1: % SUBMISSION LEVEL: First submission
2: % TITLE: Radiative and Auger decay of K-vacancy levels in the
3: % Ne, Mg, Si, S, Ar, and Ca isonuclear sequences
4: % AUTHORS: P. Palmeri, P. Quinet, C. Mendoza, M. A. Bautista, J. Garcia, T. R. Kallman
5: % CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: C. Mendoza
6: %ADDRESS: Physics Center, IVIC
7: % 8424 NW 56 Street
8: % Suite CCS 00205
9: % Miami, FL 33166
10: % USA
11: % Tlf: +58-212-504-1533
12: % Fax: +58-212-504-1148
13: % Email: claudio@ivic.ve
14: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
16: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
17: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
18:
19: \shorttitle{K-vacancy levels in Ne, Mg, Si, S, Ar, and Ca}
20:
21: \shortauthors{Palmeri et al.}
22:
23: \begin{document}
24:
25: \title{Radiative and Auger decay of K-vacancy levels in the
26: Ne, Mg, Si, S, Ar, and Ca isonuclear sequences}
27:
28: \author{P. Palmeri,}
29: \affil{Astrophysique et Spectroscopie, Universit\'e de
30: Mons-Hainaut, B-7000 Mons, Belgium}
31: \email{patrick.palmeri@umh.ac.be}
32:
33: \author{P. Quinet,}
34: \affil{Astrophysique et Spectroscopie, Universit\'e de
35: Mons-Hainaut, B-7000 Mons, Belgium and IPNAS, Sart Tilman B15,
36: Universit\'e de Li\`ege, B-4000 Li\`ege, Belgium}
37: \email{pascal.quinet@umh.ac.be}
38:
39: \author{C. Mendoza, M. A. Bautista,}
40: \affil{Centro de F\'{\i}sica, IVIC, Caracas 1020A, Venezuela}
41: \email{claudio@ivic.ve; mbautist@ivic.ve}
42:
43: \author{J. Garc\'{\i}a, and T. R. Kallman}
44: \affil{NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771}
45: \email{javier@milkyway.gsfc.nasa.gov; timothy.r.kallman@nasa.gov}
46:
47:
48: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
49:
50: \begin{abstract}
51: The {\sc hfr} and {\sc autostructure} atomic structure codes are
52: used to compute complete data sets of level energies, wavelengths,
53: $A$-values, and radiative and Auger widths for K-vacancy states of
54: the Ne, Mg, Si, S, Ar, and Ca isonuclear sequences. Ions with
55: electron number $N>9$ are treated for the first time. Detailed
56: comparisons with previous measurements and theoretical data for
57: ions with $N\leq 9$ are carried out in order to estimate reliable
58: accuracy ratings.
59: \end{abstract}
60:
61: \keywords{atomic processes --- atomic data --- line formation
62: --- X-rays: general}
63:
64: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
65:
66: \section{Introduction}
67: While X-ray emission is characteristic of hot ($T\geq 10^6$~K)
68: plasmas, X-ray spectra can also be used to study plasmas of lower
69: ionization via inner-shell transitions. Processes which
70: preferentially remove inner-shell electrons, such as
71: photoionization or collisions with suprathermal particles, can
72: give rise to emission of inner-shell fluorescence lines or K-edge
73: absorption in astrophysical spectra. These features are observed
74: from several important classes of astrophysical sources, being
75: potential diagnostics of their conditions: ionization, gas
76: motions, abundances, and inner-shell ionization rate. The grating
77: instruments on the {\em Chandra} and {\em XMM-Newton} space
78: observatories have provided high signal-to-noise spectra of these
79: features, with typical energy resolution of
80: $\varepsilon/\Delta\varepsilon\simeq 500-1000$. Exploitation of
81: these diagnostics has been limited by the accuracy of the atomic
82: data for these transitions (energies, cross sections, and
83: lifetimes). This paper is part of a large effort to calculate as
84: many of these data as possible with reliable accuracy using
85: available computational methods. Previous papers in this series
86: have focussed on the data for iron and oxygen; in this and
87: subsequent papers we concentrate on medium-$Z$ elements, namely
88: Ne, Mg, Si, S, Ar, and Ca.
89:
90: In the X-ray spectra obtained with {\em Chandra} and {\em
91: XMM-Newton}, K lines and edges from medium-$Z$ elements have been
92: observed from compact objects in which photoionization is thought
93: to be the dominant ionization mechanism, and from low ionization
94: material which is seen along the line of sight to various bright
95: sources. The active galactic nucleus NGC 3783 observed by
96: \citet{kas02} shows K-absorption lines of H- and He-like Ne, Mg,
97: Si, S, possibly Ar and Ca, and from lower stages of ionization of
98: Si and S. They are found to be blueshifted and asymmetric, and no
99: correlation is obtained between the velocity shifts and the
100: ionization potential of the ions. Absorption from low and medium
101: stages of Si and S are also seen in the spectra from AGNs
102: MCG-6-30-15 \citep{Lee01} and IRAS 13349+2438 \citep{Holc07}, and
103: from the X-ray binary Cyg X-1 \citep{Chan07}. In emission these
104: lines are seen in the spectra from Vela X-1 by \citet{Wata06} and
105: 4U1700-37 by \citet{Boro03}. Furthermore, it is likely that future
106: observations, which provide high resolution X-ray spectra from
107: spatially extended sources, will reveal inner-shell features in
108: supernova remnants and stellar coronae. In these sources, such
109: features may indicate existence of non-thermal particles or
110: non-equilibrium ionization, and their analysis requires accurate data
111: for the wavelengths and other atomic quantities associated with
112: the K lines from medium-$Z$ elements.
113:
114: Following the work by \citet{pal02,pal03a,pal03b},
115: \citet{bau03,bau04}, \citet{men04}, and \citet{kal04} on the K
116: lines of Fe and by \citet{gar05} on the K-shell photoabsorption of
117: O ions, we report new atomic data for K-vacancy levels in the Ne,
118: Mg, Si, S, Ar, and Ca isonuclear sequences. Prime objectives are
119: to improve the atomic database of the {\sc xstar} modelling code
120: \citep{bau01} and to prepare ionic targets (configuration
121: expansions and orbitals) for the lengthy computations of the
122: photoabsorption cross sections where both radiative and Auger
123: dampings are key effects. In this respect, available atomic
124: structure data sets---namely K-vacancy level energies,
125: wavelengths, $A$-values, and Auger widths---for first-row ions
126: with electron number $2\leq N\leq 10$ are far from complete while
127: for the second row ($11\leq N\leq 20$) they hardly exist.
128:
129: Previous work on the K-shell structure of medium-$Z$ elements
130: includes that by \citet{fae94} on the satellites of the He-like
131: resonance line in species with atomic number $12\leq Z\leq 16$ and
132: electron number $4\leq N\leq 9$. They have measured wavelengths in
133: a CO$_2$ laser produced plasma and computed wavelengths,
134: $A$-values, and Auger rates with the {\sc mz} code \citep{vai78,
135: vai80}. \citet{bie00} have measured wavelengths for Ar ions with
136: $3\leq N\leq 9$ in a plasma focus discharge, providing also
137: theoretical wavelengths, $A$-values, and Auger rates calculated
138: with both the {\sc hfr} atomic structure code \citep{cow81} and
139: the multiconfiguration Dirac--Fock (MCDF) {\sc yoda} code of
140: \citet{hag87}. K-vacancy level energies, wavelengths, $A$-values,
141: and Auger and radiative widths have been computed for ions of the
142: beryllium ($6\leq Z\leq 26$), boron ($6\leq Z\leq 54$), and
143: carbon ($6\leq Z\leq 54$) isoelectronic sequences with the MCDF
144: method by \citet{che85}, \citet{che88}, and \citet{che97},
145: respectively. Inner-shell excitation energies and autoionization
146: rates for ions with $6\leq Z\leq 54$ and $6\leq N\leq 9$ have been
147: computed by \citet{saf99} using the $1/Z$ perturbation theory
148: method. \citet{beh02} have calculated with the relativistic
149: multiconfiguration {\sc hullac} code \citep{bar01} wavelengths and
150: oscillator strengths for the 1s-$n$p transitions ($n\leq 3$) in
151: ions of Ne, Mg, Al, Si, S, Ar, and Ca with $2\leq N\leq 9$.
152: \citet{des03} have produced a comprehensive compilation of both
153: measured and theoretical transition energies for K lines and edges
154: in elements with $10\leq Z\leq 100$. \citet{gor03} have audited
155: the fluorescence database by \citet{kaa93} which is widely used in
156: modelling codes, in particular their scaling procedures along
157: isoelectronic sequences. The have found serious flaws which appear
158: to compromise the application of this database in plasma
159: modelling.
160:
161: The outline of the present report is as follows. The numerical
162: methods are briefly described in Section~2 while an analysis of
163: the results based on comparisons with previous experimental and
164: theoretical values is carried out in Section~3. The two
165: supplementary electronic tables are explained in Section~4 while
166: some conclusions are finally discussed in Section~5.
167:
168: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
169:
170: \section{Numerical methods}
171: The numerical approach has been fully described by \citet{bau03}.
172: The atomic data are computed with the structure codes {\sc hfr}
173: \citep{cow81} and {\sc autostructure} \citep{eis74, bad86, bad97}.
174: Wavefunctions are calculated with the Breit--Pauli relativistic
175: corrections
176: \begin{equation}
177: \label{hbp}
178: H_{\rm bp} = H_{\rm nr} + H_{\rm 1b} + H_{\rm 2b}
179: \end{equation}
180: where $H_{\rm nr}$ is the usual non-relativistic Hamiltonian. The
181: one-body relativistic operators
182: \begin{equation}
183: \label{h1b}
184: H_{\rm 1b} = \sum_{n=1}^{N} {f_n({\rm mass}) + f_n({\rm d}) + f_n({\rm so})}
185: \end{equation}
186: represent the spin--orbit interaction, $f_n({\rm so})$, and the
187: non-fine-structure mass variation, $f_n({\rm mass})$, and the
188: one-body Darwin correction, $f_n({\rm d})$. The two-body Breit
189: operators are given by
190: \begin{equation}
191: \label{h2b}
192: H_{\rm 2b} = \sum_{n<m} g_{nm}({\rm so}) + g_{nm}({\rm ss}) + g_{nm}({\rm css})
193: + g_{nm}({\rm d}) + g_{nm}({\rm oo})
194: \end{equation}
195: where the fine-structure terms are $g_{nm}(\rm so)$
196: (spin--other-orbit and mutual spin-orbit) and $g_{nm}(\rm ss)$
197: (spin--spin), and the non-fine-structure counterparts are
198: $g_{nm}(\rm css)$ (spin--spin contact), $g_{nm}(\rm d)$ (two-body
199: Darwin), and $g_{nm}(\rm oo)$ (orbit--orbit). Core relaxation
200: effects are studied with {\sc autostructure} by comparing ion
201: representations where all the electron configurations have a
202: common basis of orthogonal orbitals, to be referred to hereafter
203: as approximation AS1, with one where each configuration has its
204: own basis, approximation AS2. {\sc hfr} computes energies,
205: $A$-values, and Auger rates with bases of non-orthogonal orbitals
206: obtained by optimizing the energy of each configuration, and
207: neglects the part of the Breit interaction (\ref{h2b}) that cannot
208: be reduced to a one-body operator. This data set is to be labelled
209: HFR1.
210:
211: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
212:
213: \section{Results}
214:
215: We have carried out detailed comparisons with previous data in
216: order to obtain accuracy estimates and detect weak points. In this
217: respect, \citet{pal06} have already presented the outcome for the
218: S isonuclear sequence. Their comparison with the experimental
219: K-level energies for S~{\sc xv} and S~{\sc xiv} results in
220: differences not larger than 1~eV for HFR1 and 2~eV for AS2, but
221: for the only level reported for S~{\sc i} ($[{\rm 1s}]{\rm 3p}^5\
222: ^3{\rm P}^{\rm o}_2$), differences of 3.3~eV and 3.6~eV are
223: respectively found. The level of agreement between HFR1 and AS2
224: reported by Palmeri et al. for the S sequence is $\sim$1 eV for
225: level energies, $\sim$2 m\AA\ for wavelengths, and $\sim$10\% for
226: radiative and Auger rates greater than $10^{13}$~s$^{-1}$. They
227: cannot explain, however, large discrepancies with the MCDF data by
228: \citet{che97} for C-like S~{\sc xi}. Since a similar degree of
229: discord with Chen et al. was encountered by \citet{pal03a} for
230: Fe~{\sc xxi}, we emphasize here comparisons with the experimental
231: and theoretical data sets for Ar ions by \citet{bie00},
232: particularly those computed with the MCDF method, as they will
233: provide more solid evidence on the questionable accuracy of the
234: data by Chen et al.
235: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
236:
237: \subsection{Energy levels}
238:
239: With the exception of the He-, Li-, and Be-like species, there is
240: a general lack of experimental K-vacancy level energies for the
241: isonuclear sequences under study here. This severely limits the
242: possibilities of fine-tuning the numerical methods in order to
243: increase data accuracy and to provide reliable rankings. For this
244: reason, we mainly base our approach on computations with the {\sc
245: hfr} code as it attains marginally more reliable {\em ab initio}
246: energies due to the use of non-orthogonal basis sets for each
247: electronic configuration.
248:
249: In Fig.~\ref{nist} we show the average energy differences between
250: the values listed in the NIST database V3.1.2 \citep{ral07} and
251: HFR1 for the K-vacancy levels in He- and Li-like ions. Differences
252: are never larger than 1~eV if those for Li-like Ar~{\sc xvi} are
253: excluded as the NIST K-vacancy level energies for this ion are
254: believed to be grossly in error. As listed in Table~\ref{e-ar},
255: the energy difference for the ${\rm 1s}{\rm 2s}^2\ ^2{\rm
256: S}_{1/2}$ level in Ar~{\sc xvi} is 0.1~eV while those for the rest
257: are $\sim$756 eV. The experimental inaccuracies for this ion are
258: further established with the wavelength measurement by
259: \citet{bei02} for the ${\rm 1s2s2p}\ ^4{\rm P}^{\rm
260: o}_{5/2}\rightarrow {\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}\ ^2{\rm S}_{1/2}$
261: dipole-forbidden transition. They use high-resolution spectroscopy
262: of a low-temperature tokamak plasma to obtain an energy of
263: 3090.25$\pm$0.12 eV for the upper level which is in remarkable
264: agreement with the HFR1 value of 3090.1 eV in Table~\ref{e-ar}.
265: For Be-like Mg and Si the agreement between HFR1 and NIST is well
266: within 2~eV.
267:
268: Theoretical K-vacancy level energies for ions with $18\leq Z\leq
269: 26$ and $6\leq N\leq 9$ are listed by \citet{saf99} which allow a
270: comparison with HFR1 for species with $18\leq Z\leq 20$. It is
271: found that energy differences are within 3~eV except for the eight
272: levels in both Ar and Ca shown in Table~\ref{e-SS}. They mainly
273: belong to the O-like type, and the HFR1 values are always larger
274: by as much as 6~eV.
275:
276: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
277:
278: \subsection{Wavelengths}
279:
280: Since theoretical wavelengths do not reach spectroscopic accuracy,
281: statistical comparisons with measurements are essential inasmuch
282: as they enable small empirical adjustments to make the computed
283: values astrophysically useful. It is worth pointing out that, due
284: to the lack of experimental data for ionic species of the second
285: row, this procedure is only currently possible for systems with
286: electron number $N\leq 9$.
287:
288: Experimental wavelengths for Ar ions with $3\leq N\leq 9$ have
289: been reported by \citet{bie00} as well as theoretical values
290: computed with the {\sc hfr} and {\sc yoda} codes. The two latter
291: data sets are to be hereafter referred to as the HFR2 and MCDF1,
292: respectively. As shown in Fig.~\ref{wl}, a statistical comparison
293: with the measured values can be carried out where the average
294: theory--experiment wavelength difference, $\overline{\Delta
295: \lambda}_{\rm e}$, is plotted as a function of the ion electron
296: number $N$. It may be seen that theoretical wavelengths appear to
297: be always shorter than the measured values. In the case of our
298: HFR1 data, $|\overline{\Delta \lambda}_{\rm e}|$ increases with
299: $N$ from under 1~m\AA\ for $N=3$ to around 6~m\AA\ for $8\leq
300: N\leq 9$. A similar behavior is displayed by the MCDF1 values
301: except for $8\leq N\leq 9$ where $|\overline{\Delta \lambda_{\rm
302: e}}|< 1$~m\AA; this seems to indicate that the transition energies
303: in these two ions have been adjusted with the experimental values.
304: This is certainly also the case with the HFR2 results for $3\leq
305: N\leq 9$ where $|\overline{\Delta \lambda_{\rm e}}| < 1$~m\AA.
306: However, as shown in Fig.~\ref{wl}, the standard deviations for
307: all three theoretical data sets are around 2--3~m\AA\ which gives
308: an indication of the level of accuracy that can be attained
309: theoretically.
310:
311: For the computed MCDF wavelengths listed by \citet{che88} and
312: \citet{che97} for B- and C-like Ar, $|\overline{\Delta
313: \lambda_{\rm e}}|=2\pm 2$~m\AA\ and $|\overline{\Delta
314: \lambda_{\rm e}}|=4\pm 6$~m\AA, respectively. The somewhat large
315: standard deviation in the C-like system is caused by transitions
316: involving heavily mixed K-vacancy states, in particular ${\rm
317: 1s(^2S)2s2p^4(^2D)\ ^1D_2}$, but the level of agreement is in
318: general similar to that discussed above for HFR1.
319:
320: Differences between the HFR1 wavelengths and the measurements
321: listed by \citet{fae94} for ions with $12\leq Z\leq 16$ and $4\leq
322: N\leq 9$ display a similar behavior to that found in the Ar ions:
323: for each isonuclear sequence, $|\overline{\Delta \lambda_{\rm
324: e}}|$ increases with $N$. Also, as expected, it decreases with $Z$
325: along the isoelectronic sequence; for instance, in the case of
326: $N=9$, $|\overline{\Delta \lambda_{\rm e}}|\approx 18$~m\AA\ for
327: $Z=14$ while $|\overline{\Delta \lambda_{\rm e}}|\approx
328: 10$~m\AA\ for $Z=16$. On the other hand, we have found three
329: transitions in N-like ions ($N=7$) with unusually large wavelength
330: differences which are listed in Table~\ref{w-faenov}.
331:
332: As a result of the comparisons with the spectroscopic data, the HFR1
333: wavelengths for systems with $3\leq N\leq 9$ have been empirically
334: shifted with $-\overline{\Delta \lambda_{\rm e}}$.
335:
336: \citet{beh02} list wavelengths computed with the {\sc hullac} code
337: for 68 K-transitions arising from the ground level of ions with
338: $2\leq N\leq 9$. In general, the agreement with HFR1 is better
339: than 10~m\AA\ and progressively improves with $Z$ up to 3~m\AA\
340: for $Z=20$. As depicted in Table~\ref{w-hullac}, there are however
341: several transitions with noticeable differences, specially for
342: ions with $Z\leq 14$ and $6\leq N\leq 9$ where the longer {\sc
343: hullac} wavelengths are probably more accurate than HFR1.
344: Surprisingly large differences (10 m\AA) are found between {\sc
345: hullac} and measurements for transitions in Li-like Ne for which
346: the measured values agree with HFR1 to within 3~m\AA\ (see
347: Table~\ref{w-hullac}).
348:
349: HFR1 K$\alpha$, K$\beta$, and edge transition energies for singly
350: ionized species with $10\leq Z\leq 20$ are compared in
351: Table~\ref{ktrans} with the compilation by \citet{des03} of
352: experimental and theoretical X-ray transition energies. The HFR1
353: edge transition energy is estimated using the experimental
354: ionization potential of the neutral and the HFR1 position for the
355: lowest K-vacancy level of the singly ionized stage. The agreement
356: with their theoretical and the experimental K$\alpha$ transition
357: energies is within 1.5 eV, but discrepancies as large as 7~eV are
358: found with the experimental K$\beta$ values and with the edge
359: energies ($\sim$10 eV) for $12\leq Z\leq 16$. The soundness of
360: this comparison may be limited by experimental difficulties in
361: assigning weak features and by solid-state effects.
362:
363: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
364:
365: \subsection{$A$-values}
366: Present $A$-values are computed with approximations AS1, AS2, and
367: HFR1. As mentioned in Section~2, in AS2 and HFR1 non-orthogonal
368: orbital bases are used which then account for orbital relaxation
369: in the radiative decay process. It has been found that the 1s
370: orbital is particularly different in valence and K-vacancy states.
371: Since orthogonal bases are used in AS1, a comparison of AS1 and
372: AS2 would give an indication of the importance of this effect.
373:
374: The radiative data listed by \citet{beh02} for K transitions,
375: namely $f$- and $A$-values, are consistently (10$\pm 5$)\% below
376: HFR1. To study this situation, we first look at the absorption
377: $f$-value for the ${\rm 1s}^2\ ^1{\rm S}_0\rightarrow {\rm 1s2p}\
378: ^1{\rm P}^{\rm o}_1$ resonance transition along the He
379: isoelectronic sequence (see Fig.~\ref{f-he}). It may be seen that
380: the $f$-values by Behar \& Netzer are about 6\% below those by
381: \cite{dra79} which are usually taken as the reference. On the
382: other hand, HFR1 is 9\% higher and so is AS2 (6\%). As shown in
383: Fig.~\ref{f-he}, if the HFR1 $f$-values are recomputed in a
384: single-configuration approximation, the differences with Drake are
385: reduced to 6\% and AS1 also does somewhat better (3\%). The latter
386: result suggests that perhaps taking into account core relaxation
387: effects does not necessarily lead to improved radiative data. This
388: hypothesis is confirmed by a comparison of available lifetime
389: measurements in He- and Li-like ions with AS1 and AS2 (see
390: Table~\ref{lifet}). The computed lifetimes for these $n=2$ levels
391: are sensitive to the wavefuntions because most of them involve
392: optically forbidden decay channels. Although the agreement of both
393: AS1 and AS2 with experiment is within approximately 10\%, it is
394: not clear which is the most accurate. As a conclusion, we are only
395: confident that the accuracy of the HFR1 $A$-values is at around
396: the 15\% level.
397:
398: This suggested level of accuracy is further supported by a
399: comparison of the HFR1 $A$-values greater than $10^{13}$~s$^{-1}$
400: in Ar ions with those computed by \citet{bie00} in the HFR2 and
401: MCDF1 approximations. In spite of their fine tuning of the
402: transition matrix elements with the experimental energy levels in
403: HFR2, the general agreement is well within 15\% except for the few
404: problematic transitions listed in Table~\ref{aval}. It may be seen
405: that for transitions in species with $N=5$ and $N=7$, HFR1 and
406: HFR2 are in reasonable agreement in contrast to MCDF1. For $N=6$,
407: the scatter is large which is surely due to strong admixture of
408: the upper K-vacancy levels produced by the spin-orbit interaction.
409:
410: $A$-values calculated by \citet{che88} for B-like Ar using the
411: MCDF method agree within 20\% with HFR1 although on average they
412: are $\sim$10\% smaller. However, we find that those computed for
413: C-like Ar by \citet{che97}, as shown in Fig.~\ref{chen-A}, are
414: 37\% higher. We also include in this plot the MCDF1 $A$-values by
415: \citet{bie00} which are within 15\% of HFR1 if the problematic
416: values of Table~\ref{aval} are excluded. Moreover, there are
417: several transitions by Chen et al. that show differences larger
418: than a factor of 2 with HFR1 which have not been taken into
419: account in this comparison.
420:
421: The comparison of the HFR1 $A$-values with those calculated by
422: \citet{fae94} using the {\sc mz} method for ions with $12\leq
423: Z\leq 16$ and $4\leq N\leq 9$ shows a wide scatter: some
424: transitions agree to better than 10\% while large discrepancies
425: are found for others.
426:
427: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
428:
429: \subsection{Radiative and Auger widths}
430: Auger widths of K-vacancy levels are determined by including all
431: the decay channels $C\epsilon l$, where $C$ are all the $n=2$
432: valence configurations of the $(N-1)$-electron daughter ion and
433: $l\leq 4$.
434:
435: \citet{bie00} have computed with {\sc hfr} and the MCDF {\sc yoda}
436: code Auger widths for K-vacancy states in Ar ions with $3\leq
437: N\leq 9$ (data sets referred to as HFR2 and MCDF1, respectively).
438: A reasonable agreement (within 20\%) with HFR1 is found except for
439: the two levels in the Li-like system ($N=3$) and the five levels
440: in the Be-like system ($N=4$) shown in Table~\ref{auger}. Also the
441: MCDF1 K-vacancy levels in the N-like ion ($N=7$) are on average
442: around 40\% larger. The discrepant HFR2 results for the Li-like
443: ion are attributed to typos since a recalculation results in data
444: very similar to the HFR1 values.
445:
446: MCDF radiative and Auger widths have also been computed for Be-,
447: B-, and C-like Ar by \citet{che85}, \citet{che88}, and
448: \citet{che97}, respectively. For the Be- and B-like systems, they
449: agree with HFR1 to within 10\% except for the small Auger widths
450: ($A_{\rm a}< 10^{12}$~s$^{-1}$) of the ${\rm 1s2s2p^2\ ^5P_j}$
451: levels in Be-like Ar. For the C-like system, on the other hand,
452: radiative and Auger widths by Chen et al. are on average larger
453: than HFR1 by 40\% and 30\%, respectively, with some differences
454: being as large as a factor of 2. Such a poor accord can be
455: appreciated in Fig.~\ref{chen-Au} where the MCDF1 data by
456: \citet{bie00} is also shown. The latter agrees with HFR1 to within
457: 20\%.
458:
459: The total K-widths quoted by \citet{beh02} follow a similar trend
460: to that found for their $A$-values: on average they are found to
461: be about 15\% below HFR1, although for some levels large
462: discrepancies are encountered (see Table~\ref{a-hullac}). For such
463: levels, it is shown that the agreement between HFR1 and AS1 is
464: around 5\%.
465:
466: The Auger rates for ions with atomic number $12\leq Z\leq 16$ and
467: electron number $4\leq N\leq 9$ computed with the {\sc mz} code by
468: \citet{fae94} are found to be in complete disagreement with HFR1.
469:
470: In their study of the fluorescence database by \citet{kaa93},
471: \citet{gor03} have computed with {\sc autostructure}
472: configuration-averaged fluorescence yields for the K-vacancy
473: configurations ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}$ in Be-like ions and ${\rm
474: 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^6$ in F-like ions. They also list yields estimated
475: from the MCDF data of \citet{che85} and from the widths computed
476: with {\sc hullac} by \citet{beh02}, the latter having been revised
477: due to missing Auger channels and misquoted widths. In the
478: comparison presented in Table~\ref{yields}, it may be seen that
479: our HFR1 fluorescence yields agree with those by \citet{gor03} to
480: within 10\% except for the Ne F-like ion (20\%). Differences may
481: be due to the non-orthogonal orbital bases and neglect of two-body
482: effects in the {\sc hfr} code. The agreement between HFR1 and
483: \citet{beh02} for the Be-like configuration is within 6\% but is
484: poorer for the F-like (20\%), and that with \citet{che85} for the
485: Be-like ion is better than 15\%.
486: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
487:
488: \section{Supplementary electronic tables}
489: Computed energy levels, wavelengths, $A$-values, $gf$-values, and
490: radiative and Auger widths for ions in the Ne, Mg, Si, S, Ar, and
491: Ca isonuclear sequences can be accessed from the online
492: machine-readable
493: Tables~11\footnote{https://hartree.ivic.ve/tempfiles/tab11.txt}--12\footnote{https://hartree.ivic.ve/tempfiles/tab12.txt}.
494: The printed samples show data for ions of the Ne isonuclear with
495: electron number $N\leq 3$. It may be seen that in Table~11 levels
496: are identified with the vector $(Z,N,i,2S+1,L,2J,{\rm Conf})$
497: where $Z$ is the atomic number, $N$ the electron number, $2S+1$
498: the spin multiplicity, $L$ the total orbital angular momentum
499: quantum number, $J$ the total angular momentum quantum number, and
500: Conf the level configuration assignment. For each level, the
501: spectroscopic energy (when available), the computed HFR1 energy,
502: and its radiative width ($A_{\rm r}$) are listed. For K-vacancy
503: levels, the Auger width ($A_{\rm a}$) and fluorescence yield are
504: additionally given. In Table~12, transitions are identified with
505: the vector $(Z,N,k,i)$ where $k$ and $i$ are the upper and lower
506: level indices, respectively, tabulating its computed wavelength,
507: $A$-value, and $gf$-value.
508:
509: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
510:
511: \section{Summary and conclusions}
512: Extensive data sets containing energy levels, wavelengths,
513: $A$-values and radiative and Auger widths for K-vacancy levels in
514: the Ne, Mg, Si, S, Ar, and Ca isonuclear sequences have been
515: computed with the atomic structure codes {\sc hfr} and {\sc
516: autostructure} which include relativistic corrections. For ionic
517: species of the second row with electron numbers $11\leq N\leq 20$,
518: it is the first time that such data become available. For
519: first-row ions ($2\leq N\leq 10$), detailed comparisons have been
520: carried out with available measurements and theoretical values
521: which have brought forth the consistency and accuracy of the
522: present data sets.
523:
524: Comparisons of the present HFR1 K-vacancy level energies with
525: those listed in the NIST database and with recent measurements
526: support an accuracy rating for ions with electron number $N\leq 4$
527: of better than 2~eV. Furthermore, we have shown that the NIST
528: energies for K vacancy levels in Li-like Ar are incorrect.
529: Comparisons of the HFR1 wavelengths with the spectroscopic values
530: reported for ions with $N\leq 9$ by \citet{fae94} and
531: \citet{bie00} show that the theoretical wavelengths are
532: consistently shorter. Moreover, along an isonuclear sequence, the
533: average theory--experiment wavelength difference
534: $|\overline{\Delta \lambda}_{\rm e}|$ increases with $N$. This
535: behavior enables empirical corrections to be made to the HFR1
536: wavelengths in ions with $N\leq 9$ that are bound to improve
537: accuracy to around 2--3~m\AA. Due to a complete absence of
538: spectroscopic measurements for K transitions in ions of the second
539: row, this fine-tuning procedure cannot be extended at present to
540: species with $N>9$ whose wavelengths therefore remain uncorrected.
541:
542: The $A$-values and Auger widths for the Ar isonuclear sequence
543: previously computed by \citet{bie00} with {\sc hfr} and the MCDF
544: {\sc yoda} code have given us the opportunity to benchmark the
545: accuracy of the present data sets. This has been useful to sort
546: out the large discrepancies reported by \citet{pal03a} for Fe~{\sc
547: xxi} and \citet{pal06} for S~{\sc xi} with the MCDF data of
548: \citet{che97}. Similar discrepancies are found with their data for
549: Ar~{\sc xiii} which, in the light of the good agreement of HFR1
550: with Bi\'emont et al., are certainly not due to the more formal
551: relativistic representation of the MCDF method. Significant
552: discords of HFR1 with the Auger widths reported by \citet{fae94}
553: for the Mg, Si, and S isonuclear sequences and with those by
554: \citet{beh02} for levels in the B and C isoelectronic sequences
555: are difficult to explain. Accuracy ratings of the present
556: $A$-values and Auger widths greater than $10^{13}$~s$^{-1}$ are
557: confidently assigned to 15\% and 20\%, respectively, except for
558: special cases; e.g. transitions involving K-vacancy levels in the
559: carbon isoelectronic sequence where strong admixture causes severe
560: departures.
561:
562: The present radiative and Auger widths will be used in the
563: computations of the K-shell photoionization cross sections of
564: these medium-$Z$ ions which are required in XSTAR for the
565: modelling of interesting spectral features. Future work will
566: involve extension of the present approach to the Ni isonuclear
567: sequence.
568:
569: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
570:
571: \acknowledgments
572: MAB acknowledges partial support from FONACIT,
573: Venezuela, under contract No. S1-20011000912. This work
574: was funded in part by the NASA Astronomy and
575: Physics Research and Analysis Program. Partial support for CM was
576: provided by a travel grant from IVIC and
577: the FNRS of Belgium.
578:
579:
580: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
581:
582: \begin{thebibliography}{}
583:
584: \bibitem[Armour et al.(1981)]{arm81}Armour, I. A., Silver, J. D., \& Tr\"abert, E.
585: 1981, J. Phys. B, 14, 3563
586:
587: \bibitem[Badnell(1986)]{bad86}Badnell, N. R. 1986, J. Phys. B, 19,
588: 3827
589: \bibitem[Badnell(1997)]{bad97}Badnell, N. R. 1997, J. Phys. B, 30, 1
590:
591: \bibitem[Bar-Shalom et al.(2001)]{bar01}Bar-Shalom, A., Klapisch,
592: M., \& Oreg, J. 2001, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 71,
593: 169
594:
595: \bibitem[Bautista \& Kallman(2001)]{bau01}Bautista, M. A., \& Kallman, T. R. 2001, ApJS,
596: 134, 139
597:
598: \bibitem[Bautista et al.(2003)]{bau03}Bautista, M. A., Mendoza, C., Kallman, T. R., \& Palmeri, P.
599: 2003, A\&A, 403, 339
600:
601: \bibitem[Bautista et al.(2004)]{bau04}Bautista, M. A., Mendoza, C., Kallman, T. R., \& Palmeri, P.
602: 2004, A\&A, 418, 1171
603:
604: \bibitem[Behar \& Netzer(2002)]{beh02}Behar, E., \& Netzer, H. 2002, \apj, 570, 165
605:
606: \bibitem[Beiersdorfer et al.(2002)]{bei02}Beiersdorfer, P.,
607: Bitter, M., Hey, D., \& Reed, K. J. 2002, \pra, 66, 032504
608:
609: \bibitem[Bi\'emont et al.(2000)]{bie00}Bi\'emont, E., et al. 2000,
610: Phys. Scr., 61, 555
611:
612: \bibitem[Boroson et al.(2003)]{Boro03} Boroson, B., Vrtilek, S. D., Kallman, T., \& Corcoran, M. 2003, \apj, 592, 516
613:
614: \bibitem[Chang \& Cui(2007)]{Chan07} Chang, C., \& Cui, W. 2007, \apj, 663, 1207
615:
616: \bibitem[Chen(1985)]{che85}Chen, M. H. 1985, \pra, 31, 1449
617:
618: \bibitem[Chen \& Crasemann(1988)]{che88}Chen, M. H., \& Crasemann, B. 1988, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 38,
619: 381
620:
621: \bibitem[Chen et al.(1997)]{che97}Chen, M. H., Reed, K. J., McWilliams, D. M., Guo, D. S., Barlow, L.,
622: Lee, M., \& Walker, V. 1997, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 65, 289
623:
624: \bibitem[Cocke et al.(1974)]{coc74}Cocke, C. L., Curnutte, B., \& Randall, R. 1974, \pra, 9, 1823
625:
626: \bibitem[Cowan(1981)]{cow81}Cowan, R. D. 1981, The Theory of Atomic Structure
627: and Spectra, (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press)
628:
629: \bibitem[Crespo Ló\'opez-Urrutia et al.(2006)]{cre06}Crespo L\'opez-Urrutia, J. R., Beiersdorfer,
630: P., \& Widmann K. 2006, \pra, 74, 012507
631:
632: \bibitem[Davis \& Marrus(1977)]{dav77}Davis, W. A., \& Marrus, R. 1977, \pra, 15, 1963
633:
634: \bibitem[Deslattes et al.(2003)]{des03}Deslattes, R. D., Kessler, E. G.,
635: Indelicato, P., de Billy, L., Lindroth, E., \& Anton, J. 2003, Rev. Mod. Phys., 75, 35
636:
637: \bibitem[Dohmann \& Mann(1979)]{doh79}Dohmann, H. D. \& Mann, R. 1979, Z. Phys. A, 291, 15
638:
639: \bibitem[Drake(1979)]{dra79}Drake, G. W. F. 1979, \pra, 19, 1387
640:
641: \bibitem[Eissner et al.(1974)]{eis74} Eissner, W., Jones, M., \& Nussbaumer,
642: H. 1974, Comput. Phys., Commun., 8, 270
643:
644: \bibitem[Faenov et al.(1994)]{fae94}Faenov, A. Ya., Pikuz, S. A., \& Shlyaptseva, A. S. 1994,
645: Phys. Scr., 49, 41
646:
647: \bibitem[Garc\'{\i}a et al.(2005)]{gar05}Garc\'{\i}a, J., Mendoza, C., Bautista, M. A., Gorczyca, T. W.,
648: Kallman, T. R., \& Palmeri, P. 2005, ApJS, 158, 68
649:
650: \bibitem[Gorczyca et al.(2003)]{gor03}Gorczyca, T. W., Kodituwakku, C. N., Korista, K. T.,
651: Zatsarinny, O., Badnell, N. R., Behar, E., Chen, M. H., \& Savin, D. W. 2003, \apj, 592, 636
652:
653: \bibitem[Groeneveld et al.(1975)]{gro75}Groeneveld, K. O., Mann, R., Nolte, G., Schumann, S.,
654: \& Spohr, R. 1975, Phys. Lett. A, 54, 335
655:
656: \bibitem[Hagelstein \& Jung(1987)]{hag87}Hagelstein, P. L., \& Jung, R. K. 1987,
657: At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 37, 121
658:
659: \bibitem[Haselton et al.(1975)]{has75}Haselton, H. H., Thoe, R. S., Mowat, J. R., Griffin, P. M.,
660: Pegg, D. J., \& Sellin, I. A. 1975, Phys. Rev. A, 11, 468
661:
662: \bibitem[Hellmann \& Tr\"abert(1985)]{hel85}Hellmann, H., \& Tr\"abert, E. 1985, Nucl. Instr.
663: Meth. Phys. Res. B, 9, 611
664:
665: \bibitem[Holczer et al.(2007)]{Holc07} Holczer, T., Behar, E., \& Kaspi, S. 2007, \apj, 663, 799
666:
667: \bibitem[Hubricht \& Tr\"abert(1987)]{hub87}Hubricht, G., \& Tr\"abert, E. 1987, Z. Phys. D, 7, 243
668:
669: \bibitem[Kaastra \& Mewe(1993)]{kaa93}Kaastra, J. S., \& Mewe, R. 1993, A\&AS, 97, 443
670:
671: \bibitem[Kallman et al.(2004)]{kal04}Kallman, T. R., Palmeri, P., Bautista, M. A., Mendoza,
672: C., \& Krolik, J. H. 2004, ApJS, 155, 675
673:
674: \bibitem[Kaspi et al.(2002)]{kas02}Kaspi, S., et al. 2002, \apj, 574, 643
675:
676: \bibitem[Knystautas \& Druetta(1985)]{kny85}Knystautas, E. J., \& Druetta, M. 1985, \pra, 31, 2279
677:
678: \bibitem[Kramida \& Buchet-Poulizac(2006)]{kra06}Kramida, A. E., \& Buchet-Poulizac, M. -C. 2006,
679: Eur. Phys. J. D, 39, 173
680:
681: \bibitem[Lee et al.(2001)]{Lee01} Lee, J. C., et al. 2001, \apjl, 554, L13
682:
683: \bibitem[Mendoza et al.(2004)]{men04}Mendoza, C., Kallman, T. R., Bautista, M. A., \& Palmeri, P.
684: 2004, A\&A, 414, 377
685:
686: \bibitem[Palmeri et al.(2006)]{pal06}Palmeri, P., Mendoza, C., Bautista, M. A., Garc\'{\i}a, J., \&
687: Kallman, T. R. 2006, Rad. Phys. Chem., 75, 1465
688:
689: \bibitem[Palmeri et al.(2002)]{pal02}Palmeri, P., Mendoza, C., Kallman, T. R., \& Bautista, M.
690: A. 2002, \apj, 577, L119
691:
692: \bibitem[Palmeri et al.(2003a)]{pal03a}Palmeri, P., Mendoza, C., Kallman, T. R., \& Bautista, M.
693: A. 2003a, A\&A, 403, 1175
694:
695: \bibitem[Palmeri et al.(2003b)]{pal03b}Palmeri, P., Mendoza, C., Kallman, T. R., Bautista, M.
696: A., \& Mel\'endez, M. 2003b, A\&A, 410, 359
697:
698: \bibitem[Ralchenko et al.(2007)]{ral07}Ralchenko, Yu., et al. 2007, NIST Atomic Spectra Database
699: (version 3.1.2), http://physics.nist.gov/asd3, National Institute
700: of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD
701:
702: \bibitem[Safronova \& Shlyaptseva(1999)]{saf99}Safronova, U. I., \& Shlyaptseva, A. S. 1999,
703: Phys. Scr., 60, 36
704:
705: \bibitem[Stefanelli et al.(1995)]{ste95}Stefanelli, G. S., Beiersdorfer, P., Decaux, V., \&
706: Widmann, K. 1995, \pra, 52, 3651
707:
708: \bibitem[Tr\"abert et al.(1999)]{tra99}Tr\"abert, E., Beiersdorfer, P., Brown, G. V.,
709: Smith, A. J., Utter, S. B., Gu, M. F., \& Savin, D. W. 1999, \pra, 60, 2034
710:
711: \bibitem[Vainshtein \& Safronova(1978)]{vai78}Vainshtein, L. A., \& Safronova, U. I. 1978,
712: At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 21, 49
713:
714: \bibitem[Vainshtein \& Safronova(1980)]{vai80}Vainshtein, L. A., \& Safronova, U. I. 1980,
715: At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 25, 311
716:
717: \bibitem[Varghese et al.(1976a)]{var76a}Varghese, S. L., Cocke, C. L., \& Curnutte, B. 1976a, \pra, 14, 1729
718:
719: \bibitem[Varghese et al.(1976b)]{var76b}Varghese, S. L., Cocke, C. L., Curnutte, B., \& Seaman, G.
720: 1976b, J. Phys. B, 9, L387
721:
722: \bibitem[Watanabe et al.(2006)]{Wata06} Watanabe, S., et al. 2006, \apj, 651, 421
723:
724: \end{thebibliography}
725:
726:
727: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
728:
729: \clearpage
730: \begin{deluxetable}{lll}
731: \tablecolumns{3}
732: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
733: \tablewidth{0pc} \tablecaption{\label{e-ar} K-vacancy level energies (eV) in Ar~{\sc xvi}}
734: \tablehead{\colhead{Level} & \colhead{Expt$^a$} & \colhead{HFR1} \\}
735: \startdata
736: ${\rm 1s}{\rm 2s}^2\ ^2{\rm S}_{1/2}$ & 3079.0 & 3079.1 \\
737: ${\rm 1s}(^2{\rm S}){\rm 2s2p}(^3{\rm P}^{\rm o})\ ^4{\rm P}^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ & 3842.3 & 3086.7 \\
738: ${\rm 1s}(^2{\rm S}){\rm 2s2p}(^3{\rm P}^{\rm o})\ ^4{\rm P}^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ & 3843.8 & 3087.9 \\
739: ${\rm 1s}(^2{\rm S}){\rm 2s2p}(^3{\rm P}^{\rm o})\ ^4{\rm P}^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ & 3847.1 & 3090.1 \\
740: ${\rm 1s}(^2{\rm S}){\rm 2p}^2(^3{\rm P})\ ^4{\rm P}_{1/2}$ & 3876.2 & 3121.6 \\
741: ${\rm 1s}(^2{\rm S}){\rm 2p}^2(^3{\rm P})\ ^4{\rm P}_{3/2}$ & 3878.6 & 3123.0 \\
742: ${\rm 1s}(^2{\rm S}){\rm 2p}^2(^3{\rm P})\ ^4{\rm P}_{5/2}$ & 3881.0 & 3124.9 \\
743: ${\rm 1s}(^2{\rm S}){\rm 2s2p}(^1{\rm P}^{\rm o})\ ^2{\rm P}^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ & 3884.8 & 3124.9 \\
744: ${\rm 1s}(^2{\rm S}){\rm 2s2p}(^1{\rm P}^{\rm o})\ ^2{\rm P}^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ & 3885.9 & 3125.8 \\
745: ${\rm 1s}(^2{\rm S}){\rm 2p}^2(^1{\rm D})\ ^2{\rm D}_{3/2}$ & 3896.6 & 3139.8 \\
746: ${\rm 1s}(^2{\rm S}){\rm 2p}^2(^1{\rm D})\ ^2{\rm D}_{5/2}$ & 3897.2 & 3140.4 \\
747: \enddata
748: \tablenotetext{a}{NIST database V3.1.2 \citep{ral07}, T. Shirai et
749: al. (1999, unpublished)}
750: \end{deluxetable}
751:
752: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
753:
754: \clearpage
755: \begin{deluxetable}{llrrrrr}
756: \tablecolumns{7}
757: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
758: \tablewidth{0pc} \tablecaption{\label{e-SS}K-vacancy level energies (eV) in Ar and Ca}
759: \tablehead{\colhead{} & \colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$Z=18$} & \colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$Z=20$} \\
760: \cline{3-4}\cline{6-7}\\
761: \colhead{$N$} & \colhead{Level} & \colhead{HFR1} & \colhead{SS$^a$}
762: & \colhead{} &
763: \colhead{HFR1} & \colhead{SS$^a$}\\}
764: \startdata
765: 6 & ${\rm 1s2p}^5\ ^1{\rm P}^{\rm o}_1$ & 3165.4 & 3162.0 && 3935.5 & 3932.0 \\
766: 7 & ${\rm 1s2p}^6\ ^2{\rm S}_{1/2}$ & 3157.8 & 3154.1 && 3925.7 & 3921.9 \\
767: 8 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^5\ ^3{\rm P}^{\rm o}_2$ & 2992.3 & 2988.4 && 3734.8 & 3730.6 \\
768: 8 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^5\ ^3{\rm P}^{\rm o}_1$ & 2994.0 & 2990.4 && 3737.5 & 3733.8 \\
769: 8 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^5\ ^3{\rm P}^{\rm o}_0$ & 2995.2 & 2991.9 && 3739.4 & 3736.3 \\
770: 8 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^5\ ^1{\rm P}^{\rm o}_1$ & 3004.7 & 3000.5 && 3749.9 & 3745.4 \\
771: 8 & ${\rm 1s2s2p}^6\ ^3{\rm S}_1$ & 3059.8 & 3054.6 && 3813.3 & 3808.0 \\
772: 8 & ${\rm 1s2s2p}^6\ ^1{\rm S}_0$ & 3076.9 & 3071.2 && 3832.9 & 3827.3 \\
773: \enddata
774: \tablenotetext{a}{\cite{saf99}}
775: \end{deluxetable}
776:
777: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
778:
779: \clearpage
780: \begin{deluxetable}{rrllrrr}
781: \tablecolumns{7} \tablewidth{0pc}
782: \tablecaption{\label{w-faenov}HFR1 and experimental wavelengths
783: (\AA) with large differences} \tablehead{\colhead{$Z$} &
784: \colhead{$N$} & \colhead{Upper level} & \colhead{Lower level} &
785: \colhead{HFR1} & \colhead{Expt$^a$} & \colhead{MZ$^a$}\\}
786: \startdata
787: 14 & 7 & ${\rm 1s2p}^6\ ^2{\rm S}_{1/2}$ & ${\rm 1s^22s^22p^3}\ ^2{\rm P^o_{3/2}}$ & 6.6590 & 7.0156 & 7.0161 \\
788: 16 & 7 & ${\rm 1s(^2S)2s2p^5(^3P^{\rm o})}\ ^4{\rm P}^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ & ${\rm 1s^22s2p^4}\ ^2{\rm D}_{3/2}$ & 5.3141 & 5.2804 & 5.2797 \\
789: & 7 & ${\rm 1s2p}^6\ ^2{\rm S}_{1/2}$ & ${\rm 1s^22s^22p^3}\ ^2{\rm P^o_{3/2}}$ & 5.0434 & 5.2863 & 5.2864 \\
790: \enddata
791: \tablenotetext{a}{Experiment and calculation ({\sc mz} code) by \citet{fae94}}
792: \end{deluxetable}
793:
794: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
795:
796: \clearpage
797: \begin{deluxetable}{rrllrrr}
798: \tablecolumns{7}
799: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
800: \tablewidth{0pc} \tablecaption{\label{w-hullac}HFR1 and HULLAC
801: wavelengths (\AA) with large differences} \tablehead{\colhead{$Z$}
802: & \colhead{$N$} & \colhead{Upper level} & \colhead{Lower level} &
803: \colhead{HFR1} & \colhead{HULLAC$^a$} & \colhead{Expt}\\}
804: \startdata
805: 10 & 3 & ${\rm 1s}{\rm 2s2p}\ ^2{\rm P}^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}\ ^2{\rm S}_{1/2}$ & 13.658 & 13.648 & 13.655(3)$^b$ \\
806: & 3 & ${\rm 1s}{\rm 2s2p}\ ^2{\rm P}^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}\ ^2{\rm S}_{1/2}$ & 13.656 & 13.646 & 13.655(3)$^b$ \\
807: & 4 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}\ ^1{\rm P}^{\rm o}_1$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}^2\ ^1{\rm S}_0$ & 13.824 & 13.814 & \\
808: & 6 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^3\ ^3{\rm D}^{\rm o}_1$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}^2{\rm 2p}^2\ ^3{\rm P}_0$ & 14.225 & 14.239 & \\
809: & 8 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^5\ ^3{\rm P}^{\rm o}_2$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}^2{\rm 2p}^4\ ^3{\rm P}_2$ & 14.490 & 14.526 & \\
810: & 9 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^6\ ^2{\rm S}_{1/2}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}^2{\rm 2p}^5\ ^2{\rm P}^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ & 14.596 & 14.631 & \\
811: 12 & 6 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^3\ ^3{\rm D}^{\rm o}_1$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}^2{\rm 2p}^2\ ^3{\rm P}_0$ & 9.622 & 9.631 & \\
812: & 8 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^5\ ^3{\rm P}^{\rm o}_2$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}^2{\rm 2p}^4\ ^3{\rm P}_2$ & 9.797 & 9.816 & \\
813: & 9 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^6\ ^2{\rm S}_{1/2}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}^2{\rm 2p}^5\ ^2{\rm P}^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ & 9.875 & 9.895 & 9.9129$^c$ \\
814: 14 & 8 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^5\ ^3{\rm P}^{\rm o}_2$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}^2{\rm 2p}^4\ ^3{\rm P}_2$ & 7.052 & 7.063 & 7.0665$^c$ \\
815: & 9 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^6\ ^2{\rm S}_{1/2}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}^2{\rm 2p}^5\ ^2{\rm P}^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ & 7.107 & 7.119 & 7.1244$^c$ \\
816: \enddata
817: \tablenotetext{a}{\citet{beh02}} \tablenotetext{b}{NIST database V3.1.2 \citep{ral07}, \cite{kra06}}
818: \tablenotetext{c}{\citet{fae94}}
819: \end{deluxetable}
820:
821: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
822:
823: \clearpage
824: \begin{deluxetable}{llllll}
825: \tablecolumns{7}
826: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
827: \tablewidth{0pc}
828: \tablecaption{\label{ktrans}Transition energies (eV)} \tablehead{\colhead{$Z$} & \colhead{K$\alpha_1$} &
829: \colhead{K$\alpha_2$} &
830: \colhead{K$\beta_1$} & \colhead{K$\beta_3$} & \colhead{Edge} \\}
831: \startdata
832: 10 & 849.5 & 849.4 & & & 871.0 \\
833: & 849.2 & 849.1 & & & 870.7 \\
834: & 848.61(26) & 848.61(26) & 857.89(44) & 857.89(44) & 870.23(18) \\
835: 12 & 1254.6 & 1254.6 & 1308.4 & 1308.4 & 1311.5 \\
836: & 1254.4 & 1254.1 & & & 1312.3 \\
837: & 1253.688(11) & 1253.437(13) & 1302.20(40) & 1302.20(40) & 1303.33(27) \\
838: 14 & 1741.2 & 1741.2 & 1841.8 & 1842.8 & 1849.2 \\
839: & 1741.2 & 1739.7 & & 1841.8 & 1850.3 \\
840: & 1739.985(19) & 1739.394(34) & 1835.96(40) & 1835.96(40) & 1839.13(37) \\
841: 16 & 2309.2 & 2306.8 & 2468.7 & 2470.2 & 2481.9 \\
842: & 2308.8 & 2307.0 & 2467.5 & 2469.7 & 2481.7 \\
843: & 2307.885(34) & 2306.700(38) & 2464.07(14) & & 2471.63(70) \\
844: 18 & 2958.7 & 2956.6 & 3192.7 & 3192.5 & 3208.4 \\
845: & 2957.9 & 2955.9 & 3191.5 & 3191.3 & 3207.4 \\
846: & 2957.682(16) & 2955.566(16) & 3190.49(24) & 3190.49(24) & 3206.14(54) \\
847: 20 & 3692.4 & 3688.8 & 4015.3 & 4015.0 & 4049.9 \\
848: & 3691.0 & 3687.6 & 4014.7 & 4014.3 & 4049.4 \\
849: & 3691.719(49) & 3688.128(49) & 4012.76(38) & 4012.76(38) & 4050.48(30) \\
850: \enddata
851: \tablecomments{For each element, the first row lists HFR1 data, the second and third rows
852: respectively give computed and measured values by \citet{des03}.}
853: \end{deluxetable}
854:
855: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
856:
857: \clearpage
858: \begin{deluxetable}{llllll}
859: \tablecolumns{6} \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} \tablewidth{0pc}
860: \tablecaption{\label{lifet} Lifetimes for He- and Li-like ions}
861: \tablehead{\colhead{Level} & \colhead{$Z$}& \colhead{$N$} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{$\tau$ (ns)}\\
862: \cline{4-6}\\
863: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{AS1} & \colhead{AS2} & \colhead{Expt}\\}
864: \startdata
865: ${\rm 1s2s}\ ^3{\rm S}_1$ & 10 & 2 & 9.10$+$4 & 1.01$+$5 & 9.17(4)$+$4$^a$ \\
866: & 12 & 2 & 1.37$+$4 & 1.50$+$4 & 1.361(49)$+$4$^b$ \\
867: & 16 & 2 & 7.04$+$2 & 7.55$+$2 & 7.03(4)$+$2$^c$ \\
868: & 18 & 2 & 2.11$+$2 & 2.24$+$2 & 2.03(12)$+$2$^d$ \\
869: ${\rm 1s2p}\ ^3{\rm P}^{\rm o}_0$ & 18 & 2 & 5.11 & 4.60 & 4.87(44)$^e$ \\
870: ${\rm 1s2p}\ ^3{\rm P}^{\rm o}_1$ & 12 & 2 & 3.26$-$2 & 3.07$-$2 & 2.90(15)$-$2$^f$ \\
871: & 14 & 2 & 7.08$-$3 & 6.73$-$3 & 6.45(30)$-$3$^f$, 6.35(33)$-$3$^g$ \\
872: & 16 & 2 & 1.93$-$3 & 1.85$-$3 & 1.57(18)$-$3$^g$ \\
873: ${\rm 1s2p}\ ^3{\rm P}^{\rm o}_2$ & 16 & 2 & 2.80 & 2.60 & 2.5(2)$^h$ \\
874: & 18 & 2 & 1.58 & 1.50 & 1.62(8)$^e$ \\
875: ${\rm 1s2p}\ ^1{\rm P}^{\rm o}_1$ & 14 & 2 & 2.59$-$5 & 2.52$-$5 & 2.9(10)$-$5$^i$ \\
876: \tableline
877: ${\rm 1s2s2p}\ ^4{\rm P}^{\rm o}_{5/2}$ & 10 & 3 & 1.09$+$1 & 1.01$+$1 & 1.04(15)$+$1$^j$ \\
878: & 14 & 3 & 2.19 & 2.07 & 2.1(1)$^k$ \\
879: & 16 & 3 & 1.14 & 1.09 & 1.1(2)$^h$ \\
880: & 18 & 3 & 6.33$-$1 & 6.08$-$1 & 5.94(16)$-$1$^l$ \\
881: ${\rm 1s2p}^2\ ^4{\rm P}_{1/2}$ & 10 & 3 & 5.46$-$1 & 4.75$-$1 & 5.3(5)$-$1$^m$ \\
882: & 12 & 3 & 1.56$-$1 & 1.40$-$1 & 1.74(17)$-$1$^n$ \\
883: ${\rm 1s2p}^2\ ^4{\rm P}_{3/2}$ & 10 & 3 & 3.90$-$1 & 3.46$-$1 & 4.0(4)$-$1$^m$ \\
884: & 12 & 3 & 9.38$-$2 & 8.35$-$2 & 9.4(12)$-$2$^n$ \\
885: ${\rm 1s2p}^2\ ^4{\rm P}_{5/2}$ & 12 & 3 & 8.80$-$3 & 7.45$-$3 & 9(4)$-$3$^n$ \\
886: \enddata
887: \tablenotetext{a}{\cite{tra99}}
888: \tablenotetext{b}{\cite{ste95}}
889: \tablenotetext{c}{\cite{cre06}}
890: \tablenotetext{d}{\cite{hub87}}
891: \tablenotetext{e}{\cite{dav77}}
892: \tablenotetext{f}{\cite{arm81}}
893: \tablenotetext{g}{\cite{var76a}}
894: \tablenotetext{h}{\cite{coc74}}
895: \tablenotetext{i}{\cite{var76b}}
896: \tablenotetext{j}{\cite{gro75}}
897: \tablenotetext{k}{\cite{has75}}
898: \tablenotetext{l}{\cite{doh79}}
899: \tablenotetext{m}{\cite{kny85}}
900: \tablenotetext{n}{\cite{hel85}}
901: \tablecomments{$a\pm b\equiv a\times 10^{\pm b}$.}
902: \end{deluxetable}
903:
904: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
905: \clearpage
906: \begin{deluxetable}{rlllrrr}
907: \tablecolumns{7}
908: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
909: \tablewidth{0pc} \tablecaption{\label{aval} Transitions in Ar ions with questionable $A$-values (s$^{-1}$)}
910: \tablehead{\colhead{$N$}& \colhead{Upper level} & \colhead{Lower level} & \colhead{HFR1} &
911: \colhead{HFR2$^a$} & \colhead{MCDF1$^a$}\\}
912: \startdata
913: 5 & ${\rm 1s(^2S)}{\rm 2s2p}^3{\rm (^3D^{\rm o})}\ ^4{\rm D}^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s2p}^2\ ^4{\rm P}_{3/2}$ & 1.49$+$13 & 1.48$+$13 & 1.08$+$13 \\
914: & ${\rm 1s(^2S)}{\rm 2s2p}^3{\rm (^1D^{\rm o})}\ ^2{\rm D}^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s2p}^2\ ^2{\rm D}_{5/2}$ & 2.36$+$13 & 2.20$+$13 & 1.77$+$13 \\
915: & ${\rm 1s(^2S)}{\rm 2s2p}^3{\rm (^1P^{\rm o})}\ ^2{\rm P}^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s2p}^2\ ^2{\rm S}_{1/2}$ & 2.62$+$13 & 2.97$+$13 & 1.72$+$13 \\
916: & ${\rm 1s}{\rm 2p}^4\ ^2{\rm D}_{3/2}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2p}^3\ ^2{\rm P}^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ & 1.02$+$13 & 9.00$+$12 & 6.80$+$12 \\
917: 6 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^3\ ^3{\rm S}^{\rm o}_1$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}^2{\rm 2p}^2\ ^3{\rm P}_2$ & 3.11$+$13 & 2.33$+$13 & 3.50$+$13 \\
918: & ${\rm 1s(^2S)2s}{\rm 2p}^4{\rm (^2D)}\ ^3{\rm D}_{2}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}{\rm 2p}^3\ ^3{\rm D}^{\rm o}_2$ & 7.26$+$13 & 1.28$+$13 & 2.00$+$11 \\
919: & ${\rm 1s(^2S)2s}{\rm 2p}^4{\rm (^2D)}\ ^3{\rm D}_{2}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}{\rm 2p}^3\ ^3{\rm D}^{\rm o}_3$ & 3.45$+$13 & 6.29$+$13 & 9.60$+$13 \\
920: & ${\rm 1s(^2S)2s}{\rm 2p}^4{\rm (^2D)}\ ^3{\rm D}_{2}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}{\rm 2p}^3\ ^3{\rm P}^{\rm o}_1$ & 2.66$+$11 & 3.52$+$13 & 3.51$+$13 \\
921: & ${\rm 1s(^2S)2s}{\rm 2p}^4{\rm (^2D)}\ ^3{\rm D}_{2}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}{\rm 2p}^3\ ^3{\rm P}^{\rm o}_2$ & 3.29$+$13 & 4.70$+$12 & 1.74$+$13 \\
922: & ${\rm 1s(^2S)2s}{\rm 2p}^4{\rm (^2D)}\ ^3{\rm D}_{1}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}{\rm 2p}^3\ ^3{\rm P}^{\rm o}_2$ & 8.07$+$12 & 1.12$+$13 & 5.80$+$12 \\
923: & ${\rm 1s(^2S)2s}{\rm 2p}^4{\rm (^4P)}\ ^3{\rm P}_{2}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}{\rm 2p}^3\ ^3{\rm D}^{\rm o}_3$ & 6.94$+$13 & 4.58$+$13 & 1.50$+$13 \\
924: & ${\rm 1s(^2S)2s}{\rm 2p}^4{\rm (^4P)}\ ^3{\rm P}_{2}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}{\rm 2p}^3\ ^3{\rm P}^{\rm o}_2$ & 7.57$+$12 & 3.89$+$13 & 2.50$+$13 \\
925: & ${\rm 1s(^2S)2s}{\rm 2p}^4{\rm (^2D)}\ ^1{\rm D}_{2}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}{\rm 2p}^3\ ^1{\rm P}^{\rm o}_1$ & 1.01$+$13 & 1.45$+$13 & 1.79$+$13 \\
926: & ${\rm 1s(^2S)2s}{\rm 2p}^4{\rm (^2P)}\ ^3{\rm P}_{2}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}{\rm 2p}^3\ ^1{\rm D}^{\rm o}_2$ & 2.23$+$13 & 1.39$+$13 & 3.94$+$13 \\
927: & ${\rm 1s(^2S)2s}{\rm 2p}^4{\rm (^2P)}\ ^3{\rm P}_{2}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}{\rm 2p}^3\ ^3{\rm S}^{\rm o}_1$ & 2.39$+$13 & 3.22$+$13 & 1.53$+$13 \\
928: & ${\rm 1s(^2S)2s}{\rm 2p}^4{\rm (^2P)}\ ^3{\rm P}_{2}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s}{\rm 2p}^3\ ^1{\rm P}^{\rm o}_1$ & 1.29$+$13 & 9.30$+$12 & 5.50$+$12 \\
929: 7 & ${\rm 1s(^2S)2s2p}^5{\rm (^3P^{\rm o})}\ ^2{\rm P}^{\rm o}_{3/2}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s2p}^4\ ^2{\rm S}_{1/2}$ & 2.67$+$13 & 2.72$+$13 & 5.30$+$12 \\
930: & ${\rm 1s(^2S)2s2p}^5{\rm (^3P^{\rm o})}\ ^2{\rm P}^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s2p}^4\ ^2{\rm D}_{3/2}$ & 1.39$+$14 & 1.41$+$14 & 2.94$+$13 \\
931: & ${\rm 1s(^2S)2s2p}^5{\rm (^1P^{\rm o})}\ ^2{\rm P}^{\rm o}_{1/2}$ & ${\rm 1s}^2{\rm 2s2p}^4\ ^2{\rm P}_{3/2}$ & 2.58$+$13 & 2.61$+$13 & 1.35$+$14 \\
932: \enddata
933: \tablenotetext{a}{HFR2 and MCDF1 results computed by \citet{bie00}}
934: \tablecomments{$a\pm b\equiv a\times 10^{\pm b}$.}
935: \end{deluxetable}
936:
937: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
938:
939: \clearpage
940: \begin{deluxetable}{llllll}
941: \tablecolumns{6}
942: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
943: \tablewidth{0pc} \tablecaption{\label{auger} Questionable Auger widths (s$^{-1}$) for Ar ions}
944: \tablehead{\colhead{$N$} & \colhead{Level} & \colhead{HFR1} & \colhead{AS1} & \colhead{HFR2$^a$} &
945: \colhead{MCDF1$^a$}\\} \startdata
946: 3 & ${\rm 1s(^2S)2p^2(^3P)}\ ^2{\rm P}_{1/2}$ & 1.34$+$11 & 1.19$+$11 & 1.70$+$12 & 2.00$+$11 \\
947: & ${\rm 1s(^2S)2p^2(^1S)}\ ^2{\rm S}_{1/2}$ & 2.41$+$13 & 2.15$+$13 & 6.39$+$13 & 2.21$+$13 \\
948: 4 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}\ ^1{\rm P}^{\rm o}_{1}$ & 1.14$+$14 & 1.20$+$14 & 5.69$+$13 & 1.08$+$14 \\
949: & ${\rm 1s(^2S)2s2p^2(^4P)}\ ^3{\rm P}_1$ & 9.75$+$13 & 9.62$+$13 & 1.10$+$14 & 5.23$+$13 \\
950: & ${\rm 1s(^2S)2s2p^2(^2D)}\ ^3{\rm D}_1$ & 8.63$+$13 & 9.57$+$13 & 7.53$+$13 & 5.23$+$13 \\
951: & ${\rm 1s(^2S)2s2p^2(^4P)}\ ^3{\rm P}_2$ & 4.23$+$13 & 3.73$+$13 & 4.96$+$13 & 5.41$+$13 \\
952: & ${\rm 1s2p}^3\ ^3{\rm S}^{\rm o}_{1}$ & 5.06$+$12 & 6.23$+$12 & 1.90$+$13 & 4.50$+$12 \\
953: \enddata
954: \tablenotetext{a}{HFR2 and MCDF1 results computed by \citet{bie00}}
955: \tablecomments{$a\pm b\equiv a\times 10^{\pm b}$.}
956: \end{deluxetable}
957:
958: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
959:
960: \clearpage
961: \begin{deluxetable}{llllll}
962: \tablecolumns{6}
963: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
964: \tablewidth{0pc} \tablecaption{\label{a-hullac}Questionable HULLAC
965: K-vacancy level widths (s$^{-1}$)}
966: \tablehead{\colhead{$Z$}&\colhead{$N$}&\colhead{Level}& \colhead{HFR1} &
967: \colhead{AS1} & \colhead{HULLAC$^a$}\\} \startdata
968: 10 & 5 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^2\ ^2{\rm P}_{1/2}$ & 1.03$+$14 & 1.08$+$14 & 3.55$+$13 \\
969: & 6 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^3\ ^3{\rm S}^{\rm o}_1$ & 1.06$+$14 & 1.06$+$14 & 5.76$+$13 \\
970: & 8 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^5\ ^3{\rm P}^{\rm o}_2$ & 3.71$+$14 & 3.71$+$14 & 2.55$+$14 \\
971: & 9 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^6\ ^2{\rm S}_{1/2}$ & 3.92$+$14 & 3.88$+$14 & 5.80$+$12 \\
972: 12 & 5 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^2\ ^2{\rm P}_{1/2}$ & 1.20$+$14 & 1.33$+$14 & 5.08$+$13 \\
973: & 6 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^3\ ^3{\rm S}^{\rm o}_1$ & 1.44$+$14 & 1.48$+$14 & 7.95$+$13 \\
974: 14 & 5 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^2\ ^2{\rm P}_{1/2}$ & 1.63$+$14 & 1.67$+$14 & 7.58$+$13 \\
975: & 6 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^3\ ^3{\rm S}^{\rm o}_1$ & 2.05$+$14 & 2.23$+$14 & 1.16$+$14 \\
976: 16 & 5 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^2\ ^2{\rm P}_{1/2}$ & 2.11$+$14 & 2.13$+$14 & 1.14$+$14 \\
977: & 6 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^3\ ^3{\rm S}^{\rm o}_1$ & 2.80$+$14 & 2.95$+$14 & 1.70$+$14 \\
978: 18 & 5 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^2\ ^2{\rm P}_{1/2}$ & 2.76$+$14 & 2.76$+$14 & 1.69$+$14 \\
979: & 6 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^3\ ^3{\rm S}^{\rm o}_1$ & 3.57$+$14 & 3.63$+$14 & 2.46$+$14 \\
980: 20 & 5 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^2\ ^2{\rm P}_{1/2}$ & 3.61$+$14 & 3.59$+$14 & 2.47$+$14 \\
981: & 6 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^3\ ^3{\rm S}^{\rm o}_1$ & 4.51$+$14 & 4.45$+$14 & 3.46$+$14 \\
982: \enddata
983: \tablenotetext{a}{Widths computed with the {\sc hullac} code by
984: \cite{beh02}} \tablecomments{The level width is given by the sum of the radiative and Auger widths.
985: Also, $a\pm b\equiv a\times 10^{\pm b}$.}
986: \end{deluxetable}
987:
988: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
989: \clearpage
990: \begin{deluxetable}{rrlrrrr}
991: \tablecolumns{7}
992: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
993: \tablewidth{0pc} \tablecaption{\label{yields} Configuration-averaged fluorescence yields}
994: \tablehead{\colhead{$Z$} & \colhead{$N$} & \colhead{Configuration} & \colhead{HFR1} &
995: \colhead{AS3$^a$} & \colhead{HULLAC$^b$} & \colhead{MCDF$^c$}\\}
996: \startdata
997: 10 & 4 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}$ & 0.0223 & 0.0201 & 0.0209 & 0.0191 \\
998: 12 & & & 0.0423 & 0.0393 & 0.0414 & 0.0377 \\
999: 14 & & & 0.0691 & 0.0658 & 0.0685 & \\
1000: 16 & & & 0.1008 & 0.0974 & 0.0984 & \\
1001: 18 & & & 0.1340 & 0.1309 & 0.1273 & 0.1237 \\
1002: 20 & & & 0.1673 & 0.1646 & 0.1569 & \\
1003: 10 & 9 & ${\rm 1s2s}^2{\rm 2p}^6$ & 0.0185 & 0.0147 & 0.0215 & \\
1004: 12 & & & 0.0332 & 0.0298 & 0.0380 & \\
1005: 14 & & & 0.0564 & 0.0528 & 0.0630 & \\
1006: 16 & & & 0.0895 & 0.0855 & 0.0983 & \\
1007: 18 & & & 0.1343 & 0.1286 & 0.1443 & \\
1008: 20 & & & 0.1867 & 0.1818 & 0.2001 & \\
1009: \enddata
1010: \tablenotetext{a}{Computed with {\sc autostructure} by \citet{gor03} including relativistic corrections}
1011: \tablenotetext{b}{Estimated by \citet{gor03} from the widths computed with {\sc hullac} by
1012: \citet{beh02} after some revision}
1013: \tablenotetext{c}{Calculated by \citet{gor03} from the MCDF data
1014: by \citet{che85}}
1015: \end{deluxetable}
1016:
1017: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1018:
1019: \clearpage
1020: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrrrrlrrrrr}
1021: \tablecolumns{12} \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} \tablewidth{0pc}
1022: \tablecaption{\label{levels} Valence and K-vacancy levels for the Ne, Mg, Si, S, Ar, and Ca isonuclear sequences}
1023: \tablehead{\colhead{$Z$} & \colhead{$N$} & \colhead{$i$} & \colhead{$2S+1$} & \colhead{$L$} & \colhead{$2J$} &
1024: \colhead{Level} & \colhead{$E$(NIST)} & \colhead{$E$(HFR1)} & \colhead{$A_{\rm r}(i)$} &
1025: \colhead{$A_{\rm a}(i)$} & \colhead{Yield}\\
1026: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{eV} &
1027: \colhead{eV} & \colhead{s$^{-1}$} & \colhead{s$^{-1}$} & \colhead{}\\}
1028: \startdata
1029: 10 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 0 & 1 & 1s 2S1/2 & 0.0000 & 0.0000 & & & \\
1030: 10 & 1 & 2 & 2 & 1 & 1 & 2p 2P1/2 & 1021.4970 & 1021.4975 & & & \\
1031: 10 & 1 & 3 & 2 & 0 & 1 & 2s 2S1/2 & 1021.5180 & 1021.5177 & & & \\
1032: 10 & 1 & 4 & 2 & 1 & 3 & 2p 2P3/2 & 1021.9530 & 1021.9528 & & & \\
1033: 10 & 2 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1s2 1S0 & 0.0000 & 0.0000 & & & \\
1034: 10 & 2 & 2 & 3 & 0 & 2 & 1s2s 3S1 & 905.0775 & 904.4935 & & & \\
1035: 10 & 2 & 3 & 3 & 1 & 0 & 1s2p 3Po0 & 914.7805 & 914.1721 & 1.03E+08 & & \\
1036: 10 & 2 & 4 & 3 & 1 & 2 & 1s2p 3Po1 & 914.8177 & 914.2734 & 3.78E+09 & & \\
1037: 10 & 2 & 5 & 3 & 1 & 4 & 1s2p 3Po2 & 915.0099 & 914.4848 & 1.14E+08 & & \\
1038: 10 & 2 & 6 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1s2s 1S0 & 915.3360 & 915.2111 & 1.54E+02 & & \\
1039: 10 & 2 & 7 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 1s2p 1Po1 & 922.0163 & 921.8277 & 9.88E+12 & & \\
1040: 10 & 3 & 1 & 2 & 0 & 1 & 1s22s 2S1/2 & 0.0000 & 0.0000 & & & \\
1041: 10 & 3 & 2 & 2 & 1 & 1 & 1s22p 2Po1/2 & 15.8888 & 15.8681 & 5.50E+08 & & \\
1042: 10 & 3 & 3 & 2 & 1 & 3 & 1s22p 2Po3/2 & 16.0933 & 16.0709 & 5.72E+08 & & \\
1043: 10 & 3 & 4 & 2 & 0 & 1 & 1s2s2 2S1/2 & & 891.0215 & 5.31E+11 & 1.14E+14 & 0.0046 \\
1044: 10 & 3 & 5 & 4 & 1 & 1 & 1s(2S)2s2p(3Po) 4Po1/2 & & 895.1820 & 2.68E+08 & $<$\ 5.00E+08 & 1.0000 \\
1045: 10 & 3 & 6 & 4 & 1 & 3 & 1s(2S)2s2p(3Po) 4Po3/2 & & 895.2770 & 6.86E+08 & 1.00E+09 & 0.4069 \\
1046: 10 & 3 & 7 & 4 & 1 & 5 & 1s(2S)2s2p(3Po) 4Po5/2 & & 895.4381 & 5.03E+02 & 9.59E+07 & 0.0000 \\
1047: 10 & 3 & 8 & 2 & 1 & 1 & 1s(2S)2s2p(3Po) 2Po1/2 & 908.0482 & 907.7819 & 7.98E+12 & 7.73E+12 & 0.5080 \\
1048: 10 & 3 & 9 & 2 & 1 & 3 & 1s(2S)2s2p(3Po) 2Po3/2 & 908.0482 & 907.8962 & 8.13E+12 & 6.38E+12 & 0.5603 \\
1049: 10 & 3 & 10 & 4 & 1 & 1 & 1s(2S)2p2(3P) 4P1/2 & & 912.3807 & 1.76E+09 & $<$\ 5.00E+08 & 1.0000 \\
1050: 10 & 3 & 11 & 4 & 1 & 3 & 1s(2S)2p2(3P) 4P3/2 & & 912.4757 & 1.98E+09 & 6.00E+09 & 0.2481 \\
1051: 10 & 3 & 12 & 4 & 1 & 5 & 1s(2S)2p2(3P) 4P5/2 & & 912.6306 & 2.39E+09 & 3.70E+10 & 0.0607 \\
1052: 10 & 3 & 13 & 2 & 1 & 1 & 1s(2S)2s2p(1Po) 2Po1/2 & & 914.3583 & 9.06E+11 & 7.57E+13 & 0.0118 \\
1053: 10 & 3 & 14 & 2 & 1 & 3 & 1s(2S)2s2p(1Po) 2Po3/2 & & 914.4365 & 7.55E+11 & 7.70E+13 & 0.0097 \\
1054: 10 & 3 & 15 & 2 & 2 & 3 & 1s(2S)2p2(1D) 2D3/2 & 920.4218 & 920.5238 & 4.25E+12 & 1.29E+14 & 0.0319 \\
1055: 10 & 3 & 16 & 2 & 2 & 5 & 1s(2S)2p2(1D) 2D5/2 & 920.4218 & 920.5326 & 4.22E+12 & 1.30E+14 & 0.0314 \\
1056: 10 & 3 & 17 & 2 & 1 & 1 & 1s(2S)2p2(3P) 2P1/2 & & 922.5025 & 1.32E+13 & 2.00E+09 & 0.9998 \\
1057: 10 & 3 & 18 & 2 & 1 & 3 & 1s(2S)2p2(3P) 2P3/2 & & 922.6991 & 1.32E+13 & 4.05E+11 & 0.9702 \\
1058: 10 & 3 & 19 & 2 & 0 & 1 & 1s(2S)2p2(1S) 2S1/2 & & 932.4598 & 3.95E+12 & 1.92E+13 & 0.1706 \\
1059: \enddata
1060: \tablecomments{The complete version of this table is in the
1061: electronic edition of the Journal. The printed edition contains
1062: only a sample.}
1063: \end{deluxetable}
1064:
1065: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1066:
1067: \clearpage
1068: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrrrrr}
1069: \tablecolumns{7}
1070: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1071: \tablewidth{0pc} \tablecaption{\label{trans} K-vacancy transitions in the Ne,
1072: Mg, Si, S, Ar, and Ca isonuclear sequences}
1073: \tablehead{\colhead{$Z$} & \colhead{$N$} & \colhead{$k$} & \colhead{$i$} &
1074: \colhead{$\lambda$} & \colhead{$A(k,i)$} & \colhead{$gf(i,k)$}\\
1075: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{0.1 nm} &
1076: \colhead{s$^{-1}$} & \colhead{}\\}
1077: \startdata
1078: 10 & 2 & 4 & 1 & 13.5582 & 3.67E+09 & 3.04E$-$04 \\
1079: 10 & 2 & 7 & 1 & 13.4470 & 9.87E+12 & 8.04E$-$01 \\
1080: 10 & 3 & 4 & 2 & 14.1641 & 1.80E+11 & 1.09E$-$02 \\
1081: 10 & 3 & 4 & 3 & 14.1673 & 3.49E+11 & 2.10E$-$02 \\
1082: 10 & 3 & 5 & 1 & 13.8471 & 2.69E+08 & 1.54E$-$05 \\
1083: 10 & 3 & 6 & 1 & 13.8456 & 6.86E+08 & 7.88E$-$05 \\
1084: 10 & 3 & 8 & 1 & 13.6548 & 7.98E+12 & 4.46E$-$01 \\
1085: 10 & 3 & 9 & 1 & 13.6531 & 8.13E+12 & 9.09E$-$01 \\
1086: 10 & 3 & 10 & 2 & 13.8265 & 5.31E+08 & 3.05E$-$05 \\
1087: 10 & 3 & 10 & 3 & 13.8297 & 2.22E+07 & 1.28E$-$06 \\
1088: 10 & 3 & 11 & 2 & 13.8251 & 5.52E+06 & 6.34E$-$07 \\
1089: 10 & 3 & 11 & 3 & 13.8282 & 7.60E+08 & 8.72E$-$05 \\
1090: 10 & 3 & 12 & 3 & 13.8258 & 1.15E+09 & 1.99E$-$04 \\
1091: 10 & 3 & 13 & 1 & 13.5566 & 9.00E+11 & 4.96E$-$02 \\
1092: 10 & 3 & 14 & 1 & 13.5554 & 7.49E+11 & 8.26E$-$02 \\
1093: 10 & 3 & 15 & 2 & 13.7020 & 3.82E+12 & 4.31E$-$01 \\
1094: 10 & 3 & 15 & 3 & 13.7051 & 4.25E+11 & 4.79E$-$02 \\
1095: 10 & 3 & 16 & 3 & 13.7050 & 4.22E+12 & 7.13E$-$01 \\
1096: 10 & 3 & 17 & 2 & 13.6721 & 8.92E+12 & 5.00E$-$01 \\
1097: 10 & 3 & 17 & 3 & 13.6752 & 4.32E+12 & 2.42E$-$01 \\
1098: 10 & 3 & 18 & 2 & 13.6692 & 1.90E+12 & 2.13E$-$01 \\
1099: 10 & 3 & 18 & 3 & 13.6722 & 1.13E+13 & 1.27E$+$00 \\
1100: 10 & 3 & 19 & 2 & 13.5236 & 1.21E+12 & 6.67E$-$02 \\
1101: 10 & 3 & 19 & 3 & 13.5266 & 2.73E+12 & 1.50E$-$01 \\
1102: \enddata
1103: \tablecomments{The complete version of this table is in the
1104: electronic edition of the Journal. The printed edition contains
1105: only a sample.}
1106: \end{deluxetable}
1107:
1108: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1109:
1110:
1111: \clearpage
1112: \begin{figure}
1113: \epsscale{.80} \plotone{f1.eps}
1114: \caption{\label{nist} Average differences between the HFR1 energies and those in the
1115: NIST database V3.1.2 \citep{ral07} for the K-vacancy levels in the He and Li
1116: isoelectronic sequences. Error bars indicate the standard deviation. For nuclear charge
1117: $Z=18$, the experimental level energies for the Li-like ion have been excluded as they
1118: are believed to be incorrect.}
1119: \end{figure}
1120:
1121: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1122:
1123: \clearpage
1124: \begin{figure}
1125: \epsscale{.80} \plotone{f2.eps}
1126: \caption{\label{wl} Average wavelength difference $\overline{\Delta \lambda_{\rm
1127: e}}$ (m\AA) as a function of the electron number for ions in the Ar isonuclear sequence.
1128: $\overline{\Delta \lambda_{\rm e}}$ is determined with respect to the spectroscopic
1129: values of \citet{bie00}. Filled circles: HFR1 values. Circles: HFR2 results by
1130: \citet{bie00}. Squares: MCDF1 results by \citet{bie00}. A large error bar for the
1131: MCDF1 value at $N=7$ has been removed for clarity.}
1132: \end{figure}
1133:
1134: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1135:
1136: \clearpage
1137: \begin{figure}
1138: \epsscale{.80} \plotone{f3.eps}
1139: \caption{\label{f-he} Absorption $f$-value for the ${\rm 1s}^2\ ^1{\rm S}_0\rightarrow {\rm 1s2p}\
1140: ^1{\rm P}^{\rm o}_1$ resonance transition in the He isoelectronic
1141: sequence. Filled squares: HFR1. Filled cirles: AS2. Circles: AS1.
1142: Squares: HFR, single configuration. Filled diamonds: values by
1143: \cite{dra79} calculated in a unified relativistic theory. Filled
1144: triangles: data computed with the {\sc hullac} code by \cite{beh02}.}
1145: \end{figure}
1146: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1147:
1148: \clearpage
1149: \begin{figure}
1150: \epsscale{.80} \plotone{f4.eps}
1151: \caption{\label{chen-A} Comparison of the present HFR1 $A$-values
1152: for K transitions in C-like Ar with two independent MCDF calculations. Squares:
1153: \cite{che97}. Filled circles: MCDF1 $A$-values by \cite{bie00}. It is found
1154: that the data by \cite{che97} are on average larger by 37\% with respect to HFR1.}
1155: \end{figure}
1156:
1157: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1158:
1159: \clearpage
1160: \begin{figure}
1161: \epsscale{.80} \plotone{f5.eps}
1162: \caption{\label{chen-Au} Comparison of the present HFR1 Auger
1163: widths for K-vacancy levels in C-like Ar with two independent MCDF
1164: calculations. Squares: \cite{che97}. Filled circles: MCDF1
1165: Auger widths by \cite{bie00}. It is found that the data by
1166: \cite{che97} are on average larger by 30\%.}
1167: \end{figure}
1168:
1169: \end{document}
1170: