1: %%

2: %% Tex file : Modified 2004 January 9

3: %%

4: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the

5: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.

6: 

7: %%  All written and compiled by Hiroko Shinnaga

8: %%  Last updated on 01 Sep 2007

9: 

10: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document

11: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore

12: %% any data that comes before this command.

13: 

14: %% The command below calls the preprint style

15: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.

16: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use

17: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.

18: %%

19: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

20: 

21: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:

22: 

23: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

24: 

25: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:

26: 

27: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

28: 

29: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the

30: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,

31: %% use the longabstract style option.

32: 

33: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}

34: 

35: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so

36: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before

37: %% the \begin{document} command.

38: %%

39: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts

40: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing

41: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide

42: %% for information.

43: 

44: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

45: \newcommand{\myemail}{shinnaga@submm.caltech.edu}

46: 

47: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.

48: 

49: 

50: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

51: % My Definition -- Updated on 2008 September 10 

52: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

53: \def\Msun{$M_{\odot}$}

54: \def\Mvir{$M_{\rm VIR}$}

55: \def\Mdust{$M_{\rm dust}$}

56: \def\Tdust{$T_{\rm dust}$}

57: \def\Lsun{$L_{\odot}$}

58: \def\Rsun{$R_{\odot}$}

59: \def\kms{kms$^{-1}$}

60: \def\vlsr{$V_{\rm LSR}$}

61: \def\HII{H{\sc ii}~}

62: \def\wat{H$_2$O}

63: %\def\watd{H$_2$D$^+$}

64: \def\amm{NH$_3$}

65: \def\mcn{CH$_3$CN}

66: \def\h13cop{H$^{13}$CO$^+$}

67: \def\hc5n{HC$_{5}$N}

68: \def\hcop{HCO$^+$}

69: \def\t32{$J=3-2$}

70: \def\h13cn{H$^{13}$CN}

71: \def\cc34s{CC$^{34}$S}

72: \def\n2hp{N$_2$H$^+$}

73: %\def\n2dp{N$_2$D$^+$}

74: \def\co{$^{12}$CO}

75: \def\13co{$^{13}$CO}

76: \def\c18o{C$^{18}$O}

77: \def\ch3cn{CH$_{3}$CN}

78: %\def\ch3oh{CH$_{3}$OH}

79: \def\c34s{C$^{34}$S}

80: \def\3423{$3_4-2_3$}

81: \def\Tbol{$T_{\rm bol}$}

82: \def\Lbol{$L_{\rm bol}$}

83: \def\Fco{$F_{\rm CO}$}

84: \def\Tmb{$T_{\rm mb}$}

85: \def\Tex{$T_{\rm ex}$}

86: \def\Ta{$T_{\rm A}^{\ast}$}

87: \def\Trot{$T_{\rm rot}$}

88: \def\pbeam{beam$^{-1}$}

89: \def\deg{\hbox{$^{\circ}$}}

90: \def\arcmin{\hbox{$^{\prime}$}}

91: \def\arcsec{\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}}

92: \def\micron{$\mu$m}

93: \def\cc{cm$^{-3}$}

94: \def\degree{$^{\circ}$}

95: \def\kms{km s$^{-1}$}

96: \def\mucoj{$\mu_{\rm CO_{\it J}}$}

97: \def\muco{$\mu_{\rm CO}$}

98: \def\tdust{$T_{\rm dust}$}

99: \def\tex{$T_{\rm ex}$}

100: \def\tmb{$T_{\rm mb}$}

101: \def\Tk{$T_{\rm k}$}

102: \def\tk{$T_{\rm k}$}

103: \def\vsys{$V_{\rm sys}$}

104: \def\vsix{$V_{\rm CO 6-5}$}

105: \def\vlsr{$V_{\rm LSR}$}

106: \def\hpbw{$\theta_{\rm HPBW}$}

107: \def\mrot{$M_{\rm rot}$}

108: \def\Mrot{$M_{\rm rot}$}

109: \def\Mvir{$M_{\rm VIR}$}

110: \def\Mlte{$M_{\rm LTE}$}

111: \def\h2{$H_{2}$}

112: %\def\reff350{$R_{\rm eff~350}$}

113: \def\vone{$V_{\rm CO 1-0}$}

114: \def\dvfwhm{$\Delta v_{\rm FWHM}$}

115: \def\jybm{Jy beam$^{-1}$}

116: %\def\ga{\mathrel{\mathchoice {\vcenter{\offinterlineskip\halign{\hfil$\displaystyle##$\hfil\cr>\cr\sim\cr}}}{\vcenter{\offinterlineskip\halign{\hfil$\textstyle##$\hfil\cr\cr\sim\cr}}}

117: %{\vcenter{\offinterlineskip\halign{\hfil$\scriptstyle##$\hfil\cr

118: %\cr\sim\cr}}}

119: %{\vcenter{\offinterlineskip\halign{\hfil$\scriptscriptstyle##$\hfil\cr

120: %\cr\sim\cr}}}}}

121: 

122: \slugcomment{Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal.}

123: 

124: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although

125: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.

126: %% The left head contains a list of authors,

127: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.).  The right

128: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.

129: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.

130: 

131: \shorttitle{Submillimeter Observations of The IRAS 20126+4104 Clump} 

132: \shortauthors{Shinnaga et al.}

133: 

134: %% This is the end of the preamble.  Indicate the beginning of the

135: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.

136: 

137: \begin{document}

138: 

139: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than

140: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if

141: %% you desire.

142: 

143: \title{Submillimeter Observations of The Isolated Massive Dense Clump IRAS 20126+4104}

144: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format

145: %% author and affiliation information.

146: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command

147: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address

148: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.

149: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.

150: 

151: \author{Hiroko Shinnaga\altaffilmark{1},  

152: Thomas G. Phillips\altaffilmark{1,2}, 

153: Ray S. Furuya\altaffilmark{3}, and 

154: Riccardo Cesaroni\altaffilmark{4} 

155: } 

156: \email{shinnaga@submm.caltech.edu}

157: 

158: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which

159: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name.  Specify alternate

160: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each

161: %% affiliation.

162: 

163: \altaffiltext{1}{California Institute of Technology Submillimeter Observatory (CSO)

164:    111 Nowelo St. Hilo HI 96720}

165: \altaffiltext{2}{

166: Division of Physics, Mathematics, and Astronomy, California Institute of Technology,%MC 105-24,

167: 1200 East California Pasadena CA 91125}

168: \altaffiltext{3}{Subaru Telescope, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 

169:    650 N. A'ohoku Pl. Hilo HI 96720}

170: \altaffiltext{4}{Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, INAF, Largo E. Fermi 5, 50125 Firenze, Italy}

171: 

172: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript

173: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the

174: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author

175: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the

176: %% editorial office after submission.

177: 

178: \begin{abstract}

179: We used the CSO 10.4 meter telescope to image the 350 $\mu$m and 450$\mu$m continuum 

180: and CO $J=6-5$ line emission of the IRAS 20126+4104 clump.  

181: The continuum and line observations show that the clump is isolated over a 4 pc region

182: and has a radius of $\sim$ 0.5 pc.  

183: Our analysis shows that the clump has a radial density profile $\propto r ^{-1.2}$ for $r \la$ 0.1 pc and 

184: %$\propto r ^{-1.26 \pm 0.03}$ for $r \la$ 0.1 pc and 

185: has $\propto r^{-2.3}$ for $r \gtrsim$ 0.1 pc

186: %has $\propto r^{-2.32 \pm 0.02}$ for $r \gtrsim$ 0.1 pc, 

187: which suggests the inner region is infalling, 

188: while the infall wave has not yet reached the outer region.   

189: Assuming temperature gradient of r$^{-0.35}$, the power law indices become 

190: $\propto r ^{-0.9}$ for $r \la$ 0.1 pc and $\propto r^{-2.0}$ for $r \gtrsim$ 0.1 pc. 

191: Based on a map of the flux ratio of 350$\mu$m/450$\mu$m, we identify three distinct regions:

192: a bipolar feature that coincides with the large scale CO bipolar outflow;

193: a cocoon-like region that encases the bipolar feature and has a warm surface; and 

194: a cold layer outside of the cocoon region.  

195: The complex patterns of the flux ratio map indicates that the clump is no longer uniform 

196: in terms of temperature as well as dust properties.  

197: The CO emission near the systemic velocity traces the dense clump and  

198: the outer layer of the clump shows narrow line widths ($\la$ 3 \kms).  

199: The clump has a velocity gradient of $\sim$ 2 \kms pc$^{-1}$, which 

200: we interpret as due to rotation of the clump, as the equilibrium mass ($\sim$ 200 \Msun) is comparable 

201: to the LTE mass obtained from the CO line.  

202: Over a scale of $\sim$ 1 pc, the clump rotates in the opposite sense with respect to the 

203: $\lesssim$ 0.03 pc disk associated with the (proto)star.  

204: This is one of four objects in high-mass and low-mass star forming regions 

205: for which a discrepancy between the rotation sense of the envelope and the core

206: has been found,

207: suggesting that such a complex kinematics may not be unusual 

208: in star forming regions.  

209: %Two of the CO $6-5$ red shifted peaks show strong correlation with two of the shocked  

210: %H$_{2}$ knots, indicating that they are physically associated.  

211: %The results 

212: %Eighteen clumps are identified in CO $1-0$ interferometric data.  

213: %Most of the clumps show 350 $\mu$m flux enhancement on the locations,

214: %suggesting that these clumps are real physical entities, maybe created through fragmentation process.  

215: %The measured clump mass distribution is

216: %$\Delta N/\Delta M \varpropto M^{-1.6 \pm 0.4}$ over a range of 0.01 \Msun to 40 \Msun.

217: %The shallow slope may indicate that the clumps are formed under pure gravitational contraction without

218: %significant support from turbulence, 

219: %as the contributions from non-thermal components at the outer region of the massive dense clump 

220: %are measured not to be significant.  

221: \end{abstract}

222: 

223: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented

224: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors

225: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine

226: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.

227: 

228: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper

229: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so in the

230: %% subject header.  Objects should be in the appropriate "individual"

231: %% headers (e.g. quasars: individual, stars: individual, etc.) with the

232: %% additional provision that the total number of headers, including each

233: %% individual object, not exceed six.  The \objectname{} macro, and its

234: %% alias \object{}, is used to mark each object.  The macro takes the object

235: %% name as its primary argument.  This name will appear in the paper

236: %% and serve as the link's anchor in the electronic edition if the name

237: %% is recognized by the data centers.  The macro also takes an optional

238: %% argument in parentheses in cases where the data center identification

239: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper.

240: 

241: \keywords{ISM: clouds --- ISM: jets and outflows 

242: --- ISM: kinematics and dynamics --- ISM: lines and bands --- 

243: stars: formation } %---  radio lines: ISM ---  radio continuum: ISM ---  infrared: ISM}

244: 

245: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.

246: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep

247: %% and \citet commands to identify citations.  The citations are

248: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds

249: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have

250: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus

251: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for

252: %% each reference.

253: 

254: %\newpage

255: %\clearpage

256: 

257: \section{INTRODUCTION}

258: %Massive stars are fundamental components to the evolution of galaxies.   

259: %Thus, understanding massive star formation and the evolution is an important subject in the field of astrophysics.   

260: High mass star formation, especially in its earliest phase, is poorly understood because

261: %a variety of facts inhibit the study of this process.

262: of the nature of the objects in this phase.  

263: %a variety of facts inhibit the study of this process.

264: First of all, young high mass stars are deeply embedded in their dense natal cloud cores %parental cores

265: and form and evolve on a short time scale, much shorter than that of low mass star formation. 

266: Moreover, once a massive star has reached the zero age main sequence, 

267: %its strong UV radiation and powerful radiation pressure

268: its strong UV radiation pressure

269: heavily affects the surrounding material, thus making it difficult

270: to trace back the initial conditions of the molecular cloud.

271: Finally, high mass stars form in clusters at relatively large distances from us

272: (typically a few kpc): it is hence not easy to resolve individual %different

273: young stellar objects, even for the closest massive star 

274: forming region, Orion  (e.g., Plambeck et al. 1982, Greenhill et al. 1998, Beuther et al. 2005), 

275: 

276: The early B type massive (proto)star, IRAS 20126+4104, is a well-studied object 

277: %one of the very rare objects 

278: which provides us the opportunity to

279: study the early phase of massive star formation 

280: in a relatively simple configuration.

281: This consists of a luminous IRAS source embedded in a dense core and associated

282: with both a bipolar outflow and a circumstellar Keplerian disk

283: (imaged in NH$_3$, \ch3cn and C$^{34}$S; Zhang et al. 1998, Cesaroni et al. 1997, 1999, 2005).

284: The Caltech Millimeter Array (OVRO-MMA) was used to image

285: the large scale ($\sim$ 0.5 pc) north-south outflow in detail using the CO $J=1-0$ transitions \citep{she00}.  

286: It appears that this N--S direction is not preserved on a smaller scale (0.1~pc) where a jet

287: oriented SE--NW has been imaged in a variety of tracers, such as

288: shocked H$_{2}$ (Cesaroni et al. 1997, Shephered et al. 2000),  \amm (3,3)/(4,4) emission (Zhang et al. 1999),  

289: SiO and HCO$^{+}$ emission (Cesaroni et al. 1997, 1999), 

290: and scattered light in the near infrared (NIR) continuum (e.g., Ayala et al. 1998, Sridharan et al. 2005).

291: The position angle ($PA$) of the jet is $\sim$ 150\deg, significantly different from that of the large scale molecular outflow

292: ($PA\simeq -25$\deg; Shepherd et al. 2000, Lebr{\'o}n et al. 2006).  %11\deg.  

293: Such a discrepancy has been interpreted as

294: precession of the jet/outflow axis (Shephered et al. 2000, Cesaroni et al. 2005).  

295: 

296: While many studies have been done on this object,

297: only few of these have focused on the dense pc-scale clump hosting the (proto)star.  

298: %Studying detail about the dense clump, o

299: It is thus of interest to

300: investigate the physical properties and evolution of such a clump and its interaction

301: with the outflow from the (proto)star.  %, and the fragmentation 

302: %occurring on a process of gravitational contraction.  

303: %Observations at submillimeter band are advantageous for this purpose, because 

304: %the spectral energy distribution (SED) of the clump reaches the peak near the band.  

305: %the clump releases energy efficiently in the band.  

306: 

307: Here we present a study of the dense clump and bipolar outflow 

308: based on submillimeter continuum and spectroscopic observations %of the dense clump 

309: taken with the 10.4 meter Leighton telescope at the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory (CSO)

310: \footnote{The Caltech Submillimeter Observatory is supported by the 

311: NSF grant AST-0229008.}.  % and on CO $1-0$ interferometric observations done using the OVRO-MMA.  

312: %to study kinematics and physical properties of a massive dense clump as well as the 

313: %$\sim$ 0.5 pc scale bipolar outflow.  

314: Note that 1.5 kpc is used as the distance of the object to estimate physical parameters in this paper.  

315: A discussion regarding the distance of this object is given in the Appendix.  

316: 

317: \section{OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION} \label{obs}

318: %\subsection{The Caltech Submillimeter Observatory}

319: Submillimeter continuum and molecular line observations were carried out 

320: towards the massive dense clump %using the CSO telescope 

321: (Table 1).  

322: The dust continuum observations at 350 $\mu$m and 450 $\mu$m were made on 2005 May 10 and 11 using the Submillimeter High Angular Resolution Camera II

323: (SHARC II, Dowell et al. 2003; Voellmer et al. 2003) %\citep{dow03,voe03}, 

324: mounted on a Nasmyth focus. 

325: %Note that  b

326: Both the 350$\mu$m and 450$\mu$m beams have simple Gaussian shapes with 

327: half-power beam widths (\hpbw) of 8.7\arcsec~ and 9.8\arcsec~ (see Table\ref{tbl-1}).  

328: The 384 pixels of the bolometer array cover a region of about $\sim$ 1\arcmin~ $\times$ 2.6\arcmin~ at 350 $\mu$m.  

329: Pointing and focus were checked regularly. 

330: The pointing drift due to temperature \citep{sh04b}  was subtracted in the data reduction process.  

331: The final pointing accuracy is within $\sim$ 2\arcsec. 

332: The Dish Surface Optimization System (DSOS) \citep{leo05} was used during the observations: this allows us to apply a gravitational

333: deformation correction to the main mirror 

334: physically and is thus a key component for high sensitivity short submillimeter wave observations.

335: Zenith opacities $\tau_{225}\sim$0.06 at the wavelength of 1300 $\mu$m were measured with the CSO tau meter

336: during the 350$\mu$m observations, while during the acquisition of the 450$\mu$m data we measured $\tau_{225}\sim$0.09.

337: The data were reduced with the software Comprehensive Reduction Utility (CRUSH, Kovacs 2006)  %for SHARC II 

338: version 1.41.  The flux was calibrated with Neptune for both wavelengths, with an estimated 

339: calibration uncertainty of 7\% at 350$\mu$m and 5\% at 450$\mu$m.  

340: The estimated flux of the planet was 94.6 Jy at 350$\mu$m on 2005 May 10 and 55.9 Jy at 450$\mu$m 

341: on 2005 May 11.  Note that the angular size of the planet 

342: was much smaller than the beam sizes at these wavelengths.  

343: An area of $\sim$ 9\arcmin~ centered at the source position was mapped with the instrument, in box-scan mode. 

344: The RMS noise of the final maps is about 200 mJy/beam for both bands. 

345: After calibration, data analysis was done using the program GRAPHIC of the GILDAS software.  

346: 

347: Spectroscopic observations in the CO $J=6-5$ line ($\nu$= 691.473076 GHz, Goldsmith et al. 1981)

348: were made on 2004 July 8 and 9 %, 15 July 2005, 25/26 September 2005, 

349: %and 4/5 October 2005, 

350: using a 690 GHz heterodyne receiver.  

351: An area of 2.\arcmin7 $\times$ 2.\arcmin7 was sampled with steps of 5\arcsec~ and 20\arcsec. %5\arcsec or 10\arcsec.  

352: while the innermost region of 1\arcmin~20\arcsec $\times$ 1\arcmin~ was sampled with steps of 5\arcsec. %60\arcsec $\times$ 80\arcsec.   

353: %Inner region of the mapped area of 1\arcmin $\times$ 1\arcmin 20\arcsec was observed in Nyquist sampling (5\arcsec spacing).  

354: $\tau_{225}$ 

355: was between 0.07 and 0.085 during the observations. 

356: The SIS receiver operation at 4K produced typical single sideband system temperatures

357: (measured with the 1.5 GHz bandwidth Acousto-optic spectrometer)

358: between $\sim$ 7000 K and 10900 K at 691 GHz, for elevations in the range of $\sim$ 50--70 degrees.

359: The antenna temperature $T_{\rm A}^{*}$  calibration 

360: was done by the standard chopper wheel method every 30 minutes to 1 hour.   

361: The data were converted to the main beam brightness temperature (\tmb) scale.  

362: The \hpbw\ at 691 GHz is $\sim$10\arcsec.

363: The main beam efficiency at the frequency of the CO $6-5$ transition at an elevation of 49\deg~ was estimated to be $\sim$ 40 $\%$,

364: through observations of Uranus.  

365: Pointing was checked approximately every two hours.

366: The pointing accuracy is estimated to be $\sim$ 5\arcsec.   

367: Daily gain variations as well as gain curve over different elevation angles were derived and corrected using CO $6-5$ spectrum of NGC 7027.  

368: Frequency calibration was done every 30 minutes.   

369: %The  data were sampled every 5 arcseconds towards the central 60\arcsec $\times$ 80\arcsec region 

370: %and every  5\arcsec$-$20\arcsec ~ in an area of the clump (140\arcsec $\times$140\arcsec). 

371: The data were reduced using the program CLASS of the GILDAS software. 

372: 

373: \notetoeditor{Please insert Table 1 here.}

374: 

375: \section{RESULTS AND ANALYSIS} \label{results}

376: \subsection{Submillimeter Dust  Continuum}\label{sharc}

377: \subsubsection{Overall Structures and Flux Measurements}\label{overalldust}

378: Submillimeter continuum observations over a 4 pc region confirmed that %this is the only dense clump,   

379: the object is an isolated massive dense clump (Figure \ref{sharcimage}).  

380: The submillimeter dust peak positions in both bands coincide with the 1mm and 3mm continuum peak position 

381: (RA = 20$^{h}$ 14$^{m}$ 26.$^{s}$03, Decl. = 41\deg 13\arcmin 32.\arcsec7 (J2000);   

382:  l = 78\deg 07\arcmin 20.\arcsec2, b = 03\deg 37\arcmin 58.\arcsec3)), measured by \citet{ces99} and \citet{she00}.   

383: 

384: The 350$\mu$m image traces 

385: a north-south elongated single dense clump with a size of $\sim$1.3 $\times$ 0.7 pc, %. %, which fits the silhouette against 

386: which fits the silhouette against diffuse ionized emission.  

387: The 450$\mu$m dust continuum, which has a size of

388: about %126\arcsec $\times$ 59\arcsec (

389: 0.9 $\times$ 0.4 pc, looks more compact, with some extension towards the south.

390: The clump has a prolate spheroidal shape.  

391: %The effective radius of the clump ($R_{\rm eff}$ = (Area of 2$\sigma$ contour)$^{1/2} / \pi$)) traced with 350 $\mu$m continuum, 

392: %\reff350 and $R_{\rm 450$,  are $\sim$ 0.48 pc ($\sim$ 66\arcsec~in angular size) and . 

393: %The effective radius of the clump, 

394: The effective radius of the clump is defined as

395: $R_{\rm eff} = (A/\pi-\theta_{\rm HPBW}^2/4)^{1/2}$, 

396: where $A$ is the area of 2$\sigma$ contour traced by 350 $\mu$m and 450$\mu$m continuum.

397: %\reff350 

398: We find $R_{\rm eff 350}=0.48$~pc and $R_{\rm eff 450}=0.37$~pc, corresponding to angular radii of 66\arcsec\ and 51\arcsec, respectively. 

399: 

400: \notetoeditor{Please insert Figures 1 here.}

401: 

402: The peak flux values at 350$\mu$m and 450$\mu$m are %at these two bands are 

403: 59.1$\pm$ 4.1 Jy beam$^{-1}$ and 27.4$\pm$1.2 Jy beam$^{-1}$, respectively.  

404: Within the uncertainties, these values are consistent with previous flux measurements done with SCUBA \citep{ces99}

405: with \hpbw=15\arcsec,

406: but the 350$\mu$m peak flux value is higher than 

407: another SHARC measurement at the same wavelength, 34 \jybm \citep{hun00},  with \hpbw = 11\arcsec.  

408: All peak flux densities at different wavelengths reported to date are summarized in Table \ref{tbl-2}.  %%%%%%%

409: %The table also shows our submillimeter maps have the highest sensitivity among the listed measurements.  

410: %The flux densities reported by \citet{wil04}, 1 Jy  in a 14.4\arcsec~ beam at 850$\mu$m and 

411: %3 Jy in an 8\arcsec beam at 450$\mu$m, 

412: %are lower than all the other submillimeter continuum measurements. % described above.  

413: %From Table \ref{tbl-2}, one can recognize how sensitive our submillimeter images are comparing to other measurements.  

414: %Flux density, 1.1 Jy /11\arcsec beam measured at 1.2 mm, reported by \citet{beu02}, is also much lower than the 

415: %expected flux density at 1.2mm extrapolated from other wavelengths (see Figure 7 in Shephered et al. 2000).  

416: %These lower flux densities may be because 

417: %%%%%

418: Our total flux densities computed inside the 2$\sigma$ contour are 477 $\pm$ 13 Jy  

419: at 350$\mu$m and 137 $\pm$ 14Jy at 450$\mu$m, respectively.  

420: %By comparing the flux at the bands,  the dust temperature, ~\tdust,~ is estimated to be $\sim$ 40 K.  

421: %The derivation will be described in $\S$ \ref{dustprop}.

422: 

423: \subsubsection{Radial Density Profile}\label{densityprofile}

424: We approximate the

425: column density ($N$(H$_{2}$)) as a function of clump radius ($r$)  as a power law,

426: $N$(H$_{2}$)$\propto r^{p}$. This

427: reflects the density structure of the clump, which to a first order approximation

428: should also scale as a power law, with index $p-1$.  

429: Figure \ref{columndensitydist} represents the 

430: azimuthally averaged column density profile derived from the 350$\mu$m data.  

431: The density profile is plotted from the clump center, i.e. the peak position at 350$\mu$m.  

432: %Open triangle and filled pentagon in the diagram 

433: %Dash-dotted line and long dashed line are drawn on the observed radii of the continuum 

434: %emission measured by Beuther et al. 2002 (at 1.2mm) and by Williams et al. 2004 (at 850$\mu$m).  

435: %\citet{fon02} made detail analysis including temperature gradient of this object and did not find 

436: %any significant gradient.  

437: A discussion on the effect of a temperature gradient on the estimate of the

438: column density profile will be given in $\S$ \ref{dustprop}.  

439: 

440: %(RA = 20$^{h}$ 14$^{m}$ 26.$^{s}$104, Decl. = 41\deg 13\arcmin 32.\arcsec46 (J2000)).  

441: One can see that

442: the inner part of the dense clump has a flatter index compared to that of outer part.  

443: %%%%%%%

444: The power law for $0.03 \la r \la 0.13$ pc %radius between 0.03 and 0.13 pc 

445: (corresponding to 4.4\arcsec~ and 17\arcsec) 

446: is $r ^{-0.26 \pm 0.03}$.  

447: Note that this region is larger than \hpbw$_{350}$/2 = 4.\arcsec3, so that

448: the flatter index observed in the inner region is not due to beam dilution.

449: %There is no correction is

450: In the range $0.13 \la r \la 0.3$ pc %radius between 0.13 and 0.3 pc 

451: (i.e. between 17 and 40\arcsec), the column density decreases as $r^{-1.32 \pm 0.02}$.  

452: Finally, for $0.3 \la r \la 0.7$ pc %a radius range between 0.3 and 0.7 pc 

453: (40 -- 100\arcsec), the index $p$ %of $r$ to the column density 

454: is $-1.98 \pm 0.02$.  Steepening of the index in this region is likely due to

455: geometrical effects close to the clump border at $\sim$50\arcsec\ from the center.

456: Instead, in the two inner regions the estimates obtained are reliable and

457: imply

458: power law indices of $-1.26$ and $-2.32$ for the volume density.  %, assuming the clump is spherically symmetric.  

459: These issues will be further discussed in $\S$ \ref{dustprop}. 

460: 

461: 

462: \notetoeditor{Please insert Figures 2 here.}

463: 

464: \subsubsection{350$\mu$m/450$\mu$m Flux Ratio Map}\label{sharcratiosec}

465: The dust continuum maps taken at two different wavelengths allow us to calculate a flux ratio map.

466: %indicates changes in temperature and nature of grains.  % (size and composition). 

467: Note that such a ratio depends on two

468: parameters: the emissivity spectral index, $\beta$, and the temperature of the dust grains, \tdust.  

469: 

470: Figure \ref{sharcratioonly} shows a map of the 350$\mu$m/450$\mu$m flux ratio.

471: Note that the 350$\mu$m data have been smoothed to the same angular resolution as the 450$\mu$m image.  

472: Only data above 2 $\sigma$ 

473: have been used in the computation of the ratio.

474: The plotted ratio range is between 2 and 3 in order to show the change of the ratio clearly.  

475: %White contours are drawn from 3 $\sigma$ level of the 450 $\mu$m image.

476: %In order to see the flux variation clearly, colors show the flux ratio values between 2 and 3.  

477: 

478: The flux ratio map reveals a few intriguing features.

479: First of all, the flux ratio towards the clump center is low ($\sim$ 2)

480: and shows a bipolar structure elongated in the north-south direction.  

481: Second, the flux ratio increases towards the outer region and reaches the maximum ($\sim$ 3) at $r \sim 0.3$ pc.

482: Such a high flux ratio is found in all directions and traces a region elongated in the north-south direction.

483: Third, the flux ratio decreases down to $\lesssim$ 2 beyond the high flux ratio region at $r \gtrsim 0.4$ pc.  

484: 

485: This variation of the flux ratio can be found also in Figure \ref{sharcratio-radius}.  

486: Here, 

487: the flux ratio is calculated over circular annuli with 10\arcsec~ width and 10\arcsec~ step. % in radius.  

488: The error bars are the standard deviation of the ratio values measured in each annulus. % (see $\S$ \ref{sharcratiosec}). 

489: Note that error of the flux ratio increases towards the clump edge, as the intensities of the continuum emission decrease.  

490: 

491: Considering the fact that there is only one prominent heating source, the massive (proto)star, inside the dense clump, 

492: the flux ratio pattern is expected to be spherically symmetry.  % if the mass distribution is spherically symmetric.  

493: However, the observed pattern of the flux ratio map looks significantly elongated, which

494: may be due to the bipolar outflow from the massive (proto)star.  

495: This will be discussed in detail in $\S$ \ref{discussion}.

496: 

497: \notetoeditor{Please insert Figures 3 and 4 here.}

498: 

499: 

500: \subsection{Molecular Components Traced with CO Emission}\label{co}

501: We use our maps of the clump in the CO $J=6-5$ line % with the CSO heterodyne receivers, 

502: to investigate the physical properties of the molecular gas ($\S$ \ref{co765text}) as well as 

503: its low-velocity ($\S$ \ref{comaps}) and

504: high-velocity components ($\S$ \ref{co65outflows}).

505: 

506: \subsubsection{Physical Properties Estimated From CO $J=6-5$ and $J=7-6$ Spectra}\label{co765text} 

507: In Figure \ref{co765} (a), the CO $J=7-6$ spectrum %observed towards the millimeter continuum peak 

508: (Kawamura et al 1999) is compared with the CO $J=6-5$ spectrum to infer the physical properties of the molecular gas. 

509: %\Tmb~ is the main beam temperature. 

510: %Note that the temperature scale of CO $7-6$ spectrum is lower limit 

511: %because the reported main beam efficiency (0.41) was measured with 

512: %Jupiter whose size was more extended compared to the beam size \citep{kaw99}.   

513: Figure \ref{co765} (b) shows the ratio of the main beam temperatures of %brightness temperatures of 

514: these transitions.  Since the temperature scale of the 

515: CO $7-6$ spectrum is a lower limit \citep{kaw99}, the brightness temperature ratio is to be taken as an upper limit.  

516: One can see that the red shifted wing has a higher ratio 

517: than the blue shifted one.  

518: \notetoeditor{Please insert Figures 5 here.}

519: 

520: When dust couples well with molecular gas, 

521: the excitation temperature of the gas must be close to the temperature estimated from 

522: the spectral energy distribution (SED) of the dust continuum.  

523: Therefore line emission is expected to be optically thin when \tmb~ is lower than \tdust=\tex\ ($\sim$ 40 K, Shepherd et al. 2000;  

524: see also $\S$ \ref{dustprop}).

525: Thus, the CO emission in the line wings is likely optically thin, because \tmb $\ll$ 40~K at high velocities.  %, shown in Figure \ref{co765}.  

526: %The large velocity gradient (LVG) analysis to be described at the end of this section supports that both CO $7-6$ and $6-5$ emission is not so optically thick.  

527: 

528: We now wish to obtain an estimate of the gas temperature in the high velocity gas (i.e. in the

529: line wings) using the result in Figure~\ref{co765}~(b).

530: For this purpose we express the ratio between the main beam 

531: brightness temperatures of the CO $7-6$ and $6-5$ lines as

532: \begin{equation}

533: %\frac{T_{\rm{mb~ CO}~ 7-6}}{T_{{\rm mb~ CO}~ 6-5}} = \frac{f_{7-6}}{f_{6-5}}\cdot \cdot \frac{B_{\nu 7-6}(T_{\rm ex})-B_{\nu 7-6}(T_{\rm bg})}{B_{\nu 6-5}(T_{\rm ex})-B_{\nu 6-5}(T_{\rm bg})} \cdot \frac{1-{\rm exp}(-\tau_{7-6})}{1-{\rm exp}(-\tau_{6-5})}

534:  \frac{T_{\rm{mb~ CO}~ 7-6}}{T_{{\rm mb~ CO}~ 6-5}} = \frac{f_{7-6}}{f_{6-5}} \cdot \left(\frac{\nu_{6-5}}{\nu_{7-6}}\right)^2 \cdot

535:  \frac{B_{\nu_{7-6}}(T_{\rm ex})-B_{\nu_{7-6}}(T_{\rm bg})}{B_{\nu_{6-5}}(T_{\rm ex})-B_{\nu_{6-5}}(T_{\rm bg})} \cdot

536:  \frac{1-{\rm exp}(-\tau_{7-6})}{1-{\rm exp}(-\tau_{6-5})} 

537: \end{equation}

538: where

539: $T_{\rm{mb}}$ is the main beam brightness temperature of the CO transition, 

540: $f$ is the corresponding beam filling factor,

541: and $B_{\nu_{J-(J-1)}}(T) = \frac{2h \nu^{3}}{c^{2}}\cdot[{\rm exp}(\frac{h\nu_{J-(J-1)}}{kT})-1]^{-1}$. 

542: is the Planck function.

543: Here $h$ and $k$ are the Planck and Boltzmann's constants. 

544: $T_{\rm bg}$ is the cosmic microwave background temperature (2.7 K).  

545: At the frequencies of the CO $7-6$ and $6-5$ transitions 

546: ($\nu_{7-6}$= 806.652~GHz; $\nu_{6-5}$= 691.473~GHz), 

547: $B_{\nu_{6-5}}(T_{\rm bg})$ and $B_{\nu_{7-6}}(T_{\rm bg})$ are negligible.  %can be neglected.  %are $\approx$ 0.  

548: As already pointed out, in the line wings $\tau\ll1$, so that [1-exp(-$\tau$)] $\simeq \tau$.  

549: Since the source is resolved, we also assume $\frac{f_{7-6}}{f_{6-5}} \simeq 1$. 

550: Under these approximations, the above equation can be re-written as 

551: \begin{equation}

552: \frac{T_{\rm{mb~ CO}~ 7-6}}{T_{{\rm mb~ CO}~ 6-5}} \simeq \frac{\nu_{7-6}}{\nu_{6-5}} \cdot

553: \frac{\exp\left(\frac{h\nu_{6-5}}{kT_{\rm ex}}\right)-1}{\exp\left(\frac{h\nu_{7-6}}{kT_{\rm ex}}\right)-1} \cdot

554: \frac{\tau_{7-6}}{\tau_{6-5}}

555: \end{equation}

556: Under local thermal equilibrium (LTE) condition, the ratio of the optical depths of the two transitions can be calculated from the following equation; 

557: \begin{equation}

558: \frac{\tau_{7-6}}{\tau_{6-5}} \simeq \frac{\nu_{7-6}}{\nu_{6-5}} \cdot \exp\left(-\frac{h\nu_{7-6}}{kT_{\rm ex}}\right) \cdot

559:  \frac{{\rm exp}(\frac{h\nu_{7-6}}{kT_{\rm ex}})-1}{{\rm exp}(\frac{h\nu_{6-5}}{kT_{\rm ex}})-1}

560: \end{equation}

561: Substituting Equation (3) in the Equation (2), replacing $h\nu_{7-6}/k=38.714$~K and $\nu_{7-6}/\nu_{6-5}=7/6$,

562: and solving with respect to $T_{\rm ex}$, one finds

563: \begin{equation}

564: T_{\rm ex} = \frac{38.714~{\rm K}}{\ln\left[\left(\frac{7}{6}\right)^2\frac{T_{\rm{mb~ CO}~ 6-5}}{T_{{\rm mb~ CO}~ 7-6}}\right]}  ~~~~. 

565: \end{equation}

566: 

567: Based on this equation, the blue- and red-shifted components have temperatures equal

568: %respectively to 126~K and 26~K and we thus suggest that the blue-shifted gas is

569: to 130~K and 30~K respectively and we thus suggest that the temperature of the blue-shifted gas is

570: higher than that of the red-shifted gas.  

571: Please note that the difference on the ratio of the brightness temperatures of the CO lines could be partly 

572: due to difference in densities in the two outflow lobes.  

573: 

574: We also attempted an estimate of the optical depth of these transitions using the large velocity gradient (LVG) model.  

575: Assuming an 

576: H$_{2}$ volume density of 10$^{5}$$-$10$^{6}$~cm$^{-3}$, a CO column density of 10$^{22}$$-$10$^{23}$~cm$^{-2}$,  

577: an abundance ratio between molecular hydrogen and CO of 10$^{4}$ (see also $\S$ \ref{co65outflows}), 

578: and a measured line width of 25 \kms, 

579: we obtain $\tau_{7-6}=1.2$ and $\tau_{6-5}=0.7$ from the model.

580: The tau ratio is 0.7, similar to that obtainable from Equation~(3).

581: 

582: \subsubsection{Narrow Line-Width Rotating Massive Dense Clump}\label{comaps}

583: Figure \ref{co65quietgas} shows a comparison between the 350$\mu$m dust continuum and 

584: %CO $6-5$ integrated intensity map %($\vert$\vlsr $-$ \vone$\vert$$\leq$ 3.5 \kms; \vone~ is CO $1-0$ peak velocity)  

585: CO $6-5$ line emission with LSR velocity in the range from $-6.75$ to $-0.25$ \kms.  %0.5 $-$ 5.5~\kms.

586: This velocity range is chosen so that the emission in the range corresponds to the extended components.  

587: \notetoeditor{Please insert Figures 6 here.}

588: 

589: As shown in Figure \ref{co65quietgas}, the warm gas traced by the CO $6-5$ line shows good spatial correlation  

590: with the 350$\mu$m dust continuum emission. % and the low $J$ CO transition gas. % imaged with the interferometer.  

591: The molecular component traced by CO $6-5$ is not spherically symmetric.

592: The effective radius of the CO $6-5$ emission, $R_{\rm eff~CO 6-5}$, is 0.56 pc (77\arcsec), %76.\arcsec5, which is 

593: larger than $R_{\rm eff~350}$ %that of the 350$\mu$m dust continuum emission 

594: ($\S$ \ref{overalldust}).  

595: There is a strong CO $6-5$ peak towards the clump center (i.e. the continuum peak).  

596: 

597: %Under the optically thin assumption, t

598: The column density of the CO molecule using $J=6-5$ transition can be derived from 

599: (e.g., Equation (A1) of Scoville et al. 1986):

600: \begin{equation}

601: N_{\rm CO 6-5} = \frac{3k}{8\pi^{3}B_{\rm CO}\mu_{\rm CO}^{2}} \cdot  \frac{e^{\frac{E_{\rm CO _{J=5}}}{kT_{\rm ex}}}}{6}\cdot\frac{T_{\rm ex}+\frac{hB_{\rm CO}}{3k}}{1-e^{\frac{-h\nu_{\rm CO 6-5}}{kT_{\rm ex}}}}\cdot\frac{ \int T_{\rm mb} dv}{J_{\rm CO 6-5}-J_{\rm bg 6-5}}, 

602: \end{equation} 

603: where $B_{\rm CO}$ is the rotational constant of the molecule (57897.5 MHz), $\nu _{\rm CO 6-5}$ the frequency of the transition, 

604: $J(T)=\frac{\frac{h\nu_{\rm CO 6-5}}{k}}{exp(\frac{h\nu_{\rm CO 6-5}}{kT_{\rm ex}})-1}$ the specific intensity, and $v$ is the velocity.  Note that \Tmb = $\frac{\tau_{v}}{1-e^{-\tau_{v}}}T_{b}$, where $T_{\rm b}$ is the brightness temperature.  

605: For $\int T_{\rm mb} dv$, we use an integrated spectrum of the area inside the 2 sigma contour.  

606: Since CO $7-6$ data are available only for the central region and %for only towards the central 16\arcsec $\times$ 20\arcsec region and 

607: we don't have isotopic line data,  we assume that the column density 

608: of molecular hydrogen is proportional to the observed velocity integrated $^{12}$CO emission, $\int T_{\rm mb} dv$.  

609: %Although $\tau_{v}$ is likely to change over the velocity, we assume a constant value of $\tau$ =1. 

610: 

611: %The effect of $\tau$ is included in $T_{\rm mb}$. 

612: The LTE mass of the clump, $M_{\rm LTE}$, is calculated as follows: %by using the equation, 

613: %$M_{\rm LTE}=\pi R_{\rm eff~CO 6-5}^{2} \cdot N_{\rm CO 6-5} \cdot \frac{[\rm H_{2}]}{[\rm CO]} \cdot \mu_{\rm G} \cdot m_{\rm H_{2}}$, 

614: \begin{equation}

615: M_{\rm LTE}= A \cdot N_{\rm CO 6-5} \cdot \frac{[\rm H_{2}]}{[\rm CO]} \cdot \mu_{\rm G} \cdot m_{\rm H_{2}} 

616: \end{equation} 

617: %$R_{\rm eff~CO 6-5}$ is the effective radius of the clump traced with CO $6-5$ transition, 

618: with $\frac{[\rm H_{2}]}{[\rm CO]}$ abundance ratio of molecular hydrogen to CO (10$^{4}$), 

619: $\mu_{\rm G}$ mean atomic weight of the gas (1.36),  and $m_{\rm H_{2}}$ mass the hydrogen molecule. 

620: %%%%%

621: %Effective radius of the massive dense clump 

622: %$R_{\rm eff~CO 6-5}$ is measured to be 0.56 pc.  

623: The derived LTE mass is 390 \Msun~ for $T_{\rm ex}$=40K. % and 175 \Msun~ at $T_{\rm ex}$=100K.  

624: Hereafter, 40 K will be used as the temperature of the clump.  

625: Please note that the optical depth of CO 6-5 line that traces the extended clump components 

626: towards limited central region is likely to be thick.  

627: Accordingly, the LTE mass derived above is lower limit. 

628: 

629: \notetoeditor{Please insert Figures 7, 8 here.}

630: Figure \ref{co65quietgasvel} shows 

631: the LSR velocities towards selected positions where the full width at half

632: maximum (FWHM) of the line is $\le$ 3 \kms.

633: %traced at CO $6-5$ over the clump.  

634: %The quiescent components are selected by the line width narrower than 3 \kms.  

635: While the east part of the clump has LSR velocities ranging between $\sim -1$ to $-3.5$ \kms, 

636: in the west side the velocity ranges from $-3.0$ to $-5.2$ \kms.  

637: The velocity gradient measured over 1~pc is $\sim$ 2 \kms pc$^{-1}$.

638: The rotation angular velocity, $\Omega$, is $\sim 7\times 10^{-14}$ s$^{-1}$.  

639: In Figure \ref{co65quietgasvelspec} we show template spectra of the narrow line-width components 

640: observed in the east side and west side of the clump.  

641: This comparison demonstrates the clear velocity shift from east to west observed across the clump.  

642: Closely looking at the \vlsr change, the velocity shift might be from northeast to southwest.  

643: The direction of the velocity gradient is almost perpendicular to the major axis (directed north-south) of the massive dense clump.  

644: %The amount of the velocity shift at the positions of ($-100$\arcsec, 0\arcsec) and (+45\arcsec, 0\arcsec) 

645: %with respect to the millimeter continuum position is $\sim$ 1.2 \kms.  

646: Assuming that the velocity shift is caused by rotation of the clump and that centrifugal forces balance gravitational ones,

647: %(namely neglecting the thermal energy, turbulence, magnetic energy, surface pressure), 

648: one can estimate the equilibrium mass of the molecular dense clump as

649: %Neglecting the thermal energy, turbulence, magnetic energy, surface pressure, 

650: %when the rotational energy balances with the gravitational energy, 

651: $M_{\rm rot} \simeq \frac{\Omega^{2} \cdot r^{3}}{G}=200$~\Msun, 

652: where $G$ is the gravitational constant.  

653: %The enclosed mass 

654: This value agrees reasonably well with the LTE mass, supporting the idea that the velocity gradient 

655: may be largely due to rotation of the clump.  

656: %Sound speed in the quiet region is estimated about 0.8 kms$^{-1}$.

657: 

658: We note that rotation of the narrow line-width molecular gas component occurs in the opposite sense

659: with respect to rotation of the circumstellar Keplerian disk associated with 

660: the (proto)star.

661: A similar discrepancy in the sense of rotation on different spatial scales,

662: has been observed also in W3 \citep{hay89} 

663: and Orion \citep{har83}, for massive star forming regions, and in

664: a starless core, L1521F (MC27) 

665: in the Taurus Molecular Cloud \citep{sh04a}, for low-mass star forming regions.

666: %%%%%%%%% ------------------

667: %This might suggest that fragmentation process in an early phase %($\sim$ 10$^{2-3}$ year)

668: %may be important to form a star for both high and low mass star formation (see Section \ref{clumps}). 

669: %, which is similar to what we observed in a starless clump

670: %in the Taurus Molecular Cloud \cite{shi04}. % (Shinnaga et al. 2004). 

671: This suggests that such a complex kinematical structure may not be unusual  

672: in the star formation process.

673: 

674: \notetoeditor{Please insert Figures 9 and 10 here.}

675: The measured \dvfwhm~ averaged over the entire CO $6-5$ emitting region is 3.9 $\pm$ 0.2 \kms.  

676:  From the line width, one can derive the virial mass, \Mvir, of the clump:

677: \begin{equation}

678: M_{\rm VIR}\sim \frac{5+2e}{3+e} \cdot \frac{R_{\rm eff~CO 6-5}}{G} \sigma_{v_{\rm total}}^{2}  ~~~~~~~~~. 

679: \end{equation} 

680: where the volume density %$\rho(r) \propto$ 

681: is proportional to r$^{-e}$.  

682: %$\Delta v_{\rm FWHM}$ is measured to be $\sim$ 

683: The virial mass %at $T_{\rm k}$ = 40 %and 100 K are 

684: %is estimated to be $1.4 \times 10^{3}$. % and  $1.6 \times 10^{3}$ \Msun, respectively.   

685: is estimated to be 400\Msun for this dense clump. % and  $1.6 \times 10^{3}$ \Msun, respectively.   

686: %680 and 650 \Msun respectively.  

687: One can assess the equilibrium of the dense clump by comparing this value with the LTE 

688: mass and the one obtained assuming centrifugal equilibrium.

689: %We note that $M_{\rm LTE} \simeq M_{\rm rot} \ll M_{\rm VIR}$. This suggests that, while the narrow

690: We note that $M_{\rm LTE} \simeq M_{\rm rot}$ and at the same time, 

691: $M_{\rm LTE} \simeq M_{\rm VIR}$. %This suggests that, while the narrow

692: %line width component may be in centrifugal equilibrium, a significant fraction of the

693: %clump mass is severely affected by the outflow motions, which cause the large estimate

694: %of $M_{\rm VIR}$.

695: This suggests that the clump is in an equilibrium state and 

696: rotation of the core contributes significantly to the equilibrium of the clump.  

697: 

698: Figure \ref{co65quietgasvelwidmap}  shows the non-thermal velocity dispersion, $\sigma_{v_{nt}}$, 

699: of the narrow line-width molecular gas components.  

700: Note that the diagram of the velocity width is plotted under an assumption of constant temperature over the core.  

701: %%%%

702: %However, the velocity dispersion won't change much even when we consider an temperature gradient of 

703: %$T$($r$)$\propto r^{-0.35}$ (see \sec \ref{\dustprop}).  

704: %%%%%%%%

705: % we assume an temperature gradient of $T$($r$)$\propto r^{-0.35}$, the velocity dispersion 

706: Since the optical depth of the CO $6-5$ line is relatively small (see $\S$ \ref{co765text}), one can estimate the non-thermal 

707: velocity dispersion ($\sigma_{v_{nt}}$) by subtracting the thermal line width  

708: $(\frac{k T_{\rm k}}{m_{avr}})^{1/2}$ from total velocity dispersion, 

709: %$\sigma_{v_{total}} = [\sigma_{v_{\rm obs}}^{2} - k T_{\rm k} (\frac{1}{m_{\rm CO}}-\frac{1}{\mu})]^{1/2}$,  

710: $\sigma_{v_{total}} = [\sigma_{v_{\rm obs}}^{2} - k T_{\rm k} (\frac{1}{m_{\rm CO}}-\frac{1}{m_{avr}})]^{1/2}$,  

711: where $\sigma_{v_{\rm obs}}$ is the observed velocity dispersion, 

712: $m_{avr}$ is the average mass unit, 

713: and $m_{\rm CO}=28$ amu is the mass of the CO molecule.

714: $\sigma_{v_{\rm obs}}$ can be expressed as $\Delta v_{\rm FWHM} (4~{\rm ln} 2)^{-1/2}$, 

715: where $\Delta v_{\rm FWHM}$ is the observed line FWHM.

716: %From  Figure \ref{co65quietgasvelwidmap}, one can see the tendency of increasing 

717: %velocity width of the quiescent molecular gas components towards the clump center.  

718:  From Figure \ref{co65quietgasvelwid},

719: one can see that the non-thermal velocity dispersion decreases with increasing distance from the clump center.

720: To derive the non-thermal velocity dispersion, 40 K has been used as gas kinetic temperature.

721: The dotted line in the diagram shows the thermal velocity dispersion when \Tk = 40 K.  

722: One can see that the thermal velocity dispersion becomes dominant at $r$= 0.6 pc ($\sim$ 80\arcsec).  

723: 

724: \notetoeditor{Please insert Figures 11 here.}

725: \subsubsection{CO $6-5$ Large Scale Bipolar Outflow}\label{co65outflows}

726: Figure \ref{co65spectra} shows the CO $J=6-5$ spectra taken towards three positions and the 

727: mean spectrum over a $\leq$ 120\arcsec~ area around

728: the clump center.   

729: %Top two spectra are typical ones detected in the red- and blue-shifted outflow lobes, respectively.  

730: One can see prominent wings in the spectra taken towards each outflow lobe.  

731: Blue- and red-shifted emission is detected over the velocity ranges $-34.0 \leq$ \vlsr ~\kms $\leq -6.0$ and 

732: 0.0 $\leq$ \vlsr ~\kms $\leq$ +30, respectively.  

733: The spectrum observed towards the clump center (0\arcsec, 0\arcsec)  and the mean spectrum clearly show

734: both red- and blue-shifted emission.

735: The spectrum taken towards the center position has a strong peak at \vlsr=$-3$ \kms.  

736: 

737: \notetoeditor{Please insert Figures 12 here.}

738: Figure \ref{co65outflow} shows the distribution of CO $J=6-5$ blue-shifted %($-34.0 \leq$ \vlsr ~\kms $\leq -6.0$) 

739: and red-shifted %(0.0 $\leq$ \vlsr ~\kms $\leq$ +30) 

740: emission superposed on the 350$\mu$m dust continuum emission map.   

741: Both outflow lobes are located inside the 350$\mu$m dust continuum component.  

742: %and on a shocked H$_{2}$ image taken at 3.5 m Telescopio Nazionale Galileo (Cesaroni et al. 2005).  

743: %The shocked H$_{2}$ knots marked and numbered in the diagram is originally reported by \citet{she00}.  

744: The red-shifted bipolar outflow lobe is more than twice extended compared with the blue-shifted outflow lobe.  

745: Integrated intensities of the blue- and red-shifted outflow lobes are measured to be 

746: $(9.6 \pm 0.9) \times 10^{2}$ and $\gtrsim (2.5 \pm 0.1) \times 10^{3}$ K \kms, respectively.  

747: %To infer the optical depth and excitation temperature of the CO $6-5$ line in the outflow lobes, 

748: %CO $6-5$ and $7-6$ spectra is plotted in Figure \ref{co65outflow} (c) as an example, using the LVG model.  

749: %taken towards 

750: %(RA$_{\rm offset}$\arcsec, Dec$_{\rm offset}$\arcsec)=($-10$, +10) position

751: The masses of the blue and red shifted outflows are estimated to be 28 and 13 \Msun, respectively.  

752:  From the outflow velocity, $\sim$30 \kms, and the extension of the outflow, $\sim$0.6 pc, one can 

753: estimate the dynamical time scale of the bipolar outflow.  The averaged dynamical time scale of the outflow is estimated to be  

754: $\gtrsim 1.7 \times 10^{4}$ years.  

755: Note that the estimated age is lower limit  

756: because the south edge of the red shifted outflow lobe isn't fully covered and 

757: the inclination angle is unknown.  The inclination angle affects the size and velocity.  % and  more extended part 

758: %of the lobes might be too faint to be detected.  

759: The outflow parameters derived from the CO $6-5$ and $1-0$ lines are summarized in Table \ref{tbl-3}.  

760: The outflow velocities obtained from the $6-5$ line are higher than those from the $1-0$, while

761: the mean dynamical time scale of the $6-5$ flow is shorter than that of the $1-0$.  

762: A more detailed discussion of the outflow properties will be given in $\S$ \ref{discussion}.

763: 

764: 

765: \section{DISCUSSION}\label{discussion}

766: \subsection{Dust Property and Column Density Profile} \label{dustprop} 

767: %For the ideal dust cloud, namely, composed of spherical grain with uniform size, composition, temperature, 

768: %optically thin condition, %i.e., long wavelength ($\ga$ 100$\mu$m) observation, 

769: %and only heated from inside, % (no external heating source), 

770: To derive the dust mass \Mdust,  

771: we have used the expression

772: (see Hildebrand 1983), 

773: \begin{equation}

774: M_{\rm dust} = \frac{F_{\nu} D^{2}}{B_{\nu}(T_{\rm dust})} \cdot\frac{1}{\kappa_{\nu}}, \label{emd} %~~~~~~, 

775: \end{equation} 

776: where $F_{\nu}$ is the measured flux density, % at frequency $\nu$, 

777: $D$ the distance to the object, and $B_{\nu}$(\tdust) the Planck function.

778: %$a$ is radius of the dust particle (average size ranges from $\sim$ 0.01 $-$ 0.25 $\mu$m), 

779: %$\rho$ is dust density, $Q_{\nu}$ is dust emissivity at frequency $\nu$ ($\sim 3.8 \times 10^{-4}$ at $\lambda$=250$\mu$m).  

780: %Note that here we assume $a \ll \frac{\rm c}{\nu} = \lambda$, where $\lambda$ is the wavelength.  

781: The coefficient 1/$\kappa_{\nu}$ ($\kappa_{\nu}$ is dust opacity), % at frequency $\nu$), 

782: is estimated to be 0.1 g$\cdot$ cm$^{-2}$ at 250$\mu$m in NGC7023  \citep{hil83}.  

783: $\kappa_{\nu}$ depends on the frequency as

784: $\kappa_{\nu} \varpropto \nu^{\beta}$. 

785: %$\beta$ is the emissivity spectral index of the dust particles.  

786: $\beta$ may range from $\sim$ 1  at $\lambda \lesssim 200 \mu$m to $\gtrsim$ 2 at $\sim$1 mm 

787: (Hildebrand 1983 and the references therein).

788: Extrapolating $\kappa_{\nu}$ from 250$\mu$m to 350$\mu$m, 

789: one obtains $\kappa_{850 GHz} \simeq 5.6$ cm$^{2}$ g$^{-1}$.

790: %One can estimate dust property, such as  $\beta$ and \tdust from 

791: %multiple wavelengths dust observations.  

792: %From CO $J=6-5$ observations described in $\S$ \ref{comaps}, the estimated cloud mass from our spectral line data is about 200 \Msun. 

793: %Extrapolating the $\kappa_{\nu}$ for the observed frequencies based on the Hildebrand 1983 value at 250$\mu$m using the equation 2,   

794: %one can estimate temperature and the emissivity spectral index $\beta$ which matches with the estimated mass as 200\Msun.  

795: $\beta$ can be estimated from the flux ratio of 350$\mu$m and 450$\mu$m using the equation

796: \begin{equation}

797: \frac{F_{\nu_1}}{F_{\nu_2}}\cdot\frac{\Omega_{\nu_1}}{\Omega_{\nu_2}}=

798: \frac{B_{\nu_2}(T_{dust})}{B_{\nu_1}(T_{dust})}\cdot \left( \frac{\nu_1}{\nu_2} \right) ^{\beta}~~~,    \label{ebe}

799: \end{equation} 

800: where $\Omega_{\nu}$ is the beam solid angle.  % at frequency $\nu$. 

801: Note that in our case $\frac{\Omega_{\nu_1}}{\Omega_{\nu_2}}\simeq 1$,

802: because the 350$\mu$m image has been smoothed to the same angular resolution as the 450$\mu$m image.   

803: %To have the consistent $\beta$ value from the equations 7 and 8, assuming the dust mass is 

804: 

805: Assuming that the clump mass equals $M_{\rm rot} \simeq 200$~\Msun,

806: one may use Equation (\ref{emd}) to derive an estimate of the mean

807: clump temperature, $T_{\rm dust}=40$~K.

808: Then Equation (\ref{ebe}) gives $\beta\simeq1.7$.

809: This value lies within the typical range

810: $1.5 \lesssim \beta \lesssim 2.4$ for high mass star forming regions  

811: (e.g., Molinari et al. 2000).  %; Preibisch et al. 1993).

812: The dust temperature is more or less consistent with the temperature, $\sim$ 44~K, derived from the 

813: SED fitting by \citet{she00}, but 

814: lower than the 60~K estimated by \citet{ces99}. 

815: %%%%%%%%%%%

816: Note that the errors on $\beta$ and especially \tdust~ may %the mass estimated from the equation 7 is 

817: be significant, as \mrot~ (200 \Msun) might not represent the true clump mass.  

818: \citet{hof07} estimates a clump mass of $\sim$ 400 \Msun from their SED fitting.  

819: The column density towards the clump center is estimated to be $\sim 3.4 \times 10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$, using 

820: the values of $\beta$ and \tdust~ described above. 

821: This implies a volume density of $\sim10^{6}$ cm$^{-3}$ towards the clump center.  

822: Towards the outflow lobes, the estimated number density becomes $\sim 10^{5}$ cm$^{-3}$.  

823: 

824: A temperature gradient is likely to exist inside the clump, as this is

825: internally heated by the embedded (proto)star. Such a gradient is likely

826: to be similar to a power law of the type $T(r) \propto r^{-2/(4+\beta)}$ (Doty \& Leung 1994), %\citet{dot94},

827: with $r$ distance from the clump center. In our case $\beta=1.7$ and hence the

828: the power law index is $-0.35$.  

829: The effect of this gradient on the estimated density slopes inside the clump

830: is to change the power law indices of the inner ($0.13 \la r \la 0.3$ pc)

831: and outer ($0.3 \la r \la 0.7$ pc) regions to $\sim -0.9$ and $\sim -2$, respectively.

832: This has been assessed by recalculating the column density profile assuming 

833: the clump is spherically symmetric.  

834: These indices are not significantly different from 

835: those derived without taking the temperature gradient into account.  

836: For the non-thermal velocity dispersion described in $\S$ \ref{comaps}, 

837: the velocity dispersion won't change much (order of 0.01 \kms) even when 

838: we consider an temperature gradient of $T$($r$)$\propto r^{-0.35}$. 

839: 

840: An index of $-1.26$ for the $0.03 \la r \la 0.13$ pc region is only slightly shallower

841: than that typical of a region undergoing free-fall

842: ($\rho(r) \propto r^{-\frac{3}{2}}$) -- as in the runaway collapse model (Larson-Penston-Hunter solution, 

843: Larson 1969; Penston 1969; Hunter 1977) 

844: %\citep{lar69,pen69,hun77})

845: and the inside-out collapse model by \citet{shu87}.

846: Instead, an index of $-2.32$ for the $0.13 \la r \la 0.3$ pc region

847: resembles the density profile $\rho(r) \propto r^{-2}$ 

848: of a system in hydrostatic equilibrium.

849: We thus speculate that

850: the inner region of the clump is experiencing infall, whereas the ``infalling wave'' has

851: not yet reached the outer region beyond $r \gtrsim 0.1$ pc. 

852: 

853: \subsection{Internal Structures of The Dense Clump}\label{sharcratiodiscuss} 

854: \subsubsection{CO $6-5$ Outflow and Shocked H$_{2}$ Knots}  \label{co65outflowsd}

855:  From Figure \ref{co65outflow}, 

856: one can see a spatial coincidence between the outflow lobes and the shocked H$_{2}$ knots.  

857: All six knots lie inside the CO $6-5$ bipolar outflow lobes.  

858: %The shocked H$_{2}$ knot, H2-1, might be caused by the collision between blue-shifted outflow and 

859: %the molecular clump 5 (Figure \ref{co65quietgas}) located at the northern edge of the lobe.  

860: %%%%%%%%%%%%

861: %The highest contour of CO $6-5$ red shifted components follow south edge of the blue shifted 

862: %outflow lobe.  

863: %These two peaks might be caused by collision between blue-shifted molecular outflow and the surrounding dense material.  

864: %The components of the two peaks may be associated with the shocked H$_{2}$ knot H2-3.  

865: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

866: %The counterpart of the H2-1 knot in the red shifted side may be H2-5.  

867: More specifically,

868: the CO $6-5$ emission shows clear peaks close to the H2-5 and H2-6 knots located in the red shifted lobe.

869: Such a correlation between CO $6-5$ peaks and shocked H$_{2}$ knots indicates that they are physically associated.  

870: Note that, unlike the CO $6-5$ emission, no peak towards the knot positions is found in the CO $1-0$ line, as one

871: can see in  Figure 1 of Shepherd et al. (2000). A likely interpretation is that

872: %$\S$ \ref{sharcratio-outflow} (see Figure \ref{sharcratiooutflow}).  

873: CO $6-5$ traces more excited gas compared to the $1-0$ transition.  

874: This might be due to the gas at the knot locations being heated and compressed by interaction

875: with the jet powered by the (proto)star.  

876: 

877: \subsubsection{Implications from the Submillimeter Dust Radio Map}  \label{sharcratio}  %---Dispersing Dense Material?}  \label{sharcratio} 

878: There are three major components in the submillimeter flux ratio map (see $\S$ \ref{sharcratiosec} and Figure \ref{sharcratioonly}), namely:

879: (1) a bipolar feature in the central region of the clump, with flux ratio $\simeq 2 - $ 2.2;

880: (2) a region $\sim$ 0.5 pc in diameter and elongated north-south, with flux ratio starting from $\sim 2 - 3$ and 

881: increasing upto $\gtrsim$ 3 close to the outer border;

882: and (3) region of lower flux ratio, $\lesssim$ 2, outside of component (2).  

883: %($\sim$2) outside of the component (2).  

884: %two patches of emission, located to the north and south of the second component, with lower flux ratio ($\sim$2).

885: % (see also Figure \ref{sharcratio-radius}).  

886: %One can clearly see the symmetric bipolar structure (i.e., component (1)) towards the central region of the clump.  

887: %One can clearly the component (1) in the central region of the clump.  

888: Component (1) is located inside component (2).  

889: The $PA$ of the bipolar structure is about $-17$\degree.

890: Note that features (1) and (2) are detected above a 3$\sigma$ level in the 450 $\mu$m map and above

891: a 5$\sigma$ level in the 350 $\mu$m map. 

892: Note that 450$\mu$m emission in component (3) is detected at a 2 $-$ 3$\sigma$ level,

893: whereas the 350$\mu$m emission is much stronger.

894: Therefore, we believe that all the three features represent real structures.  

895: 

896: Equation (\ref{ebe}) shows that the ratio between the 350 and 450$\mu$m fluxes

897: is an increasing function of both $\beta$ and (albeit more weakly) $T_{\rm dust}$. It

898: is thus impossible to decide whether a change in the ratio is due to a variation

899: of $\beta$, temperature, or both.

900: For example, for T = 40 K, a $\beta$ of 1 and 2 %, and 3 

901: implies a flux ratio of 1.9 and 2.4, %, and 3.3, 

902: respectively.  

903: Vice versa, for $\beta$=1.7, a temperature of 20, 40, and 60 K implies a flux ratio of 1.9, 2.3, and 2.4, respectively. 

904: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

905: % can't distinguish statement

906: %Most likely both parameters may vary in different regions inside the clump.  

907: %%%%%%%%%%%%%

908:  From these numbers one can see that, in order to reproduce flux ratios as

909: large ($\sim$3) as those measured on the surface of component (2), very likely an increase of both $\beta$ and $T_{\rm dust}$

910: is needed.

911: %These three components mentioned above indicate interesting physical condition of the clump. For the component (1), 

912: %as to be shown in $\S$ \ref{sharcratio-outflow}, 

913: %the bipolar feature  coincides with a large-scale molecular bipolar outflow.  

914: %This is an evidence that the outflow activity emanating from the $\sim$7\Msun (proto)star 

915: %made a significant impact at the center of the massive dense clump.  

916: %Detail comparison between flux ratio map and molecular bipolar outflow components will follow in $\S$ \ref{sharcratio-outflow}. 

917: Hence component (2), which %is elongated in north-south direction and 

918: encases the bipolar feature, might be a cocoon of dense material with warm surface.  

919: On the other hand, the lower flux ratio value of component (3) indicates that

920: \tdust~ and/or $\beta$ in the region ahead of the outflow lobes are lower compared to component (2).  %the high flux ratio region.  

921: We speculate that the higher \tdust\ and $\beta$ 

922: observed on the surface of the cocoon represented by component (2)

923: might be due to a weak shock, propagating from the (proto)star and possibly created by the outflow.

924: Considering a sound speed of $\sim$ 0.8 \kms, 

925: the crossing time of the weak shock would be $\la  3 \times 10^{5}$ years.

926: Note that this is likely an upper limit to the age of the outflow (and perhaps

927: of the (proto)star),

928: as shock waves may propagate with larger velocities than the sound speed.   

929: 

930: How to explain the low flux ratio in component (1)? The fact that

931: the shape of this region matches very well the outflow lobes

932: suggests a connection between the two. This suggests that the

933: flow might have swept away the smallest grains from that region,

934: thus biasing the grain size towards the largest ones.

935: This phenomenon would have the effect of reducing the

936: slope of the spectral index $\beta$ and hence of the flux ratio.

937: 

938: In conclusion, the flux ratio variations across the clump strongly suggest that the massive dense clump is no longer uniform 

939: in terms of temperature as well as dust properties.   

940: To construct a model to explain the observed features, one must keep in mind

941: such inhomogeneities.  

942: 

943: \subsubsection{Comparison Between Submillimeter Flux Ratio Map And Molecular Components}\label{sharcratio-outflow} 

944: Here we make a detailed comparison between the flux ratio map and the structure of the dense clump and outflow.

945: Figure \ref{sharcratiooutflow} shows the CO $6-5$ and CO $1-0$ outflow lobes superposed on the flux ratio map.  

946: We have already discussed the good correlation between the CO outflow and the bipolar component (1) of the flux ratio map.

947: Now, we note also that

948: the peak of the blue shifted CO 6--5 lobe is located on the west edge of the northern bipolar feature, which

949: may be due to interaction with the jet detected in SiO and H$_2$ line emission (Cesaroni et al. 1999)

950: and oriented with PA$\simeq-60$\degree.

951: This jet might have excited the molecular gas lying on the west side of the northern lobe.  

952: Nothing similar is seen to the SW in correspondence to the CO $6-5$ red shifted outflow lobe.

953: There are two distinct CO $6-5$ red shifted peaks associated with the shocked H$_2$ knots, H2-5 and -6, 

954: located at (14\arcsec, -30\arcsec) and (17\arcsec, -48\arcsec) respectively, as described in $\S$ \ref{co65outflowsd}. 

955: At the position of the H2-5 knot, a high value of the flux ratio ($\sim$ 3) is observed, \

956: suggesting relatively large values for both the temperature and $\beta$.

957: In correspondence to the CO $6-5$ peak associated with knot H2-6, the flux ratio is $\lesssim$ 2.5.  

958: The difference in flux ratio between H2-5 and H2-6 may indicate

959: that the temperature and/or $\beta$ at the position of knot H2-6 could be lower than those of H2-5.

960: %For CO $1-0$, the outflow components show good correlation with the component (1) of the flux ratio map.  

961: %at the peak at (17\arcsec, -48\arcsec) that may be associated with the H2-5 knot.  

962: %Figure \ref{sharcratiooutflow} (b) shows an overlay of CO $1-0$ bipolar outflow on the flux ratio map.  

963: %The narrow-width blue shifted CO $1-0$ outflow components trace western edge of the northern bipolar feature of the flux ratio map, which 

964: %might be because of the current jet direction ($PA$=$-60$\degree).  

965: %Collimated blue shifted outflow lobe seems to be bent at the west edge of the clump 5.   

966: %At the location where the outflow lobe appears to be bent, one can find a shocked H$_{2}$ knot, H2-1.  

967: %We speculate that the collimated blue shifted outflow components might have hit the dense clump.  

968: %Another explanation of the bent feature of the CO $1-0$ blue shifted outflow lobe might be due to  the precession 

969: %of the outflow, as other authors discuss (e.g., Cesaroni et al. 1997).  

970: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

971: %\subsection{Implication of The Evolutionary Status of The Isolated Dense Clump}\label{status}

972: %From the results obtained by the observational study presented in this paper, 

973: %estimated \Mlte and \Mvir ($\sim$ 400\Msun) of the clump are similar to \Mrot ($\sim$ 200\Msun).  

974: %From the column density profile, we found that the clump is likely infalling inside of $r ~\sim 0.1$pc.  

975: %Outside of $r ~\sim 0.1$pc is likely in equilibrium state.  

976: %350$\mu$m/450$\mu$m flux ratio map indicated 

977: %

978: %Accordingly, the clump's evolutionary status is summarized as follows. 

979: %While rotation is supporting the clump on a large scale, infall has initiated at the center of the clump 

980: %where density enhanced exponentially and formed a massive (proto)star.  

981: %At current stage, the infall motion has reached up to $r ~\sim 0.1$pc.  

982: %At the radius of 0.1 pc, the rotation is dissociated.  

983: %Because of the dissociation of the internal  $r \sim$ 0.1 pc structure, 

984: %the medium inside $r$ of 0.1 pc has independent kinematics from the rest of the clump.  

985: %Rotational axis of the 0.03 pc disk-like structure evolved independently from the 

986: %rotational axis of the large scale clump.  At around $r \sim$ 0.3 pc, 

987: %

988: 

989: \section{SUMMARY}\label{remarks}

990: An observational study of the IRAS 20126+4104 clump %an isolated massive dense clump %in the Cygnus X region 

991: is presented.  The main findings of this study are summarized as follows.  

992: 

993: (I) The 350$\mu$m and 450$\mu$m dust continuum images revealed %emission of the massive dense clump  are 

994: %imaged using the SHARC II camera at the CSO. % Leighton telescope.  

995: that %the radial density profile has been investigated and found that 

996: the power law index of the volume density in the inner part of the clump is $-1.26 \pm 0.03$ ($r \leq 0.1$ pc), 

997: shallower than that in the outer part, $-2.32 \pm 0.02$ ($0.3 \leq r \leq 0.1$ pc).  

998: %Comparing with theoretical models, 

999: The power law indices %, relatively close to the power law index expected for the infalling density profile, 

1000: suggest that the inner region might be infalling, while the outer region of the clump is still in hydrostatic 

1001: equilibrium.    

1002: %is shallower than values predicted by theoretical models.  

1003: %The index of outer part of the clump is slightly steeper than that of the inside-out collapse models.  

1004: %, indicating there may be some missing 

1005: %components that holds the dense clump dynamics.  

1006: 

1007: %(II) Radial density profile shows two distinct power law indices, namely $r^{-1.26 \pm 0.03}$ at a radius range between 0.03 and 0.13 pc, and $r^{-2.32 \pm 0.02}$ at a radius range between 0.03 and 0.13 pc.  These indices may indicate that the inner region of $r \leq 0.1$ experiences infall

1008: %while the wave of infall has not reached yet at the outer region of $r \geq 0.1$ pc.

1009: 

1010: (II) A map of the peak velocity of narrow line-width CO 6--5 components reveals a velocity

1011: gradient across the clump, suggesting rotation about an axis oriented  northwest$-$southeast. The rotation

1012: occurs in the opposite sense with respect to the circumstellar Keplerian disk associated

1013: with the massive (proto)star. 

1014: 

1015: (III) Assuming centrifugal equilibrium, one estimates an enclosed mass \Mrot~ of $\sim$ 200\Msun.  

1016: Estimated \Mlte~ and \Mvir~ ($\sim$ 400\Msun) of the clump are comparable to \Mrot.  

1017: This indicates that the clump is in equilibrium state as a whole and rotation contributes a large fraction 

1018: to support the clump from gravitational collapse on large clump scale.  

1019: At the radius of 0.1 pc, the rotation may be disconnected from the inner region and 

1020: the medium inside of $r \sim$ 0.1 pc may be infalling.  

1021: This might be partly related to the disagreement of the rotational axes of the large scale 

1022: clump and of the disk associated with the massive (proto)star.  

1023: %A possible explanation for the complex kinetic structure of the core may be that 

1024: %

1025: %from the rotation of the clump.  %, traced by CO $J=6-5$ transition map. 

1026: %Based on the measured rotation rate $\Omega$ of $\sim 5\times 10^{-14}$ s$^{-1}$, one phase of the rotation is 

1027: %6$\times 10^{5}$ years.  

1028: 

1029: %The rotation of the CO $6-5$ is found to be almost opposite sense of the rotation of the disk like structure 

1030: %This might suggest that the fragmentation process may be important at an early stage of the star 

1031: %formation, inside the clump.  

1032: 

1033: (IV) %Given the mass of the dense clump, t

1034: The mean spectral index $\beta$ and dust temperature are estimated  to be 

1035: 1.7 and 40~K, respectively.  

1036: 

1037: %(V) The parameters of the molecular outflow components traced by the CO $6-5$ line are summarized and 

1038: %are compared with those with CO $1-0$ transition.  

1039: 

1040: (V) The 350$\mu$m/450$\mu$m ratio map outlines three major components, namely:

1041: (1) a bipolar feature, which may represent the region swept by the bipolar outflow lobes;

1042: (2) a dense cocoon $\sim$ 0.5 pc in diameter, with a warm surface; and 

1043: (3) a low temperature/low $\beta$ component outside component (2).

1044: These three components indicate that %the clump may be departing from spherical symmetry and  % no longer in spherical symmetry and 

1045: the temperature as well as the nature of the dust (grain size distribution and composition) may vary significantly % significant

1046: %variations 

1047: inside the dense clump.  

1048: The warm layer of component (2) might have been created by a shock propagating from the 

1049: (proto)star.  %Assuming the shock is propagating at a constant sound speed , 

1050: The crossing time of the shock is estimated to be $\gtrsim$ 3 $\times$ 10$^{5}$ years. 

1051: 

1052: (VI) Strong correlation between CO $6-5$ peaks and two of the shocked H$_{2}$ knots are identified, 

1053: indicating they are physically associated.  

1054: 

1055: 

1056: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,

1057: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments

1058: %% command.

1059: 

1060: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the

1061: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]

1062: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,

1063: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the

1064: %% text to be printed in the second.

1065: 

1066: \acknowledgments

1067: This research was performed at the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory, supported by 

1068: NSF grant AST-0229008.  

1069: %We also would like to thank the GILDAS software team to provide us 

1070: %their software packages (http://www.iram.fr/IRAMFR/GILDAS) for 

1071: %the analysis reported in this paper.  

1072: HS is grateful to Hiroshige Yoshida for the observational support in July 2004 

1073: %Riley Ceria for the observational support in September 2005 

1074: and Debra Shepherd and J. H. Kawamura for providing us their %Caltech Owens Valley Millimeter array 

1075: data. % and optical data published in Shepherd et al 2000 and for useful discussions.  

1076: HS is indebt to Dr. Peter Schilke for his LVG code.   

1077: Thanks are also due to Thomas A. Bell, John Carpenter and Roger Hildebrand   

1078: %and Richard Larson 

1079: %for critical reading and 

1080: for valuable comments and discussions.  

1081: HS also thank the Gildas development team 

1082: (http://www.iram.fr/IRAMFR/GILDAS) which provides us their  

1083: data reduction packages.  

1084: We thank the Hawaiian people for allowing us to observe from the summit of their sacred mountain, 

1085: Maunakea.  %, for these observations.  

1086: %More information on the AASTeX macros package is available \\ at

1087: %\url{http://www.aas.org/publications/aastex}.

1088: %For technical support, please write to

1089: %\email{aastex-help@aas.org}.

1090: 

1091: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their

1092: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope

1093: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches

1094: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be

1095: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes

1096: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.

1097: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX

1098: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.

1099: 

1100: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the

1101: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research

1102: %% for the paper.  Each keyword will be checked against the master list during

1103: %% copy editing.  Individual instruments can be provided in parentheses,

1104: %% after the keyword, but they will not be verified.

1105: 

1106: Facilities: \facility{CSO} %, \facility{Caltech Millimeter Array} %, \facility{Palomar Digitized Sky Survey}

1107: 

1108: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.

1109: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix

1110: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.

1111: 

1112: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.

1113: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix

1114: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.

1115: 

1116: \appendix

1117: %

1118: \section{Appendix: Distance To The Massive Dense Clump}

1119: IRAS 20126+4104 is located in the northwest side of the Cygnus X region.  

1120: This region \citep{pid52,dav57} is one of the most active star forming complexes in the Galaxy.   

1121: Here one can find a large variety of objects, including OB associations,  

1122: atomic diffuse clouds, molecular dense clouds/cores, evolved stars, and supernova remnants.  

1123: %The richness comes from  the fact that the region corresponds to the tangential direction  

1124: %of the spiral arm or bridge structure that the Sun belongs in our galaxy \citep{sha65,ker65},  

1125: %so that one can see many astronomical objects with different distances  along a line of site.  

1126: The distance of the massive dense clump under study is not well established as it lies on the tangential direction 

1127: of the spiral arm or bridge structure to which the Sun belongs in our Galaxy \citep{sha65,ker65}.  

1128: Many studies reporting on observations of IRAS 20126+4104 

1129: adopt a distance of 1.7 kpc, based on the value quoted by \citet{dam85}.

1130: However, \citet{dam85} do not explain how such a distance was derived.

1131: The kinematical estimate using a galactic rotation model may not be accurate for this source because of the location of 

1132: the source relative to the Galactic Center.  

1133: %because kinetic distance gives a significant error due to the fact that the region is in tangential direction to the Galactic Center. 

1134: %the source lies almost towards tangential direction to the Galactic Center. 

1135: An alternative method is that of looking for a possible interaction of the IRAS 20126+4104 clump

1136: with nearby objects whose distances are known.  

1137:  From the north-east to the north of the source, there is a chain of \HII\ regions,

1138: whose northern edge coincides with IC1318a, the biggest HII region in the cluster.

1139: IRAS 20126+4104 is located close to the south-western edge of the chain.  %, close to the west edge of the chain of the HII regions.  

1140: The angular distance from the closest HII region %4.8 GHz continuum 

1141: is about 7\arcmin.  

1142: In addition, there is a number of HII regions to the east of the source

1143: and one supernova remnant (SNR), G 78.2+2.1 \citep{hig77,lan80} 

1144: with diameter of $\sim$62\arcsec~ to the south-east of it.

1145: The angular distance between the dense clump and the supernova remnant is about 1.5\deg, along a direction with $PA$ $\sim$ 120\deg.

1146: To the south-east of the object, there is an O star, HD193322 (O9V).  

1147: The angular separation between HD193322 and IRAS 20126+4104 is about 51\arcmin.

1148: The distance of the O star is estimated to be $\sim$1 kpc from photometry \citep{cru74}. 

1149: To the south-west, there is no strong HII region. %in southwest direction.  

1150: Ionized gas appears to surround the massive dense clump 

1151: except on the south-west side, as shown in Figure 1 ($\S$ \ref{sharc}), which is evidence of interaction

1152: between our clump and all these objects.

1153: The ionized gas is likely due to irradiation from these HII regions and from the SNR. 

1154: As the distance of these sources is reported to be 1.5 $\pm$ 0.5 kpc

1155: (Iksanov 1960, Dickel et al. 1969, Higgs et al. 1977, Landecker et al. 1980, Piepenbrink \& Wendker 1988, and references therein),

1156: in this paper we assume a distance of 1.5 kpc for IRAS 20126+4104.

1157: 

1158: %Consider once again a task that computes profile parameters for a modified

1159: %Lorentzian of the form

1160: %\begin{equation}

1161: %I = \frac{1}{1 + d_{1}^{P (1 + d_{2} )}}

1162: %\end{equation}

1163: %where

1164: %\begin{mathletters}

1165: %\begin{displaymath}

1166: %d_{1} = \frac{3}{4} \sqrt{ \left( \begin{array}{c} \frac{x_{1}}{R_{maj}}

1167: %\end{array} \right) ^{2} +

1168: %\left( \begin{array}{c} \frac{y_{1}}{R_{min}} \end{array} \right) ^{2} }

1169: %\end{displaymath}

1170: %\begin{equation}

1171: %d_{2} = \case{3}{4} \sqrt{ \left( \begin{array}{c} \frac{x_{1}}{P R_{maj}}

1172: %\end{array} \right) ^{2} +

1173: %\left( \begin{array}{c} \case{y_{1}}{P R_{min}} \end{array} \right) ^{2} }

1174: %\end{equation}

1175: 

1176: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.

1177: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.

1178: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of

1179: %% curly braces.  If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error

1180: %% "Perhaps a wouldmissing \item?".

1181: %%

1182: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite

1183: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a

1184: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds

1185: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).

1186: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the

1187: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain

1188: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in

1189: %% place of the \cite commands.

1190: 

1191: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.

1192: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.

1193: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.

1194: 

1195: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly

1196: %% different from previous examples.  The natbib system solves a host

1197: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly

1198: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.

1199: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.

1200: 

1201: \begin{thebibliography}{}

1202: \bibitem[Ayala et al.(1998)]{aya98} Ayala, S., Curiel, S., Raga, A.~C., Noriega-Crespo, A., \& Salas, L.\ 1998, \aap, 332, 1055 

1203: %\bibitem[Basu \& Mouschovias(1994)]{bas94} Basu, S., \& Mouschovias, T.~C.\ 1994, \apj, 432, 720

1204: %\bibitem[Benford(1999)]{ben99} Benford, D.~J.\ 1999, Ph.D.~Thesis.  

1205: \bibitem[Beuther et al.(2002)]{beu02} Beuther, H., Schilke, 

1206: P., Menten, K.~M., Motte, F., Sridharan, T.~K., \& Wyrowski, F.\ 2002, 

1207: \apj, 566, 945 

1208: %\bibitem[Beuther et al.(2004)]{beu04} Beuther, H., et al.\ 

1209: %2004, \apjl, 616, L31 

1210: \bibitem[Beuther et al.(2005)]{beu05} Beuther, H., et al.\ 2005, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0506603 

1211: %\bibitem[Blake et al.(1996)]{bla96} Blake, G.~A., Mundy, 

1212: %L.~G., Carlstrom, J.~E., Padin, S., Scott, S.~L., Scoville, N.~Z., \& 

1213: %Woody, D.~P.\ 1996, \apjl, 472, L49 

1214: %\bibitem[Blitz(1993)]{bli93} Blitz, L. \ 1993, in Protostars and Planets II p.125, 

1215: %eds. E.H.Levy \& J.I. Lunine (The University of Arizona Press, Tucson)

1216: %\bibitem[Bohlin et al.(1978)]{boh78} Bohlin, R.~C., Savage, B.~D., \& Drake, J.~F.\ 1978, \apj, 224, 132 

1217: %\bibitem[Bonnor(1956)]{bon56} Bonnor, W.~B.\ 1956, \mnras, 

1218: %116, 351 

1219: %\bibitem[Carpenter et al.(1993)]{car93} Carpenter, J.~M., 

1220: %Snell, R.~L., Schloerb, F.~P., \& Skrutskie, M.~F.\ 1993, \apj, 407, 657 

1221: \bibitem[Cesaroni et al.(1997)]{ces97} Cesaroni, R., Felli, 

1222: M., Testi, L., Walmsley, C.~M., \& Olmi, L.\ 1997, \aap, 325, 725 

1223: \bibitem[Cesaroni et al.(1999)]{ces99} Cesaroni, R., Felli, 

1224: M., Jenness, T., Neri, R., Olmi, L., Robberto, M., Testi, L., \& Walmsley, 

1225: C.~M.\ 1999, \aap, 345, 949 

1226: \bibitem[Cesaroni et al.(2005)]{ces05} Cesaroni, R., Neri, R., Olmi, L., Testi, L., Walmsley, C.~M., \& Hofner, P.\ 2005, \aap, 434, 1039 

1227: %\bibitem[Choi et al.(1993)]{cho93} Choi, M., Evans, N.~J., \& Jaffe, D.~T.\ 1993, \apj, 417, 624 

1228: %\bibitem[Ciolek \& Mouschovias(1994)]{cio94} Ciolek, G.~E., \& Mouschovias, T.~C.\ 1994, \apj, 425, 142 

1229: \bibitem[Cruz-Gonzalez et al.(1974)]{cru74} Cruz-Gonzalez, 

1230: C., Recillas-Cruz, E., Costero, R., Peimbert, M., \& Torres-Peimbeert, S.\ 

1231: 1974, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica, 1, 211

1232: \bibitem[Dame \& Thaddeus(1985)]{dam85} Dame, T.~M.,\& Thaddeus, P.\ 1985, \apj, 297, 751 

1233: \bibitem[Davies(1957)]{dav57} Davies, R.~D.\ 1957, \mnras, 

1234: 117, 663

1235: \bibitem[Dickel et al.(1969)]{dic69} Dickel, H.~R., Wendker, H.~J., \& Bieritz, J.~H.\ 1969, \aap, 1, 270

1236: %\bibitem[Dickman(1978)]{dic78} Dickman, R.~L.\ 1978, \apjs, 37, 407 

1237: %\bibitem[Dobashi et al.(2005)]{dob05} Dobashi, K., Uehara, 

1238: %H., Kandori, R., Sakurai, T., Kaiden, M., Umemoto, T., \& Sato, F.\ 2005, 

1239: %\pasj, 57, 1 

1240: \bibitem[Doty \& Leung(1994)]{dot94} Doty, S.~D., \& Leung, 

1241: C.~M.\ 1994, \apj, 424, 729 

1242: \bibitem[Dowell et al.(2003)]{dow03} Dowell, C.~D., et al.\ 

1243: 2003, \procspie, 4855, 73 

1244: %\bibitem[Ebert(1955)]{ebe55} Ebert, R.\ 1955, Zeitschrift fur 

1245: %Astrophysics, 37, 217 

1246: %\bibitem[Encrenaz et al.(1975)]{enc75} Encrenaz, P.~J., Falgarone, E., \& Lucas, R.\ 1975, \aap, 44, 73 

1247: %\bibitem[Estalella et al.(1993)]{est93} Estalella, R., Mauersberger, R., Torrelles, J.~M., Anglada, G., Gomez, J.~F., Lopez, R., \& Muders, D.\ 1993, \apj, 419, 698 

1248: %\bibitem[Evans et al.(1994)]{eva94} Evans, N.~J., Balkum, S., Levreault, R.~M., Hartmann, L., \& Kenyon, S.\ 1994, \apj, 424, 793 

1249: %\bibitem[Flower \& Launay(1985)]{flo85} Flower, D.~R., \& Launay, J.~M.\ 1985, \mnras, 214, 271 

1250: \bibitem[Fontani et al.(2002)]{fon02} Fontani, F., Cesaroni,  R., Caselli, P., \& Olmi, L.\ 2002, \aap, 389, 603 

1251: %\bibitem[Garay et al.(1987)]{gar87} Garay, G., Moran, J.~M., \& Reid, M.~J.\ 1987, \apj, 314, 535

1252: %\bibitem[Getman et al.(2005)]{get05} Getman, K.~V., 

1253: %Feigelson, E.~D., Grosso, N., McCaughrean, M.~J., Micela, G., Broos, P., 

1254: %Garmire, G., \& Townsley, L.\ 2005, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, 

1255: %arXiv:astro-ph/0504370 

1256: %\bibitem{http://www.iram.fr/IRAMFR/GILDAS}{gra05} 

1257: %http://www.iram.fr/IRAMFR/GILDAS

1258: %\bibitem[Goldsmith et al.(1981)]{gol81} Goldsmith, P.~F., et al.\ 1981, \apjl, 243, L79 

1259: \bibitem[Greenhill et al.(1998)]{gre98} Greenhill, L.~J., Gwinn, C.~R., Schwartz, C., Moran, J.~M., \& Diamond, P.~J.\ 1998, \nat, 396, 650 

1260: %\bibitem[Greenhill et al.(2004)]{gre04} Greenhill, L.~J., 

1261: %Gezari, D.~Y., Danchi, W.~C., Najita, J., Monnier, J.~D., \& Tuthill, 

1262: %P.~G.\ 2004, \apjl, 605, L57

1263: \bibitem[Harris et al.(1983)]{har83} Harris, A., Townes, C.~H., Matsakis, D.~N., \& Palmer, P.\ 1983, \apjl, 265, L63 

1264: \bibitem[Hayashi et al.(1989)]{hay89} Hayashi, M., Kobayashi, H., \& Hasegawa, T.\ 1989, \apj, 340, 298 

1265: \bibitem[Higgs et al.(1977)]{hig77} Higgs, L.~A., Landecker,

1266: T.~L., \& Roger, R.~S.\ 1977, \aj, 82, 718

1267: \bibitem[Hildebrand(1983)]{hil83} Hildebrand, R.~H.\ 1983, 

1268: \qjras, 24, 267 

1269: %\bibitem[Hofner et al.(1999)]{hof99} Hofner, P., Cesaroni, R., Rodr{\'{\i}}guez, L.~F., \& Mart{\'{\i}}, J.\ 1999, \aap, 345, L43

1270: \bibitem[Hofner et al.(2007)]{hof07} Hofner, P., Cesaroni, R., Olmi, L., Rodr{\'{\i}}guez, L.~F., Mart{\'{\i}}, J., \& Araya, E.\ 

1271: 2007, \aap, 465, 197 

1272: %\bibitem[Hunter et al.(1996)]{hun96} Hunter, T.~R., Benford, D.~J., \& Serabyn, E.\ 1996, \pasp, 108, 1042 

1273: %\bibitem[Hunter(1997)]{hun97} Hunter, T.~R.\ 1997, Ph.D.~Thesis,  

1274: \bibitem[Hunter(1977)]{hun77} Hunter, C.\ 1977, \apj, 218, 834

1275: \bibitem[Hunter et al.(2000)]{hun00} Hunter, T.~R., 

1276: Churchwell, E., Watson, C., Cox, P., Benford, D.~J., \& Roelfsema, P.~R.\ 

1277: 2000, \aj, 119, 2711 

1278: \bibitem[Ikhsanov(1960)]{ikh60} Ikhsanov, R.~N.\ 1960, Soviet 

1279: Astronomy, 4, 258 

1280: \bibitem[Kawamura et al.(1999)]{kaw99} Kawamura, J.~H., 

1281: Hunter, T.~R., Tong, C.-Y.~E., Blundell, R., Zhang, Q., Katz, C.~A., Papa, 

1282: D.~C., \& Sridharan, T.~K.\ 1999, \pasp, 111, 1088 

1283: \bibitem[Kerr \& Westerhout(1965)]{ker65}

1284: Kerr, F.J. and Westerhout, G. 1965, in Galactic Structure,

1285: ed. A. Blaauw and M. Schmidt, Chicago Uhiv. of Chicago Press 167

1286: %\bibitem[Klessen(2001)]{kle01} Klessen, R.~S.\ 2001, \apj, 556, 837

1287: \bibitem[Kovacs(2006)]{kov06} Kovacs, A. 2005 Ph.D. thesis at California Institute of Technology 

1288: \bibitem[Landecker et al.(1980)]{lan80} Landecker, T.~L.,

1289: Roger, R.~S., \& Higgs, L.~A.\ 1980, \aaps, 39, 133

1290: \bibitem[Larson(1969)]{lar69} Larson, R.~B.\ 1969, \mnras, 145, 271 

1291: \bibitem[Lasker et al.(1990)]{las90} Lasker, B.~M., Sturch,

1292: C.~R., McLean, B.~J., Russell, J.~L., Jenkner, H., \& Shara, M.~M.\ 1990,

1293: \aj, 99, 2019

1294: \bibitem[Leong (2005)]{leo05} Leong M. M. 2005, 

1295: URSI Conf. Sec. J3-10, 426, 

1296: http://astro.uchicago.edu/ursi-comm-J/ursi2005/rf-telescope-fabrication/leong

1297: \bibitem[Lebr{\'o}n et al.(2006)]{leb06} Lebr{\'o}n, M., 

1298: Beuther, H., Schilke, P., \& Stanke, T.\ 2006, \aap, 448, 1037 

1299: %\bibitem[Leong et al.(2003)]{leo03} Leong, M. et al.\ 2003, 

1300: %in the proceedings of AMOS Conference, September 2003 

1301: %\url{http://www.cso.caltech.edu/dsos/DSOSAMOSpaper.pdf}

1302: %\bibitem[Leung \& Thaddeus(1992)]{leu92} Leung, H.~O., \& 

1303: %Thaddeus, P.\ 1992, \apjs, 81, 267 

1304: %\bibitem[McKee \& Tan(2003)]{mck03} McKee, C.~F., \& Tan, J.~C.\ 2003, \apj, 585, 850 

1305: %\bibitem[McLaughlin \& Pudritz(1997)]{mcl97} McLaughlin, D.~E., \& Pudritz, R.~E.\ 1997, \apj, 476, 750 

1306: \bibitem[Molinari et al.(2000)]{mol00} Molinari, S., Brand, 

1307: J., Cesaroni, R., \& Palla, F.\ 2000, \aap, 355, 617 

1308: %\bibitem[Moscadelli et al.(2000)]{mos00} Moscadelli, L., Cesaroni, R., \& Rioja, M.~J.\ 2000, \aap, 360, 663

1309: %\bibitem[Motte et al.(1998)]{mot98} Motte, F., Andre, P., \& Neri, R. \ 1998, \aap, 336, 150 

1310: %\bibitem[Muenter (1975)]{mue75} Muenter, J.S.\ 1975 J. Mol. Spectrosc. 55, 490 

1311: \bibitem[Penston(1969)]{pen69} Penston, M.~V.\ 1969, \mnras, 144, 425 

1312: %\bibitem[Phillips \& Huggins(1977)]{phi77} Phillips, T.~G., \& Huggins, P.~J.\ 1977, \apj, 211, 798  

1313: %\bibitem[Pickett et al.(1998)]{pic98}Pickett, H. M., Poynter, R. L., Cohen, E. A., Delitsky, M. L., Pearson, J. C., \& Mller, H. S. P. 1998, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 60, 883

1314: \bibitem[Piddington \& Minnett(1952)]{pid52} Piddington, J.~H., 

1315: \& Minnett, H. C.\ 1952, Aust. J. Sci. Res. A5, 17 

1316: \bibitem[Piepenbrink \& Wendker(1988)]{pie88} Piepenbrink, A., 

1317: \& Wendker, H.~J.\ 1988, \aap, 191, 313 

1318: \bibitem[Plambeck et al.(1982)]{pla82} Plambeck, R.~L., 

1319: Wright, M.~C.~H., Welch, W.~J., Bieging, J.~H., Baud, B., Ho, P.~T.~P., \& 

1320: Vogel, S.~N.\ 1982, \apj, 259, 617 

1321: %\bibitem[Preibisch et al.(1993)]{pre93} Preibisch, T., Ossenkopf, V., Yorke, H.~W., \& Henning, T.\ 1993, \aap, 279, 577 

1322: %Trent, G.~H.\ 1956, Australian Journal of Physics, 9, 481 

1323: %\bibitem[Scheuer \& Ryle(1953)]{sch53} Scheuer, P.~A.~G., \& 

1324: %Ryle, M.\ 1953, \mnras, 113, 3 

1325: %\bibitem[Rieke \& Lebofsky(1985)]{rie85} Rieke, G.~H., \&  Lebofsky, M.~J.\ 1985, \apj, 288, 618 

1326: %\bibitem[Robberto et al.(2005)]{rob05} Robberto, M., et al.\ 

1327: %2005, \aj, 129, 1534 

1328: %\bibitem[Salpeter(1955)]{sal55} Salpeter, E. E.\ 1955, \apj, 121, 161

1329: %\bibitem[Sandage(1975)]{san75} Sandage, A.\ 1975, \pasp, 87, 853 

1330: %\bibitem[Scalo(1998)]{sca98} Scalo, J \ 1998, The Stellar Initial 

1331: %Mass Function (38th Herstmonceux Conference), 142, 201 

1332: %\bibitem[Schalen(1975)]{sch75} Schalen, C.\ 1975, \aap, 42, 251 

1333: \bibitem[Scoville et al.(1986)]{sco86} Scoville, N.~Z., 

1334: Sargent, A.~I., Sanders, D.~B., Claussen, M.~J., Masson, C.~R., Lo, K.~Y., 

1335: \& Phillips, T.~G.\ 1986, \apj, 303, 416 

1336: \bibitem[Sharpless(1965)]{sha65}Sharpless, S. 1965, in Galactic Structure, 

1337: ed. A. Blaauw and M. Schmidt, Chicago Uhiv. of Chicago Press 131

1338: \bibitem[Shepherd et al.(2000)]{she00} Shepherd, D.~S., Yu, 

1339: K.~C., Bally, J., \& Testi, L.\ 2000, \apj, 535, 833 

1340: \bibitem[Shinnaga et al.(2004)]{sh04a} Shinnaga, H., Ohashi, 

1341: N., Lee, S.-W., \& Moriarty-Schieven, G.~H.\ 2004, \apj, 601, 962 

1342: \bibitem[Shinnaga(2004)]{sh04b} Shinnaga, H. 2004,

1343: Technical Memorandum at The Caltech Submillimeter Observatory 

1344: available on a web at 

1345: \url{http://www.submm.caltech.edu/$\sim$hs/memo/shinnaga-memo04nov.ps} 

1346: %\bibitem[Shu(1977)]{shu77} Shu, F.~H.\ 1977, \apj, 214, 488 

1347: \bibitem[Shu et al.(1987)]{shu87} Shu, F.~H., Adams, F.~C., 

1348: \& Lizano, S. 1987, araa, 25, 23 

1349: \bibitem[Sridharan et al.(2005)]{sri05} Sridharan, T.~K., 

1350: Williams, S.~J., \& Fuller, G.~A.\ 2005, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, 

1351: arXiv:astro-ph/0508342 

1352: \bibitem[Voellmer et al.(2003)]{voe03} Voellmer, G.~M., et 

1353: al.\ 2003, \procspie, 4855, 63 

1354: %\bibitem[Wang et al.(1996)]{wan96} Wang, N.,  Hunter, T., Benford, D., Serabyn, E., Lis, D.C. Phillips, T.G., Harvey, S.H.,  Boyce, K., Szymkowiak, A., 

1355: %Gygax, J., Allen, C., \& Mott, B. Applied Optics, 35, 6629 

1356: %\bibitem[Watson(1974)]{wat74} Watson, W.D. 1974, in Atomic and Molecular Physics and the Interstellar Matter Session XXXVI 

1357: %Course 5  

1358: %(North-Holland Publishing Company -- Amsterdam, Oxford; 

1359: %Americal Elsevier Publishing Company, Inc. -- New York), 180  

1360: \bibitem[Williams et al.(2004)]{wil04} Williams, S.~J., 

1361: Fuller, G.~A., \& Sridharan, T.~K.\ 2004, \aap, 417, 115 

1362: %\bibitem[Williams et al.(2005)]{wil05} Williams, S.~J., 

1363: %Fuller, G.~A., \& Sridharan, T.~K.\ 2005, \aap, 434, 257 

1364: %\bibitem[Welch et al.(1981)]{wel81} Welch, W.~J., Wright, 

1365: %M.~C.~H., Plambeck, R.~L., Bieging, J.~H., \& Baud, B.\ 1981, \apjl, 245, 

1366: %L87 

1367: %\bibitem[Wilking et al.(1990)]{wil90} Wilking, B.~A., Blackwell, J.~H., \& Mundy, L.~G.\ 1990, \aj, 100, 758 

1368: %\bibitem[Wright et al.(1992)]{wri92} Wright, M., Sandell, G., Wilner, D.~J., \& Plambeck, R.~L.\ 1992, \apj, 393, 225 

1369: %\bibitem[Wright et al.(1996)]{wri96} Wright, M.~C.~H., Plambeck, R.~L., \& Wilner, D.~J.\ 1996, \apj, 469, 216 

1370: %\bibitem[Yao et al.(2000)]{yao00} Yao, Y., Ishii, M., Nagata, T., Nakaya, H., \& Sato, S.\ 2000, \apj, 542, 392

1371: \bibitem[Zhang et al.(1998)]{zha98} Zhang, Q., Hunter, T.~R., 

1372: \& Sridharan, T.~K.\ 1998, \apjl, 505, L151 

1373: \bibitem[Zhang et al.(1999)]{zha99} Zhang, Q., Hunter, T.~R., 

1374: Sridharan, T.~K., \& Cesaroni, R.\ 1999, \apjl, 527, L117 

1375: \end{thebibliography}

1376: 

1377: %\clearpage

1378: 

1379: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include

1380: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.

1381: %% To embed the sample graphics in

1382: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and

1383: %% \includegraphics commands

1384: %%

1385: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or

1386: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the

1387: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,

1388: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the

1389: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,

1390: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.

1391: %%

1392: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of

1393: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check

1394: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to

1395: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from

1396: %% journal to journal.

1397: 

1398: 

1399: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to

1400: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption

1401: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be

1402: %% available in the electronic journal.

1403: 

1404: \clearpage

1405: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrrcr}

1406: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1407: \rotate 

1408: \tablecaption{Observations \label{tbl-1}}

1409: \tablewidth{0pt}

1410: \tablehead{

1411: \colhead{Emission} & \colhead{Frequency} & \colhead{Bandwidth} & \colhead{Telescope/}   & \colhead{$\theta_{\rm HPBW}$\tablenotemark{a} }  & \colhead{FOV\tablenotemark{b} }  & \colhead{Velocity resolution}  & 

1412: \colhead{Reference}  \\

1413: \colhead{}     & \colhead{(GHz)} & \colhead{(MHz)} & \colhead{Instrument}   & \colhead{(\arcsec)}  & \colhead{(arcmin$^{2}$)}  & \colhead{(kms$^{-1}$)} & 

1414: \colhead{} 

1415: %& \colhead{$\chi^2$} & \colhead{$R_{maj}$} &

1416: %\colhead{$R_{min}$}     & \colhead{$P$\tablenotemark{a}}  &

1417: %\colhead{$P R_{maj}$}   & \colhead{$P R_{min}$}           &

1418: %\colhead{$\Theta$\tablenotemark{b}}

1419: }

1420: \startdata

1421: 350$\mu$m continuum & 849.4 &102900  &CSO/SHARC II  & 8.7 & 9 $\times$ 9 & ... &  This work \\

1422: 450$\mu$m continuum & 658.3 & 67900  &CSO/SHARC II  & 9.8 & 9 $\times$ 9 & ... &  This work \\

1423: CO $J=6-5$ & 691.473076 & 50 & CSO/690GHz Rx  &10  & 2.7 $\times$ 2.7 & 0.6 & This work \\

1424: %CO $J=7-6$ & 806.651776 & 250/1000 & HHT\tablenotemark{b}/800GHz Rx  &10  &...           & ...  & 0.9 & \citet{kaw99}\\

1425: CO $J=7-6$ & 806.651776 & 250 & HHT\tablenotemark{c}/800GHz Rx  &10  &...             & 0.9 & \citet{kaw99}\\

1426: %CO $J=1-0$ & 115.27120 & 1000 & OVRO-MMA/230GHz Rx       & 7.53$\times$7.09\tablenotemark{d}   & 3 $\times$ 3 & 1.3 & \citet{she00}\\ 

1427: %$^{13}$CO $J=1-0$ & 110.20135 & 24 & OVRO-MMA/230GHz Rx       & 7.49$\times$6.01\tablenotemark{d}   & 3 $\times$ 3 & 2.7 & \citet{she00}\\ 

1428: %CO $J=1-0$ & 115.27120 & 32 & Nobeyama 45m/BEARS       & 14.5  & ... & 0.15 & This work \\ 

1429: %1 &33472.5 &$-$0.1 &0.4  &53 &27.4 &2.065  &1.940 &3.900 &68.3 &116.2 &$-$27.639 \\

1430:  \enddata

1431: 

1432: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before

1433: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark

1434: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.

1435: 

1436: \tablenotetext{a}{Half power beam width.}

1437: \tablenotetext{b}{Field of view.}

1438: \tablenotetext{c}{The Heinrich Hertz Telescope.}

1439: \tablenotetext{d}{The largest angular scale detected with the interferometric observations = 16\arcsec.} 

1440: %with the deluxetable environment}

1441: 

1442: %\tablecomments{Occasionally, authors wish to append a short

1443: %paragraph of explanatory notes that pertain to the entire table, but

1444: %which are different than the caption.  Such notes should be placed in

1445: %a {\tt tablecomments} command like this.}

1446: 

1447: \end{deluxetable}

1448: 

1449: \clearpage

1450: 

1451: \begin{deluxetable}{crrrrcr}

1452: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1453: %\rotate 

1454: \tablecaption{Peak Flux Densities and Total Flux \label{tbl-2}}

1455: \tablewidth{0pt}

1456: \tablehead{

1457: \colhead{Wavelengths} & \colhead{Telescope/}   & \colhead{$\theta_{\rm HPBW}$\tablenotemark{a} }  & \colhead{Flux density\tablenotemark{b}} 

1458: & \colhead{Total flux\tablenotemark{b}}   &  \colhead{Effective radius}   & \colhead{Reference}  \\

1459: \colhead{($\mu$m)}    & \colhead{Instrument}   & \colhead{(\arcsec)} & \colhead{(Jy Beam$^{-1}$)}  & \colhead{(Jy)}   & \colhead{(\arcsec)}  & \colhead{} \\

1460: %& \colhead{$\chi^2$} & \colhead{$R_{maj}$} &

1461: %\colhead{$R_{min}$}     & \colhead{$P$\tablenotemark{a}}  &

1462: %\colhead{$P R_{maj}$}   & \colhead{$P R_{min}$}           &

1463: %\colhead{$\Theta$\tablenotemark{b}}

1464: }

1465: \startdata

1466: 350  & CSO/SHARC II & 8.7  & 59.1 (4.1)  & 477 (13) & 65.5 &  This work \\

1467: 350  & CSO/SHARC    & 11  & 34              &  130          &  25 &   \citet{hun00} \\

1468: 450  & CSO/SHARC II  & 9.8 & 27.4 (1.2) &  137 (14)  & 50.4 & This work \\

1469: 450  & JCMT/SCUBA  & 8    & 29 (0.9)     &    91.1(3.9)   & ...  &  \citet{wil04} \\

1470: 450  & JCMT/SCUBA  & 12  & 32.0 (6.0)  & 162 (24) & ... & \citet{ces99} \\

1471: 850  & JCMT/SCUBA  & 14.4 & 5.6 (0.04)  &  21.9 (0.5) & 15  &\citet{wil04} \\

1472: 850  & JCMT/SCUBA  & 21   & 5.3 (0.6)  & 19 (3)       & ... &\citet{ces99} \\

1473: 1200& Pico Veleta/MAMBO  & 11   & 1.1 (0.3)  & 5.8 & 20 & \citet{beu02} \\

1474: 1350& JCMT/SCUBA  & 22   & 1.74 (0.20)  & ... & ... &\citet{ces99} \\

1475: 2000& JCMT/SCUBA  & 33  & 0.56 (0.05)  & ... & ... & \citet{ces99} \\

1476:  \enddata

1477: 

1478: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before

1479: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark

1480: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.

1481: 

1482: \tablenotetext{a}{Half power beam width.}

1483: \tablenotetext{b}{Error is given in the parenthesis when the literatures provide. }

1484: %with the deluxetable environment}

1485: 

1486: %\tablecomments{Occasionally, authors wish to append a short

1487: %paragraph of explanatory notes that pertain to the entire table, but

1488: %which are different than the caption.  Such notes should be placed in

1489: %a {\tt tablecomments} command like this.}

1490: 

1491: \end{deluxetable}

1492: 

1493: %\clearpage

1494: 

1495: 

1496: \clearpage

1497: \begin{deluxetable}{crrrrrrrrr}

1498: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1499: \rotate 

1500: \tablecaption{IRAS 20126+4104 CO Outflow Parameters  \label{tbl-3}}

1501: \tablewidth{0pt}

1502: \tablehead{

1503: %%%%%%%%%%%%%

1504: \colhead{Transition} & 

1505: \multicolumn{2}{c}{$l$\tablenotemark{a}} &

1506: %\colhead{Outflow lobe} & 

1507: %\colhead{Outflow lobe} & 

1508: \multicolumn{2}{c}{$M$\tablenotemark{b}} &

1509: %\colhead{Mass}& \colhead{Mass} & 

1510: \colhead{$PA$}  & 

1511: \multicolumn{2}{c}{$V$\tablenotemark{c}} &

1512: %\colhead{$V_{\rm Red wing}$\tablenotemark{a}} & 

1513: %\colhead{$V_{\rm Blue wing}$\tablenotemark{a}}  &

1514: %\colhead{$F_{\rm CO}$\tablenotemark{b}} & 

1515: %\colhead{$\tau_{\rm dyn}$\tablenotemark{d}}  & 

1516: %\multicolumn{$\tau_{\rm dyn}$} & %\tablenotemark{d}}  & 

1517: \colhead{$\tau_{\rm dyn}$} &

1518: \colhead{Reference}  \\

1519: \cline{2-3}

1520: \cline{4-5}

1521: \cline{7-8}

1522: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1523: \colhead{} & 

1524: \colhead{Red} & 

1525: \colhead{Blue} & 

1526: \colhead{Red}& 

1527: \colhead{Blue}  & 

1528: \colhead{}  & 

1529: \colhead{Red}  & 

1530: \colhead{Blue} &

1531: \colhead{}  & 

1532: %\colhead{Red}  & 

1533: %\colhead{Blue} &

1534: %\colhead{\Msun / kms$^{-1}$} & (yr) & 

1535: \colhead{} \\

1536: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1537: \colhead{} & 

1538: \colhead{(pc)} & 

1539: \colhead{(pc)} & 

1540: \colhead{(\Msun)}& 

1541: \colhead{(\Msun)}  & 

1542: \colhead{(\deg)}  & 

1543: \colhead{(\kms)}  & 

1544: \colhead{(\kms)} &

1545: %\colhead{\Msun / kms$^{-1}$} & (yr) & 

1546: \colhead{(yr)} &

1547: %\colhead{(yr)} &

1548: \colhead{} 

1549: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1550: %& \colhead{$\chi^2$} & \colhead{$R_{maj}$} &

1551: %\colhead{$R_{min}$}     & \colhead{$P$\tablenotemark{a}}  &

1552: %\colhead{$P R_{maj}$}   & \colhead{$P R_{min}$}           &

1553: %\colhead{$\Theta$\tablenotemark{b}}

1554: }

1555: \startdata

1556: $J=6-5$ & 0.23& 0.16 & 13 & 28 & 50 & 35 & 30  & $\gtrsim$ 1.7 $\times 10^{4}$  & This work \\

1557: $J=1-0$ & 0.64 & 0.35 & 20 & 33 & -10 & 25 & $>$ 28  & 6.4$\times 10^{4}$ & \citet{she00}\\ 

1558: %$J=6-5$ & 0.23& 0.16 & 13 & 28 & 50 & 35 & 30  & $\ga$ 1.7 $\times 10^{4}$ & $\sim$ 1.0 $\times 10^{4} & This work \\

1559: %$J=1-0$ & 0.64 & 0.35 & 20 & 33 & -10 & 25 & $>$ 28  & 6.4$\times 10^{4}$ & 1.0 $\times 10^{4} & \citet{she00}\\ 

1560:  \enddata

1561: 

1562: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before

1563: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark

1564: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.

1565: \tablenotetext{a}{Outflow lobe radius.}

1566: \tablenotetext{b}{Mass of the outflow lobes.}

1567: \tablenotetext{c}{Outer boundary of the wing components.}

1568: %\tablenotetext{b}{Momentum.}

1569: \tablenotetext{d}{Dynamical timescale.}

1570: %\tablenotetext{a}{Sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-1} that was generated

1571: %with the deluxetable environment}

1572: %\tablenotetext{b}{Another sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-1}}

1573: 

1574: %\tablecomments{Occasionally, authors wish to append a short

1575: %paragraph of explanatory notes that pertain to the entire table, but

1576: %which are different than the caption.  Such notes should be placed in

1577: %a {\tt tablecomments} command like this.}

1578: 

1579: \end{deluxetable}

1580: 

1581: 

1582: 

1583: %% If you use the table environment, please indicate horizontal rules using

1584: %% \tableline, not \hline.

1585: %% Do not put multiple tabular environments within a single table.

1586: %% The optional \label should appear inside the \caption command.

1587: 

1588: %% Tables may also be prepared as separate files. See the accompanying

1589: %% sample file table.tex for an example of an external table file.

1590: %% To include an external file in your main document, use the \input

1591: %% command. Uncomment the line below to include table.tex in this

1592: %% sample file. (Note that you will need to comment out the \documentclass,

1593: %% \begin{document}, and \end{document} commands from table.tex if you want

1594: %% to include it in this document.)

1595: 

1596: %% \input{table}

1597: 

1598: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text

1599: %% that appears after it.

1600: 

1601: \begin{figure}

1602: \epsscale{.70}

1603: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.9]{f1.eps} %{sharc350-opt-image_mag.eps}

1604: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.45]{f1b.eps} %{sharc450-opt-image2_mag.eps}\\%{sharc450-opt-image_mag.eps}

1605: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.45]{f1c.eps} %{dds-kband-image.eps}%{dds-kband-marks.eps} %{f1_350.eps}

1606: \caption{ SHARC II  350$\mu$m (left panel) 450$\mu$m (middle panel) images of %(top right)  

1607: the dense clump.  %overlaid on the optical image (DSS, $\lambda$=0.5$\mu$m, color).  %(DSS, $\lambda$0.5$\mu$m, color).  

1608: The 350$\mu$m image is overlaid on the optical image (DSS 0.5$\mu$m, color) in the right panel.  

1609: Blue stars mark the positions of foreground stars. % located in front of the dense clump. 

1610: %Diagram (c) is a magnified optical (DSS, color) and %($\lambda$0.5$\mu$m, color) and

1611: %NIR ($\lambda$2$\mu$m) K$_{s}$-band (contours, \citet{she00}) images %diagrams towards

1612: %towards the direction of the massive protostar.

1613: %Blue stars represent the positions of foreground stars.

1614: Grey scale contours of two images from left are drawn at 2$\sigma$, %(which corresponds to 600 mJy beam-1),

1615: 5$\sigma$, %and above that, logarithmically plotted,

1616: %namely, 

1617: 9$\sigma$, 27$\sigma$ 81$\sigma$, and 243$\sigma$,

1618: where 1$\sigma$=200~mJy beam$^{-1}$. 

1619: The yellow cross at the center represents the position of the clump center, 

1620: namely the peak of the 350$\mu$m continuum emission.  %by interferometers at millimeter bands ($\S$ \ref{overalldust}). 

1621: The beams %of the measurements 

1622: is shown in the left bottom corner of each panel.  

1623: %, reported by \citet{ces99} and \citet{she00}.  . 

1624: \label{sharcimage}}

1625: \end{figure}

1626: \clearpage

1627: 

1628: \begin{figure}

1629: %\plotone{f5.eps}

1630: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.80]{f2.eps} %{radialdist4.eps} %{f2_cm.eps}

1631: \caption{Radial column density profile of the dense clump (black dots) derived using the 350$\mu$m data.  

1632: The thick broken line represents the beam shape.  %The HPBW is 4.\arcsec35.  

1633: The vertical dotted line marks $R_{\rm eff 350}$. 

1634: %\reff350.  % ($\sim$ 0.5pc).  %the clump's effective radius 66\arcsec (0.5 pc).  

1635: %Open triangle and filled pentagon 

1636: The dash-dotted and long-dashed lines mark the effective radii of the continuum emission 

1637: measured at 1.2mm and at 850$\mu$m, respectively.  

1638:  \label{columndensitydist}

1639: }

1640: \end{figure}

1641: \clearpage

1642: 

1643: \begin{figure}

1644: \epsscale{1}

1645: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.8]{f3.eps} %{sharcratio4_mag_nonum_limit23_450_3sigma.eps}

1646: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.6]{f3b.eps}%{sharcratio4_mag_nonum_limit23_450_3sigma.eps}

1647: \caption{350$\mu$m/450$\mu$m flux ratio map. % made from 350- and 450-$\mu$m images. 

1648: %The flux ratio range in color is between 2 and 3. % to show the variations inside the clump.  

1649: The 450$\mu$m emission is drawn in white contours corresponding to 3$\sigma$, 5$\sigma$, 9$\sigma$, 27$\sigma$, and 81$\sigma$. 

1650: The pink dotted contours correspond to the 3$\sigma$ and 5$\sigma$ levels of the 350$\mu$m emission.  

1651: The yellow cross %and red circles %and a purple circle 

1652: marks the clump center. % and the locations of

1653: %molecular hydrogen knots \citep{she00}, %and H$\alpha$/[SII] knot positions 

1654: %\citep{she00},

1655: %reported by \citet{she00}.

1656: %respectively.  %Bottom:  Plot of the 350$\mu$m/450$\mu$m flux ratio versus radius.  

1657:  \label{sharcratioonly}

1658: }

1659: \end{figure}

1660: 

1661: \begin{figure}

1662: \epsscale{1}

1663: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.6]{f4.eps}%{sharcratio4_mag_nonum_limit23_450_3sigma.eps}

1664: \caption{Plot of the 350$\mu$m/450$\mu$m flux ratio as a function of the clump radius.

1665: The bars are the standard deviation of the ratio in each annulus. % (see $\S$ \ref{sharcratiosec}). 

1666:  \label{sharcratio-radius}

1667: }

1668: \end{figure}

1669: 

1670: 

1671: \clearpage

1672: \begin{figure}

1673: \epsscale{.60}

1674: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.7]{f5.eps} %{co7665centspec.eps}

1675: %\includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.7]{f5a.eps} %{co7665centspec.eps}

1676: %\includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.7]{f5b.eps} %{co765ratio.eps}

1677: %\includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.7]{f1c.eps} %{co7665centspec.eps}

1678: \caption{ (a) CO $6-5$ and $7-6$ spectra observed towards the center of the clump.  %Note that

1679: The solid and dashed bars under the spectra indicate the ranges of 

1680: red- and blue-shifted components (see $\S$ \ref{co65outflows}).  %, respectively.  

1681: %CO $7-6$ spectrum has a lower limit of the temperature scale

1682: %(see Section \ref{co765text}).

1683: (b)  Ratio of the brightness temperatures of the CO $7-6$ and $6-5$ emission.

1684: \label{co765}

1685: }

1686: \end{figure}

1687: 

1688: \clearpage

1689: \begin{figure}

1690: \epsscale{.60}

1691: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=1]{f6.eps} %{co65m2-m6_350.eps}%{co65_m2-m7_350.eps}%{co65_m1-m6_350.eps}

1692: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.45]{f6b.eps} %{co65m2-m6_co10amb.eps}

1693: %\includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.45]{f6c.eps} %{co65m2-m6_co10amb.eps}

1694: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.43]{f6c.eps} %{quietgas_gaussfitvlsr_co.eps}%{f4b.eps}

1695: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.43]{f6d.eps} %{quietgas_vwidth_co.eps}

1696: %\includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.43]{f6e.eps} %{co65ewspec.eps}

1697: \caption{Comparison between CO $6-5$ line emission close to the systemic velocity (black solid line contours) %ambient components (contours) %, $\vert$\vlsr $-$ \vsix $\vert$$\leq$ 2.5) 

1698: %$\pm$2.5 \kms from the CO $6-5$ 

1699: %center velocity 3 \kms) 

1700: and the 350$\mu$m dust continuum emission (grey scale contours, same as Figure \ref{sharcimage} left panel).   %and 

1701: %(b)CO $1-0$ systemic velocity components (both in grey scale).  %ambient components (both in grey scale).   

1702: Contours of the CO $6-5$ map are drawn in steps of 2$\sigma$, starting from the 2$\sigma$ level (10.6 K \kms).  

1703: %A yellow cross represents the 3mm/1mm millimeter continuum peak. 

1704: %(c) shows CO $1-0$ spectra taken towards the center of the object with the 45m telescope (black line) 

1705: %and with OVRO-MMA (shaded histogram).  

1706: %The  bar shown at right top corner is the error bar at the peak channel of the single-dish data.  

1707: \label{co65quietgas}

1708: }

1709: \end{figure}

1710: 

1711: \clearpage

1712: \begin{figure}

1713: \epsscale{.60}

1714: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.7]{f7.eps} %{quietgas_gaussfitvlsr_co.eps}%{f4b.eps}

1715: \caption{

1716: The colored pixels in the diagram represent the LSR velocities of the CO $6-5$ narrow line-width components 

1717: (contours, same as Figure \ref{co65quietgas}), overlaid 

1718: on the map of the CO $6-5$ systemic velocity component (contours, same as Figure \ref{co65quietgas}).   %, same 

1719: The black cross denotes the clump center. 

1720: \label{co65quietgasvel}

1721: }

1722: \end{figure}

1723: 

1724: \clearpage

1725: \begin{figure}

1726: \epsscale{.60}

1727: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.7]{f8a.eps} %{quietgas_gaussfitvlsr_co.eps}%{f4b.eps}

1728: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.6]{f8.eps} %{quietgas_vwidth_co.eps}

1729: \caption{

1730: CO $6-5$ spectra observed towards the positions at offsets (+45\arcsec, 0) (east) and (+100\arcsec, 0) (west) 

1731: from the clump center. % to the continuum peak.  

1732: The dotted vertical line marks \vsix.  %the CO $6-5$ center velocity.  

1733: \label{co65quietgasvelspec}

1734: }

1735: \end{figure}

1736: 

1737: \clearpage

1738: \begin{figure}

1739: \epsscale{.60}

1740: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.43]{f6c.eps} %{quietgas_gaussfitvlsr_co.eps}%{f4b.eps}

1741: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=0.7]{f9.eps} %{quietgas_vwidth_co.eps}

1742: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=0.5]{f8b.eps}

1743: %\includegraphics[angle=0,scale=0.6]{f9b.eps}

1744: %\includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.6]{f6e.eps} %{co65ewspec.eps}

1745: \caption{

1746: The grey scale represents the non-thermal velocity dispersion ($\sigma_{v_{nt}}$) %and (b) non-thermal velocity dispersion 

1747: of the narrow line-width components, overlaid on 

1748: the map of CO $6-5$ systemic velocity component (contours, same as Figure \ref{co65quietgas}).  

1749: The black cross marks the clump center.  

1750: %right diagram). %, same 

1751: %(b) Correlation between non-thermal velocity dispersion and radius $r$.  

1752: \label{co65quietgasvelwidmap}

1753: }

1754: \end{figure}

1755: 

1756: 

1757: \clearpage

1758: \begin{figure}

1759: \epsscale{.60}

1760: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.43]{f6c.eps} %{quietgas_gaussfitvlsr_co.eps}%{f4b.eps}

1761: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=0.7]{f9a.eps} %{quietgas_vwidth_co.eps}

1762: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=0.5]{f8b.eps}

1763: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=0.6]{f10.eps}

1764: %\includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.6]{f6e.eps} %{co65ewspec.eps}

1765: \caption{

1766: %(a) Grey scale shows the observed velocity width %and (b) non-thermal velocity dispersion 

1767: %of the CO $6-5$ quiescent molecular gas components, overlaid on the CO 6-5 systemic velocity  components (contours, the same as Figure \ref{co65quietgas} (a)). %, same 

1768: Plot of non-thermal velocity dispersion versus distance from the clump center.

1769: \label{co65quietgasvelwid}

1770: }

1771: \end{figure}

1772: 

1773: 

1774: 

1775: \clearpage

1776: \begin{figure}

1777: \epsscale{.70}

1778: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.9]{f11.eps} %{co65_spectra1bw.eps}%{co65_spectra1.eps}

1779: \caption{CO $J=6-5$ spectra taken towards three different positions 

1780: ((RA$_{\rm offset}$\arcsec, Dec$_{\rm offset}$\arcsec)=(+5, $-5$), ($-10$, +5), and (0, 0))

1781: and average spectrum of all spectra taken within a central area of 1\arcmin $\times$ 1\arcmin 20\arcsec. %shown in Figure \ref{co65channel_inner}.  

1782: %$\leq$ 120\arcsec area from the millimeter continuum peak. 

1783: The solid and dashed bars under each spectrum show the ranges of 

1784: red- and blue-shifted components.  %The systemic velocity  components are within 2 kms$^{-1}$ 

1785: The vertical dashed line is drawn at \vsix. \label{co65spectra}

1786: }

1787: \end{figure}

1788: 

1789: 

1790: \clearpage

1791: \begin{figure}

1792: \epsscale{.70}

1793: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.7]{f12.eps} %{shar350-co65hblured.eps}

1794: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.46]{f11b.eps} %{h2tng-co65hblured.eps} 

1795: %\includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.45]{f10c.eps} %{h2tng-co65hblured.eps} 

1796: \caption{CO $J=6-5$ blue-shifted ($-34.0 \leq V_{\rm LSR}$ \kms $\leq -6.0$, 

1797: blue dashed contours) and red-shifted (0.0 $\leq$ $V_{\rm LSR}$ \kms $\leq +30$, 

1798: red solid contours) emission superposed on the 350$\mu$m image (same as Figure 1).  

1799: Contours of the CO $J=6-5$ components are drawn in steps of 3$\sigma$, starting from the 3$\sigma$ level (50 K \kms).

1800: The yellow cross marks the clump center.  

1801: The shocked H$_{2}$ knots (green dots) marked and numbered in the diagram are taken from

1802: \citet{she00}.  

1803: \label{co65outflow}

1804: }

1805: \end{figure}

1806: \clearpage

1807: 

1808: \begin{figure}

1809: \epsscale{.5}

1810: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.9]{f13.eps} %{sharcratio-co65hblured_mag.eps}

1811: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.46]{f17b.eps} %{sharcratio-co10blured20_mag.eps}

1812: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.46]{f17c.eps} %{sharcratio-co10vhblured_mag.eps}

1813: \caption{

1814: %Comparisons of  and 

1815: CO $6-5$ blue- and red-shifted (left, same as Figure \ref{co65outflow}), 

1816: and CO $1-0$ blue- and red-shifted (right, same as Figure 1 of Shepherd et al. 2000) maps, 

1817: superposed on the 350/450$\mu$m flux ratio map.

1818: %(b) CO $1-0$ blue-shifted (-34.0 $\leq$ $V_{\rm LSR}$ \kms $\leq$ -8.0)

1819: %and red-shifted (0.0 $\leq$ $V_{\rm LSR}$ \kms $\leq$ +19.0)

1820: %emission, and

1821: %(c) CO $1-0$ high velocity outflow emission of

1822: %blue-shifted ($-41.9 \leq$ $V_{LSR}$ \kms $\leq -17.2$)

1823: %and red-shifted (+10.2 $\leq$ $V_{\rm LSR}$ \kms $\leq$ +34.9)

1824: %components.

1825: %Numbers shown in top middle diagram are the same as the ones in Figure \ref{co-sharcimage}.

1826: White dashed and red solid contours %of bottom three panels

1827: denote the blue- and red-shifted lobes respectively.

1828: \label{sharcratiooutflow}

1829: }

1830: \end{figure}

1831: 

1832: 

1833: %% Here we use \plottwo to present two versions of the same figure,

1834: %% one in black and white for print the other in RGB color

1835: %% for online presentation. Note that the caption indicates

1836: %% that a color version of the figure will be available online.

1837: %%

1838: 

1839: 

1840: 

1841: %% If you are not including electronic art with your submission, you may

1842: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the

1843: %% User Guide for details.

1844: %%

1845: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,

1846: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage

1847: %% after every seventh one.

1848: 

1849: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before

1850: %% each one.

1851: 

1852: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables:  the

1853: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX

1854: %% table environment.  Use of deluxetable is preferred.

1855: %%

1856: 

1857: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,

1858: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.

1859: 

1860: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}

1861: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.

1862: %% We also use the \rotate command to rotate the table to

1863: %% landscape orientation since it is very wide even at the

1864: %% reduced font size.

1865: %%

1866: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed

1867: %% inside the \tablecaption.

1868: 

1869: %% This table also includes a table comment indicating that the full

1870: %% version will be available in machine-readable format in the electronic

1871: %% edition.

1872: %%

1873: %\clearpage

1874: 

1875: 

1876: \end{document}

1877: 

1878: %%

1879: %% End of file `sample.tex'.

1880: 

1881: