1: %
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18:
19: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
20:
21: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
22:
23: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
24:
25: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
26:
27: %%\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
28:
29: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
30: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
31: %% use the longabstract style option.
32:
33: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
34:
35: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
36: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
37: %% the \begin{document} command.
38: %%
39: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
40: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
41: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
42: %% for information.
43:
44: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
45: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
46:
47: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
48:
49: \slugcomment{submitted to ApJL}
50:
51: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
52: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
53: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
54: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
55: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
56: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
57:
58: \shorttitle{Suzaku observation of 1ES1218+304}
59: \shortauthors{Sato et al.}
60:
61: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
62: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
63:
64: \begin{document}
65:
66: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
67: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
68: %% you desire.
69:
70: \title{$Suzaku$ observation of TeV blazar the 1ES~1218+304:
71: clues on particle acceleration in an extreme TeV blazar}
72:
73: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
74: %% author and affiliation information.
75: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
76: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
77: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
78: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
79:
80: \author{
81: R. Sato\altaffilmark{1},
82: J. Kataoka\altaffilmark{2},
83: T. Takahashi\altaffilmark{1},
84: G. M. Madejski\altaffilmark{3},
85: S. R$\ddot{\rm u}$gamer\altaffilmark{4} and
86: S. J. Wagner\altaffilmark{5}}
87:
88: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
89: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
90: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
91: %% affiliation.
92:
93: \altaffiltext{1}{Institute of Space and Astronautical Science/JAXA, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan}
94: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan}
95: \altaffiltext{3}{Stanford Linear Accelerator Center and
96: Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Stanford
97: University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA}
98: \altaffiltext{4}{Universit$\ddot{\rm a}$t W$\ddot{\rm u}$rzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 W$\ddot{\rm u}$rzburg, Germany}
99: \altaffiltext{5}{Landessternwarte, Universit$\ddot{\rm a}$t Heidelberg, K$\ddot{\rm o}$nigstuhl, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany}
100:
101: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
102: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
103: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
104: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
105: %% editorial office after submission.
106:
107: \begin{abstract}
108: We observed the TeV blazar 1ES~1218+304 with the X-ray astronomy satellite
109: $Suzaku$ in May 2006.
110: At the beginning of the two-day continuous observation,
111: we detected a large flare in which the 5$-$10 keV flux changed
112: by a factor of $\sim$2 on a timescale of 5$\times$10$^4$ s. During the flare,
113: the increase in the hard X-ray flux clearly lagged behind that observed
114: in the soft X-rays, with the maximum lag of
115: $2.3\times$10$^4$ s observed between the 0.3$-$1 keV
116: and 5$-$10 keV bands. Furthermore we discovered that the temporal profile of
117: the flare clearly changes with energy, being more symmetric at higher energies.
118: From the spectral fitting of multi-wavelength data assuming a one-zone,
119: homogeneous synchrotron self-Compton model, we obtain $B\sim0.047$ G,
120: emission region size $R = 3.0\times10^{16}$ cm for an appropriate
121: beaming with a Doppler factor of $\delta = 20$.
122: This value of $B$ is in good agreement with an independent estimate
123: through the model fit to the observed time lag
124: ascribing the energy-dependent variability
125: to differential acceleration timescale of relativistic electrons
126: provided that the gyro-factor $\xi$ is $10^5$.
127: %We estimate the magnetic field $B\sim0.049\xi_5$ G where $\xi_5$ is
128: %a gyro factor in units of $10^5$.
129: \end{abstract}
130:
131: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
132: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to uthors
133: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
134: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
135:
136: \keywords{BL Lacerate objects: individual (1ES~1218+304)
137: -- radiation mechanisms: non-thermal -- X-rays: galaxies}
138:
139: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
140: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
141: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
142: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
143: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
144: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
145: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
146: %% each reference.
147:
148:
149: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
150: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
151: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
152: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
153: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
154: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
155: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
156: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
157: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
158: %%
159: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
160: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
161: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
162: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
163:
164: \section{Introduction}
165:
166: Blazars are a sub-category of Active Galactic Nuclei where a
167: relativistic jet pointing close to our line of sight produces Doppler-boosted
168: emission (e.g., Urry \& Padovani 1995; Ulrich, Maraschi \& Urry 1997).
169: Generally, their overall spectra have two pronounced continuum components:
170: one peaking between IR and X-rays is produced by the synchrotron radiation
171: of relativistic electrons, and the other in the $\gamma$-ray regime,
172: presumably due to the inverse Compton (IC) emission by the same electrons.
173: In some cases, $\gamma$-ray emission is seen to
174: extend to the TeV range; the X-ray and GeV/TeV $\gamma$-ray bands
175: correspond to the highest energy ends ($E_{\rm max}$)
176: of the synchrotron/IC emission
177: (e.g., Inoue \& Takahara 1996; Kirk, Rieger \& Mastichiadis 1998).
178: At these ends, variability is expected to be most pronounced, and
179: in fact, such large flux variations are observed, on a timescale
180: of hours to days (e.g., Kataoka et al. 2001; Tanihata et al. 2001)
181: or even shorter (minutes scale; Aharonian et al. 2007; Albert et al. 2007).
182: Using $ASCA$ data, Takahashi et al. (1996) argued the soft X-ray
183: ($<$ 1 keV) variation of Mrk~421, observed to lag behind that of
184: the hard X-rays ($\ge$ 2 keV) by $\sim$ 4 ks, may well be ascribed to
185: the energy dependence of the synchrotron cooling timescale. More recently,
186: Kataoka et al. (2000) interpreted an observed soft-lag and spectral
187: evolution of PKS~2155-304 by a newly developed time-dependent
188: synchrotron self-Compton (SSC) model.
189:
190: The above $paradigm$ of ``soft-lag'' was questioned, however,
191: in several aspects. First, intensive X-ray monitoring of
192: blazars has revealed not only soft lags
193: but in some cases hard lags (Takahashi et al. 2000) which may be a
194: manifestation of another process, e.g., energy dependent acceleration.
195: Second, Edelson et al. (2001) voiced concerns
196: about reliability of measurement of lags that are smaller
197: than the orbital periods ($\sim$ 6 ks) of low Earth orbit satellites.
198: This was refuted by Tanihata et al. (2001) and Zhang et al. (2004) who
199: showed that, although periodic gaps introduce larger uncertainties than evenly
200: sampled data, lags on hour-scale cannot be the result of
201: periodic gaps. A time resolved cross
202: correlation analysis of uninterrupted Mrk~421 data obtained by XMM-Newton
203: revealed lags of both signs, changing
204: on time scales of up to a few 10$^3$ s (Brinkmann et al. 2005).
205: Hence the situation is very complex and still under debate.
206:
207: In this letter we present new results from the May 2006 $Suzaku$ observation
208: of 1ES~1218+304 conducted as part of a multi-wavelength campaign with
209: KVA-$Swift$-MAGIC.
210: 1ES~1218+304 is categorized as a high-frequency peaked BL Lac object,
211: at a redshift $z = 0.182$ (Veron-Cetty \& Veron 2003).
212: It was discovered as a TeV emitter by MAGIC at energies $>100$ GeV
213: (Albert et al. 2006) and subsequently confirmed by VERITAS (Fortin 2007).
214: While the detailed multiband analysis is ongoing,
215: we focus in this letter on a remarkable X-ray flare observed with $Suzaku$.
216: We present temporal and spectral features in $\S$ 3,
217: in $\S$ 4 we discuss a physical origin of temporal variability.
218: % in terms of a toy model incorporating the particle acceleration and cooling.
219:
220: \section{Observation and Data Reduction}
221:
222: 1ES~1218+304 was observed with $Suzaku$ (Mitsuda et al. 2007) during
223: 2006 May 20$-$21 UT, yielding a net exposure time of 79.9 ks.
224: $Suzaku$ carries four sets of X-ray telescopes (Serlemitsos et al. 2007)
225: each with a focal-plane X-ray CCD camera (XIS, X-ray Imaging Spectrometer;
226: Koyama et al. 2007) that is sensitive over the 0.3-12 keV band,
227: together with a non-imaging Hard X-ray Detector (HXD; Takahashi et al. 2007;
228: Kokubun et al. 2007), which covers the 10-600 keV energy band with Si PIN
229: photo-diodes and GSO scintillation detectors.
230: 1ES~1218+304 was focused on the nominal center position of the HXD detector.
231:
232: For the XIS, we analyzed the screened data, reduced via $Suzaku$ software version 2.0.
233: The screening was based on the following criteria:
234: (1) only ASCA-grade 0,2,3,4,6 events were accumulated, while hot
235: and flickering pixels were removed using the CLEANSIS script,
236: (2) the time interval after the passage of South Atlantic Anomaly
237: is greater than 500 s, (3) the object is at least 5$^\circ$ and 20$^\circ$
238: above the rim of the Earth (ELV) during night and day, respectively.
239: In addition, we also select the data with a cutoff rigidity (COR) larger than 6 GV.
240: After this screening, the net exposure for good time intervals is 69.4 ks.
241: The XIS events were extracted from a circular region with a radius
242: of 4.2$^\prime$ centered on the source peak, whereas the background
243: was accumulated in an annulus with inner and outer radii of
244: 5.4$^\prime$ and 7.3$^\prime$, respectively. We checked that the use
245: of different source and background regions did not affect the analysis
246: results. The response and auxiliary files are produced using
247: the analysis tools \textsc{xisrmfgen} and \textsc{xissimarfgen}
248: developed by the $Suzaku$ team,
249: which are included in the software package HEAsoft version 6.4.
250:
251: The HXD/PIN data (version 2.0) were processed with basically the same screening
252: criteria as those for the XIS, except that ELV\,$\ge$\,5$^\circ$ through
253: night and day and COR\,$\ge$\,8\,GV.
254: The HXD/PIN instrumental background spectra were provided by the HXD team
255: for each observation (Kokubun et al. 2007; Fukazawa et al. 2006).
256: Both the source and background spectra were made with identical good
257: time intervals and the exposure was corrected for detector
258: deadtime of 6.0\%. We used the response files version
259: \textsc{ae\_hxd\_pinhxdnom2\_20070914.rsp}, provided by the HXD team.
260:
261: \section{Analysis and Results}
262:
263: Figure \ref{fig:LC} shows the averaged light curves of the four XISs
264: in the six X-ray energy bands. Although we could see variations of
265: count rates at some level using HXD/PIN data,
266: it was not significant within uncertainties of photon statistics.
267: Thus in the following, we concentrate on the temporal variability of
268: the XIS data only, below 10 keV.
269: The temporal variation of the hardness ratio (HR) is also shown
270: in the bottom panel of Figure \ref{fig:LC}.
271: It indicates that the variability in the soft and hard X-ray bands
272: are $not$ well synchronized.
273:
274: To quantify the different shape of the flare with energy dependent time-lags,
275: we fitted the light curves with a function given by Norris (1996)
276: after a slight modification of adding a constant offset $C_0$ to mimic the observed light curves:
277: \begin{eqnarray*}
278: I(t) &=& C_0 + C_1 \times \exp [-(|t - t_{\rm peak}/\sigma_{\rm r}|)^{k}] \hspace*{0.2cm} ({\rm for} \hspace*{0.1cm} t \leq t_{\rm peak}),\\
279: &=& C_0 + C_1 \times \exp [-(|t - t_{\rm peak}/\sigma_{\rm d}|)^{k}] \hspace*{0.2cm} ({\rm for} \hspace*{0.1cm} t > t_{\rm peak}),\\
280: \end{eqnarray*}
281: where $t_{\rm peak}$ is the time of the flare's maximum intensity $C_1$,
282: $k$ is a measure of pulse sharpness,
283: $\sigma_{\rm r}$ and $\sigma_{\rm d}$ are the rise and decay time constants.
284: If the light curve is symmetric in time, $\sigma_{\rm r}$ and $\sigma_{\rm d}$
285: are expected to be equal.
286: All the light curves were binned at 2880 s (a half of the orbital period of $Suzaku$) for fitting.
287: The results of the fittings are given in Table \ref{table:pulsefit}.
288: In summary, the observed flare shows the following characteristics:
289: (1) The flare shape is asymmetric in time ($\sigma_{\rm r}/\sigma_{\rm d}<1$)
290: especially in the lower energy band (but note $\sigma_{\rm r}/\sigma_{\rm d}$
291: $\simeq$ 1 for 5$-$10 keV light curve).
292: (2) The flare amplitude defined as $(C_1+C_0)/C_0$ becomes larger as
293: the photon energy increases (the 5$-$10 keV flux changed by a factor
294: of $\sim$2).
295: (3) The rise-time of the flare is almost constant $\sim5\times10^4$ s
296: below 2 keV, while it becomes gradually longer at higher energy bands.
297:
298: Next, we try to evaluate lags of temporal variations in various energy bands.
299: Taking into account a wide variety of the flare shape measured at different
300: energies, we estimated lags by just comparing the peak-time of the flare
301: rather than using other temporal techniques, such as
302: the discrete correlation function (DCF; Edelson \& Krolik 1989) or
303: the modified mean deviation method (MMD; Hufnagel \& Bregman 1992).
304: \footnote{Since the DCF quantifies the degree of similarity or correlation
305: between two time series as a function of the time-lag, it is not suitable to
306: evaluate ``energy-dependent'' profiles, as observed in 1ES~1218+304.}
307: We compared the peak-time in five lower energy bands to that
308: determined in the 5$-$10 keV band.
309: Apparently, the hard X-ray (5$-$10 keV) peak lagged behind
310: that in the soft X-ray (0.3$-$1 keV) by
311: (2.3$\pm$0.7)$\times$10$^4$ s. Importantly, this is much larger than
312: the orbital period of $Suzaku$ and less affected by artifacts proposed
313: in Edelson et al. (2001).
314:
315: \begin{figure}[t]
316: \begin{center}
317: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.4]{f1.eps}
318: \caption{Light curves of 1ES~1218+304 observed with $Suzaku$ XISs in 2006 May.
319: The energy bands are 0.3-1, 1-1.5, 1.5-2, 2-3, 3-5 and 5-10 keV (from the
320: upper panel), respectively.
321: The bottom panel shows the HR of count rates, defined as (5-10 keV)/(0.3-1 keV).
322: The dotted line is the constant offset $C_0$.
323: The dashed line is the characteristic variability time scale of a flare
324: $t_{\rm var}$ $\simeq$ 5$\times$10$^4$ s.\label{fig:LC}}
325: \end{center}
326: \vspace*{-0.5cm}
327: \end{figure}
328:
329: \begin{table}[h]
330: \small{
331: \caption{Temporal profiles during the flare of 1ES~1218+304 in various X-ray energy bands.}
332: \begin{center}
333: \vspace*{-0.5cm}
334: \label{table:pulsefit}
335: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
336: \hline
337: E (keV) & $t_{\rm peak}$ ($10^4$ s) & $\sigma_{\rm r}/\sigma_{\rm d}$ & $k$ & $(C_1+C_0)/C_0$ \\
338: \hline
339: 0.3-1 & 4.4$\pm$0.1 & 0.34$\pm$0.14 & 1.2$\pm$0.4 & 1.2$\pm$0.1\\
340: 1-1.5 & 4.7$\pm$0.3 & 0.31$\pm$0.08 & 1.7$\pm$0.5 & 1.2$\pm$0.1\\
341: 1.5-2 & 4.7$\pm$0.3 & 0.31$\pm$0.11 & 1.4$\pm$0.5 & 1.2$\pm$0.1\\
342: 2-3 & 5.1$\pm$0.3 & 0.33$\pm$0.10 & 1.4$\pm$0.4 & 1.3$\pm$0.1\\
343: 3-5 & 6.1$\pm$0.4 & 0.67$\pm$0.12 & 2.7$\pm$0.4 & 1.4$\pm$0.1\\
344: 5-10 & 6.7$\pm$0.7 & 0.84$\pm$0.17 & 2.8$\pm$0.6 & 1.6$\pm$0.1\\
345: \hline
346: \end{tabular}
347: \end{center}
348: }
349: \end{table}
350:
351: The time averaged four XISs and HXD/PIN background subtracted spectra
352: were fitted using XSPEC ver.11.3.2, including data within the energy band 0.6$-$50 keV.
353: The background of HXD/PIN includes both the instrumental (non X-ray) background
354: and the contribution from the cosmic X-ray background (CXB; Gruber et al. 1999).
355: Here the form of the CXB was taken as
356: $9.0\times10^{-9}(E/3 \hspace{0.1cm} {\rm keV})^{-0.29} \exp(-E/40 \hspace{0.1cm} {\rm keV})$
357: erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$ keV$^{-1}$ and the observed spectrum was simulated assuming
358: the PIN detector response to isotropic diffuse emission.
359: We first fitted with a single power-law model with Galactic absorption
360: $N_{\rm H} = 1.78\times10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$ (Costamante et al. 2001).
361: We obtained the best fit photon index $\Gamma = 2.14\pm0.01$,
362: but this model did not represent the spectrum well yielding a reduced $\chi^2$ of 1.23 for 1967 dof.
363: We also tried to fit with a broken power-law model with Galactic absorption.
364: The photon index below the break energy $E_{\rm brk}$ ($\Gamma_1$) is
365: $2.04\pm0.01$ while the index above $E_{\rm brk}$ is $2.17\pm0.01$,
366: where $E_{\rm brk}$ ($\Gamma_2$) is $1.42\pm0.05$ keV.
367: The flux over 2-10 keV is $\sim 2.0\times10^{-11}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$.
368: This model gives a better fit with a reduced $\chi^2$ of 1.14 for 1959 dof
369: compared to the single power-law model, but $\chi^2$ is still not acceptable.
370: Considering the spectral variability, we analyzed the spectrum every 5760 s.
371: The power-law indices vary from $2.05\pm0.01$ to $2.22\pm0.01$ during the flare,
372: and each segment can be fitted well with a single power-law model or broken power-law
373: model with $\chi^2$/dof ranging from 0.94 to 1.09.
374:
375: Figure \ref{fig:SED} shows the spectral energy distribution (SED) of
376: 1ES~1218+304 with currently available datasets.
377: The TeV data are obtained from Albert et al. (2006), and are corrected for the
378: absorption due to the IR Extragalactic
379: background light (EBL; see Fig.\ref{fig:SED}); other data are from the
380: NED database. Note that the TeV analysis of multi-wavelength campaign data
381: is still ongoing and the combined datasets will be investigated in forthcoming paper
382: (Stefan et al. in prep).
383: As expected from the curved X-ray spectrum with photon index $\Gamma$ around 2
384: and $E_{\rm cut} \lesssim 10$ keV,
385: the synchrotron emission peaks just around the $Suzaku$ bandpass.
386:
387: In order to specify the SED of 1ES~1218+304,
388: we applied a one-zone homogeneous SSC model developed in Kataoka et al. (1999).
389: Noting that the characteristic variability time scale of the flare is
390: $t_{\rm var}$ $\simeq$ 5$\times$10$^4$ s, which is most probably
391: determined by the light travel time across the source emitting region
392: (see discussion in $\S$ 4), we obtain $R$ = $c$$t_{\rm var}$$\delta$
393: = 3.0$\times$10$^{16}$ cm for a moderate beaming factor of $\delta$ = 20
394: (e.g., Kataoka et al. 1999; 2000 for self-consistent determination of
395: physical parameters in TeV blazars). With this parameter set,
396: the SED of 1ES~1218+304 is fitted with $B=0.047$ G, $s=1.7$,
397: $\gamma_{\rm min}$=1, $\gamma_{\rm brk}=8.0\times10^3$
398: and $\gamma_{\rm max}=8.0\times10^5$.
399: We also note that the energy densities of electrons and fields are
400: $u_e=8.3\times10^{-3}$ erg/cm$^3$ and $u_B=8.8\times10^{-5}$ erg/cm$^3$,
401: respectively.
402: Thus the jet in 1ES~1218+304 is particle dominated, and the
403: ratio $u_e$/$u_B$ $\sim$ 100 is well within the range of typical TeV blazars.
404:
405: \begin{figure}[t]
406: \begin{center}
407: \includegraphics[angle=90,scale=.4]{f2.eps}
408: \caption{Overall SED of 1ES~1218+304.
409: Filled circles show X-ray data ($Suzaku$; this work).
410: For TeV data (Albert et al. 2006; filled diamonds),
411: we adopt the correction for the IR EBL by Primack et al. 2001 (open diamonds);
412: see also Primack et al. (2005) as well as
413: the discussion based on the recent HESS detection of distant TeV blazars (Costamante 2007).
414: The other plots are from the NED database.
415: The dashed line is a prediction by a one-zone SSC model (Kataoka et al. 2000).
416: \label{fig:SED}}
417: \end{center}
418: \vspace*{-0.5cm}
419: \end{figure}
420:
421: \section{Discussion}
422:
423: In our observation we detected a large flare during which the hard X-ray
424: variation lagged behind that in the soft X-rays, $\sim2.3\times10^4$ s.
425: This is completely opposite to a well-known
426: behavior in which the spectra harden during the phases of rising flux,
427: and soften during the phases of falling flux, as has been obtained
428: from the past observations.
429: In the theoretical context, however, ``hard lag''is actually expected
430: especially in the X-ray variability of TeV blazars,
431: but has never been observed so clearly before. It has been suggested
432: that a hard-lag is observable only at energies closer to the maximum
433: electron energy, $\gamma_{\rm max}$ (Kirk, Rieger \&
434: Mastichiadis 1998), where the acceleration time is
435: almost comparable to the cooling time scale of radiating electrons:
436: $t_{\rm acc}(\gamma_{\rm max})$ $\simeq$ $t_{\rm cool}(\gamma_{\rm max})$.
437:
438: It is convenient to express $t_{\rm acc}$ and $t_{\rm cool}$ in terms
439: of the observed photon energy $E$ (in units of keV).
440: Noting that the typical synchrotron emission frequency, averaged over pitch angles,
441: of an electron with energy $\gamma$$mc^2$ is given by $\nu$ $\sim$
442: 3.7$\times$10$^6$$B$$\gamma^2$ Hz, we obtain;
443: \begin{eqnarray*}
444: t_{\rm acc} (E) &=& 9.65\times10^{-2} (1+z)^{3/2} \xi B^{-3/2} \delta^{-3/2} E^{1/2} {\rm s},\\
445: t_{\rm cool} (E) &=& 3.04\times10^{+3} (1+z)^{1/2} B^{-3/2} \delta^{-1/2} E^{-1/2} {\rm s},
446: \end{eqnarray*}
447: where $z$ is the redshift, $B$ is the magnetic field strength, $\xi$ is the ``gyro-factor''
448: which can be identified with the ratio of energy in an ordered magnetic
449: field to that in a turbulent magnetic field ($\xi$ = 1 for the Bohm limit;
450: see, e.g., Inoue \& Takahara 1996), and $\delta$ is the beaming factor.
451: Note that for lower energy photons, $t_{\rm acc}(E)$ is always shorter
452: than $t_{\rm cool}(E)$ because higher energy electrons need longer time to
453: be accelerated ($t_{\rm acc}(\gamma)$ $\propto$ $\gamma$) but cool rapidly
454: ($t_{\rm cool}(\gamma)$ $\propto$ $\gamma^{-1}$). This energy
455: dependence of acceleration/cooling time-scales may qualitatively
456: explain the observed characteristics of the X-ray light curves of 1ES~1218+304.
457: It is thus interesting to consider a simple toy model in which the
458: rise time of the flare is primarily controlled by the acceleration time
459: of the electrons corresponding to observed photon energies, while the fall time
460: of the flare is due to the synchrotron cooling time scale. In this
461: model, the amount of ``hard-lag'', $\tau_{\rm hard}$, is simply due to
462: the difference of $t_{\rm acc}$, and independent of the energy dependence
463: of $t_{\rm cool}$:
464: \begin{eqnarray*}
465: \tau_{\rm hard} &=& t_{\rm acc} (E_{\rm hi}) - t_{\rm acc} (E_{\rm low}) \\
466: &\sim& 9.65\times10^{-2} (1+z)^{3/2} \xi B^{-3/2} \delta^{-3/2} (E_{\rm hi}^{1/2}
467: - E_{\rm low}^{1/2}) \hspace{3mm}{\rm s},\\
468: \end{eqnarray*}
469: where $E_{\rm low}$ and $E_{\rm hi}$ are the lower and higher
470: X-ray photon energies to which the time-lag is observed.
471: Here we took $E_{\rm low / hi}$ to be the logarithmic mean energy
472: in the observation energy bandpass.
473: The result of the model fit to the observed $\tau_{\rm hard}$ is shown
474: in Figure \ref{fig:lag} ($left$).
475:
476: Assuming a beaming factor $\delta=20$ from multiband spectral fitting
477: (see $\S$ 3), the best fit parameter of the magnetic field $B$ can be
478: written as $\sim 0.049 \xi_5$ G, where $\xi_5$ is the ``gyro-factor''
479: in units of $10^5$.
480: Thus, in order to have the $B$ field required in the acceleration
481: region consistent with that derived from the SED fitting,
482: we infer $\xi \sim 10^5$. Such high value of $\xi$ is in
483: fact consistent with that inferred by Inoue \& Takahara (1996)
484: for other blazars.
485: With these parameters, the maximum synchrotron
486: radiation energy $E_{\rm max}$, corresponding to $\gamma_{\rm max}$,
487: is expected to be $\sim5.3$ keV.
488: Hence, the above toy model qualitatively well represents the observed
489: spectral/temporal features of 1ES~1218+304, in particular:
490: (1) the synchrotron component peaks around the $Suzaku$ XIS energy band
491: in the multiband spectrum (Figure \ref{fig:SED}) and (2) the observed
492: light curve is symmetric in shape when measured at the high energy band,
493: while being ``asymmetric'' (i.e., fall time longer than the rise time) at the lower energy band.
494: Figure \ref{fig:lag} ($right$) compares the energy dependence of observed and
495: modeled flare shapes, defined as the ratio of rise and decay
496: time-scales, $\sigma_{\rm r}$/$\sigma_{\rm d}$.
497: The dashed line shows the model prediction from
498: $\sigma_{\rm r}$/$\sigma_{\rm d}$ $\simeq$ $t_{\rm acc}/t_{\rm cool}$ =
499: $(E/E_{\rm max})^{1/2}/(E/E_{\rm max})^{-1/2} \sim E/5.3$ keV.
500: Although the general trend is well reproduced, Figure \ref{fig:lag} indicates
501: that the observed rise time may have a bit longer
502: time scale than expected from the model. The most natural interpretation for
503: this is the smoothing of rapid variability by the source light
504: crossing time scale $t_{\rm crs}$ (e.g., Chiaberge \& Ghisellini 1999;
505: Kataoka et al. 2000).
506: Hence if the acceleration time scale is shorter than the
507: source crossing time, we expect $t_{\rm crs}$ to smooth out $t_{\rm acc}$.
508: The dash-dotted line in Fig. \ref{fig:lag} ($right$) shows the ratio of the time scales
509: of $t_{\rm crs}$/$t_{\rm cool}$.
510: we can see that $t_{\rm crs}$ is longer than $t_{\rm acc}$ below $\sim2$ keV,
511: but comparable or shorter above $\sim2$ keV.
512: As a result, for 1ES~1218+304 it seems reasonable that the rise time of the flare
513: is primary determined by the acceleration time of the electrons, while
514: the fall time of the flare is due to the synchrotron cooling time scale.
515: Only the rise time of the flare in the lower energy bands are dominated
516: by the light crossing time $t_{\rm crs}$,
517: but further studies using more data are necessary to confirm this model.
518:
519: \acknowledgments
520: We are grateful to Dr. L. Costamante for kindly providing us with the numerical
521: values of the EBL effects on TeV gamma-ray spectra, and Dr. M. Sikora for many
522: fruitful discussions. This work was supported, in part, by a Department of
523: Energy contract to SLAC no. DE-AC3-76SF00515.
524:
525:
526: \begin{figure}[h]
527: \begin{center}
528: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.35]{f3a.eps}
529: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.35]{f3b.eps}
530: \caption{$Left$: Time lag of photons of various X-ray energy bands vs
531: 5-10 keV band photons. The solid line corresponds to a fit with
532: $\tau_{\rm hard} = 9.65\times10^{-2} (1+z)^{3/2} \xi B^{-3/2} \delta^{-3/2} (7.1^{1/2} - E_{\rm low}^{1/2})$ where $\delta$ is fixed to 20.0.
533: $Right$: Energy dependence of the pulse shape,
534: defined as the ratio of $\sigma_{\rm r}$ and $\sigma_{\rm d}$.
535: The dashed line shows the predicted value of $\sigma_{\rm r}/\sigma_{\rm d}$,
536: calculated from $t_{\rm acc}/t_{\rm cool} = E/E_{\rm max} \sim E/5.3$ keV.
537: The dash-dotted line shows the ratio of $t_{\rm crs}/t_{\rm cool}$. \label{fig:lag}}
538: \end{center}
539: \end{figure}
540:
541: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
542: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
543: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
544: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
545: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
546: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
547: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
548: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
549:
550: %% After the acknowledgments stion, use the following syntax and the
551: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
552: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
553: %% copy editing. Individual instruments or configurations can be provided
554: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
555:
556: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
557: %% There should be a \stion command for each appendix. Mark appendix
558: %% substions with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
559:
560: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
561: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
562: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
563:
564: \begin{thebibliography}{}
565: \bibitem[Alb06]{Alb06}
566: Albert, J., et al. 2006, \apjl, 642, L119
567: \bibitem[Alb07]{Alb07}
568: Albert, J., et al. 2007, \apj, 669, 862
569: \bibitem[Aha07]{Aha07}
570: Aharonian, F. et al., 2007, \apjl, 664, L71
571: \bibitem[Bri01]{Bri01}
572: Brinkmann, W., Papadakis, I. E., Raeth, C., Mimica, P., \& Haberl, F.,
573: 2005, A\&A, 443, 397
574: \bibitem[Chi99]{Chi99}
575: Chiaberge, M., \& Ghisellini, G. 1999, \mnras, 306, 551
576: \bibitem[Cos01]{Cos01}
577: Costamante, L., et al. 2001, \aap, 371, 512
578: \bibitem[Cos07]{Cos07}
579: Costamante, L., 2007, Ap\&SS, 309, 487 (astro-ph/0612709v1)
580: \bibitem[Ede89]{Ede89}
581: Edelson, R.~A., \& Krolik, J.~H. 1989, proceedings of the International Astronomical Union Symposium, 134, 96
582: \bibitem[Ede01]{Ede01}
583: Edelson, R., Griffiths, G., Markowitz, A., Sembay, S., Turner, M.~J.~L.,
584: \& Warwick, R. 2001, \apj, 554, 274
585: \bibitem[For07]{For07}
586: Fortin, P. 2007, astro-ph/07093657
587: \bibitem[Fuk06]{Fuk06}
588: Fukazawa, Y., et al. 2006, Proc.SPIE, 6266, 75
589: \bibitem[Gru99]{Gru99}
590: Gruber, D. E., Matteson, J. L., Peterson, L. E., \& Jung, G. V. 1999, \apj, 520, 124
591: \bibitem[Huf92]{Huf92}
592: Hufnagel, B. R., \& Bregman, J. N. 1992, \apj, 386, 473
593: \bibitem[Ino96]{Ino96}
594: Inoue, S., \& Takahara, F. 1996, \apj, 463, 555
595: \bibitem[Kat00]{Kat00}
596: Kataoka, J., et al. 1999, \apj, 514, 138
597: \bibitem[Kat00]{Kat00}
598: Kataoka, J. 2000, Ph.D thesis, Univ. Tokyo (http://www.hp.phys.titech.ac.jp/kataoka/paperJK00-thesis.pdf)
599: \bibitem[Kat00]{Kat00}
600: Kataoka, J., et al. 2000, \apj, 528, 243
601: \bibitem[Kat01]{Kat01}
602: Kataoka, J., et al. 2001, \apj, 560, 659
603: \bibitem[Kir98]{Kir98}
604: Kirk, J.~G., Rieger, F.~M, \& Mastichiadis, A. 1998, \aap, 333, 452
605: \bibitem[Kok07]{Kok07}
606: Kokubun, M. et al. 2007, PASJ, 59, S53
607: \bibitem[Koy07]{Koy07}
608: Koyama, K. et al. 2007, PASJ, 59, S23
609: \bibitem[Mit07]{Mit07}
610: Mitsuda, K. et al. 2007, PASJ, 59, S1
611: %\bibitem[Muk07]{Muk07}
612: %Mukherjee, R. et al. 2007, (astro-ph/0710417v1)
613: \bibitem[Nor96]{Nor96}
614: Norris, J.~P., et al. 1996, \apj, 459, 393
615: \bibitem[Pri01]{Pri01}
616: Primack, J. R., Somerville, E.~S., Bullock, J.~S. \& Devriendt, J.~E.~G.
617: 2001, AIP Conf. Proc., 558, 463
618: \bibitem[Pri05]{Pri05}
619: Primack, J. R., Bullock, J.~S., \& Somerville, E.~S. 2005, AIP Conf. Proc., 745, 23
620: \bibitem[Ser07]{Ser07}
621: Serlemitsos, P. J., et al. 2007, PASJ, 59, S9
622: \bibitem[Ste08]{Ste08}
623: Stefan, R., et al. 2008, in prep
624: \bibitem[Tak96]{Tak96}
625: Takahashi, T. et al. 1996, \apjl, 470, L89
626: \bibitem[Tak00]{Tak00}
627: Takahashi, T. et al. 2000, \apjl, 542, L105
628: \bibitem[Tak07]{Tak07}
629: Takahashi, T. et al. 2007, PASJ, 59, S35
630: \bibitem[Tan01]{Tan01}
631: Tanihata, C. et al. 2001, \apj, 563, 569
632: \bibitem[Ulr97]{Ulr97}
633: Ulrich, M-H., Maraschi, L., \& Urry, C. M. 1997, ARA\&A, 35, 445
634: \bibitem[Urr95]{Urr95}
635: Urry, C. M., \& Padovani, P. 1995, PASP, 107, 803
636: \bibitem[Ver03]{Ver03}
637: Veron-Cetty, M. P. \& Veron, P. 2003, \aap, 412, 339
638: \bibitem[Zha04]{Zha04}
639: Zhang, Y. H., Cagnoni, I., Treves, A., Celotti, A., \& Maraschi, L. 2004, \apj, 605, 98
640: \end{thebibliography}
641:
642: \end{document}
643:
644: %%
645: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
646: