1: \documentclass{emulateapj} %[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3:
4: %\usepackage {epsf}
5: %\usepackage {lscape, graphicx}
6: %\usepackage {psfig}
7: %\usepackage {amssymb,amsmath}
8: %\usepackage [figuresleft]{rotating}
9: %\usepackage {multicol}
10:
11: \gdef\rfUV{(U-V)_{\rm rest}}
12: \gdef\rfVJ{(V-J)_{\rm rest}}
13: \gdef\1054{MS\,1054--03}
14: \gdef\Lya{Ly$\alpha$ }
15: \gdef\Ha{H$\alpha$ }
16: \def\farcs{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\prime\prime}$}}
17: \def\simgeq{{\raise.0ex\hbox{$\mathchar"013E$}\mkern-14mu\lower1.2ex\hbox{$\mathchar"0218$}}}
18:
19: %\setcounter{secnumdepth}{3}
20:
21: \begin {document}
22:
23: \title {FIREWORKS $U_{38}$-to-24 $\mu$\lowercase{m} photometry of the GOODS-CDFS: multi-wavelength catalog and total IR properties of distant $K_s$-selected galaxies}
24:
25: \author{Stijn Wuyts\altaffilmark{1,2}, Ivo Labb\'{e}\altaffilmark{3}, Natascha M. F\"{o}rster Schreiber\altaffilmark{4}, Marijn Franx\altaffilmark{2}, Gregory Rudnick\altaffilmark{5}, Gabriel B. Brammer\altaffilmark{6}, Pieter G. van Dokkum\altaffilmark{6}}
26: \altaffiltext{1}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138; W. M. Keck Postdoctoral Fellow [e-mail: swuyts@cfa.harvard.edu]}
27: \altaffiltext{2}{Leiden Observatory, P.O. Box 9513, NL-2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.}
28: \altaffiltext{3}{Carnegie Observatories, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101; Hubble Fellow}
29: \altaffiltext{4}{MPE, Giessenbackstrasse, D-85748, Garching, Germany}
30: \altaffiltext{5}{National Optical Astronomical Observatory, 950 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721; Leo Goldberg Fellow}
31: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Astronomy, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8101}
32:
33: \begin{abstract}
34: We present a $K_s$-selected catalog, dubbed FIREWORKS, for the Chandra
35: Deep Field South (CDFS) containing photometry in $U_{38}$, $B_{435}$,
36: $B$, $V$, $V_{606}$, $R$, $i_{775}$, $I$, $z_{850}$, $J$,
37: $H$, $K_s$, $[3.6\mu$m$]$, $[4.5\mu$m$]$, $[5.8\mu$m$]$,
38: $[8.0\mu$m$]$, and the MIPS $[24\mu$m$]$ band. The imaging has a
39: typical $K_{s,{\rm AB}}^{\rm tot}$ limit of 24.3 mag ($5\sigma$) and
40: coverage over 113 arcmin$^2$ in all bands and 138 arcmin$^2$ in all
41: bands but $H$. We cross-correlate our catalog with the 1 Ms X-ray
42: catalog by Giacconi et al. (2002) and with all available spectroscopic
43: redshifts to date. We find and explain systematic differences in a
44: comparison with the '$z_{850}$ + $K_s$'-selected GOODS-MUSIC
45: catalog that covers $\sim$90\% of the field. We exploit the
46: $U_{38}$-to-24 $\mu$m photometry to determine which $K_s$-selected
47: galaxies at $1.5<z<2.5$ have the brightest total IR luminosities and
48: which galaxies contribute most to the integrated total IR emission.
49: The answer to both questions is that red galaxies are dominating in
50: the IR. This is true no matter whether color is defined in the
51: rest-frame UV, optical, or optical-to-NIR. We do find however that
52: among the reddest galaxies in the rest-frame optical, there is a
53: population of sources with only little mid-IR emission, suggesting a
54: quiescent nature.
55: \end{abstract}
56:
57: \keywords{galaxies: distances and redshifts - galaxies: high redshift - infrared: galaxies}
58:
59: \section {Introduction}
60: \label{intro.sec}
61: Since the original Hubble Deep Field (Williams et al. 1996), deep
62: multi-wavelength observations of blank fields have revolutionized our
63: understanding of the high-redshift universe. Especially the epoch
64: around $z \sim 2$ is of great interest since it is then that the
65: cosmic star formation rate density was peaking (Hopkins \& Beacom
66: 2006). At $z \sim 2$, the observed optical probes the redshifted
67: rest-frame UV emission, making it a good tracer for relatively
68: unobscured star formation. Near-Infrared (NIR) observations of
69: distant galaxies, such as undertaken by the FIRES survey in the Hubble
70: Deep Field South (HDFS, Labb\'{e} et al. 2003, hereafter L03) and the
71: \1054 field (F\"{o}rster Schreiber et al. 2006, hereafter FS06), show
72: relatively small variations in the rest-frame $V$-band mass-to-light
73: ratio. Selecting galaxies in the $K_s$-band (e.g., L03; FS06) thus
74: provides a good probe of the massive galaxy content at high redshift.
75:
76: In the presence of dust, large amounts of rest-frame UV emission can
77: be absorbed and re-emitted in the Far-Infrared (FIR). Dust
78: corrections of the UV luminosities of such systems involve large
79: uncertainties. Direct observations of the dust emission are therefore
80: crucial to get a better census of the bolometric energy output. In
81: order to study the bolometric properties of typical galaxies at $z
82: \sim 2$, infrared luminosities have been derived from the observed 24
83: $\mu$m flux by means of IR spectral energy distribution (SED)
84: templates (e.g., Papovich et al. 2005; Reddy et al. 2006).
85:
86: Despite the extra model uncertainty involved, this approach adds
87: complementary information to the shorter wavelength studies of
88: high-redshift galaxies. While the Luminous ($10^{11} L_{\sun}
89: <L_{\rm IR}<10^{12} L_{\sun}$) and Ultraluminous ($L_{\rm IR}>10^{12}
90: L_{\sun}$) Infrared Galaxies, (U)LIRGS (Sanders \& Mirabel 1996) are
91: locally very rare, they are found to be increasingly more common
92: toward higher redshifts (e.g., Caputi et al. 2006).
93:
94: In this paper, we present a $K_s$-band selected multi-wavelength
95: catalog for the GOODS-CDFS, comprising WFI $U_{38}BVRI$, ACS
96: $B_{435}V_{606}i_{775}z_{850}$, ISAAC $JHK_s$, IRAC
97: 3.6-8.0 $\mu$m and MIPS 24 $\mu$m imaging. We adopt a similar format
98: as for the publicly available FIRES catalogs of the HDFS and \1054,
99: hence the name FIREWORKS. This allows the user to exploit the
100: combined photometry of the CDFS,
101: \1054, and the HDFS in a straightforward manner. The fields are
102: complementary in depth ($5\sigma$ for point sources $K_{s,{\rm
103: AB}}^{\rm tot}=24.3$, $K_{s,{\rm AB}}^{\rm tot}=25.0$, $K_{s,{\rm
104: AB}}^{\rm tot}=25.6$ respetively) and area (138 arcmin$^2$, 24
105: arcmin$^2$, and 5 arcmin$^2$ respectively).
106:
107: An analysis of the space density and colors of massive galaxies at
108: $2<z<3$ (van Dokkum et al. 2006), the rest-frame optical luminosity
109: density and stellar mass density up to $z \sim 3$ (Rudnick et
110: al. 2006), and the rest-frame luminosity functions of galaxies at
111: $2<z<3.5$ (Marchesini et al. 2006) were partly based on the FIREWORKS
112: catalog for the GOODS-CDFS presented here.
113:
114: After describing the catalog construction, we particularly address the
115: questions which $K_s$-selected galaxies at $1.5<z<2.5$ are brightest
116: at 24 $\mu$m, which galaxies have the largest total infrared
117: luminosity $L_{\rm IR}$ ($\equiv L(8-1000\ \mu$m$)$) and contribute most to
118: the total integrated IR luminosity emitted by $K_s$-selected galaxies.
119: We address this question by studying the IR emission as function of
120: color defined in three wavelength regimes: the rest-frame UV, optical,
121: and optical-to-NIR.
122:
123: An overview of the observations is presented in
124: \S\ref{observations.sec}. \S\ref{finalim.sec} describes the
125: construction of the final mosaics. Source detection and photometry is
126: discussed in \S\ref{det_phot.sec}. Next, we present our photometric
127: redshifts ($z_{\rm phot}$) and cross-correlation with the available
128: spectroscopic surveys in \S\ref{redshifts.sec}. \S\ref{param.sec}
129: summarizes the catalog content. A photometric comparison for the
130: wavelength bands in common with the GOODS-MUSIC catalog by Grazian et
131: al. (2006a, hereafter G06a) and a $z_{\rm phot}$ comparison with the
132: same authors is discussed in \S\ref{comparison.sec}. Results on 24
133: $\mu$m properties and total infrared luminosities of $K_s$-selected
134: galaxies at $1.5<z<2.5$ are discussed in \S\ref{science.sec}.
135: \S\ref{summary.sec} summarizes the paper.
136:
137: AB magnitudes are used throughout this paper. We adopt a $H_0 = 70$
138: km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_M = 0.3$, $\Omega _{\Lambda} = 0.7$
139: cosmology.
140:
141: \section {Observations}
142: \label{observations.sec}
143:
144: \subsection {The GOODS Chandra Deep Field South}
145: \label{cdfs.sec}
146: Centered on $(\alpha,\delta)$ = (03:32:30, -27:48:30), the CDFS
147: (Giaconni et al. 2000) has been targeted by most of today's major
148: telescope facilities, both in imaging mode over the whole spectral
149: range and in spectroscopic mode. Among the surveys carried out in
150: areas included in the CDFS are K20 (Cimatti et al. 2002), GMASS
151: (Cimatti et al. in preparation), VVDS (Le F\`{e}vre et al. 2004), and
152: the Hubble Ultra Deep Field (Beckwith et al. 2006). In this section,
153: we describe the public GOODS-South dataset that we used to build a
154: $K_s$-band selected catalog containing homogeneous colors from the
155: optical to 24 $\mu$m.
156:
157: \subsection {The WFI $U_{38}BVRI$ data}
158: \label{DPS.sec}
159: Ground-based optical imaging of the Extended CDFS with the Wide Field
160: Imager (WFI) on the ESO/MPG 2.2m telescope was obtained as part of the
161: COMBO-17 (Wolf et al. 2004) and ESO DPS (Arnouts et al. 2001) surveys.
162: We use the central part of the WFI $U_{38}$, $B$, $V$, $R$, and $I$
163: imaging, where it overlaps with the GOODS $K_s$-band imaging, that has
164: been re-reduced by the GaBoDS consortium (Erben et al. 2005;
165: Hildebrandt et al. 2006). The images were released on a $0\farcs 238$
166: pixel$^{-1}$ scale and have exposure times of 49, 69, 105, 88, and 35
167: ks in $U_{38}$, $B$, $V$, $R$, and $I$ respectively.
168:
169: \subsection {The ACS $B_{435}V_{606}i_{775}z_{850}$ data}
170: \label{ACS.sec}
171: During 5 epochs of observations, the ACS camera on HST acquired
172: imaging of the GOODS-South field in 4 filter bands: F435W, F606W,
173: F775W, and F850LP (hereafter referred to as
174: $B_{435}$,$V_{606}$,$i_{775}$, and $z_{850}$). Exposure times
175: amounted to 2, 1.7, 1.7, and 3.3 hours respectively. The mosaics
176: (version v1.0; Giavalisco et al. 2004), were drizzled onto a pixel
177: scale of $0\farcs 03$ pixel$^{-1}$. From the 150 arcmin$^2$ area that
178: is well covered by the $K_s$-band detection image, 138 arcmin$^2$ is
179: well exposed with ACS. We restrict our analysis of the total IR
180: properties of the distant galaxy population in
181: \S\ref{science.sec} to this overlap region.
182:
183: \subsection{The ISAAC $JHK_s$ data}
184: \label{ISAAC.sec}
185: We use the ESO/GOODS data release v1.5 \\
186: (http://www.eso.org/science/goods/releases/20050930/) to complement
187: the optical observations with NIR imaging by the Very Large Telescope
188: (VLT). For a full description of the dataset, we refer to Vandame et
189: al. (in preparation). Briefly, the v1.5 data release consists of 24
190: fully reduced VLT/ISAAC fields in the $J$ and $K_s$ bands and 19 fields
191: in the $H$-band, each with a $2\farcm 5 \times 2\farcm 5$ FOV and $0\farcs
192: 15$ pixel$^{-1}$ scale. The ISAAC data were reduced using the ESO/MVM
193: image processing pipeline (v1.9, see Vandame 2002 for the description
194: of an earlier version). Exposure times varied from field to field,
195: with typical exposures of 3.2, 4.2, and 5 hours in $J$, $H$, and
196: $K_s$-band respectively, and respective ranges between ISAAC fields of
197: 2-5 hours, 2-6 hours, and 3.6-7.5 hours. The variations in depth resulting
198: from the unequal exposure times are discussed in
199: \S\ref{bg_limdepth.sec}. A total area of 113 arcmin$^2$ is well
200: exposed in all optical and NIR filter bands. Without a restriction on
201: the $H$-band, the covered area increases to 138 arcmin$^2$.
202:
203: \subsection{The IRAC 3.6-8.0 $\mu$m data}
204: \label{IRAC.sec}
205: As a Spitzer Space Telescope Legacy Program, superdeep images of the
206: GOODS-South field were taken with the Infrared Array Camera (IRAC,
207: Fazio et al. 2004) on-board Spitzer. Over 2 epochs the whole field
208: was covered in the 3.6 $\mu$m, 4.5 $\mu$m, 5.8 $\mu$m, and 8.0 $\mu$m
209: bands. For each epoch, exposure times per channel per sky pointing
210: amounted to 23 hours. With the telescope orientation being rotated by
211: 180 degrees between the two epochs, the second epoch IRAC channel 1
212: and 3 observations targeted the area covered by IRAC channel 2 and 4
213: during the first epoch, and vice versa. An overlap region of roughly
214: 40 arcmin$^2$, including the Hubble Ultra Deep Field (Beckwith et
215: al. 2003), got twice the exposure time. We use the data releases DR2
216: and DR3 for the second and first epoch respectively. Images were
217: released on a $0\farcs 60$ pixel$^{-1}$ scale. A full description of
218: the observations and reduction will be presented by Dickinson et
219: al. (in preparation).
220:
221: \subsection{The MIPS 24 $\mu$m data}
222: \label{MIPS.sec}
223: The GOODS-South field was observed at 24 $\mu$m with the Multiband
224: Imaging Photometry for Spitzer (MIPS, Rieke et al. 2004) on-board
225: Spitzer, closely overlapping the IRAC fields with a position angle
226: that is rotated with respect to the IRAC observations by approximately
227: 3 degrees. The MIPS campaign led to a nearly uniform exposure time of
228: 10 hours. We use the version v0.30 reduced images, released on a
229: $1\farcs 20$ pixel$^{-1}$ scale, based on the Spitzer Science Center
230: (SSC) Basic Calibrated Data (BCD) pipeline (version S11.0.2).
231:
232: \section {Final images}
233: \label{finalim.sec}
234: In this section, we describe the image quality of the publicly
235: released data products, the subsequent steps undertaken to obtain the
236: final mosaics from which the photometric catalog is extracted, and the
237: limiting depths reached at all wavelengths. The main characteristics
238: of the multi-wavelength data set are summarized in Table\ \ref{dataset.tab}.
239:
240: %\clearpage
241: \begin{deluxetable*}{llrrr}
242: \tablecolumns{5}
243: \tablewidth{0pc}
244: \tablecaption{Summary of the multi-wavelength data set for the GOODS-South field \label{dataset.tab}}
245: \tablehead{
246: \colhead{Camera} & \colhead{Filter} & \colhead{$\lambda _c$} & \colhead {FWHM\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead {3$\sigma$ Total Limiting Magnitude} \\
247: & & (\AA) & (arcsec) & (AB mag) \\
248: }
249: \startdata
250: \multicolumn{5}{c}{Ground-based Optical Bands} \\
251: \cline{1-5}
252: \multicolumn{5}{c}{} \\
253: WFI & $U_{38}$ & 3656 & 0.93 & 26.06 \\
254: WFI & $B$ & 4601 & 0.97 & 27.21 \\
255: WFI & $V$ & 5379 & 0.90 & 26.88 \\
256: WFI & $R$ & 6516 & 0.78 & 26.99 \\
257: WFI & $I$ & 8658 & 0.93 & 25.00 \\
258: \cline{1-5}
259: \multicolumn{5}{c}{} \\
260: \multicolumn{5}{c}{Space-based Optical Bands} \\
261: \cline{1-5}
262: \multicolumn{5}{c}{} \\
263: ACS & $B_{435}$ & 4327 & 0.22 & 27.68 \\
264: ACS & $V_{606}$ & 5957 & 0.22 & 27.81 \\
265: ACS & $i_{775}$ & 7705 & 0.21 & 27.26 \\
266: ACS & $z_{850}$ & 9072 & 0.22 & 26.90 \\
267: \cline{1-5}
268: \multicolumn{5}{c}{} \\
269: \multicolumn{5}{c}{Near-infrared Bands} \\
270: \cline{1-5}
271: \multicolumn{5}{c}{} \\
272: \vspace{0.2in}
273: ISAAC & $J$ & 12379 & 0.38 - 0.61 & 25.82 - 26.42 \\
274: ISAAC & $H$ & 16517 & 0.35 - 0.65 & 25.39 - 25.95 \\
275: ISAAC & $K_s$ & 21681 & 0.38 - 0.58 & 25.02 - 25.96 \\
276: \cline{1-5}
277: \multicolumn{5}{c}{} \\
278: \multicolumn{5}{c}{Mid-infrared Bands} \\
279: \cline{1-5}
280: \multicolumn{5}{c}{} \\
281: IRAC & ch1 & 35634 & 1.6 & 26.15 \\
282: IRAC & ch2 & 45110 & 1.7 & 25.66 \\
283: IRAC & ch3 & 57593 & 1.9 & 23.79 \\
284: IRAC & ch4 & 79595 & 2.0 & 23.70 \\
285: MIPS & 24 $\mu$m & 237000 & 6.0 & 21.30
286: \enddata
287: \tablenotetext{a}{The intrinsic ACS PSF has a FWHM of $0\farcs 12$. The values quoted in this table were measured on the $5 \times 5$ block averaged mosaics. The ACS photometry was performed on the images convolved to the broadest NIR PSF.}
288: \end{deluxetable*}
289: %\clearpage
290:
291: \subsection {Pixel scales and large scale backgrounds}
292: \label{pixel.sec}
293:
294: First, we converted the ACS images to the $0\farcs 15$ pixel$^{-1}$
295: scale of the $K_s$-band detection image by $5 \times 5$ pixel block
296: averaging with flux conservation. All space-based optical and NIR
297: photometry was performed on this pixel scale using the SExtractor
298: software version 2.2.2 (Bertin \& Arnouts 1996) (see
299: \S\ref{det_phot.sec}).
300:
301: A source fitting algorithm developed by Labb\'{e} et al. (in
302: preparation), especially suited for heavily confused images for which
303: a higher resolution prior (in this case the $K_s$-band image) is
304: available, was used to extract photometry from the WFI, IRAC and MIPS
305: images (see \S\ref{MIR_phot.sec}). The WFI images were registered to
306: the $K_s$-band mosaic with a $0\farcs 15$ pixel$^{-1}$ scale using
307: position measurements of stars and compact objects and the IRAF geomap
308: and geotran tasks. For the MIR photometry, the algorithm requires a
309: higher resolution image than provided by the IRAC and MIPS images.
310: However, the native $K_s$-band pixel scale makes it more
311: computationally expensive without benefit in accuracy. A $2 \times 2$
312: block averaged version of the $K_s$-band mosaic was therefore produced
313: with a $0\farcs 3$ pixel$^{-1}$ scale. We registered the publicly
314: released IRAC and MIPS images onto this $K_s$-band image using the WCS
315: information in the image header in combination with a minor additional
316: shift based on position measurements of stars and compact sources,
317: again forcing flux conservation. We note that the source fitting
318: algorithm takes care of residual shifts. Since the programme does not
319: take into account large scale background variations, these were
320: removed a priori from the IRAC and MIPS images by subtracting
321: SExtractor background images produced with large background mesh
322: settings (BACK\_SIZE=64, BACK\_FILTERSIZE=3 on a $0\farcs 3$
323: pixel$^{-1}$ scale). The subtracted background varied over the image
324: by -2 to 0 times the rms noise.
325:
326: \subsection {Image quality and PSF matching}
327: \label{PSFmatch.sec}
328:
329: \subsubsection {Space-based optical and NIR wavelengths}
330: \label{opt_NIR_PSF.sec}
331: In order to obtain consistent color measurements, we match all
332: space-based optical and NIR images to a common resolution, namely that
333: of the field with the broadest point spread function (PSF). Since the
334: ground-based optical, IRAC, and MIPS images have a significantly
335: broader PSF, they are not included in the simple PSF matching, but are
336: treated separately by a source-fitting algorithm (see
337: \S\ref{MIR_phot.sec}). In this section, we describe the selection of
338: stars used to build the PSFs, the construction of the PSFs for the ACS
339: $B_{435}$-, $V_{606}$-, $i_{775}$-, and $z_{\rm
340: 850}$-mosaics and for each of the ISAAC fields in the $J$-, $H$-, and
341: $K_s$-band, the construction of the convolving kernels, and the
342: quality of the PSF matching.
343:
344: First, we compiled a list of bright, isolated, unsaturated stars.
345: Initially, well-exposed objects with $(J-K_s)_{\rm AB} < 0.04$ and
346: $K_{s,{\rm AB}}^{\rm tot}<22.86$ mag were selected from a preliminary
347: catalog of the CDFS. For ISAAC fields where the number of $J-K_s$
348: selected stars was low, we complemented the sample with stars from the
349: EIS stellar catalog (Groenewegen et al. 2002). During a first
350: iteration, the list was cleaned from galaxy-like objects, stars with
351: neighbors within 3'' radius, stars too close to the edge of an image,
352: objects that were not identified in the ACS r1.1z catalog (Giavalisco
353: et al. 2004) or resolved objects as defined by having a FWHM in the
354: $z_{850}$-band larger than $0\farcs 13$. Measurements of the FWHM
355: were performed by fitting Moffat profiles to the stars using the
356: imexam task in IRAF. Finally, we inspect by eye the radial profiles
357: and curves of growth, produced with the IRAF tasks radprof and phot
358: respectively. The final list contained 3 to 5 stars per ISAAC field,
359: with the exception of field f30, for which only 1 good star was
360: available. The numbers of stars used to build the ACS PSFs were 31,
361: 45, 49 and 53 for the $B_{435}$, $V_{606}$, $i_{775}$, and
362: $z_{850}$ mosaics respectively.
363:
364: It is sufficient to construct one PSF image per band for the whole ACS
365: mosaic since for space-based imaging the PSF is uniform across all
366: pointings. The ground-based data of each ISAAC field were taken under
367: different average seeing conditions, hence the need for the
368: construction of an individual PSF image for each field and each NIR
369: band. We computed the $J$-, $H$-, and $K_s$-band PSF images per ISAAC
370: field by averaging the registered and flux-normalized images of the
371: selected stars. The flux was normalized within $1\farcs 5$ diameter
372: apertures rather than the total aperture to optimize the
373: signal-to-noise and avoid contributions from residual neighboring
374: sources. Any neighbors in the ISAAC images of good stars,
375: sufficiently far not to bias the FWHMs and PSFs, were masked while
376: averaging. This method was preferred over taking the median, since
377: only a handful of good stars per ISAAC field were available to build a
378: PSF. PSFs for the ACS mosaics were constructed from a large enough
379: number of stars to average out any influence of faint neighboring
380: sources without masking.
381:
382: %\clearpage
383: \begin {figure} [t]
384: \centering
385: \plotone{f1.eps}
386: \caption{\small Distributions of seeing FWHM for the ISAAC $J$, $H$, and
387: $K_s$ observations. Moffat profiles were fitted to the PSFs that were
388: built from bright, isolated, unsaturated stars for each field and band
389: separately.
390: \label {FWHMhist.fig}
391: }
392: \end {figure}
393: %\clearpage
394:
395: The ACS PSFs in the $B_{435}$-, $V_{606}$-, $i_{775}$-, and
396: $z_{850}$-band on the $5 \times 5$ block-averaged ACS mosaics are well
397: fit by Moffat profiles with $\beta=3.8$, 4.0, 3.7, and 3.6, and a FWHM
398: of $0\farcs 22$, $0\farcs 22$, $0\farcs 21$, and $0\farcs 22$
399: respectively. The FWHM of the NIR ISAAC observations varied from
400: $0\farcs 35$ to $0\farcs 65$, with median values of $0\farcs 47$,
401: $0\farcs 48$, and $0\farcs 47$ in $J$, $H$, and $K_s$ respectively.
402: The values of the Moffat $\beta$ parameter were 3.1, 2.9, and 3.0 in
403: $J$, $H$, and $K_s$. Fig.\
404: \ref{FWHMhist.fig} illustrates the distribution of FWHMs of the
405: natural PSFs for the individual ISAAC fields. In all of the
406: considered bands and fields, the FWHM of the individual stars were
407: within $\approx$10\% of that measured on the final average PSF of the
408: image. We adopted the $0\farcs 65$ $H$-band PSF of ISAAC field f15 as
409: target to which all higher resolution images were matched.
410:
411: We computed the kernel for convolution for each ISAAC field and band
412: separately, using the Lucy-Richardson deconvolution algorithm. The
413: kernels are well represented by a Moffat profile with $\beta$
414: parameters varying from field to field and band to band. The ratio of
415: the growth curve of the convolved PSF over that of the target PSF is a
416: good measure for the PSF matching accuracy. Overall, the ratio of
417: growth curves deviated by at most 5.1\% from unity for apertures
418: between 1'' ($\approx$1.5FWHM of the PSF of the smoothed field maps)
419: and 6'' (the reference aperture for photometric calibration), with an
420: average of $0.54\% \pm 0.90\%$. Flux within 3'' radius is well
421: conserved during the convolution process, with a median deviation of
422: 0.06\% and a median absolute deviation of 0.6\%.
423:
424: The construction of convolving kernels for the ACS mosaics required an
425: extra step. The kernels obtained from deconvolution with the IRAF
426: Lucy task had significant noise in the outer parts, leading to noise
427: spikes around bright point-like sources in the convolved ACS mosaics.
428: To remove these artifacts, we modeled the ACS-to-ISAAC kernels by
429: fitting isophotes using the IRAF tasks ellipse and bmodel, and used
430: the modeled kernels for the convolution. This is possible because the
431: kernels are otherwise well behaved and very azimutally symmetric. The
432: ACS-to-ISAAC kernels have a nearly Moffat profile with a $\beta$
433: parameter of 3.
434:
435: Because of the different basic shapes of the ACS and ISAAC PSFs, an
436: excellent matching over the relevant radii is more difficult than in
437: general among ISAAC fields. Nevertheless, the offsets of the growth
438: curve ratios between 1'' and 6'' are limited to below 4.7\%, with an
439: average of $1.58\% \pm 1.32\%$. The average over all stars of the
440: ratio of the flux measured within 3'' radius in the convolved and that
441: measured in the natural image showed a flux conserving accuracy of
442: 0.7\% or better for all ACS bands.
443:
444: \subsubsection {Ground-based optical and MIR wavelengths}
445: \label{MIR_PSF.sec}
446: The seeing PSF of the WFI observations is significantly broader than
447: that of our $K_s$-band detection image ($\sim 0.9$'' FWHM). The FWHM
448: measured on the average image of bright, isolated stars in the IRAC
449: images even amounts to $1\farcs 6$, $1\farcs 7$, $1\farcs 9$, and
450: $2\farcs 0$ for the 3.6 $\mu$m, 4.5 $\mu$m, 5.8 $\mu$m, and 8.0 $\mu$m
451: bands respectively. The MIPS 24 $\mu$m beam has a FWHM as large as
452: 6''. Since confusion and blending effects are unavoidable in deep
453: observations at this resolution, we decide not to degrade the
454: space-based optical and NIR images to the MIR resolution. Instead, we
455: construct PSFs and convolving kernels similarly as described in
456: \S\ref{opt_NIR_PSF.sec}, but apply them using a source fitting
457: algorithm that makes fully use of the higher resolution information in
458: the $K_s$-band detection image (see
459: \S\ref{MIR_phot.sec}, Labb\'{e} et al. in preparation).
460:
461: \subsection {Zero points}
462: \label{zeropoints.sec}
463: The zero-point calibrations for all bands but the $H$-band were taken
464: from the respective GOODS data release. In the case of the NIR ISAAC
465: observations, the publicly released zero points were based on SOFI
466: images of the EIS-DEEP and DPS infrared surveys conducted over the
467: same region (Vandame et al. 2001), which themselves were
468: photometrically calibrated using standard stars from Persson et
469: al. (1998). That procedure yielded zero points with rms scatters
470: ranging between 0.01 and 0.06 mag in the $J$-band, 0.01 and 0.08 mag in
471: the $K_s$-band and up to 0.17 mag in the $H$-band.
472:
473: %\clearpage
474: \begin{deluxetable}{lc}
475: \tablecolumns{2}
476: \tablewidth{0pc}
477: \tablecaption{H-band zero points in the AB system derived from the NIR stellar locus \label{zp.tab}
478: }
479: \tablehead{
480: \colhead{Field} & \colhead{$H$-band zero point}
481: }
482: \startdata
483: 03 & 25.99 \\
484: 04 & 26.02 \\
485: 05 & 26.07 \\
486: 08 & 25.89 \\
487: 09 & 25.92 \\
488: 10 & 25.94 \\
489: 11 & 25.93 \\
490: 13 & 26.02 \\
491: 14 & 25.82 \\
492: 15 & 26.07 \\
493: 16 & 25.97 \\
494: 19 & 25.86 \\
495: 20 & 25.89 \\
496: 21 & 25.97 \\
497: 22 & 26.03 \\
498: 23 & 26.07 \\
499: 24 & 25.95 \\
500: 25n & 25.94 \\
501: 26n & 26.09
502: \enddata
503: \end{deluxetable}
504: %\clearpage
505:
506: To improve on the $H$-band calibration, we make use of stellar
507: photometry in the FIRES HDFS (L03) and \1054 (FS06) fields, for which
508: $H$-band zero points were determined to a $\sim 0.03$ mag accuracy. For
509: each of the 19 ISAAC fields with $H$-band coverage, we measured the mean
510: offset of the stars used for PSF matching along the $J-H$ axis of a
511: $J-K_s$ versus $J-H$ color-color diagram with respect to the stellar
512: locus in the FIRES fields. Assuming the $J$- and $K_s$-bands are well
513: calibrated, this immediately provides us with the $H$-band zero point
514: corrections to be applied. We list the derived $H$-band zero points in
515: Table\ \ref{zp.tab}. Zero-point corrections ranged from -0.18 mag to
516: 0.09 mag, with a median correction over all fields of -0.03 mag.
517: After applying the zero-point correction, the median absolute deviation
518: in $J-H$ color of individual stars around the stellar locus is 0.03 mag,
519: similar as measured for the FIRES HDFS and \1054 fields.
520:
521: \subsection {Mosaicing and astrometry}
522: \label{astrometry.sec}
523: Here, we describe the combination of the smoothed ISAAC NIR fields and
524: the astrometric precision of the final mosaics. The $5 \times 5$
525: blocked and smoothed ACS $i_{775}$-band mosaic was adopted as astrometric
526: reference image. The astrometric solution for the ACS data itself was
527: based on a cross-identification of sources with deep ground-based WFI
528: data that on its turn was astrometrically matched to stellar positions
529: in the Guide Star Catalog 2 (GSC2, STScI 2001). The final solution
530: had a $2\sigma$-clipped rms deviation of $\lesssim 0\farcs 01$ in
531: ACS-to-ACS and $0\farcs 12$ in ACS-to-ground difference.
532:
533: %\clearpage
534: \begin {figure} [t]
535: \centering
536: \plotone{f2.eps}
537: \caption{\small Map of residual shifts of compact sources in the
538: $K_s$-band mosaic with respect to the reference ACS $i_{775}$-band mosaic.
539: $2\sigma$-clipped reference sources used for the alignment are
540: indicated in black. Grey vectors represent the residual shift of the
541: $2\sigma$ outliers.
542: \label {astrometry.fig}
543: }
544: \end {figure}
545: %\clearpage
546:
547: The smoothed ISAAC fields were registered onto the smoothed ACS $i_{775}$-band
548: mosaic by applying simple x- and y- shifts without further distortion
549: corrections. In each ISAAC field, we measured the shift with respect
550: to the ACS $i_{775}$-band mosaic for stars and compact sources using the
551: imexam task in IRAF. A $2\sigma$-clipped sample of reference sources
552: typically consisted of 15-20 objects per ISAAC field. The
553: $2\sigma$-clipping was applied to exclude sources with strong
554: morphological k-corrections. The difference between the shifts
555: implied by individual reference sources and the final astrometric
556: solution had a standard deviation of less than $0\farcs 09$ in all NIR
557: bands. A map of residual shifts for the $K_s$-band mosaic with
558: respect to the convolved ACS $i_{775}$-band mosaic is presented in Fig.\
559: \ref{astrometry.fig}.
560:
561: First we applied the fractional pixel shift for each ISAAC field in
562: each band using the IRAF imshift task with a cubic spline
563: interpolation. Next, we summed the integer pixel shifted fields
564: applying an identical weighting scheme as described by FS06 to optimize
565: the S/N for point sources, namely:
566: \begin {equation}
567: w_{\rm pix} = \frac{w_{\rm norm}}{(rms_{\rm 1.5FWHM})^2}
568: \label{weight.eq}
569: \end {equation}
570: where the weight factor for a given pixel $w_{\rm pix}$ equals its
571: value in the normalized weight map $w_{\rm norm}$, scaled with the
572: square of the rms noise measured within apertures of 1.5FWHM diameter
573: that are placed randomly in empty regions of the ISAAC field (see
574: \S\ref{bg_limdepth.sec}). Here, $w_{\rm norm}$ is simply the weight
575: map as released by ESO/GOODS normalized to a maximum of unity. It
576: thus contains information on the relative integration time per pixel
577: and accounts for bad/hot pixels and pixels with other artifacts that
578: were excluded. The weight maps for each field given by Eq.\
579: \ref{weight.eq} were combined into a mosaic that accounts for the
580: effective background noise over the entire area. In the catalog, we
581: give the weight value for each object measured on this effective
582: weight map, normalized to the median weight value in the considered
583: band.
584:
585: The standard deviation of positional offsets between reference sources
586: on the registered WFI images and the $K_s$-band mosaic were less than
587: $0\farcs 1$.
588:
589: We chose not to combine the 2 epochs of IRAC observations into one
590: mosaic because the 180 degrees difference in position angle would lead
591: to a different PSF shape in the overlap region than in either of both
592: single epoch areas, demanding the use of a different convolving kernel
593: over different parts of the field. Instead, we treat each of the IRAC
594: epochs independently, providing an empirical quality check of the
595: photometry in the overlap region. The registration of each of the
596: IRAC images (epoch 1 and 2) onto the 2x2 blocked $K_s$-band image has
597: a positional accuracy of better than $0 \farcs 4$, as measured from
598: offsets between bright star positions on the IRAC and $K_s$-band images.
599: The positional accuracy for the MIPS images is of the order of $0
600: \farcs 3$ rms. We note that minor positional offsets between the
601: $K_s$ and IRAC/MIPS image are solved for by the source fitting
602: algorithm applied to IRAC and MIPS photometry (see
603: \S\ref{MIR_phot.sec}).
604:
605: \subsection {Signal to noise and limiting depths}
606: \label{bg_limdepth.sec}
607:
608: %\clearpage
609: \begin {figure} [htbp]
610: \centering
611: %\epsscale{0.49}
612: \plotone{f3a.eps}
613: \vspace{0.1in}
614: \plotone{f3b.eps}
615: \caption{\small The background rms derived from the distribution of
616: fluxes within empty apertures. (a) Distribution of empty aperture
617: fluxes within a 1", 2", and 3" aperture diameter on the $K_s$-band
618: image of ISAAC field f15. The distribution is well described by a
619: Gaussian with an increasing width for increasing aperture size. (b)
620: Background rms as derived from flux measurements within empty
621: apertures versus aperture size for the ACS bands and the $J$, $H$, and
622: $K_s$ ISAAC fields. Solid lines represent the functional form from
623: Eq.\ \ref{error.eq} fit to the observed rms noise values. Dashed
624: lines indicate a linear extrapolation of the pixel-to-pixel rms.
625: Correlations between pixels introduce a stronger than linear scaling
626: with aperture size.
627: \label {limdepth.fig}
628: }
629: \end {figure}
630: %\clearpage
631:
632: We analyzed the noise properties of the optical-to-24 $\mu$m
633: imaging following the same approach as for the FIRES HDFS (L03) and
634: \1054 (FS06) data. Briefly, the technique uses aperture photometry on
635: empty parts of the image to quantify the rms of background pixels
636: within the considered aperture size. For each convolved ISAAC field
637: in each band, between 200 and 400 non-overlapping apertures were
638: randomly placed at a minimum distance of 5'' from the nearest
639: segmentation pixels in a SExtractor segmentation map. For a given
640: aperture size, the distribution of empty aperture fluxes is
641: well-fitted by a Gaussian, as illustrated in Fig.\
642: \ref{limdepth.fig}(a). We applied a $5\sigma$ clipping in determining
643: the background rms. Panel (b) of Fig.\ \ref{limdepth.fig} shows that
644: a simple linear scaling of the measured background rms
645: $\sigma(N)=N\bar{\sigma}$ , where $N=\sqrt{A}$ is the linear size of
646: the aperture with area A and $\bar{\sigma}$ is the pixel-to-pixel rms,
647: would lead to underestimated flux uncertainties. The reason is that
648: correlations between neighboring pixels were introduced during the
649: reduction and PSF matching. We model the background rms as a function
650: of aperture size with a polynomial of the form
651: \begin {equation}
652: \sigma_i(N) = \frac{N\bar{\sigma}(a_i + b_i N)}{\sqrt{w_i}}
653: \label{error.eq}
654: \end {equation}
655: where $i$ refers to the considered band and field, and the weight term
656: $w_i$ is derived from the weight map of the respective field. Fig.\
657: \ref{limdepth.fig}(b) illustrates the variations in depth for the
658: different ISAAC fields, originating from variable integration times
659: and observing conditions, and reflected in the range of flux
660: uncertainties for objects with similar color aperture in the final
661: catalog. For example, the upper two curves in the ISAAC $K_s$ panel
662: correspond to fields f03 and f04 that had the lowest integration time.
663:
664: For the ACS mosaics, we used the same empty apertures as for the NIR,
665: provided they were within the ACS FOV. Every object below the
666: $K_s$-band detection threshold, even though detectable in the ACS
667: imaging, contributes to the background noise and photometric
668: uncertainties of $K_s$-band detected sources. If we were to restrict
669: our empty aperture analysis to apertures that contain neither
670: $K_s$-band nor ACS segmentation pixels, the background rms estimates
671: for the ACS mosaics would decrease by 3 to 9\%. In Fig.\
672: \ref{limdepth.fig}(b), we scaled the background rms measured on the
673: ACS and ISAAC images to the flux corresponding to AB = 26.
674:
675: Uncertainties on the fluxes were assigned based on these empirical
676: noise measurements, for an aperture of the same area as for the
677: photometric aperture of each object.
678:
679: Limiting depths of the WFI, IRAC, and MIPS images were measured with
680: the same empty aperture method. The total limiting AB magnitudes
681: (3$\sigma$ for point sources, i.e., corrected for the flux missed
682: outside the aperture used for photometry) are listed in Table\
683: \ref{dataset.tab}.
684:
685: \section {Source detection and photometry}
686: \label{det_phot.sec}
687:
688: \subsection {$K_s$-band Detection}
689: \label{detection.sec}
690: We aimed to construct a catalog that is especially suited to extract
691: stellar mass-limited samples from (e.g., van Dokkum et al. 2006).
692: Although the rest-frame NIR, probed by IRAC, is a better tracer for
693: stellar mass than the rest-frame optical, the downside is its coarser
694: resolution, leading to severe confusion. Therefore, we decided to
695: detect sources in the observed $K_s$-band.
696:
697: We used the SExtractor v2.2.2 source extraction software by Bertin \&
698: Arnouts (1996) to detect sources with at least 1 pixel above a surface
699: brightness threshold of $\mu (K_{s,{\rm AB}}) = 24.6$ mag arcsec$^{-2}$,
700: corresponding to $\approx 5\sigma$ of the rms background for a typical
701: $K_s$-band field. Setting the threshold to the same number of ADUs
702: across the image instead of adopting a $S/N$ criterion was favored,
703: since in the latter case the varying noise properties in the
704: $K_s$-band mosaic would lead to different limiting magnitudes and
705: limiting surface brightnesses from one field to the other. We
706: smoothed the detection map with a gaussian filter of $FWHM = 0\farcs
707: 65$, the size of the PSF in the detection image. This procedure
708: optimizes the detection of point sources.
709:
710: The resulting catalog contains 6308 sources, 5687 of which have a
711: position on the $K_s$-band mosaic where the pixel weight is larger
712: than 30\% of the median weight. We recommend applying such a weight
713: criterion in order to construct samples with robust photometry.
714: Running SExtractor with identical parameters on the detection map
715: multiplied by -1, we obtain a total of 43 spurious sources in the area
716: with more than 30\% of the median weight. Only one of these has
717: $S/N_{K_s} > 5$.
718:
719: SExtractor flagged 12\% of the detected sources as blended and/or
720: biased. These sources were treated separately in the photometry.
721:
722: \subsection {Photometry}
723: \label{photometry.sec}
724:
725: \subsubsection {Space-based optical and NIR photometry}
726: \label{opt_NIR_phot.sec}
727: We performed the photometry on the convolved ACS $B_{435}V_{\rm
728: 606}i_{775}z_{850}$ and ISAAC $JHK_s$ mosaics using SExtractor
729: in dual image mode, with the $K_s$-band mosaic as detection map. We
730: derive the color and total aperture from the detection image. The
731: same apertures were used in each band. We follow L03 and FS06 in
732: defining the color aperture based on the $K_s$-band isophotal
733: aperture, more precisely on the equivalent circularized isophotal
734: diameter $d_{\rm iso} = 2(A_{\rm iso}/\pi)^{1/2}$, where $A_{\rm iso}$ is the area
735: of the isophotal aperture. For isolated sources, we apply
736: \begin {equation}
737: {\small
738: APER(COLOR)=\left\{\begin{array}{cl}
739: \vspace{0.2cm}
740: APER(ISO), & 1\farcs 0 < d_{\rm iso} < 2\farcs 0 \\
741: \vspace{0.2cm}
742: APER(1\farcs 0), & d_{\rm iso} \leq 1\farcs 0 \\
743: APER(2\farcs 0), & d_{\rm iso} \geq 2\farcs 0
744: \end{array}\right.
745: }
746: \label{col_ap_isolated.eq}
747: \end {equation}
748: where APER(ISO) refers to the isophotal aperture defined by the
749: surface brightness detection threshold. Blended sources (indicated
750: with SExtractor flag ``blended'' or ``biased'') were treated
751: separately,
752: \begin {equation}
753: {\small
754: APER(COLOR)=\left\{\begin{array}{cl}
755: \vspace{0.2cm}
756: APER(d_{\rm iso}/s), & 1\farcs 0 < d_{\rm iso}/s < 2\farcs 0 \\
757: \vspace{0.2cm}
758: APER(1\farcs 0), & d_{\rm iso}/s \leq 1\farcs 0 \\
759: APER(2\farcs 0), & d_{\rm iso}/s \geq 2\farcs 0
760: \end{array}\right.
761: }
762: \label{col_ap_blended.eq}
763: \end {equation}
764: where the reduction factor s for the aperture sizes is introduced to
765: minimize contamination by close neighbors. We adopt the optimal value
766: of $s=1.4$ that was determined from experimentation by L03 and FS06.
767:
768: The motivation for the tailored isophotal apertures defined in Eq.\
769: \ref{col_ap_isolated.eq} and Eq.\ \ref{col_ap_blended.eq} is that it
770: maximizes the $S/N$ of the flux measurement. The minimum diameter of
771: $1\farcs 0$ corresponds to 1.5 $\times$ FWHM of the PSF-matched
772: mosaics. The maximum diameter of $2\farcs 0$ was adopted to avoid
773: flux from neighboring sources and avoid the large uncertainties
774: corresponding to large isophotal apertures.
775:
776: SExtractor's ``MAG\_AUTO'' was used to derive the total flux of the
777: $K_s$-band detected objects, unless the source was blended, in which
778: case the total aperture was set to the color aperture:
779: \begin {equation}
780: {\small
781: APER(TOTAL)=\left\{\begin{array}{cl}
782: \vspace{0.2cm}
783: APER(AUTO), & isolated\ sources \\
784: APER(COLOR), & blended\ sources \\
785: \end{array}\right.
786: }
787: \label{tot_ap.eq}
788: \end {equation}
789: Finally, an aperture correction was applied to compute the total
790: integrated flux. The correction factor equaled the ratio of the flux
791: within an aperture of radius 3'' and radius $r_{\rm tot}=(A_{\rm
792: tot}/\pi)^{1/2}$, based on the curve of growth of the PSF constructed
793: from stellar profiles. Here, $A_{\rm tot}$ represents the area of the
794: total aperture. The reference aperture of 3'' radius is sufficiently
795: large since less than 0.1\% of the flux for point sources falls
796: outside this radius.
797:
798: Flux uncertainties in both color and total aperture were derived from
799: Eq.\ \ref{error.eq}. The quoted uncertainties thus take into account
800: both the aperture size used for the flux measurement and the limiting
801: depth in the respective region of the mosaic.
802:
803: We performed a large number of simulations to determine the accuracy
804: of our measurements of the total $K_s$-band magnitude. In each
805: simulation, 200 artificial sources were added to the $K_s$-band
806: mosaic. They had either exponential (Sersic n=1) or de Vaucouleurs
807: (Sersic n=4) light profiles that were truncated at 5 effective radii,
808: and random position angles and ellipticities. Source magnitudes and
809: sizes were drawn from the true distribution in our catalog in order to
810: span the entire range of real galaxy properties. Subsequently, we ran
811: SExtractor with an identical configuration as for the real catalog,
812: followed by the procedure to compute $K^{\rm tot}_{s,{\rm AB}}$ as
813: described above. The recovered total magnitudes were within 0.1 (0.2)
814: mag from the input value for 89 (96)\% of the sources with exponential
815: light profiles. Since our aperture corrections are based on the
816: stellar growth curve, our procedure could not account for all flux in
817: the extended wings of low surface brightness sources with a high
818: concentration (Sersic n=4). The recovered total magnitudes were
819: within 0.1 (0.2) mag for 82 (91)\% of the sources with de Vaucouleurs
820: profiles. The sources where the $K^{\rm tot}_{s,{\rm AB}}$
821: underestimate exceeded 0.2 mag generally had $\mu_e > 22.5$ mag
822: arcsec$^{-2}$. Taking into account the spread in Sersic indices for
823: real sources in our catalog, we caution that underestimates of the
824: total $K_s$-band magnitude by over 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mag could occur
825: for roughly 13, 6, and 4\% of the galaxies in our catalog,
826: predominantly those with large size and low surface brightness.
827:
828: \subsubsection {WFI, IRAC and MIPS 24 $\mu$m photometry}
829: \label{MIR_phot.sec}
830: In this section, we describe the photometry of $K_s$-band detected
831: objects in the ground-based optical (WFI) and Spitzer IRAC and MIPS 24
832: $\mu$m imaging of the CDFS. For an in depth discussion of the source
833: fitting algorithm used, and simulations of its performance, we refer
834: the reader to Labb\'{e} et al. (in preparation). A short description
835: with illustration was also presented by Wuyts et al. (2007).
836:
837: Briefly, the information on position and extent of sources based on
838: the higher resolution $K_s$-band segmentation map was used to model
839: the lower resolution ground-based optical and 3.6 $\mu$m to 24 $\mu$m
840: images. Each source was extracted separately from the $K_s$-band
841: image and, under the assumption of negligible morphological
842: k-corrections, convolved to the WFI, IRAC, respectively MIPS
843: resolution. A fit to the WFI/IRAC/MIPS image was then made for all
844: sources simultaneously, where the fluxes of the objects were left as
845: free parameters. Next, we subtracted the modeled light of neighboring
846: objects and measured the flux on the cleaned WFI/IRAC/MIPS maps within
847: a fixed aperture: 2'' for the WFI bands, 3'' for the IRAC bands and
848: 6'' for the MIPS 24 $\mu$m band. In order to compute a consistent
849: $K_s - $WFI/IRAC/MIPS color, we measured the source's flux
850: $f_{{\rm conv},K_s}$ on a cleaned $K_s$-band image convolved to the
851: WFI/IRAC/MIPS resolution within the same aperture. We then scaled the
852: photometry to the same color apertures that were used for the
853: space-based optical and NIR photometry, allowing a straightforward
854: computation of colors over a $U_{38}$-to-8 $\mu$m wavelength baseline.
855: For the IRAC photometry, this means the catalog flux was computed as
856: follows:
857: \begin {equation}
858: f_{\rm IRAC,col} = f_{\rm IRAC,3''} * \frac{f_{K_s,{\rm col}}}{f_{{\rm conv},K_s,3''}}.
859: \end {equation}
860: For the WFI photometry, an identical procedure was followed. An
861: aperture correction based on the growth curve of the 24 $\mu$m PSF was
862: applied to scale the 24 $\mu$m flux measurements to the integrated 24
863: $\mu$m flux under the assumption that the sources were point-like.
864:
865: We note that several other authors developed similar algorithms to
866: reduce the effects of confusion (P\'{e}rez-Gonz\'{a}lez et al. 2005,
867: 2008; G06a). P\'{e}rez-Gonz\'{a}lez et al. (2005, 2008) compute
868: SExtractor photometry for an IRAC-selected catalog that is later
869: merged with shorter wavelength photometric catalogs. For the IRAC
870: sources with multiple UV/optical/NIR counterparts within $2\farcs 5$,
871: the photometry was recomputed using a deconvolution method that is
872: similar to that by Labb\'{e} et al. (in preparation), except for two
873: aspects. The algorithm by Labb\'{e} et al. (in preparation) takes
874: into account the spatial extent of the sources on the reference
875: ($K_s$-band) image. Moreover, Labb\'{e} et al. (in preparation) does
876: not adopt the best-fit flux from the source fitting as final
877: photometry, but rather measures the flux within an aperture on the
878: cleaned image (followed by an aperture correction). This allows more
879: robust photometry in cases where the object profile varies from the
880: reference to the low resolution image. A comparison with the
881: multi-wavelength photometry by G06a is presented in
882: \S\ref{MUSICphot.sec}.
883:
884: %\clearpage
885: \begin {figure*} [htbp]
886: \centering
887: \epsscale{1}
888: \plottwo{f4a.eps}{f4b.eps}
889: \vspace{0.1in}
890: \plottwo{f4c.eps}{f4d.eps}
891: \caption{\small Comparison between IRAC observations from epoch 1 and
892: epoch 2 for $K_s$-band detected sources in the overlap region between
893: the 2 epochs. The large panels show a good correspondence between the
894: 2 independent photometric measurements, with a slight zero-point drift
895: of 0.03 mag in the 3.6 $\mu$m band. The inset panels shows the
896: distribution of $(f_{\rm epoch1} - f_{\rm epoch2}) / \sqrt{err_{\rm
897: epoch1}^2 + err_{\rm epoch2}^2}$, where a minimum relative error of
898: 3\% was assumed to account for relative zero-point uncertainties over
899: the field. The standard deviation of the distribution is of order
900: unity, meaning that estimated flux errors account well for the
901: empirically determined uncertainties.
902: \label {epochs.fig}
903: }
904: \end {figure*}
905: %\clearpage
906:
907: Uncertainties in the measured fluxes in the WFI/IRAC/MIPS bands have a
908: contribution from the background rms and from the residual
909: contamination of the subtracted neighbors (Labb\'{e} et al., in
910: preparation). The former was calculated using the empty aperture
911: method described in \S\ref{bg_limdepth.sec}. The latter was derived
912: by scaling the normalized convolved $K_s$-band image of each
913: neighboring source with the formal 1$\sigma$ error in its fitted
914: WFI/IRAC/MIPS flux as computed from the covariance matrix produced by
915: the least-squares minimization. Subsequently, we performed aperture
916: photometry on this image of residual neighbor contamination. This
917: gives the confusion error corresponding to the source flux measured
918: within an aperture of the same size. The two contributions were added
919: in quadrature to obtain the total error budget. In the 3.6 $\mu$m
920: band, where confusion is most severe, the confusion term is typically
921: 5 times smaller than the background noise term. For 6\% of the
922: sources in our catalog, the confusion term dominates the total error
923: budget.
924:
925: Here, we follow an empirical approach to validate the size of the
926: uncertainties in the IRAC photometry. We exploit the overlap region
927: between the 2 independent observation epochs of the CDFS with the IRAC
928: instrument. The position angle was rotated over 180 degrees, causing
929: the PSF to have a different orientation with respect to the positions
930: of neighboring sources. In Fig.\ \ref{epochs.fig}, we show the
931: difference between the IRAC magnitude measured during epoch 1 and
932: epoch 2. The rms ranges from 5\% in the 4.5 $\mu$m band to 10\% in
933: the 8.0 $\mu$m band for sources with an AB magnitude brighter than 22.
934: The largest systematic offset was measured for the 3.6 $\mu$m band,
935: where a zero-point drift of 0.03 mag was measured between the 2
936: epochs. In the inset panels the distribution of $(f_{\rm epoch1} -
937: f_{\rm epoch2}) / \sqrt{err_{\rm epoch1}^2 + err_{\rm epoch2}^2}$ is
938: plotted. The distribution is well described by a gaussian. For well
939: estimated errors the expected standard deviation of the distribution
940: is 1. We adopted a minimum relative uncertainty in the flux of 3\% to
941: account for zero-point variations over the field. This is
942: particularly relevant for the 3.6 $\mu$m and 4.5 $\mu$m band, where
943: the sources are detected with a high signal-to-noise. The standard
944: deviation of $(f_{\rm epoch1} - f_{\rm epoch2}) / \sqrt{err_{\rm
945: epoch1}^2 + err_{\rm epoch2}^2}$ in these bands is smaller than 1.
946: Adopting a more conservative minimum relative uncertainty would only
947: decrease this value, suggesting that zero-point variations within the
948: field are limited to the few percent level. In the less sensitive 5.8
949: $\mu$m and 8.0 $\mu$m bands, where the minimum relative uncertainty is
950: not reached, we find a distribution of $(f_{\rm epoch1} - f_{\rm
951: epoch2}) /
952: \sqrt{err_{\rm epoch1}^2 + err_{\rm epoch2}^2}$ with a standard deviation of
953: nearly unity, confirming empirically the validity of our estimated
954: uncertainties.
955:
956: \section {Redshifts}
957: \label{redshifts.sec}
958:
959: \subsection {Spectroscopic redshifts}
960: \label{specz.sec}
961:
962: %\clearpage
963: \begin{deluxetable}{lcc}
964: \tablecolumns{2}
965: \tablewidth{0pc}
966: \tablecaption{Spectroscopic redshifts for $K_s$-band detected objects \label{spec.tab}
967: }
968: \tablehead{
969: \colhead{Survey} & \colhead{High quality flags} & \colhead{Number\tablenotemark{a}}
970: }
971: \startdata
972: FORS2 (v3.0, Vanzella et al. 2008) & A & 357 \\
973: K20 (Mignoli et al. 2005) & 1 & 265 \\
974: VVDS (v1.0, Le F\`{e}vre et al. 2004) & 4,3 & 251 \\
975: CXO (Szokoly et al. 2004) & 3,2,1 & 89 \\
976: Norman et al. 2002 & all & 1 \\
977: Croom et al. 2001 & all & 21 \\
978: van der Wel et al. 2004 & all & 24 \\
979: Cristiani et al. 2000 & all & 3 \\
980: Strolger et al. 2004 & all & 5 \\
981: Daddi et al. 2004 & all & 7 \\
982: IMAGES (Ravikumar et al. 2006) & 1 & 100 \\
983: LCIRS (Doherty et al. 2005) & 3 & 3 \\
984: Wuyts et al. (in prep.) & all & 7 \\
985: Kriek et al. (2007) & all & 2 \\
986: Roche et al. (2006) & all & 4 \\
987: Huang et al. (in prep.) & all & 9 \\
988: VIMOS (v1.0, Popesso et al. 2008) & A & 329
989: \enddata
990: \tablenotetext{a}{The numbers are non-redundant. For objects targeted during multiple surveys, the redshift with the highest quality flag was adopted.}
991: \end{deluxetable}
992: %\clearpage
993:
994: The CDFS-GOODS area has been targeted intensively by various
995: spectroscopic surveys, listed in Table\ \ref{spec.tab}. The combined
996: sample of spectroscopic redshifts forms a heterogeneous family of
997: objects, with selection criteria varying from pure $I$-band (VVDS, Le
998: F\`{e}vre et al. 2004), $K_s$-band (Mignoli et al. 2005) or X-ray
999: (Szokoly et al. 2004) flux limits to various color criteria (e.g.,
1000: Doherty et al. 2005; Wuyts et al. in preparation). It is therefore
1001: impossible to build a complete $K_s$-band selected spectroscopic
1002: sample from the data at hand. Rather, we aim to provide a list of
1003: trustworthy spectroscopic redshifts that are reliably cross-identified
1004: with a $K_s$-band detection in our catalog. To do so, we apply a
1005: conservative quality cut based on the quality flags that come with
1006: each of the spectroscopic catalogs, and assign the redshift to the
1007: nearest $K_s$-band selected object within a radius of $1\farcs 2$.
1008: The quality flags and number of sources included in our reliable list
1009: of cross-correlated spectroscopic redshifts are summarized in Table\
1010: \ref{spec.tab}. We mark these sources with a ``zsp\_qual'' flag of 1 in
1011: our catalog. For completeness, other spectroscopic redshifts for
1012: $K_s$-band detected objects are also listed in our catalog, marked
1013: with a ``zsp\_qual'' flag lower than 1 (zsp\_qual=0.5 for FORS2
1014: quality flag B and VIMOS quality flag B, and zsp\_qual=0.1 for all
1015: others), together with the original quality flag from the respective
1016: survey. We proceed to use only the 1477 spectroscopic redshifts with
1017: zsp\_qual = 1.
1018:
1019:
1020: \subsection {Photometric redshifts}
1021: \label{photz.sec}
1022: Together with the observed photometry, we release a list of
1023: photometric redshifts computed with the new photometric redshift code
1024: EAZY. A full description of the algorithm and template sets will be
1025: presented by Brammer et al. (in preparation). Briefly, the program
1026: fits a non-negative superposition of SED templates to the
1027: $U_{38}$-to-8 $\mu$m photometry, using a template error function that
1028: effectively downweights the rest-frame UV and rest-frame NIR of the
1029: templates in the fit. Next, a redshift probability distribution
1030: $p(z|C,m_0)$ is constructed for each galaxy with observed colors C,
1031: using the $K_s$-band magnitude $m_0$ as a prior. Finally, the value
1032: $z_{\rm mp}$ of the redshift marginalized over the total probability
1033: distribution,
1034: \begin{equation}
1035: z_{\rm mp} = \frac{\int z\ p(z|C,m_0)\ dz} {\int p(z|C,m_0)\ dz},
1036: \end{equation}
1037: was adopted as best estimate of the galaxy's redshift. 1$\sigma$
1038: confidence limits were computed by integrating the redshift
1039: probability distribution from the edges till the integrated
1040: probability equals $0.317/2$.
1041:
1042: The template set constructed by Brammer et al. (in preparation) is
1043: based on P\'{E}GASE models (Fioc \& Rocca-Volmerange 1997). From a
1044: library of $\sim 3000$ templates described by G06a, Brammer et al. (in
1045: preparation) followed the ``non-negative matrix factorization''
1046: algorithm of Blanton \& Roweis (2007) in order to derive a set of 5
1047: principal component templates that span the colors of galaxies in the
1048: semi-analytic model by De Lucia \& Blaizot (2007). One dusty template
1049: with an age of 50 Myr and $A_V=2.75$ was added to account for the
1050: existence of dustier (and thus redder) galaxies than present in the
1051: semi-analytic model mock catalog. It is this set of 6 spectral
1052: templates that we fed to EAZY.
1053:
1054: %\clearpage
1055: \begin {figure} [htbp]
1056: \centering
1057: %\epsscale{0.5}
1058: \plotone{f5a.eps}
1059: \vspace{0.1in}
1060: \plotone{f5b.eps}
1061: \caption{\small Comparison between photometric and spectroscopic
1062: redshifts for 1067 $K_s$-band detected sources with reliable $z_{\rm spec}$
1063: identification and coverage in all wavelength bands. (a) A direct
1064: comparison with 1$\sigma$ confidence intervals derived from the
1065: redshift probability distribution. (b) The distribution of $\Delta z
1066: / (1+z)$. 2.5\% of the sources fall outside the plotted range.
1067: \label {zspzph.fig}
1068: }
1069: \end {figure}
1070: %\clearpage
1071:
1072: We quantify the accuracy of the photometric redshifts $z_{\rm phot}$ by
1073: a comparison to the spectroscopic redshifts with zsp\_qual = 1. Fig.\
1074: \ref{zspzph.fig}(a) shows the correspondence between $z_{\rm phot}$ and
1075: $z_{\rm spec}$ for all 1067 sources with $K_{s,{\rm AB}}^{\rm
1076: tot}<24.3$ that are covered by all bands and for which a reliable
1077: spectroscopic redshift is available. The error bars indicate the
1078: 1$\sigma$ confidence intervals as derived from the redshift
1079: probability distribution. We find that the spectroscopic redshift
1080: lies within the formal 1$\sigma$ confidence interval for 66\% of the
1081: sources, confirming that the uncertainties on $z_{\rm phot}$ have reliably
1082: been established. Fig.\
1083: \ref{zspzph.fig}(b) presents the distribution of $\Delta z / (1+z)$, with $\Delta z = z_{\rm phot} - z_{\rm spec}$,
1084: which is commonly used to determine the accuracy of photometric
1085: redshifts. We find a median $\Delta z / (1+z)$ of -0.001 and a
1086: normalized median absolute deviation (equal to the rms for a Gaussian
1087: distribution) of $\sigma_{\rm NMAD}=0.032$. 3\% of the objects with
1088: spectroscopic redshift have $|\Delta z| / (1+z) > 5\sigma_{\rm NMAD}$.
1089:
1090: We investigated the quality of $z_{\rm phot}$ estimates as a function of
1091: redshift and total $K_s$-band magnitude. Variations in the median
1092: $\Delta z / (1+z)$ as function of redshift are small, reaching a
1093: maximum of 0.05 in the $2.5<z<3$ interval. No obvious dependence on
1094: $K_{s,{\rm AB}}^{\rm tot}$ is observed. The scatter in $\Delta z / (1+z)$ is
1095: roughly a factor 2.4 larger for the $z>1.5$ regime
1096: ($\sigma_{\rm NMAD}=0.071$) than for the $z<1.5$ ($\sigma_{\rm NMAD}=0.030$)
1097: regime.
1098:
1099: Considering the 98 spectroscopically confirmed sources with a
1100: cross-identification within $2\farcs 0$ in the 1Ms X-ray catalog by
1101: Giacconi et al. (2002), we find a scatter of $\sigma_{\rm NMAD}=0.043$.
1102: It is reassuring that despite the lack of AGN spectrum in our template
1103: set, the netto performance of our photometric redshift code for AGN
1104: candidates remains good. We do note however that, independent of
1105: redshift, the fraction of catastrophic outliers ($|\Delta z| / (1+z) >
1106: 5\sigma_{\rm NMAD}$) is 3 times larger for the AGN candidates than for
1107: the total sample of spectroscopically confirmed sources.
1108:
1109: \section {Catalog parameters}
1110: \label{param.sec}
1111: Here we describe the entries of our $K_s$-band selected FIREWORKS
1112: catalog of the GOODS-CDFS. The format is similar to the FIRES
1113: catalogs of the HDFS (L03) and \1054 (FS06), making a straightforward
1114: combination of all three fields possible for the user. The catalog
1115: can be obtained from the FIREWORKS
1116: homepage\footnote[1]{http://www.strw.leidenuniv.nl/fireworks}.
1117:
1118: \begin {itemize}
1119: \item ID-- Unique identification number
1120: \item x, y-- Pixel position of the object, based on the $K_s$-band detection map. The pixel scale is $0\farcs 15$ pixel$^{-1}$.
1121: \item RA, DEC-- Right ascension and declination coordinates for equinox J2000.0.
1122: \item ${\it [band]}$\_colf-- Flux in microjanskys measured within the color aperture (\S\ \ref{opt_NIR_phot.sec}). The bandpasses are $U_{38}$,$B_{435}$,$B$,$V$,$V_{606}$,$R$,$i_{775}$,$I$,$z_{850}$,$J$,$H$,$K_s$, $[3.6\mu$m$]$, $[4.5\mu$m$]$, $[5.8\mu$m$]$, and $[8.0\mu$m$]$.
1123: \item ${\it [band]}$\_colfe-- Uncertainty in the ${\it [band]}$\_colf flux measurement, derived from the noise analysis (\S\ \ref{bg_limdepth.sec}). The units are microjanskys.
1124: \item $K_s$\_totf-- Total $K_s$-band flux in microjanskys, measured within the total aperture and scaled by the aperture correction (\S\ \ref{opt_NIR_phot.sec}). Approximate total fluxes in other bandpasses can be computed by ${\it [band]}\_totf = {\it [band]}\_colf \times (K_s\_totf / K_s\_colf)$, provided there are no large morphological k-corrections.
1125: \item $K_s$\_totfe-- Uncertainty associated with $K_s$\_totf, also in microjanskys.
1126: \item $[24\mu$m$]$\_totf-- Total MIPS 24 $\mu$m-band flux in microjanskys, measured within a 6'' diameter circular aperture and then aperture corrected (\S\ \ref{MIR_phot.sec}).
1127: \item ${\it [band]}$w-- Effective weight in the bandpass ${\it [band]}$, normalized to the median effective weight of all sources in that band. We recommend applying a conservative weight criterion ${\it [band]}$w $> 0.3$ to construct samples with robust photometry.
1128: \item ap\_col-- Aperture diameter in arcsec within which ${\it [band]}$\_colf was measured. In cases where the color aperture was the isophotal aperture defined by the surface brightness threshold of $\mu (K_{s,{\rm AB}}) = 24.6$ mag arcsec$^{-2}$, ap\_col is the diameter in arcsec of a circular aperture with equal area.
1129: \item ap\_tot-- Aperture diameter in arcsec used for measuring the total $K_s$-band flux. When the isophotal or SExtractor's ``MAG\_AUTO'' aperture was used, this entry contains the equivalent circularized diameter corresponding to that aperture.
1130: \item f\_deblend1-- Flag equal to 1 when the source was deblended somewhere in the process (SExtractor's ``blend'').
1131: \item f\_deblend2-- Flag equal to 1 when the photometry is affected by a neighboring source (SExtractor's ``bias'').
1132: \item Kr50-- Half light radius in arcsec, measured on the $K_s$-band image (SExtractor's flux\_radius scaled to arcsec).
1133: \item Keps-- Ellipticity of the isophotal area, measured on the $K_s$-band image.
1134: \item Kposang-- Position angle of the isophotal area, measured on the $K_s$-band image.
1135: \item zph\_best-- Best estimate of the photometric redshift (\S\ \ref{photz.sec}).
1136: \item zph\_low, zph\_high-- Lower and upper edge of the 68\% confidence interval around zph\_best.
1137: \item zsp-- Spectroscopic redshift (set to -99 when no spectroscopic information is available).
1138: \item zsp\_qual-- Quality flag from 0 to 1 assigned to the spectroscopic redshift. Only zsp\_qual=1 entries are considered reliable.
1139: \item zsp\_source-- Spectroscopic survey from which zsp was taken (Tab.\ \ref{spec.tab}).
1140: \item zsp\_qual\_orig-- Original quality flag for zsp from the respective spectroscopic survey.
1141: \item XID-- Identification number from the 1Ms X-ray catalog by Giacconi et al. (2002), set to -99 when no cross-identification within 2'' was found. Note that we accounted for the $\sim 1\farcs 3$ systematic offset in the Giacconi et al. (2002) X-ray centroids, as pointed out before by Roche et al. (2003).
1142: \end {itemize}
1143:
1144: \section {Comparison to the GOODS-MUSIC catalog}
1145: \label{comparison.sec}
1146:
1147: \subsection {Differences in data and strategy}
1148: Recently, G06a presented a multicolor catalog for
1149: the GOODS-CDFS field, referred to as the GOODS-MUSIC catalog. The
1150: clustering evolution of distant red galaxies was quantified based on
1151: this sample (Grazian et al. 2006b), as was the contribution of various
1152: color-selected samples of distant galaxies to the stellar mass density
1153: (Grazian et al. 2007). Despite the overlap in public data used to
1154: compile the GOODS-MUSIC and our catalog, there are a number of marked
1155: differences.
1156:
1157: First, our catalog is purely $K_s$-band selected. Since the
1158: $K_s$-band magnitude is a better proxy for stellar mass than the
1159: optical magnitude, this makes it ideally suited to extract
1160: mass-limited samples from. The GOODS-MUSIC sample on the other hand
1161: is to first order $z_{850}$-band selected (at the ACS resolution), with an
1162: addition of the remaining $K_s$-band sources that are detected in a
1163: map with masked $z_{850}$-band detections. Although valuable in its own
1164: respect, this makes it less trivial to understand the completeness of
1165: the sample.
1166:
1167: Second, we based our catalog on the ESO/GOODS data release v1.5,
1168: consisting of 3 extra ISAAC pointings in $J$ and $K_s$, and 7 more in $H$
1169: with respect to the v1.0 release used by G06a.
1170:
1171: Third, apart from the $U_{38}$ photometry, we also added photometry
1172: based on images in the other WFI passbands: $BVRI$. Despite the
1173: shallower depth than the ACS imaging (see Table\ \ref{dataset.tab}),
1174: this addition is useful for, e.g., estimating photometric redshifts,
1175: since the WFI passbands are nicely centered in between the ACS
1176: passbands. Consequently, the spectral energy distributions of sources
1177: in the catalog are better sampled.
1178:
1179: Finally, we include MIPS 24 $\mu$m measurements, enabling us to
1180: constrain the total IR luminosity of the $K_s$-band selected
1181: galaxies. Before doing so, we compare the photometry in common
1182: between both catalogs, and the photometric redshifts derived from it.
1183:
1184: \subsection{Comparing photometry}
1185: \label{MUSICphot.sec}
1186:
1187: %\clearpage
1188: \begin {figure*} [htbp]
1189: \centering
1190: \epsscale{1}
1191: \plotone{f6.eps}
1192: \caption{\small A direct comparison of total magnitudes for sources
1193: with $S/N > 10$ in the $U_{38}$-to-8.0 $\mu$m bandpasses in common
1194: between GOODS-MUSIC and our FIREWORKS catalog. Sources that are
1195: blended in the $K_s$-band image are plotted as empty symbols. On the
1196: right side of each panel, a histogram shows the distribution of
1197: offsets. Our $U_{38}$ photometry, based on the re-reduced WFI image
1198: by the GaBoDS consortium, is systematically fainter by 0.2 mag. We
1199: find an overall good correspondence in the ACS optical and ISAAC NIR
1200: bands, with offsets of roughly 6\% due to aperture corrections. In
1201: the IRAC bands, photometric offsets amount up to 0.4 mag.
1202: \label {comp_phot.fig}
1203: }
1204: \end {figure*}
1205: %\clearpage
1206:
1207: We cross-correlated the two catalogs using a search radius of $1\farcs
1208: 2$ and in Fig.\ \ref{comp_phot.fig} present a comparison of the
1209: $U_{38}$-to-8.0 $\mu$m photometry for the bands in common between
1210: them. Differences between the total magnitudes are plotted for
1211: objects with $S/N > 10$ in the $K_s$-band and the band under
1212: consideration. Objects that are marked by SExtractor as blended in
1213: the $K_s$-band, are indicated with empty symbols.
1214:
1215: Our $U_{38}$ magnitudes for non-blended sources are fainter than the
1216: GOODS-MUSIC magnitudes by 0.2 mag in the median, with a scatter of 0.4
1217: mag. This offset can be attributed to our use of the re-reduced WFI
1218: data for which the GaBoDS consortium also supplied an improved
1219: zeropoint determination.
1220:
1221: The overall correspondence in the $B$-to-$K_s$ bands is good, and
1222: offsets can be well understood from the differences in the applied
1223: photometric method. We measure a typical median offset for
1224: non-blended sources in the optical and NIR bands of $mag_{\rm tot,FIREWORKS} -
1225: mag_{\rm tot,MUSIC} = -0.06$, and a scatter of $\sigma_{\rm NMAD} < 0.2$.
1226: G06a based their total magnitudes on SExtractor's ``MAG\_AUTO''
1227: parameter for the $z_{850}$-band detections and on the ``MAG\_BEST''
1228: for the remaining $K_s$-band detections that were not detected in the
1229: $z_{850}$-band. G06a did not apply an aperture correction based on the
1230: stellar growth curve to correct for the flux lost because it fell
1231: outside the ``MAG\_AUTO'' or ``MAG\_BEST'' aperture. The lack of
1232: aperture correction explains at least part of the systematic offset.
1233: Sources marked as blended in our $K_s$-band detection map typically
1234: are brighter by 0.2 - 0.4 mag in the MUSIC catalog. This can be
1235: explained by the contamination from neighboring sources within the
1236: ``MAG\_AUTO'' aperture, which we avoid by using the isophotal aperture
1237: in combination with an aperture correction for blended sources.
1238: However, our measure of the total magnitude in the presence of
1239: crowding is also not perfect in that flux from the source that is
1240: projected on top of a blended source may be lost by our technique.
1241:
1242: For the IRAC photometry, the discrepancies are larger, ranging from
1243: 0.16 mag in the 4.5 $\mu$m band to 0.42 mag at 8.0 $\mu$m. The
1244: observed offsets in IRAC photometry can largely be attributed to the
1245: use of an early version of the IRAC PSF by G06a and a bug in the
1246: normalization of the smoothing kernel for the IRAC data by G06a
1247: (Fontana \& Grazian, private communication). After removing these two
1248: effects, our measurements of the total IRAC magnitudes are still
1249: brighter by 0.06 to 0.1 mag. This offset is similar to that for the
1250: optical and NIR bands, and can be attributed to light missed by the
1251: ``MAG\_BEST'' magnitude, as G06a already caution. We stress that the
1252: offset in total IRAC magnitudes not only affects its derived
1253: properties such as stellar mass, but also the optical-to-MIR and
1254: NIR-to-MIR colors. For example, our $z_{850} - [3.6\mu$m$]$, $z_{850}
1255: - [4.5\mu$m$]$, $z_{850} - [5.8\mu$m$]$, and $z_{850} - [8.0\mu$m$]$
1256: colors are redder than the GOODS-MUSIC colors by 0.23, 0.11, 0.17, and
1257: 0.37 mag in the median respectively. Similarly, our $K_s -
1258: [3.6\mu$m$]$, $K_s - [4.5\mu$m$]$, $K_s - [5.8\mu$m$]$, and $K_s -
1259: [8.0\mu$m$]$ colors are redder in the median by 0.29, 0.16, 0.22, and
1260: 0.42 respectively. The scatter in the color differences with respect
1261: to GOODS-MUSIC typically amounts to 1.5 times the size of the median
1262: offset.
1263:
1264: \subsection{Comparing photometric redshifts}
1265: Finally, we compare the photometric redshifts presented in
1266: \S\ref{photz.sec} with those derived by G06a. The
1267: numbers quoted in \S\ref{photz.sec} and by G06a cannot directly be
1268: compared since new spectroscopic redshifts were added, and objects
1269: that showed evidence for the presence of an AGN in their optical
1270: spectrum were rejected from the GOODS-MUSIC photometric redshift
1271: analysis. Nevertheless, when comparing the performance of the
1272: $z_{\rm phot}$ estimates for a set of 659 non-AGN with reliable $z_{\rm spec}$
1273: and coverage in all bands in both catalogs, we find a scatter in
1274: $\Delta z / (1+z)$ for GOODS-MUSIC ($\sigma_{\rm NMAD}=0.039$) that is
1275: similar to that for our best estimates ($\sigma_{\rm NMAD}=0.033$). The
1276: median $\Delta z / (1+z)$ is -0.009 and -0.005 for the GOODS-MUSIC and
1277: FIREWORKS $z_{\rm phot}$ estimates respectively.
1278:
1279: Comparing the $z_{\rm phot}$ estimates for all objects that are well
1280: exposed in all bands in both catalogs, irrespective of a spectroscopic
1281: confirmation, we find a median $\frac{z_{\rm phot,MUSIC} - z_{\rm
1282: phot,FIREWORKS}}{1 + z_{\rm phot,FIREWORKS}}$ of 0 and a scatter
1283: $\sigma_{\rm NMAD} = 0.052$. The largest systematic offsets occur in
1284: the $1.5<z<2$ and $2.5<z<3$ intervals where median($\frac{z_{\rm
1285: phot,MUSIC} - z_{\rm phot,FIREWORKS}}{1 + z_{\rm phot,FIREWORKS}}$)
1286: $\sim$ 0.04 and -0.04 respectively. We find no systematic dependence
1287: on $K_{s,{\rm AB}}^{\rm tot}$.
1288:
1289: We conclude that the photometric differences between both catalogs can
1290: be understood from the applied method. Our $z_{\rm phot}$ estimates are
1291: in excellent agreement with the available spectroscopic samples and
1292: generally show good agreement with the $z_{\rm phot}$ estimates by G06a.
1293: We now proceed to exploit our catalog to analyze the colors and total IR
1294: energy output of distant galaxies.
1295:
1296: \section {Total IR properties of distant $K_s$-selected galaxies}
1297: \label{science.sec}
1298:
1299: With the catalog at hand, we aim to answer the following simple
1300: questions: Which $K_s$-selected ($S/N_{K_s} > 5$, $K_{s,{\rm AB}}^{\rm tot}
1301: \lesssim 24.3$) galaxies at $1.5<z<2.5$ have the brightest total IR luminosities ($L_{\rm IR} \equiv
1302: L(8-1000\ \mu$m$)$), and which contribute most to the integrated total
1303: IR luminosity? Specifically we will address whether the total IR
1304: luminosity is dominated by red or blue galaxies, with the color
1305: defined in the rest-frame UV, optical or NIR wavelength regime. We
1306: restrict our analysis to the $1.5<z<2.5$ interval, since at those
1307: redshifts the observed 24 $\mu$m probes the rest-frame mid-IR ($7\
1308: \mu$m$\lesssim \lambda_{\rm rest} \lesssim 10\ \mu$m), which broadly
1309: correlates with the total IR luminosity (e.g., Spinoglio et al. 1995;
1310: Chary \& Elbaz 2001; Dale \& Helou 2002).
1311:
1312: \subsection {Observed 24 $\mu$m flux as function of observed colors}
1313: \label{science_obs.sec}
1314: We approach the questions raised above by first studying the
1315: correlation between purely observational properties: the 24 $\mu$m
1316: flux as proxy for IR luminosity and the observed $B_{435}-V_{606}$, $J-K_s$, and
1317: $K_s - [4.5\mu$m$]$ colors as proxy for the rest-frame UV, optical and
1318: optical-to-NIR color respectively. Unless the redshift dependence of
1319: the conversion from 24 $\mu$m to total IR luminosity and of the
1320: conversion from observed to rest-frame colors are conspiring, any
1321: trend in the directly observable properties should be a signpost for
1322: correlations in the rest-frame properties, whose derivation involves
1323: significant systematic uncertainties.
1324:
1325: %\clearpage
1326: \begin {figure} [htbp]
1327: \centering
1328: %\epsscale{0.45}
1329: \plotone{f7a.eps}
1330: \plotone{f7b.eps}
1331: \plotone{f7c.eps}
1332: \caption{\small Stacked 24 $\mu$m flux densities as function of
1333: observed $B_{435}-V_{606}$, $J-K_s$, and $K_s - [4.5\mu$m$]$ color for galaxies at
1334: $1.5<z<2.5$ with $S/N > 5$ in the $K_s$-band (corresponding to
1335: $K_{s,{\rm AB}}^{\rm tot} \lesssim 24.3$). Filled circles represent the median
1336: for each equal-number bin. Empty boxes represent the mean flux.
1337: Light-grey and dark-grey polygons indicate respectively the central
1338: 68\% and 50\% of the distribution within each bin. We find a trend of
1339: increasing $[24\mu$m$]_{\rm tot}$ with redder observed-frame color that
1340: gets progressively stronger as we consider colors measured at longer
1341: wavelengths.
1342: \label {MIPSobs.fig}
1343: }
1344: \end {figure}
1345: %\clearpage
1346:
1347: The total number of $K_s$-selected galaxies at $1.5<z<2.5$ with
1348: $K^{\rm tot}_{s,{\rm AB}} < 24.3$ is 961. 45\% of these are individually
1349: detected at the $3\sigma$ level ($[24\mu$m$]_{\rm tot} > 11\
1350: \mu$Jy). Since we aim to investigate what color galaxies dominate the IR
1351: emission, we divide our galaxies in bins of similar color. Each bin
1352: contains an equal number of sources (160). Consequently, the bin
1353: widths are not equal. To start, we leave the origin of the 24 $\mu$m
1354: emission (dust heated by AGN or star formation) as an open question.
1355: We note however that when excluding X-ray detected sources each bin would
1356: contain 154 objects, and applying such a selection would not affect
1357: the results of our analysis. We perform the stacking per color bin in
1358: two ways: by averaging the 24 $\mu$m flux measurements of all sources
1359: in the bin (some of which will be negative due to noise), and by
1360: taking the median of the 24 $\mu$m flux measurements of all sources in
1361: the bin. The mean has a contribution from all the galaxies in the
1362: color bin, and hence directly measures the contribution to the
1363: integrated 24 $\mu$m emission. The median has the advantage that it
1364: is more robust against a small number of bright sources in the color
1365: bin, and is therefore lower.
1366:
1367: In Fig.\ \ref{MIPSobs.fig}, the stacked 24 $\mu$m flux densities are
1368: plotted versus the observed $B_{435}-V_{606}$, $J-K_s$, and $K_s - [4.5\mu$m$]$
1369: color. The error bars on the mean flux measurement indicate the
1370: errors in the mean ($\sigma([24]_{\rm tot}) /
1371: \sqrt{N}$), whereas the error bars on the median flux measurement are
1372: computed as $\sigma_{\rm NMAD}([24]_{\rm tot}) /
1373: \sqrt{N}$. Furthermore, the light grey and dark grey polygon show the
1374: range containing respectively the central 68\% and 50\% of the binned
1375: galaxies. Each color bin contains galaxies with a large spread in 24
1376: $\mu$m fluxes. In most bins, at least 20\% of the galaxies have an
1377: individual signal-to-noise ratio $S/N < 1$ at 24 $\mu$m.
1378:
1379: Fig.\ \ref{MIPSobs.fig}(a) shows that the galaxies in the bluest
1380: $B_{435}-V_{606}$ bins are the faintest 24 $\mu$m sources. However,
1381: the stacked $[24\mu$m$]_{\rm tot}$ flux is not uniformly increasing over
1382: the whole observed optical color range. Considering colors measured
1383: at longer wavelengths, we find a highly significant increase in the
1384: stacked $[24\mu$m$]_{\rm tot}$ flux over the entire $J-K_s$ (Fig.\
1385: \ref{MIPSobs.fig}(b)) and $K_s - [4.5\mu$m$]_{\rm tot}$ (Fig.\
1386: \ref{MIPSobs.fig}(c)) color range. The trend is strongest in the
1387: observed $K_s - [4.5\mu$m$]_{\rm tot}$ color, where we find an increase in
1388: $[24\mu$m$]_{\rm tot}$ of a factor 26 in the mean and 2 orders of
1389: magnitude in the median over a color range of $\sim 1.3$ mag. Since
1390: the bins contain an equal number of objects, it is trivial to see that
1391: not only the reddest galaxies in $J-K_s$ and $K_s-[4.5\mu$m$]$ are
1392: brightest at 24 $\mu$m, they also contribute the most to the total 24
1393: $\mu$m emission integrated over all $K_s$-selected galaxies at
1394: $1.5<z<2.5$.
1395:
1396: \subsection {Total IR luminosity as function of rest-frame colors}
1397: \label{science_mod.sec}
1398:
1399: Although the trend of more 24 $\mu$m emission for galaxies with a
1400: redder observed color is highly significant for $J-K_s$ and $K_s -
1401: [4.5\mu$m$]$, it could still be contaminated or, alternatively, driven
1402: by redshift dependencies within the $1.5<z<2.5$ redshift interval
1403: under consideration. Now, we will attempt to remove possible redshift
1404: dependencies by converting both axes to a rest-frame equivalent.
1405: Moreover, instead of converting the measured flux density at 24 $\mu$m
1406: to a rest-frame flux density at 24 $\mu$m$ / (1+z)$, we use it as a
1407: probe to determine the total IR luminosity $L_{\rm IR} \equiv L(8-1000\
1408: \mu$m$)$. Since this conversion assumes that the 24 $\mu$m emission
1409: originates from dust heated by star formation, we further reject all
1410: X-ray detections from our sample to rule out relatively unobscured AGN
1411: candidates. We caution that among the brightest 24 $\mu$m sources in
1412: our sample, there may still be cases where hot dust emission from an
1413: obscured AGN contributes significantly to the 24 $\mu$m emission and
1414: causes an overestimate of $L_{\rm IR}$. Detailed studies of such mid-IR
1415: excess sources are presented by Daddi et al. (2007) and Papovich et
1416: al. (2007). Papovich et al. (2007) find that for sources with
1417: $[24\mu$m$]_{\rm tot} >$ 250 $\mu$Jy the $L_{\rm IR}$ estimates derived from
1418: the 24 $\mu$m flux density alone are too large by factors 2-10. We
1419: stress however that we study a deep $K_s$- and not 24 $\mu$m-selected
1420: sample. The fraction of sources with $[24\mu$m$]_{\rm tot} >$ 250 $\mu$Jy
1421: per color bin never exceeds 7\%. Therefore, at least the median
1422: stacked properties are relatively robust against a possible
1423: contamination by obscured AGN.
1424:
1425: In the following, we first describe the derivation of rest-frame UV to
1426: NIR colors. Next, we explain the method to estimate the total IR
1427: luminosity. Finally, we repeat the stacking analysis using the
1428: derived rest-frame properties.
1429:
1430: \subsubsection {Stellar mass, UV slope, and rest-frame colors}
1431: \label{beta_rfcol.sec}
1432: For each of the galaxies in our sample, we modeled the spectral energy
1433: distribution (SED) using the stellar population synthesis code by
1434: Bruzual \& Charlot (2003). We used an identical approach as Wuyts et
1435: al. (2007), assuming a Salpeter IMF and solar metallicity, and fitting
1436: three star formation histories: a single stellar population without
1437: dust, an exponentially declining model with {\it e}-folding time of
1438: 300 Myr and allowed dust attenuation in the range $A_V = 0 - 4$, and a
1439: constant star formation model with the same freedom in attenuation.
1440: We subsequently scaled the stellar masses derived from the
1441: best-fitting template to a Kroupa IMF by dividing the stellar masses
1442: for a Salpeter IMF by a factor 1.6.
1443:
1444: We characterize the rest-frame UV part of each SED by fitting the
1445: functional form $F_{\lambda} \sim
1446: \lambda^{\beta}$ to the best-fitting template, using the rest-frame UV
1447: bins defined by Calzetti, Kinney,\& Storchi-Bergmann (1994). The
1448: robustness of this technique is discussed by van Dokkum et al. (2006).
1449:
1450: The rest-frame $\rfUV$ and $\rfVJ$ colors were determined by
1451: interpolation between the directly observed bands using templates as a
1452: guide. For an in depth discussion of the algorithm, we refer the
1453: reader to Rudnick et al. (2001; 2003). We used an IDL implementation
1454: of the algorithm by Taylor et al. (in preparation) dubbed
1455: ``InterRest''.
1456:
1457: \subsubsection {Converting 24 $\mu$m flux to total IR luminosity}
1458: \label{Lir.sec}
1459: At redshifts $1.5<z<2.5$, the 24 $\mu$m fluxes trace the rest-frame
1460: 7.7 $\mu$m emission from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). To
1461: convert this MIR emission to a total IR luminosity $L_{\rm IR} \equiv
1462: L(8-1000\ \mu$m$)$, we use the infrared spectral energy distributions of
1463: star-forming galaxies provided by Dale \& Helou (2002). The template
1464: set allows us to quantify the IR/MIR flux ratio for different heating
1465: levels of the interstellar environment, parameterized by $dM(U) \sim
1466: U^{-\alpha} dU$ where M(U) represents the dust mass heated by an
1467: intensity U of the interstellar radiation field.
1468:
1469: We computed the total infrared luminosity $L_{\rm IR,\alpha}$ for each
1470: object for all Dale \& Helou (2002) templates within the reasonable
1471: range from $\alpha=1$ for active galaxies to $\alpha=2.5$ for
1472: quiescent galaxies. The mean of the resulting $\log (L_{\rm IR,\alpha=1,
1473: 1.0625, ..., 2.5})$ was adopted as best estimate for the IR
1474: luminosity, and the $\pm 0.45$ dex variation from $L_{\rm IR,\alpha=2.5}$
1475: to $L_{\rm IR,\alpha=1}$ was taken as a measure for the systematic
1476: uncertainty in the conversion.
1477:
1478: Apart from the random photometric error and systematic template
1479: uncertainty, uncertainties in the photometric redshift contribute to
1480: the total error budget. For each galaxy, we calculated the spread in
1481: $L_{\rm IR}$ caused by variations of $z_{\rm phot}$ within the 68\% confidence
1482: interval. Although the uncertainty in photometric redshift is partly
1483: random (propagating from photometric uncertainties in the SED), we
1484: treat it as purely systematic, originating from template mismatches.
1485: This means the error bars related to $z_{\rm phot}$ on the stacked
1486: $L_{\rm IR}$ measurements do not scale with $1/ \sqrt{N}$. Instead, they
1487: range from the stacked $L_{\rm IR}$ based on the lowest
1488: $L_{\rm IR,individual}$ estimates allowed for each object within its
1489: $z_{\rm phot}$ uncertainty, to the stacked $L_{\rm IR}$ based on the maximum
1490: $L_{\rm IR,individual}$ allowed for each object.
1491:
1492: \subsubsection {$L_{\rm IR}$ versus rest-frame color}
1493: \label{Lir_rfcol.sec}
1494:
1495: %\clearpage
1496: \begin {figure} [htbp]
1497: \centering
1498: %\epsscale{0.45}
1499: \plotone{f8a.eps}
1500: \plotone{f8b.eps}
1501: \plotone{f8c.eps}
1502: \caption{\footnotesize Stacked total IR luminosities as function of
1503: rest-frame UV slope, $\rfUV$, and $\rfVJ$ for non-AGN at $1.5<z<2.5$
1504: with $S/N > 5$ in the $K_s$-band ($K_{s,{\rm AB}}^{\rm tot} \lesssim 24.3$).
1505: Filled circles represent the median for each equal-number bin. Empty
1506: boxes represent the mean flux. Light-grey and dark-grey polygons
1507: indicate respectively the central 68\% and 50\% of the distribution
1508: within each bin. The systematic uncertainty induced by template
1509: uncertainties in the conversion to $L_{\rm IR}$ is indicated in the bottom
1510: right corner. The dotted error bars indicate the variation in the
1511: mean and median $L_{\rm IR}$ by systematic variations in $z_{\rm phot}$. We
1512: find a trend of increasing $L_{\rm IR}$ with redder rest-frame color.
1513: Since the bins contain equal numbers of objects, this also means that
1514: red galaxies contribute most to the integrated IR emission of distant
1515: $K_s$-selected galaxies.
1516: \label {Lir.fig}
1517: }
1518: \end {figure}
1519: %\clearpage
1520:
1521: Having determined the rest-frame colors and total IR luminosities of
1522: $K_s$-selected galaxies without X-ray detection at $1.5<z<2.5$, we now
1523: proceed to investigate which $K_s$-selected galaxies contribute most
1524: to the IR emission. Again, we investigate the average properties of
1525: galaxies binned by color to enhance the robustness of our results. In
1526: Fig.\ \ref{Lir.fig}, we plot the mean and median total IR luminosities
1527: of our in color bins divided sample versus the rest-frame UV slope
1528: $\beta$, the rest-frame optical color $\rfUV$, and the rest-frame
1529: optical-to-NIR color $\rfVJ$. The black error bars indicate the error
1530: in the mean, respectively median. With dotted error bars, we show the
1531: systematic variations allowed within the photometric redshift
1532: uncertainties. Finally, the error bar in the bottom right corner
1533: represents the range from quiescent to active galaxy templates by Dale
1534: \& Helou (2002). Clearly, systematic uncertainties are dominating the
1535: error budget in this analysis.
1536:
1537: As in Fig.\ \ref{MIPSobs.fig}, we find a large range in IR properties
1538: within each bin, illustrated by the light grey and dark grey polygons
1539: that mark respectively the central 68\% and 50\% of the distribution
1540: of $L_{\rm IR}$ of individual objects. Nevertheless, a general trend is
1541: visible of redder colors corresponding to larger IR luminosities. No
1542: matter which part of the spectral energy distribution is used to
1543: define red or blue galaxies, the redder half of the galaxies in our
1544: sample have stacked IR properties in the LIRG ($L_{\rm IR} = 10^{11} -
1545: 10^{12}\ L_{\sun}$) regime. The trend seems to flatten at the reddest
1546: UV slopes, and the contribution to the total IR luminosity even drops
1547: for the reddest $\rfUV$ bin. In $\rfVJ$ on the other hand, the
1548: increase in $L_{\rm IR}$ with reddening color continues over the entire
1549: color range, reaching ULIRG luminosities ($L_{\rm IR} > 10^{12}\
1550: L_{\sun}$) for 23\% of the galaxies in the reddest bin.
1551:
1552: Considering the IR luminosities of individual objects over the entire
1553: color range, we find that ULIRGs make up 7\% of our $K_s$-selected
1554: sample with $K^{\rm tot}_{s,{\rm AB}} < 24.3$. The fraction of ULIRGs increases
1555: to 35\% when only considering massive ($M > 10^{11}\ M_{\sun}$)
1556: galaxies. A similar fraction was found by Daddi et
1557: al. (2007).
1558:
1559: The IR/MIR conversion factor varies by nearly an order of magnitude
1560: between the use of quiescent ($\alpha=2.5$) or active ($\alpha=1$)
1561: galaxy templates. For each of the galaxies, we used the mean of the
1562: logarithm of all conversion factors derived from the $1 \leq \alpha \leq
1563: 2.5$ templates. Other authors (e.g. Papovich et al. 2006; Papovich et
1564: al. 2007) adopted a conversion to total IR luminosity in which the
1565: rest-frame IR luminosity density translates uniquely to a single SED
1566: template (i.e., a lower $\alpha$ was used for brighter galaxies).
1567: Applying the conversion by Papovich et al. (2007) to each of the
1568: galaxies in our sample and repeating the stacking procedure, gives the
1569: following results. The mean $L_{\rm IR}$ for each color bin increases by
1570: typically $\sim 0.1$ dex with respect to the value obtained with our
1571: universal (flux-independent) conversion. The median $L_{\rm IR}$ for each
1572: color bin instead decreases by typically $\sim 0.15$ dex. All the
1573: described correlations between $L_{\rm IR}$ and rest-frame color remain
1574: intact. We thus confirm that our results are robust to alternative
1575: conversions from $24\ \mu$m flux to total IR luminosity that are
1576: commonly used in the literature.
1577:
1578: We conclude that amongst distant $K_s$-selected galaxies that show no
1579: sign of relatively unobscured AGN at X-ray wavelengths, the redder
1580: galaxies have on average larger total IR luminosities. Given that
1581: each bin in Fig.\
1582: \ref{Lir.fig} contains an equal number of objects, it is also clear
1583: that red galaxies in our sample contribute more to the integrated
1584: total IR luminosity than blue galaxies. We argue that this trend
1585: cannot be explained by systematic errors, and tested that this
1586: conclusion is robust against the precise choice of redshift interval
1587: by varying the lower edge between redshift 1 and 2 and the upper edge
1588: between 2 and 3. Likewise, we verified that none of our conclusions
1589: critically depend on the number of color bins. Finally, we note that,
1590: although X-ray detections were excluded from our analysis to validate
1591: the use of IR templates for starforming galaxies, the results remain
1592: nearly unaffected when we treat them as normal galaxies.
1593:
1594: %\clearpage
1595: \begin {figure} [htbp]
1596: \centering
1597: %\epsscale{0.45}
1598: \plotone{f9a.eps}
1599: \plotone{f9b.eps}
1600: \plotone{f9c.eps}
1601: \caption{\footnotesize Stacked total IR luminosities as function of
1602: rest-frame UV slope, $\rfUV$, and $\rfVJ$ for non-AGN at $1.5<z<2.5$
1603: with $K_{s,{\rm AB}}^{\rm tot} \lesssim 22.86$ ($K_{s,{\rm Vega}}^{\rm
1604: tot} \lesssim 21$). Filled circles represent the median for each
1605: equal-number bin. Empty boxes represent the mean flux. Light-grey
1606: and dark-grey polygons indicate respectively the central 68\% and 50\%
1607: of the distribution within each bin. The systematic uncertainty
1608: induced by template uncertainties in the conversion to $L_{\rm IR}$ is
1609: indicated in the bottom right corner. The dotted error bars indicate
1610: the variation in the mean and median $L_{\rm IR}$ by systematic variations
1611: in $z_{\rm phot}$. The increase in $L_{\rm IR}$ with redder rest-frame color
1612: is less pronounced than for the fainter ($K_{s,{\rm AB}}^{\rm tot} \lesssim
1613: 24.3$, Fig.\
1614: \ref{Lir.fig}) sample. The drop in $L_{\rm IR}$ at the reddest $\rfUV$
1615: colors is stronger.
1616: \label {Lir_Kbright.fig}
1617: }
1618: \end {figure}
1619: %\clearpage
1620:
1621: Dividing the sample in two equal-number bins according to $\beta$,
1622: $\rfUV$, and $\rfVJ$, we find that the integrated total IR luminosity
1623: of the red half is larger than that of the blue half by a factor $6.7
1624: \pm 1.6$, $3.6 \pm 0.8$, and $5.6 \pm 1.2$ respectively. Imposing a
1625: brighter cut in the $K_s$-band magnitude (Fig.\
1626: \ref{Lir_Kbright.fig}) weakens the correlation of $L_{\rm IR}$ with UV
1627: slope and $\rfVJ$. Adopting a $K^{\rm tot}_{s,{\rm AB}} < 22.86$ cut, as is the
1628: case for the NIR-selected sample studied by Reddy et al. (2006),causes
1629: the stacked $L_{\rm IR}$ of the bluest $\rfUV$ colors to increase while
1630: the stacked $L_{\rm IR}$ of the reddest $\rfUV$ colors drops. The overall
1631: fraction of galaxies that is not detected at the 3$\sigma$ level in
1632: the 24 $\mu$m band is lower by a factor 2 in the $K^{\rm tot}_{s,{\rm AB}} <
1633: 22.86$ sample than in our $K^{\rm tot}_{s,{\rm AB}} < 24.3$ sample. However, at
1634: the reddest optical colors ($\rfUV > 1.3$) the fraction of galaxies
1635: that is not detected at the 3$\sigma$ level in the 24 $\mu$m band
1636: remains the same as we impose the brighter $K_s$-band limit. We
1637: find that, for this $K_s$-bright sample, the ratio of the integrated
1638: $L_{\rm IR}$ of the red and the blue half of the galaxies in $\beta$,
1639: $\rfUV$, and $\rfVJ$ amounts to a factor of $2.1 \pm 0.5$, $1.2 \pm
1640: 1.1$, and $2.1 \pm 0.5$ respectively.
1641:
1642: It is tempting to elaborate on the physical interpretation in terms of
1643: star formation rate (SFR), age, and dust content of the galaxies in
1644: our sample implied by the presented results. Colors in different
1645: wavelength regimes are to a greater or lesser extent determined by
1646: these physical parameters. The UV slope and $\rfVJ$ color are both
1647: sensitive tracers of dust attenuation (Meurer et al. 1999 and Wuyts et
1648: al. 2007 respectively). In comparison to the $\rfVJ$ color, the
1649: $\rfUV$ color is more sensitive to stellar age and to lesser extent
1650: affected by dust (Wuyts et al. 2007). The fact that in the reddest
1651: $\rfUV$ bin the total IR luminosity drops again might therefore
1652: indicate an increasing contribution from low $L_{\rm IR}$ galaxies with
1653: little dust-obscured star formation. In combination with the fact
1654: that rest-frame optically selected galaxies often have faint UV
1655: luminosities and thus little unobscured star formation (F\"orster
1656: Schreiber et al. 2004), this suggests that part of the galaxies making
1657: up the reddest $\rfUV$ bin have a low overall SFR (unobscured +
1658: obscured). This is consistent with the spectral evidence for galaxies
1659: with quenched star formation at $z \sim 2$ (Kriek et al. 2006). A
1660: similar conclusion was drawn by Reddy et al. (2006), who found for a
1661: sample of galaxies at similar redshifts selected by optical and NIR
1662: color criteria that the IR luminosity of 24 $\mu$m detected sources
1663: increased toward redder observed $z-K$, but that at the reddest $z-K$
1664: colors a population without 24 $\mu$m detection exists that satisfies
1665: the Distant Red Galaxy (Franx et al. 2003) and/or BzK/PE (Daddi et
1666: al. 2004) color criteria. Based on X-ray stacking in the
1667: GOODS-North field, although also probing only to $K_{s,{\rm AB}}^{\rm tot} <
1668: 22.86$, Reddy et al. (2005) found a similar turnover in inferred SFR
1669: at $z-K>3$. Although the observed $z-K$ color is redshift dependent
1670: and at $z \sim 2$ spans a somewhat broader wavelength range than
1671: $\rfUV$, both colors probe the age-sensitive Balmer/4000\AA\ break and
1672: the observed turnovers therefore likely share the same origin.
1673:
1674: An in depth analysis of the mix between dust-obscured starforming
1675: systems and evolved red galaxies would require a careful SED modeling,
1676: estimating the SFR based on different wavelength tracers from X-ray
1677: over UV to the infrared, and a treatment of each object on an
1678: individual basis to assess their relative contribution. Such a study
1679: is clearly beyond the scope of this paper, and will be presented by
1680: Labb\'{e} et al. (in preparation) based on the combined sample of
1681: galaxies in the CDFS (this paper),
1682: \1054 (FS06) and the HDFS (L03).
1683:
1684: \subsubsection {Redshift dependence}
1685: \label{depend_z.sec}
1686:
1687: We measure a median rest-frame color evolution for galaxies in our
1688: $K_{s,{\rm AB}}^{\rm tot} < 24.3$ sample from $z=2.5$ to $z=1.5$ of
1689: 0.48, -0.05, and 0.48 for $\beta$, $\rfUV$, and $\rfVJ$ respectively.
1690: We note that going to lower redshifts, the evolution in $\beta$ and
1691: $\rfVJ$ reverses. The observed evolution amounts to 26, 5, and 40\%
1692: of the scatter in the respective rest-frame color at any given
1693: redshift in the $1.5<z<2.5$ range. Consequently, not every color bin
1694: in Fig.\ \ref{Lir.fig} and Fig.\ \ref{Lir_Kbright.fig} is composed of
1695: galaxies with exactly the same redshift distribution. This is
1696: particularly the case for $\beta$ and $\rfVJ$, where the measured
1697: color evolution with redshift is largest. A dependence on redshift
1698: can potentially affect the observed trend of increasing $L_{\rm IR}$
1699: toward redder colors, if $L_{\rm IR}$ evolves within the $1.5<z<2.5$
1700: interval. Binning galaxies by redshift, we find a decrease in the
1701: stacked $L_{\rm IR}$ from $z=2.5$ to $z=1.5$ by $\sim 0.4$ dex. We
1702: conclude that redshift dependencies within the $1.5<z<2.5$ interval
1703: are not driving, and if anything weaken, the observed increase of
1704: $L_{\rm IR}$ toward redder colors.
1705:
1706: \subsubsection {Mass dependence}
1707: \label{depend_M.sec}
1708:
1709: We now investigate the role of stellar mass in the observed trend of
1710: red galaxies dominating the total IR emission. van Dokkum et
1711: al. (2006) showed that the high-mass end of the high redshift galaxy
1712: population is dominated by galaxies with red $\rfUV$ and large
1713: $\beta$. Considering the optical-to-NIR colors of galaxies in our
1714: sample, a similar lack of massive galaxies with blue $\rfVJ$ is
1715: observed.
1716:
1717: %\clearpage
1718: \begin {figure*} [htbp]
1719: \centering
1720: %\epsscale{0.45}
1721: \plottwo{f10a.eps}{f10d.eps}
1722: \plottwo{f10b.eps}{f10e.eps}
1723: \plottwo{f10c.eps}{f10f.eps}
1724: \caption{\footnotesize Stacked total IR luminosity divided by stellar mass as function of
1725: rest-frame UV slope, $\rfUV$, and $\rfVJ$ for non-AGN at $1.5<z<2.5$
1726: with $K_{s,{\rm AB}}^{\rm tot} \lesssim 24.3$ ({\it left panels}) and
1727: $K_{s,{\rm AB}}^{\rm tot} \lesssim 22.86$ ({\it right panels}).
1728: Symbols are identical to those in Fig.\ \ref{Lir.fig} and Fig.\
1729: \ref{Lir_Kbright.fig}. The stacked $L_{\rm IR}/M_*$ shows a weaker
1730: increase with rest-frame color than the stacked $L_{\rm IR}$ (Fig.\
1731: \ref{Lir.fig} and Fig.\ \ref{Lir_Kbright.fig}), and is nearly
1732: independent of $\beta$ and $\rfVJ$ for the $K_{s,{\rm AB}}^{\rm tot} <
1733: 22.86$ subsample. A drop in the stacked $L_{\rm IR}/M_*$ at the
1734: reddest $\rfUV$ is clearly observed.
1735: \label {Lir_over_M.fig}
1736: }
1737: \end {figure*}
1738: %\clearpage
1739:
1740: In order to investigate whether the $L_{\rm IR}$ - color relation
1741: discussed in \S\ref{Lir_rfcol.sec} merely reflects a correlation
1742: between stellar mass and $L_{\rm IR}$, we now divide out the mass
1743: dependence. Fig.\ \ref{Lir_over_M.fig} shows the stacked $L_{\rm IR}
1744: / M_*$ measurements as a function of color for the $K_{s,{\rm
1745: AB}}^{\rm tot} < 24.3$ sample and the $K_{s,{\rm AB}}^{\rm tot} <
1746: 22.86$ subsample. The y-axes span 4 orders of magnitude, as in Fig.\
1747: \ref{Lir.fig} and Fig.\ \ref{Lir_Kbright.fig}, allowing an easy visual
1748: comparison of the strengths of the trends. A weaker trend, by up to
1749: an order of magnitude, is observed between $L_{\rm IR} / M_*$ and
1750: rest-frame color than between $L_{\rm IR}$ and rest-frame color (Fig.\
1751: \ref{Lir.fig} and Fig.\ \ref{Lir_Kbright.fig}). For the $K_s$-bright subsample ($K_{s,{\rm AB}}^{\rm tot} <
1752: 22.86$), the observed $L_{\rm IR}$ versus $\beta$ and $L_{\rm IR}$
1753: versus $\rfVJ$ relation can even be entirely attributed to a
1754: dependence of color on stellar mass. Finally, the drop in stacked
1755: $L_{\rm IR} / M_*$ at the reddest $\rfUV$ colors is stronger than the
1756: drop in stacked $L_{\rm IR}$. The population of optically red
1757: galaxies with only little IR emission, suggested by the analysis in
1758: \S\ref{Lir_rfcol.sec}, therefore concerns galaxies at the high-mass
1759: end of the mass function.
1760:
1761: \section {Summary}
1762: \label{summary.sec}
1763: We present a $K_s$-band selected catalog for the GOODS-CDFS, dubbed
1764: FIREWORKS, containing consistent photometry in the $U_{38}$,
1765: $B_{435}$, $B$, $V$, $V_{606}$, $R$, $i_{775}$, $I$, $z_{850}$, $J$,
1766: $H$, $K_s$, $[3.6\mu$m$]$, $[4.5\mu$m$]$, $[5.8\mu$m$]$,
1767: $[8.0\mu$m$]$, and $[24\mu$m$]$ bands. Together with the photometry,
1768: we release a list of photometric redshifts with a scatter in $\Delta z
1769: / (1+z)$ of 0.032, a cross-correlation with all available
1770: spectroscopic redshifts to date, and a cross-correlation with the 1Ms
1771: X-ray catalog by Giacconi et al. (2002). After a description of the
1772: catalog construction, we discuss the differences with the GOODS-MUSIC
1773: '$z_{850}$ + $K_s$'-selected catalog by G06a.
1774:
1775: A previous version of the catalog, lacking the WFI $U_{38}BVRI$
1776: photometry, has been used to estimate stellar mass densities (Rudnick
1777: et al. 2006), construct luminosity functions (Marchesini et al. 2006)
1778: and study the predominance of red galaxies at the high mass end (van
1779: Dokkum et al. 2006). In this paper, we exploit the full catalog to
1780: answer the following question: Which distant $K_s$-band selected
1781: galaxies are brightest and contribute most to the total IR luminosity?
1782:
1783: First, we compared the stacked 24 $\mu$m fluxes of galaxies at
1784: $1.5<z<2.5$ with $K_{s,{\rm AB}}^{\rm tot} < 24.3$ split in observed color bins.
1785: Overall, a large spread in IR properties is found in each color bin.
1786: Nevertheless, stacking the fluxes within each bin reveals a clear
1787: trend with color. Both in the observed $B_{435}-V_{606}$, $J-K_s$, and $K_s -
1788: [4.5\mu$m$]$ colors, the lowest mean and median $[24\mu$m$]_{\rm tot}$
1789: fluxes are found for the bluest color bin. In $J-K_s$ and $K_s -
1790: [4.5\mu$m$]$, the emission at 24 $\mu$m continues to rise toward redder
1791: colors.
1792:
1793: Second, we use our photometric redshifts to convert the observed
1794: spectral energy distributions to rest-frame colors and translate the
1795: observed 24 $\mu$m flux to the total IR luminosity $L_{\rm IR} \equiv
1796: L(8-1000\ \mu$m$)$. In this procedure, all relatively unobscured AGN
1797: candidates, selected by their X-ray detection, were rejected from the
1798: sample. Removing the redshift dependence and extrapolating from MIR
1799: to total IR comes at the cost of systematic uncertainties. We
1800: carefully measured the systematic contribution to the total error
1801: budget from uncertainties in $z_{\rm phot}$ and from our lack of knowledge
1802: about which IR template SED matches best the spectral shape of the
1803: objects in our sample. Doing so, we find a continuous increase in
1804: $L_{\rm IR}$ with $\rfVJ$. An increasing $L_{\rm IR}$ is also measured with
1805: UV slope $\beta$, flattening at the largest $\beta$. The rising trend
1806: of the stacked $L_{\rm IR}$ luminosity toward redder $\rfUV$ seems to
1807: reverse in the reddest color bin. The large range of total IR
1808: properties in this bin suggests a mixture of galaxies with large
1809: amounts of dust emission (LIRGs up to ULIRGs) and objects devoid of
1810: it. We note that, if we were to apply a different translation from
1811: MIR to total IR luminosity than simply averaging over the conversion
1812: factors derived from all reasonable templates, the observed trends
1813: remain intact. This is e.g. the case when an SED template
1814: corresponding to a larger heating intensity of the interstellar
1815: radiation field is used for objects with a larger rest-frame IR
1816: luminosity density, as done by Papovich et al. (2006; 2007).
1817:
1818: Since we divide our $K_s$-band selected sample in bins containing
1819: equal numbers of objects, it is immediately clear that not only do red
1820: galaxies have on average the largest total IR luminosities, it is also
1821: true that they form the dominant contribution to the overall total IR
1822: luminosity emitted by $K_s$-selected galaxies at $1.5<z<2.5$. We show
1823: that the dependence of both color and $L_{\rm IR}$ on stellar mass is
1824: an important driver of, but cannot fully explain the observed trends
1825: of $L_{\rm IR}$ with color.
1826:
1827: \acknowledgements
1828: We thank Adriano Fontana and Andrea Grazian for useful discussions
1829: about the photometric aspect of this work. SW acknowledges support
1830: from the W. M. Keck Foundation. Support from NSF CAREER grant AST
1831: 04-49678 is gratefully acknowledged. Observations have been carried
1832: out using the Very Large Telescope at the ESO Paranal Observatory
1833: under Program IDs LP168.A-0485, 170.A-0788,074.A-0709, 275.A-5060, and
1834: 171.A-3045.
1835:
1836: \begin{references}
1837: {\small
1838: \reference{} Arnouts, S., et al. 2001, A\&A, 379, 740
1839: \reference{} Beckwith, S. V. W., et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 1729
1840: \reference{} Bertin, E.,\& Arnouts, S. 1996, A\&AS, 117, 393
1841: \reference{} Bruzual, G.,\& Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000 (BC03)
1842: \reference{} Calzetti, D., Kinney, A. L.,\& Storchi-Bergmann, T. 1994, ApJ, 429, 582
1843: \reference{} Calzetti, D., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682
1844: \reference{} Caputi, K. I., Dole, H., Lagache, G., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., Puget, J.-L., Le Floc'h, E.,\& P\'{e}rez-Gonzal\'{e}z, P. G. 2006, A\&A, 454, 143
1845: \reference{} Chary, R.,\& Elbaz, D. 2001, ApJ, 556, 562
1846: \reference{} Cimatti, A., et al. 2002, A\&A, 381, L68
1847: \reference{} Cristiani, S., et al. 2000, A\&A, 359, 489
1848: \reference{} Croom, S. M., Warren, S. J.,\& Glazebrook, K. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 150
1849: \reference{} Daddi, E., Cimatti, A., Renzini, A., Fontana, A., Mignoli, M., Pozzetti, L., Tozzi, P.,\& Zamorani, G. 2004, ApJ, 617, 746
1850: \reference{} Daddi, E., et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, 156 %SF paper
1851: \reference{} Dale, D. A.,\& Helou, G. 2002, ApJ, 576, 159
1852: \reference{} Doherty, M., Bunker, A. J., Ellis, R. S.,\& McCarthy, P. J. 2005, MNRAS, 361, 525
1853: \reference{} Erben, T., et al. 2005, AN, 326, 432
1854: \reference{} Fazio, G. G., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 10
1855: \reference{} Fioc, M.,\& Rocca-Volmerange, B. 1997, A\&A, 326, 950
1856: \reference{} F\"{o}rster Schreiber, N. M., et al. 2004, ApJ, 616, 40
1857: \reference{} F\"{o}rster Schreiber, N. M., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1891
1858: \reference{} Franx, M., et al. 2003, ApJ, 587, L79
1859: \reference{} Giacconi, R., et al. 2000, A\&AS, 197, 9001
1860: \reference{} Giacconi, R., et al. 2002, ApJS, 139, 369
1861: \reference{} Giavalisco, M.,\& the GOODS Team 2004, ApJ, 600, L93
1862: \reference{} Grazian, A., et al. 2006a, A\&A, 449, 951 (G06a)
1863: \reference{} Grazian, A., et al. 2006b, A\&A, 453, 507
1864: \reference{} Grazian, A., et al. 2007, A\&A, 465, 393
1865: \reference{} Groenewegen, M. A. T., et al. 2002, A\&A, 392, 741
1866: \reference{} Hildebrandt, H., et al. 2006, A\&A, 452, 1121
1867: \reference{} Hopkins, A. M.,\& Beacom, J. F. 2006, ApJ, 651, 142
1868: \reference{} Kriek, M., et al. 2006, ApJ, 645, 44
1869: \reference{} Kriek, M., et al. 2007, ApJ, 669, 776 %origin of line emission
1870: \reference{} Kriek, M., et al. 2008, ApJ, in press (astro-ph/08011110)
1871: \reference{} Labb\'{e}, I., et al. 2003, AJ, 125, 1107
1872: \reference{} Le F\`evre, O., et al. 2004, A\&A, 428, 1043
1873: \reference{} Marchesini, D., et al. 2007, 656, 42
1874: \reference{} Meurer, G., Heckman, T. M.,\& Calzetti, D. 1999, ApJ, 521, 64
1875: \reference{} Mignoli, M., Cimatti, A., Zamorani, G., et al. 2005, A\&A, 437, 883
1876: \reference{} Norman, C., et al. 2002, ApJ, 571, 218
1877: \reference{} Papovich, C., Dickinson, M., Giavalisco, M., Conselice, C. J.,\& Ferguson, H. C. 2005, ApJ, 631, 101
1878: \reference{} Papovich, C., et al. 2006, ApJ, 640, 92
1879: \reference{} Papovich, C., et al. 2007, 668, 45
1880: \reference{} P\'{e}rez-Gonz\'{a}lez, P. G., et al. 2005, ApJ, 630, 82
1881: \reference{} P\'{e}rez-Gonz\'{a}lez, P. G., et al. 2008, ApJ, 657, 234
1882: \reference{} Persson, S. E., Murphy, D. C., Krzeminski, W., Roth, M.,\& Rieke, M. J. 1998, AJ, 116, 2475
1883: \reference{} Popesso, P., et al. 2008, astro-ph/08022930
1884: \reference{} Ravikumar, C. D., et al. 2007, A\&A, 465, 1099
1885: \reference{} Reddy, N. A., et al. 2005, ApJ, 633, 748
1886: \reference{} Reddy, N. A., et al. 2006, ApJ, 644, 792
1887: \reference{} Rieke, G. H., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 25
1888: \reference{} Roche, N. D., Dunlop, J.,\& Almaini, O. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 803
1889: \reference{} Roche, N. D., Dunlop, J., Caputi, K. I., McLure, R., Willott, C. J.,\& Crampton, D. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 74
1890: \reference{} Rudnick, G., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 2205
1891: \reference{} Rudnick, G., et al. 2003, ApJ, 599, 847
1892: \reference{} Rudnick, G., et al. 2006, ApJ, 650, 624
1893: \reference{} Salpeter, E. E. 1955, ApJ, 121, 161
1894: \reference{} Sanders, D. B.,\& Mirabel, I. F. 1996, ARA\&A, 34, 749
1895: \reference{} Smail, I., Ivison, R. J.,\& Blain, A. W. 1997, ApJ, 490, L5
1896: \reference{} Spinoglio, L., Malkan, M. A., Rush, B., Carrasco, L.,\& Recillas-Cruz, E. 1995, ApJ, 453, 616
1897: \reference{} Strolger, L.-G., et al. 2004, ApJ, 613, 200
1898: \reference{} STScI, 2001, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 1271
1899: \reference{} Szokoly, G. P., et al. 2004, ApJS, 155, 271
1900: \reference{} Vandame, B. 2002, SPIE, 4847, 123
1901: \reference{} Vandame, B., et al. 2001, astro-ph/0102300
1902: \reference{} van der Wel, A., Franx, M., van Dokkum, P. G., Rix, H.-W., Illingworth, G. D.,\& Rosati, P. 2005, ApJ, 631, 145
1903: \reference{} van Dokkum, P. G., et al. 2006, ApJ, 638, 59
1904: \reference{} Vanzella, E., et al. 2008, A\&A, 478, 83
1905: \reference{} Williams, R. E., et al. 1996, AJ, 112, 1335
1906: \reference{} Wolf, C., et al. 2004, A\&A, 421, 913
1907: \reference{} Wuyts, S., et al. 2007, ApJ, 655, 51
1908:
1909: }
1910: \end {references}
1911:
1912:
1913: \end {document}
1914: