1: % ApJ, main journal/resubmission
2: % Troy A. Porter, Igor V. Moskalenko, Andrew W. Strong, Elena Orlando, and Laurent Bouchet
3: % Inverse Compton Origin of the Hard X-Ray and Soft Gamma-Ray Emission from the Galactic Ridge
4:
5: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
6: \documentclass{emulateapj}
7:
8: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
9:
10:
11: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
12:
13:
14: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
15: %%\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
16:
17:
18: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
19:
20:
21: %\usepackage{amsmath}
22: %\usepackage{amsfonts}
23: %\usepackage{amssymb}
24: %\usepackage{graphicx}
25:
26:
27: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
28: % Author's definitions
29: \newcommand{\gray}{$\gamma$-ray}
30: \newcommand{\grays}{$\gamma$-rays}
31: \newcommand{\Dxx}{D_{xx}}
32: \newcommand{\hi}{H {\sc i}}
33: \newcommand{\hii}{H {\sc ii}}
34: \newcommand{\e}[2]{$^{#1}_{#2}$}
35: \newcommand{\Xco}{$X_{\rm CO}$}
36: \newcommand{\Xcounits}{$10^{20}$~molecules~cm$^{-2}$/~(K km s$^{-1}$)\ }
37: %%%%%%%%% Define journals
38: \newcommand{\icrc}{Int.\ Cosmic Ray Conf.\ }
39: \newcommand{\adv}{Adv.\ Space Res.}
40: \newcommand{\app}{APh}
41: \newcommand{\nphysb}{Nucl.\ Phys.\ B}
42: \newcommand{\pr}{Phys.\ Rev.}
43: \newcommand{\plb}{Phys.\ Lett.\ B}
44: \newcommand{\jcap}{JCAP}
45: %\newcommand{\rmp}{Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.}
46: \newcommand{\pubbook}[5]{#5, #1, #2 #3, #4}
47: \newcommand{\pubjournal}[5]{#4, #1, #2, #3}
48: \newcommand{\pubjournala}[5]{#4, #1, #3}
49: \newcommand{\pubjournalb}[5]{#4, #5 #1 #3}
50: \newcommand{\pubeprint}[4]{#1 #2, {\tt #3}}
51: \newcommand{\pubproc}[8]{#1 #7 {\it #2} ({\it #4}) #3 (#5) p~#6}
52: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
53:
54:
55: %%\slugcomment{}
56:
57:
58: \shorttitle{IC Origin of the Galactic Ridge Emission}
59: \shortauthors{Porter et al.}
60:
61:
62: \begin{document}
63:
64:
65: \title{Inverse Compton Origin of the Hard X-Ray and Soft Gamma-Ray Emission from the Galactic Ridge}
66:
67: \author{Troy A. Porter}
68: \affil{
69: Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics,
70: University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064
71: %%\email{tporter@scipp.ucsc.edu}
72: }
73:
74: \author{Igor V. Moskalenko\altaffilmark{1}}
75:
76: \affil{
77: Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory,
78: Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
79: %%\email{imos@stanford.edu}
80: }
81: \altaffiltext{1}{Also Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology,
82: Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309}
83:
84: \author{Andrew W. Strong and Elena Orlando}
85: \affil{
86: Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur extraterrestrische Physik,
87: Postfach 1312, D-85741 Garching, Germany
88: %%\email{aws@mpe.mpg.de}
89: %%\email{orlando@mpe.mpg.de}
90: }
91:
92: \and
93:
94: \author{L. Bouchet}
95: \affil{CESR-CNRS, 9 Av. du Colonel Roche, 31028 Toulouse Cedex 04, France
96: %%\email{Laurent.Bouchet@cesr.fr}
97: }
98:
99: \begin{abstract}
100: A recent re-determination of the non-thermal component of the
101: hard X-ray to soft \gray{} emission from the
102: Galactic ridge, using the SPI instrument on the
103: {\it INTErnational Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory} (INTEGRAL)
104: Observatory, is shown to be well reproduced as inverse-Compton emission from
105: the interstellar medium.
106: Both cosmic-ray primary electrons and secondary electrons and positrons
107: contribute to the emission.
108: The prediction uses the GALPROP model and includes
109: a new calculation of the interstellar radiation field.
110: This
111: may solve a long-standing mystery of the origin of this emission,
112: and potentially opens a new window on Galactic cosmic rays.
113: \end{abstract}
114:
115: \keywords{
116: elementary particles ---
117: cosmic rays ---
118: gamma-rays: theory
119: }
120:
121:
122: \section{Introduction}
123: %##############################################################################
124:
125: The Galactic ridge is known to be an intense source of
126: continuum hard X- and \gray{} emission.
127: The hard X-ray emission was
128: discovered in 1972 \citep{bleach72}, and interstellar emission has
129: subsequently been observed
130: by HEAO-1, Tenma (ASTRO-B),
131: ASCA, Ginga, RXTE, OSSE
132: \citep{Worrall1982,Koyama1986,purcell96,kinzer99,kinzer01},
133: and most recently by Chandra and XMM-Newton.
134: The \gray{} observations started with the OSO-III satellite in
135: 1968, followed by SAS-2 in 1972, COS-B (1975--1982) and COMPTEL and EGRET
136: on the CGRO (1991--2000).
137: With COMPTEL and EGRET the improvement in data quality was sufficient
138: to allow such studies to be performed in much greater detail.
139: The Galactic diffuse emission is a major study objective for INTEGRAL
140: (in orbit since 2002) and the GLAST LAT (to be launched in 2008)
141: \citep{Michelson2007,Ritz2007}.
142: Each of these experiments represents a significant
143: leap forward with respect to its predecessor.
144:
145: Continuum emission of diffuse, interstellar nature is expected in the
146: hard X-ray and \gray{} regime from the physical processes of positron
147: annihilation
148: (through intermediate formation of positronium),
149: inverse-Compton (IC)
150: scattering and bremsstrahlung from cosmic-ray (CR) electrons and positrons, and
151: via decay of neutral pions produced by interactions of CR nuclei with the
152: interstellar gas.
153: Positron annihilation in flight (continuum) may
154: contribute in the few MeV range \citep{Beacom06}.
155: For the non-positronium continuum, hard X-rays from bremsstrahlung emission
156: imply a luminosity in CR electrons which is unacceptably large
157: \citep[see e.g.][]{dogiel02a}.
158: Composite models have been proposed which incorporate
159: thermal and nonthermal components from electrons accelerated in supernovae
160: or the ambient interstellar turbulence \citep{valinia00b}.
161: At MeV energies the origin of the emission is also uncertain \citep{SMR00}.
162:
163: Alternatively, the origin of the ridge emission could be attributed to
164: a population of sources too weak to be detected individually, and
165: hence would not be
166: truly interstellar.
167: In general, \gray{} telescopes
168: have inadequate spatial resolution to clarify this issue.
169: For X-rays, important progress in this area was made by ASCA
170: \citep{kaneda97} and Ginga \citep{yamasaki97}.
171: More recently,
172: high-resolution imaging in X-rays (2--10 keV) with Chandra
173: \citep{ebisawa01,ebisawa05} has claimed to prove the existence of a
174: truly diffuse component.
175: Similiarly, it has been claimed from
176: an analysis of XMM-Newton data \citep{hands04} that 80\% of the Galactic-ridge
177: X-ray emission is probably diffuse, and only 9\% can be accounted for
178: by Galactic sources, the rest being extragalactic in nature.
179: However, more
180: recently \citet{Revnivtsev2006}, with RXTE PCA data, and \citet{Krivonos2007},
181: using INTEGRAL/IBIS and RXTE data, argue convincingly that below 50 keV
182: all the ``diffuse''
183: emission can be accounted for by a Galactic population of sources,
184: mainly magnetic cataclysmic variables; see also \citet{Revnivtsev2007a}
185: and \citet{Revnivtsev2007b}.
186:
187: At higher energies, an extensive study of the diffuse Galactic
188: \gray{} emission in the
189: context of CR propagation models has been carried out by
190: \citet{SMR04b,SMR00}.
191: This study confirmed that models based
192: on locally measured electron and nuclei spectra and synchrotron
193: constraints are consistent with \gray{} measurements in the 30 MeV --
194: 500 MeV range; outside this range deviations from the data are apparent.
195: The puzzling excess in the EGRET diffuse emission data above 1 GeV
196: relative to that expected \citep{SMR00,Hunter97} has shown up in all
197: models that are tuned to be consistent with the locally measured CR
198: nuclei and electron spectra \citep{M04rev,SMR04b}.
199: The excess has shown up in all directions, not only in the Galactic plane.
200: This implies that the GeV excess is not a feature
201: restricted to the Galactic ridge or the gas-related emission.
202: A simple
203: re-scaling of the components ($\pi^0$-decay, IC, bremsstrahlung) does not
204: improve the fit in any region,
205: since the observed peak is at an energy
206: higher than the $\pi^0$-peak.
207: For recent reviews see
208: \citet{M04rev}, \citet{Strong2007}, and references therein.
209:
210: Assuming that the GeV excess is not an instrumental
211: artefact\footnote{A discussion of uncertainties and possible sources of
212: error associated with determining the diffuse Galactic \gray{} emission
213: using EGRET data is available in \citet{moskalenko2007a}},
214: the so-called ``optimised model,'' which explains the GeV excess
215: in terms of CR intensity variations in the Galaxy, has been proposed by
216: \citet{SMR04b}.
217: It reproduces the spectrum of the diffuse
218: \gray{s} in \emph{all directions}, as well as the
219: latitude and longitude profiles for the whole EGRET energy range 30
220: MeV -- 50 GeV at the cost of relaxation of the restrictions imposed by
221: the measurements of local CR proton and electron spectra.
222: At lower energies, the predictions of this
223: model have never
224: been tested because of the lack of good data.
225:
226: The study of the Galactic-ridge continuum X-ray emission is a key goal
227: of the INTEGRAL mission.
228: The high spectral resolution combined
229: with its imaging capabilities promises new
230: insights into the nature of this enigmatic radiation.
231: Previous work based on initial, smaller sets of INTEGRAL/SPI observations
232: have reported
233: the detection of diffuse emission at a level consistent with previous
234: experiments
235: \citep{strong03a,strong03b}.
236: However, statistical and systematic errors were large, due in part to the
237: uncertainty in the point-source contribution.
238: Meanwhile, a new analysis of INTEGRAL/IBIS data
239: \citep{lebrun04,terrier04} showed
240: that, up to 100 keV, indeed a large fraction of the total emission from the
241: inner
242: Galaxy is due to sources.
243: \citet{strong04} used the source catalogue from this work
244: (containing 91 sources)
245: as input to SPI model fitting, giving a more
246: solid basis
247: for the contribution of point sources in such an analysis.
248: This exploited the complementarity of the instruments on
249: INTEGRAL for the first time in the context of diffuse emission.
250: The SPI analysis by \citet{bouchet05} gave a rather lower
251: 50--1000 keV power-law continuum
252: than \citet{strong05}, but the errors were large in the early datasets.
253: Now, a new analysis \citep{bouchet07} with 3 times as much SPI exposure
254: gives better statistics, background handling, and point-source subtraction.
255:
256: In the present paper we focus on energies above
257: 50 keV where sources do not appear to be important because of the
258: rapid cut-off in the spectra of the majority, and the relatively small
259: number of hard-spectrum sources.
260: We use the GALPROP model together with a new model for the
261: Galactic interstellar radiation field (ISRF) to solve a long-standing
262: mystery of the origin of the hard X-ray emission -- IC emission
263: from CR electrons and positrons --
264: and to build a model of the Galactic diffuse emission in the energy range from
265: keV to TeV energies, thus covering more that 10 orders of magnitude in energy.
266:
267: Primary CR electrons are directly accelerated in CR sources like supernova
268: remnants or pulsars.
269: Secondary electrons and positrons are
270: produced via interactions of energetic nuclei with interstellar gas, and
271: are usually considered a minor component of CRs.
272: This is indeed the case in the heliosphere where the
273: positron to all-electron ratio is small at all energies,
274: $e^+/(e^+ + e^-)_{tot} \sim 0.1$.
275: However, as we will show, the combined secondary electron/positron
276: flux in the
277: interstellar medium (ISM) is more than half of the
278: primary CR electron flux at $\sim$1 GeV energies and below.
279: This leads to a considerable
280: contribution by secondary positrons and electrons to the diffuse \gray{}
281: flux via IC scattering and bremsstrahlung and significantly,
282: by up to a factor of $\sim$2,
283: increases the flux of diffuse Galactic emission below $\sim$100 MeV.
284: Secondary positrons and electrons are, therefore, directly seen in hard X-rays
285: and \gray{s}.
286:
287: %##############################################################################
288: \section{GALPROP code}
289: %##############################################################################
290: \begin{figure*}
291: \centerline{
292: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f1a.eps}
293: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f1b.eps}}
294: \caption{Spectral energy distribution of the MW ISRF in the Galactic plane.
295: Line colouring: black, $R = 0$ kpc; blue, $R = 4$ kpc; red, $R = 8$ kpc;
296: magenta, $R = 12$ kpc.
297: {\it Left:} maximum metallicity gradient; {\it Right:}, minimum metallicity
298: gradient. The cosmic microwave background (CMB) is included in both figures
299: and dominates the SED for wavelengths $\lambda \gtrsim 600$ $\mu$m.}
300: \label{fig:ISRF}
301: \end{figure*}
302:
303: The GALPROP code \citep{SM98} was created
304: to enable simultaneous predictions of all
305: relevant observations including CR nuclei, electrons and positrons,
306: \gray{s} and synchrotron radiation.
307:
308: We give a very brief summary of GALPROP; for details we refer the
309: reader to the relevant papers
310: \citep{SMR00,SMR04b,MS98,MS00,M02,SM98,Ptuskin06} and the dedicated
311: website\footnote{\tt http://galprop.stanford.edu}.
312: The GALPROP code solves the CR transport equation with a given source
313: distribution and boundary conditions for all CR species.
314: This
315: includes a galactic wind (convection), diffusive reacceleration in the
316: ISM, energy losses, nuclear fragmentation,
317: radioactive decay,
318: and production of secondary particles and isotopes.
319: The numerical solution of the transport equation is based
320: on a Crank-Nicholson \citep{Press92} implicit second-order scheme.
321: The spatial boundary conditions assume free particle escape.
322: Since the grid involves a 3D $(R,z,p)$ or 4D $(x,y,z,p)$ problem
323: (spatial variables plus momentum)
324: ``operator splitting'' is used to handle the implicit solution.
325: For a given halo size the diffusion coefficient, as a function of
326: momentum and the reacceleration or convection parameters, is determined
327: by the boron-to-carbon ratio data.
328: If reacceleration is included, the momentum-space diffusion
329: coefficient $D_{pp}$ is related to the spatial coefficient $\Dxx$
330: ($= \beta D_0\rho^{\delta}$)
331: \citep{berezinskii90,Seo1994}, where $\delta=1/3$ for a Kolmogorov spectrum
332: of interstellar turbulence or $\delta=1/2$ for a Kraichnan cascade,
333: $\rho$ is the magnetic rigidity, $D_0$ is a constant, and $\beta= v/c$.
334: Production of secondary positrons and electrons is calculated using
335: a formalism described in \citet{MS98} with a correction by \citet{Kelner06}.
336: The \gray{s} are calculated using the propagated CR distributions,
337: including a contribution from secondary
338: particles such as positrons and electrons from inelastic processes in the ISM
339: that increases the \gray{} flux at MeV energies \citep{SMR04b}.
340: Gas-related \gray{} intensities are computed from the emissivities as a
341: function of $(R,z,E_\gamma)$ using the column densities of \hi\ and
342: H$_2$ for galactocentric annuli based on 21-cm and CO surveys included
343: in the GALPROP model.
344: Neutral pion production is calculated using the method given by
345: \citet{Dermer86a,Dermer86b} as described in \citet{MS98}, or
346: using a parameterisation developed by \citet{kamae2005};
347: bremsstrahlung is calculated
348: using a formalism by \citet{KochMotz59} as described in \citet{SMR00}.
349: The IC scattering is treated using the appropriate cross section
350: %formalism
351: for an
352: anisotropic radiation field developed by \citet{MS00}
353: using the full angular distribution of the ISRF.
354:
355: Cross-sections are based on the extensive LANL database,
356: nuclear codes, and parameterisations
357: \citep{Mashnik2004}.
358: Starting with the heaviest primary nucleus considered (e.g.\
359: $^{64}$Ni) the propagation solution is used to compute the source term
360: for its spallation products, which are then propagated in turn, and so
361: on down to protons, secondary electrons and positrons, and
362: antiprotons.
363: The inelastically scattered protons and antiprotons are treated
364: as separate components (secondary protons, tertiary antiprotons).
365: In this way secondaries, tertiaries, etc., are included.
366: (Production of $^{10}$B via the $^{10}$Be-decay channel is important
367: and requires a second iteration of this procedure.)
368: GALPROP includes
369: K-capture and electron stripping processes, where a nucleus with an
370: electron (H-like) is considered a separate species because of the
371: difference in lifetime, and knock-on electrons.
372: Primary
373: electrons are treated separately.
374: Normalisation of protons, alphas,
375: and electrons to experimental data is provided (all other isotopes
376: are determined by the source composition and propagation).
377: Gamma rays
378: are computed using interstellar gas data (for
379: $\pi^0$-decay and bremsstrahlung) and the ISRF model (for IC).
380: The synchrotron emission is computed using the Galactic magnetic field model.
381: Spectra of all species on the chosen grid and the \gray{}
382: and synchrotron skymaps are output in standard astronomical formats
383: for comparison with data.
384: Recent extensions to GALPROP include
385: non-linear wave damping \citep{Ptuskin06}
386: and a dark matter package to allow for the propagation of
387: WIMP annihilation
388: products and calculation of the corresponding synchrotron and \gray{} skymaps;
389: an interface between GALPROP and the DarkSUSY code \citep{Gondolo2004}
390: will be implemented in the near future to allow direct calls of GALPROP
391: from within DarkSUSY.
392:
393: The optimised model \citep{SMR04b} is used to calculate the
394: diffuse emission in the range
395: 10 keV -- TeV energies.
396: The CR source distribution is based on
397: the Galactic pulsar distribution \citep{Lorimer2004},
398: while the $X_{\rm CO}$-factors,
399: $X_{\rm CO}=N({\rm H}_2)/W_{\rm CO}$, are variable, increasing towards the
400: outer Galaxy, and fully compatible with the expected variations based
401: on the metallicity gradient and COBE data \citep{SMR04d}.
402: Such a model reproduces the diffuse Galactic \gray{} emission for the
403: whole sky as well as the radial gradient of diffuse Galactic \gray{} emissivity.
404:
405: \begin{figure*}
406: \centerline{
407: \includegraphics[width=3.50in]{f2a.ps}
408: \includegraphics[width=3.50in]{f2b.ps}}
409: \caption{Spectra of CR electrons and positrons in the Galactic plane,
410: as predicted by the adopted optimised GALPROP model.
411: {\it Left:} Total (primary + secondary) and secondary electrons;
412: {\it Right:} Secondary positrons.
413: Interstellar spectra (IS):
414: $R = 0$ kpc (red long dashes),
415: $R = 4$ kpc (blue short dashes),
416: $R = 8.5$ kpc (black solid), also shown modulated to 600 MV.
417: Secondary electrons are shown separately as magenta lines
418: (IS and modulated) on the left panel at $R = 8.5$ kpc.}
419: \label{fig:electrons_positrons}
420: \end{figure*}
421:
422: \section{Interstellar radiation field}
423: %##############################################################################
424:
425: %\begin{figure*}
426: %\centerline{
427: %\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f1a.eps}
428: %\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f1b.eps}}
429: %\caption{Spectral energy distribution of the MW ISRF in the Galactic plane.
430: %Line colouring: black, $R = 0$ kpc; blue, $R = 4$ kpc; red, $R = 8$ kpc;
431: %magenta, $R = 12$ kpc.
432: %{\it Left:} maximum metallicity gradient; {\it Right:}, minimum metallicity
433: %gradient. The cosmic microwave background (CMB) is included in both figures
434: %and dominates the SED for wavelengths $\lambda \gtrsim 600$ $\mu$m.}
435: %\label{fig:ISRF}
436: %\end{figure*}
437:
438: The Galactic ISRF is the result of emission
439: by stars, and the scattering, absorption, and re-emission of absorbed
440: starlight by dust in the ISM.
441: The most detailed calculation to date \citep{SMR00}, which
442: includes spatial and wavelength dependence over the whole Galaxy,
443: has been widely used.
444: The \citet{SMR00}
445: model uses emissivities based on stellar populations based on
446: COBE/DIRBE fits by \citet{Freudenreich1998} and the SKY model of
447: \citet{Wainscoat1992} together with COBE/DIRBE derived
448: infrared emissivities \citep{Sodroski1997,Dwek1997}.
449: Subsequent to this work new relevant astronomical
450: information on stellar populations, Galactic structure, and interstellar dust
451: has become available, motivating a re-evaluation of the ISRF.
452: We briefly describe our calculation of the ISRF;
453: further details can be found in \citet{MPS2006} and \citet{PMS2006}.
454:
455: The fundamental factors influencing the ISRF
456: are the luminosity distribution from the stellar populations of the Galaxy and
457: the radiative transport of the star light through the ISM.
458: The interstellar dust absorbs and scatters the star light in the ultraviolet
459: (UV) and optical, and re-emits the absorbed radiation in the infrared.
460:
461: In our model, we represent the stellar distribution by four
462: spatial components: the thin and thick disc, the bulge, and the
463: spheroidal halo.
464: We follow \citet{Garwood1987} and \citet{Wainscoat1992}
465: and use a table of stellar spectral types comprising
466: normal stars and exotics to represent the luminosity
467: function (LF) for each of the spatial components.
468: The spectral templates for each stellar type are taken from the
469: semi-empirical library of \citet{Pickles1998}.
470: The normalisations per stellar type are obtained by adjusting the
471: space densities to reproduce the observed LFs in the V- and K-band for
472: the thin disc.
473: The LFs for the other spatial components are obtained by adjusting
474: weights per component for each of the stellar types relative to the
475: normalisations obtained for the thin disc LF.
476:
477: We assume a dust model including graphite, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
478: (PAHs), and silicate.
479: Dust grains in the model are spherical and the absorption and scattering
480: efficiencies for graphite, PAHs, and silicate grains are taken from
481: \citet{Li2001}.
482: The dust grain abundance and size distribution are taken from
483: \citet{Weingartner2001} (their best fit Galactic model).
484: We assume a purely neutral ISM.
485: We consider only coherent scattering, and a Henyey-Greenstein angular
486: distribution function \citep{Henyey1941} is used in the scattering calculation.
487: The stochastic heating of grains smaller than $\sim$0.1 $\mu$m
488: is treated
489: using the ``thermal continuous'' approach of \cite{Draine2001};
490: we calculate the equilibrium heating of larger dust grains by balancing
491: absorption with re-emission as described by \cite{Li2001}.
492:
493: Dust follows the Galactic gas distribution and we assume uniform
494: mixing between the two in the ISM \citep{Bohlin1978}.
495: The dust-to-gas ratio scales with the Galactic metallicity gradient.
496: Estimates for the Galactic [O/H] gradient vary in the range $0.04-0.07$
497: dex kpc$^{-1}$ \citep[][and references therein]{SMR04d}.
498: The variation of the metallicity gradient influences
499: the redistribution of the mainly UV and blue
500: component of the ISRF into
501: the infrared: increased metallicity implies more dust, which enhances the
502: absorption of the star light.
503: The variation in the infrared component affects the
504: emission in the hard X-rays (see below).
505: Therefore, we consider two ISRFs
506: corresponding to a maximal case
507: of $0.07$ dex kpc$^{-1}$ and a minimal case with no gradient.
508:
509: The ISRF is calculated for a cylindrical geometry with azimuthal symmetry.
510: The maximum radial extent is $R_{\rm max} = 20$ kpc with the maximum height
511: above the galactic plane $z_{\rm max} = 5$ kpc.
512: The radiative transport is performed using the so-called partial
513: intensity method \citep{Kylafis1987,Baes2001}.
514:
515: Figure~\ref{fig:ISRF} shows the spectral energy distributions (SEDs) in the
516: Galactic plane for selected galactocentric radii for the maximal
517: metallicity gradient (left) and no metallicity gradient (right).
518: An increased metallicity gradient reduces the UV in the inner Galaxy
519: significantly -- by up to a factor of 3 for $\lambda \lesssim 0.3$ $\mu$m --
520: which is
521: redistributed into the infrared.
522: The infrared emission for the inner Galaxy for the maximum metallicity
523: gradient is a factor of $\sim 2$ higher than for the case of no metallicity
524: gradient.
525: For the outer Galaxy the ISRFs calculated for the two cases differ less
526: dramatically.
527: For the case of the maximal metallicity gradient the UV emission is higher
528: than the no gradient case because there is less dust in the outer
529: Galaxy.
530: In turn, this results in less emission in the infrared than for the maximal
531: gradient case.
532:
533: %##############################################################################
534: \section{Results}
535: %##############################################################################
536:
537: \begin{figure*}
538: \centerline{
539: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f3a.eps}
540: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f3b.eps}}
541: \caption{The spectrum of the diffuse emission
542: for $330^\circ<l<30^\circ,|b|<15^\circ$ as calculated in the
543: optimised GALPROP model for the ISRF with maximal metallicity gradient,
544: {\it Left:} with primary electrons only,
545: {\it Right:} with secondary electrons and positrons only.
546: Line-styles: red solid -- $\pi^0$-decay,
547: green broken -- IC (optical [long dash], IR [short dash], CMB [dot]),
548: green solid -- total IC,
549: cyan solid -- bremsstrahlung, black solid -- extragalactic \gray{} background
550: \citep{SMR04a}, blue solid -- total.
551: Data points: red -- EGRET and green -- COMPTEL, as in \citet{strong05};
552: magenta -- INTEGRAL/SPI (broken lines: components in fit to positronium +
553: positron annihilation line + unresolved point sources; shaded region: power-law
554: continuum) \citet{bouchet07}.
555: For the SPI power-law continuum the uncertainty is estimated as described
556: in the text.
557: In this and subsequent figures, the identifier (e.g., 53\_6102029RH)
558: corresponds
559: to the GALPROP version and run used; all parameters of the model are contained
560: in the ``GALDEF'' parameter file for future reference and are available from
561: the GALPROP website at \tt http://galprop.stanford.edu.
562: }
563: \label{fig:diffuse2}
564: \end{figure*}
565:
566: We compare our results for the diffuse emission in the inner Galaxy
567: with the new SPI data, and COMPTEL and EGRET data.
568: The spectrum for each instrument is obtained by integrating over deconvolved
569: skymaps.
570: Since the deconvolution of the data is done based on the
571: individual instrument response, cross-calibration of the data
572: between the individual instruments is not an issue.
573:
574: Our comparison with the SPI data is with the diffuse emission
575: power-law component from \citet{bouchet07}.
576: We describe the procedure used to obtain the diffuse emission and how
577: we estimate the uncertainty on this component.
578: In the method of \citet{bouchet07},
579: a source catalogue is constructed using an iterative algorithm taking
580: into account variable source flux contributions using templates for the
581: spatial morphologies of the interstellar emission:
582: $8^\circ$ degree Gaussian for the positron annihilation emission,
583: DIRBE 4.9 $\mu$m and CO maps for the continuum below and above 120 keV,
584: respectively.
585: The normalisation factor for each of these maps is adjusted during the fitting
586: procedure.
587: Following this initial step,
588: the source fluxes and template information are discarded with only the
589: source localisations retained.
590: The source position information is used in the next step of the analysis where
591: the region $|l| \leq 100^\circ$ and $|b| \leq 30^\circ$ is divided into cells
592: with sizes that are chosen to optimise the signal-to-noise ratio per
593: cell, while still being sufficiently small to follow the observed spatial
594: variations.
595: A likelihood fit is done using the a-priori source position information to
596: obtain the source fluxes and diffuse emission for each `pixel' cell over
597: the energy ranges 25-50, 50-100, 100-200, 200-600, 600-1800, and
598: 1800-7800 keV, respectively.
599: This model independent ``image-based'' method establishes the extent of the
600: diffuse emission.
601: To extract the diffuse spectrum with better signal-to-noise, the
602: background templates (DIRBE 4.9 $\mu$m, CO) are also fit for each
603: energy range.
604: The power-law continuum is based on
605: this model-dependent method but there is some error associated
606: with the derived emission in this case
607: which is not directly estimated in \citet{bouchet07}.
608: To estimate the effect on the diffuse emission, we compare the integrated
609: latitude profiles obtained using the image-based method and the fit results
610: for the background template maps given in Fig.5 of \citet{bouchet07}.
611: We conclude that the intensities could be up to 40\% higher than the
612: background template ones used by \citet{bouchet07} to construct their spectrum.
613:
614: The primary electron and secondary positron and electron spectra from
615: our propagation calculations are
616: shown in Figure~\ref{fig:electrons_positrons}.
617: For energies $\lesssim 1$ GeV, the combined secondary positron and electron
618: flux in the ISM actually exceeds the primary electron flux.
619: This is due to the large ratio of CR nuclei to primary electrons.
620: The addition of the secondary electrons and positrons increases by
621: $\sim 2.5$ the total number capable of producing \gray{s}
622: via IC scattering relative to the pure primary electrons.
623:
624: Figure~\ref{fig:diffuse2} shows the individual contributions by
625: primary electrons (left) and secondary electrons/positrons (right) to the
626: diffuse Galactic emission.
627: For primary electrons, the agreement with the SPI data is excellent while there
628: is still some deficit when compared with COMPTEL.
629: For secondary electrons and positrons,
630: the spectrum of \gray{s}
631: is steeper below $\sim 10$ MeV
632: compared to the primary electrons, which is a reflection of
633: the different source spectra: the primary electron
634: source spectrum is found from adjusting to the \gray{} spectrum at higher
635: energies, while the secondary electron/positron source spectrum
636: follows from the CR nuclei spectrum in the ISM.
637: The leptonic component at low energies (IC, bremsstrahlung) is thus
638: intrinsically connected with the higher energy
639: hadronic component ($\pi^0$-decay).
640:
641: \begin{figure}
642: \centerline{
643: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f4.eps}}
644: \caption{The total spectrum of the diffuse emission as calculated in the
645: optimised model for $330^\circ<l<30^\circ,|b|<15^\circ$ with the
646: maximum metallicity gradient.
647: Line and data styles as for Fig.~\ref{fig:diffuse2}.
648: }
649: \label{fig:diffuse}
650: \end{figure}
651:
652: The components of the IC emission (Figure~\ref{fig:diffuse2})
653: show the contributions
654: by the ISRF components in different energy ranges.
655: For primary electrons, the scattering of optical photons is the
656: major contribution
657: in the energy range $\sim50$~MeV--$100$~GeV, with the infrared the
658: major component below $\sim 50$~MeV and above $100$~GeV, and the Cosmic
659: Microwave Background (CMB) comparable to the infrared below $\sim$~500 keV.
660: For the secondary electrons/positrons the scattering of the optical
661: component dominates above $\sim 500$~keV, while the infrared is the
662: major component for energies below this.
663: Thus, the primary and secondary populations IC scatter the components of
664: the ISRF
665: to different hard X-ray/\gray{} ranges.
666: Interestingly, for secondary electrons/positrons the bremsstrahlung
667: contribution is a factor $\sim 2$ higher for $100$~MeV to $1$~GeV than
668: the primary electron case.
669: This reflects the enhancement of the electrons and positrons
670: in the ISM below 1 GeV that
671: was discussed in conjunction with Fig.~\ref{fig:electrons_positrons}.
672:
673: In Figure~\ref{fig:diffuse} we show the diffuse emission calculated
674: using the optimised model with an ISRF calculated with a maximal metallicity
675: gradient.
676: Inverse Compton scattering is a major component at all energies, with
677: $\pi^0$-decay more important between 100 MeV and 10 GeV,
678: while the bremsstrahlung
679: contribution is minor.
680: The inclusion of secondary electrons and positrons increases the IC emission
681: below $\sim 100$ MeV by up to a factor $\sim 2$, an effect that was pointed out
682: by \citet{SMR04b}.
683: Interestingly, the agreement with the COMPTEL data is improved by the
684: inclusion of the secondary electrons/positrons, although the model still
685: shows a deficit.
686: Instead the SPI data are over-predicted, but the spectral slope is still
687: consistent with the data below 1~MeV given the estimated uncertainties.
688: Since the secondary electrons/positrons are a by-product of the same
689: processes that produce the $\pi^0$-decay \gray{} emission at higher energies,
690: this may indicate that the ratio of CR nuclei to primary electrons we use
691: in the ISM is too high.
692: A possible remedy to recover the model
693: fit if the CR nuclei to primary electron ratio is reduced could be that we
694: have simply underestimated the optical component of the ISRF.
695: If the CR nuclei flux is reduced to improve the agreement with
696: SPI the model emission in the EGRET energy range would also be reduced.
697: The emission in the MeV energy range comes from secondary
698: electrons/positrons IC scattering the optical component of the ISRF, and
699: primary electrons IC scatter the same component to GeV energies.
700: Increasing the optical ISRF would simultaneously increase the emission in the
701: MeV and GeV range, recovering the agreement of the model with EGRET data and
702: possibly further improving the agreement with COMPTEL.
703:
704: \begin{figure}
705: \centerline{
706: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f5.eps}}
707: \caption{The spectrum of the diffuse emission as calculated in the
708: optimised model with contribution of secondary electron and positrons and
709: ISRF without the metallicity gradient.
710: Region $330^\circ<l<30^\circ,|b|<15^\circ$.
711: Line and data styles as in Fig.~\ref{fig:diffuse2}.}
712: \label{fig:diffuse_no_metallicity}
713: \end{figure}
714:
715: \begin{figure*}
716: \centerline{
717: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f6a.eps}
718: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f6b.eps}}
719: \caption{The spectrum of the diffuse emission as calculated in the
720: optimised model with contribution of secondary electron and positrons
721: for different latitude ranges.
722: {\it Left:} Region $330^\circ<l<30^\circ, |b|<10^\circ$
723: {\it Right:} Region $330^\circ<l<30^\circ, |b|<5^\circ$.
724: Line and data styles as in Fig~\ref{fig:diffuse2}.
725: }
726: \label{fig:diffuse_other_b}
727: \end{figure*}
728:
729: To test the dependence of the sub-MeV emission on the assumed ISRF model,
730: we calculate the diffuse
731: emission for the case of no metallicity gradient.
732: Figure~\ref{fig:diffuse_no_metallicity} shows the spectrum of the diffuse
733: emission for this case.
734: The major change in the ISRF is a $\sim$30\% reduction in the infrared emission
735: which is due to the smaller amount of dust in the inner Galaxy when using
736: this ISRF model.
737: This results in a drop of $\sim$10--15\% for the
738: predicted intensity of the diffuse
739: emission below $\sim$1 MeV than the maximal gradient case.
740: The optical emission increases only slightly, while the CMB emission stays the
741: same.
742: The total spectrum of the diffuse emission does not change significantly
743: under this variation of the ISRF showing the robustness of the calculations.
744:
745: We point out that the reduction in the infrared
746: significantly reduces the contribution by secondary
747: electrons and positrons to the total emission below a few hundred keV.
748: In this energy range the emission by primary electrons is also reduced, but
749: by a smaller amount because there is still a contribution by IC scattering
750: of the CMB (see Fig.~\ref{fig:diffuse2}).
751: Since the CMB is known, and if the infrared component of the ISRF is low,
752: the emission below a hundred
753: keV traces the primary electron spectrum in the ISM.
754:
755: We have made our principal comparison with the spectrum for $|b|<15^\circ$
756: since this is the nominal range for the spectrum presented in \cite{bouchet07}.
757: To illustrate the effect of different latitude ranges, we calculate
758: the diffuse emission for $|b| < 10^\circ$ and $|b| < 5^\circ$ and compare with
759: the data for these ranges.
760: The results for these latitude ranges are shown in
761: Fig.~\ref{fig:diffuse_other_b}.
762: Since the extraction of the diffuse component from the SPI data relies upon
763: templates whose latitude distribution may not exactly match the true
764: distribution of the emission some of the signal may be absorbed
765: into the baseline
766: (see Fig.~5 of \citet{bouchet07}).
767: This introduces further uncertainty when comparing reduced latitude ranges
768: which is difficult to quantify better than we have already done.
769: The model emission is qualitatively similar to the
770: data for the reduced latitude ranges, which points the way to using the IC
771: emission as a template in future analyses of the SPI data.
772:
773: %##############################################################################
774: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}
775: \label{section:discussion}
776:
777: The agreement of the single model over the whole energy range from
778: SPI data at low energies, to the EGRET data at high energies, is
779: remarkable.
780: Note that we are using the ``optimised model'' \citep{SMR04b}
781: which has higher
782: primary CR electron fluxes than observed locally, and also higher
783: CR nuclei fluxes, as required to fit the \gray{} data above 30 MeV.
784: With this model we predict too %However, we are predicting too
785: much emission below 1 MeV but seem to reproduce the spectral slope.
786: Reducing the CR nuclei source spectrum to improve the sub-MeV agreement
787: is a possibility.
788: However it cannot be reduced too much since the local CR antiproton fluxes
789: must still be reproduced by the
790: model\footnote{The BESS-Polar flight of 2004 \citep{Hams2007}
791: revealed that the CR antiproton flux is somewhat lower than previous
792: measurements with lower statistics.
793: If these data are confirmed, the CR proton
794: spectrum will become better constrained.
795: In turn, it will lead to a somewhat smaller flux of secondary leptons and
796: improved agreement with the INTEGRAL data.}.
797: Increasing the optical component of the ISRF could improve the agreement
798: at MeV and GeV energies.
799: Variation of the primary electron injection index below a few GeV is
800: another possible remedy to the over-production of diffuse emission below
801: 1~MeV.
802: This requires a different source spectrum than is presently
803: used in the optimised model to sufficiently reduce the sub-MeV
804: diffuse emission in order to be consistent with
805: the SPI spectrum.
806: If instead we use the ``conventional'' model \citep{SMR04b}
807: the situation will not be improved: the sub-MeV emission will be lower, but the
808: agreement with the COMPTEL and EGRET data will be substantially worse.
809:
810: There is still room for a contribution from populations of unresolved
811: compact sources, particularly anomalous X-ray pulsars and radio pulsars,
812: which may have
813: very hard spectra extending to a few hundred keV \citep{Kuiper2006}.
814: They may be responsible for the apparent peak near $b = 0^\circ$ in the
815: \citet{bouchet07} latitude profiles.
816:
817: The hard X-ray continuum is consistent with the predictions in
818: both intensity and spectral index.
819: However, the uncertainties in the model are still considerable: the
820: distribution of CR sources and gas in the inner Galaxy which affect both
821: the primary and secondary electrons/positrons, and the optical and
822: infrared part of the ISRF (the CMB is of course known exactly).
823: In fact, our optimised model overpredicts the SPI data,
824: which could simply reflect these uncertainties, but the agreement in the
825: spectral shape gives confidence that the
826: mechanism is correctly identified.
827:
828: There is still an excess in the COMPTEL energy range between 1--30 MeV
829: which is to be explained.
830: The contribution of the positron annihilation in flight
831: may contribute in this energy range \citep{Beacom06}, but it has to be tested
832: against the intensity of the 511 keV line and positronium continuum.
833:
834: From our modelling, we find that the total rate of secondary positron
835: production by CRs in the whole Galaxy
836: is $\sim2\times10^{42}$ s$^{-1}$ in the optimised model.
837: The conventional model gives a factor of $\sim$2
838: less positrons.
839: These values are $\sim 10$\% of the positron annihilation
840: rate $\sim 1.8\times10^{43}$ s$^{-1}$ as derived from INTEGRAL
841: observations of the 511 keV line emission \citep{Knodlseder2005}.
842: The current CR flux of positrons is not sufficient to account for the
843: observed annihilation rate.
844: A CR origin for the 511 keV annihilation line can still be reconciled with
845: the production rate if CR intensities in the past were higher.
846:
847: Our work illustrates the intrinsic connection between the diffuse
848: Galactic \gray{} emission in different energy ranges.
849: Inverse Compton emission by CR electrons and positrons on
850: starlight and infrared radiation are the most important components
851: of the hard X-ray and \gray{} emission in the 100 keV to few MeV range.
852: A considerable proportion of this emission is produced by secondary
853: electrons and positrons, the spectrum of which depends on the CR
854: nuclei spectrum at energies $\sim$ few GeV and higher.
855: These CRs also produce $\pi^0$-decay \gray{s} that dominate the emission in
856: the GLAST range from 100 MeV to $\sim$10 GeV.
857: Hence, GLAST observations of the $\pi^0$-decay diffuse emission will also
858: constrain in the future the contribution by secondary electrons/positrons
859: to the
860: diffuse \gray{} emission in the SPI energy range.
861: With the secondary electrons/positrons fixed, SPI observations probe the
862: IC emission of primary CR electrons with energies $\lesssim 10$ GeV scattering
863: the infrared component of the ISRF and the CMB.
864: This will provide information on the low energy spectrum of primary CR
865: electrons and the infrared component of the ISRF.
866: In turn, since most of the diffuse \gray{} emission between
867: $\sim$10 GeV -- 10 TeV is produced via IC scattering of primary electrons
868: on the same starlight and infrared photons,
869: this provides a connection to observations of diffuse emission at TeV
870: energies by HESS \citep{aharonian2006} and MILAGRO \citep{abdo2007}.
871:
872: \acknowledgments
873: T.\ A.\ P.\ acknowledges partial support from the US Department of Energy.
874: I.\ V.\ M.\ acknowledges partial support from NASA
875: Astronomy and Physics Research and Analysis Program (APRA) grant.
876:
877: \begin{thebibliography}{}
878:
879: %\bibitem[Atti\'e et al.(2003)]{attie03}
880: % Atti\'e, D., et al.,
881: % \pubjournal{\aap}{411}{L71}{2003}{}
882: %Cordier, B., Gros, M., et al.
883: %2003, A\&A, 411, L71
884:
885: \bibitem[Abdo et al.(2007)]{abdo2007}
886: Abdo, A., et al.,\pubjournal{\apj}{658}{L33}{2007}{}
887:
888: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2006)]{aharonian2006}
889: Aharonian, F., et al.,\pubjournal{Nature}{439}{695}{2006}{}
890:
891: \bibitem[Baes \& Dejonghe(2001)]{Baes2001}
892: Baes, M. \& Dejonghe, H., \pubjournal{\mnras}{326}{722}{2001}{}
893:
894: \bibitem[Beacom \& Y\"uksel(2006)]{Beacom06}
895: Beacom, J. F., \& Y\"uksel, H.,
896: \pubjournal{\prl}{97}{071102}{2006}{}
897: %2006, PRL, 97, 071102
898:
899: \bibitem[Berezinskii et al.(1990)]{berezinskii90}
900: \pubbook{Astrophysics of Cosmic Rays}
901: %Bulanov, S. V., Dogiel, V. A., Ginzburg, V. L.,\& Ptuskin, V. S.
902: {ed.\ V. L. Ginzburg (Amsterdam}{North Holland)}
903: {1990}{Berezinskii, V. S., et al.}
904:
905: %\bibitem[Bird et al.(2005)]{bird05} Bird, A., et al., 2005,
906: % in preparation
907:
908: \bibitem[Bleach et al.(1972)]{bleach72}
909: Bleach, R.D., et al.,
910: \pubjournal{\apj}{174}{L101}{1972}{}
911: %Boldt, E.A., Holt, S.S., Schwartz, D.A. \& Serlemitsos, P.J.
912: % 1972, ApJL, 174, L101
913:
914: \bibitem[Bohlin et al.(1978)]{Bohlin1978}
915: Bohlin, R. C., Savage, B. D., \& Drake, J. F.,
916: \pubjournal{\apj}{224}{132}{1978}{}
917:
918: \bibitem[Bouchet et al.(2005)]{bouchet05}
919: Bouchet, L., et al.,
920: \pubjournal{\apj}{635}{1103}{2005}{}
921:
922: \bibitem[Bouchet et al.(2008)]{bouchet07}
923: Bouchet, L., et al. 2008, ApJ, {\it in press}
924:
925: %\bibitem[Brown \& Leventhal(1987)]{brownleventhal87}
926: % Brown, B.L \& Leventhal, M.,
927: % \pubjournal{\apj}{319}{637}{1987}{}
928:
929: %\bibitem[Churazov et al.(2005)]{churazov05}
930: % Churazov, E., et al.,
931: % %Sunyaev, R., Sazonov, S., Revnivtsev, M., \& Varshalovich, D.
932: % \pubjournal{\mnras}{357}{1377}{2005}{}
933:
934: \bibitem[Dermer(1986a)]{Dermer86a}
935: Dermer, C. D.,
936: \pubjournal{\apj}{307}{47}{1986a}{}
937: %{Binary collision rates of relativistic thermal plasmas. II - Spectra}
938:
939: \bibitem[Dermer(1986b)]{Dermer86b}
940: Dermer, C. D.,
941: \pubjournal{\aap}{157}{223}{1986b}{}
942: %{Secondary production of neutral pi-mesons and the diffuse
943: %galactic gamma radiation}
944:
945: \bibitem[Dogiel et al.(2002a)]{dogiel02a}
946: Dogiel, V.A., et al., \pubjournal{\aap}{382}{730}{2002a}{}
947: %Sch\"onfelder, V., \& Strong, A.W. 2002a, A\&A, 382, 730
948:
949: \bibitem[Dogiel et al.(2002b)]{dogiel02b}
950: Dogiel, V.A., et al.,
951: %Inoue, H., Masai, K., Sch\"onfelder, V., \& Strong, A.W.
952: \pubjournal{\apj}{581}{1061}{2002b}{}
953: %, ApJ, 581, 1061
954:
955: \bibitem[Draine \& Li(2001)]{Draine2001}
956: Draine, B. T. \& Li, A., \pubjournal{\apj}{551}{807}{2001}{}
957:
958: \bibitem[Dwek et al.(1997)]{Dwek1997}
959: Dwek, E., et al.,
960: \pubjournal{\apj}{475}{565}{1997}{}
961:
962: %\bibitem[Ebisawa et al.(1999)]{ebisawa99}
963: % Ebisawa, K., et al., %Maeda, Y., Marshall, F. E., \& Valinia, A. 1999,
964: % \pubjournal{Astr. Nachr.}{320}{321}{1999}{}
965:
966: \bibitem[Ebisawa et al.(2001)]{ebisawa01}
967: Ebisawa, K., et al.,
968: %Maeda, Y., Kaneda, H., \& Yamauchi, S. 2001, Science, 293, 1633
969: \pubjournal{Science}{293}{1633}{2001}{}
970:
971: \bibitem[Ebisawa et al.(2006)]{ebisawa05}
972: Ebisawa, K., et al.,
973: \pubjournal{\apj}{635}{214}{2006}{}
974:
975: \bibitem[Freudenreich(1998)]{Freudenreich1998}
976: Freudenreich, H. T.,\pubjournal{\apj}{492}{495}{1998}{}
977:
978: \bibitem[Garwood \& Jones(1987)]{Garwood1987}
979: Garwood, R. \& Jones, T. J.,
980: \pubjournal{PASP}{99}{453}{1987}{}
981:
982: %\bibitem[Grimm et al.(2002)]{grimm02}
983: % Grimm, H.-J., et al., %Gilfanov, M. \& Sunyaev, R. 2002, A\&A, 391, 923
984: % \pubjournal{\aap}{391}{923}{2002}{}
985:
986: \bibitem[Gondolo et al.(2004)]{Gondolo2004}
987: Gondolo, P., et al., \pubjournal{\jcap}{7}{8}{2004}{}
988:
989: \bibitem[Hams et al.(2007)]{Hams2007}
990: Hams, T., et al., 2007, Proc. 30$^{\rm th}$ ICRC, Merida, {\it in press}
991:
992: \bibitem[Hands et al.(2004)]{hands04}
993: Hands, A. D. P., et al., %Warwick, R. S., Watson, M. G., \& Helfand, D. J.
994: %2004, MNRAS, 351, 31
995: \pubjournal{\mnras}{351}{31}{2004}{}
996:
997: \bibitem[Henyey \& Greenstein(1941)]{Henyey1941}
998: Henyey, L. G. \& Greenstein, J. L., \pubjournal{\apj}{93}{70}{1941}{}
999:
1000: \bibitem[Hunter et al.(1997)]{Hunter97}
1001: Hunter, S. D., et al. \pubjournal{\apj}{481}{205}{1997}{}
1002:
1003: %\bibitem[Jean et al.(2003)]{jean03}
1004: % Jean, P., et al.,
1005: %Kn\"odlseder, J., Lonjou, V., et al. 2003, A\&A, 407, L55
1006: % \pubjournal{\aap}{407}{L55}{2003}{}
1007:
1008: %\bibitem[Jean et al.(2004)]{jean04}
1009: % Jean, P., von Ballmoos, P., Kn\"odlseder, J., et al. 2004,
1010: % Proc. 5th INTEGRAL Workshop, ESA SP-552, eds. V. Sch\"onfelder, G. Lichti \& C. Winkler, p.51
1011:
1012: \bibitem[Kamae et al.(2005)]{kamae2005}
1013: Kamae, T., et al., %Abe, T., \& Koi, T.}
1014: \pubjournal{\apj}{620}{244}{2005}{}
1015:
1016: \bibitem[Kaneda et al.(1997)]{kaneda97}
1017: Kaneda, H., et al., %Makishima, K., Yamauchi, S., et al. 1997, ApJ, 491, 638
1018: \pubjournal{\apj}{491}{638}{1997}{}
1019:
1020: \bibitem[Kelner et al.(2006)]{Kelner06}
1021: Kelner, S. R., et al., \pubjournal{\prd}{74}{034018}{2006}{}
1022:
1023: \bibitem[Kinzer et al.(1999)]{kinzer99}
1024: Kinzer R. L., et al., %Purcell, W. R., \& Kurfess, J.D. 1999, ApJ, 515, 215
1025: \pubjournal{\apj}{515}{215}{1999}{}
1026:
1027: \bibitem[Kinzer et al.(2001)]{kinzer01}
1028: Kinzer R. L., et al., %Milne, P. A., Kurfess, J. D., Strickmann, M. S., et al.
1029: %2001, ApJ, 559, 282
1030: \pubjournal{\apj}{559}{282}{2001}{}
1031:
1032: %\bibitem[Kn\"odlseder et al.(2003)]{knodlseder03}
1033: % Kn\"odlseder, J., et al., %Lonjou, V., Jean, P., et al. 2003, A\&A, 411, L457
1034: % \pubjournal{\aap}{411}{L457}{2003}{}
1035:
1036: \bibitem[Kn\"{o}dlseder et al.(2005)]{Knodlseder2005}
1037: Kn\"{o}dlseder, J., et al., \pubjournal{\aap}{441}{513}{2005}{}
1038:
1039: \bibitem[Koch \& Motz(1959)]{KochMotz59}
1040: Koch, H. W., \& Motz, J. W., \pubjournal{Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.}{31}{920}{1959}{}
1041:
1042: \bibitem[Koyama et al.(1986)]{Koyama1986}
1043: Koyama, K., et al., \pubjournal{\pasj}{38}{503}{1986}{}
1044:
1045: \bibitem[Krivonos et al.(2007)]{Krivonos2007}
1046: Krivonos, R., et al., \pubjournal{\aap}{463}{957}{2007}
1047:
1048: %\bibitem[Kuiper et al.(2004)]{kuiper04}
1049: % Kuiper, L., et al., \pubjournal{\apj}{613}{1173}{2004}{}
1050: % Hermsen, W., \& Mendez, M. 2004, ApJ, 613, 1173;
1051: % see also presentation by L. Kuiper at http://integral.esac.esa.int/workshops/Jan2005
1052:
1053: \bibitem[Kuiper et al.(2006)]{Kuiper2006}
1054: Kuiper, L., et al., \pubjournal{\apj}{645}{556}{2006}{}
1055:
1056: \bibitem[Kylafis \& Bahcall(1987)]{Kylafis1987}
1057: Kylafis, N. D. \& Bahcall, J. N.,
1058: \pubjournal{\apj}{317}{637}{1987}{}
1059:
1060: \bibitem[Lebrun et al.(2004)]{lebrun04}
1061: Lebrun, F., \pubjournal{Nature}{428}{293}{2004}{}
1062: %Terrier, R., Bazzano, A., et al. 2004, Nature, 428 ,293
1063:
1064: \bibitem[Li \& Draine(2001)]{Li2001}
1065: Li, A. \& Draine, B. T., \pubjournal{\apj}{554}{778}{2001}{}
1066:
1067: \bibitem[Lorimer(2004)]{Lorimer2004}
1068: Lorimer, D. R., \pubjournal{Proc.~COSPAR}{35}{1321}{2004}{}
1069:
1070: \bibitem[Mashnik et al.(2004)]{Mashnik2004}
1071: Mashnik, S. G., et al., \pubjournal{\adv}{34}{1288}{2004}{}
1072: %Gudima, K. K., Moskalenko, I. V., Prael, R. E.,\& Sierk, A. J.}
1073: % {\adv}{34}{1288}{2004}{}
1074:
1075: \bibitem[Michelson(2007)]{Michelson2007}
1076: Michelson, P. F., \pubjournal{in AIP Conf.\ Proc.}{921}
1077: {First Int.\ GLAST Symp., ed.\ Ritz, S. et al. (Melville: AIP), 8}{2007}{}
1078:
1079: %\bibitem[Milne et al.(2002)]{milne02}
1080: % Milne, P. A., et al., %Kurfess, J. D., Kinzer, R. L., \& Leising, M. D. 2002,
1081: % \pubjournal{N. Astro. Rev.}{46}{553}{2002}
1082:
1083: \bibitem[Moskalenko \& Strong(1998)]{MS98}
1084: Moskalenko, I. V., \& Strong, A. W., \pubjournal{\apj}{493}{694}{1998}{}
1085:
1086: \bibitem[Moskalenko \& Strong(2000)]{MS00}
1087: Moskalenko, I. V., \& Strong, A. W., \pubjournal{\apj}{528}{357}{2000}{}
1088: % {Anisotropic inverse Compton scattering in the Galaxy}
1089:
1090: \bibitem[Moskalenko et al.(2002)]{M02}
1091: Moskalenko, I. V., et al., %Strong, A. W., Ormes, J. F., \& Potgieter, M. S.
1092: \pubjournal{\apj}{565}{280}{2002}{}
1093: %{Secondary antiprotons and propagation of cosmic
1094: % rays in the Galaxy and heliosphere}
1095:
1096: \bibitem[Moskalenko et al.(2004)]{M04rev}
1097: \pubproc{Moskalenko, I. V., Strong, A. W., \& Reimer O.}
1098: {The Multiwavelength Approach to Unidentified Gamma-Ray Sources (Hong Kong)}
1099: {ed K S Cheng and G E Romero}
1100: {Astrophysics and Space Science Library \rm vol 304}
1101: {Dordrecht: Kluwer}
1102: {279--310}
1103: {2004}
1104: {Diffuse Gamma Rays: Galactic and Extragalactic Diffuse Emission}
1105:
1106: %\bibitem[Moskalenko \& Strong(2005)]{moskalenko_strong05}
1107: % \pubproc{Moskalenko, I. V., \& Strong, A. W.}
1108: % {Proc.\ Int.\ Conf.\ Astrophysical Sources of High Energy Particles and Radiation (Torun)}
1109: % {ed T Bulik et al}
1110: % {AIP Conf.\ Proc.\ \rm vol 801}
1111: % {NY: AIP}
1112: % {57--62}
1113: % {2005}
1114: % {Diffuse gamma-ray emission: lessons and perspectives}
1115:
1116: \bibitem[Moskalenko et al.(2006)]{MPS2006}
1117: Moskalenko, I. V., Porter, T. A., \& Strong, A. W.,
1118: \pubjournal{\apj}{640}{L155}{2006}{}
1119:
1120: \bibitem[Moskalenko et al.(2007)]{moskalenko2007a}
1121: Moskalenko, I. V., et al.,
1122: \pubjournal{Nuc. Phys. B. Supp.}{173}{44}{2007}{}
1123:
1124: \bibitem[Pickles(1998)]{Pickles1998}
1125: Pickles, A. J.,
1126: \pubjournal{PASP}{110}{863}{1998}{}
1127:
1128: \bibitem[Porter et al.(2006)]{PMS2006}
1129: Porter, T. A., Moskalenko, I. V., \& Strong, A. W.,
1130: \pubjournal{\apjl}{648}{29}{2006}{}
1131:
1132: \bibitem[Press et al.(1992)]{Press92}
1133: \pubbook %Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., \& Flannery, B. P.}
1134: {Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN. The art of scientific computing}
1135: {2$^{\rm nd}$ ed.\ (Cambridge}{Cambridge Univ.\ Press)}{1992}
1136: {Press, W. H., et al.}
1137:
1138: \bibitem[Ptuskin et al.(2006)]{Ptuskin06}
1139: Ptuskin, V. S., et al.
1140: %Moskalenko, I. V., Jones, F. C., Strong, A. W., Zirakashvili, V. N.,
1141: \pubjournal{\apj}{642}{902}{2006}{}
1142: %{Dissipation of Magnetohydrodynamic Waves on Energetic Particles:
1143: %Impact on Interstellar Turbulence and Cosmic Ray Transport }
1144:
1145: \bibitem[Purcell et al.(1996)]{purcell96}
1146: Purcell, W. R., et al., \pubjournal{\aaps}{120}{389}{1996}{}
1147:
1148: %\bibitem[Revnivtsev(2003)]{revnivtsev03}
1149: % Revnivtsev, M.,
1150: % \pubjournal{\aap}{410}{865}{2003}{;also private communication.}
1151:
1152: \bibitem[Revnivtsev et al.(2006)]{Revnivtsev2006}
1153: Revnivtsev, M., et al., \pubjournal{\aap}{452}{169}{2006}{}
1154:
1155: \bibitem[Revnivtsev \& Sazonov(2007)]{Revnivtsev2007a}
1156: Revnivtsev, M. \& Sazonov, S., \pubjournal{\aap}{471}{159}{2007}{}
1157:
1158: \bibitem[Revnivtsev et al.(2007)]{Revnivtsev2007b}
1159: Revnivtsev, M., et al., \pubjournal{\aap}{473}{857}{2007}
1160:
1161: \bibitem[Ritz(2007)]{Ritz2007}
1162: Ritz, S., \pubjournal{in AIP Conf.\ Proc.}{921}{First Int.\ GLAST Symp.,
1163: ed.\ Ritz, S. et al. (Melville: AIP), 3}{2007}{}
1164:
1165: \bibitem[Seo \& Ptuskin(1994)]{Seo1994}
1166: Seo, E. S. \& Ptuskin, V. S., \pubjournal{\apj}{431}{705}{1994}{}
1167:
1168: %\bibitem[Sivia(1997)]{sivia97}
1169: % Sivia, D. S. 1997,
1170: % Data Analysis: A Bayesian Tutorial, Oxford University Press Inc., New York.
1171:
1172: \bibitem[Sodroski et al.(1997)]{Sodroski1997}
1173: Sodroski, T. J., et al.,
1174: \pubjournal{\apj}{480}{173}{1997}{}
1175:
1176: %\bibitem[Strong(1985)]{strong85}
1177: % Strong, A. W., \pubjournal{\aap}{150}{273}{1985}{}
1178:
1179: %\bibitem[Strong et al.(1999)]{strong99}
1180: % Strong, A. W., et al., 1999, \pubjournal{Astrophys. Lett. Comm.}{39}{677}{1999}{}
1181:
1182: \bibitem[Strong \& Moskalenko(1998)]{SM98}
1183: Strong, A. W., \& Moskalenko, I. V., \pubjournal{\apj}{ 509}{212}{1998}{}
1184:
1185: \bibitem[Strong et al.(2000)]{SMR00}
1186: Strong, A. W., Moskalenko, I. V., \& Reimer, O., \pubjournal{\apj}{537}{763}{2000}{}
1187:
1188: \bibitem[Strong et al.(2003)]{strong03a}
1189: Strong, A. W., et al., \pubjournal{\aap}{411}{L447}{2003}{}
1190:
1191: \bibitem[Strong(2003)]{strong03b}
1192: Strong, A. W., \pubjournal{\aap}{411}{L127}{2003}{}
1193:
1194: \bibitem[Strong et al.(2004a)]{SMR04a}
1195: Strong, A. W., Moskalenko, I. V., \& Reimer, O., \pubjournal{\apj}{613}{956}{2004a}{}
1196:
1197: \bibitem[Strong et al.(2004b)]{SMR04b}
1198: Strong, A. W., Moskalenko, I. V., \& Reimer, O., \pubjournal{\apj}{613}{962}{2004b}{}
1199:
1200: \bibitem[Strong et al.(2004b)]{strong04}
1201: Strong, A. W., et al., 2004b, Proc. 5th INTEGRAL Workshop, ESA SP-552, eds. V. Sch\"onfelder, G. Lichti \& C. Winkler, p. 507; astro-ph/0405023
1202:
1203: \bibitem[Strong et al.(2004c)]{SMR04d}
1204: Strong, A. W., et al., \pubjournal{\aap}{422}{L47}{2004c}{}
1205:
1206: \bibitem[Strong et al.(2005)]{strong05}
1207: Strong, A. W., et al., \pubjournal{\aap}{444}{495}{2005}{}
1208:
1209: \bibitem[Strong et al.(2007)]{Strong2007}
1210: Strong, A. W., Moskalenko, I. V., \& Ptuskin, V. S.,
1211: \pubjournal{Ann. Rev. Nuc. Part. Sci.}{57}{285}{2007}{}
1212:
1213: %\bibitem[Sturner et al.(2003)]{sturner03}
1214: % Sturner, S. J., et al., \pubjournal{\aap}{411}{L81}{2003}{}
1215:
1216: %\bibitem[Tanaka et al.(1999)]{tanaka99}
1217: % Tanaka, Y., et al., \pubjournal{Astron. Nachr.}{320}{181}{1999}{}
1218:
1219: %\bibitem[Tanaka(2002)]{tanaka02} Tanaka, Y., \pubjournal{\aap}{382}{1052}{2002}{}
1220:
1221: \bibitem[Terrier et al.(2004)]{terrier04}
1222: Terrier, R., et al., 2004, Proc. 5th INTEGRAL Workshop, ESA SP-552, eds. V. Sch\"onfelder, G. Lichti \& C. Winkler, p. 513; astro-ph/0405207
1223:
1224: %\bibitem[Thompson et al.(2005)]{thompson05}
1225: % Thompson, D. J., et al., %Bertsch, D.L. \& O'Neal,Jr, R.H. 2005 , ApJS, 157, 324
1226: % \pubjournal{\apjs}{157}{324}{2005}{}
1227:
1228: %\bibitem[Valinia \& Marshall(1998)]{valinia98}
1229: % Valinia, A. \& Marshall, F. E. \pubjournal{\apj}{505}{134}{1998}{}
1230:
1231: %\bibitem[Valinia et al.(2000a)]{valinia00a}
1232: % Valinia, A., et al., %Kinzer, R.L., \& Marshall, F.E.
1233: % \pubjournal{\apj}{534}{277}{2000a}{}
1234:
1235: \bibitem[Valinia et al.(2000b)]{valinia00b}
1236: Valinia, A., et al., %Tatischeff, V., Arnaud, K., Ebisawa, K., \& Ramaty, R. 2000b, ApJ, 543, 733
1237: \pubjournal{\apj}{543}{733}{2000b}{}
1238:
1239: %\bibitem[Vedrenne et al.(2003)]{vedrenne03}
1240: % Vedrenne, G., et al., %Roques, J.-P., Sch\"onfelder, V., et al. 2003, A\&A, 411, L63
1241: % \pubjournal{\aap}{411}{L63}{2003}{}
1242:
1243: \bibitem[Wainscoat et al.(1992)]{Wainscoat1992}
1244: Wainscoat, R. J., et al., \pubjournal{\apjs}{83}{111}{1992}{}
1245:
1246: \bibitem[Weingartner \& Draine(2001)]{Weingartner2001}
1247: Weingartner, J. C. \& Draine, B. T., \pubjournal{\apj}{548}{296}{2001}{}
1248:
1249: %\bibitem[Winkler et al.(2003)]{winkler03}
1250: % Winkler, C., et al.,
1251: %T. J.-L. Courvoisier, DiCocco, G., et al. 2003, A\&A, 411, L1
1252: % \pubjournal{\aap}{411}{L1}{2003}
1253:
1254: \bibitem[Worrall et al.(1982)]{Worrall1982}
1255: Worrall, D. M., et al., \pubjournal{\apj}{255}{111}{1982}{}
1256:
1257:
1258: \bibitem[Yamasaki et al.(1997)]{yamasaki97}
1259: Yamasaki, N. Y., et al.,
1260: %Ohashi, T., Takahara, F., et al. 1997, ApJ, 481, 821
1261: \pubjournal{\apj}{481}{821}{1997}{}
1262:
1263:
1264: \end{thebibliography}
1265:
1266:
1267: \clearpage
1268: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1269: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%% F I G U R E S %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1270: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1271:
1272: %\begin{figure*}
1273: %\centerline{
1274: %\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f1a.eps}
1275: %\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f1b.eps}}
1276: %\caption{Spectral energy distribution of the MW ISRF in the Galactic plane.
1277: %Line colouring: black, $R = 0$ kpc; blue, $R = 4$ kpc; red, $R = 8$ kpc;
1278: %magenta, $R = 12$ kpc.
1279: %{\it Left:} maximum metallicity gradient; {\it Right:}, minimum metallicity
1280: %gradient. The cosmic microwave background (CMB) is included in both figures
1281: %and dominates the SED for wavelengths $\lambda \gtrsim 600$ $\mu$m.}
1282: %\label{fig:ISRF}
1283: %\end{figure*}
1284:
1285: %\begin{figure*}
1286: %\centerline{
1287: %\includegraphics[width=3.50in]{f2a.ps}
1288: %\includegraphics[width=3.50in]{f2b.ps}}
1289: %\caption{Spectra of CR electrons and positrons in the Galactic plane,
1290: %as predicted by the adopted optimised GALPROP model.
1291: %{\it Left:} Total (primary + secondary) and secondary electrons;
1292: %{\it Right:} Secondary positrons.
1293: %Interstellar spectra (IS):
1294: %$R = 0$ kpc (red long dashes),
1295: %$R = 4$ kpc (blue short dashes),
1296: %$R = 8.5$ kpc (black solid), also shown modulated to 600 MV.
1297: %Secondary electrons are shown separately as magenta lines
1298: %(IS and modulated) on the left panel at $R = 8.5$ kpc.}
1299: %\label{fig:electrons_positrons}
1300: %\end{figure*}
1301:
1302: %\begin{figure*}
1303: %\centerline{
1304: %\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f3a.eps}
1305: %\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f3b.eps}}
1306: %\caption{The spectrum of the diffuse emission
1307: %for $330^\circ<l<30^\circ,|b|<15^\circ$ as calculated in the
1308: %optimised GALPROP model for the ISRF with maximal metallicity gradient,
1309: %{\it Left:} with primary electrons only,
1310: %{\it Right:} with secondary electrons and positrons only.
1311: %Line-styles: red solid -- $\pi^0$-decay,
1312: %green broken -- IC (optical [long dash], IR [short dash], CMB [dot]),
1313: %green solid -- total IC,
1314: %cyan solid -- bremsstrahlung, black solid -- extragalactic \gray{} background
1315: %\citep{SMR04a}, blue solid -- total.
1316: %Data points: red -- EGRET and green -- COMPTEL, as in \citet{strong05};
1317: %magenta -- INTEGRAL/SPI (broken lines: components in fit to positronium +
1318: %positron annihilation line + unresolved point sources; shaded region: power-law
1319: %continuum) \citet{bouchet07}.
1320: %For the SPI power-law continuum the uncertainty is estimated as described
1321: %in the text.
1322: %In this and subsequent figures, the identifier (e.g., 53\_6102029RH)
1323: %corresponds
1324: %to the GALPROP version and run used; all parameters of the model are contained
1325: %in the ``GALDEF'' parameter file for future reference and are available from
1326: %the GALPROP website at \tt http://galprop.stanford.edu.
1327: %}
1328: %\label{fig:diffuse2}
1329: %\end{figure*}
1330:
1331: %\begin{figure*}
1332: %\centerline{
1333: %\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f4.eps}}
1334: %\caption{The total spectrum of the diffuse emission as calculated in the
1335: %optimised model for $330^\circ<l<30^\circ,|b|<15^\circ$ with the
1336: %maximum metallicity gradient.
1337: %Line and data styles as for Fig.~\ref{fig:diffuse2}.
1338: %}
1339: %\label{fig:diffuse}
1340: %\end{figure*}
1341:
1342: %\begin{figure}
1343: %\centerline{
1344: %\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f5.eps}}
1345: %\caption{The spectrum of the diffuse emission as calculated in the
1346: %optimised model with contribution of secondary electron and positrons and
1347: %ISRF without the metallicity gradient.
1348: %Region $330^\circ<l<30^\circ,|b|<15^\circ$.
1349: %Line and data styles as in Fig.~\ref{fig:diffuse}.}
1350: %\label{fig:diffuse_no_metallicity}
1351: %\end{figure}
1352:
1353: %\begin{figure*}
1354: %\centerline{
1355: %\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f6a.eps}
1356: %\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f6b.eps}}
1357: %\caption{The spectrum of the diffuse emission as calculated in the
1358: %optimised model with contribution of secondary electron and positrons
1359: %for different latitude ranges.
1360: %{\it Left:} Region $330^\circ<l<30^\circ, |b|<10^\circ$
1361: %{\it Right:} Region $330^\circ<l<30^\circ, |b|<5^\circ$.
1362: %Line and data styles as in Fig~\ref{fig:diffuse}.
1363: %}
1364: %\label{fig:diffuse_other_b}
1365: %\end{figure*}
1366:
1367: \clearpage
1368: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1369: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%% T A B L E S %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1370: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1371:
1372: \end{document}
1373:
1374: