1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \def\deg{$^{\circ}~$}
3: \newcommand{\tnm}{\tablenotemark}
4: \newcommand{\tnt}{\tablenotetext}
5: \newcommand{\ks}{$K_{\rm s}$}
6: \newcommand{\ai}{$A_I$}
7: \newcommand{\av}{$A_V$}
8: \newcommand{\cf}{{\rm cf.}}
9: \newcommand{\eg}{{\it e.g.}}
10: \newcommand{\etal}{et~al.}
11: \newcommand{\ic}{$I_{\rm C}$}
12: \newcommand{\icks}{$I_{\rm C}-K_{\rm s}$}
13: \newcommand{\ie}{{\it i.e.}}
14: \newcommand{\lbol}{$L_{\rm bol}$}
15: \newcommand{\lsun}{$L_{\sun}$}
16: \newcommand{\lx}{$L_{\rm x}$}
17: \newcommand{\mdot}{$\dot{M}$}
18: \newcommand{\msun}{M$_{\sun}$}
19: \newcommand{\rsun}{R$_{\sun}$}
20: \newcommand{\teff}{$T_{\rm eff}$}
21: \newcommand{\uv}{$U-V$}
22: \newcommand{\vi}{$V-I$}
23: \newcommand{\vsini}{$v \sin i$}
24: \newcommand{\mum}{$\mu$m}
25:
26: \shorttitle{Spitzer Observations of Eta Cha Association}
27: \shortauthors{T. N. Gautier et al.}
28:
29: \begin{document}
30:
31: \title{Spitzer--MIPS Observations of the $\eta$ Cha Young Association}
32:
33: %\slugcomment{Final version following comments of 1 sept}
34:
35: \author{Thomas. N. Gautier III\altaffilmark{1,2},
36: L.M. Rebull\altaffilmark{3},
37: K.R. Stapelfeldt\altaffilmark{1} and
38: A. Mainzer\altaffilmark{1}}
39:
40:
41: \altaffiltext{1}{Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of
42: Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA}
43: \altaffiltext{2}{email: tngautier@jpl.nasa.gov}
44: \altaffiltext{3}{Spitzer Science Center, 1200 E. California Blvd,
45: Pasadena, CA 91125 USA}
46:
47: \begin{abstract}
48:
49: We have mapped the $\eta$ Chamaeleontis young stellar association
50: in the far-infrared with the Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer
51: (MIPS) on the Spitzer Space Telescope. All sixteen members
52: within the map region were detected at 24 \mum, along with five members
53: at 70 \mum\ and two at 160 \mum. Ten stars show far-infrared excess
54: emission indicating the presence of circumstellar disks; six of these
55: have central clearings as evidenced by the onset of excess emission
56: at $\lambda>$ 5 \mum. No new infrared excess sources are identified
57: among the 113 2MASS field stars with 24 \mum\ photometry but not seen as
58: X-ray sources, indicating
59: that membership lists derived from X-ray surveys are reasonably complete.
60: Circumstellar disks in the $\eta$ Cha association span the range from
61: 10$^{-1}$ to 10$^{-4}$ in their fractional infrared luminosity, with a median
62: L$_d$/L$_*$ of 0.04. The presence of optically thick, optically thin,
63: and intermediate optical depth disks within the same stellar group, in
64: combination with the large fraction of disks with inner holes, indicates
65: that the $\eta$ Cha association represents a crucial stage in circumstellar
66: disk evolution.
67:
68: \end{abstract}
69:
70: \keywords{Infrared: stars -- stars: circumstellar matter -- stars: pre-main
71: sequence -- open clusters and associations: individual ($\eta$ Chamaeleontis)
72: -- planetary systems}
73:
74: \section{Introduction}
75: \label{intro}
76:
77: The young stellar association around the B8V star $\eta$
78: Chamaeleontis (HD 75416; IRAS F08430-7846) presents an excellent
79: opportunity to study the early evolution of circumstellar disks which
80: may form planetary systems. The association was discovered by
81: \citet{mama99}, and lies at a distance of 97 pc. Age estimates from
82: comparison with stellar evolution models range from 4 to 15 Myr with
83: more recent values averaging about 8 Myr (\cite{mama99,ls04, lyo04}).
84: \citet{ls04} lists 18 association members, including a late-age
85: classical T Tauri star \citep{law02}. Other members show weak
86: H$\alpha$ emission, some with evidence for continuing accretion
87: \citep{law04}. A deficit of wide binaries was noted in the
88: association by \cite{bran06}. Three members (including $\eta$ Cha
89: itself) have 25 \mum\ excess indicated by the IRAS Faint Source
90: Survey (Moshir 1992); two of these were found to have $L$ band excess
91: by \cite{hach05}. The $\eta$ Cha association has already been the
92: target of two studies with the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}.
93: \citet{meg05} targeted 17 members with the Infrared Arrary Camera
94: (IRAC), and found six members with 8 \mum\ excess. \cite{bou06} used
95: the Infrared Spectrograph (IRS) to measure the 15 late type members
96: from 8-33 \mum, reporting excess in 8 objects.
97:
98: In order to probe the outer regions of these disks beyond the ``snow line''
99: where giant planets might potentially form, observations at longer infrared
100: wavelengths are needed. Far-infrared observations are also crucial to inform
101: comparisons between disk properties in $\eta$ Cha and the debris disks of
102: older field stars (which are primarily manifest at $\lambda\ge$ 60 \mum.)
103: Spitzer's far infrared camera MIPS (Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer;
104: \cite{rieke04}) provides unprecedented sensitivity in this wavelength region.
105: In this contribution, we report the MIPS results for $\eta$ Cha.
106:
107: \section{Observations}
108: \label{obs}
109:
110: Spitzer/MIPS was was used to map a $0.5\arcdeg\times0.5\arcdeg$
111: region covering most of the known members of the $\eta$ Cha
112: association. A ``medium scan'' map with half-array cross-scan
113: offsets provided total integration times of 80 sec, 40 sec, and 8 sec
114: throughout the mapped area at 24, 70, and 160 \mum, respectively. The
115: observations were carried out on 2005 April 08 (2.6 hr duration starting at
116: JD2453469.11412) under Spitzer program \#100, Spitzer AORKEY 4938752.
117: Our complete 24 \mum\ map appears in Figure~\ref{map_fig}.
118: \clearpage
119: \begin{figure}
120: \epsscale{1.0}
121: %\plotone{f1.pdf}
122: \plotone{f1.eps}
123: \caption{
124: MIPS 24 \mum\ map of the $\eta$ Cha association with various
125: sources marked. The scan width (upper left to lower right) is
126: approximately 0.5\deg. North is up, east to the left.
127: \label{map_fig}}
128: \end{figure}
129: \clearpage
130:
131: Table~\ref{tab:data} presents photometry of the $\eta$ Cha association
132: members as well as upper limits for undetected sources. Note that the
133: ECHA source numbers correspond to the source ID numbers given in
134: \citet{ls04}. ROSAT Eta Cha X-ray (RECX) numbers also correspond for
135: objects 1-12. The objects known by ECHA numbers 17 and 18 were not
136: measured as they are off the edge of our map.
137:
138: The 24 \mum\ data were reduced starting from the standard Spitzer
139: Science Center (SSC) pipeline-produced basic calibrated data (BCD),
140: version S13.2. \citep[See][for a description of the pipeline.]{gor05}
141: The BCDs suffered from low-level cosmetic defects which were removed
142: by self-flattening the data as described in the MIPS Data Handbook.
143: The MOPEX software package \citep{mak05} was used to re-mosaic the BCDs
144: at a pixel scale of 2.5\arcsec\ per pixel, very close to the native
145: pixel scale, and to obtain PSF-fitted source extractions. Seven hundred fifteen
146: sources with SNR $>3$ were extracted from the 24 \mum\ scan map.
147: Of the 715 sources, 129 have 2MASS counterparts. All 16 known
148: association members that fell within our map were
149: detected. The systematic uncertainty in the 24 \mum\ zero-point
150: is estimated to be 4\% \citep{chad07}. The formal $1\sigma$ statistical
151: uncertainties are reported in Table~\ref{tab:data}. An additional assessment
152: of our measurement uncertainty appears in \S\ref{kkm24sec}.
153:
154: For 70 \mum, we started with the filtered BCDs for which
155: an automated attempt has been made to remove instrumental
156: signatures. MOPEX was used to mosaic the BCDs at a pixel scale
157: of 4\arcsec, about half of the native scale, and to do PSF-fitted
158: source extraction. Here again, the $1\sigma$ statistical uncertainties are reported in
159: Table~\ref{tab:data}. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 10\%
160: \citep{gor07}. About 40 sources with SNR $>3$ were extracted at 70 \mum,
161: 21 with 2MASS counterparts. Five of the known association members were
162: detected; upper limits for the remaining observed association members
163: were obtained via an examination of the scatter in the background at the
164: expected location of the source \citep[following][]{bpmgp}. Those
165: 3-$\sigma$ upper limits appear in Table~\ref{tab:data}. ECHA 16, which
166: was observed in the 24 \mum\ map, was just off the edge of the 70 \mum\
167: map, so no measurement was obtained for this object.
168:
169: For 160 \mum\ we followed \citet{bpmgp} starting with the raw BCDs,
170: but using the MIPS Data Analysis Tool (DAT) software (version 3.06;
171: Gordon \etal\ 2005) for the final data reduction. At 160 \mum\ the map
172: was measured only at the locations of known association members. Two
173: members were detected. The MIPS 160 \mum\
174: array suffers from a spectral leak that allows near-IR radiation to
175: produce a ghost image adjacent to the true 160 micron source image for
176: stellar temperature, roughly Rayleigh-Jeans, sources brighter than
177: $J\sim5.5$. None of the $\eta$ Cha members are as bright as this
178: limit, so no correction for leak images was needed. Three-$\sigma$
179: upper limits for undetected members were obtained as in \citet{bpmgp}
180: and are given in Table~\ref{tab:data}.
181:
182: We compiled optical and NIR photometry for the known members
183: from the literature, primarily 2MASS \citep{2mass} and
184: \citet{ls04} for shorter wavelengths. For longer wavelengths we used
185: the IRAC photometry as reported by \citet{meg05} for the known members
186: and IRS photometry reported by \citet{bou06} at 13 and 33 \mum.
187: For the known cluster members, spectral types are available in
188: the literature. These spectral types were used to select a stellar
189: photosphere model spectrum from the closest corresponding Kurucz-Lejeune
190: model \citep{lej97}, which was then normalized to each object's flux
191: density at \ks, except for ECHA 11 which was normalized at J (see
192: section \ref{irxs}). No further manipulation of the spectral fit was made.
193: In particular no redding corrections were required, consistent with the
194: results of \citet{ls04} and \citet{lyo04}. The normalized photosphere models
195: were used to predict the photospheric flux density at 24, 70, and 160 \mum\
196: that are presented in Table~\ref{tab:data}.
197:
198: In order to band-merge across wavelengths from optical to 160 \mum, we
199: matched the central positions derived from photometry of each source
200: to the expected position of each known association member. Since the
201: source density in this field is not high, spurious source matches are
202: relatively unlikely. IRAC and 2MASS positions were matched within 1
203: arcsecond to the MIPS-24 position, and within 2 arcseconds to the
204: MIPS-70 position. Photometry for 160 \mum\ was done by hand at the
205: position of the association member.
206:
207: Note that the MIPS spatial resolution ($\sim6\arcsec$,
208: $\sim18\arcsec$, and $\sim40\arcsec$ for 24, 70, and 160 \mum,
209: respectively) is poor compared to most optical surveys, so source
210: confusion is in theory a concern. In practice, this is a sparse
211: enough association that source confusion among members is not a
212: concern. The chances of a random alignment of a background galaxy on
213: top of a known association member are not large given the intense scrutiny
214: (including spectroscopy and deep and/or high-spatial-resolution
215: observations) of these association members to this point \citep[see,
216: e.g.,][]{lyo06}.
217:
218: \clearpage
219: \thispagestyle{empty}
220: \begin{deluxetable}{clllrclclcl}
221: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
222: \rotate
223: \tablecaption{MIPS Photometry vs. Predicted Photospheric Emission
224: for the $\eta$ Cha Association \label{tab:data}}
225: \tablewidth{0pt}
226: \tablehead{
227: \colhead{ECHA} & \colhead{name} & \colhead{2MASS ID }& \colhead{Spectral} &
228: \colhead{pred.\ 24 \mum}&
229: \colhead{meas.\ 24 \mum}& \colhead{pred.\ 70 \mum}&
230: \colhead{meas.\ 70 \mum}& \colhead{pred.\ 160 \mum}&
231: \colhead{meas.\ 160 \mum}& \colhead{L$_{IR excess}$/L$_{star}$}\\
232: \colhead{number}& & & \colhead{Type\tnm{1}} & \colhead{(mJy)}&\colhead{(mJy)}& \colhead{(mJy)}
233: &\colhead{(mJy)}&\colhead{(mJy)}&\colhead{(mJy)}}
234: \startdata
235: %name alt name 2mass name spty pred24 meas 24 pred70 meas 70 pred160 meas 160 L/Lstar
236: 01& EG Cha &08365623-7856454& K6, K7.0\tnm{2}& 10.21& 10.11 $\pm$0.04& 1.2& $<$ 16 &0.23& $<$ 121 &\dots\\
237: 02& $\eta$ Cha &08411947-7857481& B8 & 34.54& 113.30 $\pm$0.07& 4.0& 31.1 $\pm$ 0.1&0.74& $<$ 270 & $9\times10^{-5}$ \\
238: 03& EH Cha &08413703-7903304& M3.25 & 1.82& 2.23 $\pm$0.04& 0.2& $<$ 19 &0.04& $<$ 133 & $\sim10^{-6}$\\
239: 04& EI Cha &08422372-7904030& M1.75 & 3.91& 5.37 $\pm$0.04& 0.5& $<$ 17 &0.09& $<$ 127 & 0.0003\\
240: 05& EK Cha &08422710-7857479& M4 & 1.27& 57.74 $\pm$0.07& 0.2& 94.8 $\pm$ 0.2&0.03& 165 $\pm$ 48 & 0.06\\
241: 06& EL Cha &08423879-7854427& M3 & 2.04& 1.86 $\pm$0.04& 0.3& $<$ 16 &0.05& $<$ 228 & \ldots \\
242: 07& EM Cha &08430723-7904524& K6, K6.9\tnm{2}& 7.77& 7.20 $\pm$0.04& 0.9& $<$ 23 &0.17& $<$ 135 & \ldots \\
243: 08& RS Cha AB &08431222-7904123& A7 & 32.61& 44.86 $\pm$0.06& 3.8& $<$ 17 &0.71& $<$ 195 & \ldots \\
244: 09& EN Cha &08441637-7859080& M4.5 & 2.05& 43.80 $\pm$0.07& 0.3& 50.8 $\pm$ 0.2&0.05& $<$ 133 & 0.04 \\
245: 10& EO Cha &08443188-7846311& M1 & 3.40& 2.81 $\pm$0.04& 0.4& $<$ 17 &0.08& $<$ 180 & \ldots \\
246: 11& EP Cha &08470165-7859345& K5.5, K6.5\tnm{2}& 7.14& 198.20 $\pm$0.09& 0.8& 184.7 $\pm$ 0.2&0.16& 208 $\pm$ 48 & 0.04\\
247: 12& EQ Cha &08475676-7854532& M3.25 & 4.59& 4.33 $\pm$0.05& 0.6& $<$ 19 &0.11& $<$ 122 & \ldots\\
248: 13& HD 75505 &08414471-7902531& A1 & 11.92& 10.41 $\pm$0.04& 1.4& $<$ 18 &0.26& $<$ 137 & \ldots \\
249: 14& ES Cha, ECHA J0841.5-7853 &08413030-7853064& M4.75 & 0.45& 8.63 $\pm$0.04& 0.1& $<$ 17 &0.01& $<$ 173 & 0.04 \\
250: 15& ET Cha, ECHA J0843.3-7905 &08431857-7905181& M3.25 & 1.79& 232.50 $\pm$0.11& 0.2& 173.3 $\pm$ 0.3&0.04& $<$ 121 & 0.19\\
251: 16& ECHA J0844.2-7833 &08440914-7833457& M5.75 & 0.25& 8.68 $\pm$0.08&0.03& \ldots &0.01& \ldots & 0.04\\
252: \enddata
253: \tnt{1}{Spectral types from \citet{ls04} except as explained in note 2}
254: \tnt{2}{Spectral types from \citet{lyo04} used for improved model fits as explained in section \ref{irxs}}
255: \end{deluxetable}
256:
257: \clearpage
258:
259: \begin{figure}
260: \epsscale{1.0}
261: %\plotone{f2.pdf}
262: \plotone{f2.eps}
263: \caption{
264: \ks\ magnitude vs.\ \ks$-$[24] color for all 153 MIPS-24 sources detected
265: in our map with 2MASS \ks\ counterparts. The known members are indicated
266: by a '+' sign within the circular symbol. Extragalactic objects are clustered
267: in the clump at the lower right and stars without 24 \mum\ excesses lie in the
268: vertical grouping at \ks$-[24]\sim$0 from \ks$\sim$6-11.
269: \label{kk24}}
270: \end{figure}
271:
272: \clearpage
273:
274: \section{Results}
275:
276: We analyzed the \ks$-$[24] and \ks$-$[70] colors of our sources and compared
277: the observed spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of the known association members
278: with model photospheric spectra to look for signs of infrared excess.
279:
280: \subsection{\ks\ vs.\ \ks$-$[24]}
281: \label{kkm24sec}
282:
283: Fig.~\ref{kk24} shows the \ks\ vs.\ \ks$-$[24] diagram for the 129
284: objects we detected at 24 \mum\ with \ks\ counterparts in 2MASS.
285: In this figure most stellar photospheres are near
286: \ks$-$[24]$\sim$0 and the clump of objects at the lower right are
287: likely galaxies. Six of the known $\eta$ Cha members fall in
288: the upper right of this diagram, showing strong 24 \mum\ excess:
289: ECHA 05, 09, 11, 14, 15, and 16. $\eta$ Cha itself (ECHA 02) has
290: a clear excess. Nine other members fall in or just redward of
291: the ``photospheric'' strip in the \ks\ vs.\ \ks$-$[24] diagram.
292: This red trend is not due to observational errors. We examined the scatter
293: in \ks$-$[24] for stars with good measured S/N at 24 \mum\
294: corresponding to \ks$\lesssim$10. Among the 46 stars that are not
295: known members, \ks$<$10, and \ks$-[24]<$0.5, the mean \ks$-$[24]
296: color is 0.016$\pm$0.098 mag. We take this to indicate that
297: our measurement error in the color is $\sim$0.1 mag. Therefore,
298: the majority of known members just redward of the photospheric
299: strip have clearly non-zero \ks$-$[24] colors.
300:
301: \clearpage
302: \begin{figure}
303: \epsscale{1.0}
304: %\plotone{f3.pdf}
305: \plotone{f3.eps}
306: \caption{
307: \ks$-$[24] vs.\ spectral type for all $\eta$ Cha association members;
308: members that are 24 $\mu$m excess candidates are labeled by their ECHA number.
309: The solid line represents the locus of stellar photospheric colors
310: determined from a study of nearby stars by \citep{gaut07}.
311: \label{spty}}
312: \end{figure}
313: \clearpage
314:
315: To understand whether these nine association members near the
316: photospheric strip have infrared excess
317: it is necessary to take into account the spectral types of the
318: individual objects. While the \ks$-$[24] color is near zero
319: for most stellar photospheres, it becomes non-zero and varies
320: with spectral type among M stars \citep{gaut07}. Since many of our
321: objects are of spectral type M this effect is important.
322: Figure~\ref{spty} plots \ks$-$[24] vs.\ spectral type for all
323: association members. The locus of luminosity class V photospheres
324: was obtained from \citet{lang91} for types A to K5 and from \citet{gaut07}
325: (and references therein) for K6 through M9. The strong excess sources
326: are still obvious at the top right of the diagram.
327:
328: Six of the nine association members fall on the locus of photospheric
329: \ks$-$[24] colors and thus do not possess infrared excess. However,
330: three objects (ECHA 03, 04, and 08) show a clear infrared excess.
331: Their \ks$-$[24] uncertainty combined with the dispersion of normal dwarf
332: stars about the plotted locus places ECHA 03 about $5\sigma$ away and
333: ECHA 04 and 08 about $8\sigma$ away from the photospheric locus. Their observed
334: 24 \mum\ flux densities are 1.23, 1.37, and 1.38 times greater than
335: expected for their spectral type based on our model spectra
336: (see Table~\ref{tab:data}).
337:
338: In our large $0.5\arcdeg\times0.5\arcdeg$ survey field, the possibility
339: exists that previously unrecognized members of the $\eta$ Cha association
340: might be revealed as stars with \ks$-$[24] excess. Figure~\ref{kk24}
341: shows that no obvious new candidates are detected. While objects in
342: the clump of likely galaxies have \ks$-$[24] colors comparable to other
343: $\eta$ Cha members with excess, all are fainter than \ks$\sim$13 and thus
344: unlikely to be stars at a distance of 100 pc. This result is consistent
345: with recent deep imaging and spectroscopic studies of the region that have
346: also failed to identify additional members \citep[see, e.g.,][]{lyo06}.
347:
348: \clearpage
349: \begin{figure}
350: \epsscale{1.0}
351: %\plotone{f4.pdf}
352: \plotone{f4.eps}
353: \caption{
354: \ks\ magnitude vs. \ks$-$[70] color for all 21 MIPS-70 sources with
355: 2MASS \ks\ counterparts. The known members have an additional embedded
356: + sign within the circular symbol. Extragalactic objects are clustered in
357: the clump at the lower right and stars without 70 \mum\ excesses would
358: lie near \ks$-[70]\sim$0, were any detected. Most of the association
359: members are undetected at 70 microns, with upper limits to their
360: \ks$-$[70] color indicated by leftward pointing arrows.
361: \label{kk70}}
362: \end{figure}
363: \clearpage
364:
365: \subsection{\ks\ vs.\ \ks$-$[70] and 160 \mum}
366:
367: Figure~\ref{kk70} shows the \ks\ vs.\ \ks$-$[70] diagram for the 21
368: objects detected at 70 \mum\ that have \ks\ counterparts in 2MASS.
369: As in Figure~\ref{kk24}, the clump of objects at the lower
370: right are likely galaxies. Our observations were not sensitive
371: enough to detect stellar photospheres at the distance of $\eta$ Cha,
372: and thus most of the members are not detected (upper limits are shown
373: as arrows). However, five stars show strong 70 \mum\ excess:
374: ECHA 2, 5, 9, 11, and 15. All five also have 24 \mum\ excess.
375: Our 160 \mum\ observations were also not sensitive enough to detect
376: stellar photospheres so the two stars detected, ECHA 5 and 11, show 160
377: \mum\ excess.
378:
379: \clearpage
380: \begin{figure}
381: \epsscale{0.9}
382: %\plotone{f5.pdf}
383: \plotone{f5.eps}
384: \caption{
385: SEDs of the known members of the $\eta$
386: Cha association. The $x$-axis is log of the wavelength in microns; the
387: $y$-axis is log of $\lambda F_{\lambda}$ in cgs units. Diamonds are points from
388: the literature; circles are MIPS points where upper limits are indicated by
389: downward-pointing arrows. For ECHA 11, additional IRAS PSC points are
390: given (grey squares) for comparison. For each source, a model
391: representing the stellar photospheric emission is shown as a solid
392: line.
393: \label{sed_fig1}}
394: \end{figure}
395:
396: \begin{figure}
397: \epsscale{0.9}
398: %\plotone{f6.pdf}
399: \plotone{f6.eps}
400: \caption{SEDs of the known members of the $\eta$ Cha association, continued.
401: \label{sed_fig2}}
402: \end{figure}
403: \clearpage
404:
405: \subsection{Infrared Excesses of $\eta$ Cha Members}
406: \label{irxs}
407:
408: Figures~\ref{sed_fig1} and \ref{sed_fig2} present the spectral energy
409: distributions (SEDs) for all of the known members of the $\eta$ Cha
410: Association covered by our MIPS map. Spectral types from Table \ref{tab:data}
411: were used to select the model spectra as described in section \ref{obs}.
412: The spectral types from \citet{lyo04} were
413: used for the K type stars, ECHA 1, 7 and 11, as models of the \citet{ls04}
414: types are clearly too blue for these stars and would have required
415: reddening from extinction much greater than allowed by the results of
416: \citet{lyo04} and \citet{ls04}.
417:
418: Normalization of the model spectrum at \ks\ for ECHA 11 did not produce a
419: consistent fit to the measurements at wavelengths shorter than \ks. We
420: therefore normalized ECHA 11 at J, revealing an excess that begins at \ks.
421:
422: In one object, ECHA 08 (RS Cha), an apparent infrared excess is seen at
423: 5.8, 8.0, and 24 \mum. This source is a known eclipsing binary with
424: a peak-to-peak amplitude of 0.75 mag \citep{claus80}. The ephemeris
425: in Clausen \& Nordstrom indicates that the MIPS and IRAC observations
426: were both made outside of eclipse at times when the b magnitude of RS Cha
427: differed by about 0.03. The 2MASS observation was made in the
428: secondary eclipse when RS Cha's b magnitude was about 0.2 fainter than
429: for the MIPS observation. Given the zero [5.8]-[8.0] color found in
430: simultaneous observations of this source by IRAC \citep{meg05}, and the
431: 0.1 mag slight blue [8.0]-[24] color indicated by our data -- both
432: consistent with a stellar photosphere -- it appears that our apparent
433: \ks$-$[24] excess of 0.35 mag is an artifact of non-simultaneous photometry.
434:
435: Another object, ECHA 13, the A1 star HD 75505, is reported by \citet{ls04} to
436: be slightly reddened relative to the other ECHA objects. \citet{lyo04} also
437: finds HD 75505 slightly reddened and, based on this reddening and a small
438: K$-$L excess reported by \citet{lyo03}, attributes the reddening to an
439: edge-on circumstellar disk. We find no evidence for a \ks$-$[24] excess in
440: HD 75505 that might be expected from such a disk. While the absence of a
441: 24 \mum\ excess is not evidence of no circumstellar disk, disk material
442: capable of producing the reddening would have to be at a large distance
443: from an A star to be invisible at 24 \mum. We note that \citet{meg05} did
444: not find a significant \ks$-$[3.6], a color similar to K$-$L, excess for HD 75505.
445:
446: The availability of the MIPS data now makes it possible to calculate
447: the fractional infrared excess luminosity for each member of the $\eta$
448: Cha association. Optical and near-infrared points were used to define
449: the stellar photospheres, which were represented as a blackbody at the
450: known effective temperature of each source. Integration of the infrared
451: excess across the Spitzer bands was done done using cubic spline interpolation
452: to the observed mid-infrared and far-infrared data points, and subtracting
453: off the photospheric contribution point-by-point. To account for the excess
454: luminosity out to submillimeter wavelengths, a blackbody extrapolation was
455: performed from the longest available infrared data point, with a blackbody
456: temperature chosen using Wien's law for that wavelength. The results of
457: this analysis appear in the far right column of Table~\ref{tab:data}.
458:
459: \section{Disk Properties in the $\eta$ Cha Association}
460:
461: The infrared excesses reported in the literature at some wavelength between
462: 6-160 \mum\ in nine association members require that circumstellar dust be
463: present within 10 AU of these stars. A flattened disk is the only dust configuration
464: that could be dynamically stable at the age of the association. From
465: this point forward, we assume that the infrared excesses in the $\eta$ Cha
466: association are produced by dusty circumstellar disks. A tally of our MIPS
467: results shows 9 of 16 association members have excesses at 24 \mum\ and at least
468: 5 of the members with 24 \mum\ excess also have a 70 \mum\ excess. We compare our results
469: to disk indicators from other observations in $\eta$ Cha.
470:
471: \subsection{Spitzer/IRAC}
472:
473: \citet{meg05} found excesses between 3.6-8.0 \mum\ in six stars:
474: ECHA 5, 9, 11, 14, 15, and 16. All of these also have excesses in
475: our data at $\lambda\ge$24 \mum. There are two stars, ECHA 3 and 4,
476: where we have found MIPS excess but no mid-infrared excess is detected.
477: This is not surprising, as these stars have very subtle MIPS-24 excesses.
478: The steep brightening of the stellar photosphere toward shorter
479: wavelengths would rapidly obscure such a modest mid-infrared excess of
480: the strength seen at 24 \mum. No IRAC photometry was obtained for
481: \citet{meg05} for ECHA 2, so the inner disk of this source is uncharacterized.
482: The frequency of IRAC excess in the association is 6/17 $=$ 35\%.
483: We note for completeness that \citet{meg05} discussed in detail a
484: comparison between IRAC photometry and the L-band photometry from
485: \citet{lyo03}; so we do not repeat it here.
486:
487: \subsection{Spitzer/IRS}
488: \label{spitirs}
489:
490: \citet{bou06} report 13 and 33 \mum\ flux densities for fifteen
491: $\eta$ Cha members, based on Spitzer low-resolution spectra. The
492: same six objects showing IRAC excess above also show 13 \mum\ excess.
493: In addition, they found 33 \mum\ excess in ECHA 3 and 4 Ð-- two stars
494: for which we have found weak 24 \mum\ excess. For ECHA 7, \citet{bou06}
495: report a 33 \mum\ flux density of 6.9 mJy, and a 33 \mum\ to 13 \mum\
496: flux ratio noticeable larger than for their other diskless stars, but
497: do not classify this as an excess. Our photosphere model is in excellent
498: agreement with the flux densities measured with IRS at 13 \mum\ and
499: with MIPS at 24 \mum. It predicts a flux density of 4.1 mJy at 33 \mum.
500: The 40\% difference between our prediction and the reported 33 \mum\
501: flux is significantly larger than the reported errors in the IRS
502: measurements and argues that ECHA 7 does, in fact, show a 33 \mum\
503: excess. In view of this disagreement on interpretation of 33 \mum\
504: flux of ECHA 7 we examined the now public Spitzer data on which
505: Bouwman et al. based their analysis. We find that the spectrum of
506: the ECHA 7 spectrum beyond 20 \mum\ appears to be shallower than
507: the Rayleigh-Jeans spectrum expected for photospheres in this region
508: of the spectrum. A ratio of the ECHA 7 spectrum to the ECHA 1 spectrum,
509: a star with a low value of 33 to 13 \mum\ flux ratio from the same
510: IRS cluster observation, also shows that ECHA 7 has significantly
511: shallower slope than ECHA 1 beyond 20 \mum. Given this evidence, we
512: conclude that ECHA 7 probably has a weak 33 \mum\ excess indicative of a
513: disk with a large inner hole. The MIPS 70 \mum\ upper limit is consistent with
514: this interpretation. The overall frequency of 13 \mum\ excess in
515: $\eta$ Cha is 6/15 $=$ 40\%; the revised frequency of 33 \mum\ excess,
516: including ECHA 7, is 9/15 $=$ 60\%.
517:
518: \subsection{Disk Structure}
519:
520: Table~\ref{tab:disks} summarizes the results for disks
521: in the $\eta$ Cha association. Ten members show infrared excesses
522: attributable to disks at one or more wavelengths between 2.2 and
523: 160 \mum; nine have excesses detectable by MIPS at 24 \mum\ and one
524: has an excess beginning at 33 \mum. In ECHA 11, 15, and 16, excess
525: is detected from 3.5-33 \mum\ (with 11's excess extending even to
526: 2.2 \mum), indicating that these objects possess
527: continuous disks extending from near the stellar surface to radii
528: $\gtrsim$10s of AU. Remarkably, six of the other disks show evidence
529: for inner holes. ECHA 9 and 14 have small inner holes diagnosed by
530: the presence of excess only for $\lambda \ge$ 6 \mum; ECHA 5 is similar,
531: with the excess starting at 8 \mum. The SEDs of ECHA 3 and 4 require
532: larger disk inner holes, with excess absent at 13 \mum\ but detected
533: at 24 \mum. Finally, the disk of ECHA 7 has the largest inner hole
534: of all, with a 33 \mum\ excess but no 24 \mum\ excess. The tenth
535: star with a disk is $\eta$ Cha itself; while the available data does
536: not allow the presence of an inner hole to be discerned, the large ratio
537: of the 24 and 70 \mum\ excess fluxes ($\sim$ 3; Table~\ref{tab:data})
538: is characteristic of warm material near 250 K.
539:
540:
541: \subsection{Disks and Mass Accretion}
542:
543: \cite{law04} studied the H$\alpha$ emission in ten members of the
544: association, and found that four show high-velocity line wings
545: indicative of gas accretion: ECHA 5, 9, 11, and 15. \citet{meg05}
546: reanalyzed H$\alpha$ data from Song \etal\ (2004) after the method of
547: White \& Basri (2003), and found that ECHA 16 also shows signs of gas
548: accretion. We find that all five of these have circumstellar disks
549: with L$_d$/L$_* \ge$ 0.04. The two disks around ECHA 3 and 4, where
550: Spitzer has found weak 24 and 33 \mum\ excesses, showed no accretion
551: signatures. These results support the long-known correlation between
552: the strength of disk excess and accretion rates. H$\alpha$ studies of
553: ECHA 2 and 14 are still needed to see if this relation holds for all
554: the disks Spitzer has detected in $\eta$ Cha.
555:
556: \clearpage
557: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccc}
558: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
559: %\rotate
560: \tablecaption{Disk indicators in $\eta$ Cha Members. \label{tab:disks}}
561: \tablewidth{0pt}
562: \tablehead{
563: \colhead{ECHA} & \colhead{H$\alpha$ \mdot\tablenotemark{a}} &
564: \colhead{\citet{meg05}}& \colhead{\citet{bou06}} &
565: \colhead{this work}\\
566: \colhead{(=LS)} & \colhead{} & \colhead{IRAC} &
567: \colhead{IRS} & \colhead{MIPS} }
568: \startdata
569: ECHA 01& (no data) & no & no & no \\
570: ECHA 02& (no data) & (no data) & (no data) & yes \\
571: ECHA 03& no & no & yes & yes \\
572: ECHA 04& no & no & yes & yes \\
573: ECHA 05& yes & yes & yes & yes \\
574: ECHA 06& no & no & no & no \\
575: ECHA 07& no & no & yes\tablenotemark{b}& no \\
576: ECHA 08& (no data) & no & (no data) & no\tablenotemark{c} \\
577: ECHA 09& yes & yes & yes & yes \\
578: ECHA 10& no & no & no & no \\
579: ECHA 11& yes & yes & yes & yes \\
580: ECHA 12& no & no & no & no \\
581: ECHA 13& (no data) & no & (no data) & no \\
582: ECHA 14& (no data) & yes & yes & yes \\
583: ECHA 15& yes & yes & yes & yes \\
584: ECHA 16& yes & yes & yes & yes \\
585: ECHA 17& (no data) & no & no & (no data) \\
586: ECHA 18& (no data) & no & no & (no data) \\
587: \enddata
588: \tablenotetext{a}{All analysis in this column from \citet{law04},
589: except ECHA 16, for which Megeath \etal\ (2005) reanalyzed data from Song
590: \etal\ (2004) after the method of White \& Basri (2003).}
591: \tablenotetext{b}{This excess was not claimed in \citet{bou06}. See
592: section \ref{spitirs} for explanation.}
593: \tablenotetext{c}{Apparent excess not attributable to a disk; see
594: text in section \ref{irxs}.}
595:
596: \end{deluxetable}
597: \clearpage
598:
599: \subsection{Disks and Binarity}
600:
601: Seven stars in the $\eta$ Cha association are known multiples: ECHA 1,
602: 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, and 18 \citep[][and references therein]{bran06,bou06}.
603: Infrared excess is detected for ECHA 7 and 9;
604: in ECHA 9, the disk must be circumbinary. Of the eleven single stars,
605: excess is detected around six. While an anticorrelation between
606: disks and binarity is suggested by these results, small number
607: statistics prevent any meaningful conclusion from being drawn.
608:
609:
610: \section{$\eta$ Cha and Other Young Stellar Groups}
611:
612: Two other well-studied stellar associations close in age to $\eta$ Cha
613: also have MIPS studies: the TW Hydra Association \citep[TWA;][]{low05},
614: and the Beta Pic Moving Group \citep[BPMG;][]{bpmgp}. At 8-10 Myr, TWA
615: is thought to be comparable in age to $\eta$ Cha, and BMPG is slightly
616: older at $\sim$12 Myr. \citet{low05} find for TWA that there are very
617: large excesses around four of the TWA stars, with possibly a subtle 24
618: \mum\ excess around one more of the stars. \citet{bpmgp} re-reduced the
619: TWA MIPS data in exactly the same fashion as here in $\eta$ Cha and in the
620: BPMG, and find the TWA disk fraction at 24 \mum\ to be 7/23 stars, or 30\%.
621: \citet{bpmgp} find that the BPMG has a 24 \mum\ disk fraction of 7 of
622: 30 stars, or 23\%. The larger disk fraction we find at 24 \mum\ for
623: $\eta$ Cha, 56\%, suggests that it may actually be younger than either
624: of these other two associations. Since so many association members are
625: undetected at 70 \mum, the best constraint we can put on the disk fraction
626: at this wavelength is a lower limit of 31\%. We note that the various
627: observational studies of the $\eta$ Cha association are not unbiased
628: with respect to the known association members. \citet{bou06} excludes
629: the early type members and this paper leaves two objects at 24 \mum\
630: and three objects at 70 \mum\ unobserved, with many 70 \mum\ upper limits
631: for those that were observed. However this should not affect
632: conclusions based on a larger disk fraction in $\eta$ Cha than in the
633: other associations.
634:
635: Within our $\eta$ Cha association members, there are three groups of
636: 24 \mum\ excess sources attributable to disks. There are stars without
637: excesses at 24 \mum\ (ECHA 1, 6, 7, 8, 19, 12 and 13), stars with small
638: excesses (ECHA 2, 3 and 4), and
639: stars with relatively large excesses (ECHA 5, 9, 11, 14, 15 and 16). This
640: is reminiscent of the distribution of TWA 24 \mum\ excesses found by
641: \citet{low05}, where there are either large or subtle 24 \mum\
642: excesses. In our results from $\eta$ Cha, the largest \ks$-$[24]
643: values that we find are those for ECHA 15 (5.73), ECHA 05 (4.62) and
644: ECHA 16 (4.33). ECHA 9, 11, and 14 all have \ks$-$[24]$\sim$3.8, and
645: the rest are all $<$1.2. These largest values are close to, but still
646: below, the four extreme TWA stars (\ks$-$[24]=5.8, 5.0, 4.4, and 4.4 for
647: TWA 1, 3, 4, and 11, respectively) from \citet{low05}. In contrast,
648: \citet{bpmgp} find that the BPMG has no extreme excesses -- the
649: largest \ks$-$[24] they find is for $\beta$ Pic itself at only 3.5.
650: We can compare the ratios of measured to predicted fluxes at 24 \mum\
651: for each of these three clusters. The median $F_{\rm meas}/F_{\rm
652: pred}$ for all MIPS disks is 51.4, 21.2, and 1.83 for TWA, ECHA, and
653: the BPMG, respectively.
654:
655: We conclude that, while in terms of 24 \mum\ disk fraction, the $\eta$ Cha
656: association is younger than both TWA and the BPMG, it is solidly
657: intermediate in disk properties between the two clusters.
658:
659: Fractional infrared luminosities are shown for nine $\eta$ Cha members
660: in Table~\ref{tab:data}. Three sources ($\eta$ Cha itself, ECHA 3 and
661: ECHA 4) have fractional infrared luminosities $\le 0.001$, which
662: are typical for debris disks around main sequence stars (Bryden \etal\
663: 2006; Su \etal\ 2006). The classical T Tauri star ECHA J0843.3-7905
664: (ECHA 15) has an L$_d$/L$_*$ of nearly 20\%, consistent with an
665: optically thick YSO disk like that of TW Hya. Five other members
666: (ECHA 5, 9, 11, 14, and 16) have fractional infrared
667: luminosities of 0.04-0.06. These disks are particularly interesting,
668: as their luminosities are intermediate between those of optically
669: thick young disks and those of debris disks. Other examples of disks
670: with L$_d$/L$_*$ in this range have recently been found in Spitzer
671: studies of weak-line T Tauri stars (Padgett \etal\ 2006; Cieza \etal\
672: 2007). Such disks can be explained by one of two models: an
673: optically thick disk that has been highly flattened by settling of
674: dust to its midplane, or an optically thin disk that is
675: $\sim$10$\times$ denser than the prototypical young disk of $\beta$
676: Pictoris. Sensitive submillimeter observations will be needed to
677: distinguish between these two possibilities. In either case, these
678: five disk systems systems represent a key transitional stage in disk
679: evolution; further detailed studies are needed.
680:
681: \section{Conclusions}
682:
683: Our Spitzer/MIPS data, combined with a reanalysis of IRAC and
684: IRS data, indicates an overall mid-infrared disk frequency of at least 10/18 $=$
685: 56\% in the $\eta$ Cha association at ages of $\sim$ 8 Myrs. This is
686: significantly higher than the disk fraction observed in the TW Hydra
687: or $\beta$ Pictoris associations at similar ages.
688:
689: The $\eta$ Cha disks show clear transitional characteristics
690: between young stellar object and debris disks, both in terms of the
691: distribution of their fractional infrared luminosities and the
692: presence of inner holes (diagnosed by the spectral energy
693: distribution) in 6 of the 10 disks studied.
694:
695: \acknowledgements
696:
697: This work is based on observations made with the Spitzer Space
698: Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
699: California Institute of Technology under contract with NASA. Support
700: for this work was provided by NASA through contract 1255094.
701: Gautier was also partially supported under the Research and Technical
702: Development funds at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. This
703: work also makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky
704: Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts
705: and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute
706: of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space
707: Administration and the National Science Foundation.
708:
709:
710: \begin{thebibliography}
711:
712: \bibitem[Bouwman \etal(2006)]{bou06} Bouwman, J., \etal, 2006, \apjl, 653, L57
713: \bibitem[Brandeker \etal(2006)]{bran06} Brandeker, A., Jayawardhana, R.,
714: Khavari, P., Haisch, K.E., Mardones, D. 2006, Ap.J., 652, 1572
715: \bibitem[Bryden \etal(2006)]{bryden06} Bryden, G., \etal, 2006, \apj, 646, 1038
716: \bibitem[Cieza \etal(2007)]{cieza07} Cieza, L., \etal, 2007, arXiv/0706.0563
717: \bibitem[Clausen \& Nordstrom (1980)]{claus80} Clausen, J.V. and Nordstrom,
718: B. 1980, \aap, 83, 339
719: \bibitem[Engelbracht \etal(2007)]{chad07} Engelbracht, C., \etal, 2007, \pasp, in press
720: \bibitem[Gautier \etal(2007)]{gaut07} Gautier, T. N., \etal, 2007, \apj, 667, 527
721: \bibitem[Gordon \etal(2005)]{gor05} Gordon, K., \etal, 2005, \pasp, 117, 503
722: \bibitem[Gordon \etal(2007)]{gor07} Gordon, K., \etal, 2007, \pasp, in press
723: \bibitem[Haisch \etal(2005)]{hach05} Haisch, K.E. Jr., Jayawardhana, R., and Alves, J. 2005 \apj, 627 L57
724: \bibitem[Lang(1991)]{lang91} Lang, K. R. 1991, Astrophysical Data, Springer-Verlag, New York
725: \bibitem[Lawson \etal(2002)]{law02} Lawson, W.A., Crause, L.A., Mamajek, E.E., and Feigelson, E.D. 2002 \mnras, 329 L29
726: \bibitem[Lawson \etal(2004)]{law04} Lawson, W.A., Lyo, A-R. and Muzerolle, J. 2002 \mnras, 351 L39
727: \bibitem[Lejeune \etal(1997)]{lej97} Lejeune, T., Cuisinier F., \& Buser R. 1997, \aaps, 125, 229
728: \bibitem[Low \etal(2005)]{low05} Low, F., \etal, 2005, \apj, 631, 1170
729: \bibitem[Luhman \& Steeghs(2004)]{ls04} Luhman, K.L. and Steeghs, D. 2004, \apj, 609, 917
730: \bibitem[Lyo \etal(2003)]{lyo03} Lyo, A-R., \etal, 2003, \mnras, 338, 616
731: \bibitem[Lyo \etal(2004)]{lyo04} Lyo, A-R., \etal, 2004, \mnras, 355, 363
732: \bibitem[Lyo \etal(2006)]{lyo06} Lyo, A-R., \etal, 2006, \mnras, 368, 1451
733: \bibitem[Makovoz \& Marleau(2005)]{mak05} Makovoz, D., \& Marleau, F., 2005, \pasp, 117, 1113
734: \bibitem[Mamajek \etal(1999)]{mama99} Mamajek, E.E., Lawson, W.A., and Feigelson, E.D. 1999, \apj, 516 L77
735: \bibitem[Mamajek \etal(2000)]{mama00} Mamajek, E.E., Lawson, W.A., Feigelson, E.D. 2000, \apj, 544, 356
736: \bibitem[Megeath \etal(2005)]{meg05} Megeath, S.T. \etal, 2005 \apj, 634 L113
737: \bibitem[Moshir \etal(1992)]{moshir}Moshir, M., Kopman, G., Conrow, T. 1992,
738: IRAS Faint Source Survey and Explanatory Supplement
739: \bibitem[Padgett \etal(2006)]{padgett06} Padgett, D.L., \etal, 2006, \apj, 645, 1283
740: \bibitem[Rieke \etal (2004)]{rieke04} Rieke, G., \etal, 2004, \apjs, 154, 25
741: \bibitem[Rebull \etal(2007a)]{perp} Rebull, L., \etal, 2007a, \apjs, 171, 447
742: \bibitem[Rebull \etal(2007b)]{bpmgp} Rebull, L., \etal, 2007b, \apj, submitted
743: \bibitem[Skrutskie \etal(2006)]{2mass} Skrutskie, M., \etal, 2006, \aj, 131, 1163
744: \bibitem[Song \etal (2004)]{song04} Song, I., \etal, 2004, ApJ, 600, 1016.
745: \bibitem[Su \etal (2006)]{su06} Su, K.Y.L. \etal, 2006, \apj, 653, 675
746: \bibitem[Werner \etal(2004)]{wer04} Werner, M., \etal, 2004, \apjs, 154, 1
747: \bibitem[White \& Basri(2003)]{wb03} White, R., \& Basri, G., 2003, \apj, 582, 1109
748: \end{thebibliography}
749:
750:
751:
752: \end{document}
753: