1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
20:
21: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
22:
23: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
24:
25: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
26:
27: %%\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
28:
29: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
30: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
31: %% use the longabstract style option.
32:
33: %%\documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
34:
35: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
36: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
37: %% the \begin{document} command.
38: %%
39: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
40: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
41: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
42: %% for information.
43:
44: %\newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
45: %\newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
46:
47: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
48:
49: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
50:
51: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
52: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
53: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
54: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
55: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
56: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
57:
58: \shorttitle{Frequent Occurrence of High-speed Mass Downflows}
59: \shortauthors{Shimizu et al.}
60:
61: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
62: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
63:
64: \begin{document}
65:
66: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
67: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
68: %% you desire.
69:
70: \title{Frequent Occurrence of High-speed Local Mass Downflows
71: on the Solar Surface}
72:
73: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
74: %% author and affiliation information.
75: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
76: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
77: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
78: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
79:
80: %\author{T. Shimizu}
81: %\affil{Institute of Space and Astronautical Science,
82: % Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency,
83: % 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan}
84: %
85: %\email{shimizu.toshifumi@isas.jaxa.jp}
86: %
87: %\author{B. W. Lites, M. Kubo}
88: %\affil{High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research,
89: % P.O.Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307, USA}
90: %
91: %\author{Y. Katsukawa, K. Ichimoto, Y. Suematsu, S. Tsuneta}
92: %\affil{National Astronomical Observatory of Japan,
93: % Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan}
94: %
95: %\author{S. Nagata}
96: %\affil{Kwasan and Hida Observatories, Kyoto University,
97: % Kamitakara-cho, Takayama, Gifu 506-1314, Japan}
98: %
99: %\and
100: %
101: %\author{R. A. Shine, T. D. Tarbell}
102: %\affil{Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory,
103: % Bldg. 252, 3251 Hanover St., Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA}
104:
105: \author{T. Shimizu\altaffilmark{1}, B. W. Lites\altaffilmark{2},
106: Y. Katsukawa\altaffilmark{3}, K. Ichimoto\altaffilmark{3},
107: Y. Suematsu\altaffilmark{3}, S. Tsuneta\altaffilmark{3},
108: S. Nagata\altaffilmark{4}, M. Kubo\altaffilmark{2},
109: R. A. Shine\altaffilmark{5}, and T. D. Tarbell\altaffilmark{5}}
110: \altaffiltext{1}{Institute of Space and Astronautical Science,
111: Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency,
112: 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan.
113: shimizu.toshifumi@isas.jaxa.jp}
114: \altaffiltext{2}{High Altitude Observatory,
115: National Center for Atmospheric Research,
116: P.O.Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307, USA.}
117: \altaffiltext{3}{National Astronomical Observatory of Japan,
118: Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan.}
119: \altaffiltext{4}{Kwasan and Hida Observatories, Kyoto University,
120: Kamitakara-cho, Takayama, Gifu 506-1314, Japan.}
121: \altaffiltext{5}{Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory,
122: Bldg. 252, 3251 Hanover St., Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.}
123:
124: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
125: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
126: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
127: %% affiliation.
128:
129: %\altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory.
130: %CTIO is operated by AURA, Inc.\ under contract to the National Science
131: %Foundation.}
132: %\altaffiltext{2}{Society of Fellows, Harvard University.}
133: %\altaffiltext{3}{present address: Center for Astrophysics,
134: % 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
135: %\altaffiltext{4}{Visiting Programmer, Space Telescope Science Institute}
136: %\altaffiltext{5}{Patron, Alonso's Bar and Grill}
137:
138: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
139: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
140: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
141: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
142: %% editorial office after submission.
143:
144: \begin{abstract}
145:
146: We report on new spectro-polarimetric measurements with simultaneous
147: filter imaging observation, revealing the
148: frequent appearance of polarization signals indicating
149: high-speed, probably supersonic, downflows that are associated
150: with at least three different configurations of magnetic fields
151: in the solar photosphere. The observations were carried out with
152: the Solar Optical Telescope onboard the {\em Hinode} satellite.
153: High speed downflows are excited when a
154: moving magnetic feature is newly formed near the penumbral boundary
155: of sunspots. Also, a new type of downflows is identified at the edge
156: of sunspot umbra that lack accompanying penumbral structures. These
157: may be triggered by the interaction of magnetic fields sweeped
158: by convection with well-concentrated magnetic flux. Another class of high speed
159: downflows are observed in quiet sun and sunspot moat regions. These are closely related
160: to the formation of small concentrated magnetic flux patches.
161: High speed downflows of all types are transient time-dependent mass
162: motions. These findings suggest that the excitation of supersonic
163: mass flows are one of the key observational features of the
164: dynamical evolution occurring in magnetic-field fine structures
165: on the solar surface.
166: \end{abstract}
167:
168: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
169: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
170: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
171: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
172:
173: \keywords{Sun: atmospheric motions --- Sun: magnetic fields ---
174: Sun: photosphere --- sunspots}
175:
176: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
177: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
178: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
179: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
180: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
181: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
182: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
183: %% each reference.
184:
185:
186: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
187: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
188: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
189: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
190: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
191: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
192: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
193: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
194: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
195: %%
196: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
197: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
198: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
199: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
200:
201: \section{Introduction}
202:
203: Recent high-spatial resolution imaging observations of the sun from
204: ground-based facilities using advanced techniques, such as adaptive
205: optics and image processings, have been revealing that the solar
206: photosphere is highly structured with many large and small
207: scale mass motions.
208: %% suggestion - this sentence probably not needed
209: Granules or granular cells are the most visible manifestations
210: of small scale mass motions on the photosphere and are formed by
211: convection.
212: %%
213: Magnetic fields of the sun, some of which are observed as
214: tiny bright points in G-band images \citep{ber96}, wander
215: due to interaction with
216: nearby evolving granular cells \citep{ste98}. The interaction
217: between granular motions and magnetic field can provide kinetic
218: energy to the magnetic field and drives much more dynamic behaviors
219: as well as plasma heating in the solar upper atmosphere. Sunspots,
220: the largest visible magnetic structures at the photosphere,
221: also show Evershed mass flows in the radial direction of the penumbra
222: \citep{sol03}. It is not easy with ground-based observations
223: to trace dynamical behaviors of mass motions and their association
224: with evolution of magnetic fields and heating
225: in the upper atmosphere at sub-arcsecond
226: spatial scales because of variable seeing conditions. Therefore we
227: lack observational knowledge about the overall dynamical
228: evolution of the solar atmosphere including mass motions, magnetic
229: fields, and heating. It is apparent that our observational
230: knowledge can be much improved via high spatial-resolution
231: observations from space with seeing-free stable conditions.
232: New observations of dynamic flows associated with magnetic fields
233: would provide key clues toward understanding the nature of
234: atmospheric dynamics and thus the physical mechanisms
235: that control the dynamical evolution of magnetic field features.
236:
237: Spectro-polarimetric observations of magnetically sensitive spectral lines in
238: visible and infrared wavelengths have become crucial in the past decade
239: for quantitative investigations of magnetic field structures in
240: the photosphere \citep{lit93}.
241: The spectro-polarimetric observations
242: also probe the line-of-sight Doppler motion of
243: the mass in the atmosphere occupied by the magnetic field.
244: The Solar Optical Telescope (SOT) \citep{tsu07, tar07, ich07, sue07, shi07a}
245: onboard a new Japanese spacecraft {\em Hinode} \citep{kos07},
246: starting its scientific
247: observations from November 2006 after its successful launch on 22
248: September 2006, includes the Spectro-Polarimeter (SP) instrument, which
249: performs for the first time precise (0.1\%) measurements of
250: polarization with high spatial resolution (0.3 arcsec) under seeing-free
251: conditions. The SP observations provide highly dispersed spectral profiles
252: of the polarization (Stokes profiles)
253: suitable for investigating mass flows associated with magnetic field.
254:
255: One of the remarkable features observed in the Stokes profiles
256: is the frequent appearance of complex Stokes V (circular
257: polarization) profiles showing signal excess at the red side (longer wavelength)
258: of the Fe I 630 nm spectral lines, as shown in Figure 1.
259: At two local positions, a signal elongating toward
260: the right is clearly seen $250-400$ m\AA\ from the center
261: of the spectral lines.
262: Since the peak of the antisymmetric Stokes V profile is roughly located
263: 100 m\AA\ from the line center, a $250-400$ m\AA\ offset corresponds
264: to 7-14 km s$^{-1}$, suggesting mass
265: flows exceeding the sound velocity in the photosphere (6-7 km s$^{-1}$)
266: associated with the magnetic field. Based on Stokes profile measurements,
267: the number of observational reports on supersonic or rapid flows of
268: any type in the photosphere is recently increasing;
269: a strong downflow close to the neutral line of a delta sunspot
270: \citep{mar94, lit02}, supersonic Evershed downflows in a sunspot
271: \citep{wie95, del01},
272: strong downflows at the location of chromospheric Ellerman bombs \citep{soc06},
273: magnetic elements amplified by flux expulsion and convective collapse
274: \citep{sig99, bel01, soc05}, magnetic elements in
275: quiet and active regions \citep{sig01}, supersonic downflows in
276: the sunspot moat \citep{shi07b} and so on. It appears from these
277: previous observations that supersonic mass flows occur in localized
278: areas, which can be revealed only with high spatial resolution
279: observations. The SOT
280: observations can provide time series of spectro-polarimetric
281: measurements with sub-arcsec spatial resolution under stable seeing-free
282: condition, allowing us to investigate
283: the dynamical evolution of high speed flows and its relation to
284: features seen in other imaging observations.
285:
286: This paper presents new {\em Hinode} observations showing that supersonic
287: downflows frequently occur at various magnetic circumstances
288: in the photosphere (section 3). In section 4, a few typical examples
289: corresponding to each of downflow events classified in section 3 are
290: shown to trace temporal evolution of the events and their associated
291: features captured with simultaneous filter imaging observations, followed
292: by discussions in section 5.
293: These observations show the importance of further investigations on
294: the supersonic downflows for understanding fine structures and their dynamic
295: evolution of magnetic field concentrations as well as for understanding
296: transient heating at the chromosphere.
297:
298: \section{Observations}
299:
300: Two types of spectro-polarimetric observations were made with the
301: Spectro-Polarimeter of SOT on December 2, 2006. One was a fast mapping
302: observation performed between 0:00-3:30 UT and the other is a
303: normal mapping observation performed between 10:30-15:30 UT.
304: The primary purpose of this fast mapping observation was to capture overall
305: temporal signatures of rapid flows in the active and quiet
306: region with a field of view as large as possible.
307: The fast mapping mode has a 4.4 minute cadence
308: for a 20.5 arcsec-wide scan with 0.32 arcsec
309: effective pixel size (64 positions in east-west direction).
310: In the fast mapping, since the slit width is 0.16 arcsec, photons
311: are accumulated during one modulator rotation (1.6 sec) at
312: the 1st slit position and during another rotation at the next slit position.
313: The field of view along the slit is 82 arcsec (256 pixels).
314: The supreme spatial resolution capability of the SOT is not
315: fully exploited with the fast mapping observation, and instead
316: the normal mapping observation provides the best spatial
317: resolution (0.16 arcsec pixel)
318: data. This particular normal
319: map mode had a 67 sec cadence for a 2.1 arcsec-wide scan
320: (13 positions, 4.8 sec photon accumulation for each) in
321: east-west direction with 41 arcsec (256 pixels) along the slit.
322: Hence it covered a much smaller area than the fast maps but
323: with higher resolution and longer integrations.
324:
325: A moderate sunspot was partially included in the field of view
326: with a moat flow area and quiet region located north of the spot (Figure 2).
327: The spot is a leading spot of active region NOAA 10926,
328: located near the disk center (200 arcsec S, 200 arcsec W), and it
329: consists of three umbrae divided by light bridge structures.
330:
331: The SP obtains the full polarization states of line profiles of two
332: magnetically sensitive Fe lines at 630.15 and 630.25 nm and nearby
333: continuum.
334: We define a measure to identify the elongated signal excess located far from
335: the line center by integrating the Stokes V signals
336: over $259$ to $431$ m\AA\ from the center.
337: The zero-velocity is derived from the profile
338: averaged over all the Stokes I profiles along the slit
339: (256 profiles).
340: This measure has the advantage of detecting the complicated Stokes V profiles
341: that suggest the existence of high speed signals. Note that
342: the zero-crossing wavelengths of Stokes V profile \citep[e.g.,][]{sig01}
343: sometimes used for quantitative studies do not detect high speed components
344: adequately for some types of Stokes V profiles, if a largely shifted
345: component has the same polarization polarity as the rest component
346: (See section 4 for examples).
347:
348: During the normal-mapping spectro-polarimetric measurements,
349: the Broadband Filter Imager (BFI) of SOT produced photometric images
350: in the G (430.50 nm center, 1.2 nm width) and Ca {\sc II H} (396.85 nm
351: center, 0.3 nm width) spectral bands at the highest spatial resolution
352: (about 0.2 arcsec, 0.0545 arcsec in pixel size) every minute.
353:
354: \section{Frequent Occurrence of High-Speed Downflows}
355:
356: Figure 2 shows a time series of our measure
357: representing signal excess for the red and blue sides
358: of the spectral line.
359: A large number of point-like, 1 arcsec or less in diameter, dark
360: and bright signals (opposite signs of V) can be easily identified in the red-side wing
361: at various locations. % in the red-side maps.
362: The point-like signals have durations of 4 - 30 minutes, most
363: only about 4-10 minutes, indicating that all these high-speed
364: downflows in the photosphere are transient and not static.
365:
366: Three types of high-speed downflows can be identified, each
367: associated with their spatial relationship to the sunspot:
368: 1) Around the outer boundary
369: of sunspot penumbra. Most of these events are located in a moat flow
370: region surrounding the penumbra, and some events are also seen
371: from the middle to the outer edge of penumbral structures \citep{del01}.
372: Dark features are slightly predominant,
373: i.e., negative integrated Stokes V
374: at the red side of the spectral lines.
375: 2) At the edge of those portions
376: of umbrae that do not have associated penumbral structures.
377: These transiently appear with a strong bright signal in the map.
378: In the sunspot examined in this paper, the portions of umbrae
379: without penumbral structures are formed in association with
380: light bridge structures where evolving granular cells
381: are present.
382: Another portion of the umbra without associated penumbral
383: structures is seen at the lower right-hand-side corner of
384: the field of view where the
385: umbra is face to face with a different sunspot with the same
386: magnetic polarity located to the south.
387: 3) At small magnetic field
388: concentrations located in moat and quiet regions far from the
389: sunspots. In many events, a bright point with sub arcsec diameter
390: is observed in the Stokes I continuum and more clearly in G-band images
391: at the exact location of downflows.
392:
393: It should be pointed out that strong signal excesses are not
394: as common in the blue side of the spectral lines, except for a few
395: events at the small magnetic field concentrations located near the outer
396: boundary of penumbra. This indicates less upward mass motions exceeding
397: the sound velocity at the photospheric level.
398:
399: Figure 3 shows the full Stokes profiles typically observed for
400: the three types.
401: At the outer edge of penumbral (type 1),
402: a common characteristic of the Stokes V profile is
403: a complex shape with three lobes, unlike the usual, antisymmetric
404: profile with two lobes.
405: The two lobes located at both sides about equidistant
406: from the zero velocity wavelength have
407: a symmetric Stokes Q/U (linear polarization) shape
408: with a signal strength similar to that of Stokes V.
409: This indicates an inclined magnetic field at rest.
410: The extra lobe is observed at the red side with
411: predominantly negative signal and with no clear
412: corresponding signal in Stokes Q and U, suggesting
413: that the magnetic field forming the third lobe is primarily
414: vertical.
415:
416: The second type, observed at the umbral edge without accompanying penumbra,
417: also shows a complex Stokes V profile with three
418: lobes (Figure 3b).
419: The unique signature common to these events
420: is that the third lobe is positive,
421: indicating a magnetic field
422: aligned to the ambient magnetic field of the sunspot.
423: This type of motion is also observed around the outer boundary
424: of pores, which also, of course, do not have associated penumbral structures.
425:
426: The third type is observed in the moat and quiet area
427: where small concentrations
428: of magnetic field are scattered.
429: Some of the Stokes V profiles have an elongated signal toward
430: the longer wavelength in addition to the usual, antisymmetric
431: profile with two lobes (Figure 3c). In some cases there is
432: an extreme red-shifted lobe, similar to that of the umbra.
433: No linear polarization is observed, indicating that the
434: magnetic field is vertical.
435:
436: Here we note a limitation of the measure used in
437: this analysis. Small values of this quantity do not necessarily
438: imply the absence of high-speed downflows. In fact, weak Stokes V signals
439: will always produce small values of this quantity even if strong
440: downflows exist. On the other hand, strong Stokes V signals can
441: produce large values of this quantity even if a strong downflow exists
442: only in a small fraction of the pixel. Thus, the magnitude of
443: the measure should be interpreted carefully,
444: although the measure is useful to easily identify
445: high-speed downflows that are associated with magnetic flux.
446:
447:
448:
449: \section{Temporal Evolution and Associated Features}
450:
451: In this section, we examine the temporal development
452: of high-speed downflows using the Stokes profiles
453: and simultaneous filter imaging observations to understand
454: how high-speed downflows develop with their associated
455: magnetic fields.
456:
457: \subsection{High-speed downflows near sunspot penumbral boundaries}
458:
459: Figure 4 shows the temporal evolution of typical downflow events
460: observed just outside the sunspot penumbral boundary.
461: The field of view of each frame is $3.8$ (N-S) $\times 3.3$ (E-W) arcsec.
462: Note that the quantities derived from the normal-mapping Stokes measurement
463: are 2.1 arcsec wide in the east-west direction.
464: High-speed downflows (negative signal) are observed twice in this
465: sequence (16 min coverage), each of
466: which is accompanied by a tiny positive signal.
467: The second event is marked by circles with a radius of 1.0 arcsec
468: in Figure 4. They are located
469: almost at a short extension (1-2 arcsec) from a dark filamentary structure
470: of the penumbra, where nearly horizontal Evershed gas flows seem
471: to be preferentially concentrated with nearly horizontal magnetic
472: field \citep{tit93, shi94, rim95, rou02, bel06, ich07b}. Note that
473: the tip of the dark filamentary structure is seen at the bottom of
474: Stokes I continuum and G-band images, as identified with the contour lines
475: in G-band. The duration of the events is 3-4 minutes. The longitudinal
476: magnetograms, generated by integrating the blue wing of Stokes V,
477: show that a white patch newly appears at almost the same time (t= 539s)
478: and location of the second event. The white patch at t= 539, 607, and
479: 674s is still negative-polarity, but it can be recognized as a white
480: patch because this negative polarity signal is much weaker than
481: the surrounding negative-polarity signals.
482: The center portion becomes truely positive polarity at t= 741s and
483: the positive polarity signal continues to develop after the time,
484: finally forming a smaller concentrated positive patch.
485: This evolution of the white patch suggests
486: that a positive-polarity magnetic flux starts to develop in
487: the negative-polarity flux dominant area from around t = 539s, which is
488: when the second high-speed downflow event begins.
489:
490: The positive patch slowly moves outward (upward in the figure),
491: approaching a pre-existing negative-polarity patch, where tiny positive
492: high-speed signals are observed at the red wing of the Stokes V profiles.
493: The magnetic flux in the negative-polarity patch seems to slowly
494: decrease with time. The positive-negative pair of the magnetic features
495: can be recognized as a bipolar moving magnetic feature
496: \citep[MMF, e.g.,][]{har73}. Note that the temporal evolution shown here
497: is rather common in the formation of MMFs and another example can
498: be found in \citet{kub07a}. The positive magnetic patch with strong
499: downflow exists in an inter-granular lane at the front edge of
500: a granule which gradually expands outward from the penumbral side.
501: The series of G-band images show that a bright compact feature starts
502: to appear and brighten from t= 270s and another bright feature from
503: t= 539s near the tip of the dark
504: filamentary structure and it seems to be pushed by an expanding granule.
505: Moreover, Ca {\sc II H} images show a transient brightening
506: at the location of downflow events.
507: As clearly seen in the second event marked
508: with circles, a small patchy bright feature appears at the same time
509: as the downflow event (t= 539s) and fades after t= 876s.
510: This signature is clearly different from longer-lived enhanced
511: Ca {\sc II H} emission seen in strong flux concentrations.
512:
513: This example clearly shows that
514: high-speed downflows are excited at the extension from
515: Evershed flow channels in the penumbra, resulting in a vertically
516: oriented magnetic field, well known as an MMF. Simultaneously, transient
517: heating occurs in the chromospheric layer, which may mean that
518: the magnetic field of the newly appeared positive-polarity field expanded and
519: reached the chromosphere. Also, it might be indirect
520: evidence of heating due to shocks formed by supersonic downflows.
521:
522: Figure 5 shows the temporal evolution of full Stokes profiles at the location
523: of the second large downflow event. The Stokes profiles correspond to
524: the center of the downflowing structure defined by the center of the 1.0-arcsec-radius
525: circles in Figure 4. For the profiles before and after the downflow
526: event, we traced the magnetic signature observed in G-band and magnetic
527: flux images. Before t= 270s, the position is unchanged from the last
528: identified position, because it is difficult to trace the magnetic
529: signature. The third lobe starts to appear in Stokes V from
530: t= 472s and is well observed until t= 741s. The profile of
531: Fe {\sc I} 630.15nm at t= 809s still shows a conspicuous third lobe.
532: The high-speed downflow forming
533: the third lobe reaches 9.2 km s$^{-1}$ at t= 674s, derived from
534: the wavelength of a zero-crossing formed with the third lobe.
535: The red and blue wing amplitude of antisymmetric Stokes V
536: profile decreases during the period when the third lobe is observed
537: and a Stokes V signal with the opposite polarity amplitude appears by
538: the end of the sequence,
539: indicating that the line-of-sight magnetic polarity of the main
540: magnetic field component is completely replaced with the opposite polarity
541: magnetic field formed with the excitation of high-speed downflow.
542: The linear polarization (Stokes Q and U) signals shows that the inclined
543: magnetic field evolves to almost vertically oriented field
544: when the high-speed downflow is well observed (t= 607 - 741s).
545: An inversion based on the Milne-Eddington model approximation gives
546: an inclination of the magnetic field of 114 deg with strength
547: of 809 gauss at t= 0s, where the field inclination of 90 deg is
548: defined as horizontal. At t= 944s, the magnetic field evolves to
549: 1975 gauss with an inclination of 50 deg.
550:
551: \subsection{High-speed downflows at sunspot umbral edge}
552:
553: Figure 6 shows the temporal evolution of typical downflow events
554: observed at the sunspot umbral boundary. Note that the events are
555: located near the lower edge of the Stokes observing region.
556: Three high-speed downflow events are detected in this area; one
557: bright event is observed in the upper left of the
558: frames (just outside the circles) over t= 270 - 472s,
559: the second event is at the left side of the circles over t= 203 - 809s, and
560: the third bright event starts to brighten from around t= 472s,
561: and is marked by circles with a radius of 1.0 arcsec.
562: These high-speed
563: downflow events are located at the boundary between the dark
564: umbral region and bright granules, which can be identified
565: by the contours.
566: Radial outflows, the well-known sunspot moat flows, are not seen
567: at umbral edges without penumbra, as shown in \citet{var07}.
568: The size of nearby granules appearing beside
569: the umbral edge is much smaller than those seen in the quiet Sun,
570: which is reflected by the distribution of strong magnetic flux
571: not only inside the umbral region but also in the nearby granules.
572: The magnetic flux map shows that strong flux of the umbral region
573: is extended to the nearby granule region.
574: The nearby granules evolve during the time that the high-speed downflows
575: are observed, although no clear correlation between the granule evolution
576: and downflow development is derived from this observation.
577: No clear features are
578: observed in the series of Ca {\sc II H} images.
579:
580: Figure 7 is the temporal evolution of the full Stokes profiles at the location
581: of the third downflow event. The
582: profiles are for the center of the 1.0-arcsec-radius
583: circles in Figure 6. Before the downflow event,
584: the position is unchanged from the position identified at t= 472s,
585: because it is impossible to trace the magnetic signature.
586: The antisymmetric Stokes V profile with two lobes does not show
587: significant changes during the period, but an elongated signal
588: toward the longer wavelength appears from t= 405s. The Fe {\sc I}
589: 630.15 nm line shows that the elongated signal can be identified as
590: the third lobe in t= 539 to 741s frames.
591: The scale of the vertical axis in Stokes V
592: is 4 times larger than in Stokes Q and U, meaning that the magnetic
593: field has almost a vertical orientation.
594: The Milne-Eddington inversion for the profiles at t= 944s gives
595: a 156 deg inclination for a 1685 gauss
596: magnetic field.
597:
598: \subsection{High-speed downflows at moat and quiet regions}
599:
600: Figure 8 shows the temporal evolution of one typical downflow event
601: observed in the quiet region far from the sunspot. The downflow signal
602: is observed in a weakly concentrated negative-polarity patch, which
603: is located in an inter-granular lane. It seems that the negative-polarity
604: patch is rather diffuse, about 1 arcsec in size at t = 203 s,
605: and it developes to form a concentrated magnetic flux less than
606: 0.5 arcsec in size. When the concentrated magnetic flux
607: appears in longitudinal magnetogram (after t= 337s), the signal excess
608: at the red wing is well observed, followed by the disappearance of
609: the signal excess (t= 876s). The series of G-band images show that
610: a bright point \citep[GBP, e.g.,][]{ber96} is newly
611: formed after t= 337 s at the exact location of
612: the signal excess and magnetic flux concentration. The size of GBPs
613: is 0.3 arcsec in diameter. Immediately after starting
614: the excitation of a high-speed downflow, a point-like transient brightening is
615: observed in Ca {\sc II H} images (after t= 405s).
616: After the downflow signal disappears, the chromospheric brightening
617: signature in Ca {\sc II H} also fades out (t= 944s).
618:
619: The temporal evolution of full Stokes profiles at the
620: centers of the 1.0-arcsec-radius circles
621: are given in Figure 9.
622: No apparent signal is seen in Stokes Q and U above the noise level,
623: meaning that the magnetic field is vertically
624: oriented. The third lobe is well seen for more than 10 minutes from the 2nd
625: profile (t= 67s), especially in the Fe {\sc I} 630.15 nm line, whose line core is
626: formed slightly higher than that of
627: Fe {\sc I} 630.25 nm line in the solar atmosphere.
628: Since the third lobe has the same polarity as the red wing lobe of
629: the usual, antisymmetric Stokes V profile, the third lobe does not make
630: the second zero-crossing. But the Stokes V profile of Fe {\sc I} 630.15 nm
631: line at t= 539s shows a zero-crossing by the third lobe, giving
632: 7.8 km s$^{-1}$ (164m\AA\ from the line center), which is supersonic.
633: The blue wing amplitude of the antisymmetric Stokes V profiles
634: shows a gradual growth
635: as a function of time, suggesting the increase of either (or both) magnetic
636: field strength or magnetic filling factor (how much area is
637: occupied by the magnetic field). Actually, the Milne-Eddington inversion
638: gives that the intrinsic magnetic field strength changes from 479 gauss
639: (t= 0s) to 1514 gauss (t= 944s) and the magnetic filling factor from
640: 0.22 (t= 0s) to 0.35 (t= 944s).
641:
642:
643: \section{Discussions}
644:
645: \subsection{High-speed downflows associated with formation of MMFs}
646:
647: It was shown that the excitation of high-speed downflows is
648: observed outside the sunspot penumbra when a magnetic flux patch with
649: a polarity opposite to the sunspot is newly formed. Such
650: patches may be identified as one polarity patch of a MMF. MMFs sometimes
651: have bipolar magnetic structures and stream away from near the outer
652: boundary of the penumbra of well-developed sunspots
653: \citep{zha03, hag05, cab06, kub07b}.
654: This observation suggests that bipolar MMFs
655: may be effectively developed and formed in association with
656: the excitation of high-speed downflows in a magnetic tube.
657: An outward directed flow, Evershed flow, is well observed in
658: the sunspot penumbra, and downflows are observed at some locations
659: at the outer edge of the penumbra, returning the mass flux
660: below the photosphere \citep{wes97, sch02, bel04, bor06, bec08}.
661: The Evershed flows along individual channels are transient with
662: a timescale of the order of 10-15 minutes \citep{shi94, rim94}, and
663: some of the downflows can evolve to supersonic flows at
664: the photospheric layer \citep{del01, bel04}.
665: The observed high-speed downflows
666: are predominantly located around the outer edge of the penumbra and its
667: extension to the moat flow area. Closely related to downward magnetic
668: pumping \citep{tho02}, pairs of magnetic features may be more effectively
669: developed by downward kinks formed by a high-speed downflow.
670:
671: Before the excitation of a high-speed downflow, there is an inclined
672: magnetic field in the moat region, which is partially an extension
673: from
674: nearly horizontal penumbral structures of sunspots. Transient Evershed flow gas
675: along the penumbral horizontal field may continue to flow along
676: the inclined magnetic field located just outside the penumbral
677: boundary. A bulk of gas supplied to a small height
678: above the photosphere by a transient Evershed flow may start to drop into
679: the photosphere along magnetic fields due to gravitational force.
680: Such a bulk flow may reform a part of magnetic
681: field to a more vertical oriented configuration and
682: the gas may undergo a free fall,
683: resulting in accelerating to high speed.
684: At this time, a complicated Stokes V
685: profile with three lobes is observed; The observed spectral profiles
686: can be interpreted with two magnetic components existing within
687: 0.3 arcsec resolution or with two magnetic components existing
688: along the line of sight in the thin layer of the line
689: formations, as shown in Figure 10a.
690: The main component is a pre-existing inclined magnetic field with
691: no strong mass motions, which represents the global structure of the
692: magnetic field at the outer area of penumbra. Moreover, because of the
693: highly red-shifted nature of the third lobe, a limited
694: portion of magnetic field carries a high-speed downflow
695: forming a vertical field orientation. The downward mass motion
696: continuing for roughly 5 minutes reforms the magnetic field
697: into more vertically-oriented magnetic field in the opposite direction of
698: the spot.
699: After ending the high-speed downflow, the opposite-directed
700: vertically-reformed magnetic field may go on to form a strong
701: concentrated flux, as described in section 5.3.
702:
703:
704: \subsection{High-speed downflows associated with convection in strong magnetic fields}
705:
706: High-speed downflows are sometimes observed at the edge of sunspot
707: umbra without accompanying penumbral structures. Also, similar downflows
708: are observed at the edge of pores, which are small concentration of
709: magnetic flux without horizontally oriented penumbral structures.
710: An expanding granular cell with significant magnetic flux is located beside the umbra.
711: High-speed downflows are observed at the interface between the umbra and the granular cell.
712: A significant circular polarization signal is emitted from
713: the granular cell, indicating vertically oriented magnetic flux.
714: The development of a granular cell may force
715: magnetic fields to sweep toward the umbral boundary, which may
716: trigger the interaction of the sweeping field with well-concentrated
717: magnetic flux in the umbra (Figure 10b). One possible interaction is
718: a magnetic reconnection between them.
719: To form a discontinuity between the magnetic fields, the sweeping field
720: needs to be inclined to the magnetic field inside the umbra.
721: As a result of magnetic reconnection
722: in the photosphere or lower chromosphere, a reconnection outflow directed
723: toward the surface may be observed as supersonic mass motions.
724: However, it is a puzzle why strong upward motions are not observed.
725: The other possible interaction is that the physical process described in
726: section 5.3 are excited when the sweeping magnetic field is merged to
727: the pre-existing umbral field with kilo gauss strength.
728:
729:
730: \subsection{High-speed downflows at quiet and moat regions}
731:
732: The example shown in Figure 8 and 9 clearly shows that high-speed
733: downflows are excited in the vertically-oriented magnetic field area
734: during the formation of a small concentrated magnetic
735: flux patch, which can also be seen as a bright point in G-band.
736: This observation is consistent with previous observations
737: reporting on supersonic downflows at the magnetic elements amplified by flux
738: expulsion and convective collapse \citep{sig99, bel01, soc05}.
739: Convective collapse is theoretically introduced as a mechanism for
740: concentrating magnetic fields into thin ($\approx 100$km, or 0.1-0.2 arcsec
741: in diameter) but strong (kilo gauss) flux tubes \citep{par78, spr79}.
742: It is predicted in the theory that a downward flow can be excited due
743: to convective instability developed by radiative cooling inside
744: the flux tube with decreasing heat input from ambient atmosphere
745: across magnetic field lines. The high-speed downflow leads to a partial
746: evacuation of the gas and therefore a concentration of the magnetic
747: flux with increasing magnetic field strength (Figure 10c).
748: This paper is mainly focused on the mass motions inside the concentrated
749: magnetic flux patch observed in full Stokes profiles.
750: Careful multicomponent inversions of these Stokes
751: spectra will be required for precise determinations of
752: the physical properties inside the flux tubes with high speed mass flows.
753: It should be noted that another example from a {\em Hinode}
754: spectro-polarimetric observation is recently examined with an
755: inversion technique \citep{nag07}.
756:
757: The observed high-speed downflows may be more effectively initiated if the gas
758: is drained from the low chromosphere into the photosphere. We have observed
759: flux emerging all the time in quiet areas and plage regions \citep{cen07, ish08}.
760: The emerging flux will carry mass upward, which must flow downward
761: at some point. The upward motions of the emerging magnetic fields may also
762: constrict magnetic flux tubes so that the gas flows could become high
763: speed in the tubes and the high-speed flows are sustained in the photosphere.
764: Indeed, it is observed that the Stokes V profile is strongly red-shifted
765: at one end of the emerging, horizontal magnetic structure with velocity
766: up to 5 km s$^{-1}$ \citep{ish08}.
767:
768: Almost simultaneously with the excitation of a high-speed downflow,
769: a point-like transient brightening is also observed at the exact location
770: of the high-speed downflow with the Ca {\sc II H} filter.
771: The Ca {\sc II H} filter has a response function
772: with an average response height of 247 km above the photospheric level
773: and a long tail extending into the middle chromosphere \citep{car07}.
774: Transient Ca {\sc II H} brightenings can be interpreted by various kinds
775: of mechanisms including mechanisms discussed below.
776: One interpretation is that the Ca {\sc II H} brightening is a signature of
777: transient heating of the chromospheric gas either by a heat source located
778: in the chromosphere or energy transfer from the photosphere through
779: magnetic fields. Another interpretation is that the observed Ca {\sc II H}
780: brightening is due to decreasing the line absorption with reduced opacity
781: of the gas. This may be caused by a strong evacuation inside the magnetic
782: flux tube at chromospheric layer, if the high-speed downflows observed
783: at the photosphere extends to the chromosphere during
784: the formation of the kG flux tubes.
785:
786: The first interpretation, transient heating in the upper atmospheric
787: layer, is also suggested
788: by an observation of red-shifted events observed at the outer moat
789: region using full Stokes measurements of infrared photospheric
790: Si I 10827 \AA\ line with Tenerife Infrared Spectro-Polarimeter
791: \citep{shi07b}. The physical conditions of the red-shifted component
792: derived with SIR (Stokes Inversion based on Response functions) inversion
793: show that the downflowing component has a relative downward motion as
794: large as 10 km s$^{-1}$ with a vertical orientation of the magnetic field and
795: that the temperature of the downflowing component seems to be 400-500 K
796: higher than that of the stationary component. These observations
797: suggest that a magnetic reconnection occurring in the upper atmospheric
798: layer excites a supersonic downflow \citep{shi07b}, although
799: a slight delay was observed in Ca {\sc II H} brightening compared with
800: the excitation of a high-speed downflow.
801: Note that a supersonic downflow is also reported at the location of
802: chromospheric Ellerman bombs \citep{soc06}, which may be a magnetic
803: reconnection at the chromosphere.
804:
805: As an alternate mechanism, a shock front
806: formed by a supersonic downflowing motion inside a magnetic flux tube
807: may play a key role in determining the further dynamical evolution of
808: the concentrating magnetic flux \citep{tak99}. According to this
809: simulation, the shock formation is restricted within the most
810: unstable portion of the examined parameter range. A strong downflow rebounds in
811: the deeper layers and the resulting upward mass motion leads to
812: a shock wave penetrating from the photosphere to the chromosphere,
813: which may be observed a weak blue-shift signal in Stokes V profiles
814: \citep{bel01, soc05}. The energy deposition in the low chromosphere by
815: the propagating shock waves may be observed as a point-like transient
816: brightening in Ca {\sc II H} images.
817:
818:
819: \section{Conclusions}
820:
821: The Spectro-Polarimeter provides new precise observations
822: of solar magnetic fields as well as velocity fields at the surface with
823: 0.3 arcsec spatial resolution.
824: It reveals frequent occurrences of high-speed, probably
825: supersonic, downflows in the photospheric layer.
826: We find that the photosphere is full of extremely dynamical
827: small scale structures with high-speed mass motions.
828: High-speed downward mass flows occur not only in association with sunspot
829: magnetic field structures but also in small concentrations of magnetic flux
830: in the quiet sun.
831:
832: Understanding the sources of high-speed mass downflows needs further
833: observational investigations with Stokes-polarimetric observations
834: by {\em Hinode}. However, the temporal evolution of
835: some downflow events shown in this paper suggests a few magnetic
836: circumstances for exciting high-speed mass flows
837: at the photosphere: the extension from
838: Evershed flows in sunspots, interaction between intense magnetic field
839: and nearby convective gas motions, and magnetic elements amplified by
840: flux expulsion and convective collapse. The high-speed downflows
841: observed at the extension from the penumbral filamentary structures
842: are suggested to play an important role in forming MMFs
843: around the sunspot penumbra. High speed flows in a magnetic
844: flux tube may play an role in forming kinks of magnetic field.
845: Associated with high-speed downflows, transient brightenings are also
846: observed in chromospheric Ca {\sc II H} images.
847: Supersonic mass motions would form shock
848: fronts and generate shock waves in the atmosphere, which can be important
849: in propagating the energy and the heating of plasma.
850:
851:
852: \acknowledgments
853:
854: Hinode is a Japanese mission developed and launched by ISAS/JAXA, with NAOJ
855: as domestic partner and NASA and STFC (UK) as international partners. It is
856: operated by these agencies in co-operation with ESA and NSC (Norway).
857: The authors would like to express their thanks to all the people who have
858: been involved in design, development, tests, launch operation, and science
859: operations for realizing the {\em Hinode} (Solar-B) mission and its new
860: advanced observations presented in this paper. The authors would like to
861: acknowledge the anonymous referee for his comments helpful
862: in improving the contents of the paper.
863:
864: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
865: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
866: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
867: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
868: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
869: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
870: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
871: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
872:
873: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
874: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
875: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
876: %% copy editing. Individual instruments or configurations can be provided
877: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
878:
879: %{\it Facilities:} \facility{Nickel}, \facility{HST (STIS)}, \facility{CXO (ASIS)}.
880:
881: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
882: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix
883: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
884:
885: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
886: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
887: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
888:
889:
890: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
891: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
892: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
893:
894: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
895: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
896: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
897: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
898: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
899:
900: \begin{thebibliography}{}
901: \bibitem[Beck (2008)]{bec08}
902: Beck, C. 2008, \aap, 480, 825
903: \bibitem[Bellot Rubio et al.(2001)]{bel01}
904: Bellot Rubio, L.R., Hidalgo, I.R., Collados, M., Khomenko, E.,
905: \& Ruiz Cobo, B.
906: 2001, \apj, 560, 1010
907: \bibitem[Bellot Rubio et al.(2004)]{bel04}
908: Bellot Rubio, L.R., Balthasar, H., \& Collados, M. 2004,
909: \aap, 427, 319
910: \bibitem[Bellot Rubio et al.(2006)]{bel06}
911: Bellot Rubio, L.R., Schlichenmaier, R., \& Tritschler, A.
912: 2006, \aap, 453, 1117
913: \bibitem[Berger \& Title (1996)]{ber96}
914: Berger, T.E. \& Title, A.M. 1996, \apj, 463, 365
915: \bibitem[Borrero et al. (2006)]{bor06}
916: Borrero, J.M., Solanki, S.K., Lagg, A., Socas-Navarro, H., \&
917: Lites, B. 2006, \aap, 450, 383
918: \bibitem[Cabrera Solana et al.(2006)]{cab06}
919: Cabrera Solana, D., Bellot Rubio, L.R., Beck, C., \& del Toro Iniesta, J.C.
920: 2006, \apj, 649, L41
921: \bibitem[Carlsson et al. (2007)]{car07}
922: Carlsson, M., Hansteen, V.H., De Pontieu, B., et al. 2007,
923: PASJ, 59, S663
924: \bibitem[Centeno et al. (2007)]{cen07}
925: Centeno, R., Socas-Navarro, H., Lites, B., et al. 2007,
926: \apj, 666, L137
927: %\bibitem[Chae et al.(2003)]{cha03}
928: % Chae, J., Moon, Y., \& Park, S. 2003, Journal of the Korean Astronomical
929: % Society, 36, S13
930: \bibitem[del Tor Iniesta et al.(2001)]{del01}
931: del Tor Iniesta, J.C., Bellot Rubio, L.R., Collados, M.
932: 2001, \apj, 549, L39
933: %\bibitem[De Pontiue et al.(2006)]{dep06}
934: % De Pontiue, B., Carlsson, M., Stein, R., Rouppe van der Voort, L.,
935: % L\"ofdahl, M., van Noort, M., Nordlund, A., \& Scharmer, G. 2006,
936: % \apj, 646, 1405
937: \bibitem[Hagenaar \& Shine(2005)]{hag05}
938: Hagenaar, H.J., \& Shine, R.A. 2005, \apj, 635, 659
939: %\bibitem[Handy et al.(1999)]{han99}
940: % Handy, B.N. et al. 1999, Solar Physics, 187, 229
941: \bibitem[Harvey \& Harvey (1973)]{har73}
942: Harvey, K. \& Harvey, J. 1973, Solar Physics, 28, 61
943: \bibitem[Ichimoto et al.(2008)]{ich07}
944: Ichimoto, K. et al. 2008, Solar Physics, submitted
945: \bibitem[Ichimoto et al.(2007)]{ich07b}
946: Ichimoto, K., Shine, R.A., Lites, B. et al.
947: 2007, PASJ, 59, S593
948: \bibitem[Ishikawa et al. (2008)]{ish08}
949: Ishikawa, R., Tsuneta, S., Ichimoto, K. et al.
950: 2008, \aap, in press
951: \bibitem[Kosugi et al.(2007)]{kos07}
952: Kosugi, T. et al. 2007, Solar Physics, 243, 3
953: \bibitem[Kubo et al.(2007a)]{kub07a}
954: Kubo, M., Ichimoto, K., Shimizu, T. et al. 2007a, PASJ, 59, S607
955: \bibitem[Kubo et al.(2007b)]{kub07b}
956: Kubo, M., Shimizu, T., \& Tsuneta, S. 2007b, \apj, 659, 812
957: \bibitem[Lites et al.(1993)]{lit93}
958: Lites, B.W., Elmore, D.F., Seagraves, P., \& Skumanich, A.P.
959: 1993, \apj, 418, 928
960: \bibitem[Lites et al.(2002)]{lit02}
961: Lites, B.W., Socas-Navarro, H., Skumanich, A., \& Shimizu, T.
962: 2002, \apj, 575, 1131
963: \bibitem[Mart\'inez Pillet et al.(1994)]{mar94}
964: Mart\'inez Pillet, V., Lites, B.W., Skumanich, A., \& Degenhardt, D.
965: 1994, \apj, 425, L113
966: %\bibitem[Mart\'inez Pillet et al.(1999)]{mar99}
967: % Mart\'inez Pillet, V., Collados, M., \& S\'anchez Almeida, J.
968: % 1999, in ASP Conf. Ser. 183, High Resolution Solar Physics:
969: % Theory, Observations, and Techniques, Eds. T. R. Rimmele,
970: % K. S. Balasubramaniam, and R. R. Radick (San Francisco: ASP), 264
971: %\bibitem[Montesinos \& Thomas(1997)]{mon97}
972: % Montesinos, B. \& Thomas, J.H. 1997, Nature, 390, 485
973: \bibitem[Nagata et al.(2008)]{nag07}
974: Nagata, S., Tsuneta, S., Suematsu, Y. et al. 2008, \apj, in press
975: \bibitem[Parker(1978)]{par78}
976: Parker, E.N. 1978, \apj, 221, 368
977: %\bibitem[Priest \& Forbes(2000)]{pri00}
978: % Priest, E. \& Forbes, T. 2000,
979: % Magnetic Reconnection (MHD Theory and Applications)
980: % (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
981: \bibitem[Rimmele(1994)]{rim94}
982: Rimmele, T.R. 1994, \aap, 290, 972
983: \bibitem[Rimmele(1995)]{rim95}
984: Rimmele, T.R. 1995, \aap, 298, 260
985: \bibitem[Rouppe van der Voort (2002)]{rou02}
986: Rouppe van der Voort, L.H.M. 2002, \aap, 389, 1020
987: \bibitem[Schlichenmaier \& Collados(2002)]{sch02}
988: Schlichenmaier, R., Collados, M. 2002, \aap, 381, 668
989: \bibitem[Shimizu et al.(2008)]{shi07a}
990: Shimizu, T. et al. 2008, Solar Physics, accepted
991: \bibitem[Shimizu et al.(2007)]{shi07b}
992: Shimizu, T., Mart\'inez-Pillet, V., Collados, M., Ruiz-Cobo, B.,
993: Centeno, R., Beck, C., \& Katsukawa., Y. 2007,
994: in ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 369, New Solar Physics with Solar-B Mission,
995: eds., K. Shibata, T, Sakurai, S. Nagata
996: (San Francisco: ASP), 113
997: \bibitem[Shine et al.(1994)]{shi94}
998: Shine, R.A., Title, A.M., Tarbell, T.D., Smith, K., \& Frank, Z.A.
999: 1994, \apj, 430, 413
1000: \bibitem[Sigwarth et al.(1999)]{sig99}
1001: Sigwarth, M., Balasubramaniam, K.S., Kn\"olker, M. \& Schmidt, W.
1002: 1999, \aap, 349, 941
1003: \bibitem[Sigwarth (2001)]{sig01}
1004: Sigwarth, M. 2001, \apj, 563, 1031
1005: \bibitem[Socas-Navarro \& Manso Sainz.(2005)]{soc05}
1006: Socas-Navarro, H. \& Manso Sainz, R. 2005, \apj, 620, L71
1007: \bibitem[Socas-Navarro et al.(2006)]{soc06}
1008: Socas-Navarro, H., Mart\'inez Pillet, V., Elmore, D., Pietarila, A.,
1009: Lites, B.W., \& Manso Sainz, R. 2006, Solar Physics, 235, 75
1010: \bibitem[Solanki(2003)]{sol03}
1011: Solanki, K. 2003, Astron. Astrophys. Rev., 11, 153
1012: \bibitem[Spruit \& Zweibel(1979)]{spr79}
1013: Spruit, H.C., Zweibel, E.G. 1979, Solar Physics, 62, 158
1014: \bibitem[Steiner et al.(1998)]{ste98}
1015: Steiner, O., Grossmann-Doerth, U., Kn\"olker, M., \& Schussler, M.
1016: 1998, \apj, 495, 468
1017: %\bibitem[Stenflo(1994)]{ste94}
1018: % Stenflo, J.O. 1994, Solar Magnetic Fields (Plarized Radiation Diagnostics)
1019: % (Dordrecht: Kluwer).
1020: \bibitem[Suematsu et al.(2008)]{sue07}
1021: Suematsu, Y. et al. 2008, Solar Physics, accepted
1022: \bibitem[Takeuchi (1999)]{tak99}
1023: Takeuchi, A. 1999, \apj, 522, 518
1024: \bibitem[Tarbell et al.(2008)]{tar07}
1025: Tarbell, T.D. et al. 2008, Solar Physics, submitted
1026: \bibitem[Title et al.(1993)]{tit93}
1027: Title, A., Frank, Z., Shine, R., Tarbell, T., Topka, K.,
1028: Scharmer, G., \& Schmidt, W. 1993, \apj, 403, 780
1029: \bibitem[Thomas et al.(2002)]{tho02}
1030: Thomas, J.H., Weiss, N.O., Tobias, S.M., \& Brummell, N.H. 2002, Nature,
1031: 420, 390
1032: \bibitem[Tsuneta et al.(2008)]{tsu07}
1033: Tsuneta, S. et al. 2008, Solar Physics, accepted
1034: \bibitem[Vargas Dom\'ingues et al.(2007)]{var07}
1035: Vargas Dom\'ingues, S., Bonet, J.A., Mart\'inez Pillet, V.,
1036: Katsukawa, Y., Kitagoshi, Y., \& Rouppe van der Voort, L.
1037: 2007, \apj, 660, L165
1038: \bibitem[Westendorp Plaza et al.(1997)]{wes97}
1039: Westendorp Plaza, C., del Toro Iniesta, J.C., Ruiz Cobo, B.,
1040: Mart\'inez Pillet, V., Lites, B.W., \& Skumanich, A. 1997, Nature,
1041: 389, 47
1042: \bibitem[Wiehr (1995)]{wie95}
1043: Wiehr, E. 1995, \aap, 298, L17
1044: \bibitem[Zhang et al.(2003)]{zha03}
1045: Zhang, J., Solanki, S.K., \& Wang, J. 2003, \aap, 399, 755
1046:
1047: \end{thebibliography}
1048:
1049: \clearpage
1050:
1051: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
1052: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
1053: %% To embed the sample graphics in
1054: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
1055: %% \includegraphics commands
1056: %%
1057: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
1058: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
1059: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
1060: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
1061: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
1062: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
1063: %%
1064: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
1065: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
1066: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
1067: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
1068: %% journal to journal.
1069:
1070: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
1071: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
1072: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
1073: %% available in the electronic journal.
1074:
1075: \begin{figure}
1076: \epsscale{.50}
1077: \plotone{f1.eps}
1078: \caption{Example of Stokes V profiles of magnetically sensitive
1079: Fe I 6301.5 and 6302.5 \AA\ lines observed at a slit position.
1080: At the right panel, the color depth scale is changed to enhance
1081: weak signals seen at wavelengths far from the line core
1082: (left: $-5000$ to $+5000$ DN, right: $-1000$ to $+1000$ DN).
1083: Horizontal axis gives wavelength position
1084: with spectral sampling of 21.549 m\AA/pixel.
1085: Wavelength increases toward the right. The dotted and dashed lines
1086: are 259 m\AA\ and 431 m\AA\ from the center of the averaged
1087: line profile. Pixels along the slit are 0.317 arcec.}
1088: \end{figure}
1089:
1090: \clearpage
1091:
1092: %% Here we use \plottwo to present two versions of the same figure,
1093: %% one in black and white for print the other in RGB color
1094: %% for online presentation. Note that the caption indicates
1095: %% that a color version of the figure will be available online.
1096: %%
1097:
1098: %\begin{figure}
1099: %\epsscale{.60}
1100: %\plotone{shimizufig2.eps}
1101: %\caption{ SP scanning area in active region NOAA 10926. The image is Stokes V
1102: % image acquired with Narrowband Filter Imager, another focal plane instrument
1103: % of the SOT, showing that dark (bright) is negative (positive) polarity
1104: % of line-of-sight magnetic flux. A well-developed
1105: % leading spot of the active region is captured at the lower half of
1106: % the scanning area. A part of moat flow region surrounding the sunspot and
1107: % quiet region extended from the moat are observed at the upper portion
1108: % of the area.}
1109: %\end{figure}
1110:
1111: \begin{figure}
1112: \epsscale{1}
1113: \plotone{f2.eps}
1114: \caption{
1115: Time series of our measure for detecting signal excess at the red and blue sides
1116: of the spectral line, shown with a continuum and magnetic flux image.
1117: The measure is the integration of Stokes V signals between $259-431$ m\AA\ from
1118: the center. In (a), bright features indicate positive integrated
1119: Stokes V at the red side, whereas the polarity
1120: is reversed in (b) and dark features indicate positive integrated Stokes V at
1121: the blue side. This time series of the measure is a part of the fast mapping
1122: observation performed from 0:00-3:30 UT on 2 December 2006. Tick marks
1123: are given every 5 arcsec.
1124: %The magnetic flux image gives light-of-sight component of
1125: %magnetic flux with while for positity and black for negative polarity.
1126: }
1127: \end{figure}
1128:
1129: \begin{figure}
1130: \epsscale{0.7}
1131: \plotone{f3.eps}
1132: \caption{Full Stokes profiles representing three types of high speed
1133: mass downflows: (a) Near the outer boundary of
1134: sunspot penumbra, (b) at the umbral edge without accompanying
1135: penumbral structures, and (c) in magnetic patches observed
1136: in quiet sun. The profiles are normalized to the nearby
1137: continuum.}
1138: \end{figure}
1139:
1140: \begin{figure}
1141: \epsscale{0.45}
1142: \plotone{f4.eps}
1143: \caption{Temporal evolution of one typical high-speed downflow event
1144: observed at the sunspot penumbral boundary. (a) The measure for describing
1145: signal excess at red wing, i.e., the integration of Stokes V signals
1146: between 259 - 431 m\AA\ from the line center, (b) Stokes I continuum, (c)
1147: magnetic flux, which is the wavelength integration of blue wing of Stokes
1148: V, (d) Ca {\sc II H} and (e) G-band images from the BFI. The field of view is
1149: 3.8 (N-S) $\times$ 3.3 (E-W) arcsec though the quantities derived from
1150: Stokes-polarimetric measurements (a, b, c) have a narrower field of view
1151: (2.1 arcsec). Circles with radius of 1.0 arcsec are given at each frame
1152: and the Stokes profiles at the center position of the circles are shown
1153: in Figure 5. The sunspot penumbral boundary is shown by a contour
1154: in the G-band images.}
1155: \end{figure}
1156:
1157: \begin{figure}
1158: \epsscale{1}
1159: \plotone{f5.eps}
1160: \caption{Temporal evolution of the full Stokes profiles of Fe {\sc I} lines at
1161: 630.15 and 630.25 nm observed at the location of the high-speed downflow
1162: event shown in Figure 4. The profiles are normalized to the nearby continuum.
1163: The horizontal axis is wavelength position with spectral sampling of
1164: 21.549 m\AA\ /pixel. Dotted lines shows the averaged wavelength position
1165: of the spectral lines.}
1166: \end{figure}
1167:
1168: \begin{figure}
1169: \epsscale{0.45}
1170: \plotone{f6.eps}
1171: \caption{Same as Figure 4 for one typical high-speed downflow event observed
1172: at the umbral boundary. The sunspot umbral boundary is shown by the G-band
1173: intensity contours drawn in all the panels.}
1174: \end{figure}
1175:
1176: \begin{figure}
1177: \epsscale{1}
1178: \plotone{f7.eps}
1179: \caption{Temporal evolution of the full Stokes profiles of Fe {\sc I} lines
1180: at 630.15 and 630.25 nm observed at the location of the high-speed downflow
1181: event shown in Figure 6. The vertical scale of Stokes V profiles is 4 times
1182: larger than that of Stokes Q and U. Otherwise the same as Figure 5. }
1183: \end{figure}
1184:
1185: \begin{figure}
1186: \epsscale{0.45}
1187: \plotone{f8.eps}
1188: \caption{Same as Figure 4 for one typical high-speed downflow event observed
1189: in the moat region far from the sunspot penumbra.}
1190: \end{figure}
1191:
1192: \begin{figure}
1193: \epsscale{1}
1194: \plotone{f9.eps}
1195: \caption{Temporal evolution of the full Stokes profiles of Fe {\sc I} lines
1196: observed at the location of the high-speed downflow
1197: event shown in Figure 8. Otherwise the same as Figure 5. }
1198: \end{figure}
1199:
1200:
1201: \begin{figure}
1202: \epsscale{1.0}
1203: \plotone{f10.eps}
1204: \caption{Magnetic and velocity field configurations are schematically
1205: shown to interpret the observed downflows at the three locations.}
1206: \end{figure}
1207:
1208:
1209: \end{document}
1210:
1211: %%
1212: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
1213: