1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

3: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}

4: \newcommand{\ud}{\mathrm{d}}

5: \def\lsim {$\rlap{\raise.4ex\hbox{$<$}}\lower.55ex\hbox{$\sim$}\,$}

6: \def\gsim {$\rlap{\raise.4ex\hbox{$>$}}\lower.55ex\hbox{$\sim$}\,$}

7: \bibliographystyle{apj}

8: \shorttitle{Gas Motions in UCHII Regions} \shortauthors{Zhu et al.}

9: 

10: \begin{document}

11: 

12: \title{[Ne~II] Observations of Gas Motions in Compact and Ultracompact H~II Regions}

13: 

14: \author{Qingfeng Zhu\altaffilmark{1}}

15: \affil{Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623}

16: \email{zhuqf@cis.rit.edu}

17: 

18: \and

19: 

20: \author{John H. Lacy\altaffilmark{1}, Daniel T. Jaffe\altaffilmark{1}}

21: \affil{Department of Astronomy, University of Texas, Austin, TX

22: 78712}

23: 

24: \email{lacy@astro.as.utexas.edu, dtj@astro.as.utexas.edu}

25: 

26: \and

27: 

28: \author{Matthew J. Richter\altaffilmark{1}}

29: \affil{Department of Physics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-8677}

30: 

31: \email{richter@physics.ucdavis.edu}

32: 

33: \and

34: 

35: \author{Thomas K. Greathouse\altaffilmark{1}}

36: \affil{Division \#15, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX

37: 78228} \email{tgreathouse@swri.edu}

38: 

39: \altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer at the Infrared Telescope

40: Facility, which is operated by the University of Hawaii under

41: Cooperative Agreement no. NCC 5-538 with the National Aeronautics

42: and Space Administration, Office of Space Science, Planetary

43: Astronomy Program.}

44: 

45: \clearpage

46: 

47: \begin{abstract}

48: We present high spatial and spectral resolution observations of

49: sixteen Galactic compact and ultracompact H~II regions in the

50: [Ne~II] 12.8~$\mu$m fine structure line. The small thermal width of

51: the neon line and the high dynamic range of the maps provide an

52: unprecedented view of the kinematics of compact and ultracompact

53: H~II regions. These observations solidify an emerging picture of the

54: structure of ultracompact H~II regions suggested in our earlier

55: studies of G29.96 and Mon R2; systematic surface flows, rather than

56: turbulence or bulk expansion, dominate the gas motions in the H~II

57: regions. The observations show that almost all of the sources have

58: significant (5-20~km~s$^{-1}$) velocity gradients and that most of

59: the sources are limb-brightened. In many cases, the velocity pattern

60: implies tangential flow along a dense shell of ionized gas. None of

61: the observed sources clearly fits into the categories of filled

62: expanding spheres, expanding shells, filled blister flows, or

63: cometary H~II regions formed by rapidly moving stars. Instead, the

64: kinematics and morphologies of most of the sources lead to a picture

65: of H~II regions confined to the edges of cavities created by stellar

66: wind ram pressure and flowing along the cavity surfaces. In sources

67: where the radio continuum and [Ne~II] morphologies agree, the

68: majority of the ionic emission is blue-shifted relative to nearby

69: molecular gas. This is consistent with sources lying on the near

70: side of their natal clouds being less affected by extinction and

71: with gas motions being predominantly outward, as is expected for

72: pressure-driven flows.

73: \end{abstract}

74: 

75: \keywords{interstellar medium - ultracompact H~II regions - fine structure line}

76: 

77: \section{Introduction}

78: The short Kelvin-Helmholtz timescales of massive young stellar

79: objects (YSOs) allow these objects to begin emitting ionizing

80: photons and to excite nearby material while still embedded in their

81: natal clouds \citep{lad99}. One of the earliest observable

82: manifestations of newly formed OB stars is the ultracompact HII

83: (UCHII) region. These embedded HII regions are initially small ($D

84: {\leq} 0.1~pc$) and dense ($n_{e} {\sim} 10^4~cm^{-3}$) and have a

85: typical emission measure (EM) $\sim$ 10$^7$~pc~cm$^{-6}$

86: \citep{chu02}. As HII regions evolve their sizes increase, but they

87: are still considered to be UCHII regions as long as their emission

88: measures (or surface brightnesses) remain high.

89: 

90: Since most stars with M $\ge$ 8~M$_{\odot}$ should form UCHII

91: regions shortly after their birth, studies of UCHII regions can help

92: us learn about physical conditions in high-mass star forming regions

93: and the evolution of the physical conditions as the massive stars

94: turn on. A large percentage, $\ge$ 50$\%$, of UCHII regions have

95: cometary, core-halo or irregular morphologies

96: \citep{wooC89b,kurCW94,walBHR98,depWDMD05}, arguing against the

97: classical expanding sphere model of HII regions \citep{savG55}. In

98: addition, statistical arguments based on the Galactic population of

99: UCHII regions lead to estimates of the lifetime of these regions

100: that are much longer than expected from the expanding sphere model

101: \citep{wooC89a,hoaKLKH07}. Many models have been proposed for UCHII

102: region formation \citep[see the review by][and references

103: therein]{chu99}, with solving the lifetime problem a major goal.

104: However, the age of an individual UCHII region is hard to determine

105: through observations. A number of theoretical models have been

106: geared toward explaining both these long apparent lifetimes and the

107: observed morphologies of UCHII regions

108: \citep{holJLS94,dysWR95,redWD96,wilDR96,redWD98}.

109: 

110: Observations of the morphology and gas kinematics of UCHII regions

111: can help us to constrain models for the structure and evolution of

112: the regions much more definitively than observations of the

113: morphology alone. The morphological type is not a unique indicator

114: of the UCHII region physics because many models can produce similar

115: morphologies \citep{ten79, yorTB83, macVW91, vanM92, artH06}. While

116: it is difficult to choose between different models based on the

117: morphologies of HII regions, their kinematic signatures are very

118: distinct. To understand the structure and evolution of the regions

119: around the youngest massive stars, it is therefore necessary to

120: observe gas kinematics inside UCHII regions with the highest

121: spectral and spatial resolution. The large extinction associated

122: with molecular clouds around UCHII regions, however, prevents direct

123: observation at optical wavelengths and even at near-infrared

124: wavelengths \citep{dopFCSCT06}. Thus, observations at longer

125: wavelengths become crucial to UCHII region studies.

126: 

127: Radio interferometric observations can provide data with high

128: angular and spectral resolution. At high enough frequencies, where

129: non-LTE effects become less important, hydrogen radio recombination

130: line (RRL) emission has the same dependence on the electron density

131: as thermal free-free radio continuum emission, and the emissivities

132: of these lines are well known. RRL observations can provide

133: information on gas density and kinematics, and, to a limited degree,

134: on gas temperature. However, thermal broadening of hydrogen RRLs due

135: to the low mass of hydrogen atoms degrades the spectral resolution

136: of radio spectroscopy. The thermal line width of the RRLs (or any

137: hydrogen recombination lines like Br$\alpha$ and Br$\gamma$, for

138: that matter) in an ionized region (T$_e {\simeq} $10$^4$~K) is

139: $\simeq$ 20~km~s$^{-1}$, comparable to the velocities of bulk flows

140: in many sources. Furthermore, the incomplete uv sampling of radio

141: interferometric survey can both overemphasize compact structures

142: and, more generally limit the spatial dynamic range of the

143: observations.

144: 

145: Mid-IR fine structure line observations offer an alternative to

146: radio and IR recombination line observations. Fine structure lines

147: have small thermal line widths because they are emitted by heavy

148: elements. The importance of this feature of the fine structure lines

149: has been illustrated previously by high spectral resolution maps of

150: [Ne~II] emission in Mon R2 and G29.96-0.02 which show single lines

151: or multiple components of lines with widths significantly smaller

152: than the thermal widths of the hydrogen recombination lines

153: \citep{jafZLR03,zhuLJRG05}. In some cases, the broad, largely

154: Gaussian hydrogen recombination lines are, in fact, superpositions

155: of several much narrower kinematic components (see especially Fig. 3

156: of \cite{jafZLR03}). In addition, although the emitting species are

157: several orders of magnitude less abundant than hydrogen, the fine

158: structure lines are brighter than recombination lines because

159: collisional excitation cross-sections are much larger than the

160: relevant recombination cross-sections. Typical electron densities

161: over all compact and most ultracompact H~II regions are lower than

162: the critical density of the [Ne~II] 12.8~$\mu$m transition (${\sim}

163: 5 \times 10^5~cm^{-3}$), so this line shares the property of the

164: recombination lines of having a line strength proportional to

165: emission measure. We should mention that turbulence can also have

166: significant effects on line widths. Moreover, turbulence affects

167: both RRL and fine structure line observations and prevents

168: detections of velocity variations (due to gas bulk motions) with

169: scales smaller than the intrinsic line width combining thermal and

170: turbulent effects along any line of sight direction.

171: 

172: Our previous [Ne~II] line observations of a few UCHII regions have

173: demonstrated the effectiveness of using high spectral and spatial

174: resolution maps of fine structure lines to study such regions

175: \citep{jafZLR03,zhuLJRG05}. In these studies, we demonstrated that

176: the kinematic patterns in the ionized gas in Mon R2 and G29.96-0.02

177: are consistent with tangential flows along the surfaces of thin,

178: more-or-less parabolic shells. The goal of the current paper is to

179: use [Ne~II] mapping as a tool to examine a larger sample of compact

180: and ultracompact HII regions with a range of shapes and sizes in

181: order to look for a common thread in the kinematics that might lead

182: to a better understanding of the physics and evolution of these

183: sources. We present scan-mapped spectroscopic observations of

184: fifteen Galactic compact and ultracompact HII regions. This survey

185: is the first mid-infrared high-spectral resolution study of gas

186: kinematics in a large sample of UCHII regions.

187: 

188: In \S~{\bf \ref{secobservation}}, we describe our observational

189: method. We introduce our data reduction procedure in \S~{\bf

190: \ref{secdatareduction}}. In \S~{\bf \ref{secresult}}, we investigate

191: the morphology and kinematics of individual objects. Finally, the

192: conclusions drawn from our observations are presented in \S~{\bf

193: \ref{secdiscussion}}.

194: 

195: \section{Observations}

196: \label{secobservation} Candidates in our survey were selected based

197: on their radio continuum flux density levels \citep{wooC89b},

198: biasing our list toward radio-bright compact and ultracompact HII

199: regions. Observations were performed with the high spectral

200: resolution, mid-IR (5-25~$\mu$m) cross dispersed spectrograph TEXES

201: \citep[Texas Echelon Cross Echelle Spectrograph,][]{lacRGJZ02} on

202: the 3.0 meter NASA IRTF on Mauna Kea in Hawaii.

203: 

204: We list our observational parameters in Table~\ref{obspara}. Our

205: spatial and spectral resolution were approximately 1.8$''$ and

206: 4~km~s$^{-1}$. For each object, a north-south oriented

207: slit was used to scan the object from west to east. We chose the

208: step size along the scans so that there were at least two steps per

209: slit width and chose the scan lengths to cover the emission seen in

210: radio continuum maps available in the literature. Before each scan,

211: we offset the telescope to the west several arcseconds beyond the

212: edge of the maps shown in the figures. Several extra steps were

213: taken at the beginning and the end of each scan in order to measure

214: the sky background. The lengths of the scans and the initial offsets

215: were adjusted after examining a preliminary scan with our quick-look

216: program \citep{lacRGJZ02}. We made multiple overlapping scans,

217: offset north-south, to cover the sources. TEXES takes ambient

218: temperature blackbody and sky flats at the beginning of each scan

219: for flux calibration.

220: 

221: \section{Data Reduction}

222: \label{secdatareduction} We use a custom Fortran reduction program

223: \citep{lacRGJZ02} to correct optical distortions, flat field, remove

224: cosmic ray spikes, and fix bad pixels. The same program also does

225: wavelength and flux calibrations. We use atmospheric lines for

226: wavelength calibration, with wavelengths obtained from HITRAN

227: \citep{rotRGMEFP98}. We use an IDL script to subtract sky background

228: and combine multiple scans. The sky emission at each slit position

229: is linearly interpolated from the sky frames at the beginning and

230: the end of each scan. Sometimes, we start scans too late or end

231: scans too early. Extended line emission is present in our sky frames

232: and is subtracted off from other frames. This will result in an

233: underestimate of line flux from targets. Multiple scans are

234: cross-correlated, shifted and added to create the datacubes.

235: Normally, no shift is needed along the spectral direction. One

236: exception was the source W3, whose datacube was obtained by

237: combining data from two nights and where the maps were registered

238: using the compact continuum source IRS5 \citep{wynBN72}. Both the

239: Earth's motion and the spectral settings of the instrument on two

240: different nights affect the wavelength calibration. The continuum

241: flux level at each pixel in the map is obtained from spectral points

242: off the line and is subtracted from the spectra. Finally, we

243: resample the datacubes so that each pixel has a size of

244: $0.3''{\times}0.3''$ on the sky. The coordinates of the resulting

245: continuum maps and [Ne~II] line maps are relative to the peak

246: positions in the integrated [Ne~II] line maps. When radio continuum

247: maps are available, they are cross-correlated with the [Ne~II] maps

248: so that both maps can be plotted on the same scale. The coordinates

249: in Table 1 were taken from the literature and served as reference

250: points during our line observations.

251: 

252: \section{Results}

253: \label{secresult}

254: 

255: In this section we discuss highlights of individual objects and

256: features common to several sources. [Ne~II] line emission datacubes

257: for all objects are available online. {\bf Note: the data cubes will

258: be available through the ApJ web site.}

259: 

260: \subsection{G29.96~-0.02}

261: 

262: G29.96~-0.02 (G29.96 hereafter) is a cometary UCHII region at a

263: distance of $\sim7.4$~kpc, is $\sim$20$''$$\times$15$''$ in size,

264: and is one of the most luminous UCHII regions in the sky at 2 cm

265: wavelength. The ionized region is considered as an archetype of the

266: UCHII regions caused by bow shocks \citep{macVW91}, although some

267: past observations of the gas velocities along the symmetry axis of

268: this source argue against this interpretation, implying that the

269: source is a blister flow \citep{lumH96} or a blister flow modified

270: by a stellar wind \citep{lumH99}. We presented [Ne~II] line mapping

271: observations and compared gas kinematics in the region with a bow

272: shock model in \cite{zhuLJRG05}. We include here a summary of the

273: model and results for G29.96 from the earlier paper as a template

274: for understanding the kinematics of some of the other sources in the

275: sample. The bow shock model predicts that an approximately

276: paraboloidal shell of swept-up material will form in front of a star

277: moving supersonically inside a molecular cloud. The shell is

278: supported by the ram pressure of the stellar wind and the ambient

279: medium. Swept-up material, including ionized and neutral gas, is

280: forced to flow along the surface of the shell. With different

281: viewing angles for the shell, the model can reproduce many of the

282: observed features in ionic line observations of G29.96 as well as

283: several other UCHII regions in our sample, including morphologies

284: and the distinctive shapes that parabolic flows have in

285: position-velocity (p-v) diagrams.

286: 

287: Figure~\ref{g2996mapneii} shows a 2~cm radio continuum map from

288: \cite{feyGCV95} and our spectrally integrated [Ne~II] line map of

289: G29.96. The two maps closely resemble each other, indicating that

290: most of the [Ne~II] emission arises from gas with n$<$n$_{crit}$ and

291: that the extinction to the gas is either rather uniform or small at

292: 12.8~$\mu$m. In fact, \cite{morSMPDBCR02} observed that the electron

293: density in the region is sub-critical (N$_e$$\sim$680 cm$^{-3}$ -

294: 5.7$\times$10$^4$ cm$^{-3}$) and \cite{marPMTCR02} reported low

295: infrared extinction (A$_K$$\simeq$1.6) toward the region. Our

296: findings are consistent with these observations. Both maps show an

297: emission arc open to the east with extended emission in the eastern

298: part of the region. A filament extends from the southern edge of the

299: nebula to the east, forming a ``tail'' of the cometary HII region.

300: Channel maps at nine equally spaced velocities are shown in

301: Figure~\ref{g2996nechanmapneii}. These channel maps show a

302: morphology change from a thin crescent in the most blue-shifted

303: channels to a fan-like region in red-shifted channels.

304: Figures~\ref{g2996pv1} and \ref{g2996pv2} show position-velocity

305: (p-v) diagrams of several representative cross cuts made through the

306: observed and model data cubes. The observations and the model

307: display similar p-v structures (as shown in our previous paper, a

308: characteristic ``$\Lambda$'' shape for cuts perpendicular to the

309: nebular symmetry axis and a ``7'' shape for cuts parallel to the

310: axis). Similar changes in structure from cut to cut can also be

311: seen. The similarities in line emission morphology and gas

312: kinematics between the observations and the model indicate that the

313: ionized gas in G29.96 flows along a thin shell at

314: $\sim20$~km~s$^{-1}$, as it would if it were produced by a bow

315: shock. We use these distinctive patterns in the p-v diagrams as

316: indicators of the presence of surface flows in other sources where

317: we have not carried out detailed model fits. However, one clear

318: discrepancy between the bow shock model that gives the correct shape

319: to the contours in the model p-v diagrams in Figures~\ref{g2996pv1}

320: and \ref{g2996pv2} and the observed sources is the

321: $\sim$15~km~s$^{-1}$ difference between the observed and modeled

322: velocity of the ambient neutral material. We discuss in

323: \S~\ref{secdiscussion} modifications of the bow-shock model to

324: explain this discrepancy.

325: 

326: \subsection{G5.89~-0.39}

327: 

328: G5.89~-0.39, also called W28 A2(1), is 2.6~kpc from the Sun

329: \citep{dowWBW80,kimK03}. \cite{wooC89b} measured continuum images of

330: the source at both 2~cm (Figure~\ref{g589map}, left) and 6~cm. A

331: shell-like morphology with significantly limb-brightened walls

332: surrounding the slightly elongated central cavity can be recognized.

333: The G5.89 region also hosts a source of extremely broad (FWHM

334: $\sim$140~km~s$^{-1}$) CO J=1-0 emission \citep{sheC96,harF88}.

335: \cite{acoCW98} have used multi-epoch radio continuum observations to

336: argue that the ionized shell is expanding at $\sim$35~km~s$^{-1}$.

337: Radio recombination line observations of \cite{rodRG02} show a

338: complex velocity structure across the region, which cannot be

339: explained with a consistent dynamical model. Mid-IR dust continuum

340: observations show that G5.89 deviates from spherical symmetry and

341: resembles a shell partially open to the south, with significant SW

342: and SE protrusions from the geometric center, implying an

343: anisotropic expansion of the ionization front due to density

344: variations in the surrounding molecular medium \citep{balAJKM92}.

345: 

346: Our [Ne~II]~12.8~$\mu$m line map (Figure~\ref{g589map}, right)

347: shows a morphology similar to that of the mid-infrared continuum,

348: with a bright arc along the north side of the source.

349: With our $\sim 1.5''$ resolution, the kinematic signature of an

350: expanding shell is not apparent, although there is some evidence

351: that the line is broadest toward the center of the source

352: (Figure~\ref{g589chanmapneii}).

353: The majority of the emission is blue-shifted

354: by $\sim$9~km~s$^{-1}$ with respect to the molecular cloud

355: \citep{hatTM98}, and the extent of the

356: region becomes relatively smaller toward the red end of the

357: spectrum.

358: 

359: \subsection{G11.94~-0.62}

360: Located at a distance of 4.2~kpc \citep{chuWC90}, G11.94~-0.62

361: was categorized by \cite{wooC89b} as a cometary

362: UCHII region. In their radio continuum map (Figure~\ref{g1194map},

363: left), the region shows an emission arc with its apex pointing to

364: the west and diffuse emission extending to the east and north. A

365: broad $^{12}$CO(J=1-0) line was observed toward the object

366: \citep{sheC96}. The CO line width (full width at zero intensity) of

367: over 28~km~s$^{-1}$ suggests the presence of high velocity outflows.

368: \cite{debRTP03} imaged the region at 11.7~$\mu$m and 20.8~$\mu$m.

369: The region does not show a cometary shape in their mid-IR images

370: and, although their pointing has an astrometric accuracy about

371: 1$''$, the radio peak does not match any structure in the mid-IR

372: images. The overall appearance of the region at mid-IR and radio

373: continuum wavelengths does not match well.

374: 

375: Our [Ne~II]~12.8~$\mu$m line map (Figure~\ref{g1194map}, right)

376: matches the mid-IR continuum observations \citep{debRTP03} very

377: well. By registering our map with the continuum map in

378: \cite{debRTP03}, we determine the position of the radio continuum

379: peak in our map, marked with an `X' at (-1.17$''$, 1.67$''$). Five

380: separate emission peaks (designated as A-E) can be seen in our

381: integrated [Ne~II] map. They all have corresponding 11.7$\mu$m and

382: 20.8$\mu$m emission peaks in \cite{debRTP03}. Linear sizes of these

383: clumps range from $\sim$2$''$ in C to over 7$''$ in A and E. Like

384: the mid-IR continuum, the [Ne~II] morphology is a poor match to that

385: of the radio continuum.

386: 

387: The spectra of the clumps C, D and E each can be fit with a single

388: Gaussian profile with a center velocity very close to the molecular

389: cloud velocity \citep[V$_{LSR} \simeq $39~km~s$^{-1}$,][]{chuWC90}.

390: Figure~\ref{g1194ABCspec} shows line profiles in the region of A, B

391: and C. Over this part of the source, the lines are broad, with most

392: of the additional emission to the red of the cloud velocity. The

393: profiles in Figure~\ref{g1194ABCspec} show that most of the [Ne~II]

394: emission occurs over the range V$_{LSR}$ = 30-60 km s$^{-1}$.

395: Complex morphology, probably induced by dust extinction, prevents a

396: detailed analysis of the kinematics in the region.

397: 

398: \subsection{G30.54~+0.02}

399: G30.54~+0.02 has a limb-brightened, or ''horseshoe'' shape in both the radio

400: continuum map \citep{wooC89b} and our [Ne~II] line

401: map (Figure~\ref{g3054map}).

402: The more concentrated emission with a bigger opening in the

403: radio continuum map probably is the result of the higher resolution

404: of the interferometer observations and of the uneven sensitivity of the

405: snapshot mode aperture synthesis to compact and extended emission.

406: Both radio and [Ne~II] line observations show that

407: the emission arc breaks into at least three components.

408: 

409: Figure~\ref{g3054profile} shows [Ne~II] profiles across the region

410: while Figure~\ref{g3054pv} displays position-velocity diagrams on

411: selected cuts along and across the symmetry axis. Large line widths

412: (20-30~km~s$^{-1}$ FWHM), together with smooth profiles imply that

413: turbulence or substantial small-scale motions are present and may

414: mask the bulk motion of the gas. Nevertheless, a change of velocity

415: pattern within the structure is still apparent.

416: 

417: The velocity pattern along the bright arc is consistent with

418: significant tangential flows of the type seen in G29.96, but here

419: mostly in the plane of the sky. At the vertex of the horseshoe,

420: there is a single broad line with a velocity centroid close to the

421: molecular cloud velocity (Figure~\ref{g3054pv}). On the arm of the

422: horseshoe to the east of the vertex the line peak shifts $\sim$

423: 7~km~s$^{-1}$ to the blue of the molecular cloud velocity while on

424: the western arm the molecular line and [Ne~II] peak velocities

425: agree. [Ne~II] emission is present over at least 40-50~km~s$^{-1}$

426: at all positions (Figures~\ref{g3054profile} and \ref{g3054pv}).

427: 

428: Along the symmetry axis and away from the bright arc, the match to a

429: tangential flow is less clear. Rather than breaking up into two

430: narrow lines, the emission on the axis and behind the vertex is at a

431: single velocity close to that of the molecular cloud. A small

432: velocity gradient across the apex may indicate an inclination to the

433: plane of sky.

434: 

435: \subsection{G33.92~+0.11}

436: G33.92~+0.11 is particularly remarkable because

437: of the apparent disconnect between its nondescript morphology and

438: its distinctive position-velocity structure. It was first

439: categorized as a core-halo UCHII region by \cite{wooC89b} and later

440: as a shell UCHII region by \cite{feyCGNJ92}. \cite{feyCGNJ92} showed

441: that the 20 cm extended emission is roughly shell-like, although the

442: cavity in their 20~cm image is offset to the southeast of the

443: emission peak, and the rest of the region has a morphology close to

444: a core-halo region with cometary extended emission. C$^{18}$O

445: observations showed two emission cores, and one of them is

446: associated with the peak of the UCHII region \citep{watM99}.

447: 

448: The integrated [Ne~II] line map shows an irregular peak surrounded

449: by extended emission (Figure~\ref{g3392map}). Mid-infrared continuum

450: observations show similar structure to that seen in the [Ne~II] line

451: observations \citep{givRBW07}. The major structure is a resolved

452: ellipsoid oriented northeast-southwest with an additional extension

453: to the east along the minor axis. The [Ne~II] and radio continuum

454: maps look very similar, but the central peak splits into two

455: components in the neon line, possibly as a result of foreground

456: extinction.

457: 

458: Position-velocity diagrams along a few cross cuts through G33.92

459: (Figure~\ref{g3392pv}) show kinematics identifiable with the

460: kinematics typical of a flow along a surface similar to that seen in

461: G29.96 including the characteristic ``7'' and ``$\Lambda$''

462: patterns, despite its more nondescript morphology. Profiles at

463: individual positions are broad and frequently asymmetric

464: (Figure~\ref{g3392multispec}). Channel maps

465: (Figure~\ref{g3392chanmapneii}) show that three prominent components

466: form an arc at blue velocities and persist to the ambient material

467: velocity, V$_{LSR} \simeq $108~km~s$^{-1}$. This arc has a sharp

468: falloff to the west. A fourth emission peak and extended emission

469: can be seen to the east of the arc. The positions of these emission

470: peaks shift from channel to channel. This position shift is

471: especially prominent for the peak to the east of the arc. It moves

472: almost 5$''$ southeast from a position close to the arc in the

473: channel at V$_{LSR} {\simeq} $107~km~s$^{-1}$ to (+6,-3) in the

474: channel at V$_{LSR} {\simeq} $89~km~s$^{-1}$. The three components

475: along the arc move a smaller distance to the northwest. Towards the

476: red end of the spectrum, the emission components merge together and

477: fade away. We note that the overall shape of the region changes from

478: a thin crescent at blue-shifted velocities to a fan at red-shifted

479: velocities. Bow shock models, like that for G29.96 predict a similar

480: morphological change.

481: 

482: \subsection{G43.89~-0.78}

483: G43.89~-0.78 was classified as a cometary UCHII

484: region by \cite{wooC89b}.

485: \cite{macVW91} used G43.89 as one of their bow shock

486: model tests. They concluded, based on the continuum maps

487: that they needed a viewing angle between 45$^{\circ}$ and 60$^{\circ}$

488: from head-on in order to fit the morphology well.

489: \cite{sheC96} found

490: evidence for high-velocity molecular material in the region with a CO

491: line width over 39~km~s$^{-1}$. Low-resolution 21~$\mu$m imaging

492: observations showed the region as a point source with extended

493: emission to the southeast \citep{croC03}, while the radio continuum

494: observations showed extended emission northwest of an emission peak.

495: 

496: The cometary morphology and kinematics of the [Ne~II] line emission

497: (Figure~\ref{g4389map}-\ref{g4389pv}) are consistent with flows

498: along the surface of the region like those seen in G29.96. We fitted

499: the p-v diagrams with a model like that used for G29.96

500: \citep{zhuLJRG05}. The best fit was with a stellar motion of

501: 15~km~s$^{-1}$ and 140$^{\circ}$ away from the direction to the

502: observer. However, as with G29.96, there is a discrepancy between

503: the model, which predicts that the ionic emission should be

504: redshifted relative to the molecular emission, and the observed

505: emission, which is predominantly blueshifted.

506: 

507: \subsection{G45.07~+0.13}

508: G45.07~+0.13 was classified as an UCHII region with a shell

509: morphology by \citet{turM84}. At a distance of $\sim$6.0~kpc

510: \citep{chuWC90}, it has a diameter $\sim$0.9$''$ at $\lambda$=2~cm

511: \citep{wooC89b}. The slight velocity gradient in the H76$\alpha$

512: line was interpreted as the result of either an expanding ring

513: \citep{garRV86} or ionized bipolar outflows \citep{limW99}. A group

514: of water masers lie 2$''$ to the north of the radio continuum peak

515: \citep{hofC96,debRTP03}.

516: 

517: G45.07 is unresolved in our 12.8~$\mu$m [Ne~II] map at 2$''$ spatial

518: resolution (Figure~\ref{g4507mapneii}, right). The [Ne~II] line

519: toward G45.07 is much narrower (V$_{FWHM} \simeq$ 20~km~s$^{-1}$)

520: than is the H76$\alpha$ radio recombination line

521: \citep[$\sim$48~km~s$^{-1}$,][]{garRV86}. The difference in widths

522: can arise either from pressure broadening of the H76$\alpha$ line or

523: from the presence of high velocity material at very high density

524: where the recombination line emissivity is proportional to n$_e^2$

525: while the [Ne~II] emissivity only scales with n$_e$. Dust continuum

526: emission is observed at G45.07 and at a second source $\sim$2$''$

527: north of G45.07 (Figure~\ref{g4507mapneii}, left). The location of

528: the second source matches the positions of the H$_2$O masers. We did

529: not detect any line emission from the second source, supporting the

530: suggestion that this source is at an early evolutionary stage

531: \citep{hofC96,debRTP03}.

532: 

533: \subsection{G45.12~+0.13}

534: G45.12~+0.13 (G45.12 hereafter) is located at a distance of

535: 6.9~kpc \citep{chuWC90}.

536: It was observed by \cite{wooC89b} with the VLA at 2 and 6~cm and revealed

537: at least 3 peaks with a roughly arc-like overall morphology.

538: 

539: Our [Ne~II] line observations do not completely resolve the three

540: components along the radio emission arc, which is only $\sim$3''

541: long (referred to as Source ``N'' in Figure~\ref{g4512map}). The

542: channel maps (Figure~\ref{g4512chanmap}) show that the ``horns'' of

543: the arc-like structure are more prominent at lower redshifts while

544: the bright spot at the middle of the arc dominates at higher

545: velocities. The p-v diagrams of a cut parallel to the symmetry axis

546: of the source N do show ``7'' patterns of cometary H~II regions

547: (Figure~\ref{g4512Npv}, top panels), but a cut perpendicular to the

548: axis does not show the expected ``$\Lambda$'' shaped pattern

549: (Figure~\ref{g4512Npv}, bottom panels). It is not clear how much the

550: kinematics in G45.12N resembles that in a cometary HII region,

551: because its ``7'' type p-v diagram is not dramatic compared to that

552: in G29.96 (Figure~\ref{g2996pv1}).

553: 

554: We also find two fainter sources to the south of the arc which were

555: not seen in the sparsely sampled VLA snapshot image. To show these

556: two faint sources clearly, we extend contour levels down to 1$\%$ of

557: the peak value in our line map. The southeastern source (SE) is

558: extended and almost round-shaped. It is hard to determine its

559: symmetry axes. Its p-v diagrams along RA and DEC cuts

560: (Figure~\ref{g4512SEpv}) show evidence of gas bulk motion and most

561: of emission is blue-shifted relative to the ambient molecular gas.

562: Tentative ``7'' shaped emission distribution can be seen in these

563: diagrams, suggesting that surface flows may be present in the

564: source. The southwestern source (SW) is irregular and contains

565: multiple peaks. These emission peaks surround an emission minimum at

566: the same location $\sim$(2.$''$7, -8$''$) in almost all channels

567: (Figure~\ref{g4512chanmap}). A broken shell-like morphology with an

568: opening to the west suggests an expanding shell structure for SW,

569: but the ring of the line emission does not collapse at the ends of

570: the Doppler shift-range as would be expected for an expanding shell.

571: The velocity distributions in both N and SW are more or less

572: symmetric about the ambient material velocity, which is

573: 59~km~s$^{-1}$. Line emission from SE is relatively blue-shifted,

574: and the width of the [Ne~II] line is narrower in SE than in the

575: other two sources.

576: 

577: \subsection{G45.45~+0.06}

578: G45.45~+0.06 was categorized by \cite{wooC89b} as a cometary UCHII

579: region. In the 6~cm radio continuum image, the source extends

580: $\sim9''$~EW and $6''$~NS and has a sharp and bright ionization

581: front to the north and extended emission to the south

582: (Figure~\ref{g4545map}, left panel). Multiple emission peaks

583: arranged along the ionization front form a distorted ring around a

584: cavity. At a distance 6.6~kpc, the integrated continuum flux density

585: implies an O7.5 main sequence star as the ionizing star

586: \citep{chuWC90}. \cite{felSHH98} acquired images at H and K$'$ bands

587: and three mid-infrared bands centered at 3.8$\mu$m, 10.5$\mu$m and

588: 11.7$\mu$m and found that the region contained a young OB cluster.

589: 

590: The overall morphology of the [Ne~II] line emission

591: (Figure~\ref{g4545map}, right) does not look like that of the radio

592: continuum map. Most of the line emission comes from an elongated

593: structure aligned northeast to southwest with the extended emission

594: to the southwest roughly matching that seen in Br$\gamma$ by

595: \cite{felSHH98}. The intermediate velocity (43-53~km~s$^{-1}$)

596: channel maps (Figure~\ref{g4545chanmapneii}) most nearly match the

597: radio emission. The NE-SW elongated structure is primarily present

598: in red-shifted velocity channels. Extended emission north of the

599: radio arc and a overlying compact 11.7~$\mu$m source

600: \citep{felSHH98} dominate the blue-shifted channels. The differences

601: between the [Ne~II] and radio distributions could be due to

602: incomplete uv coverage of the snap shot radio observations or/and to

603: greater sensitivity of [Ne II] line observations.

604: 

605: \subsection{W51 IRS2}

606: W51 IRS2 (W51d) is a luminous \citep[L = 2-4 $\times $10$^6$

607: L$_{\odot}$,][]{eriT80,jafHG87} ultracompact HII region/molecular

608: cloud core within a more extensive star forming complex (Carpenter

609: \& Sanders 1998). Proper motion studies of H$_2$O maser features

610: place W51 IRS2 at a distance of $\sim$ 7~kpc

611: \citep{genDSR81,schMG81,imaW02}. Elsewhere, we have presented

612: 0.5$''$ resolution maps of the [S~IV] 10.5~$\mu$m and [Ne~II] 12.8

613: $\mu$m lines toward this source \citep{lacJZRBG07}. These maps

614: reveal a number of embedded UCHII regions, which dominate the

615: [Ne~II] emission, a more extensive surface flow, seen mostly in

616: [S~IV], and a prominent $\sim$ 100~km~s$^{-1}$ jet, which we

617: attribute to ionization of one lobe of a protostellar jet. The

618: surface flow has a position-velocity pattern indicating that the gas

619: is moving along a shell with its vertex pointed away from the

620: observer. At the shell edges, the emission is blue shifted by

621: 10-15~km~s$^{-1}$ with respect to the ambient cloud. The flow is

622: less evident in [Ne~II] where several compact sources are much

623: brighter, either because of the lower extinction at 12.8~$\mu$m or

624: because of the lower ionization potential of neon than of S$^{++}$.

625: 

626: We include our somewhat more extensive 2$''$ resolution IRTF map of

627: W51 IRS2 in the [Ne~II] line here for completeness.

628: Figure~\ref{w51dmapneii} compares the distribution of radio

629: continuum and [Ne~II] emission. The channel maps in

630: Figure~\ref{w51dchanmapneii}, as well as the top p-v diagram in

631: Figure~\ref{w51dpv} show that the two components of the eastern

632: source d1 have velocities that differ by $\sim$ 10~km~s$^{-1}$, with

633: the southern component blueshifted by $\sim$ 12~km~s$^{-1}$ from the

634: molecular cloud velocity. The molecular emission spectra of CS show

635: a second feature close to the [Ne~II] velocity in the southern

636: component (49.5~km~s$^{-1}$, Plume et al. 1997). The northern

637: component of W51d1 and W51d have [Ne~II] velocities close to the

638: velocity of the main component of the molecular cloud. We also

639: notice that the ionized gas toward the center of the region is

640: somewhat redshifted with respect to ambient material, which is

641: likely because the ionized gas is pushed into the cloud by

642: stellar/cluster winds.

643: 

644: \subsection{G61.48~+0.09B}

645: G61.48~+0.09B  belongs to the emission nebula complex Sh2-88B at a

646: distance of 5.4~kpc \citep{chuWC90}. \cite{garLG94} compared

647: kinematics from hydrogen recombination line and molecular line

648: observations \citep{macLBRMF81,chuWC90} and concluded that the

649: region was undergoing a blister flow to the southwest. They argued

650: that the hydrogen recombination line kinematics and the radio

651: continuum morphology of the region were best explained by expansion

652: of ionized gas in a non-uniform medium. Radio continuum observations

653: show that the region consists of two components, designated as B1

654: and B2 in Figure~\ref{g6148mapradio}. The more compact and spherical

655: B2 is located $\sim$11$''$ east of the peak of B1, which is extended

656: and has slightly curved contours that hint toward a cometary

657: morphology. Our [Ne~II] line emission distribution

658: (Figure~\ref{g6148mapneii}), which is very similar to the

659: distribution of Br$\gamma$ emission \citep{pugAFHW04}, shows

660: significantly different structure than the radio continuum map. The

661: morphological difference between the [Ne~II] line emission and the

662: radio continuum emission is likely due to dust extinction. The

663: [Ne~II] emission has complex morphology and kinematics. Multiple

664: components are present over a 35$''$ by 20$''$ area. A bright ridge

665: of emitting gas runs diagonally from the northeast to south central

666: in the map. A less bright irregular structure extends to the

667: northwest from the south.

668: 

669: The p-v diagrams (Figure~\ref{g6148pv}) show that the gas observable

670: in the [Ne~II] line has a steep velocity gradient. The [Ne~II]

671: emission near B2 is blueshifted by a few km~s$^{-1}$ with respect to

672: the neutral cloud velocity. Over much of B1, the bulk of the neon

673: emission arises in redshifted material with the westernmost gas

674: ranging from 0-20 km~s$^{-1}$ to the red of the molecular line

675: center. The morphological differences between the radio and [Ne~II]

676: maps make it difficult to associate the kinematic and morphological

677: structures. The RRL observations of \cite{garLG94}, which are not

678: affected by extinction, show that the bulk of the ionized material

679: is redshifted with respect to the molecular cloud.

680: 

681: \subsection{K3-50A (G70.3~+1.6)}

682: K3-50 is a four-component \citep[A-D,][]{wyn69} HII region complex

683: at a distance of 8.7~kpc \citep{har75}. The kinematic distance was

684: computed using the galactic rotational curve of \cite{sch65} with

685: the assumed Sun-to-GC distance of 10~kpc and a 250~km~s$^{-1}$

686: circular velocity at the position of the Sun \citep{rubT69,rub65}.

687: More recent estimates of the distance to the Galactic Center

688: ($sim$7.94~kpc) imply that this distance is too large

689: \citep{eisSGOT03}.

690: %radial velocity $\sim$-22~km~s$^{-1}$.

691: The UCHII region K3-50A appears to

692: be the youngest and dominates the emission at infrared wavelengths.

693: \cite{hofBPW04} presented K$'$ band bispectrum speckle

694: interferometric data of K3-50A and their observations suggested that

695: K3-50A is excited by a small cluster of massive to intermediate-mass

696: stars. Radio continuum and hydrogen recombination line observations

697: found that the ionized gas in K3-50A was undergoing a high-velocity

698: bipolar outflow \citep{depGPR94}. The left panel of

699: Figure~\ref{k350map} shows the radio continuum image

700: \citep{depGPR94}. There is extended emission both north and south of

701: the dashed box that shows the extent of the [Ne~II] map.

702: 

703: The [Ne~II] line emission in K3-50A peaks at the radio peak and has

704: a remarkably similar distribution to that of the radio continuum

705: within the dashed box (Figure~\ref{k350map}). This is consistent

706: with its relatively low extinction \citep[$A_K=1.6$,][]{marPMTCR02}.

707: Most of the line emission comes from the core of the region. The

708: integrated line map shows that the core of K3-50A consists of two

709: sources, source 1 (S1) at the line emission peak and source 2 (S2)

710: $\sim 1.5''$ southeast of S1. Line emission extends north and south

711: from the central region. In the 12.8~$\mu$m continuum

712: (Figure~\ref{k350map}), a more compact emission peak is slightly

713: offset ($\sim$1$''$) to the north of S1.

714: 

715: The [Ne~II] emission has a very broad velocity range, from

716: -67~km~s$^{-1}$ to -8~km~s$^{-1}$ (Figure~\ref{k350chanmapneii}).

717: S1, at (0,0), is present in all velocity channels. S2 is bright in

718: the channels at the red end of the spectrum. A third component (S3)

719: $\sim2''$ to the south of S1 is present in the channels at central

720: and blue-shifted velocities. All three components lie significantly

721: to the blue of the molecular cloud which has V$_{LSR}$ =

722: -24~km~s$^{-1}$ \citep{sheC96}. S3 has the biggest velocity shift

723: with a line center at $\sim$-39~km~s$^{-1}$, with S1 and S2 at

724: $\sim$-35~km~s$^{-1}$. Position-velocity diagrams of K3-50A show the

725: velocity differences between different sources

726: (Figure~\ref{k350pv}). The position-velocity diagram for a

727: north-south cut (top panel of Figure~\ref{k350pv}) shows a velocity

728: gradient while the region right around S1 shows evidence for a

729: barely resolved bipolar structure with a total velocity extent of 60

730: km s$^{-1}$ (middle panel of Figure~\ref{k350pv}). Because the

731: region is very extended north-south, line emission from the region

732: fills our slit from end to end and emission from the northern and

733: southern lobes are very faint. The emission indicated by the last

734: four contours in Figure~\ref{k350map} is at least 100 times fainter

735: than emission at the peak. Our map did not cover enough area to show

736: the two more extended emission lobes.

737: 

738: \subsection{S106}

739: S106 (G76.4~-0.6) is a well-known bipolar HII region consisting of

740: two lobes with the symmetry axis oriented at a position angle of

741: $\sim$30$^{\circ}$.

742: An equatorial gap is seen in all wavelengths from optical to radio.

743: Earlier investigators suggest that a dense, circumstellar disk surrounds a

744: star and blocks the ionizing photons in the disk plane

745: forming a biconical nebula \citep{balS82}.

746: A point source, presumably the excitation source of the nebula,

747: is located at the center of the equatorial gap

748: \citep{pipSKKSM76,felMSRE84}.

749: \cite{felMSRE84} noticed that the bright radio continuum peaks in

750: S106 tended to be distributed at the edges of the radio lobes and

751: inferred that the inner volume was filled with gas with lower density.

752: A radio continuum map from their observations is shown in

753: Figure~\ref{s106mapradioneii}.

754: Dense molecular clumps were identified on both sides of the central

755: source of the HII region \citep{schSKSB02} but there is

756: no evidence of a smooth molecular disk.

757: \cite{smiJGK01} imaged the region at 3 to 20~$\mu$m.

758: Some of their images (11.7~$\mu$m) show two dark lanes.

759: One crosses the center of the region from the east to the west and

760: divides the region into the north and south lobes.

761: The other originates east of the region,

762: crosses the south lobe and forms a small angle ($\sim$30$^{\circ}$)

763: with the first dark lane.

764: 

765: The integrated [Ne~II] line map and the radio continuum map are

766: stunningly similar (Figure~\ref{s106mapradioneii}).

767: The bipolar morphology and individual emission concentrations are

768: clearly seen in both maps.

769: The south lobe is characterized by

770: a few bright clumps along the edge, while the north lobe contains

771: more diffuse emission.

772: The axis of the bipolar structure, which is indicated by the sharp edges of

773: the south lobe, runs NNE-SSW.

774: The main difference between the radio and [Ne~II] maps is that

775: the second dark lane seen in the infrared continuum is also seen in

776: [Ne~II].

777: 

778: The velocity structure shown in the p-v diagrams

779: (Figure~\ref{s106pv}) and the channel maps

780: (Figure~\ref{s106chanmapneii}) is consistent with a picture of S106

781: as a nearly edge-on bipolar nebula. Both figures indicate that the

782: south lobe is slightly blue shifted ($\sim$3 km s$^{-1}$) with

783: respect to the molecular cloud velocity while the material in the

784: northern lobe is on-average red-shifted by $\sim$4 km s$^{-1}$. At

785: the same time, individual intensity peaks show moderately narrow

786: ($\sim$10 km s$^{-1}$ lines. Projection effects may lead to velocity

787: shifts from one emission peak to its neighbors.

788: 

789: \subsection{NGC7538A}

790: NGC7538A belongs to an HII region-molecular cloud complex at a

791: distance of ${\sim}3.5$~kpc \citep{hanLR02}. In the 6 cm radio

792: continuum image, it is a compact, spherical HII region with a radius

793: $\sim5''$ \citep{wooC89b} (Figure~\ref{n7538map}, left),

794: corresponding to $\sim$19,000~AU. Molecular line observations show

795: that molecular gas toward NGC7538 has a LSR velocity

796: $-56.9$~km~s$^{-1}$ \citep{dicDW81}. \cite{bloWPFAG98} suggested

797: that NGC7538A is formed by a stellar wind bow shock with a star

798: moving from the northwest to the southeast away from the Earth into

799: the molecular cloud.

800: 

801: Since dust extinction toward the region is not huge

802: \citep[$A_K\sim1.3$,][]{werBGMNW79,herHFMHWP81,camT84}, our [Ne~II]

803: line map of NGC7538A (Figure~\ref{n7538map}, right) resembles the

804: radio continuum map closely except that the radio component which

805: should be at the southwestern corner of the source A, $\sim$(-5,-2),

806: is not present in our [Ne~II] map. This is probably due to our poor

807: spatial resolution. [Ne~II] line channel maps, spanning a velocity

808: range from -82 to -51~km~s$^{-1}$, are shown in

809: Figure~\ref{n7538chanmapneii}. A cavity can be seen in the most

810: blue-shifted channels and in the integrated line map. The shape of

811: the region changes from ring-like at the blue-shifted channels to

812: core-like at the red-shifted channels. The channel maps in

813: Figure~\ref{n7538chanmapneii} show that most of the ionized gas in

814: NGC7538A is blue-shifted with respect to the molecular cloud. The

815: limb-brightened appearance of the source in the integrated line

816: strength and radio continuum maps (Figure~\ref{n7538map}) might lead

817: to the conclusion that the source is a limb-brightened spherical

818: shell. However, the pattern of a small central source at the

819: molecular cloud velocity and a larger, shell-like structure at bluer

820: velocities, combined with the ``$\Lambda$'' and ``7'' structures

821: seen in the pv cuts through the source (Figure~\ref{n7538apv}) argue

822: against this picture. The kinematics and morphology are more

823: consistent with a tangential flow along a shell with the symmetry

824: axis close to the line of sight and with the vertex pointing away

825: from the observer.

826: 

827: \subsection{W3A+B}

828: W3 belongs to an extensive HII region-molecular cloud complex

829: located in the Perseus spiral arm \citep[D = 2.0~kpc,][]{hacBMRI06}.

830: Aperture synthesis observations identified four compact/ultracompact

831: radio continuum sources in a 3 arc minute diameter region

832: \cite[A-D,][]{wyn71}. Infrared imaging at 1.65 to 20$\mu$m revealed

833: nine objects (IRS~1-9) in W3 \citep{wynBN72}, four of which are

834: associated with the compact radio continuum sources: IRS1 and IRS2

835: with the circular source W3A; IRS3 with W3B and IRS4 with W3C.

836: Earlier authors have used the ``broken-shell'' morphology and the

837: small velocity gradients seen in hydrogen recombination lines toward

838: W3A to argue for a picture of this region as a blister flow

839: \citep{dicHG83,tieGCWJ97}. W3B has also been characterized as an

840: emerging blister flow \citep{tieGCWJ97}.

841: 

842: W3A has the morphology of a limb-brightened broken shell in our

843: [Ne~II] map (Figure~\ref{w3map}), in close agreement with the

844: distribution of the radio continuum emission. Most of the line

845: emission forms a crescent open to the south with a horizontal

846: structure crossing the center of the incomplete shell. An irregular

847: emission cavity is present inside the crescent. Two finger-like

848: structures extend from the southeast corner of the ring to the

849: south. If we ignore these finger-like structures and another small

850: lobe of emission on the northwest edge of the shell, the region

851: closely resembles a half-ring. Such an image becomes clear in the

852: channel maps of the region (Figure~\ref{w3achanmapneii}). The

853: half-ring morphology is present in channels over a broad velocity

854: range. The sharp outer edge of the ring is evident. The emission

855: level drops rapidly to the background level within a few arcseconds.

856: 

857: The shell-like morphology of W3A might lead one to expect the source

858: to have the kinematics of an expanding shell. However, p-v diagrams

859: (Figure~\ref{w3apv}) of the region do not support this picture. We

860: do not see the two components toward the center of the source which,

861: in an expanding shell, would arise from the front and back sides of

862: the shell and would gradually merge into one component at an

863: intermediate velocity at the edge of the shell. Instead, we see a

864: very broad line ($\geq$25 km~s$^{-1}$) along the bright arc-like rim

865: of the region becoming narrow blue-shifted and red-shifted lines

866: toward the center of the region. The change of the line width and

867: the center velocities of the lines are abrupt. A surface flow,

868: rather than an expanding shell, can better explain the observed p-v

869: structure. The fact that both p-v cuts show the same pattern of a

870: broad feature at the bright limb followed by a double line within

871: the cavity implies that the vertex of the flow lies between the two

872: cuts. An examination of the -53.5 km s$^{-1}$ and -26.8 km s$^{-1}$

873: channel maps in Figure~\ref{w3achanmapneii} supports this picture.

874: The emission in the southern part of W3A comes from a narrower

875: velocity range and therefore is not part of the surface flow seen in

876: the north.

877: 

878: The compact HII regions W3B and W3A have similar central velocities

879: and line widths. The overall [Ne~II] line emission distribution in

880: W3B (see left panels in Figure~\ref{w3bpv}) looks like an irregular

881: shell. The line profile at most positions in the region can be fit

882: by a single Gaussian. W3B contains a low surface brightness cavity,

883: which can be seen in both the integrated line map and the channel

884: maps (Figure~\ref{w3bchanmapneii}) of the region. The total shift in

885: velocity centroid in W3B is relatively modest, from $\sim$-42 km

886: s$^{-1}$ to -34 km s$^{-1}$ and there is an apparently random

887: element to the velocity variations at the 2-3 km s$^{-1}$ level.

888: Nonetheless, both the channel maps (Figure~\ref{w3bchanmapneii}) and

889: the p-v cuts (Figure~\ref{w3bpv}) are consistent with tangential

890: flow along the ionized walls of a cavity. The channel maps show

891: emission from the central region primarily at the least negative

892: velocities, while the shell is most prominent in the bluer channels.

893: The p-v diagrams also show the reddest velocities at positions

894: crossing the center of the cavity and the bluest velocities along

895: the edge.

896: 

897: \section{Discussion}

898: \label{secdiscussion}

899: 

900: We have presented high spatial and spectral resolution mapping of

901: the 12.8 $\mu$m [Ne~II] line toward a sample of 18 compact and

902: ultracompact HII regions, where we count distinct HII regions within

903: clusters as separate sources. In our discussion, we make use of

904: previously published results for two of the 18 regions: G29.96-0.02

905: \citep{zhuLJRG05} and W51 IRS2 \citep{lacJZRBG07}. We also include

906: in the discussion one source \citep[Mon~R2,][]{jafZLR03}, for which

907: no results are presented in the current paper, bringing our sample

908: to 19 sources.

909: 

910: In order to discuss possible interpretations of the observed source

911: morphologies and kinematics, we first sketch p-v diagrams of several

912: types of models that have been suggested for UCHII regions. We then

913: compare the observed morphologies and kinematics to these sketches.

914: We emphasize that the sketches are only meant to be qualitative

915: descriptions of generic models. They are not derived from

916: hydrodynamic simulations.

917: 

918: \subsection{Qualitative Models}

919: 

920: To facilitate the discussion of the observed gas motions, we first

921: consider qualitative kinematic models of UCHII regions.

922: Sketches of several types of models of UCHII regions are shown in

923: Figures~\ref{ssspv}-\ref{sshpv}.

924: 

925: A. (Figure~\ref{ssspv})  An uniformly expanding shell source appears

926: as a limb-brightened disk. Its p-v diagram is ring-like, centered on

927: the molecular cloud velocity, V$_{amb}$.

928: 

929: B. (Figure~\ref{ssspv})  An expanding filled sphere appears as a

930: limb-darkened disk. Its p-v diagram is a filled ellipse centered at

931: V$_{amb}$.

932: 

933: C. (Figure~\ref{sbspv})  The appearance of a bow-shock source, in

934: which a wind from a star moving supersonically through a molecular

935: cloud sweeps up a paraboloidal shell, with the motion of the gas in

936: the shell resulting from the combined momenta of the stellar wind

937: and the swept-up material \citep{macVW91,vanM92,wil00,zhuLJRG05,

938: artH06} depends on the viewing angle. If viewed from the side

939: ($\theta = 90^\circ$, left panel), two velocities are seen at each

940: offset, on opposite sides of V$_{amb}$. The line is broad in the

941: head, and the two velocities approach each other in the tail. If

942: viewed from the tail ($\theta = 180^\circ$, right panel), the source

943: would not be obviously cometary in appearance, and the velocity

944: would vary from V$_{\star}$ at the center to V$_{amb}$ at the edges.

945: From an intermediate angle ($\theta = 135^\circ$, middle panel), we

946: see a p-v pattern like those seen in G29.96, but offset in velocity.

947: A broad line, centered between V$_{amb}$ and V$_{\star}$ is seen at

948: the head of the comet. Of the two velocities seen at $\theta =

949: 90^\circ$, the V $<$ V$_{amb}$ branch is foreshortened and may blend

950: into the head (see Figure~\ref{g2996pv2}). The V $>$ V$_{amb}$

951: branch rises toward V$_{\star}$ then falls back toward V =

952: V$_{amb}$. The line centroid is at V $>$ V$_{amb}$. The p-v diagrams

953: would be mirrored about V$_{amb}$ if the star were moving toward the

954: observer ($\theta < 90^{\circ}$).

955: 

956: D. (Figure~\ref{sppv})  A paraboloidal shell can also occur in which

957: the motion of the gas in the shell is predominantly due to the

958: pressure gradient along the shell, which causes an acceleration of

959: the gas toward the tail \citep{zhuLJRG05,artH06}. In this case, the

960: paraboloidal shape of the shell could result either from a

961: relatively slow motion of the star through the molecular cloud or

962: from a density gradient in the cloud. The resulting appearance and

963: p-v diagrams are similar to those of the bow-shock model, but the

964: p-v diagrams are offset toward negative velocities, with the

965: velocity centroid at V $<$ V$_{amb}$ (for $\theta > 90^{\circ}$).

966: This is the offset seen in G29.96, indicating that it belongs to

967: this category.

968: 

969: E. (Figure~\ref{sshpv})  A filled blister flow could result if the wind

970: from the ionizing star is too weak to prevent the ionized gas from

971: flowing away from the surface of the molecular cloud, past the star

972: \citep{yorTB83,com97,henAG05,artH06}. Such a region is formed when a

973: density gradient is present in the natal molecular cloud. In this

974: case, the source morphology and p-v diagrams would depend on the

975: shape of the blister cavity in the molecular cloud, but blister

976: flows are largely axial and a broad line would be likely to be seen

977: at all positions. For $\theta > 90^{\circ}$, the line centroid is at

978: V $<$ V$_{amb}$. The largest velocities would be seen toward the

979: tail, or at the center for $\theta \approx 180^{\circ}$.

980: 

981: A number of sources in our sample either have confused kinematics or

982: have kinematics for which we have no simple qualitative models:

983: Several sources show ring, horseshoe, or bipolar morphologies,

984: without the kinematic signatures of shells or paraboloidal flows.

985: Several regions appear to be clusters of overlapping sources, making

986: the interpretation of their kinematics difficult. Several sources

987: have distinctly different morphologies in [Ne~II] and the radio

988: continuum, suggesting that variable extinction is distorting their

989: appearance in the infrared. These sources also have confusing

990: kinematics. And several sources are too small for their [Ne~II]

991: kinematics to have been resolved.

992: 

993: \subsection{Observed Source Morphologies}

994: 

995: The extraordinarily good match between the radio and [Ne~II]

996: morphologies in the majority (12 of 16) of the resolved sources

997: indicates that most neon is in Ne$^+$, that the gas density is

998: almost everywhere below the critical density of the 12.8 $\mu$m

999: line, and that the centimeter-wave radio continuum emission is for

1000: the most part optically thin. Extinction is the most likely cause of

1001: the strong differences between radio continuum and [Ne II]

1002: morphologies in the other four sources. Some of the differences

1003: could also be due to incomplete UV coverage in the radio snapshot

1004: observations. And, differences in sensitivity between [NeII] and

1005: radio continuum observations may also play a role.

1006: 

1007: In many cases, radio interferometer observations show that UCHII

1008: regions are accompanied by substantial radio continuum flux from

1009: extended, low-surface brightness ionized gas

1010: \citep{kurWHO99,kimK01}. These results imply that UCHII regions may

1011: exist in asymmetric regions where the ionizing radiation reaches

1012: dense gas in one direction and more extended low density gas in the

1013: other direction. Our scanning technique does not permit us to find

1014: these extended haloes in [Ne~II] due to limited sky area we can

1015: cover and the sky background subtraction method we use, but the

1016: frequent presence of emission halos may have implications for the

1017: interpretation of the source kinematics.

1018: 

1019: \subsection{Observed Source Kinematics}

1020: 

1021: Of the 12 sources that are resolved and not badly confused by

1022: extinction, nine show clear evidence of bulk motions, which are

1023: usually not symmetric about the molecular cloud velocities. These

1024: nine sources all show strong evidence of tangential flows along the

1025: surfaces of shells. Three of these sources, G29.96

1026: (Figures~\ref{g2996pv1} and \ref{g2996pv2}), G33.92

1027: (Figure~\ref{g3392pv}), and G43.89 (Figure~\ref{g4389pv}), show,

1028: with varying degrees of clarity, the ``$\Lambda$'' and ``7''

1029: patterns in p-v diagrams that are similar to the patterns

1030: established in the surface flow models (types C and D). In these

1031: three cases, the patterns indicate that the terminal velocities are

1032: blueshifted with respect to the molecular cloud velocities. Along

1033: the symmetry axis, the velocities cross the molecular cloud velocity

1034: from blue to red and back to blue going from the vertex into the

1035: source for G29.96 and G33.92. In G43.89, the velocity approaches the

1036: cloud velocity from the blue side but does not cross it before

1037: moving back to the blue. The kinematic behavior we observe in all

1038: three sources is very similar to what we see in the models of G29.96

1039: (Figures~\ref{g2996pv1} and \ref{g2996pv2}), which are tilted with

1040: the vertex away from the observer and have an inclination of the

1041: symmetry axis of about 45$^{\circ}$ with respect to the line of

1042: sight. With their vertices pointed away from the observer, the

1043: blueshift relative to V$_{amb}$ means that these sources are of

1044: kinematic type D (pressure-driven surface flows; Figure~\ref{sppv}).

1045: 

1046: The three sources in our sample whose [Ne~II] and radio continuum

1047: morphologies most closely resemble limb-brightened spherical shells

1048: do not have kinematic patterns consistent with a closed-shell

1049: geometry. The kinematic patterns for three of the sources, NGC~7538A

1050: (Figure~\ref{n7538apv}), W3B (Figure~\ref{w3bpv}), and W51 IRS2,

1051: \citep[see][]{lacJZRBG07}, are consistent with motion of the ionized

1052: gas along roughly parabolic shells with vertices pointing almost

1053: directly away from the observer. In the position-velocity plots, the

1054: most positive velocities, usually close to the velocity of the

1055: dense molecular gas, are toward the vertex while the velocities

1056: along the bright rim are shifted to the blue. The presence of this

1057: pattern is largely independent of the position angle of the

1058: position-velocity cut through the center of the source.

1059: These sources are of kinematic type D with $\theta \approx 180^{\circ}$.

1060: 

1061: The remaining sources with understandable kinematics also have a

1062: strongly limb-brightened appearance. The kinematics revealed by the

1063: [Ne~II] spectroscopy show that G30.54 (Figure~\ref{g3054pv}), W3A

1064: (Figure~\ref{w3apv}), and Mon~R2 \citep{jafZLR03} are also likely to

1065: be limb-brightened parabolas with significant flow of the ionized

1066: gas along the ionized shell. For these three sources, however, the

1067: kinematics indicate that the symmetry axes lie near the plane of the

1068: sky. The sources show broad lines at the source vertex and then

1069: double lines farther along the symmetry axis with the two components

1070: appearing at the extreme velocities of the line seen at the vertex.

1071: Along the edges of each source, the lines are single and

1072: significantly narrower. These sources are of either kinematic type D

1073: or type C, with $\theta \approx 90^{\circ}$.

1074: 

1075: Four sources have very similar [Ne~II] and radio morphologies, but

1076: do not fit into any of the kinematic categories we have discussed.

1077: S106 (Figure~\ref{s106mapradioneii}) has a clear bipolar morphology,

1078: but confused kinematics. G45.12N (Figure~\ref{g4512Npv}) has a

1079: cometary morphology, but does not have obvious cometary kinematics,

1080: of either type C or type D. G45.12SW (Figure~\ref{g4512SEpv}) has a

1081: ring or shell morphology, but does not have the kinematic signature

1082: of a shell. K3-50A (Figure~\ref{k350map}) appears to be a cluster of

1083: sources, which are too blended to allow us to sort out their

1084: kinematics. The peaks in the IRTF map of [Ne~II] in W51~IRS2

1085: (Figure~\ref{w51dmapneii}) are also blended. The Gemini map of

1086: \cite{lacJZRBG07} separates these sources but does not resolve their

1087: kinematics. However, the kinematics of the extended ionized gas in

1088: W51~IRS2 shown in \cite{lacJZRBG07} look much like a type D surface

1089: flow with $\theta \approx 180^{\circ}$.

1090: 

1091: Complex morphologies and kinematics in the four sources with

1092: substantially different [Ne~II] and radio continuum morphologies

1093: prevent a coherent explanation for gas motion in these sources.

1094: However, it is clear that systematic gas motions are present. In

1095: G11.94, there is a component of the [Ne~II] emission at the same

1096: velocity as the ambient cloud (Figure~\ref{g1194ABCspec}), but there

1097: is also a substantial amount of emission at many positions in a red

1098: wing or in an identifiable red component. In G45.45

1099: (Figure~\ref{g4545map}), the kinematic pattern is confusing, and the

1100: most prominent feature in [Ne~II] is not apparent in the radio

1101: continuum. G61.48 (Figure~\ref{g6148mapneii}) is the source where

1102: the [Ne~II] morphology least resembles the distribution of the radio

1103: continuum emission. The [Ne~II] emission we see may therefore not be

1104: sampling the bulk of the gas, but the dominance of red-shifted gas

1105: in the RRL observations \citep{garLG94} is consistent with the

1106: conclusion from the [Ne~II]-radio continuum morphology difference,

1107: namely that the source is on the back side of the molecular cloud

1108: and the ionized material is flowing away from the neutral core.

1109: 

1110: \subsection{Comparison of Observed Sources with Qualitative Models}

1111: 

1112: The kinematic types that we have assigned to observed sources are

1113: given in Table~\ref{kintypes}. Examination of this list shows that

1114: none of the observed sources fits into category A or B, the

1115: classical expanding shell and sphere models of HII regions. None has

1116: a ring-like p-v diagram of an expanding shell, and the sources with

1117: broad lines are either too small for their morphologies to be

1118: apparent or have confused morphologies. In addition, none of the

1119: sources fits into category E, the classical filled blister flow with

1120: the ionized gas flowing away from the ionization front.

1121: 

1122: Even more remarkably, in spite of the frequency of bow-shock

1123: morphologies, none of the observed sources clearly fits into

1124: category C, a bow shock moving with a star through a molecular

1125: cloud. Because they are nearly edge-on, Mon R2, G30.54, and W3A

1126: could fit into either category C or category D. The other sources

1127: with cometary kinematic signatures all have p-v patterns

1128: characteristic of sources tipped away from the observer (${\theta}

1129: > 90^{\circ}$) with their velocity centroids blueshifted relative to

1130: the neighboring molecular material, the signature of a

1131: pressure-driven surface flow.

1132: 

1133: The preponderance of sources with their tails tipped toward the

1134: observer ($\theta \geq 90^{\circ}$) probably results from a

1135: combination of extinction and selection effects. The extinction at

1136: 12.8~$\mu$m is relatively low

1137: \citep[A$_{12.8}$/A$_V$$\sim$0.05,][]{rieL85,rosBD00}, but the

1138: column density through the kind of massive core that harbors massive

1139: young stars and UCHII regions can be substantial \citep[A$_V$

1140: $\approx$ a few hundred,][]{beuKDS00}. The density in such cores

1141: drops rather steeply, with power-law exponents of 1.6-1.8

1142: \citep{mueSEJ02,beuSMMSW02}. If UCHII regions are not in the centers

1143: of cores, they should therefore be visible in [Ne~II] when the

1144: exciting stars lie between the front side and $\theta \approx

1145: 90^{\circ}$. Our survey was somewhat biased in favor of sources

1146: lying on the front sides of molecular clouds by including sources

1147: known from optical and near-infrared observations (NGC 7538, W3, and

1148: Mon R2). In addition, we were forced to abandon efforts to observe

1149: several UCHII regions (G8.67-0.36, G10.10+0.74, G10.62-0.38,

1150: G12.208-0.10, G33.50+0.20, G42.42-0.27, G45.47+0.05, G50.23+0.33)

1151: because they were undetectable or too faint to map.

1152: %g34.30, g35.19, w49

1153: These selection effects are likely to explain the lack of sources

1154: with kinematics indicating that they lie on the back sides of their

1155: clouds.

1156: 

1157: More than half of the observed sources fit into category D, a flow along

1158: the surface of a paraboloidal shell, which accelerates relative to

1159: molecular cloud as it moves away from the apex of the paraboloid.

1160: Although we have not made a hydrodynamic model of such a flow, we

1161: know of no driving mechanism for the acceleration other than the

1162: pressure gradient in the ionized gas. \cite{zhuLJRG05} found that

1163: the pressure gradient acceleration would be small if the ionized and

1164: swept-up molecular gas were coupled so both had to be accelerated.

1165: But we have estimated the acceleration if the ionized gas is allowed

1166: to slip past the molecular shell, and we find that speeds

1167: $\sim$20-30~km~s$^{-1}$ can occur. The hydrodynamic models of

1168: \cite{artH06} include the essential effects present in the

1169: combination of blister and bow shock models: density gradients in

1170: the neutral medium, stellar winds, and stellar motion. The

1171: \cite{artH06} models do an excellent job of matching the range of

1172: source morphologies and reproduce the most significant kinematic

1173: signatures using reasonable values for density gradients, mass loss

1174: rates, and stellar velocities. One critical area where they fall

1175: short is in explaining the width of the lines at the source vertex.

1176: The observed effect is most evident in W3A (Figure~\ref{w3apv}) and

1177: in Mon~R2 \citep{jafZLR03} where the symmetry axes are near the

1178: plane of the sky. The splitting of the broad line into two narrow

1179: lines at the velocity extremes of the broad line as one crosses the

1180: shell to the inside implies that the gas accelerates to

1181: $\sim~\pm$10~km~s$^{-1}$ within a small solid angle (less than a

1182: steradian, as seen from the point of view of the ionizing star) at

1183: the vertex. This, in turn, implies a significant pressure gradient.

1184: 

1185: The [Ne~II] kinematics of our sample unite a large and diverse group

1186: of UCHII and compact HII regions into a single empirical picture:

1187: The HII regions coexist with dense and massive molecular cores

1188: \citep{beuSMMSW02,shiEYKJ03,sriBSMW02}. The ionized regions have the

1189: form of partial, roughly parabolic shells with their open sides

1190: usually pointing away from the centers of the dense neutral

1191: condensations and gas flows tangentially along these shells.

1192: 

1193: The evidence that very many UCHII regions are dense shells with

1194: tangential flows away from the parent molecular cores has

1195: implications for the survivability of the molecular cores. Earlier

1196: examinations of the erosion of dense cores by external O stars did

1197: not take the compression of neutral material by stellar wind shocks

1198: into account. These efforts led to estimates that when as little as

1199: 4\% of the core material formed into stars with a Salpeter IMF,

1200: these stars could erode the remaining core entirely away

1201: \citep{whi79}. It has already been pointed out, however that the

1202: dense shells formed by stellar wind pressure would greatly inhibit

1203: the process of erosion \citep{chu91,lumH99,hoa06}. Our results

1204: indicate that most if not all OB stars breaking out of dense cores

1205: form such dense shells at their boundaries.

1206: 

1207: 

1208: \acknowledgments

1209: 

1210: The development of TEXES was made possible with support from the NSF

1211: and the SOFIA program through grant USRA-8500-98-008. Observations

1212: with TEXES are supported by NSF grant AST-0607312. Part of this

1213: research was performed in the Rochester Imaging Detector Laboratory

1214: with support from a NYSTAR Faculty Development Program grant. MJR

1215: acknowledges the support of NSF grant NSF-0708074 and NASA grant

1216: NNG04GG92G. TKG was supported by the Lunar and Planetary Institute,

1217: which is operated by the Universities Space Research Association

1218: under NASA CAN-NCC5-679. DTJ would like to thank the

1219: Max-Planck-Institut fuer extraterrestrische Physik for its

1220: hospitality. We thank Alan Fey and Ed Churchwell for letting us to

1221: have their data on G29.96~-0.02 and other objects. We also want to

1222: acknowledge Achim Tieftrunk, Yolanda Gomez, Marcello Felli, Chris

1223: DePree, Ralph Gaume for their permission to use their published

1224: figures in this work.

1225: 

1226: \begin{thebibliography}{97}

1227: \expandafter\ifx\csname

1228: natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi

1229: 

1230: \bibitem[{{Acord} {et~al.}(1998){Acord}, {Churchwell}, \& {Wood}}]{acoCW98}

1231: {Acord}, J.~M., {Churchwell}, E., \& {Wood}, D.~O.~S. 1998, \apjl,

1232: 495, L107+

1233: 

1234: \bibitem[{{Arthur} \& {Hoare}(2006)}]{artH06}

1235: {Arthur}, S.~J. \& {Hoare}, M.~G. 2006, \apjs, 165, 283

1236: 

1237: \bibitem[{{Ball} {et~al.}(1992){Ball}, {Arens}, {Jernigan}, {Keto}, \&

1238:   {Meixner}}]{balAJKM92}

1239: {Ball}, R., {Arens}, J.~F., {Jernigan}, J.~G., {Keto}, E., \&

1240: {Meixner}, M.~M.

1241:   1992, \apj, 389, 616

1242: 

1243: \bibitem[{{Bally} \& {Scoville}(1982)}]{balS82}

1244: {Bally}, J. \& {Scoville}, N.~Z. 1982, \apj, 255, 497

1245: 

1246: \bibitem[{{Beuther} {et~al.}(2000){Beuther}, {Kramer}, {Deiss}, \&

1247:   {Stutzki}}]{beuKDS00}

1248: {Beuther}, H., {Kramer}, C., {Deiss}, B., \& {Stutzki}, J. 2000,

1249: \aap, 362,

1250:   1109

1251: 

1252: \bibitem[{{Beuther} {et~al.}(2002){Beuther}, {Schilke}, {Menten}, {Motte},

1253:   {Sridharan}, \& {Wyrowski}}]{beuSMMSW02}

1254: {Beuther}, H., {Schilke}, P., {Menten}, K.~M., {Motte}, F.,

1255: {Sridharan}, T.~K.,

1256:   \& {Wyrowski}, F. 2002, \apj, 566, 945

1257: 

1258: \bibitem[{{Bloomer} {et~al.}(1998){Bloomer}, {Watson}, {Pipher}, {Forrest},

1259:   {Ali}, {Greenhouse}, {Satyapal}, {Smith}, {Fischer}, \&

1260:   {Woodward}}]{bloWPFAG98}

1261: {Bloomer}, J.~D., {Watson}, D.~M., {Pipher}, J.~L., {Forrest},

1262: W.~J., {Ali},

1263:   B., {Greenhouse}, M.~A., {Satyapal}, S., {Smith}, H.~A., {Fischer}, J., \&

1264:   {Woodward}, C.~E. 1998, \apj, 506, 727

1265: 

1266: \bibitem[{{Campbell} \& {Thompson}(1984)}]{camT84}

1267: {Campbell}, B. \& {Thompson}, R.~I. 1984, \apj, 279, 650

1268: 

1269: \bibitem[{{Churchwell}(1991)}]{chu91}

1270: {Churchwell}, E. 1991, in NATO ASIC Proc. 342: The Physics of Star

1271: Formation

1272:   and Early Stellar Evolution, ed. C.~J. {Lada} \& N.~D. {Kylafis}, 221--+

1273: 

1274: \bibitem[{{Churchwell}(1999)}]{chu99}

1275: {Churchwell}, E. 1999, in NATO ASIC Proc. 540: The Origin of Stars

1276: and

1277:   Planetary Systems, ed. C.~J. {Lada} \& N.~D. {Kylafis}, 515

1278: 

1279: \bibitem[{{Churchwell}(2002)}]{chu02}

1280: {Churchwell}, E. 2002, \araa, 40, 27

1281: 

1282: \bibitem[{{Churchwell} {et~al.}(1990){Churchwell}, {Walmsley}, \&

1283:   {Cesaroni}}]{chuWC90}

1284: {Churchwell}, E., {Walmsley}, C.~M., \& {Cesaroni}, R. 1990, \aaps,

1285: 83, 119

1286: 

1287: \bibitem[{{Comeron}(1997)}]{com97}

1288: {Comeron}, F. 1997, \aap, 326, 1195

1289: 

1290: \bibitem[{{Crowther} \& {Conti}(2003)}]{croC03}

1291: {Crowther}, P.~A. \& {Conti}, P.~S. 2003, \mnras, 343, 143

1292: 

1293: \bibitem[{{De Buizer} {et~al.}(2003){De Buizer}, {Radomski}, {Telesco}, \&

1294:   {Pi{\~n}a}}]{debRTP03}

1295: {De Buizer}, J.~M., {Radomski}, J.~T., {Telesco}, C.~M., \&

1296: {Pi{\~n}a}, R.~K.

1297:   2003, \apj, 598, 1127

1298: 

1299: \bibitem[{{de Pree} {et~al.}(1994){de Pree}, {Goss}, {Palmer}, \&

1300:   {Rubin}}]{depGPR94}

1301: {de Pree}, C.~G., {Goss}, W.~M., {Palmer}, P., \& {Rubin}, R.~H.

1302: 1994, \apj,

1303:   428, 670

1304: 

1305: \bibitem[{{de Pree} {et~al.}(2005){de Pree}, {Wilner}, {Deblasio}, {Mercer}, \&

1306:   {Davis}}]{depWDMD05}

1307: {de Pree}, C.~G., {Wilner}, D.~J., {Deblasio}, J., {Mercer}, A.~J.,

1308: \& {Davis},

1309:   L.~E. 2005, \apjl, 624, L101

1310: 

1311: \bibitem[{{Dickel} {et~al.}(1981){Dickel}, {Dickel}, \& {Wilson}}]{dicDW81}

1312: {Dickel}, H.~R., {Dickel}, J.~R., \& {Wilson}, W.~J. 1981, \apjl,

1313: 250, L43

1314: 

1315: \bibitem[{{Dickel} {et~al.}(1983){Dickel}, {Harten}, \& {Gull}}]{dicHG83}

1316: {Dickel}, H.~R., {Harten}, R.~H., \& {Gull}, T.~R. 1983, \aap, 125,

1317: 320

1318: 

1319: \bibitem[{{Dopita} {et~al.}(2006){Dopita}, {Fischera}, {Crowley}, {Sutherland},

1320:   {Christiansen}, {Tuffs}, {Popescu}, {Groves}, \& {Kewley}}]{dopFCSCT06}

1321: {Dopita}, M.~A., {Fischera}, J., {Crowley}, O., {Sutherland}, R.~S.,

1322:   {Christiansen}, J., {Tuffs}, R.~J., {Popescu}, C.~C., {Groves}, B.~A., \&

1323:   {Kewley}, L.~J. 2006, \apj, 639, 788

1324: 

1325: \bibitem[{{Downes} {et~al.}(1980){Downes}, {Wilson}, {Bieging}, \&

1326:   {Wink}}]{dowWBW80}

1327: {Downes}, D., {Wilson}, T.~L., {Bieging}, J., \& {Wink}, J. 1980,

1328: \aaps, 40,

1329:   379

1330: 

1331: \bibitem[{{Dyson} {et~al.}(1995){Dyson}, {Williams}, \& {Redman}}]{dysWR95}

1332: {Dyson}, J.~E., {Williams}, R.~J.~R., \& {Redman}, M.~P. 1995,

1333: \mnras, 277, 700

1334: 

1335: \bibitem[{{Eisenhauer} {et~al.}(2003){Eisenhauer}, {Sch{\"o}del}, {Genzel},

1336:   {Ott}, {Tecza}, {Abuter}, {Eckart}, \& {Alexander}}]{eisSGOT03}

1337: {Eisenhauer}, F., {Sch{\"o}del}, R., {Genzel}, R., {Ott}, T.,

1338: {Tecza}, M.,

1339:   {Abuter}, R., {Eckart}, A., \& {Alexander}, T. 2003, \apjl, 597, L121

1340: 

1341: \bibitem[{{Erickson} \& {Tokunaga}(1980)}]{eriT80}

1342: {Erickson}, E.~F. \& {Tokunaga}, A.~T. 1980, \apj, 238, 596

1343: 

1344: \bibitem[{{Feldt} {et~al.}(1998){Feldt}, {Stecklum}, {Henning}, {Hayward},

1345:   {Lehmann}, \& {Klein}}]{felSHH98}

1346: {Feldt}, M., {Stecklum}, B., {Henning}, T., {Hayward}, T.~L.,

1347: {Lehmann}, T., \&

1348:   {Klein}, R. 1998, \aap, 339, 759

1349: 

1350: \bibitem[{{Felli} {et~al.}(1984){Felli}, {Massi}, {Staude}, {Reddmann},

1351:   {Eiroa}, {Hefele}, {Neckel}, \& {Panagia}}]{felMSRE84}

1352: {Felli}, M., {Massi}, M., {Staude}, H.~J., {Reddmann}, T., {Eiroa},

1353: C.,

1354:   {Hefele}, H., {Neckel}, T., \& {Panagia}, N. 1984, \aap, 135, 261

1355: 

1356: \bibitem[{{Fey} {et~al.}(1992){Fey}, {Claussen}, {Gaume}, {Nedoluha}, \&

1357:   {Johnston}}]{feyCGNJ92}

1358: {Fey}, A.~L., {Claussen}, M.~J., {Gaume}, R.~A., {Nedoluha}, G.~E.,

1359: \&

1360:   {Johnston}, K.~J. 1992, \aj, 103, 234

1361: 

1362: \bibitem[{{Fey} {et~al.}(1995){Fey}, {Gaume}, {Claussen}, \& {Vrba}}]{feyGCV95}

1363: {Fey}, A.~L., {Gaume}, R.~A., {Claussen}, M.~J., \& {Vrba}, F.~J.

1364: 1995, \apj,

1365:   453, 308

1366: 

1367: \bibitem[{{Garay} {et~al.}(1994){Garay}, {Lizano}, \& {Gomez}}]{garLG94}

1368: {Garay}, G., {Lizano}, S., \& {Gomez}, Y. 1994, \apj, 429, 268

1369: 

1370: \bibitem[{{Garay} {et~al.}(1986){Garay}, {Rodriguez}, \& {van

1371:   Gorkom}}]{garRV86}

1372: {Garay}, G., {Rodriguez}, L.~F., \& {van Gorkom}, J.~H. 1986, \apj,

1373: 309, 553

1374: 

1375: \bibitem[{{Gaume} \& {Mutel}(1987)}]{gauM87}

1376: {Gaume}, R.~A. \& {Mutel}, R.~L. 1987, \apjs, 65, 193

1377: 

1378: \bibitem[{{Genzel} {et~al.}(1981){Genzel}, {Downes}, {Schneps}, {Reid},

1379:   {Moran}, {Kogan}, {Kostenko}, {Matveenko}, \& {Ronnang}}]{genDSR81}

1380: {Genzel}, R., {Downes}, D., {Schneps}, M.~H., {Reid}, M.~J.,

1381: {Moran}, J.~M.,

1382:   {Kogan}, L.~R., {Kostenko}, V.~I., {Matveenko}, L.~I., \& {Ronnang}, B. 1981,

1383:   \apj, 247, 1039

1384: 

1385: \bibitem[{{Georgelin} \& {Georgelin}(1976)}]{geoG76}

1386: {Georgelin}, Y.~M. \& {Georgelin}, Y.~P. 1976, \aap, 49, 57

1387: 

1388: \bibitem[{{Giveon} {et~al.}(2007){Giveon}, {Richter}, {Becker}, \&

1389:   {White}}]{givRBW07}

1390: {Giveon}, U., {Richter}, M.~J., {Becker}, R.~H., \& {White}, R.~L.

1391: 2007, \aj,

1392:   133, 639

1393: 

1394: \bibitem[{{Gomez} {et~al.}(1995){Gomez}, {Garay}, \& {Lizano}}]{gomGL95}

1395: {Gomez}, Y., {Garay}, G., \& {Lizano}, S. 1995, \apj, 453, 727

1396: 

1397: \bibitem[{{Hachisuka} {et~al.}(2006){Hachisuka}, {Brunthaler}, {Menten},

1398:   {Reid}, {Imai}, {Hagiwara}, {Miyoshi}, {Horiuchi}, \& {Sasao}}]{hacBMRI06}

1399: {Hachisuka}, K., {Brunthaler}, A., {Menten}, K.~M., {Reid}, M.~J.,

1400: {Imai}, H.,

1401:   {Hagiwara}, Y., {Miyoshi}, M., {Horiuchi}, S., \& {Sasao}, T. 2006, \apj,

1402:   645, 337

1403: 

1404: \bibitem[{{Hanson} {et~al.}(2002){Hanson}, {Luhman}, \& {Rieke}}]{hanLR02}

1405: {Hanson}, M.~M., {Luhman}, K.~L., \& {Rieke}, G.~H. 2002, \apjs,

1406: 138, 35

1407: 

1408: \bibitem[{{Harris}(1975)}]{har75}

1409: {Harris}, S. 1975, \mnras, 170, 139

1410: 

1411: \bibitem[{{Harvey} \& {Forveille}(1988)}]{harF88}

1412: {Harvey}, P.~M. \& {Forveille}, T. 1988, \aap, 197, L19

1413: 

1414: \bibitem[{{Hatchell} {et~al.}(1998){Hatchell}, {Thompson}, {Millar}, \&

1415:   {MacDonald}}]{hatTM98}

1416: {Hatchell}, J., {Thompson}, M.~A., {Millar}, T.~J., \& {MacDonald},

1417: G.~H. 1998,

1418:   \aaps, 133, 29

1419: 

1420: \bibitem[{{Henney} {et~al.}(2005){Henney}, {Arthur}, \&

1421:   {Garc{\'{\i}}a-D{\'{\i}}az}}]{henAG05}

1422: {Henney}, W.~J., {Arthur}, S.~J., \& {Garc{\'{\i}}a-D{\'{\i}}az},

1423: M.~T. 2005,

1424:   \apj, 627, 813

1425: 

1426: \bibitem[{{Herter} {et~al.}(1981){Herter}, {Helfer}, {Forrest}, {McCarthy},

1427:   {Houck}, {Willner}, {Puetter}, {Rudy}, {Soifer}, \& {Pipher}}]{herHFMHWP81}

1428: {Herter}, T., {Helfer}, H.~L., {Forrest}, W.~J., {McCarthy}, J.,

1429: {Houck},

1430:   J.~R., {Willner}, S.~P., {Puetter}, R.~C., {Rudy}, R.~J., {Soifer}, B.~T., \&

1431:   {Pipher}, J.~L. 1981, \apj, 250, 186

1432: 

1433: \bibitem[{{Hoare}(2006)}]{hoa06}

1434: {Hoare}, M.~G. 2006, \apj, 649, 856

1435: 

1436: \bibitem[{{Hoare} {et~al.}(2007){Hoare}, {Kurtz}, {Lizano}, {Keto}, \&

1437:   {Hofner}}]{hoaKLKH07}

1438: {Hoare}, M.~G., {Kurtz}, S.~E., {Lizano}, S., {Keto}, E., \&

1439: {Hofner}, P. 2007,

1440:   in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B.~{Reipurth}, D.~{Jewitt}, \& K.~{Keil},

1441:   181--196

1442: 

1443: \bibitem[{{Hofmann} {et~al.}(2004){Hofmann}, {Balega}, {Preibisch}, \&

1444:   {Weigelt}}]{hofBPW04}

1445: {Hofmann}, K.-H., {Balega}, Y.~Y., {Preibisch}, T., \& {Weigelt}, G.

1446: 2004,

1447:   \aap, 417, 981

1448: 

1449: \bibitem[{{Hofner} \& {Churchwell}(1996)}]{hofC96}

1450: {Hofner}, P. \& {Churchwell}, E. 1996, \aaps, 120, 283

1451: 

1452: \bibitem[{{Hollenbach} {et~al.}(1994){Hollenbach}, {Johnstone}, {Lizano}, \&

1453:   {Shu}}]{holJLS94}

1454: {Hollenbach}, D., {Johnstone}, D., {Lizano}, S., \& {Shu}, F. 1994,

1455: \apj, 428,

1456:   654

1457: 

1458: \bibitem[{{Imai} {et~al.}(2002){Imai}, {Watanabe}, {Omodaka}, {Nishio},

1459:   {Kameya}, {Miyaji}, \& {Nakajima}}]{imaW02}

1460: {Imai}, H., {Watanabe}, T., {Omodaka}, T., {Nishio}, M., {Kameya},

1461: O.,

1462:   {Miyaji}, T., \& {Nakajima}, J. 2002, \pasj, 54, 741

1463: 

1464: \bibitem[{{Jaffe} {et~al.}(1987){Jaffe}, {Harris}, \& {Genzel}}]{jafHG87}

1465: {Jaffe}, D.~T., {Harris}, A.~I., \& {Genzel}, R. 1987, \apj, 316,

1466: 231

1467: 

1468: \bibitem[{{Jaffe} {et~al.}(2003){Jaffe}, {Zhu}, {Lacy}, \&

1469:   {Richter}}]{jafZLR03}

1470: {Jaffe}, D.~T., {Zhu}, Q., {Lacy}, J.~H., \& {Richter}, M. 2003,

1471: \apj, 596,

1472:   1053

1473: 

1474: \bibitem[{{Kantharia} {et~al.}(1998){Kantharia}, {Anantharamaiah}, \&

1475:   {Goss}}]{kanAG98}

1476: {Kantharia}, N.~G., {Anantharamaiah}, K.~R., \& {Goss}, W.~M. 1998,

1477: \apj, 504,

1478:   375

1479: 

1480: \bibitem[{{Kim} \& {Koo}(2001)}]{kimK01}

1481: {Kim}, K. \& {Koo}, B. 2001, \apj, 549, 979

1482: 

1483: \bibitem[{{Kim} \& {Koo}(2003)}]{kimK03}

1484: {Kim}, K.-T. \& {Koo}, B.-C. 2003, \apj, 596, 362

1485: 

1486: \bibitem[{{Kurtz} {et~al.}(1994){Kurtz}, {Churchwell}, \& {Wood}}]{kurCW94}

1487: {Kurtz}, S., {Churchwell}, E., \& {Wood}, D.~O.~S. 1994, \apjs, 91,

1488: 659

1489: 

1490: \bibitem[{{Kurtz} {et~al.}(1999){Kurtz}, {Watson}, {Hofner}, \&

1491:   {Otte}}]{kurWHO99}

1492: {Kurtz}, S.~E., {Watson}, A.~M., {Hofner}, P., \& {Otte}, B. 1999,

1493: \apj, 514,

1494:   232

1495: 

1496: \bibitem[{{Lacy} {et~al.}(2007){Lacy}, {Jaffe}, {Zhu}, {Richter}, {Bitner},

1497:   {Greathouse}, {Volk}, {Geballe}, \& {Mehringer}}]{lacJZRBG07}

1498: {Lacy}, J.~H., {Jaffe}, D.~T., {Zhu}, Q., {Richter}, M.~J.,

1499: {Bitner}, M.~A.,

1500:   {Greathouse}, T.~K., {Volk}, K., {Geballe}, T.~R., \& {Mehringer}, D.~M.

1501:   2007, \apjl, 658, L45

1502: 

1503: \bibitem[{{Lacy} {et~al.}(2002){Lacy}, {Richter}, {Greathouse}, {Jaffe}, \&

1504:   {Zhu}}]{lacRGJZ02}

1505: {Lacy}, J.~H., {Richter}, M.~J., {Greathouse}, T.~K., {Jaffe},

1506: D.~T., \& {Zhu},

1507:   Q. 2002, \pasp, 114, 153

1508: 

1509: \bibitem[{{Lada}(1999)}]{lad99}

1510: {Lada}, C.~J. 1999, in NATO ASIC Proc. 540: The Origin of Stars and

1511: Planetary

1512:   Systems, ed. C.~J. {Lada} \& N.~D. {Kylafis}, 143

1513: 

1514: \bibitem[{{Lim} \& {White}(1999)}]{limW99}

1515: {Lim}, J. \& {White}, S.~M. 1999, in Star Formation 1999,

1516: Proceedings of Star

1517:   Formation 1999, held in Nagoya, Japan, June 21 - 25, 1999, Editor: T.

1518:   Nakamoto, Nobeyama Radio Observatory, 306--307

1519: 

1520: \bibitem[{{Lumsden} \& {Hoare}(1996)}]{lumH96}

1521: {Lumsden}, S.~L. \& {Hoare}, M.~G. 1996, \apj, 464, 272

1522: 

1523: \bibitem[{{Lumsden} \& {Hoare}(1999)}]{lumH99}

1524: ---. 1999, \mnras, 305, 701

1525: 

1526: \bibitem[{{Mac Low} {et~al.}(1991){Mac Low}, {van Buren}, {Wood}, \&

1527:   {Churchwell}}]{macVW91}

1528: {Mac Low}, M., {van Buren}, D., {Wood}, D.~O.~S., \& {Churchwell},

1529: E. 1991,

1530:   \apj, 369, 395

1531: 

1532: \bibitem[{{MacDonald} {et~al.}(1981){MacDonald}, {Little}, {Brown}, {Riley},

1533:   {Matheson}, \& {Felli}}]{macLBRMF81}

1534: {MacDonald}, G.~H., {Little}, L.~T., {Brown}, A.~T., {Riley}, P.~W.,

1535:   {Matheson}, D.~N., \& {Felli}, M. 1981, \mnras, 195, 387

1536: 

1537: \bibitem[{{Mart{\'{\i}}n-Hern{\' a}ndez} {et~al.}(2002){Mart{\'{\i}}n-Hern{\'

1538:   a}ndez}, {Peeters}, {Morisset}, {Tielens}, {Cox}, {Roelfsema}, {Baluteau},

1539:   {Schaerer}, {Mathis}, {Damour}, {Churchwell}, \& {Kessler}}]{marPMTCR02}

1540: {Mart{\'{\i}}n-Hern{\' a}ndez}, N.~L., {Peeters}, E., {Morisset},

1541: C.,

1542:   {Tielens}, A.~G.~G.~M., {Cox}, P., {Roelfsema}, P.~R., {Baluteau}, J.-P.,

1543:   {Schaerer}, D., {Mathis}, J.~S., {Damour}, F., {Churchwell}, E., \&

1544:   {Kessler}, M.~F. 2002, \aap, 381, 606

1545: 

1546: \bibitem[{{Morisset} {et~al.}(2002){Morisset}, {Schaerer},

1547:   {Mart{\'{\i}}n-Hern{\' a}ndez}, {Peeters}, {Damour}, {Baluteau}, {Cox}, \&

1548:   {Roelfsema}}]{morSMPDBCR02}

1549: {Morisset}, C., {Schaerer}, D., {Mart{\'{\i}}n-Hern{\' a}ndez},

1550: N.~L.,

1551:   {Peeters}, E., {Damour}, F., {Baluteau}, J.-P., {Cox}, P., \& {Roelfsema}, P.

1552:   2002, \aap, 386, 558

1553: 

1554: \bibitem[{{Mueller} {et~al.}(2002){Mueller}, {Shirley}, {Evans}, \&

1555:   {Jacobson}}]{mueSEJ02}

1556: {Mueller}, K.~E., {Shirley}, Y.~L., {Evans}, II, N.~J., \&

1557: {Jacobson}, H.~R.

1558:   2002, \apjs, 143, 469

1559: 

1560: \bibitem[{{Pipher} {et~al.}(1976){Pipher}, {Sharpless}, {Kerridge}, {Krassner},

1561:   {Schurmann}, {Merrill}, {Savedoff}, \& {Soifer}}]{pipSKKSM76}

1562: {Pipher}, J.~L., {Sharpless}, S., {Kerridge}, S.~J., {Krassner}, J.,

1563:   {Schurmann}, S., {Merrill}, K.~M., {Savedoff}, M.~P., \& {Soifer}, B.~T.

1564:   1976, \aap, 51, 255

1565: 

1566: \bibitem[{{Puga} {et~al.}(2004){Puga}, {Alvarez}, {Feldt}, {Henning}, \&

1567:   {Wolf}}]{pugAFHW04}

1568: {Puga}, E., {Alvarez}, C., {Feldt}, M., {Henning}, T., \& {Wolf}, S.

1569: 2004,

1570:   \aap, 425, 543

1571: 

1572: \bibitem[{{Redman} {et~al.}(1996){Redman}, {Williams}, \& {Dyson}}]{redWD96}

1573: {Redman}, M.~P., {Williams}, R.~J.~R., \& {Dyson}, J.~E. 1996,

1574: \mnras, 280, 661

1575: 

1576: \bibitem[{{Redman} {et~al.}(1998){Redman}, {Williams}, \& {Dyson}}]{redWD98}

1577: ---. 1998, \mnras, 298, 33

1578: 

1579: \bibitem[{{Rieke} \& {Lebofsky}(1985)}]{rieL85}

1580: {Rieke}, G.~H. \& {Lebofsky}, M.~J. 1985, \apj, 288, 618

1581: 

1582: \bibitem[{{Rodr{\'{\i}}guez-Rico} {et~al.}(2002){Rodr{\'{\i}}guez-Rico},

1583:   {Rodr{\'{\i}}guez}, \& {G{\'o}mez}}]{rodRG02}

1584: {Rodr{\'{\i}}guez-Rico}, C.~A., {Rodr{\'{\i}}guez}, L.~F., \&

1585: {G{\'o}mez}, Y.

1586:   2002, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica, 38, 3

1587: 

1588: \bibitem[{{Rosenthal} {et~al.}(2000){Rosenthal}, {Bertoldi}, \&

1589:   {Drapatz}}]{rosBD00}

1590: {Rosenthal}, D., {Bertoldi}, F., \& {Drapatz}, S. 2000, \aap, 356,

1591: 705

1592: 

1593: \bibitem[{{Rothman} {et~al.}(1998){Rothman}, {Rinsland}, {Goldman}, {Massie},

1594:   {Edwards}, {Flaud}, {Perrin}, {Camy-Peyret}, {Dana}, {Mandin}, {Schroeder},

1595:   {McCann}, {Gamache}, {Wattson}, {Yoshino}, {Chance}, {Jucks}, {Brown},

1596:   {Nemtchinov}, \& {Varanasi}}]{rotRGMEFP98}

1597: {Rothman}, L.~S., {Rinsland}, C.~P., {Goldman}, A., {Massie}, S.~T.,

1598: {Edwards},

1599:   D.~P., {Flaud}, J.-M., {Perrin}, A., {Camy-Peyret}, C., {Dana}, V., {Mandin},

1600:   J.-Y., {Schroeder}, J., {McCann}, A., {Gamache}, R.~R., {Wattson}, R.~B.,

1601:   {Yoshino}, K., {Chance}, K., {Jucks}, K., {Brown}, L.~R., {Nemtchinov}, V.,

1602:   \& {Varanasi}, P. 1998, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative

1603:   Transfer, 60, 665

1604: 

1605: \bibitem[{{Rubin} \& {Turner}(1969)}]{rubT69}

1606: {Rubin}, R.~H. \& {Turner}, B.~E. 1969, \apjl, 157, L41+

1607: 

1608: \bibitem[{{Rubin}(1965)}]{rub65}

1609: {Rubin}, V.~C. 1965, \apj, 142, 934

1610: 

1611: \bibitem[{{Savedoff} \& {Greene}(1955)}]{savG55}

1612: {Savedoff}, M.~P. \& {Greene}, J. 1955, \apj, 122, 477

1613: 

1614: \bibitem[{{Schmidt}(1965)}]{sch65}

1615: {Schmidt}, M. 1965, in Galactic Structure, ed. A.~{Blaauw} \&

1616: M.~{Schmidt},

1617:   513--+

1618: 

1619: \bibitem[{{Schneider} {et~al.}(2002){Schneider}, {Simon}, {Kramer}, {Stutzki},

1620:   \& {Bontemps}}]{schSKSB02}

1621: {Schneider}, N., {Simon}, R., {Kramer}, C., {Stutzki}, J., \&

1622: {Bontemps}, S.

1623:   2002, \aap, 384, 225

1624: 

1625: \bibitem[{{Schneps} {et~al.}(1981){Schneps}, {Moran}, {Genzel}, {Reid}, {Lane},

1626:   \& {Downes}}]{schMG81}

1627: {Schneps}, M.~H., {Moran}, J.~M., {Genzel}, R., {Reid}, M.~J.,

1628: {Lane}, A.~P.,

1629:   \& {Downes}, D. 1981, \apj, 249, 124

1630: 

1631: \bibitem[{{Shepherd} \& {Churchwell}(1996)}]{sheC96}

1632: {Shepherd}, D.~S. \& {Churchwell}, E. 1996, \apj, 457, 267

1633: 

1634: \bibitem[{{Shirley} {et~al.}(2003){Shirley}, {Evans}, {Young}, {Knez}, \&

1635:   {Jaffe}}]{shiEYKJ03}

1636: {Shirley}, Y.~L., {Evans}, II, N.~J., {Young}, K.~E., {Knez}, C., \&

1637: {Jaffe},

1638:   D.~T. 2003, \apjs, 149, 375

1639: 

1640: \bibitem[{{Smith} {et~al.}(2001){Smith}, {Jones}, {Gehrz}, {Klebe}, \&

1641:   {Creech-Eakman}}]{smiJGK01}

1642: {Smith}, N., {Jones}, T.~J., {Gehrz}, R.~D., {Klebe}, D., \&

1643: {Creech-Eakman},

1644:   M.~J. 2001, \aj, 121, 984

1645: 

1646: \bibitem[{{Sridharan} {et~al.}(2002){Sridharan}, {Beuther}, {Schilke},

1647:   {Menten}, \& {Wyrowski}}]{sriBSMW02}

1648: {Sridharan}, T.~K., {Beuther}, H., {Schilke}, P., {Menten}, K.~M.,

1649: \&

1650:   {Wyrowski}, F. 2002, \apj, 566, 931

1651: 

1652: \bibitem[{{Staude} {et~al.}(1982){Staude}, {Lenzen}, {Dyck}, \&

1653:   {Schmidt}}]{staLDS82}

1654: {Staude}, H.~J., {Lenzen}, R., {Dyck}, H.~M., \& {Schmidt}, G.~D.

1655: 1982, \apj,

1656:   255, 95

1657: 

1658: \bibitem[{{Tenorio-Tagle}(1979)}]{ten79}

1659: {Tenorio-Tagle}, G. 1979, \aap, 71, 59

1660: 

1661: \bibitem[{{Tieftrunk} {et~al.}(1997){Tieftrunk}, {Gaume}, {Claussen}, {Wilson},

1662:   \& {Johnston}}]{tieGCWJ97}

1663: {Tieftrunk}, A.~R., {Gaume}, R.~A., {Claussen}, M.~J., {Wilson},

1664: T.~L., \&

1665:   {Johnston}, K.~J. 1997, \aap, 318, 931

1666: 

1667: \bibitem[{{Tieftrunk} {et~al.}(1995){Tieftrunk}, {Wilson}, {Steppe}, {Gaume},

1668:   {Johnston}, \& {Claussen}}]{tieWSGJC95}

1669: {Tieftrunk}, A.~R., {Wilson}, T.~L., {Steppe}, H., {Gaume}, R.~A.,

1670: {Johnston},

1671:   K.~J., \& {Claussen}, M.~J. 1995, \aap, 303, 901

1672: 

1673: \bibitem[{{Turner} \& {Matthews}(1984)}]{turM84}

1674: {Turner}, B.~E. \& {Matthews}, H.~E. 1984, \apj, 277, 164

1675: 

1676: \bibitem[{{van Buren} \& {Mac Low}(1992)}]{vanM92}

1677: {van Buren}, D. \& {Mac Low}, M. 1992, \apj, 394, 534

1678: 

1679: \bibitem[{{Walsh} {et~al.}(1998){Walsh}, {Burton}, {Hyland}, \&

1680:   {Robinson}}]{walBHR98}

1681: {Walsh}, A.~J., {Burton}, M.~G., {Hyland}, A.~R., \& {Robinson}, G.

1682: 1998,

1683:   \mnras, 301, 640

1684: 

1685: \bibitem[{{Watt} \& {Mundy}(1999)}]{watM99}

1686: {Watt}, S. \& {Mundy}, L.~G. 1999, \apjs, 125, 143

1687: 

1688: \bibitem[{{Werner} {et~al.}(1979){Werner}, {Becklin}, {Gatley}, {Matthews},

1689:   {Neugebauer}, \& {Wynn-Williams}}]{werBGMNW79}

1690: {Werner}, M.~W., {Becklin}, E.~E., {Gatley}, I., {Matthews}, K.,

1691: {Neugebauer},

1692:   G., \& {Wynn-Williams}, C.~G. 1979, \mnras, 188, 463

1693: 

1694: \bibitem[{{Whitworth}(1979)}]{whi79}

1695: {Whitworth}, A. 1979, \mnras, 186, 59

1696: 

1697: \bibitem[{{Wilkin}(2000)}]{wil00}

1698: {Wilkin}, F.~P. 2000, \apj, 532, 400

1699: 

1700: \bibitem[{{Williams} {et~al.}(1996){Williams}, {Dyson}, \& {Redman}}]{wilDR96}

1701: {Williams}, R.~J.~R., {Dyson}, J.~E., \& {Redman}, M.~P. 1996,

1702: \mnras, 280, 667

1703: 

1704: \bibitem[{{Wood} \& {Churchwell}(1989{\natexlab{a}})}]{wooC89a}

1705: {Wood}, D.~O.~S. \& {Churchwell}, E. 1989{\natexlab{a}}, \apj, 340,

1706: 265

1707: 

1708: \bibitem[{{Wood} \& {Churchwell}(1989{\natexlab{b}})}]{wooC89b}

1709: ---. 1989{\natexlab{b}}, \apjs, 69, 831

1710: 

1711: \bibitem[{{Wynn-Williams}(1969)}]{wyn69}

1712: {Wynn-Williams}, C.~G. 1969, \aplett, 3, 195

1713: 

1714: \bibitem[{{Wynn-Williams}(1971)}]{wyn71}

1715: ---. 1971, \mnras, 151, 397

1716: 

1717: \bibitem[{{Wynn-Williams} {et~al.}(1972){Wynn-Williams}, {Becklin}, \&

1718:   {Neugebauer}}]{wynBN72}

1719: {Wynn-Williams}, C.~G., {Becklin}, E.~E., \& {Neugebauer}, G. 1972,

1720: \mnras,

1721:   160, 1

1722: 

1723: \bibitem[{{Yorke} {et~al.}(1983){Yorke}, {Tenorio-Tagle}, \&

1724:   {Bodenheimer}}]{yorTB83}

1725: {Yorke}, H.~W., {Tenorio-Tagle}, G., \& {Bodenheimer}, P. 1983,

1726: \aap, 127, 313

1727: 

1728: \bibitem[{{Zhu} {et~al.}(2005){Zhu}, {Lacy}, {Jaffe}, {Richter}, \&

1729:   {Greathouse}}]{zhuLJRG05}

1730: {Zhu}, Q., {Lacy}, J.~H., {Jaffe}, D.~T., {Richter}, M., \&

1731: {Greathouse}, T.~K.

1732:   2005, \apj, 631, 381

1733: 

1734: \end{thebibliography}

1735: 

1736: %\bibliography{master}

1737: %\end{thebibliography}

1738: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include

1739: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.

1740: 

1741: \begin{figure}

1742: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f1.eps} \caption{2~cm continuum map

1743: \citep[left,][restoring beam: $0.''56 \times 0.''49$]{feyGCV95} and

1744: integrated [Ne~II] line map (right) of G29.96~-0.02. The (0,0)

1745: position marks the peak emission in the [Ne~II] map. The line map

1746: has been cross-correlated with the continuum map and shifted to

1747: match. Contours are drawn at $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$,

1748: $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of the peak value in each map.

1749: The peak [Ne~II] surface brightness is

1750: 1.0~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$. The total [Ne~II] flux is

1751: 6.3$\times$10$^{-10}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$. \label{g2996mapneii}}

1752: \end{figure}

1753: 

1754: \clearpage

1755: 

1756: \begin{figure}

1757: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f2.eps} \caption{Channel maps of [Ne~II]

1758: line observations for G29.96~-0.02.

1759: The individual maps sample a single velocity slice in the

1760: data cube and therefore represent a width equal to the

1761: spectral resolution, or about 4 km s$^{-1}$.

1762: Contours are drawn at

1763: $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$,

1764: $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of the

1765: peak value of all channels. The peak value is

1766: 50.0~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$~(cm$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$.

1767: The molecular cloud velocity is V$_{LSR}$ = 98 km s$^{-1}$.

1768: \label{g2996nechanmapneii}}

1769: \end{figure}

1770: 

1771: \clearpage

1772: 

1773: \begin{figure}

1774: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f3.eps} \caption{Position-Velocity (P-V)

1775: diagrams of G29.96~-0.02 [Ne~II] observations (column 2) and a bow

1776: shock model \citep[][column 4]{zhuLJRG05}. The straight lines

1777: through the observed (column 1) and model (column 3) integrated line

1778: flux maps show the position of each cut. Dashed lines in p-v

1779: diagrams show the observed ambient molecular material velocity.

1780: Dotted lines in the model p-v diagrams show the ambient material

1781: velocity in the model. The contour maps are drawn as in

1782: Fig.\ref{g2996mapneii} with the peak value

1783: $\sim$1.0~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$ for the line maps of

1784: observations. \label{g2996pv1}}

1785: \end{figure}

1786: 

1787: \clearpage

1788: 

1789: \begin{figure}

1790: \epsscale{0.8} \plotone{f4.eps} \caption{Position-velocity diagrams

1791: of G29.96~-0.02 [Ne~II] observations (left) and the \cite{zhuLJRG05}

1792: bow shock model (right). The straight line in the integrated line

1793: map above each position-velocity diagram shows the location of the

1794: cut. The dashed lines in the p-v diagrams show the ambient molecular

1795: material velocity. Dotted lines in the model p-v diagrams show the

1796: ambient material velocity in the model. The contours are drawn as in

1797: Fig.\ref{g2996mapneii} with the peak value

1798: $\sim$1.0~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$ for the line maps of

1799: observations. \label{g2996pv2}}

1800: \end{figure}

1801: 

1802: \clearpage

1803: 

1804: \begin{figure}

1805: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f5.eps} \caption{6~cm continuum map

1806: \citep[left,][restoring beam: $0.''38 \times 0.''38$]{wooC89b} and

1807: integrated [Ne~II] line map (right) of G5.89~-0.39. The [Ne~II] line

1808: map has been cross-correlated with the radio map and the (0,0)

1809: position has been shifted to the best match. The (0,0) position is

1810: the location of the emission peak in the line map. Contours are

1811: drawn at $95\%$, $90\%$, $80\%$, $70\%$, $60\%$, $50\%$, $40\%$

1812: ,$30\%$, $20\%$ and $10\%$ of peak value for the continuum map and

1813: at $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and

1814: $6\%$ of the peak value for the line map. The peak [Ne~II] surface

1815: brightness is 1.08~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$. The total

1816: [Ne~II] flux is 2.26$\times$10$^{-10}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$.

1817: \label{g589map}}

1818: \end{figure}

1819: 

1820: \clearpage

1821: 

1822: \begin{figure}

1823: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f6.eps} \caption{Channel maps of G5.89~-0.39

1824: [Ne~II] line observations. Contours are drawn at $70\%$, $50\%$,

1825: $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of the peak

1826: value of all channels. The peak value is

1827: 9.15~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$~(cm$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$. The

1828: molecular cloud velocity is V$_{LSR}$ = 9 km s$^{-1}$.

1829: \label{g589chanmapneii}}

1830: \end{figure}

1831: 

1832: \clearpage

1833: 

1834: \begin{figure}

1835: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f7.eps} \caption{2 cm continuum map

1836: \citep[left,][restoring beam: $0.''41 \times 0.''41$]{wooC89b} and

1837: integrated [Ne~II] line flux map (right) of G11.94~-0.62. The (0,0)

1838: is the location of the peak [Ne~II] line emission. The radio

1839: continuum peak, marked with an ``X'', is offset 1.17$''$ west and

1840: 1.67$''$ north from the line emission peak according to

1841: \cite{debRTP03}. Contours are drawn at $95\%$, $90\%$, $80\%$,

1842: $70\%$, $60\%$, $50\%$, $40\%$ ,$30\%$, $20\%$,$15\%$, $10\%$ and

1843: $5\%$ of the peak flux density for the continuum map and at $70\%$,

1844: $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of the

1845: peak value for the line map. Five separate components (A, B, C, D

1846: and E) are indicated in the line map. The peak [Ne~II] surface

1847: brightness is 0.073~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$. The total

1848: [Ne~II] flux is 6.3$\times$10$^{-11}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$.

1849: \label{g1194map}}

1850: \end{figure}

1851: 

1852: \begin{figure}

1853: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f8.eps} \caption{[Ne~II] line profiles

1854: across G11.94~-0.62 (A, B and C). Spectra are averages over 1.5$''$

1855: $\times 1.5''$. Central coordinates of the averaging areas are shown

1856: in parentheses. The brightness has units of

1857: erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$~(cm$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$. The pixel size

1858: along the spectral direction is 0.0025~cm$^{-1}$

1859: ($\sim$0.95~km~s$^{-1}$). The molecular cloud velocity is V$_{LSR}$

1860: = 39 km s$^{-1}$. \label{g1194ABCspec}}

1861: \end{figure}

1862: 

1863: \clearpage

1864: 

1865: \begin{figure}

1866: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f9.eps} \caption{2~cm continuum map

1867: \citep[left,][restoring beam: $0.''41 \times 0.''41$]{wooC89b} and

1868: integrated [Ne~II] line map (right) of G30.54~+0.02. The [Ne~II]

1869: line map is cross-correlated with the continuum map and shifted to

1870: the best match. The (0,0) position marks the peak emission in the

1871: line map. Contours are drawn at $95\%$, $90\%$, $80\%$, $70\%$,

1872: $60\%$, $50\%$, $40\%$ ,$30\%$, $20\%$ and $10\%$ of the peak value

1873: for the continuum map and at $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$,

1874: $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of the peak value for the line

1875: map The peak [Ne~II] surface brightness is

1876: 0.086~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$. The total [Ne~II] flux is

1877: 4.8$\times$10$^{-11}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$. \label{g3054map}}

1878: \end{figure}

1879: 

1880: \begin{figure}

1881: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f10.eps} \caption{[Ne~II] line profiles for

1882: G30.54~+0.02. Spectra are averages over $1.5'' \times 1.5''$.

1883: Central coordinates of the averaging areas are shown in parentheses.

1884: The brightness has units of

1885: erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$~(cm$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$. The pixel size

1886: along the spectral direction is 0.0025~cm$^{-1}$. The molecular

1887: cloud velocity is V$_{LSR}$ = 48 km s$^{-1}$. \label{g3054profile}}

1888: \end{figure}

1889: 

1890: \clearpage

1891: 

1892: \begin{figure}

1893: \epsscale{0.6} \plotone{f11.eps} \caption{Position-velocity diagrams

1894: of G30.54~+0.02. Contours in line flux maps are drawn at $70\%$,

1895: $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of the

1896: peak value (0.086~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$). Dashed lines

1897: in p-v diagrams show the ambient molecular material velocity.

1898: \label{g3054pv}}

1899: \end{figure}

1900: 

1901: \clearpage

1902: 

1903: \begin{figure}

1904: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f12.eps} \caption{6~cm continuum map

1905: \citep[left,][restoring beam: $1.''6 \times 1.''4$, positions in

1906: B1950 coordinates]{feyCGNJ92} and integrated [Ne~II] line flux map

1907: (right) of G33.92~+0.11. The box drawn with dashed lines in the

1908: continuum map indicates the approximate area covered by the [Ne~II]

1909: line observations. The (0,0) position in the line map is the

1910: location of the peak [Ne~II] line emission. Contours were drawn at

1911: $100\%$, $90\%$, $80\%$, $70\%$, $60\%$, $50\%$, $40\%$, $30\%$,

1912: $20\%$, $10\%$ and $5\%$ of the peak value for the 6 cm continuum

1913: map and at $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$

1914: and $6\%$ of the peak value for the [Ne~II] line map. The peak

1915: [Ne~II] surface brightness is

1916: 0.24~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$. The total [Ne~II] flux is

1917: 2.7$\times$10$^{-10}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$. \label{g3392map}}

1918: \end{figure}

1919: 

1920: \clearpage

1921: 

1922: \begin{figure}

1923: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f13.eps} \caption{Position-velocity diagrams

1924: of [Ne~II] observations toward G33.92~+0.11. Contours in line flux

1925: maps are drawn at $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$,

1926: $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of the peak values

1927: (0.24~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$) of the maps. Dashed lines

1928: in p-v diagrams show the ambient molecular material velocity.

1929: \label{g3392pv}}

1930: \end{figure}

1931: 

1932: \clearpage

1933: 

1934: \begin{figure}

1935: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f14.eps} \caption{[Ne~II] line profiles for

1936: G33.92~+0.11. Spectra are made by averaging spectra over $1.8''

1937: \times 1.8''$. Central coordinates of the averaging areas are shown

1938: in parentheses. The brightness has units of

1939: erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$~(cm$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$. The pixel size

1940: along the spectral direction is 0.0025~cm$^{-1}$.

1941: \label{g3392multispec}}

1942: \end{figure}

1943: 

1944: \clearpage

1945: 

1946: \begin{figure}

1947: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f15.eps} \caption{Channel maps of [Ne~II]

1948: line observations for G33.92~+0.11. Contours are drawn at $70\%$,

1949: $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of the

1950: peak value

1951: (5.9~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$~(cm$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$). The

1952: molecular cloud velocity is V$_{LSR}$ = 108 km s$^{-1}$.

1953: \label{g3392chanmapneii}}

1954: \end{figure}

1955: 

1956: \clearpage

1957: 

1958: \begin{figure}

1959: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f16.eps} \caption{2~cm continuum contour map

1960: \citep[left,][restoring beam: $0.''41 \times 0.''41$]{wooC89b} and

1961: integrated [Ne~II] line flux map (right) of G43.89~-0.78. The line

1962: map has been cross-correlated with the continuum map and shifted to

1963: match. The (0,0) position is the location of peak emission in the

1964: line map. Contours are drawn at $95\%$, $90\%$, $80\%$, $70\%$,

1965: $60\%$, $50\%$, $40\%$, $30\%$, $20\%$, $15\%$, $10\%$ and $5\%$ of

1966: the peak value for the radio map and at $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$,

1967: $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of the peak value for

1968: the line map. The peak [Ne~II] surface brightness is

1969: 0.22~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$. The total [Ne~II] flux is

1970: 7.3$\times$10$^{-11}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$. \label{g4389map}}

1971: \end{figure}

1972: 

1973: \clearpage

1974: 

1975: \begin{figure}

1976: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f17.eps} \caption{Position-velocity diagrams

1977: of [Ne~II] line observations (two columns on the left) and a bow

1978: shock model (two columns on the right) of G43.89~-0.78. Contours in

1979: line flux maps are drawn at $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$,

1980: $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of the peak values

1981: (0.22~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$) in the maps. See text for a

1982: description of the model. The dashed lines in the p-v diagrams show

1983: the ambient molecular cloud velocity. Dotted lines in the model p-v

1984: diagrams show the ambient material velocity in the model.

1985: \label{g4389pv}}

1986: \end{figure}

1987: 

1988: \clearpage

1989: 

1990: \begin{figure}

1991: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f18.eps} \caption{Dust 12.8~$\mu$m continuum

1992: map (left) and integrated [Ne~II] line flux map (right) of

1993: G45.07~+0.13. The fainter northern source in the left figure is a

1994: hot molecular core candidate. The (0,0) position marks the peak

1995: [Ne~II] line emission. Contours are drawn at $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$,

1996: $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of peak values in both

1997: maps. The peak continuum flux density is

1998: 0.23~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$~(cm$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$. The peak

1999: [Ne~II] surface brightness is

2000: 0.14~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$. The total [Ne~II] flux is

2001: 7.8$\times$10$^{-12}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$. \label{g4507mapneii}}

2002: \end{figure}

2003: 

2004: \clearpage

2005: 

2006: \begin{figure}

2007: \epsscale{1.0}

2008: \plotone{f19.eps}%{g4512_contimap_ne.eps}

2009: \caption{2~cm continuum map \citep[left,][restoring beam:

2010: $0.''41 \times 0.''41$]{wooC89b}

2011: and integrated [Ne~II] line map (right) of G45.12~+0.13.

2012: The (0,0) position is the location of the [Ne~II] line emission peak.

2013: The contours are drawn at

2014: $95\%$, $90\%$, $80\%$, $70\%$, $60\%$,

2015: $50\%$, $40\%$ ,$30\%$, $20\%$,$15\%$, $10\%$ and $5\%$

2016: of peak value for the radio continuum map and at

2017: $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$,

2018: $12.5\%$, $9\%$, $6\%$, $4\%$, $2\%$ and $1\%$ of the

2019: peak value for the [Ne~II] map.

2020: The peak [Ne~II] surface brightness is 1.2~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$.

2021: The total [Ne~II] flux is 4.5$\times$10$^{-10}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$.

2022: \label{g4512map}}

2023: \end{figure}

2024: 

2025: \begin{figure}

2026: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f20.eps} \caption{Channel maps for

2027: G45.12~+0.13. Contours are drawn at $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$,

2028: $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$, $6\%$, $4\%$, $2\%$ and $1\%$ of the peak

2029: value of all channels. The peak value is

2030: 11.1~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$~(cm$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$. The

2031: molecular cloud velocity is V$_{LSR}$ = 59 km s$^{-1}$.

2032: \label{g4512chanmap}}

2033: \end{figure}

2034: 

2035: \clearpage

2036: \begin{figure}

2037: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f21.eps} \caption{Position-velocity diagrams

2038: of G45.12~+0.13N. Contours in line flux maps are drawn at $70\%$,

2039: $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of the

2040: peak values (1.23~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$) in the maps.

2041: Dashed lines in p-v diagrams show the ambient molecular material

2042: velocity. \label{g4512Npv}}

2043: \end{figure}

2044: 

2045: \clearpage

2046: 

2047: \begin{figure}

2048: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f22.eps} \caption{Position-velocity diagrams

2049: of G45.12~+0.13SE. Contours in line flux maps are drawn at $70\%$,

2050: $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of the

2051: peak values (0.10~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$) in the maps.

2052: Dashed lines in p-v diagrams show the ambient molecular material

2053: velocity. \label{g4512SEpv}}

2054: \end{figure}

2055: \clearpage

2056: 

2057: \clearpage

2058: \begin{figure}

2059: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f23.eps} \caption{6~cm continuum map

2060: \citep[left,][restoring beam: $0.''38 \times 0.''38$]{wooC89b} and

2061: integrated [Ne~II] line map (right) of G45.45~+0.06. The [Ne~II]

2062: line map has been cross-correlated with the radio map and the (0,0)

2063: position has been shifted to the best match. The (0,0) position is

2064: the location of the emission peak in the line map. Contours are

2065: drawn at $95\%$, $90\%$, $80\%$, $70\%$, $60\%$, $50\%$, $40\%$

2066: ,$30\%$, $20\%$ and $10\%$ of peak value for the continuum map and

2067: at $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and

2068: $6\%$ of the peak value for the line map. The peak [Ne~II] surface

2069: brightness is 0.16~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$. The total

2070: [Ne~II] flux is 1.2$\times$10$^{-10}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$.

2071: \label{g4545map}}

2072: \end{figure}

2073: 

2074: \clearpage

2075: 

2076: \begin{figure}

2077: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f24.eps} \caption{Channel maps for

2078: G45.45~+0.06 [Ne~II] line observations. Contours are drawn at

2079: $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$

2080: of the peak value of all channels. The peak value is

2081: 4.2~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$~(cm$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$. The

2082: molecular cloud velocity is V$_{LSR}$ = 59 km s$^{-1}$.

2083: \label{g4545chanmapneii}}

2084: \end{figure}

2085: 

2086: \clearpage

2087: 

2088: \begin{figure}

2089: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f25.eps} \caption{2~cm continuum map

2090: \citep[left,][resolution: $1.''2$]{gauM87} and integrated [Ne~II]

2091: line flux map (right) of W51 IRS2. Contours in the radio map were

2092: drawn at $90\%$, $80\%$, $70\%$, $60\%$, $50\%$, $40\%$, $30\%$

2093: ,$20\%$, $10\%$ and $-10\%$ of the peak value. Contours in the

2094: [Ne~II] map are drawn at $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$,

2095: $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of peak line emission at (0,0). The peak

2096: [Ne~II] surface brightness is

2097: 0.66~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$. The total [Ne~II] flux is

2098: 4.2$\times$10$^{-10}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$. \label{w51dmapneii}}

2099: \end{figure}

2100: 

2101: \clearpage

2102: 

2103: \begin{figure}

2104: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f26.eps} \caption{Channel maps of W51 IRS2

2105: [Ne~II] line observations. Contours are drawn at $70\%$, $50\%$,

2106: $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of the peak

2107: value of all channels. The peak value is

2108: 13.2~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$~(cm$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$. The

2109: molecular cloud velocity is V$_{LSR}$ = 58 km s$^{-1}$.

2110: \label{w51dchanmapneii}}

2111: \end{figure}

2112: 

2113: \clearpage

2114: 

2115: \begin{figure}

2116: \epsscale{0.6} \plotone{f27.eps} \caption{Position-velocity diagrams

2117: of W51 IRS2 [Ne~II] line observations. Contours in line flux maps

2118: are drawn at $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$,

2119: $9\%$ and $6\%$ of peak values

2120: (0.66~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$) of the maps. Dashed lines

2121: in p-v diagrams show the ambient molecular material velocity.

2122: \label{w51dpv}}

2123: \end{figure}

2124: 

2125: \clearpage

2126: 

2127: \begin{figure}

2128: \epsscale{0.5} \plotone{f28.eps} \caption{1.3~cm continuum map of

2129: G61.48~+0.09 \citep[][resolution $\sim 4''$]{gomGL95}. Contours were

2130: drawn at $90\%$, $75\%$, $60\%$, $45\%$, $30\%$ ,$20\%$, $10\%$,

2131: $5\%$ and $-5\%$ of the peak value. The box drawn with dashed lines

2132: indicates the approximate area covered by our [Ne~II] observations.

2133: \label{g6148mapradio}}

2134: \end{figure}

2135: 

2136: \begin{figure}

2137: \epsscale{0.5} \plotone{f29.eps} \caption{Integrated [Ne~II] line

2138: flux map of G61.48~+0.09. The (0,0) position is the location of the

2139: [Ne~II] line emission peak. Contours are drawn at $70\%$, $50\%$,

2140: $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of the peak

2141: value. The peak [Ne~II] surface brightness is

2142: 0.052~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$. The total [Ne~II] flux is

2143: 2.2$\times$10$^{-10}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$. \label{g6148mapneii}}

2144: \end{figure}

2145: 

2146: \clearpage

2147: 

2148: \begin{figure}

2149: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f30.eps} \caption{Position-velocity diagrams

2150: of G61.48~+0.09 [Ne~II] line observations. Contours in line flux

2151: maps are drawn at $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$,

2152: $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of peak values

2153: (0.052~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$) in the maps. The spatial

2154: resolution of the map is $\sim 4 ''$. Dashed lines in p-v diagrams

2155: show the ambient molecular material velocity. \label{g6148pv}}

2156: \end{figure}

2157: 

2158: \clearpage

2159: 

2160: \begin{figure}

2161: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f31.eps} \caption{The 2.0~cm continuum map

2162: of K3-50A (left) \citep[][resolution$\sim 1.''3$]{depGPR94}. The

2163: (0,0) position marks the peak continuum emission. First positive and

2164: negative contours were drawn at the 3$\sigma$ flux level. Other

2165: contours were drawn at 1.4, 2, 2.8, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 and 256

2166: times the 3$\sigma$ flux level. The box drawn with dashed lines

2167: indicates the approximate area covered by our [Ne~II] observations.

2168: The 12.8 $\mu$m dust continuum map (top right) and integrated

2169: [Ne~II] line flux map (bottom right). For both maps, the (0,0)

2170: position is the location of the [Ne~II] emission peak.  Three

2171: crosses show the approximate positions of S1, S2, and S3 which are

2172: [Ne~II] emission concentrations identified in the channel maps

2173: (Figure~\ref{k350chanmapneii}). Contours are drawn at $70\%$,

2174: $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$, $6\%$, $4\%$,

2175: $2\%$ and $1\%$ of the peak values in both maps. The peak dust

2176: continuum flux density is

2177: 0.82~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$~(cm$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$. The peak

2178: [Ne~II] surface brightness is

2179: 0.34~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$. The total [Ne~II] flux is

2180: 1.0$\times$10$^{-10}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$. \label{k350map}}

2181: \end{figure}

2182: 

2183: \clearpage

2184: 

2185: \begin{figure}

2186: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f32.eps} \caption{Channel maps of K3-50A

2187: [Ne~II] line observations. Contours are drawn at $70\%$, $50\%$,

2188: $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of the peak

2189: value of all channels. The peak value is

2190: 5.1~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$~(cm$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$. The

2191: molecular cloud velocity is V$_{LSR}$ = -24 km s$^{-1}$.

2192: \label{k350chanmapneii}}

2193: \end{figure}

2194: 

2195: \clearpage

2196: 

2197: \begin{figure}

2198: \epsscale{0.8} \plotone{f33.eps} \caption{Position-velocity diagrams

2199: of K3-50A [Ne~II] line observations. Contours in line flux maps are

2200: drawn at $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$

2201: and $6\%$ of peak values (0.34~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$) of

2202: the maps. Dashed lines in p-v diagrams show the ambient molecular

2203: material velocity. \label{k350pv}}

2204: \end{figure}

2205: 

2206: \clearpage

2207: 

2208: \begin{figure}

2209: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f34.eps} \caption{1.3~cm continuum map

2210: \citep[left,][resolution$\sim 2.''3$]{felMSRE84} and integrated

2211: [Ne~II] line flux map (right) of S106. Contours in the continuum map

2212: were drawn at each $5\%$ step from $5\%$ to $95\%$ of the peak

2213: value. The box drawn with dashed lines indicates the approximate

2214: area covered by the [Ne~II] observations. Contours in the [Ne~II]

2215: line map are drawn at $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$,

2216: $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of the peak line emission. The spatial

2217: resolution of the radio map is $\sim 2.''3$. The (0,0) position is

2218: the location of a weak continuum source seen in the line

2219: observations. The peak [Ne~II] surface brightness is

2220: 0.23~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$. The total [Ne~II] flux is

2221: 1.1$\times$10$^{-9}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$.

2222: \label{s106mapradioneii}}

2223: \end{figure}

2224: 

2225: \clearpage

2226: 

2227: \begin{figure}

2228: \epsscale{0.8} \plotone{f35.eps} \caption{Position-velocity diagrams

2229: of S106 [Ne~II] line observations. Contours in [Ne~II] line flux

2230: maps are drawn at $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$,

2231: $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of peak values

2232: (0.23~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$) in the maps. Dashed lines

2233: in p-v diagrams show the ambient molecular material velocity.

2234: \label{s106pv}}

2235: \end{figure}

2236: 

2237: \clearpage

2238: \begin{figure}

2239: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f36.eps} \caption{Channel maps of S106

2240: [Ne~II] line observations. Contours are drawn at $70\%$, $50\%$,

2241: $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of the peak

2242: value of all channels. The peak value is

2243: 3.6~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$~(cm$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$. The

2244: molecular cloud velocity is V$_{LSR}$ = -1 km s$^{-1}$.

2245: \label{s106chanmapneii}}

2246: \end{figure}

2247: 

2248: \clearpage

2249: 

2250: \begin{figure}

2251: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f37.eps} \caption{6~cm continuum map

2252: \citep[left,][restoring beam: $0.''38 \times 0.''38$]{wooC89b} and

2253: integrated [Ne~II] line flux map (right) of NGC7538A. Contours in

2254: the continuum map were drawn at $95\%$, $90\%$, $80\%$, $70\%$,

2255: $60\%$, $50\%$, $40\%$ ,$30\%$, $20\%$, $15\%$, $10\%$, $5\%$,

2256: $-5\%$, $-10\%$, $-15\%$ and $-20\%$ of the peak value. The box

2257: drawn with dashed lines indicates approximately the area covered by

2258: the [Ne~II] observations. Contours in the [Ne~II] line map are drawn

2259: at $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and

2260: $6\%$ of the peak value in the map. The radio map has a synthesized

2261: beam with FWHM$\sim 0.''38 \times 0.''38$. The (0,0) position is the

2262: location of the [Ne~II] line emission peak. The peak [Ne~II] surface

2263: brightness is 0.16~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$. The total

2264: [Ne~II] flux is 2.7$\times$10$^{-10}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$.

2265: \label{n7538map}}

2266: \end{figure}

2267: 

2268: \clearpage

2269: 

2270: \begin{figure}

2271: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f38.eps} \caption{Channel maps of N7538~A

2272: [Ne~II] line observations. Contours are drawn at $70\%$, $50\%$,

2273: $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of the peak

2274: value of all channels. The peak value is

2275: 3.1~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$~(cm$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$. The

2276: molecular cloud velocity is V$_{LSR}$ = -57 km s$^{-1}$.

2277: \label{n7538chanmapneii}}

2278: \end{figure}

2279: 

2280: \clearpage

2281: 

2282: \begin{figure}

2283: \epsscale{0.7} \plotone{f39.eps} \caption{Position-velocity diagrams

2284: of NGC7538~A [Ne~II] line observations. Contours in line flux maps

2285: are drawn at $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$,

2286: $9\%$ and $6\%$ of the peak values

2287: (0.16~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$) of the maps. Dashed lines

2288: in p-v diagrams show the ambient molecular material velocity.

2289: \label{n7538apv}}

2290: \end{figure}

2291: 

2292: \clearpage

2293: 

2294: \begin{figure}

2295: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f40.eps} \caption{Grey-scale map of the

2296: radio 6 cm free-free continuum of W3 core (left) \citep{tieGCWJ97}.

2297: The observations have a FWHM beam with a size of $0.''71 \times

2298: 0.''56$. The flux in the region ranges from 0.1~mJy to

2299: 40~mJy~beam$^{-1}$. The box drawn with dashed lines indicates the

2300: approximate area covered by our [Ne~II] observations. Integrated

2301: [Ne~II] line flux map of W3 A and B region (right). The (0,0)

2302: position is the peak location of integrated emission map. Contours

2303: are drawn at $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$,

2304: $9\%$ and $6\%$ of the peak value. The peak [Ne~II] surface

2305: brightness is 0.26~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$. The total

2306: [Ne~II] flux from W3A is

2307: 1.3$\times$10$^{-9}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$. The total [Ne~II] flux

2308: from W3B is 3.7$\times$10$^{-10}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$.

2309: \label{w3map}}

2310: \end{figure}

2311: 

2312: \clearpage

2313: 

2314: \begin{figure}

2315: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f41.eps} \caption{Channel maps of W3~A

2316: [Ne~II] line observations. Contours are drawn at $70\%$, $50\%$,

2317: $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of the peak

2318: value of all channels. The peak value is

2319: 2.8~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$~(cm$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$. The

2320: molecular cloud velocity is V$_{LSR}$ = -40 km s$^{-1}$.

2321: \label{w3achanmapneii}}

2322: \end{figure}

2323: 

2324: \clearpage

2325: 

2326: \begin{figure}

2327: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f42.eps} \caption{Position-velocity diagrams

2328: of W3~A line observations. Contours in line flux maps are drawn at

2329: $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$

2330: of peak values (0.13~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$) of the maps.

2331: Dashed lines in p-v diagrams show the ambient molecular material

2332: velocity. \label{w3apv}}

2333: \end{figure}

2334: 

2335: \clearpage

2336: 

2337: \begin{figure}

2338: \epsscale{0.8} \plotone{f43.eps} \caption{Position-velocity diagrams

2339: of W3~B line observations. Contours in line flux maps are drawn at

2340: $70\%$, $50\%$, $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$

2341: of peak values (0.17~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$) of the maps.

2342: \label{w3bpv}}

2343: \end{figure}

2344: 

2345: \clearpage

2346: 

2347: \begin{figure}

2348: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f44.eps} \caption{Channel maps of W3~B

2349: [Ne~II] line observations. Contours are drawn at $70\%$, $50\%$,

2350: $35\%$, $25\%$, $17.5\%$, $12.5\%$, $9\%$ and $6\%$ of the peak

2351: value of all channels. The peak value is

2352: 5.2~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~sr$^{-1}$~(cm$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$. The

2353: molecular cloud velocity is V$_{LSR}$ = -43 km s$^{-1}$.

2354: \label{w3bchanmapneii}}

2355: \end{figure}

2356: 

2357: \clearpage

2358: 

2359: \begin{figure}

2360: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f45.eps} \caption{Sketches of

2361: position-velocity diagrams of an expanding shell-like HII region

2362: (left) and an expanding spherical HII region (right). The expansion

2363: speed is V$_{E}$. The molecular cloud velocity is V$_{amb}$. The

2364: dashed lines show the locations of the p-v cuts. The solid arrows in

2365: the morphology diagrams indicate the moving directions of ionized

2366: gas relative to ambient molecular material and the dashed arrows

2367: show the moving directions of stellar wind material with respect to

2368: the central stars. \label{ssspv}}

2369: \end{figure}

2370: 

2371: \begin{figure}

2372: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f46.eps} \caption{Sketches of

2373: position-velocity diagrams of a stellar wind bow shock HII region at

2374: three different viewing angles. Note that the velocity vectors are

2375: shown in the frame of reference of the ambient molecular cloud; the

2376: shell is not expanding in the moving frame of reference of the star.

2377: The molecular cloud velocity is V$_{amb}$ and the ionizing star is

2378: moving supersonically at a speed of V$_{\star}$ relative to the

2379: molecular cloud. The ram pressures of incoming cloud material and

2380: stellar wind material confine the ionized material in a compressed

2381: shell which moves with the star in the cloud. The dashed lines show

2382: the locations of the p-v cuts. The p-v diagrams in the middle and

2383: right panels are drawn for stars moving away from the observer

2384: ($\theta > 90^\circ$). The p-v diagrams would be mirrored about

2385: V$_{amb}$ for stellar motions toward the observer ($\theta <

2386: 90^\circ$).

2387: %The solid arrows in the morphology diagrams

2388: %indicate the moving directions of ionized gas relative to ambient

2389: %molecular material and the dashed arrows show the moving directions

2390: %of stellar wind material with respect to the central

2391: %stars.

2392: \label{sbspv}}

2393: \end{figure}

2394: 

2395: \begin{figure}

2396: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f47.eps} \caption{Sketches of

2397: position-velocity diagrams of a stellar wind pressure-driven HII

2398: region at three different viewing angles. The molecular cloud

2399: velocity is V$_{amb}$ and the star with a stellar wind is stationary

2400: with the cloud. The ionized gas is compressed by the stellar wind

2401: into a shell and moves along the shell under the influences of the

2402: density gradient and the stellar wind pressure. V$_{\infty}$ is the

2403: exiting speed of the ionized gas. The dashed lines show the

2404: locations of the p-v cuts. The p-v diagrams are similar to those in

2405: Fig.~\ref{sbspv}, but are offset toward negative V$_{LSR}$ for the

2406: head of the shell tipped away from the observer ($\theta >

2407: 90^\circ$). The p-v diagrams would be mirrored about V$_{amb}$ for

2408: stellar motions toward the observer ($\theta < 90^\circ$).

2409: \label{sppv}}

2410: \end{figure}

2411: 

2412: \begin{figure}

2413: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f48.eps} \caption{Sketches of

2414: position-velocity diagrams of a blister flow HII region at three

2415: different viewing angles. The molecular cloud velocity is V$_{amb}$

2416: and the star is stationary. No stellar wind is present. The cloud

2417: material is continually evaporated by the stellar radiation and

2418: forced by pressures to flow along the density gradient. The

2419: V$_{\infty}$ is the exiting speed of the ionized gas. The dashed

2420: lines show the locations of the p-v cuts. The figures show p-v

2421: diagrams of the region when the head of the region is tipped away

2422: from the observer ($\theta > 90^\circ$). The p-v diagrams would be

2423: mirrored about V$_{amb}$ for stellar motions toward the observer

2424: ($\theta < 90^\circ$). \label{sshpv}}

2425: \end{figure}

2426: 

2427: 

2428: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccccccc}

2429: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

2430: \tablewidth{0pt}

2431: \tablecaption{OBSERVATIONAL DATA \label{obspara}}

2432: \tablehead{

2433: Object& Date& RA(J2000.0) &DEC &d &V$_{LSR}$  &SW & SL             &STS& PS   &ME                 & IT \\

2434:     &mm/dd/yy&hh mm ss.sss &dd mm ss.sss & (kpc) & (km~s$^{-1}$) & ($''$) & ($''$) & ($''$) &  ($''$)  &($''$ $\times$ $''$)&  (sec)

2435: }

2436: \startdata

2437: $^2$G5.89~-0.39  &06/11/03&18 00 30.4 &-24 04 00&2.6~\tablenotemark{a}&9~\tablenotemark{b} &0.9 &10.8 &0.4& 0.360&6${\times}$6  &180 \\

2438: $^1$G11.94~-0.62 &07/02/03&18 14 02.2 &-18 53 26&4.2~\tablenotemark{c}&39~\tablenotemark{c} &1.4 &10.8 &0.7& 0.360&18${\times}$16  &12 \\

2439: $^2$G29.96~-0.02 &06/11/01&18 46 03.9 &-02 39 22&7.4~\tablenotemark{c}&98~\tablenotemark{c} &0.9 &10.8 &0.4& 0.360&20.4${\times}$13 & 16 \\

2440: $^2$G30.54~+0.02 &06/30/03&18 46 59.5 &-02 07 26&13.8~\tablenotemark{c}&48~\tablenotemark{c}&1.4 &10.8 &0.7& 0.360&12${\times}$12  &16 \\

2441: $^2$G33.92~+0.11 &06/11/01&18 52 50.2 & 00 55 29&8.3~\tablenotemark{c}&108~\tablenotemark{c}&0.9 &10.8 &0.4& 0.360&17${\times}$15  &50 \\

2442: $^2$G43.89~-0.78 &07/01/03&19 14 26.2 & 09 22 34&4.2~\tablenotemark{c}&53.5~\tablenotemark{c}&1.4 &10.8 &0.7& 0.360&12${\times}$12  &16 \\

2443: $^2$G45.07~+0.13 &07/01/03&19 13 22.1 & 10 50 53&6.0~\tablenotemark{c}&59~\tablenotemark{c}&1.4 &10.8 &0.7& 0.360& 7${\times}$8   &12 \\

2444: $^2$G45.12~+0.13 &07/01/03&19 13 27.8 & 10 53 36&6.9~\tablenotemark{c}&59~\tablenotemark{c}&1.4 &10.8 &0.7& 0.360&15${\times}$18  &16 \\

2445: $^2$G45.45~+0.06 &06/11/01&19 14 21.4 & 11 09 14&6.6~\tablenotemark{c}&59.5~\tablenotemark{c}&0.9 &10.8 &0.4& 0.360&15${\times}$12  &52 \\

2446: $^1$W51 IRS2     &06/30/03&19 23 39.9 & 14 31 09&6.6~\tablenotemark{c}&58.3~\tablenotemark{e}&1.4 &10.8 &0.7& 0.360&30${\times}$14  &12 \\

2447: $^1$G61.48~+0.09B&07/01/03&19 46 49.2 & 25 12 43&5.4~\tablenotemark{c}&22~\tablenotemark{c}&1.4 &10.8 &0.7& 0.360&60${\times}$19  &16 \\

2448: $^1$K3-50A       &06/30/03&20 01 45.7 & 33 32 43&8.7~\tablenotemark{f}&-24.4~\tablenotemark{e}&1.4 &10.8 &0.7& 0.360&12${\times}$12  &24 \\

2449: $^1$S106&06/29/03&20 27 26.8 & 37 22 48&0.6~\tablenotemark{g}&-1.0~\tablenotemark{h}&1.4 &10.8 &0.7& 0.360&47${\times}$53  &16 \\

2450: $^1$NGC7538A     &09/13/02&23 13 45.6 & 61 28 18&3.5~\tablenotemark{i}&-56.9~\tablenotemark{j} &1.4 &10.1 &1.0& 0.360&29.4${\times}$16.2&$\geq$20\\

2451: $^1$W3A &07/01/03&02 25 40.8 & 62 05 53&2.0~\tablenotemark{k}&-40~\tablenotemark{l}&1.4 &10.8 &0.7& 0.360&86${\times}$37  &$>$8 \\

2452: $^1$W3B &07/03/03&02 25 36.9 & 62 05 45& 2.0~\tablenotemark{k}&

2453: -43~\tablenotemark{m}& 1.4 & 10.8 & 0.7& 0.360&61${\times}$44  &$>$8

2454: \enddata

2455: \tablecomments{The observational parameters (SW: slit width, SL:

2456: slit length, STS: step size, PS: plate scale, ME: map extent, IT:

2457: pixel integration time) of observations. The shown coordinates are

2458: for the (0,0) positions in [Ne~II] line maps. Two methods are used

2459: in determining these coordinates: $^1$ Read from published figures.

2460: Both qualities of the figures and the reading process can affect

2461: uncertainties of the resulting coordinates, which can be over 1$''$.

2462: $^2$ Cross-correlate [Ne~II] line maps resampled on fine grids

2463: (pixel size $\leq$0.1$''$) and available radio continuum maps to

2464: find the best morphological fit. Uncertainties of these coordinates

2465: should be better than 0.5$''$. Nasa/IPAC Extragalactic Database

2466: (NED) coordinate calculator is used to convert obtained B1950.0

2467: coordinates to J2000.0 coordinates. $^a$~\cite{kimK03};

2468: $^b$~\cite{hatTM98}; $^c$~\cite{chuWC90}; $^d$~\cite{wooC89b};

2469: $^e$~\cite{sheC96}; $^f$~\cite{har75}; $^g$~\cite{staLDS82};

2470: $^h$~\cite{schSKSB02}; $^i$~\cite{hanLR02} $^j$~\cite{dicDW81};

2471: $^k$~\cite{hacBMRI06}; $^l$~only for W3A, \cite{kanAG98}; $^m$~only

2472: for W3B, \cite{tieWSGJC95}}

2473: \end{deluxetable}

2474: 

2475: 

2476: \begin{deluxetable}{lcl}

2477: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

2478: \tablewidth{0pt}

2479: \tablecaption{OBSERVED KINEMATIC TYPES \label{kintypes}}

2480: \tablehead{Object & Type & Comments}

2481: \startdata

2482: Mon R2         & C/D & 70$^{\circ}$ viewing angle, see \cite{zhuLJRG05}\\

2483: G5.89~-0.39    & ? & barely resolved\\

2484: G11.94~-0.62   & ? & multiple peaks, extinction lanes, complex kinematics, $\bar{V} \approx V_{amb}$\\

2485: G29.96~-0.02   & D & 140$^{\circ}$ viewing angle, see \cite{zhuLJRG05}\\

2486: G30.54~+0.02   & C/D? & horseshoe morphology, weak type D signature on axis\\

2487: G33.92~+0.11   & D & confused morphology, but clear kinematic signature\\

2488: G43.89~-0.78   & D & clear type D morphology and kinematics\\

2489: G45.07~+0.13   & ? & unresolved, 1$''$ diameter\\

2490: G45.12~+0.13N  & ? & appears cometary but without obvious cometary kinematics\\

2491: G45.12~+0.13SE & ? & barely resolved\\

2492: G45.12~+0.13SW & ? & broken ring, multiple peaks \\

2493: G45.45~+0.06   & ? & confused line morphology, with different [Ne~II] and ff morphologies\\

2494: W51 IRS2       & D & [S~IV] has $\theta \approx 180^{\circ}$, type D kinematics \citep{lacJZRBG07},\\

2495:  & & [Ne~II] shows superimposed sources\\

2496: G61.48~+0.09B  & ? & extinction lanes, complex line morphology and kinematics, $\bar{V} > V_{molec}$\\

2497: K3-50A         & ? & three blended peaks, extended line emission\\

2498: S106           & ? & bipolar, with unclear kinematics\\

2499: NGC7538A       & D & shell-like appearance, tail-on type D kinematics\\

2500: W3A            & C/D & cometary with $\theta \approx 90^{\circ}$\\

2501: W3B            & D? & shell-like appearance, confusing kinematics

2502: \enddata

2503: \tablecomments{Kinematic types: A. expanding shell, B. expanding

2504: sphere, C. bow shock from moving star,  D. pressure-driven surface

2505: flow, E. blister. }

2506: \end{deluxetable}

2507: 

2508: 

2509: \end{document}

2510: