1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
27: \documentclass[11pt,preprint]{aastex}
28: %\documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
29: %%%%%%%%%%\documentclass[10pt,preprint]{aastex}
30:
31: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
32: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
33: %% use the longabstract style option.
34:
35: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
36:
37: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
38: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
39: %% the \begin{document} command.
40: %%
41: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
42: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
43: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
44: %% for information.
45:
46: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
47: \newcommand{\myemail}{leo.girardi@oapd.inaf.it}
48:
49: \newcommand{\mini}{\mbox{$M_{\rm i}$}}
50: \newcommand{\mto}{\mbox{$M_{\rm TO}$}}
51: \newcommand{\diff}{\mbox{${\rm d}$}}
52: \newcommand{\sub}[1]{\mbox{$_{\rm #1}$}}
53: \newcommand{\bvo}{\mbox{$(B\!-\!V)_{0}$}}
54: \newcommand{\ubo}{\mbox{$(U\!-\!B)_{0}$}}
55: %\newcommand{\ub}{\mbox{$U\!-\!B$}}
56: %\newcommand{\bv}{\mbox{$B\!-\!V$}}
57: %\newcommand{\vi}{\mbox{$V\!-\!I$}}
58: %\newcommand{\vr}{\mbox{$V\!-\!R$}}
59: \newcommand{\vk}{\mbox{$V\!-\!K$}}
60: \newcommand{\jh}{\mbox{$J\!-\!H$}}
61: \newcommand{\jk}{\mbox{$J\!-\!K$}}
62: \newcommand{\hk}{\mbox{$H\!-\!K$}}
63: \newcommand{\mv}{\mbox{$M_{V}$}}
64: \newcommand{\mi}{\mbox{$M_{I}$}}
65: \newcommand{\mk}{\mbox{$M_{K}$}}
66: \newcommand{\mbol}{\mbox{$m_{\rm bol}$}}
67: \newcommand{\Mbol}{\mbox{$M_{\rm bol}$}}
68: \newcommand{\dm}{\mbox{$(m\!-\!M)$}}
69: \newcommand{\dmo}{\mbox{$(m\!-\!M)_{0}$}}
70: \newcommand{\ebv}{\mbox{$E_{B\!-\!V}$}}
71: \newcommand{\feh}{\mbox{\rm [{\rm Fe}/{\rm H}]}}
72: \newcommand{\mh}{\mbox{\rm [{\rm M}/{\rm H}]}}
73: \newcommand{\Msun}{\mbox{$M_{\odot}$}}
74: \newcommand{\Teff}{\mbox{$T_{\rm eff}$}}
75: \newcommand{\logT}{\mbox{$\log\Teff$}}
76: \newcommand{\logL}{\mbox{$\log L/L_{\odot}$}}
77: \newcommand{\etal}{\mbox{\rm et~al.}}
78: \newcommand{\hii}{\mbox{H\,{\sc ii}}}
79: %\newcommand{\comment}[1]{}
80: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
81: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
82: \newcommand{\beqa}{\begin{eqnarray}}
83: \newcommand{\eeqa}{\end{eqnarray}}
84:
85: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
86:
87: \slugcomment{To appear in PASP May 2008 issue \\
88: (see http://www.journals.uchicago.edu)}
89:
90: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
91: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
92: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
93: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
94: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
95: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
96:
97: %\shorttitle{Bolometric corrections and interstellar extinction
98: %coefficients for ACS and WFPC2}
99: %\shortauthors{Girardi et al.}
100:
101: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
102: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
103:
104: \begin{document}
105:
106: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
107: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
108: %% you desire.
109:
110: \title{Revised bolometric corrections and interstellar extinction
111: coefficients for the ACS and WFPC2 photometric systems}
112:
113: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
114: %% author and affiliation information.
115: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
116: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
117: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
118: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
119:
120: \author{L\'eo Girardi}
121: \affil{Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova -- INAF, Padova, Italy}
122: %\and
123: \author{Julianne Dalcanton, Benjamin Williams}
124: \affil{University of Washington, Seattle}
125: %\and
126: \author{Roelof de Jong}
127: \affil{Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore}
128: %\and
129: \author{Carme Gallart, Matteo Monelli}
130: \affil{Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain}
131: %\and
132: \author{Martin A.T. Groenewegen}
133: \affil{Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium}
134: %\and
135: \author{Jon A. Holtzman}
136: \affil{New Mexico State University, Las Cruces NM}
137: %\and
138: \author{Knut A.G. Olsen}
139: \affil{Gemini Science Center, NOAO, Tucson}
140: %\and
141: \author{Anil C. Seth}
142: \affil{Harvard Center for Astrophysics, Boston}
143: %\and
144: \author{Daniel R. Weisz}
145: \affil{University of Minnesota, Minneapolis}
146: %\and
147: \author{(for the ANGST/ANGRRR collaboration)}
148:
149: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
150: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
151: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
152: %% affiliation.
153:
154: %\altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory. CTIO is operated by AURA, Inc.\ under contract to the National Science
155: %Foundation.}
156:
157: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
158: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
159: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
160: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
161: %% editorial office after submission.
162:
163: %\newpage
164: \begin{abstract}
165: We present extensive tables of bolometric corrections and interstellar
166: extinction coefficients for the WFPC2 and ACS (both WFC and HRC)
167: photometric systems. They are derived from synthetic photometry
168: applied to a database of spectral energy distributions covering a
169: large range of effective temperatures, surface gravity, and metal
170: content. Carbon stars are also considered. The zero-points take into
171: consideration the new high-accuracy Vega fluxes from Bohlin. These
172: tables are employed to transform Padova isochrones into WFPC2 and ACS
173: photometric systems using interstellar extinction coefficients on a
174: star-to-star basis. All data are available either in tabular form or
175: via an interactive web interface in the case of the
176: isochrones. Preliminary tables for the WFC3 camera are also included
177: in the database.
178: \end{abstract}
179:
180: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
181: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
182: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
183: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
184:
185: \keywords{Astrophysical Data}
186:
187: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
188: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
189: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
190: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
191: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
192: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
193: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
194: %% each reference.
195:
196:
197: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
198: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
199: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
200: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
201: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
202: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
203: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
204: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
205: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
206: %%
207: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
208: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
209: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
210: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
211:
212: \section{Introduction}
213:
214: The Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) aboard the Hubble Space
215: Telescope (HST) has provided some of the deepest photometric optical
216: images ever taken. At the same time, the Wide Field and Planetary
217: Camera 2 (WFPC2) camera aboard HST has a rich photometric data archive
218: dating back more than a decade. Both cameras have taken many images
219: of galaxies within $\sim$5 Mpc, providing reliable photometry for
220: individual stars within these nearby galaxies. This resolved stellar
221: photometry contains detailed information about the history of star
222: formation and chemical enrichment. Extracting this information
223: requires stellar evolution isochrones that track the photometric
224: properties of stars of different ages and metallicities. Only with
225: precise models can these rich samples of stellar photometry provided
226: by ACS and WFPC2 be translated into coherent histories of star
227: formation and chemical evolution.
228:
229: Given the extreme importance of the stellar photometric data provided
230: by ACS and WFPC2, many authors have described the conversion from
231: theoretical stellar models into these systems. For the WFPC2 system,
232: transformations and isochrones have been provided by Holtzman et
233: al. (1995), Chiosi et al. (1997), Salasnich et al. (2000), Girardi et
234: al. (2002), Lejeune (2002), and Dotter et al. (2007). For ACS, BC
235: tables and isochrones have been provided at
236: \url{http://pleiadi.oapd.inaf.it} since 2003, as an addition to the
237: Girardi et al. (2002) database, and later by Bedin et al. (2005) and
238: Dotter et al. (2007).
239:
240: With the present paper, our goal is to provide revised and homogeneous
241: tables of BCs and interstellar extinction coefficients in the ACS and
242: WFPC2 systems, updating as much as possible the files distributed by
243: Girardi et al. (2002) in precedence. The motivation for an overall
244: revision of the BC tables reside mainly on the definition of better
245: spectrophotometric standards by Bohlin and collaborators (Bohlin 2007,
246: and references therein), and more complete libraries of stellar
247: spectra, whereas filter transmission curves for these instruments
248: remain essentially the same as in the original papers by the
249: instrument teams. A consistent set of interstellar extinction
250: coefficients for these systems would be particularly important since
251: the unique resolution of HST allows useful optical photometry to be
252: obtained even for heavily reddened regions (with say $A_V\ga3$; see
253: e.g. Recio Blanco et al. 2005), for which interstellar extinction
254: coefficients being used so far may not be accurate enough.
255:
256: The BC and interstellar extinction tables will be used to transform
257: theoretical isochrones to these systems, and will be extensively
258: applied in the interpretation of ANGST/ANGRRR data\footnote{ANGST (ACS
259: Nearby Galaxy Survey) is a Treasury HST proposal for the imaging of a
260: complete sample of galaxies up to a distance of 3.5 Mpc. Together with
261: archival data re-reduced by the ANGRRR (Archive of Nearby Galaxies -
262: Reduce, Recycle, Reuse) collaboration, it will allow the measurement
263: of their star formation histories with a resolution of 0.3~dex in
264: log(age), up to the oldest ages.}.
265:
266: We proceed as follows: Sect.~\ref{sec_bc} describes the steps involved
267: in the derivation of bolometric corrections via synthetic photometry,
268: from the assembly of a spectral library to the definition of
269: zeropoints. Sect.~\ref{sec_extinction} describes the interstellar
270: extinction coefficients. The results are used in Sect.~\ref{sec_isoc}
271: to convert theoretical isochrones into the ACS and WFPC2 systems,
272: which are made publicly available. They are briefly illustrated in
273: Sect.~\ref{sec_data}, by means of a few comparisons with observations.
274:
275: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
276: \section{Bolometric corrections}
277: \label{sec_bc}
278:
279: Given the spectral fluxes at the stellar surface, $F_\lambda$,
280: bolometric corrections for any set of filter transmission curves
281: $S_\lambda$\footnote{Throughout this paper, $S_\lambda$ is the total
282: system throughput, i.e. including the telescope, camera, and filters.}
283: are given by (see Girardi et al. 2002 for details)
284: %
285: \beqa
286: BC_{S_\lambda} & = & M_{\rm bol, \odot}
287: - 2.5\,\log \left[
288: 4\pi (10\,{\rm pc})^2 F_{\rm bol}/L_\odot
289: \right] \label{eq_bcfinal}
290: \\ \nonumber
291: && + 2.5\,\log\left(
292: \frac { \int_{\lambda_1}^{\lambda_2}
293: \lambda F_\lambda \, 10^{-0.4A_\lambda}
294: S_\lambda \diff\lambda }
295: { \int_{\lambda_1}^{\lambda_2}
296: \lambda f^0_\lambda S_\lambda \diff\lambda }
297: \right)
298: - m_{S_\lambda}^0
299: \eeqa
300: %
301: where $f^0_\lambda$ represents a reference spectrum (incident on
302: the Earth's atmosphere) that produces a known apparent magnitude
303: $m^0_{S_\lambda}$, $F_{\rm bol} = \int_0^\infty F_\lambda
304: \diff\lambda = \sigma T_{\rm eff}^4 $ is the total emerging flux
305: at the stellar surface, and $A_\lambda$ is the interstellar extinction
306: curve in magnitude units. Once $BC_{S_\lambda}$ are computed, stellar
307: absolute magnitudes follow from
308: %
309: \beq
310: M_{S_\lambda} = M_{\rm bol} - BC_{S_\lambda} \,\,\, ,
311: \label{eq_absolmag}
312: \eeq
313: %
314: where
315: %
316: \beqa
317: M_{\rm bol} & = & M_{\rm bol, \odot} - 2.5\, \log(L/L_\odot)
318: \label{eq_mbol}
319: \\ \nonumber
320: & = & M_{\rm bol, \odot} - 2.5\, \log(
321: 4\pi R^2 F_{\rm bol} /L_\odot) \,\,\,\, .
322: \eeqa
323: %
324: As in Girardi et al. (2002), we adopt $M_{\rm bol,
325: \odot}=4.77$, and $L_\odot=3.844\times10^{33}\,{\rm erg\,s^{-1}}$
326: (Bahcall et al.\ 1995).
327:
328: Notice that Eq.~\ref{eq_bcfinal} uses photon count integration instead
329: of energy integration, as appropriate to most modern photometric
330: systems that use photon-counting detectors instead of
331: energy-amplifiers. The equation also includes the interstellar
332: extinction curve $A_\lambda$, that will be discussed later in
333: Sect.~\ref{sec_extinction}. $A_\lambda=0$ is assumed for the moment.
334:
335: \subsection{A library of spectral fluxes}
336: \label{sec_spectra}
337:
338: Girardi et al. (2002) assembled a large library of spectral fluxes,
339: covering wide ranges of initial metallicities (\mh\ from $-2.5$ to
340: $+0.5$), \Teff\ (from 500 to 50\,000~K), and $\log g$ (from $-2$ to
341: $5$). This grid is wide enough to cover most of the stellar types that
342: constitute the bulk of observed samples in resolved galaxies. The grid
343: is composed of ATLAS9 ``NOVER'' spectra from Castelli et al (1997, see
344: also Bessell et al. 1998) for most of the stellar types, Allard et
345: al. (2000a) for M, L and T dwarfs, Fluks et al. (1994) empirical
346: spectra for M giants, and finally pure blackbody spectra for stars
347: exceeding 50\,000~K. Since then, we have updated part of this library,
348: namely:
349:
350: 1) As part of the TRILEGAL project (Girardi et al. 2005), we have
351: included spectra for DA white dwarfs from Finley et al. (1997) and
352: Homeier et al. (1998) for \Teff\ between 100\,000 and 5\,000~K.
353:
354: 2) We now use Castelli \& Kurucz (2003) ATLAS9 ``ODFNEW'' spectra,
355: which incorporate several corrections to the atomic and molecular
356: data, especially regarding the molecular lines of CN, OH, SiO, H$_2$O
357: and TiO, and the inclusion of HI--H$^+$ and HI--H$^+$ quasi-molecular
358: absorption in the UV. These new models are considerably better than
359: the previous NOVER ones, especially in the UV region of the spectrum,
360: and over most of the wavelength range for $\Teff$ between $\sim4500$
361: and $3500$~K (see figs. 1 to 3 in Castelli
362: \& Kurucz 2003).
363:
364: 3) We have also incorporated in the library the Loidl et al. (2001)
365: spectral fluxes of solar-metallicity carbon (C-) stars derived from
366: static model atmospheres. They are computed for \Teff\ in the range
367: from 2600 to 3600~K, and for C/O$=1.1$ and 1.4. The C/O$=1.1$ spectra
368: are now used for all C/O$>1$ models, replacing the Fluks et al. (1994)
369: spectra of M giants which were previously (and improperly) used for
370: all cool giants including C-rich ones.
371:
372: Regarding this latter aspect, it is to be noticed that all Padova
373: isochrones published since 2001 (Marigo \& Girardi 2001; Cioni et
374: al. 2006; Marigo et al. 2008) do take into consideration the third
375: dredge-up events and hence the conversion to a C-type phase during the
376: TP-AGB evolution. This phase, characterised by the surface C/O$>1$,
377: has to be represented with either proper C-rich spectra, or
378: alternatively, with empirical $\Teff$-colour relations as in Marigo et
379: al. (2003). The use of Loidl et al. (2001) spectra frees us definitely
380: from using empirical relations for C stars. Note that such empirical
381: relations would not even be available for the ACS and WFPC2 filters we
382: are interested in. In fact, empirical $\Teff$-colour relations for C
383: stars are usually limited to red and near-IR filters, and mainly to
384: $IJHK$.
385:
386: Although the Loidl et al. (2001) models are quite limited in their
387: coverage of the parameter space of C stars (i.e. [M/H], C/O, \Teff,
388: and $\log g$) they represent a useful first approach toward obtaining
389: realistic colours for them. Work is in progress to extend
390: significantly the parameter space of such models (Aringer et al., in
391: preparation).
392:
393: \subsection{Filters and zeropoints}
394: \label{sec_zeropoints}
395:
396: As can readily be seen in Eq.~\ref{eq_bcfinal}, in the formalism
397: adopted here, the photometric zeropoints are fully determined by a
398: reference spectral energy distribution $f^0_\lambda$, which provides a
399: given set of reference magnitudes $m_{S_\lambda}^0$.
400:
401: In this work, we adopt the latest Vega spectral energy distribution
402: from Bohlin (2007) as $f^0_\lambda$. This Vega spectrum represents a
403: great improvement over previous ones distributed and used in the
404: past. It is the result of an effective effort using STIS to provide a
405: set of stellar spectrophotometric standards with an absolute
406: calibration to better than 1 percent at near-UV to blue
407: wavelengths. The best-fitting ATLAS9 model for Vega in this spectral
408: range is then used to complement its spectral energy distribution at
409: red and near-IR wavelengths. From Bohlin (2007), one can conclude the
410: new Vega spectrum is likely accurate to about 1--2 percent over the
411: complete 3200--10000~\AA\ interval.
412:
413: Having adopted Bohlin's (2007) Vega spectrum, we have just to specify
414: the Vega magnitudes in ACS and WFPC2 filters to completely define our
415: zeropoints. Following Holtzman et al.'s (1995) definition of the WFPC2
416: synthetic system, we define that Vega has the same magnitudes in WFPC2
417: filters as in the Johnson-Cousins filters that are closest to them in
418: wavelength. This choice means a magnitude of 0.02 for all filters from
419: F336W to F450W, 0.03 for F555W and F569W, 0.035 from F606W to F850LP,
420: but for F702W which has magnitude 0.039. For filters blueward of
421: F300W, Vega magnitudes are assumed to be zero.
422:
423: Then, for ACS we adopt the same definition as Sirianni et al. (2005),
424: that Vega has zero magnitudes in all ACS filters. For a question of
425: completness, we provide tables also for the AB and ST magnitude
426: systems.
427:
428: These are of course synthetic definitions of WFPC2 and ACS systems,
429: that may present small systematic offsets with respect to the real
430: systems (such as the flight WFPC2 system defined by Holtzman et
431: al. 1995) to which observations are commonly transformed.
432:
433: Finally, the filter transmission curves $S_\lambda$ -- including the
434: telescope and camera throughputs -- for WFPC2 are created with
435: SYNPHOT/STSDAS v3.7 using the most up-to-date throughput and
436: sensitivity reference files available at January 15, 2008. For
437: WFPC2/F170W and WFPC2/F218W, instead, they are taken from Holtzman et
438: al. (1995). All of the wide filters are considered. ACS filter
439: throughputs are from Sirianni et al. (2005). They are almost identical
440: to those provided by SYNPHOT/STSDAS v3.7.
441:
442: \subsection{Behaviour of bolometric corrections}
443: \label{sec_bolom}
444:
445: \placefigure{fig_bc}
446:
447: \begin{figure}[h]
448: \plottwo{f1a.ps}{f1b.ps}
449: \caption{$BC_{S_\lambda}$ as a function of \Teff, for
450: both dwarfs (continuous lines) and giants (dashed lines), for some of
451: the ACS/WFC and WFPC2 filters. }
452: \label{fig_bc}
453: \end{figure}
454:
455: Figure~\ref{fig_bc} shows how BCs depend on \Teff\ for a series of ACS
456: and WFPC2 filters. In practice, we illustrate it for a sequence of
457: dwarfs of $\log g=5$, and for a sequence of subgiants and giants (of M
458: type at the coolest \Teff) following the relation
459: $\Teff=3250+500\,\log g$ (in c.g.s. units), which roughly describes the
460: position of the Hayashi track in the HR diagram of low-mass stars with
461: near-solar metallicity. The central part of the
462: \Teff\ interval reflects the behaviour of ATLAS9 synthetic
463: spectra. The small discontinuities in the figure occur as we change
464: from one spectral library to another, namely:
465: \begin{itemize}
466: \item The wiggles at $\log\Teff\simeq3.54$ occur when we pass
467: from ATLAS9 to Fluks et al. (1994) spectra for M giants, and to Allard
468: et al. (2000a) spectra for M dwarfs.
469: \item The step at $\log\Teff\simeq3.27$ occurs when we change between the
470: ``AMES'' and ``AMES-dusty'' among Allard et al. (2000a) spectra. The
471: latter include dust formation in the outer atmosphere, and are
472: computed for solar-metallicity only (see Chabrier et al. 2000; Allard
473: et al. 2000b, 2001 for more details).
474: \item A second, less pronounced step at $\log\Teff\simeq4.75$
475: occurs when we start using blackbody spectra instead of ATLAS9.
476: \end{itemize}
477:
478: Among these discontinuities, the most important are the wiggles at
479: $\log\Teff\simeq3.54$ because they occur at \Teff\ in which many stars
480: of Local Group galaxies are routinely observed in optical to near-IR
481: passbands. In order to limit the effect of such wiggles in the final
482: isochrones, we adopt a smooth transition between the different sources
483: of BC, for both dwarfs and giants, over the $\log\Teff$ interval from
484: 3.542 and 3.590. This is the reason why isochrones using these
485: transformations (see the Fig.~\ref{fig_isocav} later for an example)
486: do not present significant discontinuities.
487:
488: It is also interesting to note, in Fig.~\ref{fig_bc}, the anomalous
489: behaviour of F170W in WFPC2 which for cool stars provides brighter
490: magnitudes than redder filters. This behaviour is a consequence of its
491: red leak (see also Holtzman et al. 1995). A similar effect is also
492: present, but much less pronounced, in the F300W filter.
493:
494:
495: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
496: \section{Interstellar extinction coefficients}
497: \label{sec_extinction}
498:
499: As already mentioned, Eq.~\ref{eq_bcfinal} can be used together with
500: an interstellar extintion curve, $A_\lambda$, to derive bolometric
501: corrections already including the effect of interstellar
502: extinction. Alternatively, we can derive relative interstellar
503: extinction coefficients, $A_{S_\lambda}/A_{V}$, by simply using
504: \beq
505: A_{S_\lambda}/A_V = [ BC_{S_\lambda}(0)-BC_{S_\lambda}(A_V) ]
506: / A_V
507: \label{eq_extcoef}
508: \eeq
509: where the 0 stands for the $A_\lambda=0$ case.
510:
511: The interstellar extinction curve $A_\lambda$ we use in
512: Eq.~\ref{eq_bcfinal} is taken from Cardelli et al. (1989) with
513: $R_V=A_V/E_{B\!-\!V}=3.1$, and integrated with the O'Donnell (1994)
514: correction for $909<\lambda/{\rm \AA}<3030$. Other extinction curves
515: and $R_V$ values can be easily implemented whenever necessary
516: (e.g. Vanhollebeke et al. 2008). Our calculations are essentially
517: identical to those by Holtzman et al. (1995) and Sirianni et
518: al. (2005), but are now performed for a more extended range of stellar
519: parameters and extinction values.
520:
521: Before proceeding, it is interesting to note that the two parameters
522: in Cardelli et al. (1989) interstellar extinction curve, $A_V$ and
523: $R_V$, refer to the Johnson's $B$ and $V$ bands. However, this does
524: not imply that synthetic realisations of the Johnson system will
525: recover the same values of $R_V$ and $A_V$ when the extinction curve
526: is applied. As examples, we find that for a G2V star the Bessell
527: (1990) version of the Johnson system provide $A_{V,{\rm
528: Bessell}}=1.006\,A_V$ and $R_{V,{\rm Bessell}}=3.457$, whereas
529: Ma\'{\i}z Apell\'aniz (2006) version gives essentially the same
530: numbers, with differences appearing just at the fifth decimal. These
531: numbers change somewhat as a function of spectral type and $A_V$
532: itself (as will be illustrated below for HST systems). Therefore,
533: $A_V$ should be considered as just ``the parameter that describes the
534: total amount of interstellar extinction in Cardelli et al. (1989)
535: law'', rather than a precise physical measure of the $V$-band
536: extinction. A similar comment applies also to $R_V$: in the context of
537: this paper it is ``the parameter that describes the shape of the
538: interstellar extinction curve'', rather than the total-to-selective
539: interstellar extinction of Johnson-like systems.
540:
541: \placefigure{fig_avteff}
542:
543: \begin{figure}[h]
544: \epsscale{0.5}
545: \plotone{f2.ps}
546: \epsscale{1.0}
547: \caption{The variation of $A_{S_\lambda}/A_V$ as a function of \Teff, for
548: both dwarfs (continuous lines) and giants (dashed lines), for some of
549: the ACS/WFC filters. }
550: \label{fig_avteff}
551: \end{figure}
552:
553: The interstellar extinction coefficients derived from
554: Eq.~\ref{eq_extcoef} depend on the $F_\lambda$ under consideration,
555: and hence on parameters such as \Teff, $\log g$, and [M/H].
556: Figure~\ref{fig_avteff} illustrates the variation of
557: $A_{S_\lambda}/A_V$ as a function of $\Teff$, for several ACS/WFC
558: filters, and for both dwarfs (continuous lines) and giants (dashed
559: ones). Giants are again defined by the relation $\Teff=3250+500\,\log
560: g$. The figure shows that $A_{S_\lambda}/A_V$ can change by as much
561: as $\sim0.3$ between very cool and very hot stars, especially for the
562: bluest (F435W, F475W) and widest (F606W, F814W) ACS filters. This
563: variation will inevitably change the morphology of a reddened
564: isochrone in the CMD, as compared to the unreddened case. This is
565: actually the main reason for taking star-to-star interstellar
566: extinction into consideration.
567:
568: $A_{S_\lambda}/A_V$ variations are more sizeable in the regime of cool
569: temperatures and blue filters, which however is not the regime
570: targeted by most HST observations of stellar populations. The most
571: relevant \Teff\ interval for $A_{S_\lambda}/A_V$ variations is instead
572: between $\sim4000$ and 15000~K, which comprehends the main sequence
573: turn-off, horizontal branch, and tip of the red giant branch (TRGB) of
574: old metal-poor populations. Inside this interval, $A_{S_\lambda}/A_V$
575: variations amount to $\sim0.15$, and hence become potentially
576: important -- causing $\sim0.05$~mag effects in colours and magnitudes
577: -- at $A_V$ higher than $\sim3$~mag.
578:
579: Another effect that can be accessed by our calculations is the
580: ``Forbes effect'', or interstellar nonlinear heterochromatic
581: extinction (Forbes 1842). It consists of the variation of the relative
582: extinction $A_{S_\lambda}/A_V$ as the total extinction $A_V$
583: increases, and results from extinction being more effective for the
584: spectral regions with the higher flux. The $A_{S_\lambda}/A_V$
585: variations are expected to occur whenever the flux $F_\lambda$ varies
586: within the wavelength interval of a passband, and they are obviously
587: higher for wider passbands and at higher total extinction. This effect
588: was originally conceived to describe atmospheric extinction, but has
589: been shown to apply also for interstellar extinction by Grebel \&
590: Roberts (1995).
591:
592: \placefigure{fig_forbes}
593:
594: \begin{figure}[h]
595: \epsscale{0.5}
596: \plotone{f3.ps}
597: \epsscale{1.0}
598: \caption{The Forbes effect for a few ACS filters, for dwarfs of
599: $\Teff=2500$~K, $4000$~K and $40000$~K (continuous lines), and giants
600: with $\Teff=4000$~K (dashed lines). The \Teff\ values in K are
601: indicated at the right extremity of their curves.}
602: \label{fig_forbes}
603: \end{figure}
604:
605: Figure~\ref{fig_forbes} illustrates the Forbes effect for some of the
606: ACS and WFPC2 passbands. It plots $A_{S_\lambda}/A_V$ as a function of
607: $A_V$ (solid lines), for a few values of \Teff\ and for the $0<A_V<12$
608: interval. It can be easily noticed that $A_{S_\lambda}/A_V$ decreases
609: with $A_V$, and that this decrease is more marked for wider
610: filters. In fact, $A_{S_\lambda}/A_V$ is almost constant for the
611: narrow F660N filter. Among the wide filters, the hottest spectra
612: ($\sim40000$~K) present the most moderate variations in
613: $A_{S_\lambda}/A_V$, which is of approximately $0.005\,A_V^{-1}$ for
614: the most widely-used filters F555W and F814W.
615:
616: \placefigure{fig_forbes2}
617:
618: \begin{figure}[h]
619: \epsscale{0.5}
620: \plotone{f4.ps}
621: \epsscale{1.0}
622: \caption{The same as Fig.~\ref{fig_forbes}, but now as a function of
623: $A_{\rm F555W}$, in the ACS/WFC system.}
624: \label{fig_forbes2}
625: \end{figure}
626:
627: Figure~\ref{fig_forbes2} instead plots $A_{S_\lambda}/A_{\rm F555W}$
628: as a function of $A_{\rm F555W}$, in the ACS/WFC system. This changes
629: somewhat the description of the Forbes effect, which becomes
630: increasing for F435W and F628N, and decreasing for F814W. Actually,
631: the most striking manifestation of the Forbes effect is expected to be
632: on the stellar colours, and this will be independent of the wavelength
633: taken as a reference for the total extinction.
634:
635: Finally, we note that for stars cooler than 3000~K and for the bluest
636: ACS/WFC filters (for instance F435W) the Forbes effect becomes
637: dramatic already at $A_V\ga4$. These cases however are of little
638: practical interest since observations of heavily reddened cool stars
639: would hardly be done with such blue filters.
640:
641: \placefigure{fig_isocav}
642:
643: \begin{figure}[h]
644: \epsscale{0.5}
645: \plotone{f5.ps}
646: \epsscale{1.0}
647: \caption{A set of $Z=0.008$ isochrones from Marigo et al. (2008) in
648: the ACS/WFC system, extincted by $A_V=6$~mag according to two
649: different prescriptions: adopting the star-to-star interstellar
650: extinction coefficients as described in this paper (continuous lines)
651: and adopting the coefficients derived from a yellow dwarf at the
652: regime of low interstellar extinction (dashed lines). The isochrone
653: ages are, from top-left to bottom-right, 0.1, 1, and 10 Gyr.}
654: \label{fig_isocav}
655: \end{figure}
656:
657: Figure \ref{fig_isocav} presents a practical application of the
658: star-to-star interstellar extinction coefficients derived in this
659: work, as compared to the usual approximation of applying a single set
660: of coefficients for all stars and independently of the actual amount
661: of total extinction. In the figure, one can notice that a set of
662: isochrones extincted by $A_V=6$~mag in the correct (star-to-star) way,
663: is narrower in colour (by about 0.3~mag in F475W--F84W) than an
664: isochrone extincted by the same $A_V$ but using a single set of
665: coefficients derived from a low-extinction yellow dwarf. Moreover,
666: using the right interstellar extinction coefficients produces brighter
667: red giants than in the case of constant coefficients. This latter
668: effect is striking in the comparison between the AGB sequences at the
669: top-right corner of Fig.~\ref{fig_isocav}.
670:
671: Although the $A_V=6$~mag case is rather extreme, it well illustrates
672: the effect of star-to-star interstellar extinction. Whether this
673: effect is important depends on the photometric accuracy of the data
674: and models available, and on the passbands being considered. A very
675: approximate rule is that, if one aims at reproducing data with an
676: accuracy better than 0.05~mag in optical bands, star-to-star
677: interstellar extinction should start being considered already at
678: $A_V>2$~mag. A more consistent and safer rule, however, is to {\em
679: always} take star-to-star extinction into consideration.
680:
681: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
682: \section{Application to isochrones and data release}
683: \label{sec_isoc}
684:
685: Extensive tables with BC and interstellar extinction coefficients have
686: been computed and are provided in the static web repository
687: \url{http://stev.oapd.inaf.it/dustyAGB07}. The BC tables contain
688: entries for all stars in our spectral library. The extinction
689: coefficients instead have been computed for solar metallicity only. In
690: fact, the effective temperature, and to a lower extent $\log g$, is
691: the main parameter driving the changes in $A_{S_\lambda}/A_V$. We have
692: verified that $A_{S_\lambda}/A_V$ values change very little as a
693: function of [M/H]: as an example, for a dwarf star of $\Teff=4000$~K
694: extincted by $A_V=1$, $A_{\rm F475W}/A_V$ values differ by just
695: 0.17~\% between the $\mh=0$ and $\mh=-2.5$ cases.
696:
697: Moreover, the interactive web interface
698: \url{http://stev.oapd.inaf.it/cmd} allows the present tables to be
699: applied to the theoretical isochrones from Padova that are based on
700: Girardi et al. (2000) tracks. Taking into account the Bertelli et
701: al. (1994) isochrone models for initial masses higher than 7~\Msun,
702: interpolated isochrones can be constructed for any age between 0 and
703: 17 Gyr, and for any metallicity value between $Z=0.0001$ and $Z=0.03$
704: (see Girardi et al. 2002). A recent paper by Marigo et al. (2008)
705: presents a substantial revision of these isochrones, with the
706: replacement of the old TP-AGB tracks by much more detailed ones
707: (cf. Marigo \& Girardi 2007). The same isochrones will soon be
708: extended to the planetary nebulae and white dwarfs stages.
709:
710: A novelty in this latter web interface is the possibility of producing
711: isochrones already incorporating the effect of interstellar extinction
712: and reddening. This is done via interpolations in the tables of
713: $BC_{S_\lambda}(A_V)$, using $\log \Teff$, $\log g$, and $A_V$ as the
714: independent parameters. The dependence in metallicity is ignored
715: since it is really minimal (with $\la0.2$~\% differences in
716: $A_{S_\lambda}/A_V$, going from the solar-metallicity to the
717: very-metal poor cases). Therefore, the $BC_{S_\lambda}(A_V)$ tables
718: are prepared for $\mh=0$ only, and the
719: $BC_{S_\lambda}(A_V)-BC_{S_\lambda}(0)$ corrections derived from these
720: tables are applied at all metallicities. This conceptually simple
721: procedure is completely equivalent to alternative ones based on the
722: interpolation of $A_{S_\lambda}/A_V$ tables.
723:
724: In this way, users of the web interface just need to specify the total
725: interstellar extinction $A_V$, to apply the proper $A_{S_\lambda}$
726: value at every point in the isochrone in each filter passband. We
727: remind that the traditional approach is to apply a single value of
728: extinction $A_{S_{\lambda_1}}$ and reddening
729: $A_{S_{\lambda_1}}-A_{S_{\lambda_2}}$ to all points along an isochrone
730: -- $A_{S_{\lambda_1}}$ and $A_{S_{\lambda_2}}$ being related to the
731: total $A_V$ via constant multiplicative factors -- then occasionally
732: seeking for the $A_V$ value that best fits a certain kind of
733: observations. Instead, by applying the proper $A_{S_\lambda}$ value to
734: each isochrone point, we take into account its dependence on
735: \Teff, on $\log g$, and on the total $A_V$ itself. Our procedure will
736: lead to both (1) the traditional overall translation of isochrones in
737: the CMD, and (2) moderate changes in the isochrone shapes as
738: interstellar extinction increases, especially for colours involving
739: blue passbands and in the regime of high extinction. The changes in
740: the isochrone shapes will not be noticeable for low extinctions (for
741: $A_V\la2$~mag, in optical passbands) and/or for near-infrared
742: passbands.
743:
744: Moreover, the present tables of bolometric corrections, for the
745: no-extinction case only, are being applied to Bertelli et al. (2008)
746: isochrones, which cover a wide region of the helium--metal content
747: $(Y,Z)$ plane.
748:
749: \section{A few comparisons with data}
750: \label{sec_data}
751:
752: The present bolometric corrections and interstellar extinction
753: coefficients for ACS and WFPC2 are part of a large database of
754: transformations to many photometric systems (see Marigo et al. 2008
755: for the most updated version). Regarding the BC and colour-\Teff\
756: relations for non-C stars, they have just slightly changed -- a few
757: hundredths of magnitude at most -- with respect to those presented by
758: Girardi et al. (2002). Therefore the transformations presented in this
759: paper are in fact already largely tested in the literature, in many
760: papers that compared data and models seeking accuracies to within
761: $\sim0.05$~mag in colours. Most of these previous comparisons were
762: however done in Johnson-Cousins, 2MASS and SDSS systems.
763:
764: In the present paper we limit ourselves to a couple of simple
765: comparisons between present models and observations in the ACS/WFC
766: F475W, F606W and F814W pass-bands. These filters, together with F555W,
767: are those in which most observations of resolved galaxies are
768: available. These are also the filters used by the ANGST project.
769:
770: The two panels of Fig.~\ref{fig_data1} compare $Z=0.0001$ and
771: $Z=0.0004$ isochrones superimposed to the CMD of the globular cluster
772: M92 in three band combinations: $(V-I)$, (F475W--F814W) and
773: (F606W--F814W). The $VI$ data are from the Rosenberg et al. (2000)
774: database, and has kindly been provided by A. Rosenberg. The F475W,
775: F814W CMD has been obtained using archival data from the ACS LCID
776: project\footnote{The LCID (Local Cosmology from Isolated Dwarfs
777: project, HST P.ID. 10505 and 10590) has obtained deep CMDs reaching
778: the oldest main sequence turnoffs in five isolated Local Group
779: galaxies and two clusters, M92 and NGC 1851.} and the F606W, F814W CMD
780: using ACS archival data of P.ID. 9453 (see Brown et al. 2005). The
781: isochrones have log(age/yr)=10.10 and 10.15, and are plotted from the
782: lower main sequence up to the TRGB; additionally, we plot the zero-age
783: horizontal branch from Girardi et al. (2000) tracks as derived by
784: Palmieri et al. (2002). In all cases we have assumed a distance
785: modulus $(m-M)_0=14.62$ (del Principe et al. 2005), and interstellar
786: extinction $A_V=0.068$ following the Schlegel et al. (1998) maps. The
787: cluster measured metallicity is $\feh=-2.24$ (Zinn \& West 1984); or
788: $-2.16$ (Carretta \& Gratton 1997), which would correspond to
789: $Z=0.0001$ of Girardi et al. (2000) scaled-solar isochrones. This case
790: is plotted in the upper panel. Note however that the $Z=0.0004$
791: isochrones (lower panel) seem to fit the cluster sequences best,
792: especially the RGB slope and the position of the main sequence
793: turn-off. Note that the different mismatches that can be appreciated
794: go in the same direction in the ground-based and the ACS fit. These
795: mismatches are likely to be associated to the theoretical isochrones
796: themselves, rather than to the color transformations.
797:
798: \placefigure{fig_data1}
799:
800: \begin{figure}[h]
801: \plottwo{f6a.ps}{f6b.ps}
802: \caption{CMD of M92 in three different band combinations, compared with
803: isochrones of metallicity $Z=0.0001$ and $0.0004$ as indicated in the
804: labels. The isochrone ages are log(age/yr)=10.10 and 10.15. See the
805: text for details.}
806: \label{fig_data1}
807: \end{figure}
808:
809: This comparison with a nearby globular cluster illustrates the
810: usefulness of the isochrones in the interpretation of star clusters in
811: general, in which the photometry goes from the red giants down to the
812: unevolved section of the main sequence. Most of the HST archival data
813: refers instead to the composite stellar populations of nearby
814: galaxies. Fig.~\ref{fig_data2} shows the case of field WIDE1 located
815: about 13~arcmin along the major axis of the spiral galaxy NGC~253,
816: observed with ACS/WFC for the ANGST project. Surprisingly, this region
817: shows no sign of young stellar populations. A set of 10-Gyr old
818: isochrones overimposed on the data CMDs would indicate a range of \mh\
819: going from about $-2$ to $0$. The observed CMD presents a striking
820: decrease of stellar density above a certain level of the red giants,
821: which obviously corresponds to the TRGB position. In
822: Fig.~\ref{fig_data2}, the green line marks the TRGB for a series of
823: 10-Gyr-old isochrones of varying \feh, displaced by a distance modulus
824: of $27.6$~mag. It can be noticed that this line describes remarkably
825: well the shape of observed boundary between the stellar-rich RGB and
826: the less populated AGB. Although the precise position of this TRGB
827: line is determined also by the quality of the underlying stellar
828: models, its reproduction over a wide range in colour (covering more
829: than $2$~mag in F475W--F814W, and more than $1$~mag in F606W--F814W)
830: is clearly suggesting a correct behaviour of the set of BCs that has
831: been applied.
832:
833: \placefigure{fig_data2}
834:
835: \begin{figure}[h]
836: \epsscale{0.7}
837: \plotone{f7.ps}
838: \epsscale{1.0}
839: \caption{CMDs for the ACS Wide~1 pointing over NGC~253 (black and gray
840: dots). The dashed line signals the 50~\% completness limit of the ACS
841: observations. The red lines are Marigo et al. (2008) 10-Gyr isochrones
842: of metallicities $\mh=(-2.0, -1.5, -1.0, -0.5, 0.0)$, shifted by a
843: distance modulus of 27.6. The green line marks the predicted locus of
844: the TRGB for a more complete sequence of 10-Gyr isochrones with \mh\
845: increasing from $-2.3$ to $+0.1$.}
846: \label{fig_data2}
847: \end{figure}
848:
849: \section{Concluding remarks}
850: \label{sec_future}
851:
852: In this paper we present tables of bolometric corrections and
853: interstellar extinction coefficients, as a function of \Teff, $\log
854: g$, and [M/H], for the WFPC2 and ACS systems. We keep the original
855: definition of the Vega magnitudes by Holtzman et al. (1995) and
856: Sirianni et al. (2005), while adopting the latest accurate
857: measurements of the Vega fluxes by Bohlin (2007). The tables are
858: applied to theoretical isochrones in
859: \url{http://stev.oapd.inaf.it/cmd} and
860: \url{http://stev.oapd.inaf.it/dustyAGB}, where similar data for many
861: other photometric systems can be found. A major novelty of this work
862: is that interstellar extinction coefficients are computed and applyed
863: star-by-star, so that isochrones present not only the overall shift in
864: the CMDs as extinction increases, but also the subtle changes in their
865: shape. We have made simple comparisons of these isochrones with real
866: data, but a more careful testing of the transformations is left to
867: future papers, and to the interested readers.
868:
869: To the users of these HST isochrones, suffice it to recall a few
870: general caveats, which apply to all photometric systems: First, our
871: results are based on theoretical model atmospheres and spectral energy
872: distributions, which are known not to be accurate at the
873: hundredths-of-magnitude level, especially for the coolest stars. The
874: same applies to Bohlin's (2007) Vega spectrum, which has uncertainties
875: of 1--2~\% in the optical. Moreover, the results for narrow-band
876: filters are particularly sensitive to errors in line opacity lists,
877: and hence may be more uncertain. Overall, we expect the BCs for
878: broad-band filters to be accurate to within $\sim0.05$, with errors in
879: colours being somewhat smaller. If we consider all the other
880: uncertainties involved in the analysis of HST photometric data --
881: including for instance the substantial uncertainties in the
882: metallicity distribution and interstellar extinction curves of nearby
883: galaxies -- errors of this magnitude may be considered as acceptable.
884:
885: The data provided in this paper are not conceived as a static set of
886: tables, but rather as a database that will be revised and/or extended
887: as soon as there is a significant improvement on the input ingredients
888: -- comprising the spectral flux libraries, the reference Vega
889: spectrum, filter transmission curves, the interstellar extinction
890: curve, and the isochrone sets to which the transformations are
891: applied. An important extension is the inclusion of tables for the
892: WFC3 camera (Bond et al. 2006), which will soon replace WFPC2 after
893: HST Servicing Mission 4. Preliminary tables for WFC3 are already
894: provided in the present database since they may be useful in the
895: preparation for HST Cycle 17. They were derived in the same way as
896: WFPC2 and ACS tables, using filter throughputs from SYNPHOT/STSDAS
897: v3.7 files available at January 15, 2008. The WFC3 data will be
898: replaced as soon as revised throughputs are released by the WFC3 team.
899:
900: \acknowledgments
901:
902: We thank M. Sirianni, B. Salasnich and B. Balick for their
903: early interest in these isochrones and for their help with the filter
904: transmission curves. L.G. acknowledges A. Bressan and P. Marigo for
905: their encouragement, and the many people who have pointed out problems
906: in previous versions of the ACS and WFPC2 isochrones.
907:
908: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
909: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
910: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
911: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
912: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
913: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
914: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
915: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
916:
917: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
918: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
919: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
920: %% copy editing. Individual instruments or configurations can be provided
921: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
922:
923: {\it Facilities:} \facility{HST (ACS)}, \facility{HST (WFPC2)}.
924:
925: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
926: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
927: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
928: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
929: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
930: %%
931: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
932: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
933: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
934: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
935: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
936: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
937: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
938: %% place of the \cite commands.
939:
940: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
941: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
942: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
943:
944: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
945: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
946: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
947: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
948: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
949:
950: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
951: %References:
952:
953: \begin{thebibliography}{}
954: \bibitem[Allard et al.(2000)]{2000ASPC..212..127A} Allard, F., Hauschildt,
955: P.~H., Alexander, D.~R., Ferguson, J.~W., \& Tamanai, A.\ 2000a, in
956: From Giant Planets to Cool Stars, ASP Conference Series, Vol. 212.
957: Eds. Caitlin A. Griffith \& Mark S. Marley (San Francisco: ASP), p. 127
958: \bibitem[Allard et al.(2000)]{2000ApJ...540.1005A} Allard, F., Hauschildt,
959: P.~H., \& Schwenke, D.\ 2000b, \apj, 540, 1005
960: \bibitem[Allard et al.(2001)]{2001ApJ...556..357A} Allard, F., Hauschildt,
961: P.~H., Alexander, D.~R., Tamanai, A., \& Schweitzer, A.\ 2001, \apj, 556,
962: 357
963: \bibitem[Bahcall et al.(1995)]{1995RvMP...67..781B} Bahcall, J.~N.,
964: Pinsonneault, M.~H., \& Wasserburg, G.~J.\ 1995, Reviews of Modern Physics,
965: 67, 781
966: \bibitem[Bedin et al.(2005)]{2005MNRAS.357.1038B} Bedin, L.~R., Cassisi,
967: S., Castelli, F., Piotto, G., Anderson, J., Salaris, M., Momany, Y., \&
968: Pietrinferni, A.\ 2005, \mnras, 357, 1038
969: \bibitem[Bertelli et al.(1994)]{1994A&AS..106..275B} Bertelli, G., Bressan,
970: A., Chiosi, C., Fagotto, F., \& Nasi, E.\ 1994, \aaps, 106, 275
971: \bibitem[Bertelli et al.(2008)]{2008arXiv0803.1460B} Bertelli, G., Girardi,
972: L., Marigo, P., \& Nasi, E.\ 2008, \aap, in press, ArXiv e-prints, 803, arXiv:0803.1460
973: \bibitem[]{} Bessell, M.S., 1990, PASP, 102, 1181
974: \bibitem[Bessell et al.(1998)]{1998A&A...333..231B} Bessell, M.~S.,
975: Castelli, F., \& Plez, B.\ 1998, \aap, 333, 231
976: \bibitem[Bohlin(2007)]{2007ASPC..364..315B} Bohlin, R.~C.\ 2007, in The Future
977: of Photometric, Spectrophotometric and Polarimetric Standardization,
978: ASP Conference Series, Vol. 364, ed. C. Sterken, San Francisco:
979: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, p. 315
980: \bibitem[]{} Bond, H.E., et al. 2006, ``Wide Field Camera 3 instrument mini-Handbook, Version 3.0'' (Baltimore: STScI)
981: \bibitem[]{} Brown, T.M., Ferguson, H.C., Smith, E., Guhathakurta, P.,
982: Kimble, R. A., Sweigart, A.V., Renzini, A., Rich, R.M., VandenBerg, D.A.
983: 2005, AJ, 130, 1693
984: \bibitem[]{} Cardelli, J.A., Clayton, G.C., Mathis, J.S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245
985: \bibitem[Castelli et al.(1997)]{1997A&A...318..841C} Castelli, F., Gratton,
986: R.~G., \& Kurucz, R.~L.\ 1997, \aap, 318, 841
987: \bibitem[]{} Castelli, F., \& Kurucz, R.~L., 2003, in Modelling of Stellar
988: Atmospheres, proceedings of IAU Symposium 210, eds. N. Piskunov, W.W. Weiss,
989: \& D.F. Gray, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, p. A20
990: \bibitem[]{} Carretta, E. \& Gratton, R.G. 1997, A\&ASS,121, 95
991: \bibitem[]{} Chabrier G., Baraffe I., Allard F., Hauschildt P.H., 2000,
992: ApJ, 542, 464
993: \bibitem[Chiosi et al.(1997)]{1997A&AS..121..301C} Chiosi, C., Vallenari,
994: A., \& Bressan, A.\ 1997, \aaps, 121, 301
995: \bibitem[Cioni et al.(2006)]{2006A&A...448...77C} Cioni, M.-R.~L., Girardi,
996: L., Marigo, P., \& Habing, H.~J.\ 2006, \aap, 448, 77
997: \bibitem[]{} Del Principe, M., Piersimoni, A., Bono, G., Di Paola, A.,
998: Dolci, M. \& Marconi, M. 2005, AJ, 129, 2714
999: \bibitem[Dotter et al.(2007)]{2007AJ....134..376D} Dotter, A., Chaboyer,
1000: B., Jevremovi{\'c}, D., Baron, E., Ferguson, J.~W., Sarajedini, A., \&
1001: Anderson, J.\ 2007, \aj, 134, 376
1002: \bibitem[]{} Finley, D.S., Koester, D., Basri, G. 1997, ApJ, 488, 375
1003: \bibitem[Fluks et al.(1994)]{1994A&AS..105..311F} Fluks, M.~A., Plez, B.,
1004: The, P.~S., de Winter, D., Westerlund, B.~E., \& Steenman, H.~C.\ 1994,
1005: \aaps, 105, 311
1006: \bibitem[]{} Forbes, J.D. 1842, Phil. Trans., 132, 225
1007: \bibitem[Girardi et al.(2000)]{2000A&AS..141..371G} Girardi, L., Bressan,
1008: A., Bertelli, G., \& Chiosi, C.\ 2000, \aaps, 141, 371
1009: \bibitem[Girardi et al.(2002)]{2002A&A...391..195G} Girardi, L., Bertelli,
1010: G., Bressan, A., Chiosi, C., Groenewegen, M.~A.~T., Marigo, P., Salasnich,
1011: B., \& Weiss, A.\ 2002, \aap, 391, 195
1012: \bibitem[Girardi et al.(2005)]{2005A&A...436..895G} Girardi, L.,
1013: Groenewegen, M.~A.~T., Hatziminaoglou, E., \& da Costa, L.\ 2005, \aap,
1014: 436, 895
1015: \bibitem[]{} Grebel, E.K., \& Roberts, W.J. 1995, A\&AS, 109, 293
1016: \bibitem[Holtzman et al.(1995)]{1995PASP..107.1065H} Holtzman, J.~A.,
1017: Burrows, C.~J., Casertano, S., Hester, J.~J., Trauger, J.~T., Watson,
1018: A.~M., \& Worthey, G.\ 1995, \pasp, 107, 1065
1019: \bibitem[]{} Homeier, D., Koester, D., Hagen, H.-J., et al. 1998,
1020: A\&A, 338, 563
1021: \bibitem[Lejeune(2002)]{2002ASPC..274..159L} Lejeune, T.\ 2002, in
1022: Observed HR Diagrams and Stellar Evolution, ASP Conference Proceedings,
1023: Vol. 274, eds. Thibault Lejeune \& Jo\~ao Fernandes,
1024: San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, p.159
1025: \bibitem[O'Donnell(1994)]{1994ApJ...422..158O} O'Donnell, J.~E.\ 1994,
1026: \apj, 422, 158
1027: \bibitem{} Loidl, R., Lan\c{c}on, A., \& J\o rgensen, U.G. 2001, A\&A
1028: 371, 1065
1029: \bibitem[Ma{\'{\i}}z Apell{\'a}niz(2006)]{2006AJ....131.1184M} Ma{\'{\i}}z
1030: Apell{\'a}niz, J.\ 2006, \aj, 131, 1184
1031: \bibitem[Marigo \& Girardi(2001)]{2001A&A...377..132M} Marigo, P., \&
1032: Girardi, L.\ 2001, \aap, 377, 132
1033: \bibitem[Marigo \& Girardi(2007)]{2007A&A...469..239M} Marigo, P., \&
1034: Girardi, L.\ 2007, \aap, 469, 239
1035: \bibitem[Marigo et al.(2003)]{2003A&A...403..225M} Marigo, P., Girardi, L.,
1036: \& Chiosi, C.\ 2003, \aap, 403, 225
1037: \bibitem[Marigo et al.(2008)]{2007arXiv0711.4922M} Marigo, P., Girardi, L.,
1038: Bressan, A., Groenewegen, M.~A.~T., Silva, L.,
1039: \& Granato, G.~L.\ 2008, \aap, in press, ArXiv e-prints, 711, arXiv:0711.4922
1040: \bibitem[Palmieri et al.(2002)]{2002A&A...392..115P} Palmieri, R., Piotto,
1041: G., Saviane, I., Girardi, L., \& Castellani, V.\ 2002, \aap, 392, 115
1042: \bibitem[Recio-Blanco et al.(2005)]{2005A&A...432..851R} Recio-Blanco, A.,
1043: et al.\ 2005, \aap, 432, 851
1044: \bibitem[]{} Rosenberg, A., Aparicio, A., Saviane, I. \& Piotto, G. 2000,
1045: A\&ASS, 145, 451
1046: \bibitem[Salasnich et al.(2000)]{2000A&A...361.1023S} Salasnich, B.,
1047: Girardi, L., Weiss, A., \& Chiosi, C.\ 2000, \aap, 361, 1023
1048: \bibitem[]{} Schlegel, D.J., Finkbeiner, D.P. \& Davis, M. 1998, \apj,
1049: 500, 525
1050: \bibitem[Sirianni et al.(2005)]{2005PASP..117.1049S} Sirianni, M., et al.\
1051: 2005, \pasp, 117, 1049
1052: \bibitem{} Vanhollebeke, E., Groenewegen, M.A.T., Girardi, L. 2008, \aap,
1053: submitted
1054: \bibitem[]{} Zinn, R. \& West, M.J. 1984, \apjs, 55, 45
1055: \end{thebibliography}
1056:
1057: \end{document}
1058: