1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
3: %\usepackage{lscape}
4: %\usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
5:
6: \shorttitle{[O IV] and X-ray Luminosity Correlation}
7: \shortauthors{Mel\'endez et. al}
8:
9: \begin{document}
10: %\title{The correlation between [\ion{O}{4}] $\lambda$25.89$\mu$m and the hard X-ray luminosities for a
11: %sample of nearby Seyfert Galaxies}
12: \title{New Indicators for AGN Power: The Correlation Between [\ion{O}{4}] $\lambda$25.89$\mu$m and Hard X-ray Luminosity for
13: Nearby Seyfert Galaxies
14: }
15:
16: \author{M. Mel\'endez, S.B. Kraemer and B.K Armentrout}
17: \affil{Institute for Astrophysics and Computational
18: Sciences, Department of Physics, The Catholic University of America,
19: Washington, DC}
20: \email{07melendez@cua.edu}
21: \author{R.P. Deo and D.M. Crenshaw}
22: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA}
23: \author{H.R. Schmitt}
24: \affil{Remote Sensing Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC}
25: \and
26: \affil{Interferometrics, Inc., Herndon, VA}
27: \author{R.F. Mushotzky, J. Tueller and C.B. Markwardt}
28: \affil{NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt , MD}
29: \and
30: \author{L. Winter}
31: \affil{University of Maryland, College Park, MD}
32:
33: \begin{abstract}
34: We have studied the relationship between the [\ion{O}{4}] $\lambda$25.89$\mu$m emission line luminosities, obtained from {\it Spitzer} spectra,
35: the X-ray continua in the 2-10 keV band, primarily from {\it ASCA}, and the 14-195 keV band obtained with the {\it SWIFT}/Burst Alert Telescope (BAT),
36: for a sample of nearby (z $<$ 0.08) Seyfert galaxies. For comparison, we have examined the relationship between the [\ion{O}{3}] $\lambda$5007, the 2-10 keV and the 14-195 keV luminosities for the same set of objects. We find that both the [\ion{O}{4}] and [\ion{O}{3}] luminosities are well-correlated with the BAT luminosities. On the other hand, the [\ion{O}{3}]
37: luminosities are better-correlated with 2-10 keV luminosities than are those of [\ion{O}{4}]. When comparing [\ion{O}{4}] and [\ion{O}{3}] luminosities for the different
38: types of galaxies, we find that the Seyfert 2's have significantly lower [\ion{O}{3}] to [\ion{O}{4}] ratios than the Seyfert 1's. We suggest that this is due to more reddening of the narrow line region (NLR) of the Seyfert 2's. Assuming Galactic dust to gas ratios, the average amount of extra reddening corresponds to a hydrogen column density of $\sim$ few times $10^{21} {\rm cm^{-2}}$, which is a small fraction of the X-ray absorbing columns in the Seyfert 2's. The combined effects of reddening and the X-ray absorption are the probable reason why the [\ion{O}{3}] versus 2-10 keV correlation is better than the [\ion{O}{4}] versus 2-10 keV, since the [\ion{O}{4}] $\lambda$25.89$\mu$m emission line is much less affected by extinction. We present a grid of photoionization models used to calculate the physical conditions present in the [\ion{O}{4}] region. We find that the [\ion{O}{4}] comes from higher ionization states and lower density regions than previous studies had determined for [\ion{O}{3}]. Overall, we find the [\ion{O}{4}] to be an accurate and truly isotropic indicator of the power of the AGN. This suggests that it can be useful in deconvolving the contribution of the AGN and starburst to the spectrum of Compton-thick and/or X-ray weak sources.
39:
40:
41: \end{abstract}
42:
43: \keywords{galaxies: Seyfert --- X-ray:galaxies --- infrared: galaxies}
44:
45: \section{Introduction}
46: The presence or absence of broad optical emission lines has been historically used to separate Seyfert galaxies into two classes: Seyfert 1 galaxies
47: with broad permitted and narrow forbidden lines and Seyfert 2 galaxies with only narrow permitted and forbidden line emission \citep{1974ApJ...192..581K}.
48: Using spectropolarimetry, \cite{1985ApJ...297..621A} found broad permitted line emission in the Seyfert 2 \objectname{NGC 1068} galaxy, characteristic of a Seyfert 1 spectrum.
49: These observational results provided the first evidence in favor of a unified model. In this model
50: \citep{1993ARA&A..31..473A} both types of Seyfert galaxies are intrinsically the same with the differences being the
51: visibility of the central engine. A geometrically and optically-thick dusty molecular torus-like structure surrounds the central source, as well as the broad line region (BLR). Therefore the visibility of the nuclear engine depends on the viewing angles.
52:
53: Following the unified model, our line of sight to Seyfert 2 galaxies is obstructed by optically thick material corresponding to
54: column densities of $N_H > 10^{22}$ ${\rm cm^{-2}}$ \citep{1999ApJ...522..157R}. For column densities $N_H \leq$ $10^{24}$ ${\rm cm^{-2}}$, photons above few keV can penetrate the torus creating
55: an unobstructed view of the nuclear source. One refers to such cases as ``Compton thin". For values of a few times $10^{24}$ ${\rm cm^{-2}}$, only high energy X-ray
56: emission (tens of keV) can pass through the obscuring material \citep{1997ApJ...488..164T}. For $N_H > 10^{25}$ ${\rm cm^{-2}}$, even high energy X-rays, above a few tens of keV, are Compton scattered and the nuclear source
57: is completely hidden from our direct view. Therefore, in order to calculate the intrinsic luminosity for an absorbed object with $N_H > 10^{22}$ ${\rm cm^{-2}}$,
58: we need to find an indirect method \citep{1994ApJ...436..586M}. Many authors have used purportedly isotropic indicators, such as the [\ion{O}{3}] $\lambda$5007 line
59: (hereafter [\ion{O}{3}]), the infrared continuum, and the 2-10 keV hard X-ray band \citep{2005ApJ...634..161H,2006A&A...453..525N,1999AJ....118.1169X,1997MNRAS.288..977A,2006A&A...457L..17H}. \cite{1999ApJS..121..473B} presented a three-dimensional diagram
60: for Seyfert 2 galaxies suitable to identify Compton-thick sources, using $K_\alpha$ iron emission line equivalent width and the 2-10 keV hard X-ray flux normalized to the [\ion{O}{3}] line flux, with the latter corrected for extinction and assumed to be a true indicator of the intrinsic luminosity of the source.
61:
62:
63: In this paper, we present and discuss the use of [\ion{O}{4}] $\lambda$25.89$\mu {\rm m}$ (hereafter [\ion{O}{4}]) as an isotropic quantity avoiding the limitations of previous methods. Since it has a relatively high ionization potential
64: (54.9 eV), it is less affected by star formation and is significantly less affected by extinction than [\ion{O}{3}] ($A_{v}\sim 5-45$ corresponds to
65: $A_{{\rm 25.89}\mu{\rm m}} \sim 0.1-0.9$) \citep{1998ApJ...498..579G}. Also, [\ion{O}{4}] represents an improvement
66: over the use of infrared continuum given the difficulty in isolating the AGN continuum from the host galaxy emission \citep{2004A&A...418..465L}. For the X-ray, we choose the
67: {\it Swift} Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) high Galactic latitude ($|b| > 19^o$) survey in the 14-195 keV band \citep{2005ApJ...633L..77M}. The survey covers the whole sky
68: at $(1 - 3) \times 10^{-11} {\rm ergs}$ ${\rm cm^{-2}}$ $s^{-1}$ and represents a complete sample including Compton thin AGNs that were missed
69: from previous X-ray surveys in the 2-10 keV band because of their high column densities ($N_H \sim 10^{24}$ ${\rm cm^{-2}}$). Furthermore, Compton-thick
70: (i.e., $N_H$ $\sim$ few $10^{24}$ ${\rm cm^{-2}}$) sources, which cannot be detected in the 2-10 keV band by the
71: {\it Advanced Satellite for Cosmology and Astrophysics} ({\it ASCA}), {\it Chandra} or {\it XMM-Newton}, have been detected by {\it Swift}/BAT
72: \citep{2005ApJ...633L..77M,bat}.
73:
74:
75:
76: In the present work we compare the $L_{[{\rm O ~ IV}]}$ $L_{14-195 {\rm keV}}$ to $L_{[{\rm O ~ III}]}$ $L_{14-195 {\rm keV}}$ and $L_{[{\rm O ~ IV}]}$ $L_{2-10 {\rm keV}}$
77: to $L_{[{\rm O ~ III}]}$ $L_{2-10 {\rm keV}}$ relations for a sample of X-ray selected
78: nearby Seyfert Galaxies. We then use the obtained relations in combination with photoionization modeling to place constraints on the
79: physical properties in these emitting regions. We also discuss the different mechanisms behind these correlations and the
80: possibilities of using such correlations as a way to find the intrinsic luminosity of AGNs.
81:
82: \section{Sample and data analysis}
83:
84: Using the preliminary results from the first 3 months of the
85: {\it Swift}/BAT high Galactic latitude survey in the 14-195 keV band \citep{2005ApJ...633L..77M} and
86: the new results from the 9 month survey \citep{bat} we have compiled a sample of
87: 40 nearby Seyfert galaxies (z $<$ 0.08, except \objectname{3C273} with z=0.16) for which the 2-10 keV, [\ion{O}{4}] $\lambda$25.89$\mu {\rm m}$ and [\ion{O}{3}] $\lambda$5007 fluxes have been measured.
88:
89:
90: The 2-10 keV fluxes are mainly from {\it ASCA} observations and were
91: retrieved from the TARTARUS data base \citep{2001AIPC..599..991T}, except where noted
92: in Tables 1 and 2. All the fluxes have been corrected for Galactic absorption and in the case of multiple observations, the mean flux was taken.
93: The luminosities in the [\ion{O}{3}] line
94: were compiled from the literature and are presented here without reddening corrections, in Tables~1 and 2. We present
95: [\ion{O}{4}] fluxes found in the literature and from our analysis of unpublished
96: archival spectra observed with the Infrared Spectrograph (IRS) \cite[see][]{2004ApJS..154...18H}
97: on board the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope} in the ${\rm 1^{st}}$ Long-Low
98: (LL1, $\lambda$ = 19.5 - 38.0 $\mu$m, 10.7$"$ $\times$ 168$"$) IRS order in Staring mode. The [\ion{O}{4}] luminosities
99: are presented without reddening corrections.
100:
101:
102: For the analysis of the archival {\it Spitzer} data we used the basic calibrated data (BCD) files preprocessed using the S15.3 IRS pipeline. This includes ramp fitting, dark sky subtraction,
103: drop correction, linearity correction and wavelength and flux calibrations. The one-dimensional (1D) spectra were extracted from the
104: IRS data using the SMART v6.2.4 data processing and analysis package \citep{2004PASP..116..975H}. For the extraction we used
105: the ``Automatic Tapered Column Point Source extraction method" for LL observations of point sources.
106: For the LL staring mode data we performed sky subtraction by subtracting
107: the BCDs between the two nodes after we created median BCDs from each node position. After that, the spectra from each node
108: position for LL1 were averaged to obtain the final spectrum for that order. We performed the line fit with SMART
109: using a polynomial to fit the continuum and a Gaussian for the line profile.
110: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
111: \objectname{NGC 6300} is the only source, within our sample, observed in high resolution with the Infrared Spectrograph (IRS)
112: in the Long-High order (LH, $\lambda$ = 18.7 - 37.2 $\mu$m, 11.1$"$ $\times$ 22.3$"$) in Staring mode. For the extraction we used
113: the ``Full" extraction method for LH observations of point sources. We created median BCDs from each node. Then the spectra from each node
114: position for LH were averaged to obtain the final spectrum. Since background observations are not available for this galaxy and we required only the
115: [\ion{O}{4}] line flux, we did not perform any background subtraction for this object.
116:
117: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
118:
119: We note the difficulty in deconvolving the adjacent [\ion{Fe}{2}] $\lambda$25.99$\mu {\rm m}$ line from the [\ion{O}{4}] in
120: low-resolution IRS spectra. We assumed that the fluxes measured in low-resolution mode are mostly from [\ion{O}{4}] given the fact that
121: the [\ion{Fe}{2}] is due primarily to star formation \citep{2004ApJ...614L..69H,2005ApJ...633..706W,2006ApJ...641..795O}, and we have a
122: hard X-ray BAT selected sample which is pre-selected to be sources in which the X-ray emission is dominated by an AGN.
123: In the next section we will discuss the possible contribution of [\ion{Fe}{2}] to the [\ion{O}{4}] fluxes, based on two cases within our sample:
124: the edge-on Seyfert 2 galaxy \objectname{NGC 3079} with a nuclear starburst having a low AGN contribution \citep{2007ApJ...655L..73G}
125: and another Seyfert 2, \objectname{Mrk 3}, with little or no starburst contribution \citep{2007ApJ...671..124D}.
126:
127: All the flux errors are within 10\% as obtained from the reduction package {\it SMART} and
128: from the literature.
129:
130: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
131: \section{Results}
132: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
133:
134: \subsection{Reddening in the NLR}
135:
136: \begin{figure}
137: \epsscale{.80}
138: \plotone{f1.eps}
139: \caption{ Comparison between [\ion{O}{4}] and [\ion{O}{3}] luminosities. The solid line represents the linear regression calculated for Seyfert 1 galaxies; the
140: dotted, dashed and point-dashed lines represents the linear regression for the sample with the Seyfert 2 galaxies corrected by extinction in the visible with
141: $A_v=0,1$ and $3$, respectively. For comparison purposes we group Seyfert 1.8's and 1.9's with the Seyfert 2's.
142: \label{fig1}}
143: \end{figure}
144:
145:
146:
147: In Figure ~\ref{fig1} we compare the [\ion{O}{3}] and the [\ion{O}{4}] luminosities.
148: For our purposes, we group Seyfert 1.2's and 1.5's with Seyfert 1's.
149: From the plot we notice that Seyfert 2, Seyfert 1.9 and Seyfert 1.8 galaxies show lower [\ion{O}{3}] luminosities than Seyfert 1 galaxies. The mean
150: value of the luminosities our sample are:
151: for Seyfert 1's $\log (L_{[{\rm O~ III}]})=41.4 \pm 0.9$ and $\log (L_{[{\rm O~ IV}]})=41.2 \pm 0.8$, for Seyfert 1.9's $\log (L_{[{\rm O~ III}]})=40.5 \pm 0.8$ and
152: $\log (L_{[{\rm O~ IV}]})=40.9 \pm 0.4$; and for Seyfert 2's $\log (L_{[{\rm O~ III}]})=40.0 \pm 1.0$ and $\log (L_{[{\rm O~ IV}]})= 41.0 \pm 0.6$.
153: A linear regression
154: for each individual group yields a relation of the type: for Seyfert 1's $L_{[{\rm O~ III}]} \propto L_{[{\rm O~ IV}]}^{0.9 \pm 0.1}$;
155: Seyfert 1.9's $L_{[{\rm O~ III}]} \propto L_{[{\rm O~ IV}]}^{2 \pm 1}$ and for Seyfert 2's $L_{[{\rm O~ III}]} \propto L_{[{\rm O~ IV}]}^{1.8 \pm 0.5}$. These results are consistent with previous reports of additional reddening in the narrow line region (NLR) of Seyfert 2's \cite[e.g.,][]{1991MNRAS.250..422J,1994ApJ...436..586M,1994A&A...283..791K,2005ApJ...620..151R,2006A&A...453..525N}.
156:
157:
158: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%Referee
159: Using the extinction law derived by \cite{1989ApJ...345..245C}, the
160: estimated extinction in the visible is $A_{v}\sim 1-6$ mag, calculated from
161: the mean values for the [\ion{O}{3}] luminosity required to ``correct" the Seyfert 2's (Sy1.8/1.9/2's)
162: [\ion{O}{3}] to those from Seyfert 1's, assuming a ratio of total to
163: selective extinction of $R_{v}=3.1$ (which represents a typical value for the diffuse interstellar medium).
164: In Figure~\ref{fig1} we present these findings by comparing the linear regression obtained for Seyfert 1 galaxies (solid line), with those obtained for all the sample with the [\ion{O}{3}] luminosities corrected for extinction in Seyfert 2 galaxies.
165: Therefore, we interpreted the higher $\log (L_{[{\rm O~IV}]}/L_{[{\rm O~III}]} \ga 1$ found in Seyfert 2 galaxies to be a result of reddening.
166:
167:
168:
169: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%Referee
170: There is a relative absence of Seyfert 1's in nearly edge-on host galaxies \citep[see][]{1980AJ.....85..198K,1995ApJ...454...95M,2001ApJ...555..663S}. Our sample
171: is consistent with this trend, in that we find that Seyfert 2's have, on average, more inclined host galaxies with a ratio of b/a$=0.5\pm0.3$\footnote{The values for the major and minor diameter of the host galaxy, a and b respectively, were taken from NED} contrasting with b/a$=0.7\pm0.2$ for Seyfert 1 galaxies. These results are also supported by the observed correlation between continuum reddening and inclination of the host galaxy \citep{2001ApJ...562L..29C}. Thus,
172: host galaxy-related obscuration may contribute to the inclination dependence of the [\ion{O}{3}] emission, although our sample is too small to draw strong conclusions.
173:
174:
175: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
176: % Interestingly from our sample, the Seyfert 2's (including Seyfert's 1.8 and 1.9) have, on average, more inclined host galaxies with a ratio of b/a$=0.5\pm0.3$\footnote{The % values for the major and minor diameter of the host galaxy, a and b respectively, were taken from NED} contrasting with b/a$=0.7\pm0.2$ for Seyfert 1 galaxies.
177: % These results are in agreement with previous works showing the relative absence of Seyfert 1's in nearly edge-on host
178: % galaxies \citep[see][]{1980AJ.....85..198K,1995ApJ...454...95M,2001ApJ...555..663S}, implying that at least part of the obscuration of the NLR's in Seyfert 2 galaxies may %% occur in the disk of the host galaxy. These results are supported by \cite{2001ApJ...562L..29C} that found that continuum reddening tends to increase with inclination
179: % of the host galaxy. However, this result hampers the use of [\ion{O}{3}] as a truly isotropic quantity since the reddening depends on the inclination of the host galaxy. % Nevertheless, from our small sample these results are not conclusive.
180: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
181:
182:
183:
184: Assuming a gas-to-dust ratio for the host galaxy of $5.2 \times 10^{21}\rm{cm^{-2}mag^{-1}}$ \citep{1985ApJ...294..599S} the additional absorbing column calculated from
185: the values derived for extinction ($A_v$) is in the range of $N_H \sim (2 - 10) \times 10^{21} {\rm cm^{-2}}$ for the Seyfert 2 galaxies. The median values
186: for the X-ray hydrogen column densities for our Seyfert 2 and Seyfert 1 samples are $N_H = 2.1 \times 10^{23} \rm{cm^{-2}}$ and $N_H = 1.2 \times 10^{21} \rm{cm^{-2}}$,
187: respectively \citep{bat}. The observed discrepancy between the X-ray column density and those required for the extinction of the [\ion{O}{3}] emission lines is consistent with
188: previous results \citep[e.g.,][]{1982ApJ...257...47M,1985ApJ...296...69R,2001A&A...365...28M}. The X-ray column density
189: is measured along the line of sight to the nucleus and the derived reddening measures the column density towards the NLR. Thus while different gas-to-dust ratios
190: may contribute, it is also likely that there is an additional attenuating gas component closer to the X-ray source which is not affecting the [\ion{O}{3}] emission, as first suggested by \cite{1982ApJ...257...47M}.
191:
192:
193: \subsection{The Correlation Between [\ion{O}{3}],[\ion{O}{4}] and the 2-10 keV Band}
194: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
195: \begin{figure*}
196: \epsscale{.80}
197: \plotone{f2.eps}
198: \caption{Correlation between [\ion{O}{4}] and [\ion{O}{3}] luminosities with hard X-ray (2-10 keV) band and BAT
199: (14-195 keV) luminosities. The solid line represents the linear regression calculated for the Seyfert 1 galaxies and the dashed line represents the linear regression for the Seyfert 2 galaxies. The circles in the lower right panel represent radio loud (RL) objects.
200: \label{fig2}}
201: \end{figure*}
202:
203: In Figure ~\ref{fig2} we present comparisons between [\ion{O}{4}] and [\ion{O}{3}] luminosities and X-ray (2-10 keV) and BAT
204: (14-195 keV) luminosities. Linear fits to these relations, and statistical analysis are presented in Table ~\ref{table0}.
205: From the different relations, the lowest level of significance for a correlation is obtained for the [\ion{O}{4}]
206: versus the 2-10 keV hard X-ray. We propose that comparing the heavily-absorbed hard X-ray band in Seyfert 2's with the
207: ``unabsorbed" [\ion{O}{4}] may have weakened any correlation. In order to corroborate this statement we
208: used the relation, $L_{[{\rm O~ IV}]} \propto L_{2-10 {\rm keV}}^{0.7\pm 0.1}$, derived from the Seyfert 1's to estimate the hard X-ray 2-10 keV fluxes for
209: the Seyfert 2 galaxies using their observed [\ion{O}{4}]. To investigate the effect of ionized absorption on the 2-10 keV X-ray continuum, we created a multiplicative table (mtable) model using the ``grid" and ``punch XSPEC" options \citep{2006PASP..118..920P} in the photoionization code CLOUDY, version 07.02.01, last described by \cite{1998PASP..110..761F}. A single zone and simple power law incident continuum model was assumed, with photon index $\Gamma = {\rm 1.8}$, and low- and high-energy cutoffs at 1 micron and 100 keV, respectively. Hydrogen column density was then varied, with hydrogen number density fixed at $n_H = 10^8~{\rm cm^{-3}}$, and ionization parameter $\log (U) = -1$, where the ionization parameter $U$ is defined as \cite[see][]{2006agna.book.....O}:
210: \begin{equation}
211: U=\frac{1}{4\pi R^2cn_H}\int^\infty_{\nu_o}\frac{L_\nu}{h\nu}d\nu=\frac{Q(H)}{4\pi R^2cn_H},
212: \label{u}
213: \end{equation}
214: where R is the distance to the cloud
215: , c is the speed of light and $Q(H)$ is the flux of ionizing photons.
216:
217: The resulting table was then fed into the X-ray spectral fitting package XSPEC (version 12.3.1). We reproduced the incident power law in XSPEC using the POWERLAW additive model, attenuated by absorption from the Cloudy-produced mtable. Using the XSPEC ``flux" command, we determined the effect of various hydrogen column densities on the emergent 2-10 keV X-ray flux. Finally, we obtained the column densities needed in order to correct the observed hard X-ray
218: fluxes with their intrinsic counterpart derived from the [\ion{O}{4}].
219:
220:
221: In Figure ~\ref{fig3} we compare the predicted absorbing column densities with
222: values found in the literature (Table ~\ref{table_column}). Even though we used a simple X-ray model, the predicted column densities are in good agreement
223: with those from the literature. \objectname{NGC 2992} is the evident outlier from our sample. The X-ray flux has been seen to vary dramatically throughout the history of \objectname{NGC 2992} (Trippe et al., in preparation). As we mentioned before, the 2-10 keV fluxes are mainly from {\it ASCA} observations (in order to maintain consistency within our sample). {\it ASCA} observations
224: for this object were taken in 1994 and {\it Spitzer} IRS staring observations in 2005. Using the hard X-ray flux,
225: $f_{2-10keV} = 8.88 \times 10^{-11}{\rm ergs~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}}$, observed by \cite{2007ApJ...666...96M} with the {\it Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer} (RXTE) in 2005,
226: we obtained better agreement with the absorbing column density
227: predicted from the [\ion{O}{4}] (see Figure~\ref{fig3} and Table~\ref{table_column}). Overall, these results confirm the heavy absorption present in Seyfert 2 galaxies and the effectiveness of [\ion{O}{4}] as a true indicator of the intrinsic X-ray luminosity of the galaxy.
228:
229: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
230:
231: \begin{figure}
232: \epsscale{.80}
233: \plotone{f3.eps}
234: \caption{ Comparison between the predicted absorbing column densities and values
235: found in the literature for our Seyfert 2 population. The predicted values were derived using the [\ion{O}{4}] and 2-10 keV luminosity correlation found
236: for Seyfert 1's. The square represents the column density prediction based on
237: ASCA observations for the
238: X-ray flux in 2004 for NGC~2992 (see text for details). The dashed line represents a 1:1 correspondence.\label{fig3}}
239: \end{figure}
240: %
241: %
242: %referee
243: The good empirical correlation between the [\ion{O}{3}] emission line and the hard X-ray in the 2-10 keV band has been discussed extensively
244: \citep[e.g.,][]{1997MNRAS.288..977A,1999AJ....118.1169X,2005ApJ...634..161H,2006A&A...453..525N}. This correlation is often used to determine the
245: intrinsic X-ray luminosity, both in absorbed AGN where the observed X-ray flux is affected by absorption. We corroborate this in our sample, in that
246: we find a strong linear correlation between [\ion{O}{3}] and 2-10 keV luminosities. However, caution must be taken when using this correlation since
247: [\ion{O}{3}] and hard X-ray luminosities are essentially absorbed quantities, especially in Seyfert 2 sources. We suggest that the
248: combined effect of extinction in the [\ion{O}{3}] luminosities ($A_{v}\sim 1-6$ mag) with correspondingly heavily absorbed 2-10 keV fluxes
249: for Seyfert 2 galaxies results in a false correlation, thereby underestimating the true intrinsic luminosity of the AGN, particularly
250: for nearly X-ray Compton thick sources.
251: %
252: %
253: %%
254:
255: \subsection{The Correlation Between [\ion{O}{3}], [\ion{O}{4}] and the BAT Band}
256:
257: Based on the statistical analysis we found equally good correlations for the [\ion{O}{3}] and [\ion{O}{4}] relations with the 14-195 keV band. As we mentioned before, the [\ion{O}{4}] represents a relatively uncontaminated
258: quantity and therefore the relation with an unabsorbed quantity such as the BAT fluxes should give the best correlation, assuming
259: that the [\ion{O}{4}] is a good indicator of the power of the AGN. However, from
260: the statistical analysis, this does not seem to be the case.
261: To explore this behavior we applied linear regression fits to the individual Seyfert 1 and Seyfert 2 galaxies in our sample (see Figure~\ref{fig2}).
262: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
263:
264: The highest level of correlation was obtained for the Seyfert 1 galaxies: [\ion{O}{3}] versus the 14-195 keV ($r_s=0.88$, $P_r=1.2 \times 10^{-7}$) and
265: [\ion{O}{4}] versus the 14-195 keV ($r_s=0.84$, $P_r=3.6 \times 10^{-7}$). As we found previously, [\ion{O}{3}] in Seyfert 2 galaxies is
266: more affected by extinction than in Seyfert 1's. This could create a well-correlated linear distribution when comparing with the 14-195 keV BAT fluxes only if there is similar attenuation present in the 14-195 keV band for Seyfert 2's. Following the individual statistical analyses, Seyfert 2 objects have less correlated [\ion{O}{3}]
267: versus 14-195 keV hard X-ray ($r_s=0.73$, $P_r=1.6 \times 10^{-2}$) and [\ion{O}{4}] versus 14-195 keV hard X-ray luminosities
268: ($r_s=0.64$, $P_r=3.4 \times 10^{-2}$) than Seyfert 1 galaxies. Partial absorption of the hard X-ray fluxes, especially in Seyfert 2 galaxies, with the relatively
269: unobscured [\ion{O}{4}] is suggested as the cause for the low level of correlation. We found that, using $L_{[{\rm O~ III}]} \propto L_{14-195 {\rm keV}}^{0.9 \pm 0.1}$ derived from the Seyfert 1 population, we underpredicted the BAT luminosities for
270: the Seyfert 2 galaxies. This is an expected result considering the extinction of the [\ion{O}{3}] emission. On the other hand,
271: using the $L_{[{\rm O~ IV}]} \propto L_{14-195 {\rm keV}}^{0.7\pm 0.1}$ derived from the Seyfert 1 population, we overpredicted the BAT luminosities for most of the
272: Seyfert 2 galaxies. There are two different scenarios to explain the over-prediction: an overestimation of [\ion{O}{4}] due to contamination from
273: [\ion{Fe}{2}] (see Section 2) and absorption in the 14-195 keV BAT band.
274:
275:
276:
277: Although we cannot dismiss the former, we expect minimal starburst
278: contribution in our X-ray selected sample. However, we are aware of the importance of [\ion{Fe}{2}] emission especially in weak X-ray sources.
279: In order to estimate the [\ion{Fe}{2}] contamination coming from the starburst contribution we calculated the predicted [\ion{O}{4}] from the relation with the 14-195 keV luminosities
280: for Seyfert 1 galaxies and compared with the observed [\ion{O}{4}] luminosities for two extreme Seyfert 2 objects (see Figure ~\ref{fig2}): \objectname{NGC 3079}, with a major contribution from the starburst \citep{2007ApJ...655L..73G},
281: and \objectname{Mrk 3}, with no starburst \citep{2007ApJ...671..124D}. Using these luminosities we estimated an upper limit for the [\ion{Fe}{2}] starburst contribution
282: to be $\sim 1.5$ times the uncontaminated [\ion{O}{4}] luminosity for the low-resolution spectra of \objectname{NGC 3079}.
283: Comparing the full low-resolution with the full high-resolution IRS spectra obtained by \cite{2005ApJ...633..706W} we clearly see [\ion{Fe}{2}] as the dominant
284: component (and the impossibility of resolving the [\ion{O}{4}] in the low-resolution spectra for \objectname{NGC 3079}). We also noticed that the strong [\ion{O}{4}] emission line in \objectname{Mrk 3} shows no contribution from [\ion{Fe}{2}]. However, the nearly X-ray Compton-thick \objectname{Mrk 3} \citep{2005MNRAS.360..380B}, with uncontaminated and unabsorbed [\ion{O}{4}], still overpredicts the measured
285: BAT flux and the observed [\ion{O}{4}] of \objectname{NGC 3079} is consistent with the X-ray flux, if the source is nearly X-ray Compton-thick \citep{2006A&A...446..459C}, as we showed with the XSPEC simulation.
286:
287:
288:
289: Therefore, the most likely scenario to explain the hard X-ray overprediction in Seyfert 2's is partial absorption in the 14-195 keV BAT band. In order to investigate this last statement further we used, as before, the X-ray spectral fitting package XSPEC. For energies above 10 keV, we employed the standard XSPEC model PLCABS, which simulates attenuation of a power law
290: continuum by dense, cold matter \citep{1997ApJ...479..184Y}. The model grid has a high energy flux calculation limit of 50 keV, so our flux range was limited to 14-50 keV. To accommodate large column densities, we set the maximum number of scatterings considered by the model to a value of 12, as suggested by \cite{1997ApJ...479..184Y}. As before, the power law photon index was set to $\Gamma={\rm 1.8}$. Other variable model parameters were set to default values, and the column density was varied to determine relative changes in the predicted 14-50 keV X-ray luminosities using the [\ion{O}{4}]- BAT correlation for Seyfert 1's, and the observed BAT 14-50 keV X-ray luminosities of the Seyfert 2 galaxies. From these results, we derived a mean column density of $N_H \approx (3.2 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{24} {\rm cm^{-2}}$ for our Seyfert 2 population.
291: Given the energy limitation of the previous method, this result is in agreement with a derived value of
292: $N_H \approx (2.4 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{24} {\rm cm^{-2}}$, calculated using the average values for the predicted and the observed BAT X-ray luminosities, and assuming a purely Thomson cross-section. From this value of column density the BAT 14-195 keV X-ray band appear to have been partially absorbed. This result is in good agreement with the large column densities observed for \objectname{Mrk 3} and \objectname{NGC 3079} (see Table~\ref{table_column}).
293:
294:
295:
296: \subsection{Radio Loudness and [\ion{O}{4}]}
297: %%Referee
298: There is a well known linear correlation between the radio and the [\ion{O}{3}] luminosities, and that this correlation is similar for both radio quiet and
299: radio loud AGNs \citep[e.g.,][]{1999AJ....118.1169X,2001ApJ...555..650H}. We noticed that some of the objects in
300: our sample, which show more more scattered with respect to the linear correlation between [\ion{O}{4}] and BAT luminosities,
301: are radio loud sources (see Figure~\ref{fig2}, open circles). In order to investigate whether or not this is an actual trend or a sample selection effect, we expanded our original sample to include more radio loud objects. We used the sample and radio loudness classification from \cite{1999AJ....118.1169X} and selected
302: the objects that have been observed with {\it Spitzer} and are classified
303: as Seyfert galaxies (following NED and SIMBAD classification).
304: These new objects do not have 14-195 keV fluxes from the 9 month BAT survey and therefore are not included in any of the previous calculations
305: regarding the correlations of the [\ion{O}{4}] and the hard X-ray.
306: We obtained the [\ion{O}{4}] fluxes from the literature and {\it Spitzer} IRS staring mode archival (unpublished) spectra in low resolution. The extended sample is presented in Table~2 (the labels are the same as in Table~1).
307:
308:
309:
310: The relationship between the [\ion{O}{3}] and [\ion{O}{4}] has been studied before in powerful Fanaroff-Riley class II radio galaxies \citep{2005A&A...442L..39H}.
311: \cite{2005A&A...442L..39H} found [\ion{O}{3}] not to be a true indicator of the AGN, because the optical emission from the NLR suffers extinction. In Figure~\ref{fig4} we compare the [\ion{O}{4}] and [\ion{O}{3}] luminosities for the combined sample, i.e. the original and extended sample. From the comparison
312: it become clear that radio loud sources exhibit higher emission line luminosities than those of other types of active galaxies. This result is in agreement
313: with previous findings and could be explained by a proposed bowshock model where part of the NLR emission is
314: being powered by a radio-emitting jets, present in radio loud AGNs \citep[eg.][]{1992MNRAS.255..351T,1995ApJ...455..468D,1997ApJ...485..112B,1998ApJ...495..680B}.
315: Most of the radio loud objects included in the extended sample were chosen to be powerful radio sources \citep{2005A&A...442L..39H,2006ApJ...647..161O}.
316: Therefore, our results are hampered by selection effects. Furthermore, our small sample does not allow us to extract any
317: statistically significant results to determine a clear trend that may distinguish between Type 1 and Type 2 radio loud AGNs. For example, there may be evidence
318: for a high [\ion{O}{4}]/[\ion{O}{3}] in radio loud Seyfert 1's, as suggested by \cite{2005A&A...442L..39H}, however the same trend is not
319: seen in the RL Seyfert 2 galaxies. This remains as an open question for further analysis.
320:
321: \begin{figure}
322: \epsscale{.80}
323: \plotone{f4.eps}
324: \caption{Correlation between [\ion{O}{4}] and [\ion{O}{3}] luminosities for the combined sample, i.e. the original and extended sample.
325: The circles represent radio loud (RL) objects. For the purpose of comparison we group Seyfert's 1.8 and 1.9 with the Seyfert 2 galaxies. \label{fig4}}
326: \end{figure}
327:
328:
329: \section{Photoionization modeling}
330:
331: To investigate the physical conditions in the emission line regions for both the [\ion{O}{4}] and [\ion{O}{3}], we generated
332: single-zone, constant-density models.
333: We used a set of roughly solar abundances \cite[e.g.,][]{1989AIPC..183....1G}. The logs of the abundances relative to H by number are: He: -1; C: -3.46; N: -3.92; O: -3.19; Ne: -3.96; Na: -5.69; Mg: -4.48; Al: -5.53;
334: Si: -4.50; P: -6.43; S: -4.82; Ar: -5.40; Ca: -5.64; Fe: -4.40 and Ni: -5.75. We assumed a column density of $10^{21}{\rm cm^{-2}}$, which is typical
335: of the narrow line region \citep[e.g.,][]{2000ApJ...531..278K}. Although it is likely that there is dust mixed in with the emission-line gas in the
336: NLRs of Seyfert galaxies \citep[e.g.,][]{1986ApJ...307..478K,1993ApJ...404L..51N}, more recent studies using optical and UV long-slit spectra obtained with the Space Telescope
337: Imaging Spectrograph aboard the {\it Hubble Space Telescope} indicate that the dust/gas ratios are significantly lower than in the Galactic ISM
338: \citep{2000ApJ...544..763K,2000ApJ...532..256K,2000ApJ...531..278K}. Therefore, we have not included dust in our models.
339:
340:
341:
342: For the Spectral Energy Distribution (SED) we assume a broken power law as used by \cite{2004ApJ...607..794K} and similar
343: to that suggested for \objectname{NGC 5548} \citep{1998ApJ...499..719K} and \objectname{NGC 4151} \citep{2000ApJ...531..278K}
344: of the form $F_\nu \propto \nu^{-\alpha}$, with $\alpha {\rm =0.5}$ below 13.6 eV, $\alpha {\rm =1.5}$ from 13.6 eV to 1 keV and 0.8 at higher energies.
345: We generated a grid of photoionization models varying the ionization parameter $U$ and total hydrogen number density ($n_H$). The average BAT luminosity (14-195 keV) of the sample, 2.67$\times 10^{43}$ ergs ${\rm s^{-1}}$,
346: yields a flux of ionizing photons of $Q (H) \sim$1.2$\times 10^{54}$ photons ${\rm s^{-1}}$.
347: %%%%%%%Referee
348:
349: In order to study the physical conditions present in the emission-line regions, we need to
350: use intrinsic quantities (free of viewing angle effects). As discussed in the previous section, the [\ion{O}{3}] emission line seems to be more affected by
351: reddening in Seyfert 2 than Seyfert 1 galaxies. Consequently, we used the values derived from the Seyfert 1 galaxies in
352: our sample to constrain the photoionization parameters. We suggested that, given the isotropic properties for [\ion{O}{4}], the physical
353: conditions derived from our Seyfert 1 population could be extended to Seyfert 2 as well.
354:
355:
356: From the Seyfert 1's we find that the average [\ion{O}{4}] and [\ion{O}{3}] ratio is $\sim 1.0 \pm 0.2$.
357: Assuming that the [\ion{O}{3}] and [\ion{O}{4}] emission comes from the same gas, we used the generated grid of models to find the range in $U$ and $n_H$ for
358: which we can obtain a ratio of approximately unity for different values of extinction ($A_v$). We obtained
359: a range for the ionization parameter $-1.50 < \log (U) < -1.30$ and for the
360: hydrogen density, $ 2.0 < \log (n_H) < 4.25~{\rm (cm^{-3})}$, assuming no extinction ($A_v=0$). The
361: values for $n_H$ lie around the [\ion{O}{4}] critical density, $\log(n_c)\sim 3.7$, where the line intensity peaks. The critical density for the $^2{\rm P}^o_2$ level
362: of ${\rm O^{3+}}$, which is the upper level of the [\ion{O}{4}] line, was calculated using the formalism described in \cite{2006agna.book.....O} using atomic data from \cite{1992ApJS...80..425B} and \cite{1998A&AS..131..499G}.
363:
364:
365: \cite{2005MNRAS.358.1043B} found from their single-zone approximation a relatively small range for the values of $n_H$
366: ($\log(n_e)\sim 5.85 \pm 0.7 ~{\rm cm^{-3}}$)\footnote{ The photoionization code CLOUDY uses the total hydrogen density ($n_H$) instead of the
367: electron density ($n_e$) as used by \cite{2005MNRAS.358.1043B}. We assumed, in our simple model, both densities to be roughly the same.}
368: and a relatively small range of $U$ ($\log (U)= -3 \pm 0.5$) where both the [\ion{O}{3}] and H$\beta$ are emitted efficiently.
369: For their two-zone model assuming $n_e = 10^{3} {\rm cm^{-3}}$ for the outer zone and $n_e = 10^{7} {\rm cm^{-3}}$ and $\log (U) = -1$ for the inner zone, they found
370: higher $U$ values for the outer zone than in the single-zone approximation ($-3.5 < \log (U) < -2$). These
371: are typical values for the conditions in the NLR \citep[e.g.,][]{2000ApJ...531..278K}. While our models predicted higher ionization parameters than
372: \cite{2005MNRAS.358.1043B}, they did not attempt to include [\ion{O}{4}].
373:
374: \begin{figure}
375: \epsscale{.80}
376: \plotone{f5.eps}
377: \caption{ Comparison between the parameter space required to obtain a ratio of approximately unity for [\ion{O}{4}]/[\ion{O}{3}] for different extinction magnitudes for the [\ion{O}{3}].
378: For comparison we shown the parameter space obtained by \cite{2005MNRAS.358.1043B}.\label{fig5}}
379: \end{figure}
380:
381: In Figure \ref{fig5}, we present the required parameter space to obtain a [\ion{O}{4}]/[\ion{O}{3}] of unity for different values of $A_v$ and compared
382: with that found by \cite{2005MNRAS.358.1043B} in their single-zone model. This comparison shows the
383: dependence of this ratio in terms of the ionization parameter, hydrogen density and extinction. For a higher extinction, the parameter space required is closer
384: to that found by \cite{2005MNRAS.358.1043B}, meaning that the intrinsic ratio is smaller than unity and therefore representing a region where the [\ion{O}{3}] is
385: dominant, relative to the [\ion{O}{4}] emission. In the absence of such large extinction ($A_v \ga 6 {\rm mag}$), it is likely that
386: the [\ion{O}{4}] is coming from a more highly ionized and lower density gas. Our comparison of [\ion{O}{4}] and [\ion{O}{3}] show that the single-zone model cannot reproduce the physical conditions present in the NLR gas since $U$ would be too low to produce the observed [\ion{O}{4}] and the line would be collisionally suppressed.
387: On the other hand, our results are in better agreement with the higher ionization state found in their constant density outer zone. However, this
388: higher ionization and lower density cloud population cannot fully reproduce the observed [\ion{O}{4}].
389:
390:
391:
392: Since $U$ depends on the flux of ionizing photons ($Q(H)$), the distance to the source ($R$) and the
393: hydrogen density of the gas ($n_H$), we used the model grid predictions to calculate a range for the distances to the source. Then, we determined a range for
394: the covering factors ($Cf$) by adjusting to the observed [\ion{O}{4}] luminosity of the sample. We found a distance of the emitting gas from the central source of
395: $250~{\rm pc} > R > 30~{\rm pc}$ and a range of covering factors of $ 0.04 < Cf < 0.15$. The range in parameter space in our grid was dominated by matter bounded models. In the matter bounded case, all the material is ionized and some fraction of the ionizing radiation passes through the gas unabsorbed. Therefore, the covering factor must be higher than that from a radiation bounded model (in which all the ionizing radiation is absorbed in the NLR), to account for the observed strength of the emission lines. However, the inclusion of dust in the models will decrease the size of the ionized zone, which would further increase the predicted covering factors \citep[e.g.,][]{1993ApJ...404L..51N,2005MNRAS.358.1043B}. If the [\ion{O}{4}] arose in such dusty gas, it would imply higher covering factors than our models predict.
396: Nevertheless, the results from our dust-free models are in good agreement with the $Cf$ ($\sim 0.02 -0.2$) obtained by \cite{2005MNRAS.358.1043B} in their
397: radiation bounded dusty models. There is evidence for a component of high ionization matter bounded gas
398: in the NLR in which optical lines such as [\ion{Ne}{5}]$\lambda$3426 and [\ion{Fe}{7}] $\lambda$6087 form \citep[e.g.,][]{1996A&A...312..365B,2000ApJ...532..256K,2000ApJ...531..278K}, so it is likely that the [\ion{O}{4}] originates in the same gas, while most of the [\ion{O}{3}]
399: arises in conditions similar to those found by \cite{2005MNRAS.358.1043B}.
400:
401:
402: %%%%
403: %These covering factor values are higher than the $\sim$ 0.02
404: % estimated based on the comparison with the BLR by \cite{1993ApJ...404L..51N}. However, they assumed that the NLR gas
405: % was radiation bounded, in which all the ionizing radiation is absorbed in the NLR. In the matter bounded case, all the material is ionized and some
406: % fraction of the ionizing radiation passes through the gas unabsorbed. Therefore, the covering factor must be higher to account for the observed strength of the emission %lines. It should be noted that the inclusion of dust in the models will decrease the size of the ionized zone, which would further increase the predicted covering factors%
407: % \citep[e.g.,][]{1993ApJ...404L..51N,2005MNRAS.358.1043B}. If the [\ion{O}{4}] arose in such dusty gas, it would imply higher covering factors than our models predict.
408: %In any case, the range in parameter space in our grid was dominated by matter bounded models.
409: % There is evidence for a component of high ionization matter bounded gas
410: %in the NLR in which optical lines such as [\ion{Ne}{5}]$\lambda$3426 and [\ion{Fe}{7}] $\lambda$6087 form \citep[eg.][]{1996A&A...312..365B,2000ApJ...532..256K,2000ApJ...531..278K}, so it is likely that the [\ion{O}{4}] originates in the same gas.
411: %%%%%
412:
413:
414: \begin{figure}
415: \epsscale{.80}
416: \plotone{f6.eps}
417: \caption{ Comparison between the correlation of [\ion{O}{4}] luminosities with BAT X-ray luminosities
418: and a grid of photoionization models for different covering factors (Cf) for a distance of $R=130~{\rm pc}$. The dashed line represents the linear regression obtained for the observed luminosities for all the sample and the open circles represent the observed Seyfert 1's luminosities (see Figure~\ref{fig2}).
419: $n_H$ refers to the $\log$ of the hydrogen nucleus density and $U$ to the $\log$ of the ionization parameter. The vertical dashed line indicates the critical
420: density for the [\ion{O}{4}] line \label{fig6}}
421: \end{figure}
422:
423: In Figure~\ref{fig6} we present the photoionization model grid overlaid on the Seyfert 1 luminosities
424: and the linear regression for all the sample. Each case corresponds to a different set of covering factors ($Cf$) for a distance from the ionizing source to the gas cloud of $R=130~{\rm pc}$. The model X-ray luminosities are calculated using U, the fixed radial distance, the range in densities shown in Figure~\ref{fig6}, and our assumed
425: SED (see Equation~1).
426:
427:
428: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
429: As presented in Figure ~\ref{fig6}, our simple photoionization model can reproduce the observed $L_{[{\rm O~IV]}}$ to $L_{14-195 {\rm keV}}$ relationship.
430: In order to fit the higher luminosity sources, the models predict that
431: more distant or higher density gas is required for the NLR. We dismiss the latter because, at high densities (i.e. higher than the critical density for
432: [\ion{O}{4}]), the [\ion{O}{4}] is collisionally de-excited and the line intensity decreases. Therefore, the most likely scenario is a more distant
433: NLR for high luminosity sources. On the other hand, Figure ~\ref{fig6} shows that our simple photoionization model underpredicts [\ion{O}{4}] at $R=130~{\rm pc}$, even at low densities. Consequently, in the low luminosity sources the NLR must be fairly small ($R < 150$ pc) with a bigger covering factor ($Cf \ga 0.07$), since gas at or below the critical density of the [\ion{O}{4}] would not be sufficiently ionized at large distances from the source. These results suggests that the size of the NLR scales with the luminosity of the source, in agreement with the observed good correlation between the NLR size and the luminosity of the AGN \citep{2003ApJ...597..768S}.
434:
435:
436: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
437:
438:
439: \section{Conclusions}
440: We have explored the relationship between the $L_{[{\rm O~ IV}]}$-$L_{14-195~keV}$ and related correlations for a sample of X-ray selected
441: nearby Seyfert Galaxies. For the X-ray selected sample the [\ion{O}{4}] and the [\ion{O}{3}] luminosities are
442: well-correlated with the hard X-ray luminosity in the 14-195 keV band over a range of $\sim$ 3 and 5 orders of magnitude, respectively.
443:
444: From the [\ion{O}{4}] and [\ion{O}{3}] comparison we derived an absorbing column density from the reddening toward the NLR for Seyfert 2 galaxies,
445: $N_H \sim (2 - 10) \times 10^{21} {\rm cm^{-2}}$, which is smaller than the median value for the X-ray column densities, $N_H = 2.1 \times 10^{23} \rm{cm^{-2}}$. The differences in the line of sight for the different absorbing columns are consistent with an additional attenuating gas component
446: close to the X-ray source.
447: We also suggested that part of the obscuration in the NLR of Seyfert 2 galaxies may occur in the disk of the host galaxy, given the fact that, in our sample,
448: Seyfert 2 galaxies are on average more inclined.
449:
450: We obtained a correlation between the $L_{[{\rm O~ IV}]}$-$L_{2-10~keV}$ that is not as strong as the one between $L_{[{\rm O~ III}]}$-$L_{2-10~keV}$,
451: which results from comparing the heavily absorbed 2-10 keV band,
452: especially in Seyfert 2 galaxies, with the intrinsic (unabsorbed) [\ion{O}{4}] fluxes. As pointed out in previous works, there is a
453: good correlation between [\ion{O}{3}] and hard X-ray 2-10 keV luminosities. However, we conclude that the
454: combined effects of reddening in the [\ion{O}{3}] and absorption in the 2-10 keV band may result in a false correlation.
455:
456: For the $L_{[{\rm O~ III}]}$ and $L_{[{\rm O~ IV}]}$ relations with the $L_{14-195{\rm keV} }$ BAT
457: band we found equally good correlations. Using the linear regression found for Seyfert 1 galaxies we
458: underpredict the hard X-ray 14-195 keV BAT luminosities of Seyfert 2's obtained from the $L_{[{\rm O~ III}]}$ versus hard
459: X-ray $L_{14-195 {\rm keV} }$ relation and overpredict the hard X-ray 14-195 keV BAT luminosities using
460: the $L_{[{\rm O~ IV}]}$ relation. We explain the former case due to the extinction of the [\ion{O}{3}] ($A_{v}\sim 1-6$ mag) and the latter with
461: absorption in the BAT band. We found that for a column density of $ N_H \sim 3 \times 10^{24} \rm{cm^{-2}}$ the BAT luminosities
462: could be smaller, by a factor of $\sim 5 \pm 3$, than the intrinsic luminosities derived from the Seyfert 1's relation.
463:
464: Assuming that the [\ion{O}{3}] and [\ion{O}{4}] come from the same gas, and using the mean fluxes of the sample, we conclude that the emitting region for [\ion{O}{4}]
465: is in a higher ionization state and lower density than the components modeled for the [\ion{O}{3}] emitting region by \cite{2005MNRAS.358.1043B} and has a
466: mean covering factor of $Cf \sim 0.07$. The physical conditions
467: derived from the photoionization models indicate that [\ion{O}{4}] originates in the inner $\sim$ 150 pc of the NLR.
468:
469: In conclusion, we propose the [\ion{O}{4}] as a truly isotropic property of AGNs given its high ionization potential and that it is
470: unaffected by reddening, which makes this line easy to identify and extract. This is true at least in galaxies with
471: minimal or no star formation as for our X-ray selected sample. Where star formation activity has an
472: important contribution this may not be the case, especially with contamination from [\ion{Fe}{2}] $\lambda$25.99$\mu {\rm m}$ in low-resolution IRS spectra.
473: In a future work we will expand our sample to include the complete 22 month {\it SWIFT}/BAT survey and high resolution {\it Spitzer} IRS observations to
474: continue to explore these open issues.
475:
476: \acknowledgments
477: We would like to thank our anonymous referee for her/his insightful comments and suggestions that improved the paper.
478: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
479: California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The IRS was a collaborative venture between
480: Cornell University and Ball Aerospace Corporation funded by NASA through the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and Ames Research Center.
481: SMART was developed by the IRS Team at Cornell University and is available through the Spitzer Science Center at Caltech. Basic research in astronomy at the NRL is supported by 6.1 base funding.
482:
483: \clearpage
484:
485: \bibliographystyle{apj}
486:
487: \bibliography{ms}
488: \clearpage
489:
490: \begin{deluxetable}{llllllll}
491: \rotate
492: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
493: \tablewidth{0pt}
494: \tablecaption{Sample of Seyfert Galaxies}
495: \tablehead{ && \multicolumn{5}{c}{Luminosities (ergs ${\rm s^{-1}}$)}\\ \colhead{Name} & \colhead{Type} &\colhead{$z$}& \colhead{$\log(L_{[{\rm O~ III}]})$} & \colhead{$\log(L_{[{\rm O~ IV}]})$} &
496: \colhead{$\log(L_{2-10 {\rm keV}})$} & \colhead{$\log(L_{14-195 {\rm keV}})$ } & \colhead{Remarks}}
497: \startdata
498:
499: 3C120 & 1 & 0.033010 & 41.85\tablenotemark{a} & 42.44 & 44.02 & 44.43 & L\\
500: 3C273 & 1 & 0.158339 & 43.17\tablenotemark{a} & 42.75 & 45.96 & 46.21 & L\\
501: 3C382 & 1 & 0.057870 & 41.87\tablenotemark{b} & 41.25 & 44.55 & 44.79 & L\\
502: 3C390.3 & 1 & 0.056100 & 42.42\tablenotemark{b} & 41.25 & 44.20 & 44.86 & L\\
503: 3C452 & 2 & 0.081100 & 41.28\tablenotemark{b} & 41.22 & 43.89 & 44.70 & L\\
504: 3C84 & 2 & 0.017559 & 41.52\tablenotemark{c} & 40.82 & 42.90 & 43.89 & L\\
505: Circinus & 2 & 0.001448 & 38.54\tablenotemark{c} & 40.48\tablenotemark{l} & 40.58 & 42.06 &Q \\
506: ESO103-G035 & 1.9 & 0.013286 & 40.67\tablenotemark{d} & 41.13 & 42.95 & 43.57 &\nodata \\
507: IC4329a & 1.2 & 0.016054 & 41.18\tablenotemark{d} & 41.77 & 43.70 & 44.22 &Q \\
508: Mrk 6 & 1.5 & 0.018813 & 41.77\tablenotemark{e} & 41.59\tablenotemark{k} & 42.92 & 43.71 &\nodata \\
509: Mrk 79 & 1.2 & 0.022189 & 41.61\tablenotemark{e} & 41.74\tablenotemark{k} & 43.52 & 43.7 &Q \\
510: Mrk 348 & 2 & 0.015034 & 41.29\tablenotemark{e} & 41.07\tablenotemark{k} & 42.43 & 43.67 &\nodata \\
511: Mrk 3 & 2 & 0.013509 & 42.15\tablenotemark{e} & 41.85 & 41.95 & 43.6 &Q \\
512: Mrk 509 & 1.2 & 0.034397 & 42.33\tablenotemark{f} & 41.75 & 44.11 & 44.40 &Q \\
513: MCG-6-30-15 & 1.5 & 0.007749 & 39.68\tablenotemark{m} & 40.41\tablenotemark{k} & 42.72 & 42.99 &\nodata \\
514: MCG-2-58-22 & 1.5 & 0.046860 & 42.17\tablenotemark{h} & 41.70 & 44.22 & 44.43 &Q \\
515: NGC 1365 & 1.8 & 0.005457 & 40.12\tablenotemark{d} & 41.04 & 40.99 & 42.66 &\nodata \\
516: NGC 2992 & 2 & 0.007710 & 41.06\tablenotemark{i} & 41.12 & 41.69 & 42.93 &Q \\
517: NGC 3079 & 2 & 0.003723 & 37.79\tablenotemark{j} & 40.03\tablenotemark{k} & 40.02 & 41.85 &I \\
518: NGC 3227 & 1.5 & 0.003859 & 40.32\tablenotemark{e} & 40.37\tablenotemark{k} & 41.97 & 42.61 &Q \\
519: NGC 3516 & 1.5 & 0.008836 & 40.99\tablenotemark{e} & 40.81\tablenotemark{k} & 42.89 & 43.25 &Q \\
520: NGC 3783 & 1.5 & 0.009730 & 41.43\tablenotemark{g} & 40.78 & 43.16 & 43.52 &Q \\
521: NGC 4051 & 1.5 & 0.002336 & 39.68\tablenotemark{g} & 39.57\tablenotemark{k} & 41.42 & 41.73 &Q \\
522: NGC 4151 & 1.5 & 0.003319 & 41.43\tablenotemark{g} & 40.76\tablenotemark{k} & 42.69 & 42.95 &Q \\
523: NGC 4388 & 2 & 0.008419 & 40.86\tablenotemark{g} & 41.59 & 41.91 & 43.59 &Q \\
524: NGC 4507 & 1.9 & 0.011801 & 41.52\tablenotemark{g} & 41.06 & 42.74 & 43.76 &Q \\
525: NGC 526A & 1.5 & 0.019097 & 41.33\tablenotemark{g} & 41.20\tablenotemark{k} & 43.33 & 43.62 &Q \\
526: NGC 5506 & 1.9 & 0.006181 & 40.51\tablenotemark{g} & 41.21 & 42.80 & 43.29 &Q \\
527: NGC 5548 & 1.5 & 0.017175 & 41.61\tablenotemark{e} & 40.98\tablenotemark{k} & 43.52 & 43.57 &Q \\
528: NGC 6240 & 2 & 0.024480 & 40.54\tablenotemark{c} & 41.80 & 42.23 & 43.79 &Q \\
529: NGC 6300 & 2 & 0.003699 & 38.60\tablenotemark{c} & 40.06 & 41.57 & 42.43 &Q \\
530: NGC 7172 & 2 & 0.008683 & 41.43\tablenotemark{d} & 40.88\tablenotemark{k} & 42.73 & 43.30 &\nodata \\
531: NGC 7213 & 1.5 & 0.005839 & 39.86\tablenotemark{d} & 39.58 & 42.34 & 42.58 &\nodata \\
532: NGC 7314 & 1.9 & 0.004763 & 39.46\tablenotemark{g} & 40.41\tablenotemark{k} & 42.10 & 42.44 &Q \\
533: NGC 7469 & 1.5 & 0.016317 & 41.53\tablenotemark{g} & 41.58 & 43.22 & 43.68 &Q \\
534: NGC 7582 & 2 & 0.005254 & 40.32\tablenotemark{g} & 41.01 & 41.93 & 42.60 &Q \\
535: NGC 931 & 1.5 & 0.016652 & 40.97\tablenotemark{d} & 41.41\tablenotemark{k} & 42.52 & 43.64 &\nodata \\
536: NGC 985 & 1 & 0.043143 & 41.94\tablenotemark{g} & 41.74 & 43.56 & 44.19 &Q \\
537: PG1501+106 & 1.5 & 0.036420 & 41.85\tablenotemark{h} & 41.73 & 43.60 & 44.18 &Q \\
538: PG1534+580 & 1 & 0.029577 & 42.08\tablenotemark{g} & 41.07 & 43.24 & 43.76 &Q \\
539:
540:
541: %\end{tabular}
542: \label{table1}
543: %\end{table}
544: %\end{landscape}
545: \enddata
546: \tablecomments{The luminosities were calculated from the fluxes using $H_o=71{\rm km}$${\rm s^{-1}}$${\rm Mpc^{-1}}$ and a deceleration parameter $q_o=0$ with redshift values
547: taken from NED. The [O~IV] luminosities obtained in the present work are presented in the table without references.
548: The 2-10 keV fluxes are from ASCA observations and were retrieve from the TARTARUS data base \citep{2001AIPC..599..991T} except for:
549: \objectname{3C 84} from {\it XMM-Newton} observations \citep{2006ApJ...642...96E};
550: \objectname{3C 452} from {\it Chandra} ACIS observations \citep{2002ApJ...580L.111I};\objectname{MCG -2-58-22} and \objectname{NGC 6300} from
551: {\it BeppoSAX} MECS observations \citep{2007A&A...461.1209D};\objectname{Mrk 79} from {\it XMM-Newton} \citep{2006MNRAS.365..688G};
552: \objectname{Mrk 79}, which is from an {\it Ariel 5} observations \citep{1978MNRAS.183..129E}; \objectname{NGC 3079} which is from {\it XMM-Newton} \citep{2006A&A...446..459C}. The 14-195 keV fluxes presented in this table are from the 9 months {\it SWIFT}/BAT high Galactic latitude survey \citep{bat} except for:
553: \objectname{Circinus} and \objectname{NGC 3079}, which are from Tueller et al. (in preparation). The last column follow the radio loudness
554: classification from \cite{1999AJ....118.1169X}, L= Radio loud, Q= Radio quiet and I= Intermediate.}
555: \tablerefs{(a) \cite{1993MNRAS.263..999T}, (b) \cite{1989MNRAS.240..701R}, (c) \cite{1996ApJS..106..399P} , (d) \cite{1997ApJ...486..132B} and references therein
556: , (e) \cite{1975ApJ...199...19A}, (f) \cite{1980ApJ...241..894Y}, (g) \cite{1992ApJS...79...49W} and references therein,(h) \cite{1988ApJS...67..249D}, (i) \cite{1980MNRAS.193..563W},
557: (j) \cite{1997ApJS..110..321B},(k) \cite{2007ApJ...671..124D},(l) \cite{2002A&A...393..821S}, (m)\cite{1992MNRAS.257..677W}.
558: }
559: \end{deluxetable}
560:
561: \clearpage
562:
563: \begin{deluxetable}{lllllll}
564: %\rotate
565: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
566: \tablewidth{0pt}
567: \tablecaption{Extended Sample}
568: \tablehead{ && \multicolumn{4}{c}{Luminosities (ergs ${\rm s^{-1}}$)}\\ \colhead{Name} & \colhead{Type} & \colhead{$z$}&\colhead{$\log(L_{[{\rm O~ III}]})$} &
569: \colhead{$\log(L_{[{\rm O~ IV}]})$} &\colhead{$\log(L_{2-10 {\rm keV}})$}&\colhead{Remarks}}
570: \startdata
571:
572: 3C 109 & 1.8 &0.305600& 43.13\tablenotemark{a} & 41.91\tablenotemark{j} & 45.19 &L \\
573: 3C 192 & 2 &0.059709& 41.72\tablenotemark{a} & 41.12 & \nodata &L \\
574: 3C 234 & 1 &0.184800& 43.29\tablenotemark{a} & 42.83\tablenotemark{k} & 44.19 &L \\
575: 3C 249.1& 1 &0.311500& 43.33\tablenotemark{b} & 41.86\tablenotemark{j} & 44.79 &L \\
576: 3C 321 & 2 &0.096100& 41.69\tablenotemark{c} & 41.64\tablenotemark{j} & 42.78 &L \\
577: 3C 323.1& 1 &0.264300& 42.80\tablenotemark{d} & 41.56\tablenotemark{j} & 45.01 &L \\
578: 3C 33 & 2 &0.059700& 42.03\tablenotemark{a} & 41.83\tablenotemark{k} & 43.79 &L \\
579: 3C 381 & 1 &0.160500& 41.53\tablenotemark{a} & 42.41\tablenotemark{k} & \nodata&L \\
580: 3C 433 & 2 &0.101600& 41.42\tablenotemark{e} & 42.28\tablenotemark{k} & 44.08 &L \\
581: 3C 445 & 1 &0.056200& 42.09\tablenotemark{f} & 40.63\tablenotemark{j} & 43.76 &L \\
582: 3C 459 & 2 &0.219900& 42.42\tablenotemark{f} & 41.47\tablenotemark{j} & \nodata &L \\
583: 3C 79 & 2 &0.255900& 43.05\tablenotemark{a} & 42.14\tablenotemark{j} & \nodata &L \\
584: Mrk 231 & 1 &0.042170& 41.94\tablenotemark{g} & 41.42\tablenotemark{l} & 43.76 &I \\
585: Mrk 573 & 2 &0.017179& 42.00\tablenotemark{h}& 41.72\tablenotemark{m} & 41.25 &Q \\
586: NGC 5643& 2 &0.003999& 40.44\tablenotemark{h} & 40.56\tablenotemark{m} & 40.35 &Q \\
587: NGC 6251& 2 &0.024710& 39.78\tablenotemark{i} & 39.85 & 42.28 &L \\
588: TOL 0109-383& 2 &0.011764& 41.09\tablenotemark{i} & 40.63\tablenotemark{m} & 41.72 &Q \\
589:
590: %\end{tabular}
591: \label{table2}
592: %\end{table}
593: %\end{landscape}
594: \enddata
595: \tablecomments{The luminosities were calculated from the fluxes using $H_o=71{\rm kms^{-1}Mpc^{-1}}$ and a deceleration parameter $q_o=0$ with redshift values
596: taken from NED. The [O~IV] luminosities obtained in the present work are presented in the table without references. The 2-10 keV fluxes are from ASCA observations and were retrieve from the TARTARUS data base \citep{2001AIPC..599..991T} except for:
597: \objectname{3C 33} from {\it XMM-Newton} observations (\cite{2006ApJ...642...96E}); \objectname{Mrk 573} from {\it XMM-Newton} observations
598: \citep{2005A&A...444..119G} and \objectname{TOL 0109-383} from \cite{2005ApJ...634..161H}. The last column follow the radio loudness
599: classification from \cite{1999AJ....118.1169X}, L= Radio loud, Q= Radio quiet and I= Intermediate.}
600: \tablerefs{(a) \cite{1989MNRAS.240..701R}, (b) \cite{1991MNRAS.250..422J}, (c) \cite{1991ApJS...75.1011G}, (d) \cite{1996ApJS..102....1B}, (e) \cite{1981ApJ...250..469S},
601: (f) \cite{1993MNRAS.263..999T}, (g) \cite{1988ApJS...67..249D}, (h) \cite{1992ApJS...79...49W}, (i) \cite{1996ApJS..106..399P}, (j) \cite{2005A&A...442L..39H},
602: (k) \cite{2006ApJ...647..161O},(l) \cite{2007ApJ...656..148A},(m) \cite{2002A&A...393..821S}.
603: }
604:
605:
606: \end{deluxetable}
607:
608:
609:
610:
611: \clearpage
612:
613: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
614: %\rotate
615: \tabletypesize{\small}
616: \tablewidth{0pt}
617: \tablecaption{Linear regressions and statistical analysis for the [\ion{O}{4}] and [\ion{O}{3}] to their X-ray luminosities}
618: \tablehead{ &\multicolumn{2}{c}{$\log ({\rm L_{2-10 keV}})$} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$\log ({\rm L_{14-195 keV}})$}\\
619: &\colhead{a} &\colhead{b}&\colhead{a}&\colhead{b}}
620: \startdata
621: $\log {\rm L_{[O~ III]}}$&0.82626&5.6382&1.0771&$-$5.8703\\
622: &$0.8\pm 0.1$&$5 \pm 4$&$1.1 \pm 0.1$&$-6 \pm 5$\\
623: &\multicolumn{2}{c}{$r_s=0.791$, $P_r=7.8 \times 10^{-7}$}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{$r_s=0.825$, $P_r=2.5 \times 10^{-7}$}\\
624: $\log {\rm L_{[O~ IV]}}$&0.38903&24.467&0.61487&14.358\\
625: &$0.4 \pm 0.1$&$24 \pm 3$&$0.6\pm 0.1$&$14 \pm 3$\\
626: &\multicolumn{2}{c}{$r_s=0.596$, $P_r=2.0 \times 10^{-4}$}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{$r_s=0.798$, $P_r=6.3 \times 10^{-7}$}\\
627:
628: \enddata
629: \label{table0}
630: \tablecomments{a and b represent the regression coefficient (slope) and regression constant (intercept) respectively. $r_s$ is the
631: Spearman rank order correlation coefficient and $P_r$ is the null probability. For each relation we presented the exact linear regression values,
632: the values as constrained by their statistical errors and the Spearman rank and null probability.}
633: \end{deluxetable}
634:
635:
636: \clearpage
637:
638: \begin{deluxetable}{lcc}
639: %\rotate
640: \tabletypesize{\small}
641: \tablewidth{0pt}
642: \tablecaption{Column densities for Seyfert 2 galaxies.}
643: \tablehead{ \colhead{Name} &\colhead{$\log N_H$ (XSPEC)}&\colhead{$\log N_H$}}
644: \startdata
645:
646: Circinus& 24.27 &24.56\tablenotemark{a}\\
647: ESO103-G035 & 23.05 & 23.17\tablenotemark{b}\\
648: Mrk 348 & 23.65 & 23.11\tablenotemark{c}\\
649: Mrk 3 & 24.47 & 24.13 \tablenotemark{d}\\
650: NGC 2992 & 22.68& 22.00 \tablenotemark{e}\\
651: NGC 3079 & 24.19 & 25.00 \tablenotemark{f}\\
652: NGC 4388 & 24.40 & 23.63 \tablenotemark{g}\\
653: NGC 4507 & 23.23 & 23.46 \tablenotemark{g}\\
654: NGC 5506 & 23.47 & 22.53 \tablenotemark{g}\\
655: NGC 6240 & 24.40 & 24.30 \tablenotemark{h}\\
656: NGC 6300 & 21.70 & 21.40 \tablenotemark{i}\\
657: NGC 7172 & 22.57 & 22.92 \tablenotemark{b}\\
658: NGC 7314 & 21.94 & 21.92 \tablenotemark{b}\\
659: NGC 7582 & 23.93 & 23.08 \tablenotemark{g}\\
660: \enddata
661: \label{table_column}
662: \tablecomments{The XSPEC calculations are based on the comparison between [O~IV] predictions and observed hard X-ray 2-10 keV fluxes. See text for details.}
663: \tablerefs{ (a) \cite{1999A&A...341L..39M}, (b) ASCA observations retrieved using TARTARUS data base, (c) \cite{2002MNRAS.332L..23A}, (d) \cite{2005MNRAS.360..380B},
664: (e) \cite{2000A&A...355..485G}, (f) \cite{2006A&A...446..459C}, (g) \cite{1999ApJS..121..473B}, (h)\cite{1999A&A...349L..57V}, (i)\cite{2007A&A...461.1209D}
665: }
666: \end{deluxetable}
667:
668:
669:
670:
671: \end{document}
672:
673: