1: \documentclass[aps,preprint]{revtex4}
2: \bibliographystyle{apsrev}
3: \usepackage[dvipdfm]{graphicx,color}% Include figure files
4: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
5: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
6: \usepackage{amsmath,amsthm,amssymb}
7: \usepackage{spintorque}
8:
9: %\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{jsarticle}
10: %\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
11: %\usepackage{bm}
12: %\usepackage{spintorque}
13: %\usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
14: \begin{document}
15: \title{Current-induced domain wall motion in Rashba spin-orbit system}
16: \author{Katsunori Obata$^{1}$}
17: \author{Gen Tatara$^{1,2}$}
18: \affiliation{%
19: $^{1}$Department of Physics, Tokyo Metropolitan University,
20: Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan
21: \\
22: $^{2}$PRESTO, JST, 4-1-8 Honcho Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012, Japan
23: }
24:
25:
26: \date{\today}
27:
28: \pacs{72.25.-b, 72.25.Ba, 72.25.Dc}
29:
30: \begin{abstract}
31: Current-induced magnetic domain wall motion,
32: induced by transfer of spin transfer effect due to exchange interaction,
33: is expected to be useful for next generation high-density storages.
34: We here show that efficient domain wall manipulation can be achieved by introduction of Rashba spin-orbit interaction, which induces spin precession of conduction electron and acts as an effective magnetic field.
35: Its effect on domain wall motion depends on the wall configuration.
36: We found that the effect is significant for Bloch wall with the hard axis along the current, since the effective field works as $\beta$ or field-like term and removes the threshold current if in extrinsic pinning is absent.
37: For N\'eel wall and Bloch wall with easy axis perpendicular to Rashba plane, the effective field induces a step motion of wall corresponding to a rotation of wall plane by the angle of approximately $\pi$ at current lower than intrinsic threshold.
38: Rashba interaction would therefore be useful to assist efficient motion of domain walls at low current.
39:
40: \end{abstract}
41: \maketitle
42:
43: \section{Introduction}
44: In recent years, magnetic-memory devices like hard disk drives have been utilized for various products such as portable music players and home appliances.
45: With the diversification of the use of the devices, they deal with a much larger amount of information and need to be more miniaturized and have higher capacity.
46: However, it is believed that the conventional magnetic-memory devices will reach the limit of downsizing and high capacity in the near future.
47: The reason is because the magnetization so far is controlled by a magnetic field and the more miniaturized and the higher capacity they get, the higher necessary field they will need.
48: Therefore, a new method which replaces the magnetic field is required.
49: One of the methods expected is the control by electric current, i.e. current-induced magnetization reversal.
50: The current-induced magnetization reversal was pointed out by Berger~\cite{Berger78,Berger86,Berger96} and Slonczeski.~\cite{Slonczewski96}
51: The torque is caused by the $s$-$d$ exchange interaction via spin transfer effect arising from conservation of spin angular momentum between the current and the magnetization.
52:
53: To realize devices using the current-induced magnetization reversal, it is absolutely essential to reduce the current necessary.
54: In this paper, we demonstrate that the problem can be solved by introduction of Rashba spin-orbit interaction.~\cite{Rashba}
55: A spin precession induced by Rashba interaction is expected to affect the spin transfer torque mechanism, and to lead to efficient control of magnetization.
56: The interaction has been proposed on two-dimensional electron systems realized at the interface of semiconductors, but is now known to arise quite generally when inversion symmetry is broken.~\cite{Lashel96}
57: For instance, significant Rashba effect can arise on surface of heavy metals.~\cite{Nakagawa07,Ast07}
58: Our results therefore would apply to systems of magnetic semiconductors~\cite{yamano} with gate for Rashba interaction attached, or on magnetic metallic thin films with heavy ions doped.~\cite{Ast07}
59:
60: Recent theoretical studies revealed
61: that current-driven domain wall motion is significantly affected by spin relaxation process.
62: Actually, spin relaxation triggers a torque perpendicular to the adiabatic spin transfer torque~\cite{Zhang04,Thiaville05} and this torque, $\beta$ torque~\cite{Thiaville05}, acts as an effective force on domain wall, which deletes intrinsic pinning effects\cite{Thiaville05,TTKSNF06}.
63: Microscopic analysis of spin relaxation was done in the case of spin flip scattering by random impurity spins and value of $\beta$ was found to be of similar magnitude with (but not necessarily equal to) the spin relaxation contribution to Gilbert damping parameter $\alpha$ \cite{Tserkovnyak06,KTS06,KS07,Duine07}.
64: On the other hand, role of spin-orbit interaction, which also causes spin relaxation, on the wall dynamics has not been much studied so far.
65: Spin-orbit interaction in magnetic semiconductors was recently studied based on Kohn-Luttinger Hamiltonian, and large enhancement of wall velocity due to spin-orbit interaction was found~\cite{Nguyen07}.
66: The Rashba spin-orbit interaction we are going to study here turns out also to assist wall motion to a large extent.
67: In this paper, we study current-driven domain wall motion in the presence of Rashba interaction.
68: Rashba interaction acts on $x$-$y$ plane and electric current is applied along $x$ axis.
69: The spin system we consider is with easy and hard axes.
70: The wall is treated as planar and rigid, which is justified if easy axis energy gain, $K$, is larger than hard axis anisotropy energy, $K_\perp$\cite{begt2,TKSLK07,TKS08}.
71: We consider three cases where easy axis direction (we call $\eta$) is $x$, $y$ and $z$.
72: The wall structure in these three cases are N\'eel for $\eta=x$ and Bloch wall for $\eta=y, z$.
73: We will see that dynamics of N\'eel wall and Bloch wall with $\eta=z$ (called Bloch(z)) are essentially the same, while Bloch with $\eta=y$ (Bloch(y)) is different.
74: The effect of current is calculated for each anisotropy configuration using gauge transformation in spin space, assuming adiabatic limit.
75: The Rashba interaction is treated perturbatively to the second order.
76: Expansion with respect to Rashba interaction is justified here since electron has large spin polarization $\Delta$.
77: (This is in contrast to the spin Hall case without polarization, where perturbative treatment is not allowed~\cite{Inoue}.)
78: Below, we derive the effective Hamiltonian for local spin, derive the equation of motion for domain wall, and then discuss wall dynamics solving the equation.
79:
80:
81:
82: \section{Model and method}
83: \subsection{Local spin}
84: Domain wall is described by a Lagrangian of local spins given by
85: \eq{
86: L_s = \inthra \hbar S \lc{\cos{\theta}-1} - H_s \label{eq:ls2},
87: }
88: where local spin direction is expressed by polar coordinates ($\theta , \phi$).
89: The first term describes time evolution of local spin (spin Berry phase term).
90: The Hamiltonian of local spin we consider is given as follows;
91: \eq{
92: H_s = \inthra \lc{\frac{J}{2} (\nabla S)^2 -\frac{K}{2} (S_{\|})^2 + \frac{K_{\bot}}{2} (S_{\bot})^2}.
93: \label{eq:hs1}
94: }
95: The first term is ferromagnetic exchange interaction between local spins, the second and third terms are magnetic anisotropy energies.
96: $S_{\|}$ is the easy axis component of spin and $K(>0)$ is the corresponding anisotropic energy, and
97: $S_{\bot}$ and $K_{\bot}$ are hard axis ones.
98:
99:
100: In the absence of Rashba interaction, we can choose space coordinate and spin coordinate independently.
101: When Rashba spin-orbit interaction is switched, spin and space coordinates correlate each other,
102: and the spin torque and gauge field depend on the choice of magnetic easy axis, which we call $\eta$ axis.
103: We consider three different cases with easy axis $\eta = x,y$ and $z$.
104: Domain wall structure then becomes N\'eel and Bloch walls.
105: We will call domain wall configuration with the easy axis label, such as Bloch(z) for a Bloch wall with $\eta =z$
106: (see Table. \ref{dwhard}).
107: \begin{table}[h]
108: \centering
109: \begin{tabular}{lcc} \hline \hline
110: & \hspace{0.05 \linewidth} Easy ($\eta$) axis ($K$) \hspace{0.05 \linewidth} & Hard axis ($K_{\bot}$) \hspace{0.05 \linewidth} \\ \hline
111: Bloch(z) & z & y \\ \hline
112: Neel(x) & x & z \\ \hline
113: Bloch(y) & y & x \\ \hline \hline
114: \end{tabular}
115: \caption{
116: Configuration of magnetic anisotropy and corresponding domain wall structure.}
117: \label{dwhard}
118: \end{table}%
119:
120: In this paper Rashba interaction acts within $xy$-plane and current is applied always along $x$.
121: Instead, our definition of polar angle in spin space
122: depends on the wall configuration.
123: We define $\theta$ as the angle measured from the easy axis (i.e., $S_{\parallel} = \cos{\theta}$), and
124: $\phi$ as the angle in the plane perpendicular to easy axis.
125: The hard axis is given by $\phi = \frac{\pi}{2}$
126: and so the hard axis component is written as
127: $S_{\bot} = \sin{\theta} \sin{\phi}$.
128: Note therefore that ($\theta , \phi$) for N\'eel and Bloch(y) walls below
129: are different from standard definition measured from $z$-axis.
130: Lagrangian $L_s$ is thus written in terms of polar angle as
131: \eq{
132: L_s = \inthra \bi{\hbar S \dot{\phi} \lc{\cos{\phi}-1}
133: - \frac{J}{2} \lc{(\na \theta)^2 + \sin^2{\theta} (\na \phi)^2}
134: - \frac{K S^2}{2} \sin^2{\theta} - \frac{K_{\bot} S^2}{2} \sin^2{\theta} \sin^2{\phi}}, \label{eq:ls1}
135: }
136: for any type of walls considered here.
137:
138:
139:
140:
141:
142: %\paragraph{electron}
143: \subsection{Conduction electron}
144: The Hamiltonian of the conduction electron is given by the following four terms.
145: The first term is the free electron part, represented as
146: \eq{H_{\rm{e}} =\inthr \cxd \bi{ -\frac{\hbar^2}{2 m} \nabla^2 -\Ef} \cx , \label{freepart}}
147: where $c$ and $c^\dagger$ are electron annihilation and creation operators,
148: $\Ef$ is the Fermi energy and $m$ is the effective mass.
149: The second is the exchange interaction between electron and local spin,
150: \eq{
151: H_{\rm{ex}} = - \frac{\Delta}{S} \inthr \bm{S}\cdot \lc{\cxd \vet{\sigma} \cx} \label{eq:hex1},
152: }
153: where $\Delta$ is the magnitude of the interaction, $\vet{S}$ is the local spin vector and
154: $\vet{\sigma}$ are Pauli matrices.
155: The third one, Rashba spin-orbit interaction,
156: is given as
157: \eq{
158: H_{\rm{so}} = \frac{i \la}{2}
159: \inthr \cxd \bi{ (\overleftrightarrow{\nabla}_{x} \pax{y} - \overleftrightarrow{\nabla}_{y} \pax{x} )} \cx ,
160: \label{rashbapart}}
161: where $\overleftrightarrow{\nabla}$ acts on both sides and $\la$ is the magnitude of Rashba interaction (the dimensions is [J $\cdot$ m]).
162: When electric field is applied in the $x$-direction, the momentum, $-i \hbar \ave{\cxd \nax{x} \cx}$, grows,
163: and Rashba interaction then changes the electron spin direction toward $y$-direction, inducing electron spin precession.
164:
165:
166:
167: Since we are interested in a response of local spins to applied current,
168: we introduce the interaction with electric field, given by
169: (neglecting $O(E^2)$)
170: \eq{
171: H_{\rm{EM}} = -e \inthr \bm{A}_{\rm{EM}} \cdot
172: \lc{\cxd \vet{v} \cx},
173: }
174: where $\bm{A}_{\rm{EM}} = \frac{\bm{E}}{i \Omega} e^{i \Omega t} $ is a $U(1)$ gauge field,
175: $\bm{E}$ is applied electric field.
176: Velocity operator is given as
177: \eq{
178: v_{\nu} = \frac{- i \hbar \nax{\nu}}{m} +\frac{\la}{\hbar} \lc{\dek{\nu}{y} \pax{x} - \dek{\nu}{x} \pax{y}}.
179: }
180: The field $\bm{E}$ is spatially uniform but has finite frequency $\Omega$.
181: This frequency is introduced for calculation purpose and is chosen as $\Omega=0$ at the end of calculation, as is usually the case of linear response calculation.
182:
183:
184: \subsection{Gauge transformation}
185: The exchange interaction, $H_{\rm{ex}}$, has in general off-diagonal components.
186: Besides the local ground state of conduction electron varies at each lattice point if magnetization is non-uniform.
187: In this case, local gauge transformation in spin space~\cite{korenman,gt2} which diagonalizes the exchange interaction is useful.
188: The spatial change of local spin is then represented by a gauge field,
189: which is proportional to spatial spin variation, $\partial_{\mu} \vet{S}$.
190: We consider the case when local spin profile is slowly varying
191: (called the adiabatic limit), and then gauge field is small.
192: We thus examine only the first-order contribution of gauge field.
193: A new electron operator ,$a$, after gauge transformation is defined by use of $2 \times 2$ unitary matrix $U$
194: as
195: \eq{
196: \cx = U(x) \ax \label{eq:sp021},
197: }
198: where electron operators here have two spin components like $c\equiv(c_+,c_-)$.
199: The matrix $U$ is expressed using Pauli matrix as
200: \eq{
201: U(x) = \vet{m}(x) \cdot \vet{\sigma} \label{eq:sp02},
202: }
203: where $\vet{m}(x)$ is a vector which characterize the gauge transformation.
204: We denote the spin easy axis as $\eta$ (e.g., $\eta=x$ for N\'eel wall).
205: The gauge transformation is defined so that conduction electron spins are polarized along magnetic easy axis $\eta$,
206: i.e. to satisfy
207: $\frac{\vet{S}(x)}{S} \cdot \lc{\cxd \vet{\sigma} \cx} = \axd \pax{\eta} \ax$.
208: (The transformation thus differs for different wall configuration.)
209: The Hamiltonian given by Eqs. (\ref{freepart})(\ref{eq:hex1})(\ref{rashbapart})
210: is written in $a$-electron representation as
211: \eq{\notag
212: H_{\rm e}+H_{\rm ex}+H_{\rm so}
213: = & \int d^3x \Bigg[
214: \axdn \bi{- \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \nabla^2 - \Delta \pax{\eta} -i \la (\pax{y} \nax{x} - \pax{x} \nax{y})
215: } a
216: \ka
217: & - \frac{i \hbar^2}{m} \sgax{\mu}{\al} \axdn \pax{\al} \nax{\mu} a + \la (\sgax{x}{y} - \sgax{y}{x}) \axdn a \\
218: & + 2i \la \bi{m^{y} m^{\be} \axdn \pax{\be} \nax{x} a - m^{x} m^{\be} \axdn \pax{\be} \nax{y} a} \Bigg] .}
219: where gauge field is given as
220: \eq{
221: A_{\mu} \equiv -i U^{\dagger}\nabla_{\mu}U = \lc{\bm{m} \times \de{\mu} \bm{m}} \cdot \bm{\sigma} \equiv A_{\mu}^{\alpha} {\sigma}^{\alpha}. \label{eq:gaze2}
222: }
223: The electromagnetic interaction after gauge transformation is given as
224: \eq{
225: H_{EM} = \int d^3x
226: \frac{- e E_x}{i \Omega} a^\dagger \bi{
227: \frac{-i\hbar \nabla_{x}}{m} +\frac{\hbar}{m} A_{x}
228: -\frac{\la}{\hbar} \overline{\pax{y}}} a,
229: }
230: where $\overline{\pax{\mu}} \equiv U^{\dagger} \pax{\mu} U = 2 m^{\mu} \lc{\bm{m} \cdot \vet{\sigma}} - \pax{\mu}$ and
231: the electric field is applied in $x$-direction.
232:
233: The total electron Hamiltonian is therefore obtained as
234: \eq{H = & \int d^3x
235: \Bigg[\notag
236: \axdn \bi{- \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \nabla^2 - \Delta \pax{\eta} -i \la (\pax{y} \nax{x} - \pax{x} \nax{y})
237: + \frac{e E_x}{\Omega} \lc{\frac{\hbar \nax{x}}{m} - \frac{\la}{i \hbar} \pax{y}}} a \ka
238: &- \frac{i \hbar^2}{m} \sgax{\mu}{\al} \axdn \pax{\al} \nax{\mu} a + \la (\sgax{x}{y} - \sgax{y}{x}) \axdn a
239: + 2i \la \bi{m^{y} m^{\be} \axdn \pax{\be} \nax{x} a - m^{x} m^{\be} \axdn \pax{\be} \nax{y} a} \\
240: & - \frac{e E_{x}}{i \Omega} \axdn \bi{\frac{\hbar}{m} \sgax{x}{\al} \pax{\al} - \frac{2 \la}{\hbar} m^{y} \lc{\vet{m} \cdot \vet{\sigma}} } a
241: \Bigg] \label{eq:ron24}.
242: }
243:
244:
245: \subsection{Effective Hamiltonian}
246:
247: The current-induced part of the effective Hamiltonian for local spin is directly obtained from Eq. (\ref{eq:ron24}) as
248: \eq{
249: H_{\rm{eff}} =& \inthr \Bigg[ \hbar \sgax{\mu}{\al} \js{\mu}{\al} + \la n (\sgax{x}{y} - \sgax{y}{x})
250: - \frac{2m}{\hbar} \la \bi{m^{y} m^{\be} \js{x}{\be} - m^{x} m^{\be} \js{y}{\be}}
251: - \frac{e E_{x}}{i \Omega} \bi{\frac{\hbar}{m} \sgax{x}{\al} s^{\al} - \frac{2 \la}{\hbar} m^{y} m^{\al} s^{\al} }
252: \Bigg].\label{eq:heff35}
253: }
254: where electron properties are represented by the following expectation values,
255: \eq{
256: n (x) &\equiv \ave{\axd \ax}, \label{eq:nsj01} \\
257: \spx{\al} (x) &\equiv \ave{\axd \pax{\al} \ax}, \label{eq:nsj02}\\
258: \js{\mu}{\al} (x) &\equiv - \frac{i \hbar}{2 m} \ave{\axd \overleftrightarrow{\nabla}_{\mu} \pax{\al} \ax \label{eq:nsj03} }.
259: }
260: Here $\left\langle \ \right\rangle$ denotes expectation value evaluated using non-perturbed Hamiltonian $H_a$ defined as
261: \eq{
262: H_a \equiv & \int d^3x
263: \axd \bi{- \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \nabla^2 - \Delta \pax{\eta} -i \la (\pax{y} \nax{x} - \pax{x} \nax{y})
264: } \ax , \label{Hadef}
265: }
266: and including to linear order the effect of current,
267: \eq{
268: H_{\rm EM}^0 \equiv & \int d^3x
269: \axd \bi{\frac{e E_x}{\Omega} \lc{\frac{\hbar \nax{x}}{m} - \frac{\la}{i \hbar} \pax{y}}} \ax .
270: }
271:
272: Current-induced part of the effective Lagrangian is given by
273: \eq{
274: L_{{eff}} = \inthr \bi{\hbar \sgax{t}{\al} s^{\al}} - H_{{eff}}.
275: }
276:
277: In calculating the expectation values,
278: Rashba spin-orbit interaction is treated perturbatively to the second-order, $\la^2$.
279: This approximation correspond to assuming $\frac{\la k_f}{\Ef} \ll 1$ with Fermi wave vector $k_F$.
280: This expansion with respect to $\la$ is justified by the presence of $\Delta$, in contrast to the non-perturbative nature of unpolarized Rashba system\cite{Inoue}.
281: We also assume that the effect of impurities is weak and the electron lifetime is long, i.e. $\frac{1}{\Ef \tau} \ll 1$.
282: In this case, the term in Eq. (\ref{eq:heff35}) including electric field turns out to be small by a factor of $\frac{1}{\Ef \tau}$ compared with dominant contributions.
283: We will thus evaluate the effective Hamiltonian given by
284: \eq{
285: H_{\rm {eff}} =
286: \inthr \Big[ \hbar \sgax{\mu}{\al} \js{\mu}{\al} + \la n (\sgax{x}{y} - \sgax{y}{x})
287: - \frac{2m}{\hbar} \la \bi{m^{y} m^{\be} \js{x}{\be} - m^{x} m^{\be} \js{y}{\be}}
288: \Big].\label{eq:hs41}%\label{eq:heff35}
289: }
290:
291:
292:
293:
294:
295:
296: \section{Bloch(z) case}
297: In this section, we derive the effective Hamiltonian for the anisotropy configuration of Bloch(z) type, namely,
298: magnetic easy axis is in the $z$-direction and hard axis is in the $y$-direction.
299: %
300: \begin{figure}[h]
301: \begin{minipage}{0.45\textwidth}
302: \centering
303: \includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{blochz.eps}
304: \caption{Bloch(z) wall configuration with easy axis along $z$ direction and hard axis along $y$ axis.
305: The spin of incoming electron is schematically shown. }
306: \label{fig:bdwz}
307: %\end{figure}
308: \end{minipage}
309: %\begin{figure}[h]
310: \hfill
311: \begin{minipage}{0.45\textwidth}
312: \centering
313: \includegraphics[width=4cm,clip]{spinz.eps}
314: \caption{Polar coordinates of local spin in the Bloch(z) case.}
315: \label{fig:spz}
316: \end{minipage}
317: \end{figure}%
318: In this case, domain wall configuration is Bloch(z) wall shown in Fig. \ref{fig:bdwz}.
319: Polar coordinates are defined by (as in Fig. \ref{fig:spz})
320: \begin{align} \vet{S}(x,t)=S(\sin{\theta}\cos{\phi}, \sin{\theta}\sin{\phi}, \cos{\theta}) .\end{align}
321:
322:
323: In the case of Bloch(z)-type anisotropy, the gauge transformation is defined by
324: $\vet{S} (\uxdn \vet{\sigma} U) =S \pax{z}$.
325: This is satisfied by choosing
326: \eq{
327: \vet{m} = (\sin{\frac{\theta}{2}}\sin{\phi} ,\cos{\frac{\theta}{2}} ,\sin{\frac{\theta}{2}}\cos{\phi} ).
328: }
329: Gauge field is then given as
330: \begin{align}
331: A_{\mu}=\begin{pmatrix} \sgax{\mu}{x} \\ \sgax{\mu}{y} \\ \sgax{\mu}{z}
332: \end{pmatrix} =
333: \frac{1}{2} \begin{pmatrix} -\partial_{\mu}\theta \sin{\phi} - \sin{\theta} \cos{\phi} \partial_{\mu}\phi \\
334: \partial_{\mu}\theta\cos{\phi}-\sin{\theta}\sin{\phi}\partial_{\mu}\phi \\
335: \big(1-\cos{\theta}\big) \partial_{\mu} \phi \end{pmatrix}.
336: \end{align}
337: The unperturbed Hamiltonian, given by choosing $\eta=z$ in Eq. (\ref{Hadef}), reads
338: \eq{
339: H_a = & \inthr \axd \bi{-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \nabla^2 - \Delta \pax{z} -i \la (\pax{y} \nax{x} - \pax{x} \nax{y})} \ax .
340: \label{eq:haz1}
341: }
342: This Hamiltonian $H_a$ has the off-diagonal elements in the spin space due to Rashba interaction,
343: and so we will diagonalize it using a unitary transformation in momentum space,
344: $\akd = d_{k}^{\dagger} T_k^{\dagger}$,
345: where $d_{k}^{\dagger}$ is a new creation operator and
346: $T_k$ is $2 \times 2$ unitary matrix.
347: The Hamiltonian $H_a$ in momentum space reads
348: \begin{align}
349: H_a = \sum_{k} d_{k}^{\dagger} T_k^{\dagger} \left( \begin{matrix} \Ek -\Delta & -i \la k_{-} \\ i \la k_{+} & \Ek - \Delta \end{matrix} \right) T_k d_k ,\label{eq:haz2}
350: \end{align}
351: where $k_{\pm} \equiv k_x \pm i k_y$.
352: Diagonalization of $H_a$ is done by chosen the unitary matrix $T_k$ as,
353: \begin{align}
354: T_k \equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{A_k^2+\la^2 k^2}} \left( \begin{matrix} A_k & i \la k_{-} \\ -i \la k_{+} & -A_k \end{matrix} \right) ,
355: \end{align}
356: where $A_k = \Delta + Z_k, Z_k = \sqrt{\Delta^2+\la^2 k^2}$.
357: The result is
358: \begin{align}
359: H_a = \sum_{k} d_k^{\dagger} \left( \begin{matrix} \Ek - Z_k & 0 \\ 0 & \Ek + Z_k \end{matrix} \right) d_k \label{eq:mha65}.
360: \end{align}
361: After diagonalization, the energy of conduction electrons is spin split as
362: \eq{\E_{k,\sigma} = \frac{\hbar k^2}{2 m} - \Ef - \sigma Z(k), \label{eq:ekz}}
363: where $\sigma = (+,-)$ is spin polarization.
364:
365: Now, let us estimate expectation values.
366: The electron density $n$ (Fig. \ref{figdiag}) is given as
367: \eq{\notag
368: n =& - \sum_{k,\ome} i \tr{\ti{G}_{k,\w}}^{<} \ka %\label{eq:nd1} \ka %\label{eq:note}
369: & + \lio \sum_{k,\ome} \frac{e E_x}{ \Omega} \frac{\hbar^2 k_x}{m} \trles{\ti{G}_{k,\w} \ti{G}_{k,\Ome}} \\ %\label{eq:nd2} \ka
370: & + \lio \sum_{k,\ome} \frac{e E_x}{ \Omega} \la \trles{\ti{G}_{k,\w} \tpax{y} \ti{G}_{k,\Ome}}, \label{eq:nd3}
371: }
372: where tr is a trace in spin space and
373: $\tpax{\al}\equiv T_k^{\dagger} \pax{\al} T_k$.
374: \begin{figure}[htb]
375: \centering
376: \includegraphics[width=0.7\linewidth,clip]{diag.eps}
377: \caption{Diagramatic representation of electron density ($n$), spin density ($s^\alpha$) and spin current ($j_{{\rm s},i}^\alpha$) at the linear order in the applied electric field, $\bm{E}$.
378: Solid line represents electron Green function with Rashba interaction included.
379: Vertex denoted by $\times$ is $1$, $\sigma^\alpha$ and $k_i\sigma^\alpha$, for $n$, $s^\alpha$ and $j_{{\rm s},i}^\alpha$, respectively.
380: }
381: \label{figdiag}
382: \end{figure}%
383: Keldysh Green function~\cite{keld,smith} with Rashba interaction included, $\ti{G}_{k,\w}^{<}$, is
384: defined as
385: \begin{align}
386: \notag
387: \ti{G}_{k,\w}^{<} \equiv & i \ave{d_{k,\ome}^{\dagger} d_{k,\ome}} \\
388: = & \begin{pmatrix} g_{k,\w,\up}^{<} & 0 \\
389: 0 & \ti{g}_{k,\w,\dw}^{<}
390: \end{pmatrix},
391: \end{align}
392: where component $\tgwl{k,\ome}{\sigma}$ is given as
393: \eq{
394: \tgwl{\ome}{\sigma} = 2 \pi i f( \ome ) \dex{\hbar \ome}{\E_{k,\sigma}},
395: }
396: $f( \ome )\equiv \frac{1}{e^{\beta\omega}+1}$ being Fermi distribution function ($\beta$ is inverse temperature).
397: Summation over $k$ is carried out in two-dimensions by replacing by energy integration,
398: $\sum_{k} = \frac{V m}{2 \pi \hbar^2} \int d\E$.
399: Products of Keldysh Green functions is calculated using relations
400: \eq{
401: \ti{G}_{k,\w}^{<} \equiv f( \w ) \bi{\ti{G}_{k,\w}^{a} - \ti{G}_{k,\w}^{r}} ,
402: }
403: where $\ti{G}_{k,\w}^{r}$ ($\ti{G}_{k,\w}^{a}$)
404: is retarded (advanced) Green function,
405: and
406: \eq{\notag
407: \lesbi{G_{k,\w} G_{k',\Ome}} =& G_{k,\ome}^{r} {G}_{k',\Ome}^{<} + G_{k,\ome}^{<} {G}_{k',\Ome}^{a} \\
408: =& G_{k,\ome}^{r} {G}_{k',\Ome}^{a} \lc{f( \Ome ) - f( \w )} - G_{k,\ome}^{r} {G}_{k',\Ome}^{r} + G_{k,\ome}^{a} {G}_{k',\Ome}^{a}
409: .}
410: Expanding with respect to $\la$ to the second order, we obtain the density as
411: \eq{
412: n = \frac{m}{\pi \hbar^2} \Ef + \frac{m^2 \la^2}{\pi \hbar^4}.
413: }
414: We see that there is no effect from the applied electric field here.
415:
416: The electron spin density $s^{\g}$ is similarly calculated as
417: \eq{\notag
418: s^{\g} =& - \sum_{k,\ome} i \trles{\tpax{\g} \ti{G}_{k,\w}} \ka %\label{eq:spin1} \\
419: & + \lio \sum_{k,\ome} \frac{e E_x \hbar^2 k_x}{ \Omega m} \trles{\tpax{\g} \ti{G}_{k,\w} \ti{G}_{k,\Ome}} \\ %\label{eq:spin2} \\
420: & + \lio \sum_{k,\ome} \frac{e E_x \la}{\Omega} \trles{\tpax{\g} \ti{G}_{k,\w} \tpax{y} \ti{G}_{k,\Ome}}. \label{eq:spin3}
421: }
422: The result is
423: \eq{
424: s^x =& - \frac{m e E_x \la}{2 \pi \hbar^2 \Delta} \nonumber\\
425: s^y =& \frac{m e E_x \tau \la}{\pi \hbar^2} \nonumber\\
426: s^z =& \frac{m \Delta}{\pi \hbar^2} \label{eq:spz3}.
427: }
428: We see that the electric field induces perpendicular components $s^x$ and $s^y$, but $\abs{s^y} \gg \abs{s^x}$ since $\frac{1}{\Delta \tau} \ll 1$.
429: We will thus approximate $\abs{s^x}\simeq0$.
430: The $z$-component of spin in Eq. (\ref{eq:spz3}) is the adiabatic contribution, which is not affected by applied field.
431:
432: Spin current, $\js{\mu}{\al}$, is estimated using
433: \eq{\notag
434: i \ave{\akd k_{\mu} \pax{\al} \ak} =& \sum_{k,\ome} k_{\mu} \trles{\tpax{\al} \ti{G}_{k,\w}} \ka
435: & - \lio \sum_{k,\ome} k_\mu \frac{e E_x \hbar^2 k_x}{i \Omega m} \trles{\tpax{\al} \ti{G}_{k,\w} \ti{G}_{k,\Ome}} \\
436: & - \lio \sum_{k,\ome} k_\mu \frac{e E_x \la}{i \Omega} \trles{\tpax{\al} \ti{G}_{k,\w} \tpax{y} \ti{G}_{k,\Ome}}, \label{eq:spcr3}
437: }
438: as
439: \eq{
440: \js{y}{x} =& \frac{m}{\pi \hbar^3} \la \Ef \nonumber \\
441: \js{x}{y} =& -\frac{m}{\pi \hbar^3} \la \Ef \nonumber \\
442: \js{x}{z} =& - \frac{e E_x \tau}{\pi \hbar} \bi{\Delta - \frac{m \la^2}{2 \Delta \hbar^2} \Ef}.
443: }
444: We see that spin current are generated in $x$ and $y$ direction by the Rashba interaction without electric field and that
445: $\js{y}{x}$ is equal to $- \js{x}{y}$.
446: This is due to the symmetry of Rashba spin orbit interaction.
447: In contrast, $\js{x}{z}$ is induced by applied electric field.
448: We define the current density (divided by $e$) and electron density without spin-orbit interaction as
449: ($\sigma$ is Boltzmann conductivity)
450: \eq{
451: J \equiv - \frac{e E_x \tau \Ef}{\pi \hbar} = \frac{\sigma}{e} E_x\label{eq:cr0},
452: }
453: and
454: \eq{
455: n_0 \equiv \frac{\Ef m}{\pi \hbar^2} \label{eq:nd0} .
456: }
457: In term of these parameters,
458: the above result reads
459: \begin{align}
460: n =& n_0 \bi{1 + \frac{m \la^2}{2 \hbar^2 \Ef}} \nonumber \\
461: \lc{s^x, s^y, s^z} =& \lc{ 0, - \frac{m \la}{\hbar \Ef} J, n_0 \frac{\Delta}{\Ef}}\nonumber \\
462: \lc{\js{x}{y}, \js{x}{z}, \js{y}{x}} =& \lc{- \frac{\la}{\hbar} n_0 , \bi{\frac{\Delta}{\Ef} - \frac{m \la^2}{2 \Delta \hbar^2}} J, \frac{\la}{\hbar} n_0}. \label{eq:js44}
463: \end{align}
464: Other components of spin current vanish.
465:
466: The effective Hamiltonian for Bloch(z) case is therefore obtained from Eq. (\ref{eq:hs41}) as
467: \eq{\notag
468: H_{\rm {eff}} =& \inthr \Bigg[ \frac{\hbar}{2} \lc{1- \cos{\theta}} \lc{\de{x}\phi} \js{x}{z} \\
469: &-\frac{\la m}{\hbar} \bi{\js{x}{z} \sin{\theta} \sin{\phi} + \lc{1- \cos{\theta}} \lc{\js{x}{y} - \sin{\phi} \js{y}{x} } } \Bigg] \label{eq:ey128}.
470: }
471: We see that applied current induces
472: $\js{x}{z}$ (Eq. (\ref{eq:js44})) and this induces when coupled with Rashba interaction an effective magnetic field in $y$-direction as indicated by
473: the second term.
474: The first term of Eq. (\ref{eq:ey128}) represents standard spin transfer torque (with current modified by Rashba interaction).
475: The third term is independent of applied current and is a modification of magnetic anisotropy by Rashba interaction.
476:
477:
478:
479:
480: \section{N\'eel(x) case}
481: \begin{figure}[h]
482: \begin{minipage}{0.45\textwidth}
483: \centering
484: \includegraphics[width=7cm,clip]{neelx.eps}
485: \caption{N\'eel(x) wall configuration.}
486: \label{fig:dwx1}
487: %\end{figure}
488: \end{minipage}
489: %\begin{figure}[h]
490: \hfill
491: \begin{minipage}{0.45\textwidth}
492: \centering
493: \includegraphics[width=4cm,clip]{spinx.eps}
494: \caption{Definition of polar coordinates for N\'eel(x) case.}
495: \label{fig:spx}
496: \end{minipage}
497: \end{figure}%
498: In this section, we consider a case of N\'eel wall
499: realized when magnetic easy axis and hard axis are in the $x$ and $z$ direction, respectively (Fig. \ref{fig:dwx1}).
500: Polar coordinates are defined differently from standard definition as (Fig. \ref{fig:spx})
501: \eq{
502: \vet{S} = S (\cos{\theta} ,\sin{\theta}\cos{\phi} ,\sin{\theta}\sin{\phi}). \label{eq:s62}
503: }
504:
505: Derivation of effective Hamiltonian is done similarly to Bloch(z) case.
506: Difference is in definition of gauge transformation,
507: $\vet{S} (U^{\dagger} \vet{\sigma} U) =S \pax{x}$.
508: Vector $\vet{m}$ is accordingly chosen as
509: \eq{
510: \vet{m} = (\cos{\frac{\theta}{2}} ,\sin{\frac{\theta}{2}}\cos{\phi} ,\sin{\frac{\theta}{2}}\sin{\phi}),
511: }
512: and $\sgax{\mu}{\al}$ is given as
513: \begin{align}
514: A_{\mu}=
515: \frac{1}{2}\left( \begin{matrix}
516: (1-\cos{\theta}) \de{\mu}\phi \\
517: -\sin{\phi} \de{\mu}\theta - \sin{\theta} \cos{\phi} \de{\mu} \phi \\
518: \de{\mu}\theta \cos{\phi} - \sin{\theta} \sin{\phi} \de{\mu}\phi
519: \end{matrix} \right) .
520: \end{align}
521: Hamiltonian $H_a$ is also different from Bloch(z) case since uniform spin polarization is now along $x$-direction.
522: It is given as
523: \begin{align}
524: H_a = \sum_k
525: \akd \left( \begin{matrix} \Ek & -b_- \\ -b_+ & \Ek \end{matrix} \right) \ak ,
526: \label{eq:hax132}
527: \end{align}
528: where $b_{\pm} \equiv (\Delta \mp i \la k_{\pm})$.
529: The diagonalization of $H_a$ is carried out as $\akd = \dkd T_k^{\dagger}$ where
530: \begin{align}
531: T \equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}Z_k} \left(\begin{matrix} Z_k & b_- \\ b_+ & -Z_k \end{matrix}\right) ,
532: \end{align}
533: where
534: \eq{
535: Z_k = \sqrt{\Delta^2 + 2 \la \Delta k_y + \la^2 k^2} .
536: }
537: The Hamiltonian after diagonalization reads
538: \begin{align}
539: H_a = \sum_{k} \dkd \left( \begin{matrix} \Ek - Z_k & 0 \\ 0 & \Ek + Z_k \end{matrix} \right) \dk \label{eq:hax1}.
540: \end{align}
541: The expectation values are calculated similarly to Bloch(z) case and we obtain
542: \eq{
543: n =& n_0\\
544: \lc{s^x, s^y} =& \lc{n_0 \bi{\frac{\Delta}{\Ef} - \frac{\la^2}{2 \Delta}},
545: - \frac{m \la}{\Ef \hbar} J} \\
546: \lc{\js{x}{x} ,\js{x}{y} ,\js{y}{x} } =& \lc{\frac{\Delta}{\Ef} J,
547: - \frac{\la}{\hbar} n_0,
548: \frac{\la}{\hbar} n_0 },
549: }
550: where other components of spin and spin current vanish.
551:
552: The current-induced effective Hamiltonian is then obtained as
553: \eq{\notag
554: H_{\rm eff} =& \inthr \frac{\hbar}{2} \lc{1-\cos{\theta}} \lc{\de{x} \phi} \js{x}{x} \\ %\label{eq:he194}\\
555: & -\frac{m}{\hbar} \la \bi{\js{x}{x} \sin{\theta} \cos{\phi} +\lc{1-\cos{\theta}} \lc{\js{x}{y} \cos^2{\phi} - \js{y}{x}} \label{eq:he195}} .
556: }
557: The applied current coupled with spin-orbit interaction induces an effective magnetic field
558: along hard, i.e., $y$ axis
559: (second term of Eq. (\ref{eq:he195})), as in the Bloch(z) case.
560:
561:
562: %\input{blochy}
563: \section{Bloch(y) case}
564: \begin{figure}[h]
565: \begin{minipage}{0.45\textwidth}
566: \centering
567: \includegraphics[width=7cm,clip]{blochy.eps}
568: \caption{Bloch(y) wall configuration.}
569: \label{fig:dwy1}
570: %\end{figure}
571: \end{minipage}
572: %\begin{figure}[h]
573: \hfill
574: \begin{minipage}{0.45\textwidth}
575: \centering
576: \includegraphics[width=4cm,clip]{spiny.eps}\\
577: \caption{Polar coordinates for Bloch(y) configuration. }
578: \label{fig:spy}
579: \end{minipage}
580: \end{figure}%
581: Finally, we consider a case of
582: magnetic easy axis and hard axis along $y$ and $x$ direction, respectively.
583: Domain wall in this case is Bloch(y) wall (Fig. \ref{fig:dwy1}).
584: Polar coordinates are define as (Fig. \ref{fig:spy})
585: \eq{
586: \vet{S} = S (\sin{\theta}\sin{\phi} , \cos{\theta} , \sin{\theta} \cos{\phi}).
587: }
588: Gauge transformation is given by
589: $\vet{S} (U^\dagger \vet{\sigma} U) =S \pax{y}$,
590: and vector $\vet{m}$ consequently becomes
591: \eq{
592: \vet{m} = (\sin{\frac{\theta}{2}}\sin{\phi} ,\cos{\frac{\theta}{2}} ,\sin{\frac{\theta}{2}}\cos{\phi} ),
593: }
594: and gauge field is
595: \begin{align}
596: A_{\mu}=
597: \frac{1}{2}\left( \begin{matrix}
598: \de{\mu}\theta \cos{\phi} - \sin{\theta} \sin{\phi} \de{\mu}\phi \\
599: (1-\cos{\theta}) \de{\mu}\phi \\
600: -\sin{\phi} \de{\mu}\theta - \sin{\theta} \cos{\phi} \de{\mu} \phi \\
601: \end{matrix} \right) .
602: \end{align}
603: Hamiltonian $H_a$ is given as
604: \begin{align}
605: H_a = \sum_{k} \akd
606: \left(\begin{matrix} \Ek & -i b_- \\ -i b_+ & \Ek \end{matrix} \right) \ak ,
607: \end{align}
608: where $b_{\pm} = (\Delta \mp \la k_{\pm})$ (is different from the N\'eel case).
609: Hamiltonian $H_a$ is diagonalized as
610: \begin{align}
611: H_a = \sum_{k} \dkd \left( \begin{matrix} \Ek - Z_k & 0 \\ 0 & \Ek + Z_k \end{matrix} \right) \dk \label{eq:hay01},
612: \end{align}
613: by defining
614: $\akd = d^{\dagger} T_k^{\dagger}$
615: with
616: \begin{align}
617: T \equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}Z_k} \left( \begin{matrix} -Z_k & i b_{-} \\ -i b_{+} & Z_k \end{matrix} \right) ,
618: \end{align}
619: where
620: \eq{
621: Z_k \equiv \sqrt{\Delta^2 - 2 \la \Delta k_x + \la^2 k^2} .
622: }
623: Expectation values which appears in the effective Hamiltonian are estimated as
624: \eq{
625: n =& n_0 \bi{1 - \frac{3 m}{\Ef \hbar^2} \la^2} \nonumber \\
626: s^y =& n_0 \bi{\frac{\Delta}{\Ef} + \frac{m \la^2}{\Delta \hbar^2}} \la J \nonumber \\
627: \lc{\js{x}{y}, \js{y}{x}} =& \lc{- n_0 \frac{\la}{\hbar} + J \bi{\frac{\Delta}{\Ef} + \frac{m \la^2}{\Ef \hbar^2} +\frac{2 m \la^2}{\Delta \hbar^2}},
628: n_0 \frac{\la}{\hbar} - \frac{m \la^2}{\Delta \hbar^2} J }.
629: }
630: The effective Hamiltonian is therefore obtained as
631: \eq{
632: H_{\rm{eff}} = & \inthr \left[
633: \frac{1}{2} (1-\cos{\theta}) \lc{\de{x} \phi} \bi{\hbar \js{x}{y} +\la n} \right. \nonumber\\
634: &\left.
635: -\frac{m \la}{\hbar} \bi{\lc{1 + \cos{\theta}} \js{x}{y} - \lc{1 - \cos{\theta}} \js{y}{x} \sin^2{\phi} } \right] \label{hey2}.
636: }
637:
638:
639: %\input{heff}
640: \section{Analysis of effective Hamiltonian}
641: The effective Hamiltonian representing the effect of current
642: obtained above is summarized as follows.\\
643: Bloch(z) case:
644: \eq{\notag
645: H_{\rm{eff}} =& \int d^3x \left[ \frac{\hbar}{2} \lc{1- \cos{\theta}} \lc{\de{x}\phi} \bi{\frac{\Delta}{\Ef} - \frac{m}{2 \Delta \hbar^2} \la^2} J
646: -\frac{\la m \Delta}{\Ef \hbar} \es{y} J \right. \\
647: & \left. + \frac{\la^2 m}{\hbar^2} n_0 \lc{1 - \es{z} } \lc{1 + \sin{\phi}} \right].
648: }
649: Neel(x) case:
650: \eq{\notag
651: H_{\rm{eff}} =& \int d^3x \left[ \frac{\hbar}{2} \lc{1- \cos{\theta}} \lc{\de{x}\phi} \frac{\Delta}{\Ef} J
652: -\frac{\la m \Delta}{\Ef \hbar} \es{y} J \right. \\
653: & \left.+ \frac{m}{\hbar} \la^2 \lc{1 - \es{x}} n_0 \lc{1+ \cos^2{\phi}} \right].
654: }
655: Bloch(y) case:
656: \eq{\notag
657: H_{\rm{eff}} =& \int d^3x \left[ \frac{\hbar}{2} \lc{1- \cos{\theta}} \lc{\de{x}\phi} \bi{\frac{\Delta}{\Ef} + \frac{m}{\Ef \hbar^2} \la^2 + \frac{2m}{\Delta \hbar^2} \la^2} J
658: -\frac{\la m \Delta}{\Ef \hbar} \es{y} J \right. \\
659: & \left. + \frac{m}{\hbar^2} \la^2 n_0 \bi{\es{y} +\sin^2{\phi} \lc{1-\es{y}}} \right]. \label{heffbly}
660: }
661: Here $\es{\al}$ is local spin component in $\al$-direction.
662: The first term of each effective Hamiltonian represents spin transfer torque, which is enhanced by Rashba interaction in Bloch(z) and Bloch(y) cases at the second order in spin-orbit interaction. The enhancement is thus small but independent of sign of $\la$.
663: The second term of the effective Hamiltonian, $\es{y} \la \frac{\Delta}{\Ef} J$, indicates that the effective magnetic field arises in the $y$-direction in all three cases.
664: This is a result of spin current induced by Rashba interaction and applied current.
665: The last term of each Hamiltonian exists without electric field and thus represents magnetic anisotropy modified by Rashba interaction.
666: This change of magnetic anisotropy is at the second-order in $\la$ and is small.
667: Furthermore, in reality, this static contribution should be contained already in the anisotropy parameters $K , K_{\bot}$. We therefore do not take it into account in the following analysis.
668:
669: The effects of Rashba interaction are summarized in Table. \ref{dwsoi1}.
670: \begin{table}[h]
671: \centering
672: \begin{tabular}{lccc} \hline \hline
673: & \hspace{0.04 \linewidth} Bloch(z) \hspace{0.04 \linewidth}&N\'eel(x)\hspace{0.04 \linewidth}&Bloch(y) \hspace{0.04 \linewidth}\\ \hline
674: Enhancement of spin transfer torque & $O(\la^2$) & $\times$& $O(\la^2$) \\ \hline
675: Effective magnetic field & $O(\la$) & $O(\la$)& $O(\la$) \\ \hline
676: Change of magnetic anisotropy & $O(\la^2$)& $O(\la^2$)& $O(\la^2$)\\ \hline \hline
677: \end{tabular}
678: \caption{
679: Summary of effects of Rashba interaction for three configurations represented by the order of the effects in $\la$.
680: Symbol $\times$ denotes the absence of the effect.}
681: \label{dwsoi1}
682: \end{table}%
683:
684:
685: %\input{dwsolution}
686: \section{Equation of motion of Domain Wall}
687: Let us discuss how Rashba spin-orbit interaction affects current-induced domain wall motion based on the effective Hamiltonian we derived.
688: For this Lagrangian formalization is convenient.
689: We consider rigid planar domain wall.
690: The Lagrangian for domain wall is then obtained as $L = \dot{X} \phi - (H_S+H_{\rm{eff}})|_{X,\phi}$ where $X$ is domain wall position, $\phi$ is local spin angle in magnetic easy plane and
691: $(H_S+H_{\rm{eff}})|_{X,\phi}$ is effective spin Hamiltonian evaluated for domain wall configuration\cite{begt2}.
692: Explicitly, domain wall Lagrangian is given as follows.\\
693: Bloch(z) wall:
694: \eq{\notag
695: \ti{L} =& \bi{\phi \ti{\dot{X}} - \sin^2{\phi}} + \cos{\phi} \ti{\dot{\phi}}
696: - \frac{\pi s^y}{2} \bi{\ti{\dot{X}} \cos{\phi} - \sin{\phi} \ti{\dot{\phi}}} \\ %\label{eq:lez274} \ka
697: &- s^z \ti{X} \ti{\dot{\phi}} - \phi \bi{\frac{\Delta}{\Ef} - \frac{\hbar^2}{2 \Delta m \ell^2} \tla^2} \ti{J}
698: + \pi \tla \sin{\phi} \frac{\Delta}{\Ef} \ti{J}.
699: \label{eq:lez274}}
700: Neel(x) wall:
701: \eq{
702: \ti{L} = \bi{\phi \ti{\dot{X}} -\sin^2{\phi}} - s^x \ti{X} \ti{\dot{\phi}}
703: + \frac{\pi s^y}{2} \bi{\ti{\dot{X}} \sin{\phi} + \cos{\phi} \ti{\dot{\phi}}}
704: - \phi \frac{\Delta}{\Ef} \ti{J} + \pi \tla \cos{\phi} \frac{\Delta}{\Ef} \ti{J}. \label{eq:lex275}
705: }
706: Bloch(y) wall:
707: \eq{\notag
708: \ti{L} =& \bi{\phi \ti{\dot{X}} -\sin^2{\phi}}
709: - s^y \frac{X}{\ell} \ti{\dot{\phi}} \ka
710: & - \phi \bi{\frac{\Delta}{\Ef} + \frac{\hbar^2 \tla^2}{m \ell^2 \Ef} + \frac{2 \hbar^2 \tla^2}{m \ell^2 \Delta}} \ti{J}
711: - 2 \tla \frac{X(t)}{\ell} \frac{\Delta}{\Ef} \ti{J}.
712: }
713: Here we introduced following dimensionless parameters ,
714: \eq{
715: &\tilde{L} \equiv \frac{\ell}{\hbar N S v_c} L, \hspace{1truecm}
716: \ti{X} \equiv \frac{X}{\ell}, \hspace{1truecm}
717: \tilde{\dot{X}} \equiv \frac{\dot{X}}{v_c}, \hspace{1truecm}
718: \tilde{\dot{\phi}} \equiv \frac{\ell}{v_c}\dot{\phi},
719: \notag \\
720: &
721: \ti{J} \equiv \frac{J}{v_c}, \hspace{1truecm}
722: \hspace{1truecm}
723: \tilde{\la} \equiv \frac{m \ell}{\hbar^2} \la.
724: \notag
725: }
726: where $N$ is a number of local spin in the domain wall and $\ell$ is domain wall thickness given as $\ell \equiv \sqrt{\frac{J}{K}}$.
727: (Dimensionless time is $\ti{t} \equiv \frac{v_c}{\ell}t$).
728: Here a velocity $v_c \equiv \frac{K_{\bot} S \ell}{2 \hbar}$ correspond to drift velocity of electron at intrinsic threshold current without Rashba interaction\cite{begt2}.
729:
730:
731: Equations of motion for domain wall is obtained taking account of dissipation as,($Q = \ti{X}, \phi $)
732: \eq{
733: \devx{\tilde{t}} \dev{\tilde{L}}{\dot{Q}} - \dev{\tilde{L}}{Q} = - \dev{\tilde{W_s}}{\dot{Q}} \label{eq:eqm},
734: }
735: where $\tilde{W_s}$ is dimensionless dissipation function written as
736: $\tilde{W_s} = \frac{\al}{2} \bi{\tilde{\dot{X}}^2 + \tilde{\dot{\phi}}^2 }$\cite{TKS08}.
737:
738: In deriving the equation of motion, we neglect contribution of conduction electron density ($s^{\g} \ll 1$) since they turns out to be small in actual situations.
739: The equation of motion is obtained as follows.\\
740: Bloch(z) wall:
741: \eq{
742: \tdt{X}- \al \ti{\dot{\phi}} =& \sin{2 \phi} + \bi{\frac{\Delta}{\Ef} - \frac{\hbar^2}{2 \Delta m \ell^2} \tla^2}
743: \ti{J} - \pi \tla \cos{\phi} \frac{\Delta}{\Ef} \ti{J} \label{eq:eqm291},
744: }
745: \eq{
746: \tdt{\phi} + \al \tdt{X} = 0 \label{eq:eqm292},
747: }
748: where time evolution of $\phi$ reduces to a single equation of
749: \eq{
750: \tdt{\phi} = -\frac{\al}{1 + \al^2} \bi{\sin{2 \phi} + \bi{\frac{\Delta}{\Ef}
751: - \frac{\hbar^2}{2 \Delta m \ell^2} \tla^2} \ti{J} - \pi \tla \cos{\phi} \frac{\Delta}{\Ef} \ti{J} } \label{eq:phyz}.
752: }
753: Neel(x) wall:
754: \eq{
755: \tdt{X} - \al \tdt{\phi} =& \sin{2 \phi} + \frac{\Delta}{\Ef} \ti{J} + \pi \tla \sin{\phi} \frac{\Delta}{\Ef} \ti{J},
756: \label{eq:eqmxx} }
757: \eq{
758: \tdt{\phi}+ \al \tdt{X} =& 0 \label{eq:eqx104},
759: }
760: which result in
761: \eq{
762: \tdt{\phi} =& - \frac{\al}{1 + \al^2} \bi{\sin{2 \phi} + \frac{\Delta}{\Ef} \ti{J} + \pi \tla \sin{\phi} \frac{\Delta}{\Ef} \ti{J} } \label{eq:phyx}.
763: }
764: Bloch(y) wall:
765: \eq{
766: \tdt{X} - \al \tdt{\phi} =& \sin{2 \phi} + \bi{\frac{\Delta}{\Ef} + \frac{\hbar^2 \tla^2}{m \ell^2 \Ef} + \frac{2 \hbar^2 \tla^2}{m \ell^2 \Delta}} \ti{J} \label{eq:eyy106},
767: }
768: \eq{
769: \tdt{\phi}+ \al \tdt{X} =& - \frac{2 \tla \Delta}{\Ef} \ti{J} \label{eq:eyq302},
770: }
771: and the time evolution of $\phi$ is obtained as
772: \eq{
773: \tdt{\phi} =& -\frac{\al}{1 + \al^2} \bi{
774: \sin{2 \phi}
775: + \bi{\frac{\Delta}{\Ef} + \frac{\hbar^2 \tla^2}{m \ell^2 \Ef} + \frac{2 \hbar^2 \tla^2}{m \ell^2 \Delta}} \ti{J}
776: + \frac{2 \hbar \tla^2}{m \ell v_c} n_0 \sin{2 \phi} \frac{X}{\ell}
777: + \frac{2}{\al} \frac{\tla \Delta}{\Ef} \ti{J} \label{eq:phyy}
778: }.}
779:
780: We here see a large difference between Bloch(y) and other cases.
781: In fact, the angle $\phi$ in Bloch(y) wall is directly driven by current and Rashba interaction
782: as indicated by the right-side of Eq. (\ref{eq:eyq302}).
783: Such effect of current has been known as $\beta$ terms in the case of electron spin relaxation due to random spin~\cite{Li04,Zhang04}.
784: In the present Rashba case, the parameter $\be$ is then given by
785: \eq{
786: \be = - \frac{2 \tla \Delta}{\Ef}, \label{eq:beta67}
787: }
788: for Bloch(y)
789: ($\be = 0$ for Bloch(z) and Neel(x) walls).
790: This result can be explained by noting that $\be$ terms is effectively equivalent to
791: an external magnetic magnetic field and that Rashba interaction induces an effective magnetic field, which coinsides with the easy axis for Bloch(y) wall. (Eq. (\ref{heffbly}).
792: We will see below that this coefficient $\be$ is quite large even assuming standard semiconducting systems and reduces much the threshold current and enhances the wall velocity.
793: The effect would be even stronger if the systems has giant Rashba effect as realized in metallic surfaces\cite{Ast07}.
794:
795: The effect of effective magnetic field due to Rashba interaction in Bloch(z) and Neel(x) cases
796: is to induce anisotropy within $\phi$-plane as seen as $\cos\phi$ and $\sin \phi$ terms in Eqs. (\ref{eq:eqm291}) and (\ref{eq:eqmxx}), respectively.
797: This anisotropy energy turns out to drive stepwise wall motion at low current.
798:
799: We also see from Eqs. (\ref{eq:eqm291}) and (\ref{eq:eyy106}) that spin transfer torque effect
800: (represented by the second term of right-hand side)
801: is enhanced by Rashba interaction,
802: at the second oder of $\la$
803: in Bloch(z) and Bloch(y) cases, but not in Neel(x) case.
804: Numerically, these second order effects are negligibly small as we will show below.
805:
806: %\input{result}
807: \section{Domain wall dynamics}
808: We first note that domain wall velocity $\tdt{X}$ is closely related to $\tdt{\phi}$~\cite{begt2}.
809: In fact, from Eqs. (\ref{eq:eqm292}),(\ref{eq:eqx104}),(\ref{eq:eyq302}), we see that
810: \eq{
811: \tdt{X} = - \frac{1}{\al} \tdt{\phi}
812: \;\;\; \mbox{\rm (Bloch(z) and Neel(x) wall)},\label{eq:beta35}
813: }
814: and
815: \eq{
816: \tdt{X} = - \frac{1}{\al} \tdt{\phi} - \frac{2 \tla \Delta}{\al \Ef} \ti{J} \;\;\; \mbox{\rm (Bloch(y) wall)}. \label{eq:beta22}
817: }
818:
819: Here, we show numerical results based on the equation of motion.
820: Parameter are chosen as
821: \eq{\notag
822: a = 5.65 \times 10^{-10} {\rm m}, \hspace{0.5truecm}
823: m = 0.05 {m_e} , \hspace{0.5truecm}
824: m_e = 9.11 \times 10^{-31} {\rm kg},\\ \notag
825: v_c = 163 {\rm m/s}, \hspace{0.5truecm}
826: \Ef = 80 {\rm m eV}, \hspace{0.5truecm}
827: \Delta = 40 {\rm m eV}, \hspace{0.5truecm}
828: \ell = 50 {\rm nm}, \hspace{0.5truecm}
829: \al = 0.01.
830: }
831: to simulate actual semiconductor systems~\cite{yamano}.
832: (We thus have $\frac{\hbar^2}{m\ell^2 \Ef}\simeq 0.007$, and so the second order contribution from Rashba interaction is very small like $\tilde\lambda^2 \frac{\hbar^2}{m\ell^2 \Ef}\simeq 0.7\times 10^{-4}$ for $\tilde\lambda=0.1$.)
833: We calculated the domain wall position $\ti{X}(t)$ after current is applied at $t = 0$.
834: \begin{figure}[h]
835: \centering
836: \includegraphics[width=16cm,clip] {kyori.eps} \\ %{kyori-j5.eps}\\
837: \caption{Wall position at $t=1\mu$s as function of dimensionless current, $\tilde{J}=J/v_c$.
838: Solid line represents the case $\tilde\lambda=0$, and
839: dashed and dotted lines represent the case $\tilde\lambda=0.1$ for Bloch(z), N\'eel(x) and Bloch(y) walls, respectively.
840: }
841: \label{fig:grawall01}
842: \end{figure}%
843: Fig. \ref{fig:grawall01} shows the wall position at $t = 1 \mu m$ after current is applied.
844: (Current is normalized by $v_c$, the electron drift velocity at intrinsic threshold.)
845: The case without Rashba interaction is shown as solid line.
846: % in Fig. \ref{fig:grawall01}.
847: We see here the intrinsic pinning due to hard axis anisotropy\cite{begt2}, since we do not consider $\beta$ term of non-Rashba origin.
848: Wall motion in the presence of Rashba interaction with $\tilde\lambda=0.1$ is plotted by lines
849: marked by $\times$ for Bloch(z) and Neel(x) and $\ast$
850: for Bloch(y) walls.
851: Bloch(z) and Neel(x) walls behaves essentially the same.
852:
853: \subsection{Bloch(y) wall}
854:
855: We immediately see that Rashba interaction affects Bloch(y) wall drastically, resulting in vanishing of threshold current and very high velocity.
856: This is due to a large effective $\be$ term induced by Rashba interaction, Eq. (\ref{eq:beta67}).
857: (Note that we do not consider extrinsic pinning.)
858: For the present parameters, its ratio to $\alpha$ is given as
859: $\frac{\beta}{\alpha}=\frac{\tilde{\lambda}}{\alpha}$, and so very large value of $\beta/\alpha\sim 10$ can be realized
860: in actual experiment with $\tilde\lambda\sim0.1$ and $\alpha=0.01$.
861: Terminal wall velocity of Bloch(y) wall is plotted for different values of $\tla$ in Fig. \ref{fig:gravelo}.
862: \begin{figure}[h]
863: \centering
864: \includegraphics[width=14cm,clip]{j-velo.eps}\\
865: \caption{Plot of wall velocity as function is current for $\tla=0,0.001,0.005,0.01$ and $0.1$.
866: Damping constant is $\al = 0.01$. }
867: \label{fig:gravelo}
868: \end{figure}
869: The behavior is consistent with previous studies including $\be$ term~\cite{Thiaville05,TTKSNF06}
870: indicating that the present motion of Bloch(y) is governed by $\be$ term induced by Rashba interaction.
871: It is natural since $\be$ term is linear in $\tla$ Eq. (\ref{eq:beta67})
872: while other effects of Rashba interaction enter at the second order (see Eq. (\ref{eq:eyy106})).
873: Within our analysis, which neglects the extrinsic pinning, threshold current of Bloch(y) is zero due to $\be$ term.
874: In reality, however, finite threshold will appear from pinning potential~\cite{Thiaville05,TTKSNF06}.
875: Due to the $\beta$ term, we have obtained very large wall velocity (like 100m/s) at very small current (like 10\% of intrinsic threshold current).
876: In reality, Gilbert damping ($\al$) is also modified by Rashba interaction, which might slow the velocity $v$ according to $v\propto\beta/\alpha$\cite{TTKSNF06}.
877: The modification of $\alpha$ is, however, second order in $\la$~\cite{hanki07,HK08}
878: and thus small, hence the high wall velocity would remain unchanged.
879:
880:
881: \subsection{Bloch(z) and Neel(x) walls}
882:
883: Behaviors of Bloch(z) and N\'eel(x) walls are essentially the same for present values of parameters, and are distinct from Bloch(y) wall.
884: These walls have a plateau in $v$-$J$ curve
885: for $0.8 \leq \ti{J} \leq 1.3$
886: as seen in Fig. \ref{fig:grawall01}.
887: This plateau is due to a step motion of wall induced by the anisotropy field within $\phi$-plane arising from Rashba interaction.
888: This stepwise motion is induced above threshold current of $\sim 0.8$, and the distance the wall moves is about 22$\mu m$ regardless of current density (for $0.8 \leq \ti{J} \leq 1.3$).
889:
890: Let us see the mechanism of the plateau in detail.
891: Dynamics near intrinsic pinning threshold is described by a potential for $\phi$\cite{begt2},
892: obtained from the Lagrangian
893: (Eq. (\ref{eq:lez274}) and Eq. (\ref{eq:lex275})) as follows:
894: \eq{
895: \intertext{Bloch(z):} \ti{V}(\phi) =& \sin^2{\phi} + \frac{\phi}{2 S} \bi{\frac{\Delta}{\Ef} + \frac{\hbar^2}{2 \Delta m \ell^2} \tla^2} \ti{J}
896: - \frac{\pi}{2 S} \tla \sin{\phi} \frac{\Delta}{\Ef} \ti{J}. \label{eq:bpz305} \ka
897: \intertext{N\'eel(x):} \ti{V}(\phi) =& \sin^2{\phi} + \frac{\phi}{2 S} \frac{\Delta}{\Ef} \ti{J}
898: - \frac{\pi}{2 S} \tla \cos{\phi} \frac{\Delta}{\Ef} \ti{J}. \label{eq:npx306}
899: }
900: These potentials are plotted in Fig. \ref{fig:grapote}.
901: \begin{figure}[htb]
902: \centering
903: \includegraphics[width=0.3 \linewidth ,clip]{potea.eps}
904: \includegraphics[width=0.3 \linewidth ,clip]{poteb.eps}
905: \includegraphics[width=0.3 \linewidth ,clip]{potec.eps}
906: \caption{
907: Potential for $\phi$ of domain wall.
908: Figure (1) is the potential without current and Rashba interaction, namely potential due to the hard axis anisotropy energy. Energy minimums are at $\phi=0, \pi, \cdots$.
909: Figure (2) includes the effect of applied current
910: below threshold, which tilts the potential
911: ($\tilde J<0$ here).
912: (The intrinsic threshold at $\tilde J=1$ corresponds to the current where local minimum near $\phi\sim0$ disappears.)
913: The last figure (3) shows the potential in the presence of Rashba interaction, which lowers (lifts) the energy barrier around $\phi\sim \frac{\pi}{2}$ for
914: N\'eel(x) shown by dashed line
915: (Bloch(z) shown by solid line).
916: }
917: \label{fig:grapote}
918: \end{figure}%
919: In the absence of current, the potential is solely by magnetic anisotropy, and energy minimum is at $\phi =0$
920: (Fig. \ref{fig:grapote}(1)).
921: When current is applied, the potential tilts (Fig. \ref{fig:grapote} (2)).
922: When local minimum near $\phi = 0$ vanishes, the wall starts to move,
923: and this gives the intrinsic threshold current of $\tilde{J_c}=1$ in the absence of Rashba interaction.~\cite{begt2}
924: When Rashba interaction is switched, $\pi$-periodicity of potential is broken due to the last terms in Eqs. (\ref{eq:bpz305})(\ref{eq:npx306}).
925: The way of deformation depends on Bloch(z) and N\'eel(x) cases.
926: Let us consider a N\'eel(x) wall case where the local energy barrier around $\pi\sim\frac{\pi}{2}$ is lowered by Rashba interaction.
927: The variable $\phi$ (and wall) starts to move at threshold current (where the local minimum disappears), which is lowered by Rashba interaction.
928: But this motion stops if current is not large enough since $\phi$ is trapped by the next local minimum near $\phi \sim \pi$,
929: which has a large energy barrier around
930: $\pi\sim \frac{3\pi}{2}$.
931: Thus in this regime, $\phi$ hops roughly by the amount $\Delta \phi = O(\pi)$ and this corresponds by Eq. (\ref{eq:beta35}) to
932: a wall shift of $\Delta X = \frac{\ell}{\al} \Delta \phi$.
933: This distance corresponds to the distance $\sim 20 \mu$ m seen in Fig. \ref{fig:grawall01}.
934: If current is sufficiently large to remove the second local minimum,
935: the wall motion continues and terminal velocity grows
936: (for $\tilde{J}>1.3$ in Fig. \ref{fig:grawall01}).
937: This is the mechanism of plateau.
938:
939: An interesting consequence of the step motion is an asymmetric ratchet motion.
940: We consider a N\'eel wall initially at $\phi=0$ (we choose $\tilde\lambda>0$).
941: When we apply a negative current, $\tilde J<0$, the local minimum at $\phi=0$ is lifted and the energy barrier for right direction is lowered as we saw in Fig. \ref{fig:grapote}.
942: In contrast, when current is positive, $\tilde J>0$, the local minimum is lowered ($\propto -\tilde\lambda \tilde J$ by Eq. (\ref{eq:npx306})) and then the effective energy barrier in the left direction becomes higher.
943: Therefore, the threshold current for step motion differs by amount $\Delta\tilde J\sim \tilde\lambda$ for the two current directions (starting from fix $\phi$), and thus
944: the wall behaves as a ratchet moving only in one way if current is small enough.
945: These features are common for Bloch(z) wall case if $\phi=0$ is replaced by $\phi=\pi$.
946:
947:
948: The plateau region has finite initial velocity (but zero terminal velocity).
949: Figure \ref{fig:bvaz} shows the initial and terminal velocities for Bloch(z) and N\'eel(x) walls
950: (the velocity is the same for two walls).
951: \begin{figure}[h]
952: %\begin{minipage}{0.45\textwidth}
953: \centering
954: \includegraphics[width=15cm,clip]{blochzvj.eps}
955: \caption{The initial and terminal velocity as function of dimensionless current in the case of Bloch(z) and Neel(x) wall.
956: The velocity is the same for the two walls.
957: }
958: \label{fig:bvaz}
959: \end{figure}%
960: We see that even plateau region shows a high velocity comparable to terminal velocity above $\ti{J} = 1$.
961: For device application, motion over a distance of $20 \mu $m is large enough and so the plateau region would
962: be quite useful for low current switching.
963:
964:
965:
966:
967:
968:
969: \section{Conclusion}
970: We have theoretically calculated the effect of the Rashba spin-orbit interaction on the spin transfer torque.
971: The effective Hamiltonian of local spin under current was calculated using gauge transformation, and the equation of motion for domain wall was derived.
972: We considered three cases with different magnetic easy and hard axes,
973: where domain wall structures realized are called Bloch(z), Neel(x) and Bloch(y) walls.
974: We found there are three influences of Rashba spin-orbit interaction, namely,
975: inducing effective magnetic field, increasing spin transfer torque and modification of magnetic anisotropy.
976: The major effect is that of effective magnetic field,
977: which arises at the first-order in Rashba interaction.
978: Applying voltage in $x$-direction, the effective magnetic field is induced in $y$-direction via Rashba interaction.
979: In case of Bloch(y) wall, where $y$-direction is the easy axis direction, we showed this field acts as a force which pushes the wall, or in other words, effective $\be$ term arises.
980: Threshold current thus vanishes. The value of $\beta$ is large even if evaluated for common semiconductor systems, and wall velocity is enhanced greatly.
981: In contrast, in the cases of Bloch(z) and Neel(x), the effective field is perpendicular the easy axis ($z$ and $x$ directions, respectively),
982: and step motion of wall over a distance of
983: $\Delta X \sim O(\frac{\pi \ell}{\al})$ arises at low current regime,
984: corresponding to a change of the angle out of easy plane, $\Delta \phi \sim O(\pi)$.
985: The current necessary for this step motion is lower than the case without Rashba interaction (by $20 \%$ at $\tla = 0.1$).
986: The initial velocity of step motion is high enough
987: (the same order as steady motion slightly above intrinsic threshold).
988: Wall motion in the step motion regime is asymmetric with respect to current direction, i.e., wall behaves as a ratchet.
989:
990:
991: Other effects by Rashba interaction, modification of spin transfer torque and anisotropy, appears at second order, $\tla^2$, and are negligibly small.
992: Change of spin transfer is due to the change of effective electron spin polarization by Rashba interaction.
993:
994:
995:
996: Rashba interaction arises quite generally when inversion symmetry is broken, e.g., on surface of metals doped with heavy ions\cite{Nakagawa07,Ast07}.
997: Such systems would be suitable to realize quite high wall velocity at very small current we have predicted for Bloch(y).
998:
999:
1000: \acknowledgements
1001: The authors are grateful to H. Kohno, J. Shibata, J. Ohe and
1002: E. Saitoh for valuable discussion.
1003: %\end{acknowledgement}
1004:
1005:
1006: %\input{refs}
1007:
1008: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1009: \bibitem{Berger78}
1010: L. Berger,
1011: J. Appl. Phys. {\bf 49},
1012: 2156 (1978).
1013: \bibitem{Berger86}
1014: L. Berger,
1015: Phys. Rev. {\bf B33},
1016: 1572 (1986).
1017:
1018: \bibitem{Berger96}
1019: L. Berger,
1020: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 54},
1021: 9353 (1996).
1022:
1023: \bibitem{Slonczewski96}
1024: J.C. Slonczewski,
1025: J. Magn. Magn. Mater. {\bf 159},
1026: L1 (1996).
1027:
1028: \bibitem{Rashba}
1029: E.I. Rashba,
1030: Sov. Phys. Solid State {\bf 2},
1031: 1109 (1960).
1032:
1033: \bibitem{Lashel96}
1034: LaShell, S. and McDougall, B. A. and Jensen,
1035: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 77},
1036: 3419 (1996).
1037:
1038: \bibitem{Nakagawa07}
1039: Takeshi Nakagawa, Osamu Ohgami, Yuka Saito, Hiroshi Okuyama, Mitsuaki Nishijima and Tetsuya Aruga,
1040: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 75},
1041: 155409 (2007).
1042:
1043: \bibitem{Ast07}
1044: Christian R. Ast, J\"{u}rgen Henk, Arthur Ernst, Luca Moreschini, Mihaela C. Falub, Daniela Pacil\'{e}, Patrick Bruno, Klaus Kern and Marco Grioni,
1045: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 98},
1046: 186807 (2007).
1047:
1048: \bibitem{yamano}
1049: M.Yamanouchi, D.Chiba, F. Matsukura and H.Ohno,
1050: Nature {\bf 428},
1051: 539 (2004).
1052: %^\cite{yamano}
1053:
1054: \bibitem{Zhang04}
1055: S.~Zhang and Z.~Li,
1056: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 93},
1057: 127204 (2004).
1058: %~\cite{Li04,Zhang04}
1059:
1060: \bibitem{Thiaville05}
1061: A.~Thiaville, Y.~Nakatani, J.~Miltat and Y.~Suzuki,
1062: Europhys.~Lett. {\bf 69},
1063: 990 (2005).
1064:
1065: \bibitem{TTKSNF06}
1066: G.Tatara, T.Takayama, H.Kohno, J.Shibata, Y. Nakatani and H. Fukuyama,
1067: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 75},
1068: 064708 (2006).
1069:
1070: \bibitem{Tserkovnyak06}
1071: Y.~Tserkovnyak, H. J. Skadsem, A.~Brataas and G.E.W.~Bauer,
1072: Phys. Rev. {\bf B74},
1073: 144405 (2006).
1074:
1075: \bibitem{KTS06}
1076: H. Kohno, G. Tatara and J. Shibata,
1077: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 75},
1078: 113706 (2006).
1079:
1080:
1081: \bibitem{KS07}
1082: H. Kohno and J. Shibata,
1083: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 76},
1084: 063710 (2007).
1085:
1086: \bibitem{Duine07}
1087: R. A. Duine, A. S. Nunez, J. Sinova and A. H. MacDonald,
1088: Phys. Rev. {\bf B75},
1089: 214420 (2007).
1090:
1091:
1092: \bibitem{Nguyen07}
1093: A. K. Nguyen, H. J. Skadsem and A. Brataas,
1094: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 98},
1095: 146602 (2007).
1096:
1097: \bibitem{begt2}
1098: G.Tatara and H.Kohno,
1099: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 92},
1100: 086601 (2004).
1101: %~\cite{begt2}
1102: \bibitem{TKSLK07}
1103: G. Tatara, H. Kohno, J. Shibata, Y. Lemaho and K.-J. Lee,
1104: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 76},
1105: 054707 (2007).
1106: \bibitem{TKS08}
1107: G. Tatara, H. Kohno and J. Shibata,
1108: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 77},
1109: 031003 (2008).
1110:
1111: \bibitem{Inoue}
1112: J. Inoue, G.E.W. Bauer, and L.W. Molenkamp,
1113: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 70},
1114: 041303(R) (2004).
1115:
1116: \bibitem{korenman}
1117: V.Korenman, J.L.Murray, and R.E.Prange,
1118: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 16},
1119: 4032 (1977).
1120:
1121: \bibitem{gt2}
1122: G.Tatara and H.Fukuyama,
1123: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 72},
1124: 772 (1994);
1125: J.Phys.Soc.Jpn. {\bf 63},
1126: 2538 (1994).
1127:
1128: \bibitem{keld}
1129: L.V.Keldysh,
1130: Zh. Eksp. Fiz. {\bf 47},
1131: 1515 (1964);
1132: Sov.Phys.-JETP {\bf 20},
1133: 1018 (1965).
1134:
1135: \bibitem{smith}
1136: J.Rammer and H.Smith,
1137: Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 58},
1138: 323 (1986).
1139:
1140: \bibitem{Li04}
1141: Z. Li and S. Zhang,
1142: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 70},
1143: 024417 (2004).
1144:
1145: %alpha????????_????
1146: \bibitem{hanki07}
1147: {E.M.Hankiewic, G.Vignal, and Y.Tserkovnyak},
1148: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 75},
1149: 174434 (2007).
1150:
1151: \bibitem{HK08}
1152: H. Kohno (Private communication).
1153: %~\cite{hanki07,HK08}
1154: %?x?[?^??
1155:
1156: \end{thebibliography}
1157:
1158: \end{document}