1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 03 Jan 01
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17:
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: \usepackage{emulateapj5} % emulates original format
29: %\topmargin1cm % to accomodate linus-sun differences
30: %\usepackage{natbib}
31:
32: \slugcomment{Draft version
33: from \today, accepted for ApJL}
34:
35: \shorttitle{Outflow driving sources in Orion-KL}
36: \shortauthors{Beuther \& Nissen}
37:
38: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
39: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
40:
41: \begin{document}
42:
43: \title{Identifying the outflow driving sources in Orion-KL}
44:
45: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
46: %% author and affiliation information.
47: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
48: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
49: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
50: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
51:
52: \author{H.~Beuther$^1$ \& H.D. Nissen$^2$}
53: %\affil{Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K\"onigstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany}
54: \altaffiltext{1}{Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K\"onigstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany}
55: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Aarhus, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark}
56: \email{beuther@mpia.de, hdn@phys.au.dk}
57:
58: \begin{abstract}
59: The enigmatic outflows of the Orion-KL region have raised
60: discussions about their potential driving sources for several
61: decades. Here, we present C$^{18}$O(2--1) observations combined from
62: the Submillimeter Array and the IRAM\,30\,m telescope. The molecular
63: gas is associated on large scales with the famous
64: northwest-southeast high-velocity outflow whereas the high-velocity
65: gas on small spatial scales traces back to the recently identified
66: submm source SMA1. Therefore, we infer that SMA1 may host the
67: driving source of this outflow. Based on the previously published
68: thermal and maser SiO data, source {\it I} is the prime candidate to
69: drive the northeast-southwest low-velocity outflow. The source SMA1
70: is peculiar because it is only detected in several submm wavelength
71: bands but neither in the infrared nor cm regime. We discuss that it
72: may be a very young intermediate- to high-mass protostar. The
73: estimated outflow masses are high whereas the dynamical time-scale
74: of the outflow is short of the order $10^3$\,yrs.
75: \end{abstract}
76:
77: \keywords{stars: formation -- stars: early-type -- stars: individual (Orion-KL) -- ISM: jets and outflows }
78:
79: \section{Introduction}
80:
81: The explosive large-scale northwest-southeast outflow in the Orion-KL
82: region is one of the best studied but probably also least understood
83: outflows in the sky. No other region shows that many H$_2$ bow shocks
84: distributed in a fan-like fashion with red- and blue-shifted emission
85: features on both sides of the central region (e.g.,
86: \citealt{schultz1999,nissen2007}). Furthermore, the molecular emission
87: as traced in CO shows extremely broad line-wings up to $>
88: 50$\,km\,s$^{-1}$, but the morphological structure has so far been
89: unclear and difficult to match closely to the H$_2$ outflow (e.g.,
90: \citealt{chernin1996,rodriguez1999}). In addition to this outflow, also
91: known as the high-velocity outflow, there exists a second outflow in
92: the northeast-southwest direction which was first detected by H$_2$O
93: maser emission and which is often labeled as the low-velocity outflow
94: (e.g., \citealt{genzel1981,genzel1989}).
95:
96: The major question is which sources drive the different outflows.
97: While originally the infrared source IRc2 was a suspect, it was soon
98: realized that one of the prime powering sources of the region is the
99: very close-by radio source {\it I} \citep{menten1995}. This source is
100: the site of vibrationally excited SiO maser emission, and the
101: orientation of these masers allowed different interpretations of the
102: associated outflow direction. While early work favored source {\it I}
103: to drive the large-scale northwest-southeast outflow (e.g.,
104: \citealt{wright1995,greenhill1998}), more recent work on the maser
105: data indicates that it rather belongs to the low-velocity
106: northeast-southwest outflow \citep{greenhill2003}. The latter
107: interpretation finds additional support in thermal SiO observations
108: that show an elongated structure centered on source {\it I} with an
109: orientation also in the northeast-southwest
110: (\citealt{blake1996,beuther2005a}, see also Fig.~\ref{sio}). Since
111: thermal SiO emission is usually attributed to shocks within outflows
112: (e.g., \citealt{schilke1997a}), the combination of the thermal and
113: maser SiO emission strongly favors source {\it I} as the driving
114: source of the low-velocity northeast-southwest outflow. Source {\it n}
115: has also been discussed as a possible driving source of the
116: northeast-southwest low-velocity outflow. It shows an elongation along
117: position angle 100--130$^{\circ}$ in the mid-infrared which could be
118: due to a disk \citep{shuping2004,greenhill2004}, and a roughly
119: perpendicular elongation in the radio at 8.4\,GHz which may be caused
120: by an outflow \citep{menten1995}. The relationship between sources
121: {\it I} and {\it n} in driving the northeast-southwest outflow(s) is
122: unknown (for a discussion see, e.g., \citealt{shuping2004,nissen2007}).
123:
124: That leaves as an open question which source is the culprit for
125: driving the large-scale high-velocity northwest-southeast outflow?
126: \citet{bally2008} recently suggested that this outflow may be powered
127: by the dynamical decay of a massive star system, but other scenarios
128: are possible as well. Based on low-resolution data,
129: \citet{devicente2002} proposed the existence of another luminous
130: source approximately $2''$ south of source {\it I}. This source was
131: unambiguously identified in the first sub-arcsecond resolution
132: 865\,$\mu$m submm continuum image obtained with the Submillimeter
133: Array (SMA), and henceforth labeled SMA1 (\citealt{beuther2004g}, see
134: also Fig.~\ref{sio}). Follow-up SMA observations at 440\,$\mu$m
135: detected the source at these shorter wavelengths as well
136: \citep{beuther2006a}. In this work we show that the high-velocity gas,
137: as traced by C$^{18}$O, apparently traces back to this relatively
138: unknown source rather than to sources {\it I} or {\it n}.
139:
140: \section{Observations}
141: \label{obs}
142:
143: Orion-KL was observed with the SMA in the compact configuration
144: simultaneously at 690\,GHz and 230\,GHz on 2005 February 19th. To
145: accomplish the high-frequency observations the weather conditions were
146: excellent with zenith opacities $\tau(230\,\rm{GHz})$ between 0.03 and
147: 0.04 throughout the night. The phase center was the nominal position
148: of source {\it I} R.A.(J2000) 05h35m14.50s and decl.(J2000)
149: 05$^{\circ}22'30.''45$, and the $v_{\rm{lsr}}$ was
150: $\sim$5\,km\,s$^{-1}$. The double-sideband receivers covered the
151: frequency ranges 218.85 to 220.85\,GHz and 228.85 to 230.85\,GHz. The
152: phase was calibrated with regularly interleaved observations of the
153: quasar 0607-157, flux and bandpass calibration were performed with
154: Callisto observations. The high-frequency data along with more
155: observational details are published in \citet{beuther2006a}, here we
156: are only interested in a small subset of the low-frequency data.
157: Complimentary C$^{18}$O(2--1) data were obtained with the 9 pixel HERA
158: array on the IRAM 30\,m telescope in September 2007. The observations
159: covered a region of $1'\times 1'$ around source {\it I} and were
160: conducted in the on-the-fly mode with on-source integration times per
161: position of $\sim$3.7\,secs. The OFF-source reference position was
162: $15'$ east of source {\it I}. The single-dish data were converted to
163: visibilities and subsequently processed with the SMA data within the
164: MIRIAD package using standard tools (e.g., UVMODEL). The weighting of
165: the two datasets was chosen to recover large-scale emission but
166: maintain at the same time the high spatial resolution to resolve
167: small-scale structure. The synthesized beam of the combined data is
168: $4.2''\times 3.3''$, and the $1\sigma$ rms per 5\,km\,s$^{-1}$ channel
169: is $\sim$50\,mJy\,beam$^{-1}$.
170:
171: \section{Results}
172: \label{results}
173:
174: The whole low-frequency SMA dataset will be presented in a forthcoming
175: publication by Nissen et al.~(in prep.), here we are only interested
176: in the C$^{18}$O(2--1) emission. Although the SMA and IRAM\,30\,m
177: observations also covered the more abundant isotopologues
178: $^{12}$CO(2--1) and $^{13}$CO(2--1), in Orion-KL it turns out that
179: because of their high optical depth these two lines strongly suffer
180: from confusion problems with the ambient cloud complicating any
181: interpretation of the data. In contrast to that, the rarer
182: isotopologue C$^{18}$O(2--1) penetrates the ambient cloud more deeply
183: and hence traces the outflow associated gas far better, allowing us a
184: deeper analysis of the outflow structure, its mass flow rate,
185: kinematics and energetics, as well as pinpointing the likely driving
186: source. Fig.~\ref{channel} presents the combined SMA+30\,m
187: C$^{18}$O(2--1) channel map. Excluding the channels with strongest
188: emission closest to the $v_{\rm{lsr}}$ (approximately four channels
189: between 0 and 15\,km\,s$^{-1}$), two main features can be
190: distinguished in the remaining channels:
191:
192: (1) The large-scale gas emission exhibits a V-shaped cone-like open
193: structure to the northwest, particularly prominent in the red-shifted
194: channels $\geq 20$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ but also visible in the blue-shifted
195: channels between $-20$ and $-10$\,km\,s$^{-1}$. This cone-like
196: structure approximately encompasses the main features of shocked
197: strong H$_2$ emission in this direction (Fig.~\ref{c18o_h2}). Finding
198: both blue- and red-shifted gas to the northwest indicates a wide
199: opening angle of the flow where the main outflow axis is not too far
200: from the plane of the sky. The less pronounced emission to the
201: southeast was already previously observed, and \citet{chernin1996}
202: argue that the outflow may be blocked in this direction by the hot
203: core\footnote{The hot core traced in NH$_3$ \citep{wilson2000}
204: actually extends further southeast of SMA1 than indicated by the hot
205: core continuum peak in Fig.~\ref{sio}. The proposed blocking of the
206: outflow by the hot core may also be responsible for some of the
207: large-scale asymmetries of the H$_2$ emission.}. It is interesting to
208: note that the main southeastern emission features are well correlated
209: with a lack of H$_2$ emission indicating particularly high column
210: densities in this direction. Furthermore, we find high-velocity gas
211: toward the southwest and northeast (Fig.~\ref{c18o_h2}). Since
212: \citet{nissen2007} find H$_2$ emission with velocities up to
213: 40\,km\,s$^{-1}$ toward the southwest as well, it is likely that this
214: high-velocity gas is associated with the low-velocity outflow.
215:
216: (2) We find that the high-velocity gas on the blue- and red-shifted
217: side of the spectrum traces back to the source SMA1. Although the
218: synthesized beam is larger than the spatial separation of source {\it
219: I} and SMA1 ($\sim 2''$or $\sim$830\,AU), the peak positions can be
220: determined with a much higher spatial accuracy depending on the
221: signal-to-noise ratio S/N. For point sources, one can in principle
222: achieve an accuracy of 0.45\,HPBW/(S/N) \citep{reid1988}, however,
223: this may be less applicable for extended emission like C$^{18}$O in
224: this case. The channel with the lowest S/N ratio still detects the
225: main peak position toward SMA1 at higher than $15\sigma$ values (at
226: $-30$\,km\,s$^{-1}$). For a point source, this would imply that the
227: peak positions could be determined to better than $0.125''$. Although
228: the C$^{18}$O emission is more extended, the shape of the
229: high-velocity gas close to SMA1 can to first order be described by a
230: two-dimensional Gaussian. Therefore, being more conservative for the
231: C$^{18}$O high-velocity gas, it should still be possible to infer the
232: emission peak positions to an accuracy of better than $1''$. Based on
233: this, the blue- and red-shifted high-velocity gas is spatially mainly
234: associated with SMA1, and not with the previously often discussed
235: sources {\it I} or {\it n}.
236:
237: The blue- and red-shifted maps shown in Figure \ref{c18o_h2}
238: (integrated from $-35$ to $-20$ and from 22.5 to 37.5\,km\,s$^{-1}$,
239: respectively) can be used to calculate the masses, kinematic and
240: energetic parameters of the outflow following \citet{beuther2002b}
241: (time-scale $t$, outflow rate $\dot{M}_{\rm{out}}$, momentum rate $p$,
242: and energy $E$). Assuming optically thin C$^{18}$O(2--1) emission at
243: 30\,K with a C$^{18}$O/H$_2$ conversion factor of $1.7\times 10^{-7}$
244: \citep{frerking1982}, the derived values are given in Table
245: \ref{parameters}. While the masses have uncertainties of
246: approximately a factor 5, the kinematic and energetic values are
247: uncertain within an order of magnitude \citep{cabrit1990}. The derived
248: masses, outflow and momentum rates are at the upper end of typically
249: found massive outflows, whereas the time-scale is relatively short
250: (compared with the outflow sample in \citealt{beuther2002b}).
251:
252: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}
253:
254: The large-scale cone-like morphology of the C$^{18}$O outflow
255: approximately following the H$_2$ bow-shock emission in the northwest
256: direction suggests that C$^{18}$O and H$_2$ are tracing the same
257: outflow. Furthermore, the spatial association of the C$^{18}$O
258: high-velocity emission with the submm source SMA1 indicates that SMA1
259: may harbor the driving source of the enigmatic large-scale Orion-KL
260: outflow. Only the combination of the single-dish 30\,m data, tracing
261: the large-scale structure, with the SMA high-spatial-resolution
262: observations allows us to see all relevant structures and to trace the
263: outflow back to pinpoint its origin.
264:
265: In combination with the thermal and maser SiO data, we suggest that
266: the two driving sources of the two known outflows can be identified:
267: (1) SMA1 may host the driving source of the large-scale
268: northwest-southeast high-velocity outflow, whereas (2) source {\it I}
269: is likely the origin of the northeast-southwest low-velocity outflow.
270:
271: The nature of source {\it I} has been subject to many investigations
272: for more than a decade (e.g.,
273: \citealt{menten1995,beuther2006a,reid2007}), however, we do not know
274: much about SMA1. So far SMA1 has only been detected at submm
275: wavelengths (865 and 440\,$\mu$m, \citealt{beuther2004g,beuther2006a})
276: but neither at shorter infrared nor at longer cm wavelengths (e.g.,
277: \citealt{menten1995,greenhill2004}). The submm-only detection is
278: indicative of a very young age of the source which is supported by the
279: short dynamical time-scale of the molecular outflow. Although deriving
280: a luminosity with just two data-points is impossible, based on the
281: large outflow masses, it is likely that SMA1 is in the process of
282: forming a massive star. The non-detection at cm wavelengths could
283: either be due to quenching of an underlying hypercompact H{\sc ii}
284: region by very high accretion rates and/or gravitational trapping of
285: the ionized gas (e.g., \citealt{walmsley1995,keto2003}), or the source
286: is still in such a young evolutionary phase that the central object
287: has not yet enough ionizing flux to produce a detectable hypercompact
288: H{\sc ii} region. In the framework of the recently proposed
289: evolutionary sequence by \citet{beuther2006b}, it may be an
290: intermediate-mass protostar destined to become massive in the future.
291:
292: Assuming optically thin dust emission at 100\,K with a dust opacity
293: index $\beta =2$ (e.g., \citealt{hildebrand1983,beuther2002a}), the
294: spatially resolved submm fluxes \citep{beuther2004g,beuther2006a}
295: correspond to a gas mass and column density of $\sim$0.1\,M$_{\odot}$
296: and $3\times 10^{24}$, respectively. While the large column densities
297: confirm that this source is undetectable at near-infrared wavelengths
298: with current instrumentation, at first sight the mass appears small.
299: However, as discussed in \citep{beuther2004g}, more than 90\% of the
300: total flux is filtered out by the SMA observations, and hence the
301: mass estimates are correspondingly unreliable. The total luminosity
302: of the region of about $10^5$\,L$_{\odot}$ (e.g.,
303: \citealt{menten1995}) cannot be produced by the sources previously
304: discussed in the literature (e.g., \citealt{greenhill2004}), and it is
305: well possible that SMA1 contributes a significant fraction of the
306: overall Orion-KL luminosity.
307:
308: We note that the short dynamical outflow time-scale of the order
309: $10^3$\,yrs is consistent with both recently discussed scenarios for
310: the proper motions in this region: \citet{tan2005} proposed that
311: the recent passage of the BN-object has triggered the outflow burst in
312: this region, whereas \citet{rodriguez2005} and \citet{gomez2005}
313: suggest that a dynamically decaying multiple system is at the root of
314: the observed proper motions. Both events are suggested to have taken
315: place about 500\,yrs ago. Our data do not allow to differentiate
316: between these scenarios, however, it is interesting that all recent
317: observations are indicative of strong activity within the last
318: $10^3$\,yrs.
319:
320:
321: \acknowledgments{H.B. acknowledges financial support by the
322: Emmy-Noether-Programm of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG,
323: grant BE2578). H.D.N. acknowledges the support of the Aarhus Centre
324: for Atomic Physics (ACAP), funded by the Danish Basic Research
325: Foundation and the financial support from the Instrument Centre for
326: Danish Astrophysics (IDA), funded by the Danish National Science
327: Committee (FNU). }
328:
329: %%%%%%%%%% to create the bibliography
330: %\bibliography{/home/beuther/tex/bibliography}
331: %\bibliography{/Users/henrikbeuther/paper/bibliography}
332: %\bibliographystyle{aa} % this does the style, aa.bst necessary
333: \input{ms.bbl}
334:
335: \clearpage
336:
337: \begin{table}[ht]
338: \caption{Outflow parameter}
339: \begin{tabular}{lr}
340: \hline
341: $M_{\rm{blue}}$ [M$_{\odot}$] & 33 \\
342: $M_{\rm{red}}$ [M$_{\odot}$] & 81 \\
343: $M_{\rm{total}}$ [M$_{\odot}$] & 124 \\
344: $t$ [yr] & 971 \\
345: $\dot{M}_{\rm{out}}$ [M$_{\odot}$\,yr$^{-1}$] & $1.2\times 10^{-1}$ \\
346: $p$ [M$_{\odot}$\,km\,s$^{-1}$] & 3980 \\
347: $E$ [erg] & $1.4\times 10^{48}$ \\
348: \hline
349: \end{tabular}
350: \label{parameters}
351: \end{table}
352:
353: \clearpage
354:
355: \begin{figure}
356: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.48\textwidth]{f1.eps}\\
357: \caption{SiO(8--7) integrated emission as contour overlay on the
358: grey-scale 865\,$\mu$m submm continuum emission obtained with the
359: SMA. This figure is an adaption of the 865\,$\mu$m continuum and
360: SiO(8--7) line data from \citet{beuther2004g,beuther2005a}. The
361: grey-scale continuum contours start at the $3\sigma$ level of
362: 0.105\,mJy\,beam$^{-1}$ and continues in $2\sigma$ steps. The SiO
363: emission is contoured from $\pm$10 to $\pm$90\% (step $\pm$10\%) of
364: the peak emission of 2.1\,Jy\,beam$^{-1}$ with full and dashed
365: contours as positive and negative features (due to missing short
366: spacings), respectively.}
367: \label{sio}
368: \end{figure}
369:
370: \begin{figure*}
371: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.98\textwidth]{f2.eps}\\
372: \caption{C$^{18}$O(2--1) channel map with 5\,km\,s$^{-1}$ of the
373: combined SMA+30m data. The contours start at the $3\sigma$ levels of
374: 150\,mJy\,beam$^{-1}$ and continue in $6\sigma$ steps for all panels
375: except of the 0, 5 and 10\,km\,s$^{-1}$ panels that follow 12, 12
376: and $14\sigma$ steps for clarity reasons. Negative features are draw
377: as dashed contours. The stars mark the positions of the five main
378: continuum source with labels in the top-left panel. The synthesized
379: beam is shown at the bottom-left of each panel.}
380: \label{channel}
381: \end{figure*}
382:
383:
384: \begin{figure*}
385: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.98\textwidth]{f3.eps}\\
386: \caption{Overlay of the H$_2$ emission in grey-scale
387: \citep{nissen2007} with the blue- and red-shifted C$^{18}$O(2--1)
388: emission in color-contours. The integration ranges are
389: [$-$35.0/$-$20.0] and [22.5,37.5]\,km\,s$^{-1}$, respectively. The
390: contours are in $3\sigma$ steps of 150\,mJy\,beam$^{-1}$. The stars
391: mark the positions of the same continuum sources as in Figure
392: \ref{channel}, the synthesized beam is shown at the top-right of
393: each panel. The large circle in the left panel shows the size of
394: the SMA primary beam, whereas the squared box marks the size of the
395: inlay-box shown in the right panel. The outflow directions of the
396: high- and low-velocity outflow are sketched in the left panel.}
397: \label{c18o_h2}
398: \end{figure*}
399:
400: \end{document}
401:
402:
403: