1: %\documentclass[12pt, preprint]{aastex}
2: \documentclass{emulateapj}
3: %\usepackage{epsfig}
4: %\usepackage{lscape}
5: %\usepackage{natbib}
6:
7: % \usepackage{times}
8:
9: \newcommand {\apgt} {\ {\raise-.5ex\hbox{$\buildrel>\over\sim$}}\ }
10: \newcommand {\aplt} {\ {\raise-.5ex\hbox{$\buildrel<\over\sim$}}\ }
11:
12: \newcommand{\mbh}{M_{\rm BH}}%
13: \newcommand{\etal}{et al.~}%
14:
15: \def\sun{\hbox{$\odot$}}
16: \def\cm3{cm$^{-3}$}
17: \def\kms{km~s$^{-1}$}
18: \def\msunyr{M$_{\odot}$\,yr$^{-1}$\,}
19: \def\lsun{L$_{\odot}$}
20: \def\rsun{R$_{\odot}$}
21: \def\mdot{$\dot{\rm M}$}
22: \def\mo{M$_{\odot}$}
23: \def\msun{M$_{\odot}$}
24: \def\mbol{M$_{\rm bol}$}
25: \let\ts=\thinspace
26: \def\one{\ts {\,\sc i}}
27: \def\two{\ts {\,\sc ii}}
28: \def\three{\ts {\,\sc iii}}
29: \def\four{\ts {\,\sc iv}}
30: \def\five{\ts {\sc v}}
31: \def\six{\ts {\sc vi}}
32: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}
33: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}
34: \def\Rstar{R_{\ast}}
35: \def\Rsun{R_{\odot}}
36: \def\sles{\lower2pt\hbox{$\buildrel {\scriptstyle <}
37: \over {\scriptstyle\sim}$}}
38: \def\sgreat{\lower2pt\hbox{$\buildrel {\scriptstyle >}
39: \over {\scriptstyle\sim}$}}
40:
41: \slugcomment{To Appear in ApJ Letters 2008 August 20}
42: \shorttitle{Probing Shock Breakout in Two SNLS Type II-P SNe with \textsl{GALEX}}
43: \shortauthors{Gezari et al.}
44:
45: \begin{document}
46:
47: \title{Probing Shock Breakout with Serendipitous \textsl{GALEX} Detections \\ of Two SNLS Type II-P Supernovae}
48:
49: \author{Suvi Gezari,\altaffilmark{1}
50: Luc Dessart,\altaffilmark{2,3}
51: St\'ephane Basa,\altaffilmark{4}
52: D.~Chris Martin,\altaffilmark{5}
53: James D.~Neill,\altaffilmark{5}
54: S.~E. Woosley,\altaffilmark{6}
55: D.~John Hillier,\altaffilmark{7}
56: Gurvan Bazin,\altaffilmark{8}
57: Karl Forster,\altaffilmark{5}
58: Peter G.~Friedman,\altaffilmark{5}
59: J\'er\'emy Le Du, \altaffilmark{9}
60: Alain Mazure,\altaffilmark{4}
61: Patrick Morrissey,\altaffilmark{5}
62: Susan G.~Neff,\altaffilmark{10}
63: David Schiminovich,\altaffilmark{11}
64: and
65: Ted K.~Wyder\altaffilmark{5}
66: }
67: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics and Astronomy,
68: Johns Hopkins University,
69: 3400 North Charles Street,
70: Baltimore, MD 21218 \email{suvi@pha.jhu.edu}}
71:
72: \altaffiltext{2}{Steward Observatory, 933 North Cherry Avenue,
73: Tucson, AZ 85721}
74:
75: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University,
76: Princeton, NJ 08544}
77:
78: \altaffiltext{4}{Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille,
79: 13376 Marseille Cedex 12, France}
80:
81: \altaffiltext{5}{California Institute of Technology,
82: MC 405-47,
83: 1200 East California Boulevard,
84: Pasadena, CA 91125}
85:
86: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
87: University of California, Santa Cruz,
88: CA 95064}
89:
90: \altaffiltext{7}{Department of Physics and Astronomy,
91: University of Pittsburgh, 3941 O'Hara Street,
92: Pittsburgh, PA 15260}
93:
94:
95: \altaffiltext{8}{DSM/DAPNIA, CEA/Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France}
96:
97: \altaffiltext{9}{CPPM, CNRS-IN2P3 and Universitat Aix-Marseille II, Case 907, 13288 Marseille Cedex 9, France}
98:
99: \altaffiltext{10}{Laboratory for Astronomy and Solar Physics,
100: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
101: Greenbelt, MD 20771}
102:
103: \altaffiltext{11}{Department of Astronomy,
104: Columbia University,
105: New York, NY 10027}
106:
107:
108: \begin{abstract}
109: We report the serendipitous detection by \textsl{GALEX}
110: of fast ($<$1\,day) rising ($\apgt$1\,mag) UV emission from two
111: Type II plateau (II-P) supernovae (SNe) at $z$=0.185 and 0.324 discovered by the Supernova
112: Legacy Survey.
113: Optical photometry and VLT spectroscopy
114: 2 weeks after the \textsl{GALEX} detections link the onset of UV emission
115: to the time of shock breakout.
116: Using radiation hydrodynamics and non-LTE radiative transfer simulations, and starting
117: from a standard red supergiant (RSG; Type II-P SN progenitor) star evolved self-consistently
118: from the main sequence to iron core collapse, we model the shock breakout phase and
119: the 55 hr that follow.
120: The small scale height of our RSG atmosphere model suggests that the breakout signature
121: is a thermal soft X-ray burst ($\lambda_{\rm peak}\sim$90\AA) with a duration of $\sles$ 2000\,s.
122: Longer durations are possible but require either an extended and tenuous non-standard envelope,
123: or an unusually dense RSG wind with $\dot{M} \sim 10^{-3}$\,\mo\,yr$^{-1}$.
124: The \textsl{GALEX} observations miss the peak of the luminous ($M_{\rm FUV}\approx-20$)
125: UV burst but unambiguously capture the rise of the emission and a subsequent 2 day long plateau. The postbreakout, UV-bright plateau is a prediction of
126: our model in which the shift of the peak of the spectral energy distribution (SED) from
127: $\sim$100 to $\sim$1000\AA\ and the ejecta expansion both counteract the decrease in
128: bolometric luminosity from $\sim$10$^{11}$ to $\sim$10$^9$\,L$_{\odot}$ over that period.
129: Based on the observed detection efficiency of our study we make predictions for
130: the breakout detection rate of the \textsl{GALEX} Time Domain Survey.
131: \end{abstract}
132:
133: \keywords{supernovae: general --- ultraviolet: ISM --- radiative transfer --- stars: atmospheres}
134:
135: \section{Introduction \label{intro}}
136:
137: In recent years, with the advent of sensitive $\gamma$-ray and X-ray detectors,
138: high-energy radiation from stellar objects has been
139: observed routinely. This includes in particular the long-soft $\gamma$-ray bursts (GRBs),
140: associated at present with a subset of hydrogen- and helium-deficient (Type Ic) SNe (Woosley \& Bloom 2006).
141: Their duration of $\sgreat$ 2\,s suggests
142: a compact progenitor with a $\sim$1\,s light-crossing time, a Wolf-Rayet (WR) star.
143: Observations have revealed that there is in fact a continuum from $\gamma$-ray to X-ray signatures
144: in association with such SNe. Hence, some events are related to GRBs in association
145: with relativistic ejecta, while others are associated with X-ray flashes and the SN shock breaking out into
146: the progenitor's dense wind, as in the Type Ic SN 2006aj and the Type Ib SN 2008D
147: (Campana et al. 2006; Waxman et al. 2007; Soderberg et al. 2008.; Li 2007, 2008).
148: In such SNe, the subsequent thermal emission from the cooling stellar envelope has also been
149: observed (e.g., SN Ic 1998bw: Galama et al. 1998; SN Ib/c 1999ex: Stritzinger et al. 2002; SNe 2006aj and SN 2008D).
150:
151: In contrast to Type Ib/c SNe, hydrogen-rich (Type II) SNe originate from main-sequence objects
152: in the mass range 8--25\,\mo,
153: with iron cores at the time of collapse buried under an envelope of $\sim$6--20\,\mo.
154: The envelope light crossing time is $\sim$0.65 $R_3$\,hr ($R_3$ is the progenitor radius
155: in 10$^3$\,\rsun) and varies from about 5 minutes for a blue supergiant (BSG) progenitor to 1 hr
156: in the largest RSGs (Levesque et al. 2005).
157: In Type II SNe, these two properties prevent a central-engine from powering relativistic ejecta and
158: from producing their associated non-thermal $\gamma$-ray/X-ray radiation.
159: Hence, a burst of high-energy radiation from a Type II SN is most likely associated with shock emergence
160: at the surface of the progenitor and its immediate aftermath.
161:
162: The shock-breakout phenomenon has been studied theoretically (Falk 1978; Klein \& Chevalier 1978),
163: with specific attention to the BSG progenitor of SN 1987A (Ensman \& Burrows 1992; Blinnikov et al. 2000)
164: or Type Ib/c SNe (Blinnikov et al. 2002). When the radiation-dominated SN shock wave travels outward through
165: the envelope and reaches regions of moderate optical depth (i.e., $\tau$ of a few tens),
166: a radiative precursor initiates the brightening of the object leading to a brief soft X-ray burst.
167: This precursor starts when the radiative diffusion time ($t_{\rm diff} \sim 3 \tau H_\rho / c$;
168: $H_{\rho}$ is the atmospheric scale height) becomes shorter than the shock-travel time to the surface,
169: located at $\tau\sim$1. The envelope structure and extent are two key ingredients controlling the properties of
170: the radiative precursor. In the absence of a wind, the expected durations
171: are $\sim$1\,s in a WR star (Blinnikov et al. 2002), $\sim$100\,s in a BSG (Ensman \& Burrows), and
172: $\sim$1000\,s in a RSG (Klein \& Chevalier 1978). A very optically-thick wind, with a scale height comparable to
173: the stellar radius, may, however, dramatically increase the diffusion time, and consequently the precursor duration.
174:
175: In this Letter, we report the serendipitous detection with \textsl{GALEX} of {\it rising}
176: UV emission in two Type II-P SNe discovered by the Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS), SNLS-04D2dc
177: (also reported by Schawinski \etal 2008)
178: and SNLS-06D1jd, and associate both events with the breakout phase.
179: This contrasts with previous early UV observations of Type II SNe, i.e., the Type II-pec
180: SN 1987A (Hamuy et al. 1988), the Type IIb SN 1993J (Schmidt et al. 1993; Richmond et al. 1994), and
181: the Type II-P SN 2006bp (Immler et al. 2007; Dessart et al. 2008, hereafter D08), in which they were all {\it fading} in the UV, since the SN ejecta had already begun their long-term cooling phase through expansion and radiation.
182: In \S 2, we describe the \textsl{GALEX} and SNLS observations.
183: In \S \ref{sect_model}, we present our numerical simulations of
184: the breakout and the early post-breakout evolution in a standard RSG progenitor,
185: and compare these results to observations. In \S \ref{sect_discussion}, we conclude and
186: make predictions for the detection rate by the \textsl{GALEX} Time Domain Survey (TDS).
187: Throughout this Letter we adopt $H_{0}= 70$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_{\rm M}$=0.3,
188: and $\Omega_{\Lambda}$=0.7.
189:
190: \section{Observations} \label{sect_obs}
191:
192: We conducted a search for early UV emission in Type II SNe
193: by matching SNLS SN candidates with UV sources in overlapping \textsl{GALEX} Deep Imaging Survey (DIS) (Martin \etal 2005) fields. We selected SN candidates that had $\sim 1.5$ ks \textsl{GALEX} DIS observations within 30 days before the optical SN candidate discovery, yielding a sample of 293 SN candidates with 1 to 77 \textsl{GALEX} observations within that time period.
194: Two variable UV sources
195: were detected with a 3$\arcsec$ matching radius to the position of SN candidates
196: SNLS-04D2dc (R.A. = 10h 00m 16.681s, decl. = $+02\degr 12\arcmin 18.52\arcsec$ [J2000.0])
197: and SNLS-06D1jd (R.A. = 02h 27m 36.189s, decl. = $-04\degr 31\arcmin 56.62 \arcsec$ [J2000.0]).
198: The \textsl{GALEX} photometry was measured using aperture magnitudes
199: with $r_{ap}=6\arcsec$ and a centroid fixed to that of the highest signal-to-noise (S/N)
200: detection, with an aperture correction to
201: account for the fraction of energy enclosed in the aperture of $m_{tot}-m_{ap} = -0.15$ and $-0.23$ mag
202: in the FUV ($\lambda_{\rm eff}$=1539\AA) and NUV ($\lambda_{\rm eff}$=2316\AA), respectively (Morrissey \etal 2007).
203:
204: SNe SNLS-04D2dc and SNLS-06D1jd were discovered on 2004 March 16 and 2006 December 12
205: by the SNLS real-time difference imaging pipeline (Astier \etal 2006; Sullivan \etal 2006).
206: Follow-up VLT-FORS1 spectroscopy was obtained on 2004 March 19 (JD 2,453,083.5) and
207: 2006 December 22 (JD 2,454,091.5),
208: corresponding to 21.2 and 23.4 days after the \textsl{GALEX} detection, respectively.
209: The SNe were classified as Type II-P SNe based on the identification of broad
210: H{\sc i} emission lines (most noticeably H$\beta$ and H$\gamma$ in SNLS-06D1jd, but also
211: H$\alpha$ in SNLS-04D2dc), and a $\sim$40\,day plateau in optical brightness.
212: The host galaxy redshifts are measured
213: from nebular emission lines and the spectra and photometry are fitted with templates
214: of a late-type galaxy at $z=0.185$ with $m_{i'}$=19.6 for SNLS-04D2dc and a starburst
215: galaxy at $z=0.324$ with $m_{i'}$=22.1 for SNLS-06D1jd.
216: Both VLT spectra match well the observations of SN 1999em at $\sim$17 days after breakout
217: (Dessart \& Hillier 2006), suggesting that the observed UV brightening
218: is contemporaneous to the breakout phase.
219:
220: The host galaxies are detected in the FUV and
221: NUV with $m_{\rm FUV}$=23.42$\pm$0.07 (23.80$\pm$0.08)
222: and $m_{\rm NUV}$= 22.94$\pm$0.06 (23.51$\pm$0.07) for SNLS-04D2dc (SNLS-06D1jd) measured from deep co-added images
223: constructed from observations taken before the SN detection with $t_{\rm exp}$= 37.6\,ks (64.0\,ks).
224: We show the light curves of SNe SNLS-04D2dc in Figure 1 and SNLS-06D1jd in Figure 2,
225: including \textsl{GALEX} FUV and NUV photometry (after subtraction of the host
226: galaxy contribution) and
227: SNLS difference imaging photometry in the $g'$
228: ($\lambda_{\rm eff}$=4872~\AA), $r'$ ($\lambda_{\rm eff}$=6282~\AA), $i'$ ($\lambda_{\rm eff}$=7776~\AA), and
229: $z'$ ($\lambda_{\rm eff}$=8870~\AA) bands.
230: Note the $\sgreat$12\,day gap between the UV and optical observations of both SNe.
231: In order to relate the UV and optical photometry, we create synthetic \textsl{GALEX}-
232: and SNLS-filter light curves using the multi-epoch non-LTE synthetic spectra
233: computed for the Type II-P SN 2006bp ($d = 17.5$\,Mpc; D08) and adjust to the
234: distance, redshift, and extinction of SNLS-04D2dc and SNLS-06D1jd.
235: For each, we adopt the onset of UV emission as the breakout time,
236: yielding JD 2,453,062.25$^{+0.10}_{-0.25}$ (JD 2,454,068.05$^{+0.01}_{-0.74}$)
237: for SNLS-04D2dc (SNLS-06D1jd).
238: For SN 2006bp, we adopt JD 2,453,834.2 (Quimby et al. 2007).
239: The optical colors during the plateau of both SNLS SNe are well fitted with a reddening of $E(B-V)\sim$0.1.
240: However, an offset of $+0.3$ ($-0.4$) for
241: SNLS-04D2dc (SNLS-06D1jd) was added to obtain the best match to the observations, suggestive of a difference
242: in intrinsic brightness of these SNe compared to SN 2006bp or an uncertainty in the extinction.
243:
244:
245:
246: \section{Models and results}\label{sect_model}
247:
248: We model the UV and optical light curves from 0.05
249: to 55.6\,hr after shock breakout in three consecutive steps.
250: First, using the one-temperature Lagrangian radiation hydrodynamics code KEPLER
251: (Weaver et al. 1978),
252: the evolution at solar metallicity of a 15\,\mo\ main sequence star is computed at high resolution
253: ($\Delta M \sim 10^{-6}$\,\mo\ at the surface) until iron core collapse.
254: At that time, the star is a RSG with a radius $R_{\star}$=865\,\rsun\ and a total mass of
255: 12.58\,\mo\ (Woosley \& Heger 2007).
256: The star above a mass cut of 1.45\,\mo\ is then artificially exploded with a piston
257: to yield an asymptotic SN ejecta kinetic energy of 1.2$\times$10$^{51}$\,ergs typical of a core-collapse SN.\footnote{However, originally,
258: about half of the energy deposited by the shock wave is in the form
259: of heat and trapped-radiation (internal energy), so that at shock breakout,
260: i.e., 1.47\,days after the piston trigger, the bulk of the SN ejecta in our model has not
261: yet reached its coasting velocity.}
262: We finally post-process a sequence of 20 KEPLER models with the non-LTE
263: non-relativistic steady-state code CMFGEN (Hillier \& Miller 1998; Dessart \& Hillier 2005a).
264: The solution for level populations and the radiation field at $\sim$10$^5$ frequencies
265: is, thus, iterated to convergence on the stationary hydrodynamical structure,
266: but allowing the temperature to relax in regions exterior to a Rosseland-mean optical depth
267: of $\sim$20. This ensures that our assumption of steady-state is consistent, i.e., the diffusion time at the
268: RSG surface being much less than the SN age. This is the first time the phase contemporaneous to
269: shock breakout is modeled with a non-LTE multi-angle multi-frequency radiative transfer code,
270: which allows for both line and continuum sources of opacities and treats
271: multiple species and ionization states, including H{\sc i}, He{\sc i}--{\sc ii},
272: C{\sc ii}--{\sc v}, N{\sc ii}--{\sc v}, O{\sc ii}--O{\sc vi}, Ne{\sc iv}--{\sc viii}, and Fe{\sc iv}--{\sc xi} and
273: corresponding to a total of $\sim$1000 levels.
274:
275: The one-temperature treatment adopted in KEPLER forces the gas and the radiation to the same temperature,
276: and, thus, prevents our modeling of the radiative precursor. However, the small atmospheric scale height
277: $H_\rho \sim$0.01\,$R_{\star}$ in our RSG progenitor surface suggests that the precursor
278: will last $\sim$1000\,s, light-travel-time effects smearing the observed signal over $\sim$$R_{\star}/c\sim$2000\,s.
279: Longer durations are possible, but would require a larger atmospheric scale
280: height, perhaps reaching $H_\rho \sim R_{\star}$.
281: This may be produced by an extended low-density envelope, as adopted by \cite{sch08}, although
282: this appears incompatible with the RSG envelope structure computed with KEPLER, the 3D hydrodynamics simulations
283: of RSG envelopes (Freytag et al. 2002), and the quantitative spectroscopic analyses of RSG stars (Josselin \& Plez 2007).
284: Alternatively, this may be produced by an RSG in a super-wind phase, i.e., an RSG with an unusually high mass-loss rate
285: $\dot{M} \sim 10^{-3}$\,\mo\,yr$^{-1}$ compared to the more standard values of a few
286: $\times$10$^{-5}$\,\mo\,yr$^{-1}$ \citep{salasnich:99}.
287:
288: In Figure \ref{fig_phot_prop}{\it a}, we show in black the evolution of the temperature $T_{\rm phot}$
289: and radius $R_{\rm phot}$, defined by $\int_{R_{\rm phot}}^\infty \kappa_{\rm t}dR$= 2/3,
290: where $\kappa_{\rm t}=\kappa_{\rm a}+\sigma$ and $\kappa_{\rm a}$ ($\sigma$) is the
291: absorptive (scattering) opacity.
292: $T_{\rm phot}$ reaches up to $\sim$1.35$\times$10$^5$\,K only $\sim$0.5\,hr after breakout, associated with
293: a brightening phase at constant radius (light-travel time effects and the radiative precursor
294: would yield a $\sim$2000\,s signal instead).
295: Note that at this time, the ``RSG'' has the surface temperature of a white dwarf
296: and radiates at 10$^{11}$ times the rate of the Sun!
297: The temperature, decreasing almost as quickly as it rose and reaching down
298: to 40,000\,K after $\sim$5\,hr, dominates the bolometric variation since mass shells
299: have hardly moved during this early phase.
300: At 55\,hr after breakout, $T_{\rm phot}\sim$20,000\,K,
301: and $R_{\rm phot}$ has increased by only a factor of 3.8 to $\sim$2.3$\times$10$^{14}$\,cm.
302: KEPLER predicts a steep density distribution at the photosphere, scaling as 1/$R^{200}$ at breakout
303: to 1/$R^{50}$ 55\,hr later, a property also inferred from line profile morphology in SN 2006bp by D08.
304: With electron scattering dominating the opacity, the emergent SN flux suffers dilution
305: (Dessart \& Hillier 2005b), reflecting better the temperature at the thermalization radius $R_{\rm th}$
306: (defined by $\int_{R_{\rm th}}^\infty \sqrt{\kappa_{\rm a} \kappa_{\rm t}}dR$= 2/3) rather
307: than at the photosphere (Fig.~3{\it a}).
308: These temperatures differ by up to a factor of 2--3 at all times, and the SED is much harder than the blackbody
309: distribution at $T_{\rm phot}$, with a peak (blue curve in Fig.~\ref{fig_phot_prop}{\it a})
310: at $\sim$90~\AA\, (900~\AA) at 0.5\,hr (55.6\,hr) after breakout. The non-LTE synthetic spectra shown
311: in Figure \ref{fig_phot_prop}{\it b} illustrate these properties and reveal for the first time
312: the line features predicted under these breakout conditions (these characteristics will be discussed
313: in a future paper).
314:
315: In Figures \ref{fig_GALEX_LCa} and \ref{fig_GALEX_LCb}, we show the model \textsl{GALEX} and SNLS light curves created from
316: our synthetic spectra for SNLS-04D2dc and SNLS-06D1jd.
317: The CMFGEN models ($1.67$ hr $\le t \le 55.6$ hr)
318: are offset by $-1.5$ ($-1.4$) mag for SNLS-04D2dc (SNLS-06D1jd) to match the SN 2006bp template
319: light curves ($t>$2 days) that were scaled to fit the optical observations, suggesting that our
320: models underestimate the observed luminosity by a factor of $\sim$4. We find no significant variability in the photon data between the first and second halves of the first two $\sim 20$ minute observations during the rise of the UV emission from SNLS-04D2dc and SNLS-06D1jd, with $\Delta$m$< 0.5$ mag. Although the lack of significant intra-observation variability and the $\sim$ 2 mag amplitude of
321: variability predicted by our models for the $\sles$1\,hr long breakout signature implies that the \textsl{GALEX} observations do not
322: coincide with the peak of the UV burst, the onset of the fast brightening UV emission
323: is suggestive evidence that we have detected the breakout phase
324: and constrains the time of shock breakout to an accuracy of 0.35 (0.75) days
325: for SNLS-04D2dc (SNLS-06D1jd), i.e. 7.1 hr (13.7 hr) in the SN rest frame.
326: Within the errors, the subsequent 2\,day long UV plateau is well reproduced by
327: the model,
328: although we note the poor match to the noisy FUV data in the plateau of SNLS-04D2dc and
329: to the FUV/NUV color of SNLS-06D1jd at $\sim$1\,day.
330: Future, better sampled, higher S/N UV light curves of breakout events in Type II-P SNe
331: will provide more accurate constraints, foster a better understanding, and, thus,
332: permit more definite conclusions on this ephemeral breakout phase and the
333: RSG envelope structure.
334:
335: \section{Discussion and conclusion}
336: \label{sect_discussion}
337:
338: \textsl{GALEX} DIS serendipitously detected fast rising UV emission in two SNLS Type II-P SNe,
339: which we associate with the breakout phase in a RSG star.
340: The observed amplitude of the UV signal is smaller than that of the
341: $\sles$\,1\,hr long breakout burst predicted by our models, which
342: suggests that the observations did not capture the peak of the burst (we see
343: no strong variability within the 20 minute observations), although
344: our theoretical peak flux is likely overestimated by the one-temperature treatment in KEPLER.
345: The important conclusion from these models is that the observed UV brightening by $\sim$1\,mag
346: is predicted to occur only during this early, breakout, phase and thus is a direct probe of the
347: time of shock breakout in these SNe.
348: Moreover, we both observe and predict that the immediate post-breakout in the UV is followed by a plateau
349: phase of about 2 days, supporting a RSG-like progenitor (more compact progenitors,
350: e.g., BSGs, cool much faster after breakout, as seen for SN 1987A), and providing an interesting clock
351: to gauge the time since breakout.
352: In SN 2006bp, the SN was fading in the UV right from the start of data
353: collection, and a time since explosion of 1.7\,days was indeed inferred (D08).
354: The post-breakout UV plateau is the result of two competing effects, with the strong decrease in
355: bolometric luminosity compensated by the shift of the SED to longer wavelength as the ejecta
356: expand and cool (Fig.~\ref{fig_phot_prop}{\it a}). At maximum light, the peak of the SED in our models
357: is at 90~\AA\ (in the rest frame), and so the UV rise reveals only the evolution of the tail of the
358: SED, not that of the peak.
359:
360: The volumetric rate of Type II-P SNe is close to that of Type Ia SNe \citep{dahl04}; thus, we use the measured fraction of Type Ia SNe in the total sample of SNLS SN candidates from Sullivan \etal (2006), $f_{Ia}=0.16$, to estimate the fraction of Type II-P SNe in our sample. If we assume that the shock breakout occurs $15 \pm 3$ days before the optical discovery of the SN, then the number of candidates in our study that had a probability of at least one \textsl{GALEX} observation during the 2 day UV plateau following shock breakout is $n_{obs}=167$. By contrast, the number of candidates that had a probability of having a \textsl{GALEX} observation that coincided with a 1\,hr long flash at the time of shock breakout is $\aplt$1. We now estimate the number of Type II-P SNe observed during the UV-plateau phase as $n_{II-P} \approx f_{Ia}n_{obs} \sim 27$, and get a detection efficiency of $f_{det} = 2/n_{II-P} \sim 0.07$.
361: \textsl{GALEX} TDS will operate in parallel with the
362: Pan-STARRS Medium Deep Survey (PS MDS), an optical time domain survey that will monitor 50 deg$^{2}$ night$^{-1}$ with a depth comparable to SNLS. \textsl{GALEX} TDS plans to monitor $\sim$7\,deg$^{2}$ of the PS MDS with cadences ranging from 98.6 minutes
363: (two consecutive orbits) to several days for $\sim$8 months of the year to a depth
364: of $m_{lim}\sim$23\,mag. PS MDS is expected to have a SN Ia detection rate of $r_{Ia} \approx 23$ month$^{-1}$ per 7\,deg$^{2}$ field (J.~Tonry 2008, private communication), which for our observed detection efficiency ($f_{det} \sim 0.07$) and $n_{months}=8$ implies a favorable detection rate of UV emission from the shock breakout phase of Type II-P SNe by \textsl{GALEX} TDS of $r_{det} \approx r_{Ia}n_{months}f_{det} \approx$ 10 yr$^{-1}$.
365:
366: \acknowledgements
367:
368: We thank the anonymous referee for their helpful comments.
369: L.D. acknowledges support for this work from the SciDAC program of the DOE,
370: under grants DE-FC02-01ER41184 and DE-FC02-06ER41452,
371: and from the NSF under grant AST-0504947. S.W. acknowledges support from
372: the SciDAC under grant DE-FC02-06ER41438 and also by NASA under grant NNG05GG28G. S.G. and S.B. thank Bruno Milliard for his support during this study. We gratefully acknowledge NASA's support for construction,
373: operation, and science analysis for the \textsl{GALEX} mission,
374: developed in cooperation with CNES of
375: France and the Korean MOST.
376: Based on observations obtained with MegaPrime/MegaCam, a joint
377: project of CFHT and CEA/DAPNIA, at the
378: CFHT which is operated by the NRC of
379: Canada, the INSU of the
380: CNRS of France, and the
381: University of Hawaii. This work is based in part on data products
382: produced at TERAPIX and the CADC as part of
383: the CFHT Legacy Survey, a collaborative
384: project of NRC and CNRS.
385: Based on observations made with the ESO telescopes at the La Silla or Paranal Observatories
386: under proposal IDs 171.A-0486 and 176.A-0589.
387:
388: \begin{thebibliography}{}
389:
390: \bibitem[Astier \etal(2006)]{ast06} Astier, P., \etal 2006, A\&A, 447, 31
391:
392: \bibitem[Blinnikov et al.(2000)]{2000ApJ...532.1132B} Blinnikov, S.,
393: \etal 2000, \apj, 532, 1132
394:
395: \bibitem[Blinnikov et al.(2002)]{2002nuas.conf..144B} Blinnikov, S.~I.,
396: et al. 2002, Nuclear Astrophysics, 144
397:
398: \bibitem[Campana \etal(2006)]{camp06}
399: Campana, S., \etal 2006, Nature, 442, 1008
400:
401: \bibitem[Dahlen \etal(2004)]{dahl04}
402: Dahlen, T., \etal 2004, ApJ, 613, 189
403:
404: \bibitem[Dessart \& Hillier(2005a)]{2005A&A...437..667D} Dessart, L., \&
405: Hillier, D.~J.\ 2005a, \aap, 437, 667
406:
407: \bibitem[Dessart \& Hillier (2005b)]{2005A&A...439..671D} Dessart, L., \&
408: Hillier, D.~J. \ 2005b, \aap, 439, 671
409:
410: \bibitem[Dessart \& Hillier(2006)]{2006A&A...447..691D} Dessart, L.,
411: \& Hillier, D.~J.\ 2006, \aap, 447, 691
412:
413: \bibitem[Dessart et al.(2008)]{2008ApJ...675..644D} Dessart, L., et al.\
414: 2008, \apj, 675, 644 (D08)
415:
416: \bibitem[Ensman \& Burrows(1992)]{ens92}
417: Ensman, L., \& Burrows, A.~1992, ApJ, 393, 742
418:
419: \bibitem[Falk(1978)]{1978ApJ...225L.133F} Falk, S.~W.\ 1978, \apjl, 225, L133
420:
421: \bibitem[Freytag et al.(2002)]{2002AN....323..213F} Freytag, B., Steffen,
422: M., \& Dorch, B.\ 2002, Astron. Nach., 323, 213
423:
424: \bibitem[Galama \etal(1998)]{1998Natur.395..670G}
425: Galama, T., \etal~1998, Nature, 395, 670
426:
427: \bibitem[Hamuy \etal(1988)]{1988AJ.....95...63H}
428: Hamuy, M., Suntzeff, N.~B., Gonzalez, R., \& Martin, G.~1988, \aj, 95, 63
429:
430: \bibitem[Hillier \& Miller(1998)]{1998ApJ...496..407H} Hillier, D.~J., \&
431: Miller, D.~L.\ 1998, \apj, 496, 407
432:
433: \bibitem[Immler \etal(2007)]{imm07}
434: Immler, S., \etal 2007, ApJ, 664, 435
435:
436: \bibitem[Josselin \& Plez(2007)]{2007A&A...469..671J} Josselin, E., \& Plez, B.\ 2007, \aap, 469, 671
437:
438: \bibitem[Klein \& Chevalier(1978)]{1978ApJ...223L.109K} Klein, R.~I., \&
439: Chevalier, R.~A.\ 1978, \apjl, 223, L109
440:
441: \bibitem[Levesque et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...628..973L} Levesque, E.~M.,
442: \etal 2005, \apj, 628, 973
443:
444: \bibitem[Li(2007)]{2007MNRAS.375..240L} Li, L.-X.\ 2007, \mnras, 375, 240
445:
446: \bibitem[Li(2008)]{2008arXiv0803.0079L} Li, L.-X.\ 2008, \mnras, {\it in press}, arXiv:0803:0079
447:
448: \bibitem[Martin \etal(2005)]{martin05}
449: Martin, D.~C., \etal 2005, ApJ, 619, L1
450:
451: \bibitem[Morrissey \etal(2007)]{morr07}
452: Morrissey, P., \etal 2007, ApJS, 597, 173, 682
453:
454: \bibitem[Quimby \etal(2007)]{quim07} Quimby, R.~M., \etal 2007, ApJ, 666, 1093
455:
456: \bibitem[Richmond et al.(1994)]{1994AJ....107.1022R}
457: Richmond, M.~W., \etal 1994, \aj, 107, 1022
458:
459: \bibitem[Salasnich et al.(1999)]{salasnich:99} Salasnich, B., Bressan, A., \& Chiosi, C.\ 1999, \aap, 342, 131
460:
461: \bibitem[Schawinski et al.(2008)]{sch08} Schawinski, K., et
462: al., Science, {\it in press}, arXiv:0803.3596
463:
464: \bibitem[Schmidt et al.(1993)]{1993Natur.364..600S} Schmidt, B.~P., et al.\
465: 1993, \nat, 364, 600
466:
467: \bibitem[Soderberg et al.(2008)]{2008arXiv0802.1712S} Soderberg, A.~M., et
468: al., 2008, Nature, 453, 469
469:
470: \bibitem[Stritzinger et al.(2002)]{2002AJ....124.2100S}
471: Stritzinger, M.~\etal 2002, AJ, 124, 2100
472:
473: \bibitem[Sullivan \etal(2006)]{sull06}
474: Sullivan, M., \etal 2006, AJ, 131, 960
475:
476: \bibitem[Waxman, M\'{e}sz\'{a}ros, \& Campana(2007)]{wax07}
477: Waxman, E., M\'{e}sz\'{a}ros, P., \& Campana, S.~2007, ApJ, 667, 351
478:
479: \bibitem[Weaver et al.(1978)]{1978ApJ...225.1021W} Weaver, T.~A.,
480: \etal 1978, \apj, 225, 1021
481:
482: \bibitem[Woosley \& Bloom(2006)]{2006ARA&A..44..507W} Woosley, S.~E., \&
483: Bloom, J.~S.\ 2006, \araa, 44, 507
484:
485: \bibitem[Woosley \& Heger(2007)]{2007PhR...442..269W}
486: Woosley, S.~E., \& Heger, A.\ 2007, \physrep, 442, 269
487:
488: \end{thebibliography}
489:
490: \clearpage
491:
492: \begin{figure*}
493: %\epsscale{0.5}
494: \plotone{f1.eps}
495: %\plotone{f1b.eps}
496: \caption{
497: \textsl{GALEX} and SNLS ({\it inset}) light curves ({\it colored symbols}) of SNLS-04D2dc
498: ($z=$0.185) shown relative
499: to the estimated breakout time ({\it horizontal bar}, labeled $t_{\rm SB}$)
500: and overplotted with synthetic magnitudes ({\it colored lines}; II-P Template:
501: scaled synthetic light curves of SN 2006bp [D08]; SB Model: shock-breakout model).
502: Horizontal error bars show the time coverage of photometry measured from coadded observations.
503: Solid arrows show 95\% upper limits. The \textsl{GALEX} FUV detector was temporarily not operational
504: during the NUV observations around $t\sim3.5$ days.
505: \label{fig_GALEX_LCa}
506: }
507: \end{figure*}
508:
509: \begin{figure*}
510: \plotone{f2.eps}
511: \caption{
512: \textsl{GALEX} and SNLS ({\it inset}) light curves ({\it colored symbols}) of SNLS-06D1jd ($z=$0.324), shown relative
513: to the estimated breakout time ({\it horizontal bar}, labeled $t_{\rm SB}$),
514: and overplotted with synthetic magnitudes ({\it colored lines}; II-P Template:
515: scaled synthetic light curves of SN 2006bp [D08]; SB Model: shock-breakout model).
516: Solid arrows show 95\% upper limits.
517: \label{fig_GALEX_LCb}
518: }
519: \end{figure*}
520:
521:
522: \begin{figure}
523: \plottwo{f3a.eps}{f3b.eps}
524: \caption{{\it Left}: KEPLER/CMFGEN predictions for the post-breakout evolution of the wavelength of the SED peak
525: ({\it blue line}; in units of 500\,\AA), together with the gas temperature (T$_{\rm phot}$; {\it dashed line})
526: and radius (R$_{\rm phot}$; {\it solid line}) at the photosphere ({\it black line}) and at the thermalization depth ({\it red line}).
527: {\it Right}: Multiepoch postbreakout synthetic non-LTE ({\it thick line}) and diluted blackbody ({\it thin line}; $T_{\rm BB} \sim T_{\rm th}$)
528: spectra, scaled to the luminosity distance of SNLS-06D1jd.
529: \label{fig_phot_prop}
530: }
531: \end{figure}
532:
533: \end{document}
534: