1:
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
30: %% use the longabstract style option.
31:
32: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
33:
34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
36: %% the \begin{document} command.
37: %%
38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
41: %% for information.
42:
43: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
44: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
45:
46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
47:
48: % \slugcomment{Draft Oct. 31, 2007; for submission to ApJ}
49:
50: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
51: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
52: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
53: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
54: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
55: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
56:
57: \shorttitle{Outflow-Triggered Star Formation in OMC-2 FIR 3/4}
58: \shortauthors{Shimajiri et al.}
59:
60: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
61: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
62:
63: \begin{document}
64:
65: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
66: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
67: %% you desire.
68:
69: \title{Millimeter- and Submillimeter-Wave Observations\\
70: of the OMC-2/3 Region. II.\\
71: Observational Evidence for Outflow-Triggered Star Formation\\
72: in the OMC-2 FIR 3/4 Region}
73:
74: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
75: %% author and affiliation information.
76: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
77: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
78: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
79: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
80: \author{YOSHITO SHIMAJIRI}
81: \affil{Department of Astronomy, School of Science, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; yoshito.shimajiri@nao.ac.jp}
82:
83: \author{SATOKO TAKAHASHI$^1$}
84: \affil{Department of Astronomical Science, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies,
85: National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Osawa 2-21-1, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan}
86:
87: \author{SHIGEHISA TAKAKUWA}
88: \affil{Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, P.O. Box 23-141, Taipei 106, Taiwan}
89:
90: \author{MASAO SAITO}
91: \affil{ALMA Project Office, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Osawa 2-21-1, Mitaka,
92: Tokyo 181-8588, Japan}
93:
94: \and
95:
96: \author{RYOHEI KAWABE}
97: \affil{Nobeyama Radio Observatory, Minamimaki, Minamisaku, Nagano 384-1805, Japan}
98:
99:
100:
101: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
102: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
103: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
104: %% affiliation.
105:
106: \altaffiltext{1}{Current Address: Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
107: P.O. Box 23-141, Taipei 106, Taiwan}
108:
109: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
110: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
111: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
112: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
113: %% editorial office after submission.
114:
115: \begin{abstract}
116: We have carried out millimeter interferometric observations of the Orion Molecular Cloud-2 (OMC-2) FIR 3/4 region at an angular resolution of $\sim$ 3$\arcsec$ - 7$\arcsec$ with the Nobeyama Millimeter Array (NMA) in the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ ($J$=1--0), $^{12}$CO ($J$=1--0), SiO ($v$=0, $J$=2--1), and CS ($J$=2--1) lines and in the 3.3 mm continuum emission. Submillimeter single-dish observations of the same region have also been performed with Atacama Submillimeter Telescope Experiment (ASTE) in the $^{12}$CO ($J$=3--2) and CH$_3$OH ($J_K$=7$_K$--6$_K$) lines. Our NMA observations in the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ emission have revealed 0.07 pc-scale dense gas associated with FIR 4. The $^{12}$CO ($J$=3--2,1--0) emission shows high-velocity blue and red shifted components at the both north-east and south-west of FIR 3, suggesting a molecular outflow nearly along the plane of the sky driven by FIR 3. The SiO ($v$=0, $J$=2--1) and the submillimeter CH$_{3}$OH ($J_K$=7$_K$--6$_K$) emission, known as shock tracers, are detected around the interface between the outflow and the dense gas. Furthermore, the $^{12}$CO ($J$=1--0) emission shows an L-shaped structure in the P-V diagram. These results imply presence of the shock due to the interaction between the molecular outflow driven by FIR 3 and the dense gas associated with FIR 4. Moreover, our high angular-resolution ($\sim$ 3$\arcsec$) observations of FIR 4 in the 3.3 mm continuum emission with the NMA have first found that FIR 4 consists of eleven dusty cores with a size of $\sim$ 1500 - 4000 AU and a mass of $\sim$ 0.2 - 1.4 M$_{\odot}$. The separation among these cores ($\sim$ 5 $\times 10^3$ AU) is on the same order of the Jeans length ($\sim$ 13 $\times 10^3$ AU), suggesting that the fragmentation into these cores has been caused by the gravitational instability. The time scale of the fragmentation ($\sim$ 3.8 $\times 10^4$ yr), estimated from the separation divided by the sound speed, is similar to the time scale of the interaction between the molecular outflow and the dense gas ($\sim$ 1.4 $\times 10^4$ yr). We suggest that the interaction between the molecular outflow from FIR 3 and the dense gas at FIR 4 triggered the fragmentation into these dusty cores, and hence the next generation of the cluster formation in FIR 4.
117:
118: \end{abstract}
119:
120:
121: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
122: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
123: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
124: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
125:
126: \keywords{ISM: clouds --- ISM: OMC-2 / FIR 3, 4, 5 ---stars: formation --- ISM: outflows ---
127: ISM: molecules --- radio lines: ISM}
128:
129: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
130: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
131: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
132: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
133: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
134: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
135: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
136: %% each reference.
137:
138:
139: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
140: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
141: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
142: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
143: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
144: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
145: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
146: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
147: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
148: %%
149: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
150: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
151: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
152: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
153:
154: \section{Introduction}
155: The process of so-called ``isolated'' star formation, where a single star or binary stars form in one molecular cloud core, has been studied intensively \citep{Sai99,Sai01,tak04,Jes07,tak07a}. In this mode, spontaneous gravitational collapse of cloud cores initiates the formation of the protostar at the center, and there is observational evidence of such gravitational collapse \citep{Myers95,Sai96,Mar97,Oha97,Momo98,tak07b}. Another mode of star formation is cluster formation, where stellar clusters form simultaneously or sequentially in one cloud core. A vast majority ($\geq$ 90 \%) of stars form as members of clusters in our galaxy \citep{Lada03}, and the understanding of the cluster formation is crucial for more comprehensive understanding of star formation. Previous observational studies of cluster formation have proposed that external effects on cloud cores, such as stellar wind, HII regions \citep{Wil94,Wil95,Hester05}, supernova \citep{koba05,Yasu06}, and molecular outflows \citep{San01,Nakano03}, are often required to trigger cluster formation. Theoretical studies also suggest that such external effects are often required to trigger cluster formation \citep{Norman80}. For example, \citet{Yasu06} have found 52 cluster members in ``Cloud 2'', which locates in the vicinity of the SNR H I shell, GSH 138-01-94. The age of the cluster in Cloud 2 ($\sim$ 1.0 $\times$ 10$^6$ yr) is younger than that of GSH 138-01-94 ($\sim$ 4.3 $\times$ 10$^6$ yr), and they suggest that the star formation in Cloud 2 was triggered by the interaction with the SNR H I shell. In the 850 $\mu$m dust continuum map of the NGC 1333 region, there are several cavity and/or shell structures observed, which are most likely created by molecular outflows \citep{San01}. One dusty core, SK-1, is in one of these shells and is gravitationally bound, and \citet{San01} suggest that this core is a specific example of the outflow-triggered star formation. However, these studies are presumptions mainly based on the overall morphology, and detailed studies of cluster formation processes, including spatially-resolved observations of both triggers and cloud cores and the investigation of the physical processes, have been limited. This is mainly due to the relatively far distance to cluster-forming regions and lack of interferometric observations of cluster-forming regions in millimeter and submillimeter molecular lines as well as continuum emissions.
156:
157: In order to investigate the detailed mechanism of cluster formation, we have initiated millimeter and submillimeter survey observations of the OMC-2/3 region with the Nobeyama Millimeter Array (NMA) and Atacama Submillimeter Telescope Experiment (ASTE). The OMC-2/3 region is one of the nearest cluster-forming regions at a distance of 450 pc \citep{Gen89,Johnson90,Lada03,nie03}, and locates at the north of the Orion A Giant Molecular Cloud \citep{Gat74,Sak94,Chini97,lis98}. Mapping observations of the OMC-2/3 region in the 1.3 mm continuum emission have identified 26 dusty cores \citep{Chini97,nie03}, and 33 dusty cores in the 850 $\mu $m emission \citep{lis98}. $^{12}$CO ($J$=1--0) survey observations of molecular outflows in OMC-2/3 have found nine outflows at an average separation of $\sim$ 0.2 pc \citep{Aso00,wil03}, and our recent submillimeter $^{12}$CO ($J$=3--2) survey observations of OMC-2/3 have revealed presence of 15 outflows \citep{Takaha07}. Extensive mapping observations of the OMC-2/3 region in the CS ($J$=1--0) \citep{Tate93} and H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ ($J$=1--0) lines \citep{Aso00, ike07} have unveiled physical properties of cloud cores in the cluster-forming region, which are quantitatively different from those in isolated star-forming regions. Interferometric H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$($J$=1--0) observations of MMS 7 in the OMC-3 region, one of the dusty cores, have revealed the disk-like envelope around MMS 7, which is being dispersed by the associated molecular outflow \citep{Takaha06}.
158:
159: In this paper, we focus on observations of the OMC-2 FIR 3/4 region
160: \citep[including FIR 3, 4, and 5;][]{Chini97}
161: FIR 4 is the strongest 1.3 mm dust-continuum source in OMC-2 \citep{Joho99,Chini97}. In this region, there are three 3.6 cm free-free emission sources of VLA 11 (consistent with FIR 3), VLA 12 and VLA 13 \citep{rei99}, and nine MIR sources \citep{nie03}, suggesting that FIR 4 is an active cluster-forming region. A molecular outflow driven by FIR 3 has been found in the $^{12}$CO ($J$=1--0, 3--2) lines \citep{wil03,Takaha07}, which is one of the candidate triggers of the cluster formation in FIR 4. Our millimeter interferometric and submillimeter single-dish observations of the FIR 4 region should shed light on the detailed mechanism of the cluster formation, which will be shown in the present paper.
162:
163: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
164: \subsection{NMA observations}
165:
166: We carried out millimeter interferometric observations of the FIR 4 region in the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ ($J$=1--0; 86.754 GHz), $^{12}$CO ($J$=1--0; 115.271 GHz), SiO ($v$=0, $J$=2--1; 86.847 GHz), and CS ($J$=2-1; 97.980 GHz) lines with the Nobeyama Millimeter Array (NMA), which consists of six 10 m antennas, during a period from 2005 May to 2007 January. The data in the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ ($J$=1--0), $^{12}$CO ($J$=1--0), and SiO ($v$=0, $J$=2--1) lines were obtained with the FX correlator, which was configured with 1024 channels per baseline and a bandwidth of 32 MHz. For the $^{12}$CO (1--0) and SiO (2--1) data we made 5-channel binning to increase the signal-to-noise ratio ($\equiv$ S/N) of the high-velocity line-wing emission. Thus, the velocity resolution in the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$, $^{12}$CO, and SiO observations is 0.108, 0.406, and 0.539 km s$^{-1}$, respectively. The CS ($J$=2--1) data were obtained with the digital spectral correlator, Ultra Wide Band Correlator (UWBC) \citep{oku00}, which has 128 channels and a 1024 MHz bandwidth per baseline (1 channel = 24.47 km s$^{-1}$). The hanning window function was applied to reduce side lobes in the sampling. Thus, the effective velocity resolution was widened to 48.94 km s$^{-1}$ (corresponding to 2 channels). The CS ($J$=2--1) emission is detected over the three UWBC channels with the hanning window function, and we integrated over these three channels (corresponding to 97.88 km s$^{-1}$) to make the total integrated intensity map. We also obtained continuum data at both the lower (87.090 $\pm $ 0.512 GHz) and upper (98.418 $\pm $ 0.512 GHz) sidebands with UWBC, simultaneously with the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ ($J$=1--0) data. To obtain a higher S/N in the continuum map, the data of both sidebands were co-added (effective observing frequency = 92 GHz = 3.3 mm). Using the AIPS package developed at NRAO, we adopted both the uniform and natural UV weighting for the continuum imaging. For the imaging of the molecular emissions we adopted the natural weighting. Table \ref{NMAobs} and \ref{continuumobs} summarize the parameters for the line and continuum observations, respectively. Since the minimum projected baseline length of the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ ($J$=1--0), $^{12}$CO ($J$=1--0), SiO ($v$=0, $J$=2--1), and CS ($J$=2--1) observations was 2.9, 3.0, 2.9, and 3.2 k$\lambda$, our observations were estimated to be insensitive to structures more extended than 57$\arcsec$ (0.13 pc), 55$\arcsec$ (0.12 pc), 57$\arcsec$ (0.13 pc), and 51$\arcsec$ (0.11 pc) at the 10 \% level, respectively \citep{Wilner94}. The overall uncertainty in the flux calibration was estimated to be $\sim$ 15 \%. After the calibrations, only the data taken under good weather conditions were adopted in the imaging.
167:
168: \subsection{ASTE observations}
169:
170: The submillimeter CH$_3$OH ($J_K$=7$_K$--6$_K$; K=-1, 0, 2; 338.408681, 338.344629, 338.72165 GHz) data in the FIR 4 region have been taken with the ASTE 10 m telescope (Atacama Submillimeter Telescope Experiment; \citet{eza05,Koh04}) located at the Pampa la Bola (altitude = 4800 m), Chile. The observed frequency range covers the CH$_{3}$OH K-ladder (7$_K$--6$_K$, $K$=-2, -1, 0, 2, and 6) from 338.32 GHz to 338.74 GHz, where three of those (7$_{-1}$--6$_{-1}$, 7$_0$--6$_0$, 7$_2$--6$_2$) are detected above 3 $\sigma$ level (= 0.51 K). Observations were remotely made from the ASTE operation room at Mitaka, Tokyo on 2006 October 7, 10, and 11, using the network observation system N-COSMOS3 developed by NAOJ \citep{kam05}. The half-power beam width of the ASTE telescope is 22$\arcsec$ at the observing frequency. The typical system noise temperature with the 345 GHz SIS heterodyne receiver in the DSB mode was 270 - 440 K, and the typical atmospheric opacity at 220 GHz was $\sim$ 0.05 during our observations. The temperature scale was determined by the chopper-wheel method, which provides us with the antenna temperature corrected for the atmosphere attenuation. As a backend, we used four sets of a 1024-channel auto-correlator, which provide us a frequency resolution of 31.12 kHz, corresponding to 0.1 km s$^{-1}$ at the CH$_3$OH ($J_K$=7$_K$--6$_K$) frequency. The On-The-Fly (OTF) mapping technique was employed to map the $5\arcmin \times 5\arcmin$ region centered on FIR 4, which covers the entire outflow driven by FIR 3 seen in the $^{12}$CO (3--2) emission \citep{Takaha07}. The telescope pointing was checked every two hours by 5-points scans of the point-like $^{12}$CO ($J$=3--2) emission from O-Cet ($\alpha _{J2000}$= 02$^{h}$ 19$^{m}$ 20$\fs$80 $\delta _{J2000}$= -02$^\circ$ 08$\arcmin$ 40$\farcs$7). The pointing errors were measured to be from 0$\farcs$2 to 1$\farcs$2 during the observing run. We also observed NGC 1333 IRAS 2A and compared the observed CH$_{3}$OH spectra to those obtained with the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory (CSO) telescope, which has the same dish size as that of the ASTE telescope \citep{Jes04}, and found that the main beam efficiency of the ASTE telescope was $\sim$ 0.4. After subtracting linear baselines, the OTF data were convolved by a Gaussian-tapered Bessel function \citep{man00} with a FWHM of 14$\arcsec$ and were resampled onto a 7$\arcsec$ grid. Since the telescope beam is a gaussian with a FWHM of 22$\arcsec$, the effective FWHM resolution in the restored images is 26$\arcsec$. The ``scanning effect" was minimized by combining scans along the R.A. and decl. direction, using the PLAIT algorithm developed by \cite{Eme88}.
171: The typical rms noise level in the final image is 0.17 K in $T_A^*$ at a velocity resolution of 0.5 km s$^{-1}$.
172:
173:
174:
175: \section{RESULTS}
176: \subsection{$^{12}$CO ($J$=3--2, 1--0) emission}
177: Figure \ref{Line_map_CO} shows the distribution of the high-velocity blueshifted and redshifted $^{12}$CO ($J$=3--2) and $^{12}$CO ($J$=1--0) emission in the FIR 4 region, observed with ASTE and NMA, respectively. The $^{12}$CO ($J$=3--2) data were taken by our group as a part of our survey project in the OMC-2/3 region \citep{Takaha07}. The $^{12}$CO ($J$=3--2) line profile toward FIR 4 is shown in Figure \ref{12cospec}. From the peak temperature of the $^{12}$CO ($J$=3--2) emission, we determine that the gas kinetic temperature in the FIR 4 region is $\sim$ 52.5 K. The detected velocity range of the $^{12}$CO ($J$=3--2) and $^{12}$CO ($J$=1--0) emission is -9.5 $\sim$ 29.4 km s$^{-1}$ and 3.7 $\sim$ 18.3 km s$^{-1}$, respectively, while that of the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ ($J$=1--0) emission, which traces the dense gas in FIR 4, is 10.4 $\sim$ 12.5 km s$^{-1}$ \citep{ike07}. There are both blueshifted and redshifted high-velocity components at the north-east (NE) and south-west (SW) of FIR 3. These results imply that the high-velocity components in the $^{12}$CO ($J$=3--2, 1--0) emission trace a bipolar molecular outflow nearly along the plane of the sky driven by FIR 3. Furthermore, the high-velocity components of the $^{12}$CO emission at the north-east of FIR 3 are associated with H$_{2}$ knots found by \citet{Yu97}, which also supports our outflow interpretation. In addition, the velocity range of the $^{12}$CO (3--2) emission is larger than that of the $^{12}$CO (1--0) emission. One of the plausible interpretations of the different velocity range is that the submillimeter line traces warmer gas in the vicinity of the jet, where the higher velocity is expected, due to the different excitation condition between the submillimeter and millimeter lines \citep{Raga93}.
178:
179:
180: The size of the SW blue lobe measured from the $^{12}$CO ($J$=3--2) image is $\sim$ 0.09 pc, which is twice smaller than that of the NE lobe ($\sim$ 0.19 pc). At the south-west of FIR 3 both the $^{12}$CO ($J$=3--2) and $^{12}$CO ($J$=1--0) emission exhibit blueshifted and redshifted peaks near FIR 4, and that these ASTE and NMA peaks appear to be consistent with each other. On the other hand, at the north-east of FIR 3 the prominent blueshifted and redshifted peaks observed with ASTE are not seen in the NMA maps, suggesting that these components are resolved out by the interferometer. These results imply that the SW component of the outflow driven by FIR 3 toward FIR 4 is more compact than the NE component. From our NMA observations, the peak position of the SW red lobe is measured to be $\alpha _{J2000}$=05$^{h}$ 35$^{m}$ 27$\fs$2, $\delta _{J2000}$=-05$^\circ$ 09$\arcmin$ 59$\farcs$5, and at the tip of the red lobe there is 3.6 cm free-free emission (VLA 12, open blue circle). There are two possibilities on the origin of this free-free emission. One is that there is another protostar located at VLA 12, and the other is that this free-free emission is originated from the ionized jet driven by FIR 3. Since there is no 3.3-mm dust continuum counterpart associated with VLA 12 (see $\S$ 3.4), the origin of the 3.6 cm free-free emission is probably the ionized jet driven by FIR 3.
181:
182: Figure \ref{CS} shows a total integrated intensity map in the CS ($J$=2--1) emission. The peak of this emission is ($\alpha_{J2000}, \delta_{J2000} $) = (05$^{h}$ 35$^{m}$ 27$\fs$0, -05$^\circ$ 09$\arcmin$ 56$\farcs$0), $\sim$ 4$\arcsec$ north-east of FIR 4. This emission extends from FIR 3 to FIR 4, similarly to the high-velocity $^{12}$CO ($J$=1--0, 3--2) emission shown in Figure \ref{Line_map_CO}. Thus, one of the possible interpretations on the origin of the CS emission is moderately dense gas in the molecular outflow. Higher velocity-resolution observations in the CS emission are required to verify the origin of the CS emission in the FIR4 region.
183:
184:
185:
186: \subsection{Dense gas associated with FIR 4}
187: Figure \ref{H13CO+}a shows a total integrated intensity map of the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ ($J$=1--0) emission in the FIR 4 region, observed with the NMA. There exists a $\sim$ 0.07 pc-scale ($\sim$ 30$\arcsec$) dense gas structure associated with FIR 4. This dense gas structure has also been identified as AC17 with the single-dish 45m telescope by \citet{Aso00}. Hereafter we call this structure ``FIR 4 clump". The peak position of FIR 4 clump ($\alpha_{J2000}$=05$^{h}$35$^{m}$27$\fs$0, $\delta_{J2000}$=-05$^\circ$ 10$\arcmin$ 03$\farcs$5), estimated by the 2-dimensional Gaussian fitting to the image, is consistent with the position of AC17, and the systemic velocity ($\equiv $V$_{sys}$$\sim$ 11.3 km s$^{-1}$) and the line width ($\sim$ 1.1 km s$^{-1}$) estimated by the Gaussian fitting to the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ spectrum at FIR 4 are also consistent with the single-dish results \citep{Aso00}.
188: Figure \ref{H13CO+}b shows the distribution of the blue- (10.5 km s$^{-1}$ - 11.2 km s$^{-1}$) and redshifted (11.3 km s$^{-1}$ - 12.4 km s$^{-1}$) H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ ($J$=1--0) emission in FIR 4. The blueshifted component is distributed from south-east to north-west while the redshifted component is distributed from east to west.
189:
190:
191: We derived the mass of FIR 4 clump ($\equiv$ M$_{gas}$) on the assumption of the Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium (LTE) condition and the optically-thin H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ ($J$=1--0) emission, using the following equation \citep{Takaha06},
192:
193: \begin{equation}
194: M_{gas}=\frac{3kc^{2}{m}D^{2}}{16h\nu^{3}\pi^{3}B\mu }\frac{T_{ex}}{X[H^{13}CO^{+}]}[ exp\left( \frac{hB(J+1)(J+2)}{kT_{ex}} \right )] \int F_{\nu } d\nu, \label{H13CO+LTE_MASS}
195: \end{equation}
196:
197: where $k$, $h$, $c$, $T_{ex}$, $D$, X[H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$], $\mu$, $m$, $\nu$, $J$, B and $F_{\nu }$ are the Boltzmann constant, the Planck constant, the speed of light, the excitation temperature, distance, fractional abundance of H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$, dipole moment, the mean mass of the molecule (2.33 a.m.u), frequency, rotational quantum number, rotational constant, and the flux density, respectively. We assume that the excitation temperature of the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ ($J$=1--0) line is equal to 52.5 K, which is derived from the peak brightness temperature of the $^{12}$CO ($J$=3--2) emission (see $\S$ 3.1). We adopt $\mu$ = 4.07 Debye as the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ dipole moment \citep{Hae79}. The H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ ($J$=1--0) abundance of 4.5 $\times$ 10$^{-11}$ is adopted from \citet{Aso00}, and the derived mass of FIR 4 clump is $\sim$ 10.5 $M_{\odot}$ (If we adopt the abundance of 1.4 $\times$ 10$^{-10}$ estimated by \citet{Takaha06}, the mass of FIR 4 clump is $\sim$ 3.6 $M_{\odot}$). We also estimated the momentum ($\equiv P_{gas}$) and the internal gas energy ($\equiv E_{gas}$) of FIR 4 clump as follows \citep{tak03a} ;
198:
199: \begin{equation}
200: P_{gas}=M_{gas}C_{eff}, \label{P_gas}
201: \end{equation}
202:
203:
204: \begin{equation}
205: E_{gas}=\frac{1}{2}M_{gas}C_{eff}^{2}, \label{E_gas}
206: \end{equation}
207:
208:
209: \begin{equation}
210: C_{eff}^2=\frac{\Delta V_{FWHM}^2}{8\ln2}+kT_K(\frac{1}{m}-\frac{1}{m_{obs}}), \label{C_eff}
211: \end{equation}
212:
213: where $\Delta V_{FWHM}$, $C_{eff}$, T$_{K}$, and m$_{obs}$ is the FWHM velocity width of the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ line, the effective sound speed, the gas kinetic temperature, and the mass mean molecular of the observed molecule. Table \ref{Physical_qua} summarizes our estimates of these parameters. Due to the effect of the missing flux in the interferometric observations ($\sim$ 83 \% of the total flux is missed), these values should be considered as a lower limit, and in fact, the estimated mass from the single-dish data is $\sim$ 35 $M_{\odot}$ \citep{Aso00}.
214:
215:
216: \subsection{Shock tracer of CH$_3$OH ($J_K$=7$_K$--6$_K$) and SiO ($v$=0, $J$=2--1)}
217:
218: We have detected the submillimeter CH$_3$OH ($J_K$=7$_K$--6$_K$; K=-1, 0, 2) lines toward FIR 4 clump with ASTE. Figure \ref{Line_map_shock} (a) and (b) show the distribution of the blue- and redshifted CH$_3$OH ($J_K$=7$_0$--6$_0$) emission, and Figure \ref{spectral} shows the spectrum of the CH$_3$OH ($J_K$=7$_0$--6$_0$) line toward FIR 4. The line width of the submillimeter line is up to 10 km s$^{-1}$ at the zeroth level, and there is slight indication of the asymmetric line profile, with a more prominent blue wing (5.7 km s$^{-1}$ - 9.9 km s$^{-1}$) than a red wing (13.1 km s$^{-1}$ - 14.2 km s$^{-1}$). The peak position of the blue and red lobe is ($\alpha_{J2000}$, $\delta_{J2000}$)=(5$^{h}$ 35$^{m}$ 26$\fs$6, -5$^\circ$ 09$\arcmin$ 55$\farcs$4) and (5$^{h}$ 35$^{m}$ 27$\fs$1, -5$^\circ$ 09$\arcmin$ 55$\farcs$4), respectively. The distribution of the blueshifted CH$_3$OH emission extends along the east-west direction, while the distribution of the redshifted emission extends toward the direction of the outflow driven by FIR 3, i.e. along SW-NE.
219:
220: We have also detected the SiO ($v$=0, $J$=2--1) emission toward FIR 4 clump with the NMA, as shown in Figure \ref{Line_map_shock} (c). The peak position of the SiO emission is ($\alpha_{J2000}$, $\delta_{J2000}$) = (05$^{h}$ 35$^{m}$ 26$\fs$6, -05$^\circ$ 09$\arcmin$ 53$\farcs$0). The SiO emission is blueshifted, point-like, and locates at $\sim$7$\arcsec$ north of FIR 4. The peak position of the SiO emission is approximately consistent with the peak position of the blueshifted CH$_3$OH emission.
221:
222:
223:
224:
225: \subsection{3.3-mm dust continuum emission}
226: Figure \ref{continuum}a and \ref{continuum}b show naturally- and uniformly-weighted 3.3-mm continuum images in the FIR 4 region observed with the NMA. In these images there appears two main components, one is associated with FIR 3 and the other with FIR 4. The overall distribution is consistent with that of the single-dish 1.3 mm continuum observations \citep{Chini97}. The overall ridge distribution of the 3.3-mm emission associated with FIR 4 also resembles that of the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ ($J$=1--0) emission, although there appears north-eastern extension in the 3.3-mm emission. The north-eastern extension in the 3.3-mm emission may trace the ``wall" of the molecular outflow, as seen in other observations \citep{Gueth03,Mori06}. However, the high-velocity CO lobes are unlikely to be the cloud-core components traced by the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ emission, as discussed in section 3.1. From these considerations, we suggest that most of the 3.3-mm emission traces the dense-gas component in FIR 4, with a contamination from the outflow component to a certain extent.
227:
228:
229: FIR 3 was detected by our 3.3 mm dust-continuum observations as a single source, although two MIR sources MIR 21 and 22, are present in FIR 3 \citep{nie03}. \citet{nie03} have suggested that MIR 21 and 22 are binary stars at a separation of $\sim$ 3$\arcsec$ (= 1350 AU). However, we consider that MIR 21 and MIR 22 are reflection nebulae evacuated by the outflow from FIR 3, because the 3.3 mm peak at FIR 3 locates between MIR 21 and MIR 22 and the alignment of MIR 21 and 22 is consistent with the direction of the molecular outflow.
230:
231:
232: The dusty component associated with FIR 4 is most likely the same identity traced by the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ ($J$=1--0) emission, that is, FIR4 clump. Moreover, the dusty component in FIR 4 has subpeaks. These peaks are probably substructures ($\equiv $ cores) in FIR 4 clump. We identified those cores with the following criteria; (1) the peak intensity should be higher than 4 $\sigma $ noise level, and (2) the ``valley'' among different cores should be deeper than 1 $\sigma$. We identified five cores in the naturally-weighted image, and six more cores in the uniformly-weighted image. Then the total number of the identified cores is eleven. Hereafter, we call these smaller-scale cores FIR 4a,b,\dots,k, as labeled in Figure \ref{continuum}b.
233: As we mentioned in $\S$ 3.1., there is no 3.3-mm continuum source toward VLA 12.
234:
235: The deconvolved size of these dusty cores was estimated by the 2-dimentional Gaussian fitting to the image. The mass of the cores ($\equiv$ $M_{dust}$) was derived from the total 3.3 mm flux, $F_{\nu}$, on the assumption that all the 3.3-mm continuum emission arises from dust and that the emission is optically thin, using the formula,
236:
237: \begin{equation}
238: M_{dust}=\frac{F_{\nu}D^2}{\kappa _{\nu}B_{\nu}(T_{d})}, \label{dustmass}
239: \end{equation}
240:
241: where we have adopted a value of the mass opacity,
242: $\kappa _{\nu }=0.1 \left(\frac{250\mu m}{\lambda _{92 GHz}} \right) ^\beta$ cm$^{2}$ g$^{-1}$ \citep{Hildebrand83} and
243: $\beta $=2.
244: \citet{Chini97} estimated the value of $\beta$ to be 2 by the SED fitting toward FIR 1 and FIR 2 in the OMC-2 region. Since FIR 4 locates on the same molecular filament of OMC-2 as FIR 1 and FIR 2, we consider that $\beta$ = 2 is probably acceptable for FIR 4. For the dust temperature we adopted $T_d$=52.5 K, which is derived from the $^{12}$CO ($J$=3--2) emission (see $\S$ 3.1). The mean gas density ($\equiv$ $n$) in these dusty cores was derived by assuming a spherically-symmetric shape as follows;
245:
246: \begin{equation}
247: n=\frac{M_{dust}}{\frac{4}{3}\pi\biggl(\sqrt{\frac{D_{maj}}{2}\times \frac{D_{min}}{2}}\biggl)^{3}}, \label{density}
248: \end{equation}
249:
250: where $D_{maj}$ and $D_{min}$ are the deconvolved size along the major and minor axis. The typical size, mass and the density of these cores are estimated to be $\sim$ 5 $\arcsec$ (= 2250 AU), 0.78 $M_{\odot}$, and 1.6 $\times$ 10$^7$ cm$^{-3}$, respectively. The total mass of FIR 4 clump estimated from the 3.3-mm dust continuum emission is 9.4 M$_{\odot}$, which is consistent with that estimated from the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ emission (10.5 M$_{\odot}$). The average density of FIR 4 clump is 9.8 $\times$$10^5$ cm$^{-3}$, assuming the spherically symmetric core with a radius of 15$\arcsec$ (6750 AU). Table \ref{Ident} summarizes these physical properties of the identified cores.
251:
252:
253: From the naturally- and uniformly-weighted interferometric 3.3 mm flux in FIR 4, the 850 $\mu$m flux is estimated to be 1.2 and 0.58 Jy, respectively, on the assumption of $\beta$ = 2, while the 850 $\mu$m flux measured with JCMT is 7.5 Jy \citep{Joho99}. Then, $\sim$ 84 and 92 \% of the total flux are missed in the naturally- and uniformly-weighted interferometric 3.3 mm continuum images. Then, the estimated mass of these cores ($\equiv$ M$_{dust}$) should be considered as lower limits. In Table \ref{Ident}, we also list the mass of these cores corrected for the effect of the missing flux ($\equiv$ M$_{cor}$), which can be considered as upper limits of the mass.
254:
255:
256: %% information to the copy editor. This information will appear as a
257: %% footnote on the printed copy for the manuscript style file. Nothing will
258: %% appear on the printed copy if the preprint or
259: %% preprint2 style files are used.
260:
261: %% The eqnarray environment produces multi-line display math. The end of
262: %% each line is marked with a \\. Lines will be numbered unless the \\
263: %% is preceded by a \nonumber command.
264: %% Alignment points are marked by ampersands (&). There should be two
265: %% ampersands (&) per line.
266:
267: %% Putting eqnarrays or equations inside the mathletters environment groups
268: %% the enclosed equations by letter. For instance, the eqnarray below, instead
269: %% of being numbered, say, (4) and (5), would be numbered (4a) and (4b).
270: %% LaTeX the paper and look at the output to see the results.
271:
272: %% This section contains more display math examples, including unnumbered
273: %% equations (displaymath environment). The last paragraph includes some
274: %% examples of in-line math featuring a couple of the AASTeX symbol macros.
275:
276: \section{Discussion}
277: \subsection{Interaction between the molecular outflow driven by FIR 3 \\
278: and FIR 4 clump}
279:
280:
281: Several pieces of evidence for the interaction between the molecular outflow driven by FIR 3 and FIR 4
282: clump were found in our observations. The extent of the SW outflow lobe from FIR 3 observed in the CO
283: (1--0, 3--2) lines ($\sim$ 0.09 pc) is shorter than that of the NE lobe ($\sim$ 0.19 pc).
284: This suggests that the propagation of the SW outflow is hampered by the material at the head of the outflow,
285: and in fact FIR 4 clump locates at the tip of the south-western outflow.
286: These pieces of morphological evidence suggest that the south-western outflow component is dammed by FIR 4 clump.
287: We also detected the SiO and submillimeter CH$_{3}$OH emission at the tip of the south-western outflow.
288: These molecular lines are often observed toward shocked regions,
289: caused by the interaction between outflows and dense gas \citep{Avery96,Bach01}.
290: Hence, the detection of the SiO and submillimeter CH$_{3}$OH emission in FIR 4 is probably the chemical
291: evidence for the interaction between the molecular outflow and the dense gas.
292: In addition, the line width of the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ emission at FIR 4 (dV$_{FWHM}$ $\sim$ 1.1 km s$^{-1}$) is
293: larger than the average value in other OMC-2/3 cores
294: \citep[dV$_{FWHM}$ $\sim$ 0.8 km s$^{-1}$;][]{ike07}
295: which may suggest the larger turbulence due to the interaction with the outflow.
296:
297:
298: Figure \ref{PV}a-d show Position-Velocity (P-V) diagrams in the $^{12}$CO, H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$, SiO, and
299: the CH$_{3}$OH emission. The P-V diagrams in the $^{12}$CO, H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$, SiO, and the CH$_{3}$OH
300: emission show successive change of the line width along the direction from FIR 3 to FIR 4.
301: First, the $^{12}$CO (1--0) emission shows a distinct L-shaped structure in the P-V diagram,
302: and the location of the line broadening is at the most upstream.
303: Second, the CH$_{3}$OH emission also shows a similar L-shape with a less broadening,
304: which locates slightly at the downstream from the CO L-shape.
305: The SiO emission shows the most extreme blueshifted components,
306: which locates at the peak of the blueshifted CH$_3$OH component. Finally, the dense gas component traced by the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ emission locates at the most downstream of the successive emission distribution and is pinched by the L-shaped CO emission distribution in the P-V diagram. These successive emission distributions and the velocity structures are likely to trace the detail of the interaction.
307:
308: These observational results suggest an interconnection among the molecular outflow, dense gas, and the shock traced by the SiO and CH$_{3}$OH emission. We consider that these pieces of evidence support the presence of the interaction between the molecular outflow and dense gas.
309:
310:
311:
312:
313:
314:
315:
316: \subsection{Outflow-triggered star formation}
317:
318: In the last section, we suggest that there is an interaction between the outflow driven by FIR 3 and dense gas of FIR 4 clump. On the other hand, in $\S$ 3.4 we have demonstrated that FIR 4 clump consists of eleven dusty cores. From these results, we presume that the interaction causes the fragmentation of FIR 4 clump into these cores and eventually the formation of the next generation of the cluster members. Hereafter we will examine this possibility from consideration of the Jeans instability, time scale, and the virial analyses.
319:
320:
321:
322: \subsubsection{Jeans instability}
323:
324: First, we will examine whether the fragmentation into the dusty cores can be caused by the Jeans instability, by comparing the average separation of the cores to the Jeans length. The average 3-dimensional separation ($\equiv$ $\Delta l$) among these cores can be estimated by the following formula \citep{Pen95};
325:
326:
327:
328: \begin{equation}
329: \Delta l=2(\frac{1}{\gamma ^{\frac{1}{3}}}-1)r,
330: \end{equation}
331:
332:
333: \begin{equation}
334: \gamma =\frac{n_{core}V_{core}}{V_{clump}},
335: \end{equation}
336:
337:
338: where $\gamma$ , $r$, $n_{core}$, $V_{clump}$, and $V_{core}$ are the volume filling factor, the average radius of the cores, the number of cores, and the average volume of FIR4 clump and a single core, respectively. V$_{core}$ was estimated from the average of the projected size of the dusty cores (Table \ref{core}), and V$_{clump}$ was estimated from the radius of 15$\arcsec$, on the assumption of the 3-dimensional spherical symmetry (see eq. 6). The estimated V$_{core}$, V$_{clump}$, and $r$ are $3.1 \times 10^{46}$ cm$^{3}$, $6.5 \times 10^{48}$ cm$^{3}$, and $1.1 \times 10^3$ AU, respectively. Then, the average separation $\Delta l$ is estimated to be $\sim$ $5 \times10^3$ AU.
339:
340: In order to estimate the Jeans length ($\equiv$ $\lambda_J$), we use the following equation \citep{Naka07};
341:
342:
343: \begin{equation}
344: \lambda_J^2=\frac{\pi C_{eff}^2}{G\rho_0},
345: \end{equation}
346:
347: where $C_{eff}$, G, and $\rho_0$ are the effective sound speed, gravitational constant, and the average density of FIR 4 clump, respectively. $C_{eff}$ is the effective sound speed in FIR 4 clump ($\sim$ 0.62 km s$^{-1}$) derived from equation (4), and $\rho_0$ is estimated to be 9.8 $\times$ 10$^{5}$ cm$^{-3}$ in $\S$ 3.4. With these values, the Jeans length $\lambda _J$ is estimated to be $\sim$ $13 \times 10^3$ AU, which is on the same order of the average separation of the dusty cores. Hence it is possible that the fragmentation of FIR 4 clump into cores was caused by the Jeans instability. The Jeans instability in FIR 4 clump may be triggered by the interaction with the outflow from FIR 3, and in the next section we will discuss whether the fragmentation was caused after the interaction between the outflow driven by FIR 3 and FIR 4 clump.
348:
349:
350:
351: \subsubsection{Time scale of the fragmentation of FIR 4 clump into cores}
352:
353: We can estimate the time scale of the fragmentation on the assumption that the fragmentation time scale
354: ($\equiv$ $\tau _{fragmentation}$) is the sound crossing time;
355:
356: \begin{equation}
357: \tau _{fragmentation}=\frac{\Delta l}{C_{eff}}.
358: \end{equation}
359:
360: Then $\tau _{fragmentation}$ is estimated to be $\sim$ $3.8 \times 10^4 $ yr.
361: Next, we estimate the time scale of the interaction between the outflow and dense gas,
362: on the assumption that the interaction time scale $\tau _{interaction}$ is similar to
363: the dynamical time $\tau_{d}$ of the north-eastern outflow driven by FIR 3, i.e.
364: $\tau _{interaction}$ $\sim$ $\tau_{d}$. \citet{Takaha07} estimated $\tau_{d}$ to
365: be $1.4 \times 10^4 $ yr.
366: Then the interaction time scale $\tau _{interaction}$ is estimated to be $1.4 \times 10^4 $ yr.
367: Therefore, the fragmentation time scale (3.8 $\times$ 10$^4$ yr) is similar to the interaction time scale
368: (1.4 $\times$ 10$^4$ yr), and we suggest that the fragmentation was triggered by the
369: interaction with the outflow from FIR 3. Moreover, the free-fall time in this region
370: ($\sim$ 1.3 $\times 10^4$ yr), which is estimated from the average density of each core
371: ($\sim$ 1.6 $\times$ 10$^7$ cm$^{-3}$), is also similar to the interaction time-scale,
372: and hence it is possible that Class 0/I protostars are already formed in the course of the interaction \citet{nie03}. In fact, there exists an MIR source (MIR 24) identified as a Class 0 protostar, and it is possible that MIR 24 is formed in the course of the interaction.
373:
374:
375: We suggest that in this particular case of FIR 4 the interaction between the outflow and the dense gas most likely triggers the fragmentation into cores, while we cannot exclude other possibilities such as the induced fragmentation due to the interaction with the HII region (M43) \citep{Hester05} as well as spontaneous fragmentation due to the gravity \citep{Inu97} and turbulence \citep{Li04}.
376:
377:
378: \subsubsection{Outflow-triggered star formation}
379:
380:
381: Finally, in order to examine whether these dusty cores have a potential to form protostars inside, we compare the H$_2$ mass of the cores estimated from the 3.3 mm dust-continuum flux and the virial mass. The virial mass ($\equiv$ M$_{virial}$) is estimated by the following equation;
382:
383:
384: \begin{equation}
385: M_{virial}=\frac{5rC_{eff}^2}{2G},
386: \end{equation}
387:
388:
389: where $r$, $C_{eff}$ and G are the radius of the core, the effective sound speed (equation 4) and the gravitational constant, respectively. Here, we assume that the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ emission is associated with all the dusty cores. Then we adopted the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ line width ($\Delta V_{FWHM}$; see Table \ref{Ident}) at each peak of the dusty core as the line width in the dusty cores. The estimated virial masses are within the range of the expected H$_2$ mass of these cores, that is, from M$_{dust}$ to M$_{cor}$ (Table \ref{Ident}). These results suggest that the observed dusty cores have a potential to form stars.
390:
391:
392:
393: From the above considerations, we suggest that the interaction between FIR 4 clump and the outflow driven by FIR 3 caused the fragmentation of FIR 4 clump into cores and triggered the next generation of cluster formation. Our scenario of the star formation in the FIR 4 region is summarized in Figure \ref{scenario} as;
394:
395:
396:
397: [STEP 1]: FIR 3 was born and drove the outflow;
398:
399: [STEP 2]: The outflow driven by FIR 3 started interacting with FIR 4 clump;
400:
401: [STEP 3]: The interaction caused the fragmentation of FIR 4 clump into cores;
402:
403: [STEP 4]: These cores will form stars.
404:
405: The present stage of the star formation in the FIR 4 region may be between STEP 3 and STEP 4.
406: We speculate that dusty cores will form protostars inside, and eventually, next generation of the stellar cluster in the FIR 4 region.
407:
408: Possible outflow-triggered star formation has also been reported observationally in NGC 1333 \citep{San01}, L1551 NE \citep{Yoko03}, and NGC 2264 IRS 1 \citep{Nakano03}. In NGC 1333, \citet{San01} found that one of the cores in the 850 $\mu$m emission (SK-1) locates at the tip of the shell evacuated by the outflow, and they suggest that SK-1 is a possible example of the outflow-triggered star formation. In L 1551 NE, \citet{Yoko03} have found an arc-shape structure of dense gas open toward South-West, or the direction of the molecular outflow driven by L1551 IRS 5, in the CS (3--2) emission. They interpret that the dense gas in L1551 NE is affected by the outflow from L1551 IRS 5, creating an arc-shape, and the protostellar formation of L1551 NE. In NGC 2264 IRS 1, \citet{Nakano03} have found that a dense-gas shell seen in the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ emission locates around the outflow driven by IRS 1, and at the inner edge of the dense shell there are three compact cores. They suggest that these cores are entrained or compressed material formed by the outflow and that these cores may represent future sites of the formation of a group of the low-mass stars. Our observational studies in the OMC-2 FIR 3/4 region have suggested that the interaction between the outflow and dense gas can cause the formation of stellar clusters. Recent 3-dimensional MHD simulations by \citet{Naka07} suggest that protostellar outflows can trigger cluster formation through shock compression, providing a theoretical support to our scenario.
409:
410:
411:
412: \section{SUMMARY}
413: We have carried out high angular-resolution ($\sim$ 3$\arcsec$ - 7$\arcsec$) millimeter interferometric observations of OMC-2 FIR 3/4 with the NMA in the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ ($J$=1--0), $^{12}$CO ($J$=1--0), CS ($J$=2--1), and SiO ($v$=0, $J$=2--1) lines as well as in the 3.3 mm continuum emission, and submillimeter single-dish observations with ASTE in the $^{12}$CO ($J$=3--2) and CH$_3$OH ($J_K$=$7_K$--$6_K$) lines. The main results of our new millimeter and submillimeter observations are summarized as follows:
414:
415:
416: \begin{enumerate}
417: \item We suggest that the outflow driven by FIR 3 interacts with the 0.07 pc-scale dense gas associated with FIR 4 ($\equiv$ FIR 4 clump), from morphological, kinematical, chemical and physical evidence. In the morphological evidence, we found that the length of the SW outflow lobe from FIR 3 observed in the CO (1--0, 3--2) lines ($\sim$ 0.09 pc) is shorter than that of the NE lobe ($\sim$ 0.19 pc), and FIR 4 clump is located at the tip of the SW molecular outflow. These results suggest that the SW lobe has been dammed by the interaction with FIR 4 clump. In the chemical and physical evidence, we detected the SiO ($v$=0, $J$=2-1) emission and the submillimeter CH$_3$OH ($J_K$=7$_K$-6$_K$; K=-1,0,2) emission around FIR 4 clump, which are known to trace shocks caused by the interaction between outflows and dense cores. In the kinematical evidence, the P-V diagrams in the $^{12}$CO, CH$_{3}$OH, SiO, and H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ emission show a successive change of the line width along the direction from FIR 3 to FIR 4. The $^{12}$CO (1--0) emission show a distinct L-shaped structure in the P-V diagram, and the location of the broadening is at the most upstream. The CH$_{3}$OH emission also shows a similar L-shape at the downstream from the CO L-shape, and the SiO emission shows the most blueshifted component at the peak of the blueshifted CH$_3$OH component. The dense gas component traced by the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ emission locates at the most downstream of the successive emission distribution and is pinched by the L-shaped CO emission distribution in the P-V diagram. These results indicate the presence of the interaction between the outflow and dense gas in FIR 4.
418:
419:
420:
421:
422: \item In the 3.3-mm continuum emission, we have first resolved FIR 4 clump into eleven dusty cores with a size of 1500 - 4000 AU and a mass of 0.2 - 1.4 M$_{\odot}$. The 3-dementinal separation among these cores, 5000 AU, is on the same order of the Jeans length, 13000 AU. Moreover, the estimated time scale of the fragmentation into the cores, 3.8 $\times10^4$ yr, is also similar to the time scale of the interaction between FIR 4 clump and the outflow from FIR 3, that is, 1.4 $\times 10^4$ yr. Therefore, it is possible that the fragmentation of FIR 4 clump into the cores has been caused by the Jeans instability triggered by the interaction with the outflow driven by FIR 3. We suggest that in this particular case of FIR 4 the outflow interaction most likely triggers the fragmentation into cores.
423:
424:
425: \item We speculate that the dusty cores in FIR 4 will form protostellar sources eventually, and that the FIR 4 region is in the course of cluster formation. We suggest that the outflow driven by FIR 3 triggered the next generation of the cluster formation in the FIR 4 region, and that the FIR 4 region is one of the promising samples of the outflow-triggered cluster formation.
426:
427:
428:
429: \end{enumerate}
430:
431:
432:
433: %% The displaymath environment will produce the same sort of equation as
434: %% the equation environment, except that the equation will not be numbered
435: %% by LaTeX.
436:
437:
438: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,
439: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments
440: %% command.
441:
442: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the
443: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]
444: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,
445: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the
446: %% text to be printed in the second.
447:
448:
449:
450: \acknowledgments
451: We are grateful to the staffs at the Nobeyama Radio Observatory (NRO) for both operating the
452: NMA and helping us with the data reduction, and to M. Yamada, Y. Kurono, and T. Tsukagoshi
453: for their helpful comments. NRO is a branch of the National Astronomical Observatory, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, Japan. We also acknowledge the ASTE staffs for both operating ASTE and helping us with the data reduction. We would like to thank the anonymous referee for providing helpful suggestions to improve the paper. Observations with ASTE were (in part) carried out remotely from Japan by using NTT's GEMnet2 and its partner R\&E (Research and Education) networks, which are based on AccessNova collaboration of University of Chile, NTT Laboratories, and National Astronomical Observatory of Japan. This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research A 18204017.
454:
455:
456:
457:
458: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
459: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
460: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
461: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
462: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
463: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
464: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
465: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
466:
467: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
468: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
469: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
470: %% copy editing. Individual instruments or configurations can be provided
471: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
472:
473:
474: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
475: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix
476: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
477:
478: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
479: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
480: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
481:
482: \appendix
483:
484: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
485: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
486: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
487: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
488: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
489: %%
490: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
491: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
492: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
493: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
494: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
495: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
496: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
497: %% place of the \cite commands.
498:
499: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
500: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
501: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
502:
503: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
504: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
505: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
506: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
507: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
508:
509:
510:
511:
512: \begin{thebibliography}{}
513:
514: \bibitem[Aso et al.(2000)]{Aso00} Aso, Y., Tatematsu, K., Sekimoto, Y., Nakano, T., Umemoto, T., Koyama, K., \& Yamamoto, S.\ 2000, \apjs, 131, 465
515: \bibitem[Avery \& Chiao(1996)]{Avery96} Avery, L.~W., \& Chiao, M.\ 1996, \apj, 463, 642
516: \bibitem[Bachiller et al.(2001)]{Bach01} Bachiller, R., P{\'e}rez Guti{\'e}rrez, M., Kumar, M.~S.~N., \& Tafalla, M.\ 2001, \aap, 372, 899
517: \bibitem[Bergin et al.(1998)]{ber98} Bergin, E.~A., Neufeld, D.~A., \& Melnick, G.~J.\ 1998, \apj, 499, 777
518: \bibitem[Chini et al.(1997)]{Chini97} Chini, R., Reipurth, B., Ward-Thompson, D., Bally, J., Nyman, L.-A., Sievers, A., \& Billawala, Y.\ 1997, \apjl, 474, L135
519: \bibitem[Emerson \& Graeve(1988)]{Eme88} Emerson, D.~T., \& Graeve, R.\ 1988, \aap, 190, 353
520: \bibitem[Ezawa et al.(2004)]{eza05} Ezawa, H., Kawabe, R., Kohno, K., \& Yamamoto, S.\ 2004, \procspie, 5489, 763
521: \bibitem[Gatley et al.(1974)]{Gat74} Gatley, I., Becklin, E.~E., Mattews, K., Neugebauer, G., Penston, M.~V., \& Scoville, N.\ 1974, \apjl, 191, L121
522: \bibitem[Genzel \& Stutzki(1989)]{Gen89} Genzel, R., \& Stutzki, J.\ 1989, \araa, 27, 41
523: \bibitem[Gueth et al.(2003)]{Gueth03} Gueth, F., Bachiller, R., \& Tafalla, M.\ 2003, \aap, 401, L5
524: \bibitem[Haese \& Woods(1979)]{Hae79}Haese, N. N., \& Woods, R. C. 1979, Chem. Phys. Lett., 61, 396
525: \bibitem[Hester \& Desch(2005)]{Hester05} Hester, J.~J., \& Desch, S.~J.\ 2005, Chondrites and the Protoplanetary Disk, 341, 107
526: \bibitem[Hildebrand(1983)]{Hildebrand83} Hildebrand, R.~H.\ 1983, \qjras, 24, 267
527: \bibitem[Hirano et al.(2001)]{Hira01} Hirano, N., Mikami, H., Umemoto, T., Yamamoto, S., \& Taniguchi, Y.\ 2001, \apj, 547, 899
528: \bibitem[Ikeda et al.(2007)]{ike07} Ikeda, N., Sunada, K., \& Kitamura, Y.\ 2007, \apj, 665, 1194
529: \bibitem[Inutsuka \& Miyama(1997)]{Inu97} Inutsuka, S.-I., \& Miyama, S.~M.\ 1997, \apj, 480, 681
530: \bibitem[Johnson et al.(1990)]{Johnson90} Johnson, J.~J., Gehrz, R.~D., Jones, T.~J., Hackwell, J.~A., \& Grasdalen, G.~L.\ 1990, \aj, 100, 518
531: \bibitem[Johnstone \& Bally(1999)]{Joho99} Johnstone, D., \& Bally, J.\ 1999, \apjl, 510, L49
532: \bibitem[J{\o}rgensen et al.(2004)]{Jes04} J{\o}rgensen, J.~K., Hogerheijde, M.~R., Blake, G.~A., van Dishoeck, E.~F., Mundy, L.~G., \& Sch{\"o}ier, F.~L.\ 2004, \aap, 415, 1021
533: \bibitem[J{\o}rgensen et al.(2007)]{Jes07} J{\o}rgensen, J.~K., et al.\ 2007, \apj, 659, 479
534: \bibitem[Kobayashi et al.(2005)]{koba05} Kobayashi, N., Yasui, C., Tokunaga, A.~T., \& Saito, M.\ 2005, Protostars and Planets V, 8639
535: \bibitem[Kamazaki et al.(2005)]{kam05} Kamazaki, T., et al.\ 2005, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIV, 347, 533
536: \bibitem[Kohno et al.(2004)]{Koh04} Kohno, K., et al.\ 2004, The Dense Interstellar Medium in Galaxies, 349
537: \bibitem[Lada \& Lada(2003)]{Lada03} Lada, C.~J., \& Lada, E.~A.\ 2003, \araa, 41, 57
538: \bibitem[Li \& Nakamura(2004)]{Li04} Li, Z.-Y., \& Nakamura, F.\ 2004, \apjl, 609, L83
539: \bibitem[Lis et al.(1998)]{lis98} Lis, D.~C., Serabyn, E., Keene, J., Dowell, C.~D., Benford, D.~J., Phillips, T.~G., Hunter, T.~R., \& Wang, N.\ 1998, \apj, 509, 299
540: \bibitem[Myers et al.(1995)]{Myers95} Myers, P.~C., Bachiller, R., Caselli, P., Fuller, G.~A., Mardones, D., Tafalla, M., \& Wilner, D.~J.\ 1995, \apjl, 449, L65
541: \bibitem[Mangum et al.(2000)]{man00} Mangum, J., Emerson, D., \& Greisen, E.\ 2000, Imaging at Radio through Submillimeter Wavelengths, 217, 179
542: \bibitem[Mardones et al.(1997)]{Mar97} Mardones, D., Myers, P.~C., Tafalla, M., Wilner, D.~J., Bachiller, R., \& Garay, G.\ 1997, \apj, 489, 719
543: \bibitem[Momose et al.(1998)]{Momo98} Momose, M., Ohashi, N., Kawabe, R., Nakano, T., \& Hayashi, M.\ 1998, \apj, 504, 314
544: \bibitem[Moriarty-Schieven et al.(2006)]{Mori06} Moriarty-Schieven, G.~H., Johnstone, D., Bally, J., \& Jenness, T.\ 2006, \apj, 645, 357
545: \bibitem[Motoyama et al.(2007)]{Moto07} Motoyama, K., Umemoto, T., \& Shang, H.\ 2007, \aap, 467, 65
546: \bibitem[Mikami et al.(1992)]{Mikami92} Mikami, H., Umemoto, T., Yamamoto, S., \& Saito,
547: \bibitem[Nakamura \& Li(2007)]{Naka07} Nakamura, F., \& Li, Z.-Y.\ 2007, \apj, 662, 395
548: \bibitem[Nakano et al.(2003)]{Nakano03} Nakano, M., Sugitani, K., \& Morita, K.\ 2003, \pasj, 55, 1
549: \bibitem[Nielbock et al.(2003)]{nie03} Nielbock, M., Chini, R., {M{\"u}ller}, S.~A.~H.\ 2003, \aap, 408, 245
550: \bibitem[Norman \& Silk(1980)]{Norman80} Norman, C., \& Silk, J.\ 1980, \apj, 238, 158
551: \bibitem[Okumura et al.(2000)]{oku00} Okumura, S.~K., et al.\ 2000, \pasj, 52, 393
552: \bibitem[Ohashi et al.(1997)]{Oha97} Ohashi, N., Hayashi, M., Ho, P.~T.~P., Momose, M., Tamura, M., Hirano, N., \& Sargent, A.~I.\ 1997, \apj, 488, 317
553: \bibitem[Peng et al.(1998)]{Pen95} Peng, R., Langer, W.~D., Velusamy, T., Kuiper, T.~B.~H., \& Levin, S.\ 1998, \apj, 497, 842
554: \bibitem[Raga \& Cabrit(1993)]{Raga93} Raga, A., \& Cabrit, S.\ 1993, \aap, 278, 267
555: \bibitem[Reipurth et al.(1999)]{rei99} Reipurth, B., Rodr{\'{\i}}guez, L.~F., \& Chini, R.\ 1999, \aj, 118, 983
556: \bibitem[Saito et al.(1996)]{Sai96} Saito, M., Kawabe, R., Kitamura, Y., \& Sunada, K.\ 1996, \apj, 473, 464
557: \bibitem[Saito et al.(1999)]{Sai99} Saito, M., Sunada, K., Kawabe, R., Kitamura, Y., \& Hirano, N.\ 1999, \apj, 518, 334
558: \bibitem[Saito et al.(2001)]{Sai01} Saito, M., Kawabe, R., Kitamura, Y., \& Sunada, K.\ 2001, \apj, 547, 840
559: \bibitem[Sakamoto et al.(1994)]{Sak94} Sakamoto, S., Hayashi, M., Hasegawa, T., Handa, T., \& Oka, T.\ 1994, \apj, 425, 641
560: \bibitem[Sandell \& Knee(2001)]{San01} Sandell, G., \& Knee, L.~B.~G.\ 2001, \apjl, 546, L49
561: \bibitem[Takahashi et al.(2006)]{Takaha06} Takahashi, S., Saito, M., Takakuwa, S., \& Kawabe, R.\ 2006, \apj, 651, 933
562: \bibitem[Takahashi et al. (2008)]{Takaha07} Takahashi, S., Saito, M., Takakuwa, S., Kusakabe, N., Shimajiri, Y., Tamura, M., \& Kawabe, R. 2008, in prep.
563: \bibitem[Takakuwa et al.(2003a)]{tak03a} Takakuwa, S., Kamazaki, T., Saito, M., \& Hirano, N.\ 2003a, \apj, 584, 818
564: \bibitem[Takakuwa et al.(2003b)]{tak03b} Takakuwa, S., Ohashi, N., \& Hirano, N.\ 2003b, \apj, 590, 932
565: \bibitem[Takakuwa et al.(2004)]{tak04} Takakuwa, S., et al.\ 2004, \apjl, 616, L15
566: \bibitem[Takakuwa et al.(2007a)]{tak07a} Takakuwa, S., Kamazaki, T., Saito, M., Yamaguchi, N., \& Kohno, K.\ 2007a, \pasj, 59, 1
567: \bibitem[Takakuwa et al.(2007b)]{tak07b} Takakuwa, S., et al.\ 2007b, \apj, 662, 431
568: \bibitem[Tatematsu et al.(1993)]{Tate93} Tatematsu, K., et al.\ 1993, \apj, 404, 643
569: \bibitem[Williams et al.(1994)]{Wil94} Williams, J.~P., de Geus, E.~J., \& Blitz, L.\ 1994, \apj, 428, 693
570: \bibitem[Williams et al.(1995)]{Wil95} Williams, J.~P., Blitz, L., \& Stark, A.~A.\ 1995, \apj, 451, 252
571: \bibitem[Williams et al.(2003)]{wil03} Williams, J.~P., Plambeck, R.~L., \& Heyer, M.~H.\ 2003, \apj, 591, 1025
572: \bibitem[Wilner \& Welch(1994)]{Wilner94} Wilner, D.~J., \& Welch, W.~J.\ 1994, \apj, 427, 898
573: \bibitem[Yasui et al.(2006)]{Yasu06} Yasui, C., Kobayashi, N., Tokunaga, A.~T., Terada, H., \& Saito, M.\ 2006, \apj, 649, 753
574: \bibitem[Yokogawa et al.(2003)]{Yoko03} Yokogawa, S., Kitamura, Y., Momose, M., \& Kawabe, R.\ 2003, \apj, 595, 266
575: \bibitem[Yu et al.(1997)]{Yu97} Yu, K.~C., Bally, J., \& Devine, D.\ 1997, \apjl, 485, L45
576: \end{thebibliography}
577:
578:
579:
580: \clearpage
581:
582: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
583: \tablecolumns{5}
584: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
585: \rotate
586: \tablecaption{Parameters for the NMA observations}
587: \tablewidth{0pt}
588: \tablehead{
589: \colhead{parameter} & \colhead{H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ ($J$=1--0)} & \colhead{$^{12}$CO ($J$=1--0)} & \colhead{SiO ($v$=0, $J$=2--1)} & \colhead{CS ($J$=2--1)}
590: }
591: \startdata
592: Configuration$^a$ & D, C and AB & D & D & D, C and AB \\
593: Baseline [k$\lambda$] & 2.9-115 & 3.0-30.8 & 2.9-23.4 & 3.2-113.6 \\
594: Phase reference center (J2000) & \multicolumn{4}{c}{$\alpha _{J2000}=05^h 35^m 26$\fs$47, \delta _{J2000}=-05^{\circ} 10\arcmin 00\farcs4$} \\
595: Primary beam HPBW [arcsec] & 77$\arcsec$ & 62$\arcsec$ & 77$\arcsec$ & 70$\arcsec$ \\
596: Synthesized Beam HPBW [arcsec] & 9$\farcs$54$\times $5$\farcs$15 & 6$\farcs$59$\times$ 5$\farcs$79 & 10$\farcs$22 $\times$ 6$\farcs$37 & 6$\farcs$68 $\times$ 4$\farcs$00 \\
597: Velocity resolution [km s$^{-1}$ ]& 0.108 km s$^{-1}$ & 0.406 km s$^{-1}$ & 0.539 km s$^{-1}$ & 48.94 km s$^{-1}$ \\
598: Gain calibrator$^b$ & \multicolumn{4}{c}{0528+134}\\
599: Bandpass calibrator$^c$ & 3C273, 0420-014, 3C84, 0528+134 & 3C273, 3C84 & 3C273, 3C84 & 3C273, 0420-014, 3C84, 0528+134 \\
600: System temperature in DSB [K]$^d$ & 100-400 K & 150-300 K & 100-350 K & 100-400 K \\
601: Rms noise level [Jy beam $^{-1}$] & 1.2$\times $10$^{-1}$ Jy beam $^{-1}$ & 5.7$\times $10$^{-1}$ Jy beam $^{-1}$ & 2.0$\times $10$^{-1}$ Jy beam $^{-1}$ & 5.1$\times $10$^{-3}$ Jy beam $^{-1}$ \\
602:
603: \enddata
604: \label{NMAobs}
605: \tablenotetext{a}{D and AB are the most compact and sparse configurations, respectively.}
606: \tablenotetext{b}{A gain calibrator, 0528+134, was observed every 20 minutes.}
607: \tablenotetext{c}{The Bandpass calibrations were archived by 40 minute observations of each calibrator.}
608: \tablenotetext{d}{The system noise temperature of the SIS receiver was measured toward the zenith.}
609: \end{deluxetable}
610:
611: \clearpage
612:
613: \begin{deluxetable}{lcc}
614: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
615: \tablecaption{Parameters for the continuum observations}
616: \tablewidth{0pt}
617: \tablehead{
618: \colhead{parameter} & \colhead{Fig.\ref{continuum}a} & \colhead{Fig.\ref{continuum}b}
619: }
620: \startdata
621: Baseline [k$\lambda$] & 2.9-115 & 2.9-115 \\
622: Weighting & Natural & Uniform \\
623: Beamsize (HPBW) [arcsec] & 6$\farcs$96$\times $ 4$\farcs$03 (P.A.=-34.59$^\circ$)& 6$\farcs$55$\times $3$\farcs$34 (P.A.=-40.31$^\circ$) \\
624: P.A. of the beam [$^\circ$] & -34.59 & -40.31\\
625: Rms noise level [Jy beam$^{-1}$] & 1.2$\times $10$^{-3}$ & 1.4$\times $10$^{-3}$ \\
626: \enddata
627: \label{continuumobs}
628: \end{deluxetable}
629:
630: \clearpage
631: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
632: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
633: \tablecaption{Parameters of FIR 4 clump derived from the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ ($J$=1--0) emission}
634: \tablewidth{0pt}
635: \tablehead{
636: \colhead{parameter} &
637: \colhead{M$_{gas}$ } &
638: \colhead{V$_{sys}$ } &
639: \colhead{$\Delta $V$_{FWHM}$}&
640: \colhead{P$_{gas}$ } &
641: \colhead{E$_{gas}$ }
642: \\
643: \colhead{} &
644: \colhead{[M$_{\odot}$]} &
645: \colhead{[km s$^{-1}$]} &
646: \colhead{[km s$^{-1}]$}&
647: \colhead{[M$_{\odot}$ km s$^{-1}$]} &
648: \colhead{[M$_{\odot}$ km$^2$ s$^{-2}$]}
649: }
650: \startdata
651: value & 10.5 & 11.3 & 1.1 & 10.5 & 5.2 \\
652: \enddata
653: \label{Physical_qua}
654: \end{deluxetable}
655:
656: \clearpage
657:
658: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccccc}
659: \scriptsize
660: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
661: \rotate
662: \tablecaption{Identified dusty cores}
663: \tablewidth{0pt}
664: \tablehead{
665: \colhead{source}
666: &\colhead{$\alpha_{J2000}$ }
667: &\colhead{$\beta _{J2000}$}
668: &\colhead{D$_{maj} \times$ D$_{min}$$$$^b$}
669: &\colhead{P.A.}
670: &\colhead{M$_{dust}$$^c$}
671: &\colhead{M$_{cor}$$^d$ }
672: &\colhead{$n$$$}
673: &\colhead{M$_{virial}$}
674: &\colhead{$\Delta $V$_{FWHM}$}
675: &\colhead{$C_{eff}$ }
676: \\
677: \colhead{}
678: &\colhead{}
679: &\colhead{}
680: &\colhead{[$\arcsec \times \arcsec$]}
681: &\colhead{[$\arcsec$]}
682: &\colhead{[M$_{\odot}$]}
683: &\colhead{[M$_{\odot}$] }
684: &\colhead{[$\times$10$^{7}$ cm$^{-3}$]}
685: &\colhead{[M$_{\odot}$]}
686: &\colhead{[km s$^{-1}$]}
687: &\colhead{[km s$^{-1}$]}
688: }
689: \startdata
690: FIR 3 & 05$^h$ 35$^m$ 27$\fs$6 & -05$^\circ$ 09$\arcmin$ 34$\farcs$0 & 11.7$\times$3.6 & 140.46 & 3.0 & 18.7 & 3.1 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
691: FIR 4a$^{a}$ & 05 35 27.4 & -05 09 49.0 & 5.4$\times$3.5 & 34.05 & 0.51 & 3.2 & 1.8 & 1.1 & 0.53 & 0.47\\
692: FIR 4b$^{a}$ & 05 35 26.6 & -05 09 51.0 & 6.3$\times$3.9 & 150.20 & 1.1 & 6.9 & 2.6 & 2.6 & 1.28 & 0.68\\
693: FIR 4c & 05 35 27.0 & -05 09 54.0 & 9.0$\times$4.0 & 168.88 & 0.45 & 5.9 & 0.59 & 1.6 & 0.57 & 0.48\\
694: FIR 4d & 05 35 26.2 & -05 09 55.9 & 4.7$\times$4.4 & 139.87 & 0.76 & 9.6 & 2.2 & 1.2 & 0.55 & 0.47\\
695: FIR 4e & 05 35 26.9 & -05 09 57.5 & 8.4$\times$5.7 & 4.302 & 1.0 & 14.3 & 0.93 & 3.8 & 1.31 & 0.69\\
696: FIR 4f & 05 35 26.6 & -05 09 58.9 & 6.1$\times$3.1 & 168.26 & 0.6 & 7.8 & 2.0 & 1.7 & 0.98 & 0.59\\
697: FIR 4g$^{a}$ & 05 35 26.6 & -05 09 59.4 & 8.3$\times$5.0 & 179.53 & 1.2 & 7.5 & 1.3 & 2.1 & 0.81 & 0.54\\
698: FIR 4h & 05 35 27.1 & -05 10 04.5 & 7.1$\times$5.7 & 156.55 & 0.64 & 8.3 & 0.70 & 3.3 & 1.25 & 0.67\\
699: FIR 4i & 05 35 26.5 & -05 10 06.0 & 6.5$\times$4.8 & 162.23 & 0.21 & 2.7 & 0.34 & 1.7 & 0.70 & 0.50\\
700: FIR 4j$^{a}$ & 05 35 27.2 & -05 10 08.0 & 5.6$\times$4.0 & 111.31 & 1.38 & 8.8 & 3.7 & 1.7 & 0.90 & 0.56 \\
701: FIR 4k$^{a}$ & 05 35 26.3 & -05 10 16.4 & 6.35$\times$3.91 & 165.76 & 0.67 & 4.2 & 1.5 & 2.1 & 1.07 & 0.61\\
702: FIR 4 clump & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 9.4 & 58.6 & 0.098$^{e}$ & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata\\
703: \enddata
704: \label{core}
705: \label{Ident}
706: \tablenotetext{a}{Identified in the naturally-weighted map.}
707: \tablenotetext{b}{The FWHM size estimated by the 2-dimensional Gaussian fitting to the image.}
708: \tablenotetext{c}{Derived from the total flux density integrated within the 3$\sigma$ contour levels,
709: with $D$=450 pc, $\beta $=2, and $T_{d}$=52.5 K. See texts for details.}
710: \tablenotetext{d}{H$_2$ mass corrected for the effect of the missing flux. See texts for details.}
711: \tablenotetext{e}{Assuming a spherically-symmetric core with a radius of 15$\arcsec$ (=6750 AU).}
712:
713: \end{deluxetable}
714:
715:
716:
717:
718:
719: \clearpage
720:
721:
722:
723: \begin{figure}
724: \includegraphics[width=11cm,clip]{f1.eps}
725: \caption{Distribution of the high-velocity blueshifted (blue contour) and redshifted (red contour)
726: $^{12}$CO ($J$=3--2) (left) and $^{12}$CO ($J$=1--0) (right) emission in the OMC-2/FIR 4 region.
727: Panel (a) and (c) show the distribution of the blue (-9.5 km s$^{-1}$ - 4.6 km s$^{-1}$)
728: and red (16.4 km s$^{-1}$ - 29.4 km s$^{-1}$) lobe in the $^{12}$CO ($J$=3--2)
729: line observed with ASTE \citep{Tahaka07}, while
730: panel (b) and (d) show the distribution of the blue (3.7 km s$^{-1}$ to 6.1 km s$^{-1}$)
731: and red (15.1 km s$^{-1}$ to 18.3 km s$^{-1}$) lobe in the $^{12}$CO ($J$=1--0)
732: line observed with the NMA, respectively.
733: Open black circles show the field of view of the NMA observations, green crosses
734: the position of MIR sources \citep{nie03}, blue circles the position of 3.6 cm free-free sources
735: \citep{rei99}, and red squares the peak position of the 1.3 mm dust-continuum emission \citep{Chini97}. Filled
736: ellipses at the bottom left corner of each panel indicate the beam size. Contour levels of these maps start at
737: $\pm$ 5 $\sigma$ levels with an interval of 5 $\sigma$. The rms noise levels (1 $\sigma$) of the panel (a), (b),
738: (c) and (d) are 1.2 K, 0.45 Jy, 1.2 K, and 0.70 Jy beam$^{-1}$, respectively.}
739: \label{Line_map_CO}
740: \end{figure}
741:
742:
743:
744:
745: \begin{figure}
746: \includegraphics[width=15cm,clip]{f2.eps}
747: \caption{$^{12}$CO ($J$=3--2; 345.705 GHz) spectrum at FIR 4 taken with ASTE \citep{Takaha07}
748: The rms noise level (1$\sigma $) is 0.5 K in T$_B$ at a velocity resolution of 1.1 km s$^{-1}$.
749: A dashed line shows the systemic velocity ($\sim$ 11.3 km s$^{-1}$), obtained from the Gaussian fit to the spectrum.}
750: \label{12cospec}
751: \end{figure}
752:
753:
754: \begin{figure}
755: \includegraphics[width=15cm,clip]{f3.eps}
756: \caption{Total integrated intensity map of the CS ($J$=2--1) emission in the OMC-2/FIR 4 region, obtained with the NMA.
757: Symbols in the Figure are the same as in Figure \ref{Line_map_CO}.
758: Contour levels of this map start at $\pm$ 3 $\sigma$ levels with an interval of 1 $\sigma$.
759: The rms noise level (1 $\sigma$) of this map is 5.1$\times$10$^{-3}$ Jy beam$^{-1}$. }
760: \label{CS}
761: \end{figure}%
762:
763:
764:
765:
766: \begin{figure}
767: \includegraphics[width=15cm,clip]{f4.eps}
768: \caption{Total integrated intensity map of the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ ($J$=1--0) emission (left), and maps of the
769: blueshifted (10.5 - 11.2 km s$^{-1}$) the redshifted (11.3 - 12.4 km s$^{-1}$)
770: H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ components (right) in the FIR 4 region, obtained with NMA.
771: Symbols in the Figure are the same as in Figure \ref{Line_map_CO}.
772: Contour levels of these maps start at $\pm$ 3 $\sigma $ levels with an interval of 1 $\sigma$.
773: The rms noise levels (1 $\sigma$) in panel (a), the blue and red contour in panel (b)
774: are 0.81, 0.49 and 0.49 Jy beam$^{-1}$, respectively. }
775: \label{H13CO+}
776: \end{figure}%
777:
778:
779: \begin{figure}
780: \includegraphics[width=15cm,clip]{f5.eps}
781: \caption{ASTE CH$_3$OH ($J_K$=7$_0$--6$_0$) and NMA SiO ($v$=0, $J$=2--1) maps in the FIR 4 region.
782: Panel (a) and (b) show the distribution of the blue (5.7 km s$^{-1}$ - 9.9 km s$^{-1}$)
783: and red (13.1 km s$^{-1}$ - 14.2 km s$^{-1}$) lobe in the CH$_3$OH ($J_K$=7$_0$--6$_0$) line,
784: respectively.
785: Panel (c) shows the distribution of the blue lobe in the SiO ($v$=0, $J$=2--1) line at a velocity
786: range from 3.4 km s$^{-1}$ to 6.1 km s$^{-1}$.
787: Symbols in the Figure are the same as in Figure \ref{Line_map_CO}. Contour levels in panel (a) and (b) start at
788: $\pm$ 5 $\sigma$ levels with an interval of 5 $\sigma$. Contour levels in panel (c) start
789: at $\pm$ 3 $\sigma $ levels with an interval of 1 $\sigma $.
790: The rms noise levels (1 $\sigma$) in panel (a), (b) and (c) are 0.024, 0.015 K, and 0.11 Jy beam$^{-1}$, respectively.}
791: \label{Line_map_shock}
792: \end{figure}%
793:
794:
795: \begin{figure}
796: \includegraphics[width=15cm,clip]{f6.eps}
797: \caption{CH$_3$OH ($J_K$=7$_0$--6$_0$; 338.408 GHz) spectrum at FIR 4 taken with ASTE.
798: The rms noise level (1$\sigma$) is 0.17 K in T$_A^{\ast }$ at a velocity resolution of 0.5 km s$^{-1}$.
799: A dashed line shows the systemic velocity ($\sim$ 11.3 km s$^{-1}$) in the FIR 4 region estimated from
800: the NMA H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ spectrum.}
801: \label{spectral}
802: \end{figure}%
803:
804:
805: \begin{figure}
806: \includegraphics[width=15cm,clip]{f7.eps}
807: \caption{3.3 mm dust-continuum maps in the FIR 4 region observed with the NMA. The left panel shows
808: the naturally-weighted map, and the right panel the uniformly-weighted map.
809: Symbols in the figure are the same as in Figure \ref{Line_map_CO}. Contour levels
810: start at $\pm$ 3 $\sigma $ noise levels with an interval of 1 $\sigma $. The rms noise level
811: (1 $\sigma $) in panel (a) and (b) are 1.2$\times$10$^{-3}$ and 1.4$\times$10$^{-3}$ Jy beam$^{-1}$, respectively.
812: }
813: \label{continuum}
814: \end{figure}%
815:
816: \begin{figure}
817: \includegraphics[width=15cm,clip]{f8.eps}
818: \caption{Position-Velocity (P-V) diagrams of the $^{12}$CO ($J$=1--0) (upper left), H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ ($J$=1--0)
819: (upper right), SiO ($v$=0, $J$=2--1) (lower left) and CH$_3$OH ($J_K$=7$_0$--6$_0$) (lower right) emission in
820: the FIR 4 region.
821: Two horizontal lines in each panel show the position
822: of FIR 3 and FIR 4, while a vertical line the systemic velocity of 11.3 km s$^{-1}$ in FIR 4 estimated from
823: the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ data. The cut line of
824: panel (a), (b), and (d) is adopted to be along P.A. = 30$^\circ$, passing through the position of FIR 3 and FIR 4.
825: The cut line of panel (c) is taken to be along P.A. = 35$^\circ$, passing through the compact SiO emission
826: and FIR 3.
827: Contour levels in panel (a) and (d) start at $\pm$ 5 $\sigma$ levels with an interval of 5 $\sigma$.
828: Contour levels in panel (b) start at $\pm$ 3 $\sigma$ levels with an interval of 3 $\sigma$.
829: Contour levels in panel (c) start at $\pm$ 2 $\sigma$ levels with an interval of 1 $\sigma$.
830: The rms noise level (1 $\sigma$) in panel (a)-(d)
831: are 0.57 Jy beam$^{-1}$, 0.12 Jy beam$^{-1}$, 0.2 Jy beam$^{-1}$, and 0.17K, respectively.
832: }
833: \label{PV}
834: \end{figure}%
835:
836:
837:
838: \begin{figure}
839: \includegraphics[width=10cm,clip]{f9.eps}
840: \caption{Schematic picture of the outflow-triggered star formation in the FIR 4 region.
841: In STEP 1, FIR 3 was born and drove the outflow. In STEP 2, the outflow driven by FIR 3 interacted
842: with FIR 4 clump. In STEP 3, the interaction between the outflow and FIR 4 clump caused the fragmentation
843: of FIR 4 clump into cores. In the final STEP, these cores form stars. The current stage of the FIR 4 region may be
844: between STEP 3 and STEP 4. In these figures, horizontal lines show the plane of the sky and the observers are
845: located at the bottom.}
846: \label{scenario}
847: \end{figure}%
848:
849:
850:
851: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
852: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
853: %% To embed the sample graphics in
854: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
855: %% \includegraphics commands
856: %%
857: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
858: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
859: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
860: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
861: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
862: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
863: %%
864: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
865: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
866: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
867: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
868: %% journal to journal.
869: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
870: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
871: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
872: %% available in the electronic journal.
873:
874: %% Here we use \plottwo to present two versions of the same figure,
875: %% one in black and white for print the other in RGB color
876: %% for online presentation. Note that the caption indicates
877: %% that a color version of the figure will be available online.
878: %%
879:
880:
881: %% If you are not including electronic art with your submission, you may
882: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the
883: %% User Guide for details.
884: %%
885: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
886: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
887: %% after every seventh one.
888:
889: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before
890: %% each one.
891:
892: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables: the
893: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX
894: %% table environment. Use of deluxetable is preferred.
895: %%
896:
897: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,
898: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.
899:
900: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}
901: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.
902: %% We also use the \rotate command to rotate the table to
903: %% landscape orientation since it is very wide even at the
904: %% reduced font size.
905: %%
906: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed
907: %% inside the \tablecaption.
908:
909: %% This table also includes a table comment indicating that the full
910: %% version will be available in machine-readable format in the electronic
911: %% edition.
912:
913:
914: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
915: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
916: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
917: %\tablecomments{Table \ref{tbl-1} is published in its entirety in the
918: %electronic edition of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}. A portion is
919: %shown here for guidance regarding its form and content.}
920: %\tablenotetext{a}{Sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-1} that was generated
921: %with the deluxetable environment}
922: %\tablenotetext{b}{Another sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-1}}
923: %\tablerefs{
924: %\end{deluxetable}
925:
926:
927:
928:
929: \end{document}
930:
931: %%
932: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
933: