1: % iaus2esa.tex -- sample pages for Proceedings IAU Symposium document class
2: % (based on v1.0 cca2esam.tex)
3: % v1.04 released 17 May 2004 by TechBooks
4: %% small changes and additions made by KAvdH/IAU 4 June 2004
5: % Copyright (2004) International Astronomical Union
6:
7: \NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}
8:
9: \newcommand{\apj}{ApJ}
10: \newcommand{\apjl}{ApJL}
11: \newcommand{\aap}{A\&A}
12:
13: \documentclass{iaus}
14: \usepackage{graphicx}
15:
16: \title[VLBA determinations of the distances to nearby star-forming regions]
17: {VLBA determinations of the distances to nearby star-forming regions}
18:
19: \author[Loinard et al.] %% give here short author list %%
20: {Laurent Loinard$^1$, Rosa M.\ Torres$^1$,\\ Amy J.\ Mioduszewski$^2$ \and Luis F.\ Rodr\'{\i}guez$^1$}
21:
22: \affiliation{$^1$Centro de Radiastronom\'{\i}a y Astrof\'{\i}sica,
23: Universidad Nacional Aut\'onoma de M\'exico \\
24: Apartado Postal 72-3 (Xangari), 58089 Morelia, Michoac\'an, M\'exico \\
25: email: {\tt l.loinard,r.torres,l.rodriguez@astrosmo.unam.mx} \\
26: [\affilskip]$^2$National Radio Astronomy Observatory,
27: Array Operations Center \\
28: 1003 Lopezville Road, Socorro, NM 87801, USA \\
29: email: {\tt amiodusz@aoc.nrao.edu}}
30:
31: \pubyear{2008}
32: \volume{248} %% insert here IAU Symposium No.
33: \pagerange{119--126}
34: % \date{?? and in revised form ??}
35: \setcounter{page}{119}
36: \jname{A Giant Step : from Milli- to Micro-arcsec Astrometry}
37: \editors{A.C. Editor, B.D. Editor \& C.E. Editor, eds.}
38: \begin{document}
39:
40: \maketitle
41:
42: \begin{abstract} Using phase-referenced multi-epoch {\em Very Long
43: Baseline Array} observations, we have measured the trigonometric
44: parallax of several young stars in the Taurus and Ophiuchus
45: star-forming regions with unprecedented accuracy. The mean distance to
46: the Taurus complex was found to be about 140 pc, and its depth around
47: 20 pc, comparable to the linear extent of Taurus on the plane of the
48: sky. In Ophiuchus, 4 sources were observed so far. Two of them were
49: found to be at about 160 pc (the distance traditionally attributed to
50: Ophiuchus), while the other 2 are at about 120 pc. Since the entire
51: Ophiuchus complex is only a few parsecs across, this difference is
52: unlikely to reflect the depth of the region. Instead, we argue that
53: two physically unrelated sites of star-formation are located along the
54: line of sight toward Ophiuchus.
55:
56:
57: \keywords{astrometry, stars: distances, stars: formation, radio continuum:
58: stars, stars: magnetic fields, radiation mechanisms: nonthermal, techniques:
59: interferometric, binaries: general, ISM: clouds}
60:
61:
62: \end{abstract}
63:
64: \firstsection % if your document starts with a section,
65: % remove some space above using this command.
66: \section{Introduction}
67:
68: To provide accurate observational constraints for pre-main sequence
69: evolutionary models, and thereby improve our understanding of
70: star-formation, it is crucial to measure as accurately as possible the
71: properties (age, mass, luminosity, etc.) of individual young stars.
72: The determination of most of these parameters, however, depends
73: critically on the often poorly known distance to the object under
74: consideration. While the average distance to nearby low-mass
75: star-forming regions (e.g.\ Taurus or $\rho-$Ophiuchus) has been
76: estimated to about 20\% precision using indirect methods (Elias
77: 1978a,b; Kenyon et al.\ 1994; Knude \& Hog 1998; Bertout \& Genova
78: 2006), the line-of-sight depth of these regions is largely unknown,
79: and accurate distances to individual objects are still missing. Even
80: the highly successful Hipparchos mission (Perryman et al.\ 1997) did
81: little to improve the situation (Bertout et al.\ 1999) because young
82: stars are still heavily embedded in their parental clouds and are,
83: therefore, faint in the optical bands observed by Hipparchos.
84:
85:
86: Low-mass young stars often generate non-thermal continuum emission
87: produced by the interaction of free electrons with the intense
88: magnetic fields that tend to exist near their surfaces (e.g.\
89: Feigelson \& Montmerle 1999). If the magnetic field intensity and the
90: electron energy are sufficient, the resulting compact radio emission
91: can be detected with Very Long Baseline Interferometers (VLBI --e.g.\
92: Andr\'e et al.\ 1992). The relatively recent possibility of accurately
93: calibrating the phase of VLBI observations of faint, compact radio
94: sources using nearby quasars makes it possible to measure the absolute
95: position of these objects (or, more precisely, the angular offset
96: between them and the calibrating quasar) to better than a tenth of a
97: milli-arcsecond (Brisken et al.\ 2000, 2002; Loinard et al.\ 2005,
98: 2007; Torres et al.\ 2007; Xu et al.\ 2006; Hachisuka et al. 2006;
99: Hirota et al.\ 2007; Sandstrom et al.\ 2007). This level of precision
100: is sufficient to constrain the trigonometric parallax of sources
101: within a few hundred parsecs of the Sun (in particular of nearby young
102: stars) with a precision better than a few percents using multi-epoch
103: VLBI observations. With this goal in mind, we have initiated a large
104: project aimed at accurately measuring the trigonometric parallax of a
105: sample of magnetically active young stars in the most prominent and
106: often-studied northern star-forming regions within 1 kpc of the Sun
107: (Taurus, $\rho-$Ophiuchus, Perseus, Serpens, etc.) using the
108: 10-element Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) of the National Radio
109: Astronomy Observatory (NRAO). Here, we will summarize the results
110: obtained so far in Taurus and Ophiuchus.
111:
112:
113: \section{Observations and parallax determination}
114:
115: All the observations used here were obtained in the continuum at 3.6
116: cm (8.42 GHz) with the {\em Very Long Baseline Array} (VLBA) of the
117: {\em National Radio Astronomy Observatory} (NRAO). A total of 7
118: sources were studied so far: three in Taurus (T Tau, Hubble 4, and
119: HDE~283572), and four in Ophiuchus (S1, DoAr21, VSSG14, and WL5). In
120: all cases, between 6 and 12 observations spread over 1.5 to 2 years
121: were obtained. The data were edited and calibrated following the
122: standard VLBA procedures for phase-referenced observations (see
123: Loinard et al.\ 2007, and Torres et al.\ 2007 for details).
124:
125: The displacement of the sources on the celestial sphere is the
126: combination of their trigonometric parallax ($\pi$) and their proper
127: motions ($\mu$). For isolated sources (such as Hubble 4, and
128: HDE~283572 in our case), it is common to consider linear and uniform
129: proper motions, so the right ascension and the declination vary as a
130: function of time $t$ as:
131:
132: \begin{eqnarray}
133: \alpha(t) & = & \alpha_0+(\mu_\alpha \cos \delta) t + \pi f_\alpha(t) \label{uni1}\\%
134: \delta(t) & = & \delta_0+\mu_\delta t + \pi f_\delta(t), \label{uni2}
135: \end{eqnarray}
136:
137: \noindent where $\alpha_0$ and $\delta_0$ are the coordinates of the
138: source at a given reference epoch, $\mu_\alpha$ and $\mu_\delta$ are
139: the components of the proper motion, and $f_\alpha$ and $f_\delta$ are
140: the projections over $\alpha$ and $\delta$, respectively, of the
141: parallactic ellipse.
142:
143: For sources in multiple systems, however, the proper motions are
144: affected by the gravitational influence of the other members of the
145: system. As a consequence, the motions are curved and accelerated,
146: rather than linear and uniform. If the orbital period is long compared
147: with the timespan covered by the observations (as will be the case for
148: T Tau --see Loinard et al.\ 2003), it is sufficient to include a
149: uniform acceleration in the fit. This leads to functions of the form:
150:
151: \begin{table}
152: \begin{center}
153: \caption{Distances to the sources in Taurus and Ophiuchus}
154: \label{tab1}
155: \begin{tabular}{lccccccc}
156: \hline
157: Complex & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Taurus} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{Ophiuchus} \\%
158: \hline
159: Source & T Tau & Hubble 4 & HDE~283572 & S1 & DoAr21 & VSSG14 & WL5 \\%
160: Distance (pc) & 147.6 $\pm$ 0.6 & 132.8 $\pm$ 0.5 & 128.5 $\pm$ 0.6 & 116.9 $^{+7.2}_{-6.4}$ & 121.9 $^{+5.8}_{-5.3}$ & 165.6 $^{+6.2}_{-5.8}$ & 168.3 $^{+8.2}_{-9.3}$ \\%
161: \hline
162: \end{tabular}
163: \end{center}
164: \end{table}
165:
166:
167: \begin{eqnarray}
168: \alpha(t) & = & \alpha_0+(\mu_{\alpha 0} \cos \delta) t + {1 \over 2} (a_\alpha\cos \delta) t^2 + \pi f_\alpha(t) \label{acc1}\\%
169: \delta(t) & = & \delta_0+\mu_{\delta 0} t + {1 \over 2} a_\delta t^2 + \pi f_\delta(t), \label{acc2}
170: \end{eqnarray}
171:
172: \noindent where $\mu_{\alpha 0}$ and $\mu_{\delta 0}$ are the proper
173: motions at a reference epoch, and $a_\alpha$ and $a_\delta$ are the
174: projections of the uniform acceleration (see Fig.\ 1 for a comparison
175: between fits with and without acceleration terms).
176:
177: Finally, if a source is a member of a multiple system whose orbital
178: period is shorter than, or comparable with the timespan covered by the
179: observations (as will be the case for all Ophiuchus sources), then a
180: full Keplerian fit is needed, but additionnal observations are
181: required to properly constrain that fit. These observations are
182: currently being obtained for all Ophiuchus sources, but are not yet
183: analyzed. As a consequence, the fits presented bellow for the
184: Ophiuchus sources are based on Eqs.\ \ref{uni1} and \ref{uni2}. The
185: resulting uncertainties will be much larger than for the sources in
186: Taurus because the orbital motions generate an unmodelled scatter
187: around the mean positions of the sources. These increased errors
188: should disappear once we include the new observations, and perform a
189: full Keplerian fit.
190:
191: \begin{figure}[t]
192: \begin{center}
193: \includegraphics[width=3.0in,angle=270]{f1.eps}
194: \caption{Measured positions of T Tau Sb and best fit without (a) and
195: with (b) acceleration terms. The observed positions are shown as
196: ellipses, the size of which represents the magnitude of the
197: errors. Note the very significant improvement when acceleration terms
198: are included.}
199: \label{fig1}
200: \end{center}
201: \end{figure}
202:
203: \section{Results and Discussion}
204:
205: The distance to the seven sources studied here are given in Tab.\ 1.
206: For the Taurus sources, Hipparchos parralaxes (Bertout et al.\ 1999),
207: and/or estimates based on a modified convergent point method (Bertout
208: \& Genova 2006) are available. Our measurements are always consistent
209: with these values, but are one to two orders of magnitude more
210: accurate. Only one other source in Taurus (V773 Tau; Lestrade et al.\
211: 1999) has a VLBI-based parallax determination. Taking the mean of that
212: and our 3 measurements, we estimate the mean distance to the Taurus
213: cluster to be $\bar{d}$ = 137 pc. The dispersion about that mean leads
214: to a full width at half maximum depth of about 20 pc, comparable to
215: the linear extent of Taurus on the plane of the sky.
216:
217: Traditionnaly assumed to be at a distance of 165 pc (Chini 1981),
218: Ophiuchus has recently been proposed to be somewhat nearer, at 120 pc
219: (Knude \& Hog 1998). Interestingly, two of our sources are consistent
220: with the traditionnal value, but the other two are consistent with a
221: distance of 120 pc. Since Ophiuchus is only a few parsecs across on
222: the plane of the sky, it is very unlikely to be 40 pc deep. It is
223: noteworthy that the two sources at about 120 pc (S1 and DoAr21) are
224: associated with the sub-condensation Oph A, whereas the two sources at
225: $\sim$ 165 pc (VSSG14 and WL5) are associated with the condensation
226: Oph B (See Motte et al.\ 1998 for an overview of the Ophiuchus
227: complex). Thus, a plausible explanation of our results is that two
228: physically unrelated star-forming regions are located along the
229: line-of-sight toward Ophiuchus. Interestingly, Knude \& Hog (1998)
230: noticed an effect that would be consistent with this possibility in
231: their analysis of extinction towards Ophiuchus. While a clear
232: extinction step was clearly visible at 120 pc, extinction was
233: apparently extending up to about 160 pc. Additional VLBI observations
234: will be needed to confirm the existence of two regions of
235: star-formation towards Ophiuchus, and to investigate at which distance
236: the other condensations in Ophiuchus are located.
237:
238: \section{Conclusions and perspectives}
239:
240: The present results show that VLBA observations of non-thermal sources
241: associated with young stars have the potential to improve very
242: significantly our knowledge of the space distribution of star-forming
243: regions in the Solar neighborod. Indeed, the precision obtained by
244: these measurements is even sufficient to probe the 3D structure of
245: star-forming regions. Coupled with pre-main sequence evolutionnary
246: models, such information could be used to reconstruct the history of
247: star-formation with individual regions.
248:
249:
250: \begin{thebibliography}{}
251:
252: \bibitem[Andre et al.(1992)]{1992ApJ...401..667A} Andre, P., Deeney, B.~D.,
253: Phillips, R.~B., \& Lestrade, J.-F.\ 1992, \apj, 401, 667
254:
255: \bibitem[]{859}
256: Bertout, C., Robichon, N., \& Arenou, F., 1999, A\&A, 352, 574
257:
258: \bibitem[Bertout \& Genova(2006)]{2006A&A...460..499B} Bertout, C., \&
259: Genova, F.\ 2006, \aap, 460, 499
260:
261: \bibitem[Brisken et al.(2000)]{2000ApJ...541..959B} Brisken, W.~F., Benson,
262: J.~M., Beasley, A.~J., Fomalont, E.~B., Goss, W.~M., \& Thorsett, S.~E.\
263: 2000, \apj, 541, 959
264:
265: \bibitem[Brisken et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...571..906B} Brisken, W.~F., Benson,
266: J.~M., Goss, W.~M., \& Thorsett, S.~E.\ 2002, \apj, 571, 906
267:
268: \bibitem[Chini(1981)]{1981A&A....99..346C} Chini, R.\ 1981, \aap, 99, 346
269:
270: \bibitem[Elias(1978)]{1978ApJ...224..857E} Elias, J.~H.\ 1978a, \apj, 224,
271: 857
272:
273: \bibitem[Elias(1978)]{1978ApJ...224..453E} Elias, J.~H.\ 1978b, \apj, 224,
274: 453
275:
276: \bibitem[]{884}
277: Feigelson, E.D., \& Montmerle, T., 1999, ARAA, 37, 363
278:
279: \bibitem[Hachisuka et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...645..337H} Hachisuka, K., et
280: al.\ 2006, \apj, 645, 337
281:
282: \bibitem[]{}
283: Hirota, T., et al.\ PASJ, in press (http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.3792)
284:
285: \bibitem[]{900}
286: Kenyon, S.J., Dobrzycka, D., \& Hartmann L., 1994, AJ, 108, 1872
287:
288: \bibitem[Knude \& Hog(1998)]{1998A&A...338..897K} Knude, J., \& Hog, E.\
289: 1998, \aap, 338, 897
290:
291: \bibitem[]{734}
292: Lestrade, J.-F., Preston, R.A., Jones, D.L., et al., 1999, A\&A, 344, 1014
293:
294: \bibitem[Loinard et al.(2007)]{} Loinard, L., Torres, R.~M.,
295: Mioduszewski, A.~J., Rodr{\'{\i}}guez, L.~F., Gonz{\'a}lez, R.~A.,
296: Lachaume, R., V\'azquez, V., \& Gonz\'alez, E.\ 2007, ApJ, 671, 546
297:
298: \bibitem[Loinard et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...619L.179L} Loinard, L.,
299: Mioduszewski, A.~J., Rodr{\'{\i}}guez, L.~F., Gonz{\'a}lez, R.~A.,
300: Rodr{\'{\i}}guez, M.~I., \& Torres, R.~M.\ 2005, \apjl, 619, L179
301:
302: \bibitem[]{923}
303: Loinard L., Rodr\'{\i}guez, L.F., \& Rodr\'{\i}guez, M.I., 2003, ApJ, 587,
304: L47
305:
306: \bibitem[Motte et al.(1998)]{1998A&A...336..150M} Motte, F., Andre, P., \&
307: Neri, R.\ 1998, \aap, 336, 150
308:
309: \bibitem[]{927}
310: Perryman, M.A.C., Lindegren, L., Kovalevsky, J., et al., 1997, A\&A, 323, L49
311:
312: \bibitem[]{}
313: Sandstrom K.M., et al., ApJ, in press (http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.2361)
314:
315: \bibitem[]{}
316: Torres, R.~M., Loinard, L., Mioduszewski, A.~J., \& Rodr{\'{\i}}guez, L.~F.\
317: 2007, ApJ, 671, 1813
318:
319: \bibitem[Xu et al.(2006)]{2006Sci...311...54X} Xu, Y., Reid, M.~J., Zheng,
320: X.~W., \& Menten, K.~M.\ 2006, Science, 311, 54
321:
322: \end{thebibliography}
323:
324: \end{document}
325: