0804.1731/ms.tex
1: % reprint is at: 
2: %
3: % http://research.amnh.org/astrophysics/staff/lepine/reprint/slepine.pdf
4: %
5: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
6: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
7: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
8: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
9: %\documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
10: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
11: 
12: \documentclass{emulateapj}
13: \usepackage{apjfonts}
14: \usepackage{lscape}
15: \input{epsf}
16: 
17: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
18: \slugcomment{To be submitted to the Astrophysical Journal Letters}
19: 
20: \shorttitle{New ultra-cool subdwarfs from SDSS}
21: \shortauthors{L\'epine \& Scholz}
22: 
23: \begin{document}
24: 
25: \title{Twenty-three new ultra-cool subdwarfs from the Sloan Digital
26:   Sky Survey.\altaffilmark{1}}
27: 
28: \author{S\'ebastien L\'epine\altaffilmark{2}, \& Ralf-Dieter
29:   Scholz\altaffilmark{3}}
30: 
31: \altaffiltext{1}{The SDSS is managed by the Astrophysical Research
32:   Consortium for the Participating Institutions. The Participating
33:   Institutions are the American Museum of Natural History,
34:   Astrophysical Institute Potsdam, University of Basel, University of
35:   Cambridge, Case Western Reserve University, University of Chicago,
36:   Drexel University, Fermilab, the Institute for Advanced Study, the
37:   Japan Participation Group, Johns Hopkins University, the Joint
38:   Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, the Kavli Institute for Particle
39:   Astrophysics and Cosmology, the Korean Scientist Group, the Chinese
40:   Academy of Sciences (LAMOST), Los Alamos National Laboratory, the
41:   Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), the Max-Planck-Institute
42:   for Astrophysics (MPA), New Mexico State University, Ohio State
43:   University, University of Pittsburgh, University of Portsmouth,
44:   Princeton University, the United States Naval Observatory, and the
45:   University of Washington.}
46: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astrophysics, American Museum of
47:   Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY
48:   10024, USA}
49: \altaffiltext{3}{Astrophysical Institute Potsdam, An der Sternwarte
50:   16, D-14481, Potsdam, Germany}
51: 
52: \begin{abstract}
53: A search of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey spectroscopic database has
54: turned up 23 new ultra-cool subdwarfs, low-mass metal-poor stars of
55: spectral subtype M 7.0 or later. Spectra from these red objects all
56: show very strong molecular bands of CaH but relatively weak bands of
57: TiO, indicative of a cool, metal-poor atmosphere. Five of the stars are
58: formally classified as M subdwarfs (sdM7.0-sdM8.5), 13 as more
59: metal-poor extreme subdwarfs (esdM7.0-esdM8.0), and five as extremely
60: metal-poor ultra subdwarfs (usdM7.0-usdM7.5). In the [$H_r$,$r-z$]
61: reduced proper motion diagram, these subdwarfs clearly populate the
62: locus of low-luminosity stars with halo kinematics. It is argued that
63: the objects are all very low-mass, metal-poor stars from the Galactic
64: halo (Population II). These new discoveries more than double the
65: census of spectroscopically confirmed ultra-cool subdwarfs. We show
66: that the stars stand out remarkably in the [g-r,r-i] color-color
67: diagram; a proposed color and proper motion selection scheme is expected
68: to be extremely efficient in identifying more of these old, very
69: low mass stars in the vicinity of the Sun.
70: \end{abstract}
71: 
72: \keywords{stars: late-type \--- subdwarfs \--- Galaxy: halo \---
73:   Galaxy: stellar content \--- solar neighborhood }
74: 
75: %=...=%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
76: \section{Introduction}
77: 
78: Ultra-cool dwarfs are very red objects with spectral subtype M7.0 or
79: later. The class includes very low mass stars, with masses just above
80: the hydrogen-burning limit, and extends into the substellar (brown dwarf)
81: regime. While ultra-cool dwarfs are expected to be common, their low
82: luminosities make them very challenging objects to find and study,
83: outside of the immediate vicinity of the Sun. The census of
84: spectroscopically confirmed ultra-cool dwarfs remains quite small
85: compared with the very large numbers of low-mass stars now formally
86: classified as M0-M6 dwarfs \citet{W08}. 
87: 
88: Ultra-cool {\em subdwarfs} are the metal-poor analogs of the
89: ultra-cool dwarfs. While representatives of the latter group have been
90: known for some time \citep{KHM91,KHS95}, it is only recently that
91: ultra-cool subdwarfs have been spectroscopically identified. In the
92: solar vicinity, ultra-cool subdwarfs are kinematically associated with
93: the Galactic halo \citep{L03a}, and represent the low-mass end of the
94: local Population II. As such, their local density is quite low, which
95: explains their scarcity in the solar vicinity.
96: 
97: Dwarfs and subdwarfs of spectral type M have optical spectra dominated
98: by molecular bands of metal hydrides (CaH, FeH) and metal oxides (TiO,
99: VO). Under the classification system recently proposed by
100: \citet{LRS07}, that expands the system of \citet{G97}, main
101: sequence M stars are segregated into four ``metallicity
102: classes.'' These are assigned on the basis of the relative strength of oxide
103: and hydride bands, which dominate the optical-red spectrum and whose
104: ratio is believed to be a function of log Z \citep{GR97}. Solar
105: metallicity objects are classified as dwarfs (M, or dM), while the
106: more metal-poor stars are classified as subdwarfs (sdM), extreme
107: subdwarfs (esdM), and ultra subdwarfs (usdM), in order of decreasing
108: metallicity. At the turn of the century, only two ultra-cool subdwarfs
109: were known: the sdM7.0 subdwarf LHS 377 \citep{G97}, and the esdM7.0
110: extreme subdwarf APMPM J0559-2903 \citep{S99}. Since then, a dozen
111: more objects have been discovered, spanning the spectral type range
112: sdM7.0-sdM9.5, esdM7.0-esdM8.5, and usdM7.0-usdM7.5
113: \citep{L03b,L04,S04b,G06,BK06,B07,LRS07}. 
114: 
115: In addition, metal-poor stars have also been found into the
116: L spectral type regime \citep{B03,B04}. These objects are clearly
117: substellar in nature, and believed to be Population II brown dwarfs. A
118: case in contention is the star LSR J1610-0040, initially classified as
119: an sdL \citep{L03c}, but which may be a peculiar sdM
120: \citep{CV06,RB06}. One thing is clear at this time: the census of
121: local ultracool subdwarfs is largely incomplete, and our knowledge
122: fragmentary. Much more extensive samples are required, which would be
123: critical in constraining the low end of the Galactic halo mass
124: function, and understanding the properties of cool, metal-poor
125: atmospheres.
126: 
127: This Letter reports the discovery of 23 new ultracool subdwarfs from
128: the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) spectroscopic database. This more
129: than doubles the current census of spectroscopically confirmed
130: ultracool subdwarfs, and suggests a simple method for the
131: identification of more such stars. The search and identification is
132: described in \S2, where the spectra are also presented. Colors and
133: reduced proper motions are analyzed in \S3. Results are discussed in
134: \S4. 
135: 
136: \begin{deluxetable*}{lrrrrrrrrr}
137: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
138: \tablecolumns{10} 
139: \tablewidth{500pt} 
140: \tablecaption{New, spectroscopically confirmed ultra-cool subdwarfs} 
141: \tablehead{designation & $\mu$R.A.& $\mu$Decl. & g & r & i & z & J\tablenotemark{a} & spec.type \\
142:  & mas yr$^{-1}$&  mas yr$^{-1}$& mag & mag & mag & mag & mag & }
143: \startdata
144: SDSS J020533.75+123824.0 & -36.1$\pm$02.8&-271.0$\pm$06.3& 21.95$\pm$0.10& 19.76$\pm$0.02& 18.11$\pm$0.01& 17.30$\pm$0.01& 15.91$\pm$0.07&  sdM 7.5\\ 
145: SDSS J023557.61+010800.5 & -20.3$\pm$10.6&-202.5$\pm$01.8& 22.39$\pm$0.11& 20.39$\pm$0.03& 19.19$\pm$0.01& 18.55$\pm$0.03& \nodata       & esdM 7.5\\
146: SDSS J080301.12+354848.5 & +21.2$\pm$04.0&-489.1$\pm$09.3& 22.07$\pm$0.08& 20.19$\pm$0.02& 19.11$\pm$0.01& 18.33$\pm$0.02& \nodata       & esdM 7.5\\
147: SDSS J081210.47+372321.1 &-125.9$\pm$07.8&-182.2$\pm$09.7& 21.70$\pm$0.04& 19.71$\pm$0.01& 18.41$\pm$0.01& 17.75$\pm$0.01& 16.43$\pm$0.13& esdM 7.0\\
148: SDSS J101200.28+204611.6 &-304.1$\pm$04.6&-247.6$\pm$05.7& 21.90$\pm$0.06& 19.68$\pm$0.01& 18.26$\pm$0.00& 17.46$\pm$0.01& 16.21$\pm$0.07& esdM 7.5\\
149: SDSS J102757.77+340146.8 & -83.2$\pm$06.7&-523.8$\pm$10.5& 22.26$\pm$0.10& 20.34$\pm$0.02& 18.58$\pm$0.01& 17.67$\pm$0.01& 16.16$\pm$0.10&  sdM 8.0\\
150: SDSS J102839.48+593908.2 &+108.5$\pm$07.0&-323.1$\pm$06.5& 22.52$\pm$0.11& 20.39$\pm$0.03& 19.09$\pm$0.01& 18.29$\pm$0.03& \nodata       & usdM 7.5\\
151: SDSS J105047.16+242241.9 & +70.7$\pm$04.1&-455.5$\pm$03.4& 22.49$\pm$0.09& 20.31$\pm$0.02& 18.85$\pm$0.01& 18.09$\pm$0.02& \nodata       & esdM 8.0\\
152: SDSS J105449.01+322527.0 & +18.0$\pm$08.9&-125.5$\pm$01.8& 22.71$\pm$0.12& 20.54$\pm$0.03& 19.41$\pm$0.01& 18.76$\pm$0.03& \nodata       & usdM 7.0\\
153: SDSS J105717.29+462102.3 & -32.8$\pm$16.6&-528.1$\pm$14.1& 21.98$\pm$0.07& 19.99$\pm$0.02& 18.61$\pm$0.01& 17.89$\pm$0.02& \nodata       & esdM 7.0\\
154: SDSS J110651.29+044814.9 & -89.9$\pm$06.4&-282.0$\pm$03.5& 22.74$\pm$0.15& 20.56$\pm$0.03& 18.80$\pm$0.01& 17.81$\pm$0.02& 16.29$\pm$0.10&  sdM 8.5\\
155: SDSS J114452.67-031420.4 & +26.2$\pm$05.7&-254.6$\pm$08.4& 22.84$\pm$0.18& 20.66$\pm$0.04& 19.51$\pm$0.02& 18.68$\pm$0.04& \nodata       & esdM 7.0\\
156: SDSS J123257.20+410723.5 & +43.1$\pm$11.2&-182.3$\pm$05.4& 23.36$\pm$0.21& 20.95$\pm$0.04& 19.84$\pm$0.02& 19.14$\pm$0.05& \nodata       & esdM 7.0\\
157: SDSS J125508.35+294939.1 &-188.2$\pm$03.9& -67.5$\pm$02.4& 22.51$\pm$0.11& 20.38$\pm$0.03& 19.26$\pm$0.02& 18.68$\pm$0.04& \nodata       & usdM 7.0\\
158: SDSS J125938.97+493404.2 &-155.2$\pm$17.7& -65.8$\pm$05.8& 22.50$\pm$0.09& 20.56$\pm$0.02& 19.27$\pm$0.01& 18.50$\pm$0.02& \nodata       & esdM 7.0\\
159: SDSS J130852.73+391142.8 &-304.4$\pm$02.9&-258.9$\pm$17.4& 22.98$\pm$0.11& 20.94$\pm$0.03& 19.32$\pm$0.01& 18.46$\pm$0.02& \nodata       &  sdM 7.0\\
160: SDSS J135128.49+550656.9 &-245.5$\pm$02.3&-166.4$\pm$01.5& 21.17$\pm$0.03& 18.99$\pm$0.01& 17.68$\pm$0.00& 16.92$\pm$0.01& 15.68$\pm$0.06& esdM 7.0\\
161: SDSS J141053.86+621742.6 &-155.1$\pm$09.2& +50.5$\pm$07.2& 22.52$\pm$0.10& 20.47$\pm$0.03& 19.19$\pm$0.01& 18.50$\pm$0.03& 16.92$\pm$0.16& esdM 8.0\\
162: SDSS J143645.25+310914.7 &-155.4$\pm$07.1& -99.3$\pm$03.9& 22.25$\pm$0.08& 20.29$\pm$0.02& 19.04$\pm$0.01& 18.31$\pm$0.03& \nodata       & esdM 7.0\\
163: SDSS J153037.83+495205.7 &-214.4$\pm$05.5& -12.3$\pm$05.1& 22.54$\pm$0.09& 20.56$\pm$0.02& 18.97$\pm$0.01& 18.14$\pm$0.02& 16.86$\pm$0.18&  sdM 7.0\\
164: SDSS J155707.09+283531.5 & -58.0$\pm$10.4&-217.9$\pm$32.5& 22.76$\pm$0.11& 20.51$\pm$0.02& 19.28$\pm$0.01& 18.61$\pm$0.03& \nodata       & usdM 7.0\\
165: SDSS J160347.10+164145.3 & -72.9$\pm$04.6&-105.4$\pm$05.5& 22.95$\pm$0.13& 20.74$\pm$0.03& 19.52$\pm$0.02& 18.88$\pm$0.05& \nodata       & usdM 7.5\\
166: SDSS J164451.75+310352.8 & -31.0$\pm$13.9&-105.8$\pm$17.1& 23.05$\pm$0.16& 20.85$\pm$0.04& 19.44$\pm$0.02& 18.66$\pm$0.03& \nodata       & esdM 8.0  
167:  \enddata
168: \tablenotetext{a}{Infrared J magnitudes from the 2MASS All-Sky Catalog
169:   of Point Sources\citep{C03}}
170: \end{deluxetable*}
171: 
172: %=...=%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
173: \section{Spectroscopic identification}
174: 
175: A search for cool subdwarfs was performed on the spectroscopic
176: database of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey \citep{G98,Y00}. A subsample of
177: 44,600 SDSS spectra from the sixth data release \citep{DR6} was
178: retrieved, including all spectra from point-like sources (STAR and
179: STAR LATE flags) with colors $g-r>1.0$. Each spectrum was
180: automatically matched against a grid of composite spectra of M dwarfs
181: and subdwarfs assembled by L\'epine (2008, in preparation). This
182: grid, built on the 4-class metallicity system of \citet{LRS07},
183: includes reference spectra for M stars of all four metallicity
184: subclasses (dM, sdM, esdM, usdM), covering all known spectral subtypes
185: with a 0.5-subtype resolution. The new grid expands and complements
186: the M dwarf classification templates assembled by
187: \citet{Bo07}.
188: 
189: Spectral classes and subtypes are assigned on the basis of a least-squares
190: fit over the full 6100-7900\AA spectral range. This improves on the
191: standard classification scheme for M subdwarfs, which is based on the
192: absolute and relative strengths of the three line indices CaH2, CaH3,
193: and TiO5 \citep{RHG95,G97,L03a,LRS07}. The main problem with those
194: molecular line indices is that they are defined over relatively narrow
195: spectral ranges, making them unreliable in low signal-to-noise
196: spectra. A fit over a much broader spectral region made it possible to
197: classify SDSS spectra from very faint sources, with a signal-to-noise
198: ratio per resolution element as low as S/N$\sim5$. Since the
199: classification grid is built from a combination of those same SDSS
200: spectra, several iterations were made on which the grid was
201: modified, and vetted against the spectral-index classification system.
202: 
203: \begin{figure*}
204: \epsscale{1.05}
205: \plotone{f1.eps}
206: \caption{SDSS medium-resolution spectra of all ultra-cool subdwarfs
207:   identified in the SDSS database, all new objects except for the
208:   usdM7.5 classification standard LSR J0822+1700 ({\it bottom right}). The
209:   most prominent feature in all those very red spectra is the deep CaH
210:   molecular absorption band just blueward of 7,000\AA. The strength of
211:   the TiO bands redward of 7,000\AA is used to assign metallicity
212:   classes, as the ratio of TiO to CaH is assumed to be proportional
213:   to log Z.}
214: \end{figure*}
215: 
216: Our automated analysis of the 44,600 red stellar spectra in the end
217: yielded the formal identification of 24 M subdwarfs of spectral
218: subtype 7.0 or later. One of the spectra was found to be of the nearby
219: high proper motion star LSR J0822+1700, recently selected as a
220: subdwarf classification standard (usdM7.5) by \citet{LRS07}. All the
221: other stars are identified here as ultra-cool subdwarfs for the first
222: time. The final tally includes five subdwarfs (sdM7.5-sdM8.5), 13 extreme
223: subdwarfs (esdM7.0-esdM8.0) and five ultra subdwarfs
224: (usdM7.0-usdM7.5). Spectra of all 23 new ultra-cool subdwarfs are
225: presented in Figure 1, along with the spectrum of LSR J0822+1700. 
226: 
227: Basic astrometry and photometry is presented in Table 1, along with
228: SDSS {\it griz} photometry \citep{G98,Fetal96}, and J magnitude from
229: the 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources \citep{C03}. All except one
230: (SDSS J1351+5506) are fainter than any of the previously known
231: ultra-cool M subdwarfs; 15 of them are even too faint to show up in
232: 2MASS. Proper motions were found in the SDSS catalog for only a few
233: stars. We instead determined the proper motions for all the stars from
234: their photographic plate counterparts, as found in the SuperCOSMOS sky
235: survey \citep{H01} and the APM-North catalogue \citep{MM00}. Proper
236: motions were calculated from a linear regression of the early-epoch
237: plate positions and later SDSS coordinates. Results are shown in Table
238: 1.
239: 
240: %=...=%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
241: \section{Colors and reduced proper motion}
242: 
243: Figure 2 shows the location of our ultra-cool subdwarfs in the
244: [$g-r$,$r-i$] diagram ({\it left panel}). For comparison, a
245: subsample of 50,000 random SDSS point sources is also displayed
246: ({\it dots}). The ultra-cool subdwarfs are found to stand out significantly
247: from the locus of the field stars, confirming the trend observed
248: for earlier M subdwarfs by \citet{W04}. Stars are also segregated by
249: metallicity subclass, with the sdM having larger $r-i$ colors and
250: usdM smaller $r-i$ values. The trend suggests that at lower
251: metallicities, cool stars tend to fall more in line with the
252: extrapolated color-color sequence of the more massive stars ({\it
253:   dashed line}), consistent with a spectral energy distribution more
254: similar to that of a blackbody.
255: 
256: \begin{figure*}[t]
257: \epsscale{1.05}
258: \plottwo{f2.eps}{f3.eps}
259: \caption{
260: {\it Left panel:} Color-color magnitude diagram [$g-r$,$r-i$] of SDSS
261: ultra-cool subdwarfs ({\it symbols}). The subdwarfs are clear outliers to the
262: standard locus of field stars, here denoted with a random sample
263: of 50,000 SDSS point sources ({\it dots}). The ultra-cool subdwarfs are also
264: clearly segregated by spectral class, which suggests a stellar locus
265: strongly dependent on metallicity, from the strong ``elbow-shaped''
266: locus for stars of solar abundances to an almost ``straight-line''
267: locus at very low metallicities. {\it Right panel}: Reduced proper
268: motion diagram of the SDSS ultra-cool subdwarfs ({\it symbols}). The stars
269: populate the low-luminosity end of the Population II main sequence,
270: which unambiguously identifies them as low-mass subdwarfs. A
271: distribution of high proper motion stars from the LSPM-North catalog
272: \citep{LS05} with SDSS counterparts is shown for comparison ({\it dots});
273: the distinct loci of disk dwarfs, halo subdwarfs, and white dwarfs (in
274: layers from upper right to lower left, respectively) are clearly
275: defined.}
276: \end{figure*}
277: 
278: Stars for which proper motions are available all have $\mu>200$ mas
279: yr$^{-1}$, which suggests that they are either high-velocity objects
280: and/or have very low luminosities. The right panel in Figure 2 shows the
281: [$H_r$,$r-z$] reduced proper motion diagram for all the SDSS
282: ultra-cool subdwarfs with recorded $\mu>200 mas yr^{-1}$. The objects
283: are all located along the extension of the Population II sequence
284: \citep{Y03,LRS07}, which runs between the Population I sequence ({\it
285:   upper right}) and the white dwarf sequence ({\it lower left}). This
286: unambiguously demonstrates that the stars are low-mass objects at the
287: bottom of the main sequence and kinematically associated with the
288: Galactic halo population.
289: 
290: The very distinctive distribution of colors and reduced proper motions
291: suggests an efficient method to identify ultra-cool subdwarfs. They
292: should be found among stellar sources with $g-r>1.85$ and
293: $g-i>3.1$ (see Fig.2). Additional proper motion or reduced proper
294: motion constraints would optimally select for those low-luminosity
295: objects, with minimal background contamination. This would work best
296: at high Galactic latitudes, where interstellar reddening is minimal.
297: 
298: 
299: %=...=%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
300: \section{Discussion and conclusions}
301: 
302: Our successful search for ultra-cool subdwarfs demonstrates that these
303: stars can be identified in deep optical surveys like SDSS. The stars
304: stand out in the (g-r,r-i) color-color diagram, their locus clearly
305: distinct from that of solar-metallicity objects. This makes them easy
306: to identify from point sources in fields imaged in the SDSS {\it
307:   ugriz} color system. It is expected that ultra-cool subdwarfs will
308: be easy to identify in future, deep imaging surveys, provided they use
309: similar {\it gri} bandpasses. The fact that ultra-cool subdwarfs are
310: segregated by metallicity in color-color space also makes them highly
311: valuable tracers of Galactic halo structure and history.
312: 
313: In color-color space, the ultracool subdwarfs populate a region
314: typically occupied by extra-galactic objects such as QSOs
315: \citep{Retal02}. Indeed, all 23 new ultra-cool subdwarfs presented in
316: this Letter were QSO targets in the SDSS spectroscopic
317: survey. Interestingly, this is not the first time that ultra-cool
318: stars are discovered as a by-product of QSO surveys; ultra-cool dwarfs
319: were also identified in early surveys of high-redshift quasars
320: \citep{K97}. But just like subdwarfs are a contaminant for QSO
321: surveys, QSOs would also be a common contaminant of subdwarf surveys.
322: Absolute proper motion cuts would be necessary to limit the
323: contamination from extragalactic sources. It is fortunate that subdwarfs
324: are kinematically associated with the local Galactic halo population
325: and tend to be high-velocity stars in the vicinity of the Sun. A
326: combination of color cuts and minimal proper motion requirement would
327: be the most efficient technique to select ultra-cool subdwarfs.
328: 
329: In the meantime, the spectra collected here will be used to further
330: refine the classification templates, and assist in the identification
331: and classification of ultra-cool subdwarfs in upcoming SDSS data
332: releases. The subdwarf classification routine is now being integrated
333: to the SEGUE spectral reduction pipeline, and ultra-cool subdwarfs are
334: now expected to be routinely identified in the SDSS survey.
335: 
336: %==%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
337: \acknowledgments
338: 
339: {\bf Acknowledgments}
340: 
341: This research was supported by NSF grant AST-0607757 at the American
342: Museum of Natural History. Funding for the SDSS and SDSS-II has been
343: provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating
344: Institutions, the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of
345: Energy, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the
346: Japanese Monbukagakusho, the Max Planck Society, and the Higher
347: Education Funding Council for England. The SDSS Web Site is
348: http://www.sdss.org/.
349: 
350: %==%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
351: \begin{thebibliography}{}
352: 
353: 
354: \bibitem[Adelman-McCarthy(2008)]{DR6}
355: Adelman-McCarthy, J., Agueros, M.A., Allam, S.S., et al. 2008, ApJS,
356: 175, in press (SDSS Data Release 6)
357: 
358: \bibitem[Burgasser {\it et al.}(2003)]{B03}
359: Burgasser, A., {\it et al.} 2003, \apj, 592, 1186
360: 
361: \bibitem[Bochanski {\it et al.}(2007)]{Bo07}
362: Bochanski, J. J., {\it et al.} 2007, \aj, 133, 531
363: 
364: \bibitem[Burgasser(2004)]{B04}
365: Burgasser, A. 2004, \apj, 614, L73
366: 
367: \bibitem[Burgasser \& Kirkpatrick(2006)]{BK06}
368: Burgasser, A., \& Kirikpatrick, J. D. 2006, \apj, 645, 1485
369: 
370: \bibitem[Burgasser {\it et al.}(2007)]{B07}
371: Burgasser, A. {\it et al.} 2007, \apj, 657, 494
372: 
373: \bibitem[Cutri {\it et al.}(2003)]{C03}
374: Cutri, R. M. {\it et al.} 2003, The 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point
375: Sources, University of Massachusetts and Infrared Processing and
376: Analysis Center (IPAC/California Institute of Technology)
377: 
378: \bibitem[Cushing \& Vacca(2006)]{CV06}
379: Cushing, M. C., \& Vacca, W. D. 2006, 131, 1797
380: 
381: \bibitem[Fukugita {\it et al.}(1996)]{Fetal96}
382: Fukugita, M., {\it et al.} 1996, \aj, 111, 1748
383: 
384: \bibitem[Gizis(1997)]{G97}
385: Gizis, J. E. 1997, \aj, 113, 806
386: 
387: \bibitem[Gizis \& Reid(1997)]{GR97}
388: Gizis, J. E., \& Reid, I. N. 1997, \aj, 109, 1233
389: 
390: \bibitem[Gizis \& Harvin(2006)]{G06}
391: Gizis, J. E., \& Harvin, J. 2006, \aj, 132, 2372
392: 
393: \bibitem[Gunn {\it et al.}(1998)]{G98}
394: Gunn, J. E., et al. 1998, \aj, 116, 3040
395: 
396: \bibitem[Hambly {\it et al.}(2001)]{H01}
397: Hambly, N.-C., {\it et al.} 2001, \mnras, 326, 1279
398: 
399: \bibitem[Kirkpatrick {\it et al.}(1991)]{KHM91}
400: Kirkpatrick, J. D., {\it et al.} 1991, \apjs, 77, 417
401: 
402: \bibitem[Kirkpatrick {\it et al.}(1995)]{KHS95}
403: Kirkpatrick, J. D., {\it et al.} 1995, \aj, 109, 797
404: 
405: \bibitem[Kirkpatrick {\it et al.}(1997)]{K97}
406: Kirkpatrick, J. D., {\it et al.} 1997, \aj, 113, 1421
407: 
408: \bibitem[L\'epine {\it et al.}(2003a)]{L03a}
409: L\'epine, S., {\it et al.} 2003a, \aj, 125, 1598
410: 
411: \bibitem[L\'epine {\it et al.}(2003b)]{L03b}
412: L\'epine, S., {\it et al.} 2003b, \apj, 585, L69
413: 
414: \bibitem[L\'epine {\it et al.}(2003c)]{L03c}
415: L\'epine, S., {\it et al.} 2003c, \apj, 591, L49
416: 
417: \bibitem[L\'epine {\it et al.}(2004)]{L04}
418: L\'epine, S., {\it et al.} 2004, \apj, 602, L125
419: 
420: \bibitem[L\'epine \& Shara(2005)]{LS05}
421: L\'epine, S., \& Shara, M. M. 2005, \aj 129, 1483 
422: 
423: \bibitem[L\'epine, Rich, \& Shara(2007)]{LRS07}
424: L\'epine, S., Rich, R. M., \& Shara, M. M. 2007, \apj, 669, 1235
425: 
426: %\bibitem[L\'epine {\it et al.}(2008)]{Letal08}
427: %L\'epine, S., {\it et al.} 2008, {\it in preparation}
428: 
429: \bibitem[McMahon {\it et al.}(2000)]{MM00}
430: McMahon, R. G., {\it et al.} 2000, The APM-North Catalogue, Institute
431: os Astronomy, Cambridge, UK
432: 
433: %\bibitem[Monet {\it et al.}(2003)]{M03}
434: %Monet, D. G. {\it et al.} 2003, \aj, 125, 984
435: %
436: %\bibitem[Munn {\it et al.}(2004)]{M04}
437: %Munn, J. A. {\it et al.} 2004, \aj, 127, 3034
438: 
439: \bibitem[Reid, Hawley, \& Gizis(1995)]{RHG95}
440: Reid, I. N., Hawley, S., \& Gizis, J. E. 1995, \aj, 110, 1838
441: 
442: \bibitem[Reiners \& Basri(2006)]{RB06}
443: Reiners, A. \& Basri, G. 2006, \aj, 131, 1806
444: 
445: \bibitem[Richards {\it et al.}(2002)]{Retal02}
446: Richards, G.T., Fan, X., Newberg, H., et al. 2002, AJ, 123, 2945
447: 
448: \bibitem[Schweitzer {\it et al.}(1999)]{S99}
449: Schweitzer, A. {\it et al.} 1999, \aap, 350, L62
450: 
451: \bibitem[Scholz {\it et al.}(2004a)]{S04b}
452: Scholz, R.-D. {\it et al.}, 2004a, \aap, 425, 519
453: 
454: \bibitem[Scholz {\it et al.}(2004b)]{S04a}
455: Scholz, R.-D. {\it et al.}, 2004b, \aap, 428, L25
456: 
457: \bibitem[West {\it et al.}(2004)]{W04}
458: West, A. A. {\it et al.} 2004, \aj, 128, 426
459: 
460: \bibitem[West {\it et al.}(2008)]{W08}
461: West, A. A. {\it et al.} 2008, \aj, 135, 785
462: 
463: \bibitem[Yong \& Lambert(2003)]{Y03}
464: Yong, D., \& Lambert, D. L. 2003, \pasp, 115, 796
465: 
466: \bibitem[York {\it et al.}(2000)]{Y00}
467: York, D. G., et al. 2000, \aj, 120, 1579
468: 
469: \end{thebibliography}
470: 
471: \end{document}
472: