1: %\usepackage{feynmf}
2: %\usepackage{amssymbol}
3: %\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{2}\normalsize
4: %\input{tcilatex}
5: %\input{tcilatex}
6:
7:
8: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{article}
9: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
10: \usepackage{amssymb}
11: \usepackage{amsmath}
12: \usepackage{graphics}
13: \usepackage{epsfig}
14: %\usepackage{psfig}
15:
16: \setcounter{MaxMatrixCols}{10}
17: %TCIDATA{OutputFilter=LATEX.DLL}
18: %TCIDATA{Version=5.00.0.2606}
19: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="SaveForMode" CONTENT="1">}
20: %TCIDATA{BibliographyScheme=Manual}
21: %TCIDATA{LastRevised=Saturday, September 09, 2006 22:24:09}
22: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="GraphicsSave" CONTENT="32">}
23: %TCIDATA{Language=American English}
24:
25: \renewcommand{\vec}[1]{{\bf #1}}
26: \setlength{\baselineskip}{20mm}
27: \textwidth 15.0 true cm
28: \textheight 22.0 true cm
29: \headheight 0 cm
30: \headsep 0 cm
31: \topmargin 0.4 true in
32: \oddsidemargin 0.25 true in
33: \newcommand{\eqb}{\begin{equation}}
34: \newcommand{\eqe}{\end{equation}}
35: \newcommand{\dmb}{\begin{displaymath}}
36: \newcommand{\dme}{\end{displaymath}}
37: \newcommand{\pd}{\partial}
38: \newcommand{\ep}{\varepsilon}
39: \newcommand{\eab}{\begin{eqnarray}}
40: \newcommand{\eae}{\end{eqnarray}}
41: \newcommand{\ra}{\right\rangle}
42: \newcommand{\la}{\left\langle}
43: \newcommand{\e}{\mbox{e}}
44: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
45: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
46: \newcommand{\sgn}{\text{sgn}\,}
47: \newcommand{\munu}{{\mu\nu}}
48: \newcommand{\ad}{{\dot{\alpha}}}
49: \newcommand{\bd}{{\dot{\beta}}}
50: \newcommand{\La}{\Lambda}
51: \setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
52: %\input{tcilatex}
53:
54: \begin{document}
55:
56:
57: \begin{titlepage}
58: \begin{flushright}
59: \end{flushright}
60: \vspace{0.6cm}
61:
62: \begin{center}
63: \Large{Evolving center-vortex loops}
64:
65: \vspace{1.5cm}
66:
67: \large{Julian Moosmann and Ralf Hofmann}
68: \end{center}
69: \vspace{1.5cm}
70:
71: \begin{center}
72: {\em Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik\\
73: Universit\"at Karlsruhe (TH)\\
74: Kaiserstr. 12\\
75: 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany}
76: \end{center}
77: \vspace{1.5cm}
78:
79: \begin{abstract}
80: We consider coarse-graining applied to nonselfintersecting planar
81: center-vortex loops
82: as they emerge in the confining phase of an
83: SU(2) Yang-Mills theory. Well-established properties of planar curve-shrinking predict
84: that a suitably defined, geometric effective action exhibits (mean-field) critical
85: behavior when the conformal limit of circular points is reached.
86: This suggests the existence of an asymptotic
87: mass gap. We demonstrate that the
88: initially sharp mean center-of-mass position in a given ensemble of
89: curves develops a variance under the flow as is the case for a
90: position eigenstate in free-particle quantum mechanics under unitary
91: time evolution. A possible application of
92: these concepts is an approach to high-$T_c$ superconductivity
93: based (a) on the nonlocal nature of the electron
94: (1-fold selfintersecting center-vortex loop) and (b) on planar curve-shrinking
95: flow representing the decrease in thermal
96: noise in a cooling cuprate.
97: \end{abstract}
98:
99: \end{titlepage}
100:
101: \section{Introduction}
102:
103: Four dimensional SU(2) Yang-Mills theory occurs in three phases: a deconfining, a
104: preconfining, and a confining one. While the former two
105: phases possess propagating gauge fields a complete
106: decoupling thereof takes place at a Hagedorn
107: transition towards the confining phase
108: \cite{Hofmann2005,GHS2006,Hofmann2007}.
109: Namely, by the decay of a preconfining ground state, consisting of
110: collapsing magnetic (w.r.t. the gauge fields in the
111: defining SU(2) Yang-Mills Lagrangian) flux lines of finite core-size $d$, see also
112: \cite{NO},
113: into nonselfintersecting or selfintersecting
114: center-vortex loops \cite{tHooft1983}
115: the mass $m_D$ of the dual gauge
116: field diverges. This, in turn, implies $d\to 0$.
117: As a consequence, center-vortex loops (CVLs) with nonvanishing selfintersection
118: number $N$ become stable solitons in isolation. These solitons are
119: classified according to their topology and center charge. That is, for $d\to 0$ the region of negative
120: pressure $P$ is confined to the vanishing vortex core, and
121: the soliton becomes a particle-like ($P=0$) excitation whose stability
122: is in addition assured topologically by its selfintersection(s).
123:
124: The purpose of our paper is to investigate the sector with $N=0$ in some
125: detail. Topologically, there is no reason for the stability of this
126: sector's excitations, and we will argue that on average and as a consequence
127: of a noisy environment a planar CVL with $N=0$ shrinks to
128: nothingness within a finite `time'. Here the role of `time' is
129: played by a variable measuring the decrease of externally provided
130: resolving power applied to the system. By `planar CVL' we mean an
131: embedding of the $N=0$ soliton into a 2D flat and spatial plane.
132: For an isolated SU(2) Yang-Mills theory the role of the
133: environment is played by the sectors with $N>0$. If the SU(2) theory
134: under consideration is part of a world subject to additional gauge
135: symmetries then a portion of such an environment arises from a mixing with
136: these theories. In any case, a planar CVL at finite length $L$ is
137: acquiring mass by frequent interactions with the environment after it was
138: generated by a process subject to an
139: inherent, finite resolution $Q_0$. At the same time, the CVL starts
140: shrinking towards a circular point. The latter becomes unresolvable starting
141: at some finite resolution $Q_*$. That is, all properties that are related to the
142: existence of extended lines of center flux, observable for
143: $Q_0\ge Q>Q_*$, do not occur for $Q\le Q_*$, and the CVL vanishes from the spectrum of confining SU(2)
144: Quantum Yang-Mills theory. Since CVLs with $N>0$ have a finite mass
145: (positive-integer multiples of the Yang-Mills scale $\Lambda$) we
146: `observe' a gap in the mass spectrum of the theory when probing the
147: system with resolution $Q\le Q_*$.
148:
149: Notice that by embedding an $N=0$ CVL of an isolated SU(2) Yang-Mills theory into a
150: flat 2D surface at $m_D<\infty$, $d>0$, a hypothetical observer measuring a positive (negative)
151: curvature along a given sector of the vortex line experiences more (less)
152: negative pressure in the intermediate vicinity of this curve sector
153: leading to this sector's motion towards (away from)
154: the observer, see Fig.\,\ref{Fig-1}.
155: %***********************
156: \begin{figure}
157: \begin{center}
158: \leavevmode
159: %\epsfxsize=9.cm
160: \leavevmode
161: %\epsffile[80 25 534 344]{}
162: \vspace{4.3cm}
163: \special{psfile=Fig-1.ps angle=0 voffset=-140
164: hoffset=-175 hscale=60 vscale=60}
165: \end{center}
166: \caption{\protect{\label{Fig-1}} Highly space-resolved snapshot of an $N=0$ CVL
167: curve-sector. The pressure $P_i$ in the region pointed to by the normal
168: vector $\vec{n}$ is more negative than the pressure
169: $P_e$ thus leading to a motion of the sector along $\vec{n}$.}
170: \end{figure}
171: %************************
172: The speed of this
173: motion is a monotonic function of curvature.
174: On average, this shrinks the CVL. Alternatively, one may {\sl globally}
175: consider the limit
176: $m_D\to\infty$, $d\to 0$,
177: that is, the confining phase of an SU(2) Yang-Mills theory,
178: but now take into account the effects of an environment which
179: {\sl locally} relaxes this limit (by collisions) and thus also induces
180: curve-shrinking. One possibility to describe this situation is by the
181: following flow equation in the (dimensionless) parameter
182: $\tau$
183: %*********
184: \eqb
185: \label{CSt}
186: \partial_\tau \vec{x}=\frac{1}{\sigma}\,\partial^2_s \vec{x}\,,
187: \eqe
188: %**********
189: where $s$ is arc length, $\vec{x}$ is a point on the planar CVL, and
190: $\sigma$ is a string tension effectively
191: expressing the distortions induced by the environment. After a rescaling,
192: $\hat{x}\equiv\sqrt{\sigma}\vec{x}$, $\xi=\sqrt{\sigma}s$,
193: Eq.\,(\ref{CSt}) assumes the following form
194: %*********
195: \eqb
196: \label{CSta}
197: \partial_\tau \hat{x}(u,\tau)=\partial^2_\xi \hat{x}=k(u,\tau)\vec{n}(u,\tau)\,,
198: \eqe
199: %**********
200: where $u$ is a (dimensionless) curve parameter ($d\xi=|\partial_u\hat{x}|\,du$), $\vec{n}$
201: the (inward-pointing) Euclidean unit normal, $k$ the
202: scalar curvature, defined as
203: %*********
204: \eqb
205: \label{curvdef}
206: k\equiv\left|\partial^2_\xi \hat{x}\right|
207: =\left|\frac{1}{|\partial_u\hat{x}|}\partial_u\left(\frac{1}{|\partial_u\hat{x}|}\partial_u\hat{x}\right)\right|\,,
208: \eqe
209: %**********
210: $|\vec{v}|\equiv\sqrt{\vec{v}\cdot\vec{v}}$, and $\vec{v}\cdot\vec{w}$
211: denotes the Euclidean scalar product of the vectors $\vec{v}$ and
212: $\vec{w}$ lying in the plane. In the following we resort to a slight abuse of notation by
213: using the same symbol $\hat{x}$ for the functional dependence on $u$ or
214: $\xi$.
215:
216: It is worth mentioning that Eq.\,(\ref{CSta}) expresses a special case
217: of the local condition that the rate of decrease of the (dimensionless)
218: curve length $L(\tau)=\int_0^{L(\tau)} d\xi=\int_0^{2\pi}
219: du\,\left|\partial_u\hat{x}(u,\tau)\right|$ is
220: maximal w.r.t. a variation of the direction of the velocity
221: $\partial_\tau\hat{x}$ of a given point on the curve at fixed
222: $|\partial_\tau\hat{x}|$ \cite{Smith}:
223: %**********
224: \eqb
225: \label{roc}
226: \frac{dL(\tau)}{d\tau}=-\int_0^{L(\tau)} d\xi\,k\vec{n}\cdot\partial_\tau
227: \hat{x}\,.
228: \eqe
229: %*********
230: The 1D heat-equation (\ref{CSta})
231: is well understood mathematically \cite{GageHamilton,Grayson} and
232: represents the 1D analogue of the Ricci equation
233: describing curvature-ho\-moge\-ni\-zation of 3-manifolds
234: \cite{PerelmanI,PerelmanII,PerelmanIII} thus proving the geometrization
235: conjecture \cite{Thurston}.
236:
237: The present work interpretes the
238: shrinking of closed and 2D-flat embedded (planar) curves as a Wilsonian
239: renormalization-group evolution governed by an effective
240: action which is defined purely in geometric terms. In the presence of an
241: environment represented by the parameter $\sigma$,
242: this action possesses a natural decomposition into a conformal and a
243: nonconformal factor. One of our goals is to show
244: that the transition to the conformal limit of vanishing
245: mean curve length really is a critical phenomenon
246: characterized by a mean-field exponent if a suitable parameterization of
247: the effective action is used. To see this, various
248: initial conditions are chosen to generate an
249: ensemble whose partition function is
250: invariant under curve-shrinking. A (second-order)
251: phase transition is characterized by the critical behavior of the
252: coefficient associated with the nonconformal factor in the effective action. That is, in the presence
253: of an environment the (nearly massless) $N=0$ sector in confining SU(2)
254: Yang-Mills dynamics,
255: generated during the Hagedorn transition, practically disappears after a finite
256: `time' leading to an asymptotic mass gap. We also believe that $N=0$
257: CVLs play the role of Majorana neutrinos in physics:
258: Their disappearance after a finite time and the absence of antiparticles
259: would be manifestations of lepton-number violation \cite{KKG} forbidden in the present
260: Standard Model of Particle Physics and may provide for an explanation to the
261: solar neutrino problem alternative to the oscillation scenario, see also \cite{BosiCavalleri2002}.
262:
263: In Sec.\,\ref{MP} we provide information on proven properties
264: of curve-shrinking evolution. The philosophy
265: underlying the statistics of geometric fluctuations in the $N=0$
266: sector is elucidated in Sec.\,\ref{PF}. In Sec.\,\ref{RGF} we present
267: our results for the renormalization-group flow of the effective
268: action, give an interpretation, and compute the evolution of a local
269: quantity. Finally, in Sec.\,\ref{S}
270: we summarize our work and give an outlook to the
271: $N=1$ case which we suspect is relevant for high-$T_c$
272: superconductivity.
273:
274: \section{Prerequisites on mathematical results\label{MP}}
275:
276: In this section we provide knowledge on the properties of the shrinking
277: of embedded (nonselfintersecting) curves
278: in a plane \cite{GageHamilton,Grayson}. It is important to stress that
279: only for curve-shrinking in a plane are the following results
280: valid. To restrict the motion of a
281: CVL to a plane is a major assumption, and additional physical
282: arguments must be provided for its validity.
283:
284: The properties of the $\tau$-evolution of smooth, embedded, and closed
285: curves $\hat{x}(u,\tau)$ subject to Eq.\,(\ref{CSta})
286: were investigated in \cite{GageHamilton} for the purely convex case
287: and in \cite{Grayson} for the general case.
288: The main result of \cite{Grayson} is
289: that an embedded curve with finitely many points of
290: inflection remains embedded and smooth when
291: evolving under Eq.\,(\ref{CSta}) and that such a curve flows to a circular
292: point for $\tau\nearrow T$ where $0<T<\infty$. That is, asymptotically the curve converges (w.r.t. the
293: $C^\infty$-norm) to a shrinking circle: $\lim_{\tau\to T} L(\tau)=0$ and
294: $\lim_{\tau\to T} A(\tau)=0$, $A$ being the (dimensionless) area
295: enclosed by the curve,
296: such that the isoperimetric ratio $\frac{L^2(\tau)}{A(\tau)}$ approaches the value $4\pi$
297: from above.
298: %***********************
299: \begin{figure}
300: \begin{center}
301: \leavevmode
302: %\epsfxsize=9.cm
303: \leavevmode
304: %\epsffile[80 25 534 344]{}
305: \vspace{5.3cm}
306: \special{psfile=Fig-2.ps angle=0 voffset=-170
307: hoffset=-195 hscale=60 vscale=50}
308: \end{center}
309: \caption{\protect{\label{Fig-2}} Plot of the
310: evolution of a planar CVL under Eq.\,(\ref{CSta}). The thick
311: central line depicts the graph of the CVL's `center of mass'. The
312: flow is started at $\tau=0$ and ends at $\tau=T$.}
313: \end{figure}
314: %************************
315: For later use, we present the following two identities, see Lemma 3.1.2
316: and Lemma 3.1.7 in \cite{GageHamilton}:
317: %***********
318: \eqb
319: \label{Levol}
320: \partial_\tau L=-\int_0^L d\xi\,k^2=-\int_0^{2\pi}du\,|\partial_u\hat{x}|k^2\,,
321: \eqe
322: %***********
323: %***********
324: \eqb
325: \label{Aevol}
326: \partial_\tau A=-2\pi\,.
327: \eqe
328: %***********
329: Setting $A(\tau=0)\equiv A_0$, the solution to Eq.\,(\ref{Aevol}) is
330: %********
331: \eqb
332: \label{solAevol}
333: \frac{A(\tau)}{A_0}=1-\frac{2\pi\tau}{A_0}\,.
334: \eqe
335: %********
336: By virtue of Eq.\,(\ref{solAevol}) the critical value $T$ is related
337: to $A_0$ as
338: %*******
339: \eqb
340: \label{TandA0}
341: T=\frac{A_0}{2\pi}\,.
342: \eqe
343: %*******
344:
345: \section{Geometric partition function \label{PF} }
346:
347: We now wish to interprete curve-shrinking as a Wilsonian
348: renormalization-group flow taking place in the $N=0$
349: planar CVL sector. A partition function,
350: defined as a statistical average (according to a suitably defined weight) over $N=0$
351: CVLs, is to be left invariant under a decrease of the
352: resolution determined by the flow parameter $\tau$.
353: Notice that, physically, $\tau$ is interpreted as a strictly
354: monotonic decreasing (dimensionless)
355: function of a ratio $\frac{Q}{Q_0}$ where $Q$ ($Q_0$) are mass
356: scales associated with an actual (initial) resolution applied to the
357: system.
358:
359: To device a geometric ansatz for the
360: effective action $S=S[\hat{x}(\tau)]$, which is a functional of the
361: curve $\hat{x}$ representable in terms
362: of integrals over local densities in $\xi$ (reparametrization
363: invariance),
364: the following reflection on symmetries is in order.
365: (i) scaling symmetry $\hat{x}\to \lambda\hat{x}\,,\ \ \lambda\in{\mathbf
366: R}_+$: For both, $\lambda\to\infty$ and $\lambda\to 0$, implying
367: $\lambda L\to\infty$ and $\lambda L\to 0$ at fixed $L$, the action $S$ should
368: be invariant under further finite rescalings (decoupling of the fixed
369: length scale $\sigma^{-1/2}$),
370: (ii) Euclidean point symmetry of the plane (rotations, translations
371: and reflections about a given axis): Sufficient but not necessary for
372: this is a
373: representation of $S$ in terms of integrals over
374: scalar densities w.r.t. these
375: symmetries. That is, the action density should be expressible as a
376: series involving products of Euclidean scalar products of $\frac{\partial^n}{\partial
377: \xi^n}\hat{x}\,,\ \ n\in\mathbf{N}_+\,,$ or constancy.
378: However, an exceptional scalar integral over a nonscalar density can be
379: deviced. Consider the area $A$, calculated as
380: %*********
381: \eqb
382: \label{area}
383: A=\left|\frac12\,\int_0^{2\pi} d\xi\,\hat{x}\cdot\vec{n}\right|\,.
384: \eqe
385: %*********
386: The density $\hat{x}\cdot\vec{n}$ in Eq.\,(\ref{area}) is not a scalar under
387: translations.
388:
389: We now resort to a
390: factorization ansatz as
391: %*********
392: \eqb
393: \label{effectactdef}
394: S=F_c\times F_{nc}\,,
395: \eqe
396: %**********
397: where in addition to
398: Euclidean point symmetry $F_c$ ($F_{nc}$) is (is not) invariant
399: under $\hat{x}\to \lambda\hat{x}$. In principle,
400: infinitely many operators can be defined
401: to contribute to $F_c$. Since the
402: evolution generates circles for $\tau\nearrow T$ higher derivatives of
403: $k$ w.r.t. $\xi$ rapidly converge to zero \cite{GageHamilton}. We expect this to be true
404: also for Euclidean scalar products involving higher
405: derivatives $\frac{\partial^n}{\partial \xi^n}\hat{x}$.
406: To yield conformally invariant expressions such integrals need to be
407: multiplied by powers of $\sqrt{A}$ and/or $L$ or the inverse of
408: integrals involving lower derivatives. At this stage, we are
409: not capable of constraining the expansion in derivatives by additional physical or
410: mathematical arguments. To be pragmatic,
411: we simply set $F_c$ equal to the isoperimetric ratio:
412: %*********
413: \eqb
414: \label{explFc}
415: F_c(\tau)\equiv\frac{L(\tau)^2}{A(\tau)}\,.
416: \eqe
417: %*********
418: We conceive the nonconformal factor $F_{nc}$ in $S$ as a formal expansion in inverse powers of
419: $L$. Since we regard the renormalization-group evolution of the
420: effective action as induced by the flow of an ensemble of curves, where the evolution of each member is
421: dictated by Eq.\,(\ref{CSta}), we allow for an explicit $\tau$
422: dependence of the coefficient $c$ of the lowest nontrivial power
423: $\frac{1}{L}$. In principle, this sums up the contribution to $F_{nc}$ of certain
424: higher-power operators which do not exhibit an explicit $\tau$
425: dependence. Hence we make the following ansatz
426: %********
427: \eqb
428: \label{explFnc}
429: F_{nc}(\tau)=1+\frac{c(\tau)}{L(\tau)}\,.
430: \eqe
431: %*******
432: The initial value $c(\tau=0)$ is determined from a physical
433: boundary condition such as the mean length $\bar{L}$ at $\tau=0$ which determines
434: the mean mass $\bar{m}$ of a CVL as $\bar{m}=\sigma\bar{L}$.
435:
436: For latter use we investigate the behavior of $F_{nc}(\tau)$ for
437: $\tau\nearrow T$ for an ensemble consisting of a single curve only and
438: require the independence of the `partition function' under changes in
439: $\tau$. Integrating Eq.\,(\ref{Levol}) in the vicinity of
440: $\tau=T$ under the boundary condition that $L(\tau=T)=0$,
441: we have
442: %************
443: \eqb
444: \label{soltau=T}
445: L(\tau)=\sqrt{8}\pi\,\sqrt{T-\tau}\,.
446: \eqe
447: %************
448: Since $F_c(\tau\nearrow T)=4\pi$ independence of the `partition
449: function' under the flow in $\tau$ implies that
450: %*******
451: \eqb
452: \label{ctau=T}
453: c(\tau)\propto\sqrt{T-\tau}\,.
454: \eqe
455: %*******
456: That is, $F_{nc}$ approaches constancy for $\tau\nearrow T$ which brings
457: us back to the conformal limit by a finite renormalization of the
458: conformal part $\int F_c$ of the action. In this parameterization of $S$, $c(\tau)$ can thus be regarded
459: as an order parameter for conformal symmetry with mean-field
460: critical exponent.
461:
462: \section{Renormalization-group flow \label{RGF} }
463:
464: \subsection{Effective action\label{EA}}
465:
466: Let us now numerically investigate the effective action
467: $S[\hat{x}(\tau)]$ resulting from a
468: partition function $Z$ w.r.t. a nontrivial ensemble $E$. The latter is defined as the average
469: %*******
470: \eqb
471: \label{PartZM}
472: Z=\sum_{i} \exp\left(-S[\hat{x}_i(\tau)]\right)
473: \eqe
474: %*******
475: over the ensemble $E=\{\hat{x}_1,\cdots\}$.
476: Let us denote by $E_M$ an ensemble consisting of $M$ curves where
477: $E_M$ is obtained from $E_{M-1}$ by adding a new curve $\hat{x}_M(u,\tau)$. In
478: Fig.\,\ref{Fig-3} eight initial curves are depicted which in this way generate the
479: ensembles $E_M$ for $M=1,\cdots,8$.
480: %***********************
481: \begin{figure}
482: \begin{center}
483: \leavevmode
484: %\epsfxsize=9.cm
485: \leavevmode
486: %\epsffile[80 25 534 344]{}
487: \vspace{4.3cm}
488: \special{psfile=Fig-3.ps angle=0 voffset=-140
489: hoffset=-215 hscale=60 vscale=60}
490: \end{center}
491: \caption{\protect{\label{Fig-3}}Initial curves contributing to the
492: ensembles $E_M$, see text. Points locate the respective positions of
493: the centers of mass.}
494: \end{figure}
495: %************************
496:
497: We are interested
498: in a situation where all curves in $E_M$ shrink to a point at the same
499: value $\tau=T$. Because of Eqs.\,(\ref{solAevol})
500: and (\ref{TandA0}) we thus demand that at $\tau=0$ all curves in
501: $E_M$ initially have the same area $A_0$. The effective action $S$ in
502: Eq.\,(\ref{effectactdef}) (when associated with the ensemble $E_M$ we
503: will denote it as $S_M$) is determined by the function $c_M(\tau)$,
504: compare with Eq.\,(\ref{explFnc}), whose
505: flow follows from the requirement of $\tau$-independence of $Z_M$:
506: %********
507: \eqb
508: \label{renflow}
509: \frac{d}{d\tau}Z_M=0\,.
510: \eqe
511: %*******
512: This is an implicit, first-order ordinary differential equation
513: for $c(\tau)$ which needs to be supplemented with an initial condition
514: $c_{0,M}=c_M(\tau=0)$. A natural initial condition is to
515: demand that the quantity
516: %********
517: \eqb
518: \label{barL}
519: \bar{L}_M(\tau=0)\equiv\frac{1}{Z_M(\tau=0)}\sum_{i=1}^M
520: L[\hat{x}_i(\tau=0)]\,\exp\left(-S_M[\hat{x}_i(\tau=0)]\right)
521: \eqe
522: %*******
523: coincides with the geometric mean $\tilde{L}_M(\tau=0)$ defined as
524: %**********
525: \eqb
526: \label{geommean}
527: \tilde{L}_M(\tau=0)\equiv\frac{1}{M}\sum_{i=1}^M L[\hat{x}_i(\tau=0)]\,.
528: \eqe
529: %**********
530: From $\bar{L}_M(\tau=0)=\tilde{L}_M(\tau=0)$ a value for $c_{0,M}$
531: follows. We also have considered a modified factor
532: $F_{nc}(\tau)=1+\frac{c(\tau)}{A(\tau)}$ in
533: Eq.\,(\ref{effectactdef}). In this case the choice of initial condition
534: $\bar{L}_M(\tau=0)=\tilde{L}_M(\tau=0)$ leads to $F_{nc}(\tau)\equiv
535: 0$. While the geometric effective action thus is profoundly different
536: for such a modification of $F_{nc}(\tau)$ physical results such
537: as the evolution of the variance of center-of-mass position agree
538: remarkably well, see Sec.\,\ref{COM}. That is,
539: the geometric effective action itself is not a physical
540: object. Rather, going from one ansatz for $S_M$ to another describes
541: a particular way of redistributing the weight in the
542: ensemble which seems to have no significant impact on the physics.
543: This is in contrast to quantum field theory and conventional
544: statistical mechanics where the action in principle is related to the
545: physical properties of a given member
546: of the ensemble.
547:
548: For the curves depicted in Fig.\,\ref{Fig-3}
549: we make the convention that $A_0\equiv 2\pi\times 100$. It then follows that $T=100$ by
550: Eq.\,(\ref{TandA0}). The dependence $c_M^2(\tau)$
551: is plotted in Fig.\,\ref{Fig-4}. According
552: to Fig.\,\ref{Fig-4} it seems
553: that the larger the ensemble the closer $c_M^2(\tau)$
554: to the evolution of a single
555: circle of initial radius $R=\sqrt{\frac{A_0}{\pi}}$. That is, for
556: growing $M$ the function $c_M^2(\tau)$ approaches the form
557: %*****
558: \eqb
559: \label{cas}
560: c^2_{\tiny\mbox{as},M}(\tau)=k_M(T-\tau)\,,
561: \eqe
562: %******
563: where the slope $k_M$ depends on the
564: strength of deviation from circles of
565: the representatives in the ensemble $E_M$ at $\tau=0$, that is, on the
566: variance $\Delta L_M$ at a given value $A_0$.
567: Physically speaking, the value $\tau=0$ is associated
568: with a certain initial resolution of the measuring
569: device (the strictly monotonic function $\tau(Q)$, $Q$ being a physical scale such as energy
570: or momentum transfer, expresses the characteristics
571: of the measuring device and the measuring process), the value of $A_0$ describes the
572: strength of noise associated with the environment ($A_0$
573: determines how fast the conformal limit of circular points is reached), and the values
574: of $c_{0,M}$ and $k_M$, see Eq.\,(\ref{cas}), are associated
575: with the conditions at which the to-be-coarse-grained
576: system is prepared. Notice that this interpretation
577: is valid for the
578: action $S_M=\frac{L(\tau)^2}{A(\tau)}\left(1+\frac{c_M(\tau)}{L(\tau)}\right)$
579: only.
580: %***********************
581: \begin{figure}
582: \begin{center}
583: \leavevmode
584: %\epsfxsize=9.cm
585: \leavevmode
586: %\epsffile[80 25 534 344]{}
587: \vspace{7.3cm}
588: \special{psfile=Fig-4.ps angle=0 voffset=-220
589: hoffset=-225 hscale=60 vscale=60}
590: \end{center}
591: \caption{\protect{\label{Fig-4}}The square of the coefficient $c_M(\tau)$
592: entering the effective action of Eq.\,(\ref{effectactdef}) by virtue
593: of Eq.\,(\ref{explFnc}) for various ensemble sizes.
594: Notice the early onset of the linear drop of $c^2_M(\tau)$ and the
595: saturation in $M$ for $M\ge 5$. The slope of $c^2_M(\tau)$ near
596: $\tau=T$ does not depend on $c_{0,M}^2\equiv c^2_M(\tau=0)$ and thus not on the initial
597: choice of $\bar{L}$. }
598: \end{figure}
599: %************************
600:
601: \subsection{Statistical uncertainty of center of mass position\label{COM}}
602:
603: We are now in a position to
604: compute the flow of a more local `observable', namely, the mean
605: `center-of-mass' (COM) position in a given ensemble and the statistical
606: variance of the COM position. The COM position
607: $\hat{x}_{\tiny\mbox{COM}}$ of a given curve $\hat{x}(\xi,\tau)$ is defined as:
608: %***********
609: \eqb
610: \label{COMdef}
611: \hat{x}_{\tiny\mbox{COM}}(\tau)=\frac{1}{L(\tau)}\int_0^{L(\tau)}
612: d\xi\,\hat{x}(\xi,\tau)\,.
613: \eqe
614: %***********
615: We will below present only results on the statistical
616: variance of the COM position.
617:
618: Let as assume that at $\tau=0$ the ensembles $E_M$ are
619: modified such that a translation is applied to
620: each representative letting its COM position coincide with the
621: origin. Recall that such a modification $E_M\to E^\prime_M$ does not
622: alter the (effective) action (Euclidean point symmetry). That is, at $\tau=0$
623: the statistical variance in the position of the COM is prepared to be
624: nil, physically corresponding to an infinite resolution applied to the
625: system by the measuring device.
626:
627: The mean COM position $\bar{\hat{x}}_{\tiny\mbox{COM}}$ over ensemble
628: $E^\prime_M$ is defined as
629: %*******
630: \eqb
631: \label{menacom}
632: \bar{\hat{x}}_{\tiny\mbox{COM}}(\tau)\equiv\frac{1}{Z_M}\sum_{i=1}^M
633: \hat{x}_{\tiny\mbox{COM},i}(\tau)\exp\left(-S_M[\hat{x}_i(\tau)]\right)\,.
634: \eqe
635: %*******
636: The scalar statistical deviation
637: $\Delta_{M,\tiny\mbox{COM}}$ of $\bar{\hat{x}}_{\tiny\mbox{COM}}$ over the
638: ensemble $E^\prime_M$ is defined as
639: %*******
640: \eqb
641: \label{statvar}
642: \Delta_{M,\tiny\mbox{COM}}(\tau)\equiv \sqrt{\mbox{var}_{M,\tiny\mbox{COM};x}(\tau)+
643: \mbox{var}_{M,\tiny\mbox{COM};y}(\tau)}\,,
644: \eqe
645: %*******
646: where
647: %*******
648: \eab
649: \label{vardef}
650: \mbox{var}_{M,\tiny\mbox{COM};x}&\equiv&\frac{1}{Z_M}\sum_{i=1}^M
651: \left(x_{\tiny\mbox{COM},i}(\tau)
652: -\bar{x}_{\tiny\mbox{COM}}(\tau)\right)^2\,\exp\left(-S_M[\hat{x}_i(\tau)]\right)\nonumber\\
653: &=&-\bar{x}^2_{\tiny\mbox{COM}}(\tau)+\frac{1}{Z_M}\sum_{i=1}^M x^2_{\tiny\mbox{COM},i}(\tau)\,
654: \exp\left(-S_M[\hat{x}_i(\tau)]\right)
655: \eae
656: %**********
657: and similarly for the coordinate $y$. In Fig.\,\ref{Fig-5} plots of
658: $\Delta_{M,\tiny\mbox{COM}}(\tau)$ are shown when
659: $\Delta_{M,\tiny\mbox{COM}}(\tau)$ is evaluated over the ensembles
660: $E^\prime_3,\cdots,E^\prime_8$ with the action
661: %********
662: \dmb
663: S_M=\frac{L(\tau)^2}{A(\tau)}\left(1+\frac{c_M(\tau)}{L(\tau)}\right)
664: \dme
665: %********
666: and subject to the initial condition
667: $\bar{L}_M(\tau=0)=\tilde{L}_M(\tau=0)$. In Fig.\,\ref{Fig-5b} the
668: according plots of $\Delta_{M,\tiny\mbox{COM}}(\tau)$ are depicted as
669: obtained with the action
670: %********
671: \dmb
672: S_M=\frac{L(\tau)^2}{A(\tau)}\left(1+\frac{c_M(\tau)}{A(\tau)}\right)
673: \dme
674: %********
675: and subject to the initial condition
676: $\bar{L}_M(\tau=0)=\tilde{L}_M(\tau=0)$. In this case, one has
677: $c_M(\tau)=-A(\tau)$ leading to equal weights for each curve in
678: $E^\prime_M$.
679: %***********************
680: \begin{figure}
681: \begin{center}
682: \leavevmode
683: %\epsfxsize=9.cm
684: \leavevmode
685: %\epsffile[80 25 534 344]{}
686: \vspace{7cm}
687: \special{psfile=Fig-5.ps angle=0 voffset=-220
688: hoffset=-225 hscale=60 vscale=50}
689: \end{center}
690: \caption{\protect{\label{Fig-5}} Plots of
691: $\Delta_{M,\tiny\mbox{COM}}(\tau)$ for $M=3,\cdots,8$ when evaluated
692: with the action
693: $S_M=\frac{L(\tau)^2}{A(\tau)}\left(1+\frac{c_M(\tau)}{L(\tau)}\right)$. Notice the rapid
694: generation of an uncertainty in the COM position under the flow
695: and its saturation when approaching the conformal limit $\tau\nearrow
696: T$. There also is a saturation of this limiting value with a growing
697: ensemble size.}
698: \end{figure}
699: %************************
700: %***********************
701: \begin{figure}
702: \begin{center}
703: \leavevmode
704: %\epsfxsize=9.cm
705: \leavevmode
706: %\epsffile[80 25 534 344]{}
707: \vspace{8.4cm}
708: \special{psfile=Fig-5b.ps angle=0 voffset=-270
709: hoffset=-225 hscale=60 vscale=50}
710: \end{center}
711: \caption{\protect{\label{Fig-5b}} Plots of
712: $\Delta_{M,\tiny\mbox{COM}}(\tau)$ for $M=3,\cdots,8$ when evaluated
713: with the action
714: $S_M=\frac{L(\tau)^2}{A(\tau)}\left(1+\frac{c_M(\tau)}{A(\tau)}\right)$.
715: Notice the qualitative agreement with the results displayed in
716: Fig.\,\ref{Fig-5}.}
717: \end{figure}
718: %************************
719:
720:
721: \subsection{Quantum mechanical versus statistical uncertainty}
722:
723: In view of the results obtained in Sec.\,\ref{COM} we would say that an
724: ensemble of evolving planar CVLs in the $N=0$ sector qualitatively resembles the
725: quantum mechanics of a free point particle\footnote{It
726: is no relevance at this point whether this particle carries spin or
727: not.} of mass $m$ in 1D. Namely, an initially localized square
728: of the wave
729: function $\psi$ with
730: $|\psi(\tau=0,x)|^2\propto \exp\left[-\frac{x^2}{a_0^2}\right]$, where
731: $\Delta x(\tau=0)=a_0$, according
732: to unitary time evolution in quantum mechanics evolves as
733: $|\psi(\tau,x)|^2=|\exp\left[-i\frac{H\tau}{\hbar}\right]\psi(\tau=0,x)|^2\propto
734: \exp\left[-\frac{(x-\frac{p}{m}\tau)^2}{a^2(\tau)}\right]$
735: where $H=\frac{p^2}{2m}$ is the free-particle Hamiltonian, $p$ is the spatial momentum, and $a(\tau)\equiv
736: a_0\sqrt{1+\left(\frac{\hbar\tau}{m a_0^2}\right)^2}$. In agreement with
737: Heisenberg's uncertainty relation one has during the process that $\Delta x\Delta
738: p=\frac{\hbar}{2}\sqrt{1+\left(\frac{\tau\hbar}{m
739: a_0^2}\right)^2}\ge\frac{\hbar}{2}$. Time evolution
740: in quantum mechanics and the process of coarse-graining in a statistical
741: system describing planar CVLs share the property that in
742: both systems the
743: evolution generates out
744: of a small initial position uncertainty (corresponding to a large
745: initial resolution $\Delta p$) a larger
746: position uncertainty in the course of the evolution. Possibly, future
747: development will show that interference effects in quantum mechanics can be traced back
748: to the nonlocal nature of the degrees of freedom (CVLs) entering a
749: statistical
750: partition function.
751:
752:
753:
754: \section{Summary, conclusions, and outlook\label{S}}
755:
756: \subsection{Summary of present work}
757:
758: In this exploratory article an attempt has been undertaken
759: to interprete the effects of an environment on 2D
760: planar center-vortex loops, as they emerge in the confining phase of an
761: SU(2) Yang-Mills theory, in terms of a Wilsonian renormalization-group
762: flow carried by purely geometric entities. Our (mainly numerical)
763: analysis uses established mathematics on the shrinking of embedded
764: curves in the plane. In the case of nonintersecting
765: CVLs ($N=0$) the role of the environment is played by the
766: entirety of all sectors with $N>0$ and possibly an explicit
767: environment. In a particular parametrization of the effective action
768: we observe critical behavior as the limit of circular points is approached during the
769: evolution. That is, planar $N=0$ CVLs on average disappear from the
770: spectrum for resolving powers smaller than a critical, finite
771: value. Using this formalism to compute the evolution of the mean values of local
772: observables, such as the center-of-mass position, a
773: behavior is generated that qualitatively resembles the associated
774: unitary evolution in quantum mechanics. We also have found evidence
775: that this situation is practically not altered when changing the ansatz for the
776: effective action.
777:
778: \subsection{Outlook on strongly correlated electrons in a plane}
779:
780: Let us conclude this article with a somewhat
781: speculative outlook on planar $N=1$
782: CVLs. Setting the Yang-Mills scale (mass of the intersection in
783: the CVL) of the associated
784: SU(2) theory equal to the electron mass, this
785: soliton is interpreted as an electron or positron,
786: see \cite{Hofmann2005,Zpinch,GiacosaHofmann2005} for a more
787: detailed discussion on the viability of such an assignment and
788: Fig.\,\ref{Fig-6} for a display. Important for our
789: purpose are the facts that the two-fold directional degeneracy of the
790: center flux represents the two-fold degeneracy of the spin
791: projection and that a large class of curve deformations (shifts
792: of the intersection point) leaves the
793: mass of the soliton invariant in the free case.
794: %***********************
795: \begin{figure}
796: \begin{center}
797: \leavevmode
798: %\epsfxsize=9.cm
799: \leavevmode
800: %\epsffile[80 25 534 344]{}
801: \vspace{3.4cm}
802: \special{psfile=Fig-6.ps angle=0 voffset=-90
803: hoffset=-90 hscale=60 vscale=60}
804: \end{center}
805: \caption{\protect{\label{Fig-6}} An isolated CVL with $N=1$, which, when
806: associated with the confining phase of an SU(2) Yang-Mills theory of
807: scale $\Lambda\sim m_e=511\,$keV, is interpreted as an electron or
808: positron. The arrows depict one out of two possible directions of center flux responsible for
809: the magnetic moment (spin), the intersection point is the location of mass and electric charge.}
810: \end{figure}
811: %************************
812:
813: It is a remarkable fact that a high level of mathematical understanding
814: exists for the behavior of curve-shrinking in a 2D plane
815: \cite{GageHamilton,Grayson} even in the case of one selfintersection \cite{GraysonII}. Incidentally, 2D quantum systems exist in
816: nature which exhibit unconventional behavior.
817: Specifically, the phenomenon of high-$T_c$ superconductivity
818: appears to be strongly related to the two-dimensionality
819: of electron dynamics as it is enabled by rare-earth doping
820: of cuprate materials \cite{Muller1986}. Apparently,
821: the Coulomb repulsion between the electrons moving in the would-be valence
822: band within the cuprate planes of high-$T_c$ superconductors (Mott
823: insulators) is effectively screened by the interplane environment also providing for the very
824: existence of these electrons by doping. The question then
825: is how the long-range order of electronic
826: spins, which at given (optimal) doping and at a
827: sufficiently low temperature leads to superconductivity,
828: emerges within the cuprate planes. As it seems, quantum Monte Carlo
829: simulations of a transformed Hubbard model ($t-J$ model) subject to
830: Gutzwiller projection yield quantitative explanations of
831: a number of experimental results related to the existence
832: of the pseudogap phase (Nernst effect, nonlinear diamagnetic
833: susceptibility), see \cite{Anderson2005} and references therein.
834:
835: We would here like to offer a sketch of an
836: alternative approach to high-$T_c$ superconductivity being well
837: aware of our ignorance on the details
838: of present-day research in this field. The key idea
839: is already encoded in Fig.\,\ref{Fig-6}.
840: Namely, according to confining
841: SU(2) Yang-Mills theory the electron is a
842: nonlocal object with the physics of its charge localization being
843: only loosely related to the physics of its magnetic moment (spin): The
844: magnetic moment, carried by the core of the flux line, microscopically manifested
845: by (oppositely) moving (opposite) electric charges, receives
846: contributions from vortex sectors that are spatially far separated (on
847: the scale of the diameter of the intersection point) from the location
848: of the isolated electric charge. This suggests that
849: in certain physical circumstances, where the ordering effect
850: of interacting vortex lines becomes important, the postulate of a spinning
851: point particle fails to describe reality.
852: %***********************
853: \begin{figure}
854: \begin{center}
855: \leavevmode
856: %\epsfxsize=9.cm
857: \leavevmode
858: %\epsffile[80 25 534 344]{}
859: \vspace{5.3cm}
860: \special{psfile=Fig-7.ps angle=0 voffset=-560
861: hoffset=-240 hscale=85 vscale=85}
862: \end{center}
863: \caption{\protect{\label{Fig-7}} An array of strongly correlated
864: electrons in the plane possibly representing the superconducting state
865: in a cuprate. The equally directed center flux in
866: adjacent vortex sections provides for an attractive force
867: (Ampere's law) at intermediate distances. For a given electron, out of six neighboring
868: vortex sectors there are four sectors with attraction and two sectors with repulsion.
869: At short distance there is repulsion since an overlap of
870: CVL sections, leading to new intersection points each of mass
871: $\sim m_e$, is topologically forbidden. Thus there is a typical
872: equilibrium configuration contributing to long-range order in the 2D system. If the
873: externally provided resolution (temperature) falls below a
874: critical value then statistical fluctuations of the position
875: of an intersection point relative to another one (the location of the electronic
876: charge) will vanish. That is, electrons no longer can disperse
877: energy provided by the heat bath (phonons, spin fluctuations) and
878: thus provide for a 2D material free of electric resistivity.}
879: \end{figure}
880: %************************
881:
882: Concerning the strong correlations in 2D electron dynamics responsible
883: for high-$T_c$ superconductivity we imagine a situation as
884: depicted in Fig.\,\ref{Fig-7}. Each electron's
885: spin in the plane interacts with the spin of its neighbors as
886: follows. Equally directed electric fluxes (dually interpreted
887: center fluxes of SU(2)$_e$) attract one another, and
888: there is attraction for four out of six vortex sectors defined by
889: the neighboring electrons (Ampere's law) while two vortex sectors
890: experience repulsion\footnote{That the electric
891: charges of confining SU(2)$_e$ are seen by the photon
892: is a consequence of the mixing between the corresponding two
893: gauge groups: SU(2)$_e$ and SU(2)$_{\tiny\mbox{CMB}}$
894: \cite{Hofmann2005,GiacosaHofmann2005}.}.
895: Notice that for a given electron two of the adjacent electrons exhibit equal spin projection while
896: four of the adjacent electrons have opposite spins. This is in agreement
897: with the observation that high-$T_c$ superconductivity is an effect
898: not related to $s$-wave Cooper-pair condensation.
899:
900: An overlap of vortex sectors, hypothetically leading
901: to the creation of extra intersection points, is topologically forbidden.
902: That is, the fluctuations in the energy density of the system are far
903: to weak to create an intersection point of mass
904: $m_e=511\,$keV. Therefore, at very small spatial separation
905: repulsion must occur between adjacent vortex sectors.
906: At a sufficiently low temperature
907: and an optimal screening of Coulomb repulsion by the
908: interplane environment (doping) this would lead to a typical equilibrium configuration as depicted in
909: Fig.\,\ref{Fig-7} where the intersection points (electronic charge) do not
910: move relative to one another. A local demolition of this highly ordered
911: state would cost a finite amount of energy
912: manifested in terms of the (gigantic)
913: gaps measured experimentally in the cuprate systems. Applying an electric
914: field vector with a component parallel to the plane would set into resistivity-free
915: motion the thus locked electrons. For a macroscopic analogue imagine a stiff table cloth being
916: pulled over the table's surface in a friction-free fashion.
917: The occurrence of the pseudogap phase would possibly be explained by local
918: defects in the fabric of Fig.\,\ref{Fig-7} due to insufficient Coulomb
919: screening and/or too large of a thermal noise (macroscopic vorticity,
920: liquid of pointlike defects in 2D).
921:
922:
923: \section*{Acknowledgments}
924: We would like to thank Markus Schwarz for useful conversations.
925:
926: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
927:
928: \bibitem{Hofmann2005}
929: R. Hofmann, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A{\bf 20}, 4123 (2005);
930: Erratum-ibid.A{\bf 21}, 6515 (2006).
931:
932: \bibitem{GHS2006}
933: F. Giacosa, R. Hofmann, M. Schwarz, Mod. Phys. Lett. A{\bf 21}, 2709
934: (2006).\\
935: R. Hofmann, Mod. Phys. Lett. A{\bf 22} 2657 (2007).
936:
937: \bibitem{Hofmann2007}
938: R. Hofmann, arXiv:0710.0962 [hep-th].
939:
940: \bibitem{NO}
941: H. B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, Nucl. Phys. B{\bf 61}, 45 (1973).
942:
943: \bibitem{tHooft1983}
944: G. 't Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B{\bf 138}, 1 (1978).
945:
946: \bibitem{Smith}
947: S. Smith, M. E. Broucke, and B. A. Francis, in proc. 44th IEEE
948: Conference on Decision and Control, and European Control Conference
949: 2005, Seville, Spain, Dec. 12-15 (2005).
950:
951: \bibitem{GageHamilton}
952: M. Gage and R. S. Hamilton, J. Differential Geometry {\bf 23}, 69
953: (1986).
954:
955: \bibitem{Grayson}
956: M. A. Grayson, J. Differential Geometry {\bf 26}, 285
957: (1987).
958:
959: \bibitem{PerelmanI}
960: G. Perelman, math/0211159.
961:
962: \bibitem{PerelmanII}
963: G. Perelman, math/0303109.
964:
965: \bibitem{PerelmanIII}
966: G. Perelman, math/0307245.
967:
968: \bibitem{Thurston}
969: W. P. Thurston, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) {\bf 6}, no. 3, 357
970: (1982).
971:
972: \bibitem{KKG}
973: H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus and I. V. Krivosheina,
974: Mod. Phys. Lett. A{\bf 21}, 1547 (2006).\\
975: H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D{\bf 13}, 2107
976: (2004).\\
977: H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, I.V. Krivosheina, A. Dietz, and
978: O. Chkvorets, Phys. Lett. B{\bf 586} 198 (2004).
979:
980: \bibitem{BosiCavalleri2002}
981: L. Bosi and G. Cavalleri, Nuovo Cim. (note brevi) {\bf 117} B, 243 (2002).
982:
983: \bibitem{Zpinch}
984: F. Giacosa, R. Hofmann, and M. Schwarz, Mod. Phys. Lett. A{\bf 21}, 2709
985: (2006).
986:
987: \bibitem{GiacosaHofmann2005}
988: F. Giacosa and R. Hofmann, Eur. Phys. J. C{\bf 50}, 635 (2007)
989: [hep-th/0512184].
990:
991: \bibitem{GraysonII}
992: M. A. Grayson, Invent. math. {\bf 96}, 177 (1989).
993:
994: \bibitem{Muller1986}
995: J. G. Bednorz and K. A. M\"uller, Z. Phys. B{\bf 64}, 189 (1986).
996:
997: \bibitem{Anderson2005}
998: P. W. Anderson, arXiv:cond-mat/0510053v2.\\
999: P. W. Anderson, Physica C{\bf 460-462}, 3 (2007).
1000:
1001:
1002: \end{thebibliography}
1003:
1004: \end{document}
1005: