1: %\documentstyle[12pt,aasms4]{article}
2: %\documentstyle[12pt,aaspp4]{article}
3: \documentclass[12pt,aaspp4]{aastex}
4: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
5:
6: \usepackage{natbib}
7: \citestyle{aa}
8:
9: \begin{document}
10: \newcommand{\up}[1]{\ifmmode^{\rm #1}\else$^{\rm #1}$\fi}
11: \newcommand{\zdot}{\makebox[0pt][l]{.}}
12: \newcommand{\upd}{\up{d}}
13: \newcommand{\uph}{\up{h}}
14: \newcommand{\upm}{\up{m}}
15: \newcommand{\ups}{\up{s}}
16: \newcommand{\arcd}{\ifmmode^{\circ}\else$^{\circ}$\fi}
17: \newcommand{\arcm}{\ifmmode{'}\else$'$\fi}
18: \newcommand{\arcs}{\ifmmode{''}\else$''$\fi}
19:
20: \title{The Araucaria Project. The Distance of the Large Magellanic Cloud
21: from Near-Infrared Photometry of RR Lyrae Variables
22: \footnote{Based on observations obtained with the ESO NTT for
23: programme 074.D-0318(B)}
24: }
25: \author{Olaf Szewczyk}
26: \affil{Universidad de Concepci{\'o}n, Departamento de Fisica, Astronomy
27: Group,
28: Casilla 160-C,
29: Concepci{\'o}n, Chile}
30: \affil{Warsaw University Observatory, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478, Warsaw,
31: Poland}
32: \authoremail{szewczyk@astro-udec.cl}
33: \author{Grzegorz Pietrzy{\'n}ski}
34: \affil{Universidad de Concepci{\'o}n, Departamento de Fisica, Astronomy
35: Group,
36: Casilla 160-C,
37: Concepci{\'o}n, Chile}
38: \affil{Warsaw University Observatory, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478, Warsaw,
39: Poland}
40: \authoremail{pietrzyn@astrouw.edu.pl}
41: \author{Wolfgang Gieren}
42: \affil{Universidad de Concepci{\'o}n, Departamento de Fisica, Astronomy Group,
43: Casilla 160-C, Concepci{\'o}n, Chile}
44: \authoremail{wgieren@astro-udec.cl}
45: \author{Jesper Storm}
46: \affil{Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam, An der Sternwarte 16,
47: D-14482
48: Potsdam, Germany}
49: \authoremail{jstorm@aip.de}
50: \author{Alistair Walker}
51: \affil{Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, Casilla 603, La Serena,
52: Chile}
53: \authoremail{awalker@ctio.noao.edu}
54: \author{Luca Rizzi}
55: \affil{Joint Astronomy Centre, 66 N. A'ohoku Pl., Hilo, Hawaii, 96720}
56: \authoremail{luca@ifa.hawaii.edu}
57: \author{Karen Kinemuchi}
58: \affil{Universidad de Concepci{\'o}n, Departamento de Fisica, Astronomy
59: Group,
60: Casilla 160-C, Concepci{\'o}n, Chile}
61: \affil{University of Florida,
62: Department of
63: Astronomy, Gainesville, Florida 32611-2055, USA}
64: \authoremail{kkinemuchi@astro-udec.cl}
65: \author{Fabio Bresolin}
66: \affil{Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2680 Woodlawn
67: Drive, Honolulu HI 96822, USA}
68: \authoremail{bresolin@ifa.hawaii.edu}
69: \author{Rolf-Peter Kudritzki}
70: \affil{Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2680 Woodlawn
71: Drive, Honolulu HI 96822, USA}
72: \authoremail{kud@ifa.hawaii.edu}
73: \author{Massimo Dall'Ora}
74: \affil{INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, I-80131 Napoli, Italy}
75: \authoremail{dallora@oacn.inaf.it}
76:
77:
78: \begin{abstract}
79: We have obtained deep infrared $J$ and $K$ band observations of five
80: fields located in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) bar with the ESO
81: New Technology Telescope equipped with the SOFI infrared camera. In
82: our fields, 65 RR Lyrae stars catalogued by the OGLE collaboration
83: were identified. Using different theoretical and empirical calibrations of the
84: period-luminosity-metallicity relation, we find consistent LMC
85: distance moduli values. Since the observed fields are situated very
86: close to the center of the LMC, the correction for the tilt of the LMC bar with
87: respect to the line of sight is negligible. Our adopted best true
88: distance modulus to the LMC of $18.58 \pm 0.03$ (statistical) $\pm$
89: 0.11 (systematic) mag agrees very well with most independent
90: determinations to this galaxy.
91: \end{abstract}
92:
93: \keywords{distance scale - galaxies: distances and redshifts - galaxies:
94: individual(LMC) - stars: RR Lyrae - infrared photometry}
95:
96: \section{Introduction}
97: In our ongoing Araucaria Project (e.g. Gieren et al. 2005a), we are applying a
98: number of different stellar standard candles to independently determine the
99: distances to a sample of nearby galaxies. The systematic differences
100: between the distance results obtained for the individual galaxies from
101: the various stellar candles will be analyzed in forthcoming
102: papers. This analysis is expected to finally lead to a detailed
103: understanding of how the various stellar techniques, which are
104: fundamental to calibrate the first rungs of the distance ladder, depend
105: on metallicity and age. While the objects we use for the
106: distance determinations are usually detected from optical wide-field imaging
107: surveys of the target galaxies (e.g. Pietrzy{\'n}ski et al. 2002b), the most
108: accurate distance work is then done from follow-up near-infrared images which
109: virtually eliminate reddening as a significant source of error on the
110: results. Examples of this very successful approach are the recent Cepheid work
111: on NGC 55 (Gieren et al. 2008), and the red clump star work on the LMC
112: (Pietrzy{\'n}ski \& Gieren 2002a). The Araucaria Project has also been
113: developing a new spectroscopic distance indicator, viz. the flux-weighted
114: gravity-luminosity relationship for blue supergiants (Kudritzki et al. 2003;
115: 2008) which holds the promise to yield distances accurate to 5\% to galaxies
116: containing massive blue stars out to about 10 Mpc from low-resolution spectra.
117:
118: Thanks to several recent theoretical and empirical studies, evidence has been
119: mounting that RR Lyrae (RRL) stars are excellent standard candles in the
120: near-infrared spectral range, providing distance results which are superior to
121: the traditional optical method (e.g. Bono 2003a). Longmore et al. (1986) were
122: the first to show that RRL variable stars follow a period-luminosity (PL)
123: relation in the near-infrared K-band. Their pioneering work was followed by
124: Liu \& Janes (1990),
125: % response to referee comment
126: Jones et al. (1996),
127: %Jones et al. (1992),
128: %
129: and Skillen et al. (1993),
130: who applied infrared versions of the Baade-Wesselink method to
131: calibrate the luminosities and distances of RRL stars. A very
132: comprehensive analysis of the IR properties of RRL stars was
133: given by Nemec et al. (1994). The first theoretical constraints on the
134: K-band PL relation of RRL stars are based on non-linear convective
135: pulsation models that were presented by Bono et al. (2001). Dall'Ora et
136: al. (2004) later demonstrated that the K-band PL relation for RRL
137: stars appears to have a very small scatter for globular clusters, with
138: small intrinsic spread in metallicity for this type of stars. Further theoretical
139: explorations of the RRL period-mean magnitude-metallicity
140: relations in near-infrared passbands were carried out by Bono et
141: al. (2003b), Catelan et al. (2004), and Cassisi et al. (2004). Most recently, Sollima et
142: al. (2006) analyzed near-infrared K-band data of RRL stars in
143: some 15 Galactic globular clusters and provided the first empirical
144: calibration of the period-luminosity-metallicity (PLZ) relation in the
145: $K$ band. All these existing theoretical and empirical studies have
146: suggested that the RRL star K-band PLZ relation appears to be
147: indeed a superb means to determine accurate distances to galaxies
148: hosting an abundant old stellar population.
149:
150: We have therefore started to include this rather new tool in the
151: Araucaria Project distance work. Pietrzy{\'n}ski et al. (2008)
152: implemented the RRL K-band PLZ relation for single-epoch K-band
153: magnitudes of a large sample of RRL stars in the Sculptor dwarf
154: galaxy. The distance determination from their analysis for this
155: galaxy compares very well with the distance of Sculptor determined
156: from the tip of the red giant branch method. In this paper, we are
157: applying the RRL K-band PLZ relation to a sample of RRL stars in five fields
158: of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC).
159: % response to referee comment
160: This is especially important
161: because the LMC Cepheid PL relation has served as the fiducial relation
162: to which the Cepheid distances measured to a sample of late-type
163: galaxies by the two HST Key Projects (Freedman et al. 2001; Saha et al.
164: 2001) has been tied.
165: %
166: On the other
167: hand, there is still an uncomfortably large and annoying discrepancy
168: among modern distance determinations to the LMC from different methods
169: (e.g. Schaefer 2008; Gieren et al. 2005b; Walker 2003; Feast 2003;
170: Benedict el al. 2002). Most recent distance determinations to the LMC
171: have clustered around the value of 18.5 mag that was adopted by the Key Project
172: (but see a cautionary comment made by Schaefer (2008)). Discrepant results
173: continue to be obtained, as shown by recent exhaustive determinations of Milky
174: Way Cepheid distances from the infrared surface brightness technique
175: (Fouqu{\'e} et al. 2007; Fouqu{\'e} \& Gieren 1997). A shorter
176: LMC distance modulus (closer to 18.4 mag) was suggested by this method.
177: A first determination of the LMC distance from an application of the
178: K-band PLZ relation on the LMC field RRL variable stars is an
179: important step towards a resolution of the distance discrepancy.
180: This is urgently needed for true progress on the calibration of the
181: distance scale.
182:
183:
184: \section{Observations, Data Reduction and Calibration}
185:
186: All the near-infrared data used and presented in this paper were collected
187: during one of the Araucaria Project observing runs. The SOFI infrared camera
188: of the ESO New Technology Telescope (NTT) telescope at La Silla
189: Observatory was used. With the Large Field setup we achieved a $4.9 \times
190: 4.9$ arcminute field of view and a pixel scale of 0.288 arcsec/pixel.
191:
192: During two photometric nights we obtained deep $Js$ and $Ks$ observations of
193: five fields in the LMC, with each field containing at least a dozen RRL stars.
194: Fig. \ref{figfields} displays the location of these fields in the
195: LMC. On the second night, fields 1 and 2 were overlapped with field
196: 3a. Detailed information on each field is given in Table \ref{tabfields}.
197: In order to take into consideration the rapid sky level variations in the
198: infrared passband, we used a dithering technique. Total integration
199: times were up to 40 minutes for $Ks$, and 11 minutes for the $Js$ band.
200:
201: The pipeline developed in the course of Araucaria Project was used for all the
202: reductions and calibrations. First, the subtraction of sky level was applied
203: in a two-step process which includes the masking of stars with the IRAF xdimsum
204: package (Pietrzy{\'n}ski \& Gieren 2002a). Next, each single image was
205: flat fielded and stacked into the final deep field. PSF photometry, including
206: aperture corrections, was performed in the same way as described in
207: Pietrzy{\'n}ski, Gieren \& Udalski (2002c).
208:
209: The calibration of the photometry onto the standard system was based on
210: observations of 14 standard stars from the UKIRT list (Hawarden et
211: al. 2001). All of them were observed together with the target fields during
212: photometric conditions at different airmasses. Thanks to the large number of
213: standard stars observed along with the science target fields, the accuracy of
214: our photometry zero point was estimated to be as good as 0.02 mag.
215: Our calibrated photometric magnitudes were compared with the 2MASS catalogue
216: for common stars, which gave us a zero point difference. Also stars that were
217: measured on both nights and cross-identified on different fields were
218: compared (SC5-FI + SC5-FII with SC5-FIII, and SC7-FV, on following
219: nights).
220: % response to referee comment
221: The results of comparison of zero point differences between our work and 2MASS are shown in Table \ref{tab2mass}.
222: %
223: % response to referee comment
224: The increase in difference between K-band observations for field 3a may be caused by larger crowding and less accuracy of 2MASS photometry in these regions.
225: %
226: The Red Clump (RC) brightness was
227: also compared with previously published data (Pietrzy{\'n}ski,
228: Gieren \& Udalski 2003). Results of the determination of the RC star mean
229: brightness in each of our fields are given in Tab. \ref{tabrc}. They compare very well
230: with the values found by Pietrzy{\'n}ski \& Gieren (2002a) in their observed
231: fields ($J=17.507 \pm 0.009$, $K=16.895 \pm 0.007$). The calibrated
232: near-infrared magnitudes for all RRL stars identified in our
233: fields are presented in Tab. \ref{tabrawobs}.
234:
235:
236: \section{Near-Infrared Period-Luminosity Relations}
237:
238: The sample of 65 RRL stars we have observed in our chosen SOFI/NTT fields
239: were cross-identified with the OGLE catalogue of RRL stars in the LMC
240: (Soszy{\'n}ski et al. 2003). The position of all identified stars in the $K$, $J-K$
241: color-magnitude diagram is shown on Fig. \ref{figcmd}.
242: Most of the stars have only one random-phase measurement, but some
243: have two random-phase observations taken on the two different nights. A
244: few of the RRL stars were cross-identified in the overlapping
245: fields, which provided three measurements for these objects.
246:
247: The period-luminosity (PL) relations for the $J$ and $K$ bands derived from our
248: data are shown in Fig. \ref{figplav}. For the RRL stars with more than one
249: observation, we took a straight average of the random-phase magnitudes, which
250: should lead to a better approximation of their mean magnitudes. In
251: Fig. \ref{figplav}, two distinct groups can be distinguished that correspond to the
252: first overtone (RRc) and fundamental mode (RRab) pulsators,
253: respectively. The relatively large scatters seen in both figures \ref{figcmd} and \ref{figplav} is
254: mostly caused by three factors: 1) the random single-phase nature of
255: our IR measurements, which represents the mean magnitude of an RRL variable
256: only to $\sim 0.15$ mag (e.g. Del Principe et al. 2006), 2)
257: the metallicity spread among RRL stars in the LMC, and 3) the accuracy of our
258: single measurements, which is 0.03-0.19 mag for stars of brightnesses of
259: 16.6-18.6 mag in the $K$ band.
260:
261: Since the most important contributor to the scatter in Figure \ref{figplav} is
262: the replacement of the mean magnitudes by single-phase or by averaged
263: few-phase measurements, we used accurate optical ($BVI$) photometry
264: from the OGLE archive (Soszy{\'n}ski et al. 2003) of the the studied sample
265: of RRL stars, taken close in time to the NIR data. With the additional
266: optical data, we can calculate improved $JK$ phase points in
267: order to use the
268: % response to referee comment
269: Jones et al. (1996)
270: %Jones et al. (1992)
271: %
272: template light curve method
273: % response to referee comment
274: (available only for the $K$ band).
275: %
276: The $J$, $K$, and $\langle K \rangle$ magnitudes are given in Table \ref{tabavobs}.
277:
278:
279: We compare the PL relations derived for the RRab stars (averaged
280: observations) and for all of the RRL stars (RRab and RRc) against
281: the existing theoretical (Bono et al. 2003b; Catelan et al. 2004) and
282: empirical (Sollima et al. 2006; 2008) relations. Table \ref{tabplav} lists our results for the
283: slope and zero point values of the PL relations as well as those
284: from the theoretical and empirical ones. Furthermore, in Table
285: \ref{tabplmean}, we present the K-band zero point and slope values obtained from
286: % response to referee comment
287: $\langle K \rangle$
288: %
289: magnitudes derived from the
290: % response to referee comment
291: Jones et al. (1996)
292: %Jones et al. (1992)
293: %
294: light curve template method.
295:
296:
297: \section{The Distance Determination}
298:
299: In order to derive the apparent distance moduli to LMC from our data, we used
300: the following calibrations of the near-infrared PL relations of mixed
301: population RRL stars:
302:
303: \begin{equation} M_{K} = -1.07 - 2.38\log P + 0.08[Fe/H]
304: \qquad\mbox{-- Sollima et al. (2008)}
305: \end{equation}
306:
307: \begin{equation} M_{K} = -0.77 - 2.101\log P + 0.231[Fe/H]
308: \qquad\mbox{-- Bono et al. (2003b)}
309: \end{equation}
310:
311: \begin{equation} M_{K} = -0.597 - 2.353\log P + 0.175\log Z
312: \qquad\mbox{-- Catelan et al. (2004)}
313: \end{equation}
314:
315: \begin{equation} M_{J} = -0.141 - 1.773\log P + 0.190\log Z
316: \qquad\mbox{-- Catelan et al. (2004)}
317: \end{equation}
318:
319: We recall that the calibration of Sollima et al. (2008) was constructed for the 2MASS
320: photometric system, while the calibrations of Catelan et al. (2004) and Bono et
321: al. (2003b) are valid for the Glass and Bessel and Brett systems,
322: respectively. Therefore, we transformed our own data, calibrated onto the
323: UKIRT system (Hawarden et al. 2001) to the Glass and Bessel and Brett systems
324: using the transformations given by Carpenter (2001) before calculating
325: distances using the calibrations of Catelan et al. (2004) and Bono et
326: al. (2003b). Since there is virtually no difference between the K-band
327: of 2MASS and UKIRT (Carpenter 2001), we did not apply any
328: transformations to our data while using the Sollima et al. (2008) calibration.
329:
330: In order to combine the RRab and RRc stars, we fundamentalize the RRc periods by adding $\log P = 0.127$.
331: Assuming the mean metallicity of our RRL sample to be $[Fe/H] = -1.48$ (Gratton et al. 2004), we have
332: calculated the $K$ and $J$ band distance moduli for the averaged magnitude
333: and mean magnitude based on the template light-curve data. The fits for
334: the relations 1-4 to both sets of data are displayed in Figs \ref{figfitjk} and \ref{figfitk}.
335:
336: To correct the derived apparent distance moduli for interstellar reddening,
337: we adopted reddening maps of $E(B-V)$ calculated for the LMC by Udalski et
338: al. (1999). Assuming the reddening law from
339: % response to referee comment
340: Fitzpatrick (1999),
341: %Schlegel et al. (1998),
342: %
343: we calculate the following selective extinctions in the
344: different bands: $A_{K} = 0.367E(B-V)$ and $A_{J}= 0.902E(B-V)$.
345:
346: For the averaged $K$ band data the true distance moduli of $18.58 \pm
347: 0.03$, $18.62 \pm 0.03$, and $18.60 \pm 0.03$ mag, were obtained using the
348: calibrations of Sollima et al. (2008), Bono et al (2003b) and Catelan et
349: al. (2004), respectively. Based on the $J$ band data and the calibration of
350: Catelan et al. (2004), the distance moduli of $18.55 \pm 0.03$ mag was
351: derived. Similar values of the true distance moduli were calculated using the
352: mean
353: % response to referee comment
354: $\langle K \rangle$
355: %
356: band magnitudes obtained from the
357: % response to referee comment
358: Jones et al. (1996)
359: %Jones et al. (1992)
360: %
361: template fitting
362: ($18.56 \pm 0.03$ - Sollima et al. (2008), $18.60 \pm 0.03$ - Bono et al. (2003b),
363: $18.59 \pm 0.03$ - Catelan et al. (2004)). These results are summarized in
364: Tab. \ref{tabdist}. For our best distance determination, we adopt the average
365: value from all the results to be of $18.58 \pm 0.03$ mag.
366:
367: \section{Discussion}
368:
369: The distance moduli obtained based on several independent theoretical
370: and empirical calibrations are consistent. The maximum difference
371: of 0.04 mag between the results from the calibrations of Sollima et al.
372: (2008) and Bono et al. (2003b) is certainly not significant taking into
373: account all uncertainties, which affect the whole process of
374: constructing the mentioned calibrations. However, it is interesting to note
375: that a very similar difference between the distance moduli derived using
376: these two calibrations was recently obtained by Pietrzy{\'n}ski et al.
377: (2008) for the Sculptor galaxy ($[Fe/H] = -1.83$ dex). Therefore,
378: perhaps there is just a zero point offset in the sense that the
379: distances from the calibration of Sollima et al. (2008) are slightly
380: shorter compared to those from the calibration of Bono et al. (2003b).
381:
382: Taking into account the errors associated with the adopted calibrations,
383: mean metallicity, photometric zero point and absorption correction,
384: we estimate the systematic error of our distance determination to be of
385: 0.11 mag. Therefore our best distance modulus determination to the LMC
386: is: $18.58 \pm 0.03$ (statistical) $\pm 0.11$ (systematic) mag.
387:
388: It is worthwhile to mention that the observed fields are located not only close
389: to the LMC center, but also opposite each other around it,
390: so the corrections for the tilt of this galaxy with
391: respect to the line of sight are expected to be very small.
392: Indeed applying the geometrical model of van der Marel et al.
393: (2002) to correct our data for this effect, we obtain a distance
394: modulus shorter by 0.01 mag.
395: % response to referee comment
396: Comparing our distance result from the present field RR Lyrae stars to
397: the distance obtained by Dall'Ora el al. (2004) for the Reticulum
398: cluster, there is evidence that the cluster could be very slightly
399: nearer than the LMC center, by about 3\%, but this small difference
400: is clearly within the combined uncertainties, even the statistical
401: ones, of both determinations.
402: %
403:
404: Very recently Sollima et al. (2008), using their calibration and
405: the IR data of a sample of RRL stars presented by Borissova
406: et al. (2004), obtained a distance modulus to the LMC of $18.56 \pm
407: 0.13$ mag. Our distance moduli derived based on this same calibration are
408: virtually the same, which reinforces both results.
409:
410: Our distance modulus agrees very well with the most LMC distance moduli
411: derived from other independent techniques (Freedman et al. 2001;
412: Benedict et al. 2002; Walker 2003). In particular this result is very
413: similar to the measurements obtained based on the near infrared
414: photometry of Cepheids (Persson et al. 2004) and the red clump stars
415: (Alves et al. 2002; Grocholski \& Sarajedini 2002; Pietrzy{\'n}ski \&
416: Gieren 2002a).
417:
418: \section{Summary and Conclusions}
419: The results of our deep infrared imaging of 65 RR Lyrae stars in the central
420: regions of the LMC are presented. Our data shows two clear sequences
421: in the period luminosity plane, which correspond to the RRc and RRab
422: stars. After fundamentalizing the RRc periods to the period of
423: the RRab stars by adding $\log P = 0.127$, both groups were
424: merged, and the distance moduli to the LMC were determined using
425: different theoretical and empirical calibrations. Our final adopted
426: distance agrees very well with the recent results obtained from the
427: near infrared observations of Cepheids and red clump stars as well as
428: with those calculated from other techniques.
429:
430: Our results confirm that the RR Lyrae period-luminosity-metallicity
431: relations in the near infrared passband are potentially a very good tool
432: for precise distance measurements.
433:
434:
435: \acknowledgments
436: WG and GP gratefully acknowledge financial support for this
437: work from the Chilean Center for Astrophysics FONDAP 15010003.
438: Support from the Polish grant N203 002 31/046 and the FOCUS
439: subsidy of the Fundation for Polish Science (FNP)
440: is also acknowledged.
441: WG gratefully acknowledges support for this work from the Chilean
442: Centro de Astrofisica y Tecnologias Afines, CATA.
443: It is a special pleasure to thank the support astronomers at ESO-La Silla
444: for their expert help in the observations, and the ESO OPC for the
445: generous amounts of observing time at the NTT allocated to our programme.
446: We thank the referee, Dr. Giuseppe Bono, for constructive remarks
447: which helped to improve the paper.
448:
449: \begin{references}
450: \reference{} Alves, D., Rejkuba, M., Minniti, D. \& Cook, K., 2002,
451: \apj, 573, L51
452:
453: \reference{} Benedict, G.F., et al., 2002, \aj, 124, 1695
454:
455: \reference{} Bono, G., Caputo, F., Castellani, V., Marconi, M. \& Storm, J., 2001,
456: \mnras, 326, 1183
457:
458: \reference{} Bono, G., 2003a, in Stellar Candles for the Extragalactic Distance Scale,
459: eds. D. Alloin and W. Gieren, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 635, p. 85
460:
461: \reference{} Bono, G., Caputo, F., Castellani, V., Marconi, M., Storm, J. \&
462: Degl'Innocenti, S., 2003b, \mnras, 344, 1097
463:
464: \reference{} Borrisova, J., Minniti, D., Rejkuba, M., Alves, D., Cook, K.H. \& Freeman, K.C., 2004, \aap, 423, 97
465:
466: \reference{} Carpenter, J.M., 2001, \aj, 121, 2851
467:
468: \reference{} Cassisi, S., Castellani, M., Caputo, F. \& Castellani, V., 2004, \aap, 426, 641
469:
470: \reference{} Catelan, M., Pritzl, B.J. \& Smith, H.A., 2004, \apjs, 154, 633
471:
472: \reference{} Dall'Ora, M., Storm, J., Bono, G., et al., 2004, \apj, 610, 269
473:
474: \reference{} Del Principe, M., Piersimoni, A.M., Storm, J., et al., 2006, \apj, 652, 362
475:
476: \reference{} Feast, M.W., 2003, in Stellar Candles for the Extragalactic Distance Scale,
477: eds. D. Alloin and W. Gieren, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 635, p. 45
478:
479: \reference{} Fitzpatrick, E.L., 1999, PASP, 111, 63
480:
481: \reference{} Fouqu{\'e}, P., and Gieren, W., 1997, \aap, 320, 799
482:
483: \reference{} Fouqu{\'e}, P., Arriagada, P., Storm, J., et al., 2007, \aap, 476, 73
484:
485: \reference{} Freedman, W.L., et al., 2001, \apj, 553, 47
486:
487: \reference{} Gieren, W., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Bresolin, F., et al., 2005a, Messenger, 121, 23
488:
489: \reference{} Gieren, W., Storm, J., Barnes, T.G., Fouqu{\'e}, P., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G. \& Kienzle, F., 2005b, \apj, 627, 224
490:
491: \reference{} Gieren, W., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Soszy{\'n}ski, I., Bresolin, F., Kudritzki, R.P.,
492: Storm, J. \& Minniti, D., 2008, \apj, 672, 266
493:
494: \reference{} Gratton, R.G., Bragaglia, A., Clementini, G., Caretta, E.,
495: Di Fabrizio, L., Maio, K. \& Taribello, E., 2004, \aap, 421, 937
496:
497: \reference{} Grocholski, A.,J., and Sarajedini, A., 2002, \aj, 123, 1603
498:
499: \reference{} Hawarden, T.G., Leggett, S.K., Letawsky, M.B., et al., 2001, \mnras, 325, 563
500:
501: % response to referee comment
502: \reference{} Jones, R.V., Carney, B.W. \& Fulbright, J.P., 1996, PASP, 108, 877
503: %\reference{} Jones, R.V., Carney, B.W., Storm, J., and Latham, D.W., 1992, \apj, 386, 646
504: %
505:
506: \reference{} Kudritzki, R.-P., Bresolin, F. \& Przybilla, N., 2003, \apj, 582, L83
507:
508: \reference{} Kudritzki, R.-P., Urbaneja, M.A., Bresolin, F., Przybilla, N., Gieren, W. \& Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., 2008, \apj, submitted, astro-ph/arXiv0803.3654
509:
510: \reference{} Liu, T., and Janes, K.A., 1990, \apj, 354, 273
511:
512: \reference{} Longmore, A.J., Fernley, J.A. \& Jameson, R.F., 1986, \mnras, 220, 279
513:
514: \reference{} Nemec, J.M., Nemec, A.F. Linnell \& Lutz, T.E., 1994, \aj, 108,
515: 222
516:
517: \reference{} Persson, S.E., Madore, B.F., Krzemi{\'n}ski, W., Freedman,
518: W.L., Roth, M. \& Murphy, D.C., 2004, \aj, 128, 2239
519:
520: \reference{} Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., and Gieren, W., 2002a, \aj, 124, 2633
521:
522: \reference{} Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Gieren, W., Fouqu{\'e}, P. \& Pont, F., 2002b, \aj, 123, 789
523:
524: \reference{} Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Gieren, W. \& Udalski, A., 2002c,
525: \pasp, 114, 298
526:
527: \reference{} Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Gieren, W. \& Udalski, A., 2003, \aj, 125, 2494
528:
529: \reference{} Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Gieren, W., Szewczyk, O., Rizzi, L., Bresolin, F.,
530: Kudritzki, R.-P., Nalewajko, K., Storm, J., Dall'Ora, M. \& Ivanov, V., 2008, \aj, submitted
531:
532: \reference{} Saha, A., Sandage, A., Tammann, G.A., Dolphin, A.E., Christensen, J., Panagia, N. \& Maccetto, F.D., 2001, \apj, 550, 554
533:
534: \reference{} Schaefer, B.E., 2008, \aj, in press, astro-ph/arXiv0709.4531
535:
536: % response to referee comment
537: %\reference{} Schlegel, D.J., Finkbeiner, D.P., and Davis, M., 1998, \apj, 500, 525
538: %
539:
540: \reference{} Skillen, I., Fernley, J.A., Stobie, R.S. \& Jameson, R.F., 1993, MNRAS, 265, 301
541:
542: \reference{} Sollima, A., Cacciari, C. \& Valenti, E., 2006, \mnras, 372, 1675
543:
544: \reference{} Sollima, A., Cacciari, C., Arkharov, A.A., Larionow, V.M.,
545: Gorshanov, N.V. \& Piersimoni, A., 2008, \mnras, in press, astro-ph/arXiv0712.0578
546:
547: \reference{} Soszy{\'n}ski, I., Udalski, A., Szyma{\'n}ski, M., Kubiak, M., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Wo{\'z}niak, P., {\.Z}ebru{\'n}, K., Szewczyk, O. \& Wyrzykowski, {\L}, 2003, Acta Astronomica, 53, 93
548:
549: \reference{} Udalski, A., Soszy{\'n}ski, I., Szyma{\'n}ski, M., Kubiak, M., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G. Wo{\'z}niak, P. \& {\.Z}ebru{\'n}, K., 1999, Acta Astronomica, 49, 223
550:
551: \reference{} Van der Marel, R.P., Alves, D.R., Hardy, E. \& Suntzeff, N.B., 2002, \aj, 124, 2639
552:
553: \reference{} Walker, A.R., 2003, in Stellar Candles for the Extragalactic Distance Scale,
554: eds. D. Alloin and W. Gieren, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 635, p. 265
555:
556: \end{references}
557:
558: \setcounter{figure}{0}
559:
560: \clearpage
561: \begin{figure}[p]
562: \vspace*{18cm}
563: \special{psfile=Picture1_fields_all.eps hoffset=-15 voffset=15 hscale=50 vscale=50}
564: \caption{The location of our observed $5 \times 5$ arcmin NTT/SOFI fields
565: in LMC on the DSS-2 infrared plate. North is up and east to the left.
566: }
567: \label{figfields}
568: \end{figure}
569:
570: \clearpage
571: \begin{figure}[htb]
572: \vspace*{15cm}
573: \special{psfile=Picture2_cmd.eps hoffset=-20 voffset=-120 hscale=80 vscale=80}
574: \caption{The color-magnitude diagram showing identified RR Lyrae stars
575: (filled circles) in observed fields .
576: }
577: \label{figcmd}
578: \end{figure}
579:
580: \clearpage
581: \begin{figure}[htb]
582: \vspace*{15cm}
583: \special{psfile=Picture3_pl_av.eps hoffset=-20 voffset=-120 hscale=80 vscale=80}
584: \caption{The near-infrared K and J band period-luminosity relations
585: defined by the 65 RR Lyrae stars observed in LMC. Period is in days.
586: Two distinct groups are formed by the fundamental (filled circles) and first overtone (open circles)
587: pulsators which are clearly seen in each panel.}
588: \label{figplav}
589: \end{figure}
590:
591: \clearpage
592: \begin{figure}[htb]
593: \vspace*{15cm}
594: \special{psfile=Picture4_fit_JK.eps hoffset=-20 voffset=-120 hscale=80 vscale=80}
595: \caption{
596: The near-infrared PL relations in $K$ and $J$ defined by our RR Lyrae
597: sample in LMC, plotted along with the best-fitting lines. The slopes
598: of the fits were adopted from the recent theoretical and empirical
599: calibrations, and the zero points determined from our data. The solid,
600: dotted, short and long dashed lines correspond to free fit and the
601: calibration of Sollima et al. (2008), Bono et al. (2003), and Catelan et al. (2004),
602: respectively.}
603: \label{figfitjk}
604: \end{figure}
605:
606: \clearpage
607: \begin{figure}[htb]
608: \vspace*{8cm}
609: \special{psfile=Picture5_fit_K.eps hoffset=-20 voffset=-120 hscale=80 vscale=80}
610: \caption{The near-infrared PL relations in
611: % response to referee comment
612: $\langle K \rangle$
613: %
614: band (corrected with
615: light-curve templates) defined by our RR Lyrae sample in LMC,
616: plotted along with the best-fitting lines. The slopes of the fits
617: were adopted from the recent theoretical and empirical calibrations,
618: and the zero points determined from our data. The solid, dotted,
619: short and long dashed lines correspond to free fit and the
620: calibration of Sollima et al. (2008), Bono et al. (2003), and Catelan et al. (2004),
621: respectively.}
622: \label{figfitk}
623: \end{figure}
624:
625: \setcounter{table}{0}
626: \clearpage
627: \begin{deluxetable}{c c c c c c}
628: %\rotate
629: \tablewidth{0pc}
630: \tablecaption{Observational information of the target fields.
631: % response to referee comment
632: Extinction values based on reddening maps by Udalski et al. (1999).
633: %
634: }
635: \tablehead{ \colhead {Field} & \colhead{Field} & \colhead {RA2000} & \colhead {DEC2000} & \colhead {Date of} & \colhead {Extinction} \\
636: \colhead {No} & \colhead {name} & \colhead {} & \colhead {} & \colhead {observation} & \colhead {E(B-V)} }
637: \startdata
638: 1 & SC5-FI & 05:23:24.0 & -70:05:24.0 & 2006-09-22 & 0.130 \\
639: 2 & SC5-FII & 05:24:16.7 & -70:05:24.0 & 2006-09-22 & 0.130 \\
640: 3a & SC5-FIII & 05:23:50.3 & -70:05:24.0 & 2007-04-06 & 0.130 \\
641: 3 & SC3-FIII & 05:29:26.3 & -70:07:30.0 & 2007-04-06 & 0.134 \\
642: 4 & SC2-FIV & 05:32:05.0 & -69:42:12.9 & 2007-04-06 & 0.150 \\
643: 5 & SC7-FV & 05:18:38.4 & -69:06:00.0 & 2006-09-22, 2007-04-06 & 0.146 \\
644:
645: \enddata
646: \label{tabfields}
647: \end{deluxetable}
648:
649: \clearpage
650: \begin{deluxetable}{c c c c}
651: %\rotate
652: \tablewidth{0pc}
653: \tablecaption{Difference of zeropoint estimation between 2MASS and observed data.}
654: \tablehead{\colhead {Field No} &\colhead{Field name}&\colhead{2MASS-J20070406}&\colhead{2MASS-K20070406}}
655: \startdata
656: 3a & SC5-FIII & 0.03 $\pm$ 0.13 & 0.13 $\pm$ 0.30 \\
657: 3 & SC3-FIII & 0.00 $\pm$ 0.10 & 0.02 $\pm$ 0.10 \\
658: 4 & SC2-FIV & 0.09 $\pm$ 0.15 & 0.03 $\pm$ 0.11 \\
659: 5 & SC7-FV & 0.09 $\pm$ 0.13 & 0.01 $\pm$ 0.11 \\
660: \enddata
661: \label{tab2mass}
662: \end{deluxetable}
663:
664: \clearpage
665: \begin{deluxetable}{c c c c}
666: %\rotate
667: \tablewidth{0pc}
668: \tablecaption{Comparison of red clump star brightnesses for the observed fields.}
669: \tablehead{ \colhead {Field} & \colhead {Date} & \colhead {J RC} & \colhead {K RC} }
670: \startdata
671: 1 SC5-FI & 2006-09-22 & 17.358$\pm$0.011 & 16.895$\pm$0.006 \\
672: 2 SC5-FII & 2006-09-22 & 17.504$\pm$0.006 & 16.950$\pm$0.004 \\
673: 3a SC5-FIII & 2007-04-06 & 17.437$\pm$0.009 & 16.917$\pm$0.007 \\
674: 3 SC3-FIII & 2007-04-06 & 17.492$\pm$0.014 & 16.900$\pm$0.007 \\
675: 4 SC2-FIV & 2007-04-06 & 17.459$\pm$0.012 & 16.924$\pm$0.006 \\
676: 5 SC7-FV & 2006-09-22 & 17.510$\pm$0.009 & 16.956$\pm$0.007 \\
677: 5 SC7-FV & 2007-04-06 & 17.505$\pm$0.012 & 16.950$\pm$0.008 \\
678: \enddata
679: \label{tabrc}
680: \end{deluxetable}
681:
682: \clearpage
683: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccc}
684: \rotate
685: \tablecaption{Individual J and K band Observations of RR Lyrae stars in LMC fields}
686: \tablewidth{0pc}
687: %\tabletypesize{\small}
688: \tablehead{\colhead{Star} & \colhead{Star} & \colhead{Field} & \colhead{J HJD} & \colhead{J mag} & \colhead{$\sigma$} & \colhead{K HJD} & \colhead{K mag} & \colhead{$\sigma$} \\
689: \colhead{ID} & \colhead{type} & \colhead{name} & \colhead{+2400000} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{+2400000} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} }
690: \startdata
691: OGLE051817.95-690358.9 & ab & LMC-SC7-FV & 54001.30645 & 18.84 & 0.05 & 54001.31523 & 18.44 & 0.06 \\
692: & & & 54196.98138 & 18.78 & 0.06 & 54196.98915 & 18.66 & 0.12 \\
693: OGLE051818.33-690513.2 & c & LMC-SC7-FV & 54001.30645 & 18.31 & 0.04 & 54001.31523 & 18.17 & 0.05 \\
694: & & & 54196.98138 & 18.26 & 0.07 & 54196.98915 & 18.14 & 0.07 \\
695: OGLE051818.71-690506.2 & ab & LMC-SC7-FV & 54001.30645 & 17.73 & 0.03 & 54001.31523 & 17.42 & 0.03 \\
696: & & & 54196.98138 & 17.61 & 0.04 & 54196.98915 & 17.30 & 0.05 \\
697: OGLE051820.31-690819.4 & c & LMC-SC7-FV & 54001.30645 & 18.10 & 0.06 & 54001.31523 & 18.10 & 0.05 \\
698: & & & 54196.98138 & 18.13 & 0.06 & 54196.98915 & 18.02 & 0.08 \\
699: OGLE051824.42-690459.4 & ab & LMC-SC7-FV & 54001.30645 & 18.40 & 0.04 & 54001.31523 & 18.08 & 0.04 \\
700: & & & 54196.98138 & 18.17 & 0.04 & 54196.98915 & 17.81 & 0.06 \\
701: OGLE051834.72-690550.6 & ab & LMC-SC7-FV & 54001.30645 & 18.15 & 0.04 & 54001.31523 & 17.97 & 0.04 \\
702: & & & 54196.98138 & 18.25 & 0.04 & 54196.98915 & 18.02 & 0.07 \\
703: OGLE051835.56-690406.0 & ab & LMC-SC7-FV & 54001.30645 & 18.20 & 0.05 & 54001.31523 & 18.09 & 0.05 \\
704: & & & 54196.98138 & 18.24 & 0.06 & 54196.98915 & 18.28 & 0.08 \\
705: OGLE051836.59-690839.6 & ab & LMC-SC7-FV & 54001.30645 & 18.55 & 0.09 & 54001.31523 & 18.47 & 0.05 \\
706: OGLE051836.68-690659.7 & ab & LMC-SC7-FV & 54001.30645 & 18.27 & 0.07 & 54001.31523 & 18.10 & 0.04 \\
707: OGLE051837.86-690821.3 & c & LMC-SC7-FV & 54001.30645 & 18.80 & 0.07 & 54001.31523 & 18.57 & 0.06 \\
708: & & & 54196.98138 & 18.77 & 0.06 & 54196.98915 & 18.57 & 0.10 \\
709: OGLE051841.62-690609.4 & ab & LMC-SC7-FV & 54001.30645 & 18.36 & 0.03 & 54001.31523 & 17.87 & 0.04 \\
710: & & & 54196.98138 & 18.17 & 0.04 & 54196.98915 & 17.81 & 0.06 \\
711: OGLE051842.24-690724.5 & ab & LMC-SC7-FV & 54001.30645 & 18.28 & 0.03 & 54001.31523 & 17.94 & 0.03 \\
712: OGLE051843.33-690502.6 & ab & LMC-SC7-FV & 54001.30645 & 18.43 & 0.05 & 54001.31523 & 18.14 & 0.05 \\
713: & & & 54196.98138 & 18.31 & 0.05 & 54196.98915 & 18.09 & 0.07 \\
714: OGLE051853.07-690819.5 & ab & LMC-SC7-FV & 54196.98138 & 18.30 & 0.04 & 54196.98915 & 17.93 & 0.06 \\
715: OGLE051923.06-693859.0 & ab & LMC-SC7-FV & 54001.30645 & 18.36 & 0.05 & 54001.30645 & 17.80 & 0.07 \\
716: & & & 54196.98138 & 18.35 & 0.07 & 54196.98915 & 17.79 & 0.07 \\
717: OGLE052301.40-700731.0 & c & LMC-SC5-FI & 54001.21410 & 18.58 & 0.05 & 54001.22293 & 18.39 & 0.05 \\
718: OGLE052308.89-700746.7 & c & LMC-SC5-FI & 54001.21410 & 18.48 & 0.05 & 54001.22293 & 18.24 & 0.05 \\
719: OGLE052317.13-700607.2 & ab & LMC-SC5-FI & 54001.21410 & 18.33 & 0.08 & 54001.22293 & 18.10 & 0.08 \\
720: OGLE052318.43-700651.5 & ab & LMC-SC5-FI & 54001.21410 & 18.33 & 0.05 & 54001.22293 & 17.96 & 0.04 \\
721: OGLE052321.67-700739.9 & ab & LMC-SC5-FI & 54001.21410 & 18.41 & 0.06 & 54001.22293 & 18.35 & 0.04 \\
722: OGLE052328.70-700523.8 & c & LMC-SC5-FI & 54001.21410 & 18.13 & 0.08 & 54001.22293 & 17.83 & 0.07 \\
723: & & LMC-SC5-FIII & 54196.99858 & 17.78 & 0.05 & 54197.00711 & 17.73 & 0.07 \\
724: OGLE052329.54-700713.1 & ab & LMC-SC5-FI & 54001.21410 & 17.90 & 0.04 & 54001.22293 & 17.66 & 0.03 \\
725: & & LMC-SC5-FIII & 54196.99858 & 18.21 & 0.08 & 54197.00711 & 17.75 & 0.05 \\
726: OGLE052331.40-700529.1 & ab & LMC-SC5-FI & 54001.21410 & 17.92 & 0.06 & 54001.22293 & 17.79 & 0.04 \\
727: & & LMC-SC5-FIII & 54196.99858 & 18.12 & 0.07 & 54197.00711 & 17.76 & 0.08 \\
728: OGLE052332.28-700654.1 & ab & LMC-SC5-FI & 54001.21410 & 17.35 & 0.03 & 54001.22293 & 17.28 & 0.03 \\
729: & & LMC-SC5-FIII & 54196.99858 & 17.37 & 0.05 & 54197.00711 & 17.29 & 0.05 \\
730: OGLE052335.14-700505.4 & ab & LMC-SC5-FI & 54001.21410 & 18.21 & 0.05 & 54001.22293 & 18.06 & 0.04 \\
731: & & LMC-SC5-FIII & 54196.99858 & 18.39 & 0.05 & 54197.00711 & 18.14 & 0.08 \\
732: OGLE052340.40-700639.8 & ab & LMC-SC5-FIII & 54196.99858 & 18.04 & 0.07 & 54197.00711 & 18.07 & 0.08 \\
733: OGLE052341.81-700632.4 & ab & LMC-SC5-FI & 54001.21410 & 18.97 & 0.11 & 54001.22293 & 18.80 & 0.07 \\
734: & & LMC-SC5-FIII & 54196.99858 & 18.69 & 0.05 & 54197.00711 & 18.32 & 0.09 \\
735: OGLE052345.86-700504.2 & ab & LMC-SC5-FI & 54001.21410 & 17.85 & 0.05 & 54001.22293 & 17.79 & 0.06 \\
736: & & LMC-SC5-FIII & 54196.99858 & 18.35 & 0.05 & 54197.00711 & 18.11 & 0.08 \\
737: OGLE052349.66-700327.1 & ab & LMC-SC5-FI & 54001.21410 & 18.08 & 0.07 & 54001.22293 & 17.83 & 0.06 \\
738: & & LMC-SC5-FII & 54001.26192 & 18.15 & 0.07 & 54001.27070 & 18.23 & 0.07 \\
739: & & LMC-SC5-FIII & 54196.99858 & 18.27 & 0.07 & 54197.00711 & 18.02 & 0.08 \\
740: OGLE052350.37-700443.2 & ab & LMC-SC5-FI & 54001.21410 & 18.50 & 0.07 & 54001.22293 & 18.22 & 0.06 \\
741: & & LMC-SC5-FII & 54001.26192 & 18.61 & 0.05 & 54001.27070 & 18.26 & 0.05 \\
742: & & LMC-SC5-FIII & 54196.99858 & 18.48 & 0.05 & 54197.00711 & 18.25 & 0.09 \\
743: OGLE052353.56-700432.4 & ab & LMC-SC5-FII & 54001.26192 & 18.44 & 0.04 & 54001.27070 & 18.22 & 0.04 \\
744: & & LMC-SC5-FIII & 54196.99858 & 18.18 & 0.05 & 54197.00711 & 18.03 & 0.07 \\
745: OGLE052355.34-700802.6 & c & LMC-SC5-FII & 54001.26192 & 18.82 & 0.08 & 54001.27070 & 18.54 & 0.06 \\
746: & & LMC-SC5-FIII & 54196.99858 & 18.71 & 0.08 & 54197.00711 & 18.81 & 0.18 \\
747: OGLE052357.93-700322.9 & ab & LMC-SC5-FII & 54001.26192 & ... & ... & 54001.27070 & 18.56 & ... \\
748: & & LMC-SC5-FIII & 54196.99858 & 18.80 & 0.08 & 54197.00711 & 18.53 & 0.12 \\
749: OGLE052400.52-700520.9 & ab & LMC-SC5-FII & 54001.26192 & 18.40 & 0.03 & 54001.27070 & 17.98 & 0.04 \\
750: & & LMC-SC5-FIII & 54196.99858 & 18.40 & 0.04 & 54197.00711 & 18.12 & 0.07 \\
751: OGLE052405.11-700611.5 & ab & LMC-SC5-FII & 54001.26192 & 18.18 & 0.04 & 54001.27070 & 17.92 & 0.05 \\
752: & & LMC-SC5-FIII & 54196.99858 & 18.29 & 0.06 & 54197.00711 & 17.99 & 0.07 \\
753: OGLE052418.64-700307.7 & c & LMC-SC5-FIII & 54196.99858 & 18.28 & 0.11 & 54197.00711 & 18.18 & 0.16 \\
754: OGLE052419.91-700616.7 & ab & LMC-SC5-FII & 54001.26192 & ... & ... & 54001.27070 & 17.90 & ... \\
755: OGLE052423.93-700736.4 & ab & LMC-SC5-FII & 54001.26192 & 18.32 & 0.05 & 54001.27070 & 18.12 & 0.04 \\
756: OGLE052859.00-700822.2 & ab & LMC-SC3-FIII & 54197.01705 & 18.97 & 0.10 & 54197.02559 & 18.31 & 0.13 \\
757: OGLE052909.42-700828.1 & ab & LMC-SC3-FIII & 54197.01705 & 17.70 & 0.05 & 54197.02559 & 17.42 & 0.07 \\
758: OGLE052911.54-700836.5 & ab & LMC-SC3-FIII & 54197.01705 & 18.58 & 0.06 & 54197.02559 & 17.99 & 0.07 \\
759: OGLE052917.43-700734.5 & ab & LMC-SC3-FIII & 54197.01705 & 18.34 & 0.04 & 54197.02559 & 18.06 & 0.07 \\
760: OGLE052917.77-700535.6 & ab & LMC-SC3-FIII & 54197.01705 & 18.43 & 0.07 & 54197.02559 & 17.81 & 0.07 \\
761: OGLE052917.87-700841.1 & ab & LMC-SC3-FIII & 54197.01705 & 18.54 & 0.05 & 54197.02559 & 18.23 & 0.08 \\
762: OGLE052917.92-700712.2 & c & LMC-SC3-FIII & 54197.01705 & 18.51 & 0.07 & 54197.02559 & 18.06 & 0.10 \\
763: OGLE052929.39-700551.0 & ab & LMC-SC3-FIII & 54197.01705 & 18.00 & 0.04 & 54197.02559 & 17.59 & 0.06 \\
764: OGLE052932.88-700842.3 & ab & LMC-SC3-FIII & 54197.01705 & 18.37 & 0.06 & 54197.02559 & 18.26 & 0.09 \\
765: OGLE052933.54-700715.9 & ab & LMC-SC3-FIII & 54197.01705 & 18.58 & 0.05 & 54197.02559 & 18.03 & 0.08 \\
766: OGLE052936.94-700721.1 & ab & LMC-SC3-FIII & 54197.01705 & 18.37 & 0.05 & 54197.02559 & 18.35 & 0.08 \\
767: OGLE052937.91-700844.9 & c & LMC-SC3-FIII & 54197.01705 & 18.24 & 0.05 & 54197.02559 & 17.95 & 0.08 \\
768: OGLE052949.93-700558.2 & ab & LMC-SC3-FIII & 54197.01705 & 18.66 & 0.06 & 54197.02559 & 18.22 & 0.09 \\
769: OGLE053147.30-694349.6 & ab & LMC-SC2-FIV & 54197.04702 & 18.11 & 0.05 & 54197.05671 & 17.82 & 0.07 \\
770: OGLE053147.82-694142.2 & ab & LMC-SC2-FIV & 54197.04702 & 18.05 & 0.05 & 54197.05671 & 17.81 & 0.07 \\
771: OGLE053155.92-694232.4 & ab & LMC-SC2-FIV & 54197.04702 & 18.35 & 0.05 & 54197.05671 & 18.19 & 0.08 \\
772: OGLE053200.94-694219.1 & ab & LMC-SC2-FIV & 54197.04702 & 18.20 & 0.09 & 54197.05671 & 18.01 & 0.12 \\
773: OGLE053203.62-694210.7 & ab & LMC-SC2-FIV & 54197.04702 & 18.26 & 0.04 & 54197.05671 & 17.99 & 0.07 \\
774: OGLE053206.72-694342.1 & ab & LMC-SC2-FIV & 54197.04702 & 18.51 & 0.04 & 54197.05671 & 18.38 & 0.09 \\
775: OGLE053206.78-694224.7 & ab & LMC-SC2-FIV & 54197.04702 & 17.98 & 0.04 & 54197.05671 & 18.02 & 0.07 \\
776: OGLE053207.32-694117.2 & ab & LMC-SC2-FIV & 54197.04702 & 17.76 & 0.03 & 54197.05671 & 17.53 & 0.06 \\
777: OGLE053207.88-694058.7 & ab & LMC-SC2-FIV & 54197.04702 & 18.15 & 0.04 & 54197.05671 & 17.93 & 0.07 \\
778: OGLE053217.55-694317.6 & ab & LMC-SC2-FIV & 54197.04702 & 17.95 & 0.08 & 54197.05671 & 17.87 & 0.07 \\
779: OGLE053219.15-694215.2 & ab & LMC-SC2-FIV & 54197.04702 & 18.22 & 0.05 & 54197.05671 & 17.94 & 0.07 \\
780: OGLE053222.39-693952.9 & ab & LMC-SC2-FIV & 54197.04702 & 18.23 & 0.07 & 54197.05671 & 18.03 & 0.11 \\
781: OGLE053225.42-694438.2 & ab & LMC-SC2-FIV & 54197.04702 & 18.38 & 0.07 & 54197.05671 & 18.03 & 0.12 \\
782: OGLE053229.21-694411.0 & ab & LMC-SC2-FIV & 54197.04702 & ... & ... & 54197.05671 & 18.15 & 0.09 \\
783:
784: \enddata
785: \label{tabrawobs}
786: \end{deluxetable}
787:
788: \clearpage
789: \begin{deluxetable}{c c c c c c c c c}
790: %\rotate
791: \tablewidth{0pc}
792: %\tabletypesize{\small}
793: \tablecaption{Averaged and mean magnitudes based on K-band template light-curves of RR Lyrae stars.}
794: \tablehead{\colhead{Star} & \colhead{Star} & \colhead{Period} &
795: \colhead{J} & \colhead{$\sigma$} & \colhead{K} & \colhead{$\sigma$}
796: & \colhead{$\langle K \rangle$} & \colhead{$\sigma$} \\
797: \colhead{ID} & \colhead{type} & \colhead{[days]} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} }
798: \startdata
799: OGLE051817.95-690358.9 & ab & 0.4270819 & 18.81 & 0.08 & 18.55 & 0.13 & 18.47 & 0.08\\
800: OGLE051818.33-690513.2 & c & 0.3543007 & 18.29 & 0.08 & 18.16 & 0.09 & 18.16 & 0.02\\
801: OGLE051818.71-690506.2 & ab & 0.6248463 & 17.67 & 0.05 & 17.36 & 0.06 & 17.43 & 0.05\\
802: OGLE051820.31-690819.4 & c & 0.2892113 & 18.12 & 0.08 & 18.06 & 0.10 & 18.07 & 0.04\\
803: OGLE051824.42-690459.4 & ab & 0.6464268 & 18.28 & 0.06 & 17.95 & 0.07 & 17.99 & 0.09\\
804: OGLE051834.72-690550.6 & ab & 0.4991066 & 18.20 & 0.06 & 17.99 & 0.08 & 18.07 & 0.02\\
805: OGLE051835.56-690406.0 & ab & 0.4736237 & 18.22 & 0.08 & 18.18 & 0.09 & 18.19 & 0.10\\
806: OGLE051836.59-690839.6 & ab & 0.5336746 & 18.55 & 0.09 & 18.47 & 0.05 & 18.38 & 0.05\\
807: OGLE051836.68-690659.7 & ab & 0.5913999 & 18.27 & 0.07 & 18.10 & 0.04 & 18.03 & 0.04\\
808: OGLE051837.86-690821.3 & c & 0.2873557 & 18.79 & 0.09 & 18.57 & 0.12 & 18.57 & 0.00\\
809: OGLE051841.62-690609.4 & ab & 0.7517683 & 18.27 & 0.05 & 17.84 & 0.07 & 17.81 & 0.01\\
810: OGLE051842.24-690724.5 & ab & 0.6597547 & 18.28 & 0.03 & 17.94 & 0.03 & 17.94 & 0.03\\
811: OGLE051843.33-690502.6 & ab & 0.5676291 & 18.37 & 0.07 & 18.11 & 0.09 & 18.13 & 0.02\\
812: OGLE051853.07-690819.5 & ab & 0.5805700 & 18.30 & 0.04 & 17.93 & 0.06 & 18.00 & 0.06\\
813: OGLE051923.06-693859.0 & ab & 0.6438395 & 18.36 & 0.07 & 17.79 & 0.10 & 17.84 & 0.01\\
814: OGLE052301.40-700731.0 & c & 0.2964723 & 18.58 & 0.05 & 18.39 & 0.05 & 18.39 & 0.05\\
815: OGLE052308.89-700746.7 & c & 0.3425135 & 18.48 & 0.05 & 18.24 & 0.05 & 18.24 & 0.05\\
816: OGLE052317.13-700607.2 & ab & 0.6020069 & 18.33 & 0.08 & 18.10 & 0.08 & 18.05 & 0.08\\
817: OGLE052318.43-700651.5 & ab & 0.5521760 & 18.33 & 0.05 & 17.96 & 0.04 & 18.00 & 0.04\\
818: OGLE052321.67-700739.9 & ab & 0.5214616 & 18.41 & 0.06 & 18.35 & 0.04 & 18.24 & 0.04\\
819: OGLE052328.70-700523.8 & c & 0.3728943 & 17.96 & 0.09 & 17.78 & 0.10 & 17.77 & 0.05\\
820: OGLE052329.54-700713.1 & ab & 0.6590143 & 18.06 & 0.09 & 17.71 & 0.06 & 17.75 & 0.04\\
821: OGLE052331.40-700529.1 & ab & 0.6131165 & 18.02 & 0.09 & 17.78 & 0.08 & 17.85 & 0.05\\
822: OGLE052332.28-700654.1 & ab & 0.6235510 & 17.36 & 0.06 & 17.28 & 0.06 & 17.31 & 0.00\\
823: OGLE052335.14-700505.4 & ab & 0.5072454 & 18.30 & 0.07 & 18.10 & 0.09 & 18.07 & 0.01\\
824: OGLE052340.40-700639.8 & ab & 0.5148516 & 18.04 & 0.07 & 18.07 & 0.08 & 18.10 & 0.08\\
825: OGLE052341.81-700632.4 & ab & 0.5285457 & 18.84 & 0.12 & 18.56 & 0.12 & 18.64 & 0.20\\
826: OGLE052345.86-700504.2 & ab & 0.5711875 & 18.10 & 0.07 & 17.95 & 0.09 & 17.88 & 0.05\\
827: OGLE052349.66-700327.1 & ab & 0.6631955 & 18.17 & 0.12 & 18.03 & 0.12 & 18.04 & 0.11\\
828: OGLE052350.37-700443.2 & ab & 0.5054740 & 18.53 & 0.10 & 18.24 & 0.11 & 18.26 & 0.04\\
829: OGLE052353.56-700432.4 & ab & 0.5520142 & 18.31 & 0.07 & 18.13 & 0.08 & 18.21 & 0.13\\
830: OGLE052355.34-700802.6 & c & 0.2628732 & 18.77 & 0.11 & 18.67 & 0.19 & 18.56 & 0.14\\
831: OGLE052357.93-700322.9 & ab & 0.5125914 & 18.80 & 0.08 & 18.54 & 0.18 & 18.47 & 0.06\\
832: OGLE052400.52-700520.9 & ab & 0.5816737 & 18.40 & 0.06 & 18.05 & 0.08 & 18.04 & 0.02\\
833: OGLE052405.11-700611.5 & ab & 0.5950911 & 18.23 & 0.07 & 17.96 & 0.08 & 17.93 & 0.05\\
834: OGLE052418.64-700307.7 & c & 0.3354890 & 18.28 & 0.11 & 18.18 & 0.16 & 18.18 & 0.16\\
835: OGLE052419.91-700616.7 & ab & 0.5036958 & ... & ... & 17.90 & ... & 17.83 & ...\\
836: OGLE052423.93-700736.4 & ab & 0.5816925 & 18.32 & 0.05 & 18.12 & 0.04 & 17.93 & 0.04\\
837: OGLE052859.00-700822.2 & ab & 0.5515840 & 18.97 & 0.10 & 18.31 & 0.13 & 18.08 & 0.13\\
838: OGLE052909.42-700828.1 & ab & 0.9210850 & 17.70 & 0.05 & 17.42 & 0.07 & 17.31 & 0.07\\
839: OGLE052911.54-700836.5 & ab & 0.5469046 & 18.58 & 0.06 & 17.99 & 0.07 & 17.99 & 0.07\\
840: OGLE052917.43-700734.5 & ab & 0.6015387 & 18.34 & 0.04 & 18.06 & 0.07 & 18.12 & 0.07\\
841: OGLE052917.77-700535.6 & ab & 0.7286710 & 18.43 & 0.07 & 17.81 & 0.07 & 17.68 & 0.07\\
842: OGLE052917.87-700841.1 & ab & 0.4802590 & 18.54 & 0.05 & 18.23 & 0.08 & 18.15 & 0.08\\
843: OGLE052917.92-700712.2 & c & 0.3383890 & 18.51 & 0.07 & 18.06 & 0.10 & 18.06 & 0.10\\
844: OGLE052929.39-700551.0 & ab & 0.6215635 & 18.00 & 0.04 & 17.59 & 0.06 & 17.65 & 0.06\\
845: OGLE052932.88-700842.3 & ab & 0.5442339 & 18.37 & 0.06 & 18.26 & 0.09 & 18.27 & 0.09\\
846: OGLE052933.54-700715.9 & ab & 0.5340639 & 18.58 & 0.05 & 18.03 & 0.08 & 17.99 & 0.08\\
847: OGLE052936.94-700721.1 & ab & 0.5858587 & 18.37 & 0.05 & 18.35 & 0.08 & 18.34 & 0.08\\
848: OGLE052937.91-700844.9 & c & 0.3758092 & 18.24 & 0.05 & 17.95 & 0.08 & 17.95 & 0.08\\
849: OGLE052949.93-700558.2 & ab & 0.5625618 & 18.66 & 0.06 & 18.22 & 0.09 & 18.17 & 0.09\\
850: OGLE053147.30-694349.6 & ab & 0.5074034 & 18.11 & 0.05 & 17.82 & 0.07 & 17.90 & 0.07\\
851: OGLE053147.82-694142.2 & ab & 0.6455259 & 18.05 & 0.05 & 17.81 & 0.07 & 17.70 & 0.07\\
852: OGLE053155.92-694232.4 & ab & 0.5211680 & 18.35 & 0.05 & 18.19 & 0.08 & 18.17 & 0.08\\
853: OGLE053200.94-694219.1 & ab & 0.6062906 & 18.20 & 0.09 & 18.01 & 0.12 & 17.95 & 0.12\\
854: OGLE053203.62-694210.7 & ab & 0.4796139 & 18.26 & 0.04 & 17.99 & 0.07 & 18.05 & 0.07\\
855: OGLE053206.72-694342.1 & ab & 0.5192097 & 18.51 & 0.04 & 18.38 & 0.09 & 18.42 & 0.09\\
856: OGLE053206.78-694224.7 & ab & 0.5230170 & 17.98 & 0.04 & 18.02 & 0.07 & 18.04 & 0.07\\
857: OGLE053207.32-694117.2 & ab & 0.5626089 & 17.76 & 0.03 & 17.53 & 0.06 & 17.58 & 0.06\\
858: OGLE053207.88-694058.7 & ab & 0.6218200 & 18.15 & 0.04 & 17.93 & 0.07 & 18.02 & 0.07\\
859: OGLE053217.55-694317.6 & ab & 0.5485307 & 17.95 & 0.05 & 17.87 & 0.07 & 17.87 & 0.07\\
860: OGLE053219.15-694215.2 & ab & 0.6521316 & 18.22 & 0.05 & 17.94 & 0.07 & 17.97 & 0.07\\
861: OGLE053222.39-693952.9 & ab & 0.6769293 & 18.23 & 0.07 & 18.03 & 0.11 & 18.10 & 0.11\\
862: OGLE053225.42-694438.2 & ab & 0.6427599 & 18.38 & 0.07 & 18.03 & 0.12 & 18.07 & 0.12\\
863: OGLE053229.21-694411.0 & ab & 0.5960780 & ... & ... & 18.15 & 0.09 & 18.10 & 0.09\\
864:
865: \enddata
866: \label{tabavobs}
867: \end{deluxetable}
868:
869: \clearpage
870: \begin{deluxetable}{c c c c c}
871: %\rotate
872: \tablewidth{0pc}
873: \tablecaption{PL relations determined for averaged data}
874: \tablehead{ \colhead {Data set} & \colhead {J slope} & \colhead {J zeropoint} & \colhead {K slope} & \colhead {K zeropoint} }
875: \startdata
876: RRab+RRc\\
877: Free fit & -1.381$\pm$0.468 & 17.953$\pm$0.123 & -2.192$\pm$0.399 & 17.493$\pm$0.108 \\
878: Sollima et al. (2008) & ... & ... & -2.380 & 17.443$\pm$0.026 \\
879: Bono et al. (2003) & ... & ... & -2.101 & 17.516$\pm$0.026 \\
880: Catelan et al. (2004) & -1.773 & 17.850$\pm$0.030 & -2.353 & 17.450$\pm$0.026 \\
881: \\
882: RRab\\
883: Sollima et al. (2008) & ... & ... & -2.380 & 17.463$\pm$0.029 \\
884: Bono et al. (2003) & ... & ... & -2.101 & 17.531$\pm$0.029 \\
885: Catelan et al. (2004) & -1.773 & 17.869$\pm$0.033 & -2.353 & 17.469$\pm$0.029 \\
886: \enddata
887: \label{tabplav}
888: \end{deluxetable}
889:
890: \clearpage
891: \begin{deluxetable}{c c c}
892: %\rotate
893: \tablewidth{0pc}
894: \tablecaption{PL relations determined for mean data, using the light-curve templates}
895: \tablehead{ \colhead {Data set} & \colhead {K slope} & \colhead {K zeropoint}}
896: \startdata
897: RRab+RRc\\
898: Sollima et al. (2008) & -2.380 & 17.421$\pm$0.026 \\
899: Bono et al. (2003) & -2.101 & 17.500$\pm$0.026 \\
900: Catelan et al. (2004) & -2.353 & 17.434$\pm$0.026 \\
901: \\
902: RRab\\
903: Sollima et al. (2008) & -2.380 & 17.445$\pm$0.029 \\
904: Bono et al. (2003) & -2.101 & 17.512$\pm$0.029 \\
905: Catelan et al. (2004) & -2.353 & 17.451$\pm$0.029 \\
906: \enddata
907: \label{tabplmean}
908: \end{deluxetable}
909:
910: \clearpage
911: \begin{deluxetable}{c c c c}
912: %\rotate
913: \tablewidth{0pc}
914: \tablecaption{Determined true distance moduli for different data sets and PL relations.}
915: \tablehead{ \colhead {Data set} & \colhead {Sollima et al. (2008)} & \colhead
916: {Bono et al. (2003)} & \colhead {Catelan et al. (2004)}}
917: \startdata
918: RRab+RRc (J) & ... & ... & 18.546 $\pm$ 0.026 \\
919: RRab+RRc (K) & 18.580 $\pm$ 0.026 & 18.621 $\pm$ 0.026 & 18.607 $\pm$ 0.026 \\
920: RRab (J) & ... & ... & 18.565 $\pm$ 0.029 \\
921: RRab (K) & 18.600 $\pm$ 0.029 & 18.620 $\pm$ 0.029 & 18.611 $\pm$ 0.029 \\
922: RRab+RRc ($\langle K\rangle$) & 18.564 $\pm$ 0.026 & 18.604 $\pm$ 0.026 & 18.590 $\pm$ 0.026 \\
923: RRab ($\langle K\rangle$) & 18.582 $\pm$ 0.029 & 18.617 $\pm$ 0.029 & 18.608 $\pm$ 0.029 \\
924: \enddata
925: \label{tabdist}
926: \end{deluxetable}
927:
928: \end{document}
929: