1: \global\def\draftcontrol{0}
2:
3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4: \def\versionno{ phase transition}
5: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
6:
7: \catcode`\@=11
8:
9: %%%
10: %%%%%% draftcontrol
11: %%%%%%%%%
12: \expandafter\ifx\csname draftcontrol\endcsname\relax\global\def\draftcontrol{0}
13: \fi
14:
15: %%%
16: %%%%%% draftdate
17: %%%%%%%%%
18: {\count255=\time\divide\count255 by 60
19: \xdef\hourmin{\number\count255}
20: \multiply\count255 by-60\advance\count255 by\time
21: \xdef\hourmin{\hourmin:\ifnum\count255<10 0\fi\the\count255}}
22: \def\draftdate{\number\month/\number\day/\number\year\ \ \ \hourmin }
23:
24: %%%
25: %%%%%% titlepage (adapted from article.cls)
26: %%%%%%%%%
27: \newcommand\makepapertitle{\par
28: \begingroup
29: \renewcommand\thefootnote{\@fnsymbol\c@footnote}%
30: \def\@makefnmark{\rlap{\@textsuperscript{\normalfont\@thefnmark}}}%
31: \long\def\@makefntext##1{\parindent 1em\noindent
32: \hb@xt@1.8em{%
33: \hss\@textsuperscript{\normalfont\@thefnmark}}##1}%
34: \newpage
35: \global\@topnum\z@ % Prevents figures from going at top of page.
36: \@makepapertitle
37: \thispagestyle{empty}\@thanks
38: \endgroup
39: \setcounter{footnote}{0}%
40: \global\let\thanks\relax
41: \global\let\makepapertitle\relax
42: \global\let\@makepapertitle\relax
43: \global\let\@thanks\@empty
44: \global\let\@author\@empty
45: \global\let\@date\@empty
46: \global\let\@title\@empty
47: \global\let\title\relax
48: \global\let\author\relax
49: \global\let\date\relax
50: \global\let\and\relax
51: \def\version{\let\version\@version\@gobble}
52: }
53: \def\@makepapertitle{%
54: \newpage
55: \ifnum\draftcontrol=1 {}
56: \version\versionno
57: \vskip 3em%
58: \else
59: \hfill\hbox to 3cm {\parbox{4cm}{\@pubnum}\hss}%
60: \vskip 3em%
61: \fi
62: \begin{center}%
63: \let \footnote \thanks
64: {\LARGE {\@title}}%
65: \vskip 1.5em%
66: {\normalsize%\large
67: \lineskip .5em%
68: \begin{tabular}[t]{c}%
69: \@author
70: \end{tabular}\par}%
71: \vskip 1.5em%
72: {\@bstract}%
73: \end{center}%
74: \vskip 1.5em
75: \@date%
76: \par
77: }
78:
79: \gdef\@pubnum{}
80: %\@latex@error{No \noexpand \pubnum given}\@ehc}
81: \def\pubnum#1{%
82: \gdef\@pubnum{#1}}
83:
84: \gdef\@bstract{}
85: \def\Abstract#1{%
86: \gdef\@bstract{%
87: \parbox{\textwidth-0pc}{%
88: \centerline{\bf Abstract}\penalty1000%
89: \kern.2cm%
90: \noindent%\abstractfont \baselineskip=12pt
91: \renewcommand\baselinestretch{1.0}%
92: {#1}}}
93: }
94:
95:
96: %%%
97: %%%%%% pagestyle
98: %%%%%%%%% for body of text
99: %%%%%%%%%%%%
100: \def\ps@paper{\let\@mkboth\@gobbletwo%
101: \ifnum\draftcontrol=1
102: \def\@oddfoot{\hbox to \textwidth{\tiny \versionno \hfil\tiny\draftdate}%
103: \hskip -\textwidth \hbox to \textwidth{\hfil\rm\thepage\hfil}}%
104: \else\def\@oddfoot{\hbox to \textwidth{\hfil\rm\thepage\hfil}}
105: \fi
106: \let\@evenfoot\@oddfoot
107: }
108: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
109:
110: %%%
111: %%%%%% front vs body vs coda
112: %%%%%%%%%
113: \def\body{\clearpage
114: % \pagenumbering{arabic}
115: \pagestyle{paper}
116: }
117: \newenvironment{acknowledgments}{%
118: \vskip 3.25ex
119: %\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}%
120: % {-3.25ex \@plus -1ex \@minus -.2ex}%
121: % {1.5ex \@plus.2ex}%
122: % {\normalfont\normalsize\bfseries}
123: \noindent {\bf Acknowledgments}
124: %\vskip 0in
125: %\noindent
126: }
127:
128: %%%%%%%%%%%%
129:
130: %%%
131: %%%%%% definitions for draftmode
132: %%%%%%%%%
133: %%%%%%%%%%%% versioncontrol
134: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
135: \def\@version#1{\ifnum\draftcontrol=1
136: \typeout{}\typeout{#1}\typeout{}
137: \vskip3mm\centerline{\hbox{\fbox{\normalsize{\tt DRAFT -- #1 -- }
138: {\draftdate}}}}\vskip3mm
139: \fi}
140: \let\version\@version
141: %%%%%%%%%%%% labels in math mode
142: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
143: \long\def\eqlabel#1{\ifnum\draftcontrol=1
144: \tag@false % there are some problems with multline without this
145: \tag*{(\theequation) \hbox to -0.2cm{\hspace{0cm}\small{#1}\hss}}
146: \refstepcounter{equation}
147: \edef\@currentlabel{\theequation}
148: \ltx@label{#1} % use old LaTeX \label instead of new definition
149: % of \label in AMSLaTeX.
150: \else
151: \label{#1}
152: \fi
153: }
154: %%%%%%%%%%%% citations keys in bibliography (very short version of showkeys.sty)
155: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
156: \let\st@bibitem\@bibitem
157: \let\st@lbibitem\@lbibitem
158: \ifnum\draftcontrol=1
159: \def\@bibitem#1{%
160: \st@bibitem{#1}\a@@label{#1}\ignorespaces}
161: \def\@lbibitem[#1]#2{%
162: \st@lbibitem[#1]{#2}\a@@label{#2}\ignorespaces}
163: \def\a@@label#1{%
164: \gdef\a@lab{\smash{\normalfont\small#1}}
165: \ifvmode
166: \if@inlabel
167: \global\setbox\@labels\hbox{%
168: \llap{\a@lab\let\a@lab\relax
169: \kern\@totalleftmargin\kern\marginparsep}%
170: \box\@labels}%
171: \fi
172: \fi}
173: \fi
174: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
175:
176:
177: %%%
178: %%%%%% start
179: %%%%%%%%%
180: \documentclass[12pt,letterpaper]{article}
181: %%%%%%%%%%%%
182:
183: %%%
184: %%%%%% load packages
185: %%%%%%%%%
186: \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,array,calc,epsfig}
187: %\usepackage[nosort]{cite}
188: %%%%%%%%%%%%
189:
190: %%%
191: %%%%%% relax
192: %%%%%%%%%
193: \ifnum\draftcontrol=1
194: \tolerance=1000
195: \fi
196: %%%%%%%%%%%%
197:
198: %%%
199: %%%%%% layout
200: %%%%%%%%%
201: \renewcommand\baselinestretch{1.25}
202: \setlength{\paperheight}{11in}
203: \setlength{\paperwidth}{8.5in}
204: \setlength{\textwidth}{\paperwidth-2.4in} \hoffset= -.3in % +1in from printer
205: \setlength{\textheight}{\paperheight-2.4in} \topmargin= -.6in % +1in from printer
206:
207: %%%%%%%%% section titles
208: \renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}%
209: {-3.5ex \@plus -1ex \@minus -.2ex}%
210: {2.3ex \@plus.2ex}%
211: {\normalfont\large\bfseries}}
212: \renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}%
213: {-3.25ex\@plus -1ex \@minus -.2ex}%
214: {1.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
215: {\normalfont\normalsize\bfseries}}
216: \renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}%
217: {-3.25ex\@plus -1ex \@minus -.2ex}%
218: {1.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
219: {\normalfont\normalsize\it}}
220: \renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}%
221: {-3.25ex\@plus -1ex \@minus -.2ex}%
222: {1.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
223: {\normalfont\normalsize\bf}}
224:
225: %%%
226: %%%%%% number equations within sections
227: %%%%%%%%%
228: \numberwithin{equation}{section}
229:
230: %%%
231: %%%%%% macros
232: %%%%%%%%%
233:
234: %%%%%%%%% standard
235: %%%%%%%%%%%%
236:
237: \def\ie{{\it i.e.}}
238: \def\eg{{\it e.g.}}
239:
240: \def\revise#1 {\raisebox{-0em}{\rule{3pt}{1em}}%
241: \marginpar{\raisebox{.5em}{\vrule width3pt\
242: \vrule width0pt height 0pt depth0.5em
243: \hbox to 0cm{\hspace{0cm}{%
244: \parbox[t]{4em}{\raggedright\footnotesize{#1}}}\hss}}}}
245:
246: \newcommand\fnxt[1] {\raisebox{.12em}{\rule{.35em}{.35em}}\mbox{\hspace{0.6em}}#1}
247: \newcommand\nxt[1] {\\\fnxt#1}
248:
249: \def\cala {{\cal A}}
250: \def\calA {{\mathfrak A}}
251: \def\calAbar {{\underline \calA}}
252: \def\calb {{\cal B}}
253: \def\calc {{\cal C}}
254: \def\cald {{\cal D}}
255: \def\cale {{\cal E}}
256: \def\calf {{\cal F}}
257: \def\calg {{\cal G}}
258: \def\calG {{\mathfrak G}}
259: \def\calh {{\cal H}}
260: \def\cali {{\cal I}}
261: \def\calj {{\cal J}}
262: \def\calk {{\cal K}}
263: \def\call {{\cal L}}
264: \def\calm {{\cal M}}
265: \def\caln {{\cal N}}
266: \def\calo {{\cal O}}
267: \def\calp {{\cal P}}
268: \def\calq {{\cal Q}}
269: \def\calr {{\cal R}}
270: \def\cals {{\cal S}}
271: \def\calt {{\cal T}}
272: \def\calu {{\cal U}}
273: \def\calv {{\cal V}}
274: \def\calw {{\cal W}}
275:
276: \def\complex {{\mathbb C}}
277: \def\naturals {{\mathbb N}}
278: \def\projective {{\mathbb P}}
279: \def\rationals {{\mathbb Q}}
280: \def\reals {{\mathbb R}}
281: \def\zet {{\mathbb Z}}
282:
283: \def\del {\partial}
284: \def\delbar {\bar\partial}
285: \def\ee {{\rm e}}
286: \def\ii {{\rm i}}
287: \def\chain {{\circ}}
288: \def\tr {\mathop{\rm Tr}}
289: \def\Re {{\rm Re\hskip0.1em}}
290: \def\Im {{\rm Im\hskip0.1em}}
291: \def\id {{\it id}}
292:
293: \def\de#1#2{{\rm d}^{#1}\!#2\,}
294: \def\De#1{{\cald}#1\,}
295:
296: \def\half{{\frac12}}
297: \newcommand\topa[2]{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{2}{\scriptstyle #1}{\scriptstyle #2}}
298: \def\undertilde#1{{\vphantom#1\smash{\underset{\widetilde{\hphantom{\displaystyle#1}}}{#1}}}}
299: \def\prodprime{\mathop{{\prod}'}}
300: \def\gsq#1#2{%
301: {\scriptstyle #1}\square\limits_{\scriptstyle #2}{\,}} % Ginsparg square
302: \def\sqr#1#2{{\vcenter{\vbox{\hrule height.#2pt
303: \hbox{\vrule width.#2pt height#1pt \kern#1pt
304: \vrule width.#2pt}\hrule height.#2pt}}}}
305: \def\square{%
306: \mathop{\mathchoice{\sqr{12}{15}}{\sqr{9}{12}}{\sqr{6.3}{9}}{\sqr{4.5}{9}}}}
307:
308: %%%%%%%%% jtl macros
309: %%%%%%%%%%%%
310: \newcommand{\fft}[2]{{\frac{#1}{#2}}}
311: \newcommand{\ft}[2]{{\textstyle{\frac{#1}{#2}}}}
312: \def\jsquare{\mathop{\mathchoice{\sqr{8}{32}}{\sqr{8}{32}}
313: {\sqr{6.3}{9}}{\sqr{4.5}{9}}}}
314:
315:
316: \newcommand{\wn}{\mathfrak{w}}
317:
318:
319: %%%%%%%%% paper specific macros
320: %%%%%%%%%%%%
321:
322:
323: \def\a{\alpha}
324: \def\b{\beta}
325: \def\w{\omega}
326: \def\r{\rho}
327: \def\dd{\delta}
328: \def\e{\epsilon}
329: \def\c{\chi}
330: \def\ga{\gamma}
331: \def\ee{\cale}
332: \def\hx{\hat{x}}
333: \def\rh{\hat{\rho}}
334: \def\chih{\hat{\chi}}
335: \def\hh{\hat{h}}
336: \def\aa1{\phi}
337: \def\cc1{\psi}
338: \def\hh{\hat{h}}
339: \def\nm{\nabla_\mu}
340: \def\nn{\nabla_\nu}
341: \def\G{\Gamma}
342: \def\arctanh{{\rm arctanh}}
343: \def\t{\tau}
344: \def\d{\Delta}
345: \def\om{\Omega}
346: \def\l{\lambda}
347: \def\ha{\hat{a}}
348: \def\hb{\hat{b}}
349: \def\hc{\hat{c}}
350: \def\hal{\hat{\alpha}}
351: \def\hp{\hat{\phi}}
352: \def\he{\hat{\eta}}
353: \def\D{\Delta}
354: %%%%%%%%%%%%
355:
356: % RJ defs
357:
358: \newcommand{\eq}{\begin{equation}}
359: \newcommand{\eqx}{\end{equation}}
360: \newcommand{\eqn}{\begin{eqnarray}}
361: \newcommand{\eqnx}{\end{eqnarray}}
362: \newcommand{\f}[2]{\frac{#1}{#2}}
363:
364:
365:
366:
367: \catcode`\@=12
368:
369: \begin{document}
370:
371: %%%
372: %%%%%% text starts here
373: %%%%%%%%%
374:
375: \title{\bf
376: ``Black Universe'' epoch in String Cosmology}
377: \pubnum{UWO-TH-08/6
378: }
379:
380:
381: %\date{April 2008}
382:
383: \author{
384: Alex Buchel$ ^{1,2}$ and Lev Kofman$ ^{3}$\\[0.4cm]
385: \it $ ^1$Department of Applied Mathematics\\
386: \it University of Western Ontario\\
387: \it London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada\\
388: \it $ ^2$Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics\\
389: \it Waterloo, Ontario N2J 2W9, Canada\\
390: \it $ ^3$CITA, University of Toronto\\
391: \it 60 St. George st.\\
392: \it Totonto, Ontario M5S 3H8, Canada
393: }
394:
395: \Abstract{
396: String theory compactification involves manifolds
397: with multiple warp factors. For cosmological applications, we often
398: introduce a short, high-energy inflationary throat, and a long,
399: low-energy Standard Model throat. It is assumed that at the end of inflation,
400: the excited Kaluza-Klein modes from the Inflationary throat tunnel to the SM throat
401: and reheat Standard Model degrees of freedom, which are attached to probe brane(s).
402: However, the huge hierarchy of energy scales
403: can result in a highly dynamic transition of the throat geometry.
404: We point out that in such a cosmological scenario the Standard Model
405: throat (together with SM brane) will be cloaked by a Schwarzschild horizon, produced by the Kaluza-Klein modes
406: tunneling from the short throat. The Black Brane formation is dual
407: to the first order chiral phase transition of the cascading gauge theory.
408: We calculate the critical energy density corresponding the formation of the the BH horizon in the long throat.
409: We discuss the duality between "Black Universe" cosmology and an expanding universe driven by the
410: hot gauge theory radiation. We address the new problem of the hierarchical multiple-throat scenarios:
411: SM brane disappearance after the decay of the BH horizon.}
412:
413: \makepapertitle
414:
415: \body
416:
417: \version\versionno
418:
419: \section{Introduction: Warped geometry, Duality and Cosmology}
420:
421: There are various high dimensional formulations of particle physics theories,
422: such as fundamental string theory or phenomenological high dimensional constructions.
423: Yet, most often string theory cosmology is reduced
424: to the conventional $3+1$ dimensional
425: universe, perhaps with some unconventional ingredients.
426: Low energy effective description is obtained from the high dimensional theory by integration over
427: compact inner dimensions
428: \begin{equation}
429: \label{reduction}
430: S_4=\int d^4x \sqrt{-g} {\cal L}_4=\int d^4x \sqrt{-g} \int d^6y \sqrt{G} {\cal L}_{10} \ .
431: \end{equation}
432:
433: An example recipe for string theory cosmology is to start with KKLT \cite{kklt} (or large volume) compactification
434: in the type IIB theory, include multiple throats with conifolds (attached to the
435: bulk Calabi-Yau) to provide the hierarchy of masses and couplings,
436: and to engineer inflation in this $4+6$ background geometry with branes or moduli fields.
437: In such a cosmological scenario at the end point of inflation, reheating, energy is supposed to stream through
438: the labyrinth of the compact manifold to find, in one of its corners, the light standard model particles which eventually
439: heat and fill up the universe \cite{Kofman:2005yz,Dufaux:2008br,tye2,csu}. For instance, one of the scenario is a
440: warped brane inflation
441: which occurs in the short (inflationary) throat at the GUT energy scale which contains an
442: anti-brane $\overline{D3}$ at the tip attracting the
443: mobile brane $D3$ \cite{K2LM2T}.
444: Brane-antibrane annihilation terminates inflation and energy cascades into KK modes associated with the
445: short throat. Suppose the SM particles are localized at the probe brane(s) in another, long SM throat of TeV scale.
446: It is often assumed that KK modes of the short throat tunnel into the long throat and subsequently
447: transfer their energy into SM sector.
448: All the calculations can be done in ten dimensional warped throat geometry (with the radial coordinate $y$ along of the throat)
449: \begin{equation}
450: \label{warped}
451: ds^2=H(y)^{-1/2}(-dt^2+d\vec x^2)+H(y)^{1/2}G_{ab}dy^ady^b\,,
452: \end{equation}
453: in the supergravity approximation
454: and then reduced to the effective four dimensional picture, according to the prescription (\ref{reduction}).
455: For the warped throats, one can use well-studied Klebanov-Strassler \cite{ks} solution with the deformed conifold at the tip,
456: to estimate KK masses, tunneling and decay rates, etc.
457:
458: The ten dimensional warped throat supergravity solution (like KS geometry) has a dual four dimensional gravity-free
459: gauge theory description.
460: Two or more throats attached to the bulk CY will be dual to two or more gauge theories
461: \begin{equation}
462: \label{gauge}
463: {\cal L}(\phi_1, \phi_2)={\cal L}_1(\phi_1)+{\cal L}_2(\phi_2)+\Delta {\cal L}(\phi_1, \phi_2)\,,
464: \end{equation}
465: where $\Delta {\cal L}(\phi_1, \phi_2)=\sum_n \frac{{\cal O}_n(\phi_1, \phi_2)}{M^n}$ is
466: an interaction term due to the high dimensional operators, $\phi_1$, $\phi_2$ are the fields in two gauge theories.
467: Excitations of KK modes in supergravity correspond to the glueball excitations in the dual picture (\ref{gauge}),
468: while the tunneling of KK modes between the throats has a dual description in terms of the
469: high dimensional operator $\Delta {\cal L}(\phi_1, \phi_2)$.
470:
471: A specific feature of the cosmological onset is that the two throats containing interacting excitations is
472: a highly dynamic system with the huge hierarchy of the energy scales.
473: Indeed, each of the gauge theories ${\cal L}_{1}(\phi_1)$, ${\cal L}_{2}(\phi_2)$ has its own critical energy $\epsilon_{c}$
474: (or critical temperature $T_{c}$) which separates the lower energy confinement phase from the higher energy
475: deconfinement plasma phase. On the other hand, the phase transitions at $\epsilon_{c}$ correspond to the
476: emergence of the strong gravity regime in the supergravity dual, manifested in the appearance of a
477: black hole (black brane) horizon across the throat, heuristically similar to the AdS/BH solution
478: \begin{equation}\label{adsbh}
479: ds^2=\frac{r^2}{R^2}\left(-\left(1-\frac{r_g^4}{r^4}\right)dt^2+d\vec x^2\right)+R^2\frac{dr^2}{r^2\left(1-{r_g^4}/{r^4}\right)}
480: +R^2 d\Omega_5^2 \ .
481: \end{equation}
482: where $r$ is related to the radial direction $y$ in (\ref{warped}).
483: Therefore, to understand string cosmology scenario with two throats of the inflationary and SM
484: scales one has to go well beyond the simple picture of KK modes tunneling between throats and
485: to recall the higher dimensional description of the throat geometry which can contain the BH horizon.
486: Moreover, the time-dependent cosmological scenario addresses to the string theory the questions
487: how the BH horizon in the throat appears, evolves and eventually disappears, and what may be the interesting consequences of
488: this higher dimensional epoch of the evolution of the universe. This is very different from the simple picture of KK modes
489: tunneling between throats. Moreover, as the BH horizon screens the tip of the SM throat (perhaps also
490: the $D3$ branes that live in the throat), the $d y$ integration in Eq.~(\ref{reduction}) is not valid so that we have to deal with
491: the higher dimensional theory. These are the problems we will try to formulate and discuss in this paper.
492:
493:
494: Let us recall the story of the high temperature phase transition /BH horizon duality.
495: Although the motivation of each original study
496: of such a duality was different, we will look at those
497: from the perspective of our string theory cosmology scenario.
498: Phase transition/BH duality is deeply connected with the correspondence between
499: supergravity in the $AdS_5 \times S^5$ and CFT at high temperature \cite{witten}.
500: In the context of supergravity throat solutions and gauge theories,
501: gravity dual to the supersymmetric $SU(K)\times SU(K+M)$ gauge theory\footnote{Assuming unbroken chiral symmetry.}
502: is the Klebanov-Tseytlin throat solution in
503: the type IIB theory with fluxes
504: \cite{kt} which has a singularity at the conifold.
505: In \cite{b} it was proposed that gauge theory with the restored chiral symmetry
506: above the critical temperature $T_{c}$ corresponds to the Schwarzschild horizon
507: which cloaks the naked singularity of the KT solution or tip of the throat in the KS solution.
508: While the original purpose in \cite{b} was to resolve the singularity of the KT solution,
509: its implications may go well beyond this. Klebanov-Strassler solution with deformed conifold
510: resolves the singularity problem of KT solution at zero temperature. However, it is the BH horizon
511: that provides a resolution of the KT singularity at high temperature.
512: Technically, it is a challenge to
513: find analytic BH throat solutions in ten dimensional type IIB theory with fluxes.
514: Supergravity solution with the regular BH horizon in the KT throat was constructed in \cite{b2, ghkt,abk}.
515: Gauge theory with the broken chiral symmetry at low temperature $T \ll T_{c}$ is dual to the regular throat solution,
516: while gauge theory with restored chiral symmetry at $T \gg T_{c}$ is dual to the generalized throat solution
517: with the regular BH horizon across the throat. Finite temperature gauge fields dynamics corresponds to the
518: first order phase transition at $T_{c}$.
519:
520: Originally, the KS throat solution was constructed as a supergravity dual to the cascading $SU(K)\times SU(K+M)$ gauge theory.
521: However, because this self-consistent geometry describes the throat with the regular tip at the finite distance, and because this
522: throat can be smoothly embedded in the CY manifold \cite{aha,kl}, KS solution is often evoked by cosmologists
523: as the model of the throat attached to the compact space.
524:
525: Correspondence between BH horizon and the phase transition was also discussed in the very different context, namely, in the
526: phenomenological five-dimensional Randall-Sundrum model.
527: While usually the four-dimensional effective theory at the brane is derived from the bulk+branes system in the
528: spirit of Eq.~(\ref{reduction}),
529: there was a proposal in \cite{apr} to extrapolate the ideas of holography
530: for the RS braneworld and particle phenomenology on the brane.
531: Original high-temperature plasma phase was proposed to be dual to the bulk AdS/BH horizon in five dimensions, while
532: EW phase transition at the brane should be dual to the disappearance of the horizon \cite{cnr}.
533:
534: In the following we recall the cascading gauge theory side of the duality. After that we explicitly evaluate the
535: critical energy density $\epsilon_c$ for a given throat. This will allow us to lay down the new cosmological
536: scenario which contains higher dimensional stage of formation and later disappearance of the higher dimensional BH horizon.
537: Similarly, this dynamics is relevant for the theoretical ``thought experiment'', if one is not interested in cosmology.
538: Finally we discuss potential cosmological problems and consequences of this cosmological model and address interesting
539: theoretical issues.
540:
541: \section{Gauge Theory Perspective}
542: The gauge theory dual to a local warped geometry is a so called ``cascading gauge theory''
543: introduced in \cite{kn,kt,ks}. This cascading gauge theory can be thought of as a specific $SU(K)\times SU(K+M)$
544: $\caln=1$ supersymmetric gauge theory, with a number of colors $K$ which runs logarithmically with the energy
545: scale $\mu$ \cite{ks,b,k,b3}
546: \begin{equation}
547: K=K(\mu)\sim M^2\ \ln\left(\mu/\Lambda\right)\, \ ,
548: \eqlabel{nrun}
549: \end{equation}
550: where $\Lambda$ is the strong coupling scale of the cascading gauge theory.
551: Despite having an infinite number of degrees of freedom in the ultraviolet, cascading gauge theory is
552: holographically\footnote{In the UV the cascading gauge theory 't Hooft coupling
553: becomes strong and thus renormalization of this
554: gauge theory must be addressed in the framework of the dual gravitational description.}
555: renormalizable as a four dimensional quantum field theory \cite{aby}.
556: At a given scale $\mu$ the gauge theory has two chiral superfields $A_1$, $A_2$ in the $(K+M,\overline{K})$
557: representation, and two fields $B_1$, $B_2$ in the $(\overline{K+M},K)$ representation. The superpotential of the model
558: is
559: \begin{equation}
560: W\sim \tr \left(A_i B_j A_k B_\ell\right) \e^{ik}\e^{j\ell}\,.
561: \end{equation}
562: The two gauge group factors have gauge couplings $g_1$ and $g_2$. Under the renormalization group flow
563: the sum of the coupling does not run
564: \begin{equation}
565: \frac{4\pi}{g_1^2}+\frac{4\pi}{g_2^2}={\rm constant} \,,
566: \eqlabel{gsum}
567: \end{equation}
568: while the difference is
569: \begin{equation}
570: \frac{4\pi}{g_2^2}-\frac{4\pi}{g_1^2}\sim M\ \ln\left(\mu/\Lambda\right)\left[3+2(1-\gamma)\right] \,,
571: \eqlabel{gdiff}
572: \end{equation}
573: where $\gamma$ is the anomalous dimension of operators $\tr A_i B_j$. It is clear from \eqref{gsum},
574: \eqref{gdiff} that starting at some energy scale and flowing either to the UV or the IR one inevitably
575: encounters a Landau pole: one of the two gauge couplings will become infinitely large. In \cite{ks}
576: it was argued that extension of the RG flow past the infinite couplings is achieved by a cascade of
577: self-similar Seiberg duality \cite{s} transformations on the strongly coupled gauge group factor.
578: At each duality step $K\to K+M$ for the RG flow to the UV, and $K\to K-M$ for the RG flow to the IR,
579: leading to the effective logarithmic running of the number of colors \eqref{nrun}.
580:
581: Cascading gauge theory confines in the IR; it has a classical $U(1)_R$ symmetry which is explicitly
582: broken to $\mathbf{Z}_{2M}$
583: by the anomaly, and then it is broken spontaneously by the gluino condensate to $\mathbf{Z}_2$ \cite{ks}.
584: In \cite{b} it was pointed out that at sufficiently high temperature, the R-symmetry of the gauge theory
585: is restored; moreover, this restoration is accompanied by a first order deconfinement phase transition\footnote{The high
586: temperature deconfinement state of the cascading gauge theory was studied in \cite{b,b2,ghkt}.}.
587: Such a phase transition was recently identified in \cite{abk}. A summary of the proposal \cite{b} and the
588: detailed analysis \cite{abk} is that a cascading gauge theory at equilibrium has a critical energy density,
589: which we refer to as $\e_{c}$, such that for density $\e>\e_{c}$ it is in a deconfined
590: phase with $\calo \left(K(\e)^2\right)$ entropy.
591:
592:
593: Several comments are in order before we finish the gauge theory discussion.
594:
595: First, the deconfinement phase transition at $\e> \e_{c}$ assumes that the boundary gauge theory
596: is in flat space-time, or at least $\e_{c}\gg R_4^{2}$. Here, $R_4$ is the Ricci scalar of the background metric.
597:
598: One expects a chiral symmetry restoration ( but {\it without} the deconfinement ) phase transition in curved
599: space-time. For a cascading gauge theory on $S^3$ this was demonstrated in \cite{bt} while for the
600: cascading gauge theory in $dS_4$ this was discussed in \cite{b4}. In both cases the background curvature serves
601: as a regulator that cuts off the IR physics associated with the gluino condensate. By studying a $D3$-brane probe
602: in the deformed geometry\footnote{In the $dS_4$ case this was done in \cite{br}.} it is easy to see that
603: the spectrum of fluctuations in the deformed throat is gapped.
604:
605: In principle, for a cascading gauge theory in flat space-time one could imagine two separate phase transitions:
606: a confinement/deconfinement one, and the chiral symmetry restoration transition. For the scenario discussed in this paper
607: it is important whether or not there is a deconfined phase with a broken chiral symmetry. Such a phase, were it to exist,
608: is expected to have a critical energy density higher than $\e_{c}$. A detailed analysis \cite{ab} indicates that such a phase
609: is not realized. In other words: the hot cascading gauge theory plasma cools though a first order phase transition
610: where the chiral symmetry is broken only when the theory confines.
611:
612:
613:
614: \section{Critical Energy Density in the Throat}
615:
616: In this Section we turn to the throat geometry. We will
617: compute the critical energy density for weakly curved 3+1 dimensional space-time
618: (modeling our universe) that is necessary to hide it behind the horizon in the ambient warped throat geometry.
619: Each throat has its own critical density, which corresponds to horizon formation, but for our scenario we will focus on
620: $\epsilon_c$ for the SM throat.
621:
622: We assume that our universe (in the low energy limit where the energy density in all throats
623: is much lower than $\epsilon_c$) is part of the KS geometry
624: which away from the tip is locally described by the KT geometry
625: \begin{equation}
626: ds_{10}^2=H^{-1/2}(r)\ \eta_{\mu\nu}dx^{\mu}dx^{\nu}+H^{1/2}(r)\left(dr^2+r^2 d s_{T^{1,1}}^2\right)\,,
627: \eqlabel{kt}
628: \end{equation}
629: where
630: \begin{equation}
631: H(r)=\frac{R_+^4+R_-^4\ \ln\left(\frac{r}{R_+}\right)}{r^4}\,,
632: \eqlabel{warp}
633: \end{equation}
634: with
635: \begin{equation}
636: R_+^4=\frac{27\pi }{4}\a'^2 g_s M K\,,\qquad R_-^4=\frac{81}{8}\a'^2g_s^2 M^2\, \ ,
637: \eqlabel{rprm}
638: \end{equation}
639: and $M$ and $K$ are the integer numbers associated with the quantization conditions of the form fields
640: fluxes of the type IIB theory
641: which generate the throat geometry (\ref{kt}).
642: The local geometry \eqref{kt} is holographically dual to the four-dimensional cascading gauge theory reviewed in
643: the previous section.
644: For large enough energy density this cascading gauge theory undergoes a deconfining phase transition \cite{b,abk},
645: which is reflected in the formation of a Schwarzschild horizon\footnote{As we will explain
646: in the following Sections, in our scenario this energy density is accumulated
647: from the ``gravitational collapse'' of the excited KK modes initially produced from the $D3\overline{D3}$ annihilation in the
648: inflationary throat.} in \eqref{kt}. The type IIB supergravity background corresponding to a Schwarzschild horizon
649: in asymptotic geometry \eqref{kt} takes form \cite{abk}\footnote{The frames $\{e_{\theta_a},e_{\phi_a}\}$ are defined as
650: in \cite{aby}, such that the metric on a unit size $T^{1,1}$ is
651: given by $\left(e_\psi^2\right)+ \sum_{a=1}^2
652: \left(e_{\theta_a}^2+e_{\phi_a}^2\right)$.}:
653: \begin{equation}
654: \begin{split}
655: ds_{10}^2=&h^{-1/2}(2Y-Y^2)^{-1/2}\left(-(1-Y)^2 dt^2+d \vec x^2\right)+G_{YY}dY^2\\
656: &+h^{1/2} [f_2\ \left(e_\psi^2\right)+ f_3\ \sum_{a=1}^2
657: \left(e_{\theta_a}^2+e_{\phi_a}^2\right)]\,,
658: \end{split}
659: \eqlabel{ktm}
660: \end{equation}
661: where $h$, $f_2$ and $f_3$ are some functions of the radial
662: coordinate $Y\in [0,1]$.
663: There is also a dilaton, and form fields ( see \cite{abk} for details).
664: Notice that the radial coordinate in \eqref{ktm} is gauged-fixed\footnote{Because we gauge-fixed
665: the radial coordinate, there is a constraint equation coming from the equation of motion of this variable;
666: this equation can be solved to determine $G_{xx}$ \cite{abk}.} so that
667: \begin{equation}
668: \eqlabel{xfixing} \frac{G_{tt}}{G_{ii}} = -(1-Y)^2\, \ .
669: \end{equation}
670: The new radial coordinate $Y$ is related asymptotically to $r$ in \eqref{kt} as follows
671: \begin{equation}
672: Y\sim \frac{1}{r^4}\,,\qquad r\to \infty\,.
673: \eqlabel{xrrel}
674: \end{equation}
675: Type IIB supergravity equations of motion in the background metric \eqref{ktm} are solved, subject
676: to the following boundary conditions:\\
677: i) near the boundary ($Y\to 0$ or $r\to \infty$) the black hole metric \eqref{ktm} approaches
678: the Klebanov-Tseytlin geometry \eqref{kt};\\
679: ii) the hypersurface $Y=1$ is a regular Schwarzschild horizon of the metric \eqref{ktm}; the latter is equivalent to requiring that
680: all the warp factors $h$, $f_2$ and $f_3$
681: are positive at $Y=1$.
682:
683:
684: When the temperature $T$ of the black hole \eqref{ktm} is much larger than the characteristic
685: KK scale $m_{KK}$ deep inside the throat geometry \eqref{ktm}\footnote{See Eq.\eqref{KK} of the next Section.}
686: \begin{equation}
687: T\gg \Lambda \sim m_{KK}\sim \frac{1}{R_-}\ e^{-\frac{2\pi K}{3Mg_s}}\,,
688: \eqlabel{hight}
689: \end{equation}
690: the black hole geometry and its thermodynamics can be determined analytically \cite{ghkt,aby,abk}.
691: Specifically, we find for $T\gg \Lambda$
692: \begin{equation}
693: f\simeq -\frac{1}{8}\pi^2 K(T)^2\ T^4\sim -M^4 T^4 \left(\ln \frac{T}{\Lambda}\right)^2 \,,\qquad \e\simeq -3 f\,,
694: \eqlabel{fe}
695: \end{equation}
696: for the black hole free energy density $f$ and the energy density $\e$.
697: We have used \eqref{nrun} to arrive at \eqref{fe}. Here $K(T)$ is the number of degrees of freedom, c.f. Eq.~(\ref{nrun}).
698:
699: For temperature $T$ of order $\Lambda$ the black hole thermodynamics can be studied only numerically.
700: It was found in \cite{abk} that there is a critical temperature, corresponding to a critical energy
701: density $\e_c$, such that the free energy density of the black hole \eqref{ktm} vanishes precisely
702: at $\e=\e_c$, and becomes positive for $\e<\e_c$.
703: Thus we expect
704: a first order deconfinement/confinement phase transition in the cascading gauge theory plasma once its energy
705: density becomes less than $\e_c$.
706: This first order phase transition (which occurs via bubble nucleation and percolation) shall be dual to the
707: inhomogeneous melting of the BH horizon (which before this is translationally invariant in the $\vec x$ directions).
708:
709: From the point of view of the usual $3+1$ dimensional GR, the disappearance of the horizon is rather unusual.
710: However, the disappearance of a higher dimensional horizon is a familiar phenomenon, and we shall comment on it.
711: A crucial observation is that at the supergravity side,
712: there is another geometry, besides the black hole geometry \eqref{ktm}, which also asymptotes to
713: (a Euclidean version) of \eqref{kt}:
714: the KS geometry with a Euclidean time direction identified with a period of $1/T$. The latter solution has no horizon,
715: it has a zero free energy, and is dual to a thermal gas of the confined cascading gauge theory.
716: The coexistence of these two solutions provides the possibility for transitions between horizon and no-horizon geometrical phases
717: (through instantons, see.e.g. \cite{cnr}).
718: The supergravity dual of the phase transition bears similarity to the Hawking-Page
719: transition, which was identified by Witten as a supergravity dual to a (kinematic) confinement/deconfinement
720: transition of the $\caln=4$ SYM plasma on a three-sphere \cite{witten}. There is a notable difference however:
721: while the Hawking-Page-Witten transition occurs in a finite volume\footnote{The transition disappears in the infinite volume.},
722: the phase transition in the cascading gauge theory occurs in the infinite volume. Thus, we expect it to proceed via the
723: nucleation of bubbles of the stable phase, which further expand and 'remove' the horizon.
724:
725: Next, we evaluate $\e_c$ quantitatively.
726: In the notation of \cite{abk}, a Schwarzschild horizon is formed in \eqref{kt} at
727: the critical energy density (at the gauge theory side) which is given by equation (see also Eq.~(4.10) of \cite{abk})
728: \begin{equation}
729: \e_{c}=\frac{1}{4\pi G_5}\ a_0^2\,,
730: \eqlabel{ec}
731: \end{equation}
732: where the 5-dimensional Newton's constant $G_5$ is
733: \begin{equation}
734: \frac{1}{G_5}=\frac{vol_{T^{1,1}}}{G_{10}}=\frac{16\pi^3}{27}\ \times \frac{1}{8\pi^6 g_s^2 \a'^4} \,,
735: \eqlabel{g5}
736: \end{equation}
737: and $a_0$ will be evaluated momentarily.
738: A careful matching of the asymptotic black hole geometry in \cite{abk} with \eqref{kt} leads to
739: identification
740: \begin{equation}
741: \left(\frac{R_+}{R_-}\right)^4-\frac 14 \ln\frac{2 e R_+^4}{ a_0^2}=\frac 12 k_{c} \,,
742: \eqlabel{map}
743: \end{equation}
744: where
745: \begin{equation}
746: k_{c}=0.25712(1) \,,
747: %\,,\qquad a_{2,0}=\frac{7}{12}\ a_0
748: \eqlabel{kc}
749: \end{equation}
750: (see Eq.~(5.12) of \cite{abk}).
751:
752: From \eqref{rprm}-\eqref{map} we conclude
753: \begin{equation}
754: \e_{c}=2 M K e^{1+2 k_{c}}\, T_3\, e^{-4 A} \,,
755: \eqlabel{ec2}
756: \end{equation}
757: where $T_3$ is a $D3$ brane tension $T_3=\frac{1}{(2\pi)^3 g_s\a'^2}$
758: and $e^{-A}=e^{-\frac{2\pi K}{3Mg_s}}$
759: is the hierarchy warp factor of the throat \cite{gkp}.
760: The four-dimensional energy-density of KK modes (located at the tip of the throat) is identified with the
761: energy-density of the glueballs in the dual picture.
762: Also notice that the bigger energy $\epsilon$ corresponds to the bigger portion of the throat cloacked by the horizon.
763:
764:
765: \section{Theory of Multiple-throat Tunneling Revisited}
766:
767:
768: Suppose compact manifold contains throats of significantly different warpings
769: which are attached to the bulk, as sketched in the Figure~\ref{throats}.
770: Suppose the short throat is associated with the higher energy scale and is populated with Kaluza-Klein excitations.
771: It is well known that the typical KK masses are of the order of
772: \begin{equation}\eqlabel{KK}
773: m_{KK}\simeq \frac{e^{-A}}{R} \ ,
774: \end{equation}
775: where $e^{-A}=H(y)^{-1/4}$ in the warping factor at the tip of the throat, $R$ is the
776: radius scale of the angular coordinates at the tip, for the metric (\ref{kt}) it is $R_-$.
777: Wave functions of the KK modes in the warped geometry are exponentially peaked around the tip of the throat,
778: as illustrated in the Figure~\ref{throats}.
779:
780: \begin{figure}[h]
781: \centerline{
782: \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{throats.eps}
783: }
784: \caption{Sketch of the compact manifold with two throats. }
785: \label{throats}
786: \end{figure}
787:
788:
789: Let us set up the thought experiment with the static geometry of the Figure~\ref{throats}, with the flat
790: outer space. Suppose the short throat is filled up with the
791: KK excitations of the mass \eqref{KK} and four-dimensional energy density $\epsilon_1$. For definiteness we can take
792: $e^{-A_1}=10^{-3}$, $R_1\simeq 10 \sqrt{\alpha'}\simeq 10^2 M_p^{-1}$ so that $m_{1KK}\sim 10^{13}$ GeV
793: (index 1 attributes parameters to the short throat, while index 2 to the long throat).
794: Suppose $\epsilon_1 \sim T_3 \sim (10^{16}GeV)^4$. KK modes from the short throat
795: begin to tunnel into the long throat. Putting aside interesting subtleties (see e.g. \cite{Kofman:2005yz,tye2,csu,Heb})
796: let us use the estimation of \cite{Dimopoulos:2001ui} for the inter-throat tunneling rate
797: \begin{equation}\eqlabel{rate}
798: \Gamma_{tun} \simeq (m_{1KK}R_1)^4 e^{-A_1} \sim \frac{e^{-5A_1}}{R_1} \,,
799: \end{equation}
800: which gives us $\t_{tun}=1/\Gamma_{tun} \sim 10^{-26}$ sec.
801: During this time the long throat is filling up with KK excitations, each with mass much lighter than $m_{1KK}$.
802: If we choose $e^{-A_2}=10^{-15}$, $R_2=R_1$, then $m_{2KK}\sim 10$ GeV.
803: Those modes again are accumulating\footnote{We can neglect the tunneling of KK modes from the long (SM) throat back
804: to the short (inflationary) throat as the latter is suppressed
805: compare to \eqref{rate} by a factor $\propto e^{5(A_2-A_1)}\propto 10^{60}$.}
806: around the tip of the long throat, with ever increasing four-dimensional energy density $\epsilon_2(t)$.
807: However, gravitational backreaction of KK modes on the geometry of the long-throat becomes significant as soon as $\epsilon_2(t)$
808: is approaching from below the critical density $\epsilon_{2c}$ of the long throat.
809: Let us estimate $\epsilon_{2c}$ from Eq.~(\ref{ec2}).
810: For example, choosing $MK \sim 10^4$, from $\e_{2c}\sim \left( (MK)^{1/4} 10 GeV \right)^4$ we get
811: $\e_{2c}\sim (100 GeV)^4$, i.e. the scale of the
812: EW phase transition.
813: This is much lower than
814: the original energy density $\epsilon_1$ of the excitations in the system. It means that long before the time $\t_{tun}$
815: KK modes accumulating in the long throat will completely change the
816: geometry of that throat. Actually, it happens instantly
817: \footnote{This follows from the energy balance equation $\epsilon_2=\e_1 \left(1-e^{-t\Gamma_{tun}} \right)$.}.
818:
819: While it is immensely difficult to follow the detailed complicated metamorphose of the compact
820: space in the self-consistent supergravity formalism, the dual picture in the gauge theory side suggests that increasing
821: energy of the plasma above $\e_{2c}$ corresponds to the formation of the BH horizon in the throat geometry.
822: Since the chiral phase transition in the gauge theory plasma is a first order one, the formation of the BH horizon will be
823: dual to the formation of the bubbles of the new phases which eventually percolate.
824:
825: Therefore we conjecture the following picture of the throat BH formation. The horizon begins to cloak the tip of the throat
826: and propagates, further screening a bigger and bigger part of the throat. This may occur in the manner of the
827: Choptuik critical collapse \cite{ch}.
828: Formation of the horizon may occur not uniformly in space, but in patches
829: which later percolate into the uniform horizon (translationary-invariant in three-dimensional outer space).
830: As KK modes from the short throat continue to
831: tunnel into the long throat, BH there absorbs all of them and it happens much faster that the tunneling time $1/\Gamma_{tun}$
832: (this timing is defined by the cross-section of the high dimensional black hole).
833:
834: All together, in our thought experiment we start with the excitations of the KK modes in the short throat and end up with the
835: high dimensional Black Hole cloaking the tip of the long throat. From the four dimensional perspective, there are no
836: particles, but uniformly distributed energy density from the high dimensional BH. Again, the dual picture suggest
837: this form of the energy density has the radiation dominated equation of state but without radiation!
838: Recall similar situation in the RS braneworlds with the AdS/Schwarzschild bulk geometry where four-dimensional
839: ``dark radiation'' is associated with the projection of the five-dimensional Weyl tensor \cite{misao}.
840:
841:
842:
843:
844: \section{``Black Universe'' Cosmological Scenario}
845:
846:
847:
848: The setting of the thought experiment of the previous Section takes place naturally in the popular
849: string theory cosmological model. Indeed, in this model, the warped brane inflation is based on the brane-antibrane
850: interaction in the short (inflationary) throat,
851: which provides very shallow effective four-dimensional inflationary potential \cite{K2LM2T}.
852: Four dimensional energy density of the branes is $\epsilon_1=2 T_3$.
853: At the end of inflation the brane-antibrane pair annihilates and releases energy into KK modes excitations, e.g.
854: \cite{Barnaby,Kofman:2005yz,Frey}. KK modes from the short throat begin to tunnel into the long throat.
855: The results of the previous section (where four dimensional outer space is not expanding)
856: indicate that the cosmological scenario with the multiple throat geometry
857: of the inner manifold drastically differs from what was considered earlier in the literature on
858: warped brane string theory cosmological model.
859:
860: In fact, expansion of the universe makes the multiple-throat cosmological scenario even more involved,
861: and in some aspects different from the scenario without cosmological expansion considered of the previous Section.
862:
863: During $D3\overline{D3}$ branes inflation in the short throat the Hubble parameter is
864: $H = \sqrt{\frac{2T_3}{3M_p^2}} \sim 10^{13}$GeV. After inflation this value decreases with time as $1/t$.
865: Thus, initially expansion of the universe is significant and would dilute the energy density of
866: KK modes in the long throat, which are much lighter than that of the short throat ($m_{2KK} \ll m_{1KK}$). KK modes of the
867: long throat behave as radiation, while KK modes in the short throat have matter equation of state.
868: As a result the tunneling will happen only after the Hubble rate drops below the value equal to the
869: tunneling rate \cite{csu}, $H\sim \Gamma_{tun} \sim 10$GeV.
870: Energy density in the long throat at this moment is
871: \begin{equation}
872: \e_2\sim M_{p}^2 H^2_{tun}\sim M_p^2 \Gamma_{tun}^2 \sim M_p^2 m^2_{1KK} e^{-8A_1} \ ,
873: \eqlabel{e2}
874: \end{equation}
875: in our example $\e_2\sim (10^9 GeV)^4$.
876:
877: However, large value of the Hubble parameter generates mass gap of the KK modes $\Delta m^2_{KK}=2H^2$. For instance, it is known
878: that massive gravitons in the four-dimensional de Sitter geometry have the mass gap $2H^2$ \cite{higuchi}.
879: As long as $H$ is large, KK modes of the long throat are not light, but become lighter and lighter as $H$ decreases.
880: As $H$ drops below $\Gamma_{tun}$, those KK modes can be treated as radiation and we return to the same
881: estimate (\ref{e2}) \footnote{Above estimate is correct provided that the problem of the angular KK modes \cite{Dufaux:2008br} is resolved and
882: the decay of KK modes into
883: gravitons is suppressed compare to the
884: tunneling time, see \cite{csu} for details. Our choice of parameters respect these conditions}.
885:
886:
887: Comparing \eqref{e2} and \eqref{ec2} we find
888: \begin{equation}
889: \frac{\e_2}{\e_{2c}}\simeq\ \frac{M_p^2 m_{1KK}^2}{T_3}\ \frac{\left(e^{-A_1}\right)^8}{\left(e^{-A_2}\right)^4}\
890: \frac{1}{2 e^{1+2k_c} MK} \ ,
891: \eqlabel{e2e2c}
892: \end{equation}
893: which is $10^{28}$ in our example.
894: Thus tunneling KK modes from the short throat collapse into a black hole in the long throat, see Figure 1.
895: Our universe enters the {\it Black Universe} (BU) phase of its cosmological evolution.
896: Because of the horizon, dimensional reduction (\ref{reduction}) is not relevant. Meanwhile, high dimensional strong gravity theory
897: is very complicated.
898:
899: Yet, the further evolution of the Black Universe phase can be understood with the magic of duality.
900: Had the long throat cloaked with the horizon been infinitely long, it would have been holographically dual to
901: the deconfined Klebanov-Tseytlin plasma (discussed in Section 2) in Minkowski space-time without gravity.
902: In this case, however, the four dimensional Planck mass $M_p$ would be infinitely large.
903: Gluing the long throat to a compact manifold produces a finite $M_p$, and in the dual picture this corresponds to the
904: coupling of the hot KT plasma to 4d gravity \cite{gr1,gr2,apr}.
905: In other words, the compact manifold with strong gravity in two throats
906: is dual to the four dimensional theory (\ref{gauge}) where we will add the four-dimensional gravity $R_4$.
907: Energy density of the deconfined KT plasma
908: will drive adiabatic expansion of the background space-time, while redshifting itself as radiation.
909: Such an expansion continues until the plasma energy density redshifts to the critical energy density of the
910: first order confinement transition \eqref{ec2}.
911: The Hubble scale at the beginning of radiation-dominated expansion is
912: \begin{equation}
913: H_{initial}^{BU}\sim \sqrt{\frac{\e_2}{M_p^2}}\sim m_{1KK}e^{-4A_1} \,,
914: \eqlabel{hb}
915: \end{equation}
916: while the Hubble scale at the confinement transition is
917: \begin{equation}
918: H_{final}^{BU}\sim \sqrt{\frac{\e_{2c}}{M_p^2}}\propto 10^{-14}\ H_{initial}^{BU}\,.
919: \eqlabel{he}
920: \end{equation}
921: Since
922: \begin{equation}
923: \frac{H_{initial}^{BU}}{\e_2^{1/4}}\sim \sqrt{\frac{m_{1KK}}{M_p}} \left(e^{-A_1}\right)^2\propto 10^{-9}\,,\qquad
924: \frac{H_{final}^{BU}}{\e_{2c}^{1/4}}\sim 10^{-16}\,,
925: \eqlabel{gaugeec}
926: \end{equation}
927: to an excellent approximation expanding KT plasma can be considered to be in thermal equilibrium in
928: (almost) flat space-time during the whole period to expansion, up to the confinement phase transition.
929:
930: For the Black Universe evolution dual to the KT plasma expansion (cooling) with the subsequent first order confinement phase
931: transition, we expect that the energy density of the black hole in the long throat will dilute, according to the
932: four-dimensional radiation dominated cosmology.
933: In higher dimensional picture this corresponds to the recession of the horizon in the direction towards imaginary tip
934: of the throat.
935: As the black hole horizon energy density redshifts below the
936: critical energy density, a first order phase transition must take place that would remove the horizon from
937: the long throat and expose the tip of the throat\footnote{A 'horizon removal' transition
938: was discussed previously in \cite{cnr}. It is not clear that our transition is similar. We comment in the conclusion
939: how one can study such transition in the context of gauge/string duality.}.
940: The disappearance of the horizon will occur in patches in accordance with the dual picture of the
941: first order phase transitions.
942:
943: Instead of the geometry with the horizon, the long throat will be filled up with the KK excitations.
944: If there were light SM fields, say, attached to probe brane(s) around the tip of the long throat,
945: they would be produced due to the decay these KK modes.
946: It is at this stage that our universe is 'born', and the SM hot FRW cosmology follows.
947: In this case one could estimate the reheating temperature of the universe in the scenario.
948: The energy density at the phase transition is $\e_{2c}\sim \left(100 { GeV}\right)^4$
949: Assuming that all this energy is available for the reheating of the SM,
950: $\e_{2c}\sim \frac{\pi^2}{30}g_* T_{RH}^4$ (where $g_*\propto 10^2$ is the number of the Standard Model degrees of freedom),
951: we find a relatively low
952: reheating temperature $T_{RH} \sim 50$ GeV.
953:
954: However, this may be irrelevant, becase there is a new problem in the cosmological scenario with hierarchical throats.
955: Indeed, it was assumed for sucessful phenomenology
956: that the probe brane(s) containing SM field are located in the long throat from the very beginning.
957: Meanwhile, emergence of the Black Brane horizon cloaks the long throat together with any probe branes
958: located there. In a sense, the SM sector becomes screened from the theory.
959: Later on, the geometrical phase transition with melting horizon and re-appearance of the compact throat solution
960: is not accompanied by the re-appearance of the SM brane. The SM sector may be missing after the ``Black Universe'' epoch.
961:
962:
963:
964:
965: \section{Conclusion}
966: We presented a cosmological scenario when excited KK modes produced from the brane/antibrane annihilation
967: in the inflationary throat tunnel to a Standard Model throat and cloak it with a Schwarzschild horizon.
968: This suggests a model when string theory inflation is followed the
969: `Black Universe' epoch. This is significantly different from the models of reheating
970: after string theory inflation previously considered in the literature.
971: However, dual picture suggest that the `Black Universe' epoch can be simply described by the
972: expanding universe filled with the hot plasma composed of
973: light particles of a (hidden sector) gauge theory 2 in deconfinement phase with $K(T)$ degrees of freedom.
974: These originate from the rapid decay of the massive particles of another,
975: confined (hidden sector) gauge theory 1.
976: After the first order phase transition, the gauge theory 2 is described by the confined phase.
977: If light SM particles are present in the theory, the
978: corresponding particles (glueballs)
979: decay into SM particles with relatively low reheat temperature $10-100 GeV$.
980:
981: However, for the hierarchical multiple throat scenarios
982: we identify the problem of the SM sector disappearance: the probe brane with SM fields, which was initially
983: placed in the long throat, will be absorbed by the horizon
984: together with a segment of the long throat. After the end of the end ``Black Universe'' epoch and
985: re-appearnce of the long throat geometry, it is not clear how the probe could re-appear.
986: Similarly, it is not clear to us what is the dual gauge theory interpretation
987: of the screening and re-appearance of the SM sector in the theory like (\ref{gauge}).
988:
989:
990: There are various directions for further study. First, one has to resolve the problem of the SM sector.
991: One potential resolution would be to keep SM brane far enough from the tip of the long throat
992: so that is will be not swallowed by the horizon.
993: On the cosmology side, we expect a very drastic phenomena to occur at the epochs of the black brane 'horizon emergence'
994: as well as the 'horizon removal' transitions.
995:
996: 'Horizon removal' phase transition is dual to the confinement/deconfinement phase transition
997: of the long-throat dual gauge theory plasma, coupled to the 4d gravity.
998: How one would study such a phase transition on the gravity side of the gauge/string correspondence?
999: In \cite{b4} if was proposed how to study the gravity dual to a gauge theory in de-Sitter space-time.
1000: In our cosmological scenario the dual gauge theory plasma couples to an FRW cosmology, driven by the
1001: plasma energy density. Thus, extending ideas of \cite{b4}, we should try to set-up the boundary metric
1002: to that of the appropriate FRW cosmology. The full ten-dimensional geometry should then be reconstructed
1003: requiring the nonsingularity, along the line of the gravity dual to the boost-invariant
1004: expansion of the $\caln=4$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma \cite{bi1,bi2,bi3,bi4}.
1005:
1006:
1007:
1008:
1009:
1010: \section*{Acknowledgments}
1011: We would like to thank Neil Barnaby, Renata Kallosh, Igor Klebanov, Volodya Miransky, Rob Myers, Marco Peloso,
1012: Joe Polchinski, Sergei Prokushkin
1013: and Dam Son for valuable discussions.
1014: We would like to thank KITP Santa Barbara for hospitality, where this work was initiated
1015: during the Program 'Nonequilibrium Dynamics in Particle Physics and Cosmology''.
1016: AB's research at Perimeter Institute is supported in part by the Government
1017: of Canada through NSERC and by the Province of Ontario through MRI.
1018: AB gratefully acknowledges further support by an NSERC Discovery
1019: grant and support through the Early Researcher Award program by the
1020: Province of Ontario. LK was supported by NSERC and CIFAR.
1021:
1022:
1023:
1024:
1025: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1026:
1027: \bibitem{kklt}
1028: S.~Kachru, R.~Kallosh, A.~Linde and S.~P.~Trivedi,
1029: % ``De Sitter vacua in string theory,''
1030: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 046005 (2003)
1031: [arXiv:hep-th/0301240].
1032: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D68,046005;%%
1033:
1034: \bibitem{Barnaby}
1035: N.~Barnaby, C.~P.~Burgess and J.~M.~Cline,
1036: %``Warped reheating in brane-antibrane inflation,''
1037: JCAP {\bf 0504}, 007 (2005)
1038: [arXiv:hep-th/0412040].
1039:
1040: %\cite{Kofman:2005yz}
1041: \bibitem{Kofman:2005yz}
1042: L.~Kofman and P.~Yi,
1043: % ``Reheating the universe after string theory inflation,''
1044: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72}, 106001 (2005)
1045: [arXiv:hep-th/0507257].
1046:
1047: \bibitem{Frey}
1048: A.~R.~Frey, A.~Mazumdar and R.~C.~Myers,
1049: %``Stringy effects during inflation and reheating,''
1050: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 73}, 026003 (2006)
1051: [arXiv:hep-th/0508139].
1052:
1053: %\cite{Dufaux:2008br}
1054: \bibitem{Dufaux:2008br}
1055: J.~F.~Dufaux, L.~Kofman and M.~Peloso,
1056: %``Dangerous Angular KK/Glueball Relics in String Theory Cosmology,''
1057: arXiv:0802.2958 [hep-th].
1058:
1059: \bibitem{tye2}
1060: X.~Chen and S.~H.~Tye,
1061: %``Heating in brane inflation and hidden dark matter,''
1062: JCAP {\bf 0606}, 011 (2006)
1063: [arXiv:hep-th/0602136].
1064: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0602136;%%
1065:
1066: \bibitem{csu}
1067: D.~Chialva, G.~Shiu and B.~Underwood,
1068: %``Warped reheating in multi-throat brane inflation,''
1069: JHEP {\bf 0601}, 014 (2006)
1070: [arXiv:hep-th/0508229].
1071: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0601,014;%%
1072:
1073: \bibitem{Heb}
1074: B.~v.~Harling, A.~Hebecker and T.~Noguchi,
1075: %``Energy Transfer between Throats from a 10d Perspective,''
1076: JHEP {\bf 0711}, 042 (2007)
1077: [arXiv:0705.3648 [hep-th]].
1078:
1079: \bibitem{K2LM2T}
1080: S.~Kachru, R.~Kallosh, A.~Linde, J.~M.~Maldacena, L.~McAllister and S.~P.~Trivedi,
1081: %``Towards inflation in string theory,''
1082: JCAP {\bf 0310}, 013 (2003)
1083: [arXiv:hep-th/0308055].
1084:
1085: \bibitem{ks}
1086: I.~R.~Klebanov and M.~J.~Strassler,
1087: %``Supergravity and a confining gauge theory: Duality cascades and
1088: %chiSB-resolution of naked singularities,''
1089: JHEP {\bf 0008}, 052 (2000)
1090: [arXiv:hep-th/0007191].
1091: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0008,052;%%
1092:
1093:
1094: \bibitem{witten}
1095: E.~Witten,
1096: %``Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge
1097: %theories,''
1098: Adv.\ Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\ {\bf 2}, 505 (1998)
1099: [arXiv:hep-th/9803131].
1100:
1101:
1102: \bibitem{kt}
1103: I.~R.~Klebanov and A.~A.~Tseytlin,
1104: %``Gravity duals of supersymmetric SU(N) x SU(N+M) gauge theories,''
1105: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 578}, 123 (2000)
1106: [arXiv:hep-th/0002159].
1107: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B578,123;%%
1108:
1109: \bibitem{b}
1110: A.~Buchel,
1111: %``Finite temperature resolution of the Klebanov-Tseytlin singularity,''
1112: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 600}, 219 (2001)
1113: [arXiv:hep-th/0011146].
1114: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B600,219;%%
1115:
1116: \bibitem{b2}
1117: A.~Buchel, C.~P.~Herzog, I.~R.~Klebanov, L.~A.~Pando Zayas and A.~A.~Tseytlin,
1118: %``Non-extremal gravity duals for fractional D3-branes on the conifold,''
1119: JHEP {\bf 0104}, 033 (2001)
1120: [arXiv:hep-th/0102105].
1121: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0104,033;%%
1122:
1123:
1124: \bibitem{ghkt}
1125: S.~S.~Gubser, C.~P.~Herzog, I.~R.~Klebanov and A.~A.~Tseytlin,
1126: %``Restoration of chiral symmetry: A supergravity perspective,''
1127: JHEP {\bf 0105}, 028 (2001)
1128: [arXiv:hep-th/0102172].
1129:
1130:
1131:
1132:
1133: \bibitem{abk}
1134: O.~Aharony, A.~Buchel and P.~Kerner,
1135: %``The black hole in the throat - thermodynamics of strongly coupled
1136: %cascading gauge theories,''
1137: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 76}, 086005 (2007)
1138: [arXiv:0706.1768 [hep-th]].
1139: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D76,086005;%%
1140:
1141:
1142:
1143:
1144: \bibitem{aha} O.~Aharony, Y.~E.~Antebi and M.~Berkooz,
1145: %``Open string moduli in KKLT compactifications,''
1146: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72}, 106009 (2005)
1147: [arXiv:hep-th/0508080].
1148:
1149: \bibitem{kl}
1150: M.~K.~Benna, A.~Dymarsky, I.~R.~Klebanov and A.~Solovyov,
1151: %``On Normal Modes of a Warped Throat,''
1152: arXiv:0712.4404 [hep-th].
1153:
1154: \bibitem{apr}
1155: N.~Arkani-Hamed, M.~Porrati and L.~Randall,
1156: %``Holography and phenomenology,''
1157: JHEP {\bf 0108}, 017 (2001)
1158: [arXiv:hep-th/0012148].
1159:
1160: %\cite{Creminelli:2001th}
1161: \bibitem{cnr}
1162: P.~Creminelli, A.~Nicolis and R.~Rattazzi,
1163: %``Holography and the electroweak phase transition,''
1164: JHEP {\bf 0203}, 051 (2002)
1165: [arXiv:hep-th/0107141].
1166:
1167:
1168:
1169:
1170: \bibitem{kn}
1171: I.~R.~Klebanov and N.~A.~Nekrasov,
1172: %``Gravity duals of fractional branes and logarithmic RG flow,''
1173: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 574}, 263 (2000)
1174: [arXiv:hep-th/9911096].
1175: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B574,263;%%
1176:
1177:
1178:
1179: \bibitem{k}
1180: M.~Krasnitz,
1181: %``A two point function in a cascading N = 1 gauge theory from
1182: %supergravity,''
1183: arXiv:hep-th/0011179.
1184:
1185:
1186: \bibitem{b3}
1187: O.~Aharony, A.~Buchel and A.~Yarom,
1188: %``Short distance properties of cascading gauge theories,''
1189: JHEP {\bf 0611}, 069 (2006)
1190: [arXiv:hep-th/0608209].
1191:
1192:
1193: \bibitem{aby}
1194: O.~Aharony, A.~Buchel and A.~Yarom,
1195: %``Holographic renormalization of cascading gauge theories,''
1196: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72}, 066003 (2005)
1197: [arXiv:hep-th/0506002].
1198: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D72,066003;%%
1199:
1200:
1201: \bibitem{s}
1202: N.~Seiberg,
1203: %``Electric - magnetic duality in supersymmetric nonAbelian gauge theories,''
1204: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 435}, 129 (1995)
1205: [arXiv:hep-th/9411149].
1206:
1207:
1208: \bibitem{bt}
1209: A.~Buchel and A.~A.~Tseytlin,
1210: %``Curved space resolution of singularity of fractional D3-branes on
1211: %conifold,''
1212: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 085019 (2002)
1213: [arXiv:hep-th/0111017].
1214:
1215: \bibitem{b4}
1216: A.~Buchel,
1217: %``Gauge / gravity correspondence in accelerating universe,''
1218: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 125015 (2002)
1219: [arXiv:hep-th/0203041].
1220: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D65,125015;%%
1221:
1222: \bibitem{br}
1223: A.~Buchel and R.~Roiban,
1224: %``Inflation in warped geometries,''
1225: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 590}, 284 (2004)
1226: [arXiv:hep-th/0311154].
1227:
1228:
1229: \bibitem{ab} O.~Aharony and A.~Buchel, to appear.
1230:
1231: \bibitem{gkp}
1232: S.~B.~Giddings, S.~Kachru and J.~Polchinski,
1233: %``Hierarchies from fluxes in string compactifications,''
1234: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 106006 (2002)
1235: [arXiv:hep-th/0105097].
1236: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D66,106006;%%
1237:
1238: \bibitem{Dimopoulos:2001ui}
1239: S.~Dimopoulos, S.~Kachru, N.~Kaloper, A.~E.~Lawrence and E.~Silverstein,
1240: %``Small numbers from tunneling between brane throats,''
1241: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 121702 (2001)
1242: [arXiv:hep-th/0104239].
1243:
1244: \bibitem{ch}
1245: M.~W.~Choptuik,
1246: %``Universality And Scaling In Gravitational Collapse Of A Massless Scalar
1247: %Field,''
1248: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 70} (1993) 9.
1249: %%CITATION = PRLTA,70,9;%%
1250:
1251: \bibitem{misao}
1252: T.~Shiromizu, K.~i.~Maeda and M.~Sasaki,
1253: %``The Einstein equations on the 3-brane world,''
1254: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 024012 (2000)
1255: [arXiv:gr-qc/9910076]; S.~Mukohyama,
1256: %``Brane-world solutions, standard cosmology, and dark radiation,''
1257: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 473}, 241 (2000)
1258: [arXiv:hep-th/9911165].
1259:
1260:
1261: \bibitem{higuchi}
1262: A.~Higuchi,
1263: %``Quantum linearization instabilities of de Sitter space-time. 1,''
1264: Class.\ Quant.\ Grav.\ {\bf 8}, 1961 (1991); {\bf 8}, 1983 (1991).
1265:
1266:
1267:
1268:
1269: \bibitem{gr1} E.~Witten, unpublished,
1270: %{\it http://www.itp.ucsb.edu/online/susy_c99/discussion};
1271: H.~L.~Verlinde,
1272: %``Holography and compactification,''
1273: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 580}, 264 (2000)
1274: [arXiv:hep-th/9906182].
1275:
1276:
1277: \bibitem{gr2}
1278: S.~S.~Gubser,
1279: %``AdS/CFT and gravity,''
1280: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 084017 (2001)
1281: [arXiv:hep-th/9912001].
1282: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D63,084017;%%
1283:
1284: \bibitem{bi1}
1285: R.~A.~Janik and R.~Peschanski,
1286: %``Asymptotic perfect fluid dynamics as a consequence of AdS/CFT,''
1287: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 73}, 045013 (2006)
1288: [arXiv:hep-th/0512162].
1289: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D73,045013;%%
1290:
1291:
1292: \bibitem{bi2}
1293: R.~A.~Janik,
1294: % ``Viscous plasma evolution from gravity using AdS/CFT,''
1295: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 98}, 022302 (2007)
1296: [arXiv:hep-th/0610144].
1297: %%CITATION = PRLTA,98,022302;%%
1298:
1299: \bibitem{bi3}
1300: M.~P.~Heller and R.~A.~Janik,
1301: % ``Viscous hydrodynamics relaxation time from AdS/CFT,''
1302: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 76} (2007) 025027
1303: [arXiv:hep-th/0703243].
1304:
1305:
1306:
1307: \bibitem{bi4}
1308: P.~Benincasa, A.~Buchel, M.~P.~Heller and R.~A.~Janik,
1309: %``On the supergravity description of boost invariant conformal plasma at
1310: %strong coupling,''
1311: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 77}, 046006 (2008)
1312: [arXiv:0712.2025 [hep-th]].
1313: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D77,046006;%%
1314:
1315:
1316:
1317:
1318: \end{thebibliography}
1319:
1320: \end{document}
1321:
1322: