1: % Using AASTeX v5.0 LaTeX 2e macros.

2: %\documentclass{aastex}

3: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

4: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

5: %\documentclass[preprint]{aastex}

6: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

7: \documentclass[apj]{emulateapj}

8: %%\usepackage{lscape}

9: \def \degpoint {${.}\!\!^{\circ}\!$}

10: \def \secpoint {${.}\!\!^{\prime \prime}\!$}

11: \def \minpoint {${.}\!\!^{\prime}$}

12: \def\arcsec{$^{\prime\prime}$}

13: \def\arcmin{$^{\prime}$}

14: \def\ltsim{ \,{}^<_\sim\, }

15: \def\gtsim{ \,{}^>_\sim\, }

16: %

17: \shorttitle{Radio study of the poor cluster AWM4}

18: \shortauthors{S.~Giacintucci et al.}

19: %

20: \begin{document}

21: 

22: \title{A GMRT multifrequency radio study of the isothermal core of the poor galaxy cluster AWM\,4}

23: 

24: \author{Simona Giacintucci\altaffilmark{1,2}, 

25: Jan M. Vrtilek\altaffilmark{2},

26: Matteo Murgia\altaffilmark{1,3},

27: Somak Raychaudhury\altaffilmark{2,4},

28: Ewan J. O'Sullivan\altaffilmark{2},

29: Tiziana Venturi\altaffilmark{1},

30: Laurence P. David\altaffilmark{2},

31: Pasquale Mazzotta\altaffilmark{2,5},

32: Tracy E. Clarke\altaffilmark{6,7},

33: Ramana M. Athreya\altaffilmark{8}

34: }

35: \altaffiltext{1}{INAF -- Istituto di Radioastronomia, 

36: via Gobetti 101, I-40129, Bologna, Italy; sgiaci$_{-}$s@ira.inaf.it}

37: \altaffiltext{2}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 

38: 60 Garden Street, MS-67, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA}

39: \altaffiltext{3}{INAF -- Osservatorio Astronomico di Cagliari, Loc.

40: Poggio dei Pini, Strada 54, I--09012 Capoterra, Italy}

41: \altaffiltext{4}{School of Physics \& Astronomy, University of

42: Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom}

43: \altaffiltext{5}{Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit\'a di Roma Tor Vergata,

44: via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, I--00133, Roma, Italy}

45: \altaffiltext{6}{Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC. 20375, USA}

46: \altaffiltext{7}{Interferometrics, Inc., 13454 Sunrise Valley Dr. No. 240, Herndon, VA 20171, USA}

47: \altaffiltext{8}{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, National Centre for

48: Radio Astrophysics, Ganeshkhind, Pune, 411 007, India} 

49: 

50: 

51: 

52: \begin{abstract}

53: We present a detailed radio morphological study and spectral analysis

54: of the wide--angle--tail radio source 4C\,+24.36 associated with the

55: dominant galaxy in the relaxed galaxy cluster AWM\,4. Our study is

56: based on new high sensitivity GMRT observations at 235 MHz, 327 MHz 

57: and 610 MHz, and on literature and archival data at other 

58: frequencies. We find that the source major axis is likely oriented 

59: at a small angle with respect to the plane of the sky. The 

60: wide--angle--tail morphology can be reasonably explained by adopting 

61: a simple hydrodynamical model in which both ram pressure (driven by 

62: the motion of the host galaxy) and buoyancy forces contribute 

63: to bend the radio structure. The spectral index progressively steepens 

64: along the source major axis from $\alpha \sim$0.3 in the region close to 

65: the radio nucleus to beyond 1.5 in the lobes. The results of the analysis 

66: of the spectral index image allow us to derive an estimate of the radiative 

67: age of the source of $\sim$ 160 Myr. The cluster X--ray emitting gas has 

68: a relaxed morphology and short cooling time, but 

69: its temperature profile is isothermal out to at least 160~kpc from the 

70: centre. Therefore we seek evidence of energy ejection from the central 

71: AGN to prevent catastrophic cooling. We find that the energy injected by 

72: 4C\,+24.36 in the form of synchrotron luminosity during its lifetime is 

73: far less than the energy required to maintain the high gas temperature in 

74: the core. We also find that it is not possible for the central source to 

75: eject the requisite energy in the intracluster gas in terms of the enthalpy 

76: of buoyant bubbles of relativistic fluid, without creating discernible large 

77: cavities in the existing X--ray {\it XMM--Newton} observations. 

78: 

79: \end{abstract}

80: 

81: \keywords{galaxies: clusters: general --- galaxies: clusters: individual (AWM\,4) 

82: --- intergalactic medium --- radio continuum: galaxies --- X--rays: galaxies: clusters}

83: 

84: \section{Introduction}\label{sec:intro}

85: 

86: In the cores of relaxed clusters and groups of galaxies the cooling 

87: time for the hot X--ray emitting intracluster medium (ICM) can be 

88: substantially less than the Hubble time (e.g., Edge et al. 1992; 

89: Sanderson et al. 2006). In the absence of any substantial sources of 

90: heating, the gas in these regions will cool and recombine, constituting 

91: a cooling flow (Fabian \& Nulsen 1977; Cowie \& Binney 1977). However, 

92: high resolution X--ray imaging and spectroscopy, using the {\it Chandra} 

93: and {\it XMM--Newton} observatories, reveal unusually low quantities of 

94: cooling gas compared to the expectations from the standard cooling flow 

95: model (e.g., Fabian 1994), showing that, even in the cores, the gas temperature 

96: does not fall below $\sim$1--2 keV (e.g., Peterson et al. 2003; Kaastra et 

97: al. 2004). The fate of the cooling gas, and the possible involvement of 

98: additional heating ({\it feedback}) to compensate for the observed radiative 

99: losses and regulate the cooling by (re--)heating the gas, remains the 

100: subject of an extensive debate.

101: 

102: One of the most promising sources of feedback is the active galactic 

103: nucleus (AGN) harbored in the central dominant galaxy in these systems 

104: (e.g., Tabor \& Binney 1993; Nusser et al. 2006; Nulsen et al. 2006; 

105: see also the recent review by McNamara \& Nulsen 2007, and references 

106: therein). Indeed, radio and X--ray images provide direct evidence of 

107: the widespread existence of AGN--driven phenomena in an increasing number 

108: of cool core clusters and groups. Evidence of strong interactions between 

109: the radio and thermal plasma can be found in the detection of X--ray 

110: disturbances in the hot gas, such as cavities, edges and filaments, 

111: which appear correlated with the structure of the central radio galaxy 

112: (see for instance the review by Blanton 2004). However, the mechanism of 

113: the energy transfer from the radio source to the surrounding thermal gas 

114: (e.g., shocks, gravity waves, turbulence) is still unclear, as is the 

115: mechanism of the distribution of energy throughout the cooling region 

116: (e.g., McNamara \& Nulsen 2007). 

117: \\

118: \\

119: The combination of high quality X--ray imaging and high sensitivity 

120: radio observations is a powerful tool to investigate the ICM/AGN 

121: connection in clusters and groups. In particular, the examination 

122: of radio images at multiple frequencies (especially at frequencies 

123: $\le$1~GHz) is important to study the cycle of radio activity and 

124: elucidate the timescales and physical mechanisms of the energy 

125: injection. With this aim in mind we recently have embarked upon a 

126: low radio--frequency survey of a sample of groups of galaxies with 

127: the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (GMRT). High quality X--ray 

128: images from {\it Chandra} and/or {\it XMM--Newton} observations show 

129: that most of these systems have a structure in the X--ray suggestive 

130: of strong interaction between the central radio source and the intragroup 

131: gas (Giacintucci et al. in preparation). The survey aims to investigate 

132: the radio source properties over a broad frequency range, examine 

133: the effects of the AGN at various phases of its activity, and study 

134: the geometry, timescales and physical mechanisms of the energy injection. 

135: 

136: 

137: In this paper we present new GMRT radio images, obtained at 235 MHz, 

138: 327 MHz and 610 MHz of the poor cluster of galaxies AWM\,4, which belongs 

139: to the sample selected for the survey. The cluster hosts the radio source 

140: 4C\,+24.36, which is associated with the central giant elliptical galaxy 

141: NGC\,6051. The general properties of the system are summarised in 

142: Tab.~1, where we provide the following information: J2000 coordinates, 

143: redshift, absolute R magnitude of NGC\,6051; 1.4 GHz flux density of 

144: 4C\,+24.36 from the NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS; Condon et al. 1998), 

145: and the corresponding radio power calculated at the redshift of the optical galaxy\footnote{Throughout the paper we assume H$_0$ = 70 km sec$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, 

146: $\Omega_m$ = 0.3, and $\Omega_{\Lambda}$ = 0.7.}; we also list the cluster 

147: optical velocity dispersion from Koranyi \& Geller (2002), and 

148: emission--weighted gas temperature of the ICM from O'Sullivan et al. 

149: (2005; hereinafter OS05). The linear scale, at the redshift of NGC\,6051 

150: given by the cosmology adopted in this paper, is 0.624 kpc per arcsec.

151: 

152: 

153: The 1.4 GHz radio power of 4C\,+24.36 and absolute magnitude of the host 

154: galaxy (Tab.~1) place the source on the lower end of the FRI--FRII transition 

155: region (e.g., Owen \& Ledlow 1994). The source is extended at the 

156: 5$^{\prime \prime}$ resolution and sensitivity (0.15 mJy b$^{-1}$) of the 

157: 1.4 GHz image from the FIRST survey (Becker et al. 1995), and shows curved 

158: jets traceable up to $\sim$50 kpc from the nucleus along the overall direction 

159: of the galaxy minor axis.

160: 

161: %

162: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Begin Table 1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

163: %

164: 

165: \begin{table}[h!]

166: \label{tab:prop}

167: \caption[]{General properties of the AWM\,4 system.}

168: \begin{center}

169: \begin{tabular}{llc}

170: \hline\noalign{\smallskip}

171: NGC\,6051 & & \\

172: & RA$_{J2000}$ (h,m,s) & 16 04 56.8 \\

173: & DEC$_{J2000}$ ($^{\circ}$, $^{\prime}$, $^{\prime \prime}$) & +23 55 56 \\

174: & z & 0.0312 \\

175: & M$_{\rm R}$ & $-$23.01 \\

176: && \\

177: 4C\,+24.36 & & \\

178: & S$_{\rm 1.4\,GHz, \, NVSS}$ (mJy) & 608 \\

179: & logP$_{\rm 1.4\,GHz}$ (W Hz$^{-1}$) & 24.15 \\

180: && \\

181: AWM\,4 && \\

182: & $\sigma_{\rm v}$ (km s$^{-1}$) & 400 \tablenotemark{(a)}\\

183: & kT (keV) & 2.5 \tablenotemark{(b)}\\

184: && \\

185: & linear scale & 0.624 kpc$ / ^{\prime \prime}$ \\

186: \noalign{\smallskip}

187: \hline

188: \end{tabular}

189: \end{center}

190: \tablenotetext{(a)}{Koranyi \& Geller (2002);} 

191: \tablenotetext{(b)}{O'Sullivan et al. (2005).}

192: \end{table}

193: 

194: 

195: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% End Table 1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

196: 

197: 

198: 

199: The outline of the paper is as follows: in Sec.~\ref{sec:obs} 

200: we describe the GMRT radio observations and data reduction; 

201: the radio images of 4C\,+24.36 are presented in Sec.~\ref{sec:images}; 

202: in Sec.~\ref{sec:spectra} we study the integrated radio spectrum and 

203: spectral index image of the source, and derive its physical parameters; 

204: the results of the radio analysis are discussed in Sec.~\ref{sec:disc}; 

205: in Sec.~\ref{sec:xray} we discuss the X--ray properties of the 

206: cluster environment in the context of its radio properties. 

207: The summary and conclusions are given in Sec.~\ref{sec:summary}.

208: 

209: 

210: 

211: \section{GMRT observations and data reduction}

212: \label{sec:obs}

213: 

214: 

215: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Begin Table 2 &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

216: 

217: \begin{table*}[h!]

218: \caption[]{Details of the GMRT observations of 4C\,+24.36}

219: \begin{center}

220: \begin{tabular}{ccccccc}

221: \hline\noalign{\smallskip}

222: $\nu$ &  $\Delta \nu$ &  Date  & Observation  & HPBW, PA  &   rms      \\ 

223:  (MHz)  &   (MHz)         &          &  time (min)      &

224: 	    ($^{\prime \prime} \times^{\prime \prime}$, $^{\circ}$) & (mJy b$^{-1}$) \\

225: \noalign{\smallskip}

226: \hline\noalign{\smallskip}

227: 235   & 16 & 2006 Jul 08 & 120 & 12.7$\times$10.4, 75  & 0.80 \\

228: 327   & 32 & 2006 Jun 16 & 100 & 9.0$\times$7.8, 53 & 0.40 \\

229: 610   & 32 & 2006 Aug 24 & 160 & 5.0$\times$4.0, 43 & 0.05 \\

230: \hline{\smallskip}

231: \end{tabular}

232: \end{center}

233: \label{tab:obs}

234: \end{table*}

235: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% end tab. 2 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

236: 

237: 

238: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Fig.1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

239: 

240: \begin{figure*}[h!]

241: \centering

242: %\includegraphics[width=\hsize]{f1.eps}

243: \plotone{f1.eps}

244: \caption{GMRT 610 MHz radio contours of 4C\,+24.36, 

245: overlaid on the red optical image from the Sloan Digital 

246: Sky Survey. The 1$\sigma$ level in the radio image is 

247: 50 $\mu$Jy b$^{-1}$. The contour levels are 0.2, 0.4, 

248: 0.8, 1.6, 3.2, 6.4 (black), 12.8, 25.6, 51.2 and 102.4 

249: (white) mJy b$^{-1}$. The contour peak flux is 121.7 mJy 

250: b$^{-1}$. The restoring beam is $5.0^{\prime \prime} 

251: \times 4.0^{\prime \prime}$, p.a. 43$^{\circ}$. The white

252: cross in the insert shows the position of the radio core (see

253: Fig.~3).}

254: \label{fig:hr_image610}

255: \end{figure*}

256: 

257: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

258: 

259: 

260: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Fig.2 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

261: 

262: \begin{figure*}[h!]

263: \centering

264: \plottwo{f2a.eps}{f2b.eps}

265: \caption{GMRT radio contours at 327 MHz ({\it left panel}) and 

266: 235 MHz ({\it right panel}) of 4C\,+24.36. The 1$\sigma$ level

267: in the image is 0.4 mJy b$^{-1}$ at 327 MHz and 0.8 mJy b$^{-1}$

268: at 235 MHz. Contour levels start from $\pm$3$\sigma$, and scale 

269: by a factor 2. The contour peak flux is 199.8 mJy b$^{-1}$ at 

270: 327 MHz and 427.8 mJy b$^{-1}$ at 235 MHz. The restoring beam 

271: is $9.0^{\prime \prime} \times 7.8^{\prime \prime}$, p.a. 

272: 53$^{\circ}$ in the left panel and $12.7^{\prime \prime} 

273: \times 10.4^{\prime \prime}$, p.a. 75$^{\circ}$ in the right 

274: panel. The black cross in both images indicates the position

275: of the radio core (see Fig.~3).} 

276: \label{fig:hr_images}

277: \end{figure*}

278: 

279: 

280: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

281: 

282: We observed the radio source 4C\,+24.36 using the GMRT at the 

283: frequencies of 235 MHz, 327 MHz and 610 MHz. We summarise the 

284: details of the observations in Tab.~\ref{tab:obs}, where we provide 

285: the frequency and total bandwidth, observation date, total time 

286: on source, half power beamwidth (HPBW) of the full array, and rms level 

287: (1$\sigma$) in the full resolution image. The observations were performed 

288: using both the upper and lower side band (USB and LSB) at each frequency, 

289: for a total observing band of 32 MHz at 327 and 610 MHz, and 16 MHz at 235 

290: MHz (Tab.~2). The data were collected in spectral--line mode with 128 

291: channels/band at 327 and 610 MHz, and 64 channels/band at 235 MHz 

292: (the spectral resolution is 125 kHz/channel). At all frequencies, the USB 

293: and LSB datasets were calibrated and reduced individually using the NRAO 

294: Astronomical Image Processing System (AIPS) package. The 

295: flux density scale was set using the sources 3C\,286 and 3C\,48 

296: as amplitude calibrators and the Baars et al. (1977) coefficients.

297: Careful editing was necessary to identify and remove the data affected 

298: by radio frequency interference at 235 and 327 MHz.

299: \\

300: In order to find a compromise between the size of the dataset and 

301: the need to minimize bandwidth smearing effects within the primary 

302: beam, the central channels in each individual dataset were averaged 

303: to 6 channels of $\sim$1 MHz each at 235 MHz, and $\sim$2 MHz each at 

304: 327 and 610 MHz after bandpass calibration. At each step of the data 

305: reduction we implemented the standard wide--field imaging technique. 

306: After a number of phase self--calibration cycles, the final USB and 

307: LSB datasets were further averaged from 6 channels to 1 single channel 

308: and then combined together to produce the final images of the source. 

309: All images were corrected for the primary beam attenuation.

310: The residual amplitude errors are of the order of 

311: $\ltsim$ 5 \%.

312: 

313: 

314: \section{The radio images}\label{sec:images}

315: 

316: The GMRT 610 MHz image of 4C\,+24.36 is presented in 

317: Fig.~\ref{fig:hr_image610}, superposed on the red optical image from 

318: the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. The images at 327 and 235 MHz are 

319: shown in the left and right panels of Fig.~\ref{fig:hr_images}, 

320: respectively. The radio galaxy exhibits a very similar morphology 

321: at all frequencies and resolution, with twin continuous jets and 

322: extended radio lobes slightly bent toward the North. It can be classified 

323: as a wide--angle--tail (WAT) source, although the angle between 

324: the tails is rather large, i.e. $\sim 140^{\circ}$. For comparison, the 

325: angle between the tails of the radio galaxy 3C\,465, which is considered 

326: the prototype of WAT sources, is $\sim 90^{\circ}$ (e.g., Eilek et al. 1984). 

327: Its total angular extent is $\sim$250$^{\prime \prime}$ along 

328: the South--East/North--West axis in all the images shown in 

329: Figs.~\ref{fig:hr_image610} and \ref{fig:hr_images}. The corresponding 

330: largest linear size is $\sim$ 160 kpc.

331: 

332: 

333: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Begin of Tab.3 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

334: 

335: \begin{table*}[t]

336: \caption[]{Radio properties of 4C\,+24.36}\label{tab:table3}

337: \begin{center}

338: \begin{tabular}{lccccc}

339: \noalign{\smallskip}

340: \hline\noalign{\smallskip}

341: & S$_{\rm 235\,MHz}$  & S$_{\rm 327\,MHz}$ &S$_{\rm 610\,MHz}$ & $\alpha_{\rm 235\,MHz}^{\rm 610\,GHz}$ & LS \\ 

342: \noalign{\smallskip}

343: & (Jy) & (Jy)  &  (Jy) & ($\pm 0.03$) &  (kpc $\times$ kpc) \\

344: \hline\noalign{\bigskip}			      

345: Total source & 2.75$\pm$0.14 & 2.20$\pm$0.11  & 1.45$\pm$0.07  & 0.67 & 160 $\times$ 40  \\

346: &&&&& \\

347: Jet West &  1.09$\pm$0.05 & 0.92$\pm$0.05 & 0.62$\pm$0.03 & 0.59  & 45$\times$15 \\

348: Jet East &  1.01$\pm$0.05 & 0.82$\pm$0.04 & 0.60$\pm$0.03 & 0.55  & 35$\times$15 \\

349: &&&&& \\

350: Lobe West & 0.32$\pm$0.02 & 0.23$\pm$0.01 & 0.12$\pm$0.01 & 1.03  & 40$\times$36 \\

351: Lobe East & 0.33$\pm$0.02 & 0.24$\pm$0.01 & 0.11$\pm$0.01 & 1.15  & 40$\times$36 \\    

352: \noalign{\smallskip}

353: \hline\noalign{\smallskip}

354: \end{tabular}

355: \end{center}

356: \label{tab:source}

357: \end{table*}

358: 

359: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% End Tab. 3 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

360: 

361: 

362: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Fig.3 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

363: 

364: \begin{figure*}

365: \centering

366: \plotone{f3.eps}

367: \caption{Radio components of 4C\,+24.36. The grey scale image 

368: is the 610 MHz image (same as contour image in 

369: Fig.~\ref{fig:hr_image610}). 

370: The black contour level is 0.2 mJy b$^{-1}$, the white 

371: contour is 0.4 mJy b$^{-1}$. The white cross indicates 

372: the position of the radio core, as determined from  

373: the 0.7$^{\prime \prime} \times 0.4^{\prime \prime}$

374: image at 4.9 GHz (from VLA archival observations), 

375: shown in the insert (contours are spaced by a factor 2 starting

376: from $\pm$0.15 mJy b$^{-1}$). The white cross in the insert 

377: indicates the position of the radio core (see Fig.~3).}

378: \label{fig:cartoon}

379: \end{figure*}

380: 

381: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

382: 

383: 

384: Figure \ref{fig:cartoon} sketches the most prominent components of the 

385: source, i.e. the two bright well--collimated jets (labelled as jet West 

386: and jet East), extending in opposite directions with respect to the position 

387: of the radio core (white cross), and two roughly round and very extended 

388: radio lobes (lobe West and lobe East). Since the core of the radio source is 

389: undetected in our GMRT images (Figs.~\ref{fig:hr_image610} and 

390: \ref{fig:hr_images}), its position has been determined using a 4.9 GHz image 

391: at the resolution of 0.7$^{\prime \prime} \times 0.4^{\prime \prime}$, 

392: obtained from a new reduction of archival Very Large Array (VLA) data 

393: (Obs. Id. AK360). The 4.9 GHz image is shown as insert in Fig.~\ref{fig:cartoon}.

394: 

395: The most relevant properties of the source and its components, derived 

396: from the observations presented here, are summarised in Table \ref{tab:source}, 

397: where we provide the flux density at 235, 327 and 610 MHz, the spectral index 

398: in the 235--610 MHz frequency range (defined according to S$\propto 

399: \nu^{-\alpha}$), and the linear size (LS). It is clear from 

400: Figs.~\ref{fig:hr_images} and \ref{fig:cartoon} and Tab.~\ref{tab:source}, 

401: that both the jets and both the lobes are rather symmetric in total 

402: flux density, spectral index and extent. In particular, the western jet has 

403: a flux density which is only $\sim 3-10$ \% higher (depending on the frequency) 

404: than the eastern jet, while the lobe West is $\sim$3--8 \% fainter than the 

405: other. The high symmetry observed in 4C\,+24.36 suggests that the radio source 

406: major axis lies close to the plane of the sky.

407: 

408: 

409: \subsection{The radio jets}\label{sec:jets}

410: 

411: The 610 MHz image of 4C\,+24.36 (Figs.~\ref{fig:hr_image610} 

412: and \ref{fig:cartoon}) shows that the radio jets are 

413: characterized by a strikingly complex morphology,

414: with a number of wiggles, almost symmetrically placed on 

415: either sides within a projected distance of $\sim$ 25 kpc 

416: from the core.

417: 

418: In order to analyze the jet behaviour, we constructed 

419: a grid of 1$^{\prime \prime}$ wide strips, parallel 

420: to each other and transverse to the source major axis.

421: The strips were set in order to cover the whole jet 

422: region on the 610 MHz image (Fig.~\ref{fig:hr_image610}). 

423: We determined the position of the surface brightness 

424: peak in each stripe, and used it to reconstruct the jet 

425: {\it trajectory} (projected on the plane of the sky) 

426: given in Fig.~\ref{fig:profile}. The figure shows that 

427: both jets initially emerge from the core region, bent 

428: with a relative angle of $\sim$130$^{\circ}$. Going outward 

429: they undergo four prominent sharp bends (labelled W1 to W4 for 

430: the western jet, and E1 to E4 for the eastern jet), which 

431: occur at similar projected distances from the galaxy nucleus. 

432: In particular, the first two bends E1 and W1 are observed 

433: at $\sim$7 kpc from the core, W2 and E2 occur at a distance 

434: of $\sim$ 13 kpc, while W3 and E3 take place at $\sim$ 16 kpc.

435: After the last change of direction in W4 and E4 (at $\sim$ 

436: 25 kpc from the center), the jets travel roughly straight 

437: for a while, and finally flare into the diffuse lobes.

438: 

439: 

440: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Fig. 4 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

441: 

442: 

443: \begin{figure*}

444: \centering

445: \plotone{f4.eps}

446: \caption{Projected distribution of the radio surface 

447: brightness peaks at 610 MHz along the jets of 4C\,+24.36. 

448: The position of the jet bends are labelled from W1 to W4 

449: for the jet West, and from E1 to E4 for the jet East. 

450: 0$^{\prime \prime}$ corresponds to the position of the radio 

451: core.}

452: \label{fig:profile}

453: \end{figure*}

454: 

455: 

456: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

457: 

458: 

459: \subsection{The radio lobes}\label{sec:lobes}

460: 

461: Both radio lobes of 4C\,+24.36 show a regular and 

462: roughly round morphology, and lack the presence of

463: hotspots (Fig.~\ref{fig:hr_image610}). The only 

464: feature with a significant surface brightness 

465: contrast with respect to the rest of the lobe is the 

466: shell--like edge visible in the outermost region of 

467: the eastern lobe (Fig.~\ref{fig:hr_image610}). The lobes 

468: are very symmetric in total flux density, size and 

469: spectral index (see Fig.~\ref{fig:cartoon} and 

470: Tab.~\ref{tab:source}). They are slightly 

471: asymmetric in the projected distance from the core: 

472: the centroid of the lobe West is at $\sim$65 kpc from the 

473: center, while that of the lobe East is at $\sim$ 50 

474: kpc. 

475: 

476: \section{Radio spectral analysis and physical parameters}\label{sec:spectra}

477: 

478: The radio observations presented in this paper, 

479: coupled with archival and literature data, allowed us 

480: to determine the integrated radio spectrum of 4C\,+24.36,

481: and to produce the image of the spectral index distribution

482: over the source (Sec.~\ref{sec:tot_sp}). This information

483: allowed us to derive the physical parameters of 4C\,+24.36

484: (Sec.~\ref{sec:parfis}). The analysis is carried out using 

485: the Synage++ package (Murgia 2000). 

486: 

487: 

488: \subsection{Spectral analysis}\label{sec:tot_sp}

489: 

490: In order to derive the broad--band radio spectrum of 

491: 4C\,+24.36, we used the databases CATS\footnote{http://cats.sao.ru} 

492: (Verkhodanov et al. 1997) and NED\footnote{http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu} 

493: to compile flux densities at different frequencies from the 

494: literature, and added our GMRT measurements (Tab.~\ref{tab:source}). 

495: The values from the literature are reported in Tab.~4. The flux 

496: densities marked with the symbol $\diamond$ in Tab.~4 were corrected 

497: for consistency with the absolute flux density scale of Baars et 

498: al. (1977) used in this paper and for the other measurements in 

499: Tab.~4. The correction factors were taken from Helmboldt et al. (2008).

500: The 74 MHz value was measured on the image from the VLA Low--frequency 

501: Sky Survey (VLSS\footnote{http://lwa.nrl.navy.mil$/$VLSS$/$}), 

502: and was corrected for the {\it clean bias} as described in

503: Cohen et al. (2007). The flux density at 327 MHz was measured

504: on the VLA--C array image of 4C\,+24.36, obtained from a new

505: reduction of public archival data (Obs.Id. AC598).

506: 

507: The source integrated spectrum between 26 MHz and 

508: 10.7 GHz is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:spectrum}. The GMRT 

509: data points align well with the data from the literature. 

510: We notice the extremely good agreement of the GMRT 327 MHz 

511: flux density with the measurement from the VLA image at the

512: same frequency (Tab.~4). The flux density at 26 MHz (empty 

513: square) was derived from observations with the Clarke Lake 

514: Radio Observatory with a resolution of $\sim$0.5 deg$^2$

515: (Viner \& Erickson 1975), and thus powerful nearby radio sources 

516: might contribute to the total flux density reported in Tab.~4. 

517: For this reason this value is very uncertain, and will not

518: be included in the following analysis of the radio spectrum.

519: \\

520: The spectrum in Fig.~\ref{fig:spectrum} can be described 

521: as a single power--law over the entire range 74 MHz--10.7 GHz, 

522: with a spectral index of $\alpha_{\rm obs}$=0.82. 

523: The solid line in the figure represents the fit with a 

524: simple power--law model, which provides $\alpha$=0.82$\pm$0.03.

525: 

526: 

527: 

528: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Tab.%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

529: 

530: \begin{table}\label{tab:flux2}

531: \caption[]{Literature radio data for 4C\,+24.36}

532: \begin{center}

533: \begin{tabular}{rcc}

534: \noalign{\smallskip}

535: \hline\noalign{\smallskip}

536: $\nu$     & Flux density & Reference\\

537:  (MHz)    &   (Jy)     &       \\

538: \hline\noalign{\smallskip}

539: 26   & 26.00 $\pm$ 7.00 & (1) \\  

540: 74   &  6.12 $\pm$ 0.47 & (2) \\

541: $\diamond$ 178 & 2.77 $\pm$ 0.42 & (3) \\

542: 327  &  2.19 $\pm$ 0.11 & (4) \\

543: $\diamond$ 365 & 1.43 $\pm$ 0.07 & (5)\\  

544: $\diamond$ 408 & 1.76 $\pm$ 0.14 & (6) \\

545: 1400 &  0.68 $\pm$ 0.03 & (7) \\

546: 1400 &  0.67 $\pm$ 0.03 & (8) \\

547: 1410 &  0.60 $\pm$ 0.04 & (9) \\

548: 2700 &  0.33 $\pm$ 0.02 & (10) \\

549: 2700 &  0.37 $\pm$ 0.02 & (9) \\

550: 4860 &  0.19 $\pm$ 0.01 & (11) \\

551: 4850 &  0.21 $\pm$ 0.03 & (12) \\ 

552: 5000 &  0.20 $\pm$ 0.02 & (9) \\ 

553: 10700&  0.11 $\pm$ 0.01 & (13)\\   

554: \hline\noalign{\smallskip}

555: \end{tabular}

556: \end{center}

557: \tablerefs{(1) Viner \& Erickson (1975); (2) VLSS image,

558: Cohen et al. (2007); (3) 4C; Pilkington \& Scott (1965), Gower et 

559: al. (1967); (4) VLA archival data (Obs. Id. AC598); (5) TXS, 

560: Douglas et al. (1996); (6) B2, Colla et al. 1970, Fanti et al. (1974); 

561: (7) FIRST, White et al. (1997); 

562: (8) NVSS, Condon et al. (1998); (9) PKS90, Wright \& Otrupcek (1990); 

563: (10) Bridle, Kesteven \& Brandie (1977); (11) GB6, Gregory et al. (1996); 

564: (12) Gregory \& Condon (1991); (13) Reich et al. (2000).}

565: 

566: \tablenotetext{}{The values marked with $\diamond$ were corrected for 

567: consistency with the Baars et al. (1997) scale.}

568: \end{table}

569: 

570: 

571: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Fig.5 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

572: 

573: \begin{figure}

574: \centering

575: \plotone{f5.eps}

576: \caption{Radio spectrum of 4C\,+24.36 between 26 MHz and 

577: 10.7 GHz. The empty symbols are literature data (see 

578: Table~\ref{tab:table3}), while the filled circles are the 

579: GMRT 235, 327 and 610 MHz values (Tab. 4). The solid line 

580: is the power--law fit to the data. The uncertain 

581: 26 MHz data point (empty square) was not included in the fit 

582: (see text). The value of $\alpha$ provided by the 

583: fit, along with the reduced $\chi^2$, are reported.}

584: \label{fig:spectrum}

585: \end{figure}

586: 

587: 

588: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

589: 

590: 

591: %

592: %%%%%%%%%%% Tab. 5 - spectral results %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

593: %

594: 

595: \begin{table}[h!]

596: \caption[]{Results of the point--to--point analysis}

597: \begin{center}

598: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}

599: \noalign{\smallskip}

600: \hline\noalign{\smallskip}

601:   & $\alpha_{inj}$ & $\nu_{\rm br}$ & t$_{\rm rad}$ & v$_{\rm growth}$ \\

602:   &            & (MHz)              &  ($10^{8}$) yr & (c)  \\

603: \hline\noalign{\bigskip}

604: jet+lobe West\tablenotemark{(b)} & 0.48$^{+0.07}_{-0.07}$ & 359$^{+37}_{-31}$ & 1.6  & 0.0017   \\

605: jet+lobe East \tablenotemark{(b)} & 0.45$^{+0.07}_{-0.07}$ & 316$^{+29}_{-26}$  & 1.7  & 0.0015   \\

606: &&&&\\

607: \hline\noalign{\smallskip}

608: \end{tabular}

609: \end{center}

610: \end{table}

611: 

612: %

613: %%%%%%%%%%% End of Tab. 5 - spectral results %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

614: %

615: 

616: 

617: We obtained the image of the 235--610 MHz spectral index 

618: distribution over the source using two images produced 

619: with the same u--v range and same cellsize, restored with 

620: the same beam of $13.0^{\prime \prime} \, \times \, 

621: 11.0^{\prime \prime}$, and corrected for the primary beam 

622: attenuation. The images were aligned, clipped at the 

623: 3$\sigma$ level, and finally combined to obtain the spectral 

624: index image presented in Fig.~\ref{fig:spix}. The figure 

625: shows the presence of a flat region ($\alpha \sim 0.3 \pm0.1$) 

626: at the source center, corresponding to the inner $\sim$ 10 kpc 

627: portion of the jets (see Fig.~\ref{fig:cartoon}). On a larger scale, 

628: the spectral index gradually steepens along the jets up to 

629: $\alpha \sim 0.9 \pm 0.1$ where the jets merge into the lobes. 

630: Finally, a further steepening is observed in the lobe region where 

631: the spectral index has an average value $<\alpha>=1.5 \pm 0.2$.

632: 

633: 

634: %

635: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Fig. 6 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

636: %

637: 

638: \begin{figure}

639: \centering

640: \plotone{f6.eps}

641: \caption{Colour scale image of the spectral index 

642: distribution between 235 MHz and 610 MHz over 4C\,+24.36. 

643: The image has been computed from images with a restoring

644: beam of $13.0^{\prime \prime} \, \times \, 11.0^{\prime \prime}$. 

645: Overlaid are the 235 MHz contours at levels 3,6,12,24,48,96 and 

646: 192 mJy b$^{-1}$. The white cross shows the position of the

647: radio core.}

648: \label{fig:spix}

649: \end{figure}

650: 

651: %

652: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% end of Fig. 6 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

653: %

654: 

655: 

656: Following Parma et al. (1999 and 2007; see also Giacintucci et 

657: al. 2007), we performed a fit of the observed spectral index trend 

658: along the source axis. We determined the average spectral index in 

659: 7.5$^{\prime \prime}$ radius circular regions starting from the source

660: center and going outwards toward the lobes (see insert in 

661: Fig.~\ref{fig:steepening}). The size of the region was chosen to be larger 

662: than one beam, in order to sample independent regions. The derived 235--610 

663: MHz spectral index distribution as a function of the distance from the 

664: core is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:steepening}. We notice that the two spectral 

665: trends are very similar once errors are taken into account.

666: %

667: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Fig. 7 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

668: %

669: 

670: \begin{figure}

671: \centering

672: \plotone{f7.eps}

673: \caption{Spectral index distribution, calculated

674: from the 235 and 610 MHz observations, along the 

675: source as a function of the distance from the core, derived 

676: using the circular regions shown in the insert. The radius 

677: of each region is 7.5$^{\prime \prime}$. The ellipse in the 

678: upper--left corner of the insert indicates the size of the 

679: radio beam (HPBW=$13.0^{\prime \prime} \, \times \, 

680: 11.0^{\prime \prime}$). The contours correspond

681: to the 235 MHz image (same as in

682: Fig.~\ref{fig:spix}). The solid lines represent the best fit 

683: of the radiative model described in the text. The values of 

684: $\alpha_{\rm inj}$ and $\nu_{\rm br}$ provided by the fit, 

685: along with the reduced $\chi^2$, are also reported. The data 

686: point at $d\!=\!0$ (empty circle) was not used in the fit.}

687: \label{fig:steepening}

688: \end{figure}

689: 

690: %

691: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% End of Fig. 7 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

692: %

693: 

694: We fitted these trends using a JP model (Jaffe \& Perola 1974), in 

695: which the timescale for continuous isotropization of the electrons 

696: is assumed to be much shorter than the radiative timescale. We also 

697: assumed that the break frequency $\nu_{\rm br} \, \propto 

698: \, d^{-2}$, where $d$ is the distance from the core. Such a relation 

699: is expected under the assumption that the expansion velocity of the 

700: source is constant (i.e. $d \, \propto \, t$), and reflects the fact 

701: that the age of the radio emitting electrons increases as one moves 

702: away from the nucleus, which is appropriate for FR I radio galaxies 

703: such as 4C\,+24.36. The best fit to the observed spectral trend is 

704: shown as solid line in Fig.~\ref{fig:steepening}. Note that the data 

705: point at d$=$0 (empty circle) was not used in the fit. The model 

706: yields similar values of the injection spectral index and break 

707: frequency for both regions, with $\alpha_{\rm inj} \sim 0.5$ 

708: and $\nu_{\rm break} \sim 360$ and $\sim$ 320 MHz for the western and

709: eastern parts, respectively (see also Tab.~5). 

710:  

711: \subsection{Physical parameters of 4C\,+24.36}\label{sec:parfis}

712: 

713: We assume that the relativistic particle and magnetic field 

714: energy densities are uniformly distributed over the source volume 

715: and in energy equipartition. The equipartition parameters 

716: are derived adopting a low--energy cut--off of $\rm \gamma_{min}$ 

717: in the energy distribution of the radiating electrons (where

718: $\gamma$ is the electron Lorentz factor), instead of the 10 

719: MHz--100 GHz frequency interval normally used in the standard 

720: equipartition equations (e.g. Pacholczyk 1970). This choice 

721: allows us to take into account the contribution from low energy 

722: electrons, since the assumption of a low frequency cut--off of 

723: 10 MHz in the synchrotron spectrum tends to neglect the input from 

724: electrons with energy lower than $\gamma \sim$1500--500 for typical 

725: equipartition magnetic fields of $\sim$1--10 $\mu$G, respectively 

726: (Brunetti, Setti \& Comastri 1997). We adopt $\rm \gamma_{min}\!=\!10$ 

727: which corresponds to an energy cut--off of $\sim$5 MeV (Brunetti, Setti 

728: \& Comastri 1997; see also Parma et al. 2007). Furthermore, we use the 

729: flux density measurement at 235 MHz (Tab.~2), since the electron aging 

730: is less relevant at lower frequencies. A spectral index of 0.5, 

731: consistent with the values of the injection spectral index 

732: $\alpha_{\rm inj}$ derived in Sec.~\ref{sec:tot_sp} (Tab.~5), is adopted.

733: Finally, we assume a relativistic proton energy to electron energy ratio 

734: $\kappa$=1, and a filling factor $\phi$ of unity.  

735: 

736: %

737: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%  Tab. 6 Physical parameters %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

738: %

739: 

740: \begin{table*}[t]

741: \label{tab:parfis}

742: \caption[]{Physical parameters of 4C\,+24.36 and its components}

743: \begin{center}

744: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}

745: \noalign{\smallskip}

746: \hline\noalign{\smallskip}

747:  & B$_{\rm eq}$ & P$_{\rm min}$ & U$_{\rm min}$ & u$_{\rm min}$ \\

748:  & ($\mu$G) & ($10^{-13}$ dyne cm$^{-2}$) & (10$^{57}$ erg) & ($10^{-12}$ erg cm$^{-3}$) \\

749: \hline\noalign{\bigskip}

750: total source & 5.00 & 7.8 & 3.7 & 2.3 \\

751: &&&&\\

752: jet+lobe West & 5.04 & 8.0 & 1.9 & 2.4 \\

753: jet+lobe East & 4.97 & 7.9 & 1.8 & 2.3  \\

754: &&&&\\

755: lobe West    & 3.14 & 3.1 & 0.9 & 0.9 \\

756: lobe East    & 3.17 & 3.1 & 0.9 & 0.9 \\

757: &&&&\\

758: jet West      & 8.99 & 25.0 & 0.7 & 7.5 \\

759: jet East     & 9.42 & 27.3 & 0.5 & 8.2 \\

760: \hline\noalign{\smallskip}

761: \end{tabular}

762: \end{center}

763: \end{table*}

764: 

765: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

766: 

767: 

768: The equipartition magnetic field B$_{\rm eq}$ computed in 

769: this way is listed in Tab.~6 for the entire source, and for

770: parts thereof. We found B$_{\rm eq} \sim 5$ $\mu$G both for 

771: the whole source and the western and eastern jet+lobe regions 

772: analysed in Sec.~\ref{sec:tot_sp}. A lower estimate is obtained 

773: for the lobes separately (B$_{\rm eq} \sim 3$ $\mu$G), while 

774: the highest values are found in the jets where B$_{\rm eq} 

775: \sim 9$ $\mu$G. We also derived the total energy U$_{\rm min}$, 

776: energy density u$_{\rm min}$, and minimum pressure 

777: p$_{\rm min}$ for the source and its components (Tab.~6). 

778: 

779: 

780: The break frequency derived in Sec.~\ref{sec:tot_sp}

781: can be used to estimate the radiative age $\rm t_{\rm rad}$

782: of 4C\,+24.36. If the expansion losses can be neglected 

783: and the magnetic field is uniform across the source and 

784: constant over its lifetime, $\rm t_{\rm rad}$ (expressed in 

785: Myrs) is given by the following equation:

786: 

787: \begin{equation}\label{eq:trad}

788: {\rm t_{rad} = 1590\frac{B^{0.5}}{(B^2 + B_{CMB}^2)} [(1+z) \nu_{br}]^{-0.5}} 

789: \end{equation}

790: 

791: \noindent where B is the magnetic field intensity in $\mu$G, 

792: $\nu_{\rm br}$ is in GHz, and $\rm B_{CMB} (\mu G)= 3.2 \times 

793: (1+z)^2$ is the magnetic field strength with energy density 

794: equal to that of the CMB the redshift z. Adopting 

795: the equipartition magnetic fields (Tab.~6) in Eq.~\ref{eq:trad},

796: we estimate ${\rm t_{rad}} \sim 160$ Myr and $\sim$170 Myr for

797: the western and eastern parts of 4C\,+24.36, respectively (also

798: reported in Tab.~5). A growth velocity of $\rm v_{growth} 

799: \sim 0.002$c is found for both regions (Tab.~5). The latter quantity 

800: was derived as $\rm v_{growth} = LLS/t_{rad}$, i.e. assuming 

801: a constant velocity and using the largest linear size given 

802: in Tab.~2. It is worth noting the good agreement between the results 

803: obtained for two regions.

804: 

805:  

806: \section{Discussion of the radio results}\label{sec:disc}

807: 

808: 

809: \subsection{Jet orientation and velocity}\label{sec:theta}

810: 

811: The radio galaxy 4C\,+24.36 has WAT morphology in all the 

812: images presented in this paper (Figs.~\ref{fig:hr_image610} 

813: and \ref{fig:hr_images}), with two bright continuous jets 

814: and very extended radio lobes. Such components are very 

815: symmetric in total flux density and extent (Tab.~2), as

816: well as in spectral index properties and physical parameters 

817: (Tabs.~5 and 6). These results suggest that the major axis 

818: of 4C\,+24.36 most probably lies close to the plane of the sky.

819: \\

820: We searched for further hints of the source orientation

821: in the plane of the sky by means of a standard analysis based

822: on the jet asymmetry. Assuming that the jets are intrinsically 

823: symmetric with respect to the source core, the jet to counterjet 

824: brightness ratio $R$ can be used to constrain the geometry and 

825: velocity of the jets in the context of a relativistic beaming 

826: model (e.g. Lind \& Blandford 1985) according to 

827: 

828: 

829: \begin{equation}\label{eq:ratio}

830: R=(1+\beta cos \theta)^{q}(1-\beta cos \theta)^{-q},

831: \end{equation}

832: 

833: \noindent where $\beta$ is the ratio of the jet velocity to 

834: the speed of light, $\theta$ is the orientation angle of the 

835: jet with respect to the line of sight, and $\alpha$ is the 

836: jet spectral index. If the jet emissivity is isotropic 

837: with no preferred direction for the magnetic field (Pearson 

838: \& Zensus 1987), the exponent $q$ is given by $2+\alpha$.

839: 

840: Using the 0.7$^{\prime \prime} \times 0.5^{\prime \prime}$ 

841: resolution image at 4.9~GHz (see insert in Fig.~\ref{fig:cartoon}), 

842: and assuming the jet East to be the counterjet, we estimated

843: $R$ within the inner $\sim 5$ kpc from the core. Assuming 

844: $\alpha=0.5$ for the jet emission, we found $R=1.3$ which 

845: yields $\beta \cos \theta$=0.05 (Eq.~\ref{eq:ratio}). 

846: Fig.~\ref{fig:beta} shows the corresponding constraints 

847: on $\theta$ and the intrinsic jet velocity $\beta$ (solid 

848: black curve). Jetha, Hardcastle \& Sakelliou (2006) found that the average value 

849: for the inner jet speed in a relatively large sample of WAT radio 

850: galaxies is $\beta=0.5\pm0.2$. This velocity is in general agreement 

851: with the values found for FRI radio galaxies, whose properties are 

852: consistent with the hypothesis that jets slow down from relativistic 

853: to sub--relativistic velocities on scales of 1--10 kpc (Parma et al. 

854: 1994). Adopting $\beta=0.5\pm0.2$ for 4C\,+24.36, the black solid 

855: curve in Fig.~\ref{fig:beta} shows that the allowed jet orientation 

856: angle is in the range $\theta \sim 81^{\circ} $-- $87^{\circ}$ 

857: (red dashed region). This suggests that the source probably lies 

858: at a very small angle with respect to the plane of the sky.

859: \\

860: If we use the exponent $q=3+2\alpha$ in Eq.~\ref{eq:ratio}, which

861: is valid in the case of a perfectly ordered magnetic field

862: parallel to the jet axis (Begelman 1993), we obtain very similar 

863: constraints for the jet orientation, as shown by the solid blue 

864: curve in Fig.~\ref{fig:beta}. In this case $\theta \sim 

865: 84^{\circ}$--$88^{\circ}$.

866: 

867: %

868: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Fig. 8 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

869: %

870: 

871: \begin{figure}

872: \centering

873: \plotone{f8.eps}

874: \caption{Constraints on the angle $\theta$ between

875: the jet and the line of sight, and the intrinsic

876: jet velocity $\beta$ for 4C\,+24.36. The solid black 

877: line is the curve obtained from the jet--counterjet 

878: ratio in the isotropic case (i.e., using $q=2+\alpha$ 

879: in Eq.~\ref{eq:ratio}), while the solid blue curve is 

880: given by $q=3+2\alpha$. The long-dashed line, corresponding 

881: to $\beta=0.5$, is an average value for the jet speed 

882: in WATs (the black dashed region represents the 

883: 1$\sigma$=0.2 dispersion). The red dashed region shows the 

884: allowed values for $\theta$ in 4C\,+24.36 in the isotropic

885: case, corresponding to $\beta=0.5\pm0.2$.}

886: \label{fig:beta}

887: \end{figure}

888: 

889: %

890: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% End of Fig.8%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

891: %

892: 

893: 

894: \subsection{Morphological distortions}\label{sec:morph}

895: 

896: The radio structure of 4C\,+24.36 is characterised 

897: by clear distortions occurring over different linear 

898: scales. One of most prominent features is the number 

899: of sharp wiggles which the jets undergo within the 

900: central $\sim 25$ kpc (projected) from the core 

901: (Fig.~\ref{fig:profile}). On the large scale, the 

902: overall structure of the source appears slightly 

903: bent toward the North in a C--shape which is typical 

904: of WAT sources (Fig.~\ref{fig:hr_image610} and 

905: Fig.~\ref{fig:hr_images}). This suggests that 

906: different physical processes may play a role in the 

907: origin of the morphological distortions observed on the 

908: different scales.

909:  

910: 

911: \subsubsection{Jet wiggles}\label{sec:wiggles}

912: 

913: Jet oscillations have been observed in other FRI 

914: radio sources of similar luminosity as 4C\,+24.36, 

915: e.g. the well studied radio galaxies 

916: 3C\,31 (e.g., Blandford \& Icke 1978; Andernach et 

917: al. 1992; Laing \& Bridle 2002) and 3C\,449 (e.g., Andernach et al. 1992; 

918: Feretti et al. 1999). Both sources are characterized 

919: by a very large total extent (LLS $\sim$ 800 kpc and 

920: 600 kpc, respectively) which places them among the 

921: class of giant radio galaxies. They are associated 

922: with the dominant members of two nearby poor groups 

923: of galaxies (z=0.17), and both galaxies are likely 

924: undergoing a gravitational encounter with a close 

925: bright companion. 

926: 

927: 

928: %

929: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Fig. 9 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

930: %

931: 

932: \begin{figure*}[t]

933: \centering

934: \epsscale{0.75}

935: \plotone{f9.eps}

936: \caption{Comparison of the radio morphology of

937: 4C\,+24.36, 3C\,31 and 3C\,449 (note that the last

938: one has been reversed in order to better highlight the 

939: similarities). {\it Upper panel} -- 1.4 GHz image of 4C\,+24.36 

940: obtained from the combination of VLA A and B--Array observations 

941: from the public archive (Obs.Id. 074). The HPBW is 

942: 3.6$^{\prime \prime} \times 1.8^{\prime \prime}$, 

943: p.a. -65$^{\circ}$. The first contour is 0.15 

944: mJy b$^{-1}$. {\it Central panel} -- VLA--BnA 1.4 

945: GHz image of 3C\,31 from the public archive (Obs.Id.

946: AF263). The HPBW is 4.1$^{\prime \prime} \times 3.7^{\prime \prime}$, 

947: p.a. -65$^{\circ}$. The first contour is 0.25 mJy b$^{-1}$.

948: {\it Lower panel} -- VLA--B 1.4 GHz image of

949: 3C\,449 from the public archive (Obs.Id. AK319). The 

950: HPBW is 4.5$^{\prime \prime} \times 3.9^{\prime \prime}$, 

951: p.a. 86$^{\circ}$. The first contour is 0.35 mJy b$^{-1}$.}

952: \label{fig:morph}

953: \end{figure*}

954: 

955: %

956: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% End of Fig.9 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

957: 

958: In Fig.~\ref{fig:morph} we compare the radio morphology 

959: of 4C\,+24.36 (upper panel) to the structure of 

960: the well-known radiogalaxies 3C\,31 

961: and 3C\,449 (central and lower panels, respectively). 

962: All images were obtained from a new reduction of 1.4 GHz 

963: observations  from the VLA public archive, and have a resolution 

964: of $\sim 4^{\prime \prime}$ (see Figure caption for details). 

965: Note that the images of 3C\,31 and 3C\,449 have been rotated

966: and reversed in order to highlight the morphological 

967: similarities. We also point out that the image of 3C\,449 

968: shows only the central region of the source, whose total 

969: extent at this resolution is $\sim 20^{\prime}$ (i.e. $\sim$ 

970: 420 kpc; see Feretti et al. 1999). Despite the different 

971: linear size, the similarity of the pattern of wiggles in 

972: the three sources is striking. However we can notice some 

973: important differences: {\it i)} the wiggles in 4C\,+24.36 

974: occur over a smaller projected distance from the nucleus 

975: (i.e. between $\sim$7 kpc and $\sim$25 kpc; see Fig.~\ref{fig:profile}) 

976: than in 3C\,31 and 3C\,449, where the first bend is observed 

977: at $\sim 20$ kpc; {\it ii)} the inner jets in 4C\,+24.36 

978: show a much stronger deviation from linearity than 3C\,31 

979: and 3C\,449. In particular, the western jet appears 

980: already bent at $\sim$3 kpc only from the core (see insert 

981: in Fig.~\ref{fig:cartoon}).

982: \\

983: \\

984: Jet oscillations can be ascribed to various reasons, which 

985: include {\it a)} orbital motion, {\it b)} precession 

986: of the nuclear collimator, and {\it c)} jet instabilities, 

987: such as Kelvin-Helmholtz (K--H) instabilities, at 

988: the jet boundary. 

989: 

990: \begin{itemize}

991: 

992: \item [{\it a)}] The orbital motion is expected to generate 

993: a single oscillation wavelength with fixed amplitude and 

994: mirror symmetry of the jet with respect to the core. Given the 

995: presence of a close bright companion, it has been 

996: suggested that the orbital motion might indeed be responsible for 

997: the jet wiggles in 3C\,31 (Blandford 

998: \& Icke 1978) and 3C\,449 (Perley, Willis \& Scott 1979). 

999: However no bright companion is visible on the available 

1000: optical images of 4C\,+24.36 (e.g. Fig.~\ref{fig:hr_image610}), 

1001: thus it seems difficult to ascribe the jet oscillations to 

1002: the presence of an orbiting system. Furthermore, with plausible 

1003: galaxy masses and the orbital separation required to produce 

1004: the observed lateral displacement of the jets, the orbital 

1005: period would be far larger than the jet age allows.

1006: 

1007: \item [{\it b})] Precessional motion is expected to lead to a 

1008: single oscillation wavelength with amplitude linearly growing 

1009: with the distance from the nucleus and anti--symmetric pattern. 

1010: Given the approximate mirror symmetry of the initial jet 

1011: oscillations in 4C\,+24.36, we can reasonably rule out the 

1012: precessional model. 

1013: 

1014: \item [{\it c})] Confined radio jets are known to be unstable 

1015: against K--H instabilities at their boundary (Hardee 1987). The 

1016: jet oscillations can be then interpreted as the result of helical 

1017: motion arising from small perturbations at the jet origin, 

1018: amplified by growing K--H instabilities (Hardee 2003; Savolainen 

1019: et al. 2006). These instabilities can be triggered for example 

1020: by random perturbations of the jet flow (e.g., by jet--cloud 

1021: interactions; G\'omez et al. 2000), or by variation in the jet 

1022: injection direction from the nucleus (e.g., due to the 

1023: orbital motion of a supermassive binary black hole in the host 

1024: galaxy). It has been shown that the K--H helical distortion 

1025: waves propagating along the jet are able to displace the whole 

1026: jet and produce large scale helical structures (Hardee 1987). 

1027: Thus K--H instabilities are an appealing possibility to interpret 

1028: the wiggles observed in 4C\,+24.36. Unfortunately the resolution of 

1029: our present radio data is not high enough to allow us to 

1030: determine the characteristics of a possible K--H wave propagating 

1031: along the jet. 

1032: \end{itemize}

1033: 

1034: Further information on the fine brightness structure and 

1035: polarization properties of the jets from higher resolution 

1036: radio observations would be required to shed light on the 

1037: possible mechanisms responsible for the oscillations. 

1038: Moreover, forthcoming high resolution X--ray {\it Chandra} 

1039: observations (Cycle~9) will allow us to carry out a 

1040: detailed structural comparison of the radio and X--ray 

1041: emission in the jet regions. 

1042: 

1043: \subsubsection{Large scale bending}\label{sec:bending}

1044: 

1045: The investigation of the physical mechanism responsible for the 

1046: wide--angle tail formation poses a number of interesting problems 

1047: which are not completely understood yet. The earliest models developed 

1048: for the origin of WATs invoked ram pressure resulting 

1049: from the motion of 

1050: the associated galaxy through the surrounding intracluster medium 

1051: (e.g., Owen \& Rudnick 1976; Begelman, Rees \& Blandford 1979). 

1052: However, WATs are usually associated with the central dominant galaxies 

1053: in groups and clusters, and they are not expected to have large velocities 

1054: relative to the ICM (Burns 1981), as they usually reside at the center 

1055: of the cluster gravitational potential well (Merritt 1984; Bird 1994). 

1056: Thus, ram pressure alone seems unable to explain the bends observed 

1057: in most of the WATs (e.g., Eilek et al. 1984; O'Donoghue, Eilek \& Owen 

1058: 1993).

1059: \\

1060: One possibility is that if the radio jets are less dense than the

1061: external gas, buoyancy forces might contribute to the bending of the tails, 

1062: as they drag the radio plasma towards lower density regions in the ICM 

1063: (e.g., Burns \& Balonek 1982). In real situations, both ram pressure by

1064: the galaxy motion and buoyancy are expected to play a role, with buoyancy 

1065: forces dominant at larger radii (Sakelliou et al. 1996). An alternative 

1066: scenario is that the large scale bulk motions in the ICM, resulting from

1067: cluster mergers, may provide the necessary ram pressure to distort the 

1068: structure of the central dominant radio galaxy (e.g., Pinkney, Burns 

1069: \& Hill 1994; G\'omez et al. 1997). Large scale X--ray substructure

1070: and merging signatures have been indeed observed in many clusters hosting a 

1071: WAT (Burns et al. 1994). Finally, an appealing possibility to explain 

1072: the existence of WATs at the center of non--merging clusters is the possible 

1073: connection of the radio source bending with the process of gas sloshing in 

1074: the cluster core thought to be responsible for the formation of cold fronts 

1075: (Ascasibar \& Markevitch 2006). For example, such a connection might be 

1076: present in A\,2029, a very relaxed cluster hosting a WAT and a pair of cold 

1077: fronts at its center (Clarke, Blanton \& Sarazin 2004; Ascasibar \& 

1078: Markevitch 2006 ).

1079: \\

1080: \\

1081: The optical and X--ray properties of AWM\,4 (Koranyi \& Geller 2002 and 

1082: OS05, respectively) indicate that the cluster has not 

1083: recently experienced major episodes of merging (see also Sec.~\ref{sec:environment}). 

1084: Moreover, the XMM--Newton images do not show any sharp surface brightness 

1085: edges suggestive of the existence of cold fronts in the core (OS05). For 

1086: these reasons we interpret the bending in 4C\,+24.36 as a result of the

1087: interplay of ram pressure (driven by the motion of NGC\,6051) and buoyancy 

1088: forces. Following Sakelliou et al. (1996), we can derive a constraint on 

1089: the galaxy velocity relative to the ICM, as a function of the ratio of the 

1090: jet density to the ICM density, at the point where the components of ram 

1091: pressure and buoyancy in the direction orthogonal to the jet balance

1092: each other (the {\it turnover point}). At smaller distances than this point, the jet 

1093: bending is expected to be mostly determined by ram pressure, while 

1094: buoyancy forces dominate at larger distances. Furthermore, the bending 

1095: does not depend on the jet velocity at the turnover point (Sakelliou et 

1096: al. 1996). 

1097: \\

1098: We assume that the radio jets can be described as a steady 

1099: flow of a non--relativistic plasma (Bridle \& Perley 1984), and adopt

1100: a coordinate system in which the axes always lie parallel and perpendicular 

1101: to the jet. At the {\it turnover} point the component of the galaxy 

1102: velocity in the plane of the sky ($\rm v_{gal}$) can be expressed as 

1103: (see Sakelliou et al. 1996, and Smol\v{c}i\'{c} et al. 2007 for details),

1104: \begin{equation}\label{eq:vgal}

1105: \rm v_{gal}^2 = \frac{ 3\beta k T_{gas} h }{ \mu m_p r_c }

1106:             \frac { { r_{to}/r_c} }{ 1 +  \left ({ r_{to} / r_c }\right ) ^2}

1107:             \frac{\bf \hat{r}\cdot \hat{n}}{{\bf \hat{v}_{gal}\cdot \hat{n}}}

1108:             \left( 1 - \frac{\rho_{jet}}{\rho_{gas}}\right),

1109: \end{equation}

1110: \noindent 

1111: where $\rm \bf{\hat{n}}$ is the normal vector to the jet in the plane 

1112: of the sky, $\rm \bf{\hat{v_{gal}}}$ is the unity vector in the direction of 

1113: the galaxy velocity, $\rm \bf{\hat{r}}$ is the unity vector in the direction from 

1114: the cluster center, $\beta$ and $\rm r_c$ are the slope and core radius of the 

1115: X--ray surface brightness when fit to a hydrostatic $\beta$ model, kT is the 

1116: ICM temperature, $\rm r_{to}$ is the projected distance of the turnover point 

1117: from the cluster center, h is the width of the jet at this point (corrected for 

1118: the resolution of the telescope), $\mu$ is the mean molecular weight ($\mu$=0.6), 

1119: $\rm m_p$ is the proton mass, and $\rm \rho_{gas}$ are the density of the jet 

1120: and ICM.

1121: 

1122: 

1123: A close examination of Figs.~\ref{fig:hr_image610} and \ref{fig:profile} 

1124: suggests that the last change in direction of the jets (points E4 and W4) 

1125: might be identified as the turnover point for 4C\,+24.36.

1126: In this case $\rm r_{to} \sim 25$ kpc. The average gas temperature 

1127: in AWM\,4 is kT=2.5 keV (Tab.~1), and the fit of the radial profile 

1128: of the cluster X--ray surface brightness with a single $\beta$ model 

1129: provides $\rm r_c=67$ kpc and $\beta=0.67$ (OS05). Thus, if $h\!=\!8$ kpc, 

1130: as estimated from Fig.~\ref{fig:hr_image610}, then from Eq.~\ref{eq:vgal} 

1131: we can derive the galaxy velocity as a function of $\rm \rho_{jet} / 

1132: \rho_{gas}$ (Fig.~\ref{fig:vgal}). In the limit $\rm \rho_{jet} / 

1133: \rho_{gas} \rightarrow 0$, we obtain an upper limit for the NGC\,6051 

1134: velocity relative to the ICM of $\rm v_{gal} \ltsim 120$ km s$^{-1}$. 

1135: \\

1136: We stress that $\rm v_{gal}$ is the velocity component in the plane 

1137: of the sky, therefore the derived value is a lower limit on the 

1138: total speed of NGC\,6051. On the other hand, the comparison of the NGC\,6051 

1139: redshift to the average redshift of the other cluster members provides 

1140: an estimate of the line of sight component of its velocity. Koranyi \& 

1141: Geller (2002) report a recession velocity of 9703$\pm$46 km s$^{-1}$ 

1142: for NGC\,6051, and an average velocity for the cluster members within 

1143: a radius of 0.5 $h^{-1}$ Mpc of 9722$\pm$98 km s$^{-1}$. 

1144: Thus NGC\,6051 seems to be relatively at rest with respect to the 

1145: potential well of AWM\,4. This is consistent with the fact that the 

1146: galaxy position is coincident with the peak of the cluster X-‐ray 

1147: emission (Koranyi \& Geller 2002; OS05), and is also in agreement 

1148: with the velocities usually found for the dominant galaxies in 

1149: non--merging groups and poor clusters of galaxies (e.g., Beers et 

1150: al. 1995). 

1151: 

1152: 

1153: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Fig. 10 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1154: 

1155: \begin{figure}

1156: \centering

1157: \epsscale{1.00}

1158: \plotone{f10.eps}

1159: \caption{The transverse component of the 

1160: velocity of NGC\,6051 (in the plane of the sky), as a function 

1161: of the ratio of the jet density to external gas density.}

1162: \label{fig:vgal}

1163: \end{figure}

1164: 

1165: 

1166: 

1167: \subsection{Source age}\label{sec:age}

1168: 

1169: Our spectral analysis led us to an estimate of the synchrotron age 

1170: of 4C\,+24.36 of $t_{\rm rad} \sim 160$ Myr (Tab.~5). This age is 

1171: significantly higher than the typical values derived 

1172: (using a similar approach to the one adopted in Sec.~\ref{sec:parfis}) 

1173: for currently active radio galaxies of similar luminosity, as for 

1174: example the sources in the B2 sample which have a median age of 16 

1175: Myr (Parma et al. 1999, 2007). The age of 4C\,+24.36 is indeed more 

1176: similar to the values derived by Parma et al. (2007) for a sample of 

1177: candidate dying radio galaxies, which have a median age of 63 Myr, 

1178: with values up to 170 Myr. 

1179: \\

1180:  Giacintucci et al. (2007) have recently analysed a sample 

1181: of cD radio galaxies in rich and poor clusters of galaxies, 

1182: and found radiative ages $ > 10^{8}$ years for 4 of the 7 sources 

1183: with available estimates of the age. They argued that one of them 

1184: (A\,2372) is a restarted radio galaxy, where both the new activity 

1185: and the relic radio plasma from the previous AGN burst are 

1186: visible. Another two sources (A\,2622 and MKW\,3s) are most likely dying 

1187: radio galaxies, where the nuclear engine has switched off and a relic 

1188: phase is currently ongoing. However, the total spectral index of 

1189: 4C\,+24.36 ($\alpha \sim 0.8$ in the 74 MHz--10.7 GHz range) is 

1190: typical of a currently active radio galaxy rather than a relic source, 

1191: where $\alpha$ can be much steeper ($\gtsim$2; e.g. Parma et al. 2007; 

1192: Giacintucci et al. 2007). Furthermore, 4C\,+24.36 clearly shows active 

1193: nuclear emission at high frequencies 

1194: (see insert in Fig.~\ref{fig:hr_image610}). 

1195: Thus it seems rather unlikely that we are dealing with a dying radio 

1196: galaxy. 

1197: 

1198: We would like to point out here that the estimate of the radiative age 

1199: in Tab.~5 is based on the assumption  

1200: that the energy losses due to the source expansion can be neglected, 

1201: and that the spectral steepening is due to electron aging in a magnetic 

1202: field which is constant and uniform across the source. 

1203: The role of a decreasing magnetic field along the source structure 

1204: has been considered in alternative models for classical double radio

1205: galaxies (e.g., Blundell \& Rawlings 2000, and references therein),

1206: where the magnetic field decrease is reflected in a steepening of

1207: the spectral index, with no direct implication for the source aging.

1208: 

1209: A detailed calculation of the evolution of the electron energy 

1210: spectrum under the combined effect of radiative losses and adiabatic 

1211: expansion is difficult, and it is beyond the purpose of the present 

1212: work. However, we can derive a crude estimate of the effects of 

1213: possible expansion losses in 4C\,+24.36 by considering that the cross 

1214: section of the radio plasma increases by a factor of $\sim$2 in the 

1215: transition from the jets to the lobes (Fig.~\ref{fig:hr_image610}; Tab.~3). 

1216: If we further consider that the Inverse Compton losses are as important 

1217: as synchrotron losses ($\rm B \sim B_{CMB} = 3.4$ $\mu$G; Tab.~5), we may 

1218: expect that the break energy could be lower by an extra factor of $\sim$ 0.6 due 

1219: to the expansion of the source. Moreover, because of the conservation of 

1220: the magnetic field flux, we would expect a decrease of the magnetic field 

1221: strength by a factor of $\sim$ 0.25. The combination of these effects 

1222: would lead to a break frequency which is about one order of magnitude lower 

1223: with respect to the case in which there is no expansion of the source. 

1224: As a result, given that $\rm t_{rad} \propto \nu_{br}^{-0.5}$ 

1225: (Eq.~\ref{eq:trad}), the age of the source would artificially appear a 

1226: factor of $\sim$ 3 higher than its real value. This implies that in the

1227: case of 4C\,+24.36, the real age would be of the order of $\sim$ 50 Myr.

1228: Thus the age reported in Tab.~5 should be considered an upper limit to 

1229: the real age of the source, and consequently the computed velocity 

1230: growth as a lower limit. 

1231: 

1232: 

1233: \section{Gas heating at the core of AWM\,4?}\label{sec:xray}

1234: 

1235: The XMM--Newton observation of the core of AWM\,4 (Obs. ID. 0093060401; 

1236: OS05) reveals that the ICM is isothermal at about 2.5~keV out 

1237: to at least 160 kpc from the center, even though the cooling 

1238: time in the middle is about 2~Gyr. In such systems, to account for 

1239: the absence of the establishment of a cool core, many possible heating 

1240: mechanisms have been proposed, including gravitational heating due to 

1241: orbital motion and dynamical friction (e.g., Dekel \& Birnboim 2008), 

1242: galaxy and sub-cluster mergers (e.g., G{\'o}mez et al. 2002), 

1243: supernovae (e.g., Efstathiou 2000), turbulent mixing in the ICM 

1244: (e.g., Kim \& Narayan 2003a), thermal conduction from the outer parts 

1245: of the cluster (e.g., Kim \& Narayan 2003b), and conduction of energy 

1246: from cosmic rays (e.g., Guo \& Oh 2008). However, the most promising 

1247: energy injection models invoke the presence of a central AGN, and various 

1248: modes of transport of the output energy from the supermassive black hole 

1249: to the ICM have been considered (e.g., Binney \& Tabor 1995; Roychowdhury et 

1250: al. 2004; Mathews et al. 2004; Nusser et al. 2006; Jetha et al. 2008). 

1251: Here we conclude the detailed study of the remarkable radio galaxy 4C\,+24.36,

1252: in the core of the relaxed yet isothermal cluster AWM\,4, by assessing

1253: the role of the AGN in the prevention of the establishment of a 

1254: cool core in this system.

1255: 

1256: \subsection{4C\,+24.36 and the cluster environment}\label{sec:environment}

1257: 

1258: The overall optical properties of AWM\,4 have been investigated by 

1259: Koranyi \& Geller (2002). It is a relatively poor cluster containing 

1260: about 30 members centered on NGC\,6051, within a projected radius of 

1261: $0.5\,h^{-1}$ Mpc, with a velocity dispersion of $\sigma_{\rm} = 439$ 

1262: km s$^{-1}$ (Tab.~1). Morphological segregation is clearly evident

1263: within the cluster galaxy population, with the early--type galaxies more 

1264: concentrated toward the core region (i.e., around NGC\,6051) than the 

1265: late--type galaxies. No substructure has been detected in the projected 

1266: galaxy distribution and/or in the velocity space, suggesting that AWM\,4 

1267: is a relatively relaxed cluster, which has not recently experienced major 

1268: mergers or infall of substantial subclusters.

1269: \\

1270: The relaxed nature of this system is further supported by the 

1271: analysis of the XMM--Newton observations of the cluster by OS05 

1272: (see also the recent study by Gastaldello et al. 2008). In 

1273: Fig.~\ref{fig:xmm}, we show the XMM--Newton image of AWM\,4 

1274: (contours, adaptively smoothed from a combination of the MOS and PN 

1275: data), on which the GMRT 610 MHz image of 4C\,+24.36 (grey scale) has 

1276: been superposed. The cluster X--ray surface brightness shows a very 

1277: regular and relaxed appearance free of any visible substructures, 

1278: with a steep increase of the brightness toward the center. The radio 

1279: source extends over the whole core region of the cluster (core radius 

1280: $\sim 70$ kpc as provided by the fit of the X--ray surface brightness 

1281: to a single hydrostatic $\beta$ model; OS05). No significant feature 

1282: in the hot gas distribution seems associated with the region filled by 

1283: the radio emission or surrounding it. In particular, at the location 

1284: of the radio lobes, we do not observe any depression in the X--ray 

1285: surface brightness, which might indicate the presence of cavities in 

1286: the ICM, evacuated by the radio galaxy, as is often observed in many 

1287: relaxed clusters and groups of galaxies (see for instance the reviews 

1288: by Blanton 2004, McNamara \& Nulsen 2007, and references therein).

1289: 

1290: 

1291: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%Fig. 11 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1292: 

1293: \begin{figure}

1294: \centering

1295: \plotone{f11.eps}

1296: \caption{Overlay of the grey--scale radio image

1297: at 610 MHz of 4C\,+24.36 (same as Fig.~\ref{fig:hr_image610})

1298: on the X--ray contours of AWM\,4 from the XMM--Newton

1299: adaptively smoothed image, obtained by combining the 

1300: observations with 

1301: the PN and MOS cameras. The X--ray contour levels

1302: are logarithmically spaced by a factor $\sqrt{2}$ .} 

1303: \label{fig:xmm}

1304: \end{figure}

1305: 

1306: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1307: 

1308: 

1309: 

1310: 

1311: \subsection{Pressure balance}

1312: 

1313: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Fig. 12 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1314: 

1315: 

1316: \begin{figure}

1317: \centering

1318: \plotone{f12.eps}

1319: \caption{Radial profile of the thermal gas pressure 

1320: in the central region of AWM\,4 from the XMM--Newton 

1321: data (O'Sullivan et al. 2005). The dashed error 

1322: region is for 1$\sigma$ uncertainties. Dashed lines 

1323: indicate the minimum synchrotron pressure in the radio 

1324: jets and lobes of 4C\,+24.36.}

1325: \label{fig:pressure}

1326: \end{figure}

1327: 

1328: 

1329: Fig.~\ref{fig:pressure} shows the profile of the thermal 

1330: gas pressure ($\rm P_{gas}$) as a function of the distance

1331: from the cluster center, inferred from the best fitting

1332: X--ray temperature and density models as part of the mass

1333: analysis described in OS05. In this plot, we also show the 

1334: minimum pressure $\rm P_{min}$ of the radio 

1335: jets and lobes of 4C\,+24.36 (dashed lines), estimated assuming 

1336: equipartition arguments (Sec.~\ref{sec:parfis}; Tab.~6). From 

1337: Fig.~\ref{fig:pressure} it is clear that the jet minimum 

1338: pressure is comparable to $\rm P_{gas}$ over most of the jet 

1339: length. On the contrary, the radio lobes appear underpressured 

1340: with respect to the external medium by a factor ranging 

1341: from $\sim$3 to $\sim$5. We point out that the assumption

1342: of standard equipartition equations, i.e., without the 

1343: low--energy cut--off of $\rm \gamma_{min}$ in the electron energy 

1344: distribution (Sec.~\ref{sec:parfis}), would lead to 

1345: a higher pressure imbalance in the lobe regions of the 

1346: order of $\rm P_{gas}/P_{min} \sim 6-12$. We also notice 

1347: that projection effects are not expected to play a 

1348: significant role in the comparison in Fig.~\ref{fig:pressure}, 

1349: as the source is approximately in the plane of the sky 

1350: (Sec.~\ref{sec:theta}). 

1351: 

1352: A similar lack of pressure balance has been found in the large 

1353: scale components of other FRI radio sources, where, based 

1354: on standard equipartition arguments, the ratio $\rm P_{th}/P_{min}$ 

1355: is usually $>1$, with values up to $\sim$100 (e.g., Feretti,

1356: Perola \& Fanti 1992). This suggests a departure from the 

1357: minimum energy condition within the radio lobes. In particular,

1358:  

1359: \begin{itemize}

1360: 

1361: \item[{\it i)}] the lobes could be far from equipartition, 

1362: with a higher relativistic particle or magnetic field energy 

1363: density.

1364: 

1365: \item[{\it ii)}] Assuming that equipartition still holds, 

1366: the lobes may contain an energetically dominant population of 

1367: non--radiating relativistic particles (protons) which contribute 

1368: to the internal pressure. The minimum pressure is a weak function 

1369: of the energy ratio $\kappa$ between relativistic protons and 

1370: electrons, i.e., P$_{\rm min} \propto (1+\kappa)^{4/7}$. 

1371: The values of P$_{\rm min}$ in Tab.~6 were estimated 

1372: assuming $\kappa=1$. Thus, in order to achieve pressure balance 

1373: in the lobe regions of 4C\,+24.36, we should require a 

1374: contribution of relativistic protons such as $\kappa \sim$ 6--22, 

1375: which is in agreement with the estimates for other radio 

1376: sources of similar luminosity (e.g. Feretti, Perola \& Fanti 1992).

1377: 

1378: \item[{\it iii)}] The balance could also be achieved (in the equipartition 

1379: hypothesis) assuming that the plasma has a filling factor 

1380: $\phi \sim 0.05$--$0.2$ (according to P$_{\rm min} \propto 

1381: \phi^{-4/7}$), instead of unity. Filamentary structures 

1382: have been detected in high resolution radio images of a number of 

1383: radio sources which may indeed indicate filling factors smaller 

1384: than 1 (e.g., Fornax A; Fomalont et al. 1989; M87, Hines, Owen \& Eilek 1989).

1385: 

1386: \item[{\it iv)}] An additional pressure component might be 

1387: provided by the presence of thermal plasma within the lobes. The

1388: jets could accrete material as they move through the external

1389: medium (e.g., Bicknell 1994) and transport it into the lobes.

1390: This would be in line with the fact that the pressure imbalance

1391: increases with the distance from the nucleus (Fig.~\ref{fig:pressure}). 

1392: 

1393: \end{itemize} 

1394: 

1395: \subsection{Energy output from 4C\,+24.36}

1396: 

1397: The analysis of the {\it XMM-Newton} observations in OS05 

1398: revealed that AWM\,4 occupies an unusual place among groups and clusters (see 

1399: also Gastaldello et al. 2008). The combination of the regular X--ray 

1400: emission and monotonic increase of brightness toward the center would 

1401: usually suggest a relaxed cluster with a well--established cool core. 

1402: Such an expectation would be further supported by the abundance profile 

1403: which shows a clear metallicity decline going from the cluster center 

1404: to larger radii (OS05; Gastaldello et al. 2008). However, the X--ray 

1405: spectral fitting reveals that AWM\,4 does not possess a cool core. 

1406: The azimuthally averaged temperature profile is approximately constant 

1407: out to a distance of at least $\sim$160 kpc from the center, without 

1408: any sign of the substantial temperature drop in the center expected in 

1409: an ordinary cool core cluster (OS05; Gastaldello et al. 2008).

1410: 

1411: Given the absence of any significant signature of a recent merger 

1412: event which may have disrupted the cool core in AWM\,4 

1413: (Sec.~\ref{sec:environment}), OS05 suggested that the AGN in the 

1414: central galaxy NGC\,6051 has been active for enough time to (re--)heat 

1415: the surrounding gas in the core. Assuming that a cool core existed 

1416: in the cluster before the re--heating process, OS05 estimated 

1417: that the total energy required to produce the observed isothermal 

1418: profile is $\sim 9 \times 10^{58}$ erg. 

1419: 

1420: Using a spectral index $\alpha=0.5$ (consistent with the injection

1421: spectral index provided by the spectral fit; Tab.~5), we calculate 

1422: the total radio luminosity of 4C\,+24.36 over the frequency range 

1423: 10 MHz--100 GHz to be L$_{\rm radio} \sim 5.8 \times 10^{41}$ 

1424: erg s$^{-1}$. In Sec.~\ref{sec:parfis} we estimate a synchrotron 

1425: lifetime of the radiating electrons in the source of $\rm t_{rad}

1426: \sim$ 160 Myr (Tab.~5). This value implies that the energy deposited

1427: in the ICM by the source over its lifetime is E$_{\rm tot,\, radio}

1428: \sim 2.9 \times 10^{57}$ erg. Thus the radio source seems to be at

1429: least a factor of $\sim$30 too underluminous to balance the cooling in

1430: this system. Indeed, in the sample of clusters studied by B\^irzan et

1431: al. (2004, see also McNamara et al. 2007), the median ratio of the jet

1432: power to the synchrotron power is  $\epsilon\sim 120$, the mean

1433: value $\langle \epsilon \rangle\sim 4700$ being dominated by a few

1434: extreme cases. In the case of AWM4, we should point out that this ratio 

1435: could be much higher than 30, if we consider that the age of the source

1436: might be up to $\sim$ 3 times less than the value of 160 Myr quoted

1437: above, as we have discussed in Sec.~\ref{sec:age}.

1438: 

1439: On the other hand, the total energy output of a radio source can be 

1440: considerably higher than what estimated from its synchrotron luminosity, 

1441: since the total radio power is thought to be dominated by the mechanical 

1442: work done by the jets on the ICM during the source expansion (e.g. Scheuer 1974). 

1443: One mode of doing so is by inflating bubbles filled with a relativistic fluid

1444: in the ICM, which would expand and rise, imparting energy to the ICM 

1445: (Churazov et al. 2002,  Nulsen et al. 2003, Nusser et al. 2006, McNamara 

1446: \& Nulsen 2007). This is supported by the direct detection of significant 

1447: cavities in the X--ray surface brightness of several clusters, which might 

1448: represent these rising bubbles (Fabian et al. 2000, 

1449: B\^irzan et al. 2004 \& 2006, Allen et al. 2006, Gitti, Feretti \& Schindler 2006,

1450: Jetha et al. 2008).

1451: 

1452: The enthalpy H of a rising adiabatic bubble is the sum of the $pV$ work

1453: done to displace the X--ray emitting gas, and its thermal energy, and 

1454: is given by $\frac{\gamma}{\gamma - 1} pV$, where $p$ is the pressure of

1455: the surrounding ICM, $V$ the volume of the bubble and $\gamma$

1456: the ratio of specific heats of the gas. For an ideal

1457: relativistic gas, 

1458: $\gamma\!=\! 4/3$, and $H=4pV$. In case of a non-relativistic

1459: plasma filling the bubble, and also in the presence of significant

1460: magnetic fields in the lobes, the value of enthalpy

1461: could be a factor of 2 lower. Churazov

1462: et al. (2002) argue that almost all of this enthalpy can be

1463: transferred as thermal energy to the ICM. 

1464: 

1465: To assemble the equivalent of $\sim 9 \times 10^{58}$~erg of mechanical

1466: energy, which is needed to produce the isothermal profile in the core of

1467: AWM\,4, as estimated by OS05, with the lobe pressure being $p=3.1\times

1468: 10^{-13}$ dyne~cm$^{-2}$ (see Table~6), would require the entire

1469: enthalpy ($=4pV$) of a spherical bubble of radius of over $\sim$80

1470: kpc. Inflating this bubble against a pressure as high as jet

1471: pressure, which is an order of magnitude higher, would require a bubble

1472: of half this size, whereas a value of enthalpy that is lower than

1473: $4pV$ would only require a larger bubble. Such an extensive

1474: displacement of plasma in the ICM would be easily apparent in the

1475: {\it XMM--Newton} observation of AWM\,4, where no such features are seen

1476: within the inner 200~kpc, in the gas associated with the radio lobes

1477: of 4C\,+24.36. Even if the heating is due to an abundance of buoyant

1478: bubbles, the larger ones should have been evident in the deep X--ray

1479: image. A forthcoming deep X--ray observation (80 ks) at higher

1480: angular resolution, to be obtained by {\it Chandra} during Cycle~9,

1481: will possibly yield a better insight into the presence or absence of

1482: cavities in this system.

1483: 

1484: 

1485: 

1486: \section{Summary and Conclusions}\label{sec:summary}

1487: 

1488: In this paper we presented a detailed morphological and spectral

1489: analysis, at radio wavelengths, of the WAT radio galaxy 4C\,+24.36,

1490: located at the core of the poor galaxy cluster AWM\,4, based on new

1491: high sensitivity observations at 235~MHz, 327~MHz and 610~MHz, using

1492: the GMRT, and literature and archival data at other frequencies.

1493: 

1494: The large scale source structure appears bent in a very similar WAT

1495: morphology at all frequencies, and all resolutions afforded by

1496: our GMRT images. We interpret this bending to be the result of the

1497: interplay of ram pressure (driven by the motion of the host galaxy

1498: NGC\,6051) and buoyancy forces. In the framework of this model, we

1499: estimate that the velocity of the galaxy NGC\,6051, with respect to

1500: the cluster, is $\ltsim$ 120 km s$^{-1}$, in the plane of the

1501: sky. Combined with the upper limit on the radial velocity of

1502: NGC\,6051, which is $\ltsim$ 20 km s$^{-1}$ with respect to the mean

1503: radial velocity, out to $0.5\,h^{-1}$~Mpc, of the cluster AWM4

1504: (Koranyi \& Geller 2002), our result indicates that the galaxy is

1505: expected to be relatively at rest in the potential well of the

1506: cluster. 

1507: 

1508: On the small scale, the radio jets show prominent symmetric

1509: oscillations within the central $\sim$25 kpc from the core. An

1510: appealing possibility to explain these features is the development of

1511: Kelvin--Helmholtz helical instabilities propagating along the

1512: jets. However the resolution of our images is not high enough to

1513: investigate the fine structure of the jets, and to determine the

1514: characteristics of a possible distortion wave. Deep radio observations

1515: at higher resolution, combined with polarisation information, are

1516: necessary to carry out a more detailed analysis of the jet regions.

1517: 

1518: 

1519: Combining the new GMRT observations, with data from the

1520: literature at various other frequencies (see Tab.~4), we derived the

1521: broadband radio spectrum of 4C\,+24.36, and found that it is 

1522: well fitted by a power--law with $\alpha=0.82 \pm 0.03$ between 

1523: 74 MHz and 10.7~GHz.

1524: From the GMRT images at 235 and 610 MHz, evaluating the spectral 

1525: index distribution at discrete intervals along each jet, we showed 

1526: (Fig.~7) how the spectral index gradually steepens along the jet to 

1527: about $0.9\pm 0.1$ where the jets merge into the lobes, and further 

1528: steadily steepens within the lobes to $\alpha \!>\! 1.5$. 

1529: 

1530: Assuming equipartition of energy between the relativistic particles and

1531: the ambient magnetic field, and adopting a lower energy cutoff equivalent to

1532: the minimum Lorentz factor of the radiating electrons ($\gamma_{\rm min}$=10,

1533: $E_{\rm min}\sim 5$ MeV), we find that the equipartition value of

1534: the magnetic field varies between 3 to 9$\mu$ G from the lobes to the jets.  

1535: The radiative age for  4C\,+24.36 was found to be around 160~Myr from 

1536: this estimate.

1537: 

1538: We used the jet to counterjet brightness ratio to constrain the

1539: geometry and velocity of the jet. Assuming a typical value for the

1540: inner jet velocity in WAT radio galaxies, we found that the source is

1541: likely oriented at a large angle ($\sim$ 81$^{\circ}$--88$^{\circ}$)

1542: with respect to the line of sight. This result is consistent with the

1543: high level of symmetry found in the total flux density, extent,

1544: spectral index properties and physical parameters of the lobes and

1545: jets.  

1546: 

1547: 

1548: Even though the host cluster AWM04 has a hot X--ray emitting ICM

1549: of relaxed morphology and uniform temperature profile out to

1550: at least 160~kpc from the center, its cooling time in the core 

1551: is about 2~Gyr, indicating the presence of significant sources of 

1552: energy injection that prevents the catastrophic cooling expected in 

1553: the core of the cluster. Based on the above values of the jet power 

1554: and the estimated radiative age, the total energy output from the 

1555: radio source falls short by almost two orders of magnitude

1556: of the energy required for the isothermal temperature profile 

1557: obtained from the {\it XMM--Newton} observation of the cluster.

1558: The latter observation enables us to measure the pressure of the hot

1559: gas as a function of radius within the cluster, which is found to be

1560: comparable to the pressure in the jets over most of their lengths, but

1561: higher than the pressure in the lobes by a factor $>$5.  Several

1562: interpretations of this pressure imbalance are discussed. Finally, it

1563: is found that for any reasonable value of gas pressure in the range

1564: between the value in the lobes and that in the jets, if the

1565: central source were to transfer mechanical energy to the ICM, in terms

1566: of the enthalpy of buoyant bubbles of relativistic fluid, it would

1567: require bubbles of tens of kpc in radius, which would have been detected

1568: in the existing XMM-Newton observations of O'Sullivan et al. (2005). We look

1569: forward to a forthcoming deeper {\it Chandra} observation of this system

1570: for further insight into morphological evidence of this energy transfer.

1571: 

1572: 

1573: 

1574: 

1575: \acknowledgments

1576: 

1577: We thank the staff of the GMRT for their help during the observations.

1578: GMRT is run by the National Centre for Radio Astrophysics of the Tata 

1579: Institute of Fundamental Research. E.O'S. acknowledges support from NASA

1580: grant NNX06AE90G. J.M. Vrtilek acknowledges support from NASA

1581: grant NNX07AE95G. Basic research in radio astronomy at the NRL is 

1582: supported by 6.1 Base funding. We would like to thank R. Fanti, 

1583: G. Brunetti and M. Markevitch for useful discussion. This research has 

1584: made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated 

1585: by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. 

1586: The authors made use of the database CATS (Verkhodanov et al. 1997) of the 

1587: Special Astrophysical Observatory (Russia).

1588: 

1589: 

1590: %***************************************************************************

1591: %*************************REFERENCES*************************************

1592: %***************************************************************************

1593: 

1594: \begin{thebibliography}{}

1595: 

1596: \bibitem[Allen et al. (2006)]{allen06}

1597: Allen, S.~W., Dunn, 

1598: R.~J.~H., Fabian, A.~C., Taylor, G.~B., \& Reynolds, C.~S.\ 2006, MNRAS, 

1599: 372, 21 

1600: 

1601: \bibitem[Andernach et al. (1992)]{andernach92}

1602: Andernach H., Feretti L., Giovannini G., Klein U., 

1603: Rossetti E., Schnaubelt J., 1992, A\&AS, 93, 331

1604: 

1605: \bibitem[Ascasibar \& Markevitch (2006)]{scasibar06}

1606: Ascasibar Y., \& Markevitch M., 2006, ApJ, 650, 102

1607: 

1608: \bibitem[Baars et al. (1977)]{baars77}

1609: Baars J.W.M., Genzel R., Pauliny--Toth I.I.K., Witzel A.,

1610: 1977, A\&A, 61, 99

1611: 

1612: \bibitem[Becker et al. (1995)]{becker95}

1613: Becker R.H., White R. L. \& Helfand D.J.,

1614: 1995, ApJ 450, 559

1615: 

1616: \bibitem[Beers et al. (1995)]{beers95}

1617: Beers T.C., Kriessler J.R., Bird C.M., Huchra J.P.,

1618: 1995, AJ, 109, 874

1619: 

1620: \bibitem[Begelman (1993)]{begelman93}

1621: Begelman M.C, 1993, in {\it Jets in Extragalactic

1622: Radio Sources}, ed. H.--J. Roeser \& K. Meisenheimer

1623: (Berlin:Springer), p.~145

1624: 

1625: \bibitem[Begelman, Rees \& Blandford (1979)]{begelman93b}

1626: Begelman M.C., Rees M.J., \& Blandford R.D., 1979,

1627: Nature, 279, 770 

1628: 

1629: \bibitem[Bicknell (1994)]{bicknell94}

1630: Bicknell G.V., 1994, ASPC, 54, 357

1631: 

1632: \bibitem[Binney \& Tabor(1995)]{binney95} Binney, J., \& Tabor, 

1633: G.\ 1995, MNRAS, 276, 663 

1634: 

1635: 

1636: \bibitem[Bird (1994)]{bird94}

1637: Bird C.M., 1994, AJ, 107, 1637

1638: 

1639: 

1640: \bibitem[B\^irzan et al. (2004)]{birzan04}

1641: B\^irzan L., Rafferty D.A., McNamara B.R., Wise M.W., Nulsen P.E.J.,

1642: 2004, ApJ, 607, 800

1643: 

1644: \bibitem[B\^irzan et al. (2006)]{birzan06}

1645: B\^irzan L., McNamara B.R., Carilli C.L., Nulsen P.E.J., Wise M.W.,

1646: 2006, in {\it Heating vs. Cooling in Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies}, Eds. 

1647: H.B\"ohringer, P.Schuecker, G.W. Pratt \& A. Finoguenov (ESO Astrophysics Symposia), 

1648: (arXiv:astro-ph/0612393)

1649: 

1650: \bibitem[Blandford \& Icke (1978)]{blandford78}

1651: Blandford R.D., \& Icke V., 1978, MNRAS, 185, 527

1652: 

1653: \bibitem[Blanton (2004)]{blanton04}

1654: Blanton E.L., 2004, Proceedings of {\it The Riddle

1655: of Cooling Flows in Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies},

1656: eds. T. Reiprich, J. Kempner \& N. Soker, p.~181

1657: 

1658: \bibitem[Blundell \& Rawlings (2000)]{blundell00}

1659: Blundell K.M., \& Rawlings S., 2000, AJ, 119, 1111

1660: 

1661: \bibitem[Bridle, Kesteven \& Brandie (1977)]{bridle77}

1662: Bridle A.H., Kesteven M.J.L. \& Brandie G.W.,

1663: 1977, AJ, 82

1664: 

1665: 

1666: \bibitem[Bridle \& Perley (1984)]{bridle84}

1667: Bridle A.H.,\& Perley R.A., 1984, ARA\&A, 22, 319

1668: 

1669: \bibitem[Brunetti, Setti \& Comastri 1997]{brunetti97}

1670: Brunetti, G., Setti, G.,  Comastri, A., 1997, A\&A 325, 898 

1671: 

1672: \bibitem[Burns (1981)]{burns81}

1673: Burns J.O., 1981, MNRAS, 195, 523

1674: 

1675: \bibitem[Burns \& Balonek (1982)]{burns82}

1676: Burns J.O., \& Balonek T.J., 1982, ApJ, 263, 546

1677: 

1678: \bibitem[Burns et al. (1994)]{burns94}

1679: Burns J.O., Rhee G., Owen F.N., Pinkney J., 1994, ApJ, 423, 94

1680: 

1681: 

1682: \bibitem[Churazov et al.(2002)]{churazov02} Churazov, E., Sunyaev, 

1683: R., Forman, W.,  B{\"o}hringer, H.\ 2002, MNRAS, 332, 729 

1684: 

1685: 

1686: \bibitem[Clarke, Blanton \& Sarazin (2004)]{clark04}

1687: Clarke T.E., Blanton E.L., \& Sarazin C.L., 2004, ApJ, 616, 178

1688: 

1689: \bibitem[Cohen et al.(2007)]{cohen07}

1690: Cohen A.S., Lane W.M., Cotton W.D., Kassim N.E.,

1691: Lazio T.J.W., Perley R.A., Condon J.J., Erickson W.C.,

1692: 2007, AJ, 134, 1245

1693: 

1694: \bibitem[Colla et al. (1970)]{colla70}

1695: Colla G., Fanti C., Ficarra A., et al., 1970, A\&AS, 1, 281

1696: 

1697: \bibitem[Condon et al. (1998)]{condon98}

1698: Condon J.J., Cotton W.D., Greisen E.W., Yin Q.F., 

1699: Perley R.A., Taylor G.B., Broderick J.J.,

1700: 1998, AJ, 115, 1693

1701: 

1702: 

1703: 

1704: \bibitem[Cowie \& Binney (1977)]{cowie77}

1705: Cowie L.L., \& Binney J., 1977, ApJ, 215, 723

1706: 

1707: 

1708: \bibitem[Dekel \& Birnboim(2008)]{dekel08} Dekel, A., \& 

1709: Birnboim, Y.\ 2008, MNRAS, 383, 119 

1710: 

1711: \bibitem[Douglas et al. (1996)]{douglas96}

1712: Douglas J.N., Bash F.N., Bozyan F.A., et al., 1996, AJ, 111, 1945 

1713: 

1714: \bibitem[Edge, Stewart \& Fabian (1992)]{edge92}

1715: Edge, A.~C., Stewart, G.~C., \& Fabian, A.~C.\ 1992, 

1716: MNRAS, 258, 177 

1717: 

1718: \bibitem[Efstathiou(2000)]{efstathiou00} Efstathiou, G.\ 2000, 

1719: MNRAS, 317, 697 

1720: 

1721: 

1722: \bibitem[Eilek et al. (1984)]{eilek84}

1723: Eilek J.A., Burns J.O., O`Dea C.P., Owen F.N., 

1724: 1984, ApJ, 278, 37

1725: 

1726: \bibitem[Fabian \& Nulsen (1977)]{fabian77}

1727: Fabian A.C. \& Nulsen P.E.J., 1977, MNRAS, 180, 479

1728: 

1729: \bibitem[Fabian (1994)]{fabian94}

1730: Fabian A.C., 1994, ARA\&A, 32, 277

1731: 

1732: \bibitem[Fabian et al.(2000)]{fabian00} 

1733: Fabian, A.~C., et al.\ 2000, MNRAS, 318, L65 

1734: 

1735: 

1736: \bibitem[Fanti et al. (1974)]{fanti74}

1737: Fanti C., Fanti R., Ficarra A., Padrielli L.,

1738: 1974, A\&AS, 18, 147

1739: 

1740: 

1741: \bibitem[Feretti et al. (1992)]{feretti92}

1742: Feretti L., Perola G.C., \& Fanti R., 1992, A\&A, 265, 9

1743: 

1744: 

1745: \bibitem[Feretti et al. (1999)]{feretti99}

1746: Feretti L., Perley R., Giovannini G., Andernach H., 

1747: 1999, A\&A, 341, 29

1748: 

1749: \bibitem[Fomalont at al. (1989)]{fomalont89}

1750: Fomalont E.B., Ebneter K.A., van Breugel W.J.M., Ekers R.D.,

1751: 1989, ApJ, 346, 17

1752: 

1753: 

1754: \bibitem[Gastaldello et al. (2008)]{gastaldello08}

1755: Gastaldello F., Buote D.A., Brighenti F., Mathews W.G., 

1756: 2008, ApJ, 673L, 17

1757: 

1758: \bibitem[Giacintucci et al. (2007)]{giacintucci07}

1759: Giacintucci S., Venturi T., Murgia M., Athreya R.,

1760: Bardelli S., Dallacasa D., Mazzotta M., Saikia D.J.,

1761: 2007, A\&A, 476, 99

1762: 

1763: %\bibitem[Giovannini et al. (1994)]{giovannini94}

1764: %Giovannini G., Feretti L., Venturi T., et al.,

1765: %1994, ApJ, 435, 116

1766: 

1767: %\bibitem[Giovannini et al. (2001)]{giovannini01}

1768: %Giovannini G., Cotton W.D., Feretti L., Lara L., Venturi T.,

1769: %2001, ApJ, 552, 508

1770: 

1771: \bibitem[Gitti, Feretti \& Schindler (2006)]{gfs06} 

1772: Gitti, M., Feretti, L., \& Schindler, S.\ 2006, A\&A, 448, 853 

1773: 

1774: \bibitem[G\'omez et al. (1997)]{gomez97}

1775: G\'omez P.L., Pinkney J., Burns J.O., Wang Q., Owen F.N.,

1776: Voges W., 1997, ApJ, 474, 580

1777: 

1778: \bibitem[G\'omez et al. (2000)]{gomez00}

1779: G\'omez J.--L., Marscher A.P., Alberdi A., Jorstad S.G., Garcia--Mir\'o C., 

1780: 2000, Science, 289, 2317

1781: 

1782: 

1783: \bibitem[G{\'o}mez et al.(2002)]{gomez02} G{\'o}mez, P.~L., 

1784: Loken, C., Roettiger, K., \& Burns, J.~O.\ 2002, ApJ, 569, 122 

1785: 

1786: 

1787: \bibitem[Gower, Scott \& Wills (1967)]{gower67}

1788: Gower J.F.R., Scott P.F. \& Wills D., 1967, 

1789: MmRAS, 71, 49

1790: 

1791: 

1792: \bibitem[Gregory \& Condon (1991)]{gregory91}

1793: Gregory P.C. \& Condon J.J.,

1794: 1991, ApJS, 75, 1011

1795: 

1796: \bibitem[Gregory et al. (1996)]{gregory96}

1797: Gregory P.C., Scott W.K., Douglas K., Condon J.J.,

1798: 1996, ApJS, 103, 427	

1799: 

1800: 

1801: \bibitem[Guo \& Oh (2008)]{guo08} 

1802: Guo, F., \& Oh, S.~P., 2008, MNRAS, 384, 251 

1803: 

1804: 

1805: \bibitem[Hardee (1987)]{hardee87}

1806: Hardee P.E., 1987, ApJ, 313, 607

1807: 

1808: \bibitem[Hardee (2003)]{hardee03}

1809: Hardee P.E., 2003, ApJ, 597, 798

1810: 

1811: \bibitem[Helmboldt et al. (2008)]{helm08}

1812: Helmboldt J.F., Kassim N.E., Cohen A.S., et al.,

1813: ApJS, 174, 313

1814: 

1815: \bibitem[Hines, Owen \& Eilek (1989]{hines89}

1816: Hines D.C., Owen F.N., \& Eilek J.A, 1989, ApJ, 347, 713

1817: 

1818: \bibitem[Jaffe \& Perola (1974)]{jaffe74}

1819: Jaffe W.J., \& Perola G.C., 1974, A\&A, 26, 423

1820: 

1821: \bibitem[Jetha, Hardcastle \& Sakelliou (2006)]{jetha06}

1822: Jetha N.N., Hardcastle M.J., \& Sakelliou I, 

1823: 2006, MNRAS, 368, 609

1824: 

1825: \bibitem[Jetha et al. (2008)]{jetha08}

1826: Jetha, N.~N., Hardcastle, M.~J., Babul, A., O'Sullivan, E., 

1827: Ponman, T.~J., Raychaudhury, S., \& 

1828: Vrtilek, J.\ 2008, to appear in MNRAS, ArXiv e-prints,  arXiv:0712.1150 

1829: 

1830: \bibitem[Kaastra et al. (2004)]{kaastra04}

1831: Kaastra J.S., Tamura T., Peterson J.R., et al., 2004, A\&A, 413, 415

1832: 

1833: %\bibitem[Kardashev 1962]{kardashev62}

1834: %Kardashev N.S., 1962, SvA, 6, 317

1835: 

1836: 

1837: 

1838: \bibitem[Kim \& Narayan(2003a)]{kim03a} Kim, W.-T., \& Narayan, 

1839: R.\ 2003a, ApJL, 596, L139 

1840: 

1841: \bibitem[Kim \& Narayan(2003b)]{kim03b} Kim, W.-T., \& Narayan, 

1842: R.\ 2003b, ApJ, 596, 889 

1843: 

1844: 

1845: \bibitem[Koranyi \& Geller (2002)]{koranyi02}

1846: Koranyi D.M., \& Geller M.J., 2002, AJ, 123, 100

1847: 

1848: \bibitem[Laing \& Bridle (2002)]{laing02}

1849: Laing R.A., \& Bridle A.H., 2002, MNRAS, 336, 1161

1850: 

1851: %\bibitem[Lind \& Blandford (1985)]{lind85}

1852: %Lind K.R., \& Blandford R.D., 1985, ApJ, 295, 358

1853: 

1854: \bibitem[Mathews et al.(2004)]{mbb04} Mathews, W.~G., 

1855: Brighenti, F., \& Buote, D.~A.\ 2004, \apj, 615, 662 

1856: 

1857: 

1858: \bibitem[McNamara \& Nulsen (2007)]{mcnamara07}

1859: McNamara B.R. \& Nulsen P.E.J., 2007, ARA\&A, 45, 117

1860: 

1861: \bibitem[McNamara et al. (2007)]{mcnamara-etal-07}

1862: McNamara, B.~R., 

1863: Birzan, L., Rafferty, D.~A., Nulsen, P.~E.~J., Carilli, C., \& Wise, M.~W.\ 

1864: 2007, in ``Extragalactic Jets: Theory and Observation from Radio to Gamma Ray''

1865: (arXiv:0708.0579)

1866: 

1867: \bibitem[Merritt (1984)]{merritt84}

1868: Merritt D., 1984, ApJ, 276, 26

1869: 

1870: \bibitem[Murgia (2000)]{murgia00}

1871: Murgia M., 2000, Ph.D thesis, University of Bologna

1872: 

1873: \bibitem[Nulsen et al.(2003)]{nulsen03} Nulsen, P.~E., McNamara, 

1874: B.~R., David, L.~P., \& Wise, M.\ 2003, The Cosmic Cauldron, 25th meeting 

1875: of the IAU, Joint Discussion 10, Sydney, Australia

1876: (arXiv:astro-ph/0311284)

1877: 

1878: \bibitem[Nulsen et al. (2006)]{nulsen06} 

1879: Nulsen, P.E.J. et al., 

1880: 2006, in {\it Heating vs. Cooling in Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies}, Eds. 

1881: H.B\"ohringer, P.Schuecker, G.W. Pratt \& A. Finoguenov (ESO Astrophysics Symposia), 

1882: (arXiv:astro-ph/0611136)

1883: 

1884: 

1885: \bibitem[Nusser et al.(2006)]{nusser06} Nusser, A., Silk, J., \& 

1886: Babul, A.\ 2006, \mnras, 373, 739 

1887: 

1888: \bibitem[O'Donoghue, Eilek \& Owen (1993)]{odonoghue93}

1889: O'Donoghue A.A., Eilek J.A., \& Owen F.N., 1993, ApJ, 408, 428

1890: 

1891: \bibitem[O'Sullivan et al. (2005)]{osullivan05}

1892: O'Sullivan E., Vrtilek J.M., Kempner J.C., David L.P.,

1893: Houck J.C., 2005. MNRAS, 357, 1134 (OS05)

1894: 

1895: 

1896: \bibitem[Owen \& Rudnick 1986]{owen86}

1897: Owen F.N., \& Rudnick L., 1976, ApJ, 205, L1

1898: 

1899: \bibitem[Owen \& Ledlow (1994)]{owen94}

1900: Owen F.N. \& Ledlow M.J., 1994, ASPC, 54, 3190

1901: 

1902: \bibitem[Pacholczyk (1970)]{pacholczyk70}

1903: Pacholczyk A.G., 1970, {\it Radio astrophysics; nonthermal

1904: processes in galactic and extragalactic sources}, W.H. Freeman,

1905: San Francisco

1906: 

1907: \bibitem[Parma et al. (1994)]{parma94}

1908: Parma P., de Ruiter H.R., Fanti R., Laing R.,

1909: 1994, in Bicknell G.V., Dopita M.A., Quinn P.J. (eds),

1910: {\it The Phyisics of Active Galaxies}, ASP Conference

1911: Series n.100, p. 241

1912: 

1913: \bibitem[Parma et al.(1999)]{parma99}

1914: Parma P., Murgia M., Morganti R., Capetti A., 

1915: de Ruiter H.R., Fanti R., 1999, A\&A 344, 7 

1916:   

1917: 

1918: 

1919: \bibitem[Parma et al. (2007)]{parma07}

1920: Parma P., Murgia M., de Ruiter H.R., Fanti R.,

1921: Mack K--H., Govoni F., 2007, A\&A, 470, 87

1922: 

1923: \bibitem[Pearson \& Zensus (1987)]{pearson87}

1924: Pearson T.J., \& Zensus J.A., 1987, in: Zensus J.A.,

1925: \& Pearson T.J. (eds), {\it Parsec--scale Radio

1926: Jets}, Cambridge University Press, p. 323

1927: 

1928: \bibitem[Perley, Willis \& Scott (1979)]{perley79}

1929: Perley R.A., Willis A.G., \& Scott J.S., 1979,

1930: Nat, 281, 437

1931: 

1932: \bibitem[Peterson et al. (2003)]{peterson03}

1933: Peterson J.R., Kahn S.M., Paerels F.B. S., et al., 2003, ApJ, 590, 207

1934: 

1935: \bibitem[Pilkington \& Scott (1965)]{pilk65}

1936: Pilkington J.D.H., \& Scott P.F., 1965, MnRAS, 69, 183

1937: 

1938: \bibitem[Pinkney, Burns \& Hill (1994)]{pinkney94}

1939: Pinkney J., Burns J.O., \& Hill J.M., 1994,

1940: AJ, 108, 2031

1941: 

1942: \bibitem[Reich et al. (2000)]{reach00}

1943: Reich W., F\"urst E., Reich P., et al., 2000, A\&A, 363, 141

1944: 

1945: \bibitem[Roychowdhury et al.(2004)]{roychow04} Roychowdhury, S., 

1946: Ruszkowski, M., Nath, B.~B., \& Begelman, M.~C.\ 2004, ApJ, 615, 681 

1947: 

1948: 

1949: \bibitem[Sakelliou, Merrifield \& McHardy (1996)]{sakelliou96}

1950: Sakelliou I., Merrifield M.R., \& McHardy I.M., 1996,

1951: MNRAS, 283, 673

1952: 

1953: \bibitem[Sanderson et al. (2006)]{sanderson06}

1954: Sanderson, A.~J.~R., 

1955: Ponman, T.~J., \& O'Sullivan, E.\ 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1496

1956: 

1957: \bibitem[Savolainen et al. (2006)]{savolainen06}

1958: Savolainen T., Wiik K., Valtaoja E., Kadler M., Ros E., 

1959: Tornikoski M., Aller M.F., Aller H.D., 2006, ApJ, 647, 172

1960: 

1961: %\bibitem[Scheuer (1974)]{scheuer74}

1962: %Scheuer P.A.G., 1974, MNRAS, 166, 513

1963: 

1964: \bibitem[Smol\v{c}i\'{c} et al. (2007)]{smolcic07}

1965: Smol\v{c}i\'{c} V., Schinnerer E., Finoguenov A. et al.,

1966: 2007, ApJS, 172, 295

1967: 

1968: \bibitem[Tabor \& Binney (1993)]{tabor93}

1969: Tabor G., \& Binney J., 1993, MNRAS, 263, 323

1970: 

1971: \bibitem[Verkhodanov et al.(1997)]{verkho97} Verkhodanov, O.V., 

1972: Trushkin, S.A., Andernach, H.,  Cherenkov, V.N., 1997, 

1973: ASP Conf. Series, Vol. 125, p. 322

1974: 

1975: \bibitem[Viner \& Erickson (1975)]{viner75}

1976: Viner M.R., \& Erickson W.C., 1975, AJ, 80, 931

1977: 

1978: \bibitem[White et al. (1997)]{white97}

1979: White R.L., Becker R.H., Helfand D.J., \& 

1980: Gregg M.D., 1997, AJ, 475, 479

1981: 

1982: 

1983: \bibitem[Wright \& Otrupcek (1990)]{wright90}

1984: Wright A. \& Otrupcek R., 1990, PKS catalogue

1985: 

1986: 

1987: 

1988: \end{thebibliography}

1989: 

1990: 

1991: % ***************   FIGURES **********************

1992: 

1993: 

1994: %**************************TABLES*****************************************

1995: 

1996: 

1997: \end{document}