filippenko, A.~V., Barth, A.~J., \& Matheson, T.\ 2000, \apj, 536, 239
2796: % Evidence for Asphericity in the Type IIN Supernova SN 1998S
2797:
2798: \bibitem[Levesque et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...628..973L} Levesque, E.~M.,
2799: Massey, P., Olsen, K.~A.~G., Plez, B., Josselin, E., Maeder, A.,
2800: \& Meynet, G.\ 2005, \apj, 628, 973
2801:
2802: \bibitem[Liu et al.(2000)]{2000A&AS..144..219L} Liu, Q.-Z., Hu, J.-Y.,
2803: Hang, H.-R., Qiu, Y.-L., Zhu, Z.-X., \& Qiao, Q.-Y.\ 2000, \aaps, 144, 219
2804: % The supernova 1998S in NGC 3877: Another supernova with Wolf-Rayet
2805: % star features in pre-maximum spectrum
2806:
2807: \bibitem[Luo \& Pradhan(1989)]{1989JPhB...22.3377L} Luo, D., \& Pradhan, A.~K.\ 1989, Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular Physics, 22, 3377
2808:
2809: \bibitem[Luo et al.(1989)]{1989JPhB...22..389L} Luo, D., Pradhan, A.~K.,
2810: Saraph, H.~E., Storey, P.~J.,
2811: \& Yan, Y.\ 1989, Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular Physics, 22, 389
2812:
2813: \bibitem[Matheson et al.(2000)]{2000AJ....119.2303M} Matheson, T.,
2814: Filippenko, A.~V., Chornock, R., Leonard, D.~C.,
2815: \& Li, W.\ 2000, \aj, 119, 2303
2816:
2817: \bibitem[Mendoza(1983)]{1983IAUS..103..143M} Mendoza, C.\ 1983, Planetary
2818: Nebulae, 103, 143
2819:
2820: \bibitem[Mendoza et al.(1995)]{1995JPhB...28.3485M} Mendoza, C., Eissner,
2821: W., LeDourneuf, M.,
2822: \& Zeippen, C.~J.\ 1995, Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular Physics, 28, 3485
2823:
2824: \bibitem[Mucciarelli et al.(2006)]{2006MSAIS...9..391M} Mucciarelli, P.,
2825: Zampieri, L., Turatto, A.~P.~M., Cappellaro, E., \& Benetti, S.\ 2006,
2826: Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplement, 9, 391
2827: % XMM-Newton and VLT observations of SN 1995N
2828:
2829: \bibitem[Nahar(1995)]{1995A&A...293..967N} Nahar, S.~N.\ 1995, \aap, 293, 967
2830:
2831: \bibitem[Nahar(1996)]{1996PhRvA..53.1545N} Nahar, S.~N.\ 1996, \pra, 53, 1545
2832:
2833: \bibitem[Nahar
2834: \& Pradhan(1996)]{1996A&AS..119..509N} Nahar, S.~N., \& Pradhan, A.~K.\ 1996, \aaps, 119, 509
2835:
2836: \bibitem[Neufeld
2837: \& Dalgarno(1987)]{1987PhRvA..35.3142N} Neufeld, D.~A., \& Dalgarno, A.\ 1987, \pra, 35, 3142
2838:
2839: \bibitem[Nussbaumer
2840: \& Storey(1984)]{1984A&AS...56..293N} Nussbaumer, H., \& Storey, P.~J.\ 1984, \aaps, 56, 293
2841:
2842: \bibitem[Nussbaumer
2843: \& Storey(1983)]{1983A&A...126...75N} Nussbaumer, H., \& Storey, P.~J.\ 1983, \aap, 126, 75
2844:
2845: \bibitem[Ofek et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...659L..13O} Ofek, E.~O., et al.\ 2007,
2846: \apjl, 659, L13
2847: % SN 2006gy: An Extremely Luminous Supernova in the Galaxy NGC 1260
2848:
2849: % \bibitem[Osterbrock(1974)]{Osterbrock_1974} Osterbrock, D.~E.\ 1974,
2850: % {\it Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae},
2851:
2852: \bibitem[Pastorello et al.(2002)]{2002MNRAS.333...27P} Pastorello, A., et
2853: al.\ 2002, \mnras, 333, 27
2854: % The type IIn supernova 1995G: interaction with the circumstellar medium
2855:
2856: \bibitem[Pastorello et al.(2006)]{PST06_SN2005cs}
2857: Pastorello, A., et al.
2858: %{Pastorello}, A., {Sauer}, D., {Taubenberger}, S., {Mazzali}, P.~A., {Nomoto}, K.,
2859: %{Kawabata}, K.~S., {Benetti}, S., {Elias-Rosa}, N., {Harutyunyan}, A., {Navasardyan}, H.,
2860: %{Zampieri}, L., {Iijima}, T., {Botticella}, M.~T., {Di Rico}, G., {Del Principe}, M.,
2861: %{Dolci}, M., {Gagliardi}, S., {Ragni}, M., \& {Valentini}, G.
2862: 2006,\mnras, 370, 1752
2863: %SN 2005cs in M51 - I. The first month of evolution of a subluminous SN II plateau
2864:
2865: \bibitem[Pastorello et al.(2007)]{2007Natur.447..829P} Pastorello, A., et
2866: al.\ 2007, \nat, 447, 829
2867: % A giant outburst two years before the core-collapse of a massive star
2868:
2869: \bibitem[Peach et al.(1988)]{1988JPhB...21.3669P} Peach, G., Saraph, H.~E.,
2870: \& Seaton, M.~J.\ 1988, Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular Physics, 21, 3669
2871:
2872: \bibitem[Pooley et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...572..932P} Pooley, D., et al.\
2873: 2002, \apj, 572, 932
2874: % X-Ray, Optical, and Radio Observations of the Type II Supernovae 1999em and 1998S
2875:
2876: \bibitem[Pozzo et al.(2005)]{2005ASPC..342..337P} Pozzo, M., Meikle,
2877: W.~P.~S., Fassia, A., Geballe, T., Lundqvist, P., Chugai, N.~N., \&
2878: Sollerman, J.\ 2005, 1604-2004: Supernovae as Cosmological Lighthouses,
2879: 342, 337
2880: % Dust Signatures from Late-time Infrared and Optical Observations of SN 1998S
2881:
2882: \bibitem[Pozzo et al.(2004)]{2004MNRAS.352..457P} Pozzo, M., Meikle,
2883: W.~P.~S., Fassia, A., Geballe, T., Lundqvist, P., Chugai, N.~N., \&
2884: Sollerman, J.\ 2004, \mnras, 352, 457
2885: % On the source of the late-time infrared luminosity of SN 1998S and other Type II supernovae
2886:
2887: \bibitem[Pradhan et al.(1996)]{1996AAS...189.7211P} Pradhan, A.~K., Zhang,
2888: H.~L., Nahar, S.~N., Romano, P.,
2889: \& Bautista, M.~A.\ 1996, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 28, 1367
2890:
2891: \bibitem[Prieto et al.(2008)]{2008arXiv0803.0324P} Prieto, J.~L., et al.\
2892: 2008, ArXiv e-prints, 803, arXiv:0803.0324
2893:
2894: \bibitem[Ralchenko et al.(2008)]{NIST}
2895: Ralchenko, Yu., Kramida, A.E., Reader, J. and NIST ASD Team (2008). NIST Atomic Spectra Database (version 3.1.5),
2896: http://physics.nist.gov/asd3 [2008, August 1]. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
2897:
2898: \bibitem[Rybicki \& Hummer(1994)]{1994A&A...290..553R} Rybicki, G.~B., \&
2899: Hummer, D.~G.\ 1994, \aap, 290, 553
2900:
2901: \bibitem[Salamanca et al.(2002)]{2002MNRAS.330..844S} Salamanca, I.,
2902: Terlevich, R.~J., \& Tenorio-Tagle, G.\ 2002, \mnras, 330, 844
2903: % The circumstellar material around SN IIn 1997eg: another detection
2904: % of a very narrow P Cygni profile
2905:
2906: \bibitem[Schlegel \& Petre(2006)]{2006ApJ...646..378S} Schlegel, E.~M., \&
2907: Petre, R.\ 2006, \apj, 646, 378
2908: % A Chandra ACIS Observation of the X-Ray-luminous SN 1988Z
2909:
2910: \bibitem[Schlegel(1999)]{1999ApJ...527L..85S} Schlegel, E.~M.\ 1999, \apjl,
2911: 527, L85
2912: % X-Ray Detection of SN 1994W in NGC 4041?
2913: % Luminosity is at the 10^6Lsun level.
2914:
2915: % \bibitem[Smith et al.(2007)]{2007arXiv0704.2249S} Smith, N., Foley, R.~J.,
2916: % \& Filippenko, A.~V.\ 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 704, arXiv:0704.2249
2917: % Hot Coal for Christmas: Dust Formation in the Swept-Up Shell
2918: % Around The Peculiar Type Ib Supernova 2006jc
2919:
2920: \bibitem[Seaton(1987)]{1987JPhB...20.6363S} Seaton, M.\ 1987, Journal of
2921: Physics B Atomic Molecular Physics, 20, 6363
2922:
2923: \bibitem[Smith et al. (2003)]{S03_hom_ek}
2924: {Smith}, N., {Gehrz}, R.~D., {Hinz}, P.~M., {Hoffmann}, W.~F., {Hora}, J.~L.,
2925: {Mamajek}, E.~E., and {Meyer}, M.~R. 2003, \apj, 125, 1458
2926: %{Mass and Kinetic Energy of the Homunculus Nebula around {$\eta$} Carinae}
2927:
2928: \bibitem[Smith (2005)]{S05_lit_hom}
2929: Smith, N. 2005, \mnras, 357, 1330
2930: %Doppler tomography of the Little Homunculus: high-resolution spectra of [FeII]?16435 around Eta Carinae
2931:
2932: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...666.1116S} Smith, N., et al.\ 2007,
2933: \apj, 666, 1116
2934: % SN 2006gy: Discovery of the Most Luminous Supernova Ever Recorded,
2935: % Powered by the Death of an Extremely Massive Star like η Carinae
2936:
2937: \bibitem[Smith \& McCray(2007)]{2007ApJ...671L..17S} Smith, N., \&
2938: McCray, R.\ 2007, \apjl, 671, L17
2939: % Shell-shocked diffusion model for the light curve of SN2006gy
2940:
2941: \bibitem[Sobolev(1960)]{1960mes..book.....S} Sobolev, V.~V.\ 1960,
2942: Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960, ``Moving envelopes of stars''.
2943:
2944: \bibitem[Sollerman et al.(1998)]{1998ApJ...493..933S} Sollerman, J.,
2945: Cumming, R.~J., \& Lundqvist, P.\ 1998, \apj, 493, 933 (SCL)
2946: % A Very Low Mass of 56Ni in the Ejecta of SN 1994W
2947:
2948: \bibitem[Stathakis \& Sadler(1991)]{1991MNRAS.250..786S} Stathakis, R.~A.,
2949: \& Sadler, E.~M.\ 1991, \mnras, 250, 786
2950: % What was supernova 1988Z?
2951:
2952: \bibitem[Tsvetkov(1995)]{1995IBVS.4253....1T} Tsvetkov, D.~Y. 1995,
2953: Informational Bulletin on Variable Stars, 4253, 1
2954: % SN 1994W: Unprecedented Brightness Decline at Late Stage
2955:
2956: \bibitem[Tsvetkov et al. (2006)]{TVS06_2005cs}
2957: {Tsvetkov}, D.~Y., {Volnova}, A.~A., {Shulga}, A.~P., {Korotkiy}, S.~A., {Elmhamdi}, A., {Danziger}, I.~J., \& {Ereshko}, M.~V. 2006, \aap, 460, 769
2958: %Observations and analysis of two type IIP supernovae: the intrinsically faint object SN 2005cs and the ambiguous object SN 2005ay
2959:
2960: \bibitem[Tully et al.(1990)]{1990JPhB...23.3811T} Tully, J.~A., Seaton, M.~J.,
2961: \& Berrington, K.~A.\ 1990, Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular Physics, 23, 3811
2962:
2963: \bibitem[Turatto et al.(1993)]{1993MNRAS.262..128T} Turatto, M.,
2964: Cappellaro, E., Danziger, I.~J., Benetti, S., Gouiffes, C., \& della Valle,
2965: M.\ 1993, \mnras, 262, 128
2966: % The Type II supernova 1988Z in MCG + 03-28-022 - Increasing evidence of
2967: % interaction of supernova ejecta with a circumstellar wind
2968:
2969: \bibitem[van Dyk et al.(1993)]{1993ApJ...419L..69V} van Dyk, S.~D., Weiler,
2970: K.~W., Sramek, R.~A., \& Panagia, N.\ 1993, \apjl, 419, L69
2971: % SN 1988Z: The Most Distant Radio Supernova
2972:
2973: \bibitem[Wang et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...604L..53W} Wang, L., Baade, D.,
2974: H{\"o}flich, P., Wheeler, J.~C., Kawabata, K., \& Nomoto, K.\ 2004, \apjl,
2975: 604, L53
2976: % On the Hydrogen Emission from the Type Ia Supernova SN 2002ic
2977:
2978: \bibitem[Wiese et al.(1966)]{1966atp..book.....W} Wiese, W.~L., Smith, M.~W.,
2979: \& Glennon, B.~M.\ 1966, NSRDS-NBS 4, Washington, D.C.: US Department of Commerce, National Buereau of Standards, 1966,
2980:
2981: \bibitem[Wiese et al.(1969)]{1969atp..book.....W} Wiese, W.~L., Smith, M.~W.,
2982: \& Miles, B.~M.\ 1969, NSRDS-NBS, Washington, D.C.: US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, |c 1969,
2983:
2984: \bibitem[Williams et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...581..396W} Williams, C.~L.,
2985: Panagia, N., Van Dyk, S.~D., Lacey, C.~K., Weiler, K.~W., \& Sramek, R.~A.\
2986: 2002, \apj, 581, 396
2987: % Radio Emission from SN 1988Z and Very Massive Star Evolution
2988:
2989: \bibitem[Wood-Vasey et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...616..339W} Wood-Vasey, W.~M.,
2990: Wang, L., \& Aldering, G.\ 2004, \apj, 616, 339
2991: % Photometry of SN 2002ic and Implications for the Progenitor Mass-Loss History
2992:
2993: \bibitem[Wood-Vasey \& Sokoloski(2006)]{2006ApJ...645L..53W} Wood-Vasey,
2994: W.~M., \& Sokoloski, J.~L.\ 2006, \apjl, 645, L53
2995: % Novae as a Mechanism for Producing Cavities around the Progenitors of
2996: % SN 2002ic and Other Type Ia Supernovae
2997:
2998: \bibitem[Woosley
2999: \& Timmes(1996)]{1996NuPhA.606..137W} Woosley, S.~E., \& Timmes, F.~X.\ 1996, Nuclear Physics A, 606, 137
3000:
3001: \bibitem[Woosley \& Janka(2005)]{2005NatPh...1..147W} Woosley, S.~E., \&
3002: Janka, T.\ 2005, Nature Physics, 1, 147
3003:
3004: \bibitem[Woosley et al.(2007)]{2007Natur.450..390W} Woosley, S.~E.,
3005: Blinnikov, S., \& Heger, A.\ 2007, \nat, 450, 390
3006: % Pulsational pair instability as an explanation for the most luminous supernovae
3007:
3008: \bibitem[Zampieri et al.(2005)]{2005MNRAS.364.1419Z} Zampieri, L.,
3009: Mucciarelli, P., Pastorello, A., Turatto, M., Cappellaro, E., \& Benetti,
3010: S.\ 2005, \mnras, 364, 1419
3011: % Simultaneous XMM-Newton and ESO VLT observations of supernova 1995N:
3012: % probing the wind-ejecta interaction
3013:
3014: \bibitem[Zhang \& Pradhan(1997)]{1997A&AS..126..373Z} Zhang, H.~L., \& Pradhan, A.~K.\ 1997, \aaps, 126, 373
3015:
3016: \bibitem[Zhang \& Pradhan(1995)]{1995A&A...293..953Z} Zhang, H.~L., \& Pradhan, A.~K.\ 1995, \aap, 293, 953
3017:
3018: \label{lastpage}
3019:
3020: \end{document}
3021:
3022:
3023: \subsection{SN 2003D4ck observed with GALEX and CFHT}
3024:
3025: % From Suvi:
3026: % The Cardelli et al. 1989 law integrated over the GALEX bandpass
3027: % results in:
3028: % A_FUV/E(B-V)=8.376
3029: % A_NUV/E(B-V)=8.741
3030: % This was reported by Wyder et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, L15
3031: % Cardelli et al. 1989 should go out to 1250 A.
3032: %
3033:
3034: A Supernova Type IIn at $z=0.189$ discovered by the CFHT Supernova Legacy
3035: Survey (SNLS ID: 03D4ck) was detected by \textsl{GALEX} in the $FUV$
3036: ($\lambda_{eff}=1539$\,\AA) and $NUV$ ($\lambda_{eff}=2316$\,\AA) (Gezari et al.
3037: 2007). The Supernova was discovered in the \textsl{GALEX} Deep Imaging Survey
3038: (DIS) CFHTLS D4 field as a $FUV$ source that varied by $>$ 5$\sigma$ between
3039: yearly coadds from 2003 to 2006. The source is only detected in the $FUV$ and
3040: $NUV$ in the 2003 coadd. Here we present the detailed UV light curve
3041: constructed from dividing up the 2003 coadded image. The $FUV$ and $NUV$
3042: magnitudes are measured using a 6$\arcsec$ radius aperture, with an aperture
3043: correction for the fraction of energy enclosed of 0.95 and 0.86 for the $FUV$
3044: and $NUV$ respectively.
3045:
3046: We also present the CFHT Legacy Survey optical light curve of the flare in the
3047: $g$ ($\lambda_{eff}=4872$\,\AA) ,$r$ ($\lambda_{eff}=6282$\,\AA) ,$i$
3048: ($\lambda_{eff}=7776$\,\AA) , and $z$ ($\lambda_{eff}=11702$\,\AA) bands. The
3049: optical magnitudes are measured from difference imaging following the method
3050: of Alard \& Lupton (1998) implemented by Leguillou (2003).
3051:
3052: The type of the Supernova (SN) was identified by SNLS with follow-up optical
3053: spectroscopy at Gemini on 2003 August 27 (Howell et al. 2005) which
3054: demonstrated narrow Balmer emission lines characteristic of a Type IIn SN.
3055: Here we present additional spectra that were taken with Keck LRIS on 2003
3056: August 27, September 23, and November 3. The LRIS spectra were reduced and
3057: flux calibrated with spectrophotometric standard stars using IRAF. Figure xx
3058: shows the optical spectra and UV and optical photometry of the SN over time.
3059: The blue side of the LRIS spectrum on 2003 August 27 is not shown due to a
3060: broken blue shutter during that night. There is no continuum detected in the
3061: blue side on 2003 November 3 spectrum, and so it was not possible to extract
3062: the spectrum.
3063:
3064: Figure xx shows the UV/optical light curve of the Type IIn SN, which shows an
3065: early decline of the UV emission compared to the optical, typical of the light
3066: curves seen of Type II-P SNe (Brown et al. 2007). This is, however, the first
3067: UV detection of a Type IIn SN, and is useful for understanding the mechanisms
3068: for emission from this class of SNe. Here we compare the observed evolution
3069: of the UV and optical properties of the Supernova with our models.
3070:
3071: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3072: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3073: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3074: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3075:
3076: % \begin{center}
3077: % \begin{longtable}{lll}
3078: % %Here is the caption, the stuff in [] is the table of contents entry,
3079: % %the stuff in {} is the title that will appear on the first page of the
3080: % %table.
3081: % \caption[Feasible triples for a highly variable Grid]{Feasible triples
3082: % for highly variable Grid, MLMMH.} \label{grid_mlmmh} \\
3083:
3084: % %This is the header for the first page of the table...
3085: % \hline \hline \\[-2ex]
3086: % \multicolumn{1}{c}{\textbf{Time (s)}} &
3087: % \multicolumn{1}{c}{\textbf{Triple chosen}} &
3088: % \multicolumn{1}{c}{\textbf{Other feasible triples}} \\[0.5ex] \hline
3089: % \\[-1.8ex]
3090: % \endfirsthead
3091:
3092: %This is the header for the remaining page(s) of the table...
3093: % \multicolumn{3}{c}{{\tablename} \thetable{} -- Continued} \\[0.5ex]
3094: % \hline \hline \\[-2ex]
3095: % \multicolumn{1}{c}{\textbf{Time (s)}} &
3096: % \multicolumn{1}{c}{\textbf{Triple chosen}} &
3097: % \multicolumn{1}{c}{\textbf{Other feasible triples}} \\[0.5ex] \hline
3098: % \\[-1.8ex]
3099: % \endhead
3100:
3101: % %This is the footer for all pages except the last page of the table...
3102: % \multicolumn{3}{l}{{Continued on Next Page\ldots}} \\
3103: % \endfoot
3104:
3105: % %This is the footer for the last page of the table...
3106: % \\[-1.8ex] \hline \hline
3107: % \endlastfoot
3108:
3109: %Now the data...
3110: % 0 & (1, 11, 13725) & (1, 12, 10980), (1, 13, 8235), (2, 2, 0), (3, 1, 0) \\
3111: % 2745 & (1, 12, 10980) & (1, 13, 8235), (2, 2, 0), (2, 3, 0), (3, 1, 0) \\
3112: % 5490 & (1, 12, 13725) & (2, 2, 2745), (2, 3, 0), (3, 1, 0) \\
3113: % 8235 & (1, 12, 16470) & (1, 13, 13725), (2, 2, 2745), (2, 3, 0), (3, 1, 0) \\
3114: % % <data removed>
3115: % 164700 & (1, 13, 13725) & (2, 2, 2745), (2, 3, 0), (3, 1, 0) \\
3116: % \end{longtable}
3117: % \end{center}
3118:
3119: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3120: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3121: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3122: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3123: