1: % Based on RevTEX4

2:                                                                                          

3: \documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}

4: \usepackage{graphicx}

5: \usepackage{dcolumn}

6: \newcommand{\Dfrac}[2]{\frac{\displaystyle #1}{\displaystyle #2}}

7: \newcommand{\F}[1]{Figure~\ref{#1}}

8: \date{March, 31}                                                                                          

9: \begin{document}

10:                                                                                          

11: \title{\large Electroexcitation of the Roper resonance for 

12:               $1.7< Q^2< 4.5~$GeV$^2$ 

13:               in $\vec{e}p\rightarrow en\pi^+$}

14:                                                                                          

15: \newcommand*{\JLAB}{Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, 

16: Newport News, Virginia 23606}

17: \affiliation{\JLAB}

18: \newcommand*{\YEREVAN}{Yerevan Physics Institute, 375036 Yerevan, 

19: Armenia}

20: \affiliation{\YEREVAN}

21: \newcommand*{\SCAROLINA}{University of South Carolina, Columbia, South 

22: Carolina 29208}

23: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}

24: \newcommand*{\KYUNGPOOK}{Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, 

25: Republic of Korea}

26: \affiliation{\KYUNGPOOK}

27: \newcommand*{\ANL}{Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne,

28: Illinois 60439}

29: \affiliation{\ANL}

30: \newcommand*{\ASU}{Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-1504}

31: \affiliation{\ASU}

32: \newcommand*{\UCLA}{University of California at Los Angeles, Los 

33: Angeles, California  90095-1547}

34: \affiliation{\UCLA}

35: \newcommand*{\CSU}{California State University, Dominguez Hills, Carson, 

36: California 90747}

37: \affiliation{\CSU}

38: \newcommand*{\CMU}{Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 

39: 15213}

40: \affiliation{\CMU}

41: \newcommand*{\CUA}{Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 

42: 20064}

43: \affiliation{\CUA}

44: \newcommand*{\SACLAY}{CEA-Saclay, Service de Physique Nucl\'eaire, 91191 

45: Gif-sur-Yvette, France}

46: \affiliation{\SACLAY}

47: \newcommand*{\CNU}{Christopher Newport University, Newport News, 

48: Virginia 23606}

49: \affiliation{\CNU}

50: \newcommand*{\UCONN}{University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 

51: 06269}

52: \affiliation{\UCONN}

53: \newcommand*{\Chile}{Universidad T\'ecnica Federico Santa Mar\'ia, 

54: Casilla 110-V, Valpara\'iso, Chile}

55: \affiliation{\Chile}

56: \newcommand*{\ECOSSEE}{Edinburgh University, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, United 

57: Kingdom}

58: \affiliation{\ECOSSEE}

59: \newcommand*{\EMMY}{Emmy-Noether Foundation, Germany}

60: \affiliation{\EMMY}

61: \newcommand*{\FU}{Fairfield University, Fairfield, Connecticut 06824}

62: \affiliation{\FU}

63: \newcommand*{\FIU}{Florida International University, Miami, Florida 

64: 33199}

65: \affiliation{\FIU}

66: \newcommand*{\FSU}{Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306}

67: \affiliation{\FSU}

68: \newcommand*{\GWU}{The George Washington University, Washington, D.C. 

69: 20052}

70: \affiliation{\GWU}

71: \newcommand*{\ECOSSEG}{University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United 

72: Kingdom}

73: \affiliation{\ECOSSEG}

74: \newcommand*{\ISU}{Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho 83209}

75: \affiliation{\ISU}

76: \newcommand*{\INFNFR}{INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, 00044 

77: Frascati, Italy}

78: \affiliation{\INFNFR}

79: \newcommand*{\INFNGE}{INFN, Sezione di Genova, 16146 Genova, Italy}

80: \affiliation{\INFNGE}

81: \newcommand*{\ORSAY}{Institut de Physique Nucleaire ORSAY, Orsay, 

82: France}

83: \affiliation{\ORSAY}

84: %\newcommand*{\BONN}{Institute f\"{u}r Strahlen und Kernphysik, 

85: %Universit\"{a}t Bonn, Germany}

86: %\affiliation{\BONN}

87: \newcommand*{\ITEP}{Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 

88: Moscow, 117259, Russia}

89: \affiliation{\ITEP}

90: \newcommand*{\JMU}{James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia 

91: 22807}

92: \affiliation{\JMU}

93: \newcommand*{\MIT}{Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 

94: Massachusetts  02139-4307}

95: \affiliation{\MIT}

96: \newcommand*{\UMASS}{University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts  

97: 01003}

98: \affiliation{\UMASS}

99: \newcommand*{\MOSCOW}{Moscow State University, General Nuclear Physics 

100: Institute, 119899 Moscow, Russia}

101: \affiliation{\MOSCOW}

102: \newcommand*{\UNH}{University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 

103: 03824-3568}

104: \affiliation{\UNH}

105: \newcommand*{\NSU}{Norfolk State University, Norfolk, Virginia 23504}

106: \affiliation{\NSU}

107: \newcommand*{\OHIOU}{Ohio University, Athens, Ohio  45701}

108: \affiliation{\OHIOU}

109: \newcommand*{\ODU}{Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia 23529}

110: \affiliation{\ODU}

111: \newcommand*{\PITT}{University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 

112: 15260}

113: \affiliation{\PITT}

114: \newcommand*{\RPI}{Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 

115: 12180-3590}

116: \affiliation{\RPI}

117: \newcommand*{\RICE}{Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005-1892}

118: \affiliation{\RICE}

119: \newcommand*{\URICH}{University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia 23173}

120: \affiliation{\URICH}

121: \newcommand*{\TRIUMF}{TRIUMF, 4004, Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 

122: 2A3, Canada}

123: \affiliation{\TRIUMF}

124: \newcommand*{\UNIONC}{Union College, Schenectady, New York 12308}

125: \affiliation{\UNIONC}

126: \newcommand*{\VT}{Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 

127: Blacksburg, Virginia   24061-0435}

128: \affiliation{\VT}

129: \newcommand*{\VIRGINIA}{University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 

130: Virginia 22901}

131: \affiliation{\VIRGINIA}

132: \newcommand*{\WM}{College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 

133: 23187-8795}

134: \affiliation{\WM}

135: \newcommand*{\deceased}{Deceased}

136: %\altaffiliation[]{\deceased}

137: 

138: 

139: 

140: 

141: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% authors %%%%%%%%% 

142: \author{I.G.~Aznauryan}

143:      \affiliation{\JLAB}

144:      \affiliation{\YEREVAN}

145: \author{V.D.~Burkert}

146:      \affiliation{\JLAB}

147: \author{W.~Kim}

148:      \affiliation{\KYUNGPOOK}

149: \author {K.~Park} 

150: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}

151: \affiliation{\KYUNGPOOK}

152: \author {G.~Adams} 

153: \affiliation{\RPI}

154: \author {M.J.~Amaryan} 

155: \affiliation{\ODU}

156: \author {P.~Ambrozewicz} 

157: \affiliation{\FIU}

158: \author {M.~Anghinolfi} 

159: \affiliation{\INFNGE}

160: \author {G.~Asryan} 

161: \affiliation{\YEREVAN}

162: \author {H.~Avakian} 

163: \affiliation{\JLAB}

164: \author {H.~Bagdasaryan} 

165: \affiliation{\YEREVAN}

166: \affiliation{\ODU}

167: \author {N.~Baillie} 

168: \affiliation{\WM}

169: \author {J.P.~Ball} 

170: \affiliation{\ASU}

171: \author {N.A.~Baltzell} 

172: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}

173: \author {S.~Barrow} 

174: \affiliation{\FSU}

175: \author {V.~Batourine} 

176: \affiliation{\KYUNGPOOK}

177: \author {M.~Battaglieri} 

178: \affiliation{\INFNGE}

179: \author {I.~Bedlinskiy} 

180: \affiliation{\ITEP}

181: \author {M.~Bektasoglu} 

182: \affiliation{\ODU}

183: \author {M.~Bellis} 

184: \affiliation{\CMU}

185: \author {N.~Benmouna} 

186: \affiliation{\GWU}

187: \author {B.L.~Berman} 

188: \affiliation{\GWU}

189: \author {A.S.~Biselli} 

190: \affiliation{\RPI}

191: \affiliation{\CMU}

192: \affiliation{\FU}

193: \author {L.~Blaszczyk} 

194: \affiliation{\FSU}

195: \author {B.E.~Bonner} 

196: \affiliation{\RICE}

197: \author {C. Bookwalter} 

198: \affiliation{\FSU}

199: \author {S.~Bouchigny} 

200: \affiliation{\ORSAY}

201: \author {S.~Boiarinov} 

202: \affiliation{\ITEP}

203: \affiliation{\JLAB}

204: \author {R.~Bradford} 

205: \affiliation{\CMU}

206: \author {D.~Branford} 

207: \affiliation{\ECOSSEE}

208: \author {W.J.~Briscoe} 

209: \affiliation{\GWU}

210: \author {W.K.~Brooks} 

211: \affiliation{\Chile}

212: \affiliation{\JLAB}

213: \author {S.~B\"{u}ltmann} 

214: \affiliation{\ODU}

215: \author {C.~Butuceanu} 

216: \affiliation{\WM}

217: \author {J.R.~Calarco} 

218: \affiliation{\UNH}

219: \author {S.L.~Careccia} 

220: \affiliation{\ODU}

221: \author {D.S.~Carman} 

222: \affiliation{\JLAB}

223: \author {L.~Casey} 

224: \affiliation{\CUA}

225: \author {A.~Cazes} 

226: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}

227: \author {S.~Chen} 

228: \affiliation{\FSU}

229: \author {L.~Cheng} 

230: \affiliation{\CUA}

231: \author {P.L.~Cole} 

232: \affiliation{\JLAB}

233: \affiliation{\CUA}

234: \affiliation{\ISU}

235: \author {P.~Collins} 

236: \affiliation{\ASU}

237: \author {P.~Coltharp} 

238: \affiliation{\FSU}

239: \author {D.~Cords} 

240: \altaffiliation[]{\deceased}

241: \affiliation{\JLAB}

242: \author {P.~Corvisiero} 

243: \affiliation{\INFNGE}

244: \author {D.~Crabb} 

245: \affiliation{\VIRGINIA}

246: \author {V.~Crede} 

247: \affiliation{\FSU}

248: \author {J.P.~Cummings} 

249: \affiliation{\RPI}

250: \author {D.~Dale} 

251: \affiliation{\ISU}

252: \author {N.~Dashyan} 

253: \affiliation{\YEREVAN}

254: \author {R.~De~Masi} 

255: \affiliation{\SACLAY}

256: \affiliation{\ORSAY}

257: \author {R.~De~Vita} 

258: \affiliation{\INFNGE}

259: \author {E.~De~Sanctis} 

260: \affiliation{\INFNFR}

261: \author {P.V.~Degtyarenko} 

262: \affiliation{\JLAB}

263: \author {H.~Denizli} 

264: \affiliation{\PITT}

265: \author {L.~Dennis} 

266: \affiliation{\FSU}

267: \author {A.~Deur} 

268: \affiliation{\JLAB}

269: \author {S.~Dhamija} 

270: \affiliation{\FIU}

271: \author {K.V.~Dharmawardane} 

272: \affiliation{\ODU}

273: \author {K.S.~Dhuga} 

274: \affiliation{\GWU}

275: \author {R.~Dickson} 

276: \affiliation{\CMU}

277: \author {C.~Djalali} 

278: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}

279: \author {G.E.~Dodge} 

280: \affiliation{\ODU}

281: \author {J.~Donnelly} 

282: \affiliation{\ECOSSEG}

283: \author {D.~Doughty} 

284: \affiliation{\CNU}

285: \affiliation{\JLAB}

286: \author {M.~Dugger} 

287: \affiliation{\ASU}

288: \author {S.~Dytman} 

289: \affiliation{\PITT}

290: \author {O.P.~Dzyubak} 

291: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}

292: \author {H.~Egiyan} 

293: \affiliation{\UNH}

294: \affiliation{\JLAB}

295: \author {K.S.~Egiyan} 

296: \altaffiliation[]{\deceased}

297: \affiliation{\YEREVAN}

298: \author {L.~El~Fassi} 

299: \affiliation{\ANL}

300: \author{L.~Elouadrhiri}

301:      \affiliation{\JLAB}

302: \author {P.~Eugenio} 

303: \affiliation{\CMU}

304: \affiliation{\FSU}

305: \author {R.~Fatemi} 

306: \affiliation{\VIRGINIA}

307: \author {G.~Fedotov} 

308: \affiliation{\MOSCOW}

309: \author {G.~Feldman} 

310: \affiliation{\GWU}

311: \author {R.J.~Feuerbach} 

312: \affiliation{\CMU}

313: \author {T.A.~Forest} 

314: \affiliation{\ODU}

315: \affiliation{\ISU}

316: \author {A.~Fradi} 

317: \affiliation{\ORSAY}

318: \author {H.~Funsten} 

319: \altaffiliation{\deceased}

320: \affiliation{\WM}

321: \author {M.Y.~Gabrielyan} 

322: \affiliation{\FIU}

323: \author {M.~Gar\c con} 

324: \affiliation{\SACLAY}

325: \author {G.~Gavalian} 

326: \affiliation{\UNH}

327: \affiliation{\ODU}

328: \author {N.~Gevorgyan} 

329: \affiliation{\YEREVAN}

330: \author {G.P.~Gilfoyle} 

331: \affiliation{\URICH}

332: \author {K.L.~Giovanetti} 

333: \affiliation{\JMU}

334: \author {F.X.~Girod} 

335: \affiliation{\SACLAY}

336: \affiliation{\JLAB}

337: \author {J.T.~Goetz} 

338: \affiliation{\UCLA}

339: \author {W.~Gohn} 

340: \affiliation{\UCONN}

341: \author {E.~Golovatch} 

342: \affiliation{\MOSCOW}

343: \affiliation{\INFNGE}

344: \author {A.~Gonenc} 

345: \affiliation{\FIU}

346: \author {C.I.O.~Gordon} 

347: \affiliation{\ECOSSEG}

348: \author {R.W.~Gothe} 

349: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}

350: \author {L.~Graham} 

351: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}

352: \author {K.A.~Griffioen} 

353: \affiliation{\WM}

354: \author {M.~Guidal} 

355: \affiliation{\ORSAY}

356: \author {M.~Guillo} 

357: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}

358: \author {N.~Guler} 

359: \affiliation{\ODU}

360: \author {L.~Guo} 

361: \affiliation{\JLAB}

362: \author {V.~Gyurjyan} 

363: \affiliation{\JLAB}

364: \author {C.~Hadjidakis} 

365: \affiliation{\ORSAY}

366: \author {K.~Hafidi} 

367: \affiliation{\ANL}

368: \author {K.~Hafnaoui} 

369: \affiliation{\ANL}

370: \author {H.~Hakobyan} 

371: \affiliation{\YEREVAN}

372: \author {R.S.~Hakobyan} 

373: \affiliation{\CUA}

374: \author {C.~Hanretty} 

375: \affiliation{\FSU}

376: \author {J.~Hardie} 

377: \affiliation{\CNU}

378: \affiliation{\JLAB}

379: \author {N.~Hassall} 

380: \affiliation{\ECOSSEG}

381: \author {D.~Heddle} 

382: \affiliation{\JLAB}

383: \author {F.W.~Hersman} 

384: \affiliation{\UNH}

385: \author {K.~Hicks} 

386: \affiliation{\OHIOU}

387: \author {I.~Hleiqawi} 

388: \affiliation{\OHIOU}

389: \author {M.~Holtrop} 

390: \affiliation{\UNH}

391: \author {C.E.~Hyde} 

392: \affiliation{\ODU}

393: \author {Y.~Ilieva} 

394: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}

395: \affiliation{\GWU}

396: \author {D.G.~Ireland} 

397: \affiliation{\ECOSSEG}

398: \author {B.S.~Ishkhanov} 

399: \affiliation{\MOSCOW}

400: \author {E.L.~Isupov} 

401: \affiliation{\MOSCOW}

402: \author {M.M.~Ito} 

403: \affiliation{\JLAB}

404: \author {D.~Jenkins} 

405: \affiliation{\VT}

406: \author {H.S.~Jo} 

407: \affiliation{\ORSAY}

408: \author {J.R.~Johnstone} 

409: \affiliation{\ECOSSEG}

410: \author{K.~Joo}

411:      \affiliation{\UCONN}

412:      \affiliation{\VIRGINIA}

413: \author {H.G.~Juengst} 

414: \affiliation{\GWU}

415: \affiliation{\ODU}

416: \author {N.~Kalantarians} 

417: \affiliation{\ODU}

418: \author {D. Keller} 

419: \affiliation{\OHIOU}

420: \author {J.D.~Kellie} 

421: \affiliation{\ECOSSEG}

422: \author {M.~Khandaker} 

423: \affiliation{\NSU}

424: \author {K.Y.~Kim} 

425: \affiliation{\PITT}

426: \author {A.~Klein} 

427: \affiliation{\ODU}

428: \author {F.J.~Klein} 

429: \affiliation{\FIU}

430: \affiliation{\CUA}

431: \author {A.V.~Klimenko} 

432: \affiliation{\ODU}

433: \author {M.~Kossov} 

434: \affiliation{\ITEP}

435: \author {Z.~Krahn} 

436: \affiliation{\CMU}

437: \author {L.H.~Kramer} 

438: \affiliation{\FIU}

439: \affiliation{\JLAB}

440: \author {V.~Kubarovsky} 

441: \affiliation{\JLAB}

442: \affiliation{\RPI}

443: \author {J.~Kuhn} 

444: \affiliation{\RPI}

445: \affiliation{\CMU}

446: \author {S.E.~Kuhn} 

447: \affiliation{\ODU}

448: \author {S.V.~Kuleshov} 

449: \affiliation{\ITEP}

450: \author {V.~Kuznetsov} 

451: \affiliation{\KYUNGPOOK}

452: \author {J.~Lachniet} 

453: \affiliation{\CMU}

454: \affiliation{\ODU}

455: \author {J.M.~Laget} 

456: \affiliation{\SACLAY}

457: \affiliation{\JLAB}

458: \author {J.~Langheinrich} 

459: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}

460: \author {D.~Lawrence} 

461: \affiliation{\UMASS}

462: \author {T.~Lee} 

463: \affiliation{\UNH}

464: \author {Ji~Li} 

465: \affiliation{\RPI}

466: \author {A.C.S.~Lima} 

467: \affiliation{\GWU}

468: \author {K.~Livingston} 

469: \affiliation{\ECOSSEG}

470: \author {H.Y.~Lu} 

471: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}

472: \author {K.~Lukashin} 

473: \affiliation{\CUA}

474: \author {M.~MacCormick} 

475: \affiliation{\ORSAY}

476: 

477: \author {N.~Markov} 

478: \affiliation{\UCONN}

479: 

480: \author {P.~Mattione} 

481: \affiliation{\RICE}

482: 

483: \author {S.~McAleer} 

484: \affiliation{\FSU}

485: \author {B.~McKinnon} 

486: \affiliation{\ECOSSEG}

487: 

488: \author {J.W.C.~McNabb} 

489: \affiliation{\CMU}

490: \author {B.A.~Mecking} 

491: \affiliation{\JLAB}

492: \author {S.~Mehrabyan} 

493: \affiliation{\PITT}

494: \author {J.J.~Melone} 

495: \affiliation{\ECOSSEG}

496: \author {M.D.~Mestayer} 

497: \affiliation{\JLAB}

498: \author {C.A.~Meyer} 

499: \affiliation{\CMU}

500: \author {T.~Mibe} 

501: \affiliation{\OHIOU}

502: 

503: \author {K.~Mikhailov} 

504: \affiliation{\ITEP}

505: \author{R.~Minehart}

506:      \affiliation{\VIRGINIA}

507: \author {M.~Mirazita} 

508: \affiliation{\INFNFR}

509: \author {R.~Miskimen} 

510: \affiliation{\UMASS}

511: 

512: \author {V.~Mokeev} 

513: \affiliation{\MOSCOW}

514: \affiliation{\JLAB}

515: 

516: \author {L.~Morand} 

517: \affiliation{\SACLAY}

518: \author {B.~Moreno} 

519: \affiliation{\ORSAY}

520: 

521: \author {K.~Moriya} 

522: \affiliation{\CMU}

523: 

524: \author {S.A.~Morrow} 

525: \affiliation{\ORSAY}

526: \affiliation{\SACLAY}

527: 

528: \author {M.~Moteabbed} 

529: \affiliation{\FIU}

530: 

531: \author {J.~Mueller} 

532: \affiliation{\PITT}

533: \author {E.~Munevar} 

534: \affiliation{\GWU}

535: 

536: \author {G.S.~Mutchler} 

537: \affiliation{\RICE}

538: \author {P.~Nadel-Turonski} 

539: \affiliation{\GWU}

540: 

541: \author {R.~Nasseripour} 

542: \affiliation{\GWU}

543: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}

544: 

545: \author {S.~Niccolai} 

546: \affiliation{\GWU}

547: \affiliation{\ORSAY}

548: 

549: \author {G.~Niculescu} 

550: \affiliation{\OHIOU}

551: \affiliation{\JMU}

552: 

553: \author {I.~Niculescu} 

554: \affiliation{\GWU}

555: \affiliation{\JLAB}

556: \affiliation{\JMU}

557: \author {B.B.~Niczyporuk} 

558: \affiliation{\JLAB}

559: \author {M.R. ~Niroula} 

560: \affiliation{\ODU}

561: 

562: \author {R.A.~Niyazov} 

563: \affiliation{\ODU}

564: \affiliation{\JLAB}

565: \author {M.~Nozar} 

566: \affiliation{\TRIUMF}

567: \affiliation{\JLAB}

568: 

569: \author {G.V.~O'Rielly} 

570: \affiliation{\GWU}

571: \author {M.~Osipenko} 

572: \affiliation{\INFNGE}

573: \author {A.I.~Ostrovidov} 

574: \affiliation{\FSU}

575: \author {S. Park} 

576: \affiliation{\FSU}

577: 

578: \author {E.~Pasyuk} 

579: \affiliation{\ASU}

580: \author {C.~Paterson} 

581: \affiliation{\ECOSSEG}

582: 

583: \author {S.~Anefalos~Pereira} 

584: \affiliation{\INFNFR}

585: 

586: \author {S.A.~Philips} 

587: \affiliation{\GWU}

588: \author {J.~Pierce} 

589: \affiliation{\VIRGINIA}

590: 

591: \author {N.~Pivnyuk} 

592: \affiliation{\ITEP}

593: \author {D.~Pocanic} 

594: \affiliation{\VIRGINIA}

595:  

596: \author {O.~Pogorelko} 

597: \affiliation{\ITEP}

598: \author {E.~Polli} 

599: \affiliation{\INFNFR}

600: \author {I.~Popa} 

601: \affiliation{\GWU}

602: \author {S.~Pozdniakov} 

603: \affiliation{\ITEP}

604: \author {B.M.~Preedom} 

605: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}

606: \author {J.W.~Price} 

607: \affiliation{\CSU}

608:  

609: \author {Y.~Prok} 

610: \affiliation{\MIT}

611: \affiliation{\CNU}

612: \affiliation{\JLAB}

613:  

614: \author {D.~Protopopescu} 

615: \affiliation{\UNH}

616: \affiliation{\ECOSSEG}

617: \author {L.M.~Qin} 

618: \affiliation{\ODU}

619: \author {B.A.~Raue} 

620: \affiliation{\FIU}

621: \affiliation{\JLAB}

622: \author {G.~Riccardi} 

623: \affiliation{\FSU}

624:  

625: \author {G.~Ricco} 

626: \affiliation{\INFNGE}

627: \author {M.~Ripani} 

628: \affiliation{\INFNGE}

629: \author {B.G.~Ritchie} 

630: \affiliation{\ASU}

631: \author {G.~Rosner} 

632: \affiliation{\ECOSSEG}

633:  

634: \author {P.~Rossi} 

635: \affiliation{\INFNFR}

636: \author {D.~Rowntree} 

637: \affiliation{\MIT}

638: \author {P.D.~Rubin} 

639: \affiliation{\URICH}

640: \author {F.~Sabati\'e} 

641: \affiliation{\ODU}

642: \affiliation{\SACLAY}

643: \author {M.S.~Saini} 

644: \affiliation{\FSU}

645:  

646: \author {J.~Salamanca} 

647: \affiliation{\ISU}

648:  

649: \author {C.~Salgado} 

650: \affiliation{\NSU}

651: \author {J.P.~Santoro} 

652: \affiliation{\CUA}

653: \affiliation{\JLAB}

654:  

655: \author {V.~Sapunenko} 

656: \affiliation{\INFNGE}

657: \affiliation{\JLAB}

658: \author {D.~Schott} 

659: \affiliation{\FIU}

660:  

661: \author {R.A.~Schumacher} 

662: \affiliation{\CMU}

663: \author {V.S.~Serov} 

664: \affiliation{\ITEP}

665: \author {Y.G.~Sharabian} 

666: \affiliation{\JLAB}

667: \author {D.~Sharov} 

668: \affiliation{\MOSCOW}

669:  

670: \author {J.~Shaw} 

671: \affiliation{\UMASS}

672:  

673: \author {N.V.~Shvedunov} 

674: \affiliation{\MOSCOW}

675:  

676: \author {A.V.~Skabelin} 

677: \affiliation{\MIT}

678: \author {E.S.~Smith} 

679: \affiliation{\JLAB}

680: \author{L.C.~Smith}

681:      \affiliation{\VIRGINIA}

682: \author {D.I.~Sober} 

683: \affiliation{\CUA}

684: \author {D.~Sokhan} 

685: \affiliation{\ECOSSEE}

686:  

687: \author {A.~Stavinsky} 

688: \affiliation{\ITEP}

689: \author {S.S.~Stepanyan} 

690: \affiliation{\KYUNGPOOK}

691: \author {S.~Stepanyan} 

692: \affiliation{\JLAB}

693:  

694: \author {B.E.~Stokes} 

695: \affiliation{\FSU}

696: \author {P.~Stoler} 

697: \affiliation{\RPI}

698: \author {I.I.~Strakovsky} 

699: \affiliation{\GWU}

700: \author {S.~Strauch} 

701: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}

702:  

703: \author {R.~Suleiman} 

704: \affiliation{\MIT}

705: \author {M.~Taiuti} 

706: \affiliation{\INFNGE}

707: \author {T.~Takeuchi} 

708: \affiliation{\FSU}

709:  

710: \author {D.J.~Tedeschi} 

711: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}

712:  

713: \affiliation{\EMMY}

714: \author {A.~Tkabladze} 

715: \affiliation{\OHIOU}

716: \affiliation{\GWU}

717:  

718: \author {S.~Tkachenko} 

719: \affiliation{\ODU}

720:  

721: \author {L.~Todor} 

722: \affiliation{\CMU}

723: \affiliation{\URICH}

724:  

725: \author {C.~Tur} 

726: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}

727:  

728: \author {M.~Ungaro} 

729: \affiliation{\RPI}

730: \affiliation{\UCONN}

731: \author {M.F.~Vineyard} 

732: \affiliation{\UNIONC}

733: \affiliation{\URICH}

734: \author {A.V.~Vlassov} 

735: \affiliation{\ITEP}

736: \author {D.P.~Watts} 

737: \affiliation{\ECOSSEE}

738: \affiliation{\ECOSSEG}

739: \author {L.B.~Weinstein} 

740: \affiliation{\ODU}

741: \author {D.P.~Weygand} 

742: \affiliation{\JLAB}

743: \author {M.~Williams} 

744: \affiliation{\CMU}

745: \author {E.~Wolin} 

746: \affiliation{\JLAB}

747: \author {M.H.~Wood} 

748: \affiliation{\UMASS}

749: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}

750: \author {A.~Yegneswaran} 

751: \affiliation{\JLAB}

752: \author {J.~Yun} 

753: \affiliation{\ODU}

754: \author {M.~Yurov} 

755: \affiliation{\KYUNGPOOK}

756:  

757: \author {L.~Zana} 

758: \affiliation{\UNH}

759: \author {B.~Zhang} 

760: \affiliation{\MIT}

761: \author {J.~Zhang} 

762: \affiliation{\ODU}

763:  

764: \author {B.~Zhao} 

765: \affiliation{\UCONN}

766:  

767: \author {Z.W.~Zhao} 

768: \affiliation{\SCAROLINA}

769:  

770: \collaboration{The CLAS Collaboration}

771:      \noaffiliation

772: 

773: 

774: \begin{abstract} 

775: {The helicity amplitudes of the electroexcitation

776: of the Roper resonance are extracted

777: for $1.7< Q^2< 4.5~$GeV$^2$ from recent high precision

778: JLab-CLAS  cross section and longitudinally polarized

779: beam asymmetry data for $\pi^+$ electroproduction on protons

780: at $W=1.15-1.69~$GeV.

781: The analysis is made using two approaches, dispersion relations

782: and a unitary isobar model, which give consistent results.

783: It is found that the transverse helicity amplitude $A_{1/2}$

784: for the $\gamma^* p\rightarrow ~$N(1440)P$_{11}$ transition,

785: which is large and negative at $Q^2=0$,

786: becomes large and positive at $Q^2\simeq 2~$GeV$^2$,

787: and then drops slowly with $Q^2$. 

788: The longitudinal helicity amplitude $S_{1/2}$, which was

789: previously found from CLAS $\vec{e}p\rightarrow ep\pi^0,en\pi^+$

790: data to be large and positive at

791: $Q^2=0.4,~0.65~$GeV$^2$, drops

792: with  $Q^2$. Available model predictions for

793: $\gamma^* p\rightarrow ~$N(1440)P$_{11}$ allow us 

794: to conclude that these results

795: provide strong evidence in favor

796: of N(1440)P$_{11}$ as a first radial excitation

797: of the 3$q$ ground state. The results of the present paper 

798: also confirm

799: the conclusion of our previous analysis for $Q^2< 1~$GeV$^2$

800: that the presentation of N(1440)P$_{11}$ as a q$^3$G

801: hybrid state is ruled out.} 

802: \end{abstract}

803: 

804: \pacs{PACS number(s): 11.55.Fv, 13.40.Gp, 13.60.Le, 14.20.Gk  }

805: \maketitle

806: 

807: The excitation of nucleon resonances

808: in electromagnetic interactions has long been recognized

809: as a sensitive source of information on the long-

810: and short-range structure of the nucleon and its excited

811: states in the domain of quark confinement. 

812: Constituent quark models (CQM) have been developed

813: that relate electromagnetic resonance transition form factors

814: to fundamental quantities, such as the quark confining potential.

815: While this relationship is more direct for heavy quarks,

816: even in the light quark sector such connections

817: exist and may be probed by measuring transition

818: form factors over a large range in photon

819: virtuality $Q^2$, which 

820: defines the space-time resolution of the probe.

821: 

822: The so-called Roper resonance, or N(1440)P$_{11}$,

823: is the lowest excited state of the nucleon.

824: In the CQM, the simplest and most natural

825: assumption is that this is the first

826: radial excitation of the 3$q$ ground state. However,

827: calculations within the nonrelativistic CQM

828: fail to reproduce even the sign of the transition

829: photo-coupling amplitude \cite{Capstick1}.

830: Moreover, the mass of the state is more than 100 MeV lower

831: than what is predicted in the CQM with gluon exchange

832: interaction \cite{Capstick2,Richard}.

833: More recent models that include also Goldstone boson 

834: exchange between quarks gave better agreement with the mass 

835: \cite{Glozman}.  

836: To deal with shortcomings of the quark model,

837: alternative descriptions of 

838: N(1440)P$_{11}$ were

839: developed, where this resonance is treated respectively 

840: as: a hybrid q$^3$G state where the three

841: quarks are bound together with a gluon   \cite{Li1,Li2},

842: a quark core dressed by a meson cloud

843: \cite{Cano1,Cano2}, and a dynamically generated $\pi N$ 

844: resonance \cite{Krewald}; other models 

845: include 3$q-q\bar{q}$ components,

846: in particular a strong $\sigma N$ component (see Ref. 

847: \cite{Dillig}

848: and references therein).

849: Discrimination between these descriptions 

850: of the Roper resonance can provide deep insight

851: into the underlying basic symmetries and 

852: the structure of quark confinement.

853: 

854: The $Q^2$ dependence of the electromagnetic transition

855: form factors is highly sensitive to different

856: descriptions of the Roper state.

857: However, until recently, the data base used to extract

858: these form factors was almost exclusively based on $\pi^0$

859: production, and very limited in kinematical coverage.

860: Also, the $\pi^0 p$ final state is dominated by the nearby  

861: isospin $\frac{3}{2}$ $\Delta(1232)$P$_{33}$ resonance, 

862: whereas the isospin $\frac{1}{2}$ Roper state

863: couples more strongly to the $\pi^+ n$ channel.

864: The CLAS Collaboration has now published a large body

865: of precise differential cross sections and polarized beam asymmetries

866: for the process $\vec{e}p\rightarrow en\pi^+$

867: in the range of invariant hadronic mass

868: $W=1.15-1.69~$GeV and photon virtuality

869: $Q^2=1.7-4.5~$GeV$^2$, with full azimuthal and polar

870: angle coverage \cite{Park}. 

871: In this Letter we report the results on the electroexcitation

872: of the Roper resonance  extracted from this large data set.

873: 

874: The approaches we used to analyze the data are 

875: fixed-$t$

876: dispersion relations (DR) and a unitary isobar model (UIM). 

877: They

878: were successfully employed in Refs. \cite {Azn0,Azn04,Azn065} 

879: for analyses of pion-photoproduction 

880: and low-$Q^2$-electroproduction data.  

881: 

882: The imaginary parts of the amplitudes in the 

883: DR and UIM approaches

884: are determined mainly by $s$-channel resonance contributions

885: that we parameterize in the usual Breit-Wigner form

886: with energy-dependent widths. We also take  

887: into account inelastic channels in the form 

888: proposed in Ref. \cite{Drechsel}. An 

889: exception

890: was made  for

891: the $\Delta(1232)$P$_{33}$ resonance, which was treated

892: differently. According to the phase-shift analyses

893: of $\pi N$ scattering,

894: the $\pi N$ amplitude corresponding to

895: the $P_{33}(1232)$ resonance is elastic

896: up to $W=1.43~$GeV (see, for example, the

897: latest GWU analyses \cite{GWU1,GWU2}).

898: In combination with DR and Watson's theorem, this provides

899: strict constraints on the multipole amplitudes

900: $M_{1+}^{3/2}$, $E_{1+}^{3/2}$, $S_{1+}^{3/2}$

901: that correspond to the $\Delta(1232)$P$_{33}$ resonance.

902: In particular, as was shown in Ref. \cite{Azn0},

903: the $W$-dependence of $M_{1+}^{3/2}$

904: is close to that 

905: from the GWU analysis \cite{GWU3} at $Q^2=0$

906: if the same normalizations of the amplitudes

907: at the resonance position are used.

908: This constraint on the large 

909: $M_{1+}^{3/2}$ amplitude plays an important role in the reliable

910: extraction of the N(1440)P$_{11}$ electroexcitation

911: amplitudes, because the $\Delta(1232)$P$_{33}$ and N(1440)P$_{11}$ 

912: states are overlapping.

913: 

914: We have taken into account

915: all  resonances from the first, second, and third resonance

916: regions. These are 4- and 3-star resonances

917: $\Delta(1232)$P$_{33}$, N(1440)P$_{11}$,

918: N(1520)D$_{13}$, N(1535)S$_{11}$,

919: $\Delta(1600)$P$_{33}$, $\Delta(1620)$S$_{31}$,

920: N(1650)S$_{11}$,

921: N(1675)D$_{15}$,

922: N(1680)F$_{15}$,

923: N(1700)D$_{13}$, $\Delta(1700)$D$_{33}$,

924: N(1710)P$_{11}$, and

925: N(1720)P$_{13}$.

926: For the masses, widths, and  $\pi N$ branching

927: ratios  of these resonances, we used

928: the mean values of the data presented in the Review of Particle

929: Physics (RPP) \cite{PDG}. 

930: In particular for the Roper resonance,

931: the values $M=1.44~$GeV, $\Gamma=0.35~$GeV,

932: and $\beta_{\pi N}=0.6$ were taken. Resonances of the fourth

933: resonance region practically have no influence

934: in the energy region under investigation

935: and were not included.

936: 

937: For the values of $Q^2$ under consideration,

938: the available $ep\rightarrow ep\pi^0$

939: data are related mostly to the $\Delta(1232)$P$_{33}$

940: resonance region \cite{Frolov,Joo1,Ungaro}.  

941: The DESY data \cite{Haidan} at higher energies 

942: $W=1.14-1.72~$GeV ($Q^2\approx 3~$GeV$^2$) have very 

943: limited angular coverage. Our analysis showed that

944: the combined $ep\rightarrow ep\pi^0$

945: \cite{Frolov,Joo1,Ungaro,Haidan}

946: and $\vec{e}p\rightarrow en\pi^+$

947: \cite{Park} data give results that are very

948: close to those obtained from 

949: the $\vec{e}p\rightarrow en\pi^+$

950: data \cite{Park} alone.  

951: For this reason, and also to avoid mixing data sets with different

952: systematic uncertainties, in this letter we present 

953: the results for N(1440)P$_{11}$ obtained from

954: the analysis of the $\vec{e}p\rightarrow en\pi^+$

955: data \cite{Park} only. 

956: 

957: At each $Q^2$ available for $\vec{e}p\rightarrow en\pi^+$ 

958: \cite{Park}, $Q^2= 1.72,~2.05,~2.44,~2.91,~3.48,~4.16~$GeV$^2$, 

959: we performed two kinds of fits

960: in both approaches:

961: (i) The magnitudes of the helicity amplitudes

962: corresponding to all resonances

963: listed above were fitted.

964: (ii) The transverse amplitudes for

965: the members of the multiplet $[70,1^-]$: $\Delta(1620)$S$_{31}$,

966: N(1650)S$_{11}$,

967: N(1675)D$_{15}$, N(1700)D$_{13}$, and $\Delta(1700)$D$_{33}$,

968: were fixed according to

969: the single quark transition model  \cite{SQTM},

970: which relates these amplitudes to those for

971: N(1520)D$_{13}$ and N(1535)S$_{11}$;

972: the longitudinal amplitudes of these resonances

973: and the amplitudes of the resonances

974: $\Delta(1600)$P$_{33}$ and

975: N(1710)P$_{11}$, which have small photocouplings \cite{GWU3,PDG}

976: and are not seen in low $Q^2$ $\pi$ and 2$\pi$ 

977: electroproduction \cite{Azn065}, 

978: were assumed to be zero.

979: The results obtained

980: for $\Delta(1232)$P$_{33}$, N(1440)P$_{11}$,

981: N(1520)D$_{13}$, and N(1535)S$_{11}$ in the two fits

982: were very close to each other. The amplitudes

983: of the Roper resonance

984: presented below are the average values of the results

985: obtained in these fits. The uncertainties arising from 

986: the averaging procedure we will refer to as uncertainties (I). 

987: They were included in quadrature into 

988: the total systematic uncertainties.

989: 

990: The background of both approaches contains Born terms

991: corresponding to

992: the $s$- and $u$- channel nucleon exchanges

993: and $t$-channel pion contribution,

994: and depends, therefore, 

995: on the proton, neutron,

996: and pion form factors.

997: The background of the UIM contains also 

998: the $\rho$ and $\omega$ $t$-channel exchanges \cite{Drechsel}

999: and, therefore, the contribution

1000: of the form factors

1001: $G_{\rho(\omega)\rightarrow\pi\gamma}(Q^2)$.

1002: All of these form factors, except the neutron

1003: electric and $G_{\rho(\omega)\rightarrow\pi\gamma}(Q^2)$ ones,

1004: are known in the region of $Q^2$

1005: under investigation from existing experimental data.

1006: For the proton form factors we used the parameterizations

1007: found for the existing data 

1008: in Ref. \cite{21}. The neutron magnetic form factor

1009: and the pion form factor

1010: were taken from Refs. \cite{22} and \cite{23,24,25,26},

1011: respectively. 

1012: The neutron electric form factor, $G_{E_n}(Q^2)$, is measured

1013: up to $Q^2=1.45~$GeV$^2$ \cite{27}, and Ref. \cite{27}

1014: presents a parameterization 

1015: for all existing data on  $G_{E_n}(Q^2)$ that we used

1016: for extrapolation of

1017: $G_{E_n}(Q^2)$  to $1.7<Q^2<4.2~$GeV$^2$.  

1018: In our final results we accounted for a

1019: systematic uncertainty assuming a

1020: $50\%$ deviation from this parameterization.

1021: There are no measurements of the form factors

1022: $G_{\rho(\omega)\rightarrow\pi\gamma}(Q^2)$;

1023: however, investigations made using both QCD sum rules \cite{28}

1024: and quark model \cite{29} predict a $Q^2$ dependence

1025: of $G_{\rho(\omega)\rightarrow\pi\gamma}(Q^2)$

1026: close to the dipole form factor

1027: $G_d(Q^2)

1028: =1/(1+\frac{Q^2}{0.71GeV^2})^2$.

1029: In our analysis

1030: we assumed that

1031: $G_{\rho(\omega)\rightarrow\pi\gamma}(Q^2)= G_d(Q^2)$,

1032: and introduced in our final results a systematic uncertainty   

1033: that can arise from

1034: a $50\%$ deviation from this assumption.

1035: All of these uncertainties, including those that arise

1036: from the measured proton, neutron, and pion form factors,

1037: were added in quadrature and will be referred to as

1038: systematic uncertainties (II) in our final results.

1039: 

1040: \begin{figure}[b]

1041: \includegraphics[width=8.7cm, bb=36 414 510 515]{leg.eps}

1042: \caption{

1043: Experimental data for the 3 lowest Legendre moments

1044: of the structure function $\sigma_T+\epsilon \sigma_L$ at

1045: $Q^2=2.05~$GeV$^2$ \cite{Park} in comparison with our

1046: results. The solid and dashed 

1047: curves correspond to the

1048: DR and UIM results, respectively.

1049: The dotted curves are obtained by

1050: switching off the N(1440)P$_{11}$ resonance

1051: in the final DR results. 

1052: }

1053: \label{fig:fig1}

1054: \end{figure}

1055: In Fig. 1, we present the comparison of our results

1056: with the experimental data

1057: for the lowest Legendre moments  of

1058: the structure function

1059: $\sigma_T+\epsilon \sigma_L$

1060: at $Q^2=2.05~$GeV$^2$ \cite{Park}.

1061: The  Legendre moment $D_0^{T+\epsilon L}$ is the

1062: $\cos\theta^*_{\pi}$ independent part of 

1063: $\sigma_T+\epsilon \sigma_L$; it does not

1064: contain interference of different multipole amplitudes and

1065: is related

1066: to the sum of  squares of these amplitudes.

1067: The resonance behavior of the multipole amplitudes is revealed

1068: in $D_0^{T+\epsilon L}$

1069: in the form of enhancements. Resonance structures

1070: related to the resonances

1071: $\Delta(1232)$P$_{33}$, N(1520)D$_{13}$, and N(1535)S$_{11}$

1072: are clearly  seen in

1073: $D_0^{T+\epsilon L}$.

1074: There is a shoulder between the $\Delta$

1075: and $1.5~$GeV peaks, which 

1076: is related to the broad Roper resonance.

1077: To demonstrate this, we present in Fig. 1

1078: the curves obtained by

1079: switching off the N(1440)P$_{11}$ resonance

1080: in the final DR results. 

1081: A fit to the data with the Roper amplitudes put to zero

1082: results in $\chi^2\approx 7$ and gives the dip

1083: in $D_0^{T+\epsilon L}$ of the same size as in Fig. 1.

1084: This clearly shows that the data can not be explained

1085: without the Roper resonance.

1086: 

1087: To stress the advantage of the investigation of

1088: the Roper resonance in the reaction $\gamma^* p \rightarrow \pi^+ n$,

1089: we note that for this reaction  

1090: the relative contribution

1091: of N(1440)P$_{11}$ in comparison with $\Delta(1232)$P$_{33}$

1092: in $D_0^{T+\epsilon L}$

1093: is four times larger than for $\gamma^* p \rightarrow \pi^0 p$,

1094: because isospin 

1095: $I=\frac{1}{2}$ and $\frac{3}{2}$ resonances enter the

1096: $ep\rightarrow eN\pi$ amplitudes with the coefficients

1097: $\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}},~\sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}$

1098: for $n\pi^+$ in the final state

1099: and $-\sqrt{\frac{1}{3}},~\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}$ for $p\pi^0$.

1100:                                                                                 

1101: The role of N(1440)P$_{11}$  is 

1102: also seen in other  Legendre moments.

1103: In $D_1^{T+\epsilon L}$, the large effect

1104: caused by

1105: switching off this resonance

1106: is connected  with

1107: the interference of $M_{1-}$

1108: corresponding to N(1440)P$_{11}$ with

1109: the non-resonant and N(1535)S$_{11}$ contributions to $E_{0+}$,

1110: which creates a linear dependence of 

1111: $\sigma_T+\epsilon \sigma_L$ in

1112: $\cos\theta^*_{\pi}$.

1113: Due to interference effects like those mentioned above

1114: and to the large width of this state,

1115: the N(1440)P$_{11}$ plays

1116: a significant role

1117: in the entire $W$ range covered by the data.

1118: 

1119: \begin{table}[t]

1120: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c}

1121: \hline

1122: $Q^2$&$A_{1/2}~~~~~~~~~~~~~~S_{1/2}$&$N_{data}$&

1123: $\chi^2/N_{data}$\\

1124: (GeV$^2$)&$(10^{-3}$GeV$^{-1/2})$&&\\

1125: \hline

1126: &DR&&\\

1127: \hline

1128: 1.72&$72.5\pm 1.0\pm 4.3~~~~24.8\pm 1.4\pm 5.3$&5101&3.1\\

1129: \hline

1130: 2.05&$72.0\pm 0.9\pm 4.2~~~~21.0\pm 1.7\pm 5.0$&5844&2.4\\

1131: \hline

1132: 2.44&$50.0\pm 1.0\pm 3.2~~~~~9.3\pm 1.3\pm 4.1$&6177&2.1\\

1133: \hline

1134: 2.91&$37.5\pm 1.1\pm 2.8~~~~~9.8\pm 2.0\pm 2.3$&6251&2.0\\

1135: \hline

1136: 3.48&$29.6\pm 0.8\pm 2.7~~~~~4.2\pm 2.5\pm 2.3$&6105&1.5\\

1137: \hline

1138: 4.16&$19.3\pm 2.0\pm 3.9~~~~10.8\pm 2.8\pm 4.5$&5778&1.1\\

1139: \hline

1140: &UIM&&\\

1141: \hline

1142: 1.72&$58.5\pm 1.1\pm 4.2~~~~26.9\pm 1.3\pm 5.3$&5101&3.5\\

1143: \hline

1144: 2.05&$62.9\pm 0.9\pm 3.3~~~~15.5\pm 1.5\pm 4.9$&5844&2.3\\

1145: \hline

1146: 2.44&$56.2\pm 0.9\pm 3.2~~~~11.8\pm 1.4\pm 4.1$&6177&2.1\\

1147: \hline

1148: 2.91&$42.5\pm 1.1\pm 2.8~~~~13.8\pm 2.1\pm 2.3$&6251&2.2\\

1149: \hline

1150: 3.48&$32.6\pm 0.9\pm 2.6~~~~14.1\pm 2.4\pm 2.0$&6105&1.6\\

1151: \hline

1152: 4.16&$23.1\pm 2.2\pm 4.8~~~~17.5\pm 2.6\pm 5.5$&5778&1.1\\

1153: \hline

1154: \end{tabular}

1155: \caption{\label{tab1}The

1156: $\gamma^* p \rightarrow ~$N(1440)P$_{11}$ 

1157: helicity amplitudes

1158: found from the analysis

1159: of  $\pi^+$ electroproduction

1160: data \cite{Park} using DR and UIM.

1161: The first and second uncertainties are, respectively,

1162: the statistical uncertainty from the fit 

1163: and the systematic uncertainties (I) and (II) added in quadrature.

1164: The number of data points, $N_{data}$, and the $\chi^2$ value

1165: per data point are also presented. }

1166: \end{table}

1167: \begin{figure}[t]

1168: \includegraphics[width=8.6cm, bb=32 413 521 647]{p11.eps}

1169: \caption{

1170: Helicity amplitudes

1171: for the  $\gamma^* p \rightarrow~$N(1440)P$_{11}$ transition.

1172: The full circles are 

1173: our results obtained from

1174: the analysis

1175: of  $\pi^+$ electroproduction

1176: data \cite{Park}.

1177: The bands present the systematic uncertainties

1178: (I,II,III)

1179: added in quadrature; see text.

1180: The full boxes are  the results obtained

1181: from CLAS data \cite{Azn04,Joo1,Joo2,Joo3,Egiyan}; 

1182: open boxes present the results of the combined 

1183: analysis of CLAS

1184: single $\pi$ and $2\pi$ electroproduction

1185: data \cite{Azn065}.

1186: The full triangle at $Q^2=0$ is the RPP estimate \cite{PDG}.

1187: The thick curves correspond to

1188: the light-front relativistic quark models:  dotted, dashed,

1189: dash-dotted, long-dashed, and solid curves are

1190: from Refs. \cite{Capstick1,Weber,Simula,Riska,Quark},  respectively.

1191: The thin solid curves are the predictions obtained for the

1192: Roper resonance treated as

1193: a quark core dressed by a meson cloud \cite{Cano1,Cano2}.

1194: The thin dashed curves are

1195: obtained assuming that N(1440)P$_{11}$

1196: is a q$^3$G hybrid state \cite{Li2}.

1197: }

1198: \label{fig:fig2}

1199: \end{figure}

1200: 

1201: We now discuss the results for the

1202: $\gamma^* p \rightarrow ~$N(1440)P$_{11}$

1203: helicity amplitudes 

1204: presented in Table \ref{tab1} and Fig. 2.                                                                              

1205: The results obtained using DR and UIM

1206: are given in Table \ref{tab1} separately;

1207: it can be seen that they

1208: are close to each other.

1209: As the non-resonant background of these approaches is

1210: built in conceptually different ways,

1211: we conclude that the model uncertainties

1212: of the obtained results are relatively small.

1213: In Fig. 2 we present average values of the results

1214: obtained within the DR and UIM approaches.

1215: The uncertainties that originate from this averaging

1216: procedure are referred to as 

1217: systematic uncertainties (III) in our final results.

1218:                                                                                

1219: Combined with the information obtained from

1220: the previous CLAS data at $Q^2=0.4,~0.65~$GeV$^2$ 

1221: \cite{Azn04,Azn065,Joo1,Joo2,Joo3,Egiyan},

1222: and that at $Q^2=0$ \cite{PDG}, our results show

1223: the following behavior

1224: of the transverse helicity

1225: amplitude $A_{1/2}$:

1226: being large and negative at $Q^2=0$,

1227: it crosses zero between $Q^2=0.4$ and $0.65~$GeV$^2$

1228: and becomes large and positive

1229: at $Q^2\simeq 2~$GeV$^2$.

1230: With

1231: increasing $Q^2$, this amplitude drops smoothly in magnitude.

1232: The longitudinal helicity amplitude $S_{1/2}$, which is large and

1233: positive at small $Q^2$, drops smoothly with increasing $Q^2$.

1234:                                                                                 

1235: In Fig. 2, we compare our results

1236: with model predictions.

1237: These are (i) quark model predictions

1238: \cite{Capstick1,Weber,Simula,Riska,Quark}

1239: where the N(1440)P$_{11}$ is described

1240: as the first radial excitation of the 3$q$ ground state;

1241: (ii) those assuming the

1242: N(1440)P$_{11}$ is

1243: a hybrid state  \cite{Li2}; and (iii)

1244: the results for the

1245: Roper resonance treated as

1246: a quark core (which is a radial excitation of the 3$q$ ground state)

1247: dressed by a meson cloud \cite{Cano1,Cano2}.

1248:                                                                                

1249: It is known that with increasing $Q^2$,

1250: when the momentum transfer becomes larger

1251: than the masses of the constituent quarks, a relativistic

1252: treatment of the electroexcitation of the nucleon resonances,

1253: which is important already at $Q^2=0$,

1254: becomes crucial.

1255: A consistent way to perform the relativistic

1256: treatment of the

1257: $\gamma^* N \rightarrow N^*$  transitions

1258: is to consider

1259: them in light-front (LF) dynamics.

1260: In Fig. 2 we present the results

1261: obtained in the LF quark models 

1262: \cite{Capstick1,Weber,Simula,Riska,Quark}.

1263: All LF approaches \cite{Capstick1,Weber,Simula,Riska,Quark}

1264: give a good description of nucleon form factors, however,

1265: the predictions for the $\gamma^* N \rightarrow~$N(1440)P$_{11}$

1266: helicity amplitudes differ significantly.

1267: This is caused by the large sensitivity

1268: of these amplitudes to

1269: the N and N(1440)P$_{11}$ wave functions \cite{Quark}.                                                                               

1270: The approaches \cite{Capstick1,Weber,Simula,Riska,Quark}

1271: fail to describe the value of the

1272: transverse amplitude $A_{1/2}$ at $Q^2=0$.

1273: This can be an indication of a large meson cloud

1274: contribution to $\gamma^* p \rightarrow~$N(1440)P$_{11}$,

1275: which is expected to be significant at small $Q^2$.

1276: As a confirmation of this assumption, one can consider

1277: the results of Refs. \cite{Cano1,Cano2} where

1278: this contribution

1279: is taken into account,

1280: and a good description of the helicity amplitudes

1281: is obtained at small $Q^2$.

1282:                                                                                

1283: In spite of the

1284: differences, all LF predictions

1285: for the $\gamma^* p \rightarrow~$N(1440)P$_{11}$

1286: helicity amplitudes

1287: have common features

1288: that agree

1289: with the results extracted from the experimental data:

1290: (i) the sign of the transverse amplitude

1291: $A_{1/2}$ at $Q^2=0$

1292: is negative,

1293: (ii) the sign

1294: of the longitudinal

1295: amplitude $S_{1/2}$ is positive,

1296: (iii) all LF approaches predict the sign change

1297: of the transverse amplitude $A_{1/2}$ at small $Q^2$.

1298: We take this qualitative agreement as evidence in favor

1299: of the N(1440)P$_{11}$ resonance as a radial excitation

1300: of the 3$q$ ground state. Final confirmation of this conclusion requires

1301: a complete simultaneous description of the nucleon

1302: form factors and the  $\gamma^* p \rightarrow~$N(1440)P$_{11}$ 

1303: amplitudes.

1304: This will allow us to  find the magnitude of the meson cloud 

1305: contribution, and

1306: to better specify the $N$ and N(1440)P$_{11}$ wave functions.

1307: To achieve a satisfactory description at large $Q^2$, it may be

1308: necessary to take into account quark form factors,

1309: as well as other

1310: effects, such as the quark mass dependence

1311: on the momentum transfer.

1312:                           

1313: The results of Refs. \cite{Li1,Li2}, where

1314: N(1440)P$_{11}$ is treated as

1315: a hybrid state,  are obtained via non-relativistic calculations.

1316: Nevertheless the suppression

1317: of the longitudinal amplitude $S_{1/2}$ has its physical

1318: origin

1319: in the fact that the longitudinal

1320: transition operator for the vertex $\gamma q\rightarrow q G$

1321: requires both a spin and angular momentum flip by one unit,

1322: while the angular momenta of quarks in the N and N(1440)P$_{11}

1323: \equiv $q$^3$G are equal to 0.

1324: This makes this result practically independent

1325: of relativistic effects.

1326: The predicted suppression of the longitudinal

1327: amplitude $S_{1/2}$

1328: strongly disagrees with the experimental results.

1329:                                                                                            

1330: In summary, for the first time the transverse and longitudinal helicity

1331: amplitudes of the  $\gamma^* p \rightarrow~$N(1440)P$_{11}$ transition

1332: are extracted from experimental data

1333: at high $Q^2$. The results are obtained from differential

1334: cross sections and longitudinally polarized

1335: beam asymmetries for $\pi^+$ electroproduction on protons

1336: at $W=1.15-1.69~$GeV \cite{Park}.

1337: The data were analyzed using two

1338: conceptually different approaches, DR and UIM,

1339: which give close results.

1340: 

1341: Comparison with quark model predictions provides strong 

1342: evidence in favor of

1343: N(1440)P$_{11}$ as a first radial excitation of the 3$q$ ground state. 

1344: 

1345: The results for the longitudinal helicity amplitude

1346: confirm our conclusion made from the 

1347: previous analysis of CLAS $\vec{e}p\rightarrow ep\pi^0,en\pi^+$

1348: data for  $Q^2< 1~$GeV$^2$ \cite{Azn04} that 

1349: the presentation of

1350: the Roper resonance as a q$^3$G hybrid state

1351: is ruled out.

1352: 

1353: This work was supported

1354: in part by the U.S. Department of Energy and the National

1355: Science Foundation, the Korea Research Foundation,

1356: the French Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique, and the

1357: Italian Instituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare.

1358: Jefferson Science Associates, LLC, operates Jefferson Lab

1359: under U.S. DOE contract DE-AC05-060R23177.

1360: 

1361: \begin{thebibliography}{999} 

1362: \bibitem{Capstick1} S. Capstick and B. D.

1363: Keister, Phys. Rev. D $\bf{51}$, 3598 (1995).

1364:                                                                                 

1365: \bibitem{Capstick2} S. Capstick and N. Isgur,

1366: Phys. Rev. D $\bf{34}$, 2809 (1986).

1367:                                                                                 

1368: \bibitem{Richard} J.-M. Richard,

1369: Phys. Rep. $\bf{212}$, 1 (1992).

1370:                                                                                 

1371: \bibitem{Glozman} L. Ya. Glozman and D. O. Riska,

1372: Phys. Rep. $\bf{268}$, 263 (1996).

1373: 

1374: \bibitem{Li1}   Z. P. Li,

1375: Phys. Rev. D $\bf{44}$, 2841 (1991).

1376:                                                                                 

1377: \bibitem{Li2}   Z. P. Li, V. Burkert, and Zh. Li,

1378: Phys. Rev. D $\bf{46}$, 70 (1992).

1379:                                                                                 

1380: \bibitem{Cano1}  F. Cano, P. Gonz\'alez,

1381: S. Noguera, and B. Desplanques, Nucl. Phys. A $\bf{603}$, 257 (1996).

1382:                                                                                 

1383: \bibitem{Cano2}  F. Cano and P. Gonz\'alez,

1384: Phys. Lett. B $\bf{431}$, 270 (1998).

1385: 

1386: \bibitem{Krewald}  O. Kreil, C. Hanhart, S. Krewald, and J. Speth,

1387: Phys. Rev. C $\bf{62}$, 025207 (2000).

1388: 

1389: \bibitem{Dillig}  M. Dillig and J. Schott,

1390: Phys. Rev. C $\bf{75}$, 067001 (2007).

1391: 

1392: \bibitem{Park} K. Park et al., CLAS Collaboration,

1393: Phys. Rev. C $\bf{77}$, 015208 (2008).

1394: 

1395: \bibitem{Azn0} I. G. Aznauryan,

1396: Phys. Rev. C $\bf{67}$, 015209 (2003).

1397: 

1398: \bibitem{Azn04} I. G. Aznauryan, V. D. Burkert, H. Egiyan,

1399: et al., Phys. Rev. C $\bf{71}$, 015201 (2005).

1400: 

1401: \bibitem{Azn065} I. G. Aznauryan, V. D. Burkert,

1402: et al., Phys. Rev. C $\bf{72}$, 045201 (2005).

1403: 

1404: \bibitem{Drechsel} D. Drechsel, O. Hanstein, S. Kamalov,  and L. Tiator,

1405: Nucl. Phys. A $\bf{645}$, 145 (1999).

1406: 

1407: \bibitem{GWU1} R. A. Arndt, W. J. Briscoe, I. I. Strakovsky,

1408: and R. L. Workman,

1409: Phys. Rev. C $\bf{69}$, 035213 (2004).

1410: 

1411: \bibitem{GWU2} R. A. Arndt, W. J. Briscoe, I. I. Strakovsky,

1412: and R. L. Workman,

1413: Phys. Rev. C $\bf{74}$, 045205 (2006).

1414: 

1415: \bibitem{GWU3} R. A. Arndt, W. J. Briscoe, I. I. Strakovsky,

1416: and R. L. Workman,

1417: Phys. Rev. C $\bf{66}$, 055213 (2002).

1418: 

1419: \bibitem{PDG} W.-M. Yao et al. [Particle Data Group],

1420: Journal of Physics G  $\bf{33}$, 1 (2006).

1421: 

1422: \bibitem{Frolov} V. V. Frolov et al., 

1423: Phys. Rev. Lett. $\bf{82}$, 45 

1424: (1999).

1425: 

1426: \bibitem{Joo1} K. Joo et al., 

1427: CLAS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. $\bf{88}$, 122001 

1428: (2002).

1429: 

1430: \bibitem{Ungaro} M. Ungaro et al., 

1431: CLAS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. $\bf{97}$, 112003 

1432: (2006).

1433: 

1434: \bibitem{Haidan} R. Haidan, PhD thesis, University of Hamburg,

1435: Hamburg, 1979. 

1436: 

1437: \bibitem{SQTM} V. D. Burkert et al.,

1438: Phys. Rev. C $\bf{67}$, 035204 (2003).

1439: 

1440: \bibitem{21} J. Arrington, W. Melnitchouk,

1441: and J. A. Tjon,  

1442: Phys. Rev. C $\bf{76}$, 035205 (2007).

1443: 

1444: \bibitem{22} W. K. Brooks et al., Nucl. Phys. A $\bf{755}$, 261 

1445: (2005).

1446: 

1447: \bibitem{23} C. J. Bebek et al., Phys. Rev. D $\bf{13}$, 25 (1976).

1448: 

1449: \bibitem{24} C. J. Bebek et al., Phys. Rev. D $\bf{17}$, 1693 (1978).

1450: 

1451: \bibitem{25} T. Horn  et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. $\bf{97}$, 192001 (2006).

1452: 

1453: \bibitem{26} V. Tadevosyan et al., Phys. Rev. C  $\bf{75}$, 055205 

1454: (2007).

1455: 

1456: \bibitem{27} R. Madey et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. $\bf{91}$, 122002 (2003).

1457: 

1458: \bibitem{28} V. Eletski and Ya. Kogan, Yad. Fiz. $\bf{39}$, 138 (1984).

1459: 

1460: \bibitem{29} I. Aznauryan and K. Oganessyan, Phys. Lett. B $\bf{249}$,

1461: 309 (1990).

1462: 

1463: \bibitem{Joo2} K. Joo et al., 

1464: CLAS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. C $\bf{68}$, 032201 

1465: (2003).

1466: 

1467: \bibitem{Joo3} K. Joo et al., 

1468: CLAS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. C $\bf{70}$, 042201 

1469: (2004).

1470: 

1471: \bibitem{Egiyan} H. Egiyan et al., 

1472: CLAS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. C $\bf{73}$, 025204 

1473: (2006).

1474: 

1475: \bibitem{Weber} H. J. Weber, Phys. Rev.

1476: C $\bf{41}$, 2783 (1990).

1477:                                                                                 

1478: \bibitem{Simula} F. Cardarelli, E. Pace, G. Salme, and S. Simula,

1479: Phys. Lett. B $\bf{397}$, 13 (1997).

1480:                                                                                 

1481: \bibitem{Riska} B. Juli\'a-D\'iaz,

1482: D. O. Riska, and F. Coester, Phys. Rev.

1483: C $\bf{69}$, 035212 (2004).

1484:          

1485:                                                                                

1486: \bibitem{Quark} I. G. Aznauryan, Phys. Rev.

1487: C $\bf{76}$, 025212 (2007).

1488:                                                                                 

1489: \end{thebibliography}

1490: \end{document}

1491: 

1492: