1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
23: \documentclass{emulateapj}
24:
25: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
26:
27: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
28:
29: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
30: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
31: %% use the longabstract style option.
32:
33: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
34:
35: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
36: \newcommand{\myemail}{djess01@qub.ac.uk}
37:
38: \slugcomment{}
39:
40: \shorttitle{Transition-Region Velocity Oscillations Observed by EUNIS-06}
41: \shortauthors{D.B. Jess et al.}
42:
43: \begin{document}
44:
45: \title{Transition-Region Velocity Oscillations Observed by EUNIS-06}
46:
47: \author{D. B. Jess}
48: \affil{Astrophysics Research Centre, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University, Belfast, BT7~1NN,
49: Northern Ireland, U.K.}
50: \affil{}
51: \affil{NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Solar Physics Laboratory, Code 671, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA}
52: \email{djess01@qub.ac.uk}
53:
54: %\and
55:
56: %\author{\bf{other important people such as Doug, Roger, Mihalis, Jeff, Francis........}}
57: %\affil{Planet Earch, Milky Way, Universe}
58:
59: \author{D. M. Rabin and R. J. Thomas}
60: \affil{NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Solar Physics Laboratory, Code 671, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA}
61:
62:
63: \author{J. W. Brosius}
64: \affil{Catholic University of America at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Solar Physics Laboratory, Code 671, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA}
65:
66: \and
67:
68: \author{M. Mathioudakis and F. P. Keenan}
69: \affil{Astrophysics Research Centre, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University, Belfast, BT7~1NN,
70: Northern Ireland, U.K.}
71:
72:
73:
74: \begin{abstract}
75:
76: Spectroscopic measurements of AR NOAA 10871, obtained with the Extreme Ultraviolet Normal Incidence
77: Spectrograph (EUNIS) sounding rocket instrument on 2006 April 12, reveal velocity oscillations in the
78: He~II 303.8\AA~emission line formed at $T~\approx~5~\times~10^{4}$~K. The oscillations appear to arise
79: in a bright active-region loop arcade about 25$''$~wide which crosses the EUNIS slit. The period of these
80: transition region oscillations is
81: 26~$\pm$~4~s, coupled with a velocity amplitude of $\pm~10$ km/s, detected over 4 complete cycles. Similar oscillations
82: are observed in lines formed at temperatures up to $T \approx 4 \times 10^5$~K, but we find no evidence for the
83: coupling of these velocity oscillations with corresponding phenomena in the corona. We interpret the detected
84: oscillations as originating from an almost purely adiabatic plasma, and infer that they are generated
85: by the resonant transmission of MHD waves through the lower active-region atmospheres. Through use of seismological
86: techniques, we establish that the observed velocity oscillations display wave properties most characteristic of
87: fast-body global sausage modes.
88:
89: \end{abstract}
90:
91: \keywords{Sun: activity --- Sun: oscillations --- Sun: transition region --- Sun: UV radiation}
92:
93:
94:
95: \section{Introduction}
96: \label{intro}
97:
98: The discovery of solar oscillations in the 1960s (Leighton~1960) and the identification of individual wave modes
99: enabled accurate information on the properties of the solar interior to be established. These discoveries thereafter developed
100: into the prominent research area of helioseismology (Pomerantz~et~al.~1985; Duvall~\& Harvey~1984; Scherrer~et~al.~1982).
101: The discovery of oscillations in coronal structures raised the prospect of using
102: these oscillations as a diagnostic tool to establish coronal loop parameters.
103: The field of coronal seismology subsequently emerged (Roberts~2000; Aschwanden~et~al.~2004; Nakariakov~et~al.~2004; Ofman~2007).
104: The identification of waves with wavelengths shorter than the size of typical coronal structures imposes
105: great demands on current spectrocscopic and imaging instruments. The contribution of high frequency waves to the
106: heating of coronal structures may be significant (Porter et al. 1994). However, current space-borne instruments lack the
107: necessary spatial, spectral and temporal resolution required to probe such small-scale structures.
108: Extensive analyses of photospheric oscillations has shown evidence for high-frequency, reconnection-driven acoustic wave trains
109: (Jess~et~al.~2007b). High-cadence observations of the upper solar atmosphere are much more scarce, primarily due to telemetry
110: restrictions imposed by space-borne experiments.
111: One such study was carried out by Williams~et~al.~\cite{Wil01} who detected a 6~s intensity oscillation associated with an
112: active region coronal loop. This oscillation was subsequently interpreted as a fast-mode, impulsively generated, magneto-acoustic
113: wave (Williams~et~al.~2002).
114:
115: \begin{figure*}
116: \epsscale{0.8}
117: \plotone{f1.eps}
118: \caption{The top panel shows the EUNIS LW~slit position, at the start of the ``stare'' sequence, after coalignment with
119: {\sc{eit}}'s 304\AA~image. The middle panel shows a snapshot of the LW detector, cropped to only include contributions from the
120: He~II emission line, as a function of position along the slit. The lower panel plots the integrated He~II intensity
121: as a function of position along the slit. Both the middle and lower panels are overplotted with vertical
122: dashed lines indicating the boundaries of three bright transition-region features, outlined in \S~\ref{analy}. Velocity
123: oscillations were detected in Feature~2.
124: \label{fig1}}
125: \end{figure*}
126:
127:
128: The transition region, with a very dynamic nature over an inherently small depth, provides a regime to fully explore the
129: potential coupling of underlying wave trains to those found in the corona (Doschek~2006).
130: Recent work by G\"{o}m\"{o}ry~et~al.~\cite{Gom06} discusses the detection of transition region velocity oscillations with periodicities
131: in the range 250--450~s and proposes this as evidence of downward propagating waves. Doyle~et~al.~\cite{Doy98} found transition region
132: intensity oscillations with periods ranging from 200--500~s, while Hansteen~et~al.~\cite{Han00} report both intensity and velocity
133: oscillations in the transition region with periods ranging from 100--300~s. Additionally, De~Pontieu~et~al.~\cite{DeP05} find, through
134: use of numerical models, that oscillations generated in the photosphere can propagate into the corona providing they are guided
135: along an inclined magnetic flux tube. Although there have been many detections of transition-region oscillations, space-borne
136: instrumentation lacks the temporal resolution required to probe waves with frequencies above 33~mHz in this part of the solar
137: atmosphere. The reason for this may be the lack of instruments available which are sensitive enough to obtain good count
138: statistics, while maintaining short exposure times necessary for high-cadence observations. In order to probe physical processes
139: occurring in the transition region on time scales less than 1~min, it is imperative to acquire data at the highest possible cadence
140: using a sensitive camera system.
141:
142: Here we report velocity oscillations detected in the transition region using an Extreme Ultraviolet Normal Incidence
143: Spectrograph (EUNIS) sounding rocket instrument developed at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center. In \S~2 we provide a brief outline
144: of the observations, while in \S~3 we discuss the methodologies used during
145: the analysis of the data and the search for reliable oscillatory signatures. A discussion of our results in the context of
146: velocity oscillations is in \S~4, and finally, our concluding remarks are given in \S~5.
147:
148:
149: \section{Observations}
150: \label{observations}
151:
152: EUNIS was launched from White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, at 1810~UT on 2006 April~12. It achieved a maximum
153: altitude of 313~km and obtained solar spectra and images between 1812 and 1818~UT. EUNIS observed NOAA AR~10871
154: (S07E28) and AR~10870 (S08W02), the quiet area between them, and a southern-hemisphere coronal bright point within
155: the quiet area. For the present study, we are concerned with 75 solar exposures taken during a ``stare'' (fixed pointing)
156: mode near the start of the flight, with constant 1.024~s durations. Each of the data frames consist of imaged EUV spectra along a
157: slit 660$''$ long, together with spectroheliograms (called lobe images) formed by 200$''$ wide areas
158: beyond the two slit ends which are used for spatial registration. For this analysis, we will focus on the long-wave [LW] channel,
159: where the spectral coverage ranges from 300\AA~to 370\AA, with an associated cadence of~$\approx~2$~s. Further observations in
160: scanning (spectroheliogram) mode are not discussed
161: here. Additional details regarding the EUNIS instrument can be found in Brosius~et~al.~\cite{Bro07}.
162:
163:
164:
165: \section{Data Analysis}
166: \label{analy}
167:
168: Processing the EUNIS images was performed by subtracting an average dark frame obtained in flight, debiasing
169: each detector row with a linear fit to the unilluminated ends, correcting for non-linear detector response, and applying
170: a flat-field image obtained in the laboratory after the flight. Radiometric calibration, carried out post-flight at
171: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, and corrections for atmospheric extinction, are also included. Brosius~et~al.~\cite{Bro08} discuss
172: validation of the EUNIS relative and absolute radiometric calibration.
173:
174:
175: \begin{figure}
176: \epsscale{1.0}
177: \plotone{f2.eps}
178: \caption{The slit-averaged wavelength (star symbols) for each of the 75 one-second stare exposures, plotted
179: as a function of time from the start of the ``stare'' sequence. For each exposure, the slit-averaged wavelength was derived
180: by taking the average of
181: the fitted centroid wavelength for each spatial pixel along the slit, as outlined in \S~\ref{analy}. Notice the decrease
182: in wavelength, with exposure number, believed to be caused by thermal effects within the EUNIS payload. Overplotted on
183: the diagram, using a solid, bold line, is a least-squares fit to the data, which is used to remove this systematic
184: wavelength shift.
185: \label{wave_drift}}
186: \end{figure}
187:
188:
189: Comparison of EUNIS He~II 303.8\AA~lobe images with a full Sun He~II image obtained at 1812 UT with {\sc{soho}}'s
190: {\sc{eit}} reveals that the EUNIS~LW slit was tilted about 1.5$^{\circ}$ counterclockwise from the solar E-W axis, and that this
191: angle remained
192: stable in time. The EUNIS~LW field of view was initially centered at (x~=~-193$''$, y~=~-83$''$), but its pointing drifted at
193: a steady rate of about 0.04$''$~s$^{-1}$ in both the x- and y-directions, which corresponds to a net drift in each dimension
194: of about 6$''$ during the 167~s spent in this mode. Due to the drift in the solar x-direction being along the slit axis, we
195: were able to remove this spatial shift through co-alignment techniques. Implementing Fourier cross-correlation routines as well
196: as squared mean absolute deviations, we were able to provide sub-pixel co-alignment accuracy. However, it must be noted that
197: sub-pixel image shifting was not implemented due to the substantial interpolation errors which may accompany this
198: technique. Drift of the EUNIS~LW field of view in the solar y-direction was not compensated for since the overall drift is
199: greater than the $\approx~2''$ slit-width.
200:
201: After co-alignment of the EUNIS LW spectra, we averaged over three spatial pixels for a net spatial pixel size of $2.8''$.~Line fits
202: were then made using Gaussian profiles on linear backgrounds, resulting in values of the centroid position, integrated intensity,
203: and FWHM, together with their corresponding uncertainties, at each spatial location along the slit and for each EUNIS exposure.
204: Figure 1 shows the pointing of the EUNIS LW slit near the beginning of ``stare'' sequence, along with the simultaneous He II slit
205: image and corresponding line intensity as a function of position along the slit. Active Region NOAA 10871, which is the subject of
206: this paper, is located towards the left-hand side of Figure 1. The EUNIS spectral resolution for this first flight was
207: $\approx 200$~m\AA~FWHM in the LW channel; still, the centroids of strong lines, such as with He II reported here, can be
208: determined with a statistical uncertainty of $\pm 2$~km/s or better (Brosius et al. 2007).
209:
210: Since EUNIS does not provide an absolute wavelength scale, velocities reported here are relative to average values measured across
211: individual solar features. For example, Figure~\ref{wave_drift} shows the slit-averaged He II central wavelength as a function of time
212: from the
213: start of the EUNIS stare sequence, and reveals a systematic shift toward shorter wavelength. The wavelength drift is modest, less than
214: 1~pixel over the whole flight, but real. Its characteristics are identical in all observed LW lines, and does not depend on the solar
215: feature being observed. These facts, coupled with the shape of the drift with time, suggest it is due to thermal changes within the
216: payload resulting in a tilt of the grating within its dispersion plane. To
217: remove this effect, a least-squares linear fit is performed, after which the resulting trend is removed from the data leaving pure
218: deviations relative to the average value measured across the solar feature. Portions of the He II slit image were analysed based on
219: their relative magnitudes. Figure~1 shows the isolation of three distinct and intense features corresponding to a coronal bright
220: point and two enhancements in AR~NOAA~10871.
221:
222: Relative He~II velocities as a function of time are generated for each of the three features
223: shown in Figure 1. Since the spatial averaging of three pixels has already been performed
224: to improve the signal-to-noise ratio, no additional averaging was required. Thus, spatially resolved
225: velocities are determined for each solar feature, allowing for more precise diagnostics.
226: Before temporal analysis of the dataset can be implemented, timing corrections must be
227: considered. During the stare mode investigated here, all exposure durations were exactly
228: the same, namely 1.024~s. However, time-intervals between a small number of exposures varied somewhat.
229: To compensate for this timing irregularity, all line-fit parameters were
230: interpolated onto a constant-cadence time series with linear interpolation performed between data points. During this interpolation
231: procedure approximately 15\% of all data points required a timing correction.
232: This provides the necessary platform for temporal studies to commence.
233:
234: All spatially-resolved He~II velocity measurements were passed into Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and wavelet analysis routines.
235: While a FFT searches for periodic signatures by decomposing the input signal into infinite length sinusoidal wavetrains using a
236: basic exponential function, wavelet analysis utilizes a time localised oscillatory function continuous in both frequency and
237: time (Bloomfield~et~al.~2004) and is therefore highly suited in the search for transient oscillations. The wavelet chosen for
238: this study is known as a Morlet wavelet and is the modulation of a sinusoid by a Gaussian envelope (Torrence \&~Compo~1998).
239: Strict criteria were implemented during wavelet analysis to insure that oscillatory signatures correspond to real periodicities.
240: The first is a test against spurious detections of power that may be due to Poisson noise, where the input time series is
241: assumed to be normally distributed (consistent with photon noise) and following a $\chi^{2}$ distribution with two degrees
242: of freedom. A 99\% confidence level is calculated by multiplying the power in the background spectrum by the values of
243: $\chi^{2}$ corresponding to the 99th percentile of the distribution (Torrence \&~Compo~1998, Mathioudakis~et~al.~2003).
244:
245:
246:
247: \begin{figure*}
248: \epsscale{0.8}
249: \plotone{f3.eps}
250: \caption{Wavelet diagram showing the detection of a 26~$\pm$~4~s periodic velocity oscillation in He~II, over four complete cycles,
251: originating from Feature~2 (see Fig.~\ref{fig1}). The original He~II velocity time series is plotted in a) with arrows indicating
252: the peaks of the oscillation. The wavelet power transform along with locations where detected power is at, or
253: above, the 99\% confidence level are contained within the contours in b). Plot c) shows the summation of the wavelet power
254: transform over time (full line) and the Fast Fourier power spectrum (crosses) over time, plotted as a function of period.
255: Both methods have detected a well pronounced 26~s oscillation. The cone of influence (COI), cross-hatched area in the plot,
256: defines an area in the wavelet diagram where edge effects become important and as such any frequencies inside the COI are
257: disregarded. Periods above the horizontal line (dashed) fall within the COI.
258: \label{wavelet1}}
259: \end{figure*}
260:
261:
262:
263:
264: The second criterion applied is a comparison of the input time series with a large number (1500) of randomized time-series
265: with an identical distribution of counts. The probability, $p$, of detecting non-periodic power is calculated
266: for the peak power at each timestep by comparing the value of power found in the input time series with the number of times
267: that the power transform of the randomized series produces a peak of equal or greater power. A percentage confidence is attributed
268: to the peak power at every time step in the wavelet transform by $(1 - p) \times 100$, such that a high value of $p$ implies
269: that there is no periodic signal in the data, while a low value suggests that the detected periodicity is real
270: (see Banerjee~et~al.~2001).
271:
272: Our final wavelet criterion is the exclusion of oscillations which last, in duration, less than $1.41$ cycles. This is consistent
273: with the decorrelation time defined by Torrence~\& Compo~\cite{Tor98}. One can distinguish between a spike in the data and a
274: harmonious periodic component at the equivalent Fourier frequency by comparing the width of a peak in the wavelet power spectrum
275: with the decorrelation time. From this, the oscillation lifetime at the period of each power maximum is defined as the interval
276: of time from when the power supersedes 95\% significance to when it subsequently dips
277: below 95\% significance (McAteer~et~al.~2004). The lifetime was then divided by the period to give a lifetime in terms
278: of complete cycles (Ireland~et~al.~1999). Any oscillations which last for less than this minimum duration were discarded as they
279: may have simply been a spike in the time series.
280:
281: Wavelet power, for a variety of oscillatory periods which lay above the 95\% significance level, was saved as the output of
282: this analysis.
283:
284:
285:
286: \section{Results and Discussion}
287: \label{results}
288:
289:
290:
291: %Active Region NOAA~10871 shows clear signatures of high-frequency velocity %oscillations originating from within the transition
292: %region.
293: In Figure~\ref{wavelet1}, it is clear to see a strong 26~s oscillatory signal, coupled with an amplitude of $\pm$10~km/s,
294: lasting in excess of four complete cycles. Through examination of the FWHM of corresponding Fourier and global spectra, in
295: addition to the boundaries of the 99\% confidence-level contours, we can associate an error of $\pm$~4~s to the detected periodic
296: signal. This oscillatory frequency is much higher than previously detected and originates from the most westerly part of the
297: active region (Feature~2). Similar analysis of the intensity variation of Feature~2 reveals no intensity oscillations at this
298: location. Through closer examination of the {\sc{eit}}~304\AA~image,
299: the location of strong oscillatory power originates from a particularly bright part of AR~NOAA~10871.
300: Due to the EUNIS instrument providing spatially-resolved spectra, pixels of the EUNIS slit corresponding to this bright
301: feature (eight in total) were analysed in full. Each pixel, corresponding to a spatial scale of 2.8$''$ (as outlined in
302: \S~\ref{analy}), provides high oscillatory power at a 26~s periodicity. Furthermore, no phase difference between neighboring
303: pixels was found indicating that this oscillatory phenomena is of substantial physical size (in excess of 20$''$). The fact that the
304: signal remains coherent during pointing drifts perpendicular to the slit-direction indicates a size of at least 6$''$ in
305: that dimension as well. Additional
306: transition region lines were also studied, consisting of the Mg~VI~349.2\AA~($T~\approx~4.0\times10^{5}$~K), Ne~IV~358.7\AA~
307: ($T~\approx~1.6\times10^{5}$~K) and Ne~V~359.4\AA~($T~\approx~3.2\times10^{5}$~K) emission lines. All of these emission lines
308: corroborate the detection of the 26~s velocity oscillation in Feature~2. However, due to these lines being much weaker when compared
309: to He~II, the resulting reduction in signal-to-noise means that the confidence levels associated with these detections are reduced.
310: Nevertheless, a strong 26~s oscillatory signal over four complete cycles, with confidence levels exceeding 85\% in each instance,
311: is observed in transition region emission lines formed at temperatures up to $4 \times 10^5$~K.
312:
313:
314: Due to the full-disk nature of {\sc{eit}} and {\sc{mdi}} images, these can be accurately co-aligned by forcing the solar limbs to
315: agree (L\'{o}pez Fuentes~et~al.~2006). Through multiple coalignments an uncertainty between {\sc{eit}} and {\sc{mdi}} images
316: converges to approximately 0.5 of an {\sc{eit}} pixel, or 1$''$. This is an intermediary step which allows subsequent co-alignment of
317: {\sc{trace}} images to {\sc{mdi}} magnetograms. Upon
318: inspection of a co-aligned {\sc{trace}}~195\AA~image, it is clear that the oscillatory phenomena is generated in the immediate vicinity
319: of a coronal loop structure (Fig.~\ref{mdi_eit_trace}). This,
320: coupled with the strong underlying photospheric magnetic-field (top panel of Fig.~\ref{mdi_eit_trace}),
321: suggest that this could be an observational signature of a propagating MHD wave. Highly magnetic structures,
322: such as coronal loops, can act as superior wave guides (Edwin~\& Roberts~1983), which allow the efficient propagation of MHD waves.
323: To search for upward propagating waves, we perform the same rigorous analysis on co-spatial coronal emission lines. For this, we
324: choose the strong Mg~IX~368.1\AA~($T~\approx~9.5\times10^{5}$~K), Fe~XIV~334.2\AA~($T~\approx~2.0~\times~10^{6}$~K), and
325: Fe~XVI~335.4/360.8\AA~($T~\approx~2.5~\times~10^{6}$~K) emission lines. Due to structures at one level in the solar atmosphere
326: not always overlying the structures to which they are connected to at other levels in the atmosphere, we included additional EUNIS pixels
327: during our search for coronal oscillations. Due to the EUNIS slit being one-dimensional, we are unable to investigate any oscillatory
328: behavior at
329: locations North and South of the EUNIS pointing. However, we analyse pixels lying to the East and West of the detected He II
330: oscillations. We incorporate an extra four pixels in each direction into our investigation totalling an additional 22.4$''$.
331: After searching for simultaneous oscillations in these
332: lines, no velocity perturbations could be found in the corona. Additionally, no periodic signatures in coronal
333: emission intensities could be found implying that our detected transition-region oscillations are not propagating out into
334: the corona.
335: %This does not mean, however, that there are no upward
336: %waves propagating into the corona (or indeed downward from
337: %the corona). Due to the inclination of magnetic-field lines and large height separation between the transition region and outer corona,
338: %the term ``co-spatial'' might be misleading. Features which lie at the same solar co-ordinates, but which are seen in different
339: %wavelengths, may in fact correspond to different parts of the same feature. If this is the case, and due to the narrow slit used
340: %in the EUNIS instrument, variations of a few arcsec (line-of-sight effects between transition region and corona), in the solar-y
341: %direction, may lead to the inability to accurately analyse the same solar feature at multiple heights. Nevertheless, full analysis
342: %of the western limb of AR~NOAA~10871 (Feature~2) yields no detectable oscillations in the coronal emission lines outlined above.
343:
344: To check the validity, and reliability, of our detected He~II velocity oscillation, we examine the results of analysing two
345: additional features mentioned in \S~\ref{analy}. One feature corresponds to the central portion of AR~NOAA~10871 (Feature~1),
346: while the second coincides with the coronal bright point found to the west of the active region (Feature~3). Examining these
347: two features in detail reveals no signatures of He~II velocity oscillations. It is interesting to note that Feature~1
348: overlies a region of opposite magnetic polarity to that of Feature~2 (Fig.~\ref{mdi_eit_trace}). Additionally,
349: the {\sc{mdi}} magnetogram shows that the magnetic field is stronger for Feature~2 than for
350: Feature~1. In accordance with the theory of Edwin~\& Roberts~\cite{Edw83}, this may imply that the magnetic structuring around
351: Feature~2 may act as a better waveguide than the magnetic field found
352: surrounding Feature~1. Additionally, the velocity fluctuations of the He~II line are consistent with the relative Doppler velocities
353: reported by Brosius~et~al.~\cite{Bro07}.
354:
355:
356: \begin{figure}
357: \epsscale{1.1}
358: \plotone{f4.eps}
359: \caption{Top panel shows an {\sc{mdi}} magnetogram, the middle panel shows an {\sc{eit}}~304\AA~transition~region image, and the
360: bottom panel
361: shows a {\sc{trace}}~195\AA~coronal image. Each image was taken around the time of the EUNIS launch, and therefore acts as a good
362: two-dimensional reference to compare with the one-dimensional, spectroscopic results of EUNIS. Overplotted in each diagram
363: are the vertical dashed lines corresponding to the boundaries of Features~1 and~2 (\S~\ref{analy} and Fig.~\ref{fig1}), as well
364: as He~II intensity contours from the EUNIS~LW~slit. Notice how Features~1 and~2 are located very close to regions of opposite
365: magnetic polarity.
366: \label{mdi_eit_trace}}
367: \end{figure}
368:
369:
370: Such a scenario leaves open the issue of what causes these transition region velocity oscillations. De~Pontieu~et~al.~\cite{DeP03}
371: state there is a general correspondence between p-modes and upper transition region oscillations, in duration, periods, and locations
372: of oscillatory power. Priest~\cite{Pri82} explains that the superposition of p-mode oscillations usually results in wavetrains
373: containing 4 or 5 cycles, after being emitted from the photosphere. This is corroborated by De~Pontieu~et~al.~\cite{DeP03} who find
374: transition region oscillations typically consisting of wavetrains 3--7 cycles long. The cycle lifetimes stated by
375: De~Pontieu~et~al.~\cite{DeP03} and Priest~\cite{Pri82} match closely our findings, however, these pressure driven modes cannot
376: explain the velocity oscillations presented in this work. Traditionally, transition region velocity oscillations, surrounding an
377: active region, have been interpreted as the
378: signature of resonant transmission of chromospheric umbral oscillations (Thomas~et~al.~1987). Previously detected transition region
379: velocity oscillations have associated periods of 129--173~s (Gurman~et~al.~1982) and directly corroborate the work of
380: Thomas~et~al.~\cite{Tho87}.
381:
382: Since there are no low-temperature lines in the EUV bandpasses of EUNIS, it provides no direct information about chromospheric
383: plasmas. Therefore, we are unable to provide a quantitative comparison to the work of Gurman~et~al.~\cite{Gur82}, who detect transition
384: region and chromospheric velocity oscillation interplay in highly magnetic structures. Nevertheless, the fact that we detect pure
385: velocity oscillations, with no intensity variation, implies that we are dealing with an almost purely adiabatic plasma
386: (Rendtel~et~al.~2003). Models of coupled resonators (\v{Z}ug\v{z}da~et~al.~1983, 1987; Settele~et~al.~1999), which explain the resonant
387: transmission of MHD waves through active-region atmospheres, require regions of strong wave reflection, e.g. from the
388: steep temperature gradient found within the transition region. Consequently, according to Rendtel~et~al.~\cite{Ren03},
389: velocity oscillations may be observed in the EUV lines of active regions as a result of resonant transmission. If
390: intensity oscillations were found to accompany
391: transition region velocity waves, this would hint at a non-adiabatic system consisting of isothermal waves (Staude~et~al.~1985).
392: Such a distinction is important, as it indicates that the solar transition region plasma for Feature~2 is adiabatic in nature, and
393: experiences strong, non-stationary behaviour over the duration of the EUNIS stare mode. Therefore, through
394: comparison of our results to those of Gurman~et~al.~\cite{Gur82}, Rendtel~et~al.~\cite{Ren03} and Thomas~et~al.~\cite{Tho87},
395: we can infer that our detected transition region velocity oscillations are similar in both amplitude and location to those
396: found interacting with chromospheric plasma (Brynildsen~et~al.~1999). We find the oscillations propagating in a concentrated magnetic
397: field region with much higher frequencies than reported to date.
398:
399: Of particular importance is the ability to place the observed He~II oscillation onto a dispersion diagram (Edwin~\&~Roberts~1983).
400: From this diagram, it is possible to infer the exact mode of propagation in relation to fast- or slow-body waves.
401: Several kinds of wave modes have been directly observed with the {\sc{trace}} and {\sc{soho}}
402: spacecraft, as well as with ground-based telescopes (Aschwanden~et~al~1999, Wang~et~al.~2002). It is of
403: particular interest that these wave modes, through use of MHD seismology techniques,
404: can be deduced from simple plasma parameters such as electron density and magnetic-field strength
405: (Nakariakov~et~al.~1999, Nakariakov~\& Ofman~2001). One particular mode, the sausage mode, has been typically used to interpret
406: short periodicities of less than one minute. The sausage mode is based on an assumption whereby
407: the period of this mode is determined by the ratio of the cross-sectional radius to the Alfv\'{e}n speed inside the
408: waveguide (Meerson et al. 1978). The global sausage mode (GSM) is a fast-MHD mode which can efficiently modulate the plasma
409: density and magnetic field strength. It is also one of the principal modes that can be excited in active regions providing
410: the magnetic waveguide is sufficiently thick and dense. In order to assess whether the
411: GSM can be supported in the transition region of AR~NOAA~10871, we require information on the plasma temperature,
412: electron density and magnetic field strength.
413:
414: For this assessment, we choose a plasma temperature of $T~\approx~5~\times~10^{4}$~K (the formation temperature of He~II), an
415: internal-waveguide electron density of
416: $n_{e}^{i}~\approx~10^{11.5}$~cm$^{-3}$, an external-waveguide electron density of $n_{e}^{e}~\approx~10^{10.7}$~cm$^{-3}$ and
417: a magnetic field strength of 25~G. These values are consistent with previously measured transition region values
418: (Parnell~et~al.~2002, P\'{e}rez~et~al.~1999). The GSM exists if the dimensionless wave number, $k\alpha$, is greater than
419: the cut-off value,
420: \begin{equation}
421: k_c\alpha = j_0\sqrt{\frac{(C_{S0}^2 + C_{A0}^2)(C_{Ae}^2 - C_{T0}^2)}
422: {(C_{Ae}^2 -C_{A0}^2)(C_{Ae}^2 - C_{S0}^2)}}
423: \end{equation}
424: where $\alpha$ is the waveguide radius and $j_0$~=~2.4 is the first zero of the Bessel function $J_{0}(x)$, as detailed in Edwin~\&
425: Roberts~\cite{Edw83}.
426: $C_{A0}$ and $C_{Ae}$ are the
427: internal and external Alfv\'{e}n speeds, while $C_{S0}$ and $C_{T0}$~=~$C_{S0}C_{A0}$/$(C_{S0}^{2}+C_{A0}^{2})^{1/2}$ are the
428: internal sound and tube speeds, respectively. These values can be derived directly
429: from our input parameters described above, and following the criteria
430: outlined in Nakariakov~et~al.~\cite{Nak03}, we can determine if this mode can explain the
431: oscillations presented here. We derive the associated cut-off value, $k_{c}\alpha$, to be 1.12. In order to
432: see whether the observed wave train is a fast- or slow-body wave, we relate the detected periodicity, $P$, to
433: the internal Alfv\'{e}n speed, whereby a fast-body wave will be present if:
434: \begin{equation}
435: \alpha > \frac{j_{0} C_{A0} P}{2 \pi} .
436: \end{equation}
437:
438: Substituting known values into Equation~2, we find that the minimum diameter of the waveguide
439: required to channel fast-body waves is $\approx$~1800~km. We can use co-spatial coronal observations
440: to provide an estimate of the diameter of the transition-region waveguide.
441: %Due to the diffuse nature of
442: %transition-region plasma, the waveguide diameter should be larger in the %transition region when compared to
443: %its value in the corona.
444: By measuring the co-spatial width of coronal loops seen in the {\sc{trace}}~195\AA~images,
445: we establish an average loop width of 7~{\sc{trace}}~pixels, corresponding to a diameter of $\approx$~2500~km. This measured
446: width is consistent with previous {\sc{trace}} statistical loop measurements (Aschwanden~et~al.~2000, Aschwanden~\&~Nightingale~2005)
447: and is greater than the minimum diameter required to channel fast-body waves. Accompanying our derived
448: $k_{c}\alpha$ value, we deem that a fast-MHD wave ({\emph{i.e.}}, the global sausage mode) could explain the
449: origins of the detected He~II velocity oscillation (Fig~\ref{omegak}). In addition to He~II, the warmer
450: transition region lines for which periodic velocity oscillations were detected are also consistent with the global sausage mode.
451: Increasing the line-formation temperature from $5~\times~10^{4}$ to $4.0\times10^{5}$~K leads to an increase in the sound and tube
452: speeds, whereas the internal and external Alfv\'{e}n speeds remain unchanged. As a result, the cut-off value is increased, thus
453: maintaining the validity of the GSM as the most favorable mode of propagation.
454:
455:
456: \begin{figure}
457: \epsscale{1.0}
458: \plotone{f5.eps}
459: \caption{Phase speed $\omega/k$ is shown for magneto-acoustic waves in a cylindrical
460: waveguide (with radius $\alpha$) as a function of the dimensionless longitudinal wavenumber $k\alpha$ under
461: the transition-region/coronal conditions $C_{Ae} > C_{A0} > C_{T0} > C_{S0}$. Solid lines show the sausage modes, while
462: the dashed lines indicate kink modes (Edwin~\& Roberts~1983). The solid red box indicates the region
463: on the dispersion curve in which the observed He~II velocity oscillations lie.
464: \label{omegak}}
465: \end{figure}
466:
467:
468: However, it must be noted that the cutoff value, $k_{c}\alpha$,
469: is extremely sensitive to the assumed values of magnetic field strength and electron density, through their relationship with the
470: Alfv\'{e}n speed, $C_{A}$. Furthermore, the magnetic field strength is almost always an inferred measure (Parnell~et~al.~2002)
471: and exerts a stronger variation on the Alfv\'{e}n speed due to a linear dependence between them. Therefore, caution must be
472: exercised when evaluating the mode of propagation. In this instance, the GSM appears to be the most favorable mode of propagation,
473: although for a definitive answer, values of magnetic field strength and electron density must first be determined accurately.
474:
475:
476: \section{Concluding Remarks}
477: \label{conc}
478:
479: We have presented direct evidence of high-frequency waves propagating in an active region, at transition region heights. We have
480: shown the location of 26~s oscillatory signatures, with significance levels greater than 95\% due to the rigorous wavelet criteria
481: enforced in \S~\ref{analy}. The velocity oscillations detected here originate from a large ($>$ 20$''$), bright He~II structure
482: crossing the EUNIS slit on
483: the westerly edge of AR~NOAA~10871. The highest temperature at which we observe this oscillation is $4 \times 10^5$~K, but we find no
484: evidence for upward propagation of this wave train into the corona, and infer,
485: qualitatively, that the detected oscillations could be caused by the resonant transmission interplay between the
486: chromosphere and transition region. We deduce that the observed velocity oscillations exhibit signatures of a fast-MHD wave - in
487: particular, that of the fast-body global sausage wave mode.
488: The work of De Pontieu~et~al.~\cite{DeP03} emphasizes the coupling of transition region oscillations to those in the underlying
489: photosphere. A natural extension of this work is to investigate if such a correspondence also exists in the high frequency
490: domain (see Jess~et~al.~2007a for high-frequency photospheric analysis).
491:
492: %The second launch of the EUNIS payload took place on 2007 November 06,
493: %enabling the search for high-frequency velocity and intensity oscillations in the outer solar atmosphere to continue. A better
494: %spectral resolution is expected, compared to the first flight, which will enable much weaker velocity and intensity
495: %perturbations to be measured.
496:
497:
498:
499:
500:
501: \acknowledgments
502:
503: DBJ is supported by a Northern Ireland Department for Employment and Learning studentship. DBJ additionally thanks NASA
504: Goddard Space Flight Center for a CAST studentship -- in particular Doug Rabin, Roger Thomas and Jeff Brosius deserve special
505: thanks for their endless help, support and scientific input. FPK is grateful to AWE Aldermaston for the award of a William Penney
506: Fellowship. The EUNIS program is supported by the NASA Heliophysics
507: Division through its Low Cost Access to Space Program in Solar and Heliospheric Physics. We thank the entire EUNIS team for
508: the concerted effort that led to a successful flight. Wavelet software was provided by C. Torrence and G.P. Compo.
509: \footnote{Wavelet software is available at http://paos.colorado.edu/research/wavelets/.}
510:
511: \begin{thebibliography}{}
512:
513: \bibitem[1999]{Asc99}
514: Aschwanden, M. J., Fletcher, L., Schrijver, C. J., \& Alexander, D., 1999, ApJ, 520, 880
515: \bibitem[2000]{Asc00}
516: Aschwanden, M. J., Nightingale, R. W., \& Alexander, David, 2000, ApJ, 541, 1059
517: \bibitem[2004]{Asc04}
518: Aschwanden, M. J., Nakariakov, V. M., \& Melnikov, V. F., 2004, ApJ, 600, 458
519: \bibitem[2005]{Asc05}
520: Aschwanden, M. J., \& Nightingale, R. W., 2005, ApJ, 633, 499
521: \bibitem[2001]{Ban01}
522: Banerjee, D., O'Shea, E., Doyle, J. G., \& Goossens, M., 2001, A\&A, 371, 1137
523: \bibitem[2004]{Blo04}
524: Bloomfield, D. S., McAteer, R. T. J., Mathioudakis, M., Williams, D. R., \& Keenan, F. P., 2004, ApJ, 604, 936
525: \bibitem[2007]{Bro07}
526: Brosius, J. W., Rabin, D. M., \& Thomas, R. J., 2007, ApJL, 656, 41
527: \bibitem[2008]{Bro08}
528: Brosius, J. W., Rabin, D. M., Thomas, R. J., \& Landi, E., 2008, ApJ, 677, in press
529: \bibitem[1999]{Bry99}
530: Brynildsen, N., Kjeldseth-Moe, O., Maltbys, P., \& Wilhelm, K., 1999, ApJL, 517, 159
531: \bibitem[2003]{DeP03}
532: De Pontieu, B., Erd\'{e}lyi, R., \& De Wijn, A. G., 2003, ApJL, 595, 63
533: \bibitem[2005]{DeP05}
534: De Pontieu, B., Erd\'{e}lyi, R., \& De Moortel, I., 2005, ApJL, 624, 61
535: \bibitem[2006]{Dos06}
536: Doschek, G. A., 2006, ApJ, 649, 515
537: \bibitem[1998]{Doy98}
538: Doyle, J. G., van den Oord, G. H. J., O'Shea, E., \& Banerjee, D., 1998, Sol. Phys., 181, 51
539: \bibitem[1984]{Duv84}
540: Duvall, T. L., \& Harvey, J. W., 1984, Nature, 310, 19
541: \bibitem[1983]{Edw83}
542: Edwin, P. M., \& Roberts, B., 1983, Sol. Phys., 88, 179
543: \bibitem[2006]{Gom06}
544: G\"{o}m\"{o}ry, P., Ryb\'{a}k, J., Ku\v{c}era, A., Curdt, W., \& W\"{o}hl, H., 2006, A\&A, 448, 1169
545: \bibitem[1982]{Gur82}
546: Gurman, J. B., Leibacher, J. W., Shine, R. A., Woodgate, B. E., \& Henze, W., 1982, ApJ, 253, 939
547: \bibitem[2000]{Han00}
548: Hansteen, V. H., Betta, R., \& Carlsson, M., 2000, A\&A, 360, 742
549: \bibitem[1999]{Ire99}
550: Ireland, J., Walsh, R. W., Harrison, R. A., \& Priest, E. R., 1999, A\&A, 347, 355
551: \bibitem[2007]{Jes07a}
552: Jess, D. B., Andic, A., Mathioudakis, M., Bloomfield, D. S., \& Keenan, F. P., 2007a, A\&A, 473, 943
553: \bibitem[2007]{Jes07b}
554: Jess, D. B., McAteer, R. T. J., Mathioudakis, M., Keenan, F. P., Andic, A., \& Bloomfield, D. S., 2007b, A\&A, 476, 971
555: \bibitem[1960]{Lei60}
556: Leighton, R. B., 1960, IAUS, 12, 321
557: \bibitem[2006]{Lop06}
558: L\'{o}pez Fuentes, M. C., Klimchuk, J. A., \& D\'{e}moulin, P., 2006, ApJ, 639, 459
559: \bibitem[2004]{McA04}
560: McAteer, R. T. J., Gallagher, P. T., Bloomfield, D.S., Williams, D. R., Mathioudakis, M., \& Keenan, F.P., 2004, ApJ, 602, 436--445
561: \bibitem[2003]{Mat03}
562: Mathioudakis, M., Seiradakis, J. H., Williams, D. R., Avgoloupis, S., Bloomfield, D. S., \& McAteer, R. T. J., 2003, A\&A, 403, 1101--1104
563: \bibitem[1978]{Mee78}
564: Meerson, B. I., Sasorov, P. V., \& Stepanov, A. V., 1978, Sol. Phys., 58, 165
565: \bibitem[1999]{Nak99}
566: Nakariakov, V. M., Ofman, L., DeLuca, E. E., Roberts, B., \& Davila, J. M., 1999, Science, 285, 862
567: \bibitem[2001]{Nak01}
568: Nakariakov, V. M., \& Ofman, L., 2001, A\&A, 372, L53
569: \bibitem[2003]{Nak03}
570: Nakariakov, V.M., Melnikov, V.F., \& Reznikova, V.E., 2003, A\&A, 412, L7
571: \bibitem[2004]{Nak04}
572: Nakariakov, V. M., Arber, T. D., Ault, C. E., Katsiyannis, A. C., Williams, D. R., \& Keenan, F. P., 2004, MNRAS, 349, 705
573: \bibitem[2007]{Ofm07}
574: Ofman, L., 2007, ApJ, 655, 1134
575: \bibitem[2002]{Par02}
576: Parnell, C. E., Bewsher, D., \& Harrison, R. A., 2002, Sol. Phys., 206, 249
577: \bibitem[1994]{Por94}
578: Porter L.,J., Klimchuk J.A., Sturrock P.A., 1994, ApJ, 435, 482
579: \bibitem[1999]{Per99}
580: P\'{e}rez, M. E., Doyle, J. G., O'Shea, E., \& Keenan, F. P., 1999, A\&A, 351, 1139
581: \bibitem[1985]{Pom85}
582: Pomerantz, M. A., Fossat, E., Gelly, B., Grec, C., Harvey, J. W., \& Duvall, T. L., 1985, Antarctic J. U.S., 20, 221
583: \bibitem[1982]{Pri82}
584: Priest, E. R., 1982, in Solar Magnetohydrodynamics (Dordrecht: Reidel)
585: \bibitem[2003]{Ren03}
586: Rendtel, J., Staude, J., \& Curdt, W., 2003, A\&A, 410, 315
587: \bibitem[2000]{Rob00}
588: Roberts, B., 2000, Sol. Phys., 193, 139
589: \bibitem[1982]{Sch82}
590: Scherrer, P. H., Wilcox, J. M., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., \& Gough, D., 1982, Nature, 297, 312
591: \bibitem[1999]{Set99}
592: Settele, A., Zhugzhda, Y. D., \& Staude, J., 1999, Astron. Nachr., 320, 147
593: \bibitem[1985]{Sta85}
594: Staude, J., \v{Z}ug\v{z}da, Y. D., \& Loc\={a}ns, V., 1985, Sol. Phys., 95, 37
595: \bibitem[1987]{Tho87}
596: Thomas, J. H., Lites, B. W., Gurman, J. B., \& Ladd, E. F., 1987, ApJ, 312, 457
597: \bibitem[1998]{Tor98}
598: Torrence, C., \& Compo, G. P., 1998, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 79, 61
599: \bibitem[2002]{Wan02}
600: Wang, T. J., Solanki, S. K., Curdt, W., Innes, D. E., \& Dammasch, I. E., 2002, ApJ, 574, L101
601: \bibitem[2001]{Wil01}
602: Williams, D. R., Phillips, K. J. H., Rudawy, P., Mathioudakis, M., et~al., 2001, MNRAS, 326, 428--436
603: \bibitem[2002]{Wil02}
604: Williams, D. R., Mathioudakis, M., Gallagher, P. T., Phillips, K. J. H., et~al., 2002, MNRAS, 336, 747--752
605: \bibitem[1983]{Zug83}
606: \v{Z}ug\v{z}da, Y. D., Loc\={a}ns, V., \& Staude, J., 1983, Sol. Phys., 82, 369
607: \bibitem[1987]{Zug87}
608: \v{Z}ug\v{z}da, Y. D., Loc\={a}ns, V., \& Staude, J., 1987, Astron. Nachr., 308, 257
609: \end{thebibliography}
610:
611: \clearpage
612:
613:
614: \clearpage
615:
616:
617:
618: \clearpage
619:
620:
621:
622: \clearpage
623:
624:
625:
626: \clearpage
627:
628:
629:
630:
631:
632:
633: %% This figure uses \includegraphics to scale and rotate the still frame
634: %% for an mpeg animation.
635:
636: %% If you are not including electonic art with your submission, you may
637: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the
638: %% User Guide for details.
639: %%
640: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
641: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
642: %% after every seventh one.
643:
644: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before
645: %% each one.
646:
647: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables: the
648: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX
649: %% table environment. Use of deluxetable is preferred.
650: %%
651:
652: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,
653: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.
654:
655: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}
656: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.
657: %% We also use the \rotate command to rotate the table to
658: %% landscape orientation since it is very wide even at the
659: %% reduced font size.
660: %%
661: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed
662: %% inside the \tablecaption.
663:
664: %% This table also includes a table comment indicating that the full
665: %% version will be available in machine-readable format in the electronic
666: %% edition.
667:
668: %% If you use the table environment, please indicate horizontal rules using
669: %% \tableline, not \hline.
670: %% Do not put multiple tabular environments within a single table.
671: %% The optional \label should appear inside the \caption command.
672:
673: %% If the table is more than one page long, the width of the table can vary
674: %% from page to page when the default \tablewidth is used, as below. The
675: %% individual table widths for each page will be written to the log file; a
676: %% maximum tablewidth for the table can be computed from these values.
677: %% The \tablewidth argument can then be reset and the file reprocessed, so
678: %% that the table is of uniform width throughout. Try getting the widths
679: %% from the log file and changing the \tablewidth parameter to see how
680: %% adjusting this value affects table formatting.
681:
682: %% The \dataset{} macro has also been applied to a few of the objects to
683: %% show how many observations can be tagged in a table.
684:
685: %% Tables may also be prepared as separate files. See the accompanying
686: %% sample file table.tex for an example of an external table file.
687: %% To include an external file in your main document, use the \input
688: %% command. Uncomment the line below to include table.tex in this
689: %% sample file. (Note that you will need to comment out the \documentclass,
690: %% \begin{document}, and \end{document} commands from table.tex if you want
691: %% to include it in this document.)
692:
693: %% \input{table}
694:
695: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
696: %% that appears after it.
697:
698: \end{document}
699:
700: %%
701: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
702: