1: \documentstyle{pasj06}

2: %\draft

3: \begin{document}

4: 

5: \SetRunningHead{A.Imada et al.}{dwarf nova FL TrA and CTCV J0549-4921}

6: 

7: \title{Photometric Studies of New Southern SU UMa-type dwarf novae,

8: FL Triangulum Australe and CTCV J0549-4921}

9: 

10: \author{

11:       Akira Imada$^1$,

12:       Taichi Kato$^1$, 

13:       L.A.G. Monard$^2$,

14:       Rod Stubbings$^3$, \\

15:       Makoto Uemura$^4$,

16:       Ryoko Ishioka$^5$, and

17:       Daisaku Nogami$^6$

18: }

19: 

20: \affil{$^1$ Department of Astronomy,Faculty of Science, 

21:        Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan}

22: 

23: \email{a\_imada@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp}

24: 

25: \affil{$^2$ Bronberg Observatory, CBA Pretoria, PO Box 11426,

26:        Tiegerpoort 0056, South Africa}

27:        

28: \affil{$^3$ Tetoora Observatory, Tetoora Road, Victoria, Australia}

29:        

30: \affil{$^4$ Hiroshima Astrophysical Science Center, Hiroshima University,

31:        Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan}

32: 

33: \affil{$^5$ Subaru Telescope, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan

34:        650 North A'ohoku Place, Hilo, \\HI 96720, U.S.A.}

35:         

36: \affil{$^6$ Hida Observatory, Kyoto University, Kamitakara, Gifu

37:        506-1314, Japan}

38: 

39: 

40: \KeyWords{

41:           accretion: accretion discs --- stars: cataclysmic

42:           --- stars: dwarf novae

43:           --- stars: individual (FL Triangulum Australe, CTCV J0549-4921)

44:           --- stars: novae, cataclysmic variables

45:           --- stars: oscillations

46: }

47: 

48: \maketitle

49: 

50: 

51: \begin{abstract}

52: 

53: We report time-resolved optical CCD photometry on newly discovered SU

54:  UMa-type dwarf novae, FL TrA and CTCV J0549-4921. During the 2006 August

55:  outburst, we detected superhumps with a period of 0.59897(11) days for FL

56:  TrA, clarifying the SU UMa nature of the system. On the first

57:  night of our observations on FL TrA, the object showed no superhumps.

58:  This implies that it takes a few days for full development of

59:  superhumps. The superhump period variation diagram of FL TrA was

60:  similar to that observed in some WZ Sge stars and short period SU

61:  UMa-type stars. This indicates that the system is closely related to WZ

62:  Sge stars and SU UMa stars having short orbital periods. For CTCV

63:  J0549-4921, the candidates of the mean superhump period are

64:  0.083249(10) days and 0.084257(8) days, respectively. Due to a lack of

65:  the observations, we cannot determine the true superhump period, but

66:  the latter period is favorable. Using the ASAS-3 archive, it

67:  turned out that the system shows only four outbursts over the past 6

68:  years. The outburst amplitude of CTCV J0549-4921 was relatively small,

69:  with about 4.5 mag. One possibility is that mass evaporation may

70:  play a role during quiescence.

71:    

72: \end{abstract}

73: 

74: \section{Introduction}

75: 

76: Dwarf novae are a subclass of cataclysmic variables that consist of a

77: white dwarf (primary) and a late-type star (secondary). The secondary

78: star fills its Roche lobe, transferring the matter into the primary via

79: inner Lagragian point (L1). Then the accretion disc is formed around the

80: white dwarf. The accretion disc shows various modulations both in

81: outburst and quiescence (for a review, see \cite{war95book};

82: \cite{hel01book}; \cite{las01DIDNXT}; \cite{smi07review}).

83: 

84: SU UMa-type stars are a subclass of dwarf novae (\cite{osa89suuma};

85: \cite{osa96review}; \cite{pat05suuma}; \citet{2005PJAB...81..291O}). The

86: systems basically exhibit two types of eruptions: normal outburst which

87: lasts a few days and superoutburst which lasts about two

88: weeks. During the superoutburst, modulations having an

89: amplitude of ${\sim}$ 0.2 mag called

90: superhumps, are always observed. The period of the superhumps are a

91: few percent longer than that of the orbital period of the system, which

92: is attributed to prograde precession of tidally deformed accretion disc

93: \citep{whi88tidal}. Short and long-term variations of SU UMa stars are

94: well reproduced by the thermal-tidal instability

95: model developed by \citet{osa89suuma}. Recent arising problems concerning

96: SU UMa stars are reviewed in \citet{nog07suuma}. 

97: 

98: Recently, the advent of the Internet has significantly improved our

99: understanding in SU UMa stars (\cite{pat00iyuma}; \cite{pat02wzsge};

100: \cite{ish02wzsgeletter}; \cite{pat03suumae}; \cite{kat04vsnet}),

101: especially in the Northern hemisphere. As for Southern SU UMa stars, it

102: is true that a lot of studies have been performed for them including

103: e.g., VW Hyi (\cite{vog74vwhyi}; \cite{hae79lateSH}), Z Cha

104: (\cite{woo86zcha}; \cite{wad88zcha}), and OY Car (\cite{woo89oycar};

105: \cite{hor94oycarHST}). However, there are many poorly studied SU UMa

106: stars compared to the Northern SU UMa stars. This trend has been

107: changing over the past few years because of the advent of the All Sky

108: Automated Survey (ASAS, \cite{poj02asas3}). Valuable observations of SU

109: UMa stars have been carried out thanks to prompt detection of outburst by

110: the ASAS-3 (\cite{tem06asas0025}; \cite{ima06asas1600letter};

111: \cite{ima062qz0219}).

112: 

113: In this paper, we report photometric observations of two Southern dwarf

114: novae, FL TrA and CTCV J0549-4921 during outbursts, during which we

115: detected superhumps for the first time for these objects.

116: 

117: \section{FL TrA}

118: 

119: \subsection{introduction}

120: 

121: FL TrA was first cataloged in \citet{mei70fltra} in which the system was

122: numbered S 5770 TrA with the variable type of UG. \citet{DownesCVatlas1}

123: tabulated cataclysmic variable stars,

124: including FL TrA, in which the variable was categorised as UG with the

125: magnitude range of 15.5p $-$ 17.0p. \citet{DownesCVatlas1} also gave the

126: coordinate of RA:$16^{\rm h} 30^{\rm m} 37^{\rm s}$, Dec:$-61^{\circ} 50'

127: 33''$. No outburst of FL TrA was reported to the VSNET

128: \citep{kat04vsnet} until 2005. We have suspected the WZ Sge subclass of

129: the object. Spectroscopic observations were carried out by

130: \citet{mas03faintCV} in which the object showed a spectrum of a common

131: G-type star. \citet{mas03faintCV} pointed out the misidentification of

132: FL TrA.

133: 

134: On 2005 July 27, Rod Stubbings reported to the VSNET that FL TrA

135: appeared to be in outburst with a visual magnitude of 15.0

136: ([vsnet-alert 8574]). He further noticed that the position of

137: the system looked slightly north from the above mentioned

138: coordinate. It turned out that FL TrA was misidentified as USNOB1

139: 0281-0691553 (RA:$16^{\rm h} 30^{\rm m} 36^{\rm s}.4$, Dec:$-61^{\circ} 50'

140: 28''.1$). In response to the report, \citet{DownesCVatlas3} refined the

141: finding chart of the system, which can be seen from the

142: website.\footnote{$\langle$http://archive.stsci.edu/prepds/cvcat/index.html$\rangle$}

143: The precise coordinate of the system is RA:$16^{\rm h} 30^{\rm m} 36^{\rm

144: s}.61$, Dec:$-61^{\circ} 50' 21''.0$, where no optical counterpart

145: exists in the USNO B1 catalog, which indicates the magnitude in quiescence

146: may be fainter than 21 mag.

147: 

148: \subsection{observations}

149: 

150: \begin{table}

151: \caption{Observation log of FL TrA during the 2005 August superoutburst.}

152: \begin{center}

153: \begin{tabular}{cccc}

154: \hline\hline

155: 2005 Date & Start$^a$ & End$^a$ & N$^b$ \\ 

156: \hline

157: Jul. 27 & 579.2491 & 579.3572 & 225 \\

158: Jul. 28 & 580.2378 & 580.5585 & 451 \\

159: Jul. 29 & 581.2032 & 581.5047 & 426 \\

160: Jul. 30 & 582.3141 & 582.5241 & 297 \\

161: Jul. 31 & 583.2259 & 583.4713 & 347 \\

162: Aug. 1. & 584.1918 & 584.4763 & 360 \\

163: Aug. 2. & 585.2243 & 585.3945 & 241 \\

164: \hline

165: \multicolumn{4}{l}{$^a$ HJD - 2453000. $^b$ Number of exposure.} \\

166: \end{tabular}

167: \end{center}

168: \label{t1}

169: \end{table}

170: 

171: Time resolved CCD photometric observations were carried out from 2005

172: July 27 to 2005 August 2 at Bronberg Observatory in South Africa using

173: a 32 cm Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope equipped with a SBIG ST-7XME CCD

174: camera. We tabulate journal of observations

175: in table 1. All of the observations were performed with 30 sec

176: exposure time. The total data points amounted to 2347. No filter was used

177: during the observations. The unfiltered data are close to the $R_{\rm

178: c}$ system. After debiasing and flat-fielding, we performed aperture

179: photometry using AIP4WIN software. As a comparison star, we used USNO A2.0

180: 0225$-$25536030 (RA:$16^{\rm h} 30^{\rm m} 38^{\rm

181: s}.79$, Dec:$-61^{\circ} 49' 58''.0$, $B$ =14.2, $R$ = 13.2), whose

182: constancy was checked by some stars located in the same

183: image. The 1-sigma error for each differential magnitude is of an order of

184: 0.03 mag, which is small enough to perform the following analysis,

185: including exploring superhump period and profile

186: variations. Heliocentric corrections to our run were applied before the

187: following analysis.

188: 

189: \subsection{results}

190: 

191: %#light curves

192: 

193: \begin{figure}

194: \begin{center}

195: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{fig1.eps}}

196: \end{center}

197: \caption{Light curves of FL TrA during the 2005 July/August

198:  superoutburst. The vertical and horizontal axis indicate differential

199:  magnitude and the fractional HJD, respectively. The magnitude of the

200:  comparison star is 13.2 in $R$. The star showed almost the constant

201:  decline from HJD 2453581 (2005 July 28) at a rate of 0.13 mag

202:  d$^{-1}$.}

203: \label{}

204: \end{figure}

205: 

206: \begin{figure}

207: \begin{center}

208: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{fig2.eps}}

209: \end{center}

210: \caption{Enlarged light curve on HJD 2453579 (2005 July 27), the first

211:  night of our run. The light curves provide no evidence of superhumps

212:  during this phase.}

213: \label{}

214: \end{figure}

215: 

216: \begin{figure}

217: \begin{center}

218: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{fig3.eps}}

219: \end{center}

220: \caption{Theta diagram of the superoutburst of FL TrA from HJD 2453580

221:  to HJD 2453585. The arrow shows the best estimated superhump period,

222:  0.059897(11) days with 99$\%$ significance level.}

223: \label{}

224: \end{figure}

225: 

226: Figure 1 shows light curves of FL TrA during the 2005 July/August

227: superoutburst. At the onset of our observations, FL TrA was at the

228: magnitude of 15.0 on 2005 July 27, after which the system almost

229: constantly declined at the rate of 0.13(1) mag d$^{-1}$. This decline rate

230: is a typical value among SU UMa-type dwarf novae. As can be seen in

231: figure 2, the light curve showed almost no feature on 2005 July 27 (HJD

232: 2453579), indicating that superhumps did not yet develop. After subtracting

233: a linear decline trend of daily light curves, we performed a period

234: analysis of the phase

235: dispersion minimization (PDM) method \citep{ste78pdm} applied between HJD

236: 2453580 and 2453285. Figure 3 displays the results of the PDM analysis,

237: by which we determined 0.059897(11) days as the best estimated period

238: during this stage. A statistical F-test provided the confidence level of

239: 99 $\%$. The 1-sigma error was calculated using the Lafler-Kinman method

240: \citep{fer89error}.

241: 

242: 

243: \begin{figure}

244: \begin{center}

245: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{fig4.eps}}

246: \end{center}

247: \caption{Phase averaged light curve during the superoutburst folded by

248:  0.059897 days. The abscissa and ordinate denote phase and differential

249:  magnitude, respectively. A rapid rise and slow decline, characteristic

250:  of superhumps, are visible.}

251: \label{}

252: \end{figure}

253: 

254: We present daily averaged light curves in figure 4. These light curves

255: are folded

256: with the above obtained period. On HJD 2453580 (2005 July 28), the

257: profile is characteristic of superhumps, with the mean amplitude of about

258: 0.2 mag, from which we first confirmed the SU UMa nature of FL TrA. On

259: 2005 July 29, the amplitude of the superhumps was at the maximum value

260: of about 0.3 mag. No eclipse feature was detected during the

261: observations, indicating a low-to-mid inclination of FL TrA.

262: 

263: \begin{table}

264: \caption{superhump timing maxima}

265: \begin{center}

266: \begin{tabular}{ccc}

267: \hline\hline

268: $E^a$ & Time$^b$ & error$^c$ \\

269: \hline

270: 0 & 580.2921 & 0.003 \\

271: 1 & 580.3506 & 0.004 \\

272: 2 & 580.4116 & 0.002 \\

273: 3 & 580.4712 & 0.002 \\

274: 4 & 580.5355 & 0.003 \\

275: 16 & 581.2542 & 0.002 \\

276: 17 & 581.3122 & 0.004 \\

277: 18 & 581.3702 & 0.001 \\

278: 19 & 581.4297 & 0.001 \\

279: 20 & 581.4920 & 0.003 \\

280: 34 & 582.3274 & 0.001 \\

281: 35 & 582.3879 & 0.003 \\

282: 36 & 582.4532 & 0.004 \\

283: 50 & 583.2827 & 0.002 \\

284: 51 & 583.3451 & 0.004 \\

285: 52 & 583.4002 & 0.002 \\

286: 66 & 584.2420 & 0.002 \\

287: 68 & 584.3643 & 0.005 \\

288: 69 & 584.4266 & 0.003 \\

289: 83 & 585.2644 & 0.001 \\

290: 84 & 585.3212 & 0.004 \\

291: \hline

292: \multicolumn{3}{l}{$^a$ Cycle count. $^b$ HJD - 2453000.} \\

293: \multicolumn{3}{l}{$^c$ error in a unit of days.} \\

294: \end{tabular}

295: \end{center}

296: \end{table}

297: 

298: \begin{figure}

299: \begin{center}

300: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{fig5.eps}}

301: \end{center}

302: \caption{$O-C$ diagram of FL TrA. Each datapoint of the maximum timing

303:  of superhumps is listed in table 2. The solid curve means the best

304:  fitting quadratic described in equation (2) for 16 $<E<$ 84. It

305:  should be noted that the cycle count between 0 $<$ E $<$ 3 is

306:  deviated from the quadratic, which is also observed in some short

307:  period SU UMa stars.}

308: \end{figure}

309: 

310: In order to investigate the variations of the superhump period during

311: the plateau phase, we measured the timings of the superhump maxima

312: listed in table 2. The typical error is an order of 0.002 days. A linear

313: fitting yielded as the following equation, 

314: 

315: \begin{equation} 

316: HJD (max) = 2453580.2930(9) + 0.059864(21) \times E,

317: \end{equation}

318: 

319: where the parentheses denote 1-sigma error for each value. By using the

320: above ephemeris, we draw an $O - C$ diagram, which is displayed in

321: figure 5. The best fitted quadratic for 16 $< E <$ 84 can be

322: represented as follows:

323: 

324: \begin{eqnarray}

325: O - C =&  5.23(2.98)\times10^{-3} - 2.56(1.46)\times10^{-4} E \nonumber \\

326:        & +2.53(1.50)\times 10^{-6} E^{2}.

327: \end{eqnarray}

328: 

329: The above obtained value implies that the superhump period may increase since

330: HJD 2453581 with $P_{\rm dot}$ = $\dot{P}$/$P$ =

331: $+$8.4(5.0)$\times$10$^{-5}$.

332: 

333: \subsection{FL TrA as a short period SU UMa star}

334: 

335: The present photometric studies and the previous archival survey

336: reasonably qualified FL TrA as a new member of SU UMa-type dwarf novae

337: with short periods. The outburst amplitude of FL TrA exceeded 6

338: mag, suggestive of a large amplitude SU UMa-type dwarf novae (TOAD,

339: \cite{how95TOAD}). Unfortunately, the lack of baseline during the early

340: stage of the superoutburst prevented us from further investigating whether

341: double-peaked humps existed, which is exclusively observed among WZ Sge

342: stars in early phase of superoutburst (\cite{osa02wzsgehump};

343: \cite{kat02wzsgeESH}; \cite{pat02wzsge}). 

344: 

345: As for superhump period changes, the estimated positive $P_{\rm dot}$

346: derivative indicates that the

347: superhump period increases during the plateau stage. Such systems

348: include all of

349: confirmed WZ Sge-type dwarf novae \citep{kat01hvvir}, as well as SU

350: UMa-type dwarf novae with short superhump periods

351: \citep{oiz07v844her}. Recently,

352: \citet{uem05tvcrv} found that a short period SU UMa star TV Crv

353: shows two types of $P_{\rm dot}$. The 2001 superoutburst of TV Crv

354: showed positive $P_{\rm dot}$, while the 2004 superoutburst showed almost

355: constant $P_{\rm sh}$. The big difference between the two

356: superoutbursts is not only the different $P_{\rm dot}$, but also the

357: light curves themselves: a precursor was present for the 2004

358: superoutburst while it was absent for the 2001 superoutburst. One

359: interpretation is that an appearance of the positive or

360: constant/negative $P_{\rm dot}$ depends

361: on the maximum radius of the accretion disc during the superoutburst

362: \citep{uem05tvcrv}. \citet{uem05tvcrv} have further stated that systems

363: which show both types of $P_{\rm dot}$ will be restricted to

364: short period SU UMa stars, because the tidal truncation radius should be

365: significantly larger than the 3:1 resonance radius (see

366: \cite{osa03DNoutburst}). With this respect, the 2005 superoutburst of FL

367: TrA had a large disc radius, which is consistent with the large

368: amplitude of the outburst.

369: 

370: Another important finding is that unfittable cycle counts by the

371: equation (2) exists at the earliest stage of our run. These correspond to

372: 0 $< E <$ 4 in figure 5. Similar results are found in V1028 Cyg

373: \citep{bab00v1028cyg}, RZ Leo \citep{ish01rzleo}, HV Vir

374: \citep{ish03hvvir}, V844 Her \citep{oiz07v844her} and GW Lib (Imada et

375: al. in preparation). During the cycle count of 0 $< E <$ 4, the

376: superhump period keeps constant, while an abrupt change of the superhump

377: period occurred after $E >$ 4. The origin of the abrupt period

378: change remained unknown, which should be elucidated in the future

379: observations.

380: 

381: \section{CTCV J0549-4921}

382: 

383: \subsection{introduction}

384: 

385: CTCV J0549-4921 (hereafter CTCV J0549) was first identified as a

386: candidate of cataclysmic

387: variables after spectroscopic observations in the Calan-Tololo Survey

388: \citep{maz89CTS}. The optical spectrum shows H${\alpha}$ and HeI 5876

389: emission \citep{tap04ctcv}, indicating the dwarf nova nature of the system.

390: \citet{tap04ctcv} pointed out there is no evidence of the secondary

391: star in the optical spectrum because of the absence of TiO bands. Optical

392: observations during quiescence and outburst were also performed by

393: \citet{tap04ctcv}. During the quiescence, \citet{tap04ctcv} found

394: photometric orbital

395: modulations with the period of 0.080218(70) days, which they interpreted

396: as the orbital period of CTCV J0549. \citet{tap04ctcv} pointed out the

397: shape of the modulation is reminiscent of quiescent light curve of WZ

398: Sge. During the outburst,

399: CTCV J0549 brightened up to $V$ = 13.75 on 1996 October 5. However,

400: superhumps were not detected. It is likely

401: \citet{tap04ctcv} observed a normal outburst of SU UMa-type dwarf

402: novae. In conjunction with the above observations, CTCV J0549 has been a

403: promising candidate for SU UMa-type dwarf novae.

404: 

405: On 2006 April 2, a brightening of the star was discovered by

406: L.A.G. Monard ([vsnet-alert 8896]) at the magnitude of 13.8, who

407: detected the rising phase of outburst. On 2006 April 4, we first

408: detected superhumps of CTCV J0549, and confirmed the SU UMa nature of

409: the object. Long-term monitoring by

410: the ASAS-3 have detected 3 outbursts, of which one was possibly a

411: superoutburst. This occurred in 2004 January. The precise coordinate of

412: the system is RA:$05^{\rm h} 49^{\rm m} 45^{\rm s}.4$, Dec:$-49^{\circ}

413: 21' 56''$, where the 2MASS counterpart of CTCV J0549 yields $J$ =

414: 15.619(50), $H$ = 15.210(81), and $K$ = 14.869(112), respectively

415: \citep{ima06j0137}.

416: 

417: \subsection{observations}

418: 

419: \begin{table}

420: \caption{Observation log of CTCV J0549 during the 2006 April superoutburst.}

421: \begin{center}

422: \begin{tabular}{cccc}

423: \hline\hline

424: 2006 Date & Start$^a$ & End$^a$ & N$^b$ \\

425: \hline

426: Apr. 2 & 828.2200 & 828.3839 & 452 \\

427: Apr. 4 & 830.2275 & 830.3658 & 286 \\

428: Apr. 5 & 831.1955 & 831.3463 & 428 \\

429: Apr. 6 & 832.1991 & 832.3524 & 428 \\

430: Apr. 12& 838.1970 & 838.3339 & 385 \\

431: \hline

432: \multicolumn{4}{l}{$^a$ HJD - 2453000. $^b$ Number of exposure.}

433: \end{tabular}

434: \end{center}

435: \end{table}

436: 

437: Time resolved CCD photometric observations were carried out from 2006

438: April 2 to 2006 April 12. The observing site and instrument are the same

439: as described in section 2.2. The journal of observations is summarized in

440: table 3. All of the observations were performed with 30-sec exposure time

441: with no filter. The total data points of our run amounted to 1979. For

442: obtained data, we performed the same manner as mentioned in section

443: 2.2. We used  USNO A2.0 0375$-$2158238 

444: (RA:$05^{\rm h} 49^{\rm m} 53^{\rm s}.41$,

445: Dec:$-49^{\circ} 18' 50''.8$, $B$ = 13.3, $R$ = 12.8) as a

446: comparison star, whose constancy was checked by some stars in the same

447: image. The 1-sigma error for each differential magnitude is of an order of

448: 0.01 mag. Heliocentric corrections to our run were applied before the

449: following analyses. 

450: 

451: \subsection{results}

452: 

453: \begin{figure}

454: \begin{center}

455: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{fig6.eps}}

456: \label{}

457: \end{center}

458: \caption{Light curves of CTCV J0549 during the 2006 April

459:  superoutburst. The ordinate means the ASAS-3 $V$ and $R$ magnitude. The

460:  magnitude of the comparison star is 12.7 in $R$. The filled circles

461:  show time resolved CCD observations. The crosses indicate the ASAS-3

462:  light curves, which contains 0.2 mag error originated from the

463:  modulation of superhumps. The negative observation was performed by

464:  the ASAS-3 on HJD 2453849, when the object was fainter than 14.4 in

465:  $V$.}

466: \end{figure}

467: 

468: The overall light curves during our run are presented in figure 6, in

469: which we also demonstrate the ASAS-3 positive and negative

470: observations. The discrepancy between our CCD observations and

471: the ASAS-3 archive is large, presumably due to different filters between

472: the site and the ``snapshot'' in the ASAS-3 photometry. Nevertheless,

473: it is well determined that the bright maximum of CTCV J0549 was on HJD

474: 2453831 with the magnitude of ${\sim}$ 13.0. The rarely observed rising

475: phase was fortunately detected on HJD 2453879, providing $-$1.0(1) mag

476: d$^{-1}$ as the rising rate. Although our observations were absent

477: between HJD 2453833-2453837, during which the magnitude was assumed to

478: decline linearly, the decline rate could be estimated to be 0.12(1)

479: mag $^{-1}$. The value is typical for usual SU UMa-type dwarf novae

480: during the plateau phase. 

481: 

482: \begin{figure}

483: \begin{center}

484: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{fig7.eps}}

485: \label{}

486: \end{center}

487: \caption{Daily light curves after removing the linear trend. There were

488:  almost no modulation on April 2. The growth time of superhumps is as

489:  short as 2 days. The amplitude of superhumps is the largest on April 5

490:  with 0.4 mag. There is no evidence for an eclipse, which indicates of

491:  low to mid inclination system.}

492: \end{figure}

493: 

494: Enlarged light curves for each night are depicted in figure 7, after

495: subtracting linear rising or declining trend. As can be seen in this

496: figure, there are no features on HJD 2453829 (2006 April 2), corresponding to

497: the rising phase, while prominent superhumps are shown from HJD 2453831

498: (2006 April 4). Therefore, we first confirmed CTCV J0549 as an SU UMa

499: star.

500: 

501: \begin{table}

502: \caption{superhump timing maxima}

503: \begin{center}

504: \begin{tabular}{ccc}

505: \hline\hline

506: $E^a$ & Time$^b$ & error$^c$ \\

507: \hline

508: 0 & 830.2360 & 0.001 \\

509: 1 & 830.3230 & 0.005 \\

510: 12 & 831.2567 & 0.002 \\

511: 13 & 831.3401 & 0.001 \\

512: 24 & 832.2591 & 0.001 \\

513: 25 & 832.3474 & 0.001 \\

514: \hline

515: \multicolumn{3}{l}{$^a$ Cycle count. $^b$ HJD - 2453000.} \\

516: \multicolumn{3}{l}{$^c$ error in unit of days.} \\

517: \end{tabular}

518: \end{center}

519: \end{table}

520: 

521: \begin{figure}

522: \begin{center}

523: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{fig8.eps}}

524: \end{center}

525: \caption{Theta diagram of CTCV J0549 applied to the plateau phase. Two

526:  possible periods of superhumps were found, 0.083249(10) days and

527:  0.084257(8) days. Due to the lack of the observations, we

528:  cannot specify the exact period of superhumps.}

529: \end{figure}

530: 

531: In order to determine the mean superhump period during the plateau

532: phase, we performed the PDM method \citep{ste78pdm}. The strongest

533: periodicity can be found at 0.084257(8) days. However, due to the lack of

534: our observations, we cannot rule out the second strongest period,

535: 0.083249(10) days. Hence, we carried out another approach to

536: determine the mean superhump period by measuring the maximum timing of

537: the superhumps. We tabulate the result on table 4. The best fitting

538: linear regression is yielded in the following equation:

539: 

540: \begin{equation}

541: HJD(max) = 2453830.2396(29) + 0.08433(18) \times E.

542: \end{equation}

543: 

544: The above equation favors the former period of the superhump, 0.084257(8)

545: days. If the quiescent modulations reflect the orbital period of the

546: system, and the mean superhump period is $P_{\rm sh}$=0.084257(8) days,

547: then the fractional superhump period excess is ${\sim}$ 5 $\%$. This

548: value is significantly larger than that observed in common SU UMa-type

549: dwarf novae \citep{pat05suuma}. The actual $P_{\rm orb}$ and $P_{\rm

550: sh}$ should be measured in the future observations. 

551: 

552: \subsection{CTCV J0549 as a long period SU UMa star}

553: 

554: \begin{table}

555: \caption{Recorded outbursts by the ASAS-3.}

556: \begin{center}

557: \begin{tabular}{cccc}

558: \hline\hline

559: Time$^a$ & Mag.$^b$ & error$^c$ & type$^d$\\

560: \hline

561: 51949.60890 & $<$14.4 & - & \\

562: 51952.54990 & 13.515 & 0.062 & N \\

563: 51954.55382 & $<$14.4 & - & \\

564: 52171.80528 & $<$14.4 & - & \\

565: 52172.86305 & 13.654 & 0.047 & ? \\ 

566: 52183.79372 & $<$14.4 & - & \\

567: 53020.83195 & $<$14.4 & - & \\

568: 53025.61437 & 13.714 & 0.023 & S \\ 

569: 53029.61569 & 13.284 & 0.067 & \\

570: 53031.65788 & 13.732 & 0.111 & \\

571: 53033.68195 & 14.580 & 0.437 & \\

572: 53035.64670 & 14.006 & 0.075 & \\

573: 53039.64744 & $<$14.4 & - & \\

574: 53827.59870 & $<$14.4 & - & \\

575: 53830.53230 & 13.480 & 0.048 & S \\ 

576: 53832.54772 & 13.805 & 0.131 & \\

577: 53834.55680 & 13.934 & 0.175 & \\

578: 53836.56170 & 13.888 & 0.094 & \\

579: 53849.51095 & $<$14.4 & - & \\

580: \hline

581: \multicolumn{4}{l}{$^a$ HJD - 2400000. $^b$ Mean magnitude in} \\

582: \multicolumn{4}{l}{$V$. $^c$ 1-sigma error in unit of $V$.} \\

583: \multicolumn{4}{l}{$^d$N: Normal outburst. S: Superoutburst.} \\

584: \end{tabular}

585: \end{center}

586: \end{table}

587: 

588: We first confirmed the SU UMa nature of CTCV J0549 by the detection of

589: superhumps. Although the mean superhump period cannot be determined, the

590: period exceeds 0.08 days, which we safely qualify CTCV J0549 as a long

591: period SU UMa star. This is also supported by quiescent photometric

592: observations \citep{tap04ctcv}. 

593: 

594: The most remarkable fact for CTCV J0549 is that the object has shown only

595: 4 outbursts over the past 6 years. According to the ASAS-3 archive, the

596: recorded outbursts were 2001 Febuary 12, 2001 September 20, 2004 January

597: 21, and the present superoutburst. We summarize recorded outbursts

598: monitored by the ASAS-3 in table 5. Judging from table 5, only two

599: are superoutbursts, one is a normal outburst, and we cannot distinguish

600: the type for one outburst. If we do not miss any superoutburst since

601: 2001, a supercycle of CTCV J0549 is estimated as ${\sim}$ 800

602: days. This is one of the longset values among SU UMa-type dwarf novae

603: \citep{kat01hvvir}. Inactive systems

604: having a similar superhump period include QY Per ($P_{\rm sh}$ = 0.07681

605: days, \cite{kat00qyperiauc}), EF Peg ($P_{\rm sh}$ = 0.08705 days,

606: \cite{kat02efpeg}) and V725 Aql ($P_{\rm sh}$ = 0.09909 days,

607: \citep{uem01v725aql}). Although the exact mechanism of the long

608: supercycle still remains unknown, mass evaporation

609: during quiescence might be a possible explanation for the origin of the

610: outburst and quiescent properties (\cite{mey94siphonflow}; \cite{las95wzsge};

611: \cite{min98wzsge}). This may be consistent with relatively small

612: amplitude of 4.5 mag of CTCV J0549. As for evporation,

613: \citet{min98wzsge} predicted

614: that quiescent superhumps could be observed even during quiescence if

615: evaporation works in the acretion disc. \citet{oiz07v844her} also argued

616: that a peak separation variation of an optical spectrum during

617: quiescence is a powerful tool to check whether or not the evaporation

618: works in the accretion disc. Future spectroscopic observations are

619: required to elucidate the nature of CTCV J0549. 

620: 

621: \section{Summary}

622: 

623: In this paper, we newly confirmed the SU UMa nature of FL TrA and CTCV

624: 0549-4921.  

625: 

626: After the discovery of the outburst of FL TrA, we found that the

627: previous candidate of the object had been misidentified. The mean

628: superhump period of FL TrA was determined to be 0.059897 days. This

629: superhump period qualified FL TrA as a short period SU UMa-type dwarf

630: nova. The superhump period

631: increased at the rate of $P_{\rm dot}$ = $+$8.4(5.0)$\times$10$^{-5}$,

632: which is a typical value of short period SU UMa stars. At the early

633: stage of the superoutburst, the period of the superhumps changed

634: abruptly, as observed in some WZ Sge stars, as well as short period SU

635: UMa stars. Although the exact mechanism of the abrupt change is unknown,

636: the origin of this phenomenon should be discussed in future.

637: 

638: A previously suspected dwarf nova CTCV J0549-4921 has been first

639: confirmed as the SU UMa nature by the detection of

640: superhumps. Although a short baseline of our observation hindered us from

641: accurate determination of the mean superhump period, we found the

642: strongest signal at 0.084257 days, which is consistent with our eye

643: estimation. This candidate period leads us to the conclusion that CTCV

644: J0549 belongs to a long period SU UMa star. The ASAS-3 archive for CTCV

645: J0549 puzzles us in terms of its inactive behaviour, as well as the small

646: amplitude of the outburst despite the long supercycle of the system. A

647: possible explanation may be that the mass evaporation plays a role

648: during quiescence.

649: 

650: \vskip 5mm

651: 

652: We would express our gratitude to G. Pojmanski for

653: providing invaluable data of ASAS-3 observations. This work is supported

654: by a Grant-in-Aid for the 21st Century COE ``Center for Diversity and

655: Universality in Physics'' from the Ministry of Education, Culture,

656: Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). This work is partly supported by

657: a grant-in aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,

658: Science and Technology (No. 17740105). Part of this work is

659: supported by a Research Fellowship of the Japan Society for the

660: Promotion of Science for Young Scientists (RI, AI).

661: 

662: 

663: 

664: 

665: \begin{thebibliography}{}

666: 

667: \bibitem[Baba et~al.(2000)]{bab00v1028cyg}

668:   Baba, H., Kato, T., Nogami, D., Hirata, R., Matsumoto, K., \& Sadakane, K.\

669:   2000, \pasj, 52, 429

670: 

671: \bibitem[{Connon Smith}(2007)]{smi07review}

672:   {Connon Smith}, R.\ 2007, astro-ph/0701654

673: 

674: \bibitem[Downes, Shara(1993)]{DownesCVatlas1}

675:   Downes, R.~A., \& Shara, M.~M.\ 1993, \pasp, 105, 127

676: 

677: \bibitem[Downes et~al.(2001)]{DownesCVatlas3}

678:   Downes, R.~A., Webbink, R.~F., Shara, M.~M., Ritter, H., Kolb, U., \&

679:   Duerbeck, H.~W.\ 2001, \pasp, 113, 764

680: 

681: \bibitem[Fernie(1989)]{fer89error}

682:   Fernie, J.~D.\ 1989, \pasp, 101, 225

683: 

684: \bibitem[Haefner et~al.(1979)]{hae79lateSH}

685:   Haefner, R., Schoembs, R., \& Vogt, N.\ 1979, \aap, 77, 7

686: 

687: \bibitem[Hellier(2001)]{hel01book}

688:   Hellier, C.\ 2001, Cataclysmic Variable Stars: how and why they vary

689:   (\PublisherSpringer)

690: 

691: \bibitem[Horne et~al.(1994)]{hor94oycarHST}

692:   Horne, K., Marsh, T.~R., Cheng, F.~H., Hubeny, I., \& Lanz, T.\ 1994, \apj,

693:   426, 294

694: 

695: \bibitem[Howell et~al.(1995)]{how95TOAD}

696:   Howell, S.~B., Szkody, P., \& Cannizzo, J.~K.\ 1995, \apj, 439, 337

697: 

698: \bibitem[Imada et~al.(2006a)]{ima062qz0219}

699:   Imada, A., Kato, T., Monard, L. A.~G., Retter, A., Liu, A., \& Nogami, D.\

700:   2006a, \pasj, 58, 383

701: 

702: \bibitem[Imada et~al.(2006b)]{ima06j0137}

703:   Imada, A., {et~al.}\ 2006b, \pasj, 58, 143

704: 

705: \bibitem[Imada, Monard(2006)]{ima06asas1600letter}

706:   Imada, A., \& Monard, L. A. G.~B.\ 2006, \pasj, 58, L19

707: 

708: \bibitem[Ishioka et~al.(2001)]{ish01rzleo}

709:   Ishioka, R., {et~al.}\ 2001, \pasj, 53, 905

710: 

711: \bibitem[Ishioka et~al.(2003)]{ish03hvvir}

712:   Ishioka, R., {et~al.}\ 2003, \pasj, 55, 683

713: 

714: \bibitem[Ishioka et~al.(2002)]{ish02wzsgeletter}

715:   Ishioka, R., {et~al.}\ 2002, \aap, 381, L41

716: 

717: \bibitem[Kato(2002a)]{kat02wzsgeESH}

718:   Kato, T.\ 2002a, \pasj, 54, L11

719: 

720: \bibitem[Kato(2002b)]{kat02efpeg}

721:   Kato, T.\ 2002b, \pasj, 54, 87

722: 

723: \bibitem[Kato et~al.(2001)]{kat01hvvir}

724:   Kato, T., Sekine, Y., \& Hirata, R.\ 2001, \pasj, 53, 1191

725: 

726: \bibitem[Kato et~al.(2004)]{kat04vsnet}

727:   Kato, T., Uemura, M., Ishioka, R., Nogami, D., Kunjaya, C., Baba, H., \&

728:   Yamaoka, H.\ 2004, \pasj, 56S, 1

729: 

730: \bibitem[Kato et~al.(2000)]{kat00qyperiauc}

731:   Kato, T., {et~al.}\ 2000, \iaucirc, 7343

732: 

733: \bibitem[Lasota(2001)]{las01DIDNXT}

734:   Lasota, J.-P.\ 2001, \NewAR, 45, 449

735: 

736: \bibitem[Lasota et~al.(1995)]{las95wzsge}

737:   Lasota, J.~P., Hameury, J.~M., \& Hur\'{e}, J.~M.\ 1995, \aap, 302, L29

738: 

739: \bibitem[Mason, Howell(2003)]{mas03faintCV}

740:   Mason, E., \& Howell, S.\ 2003, \aap, 403, 699

741: 

742: \bibitem[Maza et~al.(1989)]{maz89CTS}

743:   Maza, J., Ruiz, M.~T., Gonzalez, L.~E., \& Wischnjewsky, M.\ 1989, \apjs, 69,

744:   349

745: 

746: \bibitem[Meinunger(1970)]{mei70fltra}

747:   Meinunger, L.\ 1970, \MitVS, 5, 156

748: 

749: \bibitem[Meyer, Meyer-Hofmeister(1994)]{mey94siphonflow}

750:   Meyer, F., \& Meyer-Hofmeister, E.\ 1994, \aap, 288, 175

751: 

752: \bibitem[Mineshige et~al.(1998)]{min98wzsge}

753:   Mineshige, S., Liu, B., Meyer, F., \& Meyer-Hofmeister, E.\ 1998, \pasj, 50,

754:   L5

755: 

756: \bibitem[{Nogami}(2007)]{nog07suuma}

757:   {Nogami}, D.\ 2007, in The Seventh Pacific Rim Conference on Stellar

758:   Astrophysics, ed. Y.~W. {Kang}, H.-W. {Lee}, K.-C. {Leung}, \& K.-S. {Cheng}

759:   Vol.~362 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series(.

760: pp 195--+

761: 

762: \bibitem[{Oizumi} et~al.(2007)]{oiz07v844her}

763:   {Oizumi}, S., {et~al.}\ 2007, astro-ph/0702752

764: 

765: \bibitem[Osaki(1989)]{osa89suuma}

766:   Osaki, Y.\ 1989, \pasj, 41, 1005

767: 

768: \bibitem[Osaki(1996)]{osa96review}

769:   Osaki, Y.\ 1996, \pasp, 108, 39

770: 

771: \bibitem[{Osaki}(2005)]{2005PJAB...81..291O}

772:   {Osaki}, Y.\ 2005, Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Ser.~B: Physical and

773:   Biological Sciences, Vol.~81, p.~291-305., 81, 291

774: 

775: \bibitem[Osaki, Meyer(2002)]{osa02wzsgehump}

776:   Osaki, Y., \& Meyer, F.\ 2002, \aap, 383, 574

777: 

778: \bibitem[Osaki, Meyer(2003)]{osa03DNoutburst}

779:   Osaki, Y., \& Meyer, F.\ 2003, \aap, 401, 325

780: 

781: \bibitem[Patterson et~al.(2005)]{pat05suuma}

782:   Patterson, J., {et~al.}\ 2005, \pasp, 117, 1204

783: 

784: \bibitem[Patterson et~al.(2000)]{pat00iyuma}

785:   Patterson, J., Kemp, J., Jensen, L., Vanmunster, T., Skillman, D.~R., Martin,

786:   B., Fried, R., \& Thorstensen, J.~R.\ 2000, \pasp, 112, 1567

787: 

788: \bibitem[Patterson et~al.(2002)]{pat02wzsge}

789:   Patterson, J., {et~al.}\ 2002, \pasp, 114, 721

790: 

791: \bibitem[Patterson et~al.(2003)]{pat03suumae}

792:   Patterson, J., {et~al.}\ 2003, \pasp, 115, 1308

793: 

794: \bibitem[Pojmanski(2002)]{poj02asas3}

795:   Pojmanski, G.\ 2002, \AcA, 52, 397

796: 

797: \bibitem[Stellingwerf(1978)]{ste78pdm}

798:   Stellingwerf, R.~F.\ 1978, \apj, 224, 953

799: 

800: \bibitem[Tappert et~al.(2004)]{tap04ctcv}

801:   Tappert, C., Augusteijn, T., \& Maza, J.\ 2004, \mnras, 354, 321

802: 

803: \bibitem[Templeton et~al.(2006)]{tem06asas0025}

804:   Templeton, M.R., {et~al.}\ 2006, \pasp, 118, 226

805: 

806: \bibitem[Uemura et~al.(2001)]{uem01v725aql}

807:   Uemura, M., Kato, T., Pavlenko, E., Baklanov, A., \& Pietz, J.\ 2001, \pasj,

808:   53, 539

809: 

810: \bibitem[Uemura et~al.(2005)]{uem05tvcrv}

811:   Uemura, M., {et~al.}\ 2005, \aap, 432, 261

812: 

813: \bibitem[Vogt(1974)]{vog74vwhyi}

814:   Vogt, N.\ 1974, \aap, 36, 369

815: 

816: \bibitem[Wade, Horne(1988)]{wad88zcha}

817:   Wade, R.~A., \& Horne, K.\ 1988, \apj, 324, 411

818: 

819: \bibitem[Warner(1995)]{war95book}

820:   Warner, B.\ 1995, Cataclysmic Variable Stars (\PublisherCambridge)

821: 

822: \bibitem[Whitehurst(1988)]{whi88tidal}

823:   Whitehurst, R.\ 1988, \mnras, 232, 35

824: 

825: \bibitem[Wood et~al.(1986)]{woo86zcha}

826:   Wood, J., Horne, K., Berriman, G., Wade, R., O'Donoghue, D., \& Warner, B.\

827:   1986, \mnras, 219, 629

828: 

829: \bibitem[Wood et~al.(1989)]{woo89oycar}

830:   Wood, J.~H., Horne, K., Berriman, G., \& Wade, R.~A.\ 1989, \apj, 341, 974

831: 

832: \end{thebibliography}

833: 

834: \end{document}

835: