1: \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
2:
3: %\newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
4: %\newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
5:
6: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
7:
8: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
9:
10: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
11: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
12: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
13: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
14: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
15: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
16:
17: \shorttitle{The Bar Pattern Speed of NGC 1433}
18: \shortauthors{Treuthardt, Salo, Rautiainen, \& Buta}
19:
20: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
21: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
22:
23: \def\arcs{\rlap{.}$^{\arcsec}$}
24: \def\arc{$^{\arcsec}$}
25: \def\br{\hfill\break}
26:
27: \begin{document}
28:
29: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
30: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
31: %% you desire.
32:
33: \title{The Bar Pattern Speed of NGC 1433 Estimated Via Sticky-Particle Simulations}
34:
35: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
36: %% author and affiliation information.
37: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
38: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
39: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
40: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
41:
42: \author{P. Treuthardt\altaffilmark{1}, H. Salo\altaffilmark{2}, P.
43: Rautiainen\altaffilmark{2}, and R. Buta\altaffilmark{1}}
44: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama,
45: Box 870324, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA}\altaffiltext{2}{Division of Astronomy,
46: Department of Physical Sciences, University of Oulu, Oulu, FIN-90014, Finland}
47:
48: %\email{aastex-help@aas.org}
49:
50: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
51: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
52: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
53: %% affiliation.
54:
55: \begin{abstract}
56: %NGC 1433 is a well studied disk galaxy that hosts many interesting
57: %morphological features that are thought to be
58: %associated
59: %with specific resonances, including two symmetric detached arm segments or
60: %"plumes".
61: We present detailed numerical simulations of NGC 1433, an intermediate-type
62: barred spiral showing strong morphological features including a secondary bar,
63: nuclear ring, inner ring, outer pseudoring, and two striking, detached
64: spiral arcs known as ``plumes.''
65: This galaxy is an ideal candidate for recreating the
66: observed morphology through dynamical models and determining the pattern
67: speed. We derived a gravitational potential from an $H$-band image of the
68: galaxy and simulated the behavior of a two-dimensional disk of 100,000
69: inelastically colliding gas particles. We find that the closest matching
70: morphology between a $B$-band image and a simulation occurs with a
71: pattern speed of 0.89 km s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$ $\pm$ 5-10\%. We also
72: determine that the ratio of corotation radius to the average published bar
73: radius is 1.7 $\pm$ 0.3, with the ambiguity in the bar radius
74: being the largest contributor to the error.
75:
76: \end{abstract}
77:
78: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
79: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
80: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
81: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
82:
83: \keywords{galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; galaxies: individual (NGC 1433);
84: galaxies: spiral; galaxies: structure}
85:
86: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
87: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
88: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
89: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
90: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
91: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
92: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
93: %% each reference.
94:
95: \section{Introduction}
96:
97: NGC 1433 is a well studied disk galaxy that hosts many interesting
98: morphological features. Detailed studies of the galaxy have
99: been performed by Buta (1986) and, most recently, by Buta et al. (2001).
100: The galaxy is a ringed barred spiral of revised de Vaucouleurs type
101: (R$_1^\prime$)SB(r)ab (Buta et al. 2007; see Figure 1)
102: that displays a nuclear ring or lens as well as
103: inner and outer rings.
104: The nuclear ring is a small, blue feature approximately 19$\arcsec$
105: in angular diameter that has a small secondary bar crossing it
106: when viewed in the
107: near-infrared (Buta 1986). The strong primary bar is encircled by a
108: large, knotty, and intrinsically oval
109: inner ring which appears to be formed by
110: four tightly wrapped spiral arm sections that have come together in
111: the bar major and minor axis regions. In the context of passive,
112: non-self-gravitating sticky particle simulations (Schwarz 1981; 1984),
113: this morphology implies the
114: inner ring is a 4:1 resonance feature. The faint
115: outer pseudoring is slightly asymmetric and appears relatively
116: smooth compared to the inner ring.
117:
118: NGC 1433 also harbors two symmetric detached arm segments, or
119: "plumes" (Buta 1984), just outside the leading sections of the inner
120: ring. Like the inner ring, the plumes lie along an ellipse oriented
121: parallel to the bar. It is possible that these features are residual
122: traces of a characteristic $m=4$ spiral pattern that may form in the
123: presence of bars between the inner and outer 4:1 resonances
124: (Rautiainen, Salo, \& Buta 2004). Since strong plumes like those seen
125: in NGC 1433 are rarely observed
126: (Buta 1984), it is possible that they are transient features although
127: the simulations of Rautiainen, Salo, \& Buta (2004) produced a
128: long-lived four-armed pattern. The plumes, as well as the nucleus and
129: inner ring of the galaxy, are well covered with H$\alpha$ emission (Figure 1).
130: The outer pseudoring is much fainter and very little H$\alpha$
131: emission is seen in the bar region. H I counterparts of the plumes, nuclear
132: ring, inner ring, and outer pseudoring have also been detected
133: (Ryder et al. 1996).
134:
135: The pattern speed, $\Omega_p$, of a galaxy is an important parameter
136: that governs the overall morphology (Kalnajs 1991). In galaxies with
137: a single perturbation mode, such as a bar or a grand design spiral,
138: $\Omega_p$ determines the locations of important resonances. Since
139: NGC 1433 has multiple features that are thought to be associated
140: with specific resonances, it is an ideal candidate for recreating the
141: observed morphology through dynamical models (e.g., Salo et al.
142: 1999; Rautiainen et al. 2005) and determining
143: $\Omega_p$. This modeling involves determining the gravitational potential
144: from observations and studying the "gas" response on a rigidly
145: rotating nonaxisymmetric component. The gas is modeled as inelastically
146: colliding, or "sticky," particles. Different dynamical
147: parameters are varied until the morphology and kinematics of the numerically
148: simulated galaxy matches, as closely as possible, to the morphology
149: and kinematics of the observed galaxy.
150:
151: \section{Analysis}
152:
153: \subsection{Determining the Potential}
154:
155: In order to simulate the dynamics of the galaxy, a gravitational
156: potential must be derived. One way to do this is to assume the
157: near-infrared light distribution effectively traces the mass
158: distribution. The potential may then be derived from the convolution
159: of the density with the function 1/$R$ (Quillen, Frogel, \& Gonzalez
160: 1994), combined with an assumption for the vertical density
161: distribution. For NGC 1433, the potential was derived from a 1.65 $\mu$m
162: Johnson $H$-band image obtained in February 1996 with the CTIO 1.5m
163: telescope (Buta et al. 2001). $B$- and $I$-band images were also taken and
164: the details of these observations are found in Buta et al. (2001). The
165: $H$-band light distribution is more reliable than $B$ or $I$ for this
166: purpose due to the reduced extinction effects from dust and the
167: weakened influence of young Population I complexes. However,
168: the polar FFT method we use for the evaluation of gravitational forces
169: (Salo et al. 1999, Laurikainen \& Salo 2002) effectively filters out
170: the high frequency components of the image, and is thus not sensitive
171: to individual SF regions (see Salo et al. 2004). Before the
172: gravitational potential was derived, the $H$-band image was
173: converted into a surface mass density by assuming a mass-to-light
174: ($M/L$) ratio accounting for the average disk $B-H$ color gradient using
175: formulae from Bell \& de Jong (2001). The seven different $M/L$
176: models discussed in the Bell \& de Jong paper were applied to the
177: $H$-band image and each corrected image was used to determine a
178: gravitational potential (Figure 2). The $M/L$ models in Bell \& de Jong
179: were derived by
180: following the evolution of simulated exponential gaseous disks in
181: order to describe the trends in spiral galaxy colors.
182: Each $M/L$ model corresponds to the various allowed parameters in the
183: simulations.
184: The Cole et al. (2000) model discussed by Bell \& de Jong serves as a
185: completely independent assessment of effects of galaxy evolution on
186: these color trends.
187:
188: The gravitational potentials were calculated for each of the seven
189: $M/L$-corrected images by first using an iterative two-dimensional
190: bulge-disk-bar decomposition described by
191: Laurikainen et al. (2004). Upon application of the bulge-disk-bar
192: decomposition it was found that the images that were $M/L$-corrected
193: using the outflow and Cole et al. (2000) models did not converge
194: through the iterative process and, therefore, were not used.
195: %The outflow model is a closed-box galaxy model with no gas inflow but with
196: %metal-enriched gas outflow, a Schmidt (1959) star
197: %formation law, and a galaxy age of 12 Gyr. The Cole et al. (2000) model
198: %used by Bell \& de Jong is based on the trends in stellar $M/L$ ratio with
199: %color using disk-dominated nonsatellite galaxies from the models of
200: %Cole et al. (2000). Following the decomposition,
201: The bulge component was then removed from the $H$-band light
202: distribution and the disk was deprojected to a face-on orientation using
203: a position angle of 21$^{\circ}$ and an inclination of 33$^{\circ}$ (Buta et
204: al. 2001).
205: %In Table 1, we list the Sersic index (n) and the bulge contribution of the
206: %total $M/L$-corrected $H$-band luminosity for each successful
207: %decomposition.
208: The disk light distribution was approximated by an azimuthal Fourier
209: decomposition at each radius and the disk gravity was calculated using the
210: even components from $m=0$ to $m=8$, as was done by Rautiainen et al.
211: (2005).
212:
213: Other factors affect the morphology of a simulated galaxy besides
214: the pattern speed. These include the impact frequency from
215: the assumed cross section of the particles, initial particle
216: distribution, and time when the features are examined. The amplitude
217: of the bar is also an important factor affecting the modeled morphology.
218: Separate exponential vertical
219: distributions were, therefore, assumed for the
220: disk and the bar. The bar component was isolated from the disk
221: component upon determining the approximate length and, thereby, the
222: orientation and ellipticity of the bar in the sky plane. The
223: deprojected radius of the bar was already determined to be a maximum of
224: approximately 115$\arcsec$ by Block et al. (2004; see their Figure
225: 1) through their Fourier bar-spiral separation technique on a deep
226: K$_s$-band image. The orientation and ellipticity values of the bar
227: at the given length in the sky plane were determined using ELLIPSE
228: in IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy
229: Observatories,
230: which are operated by AURA, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the
231: National
232: Science Foundation.}.
233: A typical scale height of 1/6 the radial scale length (de
234: Grijs 1998) was assumed for the disk component of the galaxy.
235: Bureau et al. (2006) has advocated that the bar region of galaxies
236: is subject to vertical thickening. Since the thickening
237: factor is very uncertain, in Figure 3 we compare a range of thicknesses to
238: $Q_g$,
239: the maximum relative tangential perturbation $F_{T}/F_{R}$.
240: This figure shows that a fairly large range in bar scale heights
241: results in a rather small range of $Q_g$.
242: %The
243: %bar potential was added to the disk potential with a scale height 3
244: %times greater than that of the disk, the effects of which
245: %can be seen
246: %in Figure 3.
247: %In this figure we also see that $Q_g$, the maximum relative tangential
248: %perturbation $F_{T}/F_{T}$,
249: %nonaxisymmetric torque strength,
250: We choose the scale height of the bar to be three times that of the disk, where
251: $Q_g$ is approximately 0.31. This corresponds to reducing the bar amplitude
252: by a factor of 0.66, if the scale heights of the bar and disk are
253: assumed to be equal (see Figures 9 and 10 for a display of the
254: effects of bar amplitude variations).
255: In comparison with the results of Buta et al. (2005; see their Figure 8),
256: this value of $Q_g$ means that approximately 70$\%$ of normal bright galaxies
257: have
258: bars weaker than that seen in NGC 1433. It has been argued that boxy and
259: peanut shaped bulges are associated with relatively strong bars (Bureau et al.
260: 2006) and that the ratio of bar length to thickness is 14 $\pm$ 4 for galaxies
261: with these bulges (L\"{u}tticke, Dettmar, \& Pohlen 2000). Therefore, we
262: conclude that our bar scale height of 23$\arcsec$ (corresponding to a bar
263: length to thickness ratio of about 10) is not unreasonable for the assumed
264: bar radius.
265:
266: The gravitational potential of
267: the bulge was also added to the disk potential under the assumption
268: that the bulge mass is spherically distributed. Additionally, a dark
269: halo component, based on the universal rotation curve of Persic et
270: al. (1996) and scaled by approximately 1/3, was added to the galaxy
271: potential so that the rotation amplitude at large
272: radii (r $>$ 100$\arcsec$) matched the composite rotation curve of Buta et al.
273: (2001) as closely as possible (Figure 4). The effects of assuming a
274: significantly more prominent halo can be estimated from the bar amplitude
275: variation plots (see Figures 9 and 10). In Figure 4 there is a clear
276: difference between the observed rotation curve, adopted by Buta et al. (2001),
277: and that estimated from the
278: azimuthally averaged mass model from approximately 30 to 100 arcseconds.
279: The observed rotation curve was derived from H I, H$\alpha$, and Mg I b
280: data, where the H I rotation curve points were determined in Ryder et al.
281: (1996) using the
282: ROTCUR algorithm (based on the method discussed by Begeman 1989) within the
283: Astronomical Image Processing System (AIPS).
284: The H$\alpha$ rotation points were derived from Fabry-Perot velocity field
285: observations in Buta et al. (2001) using the Warner et al. (1973) method.
286: The Mg I b major axis stellar velocity points were determined using the
287: Fourier quotient (STSDAS routine FQUOT in IRAF) and cross-correlation methods
288: (STSDAS routine XCOR; see Buta et al. 2001) and then applying the asymmetric
289: drift correction to make them comparable with gas velocity data.
290: It should be noted that the observed inner rotation curve is
291: uncertain due to non-circular motions and the uncertainties in the
292: axisymmetric drift correction.
293:
294: \subsection{Simulations}
295:
296: The simulation code used to model NGC 1433 was written by H. Salo,
297: the details of which can be found in Salo et al.
298: (1999; see also Salo 1991 for the description of the treatment of inelastic
299: collisions). The behavior of a two-dimensional disk of 100,000
300: inelastically colliding gas particles was simulated in the
301: determined potential. The nonaxisymmetric part of the potential (i.e. the bar)
302: was turned on gradually and reached full strength at one rotation. We assumed
303: a single pattern speed for our models, that of the bar, and this was the main
304: parameter that was varied.
305: The morphology of the simulated gas distribution was
306: compared to the morphology observed in the deep $B$-band image of the
307: galaxy. Since resonance rings generally form in the gas component, the
308: observed $B$-band morphology is best suited for this purpose. The deep
309: $B$-band image also lacks the gaps seen in the H$\alpha$ data
310: (Buta et al. 2001) and is of higher resolution than the existing H I data
311: (Ryder et al. 1996). We specifically compared the visual size of the inner
312: ring and outer pseudoring as well as the size and positioning of the
313: plumes. The size of the nuclear ring is not easy to connect with the ILR of
314: the bar, therefore the nuclear ring region is not considered in the
315: visual matching. Regarding the bar itself, dust lanes can be seen along it in
316: optical images (Figure 1) and there is evidence for it in the
317: H I intensity map of Ryder et al. (1996).
318: CO emission was observed by Bajaja et al. (1995) and found to be peaked at
319: the center of the galaxy and slightly elongated along the bar. Most of the CO
320: intensity is found within approximately 30$\arcsec$ of the center, or less
321: than half the bar radius.
322: %In a paper by Helfer et al. (2003), it appears
323: %that galaxies with the greatest extent of CO emission along their bars are
324: %generally of a later type than those with very little or no CO emission
325: %and NGC 1433.
326: In the early phases of gas particle simulations, dust lanes
327: are often seen but as the evolution proceeds the bar region becomes depleted
328: of particles. In part, this is because
329: the relative timescales of the inner and outer parts of the galaxy are not
330: necessarily realistic. The impact frequency of the gas particles in the
331: inner ring region is about 25 impacts/particle/bar rotation, whereas in the
332: outer ring region it is about 2 impacts/particle/bar rotation. The timescale
333: of evolution is rather arbitrary since it
334: is determined by the assigned simulation parameters, mainly the radius of the
335: gas particles, which have no direct physical correspondence to real gas. The
336: gravitational potential is also static with respect to time which can cause
337: the rigidly rotating bar to clean some regions of the disk with exaggerated
338: efficiency. The additional caveat of the simulation code not taking gas
339: recycling into account leads to a majority of the existing gas particles
340: collecting at resonance locations.
341: Overall though, the morphology and size of the bar is a less accurate
342: pattern speed estimator than the resonance ring and plume features.
343:
344:
345: \subsection{Results and Discussion}
346:
347: In Figure 5 (left), we plot the Lindblad precession frequency curves
348: derived from the simulated rotation curve estimated from the
349: $H$-band image of the galaxy. These curves show how resonance
350: locations vary with angular velocity in the linear (epicyclic)
351: approximation. In this figure (right), we also see that the
352: simulated outer Lindblad ($\Omega+\kappa/2$), corotation ($\Omega$),
353: and inner Lindblad ($\Omega-\kappa/2$) frequency
354: curves appear similar to the same curves derived from the observed
355: rotation curve data. A significant difference between the simulated
356: and observed frequency
357: curves is seen in the inner Lindblad curve. The curve derived from
358: observational data is seen to reach a maximum of $\Omega-\kappa/2$ $\approx$
359: 5 km s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$, whereas the simulated curve has no maximum.
360: This is due to a subtle difference in the slopes
361: within a radius of 10$\arcsec$, though the sparsity of observed data points
362: leaves some ambiguity. The uncertainty of the inner rotation curve, due to
363: corrections for asymmetric drift and non-circular motions, also propagates to
364: the Lindblad frequency curves.
365: %In Figure 4, the observed rotation
366: %curve is shown to reach a maximum at a radius of
367: %appoximately 58$\arcsec$, while the simulated rotation curve
368: %reaches a maximum at approximately 11$\arcsec$.
369: A galaxy with a slowly rising rotation curve will have an inner
370: Lindblad frequency curve that reaches a finite maximum (e.g.,
371: Yuan \& Kuo 1997). This allows the
372: possibility for the galaxy to host two inner Lindblad resonances
373: (ILR), dubbed an inner inner Lindblad resonance (IILR) and outer
374: inner Lindblad resonance (OILR). If the bar rotates fast enough and
375: the peak of the $\Omega-\kappa/2$ curve is low, it is also possible
376: that there is no ILR. A fast rising rotation curve, on
377: the other hand, will have an inner Lindblad resonance curve with an
378: infinite maximum and therefore only allow a single ILR. On the other hand,
379: a secondary bar can also have considerable effect in this region.
380:
381: In order to estimate $\Omega_p$ for NGC 1433, we would like to find
382: the value that best matches the simulated and observed morphologies.
383: For this purpose, we have the inner ring, the plumes, and
384: the outer pseudoring as features that a good simulation ought to match.
385: The nuclear ring, however, is not considered in the matching since its
386: size is much more sensitive to the strength of the perturbation and the method
387: of the gas treatment.
388: Good agreement between the size of the inner and outer rings, as
389: well as the position and orientation of the plumes, is obtained
390: at 5 bar rotation periods with a pattern speed of 0.89 km s$^{-1}$
391: arcsec$^{-1}$, or 15.8 km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$ with an assumed
392: distance of 11.6 Mpc (Block et al. 2004), and using the formation
393: epoch $M/L$ model with bursts from Bell \& de Jong (2001; see Table 1 and
394: Figure 6). The gravitational potentials derived from the other $M/L$
395: models
396: did not cause the simulated morphology of the galaxy to differ
397: significantly. The plumes found in the simulations are transient
398: features that are seen to dissipate after about 5 bar rotations.
399: %, or about 1.9 Gyr.
400: They begin as complete spiral arms emerging from
401: a very boxy model inner ring, and evolve to detached segments.
402: A variation in the pattern speed of
403: approximately $\pm$5-10\% also prevents the plumes from taking a
404: shape similar to what is seen in the $B$-band (Figure 7). This
405: is also true when the bar scale height is reduced.
406: The inner and
407: outer ring sizes were only dependent on the bar pattern speed. The
408: simulated inner ring has a similar size and elongation to the
409: observed galaxy, but appears more diamond-shaped. The shape of the inner
410: ring can sensitively depend on the orbit families in this region,
411: where a rather small change in parameters (e.g. $\Omega_p$ or bar amplitude)
412: could lead to a large change
413: in morphology. Since the assumed single bar pattern speed gives both the
414: inner ring and the structure beyond it, there is no obvious need for a
415: possible outer, slower spiral mode obtained in other barred spiral
416: simulations (i.e. Rautiainen \& Salo 1999). It should be noted that
417: all the simulation timescales are very uncertain. For example, the gas
418: particle parameters, the rigidity of the gravitational potential, and the
419: lack of gas recycling in the system all affect the dynamical timescale of
420: the simulation.
421:
422: Examining the morphology of the galaxy, we find that the
423: observed inner ring corresponds to the location of the simulated
424: inner 4:1 resonance ($\Omega_p=\Omega-\kappa/4$) and the outer pseudoring
425: lies between the corotation resonance and
426: outer 4:1 resonance ($\Omega_p=\Omega+\kappa/4$) (Figure 8).
427: The plumes and the outer pseudoring lie between the inner and outer
428: ($\Omega+\kappa/4$) 4:1 resonances, similar to what was determined for
429: ESO 566-24 (Rautiainen et al. 2004). An outer ring was also shown to
430: occasionally form
431: within the outer 4:1 resonance, instead of near the OLR, in an N-body
432: model produced by Rautiainen \& Salo (2000). This suggests that some
433: outer pseudorings that show the R$_1^{\prime}$ morphology (Buta \& Crocker
434: 1991) are not actually OLR features. This was already hinted at
435: observationally by ESO 566$-$24, where two of the four outer arms
436: were noted to form an R$_1^{\prime}$ morphology by Buta et al. (1998).
437: In this galaxy, a clear detached outer ring that encircles the $m=4$
438: pattern could trace the actual location of the OLR.
439:
440: These results may be compared with the precession frequency analysis
441: made by Buta et al. (2001, their Fig. 14), who used preliminary numerical
442: simulations from Buta \& Combes (2000) to set the pattern speed at
443: 1.3 km s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$. These simulations did not reproduce the
444: plumes of NGC 1433, and the derived pattern speed placed the outer
445: Lindblad resonance closer to the radius of the outer pseudoring than
446: do our present simulations. In Table 2, we summarize the resonance
447: radii derived by both Buta et al. (2001) and our best model. Our model
448: predicts that the OLR is at a radius about 1.4 times larger than the observed
449: major axis radius of the outer pseudoring. The radial
450: distribution of the azimuthally averaged H I surface density published by
451: Ryder et al. (1996, their Fig. 6) shows that there is very little gas in
452: the OLR region predicted by our new simulations. This may explain why no
453: features associated with this resonance are observed in NGC 1433.
454:
455: An obvious difference between the simulated and observed
456: morphologies is the size of the nuclear ring. The nuclear ring seen
457: in the simulations is much larger than what is observed in the
458: actual galaxy. According to Buta \& Combes (1996), nuclear rings
459: tend to form near the IILR if it exists. By plotting our value of
460: $\Omega_p$ over the Lindblad precession frequency curves in Figure
461: 5, we are able to predict where resonances occur by determining the
462: radius at which the $\Omega_p$ line crosses a corresponding
463: frequency curve. For the observed inner Lindblad frequency curve,
464: the smallest intersection radius is near 3$\arcsec$. In
465: Table 1 of Buta et al. (2001), the semimajor axis radius of the
466: nuclear ring is given as 0.5 kpc at a distance of 11.6 Mpc, or
467: 8.9$\arcsec$, which is about three times the estimated linear resonance
468: radius. In the case
469: of the simulation, the fast rising rotation curve forces the nuclear
470: ring to form near the single ILR which corresponds to the OILR derived
471: from the observed rotation curve.
472: %Alternatively, the larger size of
473: %the simulated nuclear ring could be due to the limitations of this gas
474: %dynamical method. The nuclear rings in hydrodynamical models
475: %of Regan \& Teuben (2003) shrank throughout the simulation. This was
476: %also seen by Rautiainen et al. (2004) in their models, though the change
477: %in ring size became very slow at later times.
478: The presence of a secondary
479: bar with a different pattern speed is a further complication. The
480: observed nuclear ring can be an example of loops which were introduced by
481: Maciejewski \& Sparke (2000) in orbit analysis in double barred
482: potentials and simulated by Rautiainen \& Salo (2002). In principle, a
483: stronger bar perturbation, due to the bar being less vertically extended
484: for example, would shift the nuclear ring inward from the linear ILR
485: distance (see e.g. Salo et al. 1999). However, decreasing the
486: scale height of the bar did not have a significant effect on the
487: size of the nuclear ring. In contrast, Regan \& Teuben (2003)
488: have stated that the ILR does not exist for a galaxy with a strong bar,
489: like NGC 1433, since there is no resonance with the rotating potential
490: at that radius. Instead, they showed through their hydrodynamical models
491: that nuclear rings result from the
492: interaction of gas on $x_1$-like and $x_2$-like streamlines.
493: This suite of uncertainties in the central region of NGC 1433 indicates
494: that the observed nuclear ring does not serve as an accurate
495: indicator of $\Omega_p$.
496:
497: In an effort to examine the expected deviations from the linear epicyclic
498: approximation caused by a strong bar, we have produced models of different
499: bar amplitudes (e.g. the non-axisymmetric Fourier components of the potential
500: were multiplied by a factor while the axisymmetric component was kept
501: intact). In Figure 9, we compare the observed gas morphology
502: to models at 5 bar rotations with $\Omega_p$ equal to 0.89 km s$^{-1}$
503: arcsec$^{-1}$ and with bar amplitudes varied by a factor of 0.25 to 1.25.
504: As mentioned earlier, these models also serve to describe the possible effects
505: of uncertainties in factors like bar height or the contribution from the halo.
506: The results are similar to those found when the bar amplitude of IC 4214 was
507: varied by Salo et al. (1999).
508: As the amplitude is increased from a factor of 0.25 to 1.00, the inner ring
509: becomes well defined and increases in ellipticity. The ring nearly vanishes
510: when
511: the amplitude is increased by a factor of 1.25. The resultant morphology from
512: varying the amplitude indicates that the shape
513: of the observed inner ring may be due to a somewhat weaker perturbation
514: than assumed in the nominal model. Also, as the bar amplitude of the model
515: is increased, the size of the nuclear ring decreases.
516:
517: In Figure 10, we compare the observed and simulated kinematics of the galaxy
518: by examining the zero-velocity contour, which is sensitive to bar-induced
519: radial velocities.
520: We compare the
521: H$\alpha$ Fabry-Perot velocity field found in Buta et al. (2001) with
522: the simulated gas velocity fields derived from various bar amplitudes.
523: Agreements between the observed and simulated kinematics of the
524: galaxy support our estimate of $\Omega_p$ with a bar amplitude factor
525: close to 1.
526: %We compared the
527: %zero-velocity contours of the velocity field derived from the
528: %simulated gas morphology at 5.0 bar rotations and a pattern speed of
529: %0.89 km s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$ with the H$\alpha$ Fabry-Perot
530: %velocity field found in Buta et al. (2001).
531: Although the observed
532: velocity field is not as rich with data as the simulated velocity
533: field, the zero-velocity contours show similar characteristics
534: within 100$\arcsec$ from the galaxy center. A comparison
535: of the observed and modeled major axis velocity profiles (Figure 11),
536: sensitive to bar induced tangential velocity increments, reveals a
537: similar behavior between approximately 50$\arcsec$ and 80$\arcsec$.
538: A deviation is seen between the azimuthally averaged total velocity
539: contribution
540: calculated from the mass model and the major axis velocity profile
541: near 30$\arcsec$ due to the large nuclear ring in the model.
542: %in the model.
543: Particles in this
544: ring, near the major axis, are close to their apocenter and are therefore
545: moving slower than their average orbital velocity. At larger
546: radii, the modeled major axis velocity profile is approximately
547: 15 km s$^{-1}$ less than
548: the azimuthally averaged total velocity
549: contribution used in the simulations. In principle, the match in this region
550: could be easily improved by assuming a somewhat larger halo contribution. This
551: would also reduce the relative bar perturbation.
552:
553: Also, the asymmetry seen in the simulated radial
554: velocity of the gas found in the inner ring of the galaxy is similar to
555: what is observed (Figure 12).
556: The upper right panel of this figure shows the velocity-position angle
557: diagram for points confined between the two ellipses shown in the upper left
558: panel. The observed velocity-position angle diagram shows a subtle asymmetry
559: that was also detected by Buta (1986) and interpreted in terms of ring
560: material moving along an oval bar orbit. The lower right panel of
561: Figure 12 shows the same diagram for the simulated inner ring, showing
562: a similar asymmetry. The main difference is that the simulated curve
563: is steeper near position angles of 100$^{\circ}$ and 280$^{\circ}$ owing to
564: the more
565: pointy oval shape of the simulated inner ring. By fitting a simple
566: orbit model to the observed velocity-position angle diagram, Buta (1986)
567: estimated a pattern speed of 1.55 $\pm$ 0.4 km s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$. If
568: the bar were exactly perpendicular or parallel to the line of nodes, this
569: asymmetry would not be seen, as in the case of NGC 3351 (Buta 1988).
570:
571: Because of the versatility of the modeling process, we are able to
572: track a number of individual gas particles for the duration of a
573: simulation. In Figure 13 we show the paths of selected gas particles
574: in the rotating frame of the simulated galaxy from 1.0 (when the bar
575: has reached full strength) to 5.0 bar
576: rotations where $\Omega_p$ = 0.89 km s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$. We
577: find that the nuclear ring is partially made up of gas particles that
578: originate from near the final location of the inner ring. The
579: inner ring includes some particles drawn from outside the final
580: inner ring location. The transient plumes seen in the simulations
581: appear to be due to both gas trapped in the outer banana orbits and traveling
582: from theses orbits inward toward the inner ring.
583:
584: Determining a value for $\Omega_p$ also allows us to estimate
585: $\cal{R}$ $\equiv R_{CR}/R_{B}$ where $R_{CR}$ is the corotation
586: radius of the galaxy and $R_{B}$ is the bar semimajor axis length.
587: If this distance-independent ratio is between 1.0 and 1.4, a bar is
588: said to be ``fast,'' while if greater than 1.4, a bar is said to be
589: ``slow.'' Contopoulos (1980) concluded that self-consistent bars cannot
590: exist when $\cal{R} <$ 1.0, although Zhang \& Buta (2007)
591: have argued to the contrary. Debattista \& Sellwood (2000) contend
592: that fast bars exist in halos with a low central concentration since
593: the bar rotation rate would rapidly decrease due to dynamical
594: friction with the halo. Certain galaxy models from Athanassoula
595: (2003) also show this correlation between fast bars and halos of low
596: central concentration. The value of $R_{CR}$ is found by determining
597: the radius at which $\Omega_p=\Omega$ in the simulation. For our
598: $\Omega_p$ value of 0.89 $\pm$ 0.06 km s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$, the
599: average $R_{CR}$ value is
600: 162.5 $\pm$ 11.9$\arcsec$ (see Figure 5).
601:
602: The deprojected value of $R_{B}$ was estimated to be 82$^{\arcsec}$
603: (4.6 kpc) by Buta et al. (2001). With our average value of $R_{CR}$, this
604: would imply an upper limit of $\cal{R}=$ 2.0. This is because
605: $R_{B}=$ 82$^{\arcsec}$ refers to the apparent sharp
606: ends of the bar, and may not be the best estimate of the actual bar radius.
607: Based on a bar-spiral Fourier separation analysis, Figure 1 of
608: Block et al. (2004) suggests that the bar extends to a maximum radius
609: of 115 $\pm$ 5$\arcsec$. This value implies that the lower limit of
610: $\cal{R}$ is 1.4 $\pm$ 0.1. An average of these $R_{B}$ values
611: (98.5$\arcsec$) yields $\cal{R}=$ 1.7 $\pm$ 0.3, with the error largely due to
612: the ambiguity in the bar length.
613: In any case, NGC 1433 may be in the ``slow bar" domain of Debattista
614: \& Sellwood (2000). Most previous direct measurements of bar pattern speeds
615: in early-type galaxies have not found slow bars (e.g. Corsini et al. 2007;
616: Debattista \& Williams 2004; Aguerri et al. 2003; Corsini et al. 2003).
617:
618:
619: \section{Conclusions}
620:
621: Using near-IR images to trace the stellar disk potential, we
622: have located resonances in NGC 1433, an exceptional barred spiral
623: galaxy having strong morphological features. The numerical
624: simulation method of Salo et al. (1999; see also Rautiainen et al.
625: 2005) was used to interpret the structure of the
626: galaxy by matching a cloud-particle model to the observed
627: morphology. The results are consistent
628: with previous studies such as Schwarz (1984), Byrd et al. (1994),
629: Rautiainen \& Salo (2000), and Rautiainen, Salo, \& Buta (2004).
630: Our best simulation model provides
631: an interpretation of NGC 1433 which places corotation at 1.7 times
632: the average estimated bar radius of about 100$^{\arcsec}$. This model
633: also places the inner 4:1 resonance near the cuspy ends of
634: the highly elongated inner ring and just outside the ends of the bar.
635: %The simulated ring shows this association through its diamond shape,
636: %while the observed one may show this association in terms of
637: %the four spiral segments that make it up.
638:
639: The plumes and the two outer arms forming the R$_1^{\prime}$ outer
640: pseudoring appear confined completely between the inner and outer
641: 4:1 resonances, very similar to what Rautiainen, Salo, \& Buta (2004)
642: found for the symmetric $m=4$ barred spiral ESO 566$-$24. The
643: plumes, which are like detached spiral segments,
644: appear to be evolved versions of the two
645: extra ``side arms" of ESO 566$-$24 that wrap around the bar ends.
646:
647: The predicted location of the OLR in NGC 1433 is well outside
648: the outer pseudoring in a region where there is little H I gas
649: (Ryder et al. 1996).
650: Thus, NGC 1433 presents an example of an ``OLR subclass" outer
651: pseudoring (Buta \& Crocker 1991; Buta, Corwin, \& Odewahn 2007)
652: that is {\it not} associated with the OLR.
653:
654:
655: %%Future work would involve rectifying the dichotomy between the observed and
656: %%simulated rotation curves with more high resolution stellar velocity data in
657: %%the inner $\sim$100 arcseconds of the galaxy. Since this region is largely
658: %%devoid of gas, good stellar velocity data is critical in understanding the
659: %%dynamics in this region. These data would then either implicate or exonerate
660: %%the simulated rotation curve in this region.
661: %%Additionally, 3D simulations of
662: %%stars and gas
663: %%that might allow for the presence of multiple patterns and corotation
664: %%radii should also be attempted.
665:
666: P. Treuthardt and R. Buta acknowledge the support of NSF Grants AST-0205143
667: and AST-0507140 to the University of Alabama. H. Salo and P. Rautiainen
668: acknowledge the support of the Academy of Finland.
669: P. Treuthardt acknowledges the support of the
670: Academy of Finland during two summer visits to Oulu in 2002 and 2003.
671:
672: \clearpage
673:
674: %%\centerline{REFERENCES}
675: \begin{references}
676:
677: \reference{}
678: Aguerri, J. A. L., Debattista, V. P., \& Corsini, E. M. 2003, \mnras, 338, 465
679:
680: \reference{}
681: Athanassoula, E. 2003, \mnras, 341, 1179
682:
683: \reference{}
684: Bajaja, E., Wielebinski, R., Reuter, H.-P., Harnett, J. I., \& Hummel, E. 1995, A\&AS, 114, 147
685:
686: \reference{}
687: Begeman, K. G. 1989, A\&A, 223, 47
688:
689: \reference{}
690: Bell, E. F \& de Jong, R. S. 2001, \apj, 550, 212
691:
692: \reference{}
693: Block, D. L., Buta, R., Knapen, J. H., Elmegreen, D. M., Elmegreen, B. G., \& Puerari, I. 2004, \aj, 128, 183
694:
695: \reference{}
696: Bureau, M., Aronica, G., Athanassoula, E., Dettmar, R.-J., Bosma, A., \& Freeman, K. C. 2006, \mnras, 370, 753
697:
698: \reference{}
699: Buta, R. 1984 PASAu, 5, 472
700:
701: \reference{}
702: Buta, R. 1986, \apjs, 61, 631
703:
704: \reference{}
705: Buta, R. 1988, \apjs, 66, 233
706:
707: \reference{}
708: Buta, R., Alpert, A., Cobb, M. L., Crocker, D. A., \& Purcell,
709: G. B. 1998, \aj, 116, 1142
710:
711: \reference{}
712: Buta, R. \& Combes, F. 1996, Fund. Cosmic Phys., 17, 95
713:
714: \reference{}
715: Buta, R. \& Combes, F. 2000, ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 197, p. 11
716:
717: \reference{}
718: Buta, R. \& Crocker, D. A. 1991, \aj, 102, 1715
719:
720: \reference{}
721: Buta, R., Ryder, S. D., Madsen, G. J., Wesson, K., Crocker, D. A., \& Combes, F. 2001, \aj, 121, 225
722:
723: \reference{}
724: Buta, R., Vasylyev, S., Salo, H., \& Laurikainen, E. 2005, \aj, 130, 506
725:
726: \reference{}
727: Buta, R. J., Corwin, H. G., \& Odewahn, S. C. 2007, The de Vaucouleurs Atlas of Galaxies (Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press; BCO)
728:
729: \reference{}
730: Byrd, G., Rautiainen, P., Salo, H., Buta, R., \& Crocker, D. A. 1994, \aj, 108, 476
731:
732: \reference{}
733: Cole, S., Lacey, C. G., Baugh, C. M., \& Frenk, C. S. 2000, \mnras, 319, 168
734:
735: \reference{}
736: Contopoulos, G. 1980, A\&A, 81, 198
737:
738: \reference{}
739: Corsini, E. M., Aguerri, J. A. L., Debattista, V. P., Pizzella, A., Barazza, F. D., \& Jerjen, H. 2007, \apj, 659, 121L
740:
741: \reference{}
742: Corsini, E. M., Debattista, V. P., \& Aguerri, J. A. L. 2003, \apj, 599, 29L
743:
744: \reference{}
745: Debattista, V. P. \& Sellwood, J. A. 2000, \apj, 543, 704
746:
747: \reference{}
748: Debattista, V. P. \& Williams, T. B. 2004, \apj, 605, 714
749:
750: %\reference{}
751: %Helfer, T. T., Thornley, M. D., Regan, M. W., Wong, T., Sheth, K., Vogel, S. N., Blitz, L., \& Bock, D. C.-J. 2003, ApJS, 145, 259
752:
753: \reference{}
754: Kalnajs, A. 1991, in Dynamics of Disk Galaxies, ed. B. Sundelius (G\"{o}teborg: G\"{o}teborg Univ.), 323
755:
756: \reference{}
757: Laurikainen, E. \& Salo, H. 2002, \mnras, 337, 1118
758:
759: \reference{}
760: Laurikainen, E., Salo, H., Buta, R., \& Vasylyev, S. 2004, \mnras, 355, 1251L
761:
762: \reference{}
763: L\"{u}tticke, R., Dettmar, R.-J., \& Pohlen, M. 2000, A\&A, 362, 435
764:
765: \reference{}
766: Maciejewski, W. \& Sparke, L. S. 2000, \mnras, 313, 745
767:
768: \reference{}
769: Persic, M., Salucci, P., \& Stel, F. 1996, \mnras, 281, 27
770:
771: \reference{}
772: Quillen, A. C., Frogel, J. A., \& Gonzalez, R. A. 1994, \apj, 437, 162
773:
774: \reference{}
775: Rautiainen, P. \& Salo, H. 1999, A\&A, 348, 737
776:
777: \reference{}
778: Rautiainen, P. \& Salo, H. 2000, A\&A, 362, 465
779:
780: \reference{}
781: Rautiainen, P., Salo, H., \& Buta, R. 2004, \mnras, 349, 933
782:
783: \reference{}
784: Rautiainen, P., Salo, H., \& Laurikainen, E. 2002, \mnras, 337, 1233
785:
786: \reference{}
787: Rautiainen, P., Salo, H., \& Laurikainen, E. 2005, \apj, 631, L129
788:
789: \reference{}
790: Regan, M. W. \& Teuben, P. 2003, \apj, 582, 723
791:
792: \reference{}
793: Ryder, S. D., Buta, R. J., Toledo, H., Shukla, H., Staveley-Smith, L., \& Walsh, W. 1996, \apj, 460, 665
794:
795: \reference{}
796: Salo, H. 1991, A\&A, 243, 118
797:
798: \reference{}
799: Salo, H., Laurikainen, E., \& Buta, R. 2004, ASSL, 319, 673
800:
801: \reference{}
802: Salo, H., Rautiainen, P., Buta, R., Purcell, G. B., Cobb, M. L. Crocker, D. A., \& Laurikainen, E. 1999, \aj, 117, 792
803:
804: \reference{}
805: Schwarz, M. P. 1981, \apj, 247, 77
806:
807: \reference{}
808: Schwarz, M. P. 1984, \mnras, 209, 93
809:
810: \reference{}
811: Warner, P. J., Wright, M. C. H., \& Baldwin, J. E. 1973, \mnras, 163, 163
812:
813: \reference{}
814: Yuan, C. \& Kuo, C. 1997, \apj, 486, 750
815:
816: \reference{}
817: Zhang, X. \& Buta, R. 2007, \aj, 133, 2584
818:
819: \end{references}
820:
821: \clearpage
822:
823: \input{tab1.tex}
824:
825: \clearpage
826:
827: \input{tab2.tex}
828:
829: \clearpage
830:
831: \begin{figure}
832: \figurenum{1}
833: %\plottwo{f01a.eps}{f01b.eps}
834: \includegraphics[scale=0.21,viewport=54 14 1029 950]{f01a.eps}
835: \includegraphics[scale=0.21,viewport=14 14 1029 948]{f01b.eps}
836: \includegraphics[scale=0.42,viewport=28 42 538 679]{f01c.ps}
837: \includegraphics[scale=0.42,viewport=-78 42 538 679]{f01d.ps}
838: \label{sample}
839: \caption{$B$-band (upper left), $B-I$ color index (upper right), H$\alpha$
840: Fabry-Perot (lower left), and $H$-band (lower right) images displaying the
841: morphology of NGC 1433. In the color index image, the dark areas represent
842: bluer regions, while the white areas represent redder regions. All images are
843: 7.4$\arcmin$ by 6.8$\arcmin$. The $B$ and $B-I$ images are taken from Buta
844: et al. 2007 while the H$\alpha$ and $H$-band images are taken from Buta
845: et al. 2001.}
846: \end{figure}
847:
848: \clearpage
849:
850: \begin{figure}
851: \figurenum{2}
852: %%\plotone{colorcorrection.ps}
853: \includegraphics[angle=90,height=125mm]{f02.ps}
854: \label{sample}
855: \caption{A plot of the radial M/L profiles derived
856: from each of the seven models described in Bell \& de Jong 2001.}
857: \end{figure}
858:
859: \clearpage
860:
861: \begin{figure}
862: \figurenum{3}
863: %%\plottwoone{n1433_freqcurves.ps}
864: \includegraphics[angle=90,height=125mm]{f03.ps}
865: \label{sample}
866: \caption{Plots of the tangential force amplitude ($F_{T}$) normalized
867: by the axisymmetric disk force ($F_{R}$) for different bar scale heights
868: ($h_{B}$). The bar scale heights range from one to three times the disk scale
869: height of 7.7$\arcsec$.}
870: \end{figure}
871:
872: \clearpage
873:
874: \begin{figure}
875: \figurenum{4}
876: %%\plotone{n1433rotcurves.ps}
877: \includegraphics[angle=90,height=125mm]{f04.ps}
878: \label{sample}
879: \caption{A plot of both the observed composite rotation curve
880: (triple-dot-dashed line) and the simulation rotation curve (solid
881: line) for NGC 1433. The composite rotation curve is from Buta et
882: al. (2001), based on a polynomial fit to H I, H$\alpha$, and Mg I b
883: velocity data (plus, triangle, and diamond symbols, respectively),
884: corrected for an inclination of 33$^{\circ}$. The points have typical
885: statistical uncertainties of $\pm$10-20 km s$^{-1}$, due to non-circular
886: motions and an uncertain correction for asymmetric drift within 60$\arcsec$.
887: Lines are also shown that indicate the azimuthally averaged velocity
888: contributions
889: of the bulge (dotted), disk (dashed), and halo (dot-dashed) used in the
890: simulations. These lines were calculated from the mass model based on the
891: formation epoch
892: with bursts (Bell \& de Jong 2001) M/L corrected NIR image of the galaxy,
893: an assumed disk vertical scale height of 7.7$\arcsec$, and a distance of
894: 11.6 Mpc.
895: The Persic halo component was modeled as an isothermal sphere with a core
896: radius of 213$\arcsec$ and an asymptotic velocity at infinity of 127 km
897: s$^{-1}$.
898: The solid line is the sum of the component contributions or the total simulated
899: rotation curve.}
900: \end{figure}
901: %A plot of both the adopted rotation curve from the data and the
902: %simulated rotation curve for NGC
903: %1433. The plus, triangle, and diamond symbols denote the observed H I,
904: %H$\alpha$, and Mg I b
905: %velocity data taken along the galaxy major axis by Buta et al. (2001) and
906: %corrected for an inclination of 33$^{\circ}$. The points have typical
907: %statistical uncertainties of $\pm$10-20 km s$^{-1}$, with non-circular motions
908: %and corrections for asymmetric drift within 60$\arcsec$ adding additional
909: %uncertainty to the observed rotation curve. The dash-triple-dotted line indicates
910: %the polynomial fit to the data from Buta et al. (2001).
911: %The lines indicate the azimuthally averaged
912: %velocity contributions of the bulge (dotted), disk (dashed) and halo
913: %(dot-dashed) that were used in the
914: %simulations.
915: %These lines were calculated from the mass model
916: %based on the formation epoch with bursts (Bell \& de Jong 2001) M/L corrected
917: %NIR image of the galaxy, an assumed disk vertical scale height of 7.7$\arcsec$,
918: %and a distance of 11.6 Mpc.
919: %The Persic halo component was modeled as an isothermal sphere with a
920: %core radius of 213$\arcsec$ and an
921: %asymptotic velocity at infinity of 127 km s$^{-1}$.
922: %The solid line is the sum of the component contributions or the total
923: %simulated rotation curve.
924:
925: %%There is a clear difference in the
926: %%simulated and observed rotation curves between approximately 30 and 100
927: %%arcseconds.
928:
929:
930: \clearpage
931:
932: \begin{figure}
933: \figurenum{5}
934: %%\plottwo{n1433_freqcurves_03.ps}{n1433_freqcurves_04.ps}
935: \includegraphics[angle=90,height=63mm]{f05a.ps}
936: \includegraphics[angle=90,height=63mm]{f05b.ps}
937: %%\label{sample}
938: \caption{Lindblad precession frequency curves for NGC 1433. The horizontal
939: line in both plots corresponds to the inclination corrected $\Omega_p$ of 0.89
940: km s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$ or 15.8 km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$ with a galaxy
941: distance of 11.6 Mpc. The left plot shows the frequency curves derived from
942: the simulated rotation curve shown in Figure 2.
943: The horizontal line intersects curves corresponding to, from smaller to
944: larger radii, $\Omega-\kappa/2$, $\Omega-\kappa/4$, $\Omega$,
945: $\Omega+\kappa/4$, and $\Omega+\kappa/2$. $\Omega$ is the circular angular
946: velocity and $\kappa$ is the epicyclic frequency. The corotation radius is
947: where $\Omega=\Omega_p$. The right plot displays the simulated
948: $\Omega-\kappa/2$, $\Omega$, and $\Omega+\kappa/2$ curves (dotted) with the
949: corresponding curves derived from the observed composite rotation curve from
950: Buta et al. (2001) overlayed (solid).
951: %The
952: %observed $\Omega-\kappa/2$ curve reaches a maximum at $\Omega$ = 5.66 km
953: %s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$. The $\Omega_p$ line would first intersect this
954: %curve at 3.2$\arcsec$.
955: }
956: \end{figure}
957:
958: \clearpage
959:
960: \begin{figure}
961: \figurenum{6}
962: %%\plotone{morphcompare_86.eps}
963: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=1.0]{f006.eps}
964: \label{sample}
965: \caption{A $B$-band image of NGC 1433 (upper left panel) showing
966: the (R$^{\prime}$$_1$)SB(rs)ab morphology. The remaining panels are
967: gas simulations showing the sky-plane morphology at 0.5, 1.6, 2.8, 3.9, 5.0,
968: 6.0, 7.0, and 8.0 bar
969: rotations
970: %%(1.3, 4.2, 7.1, 10.1, and 13.0 Gyr, respectively)
971: using a pattern
972: speed of 0.89 km s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$. The simulated bar has a scale height
973: 3 times larger than that of the disk. After a few bar rotations, the simulated
974: and observed morphologies appear similar. Note the ``plumes,'' or detached
975: arm segments, to the upper left and lower right of the inner ring in the
976: observed and simulated morphologies. All panels are 400 by 400 arcseconds.}
977: \end{figure}
978:
979: \clearpage
980:
981: \begin{figure}
982: \figurenum{7}
983: \includegraphics[angle=0,height=120mm]{f007.eps}
984: \label{sample}
985: \caption{A $B$-band image of NGC 1433 (upper left panel) showing
986: the (R$^{\prime}$$_1$)SB(rs)ab morphology. The remaining panels are
987: gas simulations showing the morphology at 5.0 bar rotations with pattern
988: speeds of 0.83, 0.86, 0.89, 0.92, and 0.94 km s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$. The
989: shape and position of the simulated plumes most closely resembles the $B$-band
990: morphology with a pattern speed of 0.89 km s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$ is used. Also
991: note the decrease in size of the inner ring with the increase in pattern speed.
992: All panels are 400 by 400 arcseconds.}
993: \end{figure}
994:
995: \clearpage
996:
997: \begin{figure}
998: \figurenum{8}
999: \includegraphics[angle=90,height=125mm]{f008.eps}
1000: \label{sample}
1001: \caption{$B$-band disk- (upper left) and sky-plane (upper right) images
1002: of NGC 1433 along with disk- (lower left) and sky-plane (lower right) gas
1003: particle simulations shown at 5.0 bar rotations with a pattern speed of
1004: 0.89 km s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$. The overlayed ellipses are resonance
1005: locations derived from the shown gas particle simulations. The inner-most,
1006: middle, and outer-most ellipses
1007: correspond to the $\Omega-\kappa/4$, corotation, and $\Omega+\kappa/4$
1008: resonances, respectively.}
1009: \end{figure}
1010:
1011: \clearpage
1012:
1013: \begin{figure}
1014: \figurenum{9}
1015: %%\plottwoone{n1433_freqcurves.ps}
1016: \includegraphics[angle=0,height=120mm]{f009.eps}
1017: \label{sample}
1018: \caption{A $B$-band image of NGC 1433 (upper left panel) showing
1019: the (R$^{\prime}$$_1$)SB(rs)ab morphology. The remaining panels are
1020: gas simulations showing the morphology at 5.0 bar rotations with a pattern
1021: speed of 0.89 km s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$ and bar amplitudes varying from 0.25 to
1022: 1.25. All panels are 400 by 400 arcseconds.}
1023: \end{figure}
1024:
1025: \clearpage
1026:
1027: \begin{figure}
1028: \figurenum{10}
1029: \includegraphics[angle=90,scale=0.73]{f10.ps}%{junkzerovel99.ps}%zerovelplots2.ps}
1030: \label{sample}
1031: \caption{Zero-velocity regions (filled contours) from the observed and
1032: simulated data derived from velocities within $\pm$10 km s$^{-1}$ of the
1033: systemic velocity.
1034: The upper left frame shows the H$\alpha$ velocity field of NGC 1433 from
1035: Buta et al. 2001 while the remaining frames show the gas particle distribution
1036: at 5.0 bar rotations with an $\Omega_p$ of 0.89 km s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$ and bar
1037: amplitude factors ranging from 0.25 to 1.25. The
1038: dashed line in the frames coincide with the galaxy's minor axis. All frames are
1039: 380 by 200 arcseconds.}
1040: \end{figure}
1041:
1042: \clearpage
1043:
1044: \begin{figure}
1045: \figurenum{11}
1046: \includegraphics[angle=90,height=125mm]{f11.ps}
1047: \label{sample}
1048: \caption{A plot of the observed (plus symbols) and modeled
1049: (points) major axis velocity profiles for NGC 1433, as well as the
1050: azimuthally averaged total velocity contribution calculated from
1051: the mass model (line) discussed in Figure 4. The major axis velocity
1052: profiles are derived
1053: from the observed H$\alpha$ velocity field (from Buta et al. 2001) and the
1054: modeled gas particle
1055: distribution at 5 bar rotations with an $\Omega_p$ of 0.89 km s$^{-1}$
1056: arcsec$^{-1}$. The velocity profile data was extracted from within 5$^{\circ}$
1057: of the major axis position angle of 21$^{\circ}$ and corrected for an
1058: inclination of 33$^{\circ}$. The deviation between the model and the observed
1059: gas velocities for radii less than 20$\arcsec$ is due in part to noncircular
1060: motions, manifested as a 9$^{\circ}$ counterclockwise
1061: offset between the kinematic major axis
1062: of the inner velocity field in Fig. 6 of Buta et al. (2001)
1063: and the overall position angle. The deviation is also due to the model,
1064: which we have shown does not describe the inner regions
1065: reliably owing to our assumption of a single pattern speed
1066: and other model details.}
1067:
1068: %The kinematic major axis of the
1069: %H$\alpha$ velocity field within 20$\arcsec$ of the center is 30$^{\circ}$,
1070: %attributing to the deviation seen between the observed and modeled velocity
1071: %profiles.
1072:
1073:
1074: %The deviation between the model and the observed gas velocities
1075: %for radii $<$20$^{\prime\prime}$ is due in part to noncircular
1076: %motions, manifested as a 9$^{\circ}$ counterclockwise
1077: %offset between the kinematic major axis
1078: %of the inner velocity field in Fig. 6 of Buta et al. (2001)
1079: %and the overall position angle; and in part to the model,
1080: %which we have shown does not describe the inner regions
1081: %reliably owing to our assumption of a single pattern speed
1082: %and other model details.
1083:
1084: \end{figure}
1085:
1086: \clearpage
1087:
1088: \begin{figure}
1089: \figurenum{12}
1090: \includegraphics[angle=90,height=125mm]{f012.eps}
1091: \label{sample}
1092: \caption{Line-of-sight velocities along the inner ring of NGC 1433. The
1093: left-most
1094: plots show the annuli where the inner ring velocity data was extracted from
1095: the observed H$\alpha$ velocity field from Buta et al. 2001 (upper) and the
1096: simulated gas particle distribution at 5.0 bar rotations with an $\Omega_p$
1097: of 0.89 km s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$. The angled line near the top of the frames
1098: coincides with the line-of-nodes of the galaxy. The right-most plots show the
1099: line-of-sight velocity versus the position angle relative to the
1100: line-of-nodes along the ring from the observed
1101: (upper) and simulated (lower) data. There is a clear asymmetry in both the
1102: observed and simulated radial velocity data along the inner ring.}
1103: \end{figure}
1104:
1105: \clearpage
1106:
1107: \begin{figure}
1108: \figurenum{13}
1109: %%\plottwoone{n1433_freqcurves.ps}
1110: \includegraphics[angle=90,height=125mm]{f013.eps}
1111: \label{sample}
1112: \caption{Plots of selected gas particle orbits from 1.0 to 5.0 bar
1113: rotations overlayed on the simulated gas particle distribution at 5.0 bar
1114: rotations with
1115: $\Omega_p$ = 0.89 km s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$. The upper left and upper right
1116: plots display the orbits that conclude in the nuclear and inner ring of the
1117: simulation, respectively. The lower left plot displays orbits trapped near the
1118: $L_{4}$ and $L_{5}$ Lagrangian points. The lower right plot displays orbits
1119: that pass through the regions of the plumes. Most of these gas particles were
1120: found to conclude their orbits in the inner ring. All of the plots are in the
1121: disk plane of the simulation and the orbits are shown in the rotating frame.}
1122: \end{figure}
1123:
1124:
1125: \end{document}
1126: