1: \documentclass[12pt]{iopart}
2: %\documentclass{aastex}
3: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{/home/luisfr/aastex/aastex52/aastex}
5: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
6: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
7: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
8: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
9: \include{graphicx}
10:
11:
12: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
13:
14: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
15:
16: %\slugcomment{To appear in The Astronomical Journal}
17:
18: %\shorttitle{Collimated jet towards IRAS16547-4247}
19: %\shortauthors{Rodr\'\i guez et al.}
20:
21: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
22: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
23:
24: \begin{document}
25:
26: To appear in The Astronomical Journal
27:
28: \title[The Collimated Jet Source in IRAS~16547-4247]{The Collimated Jet Source
29: in IRAS~16547-4247: Time Variation, Possible Precession, and Upper Limits to the Proper Motions Along the Jet Axis}
30:
31: \author{Luis F. Rodr\'\i guez}
32: \address{Centro de Radioastronom\'\i a y Astrof\'\i sica, UNAM,
33: Apdo. Postal 3-72, Morelia, Michoac\'an, 58089 M\'exico}
34: \ead{l.rodriguez@astrosmo.unam.mx}
35:
36: \author{James M. Moran and Ramiro Franco-Hern\'andez\footnote{Centro de Radioastronom\'\i a y Astrof\'\i sica,
37: UNAM, Morelia 58089, M\'exico}}
38: \address{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,
39: 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA}
40: \ead{jmoran, rfranco@cfa.harvard.edu}
41:
42: \author{Guido Garay}
43: \address{Departamento de Astronom\'\i a,
44: Universidad de Chile, Casilla 36-D, Santiago, Chile}
45: \ead{guido@das.uchile.cl}
46:
47: \author{Kate J. Brooks}
48: \address{Australia Telescope National Facility, P.O. Box 76, Epping NSW 1710
49: Australia}
50: \ead{Kate.Brooks@atnf.csiro.au}
51:
52: %\and
53:
54: \author{Diego Mardones}
55: \address{Departamento de Astronom\'\i a,
56: Universidad de Chile, Casilla 36-D, Santiago, Chile}
57: \ead{mardones@das.uchile.cl}
58:
59: %\and
60:
61: \begin{abstract}
62:
63: The triple radio source detected in association with the luminous infrared
64: source IRAS~16547-4247 has previously been studied with high angular resolution and high
65: sensitivity with the Very Large Array (VLA) at 3.6-cm wavelength.
66: In this paper, we present new 3.6 cm observations taken 2.68 years
67: after the first epoch that allow a search for variability and proper motions, as well as
68: the detection of additional faint sources in the region.
69: We do not detect proper motions along the axis of the outflow in the outer lobes of this source
70: at a 4-$\sigma$ upper limit of $\sim$160 km s$^{-1}$. This suggests that these lobes are probably
71: working surfaces where the jet is interacting with a denser medium. However, the brightest
72: components of the lobes show evidence of precession, at a
73: rate of $0\rlap.^\circ08$ yr$^{-1}$ clockwise in the plane of the sky.
74: It may be possible to understand the distribution of almost
75: all the identified sources as the result of ejecta from a precessing jet.
76: The core of the thermal jet shows significant variations in flux density and morphology. We compare this
77: source with other jets in low and high mass young stars and suggest that the former can
78: be understood as a scaled-up version of the latter.
79:
80: \end{abstract}
81:
82: %\keywords{ISM: individual (\objectname{IRAS 16547-4247}) --- ISM:
83: %jets and outflows --- radio continuum: stars --- stars: formation}
84:
85: \section{Introduction}
86:
87: A successful model of low-mass star formation, based on accretion via a circumstellar disk and a
88: collimated outflow in the form of jets (Shu, Adams, \& Lizano 1987), has been developed and found to
89: be consistent with the observations. An important question related to star formation is whether or not
90: this model can be scaled up for the case of high-mass protostars or if other physical processes
91: (i.e., stellar merging; Bonnell, Bate, \& Zinnecker 1998; Stahler, Palla, \& Ho 2000; Bally \& Zinnecker 2005) are important.
92: A small number of B-type young stars have been found to be associated
93: with collimated outflows and possibly even circumstellar disks
94: (see Garay \& Lizano 1999; Arce et al. 2007; Cesaroni et al. 2007).
95: The source IRAS~16547-4247 is the best example of a highly-collimated outflow associated
96: with an O-type protostar studied so far, and its study may reveal important
97: information about the way high mass stars form.
98:
99: The systemic LSR velocity of the ambient molecular cloud where IRAS~16547-4247 is embedded is
100: $-$30.6 km s$^{-1}$ (Garay et al. 2007). Adopting the galactic rotation model of Brand \& Blitz (1993) and
101: assuming that the one-dimensional rms velocity dispersion among molecular clouds is 7.8 km s$^{-1}$ (Stark \& Brand 1989),
102: we estimate a distance of 2.9$\pm$0.6 kpc for the source.
103: IRAS~16547-4247 has a bolometric luminosity of 6.2$\times$10$^4$ $L_\odot$,
104: equivalent to that of a single O8 zero-age main-sequence star, although
105: it is probably a cluster for which the most massive star would have slightly lower luminosity.
106: Garay et al. (2003) detected an embedded triple radio continuum source associated with the IRAS~16547-4247.
107: The three radio components are aligned in a northwest-southeast direction,
108: with the outer lobes symmetrically separated from the central source by
109: an angular distance of $\sim10{''}$, equivalent to
110: a physical separation in the plane of the sky of $\sim$0.14 pc.
111: The positive spectral index of the central source
112: is consistent with that expected for a radio thermal (free-free) jet
113: (e.g., Anglada 1996; Rodr\'\i guez 1997),
114: while the spectral index of the lobes suggests a mix of thermal and nonthermal emission.
115: Forster \& Caswell (1989) detected both mainline OH and H$_2$O masers
116: at a position close to the central continuum source.
117: The triple system is centered on the position of the IRAS source and is
118: also coincident within measurement error with a 1.2 mm dust continuum and
119: molecular line emission core whose
120: mass is on the order of 10$^3$ $M_\odot$ (Garay et al. 2003).
121: Brooks et al. (2003) reported a chain of $H_2$ 2.12 $\mu$m emission
122: knots that trace a collimated flow extending over 1.5 pc
123: that emanates from close to the central component of the triple radio
124: source and has a position angle very similar to that defined by the
125: outer lobes of the triple radio source. Most likely this extended
126: component traces gas ejected in the past by the central component of
127: the triple source. The molecular observations of
128: Garay et al. (2007) revealed the presence of a collimated bipolar outflow
129: with lobes $\sim$0.7 pc in extent and aligned with the thermal jet
130: located at the center of the core.
131:
132: In a high angular resolution study made with the VLA and ATCA,
133: Rodr\'\i guez et al. (2005) confirmed that the central object is a thermal radio jet, while the
134: two outer lobes are most probably heavily obscured HH objects.
135: The thermal radio jet was resolved angularly for the first time
136: by these authors and found to align closely with the outer lobes.
137: Several fainter sources detected in the region away
138: from the main outflow axis were interpreted as most probably associated
139: with other stars in a young cluster. Brooks et al. (2007) used ATCA observations to substantiate the
140: jet nature of the central source and to detect emission at 88 GHz that most probably arises from dust associated with this source.
141:
142: In this paper, we present new sensitive high angular-resolution Very Large Array
143: observations that provide new information on the characteristics of the radio triple source in
144: IRAS~16547-4247 as well as other sources in the field.
145:
146: \section{Observations}
147:
148: The new 3.6-cm wavelength observations were made using the Very Large Array (VLA) of the National
149: Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO)\footnote{NRAO is a facility of the National Science Foundation
150: operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.}. These VLA radio continuum
151: observations were carried out in 2006 May 31 and June 08 at the frequency of 8.46 GHz.
152: The array was in the BnA configuration and an effective bandwidth of 100~MHz
153: was used. The absolute amplitude
154: calibrator was 1331+305 (with an adopted flux density of 5.21 Jy), and a source model provided by NRAO was used for its calibration.
155: The phase calibrator was 1626$-$298, with bootstrapped
156: flux densities of 1.684$\pm$0.003 and
157: 1.823$\pm$0.004 Jy for the first and second epochs, respectively. The phase
158: center of the array was $\alpha=16^h58^m17{\rlap.}{^s}202$ and
159: $\delta=-42^\circ52'09{\rlap.}{''}59$ (J2000.0). The
160: data were edited and calibrated using
161: the software package Astronomical Image Processing System (AIPS) of NRAO.
162: To correct for amplitude and phase errors caused by the low elevation of
163: the source, the data were self-calibrated in phase and amplitude.
164: No significant variations were
165: found between the two epochs of observations (separated by only eight days)
166: and the final analysis was made from the result of concatenating all data.
167: The average epoch for the two data sets is 2006.42, which we use in subsequent
168: analysis.
169: %We will refer to the final data set as of epoch 2006.42, the average
170: %of the two epochs of observation.
171: Clean maps were obtained using the task IMAGR of AIPS with the
172: ROBUST parameter set to 0. The synthesized (FWHM) beam was $1\rlap.{''}18\times0\rlap.{''}60; PA = 8^\circ$.
173: The noise level achieved in the final image was 23 $\mu$Jy beam$^{-1}$.
174:
175: The 3.6-cm wavelength archive data was taken on 2003 September 25
176: and 30 (epoch 2003.74) in very similar conditions to those of the new observations
177: and the resulting beam was $1\rlap.{''}17\times0\rlap.{''}64; PA = 11^\circ$. This old data set
178: is described in Rodr\'\i guez et al. (2005). These data were cross-calibrated in phase and amplitude
179: using the 2006.42 epoch as the model, which serves
180: to globally minimize the differences in positions and flux densities of the sources. The absolute flux
181: density error is estimated to be 10\%.
182: % and we have adjusted the amplitude of the 2003.74 by a factor of
183: % 0.91 to minimize the flux density differences between the
184: % two epochs for as many sources as possible. The flux densities for 2003.74 listed in Table 1
185: % are corrected by this factor. In Figure 1 we compare the flux densities of all sources
186: % for the two epochs from Table 1, where it can be seen that, with the exception
187: % of the jet and S-1, they are consistent with no variability.
188: % The jet and S-1 show evidence of a
189: % small increment between 2003 and 2006.
190:
191: \section{Results and Discussion}
192:
193: To allow a more reliable comparison between the two epochs, both
194: images were convolved to the same angular resolution
195: ($1\rlap.{''}20\times0\rlap.{''}65; PA = 9^\circ$).
196: To improve the relative gain
197: calibration between the two epochs we examined the relative strengths
198: of the 13 sources we identified in the images. It is clear that the
199: ratios of the flux densities of all the sources except S-1 and N-1
200: had the
201: same constant value of 0.91$\pm$0.02. Hence, we adjusted the flux scale
202: of the first epoch by this relative gain factor. Figure 1 shows the
203: corrected ratio of the flux densities of all the sources. The reduced
204: $\chi^2$ of the estimate of the gain constant is 0.76, which suggests
205: that the flux density errors may be slightly overestimated by about
206: 15 percent. Since the $\chi^2$ is close to unity we conclude that there
207: is no evidence for variability among the 11 sources, whereas the
208: changes in flux densities of S-1 and the jet are highly significant.
209: Figure 2 shows contour images of the emission observed at
210: 8.46 GHz in the two epochs, as well as the difference image
211: (2006.42 - 2003.74). The positions, flux densities, and deconvolved angular sizes of the sources
212: identified in Fig. 2 are given in Table 1.
213: %In Table
214: %1, we present the sources that are along the major axis of the outflow
215: %(interpreted to be the jet and knots along the outflow),
216: %while in Table 2, we present the sources that are away from
217: %the major axis of the outflow (interpreted as independent stars in the field).
218: The observed parameters for each component were determined from a
219: linearized least-squares fit to a Gaussian ellipsoid function using the task
220: JMFIT of AIPS. In Table 2
221: we summarize the parameters of the proper motions of all sources in the field,
222: derived from differences of the positions in the two epochs. Note that the position of the jet
223: changes slightly between the epochs by about 6 mas in each coordinate ($\sim3\sigma$). We do not
224: attach any significance to this shift. If we aligned the jet positions, the proper motions listed in
225: Table 2 would change by about 2 mas yr$^{-1}$. This amount is insignificant and does not change any of our conclusions.
226:
227: We note that the faint features that appear marginally detected at the 4-$\sigma$ level in the images of
228: the individual epochs (for example, some faint structures to the west of the central source in the 2006.42 image), do
229: not appear in the difference image, since this is about $\sqrt{2}$ noisier than the individual images.
230:
231: As already discussed by Rodr\'\i guez et al. (2005), the lobes
232: first observed by Garay et al. (2003) break into
233: several components. A more careful examination of
234: the 2003 map in conjunction with the 2006 map shows that there are two
235: other components present in the northern lobe
236: (components N-4 and N-5; see Table 1 and Figure 2), as well as two additional
237: field sources (sources D and E, see Table 1).
238:
239: In this section we will discuss the sources individually when
240: new information was found, and in the
241: following section we focus on the search for variability and proper motions. Most of the interpretation is
242: in the context of a jet and bipolar outflow. The position angle of the jet is $-16\pm1^{\circ}$, whereas the
243: PA of the CO lobes is about $-6^{\circ}$ and the PA of the line joining N-1 and S-1 is $-16^{\circ}$. We adopt
244: a nominal angle for the jet outflow of $-16^{\circ}$.
245:
246: \subsection{The central jet source}
247:
248: An important difference with respect to the analysis of
249: Rodr\'\i guez et al. (2005) is that we recognize the presence of a compact source
250: (source D) very close to the jet source (see Fig. 2), about
251: $1\rlap.{''}2$ to its NW. To obtain the parameters
252: of the jet and of source D separately we fitted simultaneously two Gaussian ellipsoids
253: to this region of the image. The jet parameters for the two epochs discussed are
254: given in Table 1. We note that the consideration of source D in the fitting procedure
255: results in somewhat smaller deconvolved dimensions for the minor axis of the jet
256: than obtained in Rodr\'\i guez et al.~(2005).
257: We assume that the
258: opening angle of the thermal jet is the angle subtended
259: by the deconvolved minor axis at a distance of one-half the
260: deconvolved major axis (Eisl\"offel et al. 2000).
261: Using the average of the deconvolved angular dimensions given in Table 1,
262: we then estimate the opening angle of the thermal
263: jet to be $\sim$15$^\circ$ (as opposed to the
264: value of $\sim$25$^\circ$ derived by Rodr\'\i guez et al.),
265: indicating significant collimation in this massive protostar. This result suggests that jets
266: from high mass young stars can be as collimated as those found in lower mass objects, where HST studies
267: indicate opening angles in the range of tens of degrees in scales of tens of AU from the star (Ray et al. 2007). On
268: larger physical scales the optical jets from low mass young stars are known to show recollimation, resulting
269: in opening angles of a few degrees (Ray et al. 2007). This recollimation is not evident in the thermal
270: radio jets, which are usually detected only close to the star.
271:
272: \subsection{The northern lobe}
273:
274: As noted before, we identify two additional components (N-4 and N-5) in this lobe,
275: indicating an almost continuous sequence of knots between the central jet and
276: the outermost N-1 component (see Fig. 2).
277: The sequence of five knots, N-1 to N-5, shows a gentle monotonic curvature that may be indicative of
278: precession (see Section 5). Four of the five knots are resolved angularly, and it is interesting to
279: note that all four have position angles consistent with $\sim$$160^\circ \pm 10^\circ$.
280: This result suggests that they are part of the northern outflow.
281: This orientation does not seem to be valid for component S-1, as discussed in the
282: next subsection.
283: The N-1 and N-2 continuum components are the only ones in the whole region that appear to
284: be associated with class I methanol masers (Voronkov et al. 2006).
285:
286:
287: \subsection{The southern lobe}
288:
289: Only the component S-1 is clearly resolved, but in contrast to
290: the components of the northern lobe that have
291: intrinsic position angles consistent with $\sim$$160^\circ \pm 10^\circ$,
292: the southern lobe's intrinsic
293: position angle is $\sim$$40^\circ$.
294: % (its position angle with respect
295: % to the jet is $\sim$$164^\circ$).
296: The misalignment between the intrinsic
297: position angle of S-1 and the outflow axis, suggests that
298: more than part of the main jet body, S-1 could be its working surface
299: (e.g., Chakrabarti 1988)
300: to the south. As we will see below, the time variability of this component
301: could support this interpretation. On the other hand, the presence of
302: an additional component (S-2) downstream suggests that our interpretation
303: of S-1 as a working surface may be incorrect, or that S-2 is an independent
304: source associated with a star. The fact that S-2 is unresolved is consistent with this interpretation.
305:
306: \subsection{Source A}
307:
308: This source is clearly resolved.
309: %Of the five sources found away from the outflow axis, source A
310: %is the only one that is clearly resolved.
311: It appears to be part of
312: a diffuse region of emission that connects with the brighter component
313: of the northern lobe.
314: Source A could actually be part of the outflow, either if the outflow
315: is less collimated and the ionized gas preferentially highlights regions where the flow is
316: interacting with dense ambient material or if source
317: A is part of the northern flow being deflected to the east
318: by interaction with a dense clump of gas. The second possibility
319: is interesting and it may be related to the fact that components N1 and N2
320: are the only ones in the region showing methanol maser emission.
321: It is possible that the methanol maser emission is being stimulated by the deflection of
322: the jet, as it interacts with N1 and N2. Finally, the position of source A
323: could be understood if the
324: outflow has precession (see discussion in Section 5). High angular
325: resolution observations of a tracer of dense molecular gas are needed to advance our understanding of this source.
326:
327: \subsection{Source D}
328:
329: Source D is the faint source located $1\rlap.{''}2$ to the NW of the jet,
330: and first identified as an independent source here. It is unresolved angularly and may probably
331: trace an independent star. In the 2006.42 image, it shows a faint extension to the west.
332:
333: \subsection{Source E}
334:
335: Source E is a barely detected source located about $10''$ to the
336: east of the core of IRAS 16547-4247. It is located outside of the
337: region shown in Figure 2, and is unresolved in angular size.
338: A contour image of this source is shown in Figure 3. The \sl a priori \rm
339: probability of finding a 3.6 cm background source with a flux density
340: of $\sim$0.14 mJy (the average flux density of the two epochs)
341: in a solid angle of $20'' \times 20''$ is only
342: $\sim$0.003 (Windhorst et al.~1993). We conclude that
343: this radio source most
344: probably traces a young star embedded in this region.
345:
346: \section{Search for variation and proper motions}
347:
348: Analysis of Figure 2 and Table 1 indicates that significant
349: flux density or morphological variations
350: are observed only in three sources: the jet source, N-1, and S-1.
351: This is not unexpected, since these are the three brightest sources in the field
352: and small variations in position or flux density are not evident in weaker sources
353: where the signal-to-noise ratio is much smaller.
354: In the case of N-1 the variation is only in position since the flux density
355: remained constant and the flux density variations are evident only
356: for the jet source and S-1.
357: We will discuss our interpretation
358: of the observed variabilities and proper motions in the following subsections.
359:
360:
361: \subsection{The central jet source and source S-1}
362:
363: The jet source seems to have increased its flux density by about 10\% between the
364: two epochs (see Table 1 and Figure 1). This difference is consistent with the fact that both thermal jets
365: (Rodr\'\i guez et al. 2001; Galv\'an-Madrid, Avila, \& Rodr\'\i guez 2004) and HH knots (Rodr\'\i guez et
366: al. 2000) can show small but statistically significant flux density variations on scales of years or
367: even months. The difference image (Figure 4)
368: suggests that the increase in emission comes from two discrete positions.
369: One increase (of about 0.8 mJy) is unresolved and associated with the central source and
370: we attribute it to an increase in mass loss at the core of the jet. The second
371: increase (of about 0.4 mJy) comes from an unresolved component
372: clearly displaced to the SE, and located at $\alpha(2000) = 16^h~ 58^m~ 17\rlap.^s2446 \pm
373: 0\rlap.^s0033; \delta(2000) = -42^\circ~ 52'~ 08\rlap.^{''}354 \pm 0\rlap.^{''}067$,
374: at $1\rlap.{''}3$ from the center of the jet.
375: The OH maser emission detected by Caswell (1998) is
376: close to the unresolved component associated with this second
377: increase.
378: We can think of three interpretations for this localized flux density increase.
379: One is that we are observing a time-variable source powered by an independent star.
380: There are two arguments against this interpretation: the first is that the sources
381: in this region in general show little variation (see Table 1) and the
382: second is that the source
383: lies exactly in the path of the outflow, suggesting
384: a relation with the jet. This latter fact suggests a second interpretation:
385: we are seeing a discrete, new ejecta from the jet. This interpretation, on its turn, has
386: several difficulties. The first is that, while a similar phenomenon was observed and monitored
387: in the jet associated with HH~80-81 (Mart\'\i, Rodr\'\i guez, \& Reipurth 1995;
388: 1998), in this source the ejection
389: was clearly bipolar, while in IRAS~16547-4247 we would have to consider a monopolar
390: ejection. The second problem is related to the large velocity required for
391: the ejection to move over $1\rlap.{''}3$ in 2.68 years or less, that at a
392: distance of 2.9 kpc implies the unlikely velocity of $\sim10^4$~km~s$^{-1}$
393: or more. Finally, a third possibility is that we are observing the brightening
394: of the jet flow as it interacts with dense gas in its path.
395: Observations of higher angular resolution are required to disentangle
396: the nature of the variations seen in the jet source.
397: Unfortunately, the present observations are the best that it can
398: be done now and possibly for decades (until completion of the Square Kilometer
399: Array). The source can be observed, but with lower angular resolution, with
400: ATCA (as already done) but it cannot be observed from the latitude
401: of the future e-MERLIN. Finally, the emission is thermal and not easily detectable with VLBI arrays.
402:
403: The source S-1 is the one with the largest flux density variation, with an increase of
404: $\sim$40\% (see Figure 1 and Table 1) between the two epochs.
405: We believe that this large increase is related
406: to our suggestion that S-1 may be a working surface of the jet, where
407: kinetic energy is rapidly being dissipated and changes are expected.
408:
409:
410: \subsection{Lack of Proper Motions Along the Jet Axis}
411:
412: The proper motions of the prominent components N-1 and S-1
413: along the nominal jet axis of $-16^\circ$ are $-2 \pm 5$ and
414: $-3 \pm 2$ mas yr$^{-1}$, respectively. These motions correspond
415: to inward motions of 28 and 42 km s$^{-1}$, respectively, and
416: are not statistically significant. The weighted average
417: radial motion of all the components is $5.0 \pm 2.5$ mas yr$^{-1}$, corresponding
418: to $70 \pm 40$ km s$^{-1}$. We adopt a conservative 4-$\sigma$ upper limit on the proper motion
419: of 160 km s$^{-1}$. This upper limit is not very stringent, but
420: certainly indicates that the IRAS~16547-4247 lobes are not moving as fast as the
421: knots observed in the jets associated with the massive
422: young stars HH~80-81 and Cep A HW2, where velocities in the plane of the sky of
423: $\sim$500 km s$^{-1}$ have been reported (Mart\'\i, Rodr\'\i guez, \& Reipurth 1998; Curiel et al. 2006).
424:
425: \subsection{Proper Motions in the Direction Transverse to the Jet Axis}
426:
427: The only components that show transverse motions to the nominal
428: jet direction of $-16$ degrees above the 4-$\sigma$ level are N-1 and S-1 (see Table 2). These motions
429: are $-13 \pm 3$ and $-16 \pm 2$~mas~yr$^{-1}$,
430: corresponding to clockwise transverse motions of $180 \pm 40$ and $220 \pm 30$
431: km s$^{-1}$, respectively. The discovery of transverse (clockwise)
432: motion, with no radial motion, was unexpected.
433:
434: The total flux density of component N-1 hardly changed,
435: and the difference images shown in Figures 2 and 5
436: clearly show the negative-positive residuals characteristic of
437: a moving source with constant flux density.
438: In contrast, the negative-positive signature of proper motion
439: is not present in the case of S-1 (see Figures 2 and 6) because
440: during the same period there was the strong brightening
441: previously discussed
442: that dominated the difference image.
443:
444:
445: \section{A Precession Model for IRAS 16547-4247}
446:
447: We believe that it may be possible to understand the distribution of almost
448: all the identified sources as well as the clockwise
449: precession as the result of ejecta from a precessing jet of
450: stellar origin. The gently curved and antisymmetric distribution
451: of the radio components strongly suggests such a model. The basic idea is that the jet
452: itself is not observed directly (because of the lack of radial motion in the outflow).
453: Rather the observed sources are the result of the jet interacting with the ambient medium. We describe this model in
454: simple empirical terms. We assume that the axis of symmetry is along the
455: N-S direction and that the position angle (measured East of North) of
456: the precession axis is given by
457: $$\theta \sim\, \theta_m \,\sin(\omega t) - \theta _0~,~~~~~~~~ (1)$$
458:
459: \noindent where $\theta_m$ is the amplitude of precession, $\omega$ is the precession rate and
460: $\theta_0$ is the position angle at $t=0$. We assume that the time scale of the observable outflow
461: phenomenon is much shorter than the precession period. Hence, over a short period the precession
462: position angle changes linearly, $$\theta \simeq \theta_m \omega t - \theta_0 = \beta t - \theta_0~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(2)$$
463:
464: \noindent The coordinates in the plane of the sky at the time of our observations, $t$, for
465: the location of gas ejected from the star at time $t_e$ will be
466: $$x(t) = r(t) \, \sin\,\theta_e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(3)$$
467: $$y(t) = r(t)\cos \theta_e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(4)$$
468:
469:
470: \noindent where $\theta_e$ is the precession angle at the time of emission, and $r$
471: is the radial position of the ejecta, $r = v~(t-t_e)$. We assume that the
472: ejection velocity, $v$, is constant. Since $t-t_e = r/v$ we obtain
473: $$x(t) = r\,\sin\,(\frac{\beta r}{v} - \theta_0)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(5)$$
474: $$ y(t) = r\,\cos\,(\frac{\beta r}{v} - \theta_0)~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(6)$$
475:
476: \noindent The prediction of this simple model is that $\theta$ is linearly
477: related to $r$, that is
478:
479: $$ \theta(r) = \beta~r/v - \theta_0. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(7)$$
480:
481: \noindent Figure 7 shows the position angle of each component plotted versus its radial offset from the
482: center of the jet component, which we identify as the origin. Source C deviates from the straight line
483: fit to the data by about 19$^\circ$. We assume that it is not part of the jet, but a separate entity from the
484: jet, perhaps evidence of another nearby star.
485: The straight-line fit of equation 7 to the remaining 9 sources gives parameters,
486: $\theta_0 = -43^\circ \pm 4^\circ$ (the current PA of the jet), and
487: $\alpha = \beta/v = 2.3 \pm 0.4$ degrees/arcsecond. For a distance of 2.9 kpc the value of $\alpha$ in
488: the source frame is 9.2 $\times 10^{-19}$ radians/cm or 2.9 radians/pc. Since the jet seems to be
489: precessing linearly with time, we assume that the precession period is much greater than the time scale of the
490: flow. Note that we cannot solve separately for the
491: precession rate and the ejection velocity. The shape of the jet at the current epoch, as determined by
492: equations 5 and 6, is shown in Figure 8.
493:
494: As noted before only two sources have significant proper motions, N-1 and S-1. Their motions are
495: both in the transverse direction to the direction of the jet, whereas their motions along the jet are
496: insignificant (see Table 2). Hence, we assume that
497: the sources are caused by the interaction of the jet and clumps of ambient material as the jet sweeps across the
498: clumps. In this model, the clumps will have apparent transverse velocities given by
499:
500: $$ v_T = r \beta = r \alpha v~, ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(8)$$
501:
502: \noindent
503: which, with the observed value of $\alpha$, becomes
504:
505: $$ v_T = 0.42 v (r/10")~. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(9)$$
506:
507: \noindent
508: The proper motion measurements of all the sources are listed in Table 2.
509: We believe that the apparent motions of
510: source C could be due to the presence of an additional, time-variable component
511: to the NW of the main component of source C (see Fig. 2).
512: Source N-4 shows proper motions that are slightly below 4-$\sigma$ (see
513: Table 2). However, these marginal proper motions are against the
514: expected flow of the jet and, if real, are probably due to a ``Christmas tree''
515: effect more that to a real motion.
516:
517: The velocity vectors of S-1 and N-1 are nearly transverse to the jet direction, and agree in direction with
518: the sense of precession of the
519: jet (see Fig. 8). These velocities are 180 and 220~km~s$^{-1}$, respectively. Since N-1 and S-1 both have about
520: the same radial distance, we cannot confirm the expected linear trend in transverse velocity with radius predicted
521: by eqn. 8. However, with these two data points we estimate from eqn. 9 that the ejection velocity is
522: $490~\pm~80$~km~s$^{-1}$. If we assume that we are indeed dealing with a working surface, the lack of
523: proper motions ($\leq$160~km~s$^{-1}$) allow us to estimate the ratio between the density
524: of the medium and the density of the jet. Using the
525: formulation of
526: Raga, Rodr\'\i guez, \& Cant\'o (1997),
527: the ratio of ambient medium density, $\rho_a$, to jet density, $\rho_j$, is
528:
529: $${{\rho_a} \over {\rho_j}} = \biggl({{v_j} \over {v_{ws}}} - 1 \biggr)^2,~~~~~~~~~~(10)$$
530:
531: \noindent where $v_j$ and $v_{ws}$ are the jet and working surface velocities, respectively.
532: For a jet velocity of 490~km~s$^{-1}$ and an upper limit of 160~km~s$^{-1}$ for the
533: velocity
534: of the working surface, we obtain $\rho_a/\rho_j \geq$ 4.
535:
536: The precession rate of the jet is $\beta = \alpha v$. Hence with
537: $\alpha = 2.3\pm0.4$ degree/arcsecond, and v = $490\pm80$~km~s$^{-1}$, $\beta = 0.080\pm~0.02$ degrees/year.
538: Note that the measurements
539: of $\alpha$ and v are both 6-$\sigma$ results, but the measurement of $\beta$ is
540: a 4-$\sigma$ result.
541: The precession period of the jet is $T=2 \pi \theta_m/(\alpha v)$, which for a precession opening angle of
542: 30$^\circ$, would be about 5500 years. Since the range in PA among the components is about 25$^{\circ}$
543: (see Fig. 7), the jet travel time to outer components is about 300 years.
544:
545: We might expect that the sources excited by the passing jet would persist after the jet moves on. However, there
546: is no evidence (see Fig. 8) of structure in the transverse direction in any of the sources. This absence of ``trails''
547: suggests that the decay times for emission must be less than $\sim~100$ years, which would produce an extension of 1.5$''$
548: at the radius of sources N-1 and S-1. The recombination time for an H~II region with electron density $n_e$
549: is estimated as
550: %
551: %\begin{equation}\label{rec}
552: %\left(\frac{t}{\mbox{yr}}\right)=1.2\times10^5\left(\frac{n_e}{\mbox{cm}^{-%3}}\right)^{-1}.
553: %\end{equation}
554: %
555: $$\left(\frac{t}{\mbox{yr}}\right)=1.2\times10^5\left(\frac{n_e}{\mbox{cm}^{-3}}\right)^{-1}.~~~~~~(11)$$
556:
557: \noindent The spectral index of N-1 indicates it is probably a thermal
558: optically thin HII region (Rodriguez et~al. 2005). Using the values for the
559: flux density and size in Table~1 we estimate a emission measure of $1.8\times10^6$ cm$^{-6}$ pc$^{-1}$ and the
560: electron density as $n_e=1.1\times10^4$ cm$^{-3}$. Using this value for
561: the electron density in eqn.~(10) we find a recombination time
562: for the N-1 component to be about 11 years. This time is an order of
563: magnitude smaller than that required for the jet to leave an observable transverse trail.
564:
565: For the S-1 source the emission may have a nonthermal component
566: (Rodriguez et~al 2005). The density of relativistic
567: electrons, $n_{er}$, and magnetic field, $B$, can be estimated using
568: eqns.~(2) and (3) from Garay et~al. (1996)
569: %
570: %\begin{equation}
571: $$\left(\frac{B}{\mbox{mG}}\right)=0.50
572: \left(\frac{S_{\nu}}{\mbox{mJy}}\right)^{2/7}
573: \left(\frac{\theta_{s}}{\mbox{arcsec}}\right)^{-6/7}
574: \left(\frac{\nu}{10~\mbox{GHz}}\right)^{1/7}
575: \left(\frac{D}{\mbox{kpc}}\right)^{-2/7}
576: \left(\log\frac{E_{max}}{E_{min}}\right)^{2/7},~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(12)$$
577: %\end{equation}
578: %
579: %\begin{equation}
580: $$\left(\frac{n_{er}E_{min}}{10^{-9}~\mbox{ergs cm}^{-3}}\right)=3.58
581: \left(\frac{S_{\nu}}{\mbox{mJy}}\right)
582: \left(\frac{\theta_{s}}{\mbox{arcsec}}\right)^{-3}
583: \left(\frac{\nu}{10~\mbox{GHz}}\right)^{1/2}
584: \left(\frac{D}{\mbox{kpc}}\right)^{-1}
585: \left(\frac{B}{\mbox{mG}}\right)^{2/7},~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(13)$$
586: %\end{equation}
587: %
588: where $E_{max}$ and $E_{min}$ are the maximum and minimum energies of
589: the relativistic electrons that we assume are $10^{11}$ and $10^{6}$ eV
590: respectively. For the distance $D=2.9$ kpc and $\theta_s=0.76$ arcsec, we get $B=1.4$ mG and a density of
591: relativistic electrons of $n_{er}=4.6\times10^{-3}$
592: cm$^{-3}$. The decay time is given by Krolick (1999) as $t_{d}=1.3\times10^{12}\nu^{-1/2}B^{-3/2}$ sec with
593: $\nu$ in Hz and $B$ in G, or $t_{d}(yr) = 0.5B^{-3/2}$ for our frequency. Using the value derived above for $B$
594: we get $t_{d}=9\times10^4$ yr, which is much too long.
595: A magnetic field of 30 mG would be required to achieve a synchrotron decay time of 100 years.
596:
597: Franco-Hern\'andez et al. (2008,
598: in preparation) have discovered two linear structures traced by water vapor masers on the mas scale.
599: Their g2 group of maser has a PA of about $-30^\circ$, which is 13$^\circ$
600: away from the current PA of the proposed precessing source
601: ($-43^\circ$). Another group of masers (g1) has a position angle of about 50$^\circ$. If these masers
602: were in a disk, their pole PA would
603: be $-40^\circ$, close to the current precession angle. Hence these masers may be associated with the precessing excitation source.
604:
605: The larger scale CO lobes are offset from the jet by about 15{''} along a PA of
606: about $-6^{\circ}$. The line of sight velocity with
607: respect to the ambient cloud is about $\pm$30 km s$^{-1}$. These lobes could also be associated
608: with the precessing source. The expected PA for emission at 15{''} from eqn. (7) would be about $-8^{\circ}$, close to
609: the observed value. If the molecular flow picks up the full jet velocity of 490 km s$^{-1}$, then the inclination
610: would be about 90 -- arctan (30/490), or about 86$^\circ$, very close to the value inferred from the analysis of the
611: velocity structure of the CO lobes (Garay et al 2007). More realistically, the molecular flow velocity will be
612: smaller, implying a smaller inclination angle.
613:
614: The precession model nicely accounts for the fact that the line from N-1 to S-1 does not intercept the
615: known jet. However, if
616: the angle of the driving precessing source is currently $-43^\circ$, it is significantly discrepant with the
617: PA of $-16$ of the known radio jet. A possible explanation for this discrepancy might be that the central source is really
618: a binary stellar system. Source I would be a non-precessing source associated with the known jet, which is related to
619: the large scale CO outflow with about the same PA. Source II would be a precessing source which drives the continuum
620: thermal sources and may be associated with the water masers and also the large scale CO outflow.
621:
622: \section{Putting the IRAS~16547-4247 Jet in Context}
623:
624: How does the IRAS~16547-4247 jet compare with other jets
625: found in regions of star formation? Anglada et al. (1992) have compared
626: the centimeter radio luminosity (taken to be proportional
627: to the flux density times the distance squared, $S_\nu d^2$) of thermal jets associated with
628: low mass young stars with the momentum rate ($\dot P$) in the associated molecular outflow.
629: For 16 sources studied, they conclude that these low mass objects can be fitted with a power law
630: of the form $\dot P = 10^{-2.6} (S_\nu d^2)^{1.1}$, where
631: $\dot P$ is in $M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ km s$^{-1}$, $S_\nu$
632: is in mJy and $d$ is in kpc. In Figure 9, we plot the data used
633: by Anglada et al. (1992). They interpret the fit to be in agreement with a simple model in which the
634: observed ionization is produced by shocks (Curiel, Cant\'o, \& Rodr\'\i guez 1987; Curiel et al. 1989), where
635: about 10\% of the energy in the jet is thermalized. We have plotted in the same figure, the three best studied
636: cases of thermal jets associated with massive young stars: IRAS~16547-4247,
637: HH~80-81, and Cep A HW2, using the data listed in
638: Table 3. Remarkably, these three data points fall reasonably well on the
639: Anglada et al.~correlation. We believe that this agreement suggests that the
640: jets associated with massive young stars may be a scaled-up version of the
641: phenomenon seen in low mass young stars, although
642: a firmer conclusion
643: requires the study of a larger sample of objects than now available. Note that the intrinsic radio luminosity of the
644: IRAS~16547-4247 jet is about $2~\times~ 10^3$ larger than the typical radio luminosity of jets associated with
645: low mass stars, and that it is the most luminous case known.
646:
647: \section{Conclusions}
648:
649: Our main conclusions follow:
650:
651: 1) We present new, sensitive 3.6-cm wavelength VLA observations
652: of the multiple radio source associated with the luminous infrared
653: source IRAS~16547-4247, the most massive example known of a thermal
654: jet found in association with a forming star. The main
655: purposes of these new observations were to
656: search for variability and proper motions as well as to
657: detect additional faint sources in the region.
658: We detected four new components (N-4, N-5, D, and E) in the region;
659:
660: 2) We do not detect proper motions along the
661: axis of the flow in the outer lobes of this source at a
662: 4-$\sigma$ upper limit of $\sim$160~km~s$^{-1}$, suggesting that if
663: these lobes are the working surfaces of the jets and the
664: jet velocity is $\sim$490km~s$^{-1}$, the ambient medium is at
665: least four times as dense as the jet;
666:
667: 3) The brightest components of the lobes, sources N-1 and S-1,
668: show evidence of clockwise precession, at a
669: rate of $0\rlap.^\circ08$ yr$^{-1}$ in the plane of the sky;
670:
671: 4) A precessing model can account for the antisymmetric distribution of most of the sources in the field, as well as
672: for the evidence of precession in
673: sources N-1 and S-1;
674:
675: 5) The thermal jet at the core of the region shows significant variations in flux density and morphology but
676: our angular resolution is insufficient to reach a clear conclusion on what produces
677: these changes; and
678:
679: 6) The correlation found by Anglada et al.~(1992) for outflows and jets
680: in low mass stars extends to the handful of massive forming stars
681: known. This result suggests that the
682: jets associated with massive young stars are a scaled-up version of the phenomenon
683: seen in low mass young stars, although a firmer conclusion
684: requires the study of a larger sample of jets that now available.
685:
686: %\acknowledgments
687: \ack
688:
689: We thank an anonymous referee for valuable comments.
690: LFR acknowledges support from grant CB0702172\_3 of COECyT,
691: Michoac\'an, M\'exico.
692: DM and GG acknowledge
693: support from the Chilean {Centro de Astrof\'\i sica} FONDAP 15010003.
694:
695: \section*{References}
696: %\begin{thebibliography}{}
697: \begin{harvard}
698:
699: \item[] Anglada, G., Rodr\'\i guez, L. F., Cant\'o, J.,
700: Estalella, R., \& Torrelles, J. M. 1992, ApJ, 395, 494
701:
702: \item[] Anglada, G. 1996, in ASP Conf. Ser. 93, Radio
703: Emission from the Stars and the Sun, ed. A. R. Taylor \& J. M. Paredes
704: (San Francisco: ASP), 3
705:
706: \item[] Arce, H. G., Shepherd, D., Gueth, F., Lee, C.-F.,
707: Bachiller, R., Rosen, A., \& Beuther, H.
708: 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, \& K. Keil
709: (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 245
710:
711: %\item[] Bally, J., Heathcote, S., Reipurth, B., Morse, J.,
712: %Hartigan, P., \& Schwartz, R. 2002, AJ, 123, 2627
713:
714: \item[] Bally, J. \& Zinnecker, H. 2005, AJ, 129, 2281
715:
716: \item[] Bonnell, I.~A., Bate, M.~R.,
717: \& Zinnecker, H. 1998, MNRAS, 298, 93
718:
719: \item[] Brand, J. \& Blitz, L. 1993, A\&A, 275, 67
720:
721: \item[] Brooks, K. J., Garay, G., Mardones, D., \&
722: Bronfman, L. 2003, ApJ, 594, L131
723:
724: \item[] Brooks, K. J., Garay, G., Voronkov, M., \& Rodr\'\i guez, L. F.
725: 2007, ApJ, 669, 459
726:
727: \item[] Caswell, J. L. 1998, MNRAS, 297, 215
728:
729: \item[] Cesaroni, R., Galli, D., Lodato, G., Walmsley, C. M., \& Zhang, Q.
730: 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, \& K. Keil
731: (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 197
732:
733: \item[] Chakrabarti, S.~K.\ 1988,
734: MNRAS, 235, 33
735:
736: %\item[] Crusius-W\"atzel, A. R. 1990, ApJ, 361, L49
737:
738: \item[] Curiel, S., Cant\'o, J., \& Rodr\'\i guez, L. F.
739: 1987, RevMexA\&A, 14, 595
740:
741: \item[] Curiel, S., Rodr\'\i guez, L. F.,
742: Bohigas, J., Roth, M., Cant\'o, J., \& Torrelles, J. M.
743: 1989, ApL\&C, 27, 299
744:
745: %\item[] Curiel, S., Rodr\'\i guez, L. F., Moran, J. M., \& Cant\'o, J.
746: %1993, ApJ, 415, 191
747:
748: \item[] Curiel, S., et al. 2006, ApJ, 638, 878
749:
750: \item[] Eisl\"offel, J., Mundt, R., Ray, T. P., \& Rodr\'\i guez, L. F. 2000,
751: in Protostars and Planets IV, ed. V. Mannings, A. P. Boss, \& S. S. Russell
752: (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 815
753:
754: \item[] Forster J. R., \& Caswell J. L., 1989, A\&A, 213, 339
755:
756: \item[] Galv\'an-Madrid, R., Avila, R., \& Rodr\'\i guez, L. F.
757: 2004, RevMexA\&A, 40, 31
758:
759: \item[] Garay, G., Ramirez, S., Rodr\'\i guez, L. F.,
760: Curiel, S., \& Torrelles, J. M. 1996, ApJ, 459, 193
761:
762: \item[] Garay, G., \& Lizano, S. 1999, PASP, 111, 1049
763:
764: \item[] Garay, G., Brooks, K. J., Mardones, D., \& Norris, R. P.
765: 2003, ApJ, 587, 739
766:
767: \item[] Garay, G., Mardones, D., Bronfman, L., Brooks, K.J. Rodr\'\i guez,
768: L.F., G\"usten, R., Nyman, L-{\AA}, Franco-Hern\'andez, R., \& Moran, J.M. 2007,
769: A\&A 463, 217
770:
771:
772: %\item[] G\'omez, Y., Rodr\'\i guez, L. F., \& Garay, G.
773: %2002, ApJ, 571, 901
774:
775: %\item[] Henriksen, R. N., Ptuskin, V. S., \& Mirabel, I. F. 1991, A\&A, 248, 221
776:
777: \item[] Krolik, J. H. 1999, Active galactic nuclei: from the central black hole to the galactic
778: environment (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press)
779:
780: \item[] Mart\'\i. J., Rodr\'\i guez, L. F., \& Reipurth, B. 1993,
781: ApJ, 416, 208
782:
783: \item[] Mart\'\i. J., Rodr\'\i guez, L. F., \& Reipurth, B. 1995,
784: ApJ, 449, 184
785:
786: \item[] Mart\'\i. J., Rodr\'\i guez, L. F., \& Reipurth, B. 1998,
787: ApJ, 502, 337
788:
789: %\item[] Masciadri, E., \& Raga, A. C. 2002, ApJ, 568, 733
790:
791: \item[] Narayanan, G., \& Walker, C. F. 1996, ApJ, 466, 844
792:
793: \item[] Raga, A. C., Rodr\'\i guez, L. F., \& Cant\'o, J. 1997, RMxF, 43, 825
794:
795: \item[] Ray, T., Dougados, C., Bacciotti, F., Eisl\"offel, J., \& Chrysostomou, A.
796: 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, \& K. Keil
797: (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 231
798:
799: %\item[] Reipurth, B., Heathcote, S.,
800: %Morse, J., Hartigan, P., \& Bally, J. 2002, 123, 362
801:
802: %\item[] Reynolds, S. P. 1986, ApJ, 304, 713
803:
804: \item[] Rodr\'\i guez, L. F., Curiel, S., Moran, J. M., Mirabel, I. F.,
805: Roth, M. \& Garay, G. 1989, ApJ, 346, L85
806:
807: \item[] Rodr\'\i guez, L. F. 1997, in
808: Herbig-Haro Flows and the Birth of Low Mass Stars, proceedings
809: of IAU Symp. No. 182, eds. B. Reipurth \& C. Bertout, p. 83
810: (Dordrecht: Kluwer)
811:
812: \item[] Rodr\'\i guez, L. F., Delgado-Arellano, V. G.,
813: G\'omez, Y., Reipurth, B., Torrelles, J. M., Noriega-Crespo, A., Raga, A. C., \&
814: Cant\'o, J. 2000, AJ, 119, 882
815:
816: \item[] Rodr\'\i guez, L. F., Torrelles, J. M., Anglada, G., \& Mart\'\i,
817: J. 2001, RevMexA\&A, 37, 95
818:
819: %\item[] Rodr\'\i guez, L. F., Porras, A., Claussen M. J.,
820: %Curiel, S., Wilner, D. J., \& Ho, P. T. P. 2003, ApJ, 586, L139
821:
822: \item[] Rodr\'\i guez, L. F., Garay, G., Brooks, K. J., \&
823: Mardones, D. 2005, ApJ, 626, 953
824:
825: \item[] Shu, F. H., Adams, F. C., \& Lizano, S. 1987,
826: ARA\&A, 25, 23
827:
828: \item[] Stahler, S.~W., Palla, F., \& Ho, P.~T.~P. in Protostars and
829: Planets IV (eds. Mannings, V., Boss, A.P. \& Russell, S. S.), 327
830: (University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 2000)
831:
832: \item[] Stark, A. A., \& Brand, J. 1989, ApJ, 339, 763
833:
834: \item[] Voronkov, M. A., Brooks, K. J., Sobolev, A. M., Ellingsen, S. P.,
835: Ostrovskii, A. B. \& Caswell, J. L. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 411
836:
837: %\item[] Wilner, D. J., Reid, M. J., \& Menten, K. M. 1999, ApJ, 513, 775
838:
839: \item[] Windhorst, R. A., Fomalont, E. B., Partridge, R. B., \&
840: Lowenthal, J. D. 1993, ApJ, 405, 498
841:
842: \item[] Yamashita, T., Suzuki, H., Kaifu, N., Tamura, M., Mountain, C. M., \&
843: Moore, T. J. T. 1989, ApJ, 347, 894
844:
845: %\end{thebibliography}
846: \end{harvard}
847:
848: \clearpage
849:
850: \begin{figure}
851: %\epsscale{0.5}
852: \begin{center}
853: \includegraphics[scale=0.7, angle=0]{f1.eps}
854: \end{center}
855: \caption{Ratio of 2006 to 2003 flux densities versus the
856: logarithm of the 2003 flux density, given in mJy. Only the jet and source
857: S-1 show clear evidence of variability between the two epochs.
858: \label{fig1}}
859: \end{figure}
860:
861: \begin{figure}
862: %\epsscale{0.5}
863: \begin{center}
864: \includegraphics[scale=0.45, angle=90]{f2.eps}
865: \end{center}
866: \caption{VLA contour images at 8.46 GHz towards
867: IRAS~16547-4247 for epochs 2003.74 (left) and 2006.42 (center),
868: as well as the difference image (2006.42 - 2003.74).
869: Contours are -25, -20, -15, -10, -8, -6, -5, -4, 4, 5,
870: 6, 8, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 60, 100, 140, 160, and 200 times
871: 27 $\mu$Jy beam$^{-1}$ for the 2003.74 and 2006.42 images
872: (the average value of the rms noises of the two images)
873: and 38 $\mu$Jy beam$^{-1}$ for the difference image
874: (the rms noise of this last image).
875: The half power contour of the synthesized beams
876: ($1\rlap.{''}20 \times 0\rlap.{''}65$; PA = $9^\circ$)
877: is shown in the bottom left corner of each panel.
878: The individual sources are identified
879: in the 2003.74 image.
880: \label{fig2}}
881: \end{figure}
882:
883:
884: \clearpage
885:
886: \begin{figure}
887: %\epsscale{0.5}
888: \begin{center}
889: \includegraphics[scale=0.6, angle=0]{f3.eps}
890: \end{center}
891: \caption{VLA contour images at 8.46 GHz of
892: the source E, made from the average of both epochs
893: (2003.74 and 2006.42).
894: Contours are -4, 4, 5, and 6 times
895: 18 $\mu$Jy beam$^{-1}$,
896: the rms noise of the image.
897: The half power contour of the synthesized beam
898: is as in Fig. 2.
899: \label{fig3}}
900: \end{figure}
901:
902:
903: \clearpage
904:
905: \begin{figure}
906: %\epsscale{1.0}
907: \begin{center}
908: \includegraphics[scale=0.35, angle=90]{f4.eps}
909: \end{center}
910: \caption{VLA contour images at 8.46 GHz towards
911: the jet in
912: IRAS~16547-4247 for epochs 2003.74 (left) and 2006.42 (center),
913: as well as the difference image (2006.42 - 2003.74).
914: Contours are -25, -20, -15, -10, -8, -6, -5, -4, 4, 5,
915: 6, 8, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 60, 100, 140, 160, and 200 times
916: 27 $\mu$Jy beam$^{-1}$ for the 2003.74 and 2006.42 images
917: and 38 $\mu$Jy beam$^{-1}$ for the difference image.
918: The half power contour of the synthesized beams
919: ($1\rlap.{''}20 \times 0\rlap.{''}65$; PA = $9^\circ$)
920: is shown in the bottom right corner.
921: The cross marks the peak position of
922: the jet as determined from the average of the two positions given
923: in Table 1.
924: Individual sources are identified
925: in the 2003.74 image.
926: \label{fig4}}
927: \end{figure}
928:
929: \clearpage
930:
931: \begin{figure}
932: %\epsscale{1.0}
933: \begin{center}
934: \includegraphics[scale=0.35, angle=90]{f5.eps}
935: \end{center}
936: \caption{VLA contour images at 8.46 GHz towards
937: the component N-1 in
938: IRAS~16547-4247 for epochs 2003.74 (left) and 2006.42 (center),
939: as well as the difference image (2006.42 - 2003.74).
940: Contours are -25, -20, -15, -10, -8, -6, -5, -4, 4, 5,
941: 6, 8, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 60, 100, 140, 160, and 200 times
942: 27 $\mu$Jy beam$^{-1}$ for the 2003.74 and 2006.42 images
943: and 38 $\mu$Jy beam$^{-1}$ for the difference image.
944: The half power contour of the synthesized beams
945: ($1\rlap.{''}20 \times 0\rlap.{''}65$; PA = $9^\circ$)
946: is shown in the bottom right corner.
947: Individual sources are identified
948: in the 2003.74 image.
949: \label{fig5}}
950: \end{figure}
951:
952: \clearpage
953:
954: \begin{figure}
955: %\epsscale{1.0}
956: \begin{center}
957: \includegraphics[scale=0.35, angle=90]{f6.eps}
958: \end{center}
959: \caption{VLA contour images at 8.46 GHz towards
960: the component S-1 in
961: IRAS~16547-4247 for epochs 2003.74 (left) and 2006.42 (center),
962: as well as the difference image (2006.42 - 2003.74).
963: Contours are -25, -20, -15, -10, -8, -6, -5, -4, 4, 5,
964: 6, 8, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 60, 100, 140, 160, and 200 times
965: 27 $\mu$Jy beam$^{-1}$ for the 2003.74 and 2006.42 images
966: and 38 $\mu$Jy beam$^{-1}$ for the difference image.
967: The half power contour of the synthesized beams
968: ($1\rlap.{''}20 \times 0\rlap.{''}65$; PA = $9^\circ$)
969: is shown in the bottom right corner.
970: Individual sources are identified
971: in the 2003.74 image.
972: \label{fig6}}
973: \end{figure}
974:
975: \clearpage
976:
977: \begin{figure}
978: %\epsscale{1.0}
979: \begin{center}
980: \includegraphics[scale=0.75, angle=0]{f7.eps}
981: \end{center}
982: \caption{Position angle of the jet components as a function
983: of radial offset from the jet center.
984: The components south of the jet have been folded by 180$^\circ$
985: in this figure.
986: The dashed line is the linear least squares fit to the components,
987: with the exception of source C, that is taken to be an
988: independent star.
989: \label{fig7}}
990: \end{figure}
991:
992: \begin{figure}
993: %\epsscale{1.0}
994: \begin{center}
995: \includegraphics[scale=0.75, angle=0]{f8.eps}
996: \end{center}
997: \caption{VLA contour image at 8.46 GHz towards
998: IRAS~16547-4247 for epoch 2003.74.
999: Contours and beam are as in Figure 2.
1000: The solid line indicates the position of the spiral model
1001: discussed in the text. The arrows indicate the proper motions
1002: of components N-1 and S-1 for a period of 300 years.
1003: \label{fig8}}
1004: \end{figure}
1005:
1006: \begin{figure}
1007: %\epsscale{1.0}
1008: \begin{center}
1009: \includegraphics[scale=0.75, angle=0]{f9.eps}
1010: \end{center}
1011: \caption{Momentum rate in the molecular outflow, $\dot P$,
1012: versus the radio flux density times distance squared,
1013: $S_\nu d^2$. The solid dots are the 16 low mass young stars from
1014: the study of Anglada et al.~(1992). We have included three
1015: high mass young stars (solid triangles, see also labels
1016: in figure) from this paper as well as from
1017: the references given in Table 3. The dashed line is the fit of
1018: Anglada et al.~(1992) to the low mass young stars. The
1019: high mass young stars fall reasonably well on the correlation,
1020: suggesting a common nature for thermal jets associated with
1021: low and high mass young stars.
1022: \label{fig9}}
1023: \end{figure}
1024:
1025:
1026:
1027:
1028: \clearpage
1029: %\begin{verbatim}
1030: \begin{table}
1031: \small
1032: %\tabletypesize{\small}
1033: %
1034: %\tablecolumns{5}
1035: %\tablewidth{0pc}
1036: \caption{Observed 3.6 cm parameters of sources in the field \label{tab1}}
1037: %\begin{indented}
1038: %\lineup
1039: %\tablehead{
1040: %\colhead{Component} &
1041: %\colhead{$\alpha$(2000)\tablenotemark{a}} &
1042: %\colhead{$\delta$(2000)\tablenotemark{a}} &
1043: %\colhead{S$_\nu$\tablenotemark{b}} &
1044: %\colhead{Deconvolved Size\tablenotemark{c}} \\
1045: %\colhead{(Epoch)} &
1046: %\colhead{($16^h~58^m$)} &
1047: %\colhead{($-42^\circ$)} &
1048: %\colhead{(mJy)} &
1049: %\colhead{} \\
1050: %}
1051: %\item[]
1052: \begin{tabular}{@{}lllll}
1053: %\begin{tabular}{@{}lllll}
1054: %\item[]\begin{tabular}{lllll}
1055: \br
1056: Component & $\alpha$(2000)$^{\rm a}$ & $\delta$(2000)$^{\rm a}$ & S$_\nu^{\rm b}$ & \cr
1057: \ns
1058: (Epoch) & ($16^h~58^m$) & ($-42^\circ$) & (mJy) & Deconvolved Size$^{\rm c}$ \cr
1059: \mr
1060: %\startdata
1061: %\cutinhead{Central jet source}
1062: %\cutinhead{North lobe}
1063: A(2003) & 17$\rlap.^s$0597$\pm$0.0077 & 51$'$ 55$\rlap.{''}$039$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$240 &
1064: 1.58$\pm$0.23 &
1065: 4\rlap.{''}2$\pm$0\rlap.{''}6$\times$1\rlap.{''}2$\pm$0\rlap.{''}2;
1066: 9$^\circ \pm$4$^\circ$ \\
1067: A(2006) & 17$\rlap.^s$0641$\pm$0.0072 & 51$'$ 55$\rlap.{''}$212$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$205 &
1068: 1.60$\pm$0.20 &
1069: 4\rlap.{''}1$\pm$0\rlap.{''}5$\times$1\rlap.{''}5$\pm$0\rlap.{''}2;
1070: 4$^\circ \pm$5$^\circ$ \\
1071: \hline
1072: N-1(2003) & 16$\rlap.^s$8165$\pm$0.0005 & 51$'$ 57$\rlap.{''}$048$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$011 &
1073: $2.86\pm0.07$ &
1074: 1\rlap.{''}06$\pm$0\rlap.{''}04$\times$0\rlap.{''}31$\pm$0\rlap.{''}05;
1075: 163$^\circ \pm$3$^\circ$ \\
1076: N-1(2006) & 16$\rlap.^s$8136$\pm$0.0004 & 51$'$ 57$\rlap.{''}$060$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$009 &
1077: $2.85\pm0.06$ &
1078: 1\rlap.{''}15$\pm$0\rlap.{''}03$\times$0\rlap.{''}23$\pm$0\rlap.{''}08;
1079: 156$^\circ \pm$2$^\circ$ \\
1080: \hline
1081: N-2(2003) & 16$\rlap.^s$8706$\pm$0.0015 & 51$'$ 58$\rlap.{''}$339$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$028 &
1082: $2.35\pm0.10$ &
1083: 1\rlap.{''}65$\pm$0\rlap.{''}09$\times$0\rlap.{''}80$\pm$0\rlap.{''}08;
1084: 162$^\circ \pm$5$^\circ$ \\
1085: N-2(2006) & 16$\rlap.^s$8669$\pm$0.0011 & 51$'$ 58$\rlap.{''}$249$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$019 &
1086: $2.24\pm0.07$ &
1087: 1\rlap.{''}47$\pm$0\rlap.{''}07$\times$0\rlap.{''}76$\pm$0\rlap.{''}07;
1088: 151$^\circ \pm$5$^\circ$ \\
1089: \hline
1090: N-3(2003) & 16$\rlap.^s$9142$\pm$0.0021 & 52$'$ 00$\rlap.{''}$776$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$061 &
1091: $1.82\pm0.12$
1092: & 2\rlap.{''}52$\pm$0\rlap.{''}17$\times$0\rlap.{''}62$\pm$0\rlap.{''}10;
1093: 168$^\circ \pm$3$^\circ$ \\
1094: N-3(2006) & 16$\rlap.^s$9114$\pm$0.0022 & 52$'$ 00$\rlap.{''}$921$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$052 &
1095: $1.76\pm0.10$
1096: & 2\rlap.{''}52$\pm$0\rlap.{''}14$\times$0\rlap.{''}78$\pm$0\rlap.{''}09;
1097: 162$^\circ \pm$3$^\circ$ \\
1098: \hline
1099: E(2003) & 18$\rlap.^s$2348$\pm$0.0080 & 52$'$ 02$\rlap.{''}$183$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$115 &
1100: 0.16$\pm$0.05 &
1101: $ \leq 1\rlap.{''}2^{\rm d}$ \\
1102: E(2006) & 18$\rlap.^s$2128$\pm$0.0044 & 52$'$ 02$\rlap.{''}$319$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$106 &
1103: 0.12$\pm$0.04 &
1104: $ \leq 1\rlap.{''}1^{\rm d}$ \\
1105: \hline
1106: N-4(2003) & 16$\rlap.^s$9645$\pm$0.0061 & 52$'$ 02$\rlap.{''}$650$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$164 &
1107: $0.87\pm0.14$
1108: & 2\rlap.{''}66$\pm$0\rlap.{''}43$\times$0\rlap.{''}88$\pm$0\rlap.{''}27;
1109: 171$^\circ \pm$9$^\circ$ \\
1110: N-4(2006) & 16$\rlap.^s$9851$\pm$0.0033 & 52$'$ 03$\rlap.{''}$286$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$092 &
1111: $0.86\pm0.09$
1112: & 2\rlap.{''}40$\pm$0\rlap.{''}25$\times$0\rlap.{''}71$\pm$0\rlap.{''}16;
1113: 170$^\circ \pm$5$^\circ$ \\
1114: \hline
1115: N-5(2003) & 17$\rlap.^s$0764$\pm$0.0053 & 52$'$ 04$\rlap.{''}$881$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$079 &
1116: $0.27\pm0.06$
1117: & $\leq 1\rlap.{''}0^{\rm d}$ \\
1118: N-5(2006) & 17$\rlap.^s$0715$\pm$0.0024 & 52$'$ 04$\rlap.{''}$737$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$046 &
1119: $0.30\pm0.04$
1120: & $\leq 0\rlap.{''}7^{\rm d}$ \\
1121: \hline
1122: D(2003) & 17$\rlap.^s$1265$\pm$0.0016 & 52$'$ 06$\rlap.{''}$840$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$031 &
1123: 0.50$\pm$0.03 &
1124: $ \leq 0\rlap.{''}7^{\rm d}$ \\
1125: D(2006) & 17$\rlap.^s$1211$\pm$0.0012 & 52$'$ 06$\rlap.{''}$833$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$023 &
1126: 0.48$\pm$0.02 &
1127: $ \leq 0\rlap.{''}6^{\rm d}$ \\
1128: \hline
1129: Jet(2003) & 17$\rlap.^s$2097$\pm$0.0001 & 52$'$ 07$\rlap.{''}$142$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$003 &
1130: 10.4$\pm$0.1 &
1131: 1\rlap.{''}21$\pm$0\rlap.{''}01$\times$0\rlap.{''}15$\pm$0\rlap.{''}03;
1132: 165$^\circ \pm$1$^\circ$ \\
1133: Jet(2006) & 17$\rlap.^s$2093$\pm$0.0001 & 52$'$ 07$\rlap.{''}$150$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$002 &
1134: 11.3$\pm$0.1 &
1135: 1\rlap.{''}20$\pm$0\rlap.{''}01$\times$0\rlap.{''}14$\pm$0\rlap.{''}02;
1136: 163$^\circ \pm$1$^\circ$ \\
1137: \hline
1138: B(2003) & 17$\rlap.^s$3946$\pm$0.0013 & 52$'$ 09$\rlap.{''}$675$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$019 &
1139: 0.81$\pm$0.06 &
1140: $ \leq 0\rlap.{''}6^{\rm d}$ \\
1141: B(2006) & 17$\rlap.^s$3904$\pm$0.0009 & 52$'$ 09$\rlap.{''}$732$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$015 &
1142: 0.85$\pm$0.04 &
1143: $ \leq 0\rlap.{''}5^{\rm d}$ \\
1144: \hline
1145: C(2003) & 17$\rlap.^s$6549$\pm$0.0010 & 52$'$ 12$\rlap.{''}$150$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$018 &
1146: 1.10$\pm$0.06 &
1147: $ \leq 0\rlap.{''}6^{\rm d}$ \\
1148: C(2006) & 17$\rlap.^s$6603$\pm$0.0007 & 52$'$ 12$\rlap.{''}$221$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$012 &
1149: 0.97$\pm$0.04 &
1150: $ \leq 0\rlap.{''}5^{\rm d}$ \\
1151: \hline
1152: %\cutinhead{South lobe}
1153: S-1(2003) & 17$\rlap.^s$4519$\pm$0.0004 & 52$'$ 16$\rlap.{''}$301$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$006 &
1154: $3.65\pm0.06$ &
1155: 0\rlap.{''}59$\pm$0\rlap.{''}04$\times$0\rlap.{''}40$\pm$0\rlap.{''}05;
1156: 51$^\circ \pm$9$^\circ$ \\
1157: S-1(2006) & 17$\rlap.^s$4556$\pm$0.0002 & 52$'$ 16$\rlap.{''}$284$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$003 &
1158: $4.97\pm0.05$ &
1159: 0\rlap.{''}66$\pm$0\rlap.{''}02$\times$0\rlap.{''}38$\pm$0\rlap.{''}02;
1160: 35$^\circ \pm$4$^\circ$ \\
1161: \hline
1162: S-2(2003) & 17$\rlap.^s$5481$\pm$0.0013 & 52$'$ 18$\rlap.{''}$113$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$031 &
1163: 0.63$\pm$0.06 &
1164: $ \leq 0\rlap.{''}7^{\rm d}$ \\
1165: S-2(2006) & 17$\rlap.^s$5473$\pm$0.0011 & 52$'$ 18$\rlap.{''}$210$\pm$0$\rlap.{''}$026 &
1166: 0.69$\pm$0.05 &
1167: $ \leq 0\rlap.{''}8^{\rm d}$ \\
1168:
1169:
1170: %\enddata
1171: \br
1172: \end{tabular}
1173: $^{\rm a}$ Peak position. Right ascension ($\alpha$) given in hours,
1174: minutes, and seconds, and declination ($\delta$), given in degrees, arcmins,
1175: and arcsecs. The errors given are formal statistical errors. The absolute
1176: positional error of the images are estimated to be 0$\rlap .{''}$2
1177: in right ascension and 0$\rlap .{''}$5 in declination.
1178: The sources are listed in order of decreasing declination.
1179:
1180: $^{\rm b}$ Total flux density. The errors given are formal statistical errors.
1181: The absolute flux density error is estimated to be on the order of 10\%.
1182:
1183: $^{\rm c}$ Deconvolved dimensions of the source: FWHM major axis $\times$
1184: FWHM minor axis; position angle of major axis.
1185:
1186: $^{\rm d}$ Unresolved
1187: %\end{indented}
1188: \end{table}
1189: \normalsize
1190: %\end{verbatim}
1191:
1192: \clearpage
1193:
1194: \begin{table}
1195: \small
1196: %\tabletypesize{\small}
1197: %
1198: %\tablecolumns{5}
1199: %\tablewidth{0pc}
1200: \caption{Proper Motions of Sources \label{tab2}}
1201: %\begin{indented}
1202: %\lineup
1203: %\tablehead{
1204: %\colhead{Component} &
1205: %\colhead{$\alpha$(2000)\tablenotemark{a}} &
1206: %\colhead{$\delta$(2000)\tablenotemark{a}} &
1207: %\colhead{S$_\nu$\tablenotemark{b}} &
1208: %\colhead{Deconvolved Size\tablenotemark{c}} \\
1209: %\colhead{(Epoch)} &
1210: %\colhead{($16^h~58^m$)} &
1211: %\colhead{($-42^\circ$)} &
1212: %\colhead{(mJy)} &
1213: %\colhead{} \\
1214: %}
1215: %\item[]
1216: \begin{tabular}{@{}lccccccccc}
1217: %\begin{tabular}{@{}lllll}
1218: %\item[]\begin{tabular}{lllll}
1219: \br
1220: & D$^{\rm a}$ & PA(O)$^{\rm b}$ & PA(P)$^{\rm c}$ & $\mu(\alpha)^{\rm d}$ & $\mu (\delta)^{\rm e}$ &
1221: $\mu^{\rm f}$ & $PA(\mu)^{\rm g}$ & $\mu (R)^{\rm h}$ & $\mu (T)^{\rm i}$ \cr
1222: \ns
1223: Source & ({''}) & ($^\circ$) & ($^\circ$) & (mas~yr$^{-1}$) & (mas~yr$^{-1}$) &
1224: (mas~yr$^{-1}$) & ($^\circ$) & (mas~yr$^{-1}$) & (mas~yr$^{-1}$) \cr
1225: \mr
1226:
1227: A & 12.215 & -7.76 & -15 & 18$\pm$43 & -65$\pm$118 & 67$\pm$114 &
1228: 164$\pm$97 & -67$\pm$114 & 0$\pm$53 \\
1229: N-1 & 10.981 & -23.19 & -18 & -12$\pm$3 & -4$\pm$5 & 13$\pm$3 &
1230: -111$\pm$14 & -1$\pm$5 & -13$\pm$3 \\
1231: N-2 & 9.560 & -22.96 & -21 & -15$\pm$8 & 34$\pm$13 & 37$\pm$12 &
1232: -24$\pm$19 & 36$\pm$12 & -5$\pm$8 \\
1233: N-3 & 7.147 & -27.04 & -27 & -11$\pm$12 & -54$\pm$30 & 55$\pm$29 &
1234: -168$\pm$30 & -49$\pm$29 & -26$\pm$15 \\
1235: E & 12.316 & 66.26 & -15 & -90$\pm$37 & -51$\pm$58 & 104$\pm$43 &
1236: -119$\pm$24 & -24$\pm$57 & -101$\pm$39 \\
1237: N-4 & 5.239 & -30.98 & -31 & 85$\pm$28 & -237$\pm$70 & 252$\pm$67 &
1238: 160$\pm$15 & -251$\pm$68 & 16$\pm$34 \\
1239: N-5 & 2.695 & -32.96 & -37 & -20$\pm$24 & 54$\pm$34 & 57$\pm$33 &
1240: -21$\pm$33 & 57$\pm$33 & -5$\pm$25 \\
1241: D & 0.964 & -71.73 & -41 & -22$\pm$8 & 3$\pm$14 & 22$\pm$8 &
1242: -83$\pm$21 & 9$\pm$14 & -21$\pm$9 \\
1243: Jet & 0.000 & 0.00 & -43 & -2$\pm$1 & -3$\pm$1 & 3$\pm$1 &
1244: -151$\pm$20 & -2$\pm$1 & -2$\pm$1 \\
1245: B & 3.248 & 141.24 & 144 & -17$\pm$6 & -21$\pm$9 & 27$\pm$8 &
1246: -141$\pm$17 & 17$\pm$9 & 22$\pm$7 \\
1247: C & 7.004 & 135.65 & 153 & 22$\pm$5 & -26$\pm$8 & 35$\pm$7 &
1248: 140$\pm$12 & 31$\pm$8 & -16$\pm$5 \\
1249: S-1 & 9.538 & 163.79 & 159 & 15$\pm$2 & 6$\pm$3 & 16$\pm$2 &
1250: 67$\pm$7 & -3$\pm$2 & -16$\pm$2 \\
1251: S-2 & 11.585 & 161.26 & 164 & -3$\pm$7 & -36$\pm$15 & 36$\pm$15 &
1252: -175$\pm$24 & 35$\pm$15 & 11$\pm$8 \\
1253:
1254: \br
1255: \end{tabular}
1256: $^{\rm a}$ Displacement with respect to the jet in arcsec.
1257:
1258: $^{\rm b}$ Observed position angle with respect to the jet in degrees.
1259:
1260: $^{\rm c}$ Predicted position angle in the precession model.
1261:
1262: $^{\rm d}$ Right Ascension proper motion in milliarcsec per year. (1 mas yr$^{-1}$ = 14 km s$^{-1}$ at a distance of 2.9 Kpc)
1263:
1264: $^{\rm e}$ Declination proper motion in milliarcsec per year.
1265:
1266: $^{\rm f}$ Total proper motion in milliarcsec per year.
1267:
1268: $^{\rm g}$ Position angle of the total proper motion in degrees.
1269:
1270: $^{\rm h}$ Radial proper motion with respect to an axis with PA = $-16^\circ$,
1271: in milliarcsec per year. A negative sign corresponds to motions approaching the jet.
1272:
1273: $^{\rm i}$ Transversal proper motion with respect to an axis with PA = $-16^\circ$, in milliarcsec per year.
1274: A positive sign corresponds to counterclockwise motion.
1275:
1276: $^{\rm j}$ Note that if the maps were aligned to make the position of the jet fixed, the
1277: proper motions of the other components would change by 2 and 3 mas yr$^{-1}$ in Right Ascension and Declination, respectively.
1278:
1279: %\end{indented}
1280: \end{table}
1281: \normalsize
1282: %\end{verbatim}
1283:
1284: \clearpage
1285:
1286:
1287: \small
1288: \begin{table}
1289: \caption{Jet and Molecular Outflow Parameters of Three Massive Young Stars.\label{tbl-3}}
1290: \begin{indented}
1291: \item[]\begin{tabular}{@{}lllll}
1292: \br
1293: & Distance & $S_\nu$(3.6 cm) & $\dot P$ & \\
1294: \ns
1295: Source & (kpc) & (mJy) & ($M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ km s$^{-1}$) & References$^{\rm a}$ \\
1296: \mr
1297: IRAS~16547-4247 & 2.9 & 8.7 & $4.0\times10^{-1}$ & 1,2,3,4 \\
1298: HH~80-81 & 1.7 & 3.0 & $5.3\times10^{-2}$ & 5,6 \\
1299: Cep A HW2 & 0.725 & 6.9 & $5.4\times10^{-3}$ & 7,8 \\
1300: \br
1301: \end{tabular}
1302: \item[] $^{\rm a}$ 1) Garay et al. (2007); 2) Garay et al. (2003);
1303: 3) Rodr\'\i guez et al. (2005); 4) this paper; 5) Mart\'\i\ et al. (1993);
1304: 6) Yamashita et al. (1989); 7) Curiel et al. (2006); 8) Narayanan \& Walker (1996).
1305: \end{indented}
1306: \end{table}
1307: \normalsize
1308: %\end{verbatim}
1309:
1310: \clearpage
1311:
1312: \end{document}
1313:
1314: %%
1315: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
1316: