1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3:
4: \def\princeton{1}
5: \def\stanford{2}
6: \def\riken{3}
7: \def\cfa{4}
8: \def\telaviv{5}
9:
10:
11: \shorttitle{Strongly lensed E+A galaxy}
12: \shortauthors{Shin et al.}
13:
14:
15: \begin{document}
16:
17: \title{THE SDSS DISCOVERY OF A STRONGLY
18: LENSED POST-STARBURST GALAXY AT z=0.766}
19: \author{Min-Su~Shin\altaffilmark{\princeton},
20: Michael~A.~Strauss\altaffilmark{\princeton},
21: Masamune~Oguri\altaffilmark{\stanford},
22: Naohisa~Inada\altaffilmark{\riken},
23: Emilio~E.~Falco\altaffilmark{\cfa},
24: Tom~Broadhurst\altaffilmark{\telaviv},
25: James~E.~Gunn\altaffilmark{\princeton}}
26:
27: \altaffiltext{\princeton}{Princeton University Observatory,
28: Peyton Hall, Ivy Lane, Princeton, NJ 08544}
29: \altaffiltext{\stanford}{Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Stanford University,
30: 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025}
31: \altaffiltext{\riken}{Cosmic Radiation Laboratory, RIKEN (The Physical and Chemical Research
32: Organization), 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan}
33: \altaffiltext{\cfa}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street,
34: Cambridge, MA 02138}
35: \altaffiltext{\telaviv}{School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
36: 69978, Israel.}
37:
38: \begin{abstract}
39:
40: We present the first result of a survey for strong galaxy-galaxy lenses in Sloan
41: Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) images.
42: SDSS J082728.70+223256.4 was selected as a lensing candidate using selection
43: criteria based on the color and positions of
44: objects in the SDSS photometric catalog.
45: Follow-up imaging and spectroscopy showed this object to be a lensing system.
46: The lensing galaxy is
47: an elliptical at z = 0.349 in a galaxy cluster. The lensed galaxy has the spectrum of a
48: post-starburst galaxy at z = 0.766. The lensing galaxy has an estimated mass of
49: $\sim$ 1.2$\times$ $10^{12}\ {\rm M_{\odot}}$ and the corresponding mass to light
50: ratio in the $B$-band is $\sim$
51: 26 ${\rm M_{\odot}/L_{\odot}}$ inside 1.1 effective radii of the lensing galaxy. Our study shows how
52: catalogs drawn from multi-band surveys can be used to find strong galaxy-galaxy
53: lenses having multiple lens images. Our strong lensing candidate selection based on photometry-only catalogs will be useful
54: in future multi-band imaging surveys such as SNAP and LSST.
55:
56: \end{abstract}
57:
58: \keywords{gravitational lensing --- galaxies}
59:
60: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
61:
62:
63:
64: \section{INTRODUCTION}
65:
66:
67:
68: Gravitational lensing is a highly useful phenomenon in astrophysics. It allows us to
69: study faint galaxies that have been magnified, and can be used for a variety of
70: cosmological constraints. For example, a
71: strong lens forming multiple images of a background source allows us to determine
72: the mass distribution of the lensing object \citep[e.g.][]{bolton06}.
73: Moreover, the discovery of a substantial number of lens systems makes it possible
74: to study the potential wells of lensing galaxies in a statistical way \citep[e.g.][]
75: {koopmans06}. The lensed galaxy itself is magnified, allowing us to study its
76: properties in detail \citep[e.g.][]{seitz98,richard06}. When a background
77: quasar is strongly lensed, this magnification sometimes makes the host galaxy
78: visible \citep{peng06}. The statistics of strong lenses allow constraints on the
79: cosmological parameters \citep[e.g.][]{kochanek03,oguri07a}, including models of dark energy \citep{fedeli07,oguri08}.
80:
81: Because of the importance of gravitational lensing systems, there have been many systematic studies of
82: them and surveys for them.
83: In particular, strong gravitational lensing of quasars has been studied systematically by the CASTLES
84: collaboration \citep{castles98}, the CLASS \citep{class01},
85: and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) \citep{inada07}.
86: While various surveys of galaxy lensing have been carried out
87: \citep[e.g.,][]{fassnacht04,moustakas07}, many discoveries of lensed galaxies
88: have been serendipitous, such as the discovery of the lensed galaxy cB58 at z=2.7
89: \citep{yee96,seitz98}.
90: Systematic searches for strongly lensed galaxies
91: have been also made in the fields of massive clusters \citep[e.g.][]{pello05}.
92: For example, HST WFPC2 images were used to find
93: giant arcs around galaxy clusters \citep{sand05}. \citet{hennawi08} obtained
94: deep images of 240 rich galaxy clusters selected from SDSS, discovering 16 new giant arc systems.
95: These giant galaxy cluster lenses allow us to determine the mass distribution on scales of several hundred kpc.
96:
97: The large volume spectroscopic survey of the SDSS \citep{york00} allows systematic searches
98: for galaxy-galaxy lenses. \citet{bolton04} and \citet{willis06} searched for objects whose
99: spectra show features of both low-redshift ellipticals
100: and higher-redshift emission lines.
101: Deep HST imaging confirms that the foreground elliptical is lensing the background galaxy.
102: This method has discovered enough strong lensing cases to allow a statistical study of
103: lensing galaxies \citep[e.g.][]{bolton06,bolton07}.
104:
105:
106: Using SDSS imaging data, \citet{allam07} serendipitously discovered a lensed Lyman break galaxy at z =
107: 2.73 around a lensing galaxy at z = 0.38. The lensing galaxy of this lens system has an SDSS
108: spectrum, which does not show any features of the lensed
109: background galaxy because the separation between the lensing galaxy and the lensed image is larger
110: than the 1\farcs5 radius of the spectrograph fiber.
111: This lens therefore did not enter the \citet{bolton04} sample.
112:
113:
114: These discoveries suggest an automated search for galaxy lenses in wide-field imaging data.
115: Several recent studies have used automatic image analysis techniques to find strong lenses
116: in deep images \citep{lenzen04,horesh05,alard06,
117: seidel06,cabanac07}. \citet{estrada07} have also applied a similar method to SDSS images to
118: find giant arcs around clusters of galaxies. These methods use the characteristic arc shape of
119: lens images by calculating the ellipticity or the length-to-width ratios of objects in the imaging
120: data. These arc-shape detection programs can find a hidden
121: compact ring around a lensing galaxy, as shown by \citet{cabanac07}.
122:
123:
124: However, strong lensing detection based on the shape of objects has several difficulties.
125: First, this kind of survey depends on several parameters that are tuned
126: for an optimal detection rate. For example, when the properties of the images such as signal-to-noise
127: ratio and seeing change, the parameters have to
128: be retuned before the codes are applied to the new images. Second, it does not work
129: well when the images are not deep enough to show a bright arc shape,
130: even if the lensed galaxy is quite visible. Third, it is computationally demanding
131: to process massive quantities of wide field image data with shape detection codes
132: when we want to search all lensing possibilities around all elliptical galaxies.
133: A simpler method to search for strong galaxy-galaxy lensing would be valuable.
134:
135:
136: We find that a lensing search based only on a photometric catalog can be used to detect strong galaxy-galaxy
137: lenses in SDSS images, even though they are not deep enough to show the full morphology
138: of lensed arcs.
139: All SDSS imaging data are processed by an automated pipeline \citep{lupton02}. Measured
140: parameters of detected objects including multi-band
141: magnitudes and correlations with neighboring objects are archived
142: to a database from the pipeline.
143: Indeed, the photometric catalog has enough information to allow us to
144: separate the rare lenses from other objects.
145:
146:
147: In this paper we show the first results of our search for strong galaxy-galaxy lenses in SDSS.
148: We explain the candidate selection strategy in the following section.
149: In \S3, we present follow-up observational data of the first confirmed lensing object,
150: SDSS J082728.70+223256.4. A possible lens model is given in \S4.
151: The properties of the lensing galaxy are described in \S5.
152: Discussion and conclusions follow in \S 6.
153: In this paper we focus on demonstrating the use of a
154: multi-band photometry catalog to find lensing systems.
155: We are still refining our selection algorithm, so we will quantify the completeness
156: of our sample and give details of our final candidate selection method in
157: a subsequent paper.
158:
159:
160:
161: \section{CANDIDATE SELECTION}
162:
163:
164:
165: The SDSS produces a photometric catalog in five bands using a 2.5m telescope equipped with 30
166: CCDs \citep{gunn98,gunn06} as well as a spectroscopic catalog of objects selected from
167: the imaging data. The properties of all objects detected above 5 $\sigma$ in at least one band
168: over the ${\rm \sim\ 10^{4}\ deg^{2}}$ imaged to date are measured by a dedicated pipeline \citep{lupton02} and
169: are calibrated photometrically \citep{tucker06} and astrometrically \citep{pier03}.
170: We use the fifth public data release \citep{dr5} in selecting lens candidates. Since most possible lensing galaxies are early-type galaxies
171: because of their large velocity dispersions \citep{turner84, fukugita91}, we assume that lensing galaxies are red galaxies in the SDSS images.
172: Because only the most luminous of those possible lensing galaxies have redshifts
173: above 0.2 \citep{strauss02,eisenstein01},
174: we do not restrict our analysis to the sample of objects with redshifts.
175:
176:
177: Our candidate selection method is still being developed, so we only outline the criteria that were used
178: in finding the reported lens system here.
179: First, we identify all red galaxies in the photometric catalog that have a model magnitude in
180: $g$-band $<$ 23.0 without correction for Galactic extinction. Red galaxies are defined using color cuts suggested
181: by \citet{goto02}:
182: \begin{eqnarray}
183: -0.2 < (r - i) - 0.25 (g - r) - 0.18 < 0.2, \\
184: -0.2 < (g - r) < 2.0,
185: \end{eqnarray}
186: where we use model magnitudes throughout. This color cut selects intrinsically red galaxies up to redshift 0.4.
187: We next select those red galaxies that have at least
188: two photometric
189: companions between 2\farcs4 and 3\farcs6 away, a typical radius of strongly
190: lensed systems, and a large enough separation that the image deblender separates the lens images
191: from the red galaxy.
192:
193:
194:
195: In order to discriminate a lensing system from a galaxy group or cluster, we require that the $u - g$ colors of
196: the possible lens images differ by more than two magnitudes from that of the lensing galaxy.
197: This color difference is much larger than the observed color range of cluster ellipticals \citep[e.g.][]
198: {goto02}. This color difference cut was adopted to test our preliminary selection method and to reduce possible
199: contamination of neighbor galaxies around red galaxies. While cluster ellipticals are red and tend to
200: be undetected in $u$, background lensed galaxies are often quite blue and have very different $u - g$ colors.
201: We discuss refinement of this color cut in \S5.
202:
203:
204: In most strong quadruple lensing systems we expect to find at least two bright knots on one side of the lensing
205: galaxy \footnote{The case of double images is discussed in \S5.}. We therefore require that the angle between the two
206: companion objects with respect to the possible lensing galaxy be less than 90$^{\circ}$. Even though the surface
207: brightness of the arc may not be high enough to appear in the SDSS images, the positions of the bright knots
208: are precise enough to check whether the positions of the photometric objects are consistent with a
209: lensing system.
210:
211: Finally, we eye-inspect the objects that satisfy our criteria. We found 38154 galaxies that satisfy
212: the color cut and have at least one companion with $u - g$ color difference of more than two magnitudes
213: in the separation bin of 2\farcs4 and 3\farcs6.
214: Among the galaxies found, 1644 objects have more than one companion. But
215: only 38 objects have an angle of less than 90$^{\circ}$ between the two lens images; these
216: we examine by eye.
217:
218:
219:
220: From its appearance in the SDSS images (Figure 1), SDSS J082728.83+223253.9 (G) was the most promising
221: lensing galaxy in our search.
222: The basic SDSS photometry data are
223: given in Table 1. The model magnitude $u - g$ color of this elliptical galaxy is 4.48 without
224: Galactic extinction correction. The lensing galaxy
225: is undetected in $u$, as expected for a red elliptical. Therefore, the $u - g$ color
226: of the lensing
227: galaxy should be interpreted as a lower limit. Meanwhile, the
228: lens images are deblended as three photometric objects: SDSS J082728.87+223256.5
229: (A), SDSS J082728.70+223256.4 (B), and SDSS J082728.86+223252.6 (C).
230: The first two objects are classified as galaxies by the SDSS software
231: while the last one is star-like. The distances of objects A and B from
232: the lensing galaxy are $\sim$ 3\farcs0, and satisfy our selection criteria.
233: Although image C is also close to the lensing galaxy, its model magnitude in
234: the $g$-band is fainter than
235: 23 mag, and therefore was not selected by our criteria. The angle between images
236: A and B is $\sim$ 40\degr, i.e. less than 90\degr. Images A and B have
237: $u - g$ = 0.36 $\pm$ 0.65 and $-0.01 \pm 0.08$ without Galactic extinction correction,
238: respectively. The larger color error for A simply reflects the fact that
239: it is 2 magnitudes fainter than B. The difference of $u - g$ between the lensing
240: galaxy and the lens images is larger than the color error itself.
241: The fact that two objects with different $u - g$ colors from the
242: lensing galaxy are on the same side of the galaxy strongly suggests that
243: they are images of a gravitationally lensed background galaxy.
244:
245:
246:
247: \section{FOLLOW-UP OBSERVATIONS}
248:
249: \subsection{APO 3.5m Spectroscopy}
250:
251: We observed the brightest object A using the Double Imaging Spectrograph (DIS) of the Astrophysical Research
252: Consortium 3.5m telescope at Apache Point Observatory (APO) on 2006 December 17 (UT). We set the
253: two gratings to cover the wavelength ranges from $\sim 3700 {\rm \AA}$ to $\sim 5570 {\rm \AA}$ and from
254: $\sim 5300 {\rm \AA}$ to $\sim 9000 {\rm \AA}$, with dispersions of
255: 1.83 ${\rm \AA}$ per pixel and 2.31 ${\rm \AA}$ per pixel for the blue and red channels of DIS, respectively.
256: We exposed for 2400 seconds using a 1\farcs5 slit. The spectrum given in Figure 2 has signal-to-noise
257: ratio of $\sim$ 7.5 per pixel
258: around $\lambda \sim 6500 {\rm \AA}$, allowing us to measure the redshift and to identify the
259: characteristics of the object. The spectrum shows strong Balmer absorption lines of
260: redshift z=0.7654 $\pm$ 0.0004, characteristic of post-starburst
261: galaxies \citep{goto03}. The spectrum does not show any strong emission lines.
262: E+A galaxies are
263: rare objects, representing $1 - 2$\% of the galaxy population at z$\approx$0 \citep{quintero04,yan06},
264: and lensed E+A galaxies are rarer still; there is only one previously known lensed E+A galaxy, at
265: z = 1.394 \citep{fassnacht96}.
266:
267: The spectrum has a blue continuum and shows
268: strong absorption by MgII $\lambda\lambda 2796, 2803$,
269: although the doublet is not resolved in our low-resolution spectrum. As shown
270: in \citet{tremonti07}, the MgII absorption might be a feature of an outflow in
271: this post-starburst galaxy. Because outflows in post-starburst galaxies are
272: thought to originate from galactic winds, the spatial location of
273: this absorption feature in the galaxy would be valuable for understanding
274: the galactic wind scenario.
275: Thanks to the strong lensing of this galaxy,
276: spatially resolved spectroscopy should allow us to map the MgII absorption feature across the galaxy.
277:
278:
279:
280: \subsection{Subaru Imaging and Spectroscopy}
281:
282: We conducted imaging and spectroscopic follow-up observations with the
283: Faint Object Camera And Spectrograph \citep[FOCAS;][]{kashikawa02} on the
284: Subaru 8.2-meter telescope on 2007 January 21. The spectroscopic
285: observation was performed with 2x2 on-chip binning with the
286: 300B grism and SY47 filter. A 1\arcsec\ slit was aligned
287: to observe objects B and C and the lensing galaxy G
288: simultaneously. An 1800 sec exposure was taken with seeing of $\sim 0\farcs7$.
289: We also took 120 sec $V$- and $I$-band images. All the data were reduced using
290: standard tasks in IRAF.
291:
292: The spectra of the lens images B and C in Figure 2 show the same redshift as object
293: A. The redshift of object B, z=0.7659 $\pm$ 0.0003, is
294: determined by the absorption lines H8, H7, H6, H, and H$\delta$. The
295: lines are also used in estimating the redshift of object C, resulting
296: in z=0.7660 $\pm$ 0.0007.
297:
298: The spectrum of the lensing galaxy G (Figure 2) has a redshift of
299: z= 0.3492 $\pm$ 0.0007 based on the CaII K \& H, G-band, and Mg lines.
300: This is in good agreement with the SDSS DR5 photometric redshift
301: \citep{csabai03}, 0.305 $\pm$ 0.039. An object 13\farcs2 away,
302: SDSS J082728.62+223241.0, has an SDSS redshift of z=0.3347 $\pm$ 0.0002.
303: The lensing galaxy is surrounded by other red galaxies of similar color,
304: suggesting a similar redshift. The lensing galaxy thus appears to be a member of a
305: galaxy cluster. The case for this is strengthened by the
306: presence of a X-ray source in the ROSAT All-Sky Survey Faint
307: Source Catalog \citep{voges00}, 1RXS J082726.8+223237, that is $\sim 33$'', i.e.
308: a projected distance of $\sim 160$ kpc,
309: away from the lensing galaxy. The positional error of this faint
310: source is $\sim 14$'' \citep{voges00}, thus this position is consistent with that
311: of the apparent cluster of galaxies.
312: Assuming that the X-ray source is at the same redshift as the lensing galaxy,
313: the estimated flux from the ROSAT catalog is about $6\times10^{-13}~{\rm erg/cm^{2}~s}$ with
314: the Galactic absorption correction, assuming a Raymond-Smith plasma spectrum
315: \citep{raymond77} or a simple power-law spectrum of index -0.5.
316: It corresponds to a luminosity of about $2\times10^{44}~{\rm erg/s}$
317: in the range 0.5 - 2.0 keV. This value is close to the luminosities of typical
318: galaxy clusters \citep{mullis03}. The confirmation of the
319: galaxy cluster is discussed further in \S5.
320:
321: The Subaru $V$-band image (Figure 3) shows the blue lensed objects more distinctly
322: than SDSS, because it is deeper and has better seeing.
323: We measure the positions of the brightness peaks using SExtractor \citep{bertin96}. To deblend the
324: faintest lens image C from the lensing galaxy, we used a Mexican hat filter with a full-width at
325: half-maximum of 0\farcs6. The derived relative positions
326: of the lens images are used to constrain a lens model in \S4.
327:
328: We suspect that the faint object D, at 082729.11+223253.76 in Figure 3 is
329: the fourth lens image.
330: In order to check this hypothesis, we measure $(V - I)$ color differences among the lens
331: images. The color is measured through a 3\arcsec\ diameter aperture. Between objects D
332: and A, $\Delta(V - I) = (V - I)_{D} - (V - I)_{A}$ is 0.13 $\pm$ 0.04 while $\Delta(V - I)$
333: between D and B is 0.20 $\pm$ 0.04, where the errors are from photon statistics only.
334: Given the uncertainties in deblending, this agreement is
335: consistent with the hypothesis that D is the possible fourth lens image.
336:
337:
338: \section{THE LENS MODEL}
339:
340: We fit a model of a singular isothermal ellipsoid (SIE) with external shear to
341: the positions of the four components A, B, C and D
342: system using the {\it gravlens} software \citep{keeton01}; this is the simplest
343: model which can fit quadruple lenses in general \citep{keeton97}.
344: However, the cluster environment of the lens (\S5) suggest a more complicated
345: model \citep[e.g.][]{keeton04,kawano04}. The perturbation of mass substructures
346: in the lensing environment will affect the lensing magnification \citep[e.g.][]{saha07}.
347: For this reason, we do not use relative flux ratios among the lens images in
348: constraining the lens model, but just use their relative positions.
349:
350:
351: A well-fitted lens model is found with a positional error of $\sim$ 0\farcs2 between
352: the derived and observed positions of lens images, as shown in Figure 4.
353: The derived central position of
354: the lensing galaxy is within 0\farcs1 of the optical position.
355: The required external shear is about 0.1 in this model.
356: The direction of the critical curve is completely inconsistent with the position angle
357: of the lensing galaxy. But this discrepancy could be explained by
358: the dominance of the external shear.
359: The position angle of the quadrupole term is within $5^{\circ}$ of the direction
360: to the brightest cluster galaxy. This angle difference is acceptable when
361: considering the possible offset between the position of the brightest cluster
362: galaxy and the center of mass of the cluster, and the degeneracy between
363: the strength and position angle of the external shear. The Einstein radius (${\rm R_{Ein}}$)
364: from the fitted model is 2\farcs23$\pm$0.01\arcsec, corresponding to 10.8 kpc in the lens plane
365: \footnote{We adopt cosmological parameters of $\Omega_{{\rm m}}=0.26$,
366: $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.74$, and h=0.72 as given in \citet{spergel07}. The error of
367: the ${\rm R_{Ein}}$ represents only a fitting error of the mass parameter.}.
368: ${\rm R_{Ein}}$ is the mass parameter of a singular isothermal ellipsoid, that is related
369: to the velocity dispersion of the lensing galaxy as used in \citet{keeton04}.
370: The configuration of the source and lens images is consistent with what we expect from
371: strong lensing in a galaxy cluster environment \citep[e.g.][]{king07}.
372:
373:
374: \section{THE LENSING GALAXY}
375:
376:
377: We present a simple estimation of the properties of the lensing galaxy. A detailed lensing model
378: and other properties of lensing galaxies will be given as part of a study of a larger sample.
379:
380: We can estimate a rough total mass of the lensing galaxy inside ${\rm R_{Ein}}$ derived in the
381: previous section:
382: \begin{equation}
383: M = \frac{R_{Ein}^{2} c^{2}}{4 G} \frac{D_{d} D_{s}}{D_{ds}} \sim 1.2 \times {\rm 10^{12}\ M_{\odot}},
384: \end{equation}
385: where $D_{s}$, $D_{d}$, and $D_{ds}$ are angular-diameter distances to the
386: lensed galaxy, to the lensing galaxy, and between the two galaxies, respectively.
387: The SDSS photometric pipeline gives a de Vaucouleurs effective radius of the lensing
388: galaxy of 1\farcs96
389: $\pm$ 0.17\arcsec, or 9.5 $\pm$ 0.8 kpc in the SDSS $i$-band. Therefore, ${\rm R_{Ein}}$ is roughly
390: 1.1 effective radii. The velocity dispersion of the lensing galaxy is poorly measured at 210
391: $\pm$ 130 km/s due to the low resolution of the spectrum, R = 500. With this large uncertainty,
392: it is not meaningful to compare this velocity dispersion with that derived from the SIE model.
393:
394:
395: We next estimate a mass-to-light ratio. The model magnitude is 21.0 in
396: the $g$-band within
397: 1.1 effective radii,
398: after correction for Galactic extinction from \citet{schlegel98}.
399: Therefore, the absolute magnitude of the lensing galaxy is $-21.2$
400: in the $B$-band, applying the K-corrections given in \citet{fukugita95}.
401: The estimated ${\rm M/L}$ of the lensing galaxy is
402: $\sim 26\ {\rm M_{\odot}/L_{\odot}}$ in the $B$-band.
403: We have taken the absolute magnitude of the Sun to be 5.45 mag
404: in the $B$-band \citep{blanton07}.
405:
406:
407: This mass-to-light ratio is higher than
408: that of typical elliptical galaxies,
409: $\sim$ 10 ${\rm M_{\odot}/L_{\odot}}$
410: \citep{bahcall95,keeton98,wilson01,padmanabhan04}, and is
411: comparable to that of a
412: galaxy group \citep{bahcall95,parker05}.
413: This mass-to-light ratio is acceptable when we remember
414: that the lensing galaxy is near the
415: center of a galaxy cluster as shown in \S3.2, and the lensing
416: is sensitive to all the projected mass. Most massive early-type
417: galaxies reside in dense regions like galaxy clusters \citep[e.g.,][]{kauffmann04}.
418: Indeed, many lensing ellipticals are known to lie in
419: galaxy group or cluster environments \citep{fassnacht02,williams06,auger07},
420: partly because of enhancement of the strong lensing probability by
421: external convergence from dark matter in the group/cluster \citep{oguri05}.
422: Note that the redshift difference between the lensing galaxy and
423: the SDSS spectroscopic object SDSS J082726.8+223241.0 is equivalent
424: to a radial velocity difference of
425: $\sim$ 3000 km/s. This implies either that this galaxy cluster is quite massive, or
426: that there are multiple superposed clusters along the line of sight. Further
427: spectroscopy of galaxies in the field is needed to distinguish these cases.
428:
429: Figure 5 shows the color-magnitude diagram and $(g - r)$ color distribution of
430: galaxies within 3\arcmin, i.e. $\sim$ 870 kpc on the lens plane, around the lensing
431: galaxy. The lensing galaxy appears to be a member of a galaxy cluster, although
432: it is not the brightest member. As shown
433: in \citet{goto02}, the expected $(g - r)$ color of ellipticals
434: at z $\sim$ 0.3 is $\sim$ 1.6. We select ellipticals with $r$-band model magnitude $<$ 21.5 using
435: the criterion that the de Vaucouleurs model fitting likelihood is 10\% larger than that of
436: the exponential model. There is a clear concentration of ellipticals around the expected
437: $(g - r) \sim$ 1.6. The brightest member galaxy SDSS J082728.42+223245.7 is about 10\arcsec\ away
438: from the lensing galaxy. That is, the projected distance is about 48 kpc. Therefore, the
439: lensing might be affected by the dense central part of the galaxy cluster,
440: as we argued above.
441:
442:
443:
444: \section{DISCUSSION \& CONCLUSION}
445:
446: We have shown that it is possible to detect strong galaxy-galaxy lenses
447: with photometric catalogs drawn from large multi-band imaging surveys.
448: Thus our method can be applied to the next-generation of
449: wide-field multi-band surveys including UKIDSS \citep{ukidss},
450: Pan-STARRS \citep{kaiser04}, SNAP \citep{kim02},
451: LSST \citep{tyson05}, the Sky Mapper Southern Sky Survey \citep{keller07}, and VISTA \citep{vista}.
452:
453: In SDSS and future surveys, our approach can be improved
454: using photometric redshifts as well as color information;
455: the precision of photometric redshifts is good enough to discriminate low-redshift elliptical galaxies from
456: the high-redshift lensed galaxy. Moreover, photometric-redshift techniques also allow an estimate of
457: the intrinsic colors of galaxies \citep{csabai03}, allowing red galaxies to be identified in a more sophisticated
458: way than we have.
459:
460: The photometric pipelines and databases of future multi-band wide-field imaging surveys must have several
461: components in order for our approach to work.
462: First, the detection of the lens system described in this paper was possible due to the
463: successful deblending algorithm used by the SDSS photometric pipeline \footnote{\url{http://www.sdss.org/dr5/algorithms/deblend.html}} \citep{lupton02}. When the lensing arc is not bright enough to be classified as an
464: extended object, the lens images often look like a series of disconnected, deblended knots, as we saw in Figure 1.
465: So, we expect our approach to have
466: better efficiency for detecting faint lensed galaxies than do image analysis methods.
467: The second important consideration is a database which links close neighbors together,
468: given our criteria on the angular distance between possible lensing galaxies and lensed images.
469:
470:
471: Given that our method uses position and color information only, it can easily be used with archival data in the Virtual
472: Observatory.
473: In particular, the application of our approach to combined catalogs over a range of wavelengths will benefit
474: from improved photometric redshifts. For example, the recent discovery of
475: high-redshift galaxy clusters with massive dark matter
476: halos \citep[e.g.][]{stanford05,brodwin06} suggests applying our method to the database of a deep multi-band
477: imaging survey of high-redshift clusters.
478:
479:
480: We note that our strategy has several disadvantages. First, our method is restricted by the angular resolution of
481: the data. The poor angular resolution of SDSS, $\sim$ 1\farcs2, does not permit
482: us to find compact lenses.
483: Future surveys like LSST will be much superior in that regard.
484: Second, our selection criteria are based on our incomplete understanding of the properties of possible lensing
485: galaxies. As we mentioned in \S2, we
486: narrowed the color range of possible lensing galaxies to increase the lensing
487: detection probability.
488: Third, our method will be contaminated
489: by foreground objects mistaken as possible lens images. Improved photometric
490: redshifts should reduce this problem.
491:
492:
493: We continue to refine our lens candidate selection method. First of
494: all, our requirement of a color difference of more than two magnitudes between the candidate lensed
495: and lensing galaxies is rather crude, and can be replaced with a criterion based on photometric
496: redshifts. In addition, we can use other colors like $(g - r)$ or $(u - r)$ to separate lenses from
497: galaxy clusters. In particular, early-type galaxies have a narrow range of $(g - r)$ color, suggesting
498: that $(g - r)$ color differences could be better discriminant of background lensed galaxies.
499: We can also loosen the criterion on the angular separation between the two lens images
500: to find double lens systems, and the criterion on separation between a lensing galaxy and images also can be
501: modified to include large-separation lenses.
502:
503:
504:
505: We have described a new method to search for strong galaxy-galaxy lenses from the SDSS photometric catalog.
506: We have demonstrated the use of our method with the discovery of a new strong galaxy lens.
507: A lensing elliptical galaxy at z = 0.349 in
508: a galaxy cluster magnifies a background post-starburst galaxy at z = 0.766, producing four images.
509: Our selection method will be useful for future imaging surveys, with their superior depth and angular
510: resolution.
511:
512: It is possible to combine our lensing search method based on a photometric catalog with
513: a direct image analysis method \citep[e.g.][]{cabanac07}. By using both approaches, we will be able to
514: detect various classes of lenses, ranging from faint lens images to giant arcs around galaxy
515: clusters. For example,
516: after selecting a possible lensing system using our method, one can easily apply the image analysis
517: method to the selected object, reducing the time required to apply the
518: direct image analysis approach to a massive imaging dataset.
519:
520: We are refining our selection criteria and plan follow-up observations of
521: several candidates.
522: We will publish our full sample and present details of lens models for each object,
523: statistical properties of the lenses, and the detection statistics of our lens sample
524: in future papers. The high magnification that the lensing gives allows us to study
525: the populations of these otherwise
526: faint and distant galaxies in detail. In particular,
527: for the lensed E+A galaxy we present here, we plan observations using an
528: integral field unit spectrograph and adaptive optics to understand the spatial distribution of the MgII
529: absorption and blue continuum; given a precise lensing model, we may be able to spatially resolve the
530: outflow across the face of the galaxy.
531:
532:
533:
534:
535:
536:
537: \acknowledgments
538:
539:
540: M.-S.~S. and M.~A.~S. acknowledge the support of NSF grants AST-0307409 and
541: AST-0707266.
542: N.~I. acknowledges support from the Special
543: Postdoctoral Researcher Program of RIKEN.
544: We thank
545: Huan Lin, Sahar Allam, Douglas Tucker, Tom Diehl, and James Annis of the SDSS group
546: at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory for many fruitful discussions.
547: This work was supported in part by Department of Energy contract DE-AC02-76SF00515.
548:
549: This paper is based in part on observations
550: obtained with the Apache Point Observatory
551: 3.5-meter telescope, which is owned and operated by the Astrophysical
552: Research Consortium and based on data collected at Subaru Telescope, which
553: is operated by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.
554:
555: Funding for the SDSS and SDSS-II has been provided by the Alfred P.
556: Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the National Science
557: Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Aeronautics
558: and Space Administration, the Japanese Monbukagakusho, the Max Planck
559: Society, and the Higher Education Funding Council for England. The
560: SDSS Web Site is http://www.sdss.org/. The SDSS is managed by the
561: Astrophysical Research Consortium for the Participating
562: Institutions. The Participating Institutions are the American Museum
563: of Natural History, Astrophysical Institute Potsdam, University of
564: Basel, Cambridge University, Case Western Reserve University,
565: University of Chicago, Drexel University, Fermilab, the Institute for
566: Advanced Study, the Japan Participation Group, Johns Hopkins
567: University, the Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, the Kavli
568: Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, the Korean
569: Scientist Group, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST), Los Alamos
570: National Laboratory, the Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA),
571: the Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA), New Mexico State
572: University, Ohio State University, University of Pittsburgh,
573: University of Portsmouth, Princeton University, the United States
574: Naval Observatory, and the University of Washington.
575:
576:
577: %------------- REFERENCE ----------------%
578:
579: \begin{thebibliography}{}
580: \bibitem[Adelman-McCarthy et al.(2007)]{dr5}
581: Adelman-McCarthy, J.~K., et al.\ 2007, \apjs, 172, 634
582:
583: \bibitem[Alard (2006)]{alard06} Alard, C. 2006, preprint (astro-ph/0606757)
584:
585: \bibitem[Allam et al.(2007)]{allam07} Allam, S.~S., Tucker,
586: D.~L., Lin, H., Diehl, H.~T., Annis, J., Buckley-Geer, E.~J.,
587: \& Frieman, J.~A.\ 2007, \apjl, 662, L51
588:
589: \bibitem[Auger et al.(2007)]{auger07} Auger, M.~W., Fassnacht,
590: C.~D., Abrahamse, A.~L., Lubin, L.~M.,
591: \& Squires, G.~K.\ 2007, \aj, 134, 668
592:
593: \bibitem[Bahcall et al.(1995)]{bahcall95} Bahcall, N.~A., Lubin,
594: L.~M., \& Dorman, V.\ 1995, \apjl, 447, L81
595:
596: \bibitem[Bertin \& Arnouts(1996)]{bertin96} Bertin, E., \& Arnouts, S.\ 1996, \aaps, 117, 393
597:
598: \bibitem[{{Blanton} \& {Roweis}(2007)}]{blanton07}
599: {Blanton}, M.~R., \& {Roweis}, S. 2007, \aj, 133, 734
600:
601: \bibitem[Bolton et al.(2006)]{bolton06} Bolton, A.~S., Burles,
602: S., Koopmans, L.~V.~E., Treu, T., \& Moustakas, L.~A.\ 2006, \apj, 638, 703
603:
604: \bibitem[Bolton et al.(2004)]{bolton04} Bolton, A.~S., Burles,
605: S., Schlegel, D.~J., Eisenstein, D.~J.,
606: \& Brinkmann, J.\ 2004, \aj, 127, 1860
607:
608: \bibitem[Bolton et al.(2007)]{bolton07} Bolton, A.~S., Burles,
609: S., Treu, T., Koopmans, L.~V.~E.,
610: \& Moustakas, L.~A.\ 2007, \apjl, 665, L105
611:
612: \bibitem[Brodwin et al.(2006)]{brodwin06} Brodwin, M., et al.\
613: 2006, \apj, 651, 791
614:
615: \bibitem[Cabanac et al.(2007)]{cabanac07} Cabanac, R.~A., et al.\ 2007, \aap, 461, 813
616:
617: \bibitem[Csabai et al.(2003)]{csabai03} Csabai, I., et al.\
618: 2003, \aj, 125, 580
619:
620: \bibitem[Eisenstein et al.(2001)]{eisenstein01} Eisenstein, D.~J.,
621: et al.\ 2001, \aj, 122, 2267
622:
623: \bibitem[Estrada et al.(2007)]{estrada07} Estrada, J., et al.\
624: 2007, \apj, 660, 1176
625:
626: \bibitem[Fassnacht et al.(1996)]{fassnacht96} Fassnacht, C.~D.,
627: Womble, D.~S., Neugebauer, G., Browne, I.~W.~A., Readhead, A.~C.~S.,
628: Matthews, K., \& Pearson, T.~J.\ 1996, \apjl, 460, L103
629:
630: \bibitem[{{Fassnacht} \& {Lubin}(2002)}]{fassnacht02}
631: {Fassnacht}, C.~D., \& {Lubin}, L.~M. 2002, \aj, 123, 627
632:
633: \bibitem[Fassnacht et al.(2004)]{fassnacht04} Fassnacht, C.~D.,
634: Moustakas, L.~A., Casertano, S., Ferguson, H.~C., Lucas, R.~A.,
635: \& Park, Y.\ 2004, \apjl, 600, L155
636:
637: \bibitem[{{Fedeli} \& {Bartelmann}(2007)}]{fedeli07}
638: {Fedeli}, C., \& {Bartelmann}, M. 2007, \aap, 461, 49
639:
640: \bibitem[{{Fukugita} {et~al.}(1995){Fukugita}, {Shimasaku}, \&
641: {Ichikawa}}]{fukugita95}
642: {Fukugita}, M., {Shimasaku}, K., \& {Ichikawa}, T. 1995, \pasp, 107, 945
643:
644: \bibitem[{{Fukugita} \& {Turner}(1991)}]{fukugita91}
645: {Fukugita}, M., \& {Turner}, E.~L. 1991, \mnras, 253, 99
646:
647: \bibitem[Goto et al.(2003)]{goto03} Goto, T., et al.\ 2003,
648: \pasj, 55, 771
649:
650: \bibitem[Goto et al.(2002)]{goto02} Goto, T., et al.\ 2002,
651: \aj, 123, 1807
652:
653: \bibitem[Gunn et al.(1998)]{gunn98} Gunn, J.~E., et al.\ 1998,
654: \aj, 116, 3040
655:
656: \bibitem[Gunn et al.(2006)]{gunn06} Gunn, J.~E., et al.\ 2006,
657: \aj, 131, 2332
658:
659: \bibitem[Hennawi et al.(2008)]{hennawi08} Hennawi, J.~F., et al.\
660: 2008, \aj, 135, 664
661:
662: \bibitem[Horesh et al.(2005)]{horesh05} Horesh, A., Ofek, E.~O.,
663: Maoz, D., Bartelmann, M., Meneghetti, M.,
664: \& Rix, H.-W.\ 2005, \apj, 633, 768
665:
666: \bibitem[Inada et al.(2007)]{inada07} Inada, N., et al.\ 2007,
667: \aj, 133, 206
668:
669: \bibitem[{{Kaiser}(2004)}]{kaiser04}
670: {Kaiser}, N. 2004, in Presented at the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation
671: Engineers (SPIE) Conference, Vol. 5489, Ground-based Telescopes. Edited by
672: Oschmann, Jacobus M., Jr. Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 5489, pp. 11-22
673: (2004)., ed. J.~M. {Oschmann}, Jr., 11--22
674:
675: \bibitem[Kashikawa et al.(2002)]{kashikawa02} Kashikawa, N., et
676: al.\ 2002, \pasj, 54, 819
677:
678: \bibitem[Kauffmann et al.(2004)]{kauffmann04} Kauffmann, G., White,
679: S.~D.~M., Heckman, T.~M., M{\'e}nard, B., Brinchmann, J., Charlot, S.,
680: Tremonti, C., \& Brinkmann, J.\ 2004, \mnras, 353, 713
681:
682: \bibitem[{{Kawano} {et~al.}(2004){Kawano}, {Oguri}, {Matsubara}, \& {Ikeuchi}}]{kawano04}
683: {Kawano}, Y., {Oguri}, M., {Matsubara}, T., \& {Ikeuchi}, S. 2004, \pasj, 56, 253
684:
685: \bibitem[{{Keeton} {et~al.}(1997){Keeton}, {Kochanek}, \& {Seljak}}]{keeton97}
686: {Keeton}, C.~R., {Kochanek}, C.~S., \& {Seljak}, U. 1997, \apj, 482, 604
687:
688: \bibitem[{{Keeton} {et~al.}(1998){Keeton}, {Kochanek}, \& {Falco}}]{keeton98}
689: {Keeton}, C.~R., {Kochanek}, C.~S., \& {Falco}, E.~E. 1998, \apj, 509, 561
690:
691: \bibitem[{{Keeton}}(2001){Keeton}]{keeton01}
692: {Keeton}, C.~R. 2001, preprint (astro-ph: 0102340)
693:
694: \bibitem[{{Keeton} \& {Zabludoff}(2004)}]{keeton04}
695: {Keeton}, C.~R. \& {Zabludoff}, A.~I. 2004, \apj, 612, 660
696:
697: \bibitem[{{Keller} {et~al.}(2007){Keller}, {Schmidt}, \& {Bessell}}]{keller07}
698: {Keller}, S.~C., {Schmidt}, B.~P., \& {Bessell}, M.~S. 2007, preprint (astro-ph: 0704.1339)
699:
700: \bibitem[Kim et al.(2002)]{kim02} Kim, A.~G., et al.\ 2002,
701: \procspie, 4836, 53
702:
703:
704: \bibitem[{{King}(2007)}]{king07}
705: {King}, L.~J. 2007, \mnras, 382, 308
706:
707: \bibitem[{{Kochanek}(2003)}]{kochanek03}
708: {Kochanek}, C.~S. 2003, \apj, 583, 49
709:
710: \bibitem[Koopmans et al.(2006)]{koopmans06} Koopmans, L.~V.~E.,
711: Treu, T., Bolton, A.~S., Burles, S.,
712: \& Moustakas, L.~A.\ 2006, \apj, 649, 599
713:
714: \bibitem[Lawrence et al.(2007)]{ukidss} Lawrence, A., et al.\
715: 2007, \mnras, 379, 1599
716:
717: \bibitem[{{Lenzen} {et~al.}(2004){Lenzen}, {Schindler}, \&
718: {Scherzer}}]{lenzen04}
719: {Lenzen}, F., {Schindler}, S., \& {Scherzer}, O. 2004, \aap, 416, 391
720:
721: \bibitem[Lupton et al.(2002)]{lupton02} Lupton, R.~H., Ivezic,
722: Z., Gunn, J.~E., Knapp, G., Strauss, M.~A.,
723: \& Yasuda, N.\ 2002, \procspie, 4836, 350
724:
725: \bibitem[McPherson et al.(2003)]{vista} McPherson, A.~M.,
726: Craig, S.~C., \& Sutherland, W.\ 2003, \procspie, 4837, 82
727:
728: \bibitem[Mu{\~n}oz et al.(1998)]{castles98}
729: Mu{\~n}oz, J.~A., Falco, E.~E., Kochanek, C.~S.,
730: Leh{\'a}r, J., McLeod, B.~A., Impey, C.~D., Rix, H.-W., \& Peng, C.~Y.\ 1998, \apss, 263, 51
731:
732: \bibitem[Moustakas et al.(2007)]{moustakas07} Moustakas, L.~A., et
733: al.\ 2007, \apjl, 660, L31
734:
735: \bibitem[Mullis et al.(2003)]{mullis03} Mullis, C.~R., et al.\ 2003, \apj, 594, 154
736:
737: \bibitem[{{Myers} {et~al.}(2001){Myers}, \& {The Class Collaboration}}]{class01}
738: {Myers}, S.~T., \& {The Class Collaboration} in
739: Gravitational Lensing: Recent Progress and Future Goals, ASP Conference Proceedings,
740: Vol. 237. Edited by Tereasa G. Brainerd and Christopher S. Kochanek.
741: San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2001.
742:
743: \bibitem[{{Oguri}(2007)}]{oguri07a}
744: {Oguri}, M. 2007, \apj, 660, 1
745:
746: \bibitem[Oguri et al.(2008)]{oguri08} Oguri, M., et al.\ 2008,
747: \aj, 135, 512
748:
749: \bibitem[{{Oguri} {et~al.}(2005){Oguri}, {Keeton}, \& {Dalal}}]{oguri05}
750: {Oguri}, M., {Keeton}, C.~R., \& {Dalal}, N. 2005, \mnras, 364, 1451
751:
752: \bibitem[Padmanabhan et al.(2004)]{padmanabhan04} Padmanabhan, N., et
753: al.\ 2004, New Astronomy, 9, 329
754:
755: \bibitem[{{Parker} {et~al.}(2005){Parker}, {Hudson}, {Carlberg}, \&
756: {Hoekstra}}]{parker05}
757: {Parker}, L.~C., {Hudson}, M.~J., {Carlberg}, R.~G., \& {Hoekstra}, H. 2005,
758: \apj, 634, 806
759:
760: \bibitem[{{Pell{\'o}} {et~al.}(2005){Pell{\'o}}, {Schaerer}, {Richard}, {Le
761: Borgne}, \& {Kneib}}]{pello05}
762: {Pell{\'o}}, R., {Schaerer}, D., {Richard}, J., {Le Borgne}, J.-F., \& {Kneib},
763: J.-P. 2005, in IAU Symposium, ed. Y.~{Mellier} \& G.~{Meylan}, 373--386
764:
765: \bibitem[{{Peng} {et~al.}(2006){Peng}, {Impey}, {Rix}, {Falco}, {Keeton},
766: {Kochanek}, {Leh{\'a}r}, \& {McLeod}}]{peng06}
767: {Peng}, C.~Y., {Impey}, C.~D., {Rix}, H.-W., {Falco}, E.~E., {Keeton}, C.~R.,
768: {Kochanek}, C.~S., {Leh{\'a}r}, J., \& {McLeod}, B.~A. 2006, New Astronomy
769: Review, 50, 689
770:
771: \bibitem[{{Pier} {et~al.}(2003){Pier}, {Munn}, {Hindsley}, {Hennessy}, {Kent},
772: {Lupton}, \& {Ivezi{\'c}}}]{pier03}
773: {Pier}, J.~R., {Munn}, J.~A., {Hindsley}, R.~B., {Hennessy}, G.~S., {Kent},
774: S.~M., {Lupton}, R.~H., \& {Ivezi{\'c}}, {\v Z}. 2003, \aj, 125, 1559
775:
776: \bibitem[Quintero et al.(2004)]{quintero04} Quintero, A.~D., et
777: al.\ 2004, \apj, 602, 190
778:
779:
780: \bibitem[Raymond \& Smith(1977)]{raymond77} Raymond, J.~C.,
781: \& Smith, B.~W.\ 1977, \apjs, 35, 419
782:
783: \bibitem[{{Richard} {et~al.}(2006){Richard}, {Pell{\'o}}, {Schaerer}, {Le
784: Borgne}, \& {Kneib}}]{richard06}
785: {Richard}, J., {Pell{\'o}}, R., {Schaerer}, D., {Le Borgne}, J.-F., \& {Kneib},
786: J.-P. 2006, \aap, 456, 861
787:
788: \bibitem[{{Saha} {et~al.}(2007){Saha}, {Williams}, \& {Ferreras}}]{saha07}
789: {Saha}, P. and {Williams}, L.~L.~R., \& {Ferreras}, I. 2007, \apj, 663, 29
790:
791: \bibitem[{{Sand} {et~al.}(2005){Sand}, {Treu}, {Ellis}, \& {Smith}}]{sand05}
792: {Sand}, D.~J., {Treu}, T., {Ellis}, R.~S., \& {Smith}, G.~P. 2005, \apj, 627,
793: 32
794:
795: \bibitem[{{Schlegel} {et~al.}(1998){Schlegel}, {Finkbeiner}, \&
796: {Davis}}]{schlegel98}
797: {Schlegel}, D.~J., {Finkbeiner}, D.~P., \& {Davis}, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
798:
799: \bibitem[{{Seidel} \& {Bartelmann}(2006)}]{seidel06}
800: {Seidel}, G., \& {Bartelmann}, M. 2007, A\&A, 472, 341
801:
802: \bibitem[{{Seitz} {et~al.}(1998){Seitz}, {Saglia}, {Bender}, {Hopp}, {Belloni},
803: \& {Ziegler}}]{seitz98}
804: {Seitz}, S., {Saglia}, R.~P., {Bender}, R., {Hopp}, U., {Belloni}, P., \&
805: {Ziegler}, B. 1998, \mnras, 298, 945
806:
807: \bibitem[Spergel et al.(2007)]{spergel07} Spergel, D.~N., et al.\
808: 2007, \apjs, 170, 377
809:
810: \bibitem[Stanford et al.(2005)]{stanford05} Stanford, S.~A., et
811: al.\ 2005, \apjl, 634, L129
812:
813: \bibitem[Strauss et al.(2002)]{strauss02} Strauss, M.~A., et al.\
814: 2002, \aj, 124, 1810
815:
816: \bibitem[{{Tremonti} {et~al.}(2007){Tremonti}, {Moustakas}, \&
817: {Diamond-Stanic}}]{tremonti07}
818: {Tremonti}, C.~A., {Moustakas}, J., \& {Diamond-Stanic}, A.~M. 2007, \apjl,
819: 663, L77
820:
821: \bibitem[Tucker et al.(2006)]{tucker06} Tucker, D.~L., et al.\
822: 2006, Astronomische Nachrichten, 327, 821
823:
824:
825: \bibitem[{{Turner} {et~al.}(1984){Turner}, {Ostriker}, \& {Gott}}]{turner84}
826: {Turner}, E.~L., {Ostriker}, J.~P., \& {Gott}, III, J.~R. 1984, \apj, 284, 1
827:
828: \bibitem[{{Tyson}(2005)}]{tyson05}
829: {Tyson}, A. 2005, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series,
830: Vol. 339, Observing Dark Energy, ed. S.~C. {Wolff} \& T.~R. {Lauer}, 95
831:
832: \bibitem[Voges et al.(1999)]{voges99} Voges, W., et al.\ 1999, \aap, 349, 389
833:
834: \bibitem[Voges et al.(2000)]{voges00} Voges, W., et al.\ 2000,
835: VizieR Online Data Catalog, 9029, 0
836:
837: \bibitem[{{Williams} {et~al.}(2006){Williams}, {Momcheva}, {Keeton},
838: {Zabludoff}, \& {Leh{\'a}r}}]{williams06}
839: {Williams}, K.~A., {Momcheva}, I., {Keeton}, C.~R., {Zabludoff}, A.~I., \&
840: {Leh{\'a}r}, J. 2006, \apj, 646, 85
841:
842: \bibitem[{{Willis} {et~al.}(2006){Willis}, {Hewett}, {Warren}, {Dye}, \&
843: {Maddox}}]{willis06}
844: {Willis}, J.~P., {Hewett}, P.~C., {Warren}, S.~J., {Dye}, S., \& {Maddox}, N.
845: 2006, \mnras, 369, 1521
846:
847: \bibitem[{{Wilson} {et~al.}(2001){Wilson}, {Kaiser}, {Luppino}, \&
848: {Cowie}}]{wilson01}
849: {Wilson}, G., {Kaiser}, N., {Luppino}, G.~A., \& {Cowie}, L.~L. 2001, \apj,
850: 555, 572
851:
852: \bibitem[{{Yan} \& {DEEP2 Team}(2006)}]{yan06}
853: {Yan}, R., \& {DEEP2 Team}. 2006, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical
854: Society, Vol.~38, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 1159
855:
856: \bibitem[{{Yee} {et~al.}(1996){Yee}, {Ellingson}, {Bechtold}, {Carlberg}, \&
857: {Cuillandre}}]{yee96}
858: {Yee}, H.~K.~C., {Ellingson}, E., {Bechtold}, J., {Carlberg}, R.~G., \&
859: {Cuillandre}, J.-C. 1996, \aj, 111, 1783
860:
861: \bibitem[York et al.(2000)]{york00} York, D.~G., et al.\ 2000,
862: \aj, 120, 1579
863: \end{thebibliography}
864:
865:
866: %------------- TABLE ----------------%
867:
868: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}
869: \tabletypesize{\small}
870: \rotate
871: \tablewidth{0pt}
872: \tablecaption{SDSS model magnitudes of objects making up the lens system.}
873: \tablehead{\colhead{object} & \colhead{coordinate} & \colhead{u} & \colhead{g} & \colhead{r} & \colhead{i} & \colhead{z}}
874: \startdata
875: A & SDSS J082728.87+223256.5 & 21.93 $\pm$ 0.62 & 21.57 $\pm$ 0.19 & 24.23 $\pm$ 2.29 & 23.39 $\pm$ 1.96 & 21.27 $\pm$ 0.95 \nl
876: B & SDSS J082728.70+223256.4 & 20.17 $\pm$ 0.07 & 20.18 $\pm$ 0.03 & 20.27 $\pm$ 0.05 & 19.42 $\pm$ 0.03 & 19.38 $\pm$ 0.09 \nl
877: C & SDSS J082728.86+223252.6 & 22.52 $\pm$ 0.27 & 24.11 $\pm$ 0.40 & 24.80 $\pm$ 0.66 & 23.9 $\pm$ 0.59 & 22.39 $\pm$ 0.43 \nl
878: G & SDSS J082728.83+223253.9 & 24.93 $\pm$ 2.07 & 20.45 $\pm$ 0.04 & 18.86 $\pm$ 0.02 & 18.24 $\pm$ 0.02 & 17.82 $\pm$ 0.03 \nl
879: \enddata
880: \tablecomments{Galactic extinction correction is not applied in this table.}
881: \end{deluxetable}
882:
883:
884: %------------- FIGURE ----------------%
885:
886:
887: \begin{figure}
888: \plotone{f1.eps}
889: \caption{SDSS gri composite cutout image of the lensing system,
890: with seeing of $\sim$ 1\farcs2.
891: Three lens images (A, B, and C),
892: as well as the lensing galaxy, are identified in the SDSS imaging pipeline.
893: The lensing galaxy is located in the field of a galaxy cluster. The red box represents the
894: galaxy SDSS J082728.62+223241.0, which has an SDSS spectrum with z=0.3346. North
895: is up and East is to the left in this figure.}
896: \label{fig:sdss_cutout}
897: \end{figure}
898:
899: \begin{figure}
900: \plotone{f2.eps}
901: \caption{Spectra of the lens images (A, B, and C) and the lensing galaxy (G). Wavelength is
902: given in the observed frame. The spectra
903: of the lens images A, B, and C have the same redshift of 0.766. The lensing galaxy has z = 0.349
904: as measured from the CaII K \& H, G-band, and Mg lines. Spectra B, C, and G were obtained using the
905: Subaru FOCAS instrument, while the spectrum of A is from the APO 3.5m DIS spectrograph. The inconsistency
906: of the continua of A and B is due to slit losses from atmospheric refraction.}
907: \label{fig:spectrum}
908: \end{figure}
909:
910: \begin{figure}
911: \plotone{f3.eps}
912: \caption{Subaru $V$-band image. The brightness peak positions of objects A, B, C, D, and G are measured
913: using SExtractor. North is up and East is to the left.}
914: \label{fig:Subaru_V}
915: \end{figure}
916:
917: \begin{figure}
918: \plottwo{f4a.eps}{f4b.eps}
919: \caption{Results of fitting a singular isothermal ellipsoid with
920: external shear to the positions of the four images. In the image plane {\it (left)},
921: the observed positions of lens images are shown as filled rectangles,
922: while the fitted positions
923: are given as open circles. The difference of the positions is $\sim$ 0\farcs2. The critical
924: curve of the fitted lens model {\it (solid line)} shows that the external shear plays
925: an important role and the direction of the quadrupole term is
926: toward the brightest cluster galaxy {\it (dashed arrow)}.
927: In the source plane {\it (right)}, the derived source position
928: {\it (filled rectangle)} is inside both the outer pseudo-caustic and
929: the astroid caustic.}
930: \label{fig:lens_model}
931: \end{figure}
932:
933:
934:
935: \begin{figure}
936: \plotone{f5.eps}
937: \caption{Color distribution and color-magnitude diagram of galaxies within 3\arcmin\ of the lensing galaxy
938: from SDSS imaging.
939: {\it (top)} The solid line shows the distribution of galaxies brighter than $r = 21.5$ within
940: 3\arcmin, while
941: the dashed line represents the color distribution of ellipticals only.
942: The color of the lensing galaxy
943: is shown as a point with 1$\sigma$ error. {\it (bottom)} The color-magnitude
944: diagram of ellipticals shows
945: the red sequence of a galaxy cluster. The lensing galaxy {\it (open triangle)}
946: is not the brightest elliptical in this cluster. All magnitudes and colors are corrected for Galactic
947: extinction based on \citet{schlegel98}.}
948: \label{fig:cluster}
949: \end{figure}
950:
951:
952:
953:
954:
955:
956: \end{document}
957: