1: \documentclass[useAMS,usenatbib]{mn2e}
2: \usepackage{latexsym,graphics,epsfig}
3: \def \be{\begin{equation}}
4: \def \ee{\end{equation}}
5: \def \bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
6: \def \eea{\end{eqnarray}}
7: \def\etal{{et al.\ }}
8:
9:
10: \title[Dynamical friction of radio galaxies in galaxy clusters]
11: {Dynamical friction of radio galaxies in galaxy clusters}
12:
13: \author[Biman B. Nath]{Biman B. Nath\\
14: Raman Research Institute, Sadashivanagar, Bangalore 560080, India}
15:
16: \begin{document}
17: \maketitle
18:
19: \begin{abstract}
20: The distribution of luminous radio galaxies in galaxy
21: clusters has been observed to be
22: concentrated in the inner region. We consider the role of
23: dynamical friction of massive galaxies ($M\sim 10^{12.5}$ M$_{\odot}$),
24: assuming them to be hosts of
25: luminous radio galaxies, and show that beginning with a Navarro-Frenk-White
26: density profile of a cluster of mass $M_{cl}\sim 10^{15}$ M$_{\odot}$
27: of concentration $c\sim 5$ and collapsing at $z\sim 1$,
28: the density profile of radio
29: galaxies evolve to a profile of concentration $c \sim 25$, as observed,
30: in a time scale of $t\sim 3\hbox{--}5$ Gyr.
31: \end{abstract}
32:
33: \begin{keywords}
34: galaxies:clusters:general -- galaxies:active -- radio continuum:galaxies
35: \end{keywords}
36:
37: \section{Introduction}
38: Recent observations have shown that powerful radio sources in galaxy clusters
39: are concentrated toward the cluster center. In a survey of 30 clusters of
40: galaxies,
41: Morrison \& Owen (2003) found that the spatial distribution of
42: high luminosity radio galaxies in rich clusters is described by
43: a small core radius. In particular, they found that
44: the spatial distribution of galaxies depend on their radio power---
45: high luminosity radio galaxies have a smaller core radius ($\sim 0.12\pm 0.02$
46: Mpc) than low luminosity ones ($\sim 0.4\pm 0.08$ Mpc). Recently, Lin \&
47: Mohr (2007) have collected data for 188 rich clusters, and they have analyzed
48: the spatial distribution of radio galaxies contained within them.
49: % (although
50: %theirs was not a spectroscopic survey like that of Morrison \& Owen 2003).
51: They found that the spatial distribution of powerful radio sources could
52: be fit by the `universal' Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) profile (Navarro,
53: Frenk, White 1997) with a larger concentration parameter than needed
54: for fitting the total mass distribution of the cluster. And similar to the
55: findings to Morrison \& Owen (2003), they discovered that the concentration
56: of galaxies in the spatial distribution increased with their
57: radio power.
58:
59: Many explanations can be put forward for such a steep spatial distribution of
60: radio galaxies in clusters. It is possible that the increased number density
61: of galaxies in the inner region facilitates mergers and interactions that
62: can trigger active galactic phenomena and
63: increase the radio luminosity of galaxies. Also,
64: radio galaxies are mostly associated with giant ellipticals which generally
65: inhabit the central regions of rich clusters. Moreover, the increased
66: pressure of the hot X-ray gas of rich clusters in the inner region may
67: enhance the radio luminosity of FRII radio galaxies by confining the
68: lobes with high pressure.
69:
70: There is also a dynamical aspect of the problem besides these factors.
71: If the hosts of radio loud objects in general are massive galaxies,
72: then dynamical friction will lead to mass segregation in galaxy clusters,
73: and radio galaxies will settle toward the cluster center over many orbits.
74: The situation is analogous to the phenomenon of large
75: density of millisecond pulsars in the central regions of globular clusters.
76: %(e.g, in 47 Tuc, Freire \etal 2000).
77: This concentration
78: is believed to be due to favorable conditions in the cluster core for
79: accretion spin-up of neutron stars leading to the phenomenon of millisecond
80: pulsars. However, it is first
81: the process of mass segregation in globular clusters
82: owing to dynamical friction that makes massive stars settle toward the
83: center, thereafter
84: leading to an increased number density of neutron
85: stars in the inner regions (Meylan \& Heggie 1997).
86:
87: Mass segregation by the process of dynamical friction
88: is also expected to occur in galaxy clusters
89: and it will lead to a preponderance of massive galaxies toward the
90: cluster center. This process is likely to occur simultaneously with other
91: processes of galactic evolution that may make galaxies in the inner region
92: prone to becoming a radio loud source. To study the dynamical aspect
93: of the evolution of spatial distribution of radio sources, one would need
94: to isolate it from other evolutionary process and determine if it is
95: a significant process by itself. We wish to address this issue in this paper.
96:
97: The main motivation to isolate the dynamical aspect of the problem
98: comes from the fact that the hosts of radio galaxies are often
99: massive galaxies,
100: irrespective of their membership in clusters or groups of galaxies.
101: Recent statistical studies of radio loud objects show that their hosts
102: are predominantly massive objects (containing black holes of mass
103: $\sim 10^{8.5}$ M$_{\odot}$) (Best \etal 2005).
104: It is therefore reasonable
105: to expect that dynamical evolution of massive galaxies in clusters
106: will have a significant effect on the spatial distribution of radio loud
107: sources in galaxy clusters, irrespective of other processes that contribute
108: toward increasing the radio output of a galaxy.
109:
110: Here we focus on the dynamical
111: evolution of the distribution of massive galaxies in clusters
112: from dynamical friction, and compare with recent observations.
113:
114:
115: \section{Hosts of radio galaxies}
116: Powerful radio sources (with $P_{1.4 GHz} \ge 10^{24}$ W Hz$^{-1}$) have
117: been found
118: to be associated with giant ellipticals, the oldest and the most massive
119: galaxies in the universe. Best \etal (2005) have discussed the mass
120: dependence of radio activity with the help of a statistical analysis of
121: the radio properties of galaxies from the 2dF survey. They have shown
122: shown that the probability of a galaxy containing
123: a central black hole of a certain mass to have a given (or larger)
124: radio luminosity
125: depends strongly on the black hole mass; the probability scales as $
126: \propto M_{BH}^{1.6
127: }$. The (volume weighted) distribution of the black hole mass in the sample
128: showed that most radio loud objects had a black hole mass in the range
129: $M_{BH} \sim 10^{8}\hbox{--}10^9$ M$_{\odot}$, peaking at
130: $M_{BH}\sim 10^{8.5}$ M$_{\odot}$. The total mass of the host galaxy
131: of radio loud sources is related to the central black hole mass.
132: Fine \etal (2006) found
133: from the analysis of the 2dF QSO survey
134: that for a QSO host containing a central black hole of
135: mass $M_{BH} \sim 10^{8.4}$ M$_{\odot}$, the total dark matter mass of the host
136: galaxy is $\sim 10^{12.5}$ M$_{\odot}$.
137:
138: Based on these considerations, we will
139: consider galaxies of total (dark matter)
140: mass of $\sim 10^{12.5}$ M$_{\odot}$, and containing
141: a central black hole of mass $M_{bh}\sim 10^{8.5}$
142: M$_{\odot}$, as examples of host galaxies of radio loud objects in our
143: calculation below.
144:
145: \section{Dynamical friction}
146: Consider a galaxy cluster
147: of total mass $M_{cl}$ and velocity dispersion $\sigma$. We assume that
148: the average mass distribution inside the cluster follows the Navarro-Frenk-White
149: (NFW) profile (Navarro, Frenk, White 1997), $\rho=\rho_s /((r/r_s) (1+
150: (r/r_s)))$, where $r_s=r_{vir}/c$, $c$ is the concentration parameter, and
151: $r_{vir}$ is the virial radius. The virial radius is fixed by the overdensity
152: estimated from spherical collapse model, which is
153: approximately $\Delta (z=0) \sim 100$ at the present epoch,
154: for the standard $\Lambda$CDM cosmological model
155: ($\Omega_m=0.3, \Omega_\Lambda=1-\Omega_m$) (see, e.g., Komatsu \& Seljak ).
156: The
157: characteristic density $\rho_s$ is then given by,
158: \be
159: \rho_{\rm s} = {c^3 \, \Delta(z) \, \rho_c(z)
160: \over 3 [\ln(1+c) - {c \over
161: (1+c)} ] } ,
162: \label{eq:rhos}
163: \ee
164: where $\rho_c(z)$ is the critical density of the universe at redshift $z$.
165: For a large range of length scales (barring the central and outer regions
166: of the cluster), the mass density $\rho \propto r^{-2}$. The mass distribution
167: in these parts will be characterized by a near constant velocity dispersion
168: $\sigma$.
169:
170: We assume a concentration parameter $c=5$ for a rich cluster as suggested
171: by N-body simulations (Navarro \etal 1996).
172: We also assume a Maxwellian distribution of velocities of
173: objects in the clusters
174: with dispersion $\sigma$, and assume
175: the average mass of galaxies to be $m$.
176:
177: Consider the motion of a massive galaxy of mass $M$ and speed $V$
178: in this cluster.
179: Its motion in the background potential
180: of numerous small galaxies of mass $m$ will be perturbed by random
181: interactions with these galaxies. These perturbations will amount to
182: a force of dynamical friction given by,
183: \be
184: F_{drag} (r) =-{4 \pi G^2 M^2 n m \ln \Lambda \over V^2} \Bigl
185: [ {\rm erf} (X)-{2 X
186: \over \sqrt{\pi}} \exp (-X^2) \Bigr ] \,,
187: \ee
188: where $n$ is the number density of galaxies of mass $m$, and
189: $X=V/\sqrt{2} \sigma $. The dynamical friction will slowly change its
190: orbital parameters and the massive galaxy will slowly settle toward the
191: cluster center over many orbits.
192:
193: Consider a near circular orbit of the massive galaxy. Then, for a large
194: range of length scales in the cluster, we have $V=\sqrt{2} \sigma$, and $X=1$.
195: The coulomb logarithm is approximately $\ln \Lambda \sim \ln {b_{max} V^2
196: \over GM}$
197: (Binney \& Tremaine 1987, eqn 7-13b). For $M\sim 10^{12.5}$ M$_{\odot}$,
198: and $V\sim 1300$ km/s (see below for the choice of this value), we have
199: $\ln \Lambda \sim \ln {b_{max} \over 7.7 \, {\rm kpc}}$.
200: If we take $b_{max}$ as the
201: cluster core radius which is $\sim 100$ kpc for rich clusters, then
202: $\ln \Lambda \sim 2.5$. In this case, the product $[ {\rm erf} (X)-{2 X
203: \over \sqrt{\pi}} \exp (-X^2) \Bigr ] \ln \Lambda \sim 1.1$, and we assume
204: it to be unity for simplicity.
205: Also, we will use the average density of matter $\rho= nm$ in the above
206: expression.
207:
208: If we consider an inspiraling orbit of a massive galaxy owing to the
209: dynamical friction from its interactions with average mass galaxies, then
210: one can estimate the time scale over which the distance of the massive galaxy
211: from the cluster center would significantly decrease. Since the
212: angular momentum $L \sim MVr$ changes according to $dL/dt=F_{drag} \times r$,
213: we have
214: \be
215: {1 \over r} {dr \over dt} %\sim - {4 \pi G^2 M^2 \rho \over M V^2}
216: \sim - {4 \pi G^2 M \rho \over V^3 } \,,
217: \label{eq:fr}
218: \ee
219: since the circular
220: velocity $V$ changes little in the region of the cluster potential under
221: consideration (where $\rho \propto r^{-2}$ and the circular velocity
222: $V=\sqrt{2} \sigma$). Ostriker \& Turner (1979) also used this equation
223: to study dynamical friction in galaxy clusters (see also Nusser \& Sheth 1999).
224:
225: We can estimate the time scale of dynamical friction as,
226: $t_{dyn}\equiv r /{dr \over dt} \sim {V^3 \over 4 \pi G^2 M \rho}$.
227: For $V\sim 10^3$ km/s, $M\sim 10^{12.5}$ M$_{\odot}$, and using the
228: matter density at the characteristic radius $r_s$ (using eqn \ref{eq:rhos}),
229: $\rho_s %\sim {200 c^3 \rho_c \over 4 [\ln (1+c)-c/(1+c)]}
230: \sim 10^{-26.6}$ g cm$^{-3}$, for $c=5$ and $z=0$, we have,
231: \bea
232: t_{dyn} \sim &&2.4 \, {\rm Gyr} \, \Bigl ({V \over 10^3 \, {\rm km/s}} \Bigr )^3
233: \, \nonumber\\ && \times
234: \Bigl ({M \over 10^{12.5} \, M_{\odot}} \Bigr )^{-1} \,
235: \Bigl ({\rho \over 10^{-26.6} \, {\rm g/cc} } \Bigr )^{-1} \,.
236: \eea
237: It is believed that rich clusters formed at
238: $z\sim 1$, judging
239: from the lack of evolution in X-ray luminosity function of clusters
240: up to $z \sim 1$ (see, e.g., Rosati \etal 2002). The
241: mass distribution would have settled into a NFW profile
242: by that epoch. If such a cluster contained a few massive galaxies far from
243: its center, then the above estimate shows that these massive galaxies
244: would have spiralled toward the cluster center in a few Gyr time scale.
245:
246: The time evolution of the orbit of a massive galaxy embedded in a
247: galaxy cluster can be obtained from numerically
248: solving eqn \ref{eq:fr}. A few representative
249: cases are shown in Figure 1 in for $M=10^{12.5}$ M$_{\odot}$, $V=10^3$ km
250: s$^{-1}$. We compute the density distribution of the cluster halo
251: for $M_{cl}=10^{15}$ M$_{\odot}$ collapsing at $z=1$. We emphasize that
252: the results shown in Figure 1 are
253: approximate and are based on several assumptions. Firstly,
254: we have assumed circular orbit. But the results shown in Figure 1 can be
255: interpreted as the evolution of the radial distance averaged over an orbital
256: period. Also, we have neglected the effect of the massive galaxy being an
257: extended object.
258: In reality, the galaxy will be tidally stripped, decreasing its
259: mass, as it spirals
260: inward (see Nusser and Sheth (1999) for a discussion on this effect).
261:
262: \begin{figure}
263: \centerline{
264: \epsfxsize=0.5\textwidth
265: \epsfbox{fig1.eps}
266: }
267: {\vskip-3mm}
268: \caption{
269: The evolution of orbit for a massive galaxy ($M=3 \times 10^{12}$)
270: embedded in a rich cluster ($M_{cl}=10^{15}$ M$_{\odot}$) is shown, for
271: a few initial radii.
272: }
273: \label{f:evol}
274: \end{figure}
275:
276:
277: We can then ask how the distribution of such massive
278: galaxies would evolve in a statistical sense, beginning with the NFW profile
279: of a given concentration parameter.
280: A given cluster will contain only a handful of massive galaxies, but we
281: can consider a statistical ensemble of clusters with the same concentration
282: parameter and total mass, which will contain several massive galaxies
283: with initial orbital parameters such that the total mass distribution of the
284: ensemble cluster resembles a NFW profile of the assumed concentration
285: parameter (here $c=5$).
286: Slowly, over time and many orbits, the massive galaxies will settle toward
287: the center, and their mass distribution will change.
288:
289:
290: To estimate the gradual change in the
291: mass distribution of massive galaxies immersed in a gravitational
292: potential determined by several average mass galaxies, we divide the
293: cluster into several annuli, and compute the cluster halo
294: density in the $i$-th annulus
295: as that given by the NFW profile for the average radius in that annulus.
296: Then we ascribe an initial number of
297: massive galaxies in each annulus, $N_M (i,t=0)$, so that the density
298: profile of these galaxies ($N_M(i,t=0)/vol(i)$, where $vol(i)$ is the volume of
299: the $i$-th annulus) follows
300: the NFW profile with same concentration ($c=5$ here). We normalize the number
301: of massive galaxies in different annuli
302: by the density at the outermost annulus, which does not change owing to
303: negligible dynamical friction at that radius.
304: % Beginning with a NFW profile with
305: %a concentration parameter $c=5$, we can then track the gradual sinking of
306: %massive galaxies relative to the background mass distribution which is
307: %assumed to be fixed in time, by solving eqn. \ref{eq:fr}.
308:
309: We first calculate the
310: change in radius of these massive galaxies initially stationed at each annulus
311: using eqn (\ref{eq:fr}). We compute their radii after an
312: elapsed time interval, and then
313: we re-calculate the number of massive galaxies in all
314: annuli $N_M(i,t)$ at this epoch,
315: again normalized by the number of massive galaxies in the outermost
316: annulus. From this we calculate the
317: number density of massive galaxies in each annulus as a function of time.
318: The result
319: will depend on the mass assumed for the massive galaxies and the
320: time elapsed. Our previous estimates show that, we can expect a significant
321: evolution in the distribution of massive galaxies over a time scale
322: of a few Gyr for galaxies with $M\sim 10^{12.5}$
323: M$_{\odot}$.
324:
325: We consider a cluster of mass $M_{cl}=10^{15}$ M$_{\odot}$
326: and concentration parameter $c=5$. The virial radius for a cluster collapsing
327: at $z\sim 1$ is calculated to be $r_{vir}\sim 2.6$ Mpc. The appropriate
328: velocity
329: dispersion for such a cluster is taken from the scaling observed in simulations
330: by Evrard \etal (2008) to be $\sigma \sim 9.5 \times 10^8$ cm s$^{-1}$
331: (for
332: Hubble constant
333: $H=70$ km/s/Mpc); we assume it to be independent of location inside the cluster,
334: We consider massive galaxies with
335: $M=10^{12.5}$ M$_{\odot}$ and $V=\sqrt{2}\sigma \sim 1.3 \times 10^8$
336: cm s$^{-1}$.
337:
338:
339: \section{Results}
340: We show in Figure 2 the initial mass distribution by dotted line; it is
341: a NFW mass profile with $c=5$, for $M_{cl}=10^{15}$ M$_{\odot}$ collapsing
342: at $z=1$. We plot the radius as a fraction of $r_{200}$.
343: Then, the mass distribution of an ensemble of galaxies with $M=3 \times 10^{12}$
344: M$_{\odot}$ is shown after $t=1.5, 3$ and $5$ Gyr with solid lines.
345: It is found that the distribution steepens with time.
346: The distribution
347: at outer radii does change much, but massive galaxies in the middle
348: region settles toward the center, increasing the density of these galaxies
349: in the bins
350: of radii in these regions. The dashed line shows a NFW profile with
351: $c=25$. All profiles have been drawn keeping the mass density at the outermost
352: bin fixed in time, for comparison.
353:
354: \begin{figure}
355: \centerline{
356: \epsfxsize=0.5\textwidth
357: \epsfbox{fig2.eps}
358: }
359: {\vskip-3mm}
360: \caption{
361: The density profile of galaxies is plotted here. The dotted line shows
362: the initial profile, and the solid lines correspond to the density profile
363: of massive galaxies with $M=3 \times 10^{12}$ M$_{\odot}$ after $t=1.5, 3$ and
364: $5$
365: Gyr, the steepest profile being for the longest time interval.
366: The dashed line corresponds to a NFW profile with $c=25$ (normalized
367: to have the same density as other profiles at the outermost bin).
368: }
369: \label{f:evol}
370: \end{figure}
371:
372:
373:
374: We therefore find that the distribution of massive galaxies in a statistical
375: ensemble of clusters steepens with time. The steepening depends on the
376: assumed mass of the massive galaxies and the time elapsed. In our fiducial
377: case of $M=3 \times 10^{12}$
378: M$_{\odot}$ immersed in a cluster of total mass $M_{cl}+10^{15}$ M$_{\odot}$
379: collapsing at $z=1$, we find that a distribution with initial $c=5$ has changed
380: to a distribution with $c=25$ over a time scale $t \sim 3\hbox{--}5$ Gyr.
381:
382: It is interesting to compare this time scale with the cosmological
383: lookback time. The look back time to redshift $z\sim 0.5$ is $t \sim 4$ Gyr.
384: If rich clusters formed at
385: these redshifts, then
386: their mass distribution would have settled into the NFW profile
387: by that epoch. If such a cluster contained a few massive galaxies far from
388: its center, then it is conceivable that these massive galaxies
389: would have spiralled toward the cluster center by the present epoch.
390:
391: \section{Discussions}
392: Lin \& Mohr (2007) have stacked the data from 188 clusters containing
393: 16,646 radio loud objects (with radio luminosity $P > 10^{23}$ W Hz$^{-1}$)
394: to produce the density profile of these objects. The number of radio
395: loud objects within the radius $r_{200}$ in their study
396: was 836. They found that the
397: density profile corresponds to a NFW profile with $c\sim 25\pm 7$,
398: excluding the
399: brightest cluster galaxy (BCG). With the inclusion of BCGs which they
400: defined as radio loud objects within $0.1 r_{200}$, the profile
401: steepens to $c\sim 52^{+25}_{-14}$.
402:
403: The solid curve in Figure 2 steepens further below a radius $0.1 r_{200}$,
404: and excluding this part (equivalent to excluding the statistics of
405: BCGs), we find that the density distribution is comparable
406: to a NFW profile with $c\sim 25$, close to the observed value. It then appears
407: the distribution of radio loud
408: objects in the ensemble cluster (produced by stacking the data
409: of numerous clusters) can be explained by assuming that the original
410: mass distribution was a standard NFW profile with $c\sim 5$, and that
411: massive galaxies slowly sink toward the cluster center owing to dynamical
412: friction. The time taken to match the observed distribution is
413: $t \sim 3\hbox{--}5$ Gyr if the massive galaxies have $M\sim 10^{12.5}$
414: M$_{\odot}$, and belonging to a cluster of $M_{cl}=10^{15}$ M$_{\odot}$.
415:
416: It is interesting to note that Lin \& Mohr (2007) have found that more
417: powerful radio sources are more centrally concentrated than the weaker
418: ones. For example, they found that radio sources with luminosity
419: larger than $10^{24.5}$ W Hz$^{-1}$ have a distribution comparable to a NFW
420: profile with $c\sim 59 \pm 11$. This trend is expected in the above
421: scenario if the probability
422: of a galaxy to have a given radio luminosity increases with its total mass,
423: which indeed seems to be the case. Best \etal (2005) found from the 2dF
424: survey data that the probability of a galaxy with a black hole mass $M_{BH}$
425: to have radio power larger than a given value
426: approximately scales as $M_{BH}^{1.6}$. If the central black hole mass scales
427: linearly
428: with the dynamical mass $M_{dyn}$ of the host galaxy as
429: (e.g., Hopkins \etal 2007), then one expects the hosts
430: of more powerful radio sources
431: to be more massive galaxies.
432:
433: We note here that
434: dynamical friction cannot be the complete story behind the concentration
435: of radio loud objects in clusters. Masses of galaxies alone do not determine
436: their radio properties; there are many factors that contribute to its
437: radio luminosity, like mergers and interactions with other galaxies, and
438: properties of the medium confining radio lobes. Here
439: we have isolated the dynamical aspect of the issue,
440: and the results show that dynamical friction can also be
441: as important as other factors in producing a steep density profile of
442: radio sources in clusters.
443:
444:
445: \section{Summary}
446: We study the dynamical friction of massive galaxies--- which can often be
447: hosts of radio loud objects--- in galaxy clusters, and find the the time
448: scale of mass segregation to be $t \sim 3\hbox{--}5$ Gyr, for galaxies
449: of mass $\sim 10^{12.5}$ M$_{\odot}$ within clusters of mass $M_{cl}\sim 10^{15}
450: $ M$_{\odot}$. We show that this effect can help explain the observed
451: distribution of radio loud objects in rich clusters of galaxies.
452:
453: \bigskip
454: Acknowledgement-- I thank M. Begelman, J. Silk and S. Sridhar for comments on
455: an earlier version of the manuscript, and an anonymous referee for useful comments.
456:
457: \begin{thebibliography}{}
458:
459:
460: \bibitem[]{best} Best, P. N., Kauffman, G., Heckman, T. M., Brinchmann, J,
461: Charlot, S., Ivezic, Z, White, S.D.M. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 25
462: \bibitem[]{BT} Binney, J., Tremaine, S., Galactic Dynamics, Princeton University
463: Press, 1987
464: \bibitem[]{evrard} Evrard, A. E. et al. 2008, ApJ, 672, 122
465: \bibitem[]{fine} Fine, S \etal 2006, MNRAS, 373, 613
466: \bibitem[]{hopkins} Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J.,
467: Robertson, B., Krause, E. 2007, ApJ, 669, 67
468: \bibitem[]{komatsu} Komatsu, E., Seljak, U. 2001, MNRAS, 327, 1353
469: \bibitem[]{lin} Lin, Y-T, \& Mohr, J. J. 2007, ApJS, 170, 71
470: \bibitem[]{meylan} Meylan G., Heggie, D. C. 1997, A\&ARv, 8, 1
471: \bibitem[]{morrison} Morrison, G. E. \& Owen, F. N. 2003, AJ, 125, 506
472: \bibitem[]{nfw96} Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., White, S. D. M. 1996, ApJ,
473: 462, 563
474: \bibitem[]{Nusser} Nusser, A. \& Sheth, R. K. 1999, MNRAS, 303, 685
475: \bibitem[]{ost} Ostriker, J. P. \& Turner, T. L. 1979, ApJ, 234, 785
476: \bibitem[]{rosati} Rosati, P., Borgani, S., Norman, C. 2002, ARAA, 40, 539
477: \bibitem[]{tremaine} Tremaine, S. D., Ostriker, J. P., Spitzer, Jr. L. 1975,
478: ApJ, 407
479: \end{thebibliography}
480:
481:
482:
483: \end{document}
484:
485: