1: % v. 04/23/2008 JR
2:
3: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4: \documentclass[apjl]{emulateapj}
5: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
6: %\usepackage{psfig}
7: %\usepackage{epsf}
8:
9: \shorttitle{ACS OBSERVATIONS OF EDIG IN EDGE-ON SPIRALS}
10: \shortauthors{ROSSA ET AL.}
11:
12: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
13: % User defined macros
14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15:
16: \newcommand{\etal}{{et al.~}}
17:
18: \newcommand{\lta}{\lesssim}
19: \newcommand{\gta}{\gtrsim}
20:
21: \newcommand{\kms}{\>{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}}
22: \newcommand{\kpc}{\>{\rm kpc}}
23: \newcommand{\Mpc}{\>{\rm Mpc}}
24: \newcommand{\pc}{\>{\rm pc}}
25: \newcommand{\Msun}{\>{\rm M_{\odot}}}
26: \newcommand{\Lsun}{\>{\rm L_{\odot}}}
27:
28: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
29: % Title and authors
30: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
31:
32: \begin{document}
33:
34: \title{{\it HST} ACS OBSERVATIONS OF STAR FORMATION DRIVEN
35: OUTFLOWS IN NEARBY EDGE-ON SPIRAL GALAXIES: DEPENDENCE OF HALO MORPHOLOGY
36: ON STAR FORMATION ACTIVITY\altaffilmark{1}}
37:
38: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
39: %% author and affiliation information.
40: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
41: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
42: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
43: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
44:
45: \author{J\"{o}rn Rossa\altaffilmark{2,3},
46: Michael Dahlem\altaffilmark{4},
47: Ralf-J\"urgen Dettmar\altaffilmark{5}, and
48: Roeland P. van der Marel\altaffilmark{2}}
49:
50: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations made with the NASA/ESA Hubble
51: Space Telescope, obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute,
52: which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in
53: Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555. These observations
54: are associated with proposal 10416.}
55:
56: \altaffiltext{2}{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin
57: Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218; marel@stsci.edu}
58:
59: \altaffiltext{3}{Present address: Department of Astronomy, University
60: of Florida, 211 Bryant Space Science Center, P.O.Box 112055,
61: Gainesville, FL 32611-2055; jrossa@astro.ufl.edu}
62:
63: \altaffiltext{4}{CSIRO/ATNF - Paul Wild Observatory, Locked Bag 194, Narrabri
64: NSW 2390, Australia; Michael.Dahlem@csiro.au}
65:
66: \altaffiltext{5}{Astronomisches Institut, Ruhr-Universit\"at Bochum,
67: Universit\"atsstrasse 150/NA7, D-44780 Bochum, Germany; dettmar@astro.rub.de}
68:
69: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
70: % Abstract
71: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
72:
73: \begin{abstract}
74:
75: We present new high spatial resolution narrowband imaging observations of
76: extraplanar diffuse ionized gas (eDIG) in four late-type, actively star
77: forming edge-on spirals, obtained with ACS on-board {\it HST}. Our F658N
78: (H$\alpha$) observations reveal a multitude of structures on both small and
79: large scales. Whereas all four galaxies have been studied with ground-based
80: telescopes before, here the small scale structure of the extended emission
81: line gas is presented for the first time at a spatial resolution of 0\farcs05,
82: corresponding to 5.0\,pc at the mean distance to the target galaxies. The eDIG
83: morphology is {\em very} different for all four targets, probably as a result
84: of their different levels of star formation activity. We find that the morphology
85: of the eDIG, in particular the break-up of diffuse emission into filaments in galaxy
86: halos, shows a strong dependence on the level of star formation activity per unit
87: area, and eDIG can be arranged into a morphological sequence. The eDIG is
88: resolved into an intricate morphology of individual filaments for NGC\,4700 and
89: NGC\,7090. The ionized gas in the latter galaxy, being the one with the lowest SF activity
90: per unit area in our sample, reveals besides some filaments many prominent bubbles
91: and superbubbles. NGC\,4634 and NGC\,5775 have instead a more diffuse layer of eDIG.
92: The latter two galaxies have the highest SF rate per unit area in our sample and
93: the observed morphology suggests that the break-up of the smooth eDIG layer into
94: individual resolved filaments occurs only above a certain threshold of SF activity
95: per unit area. We note that this is not a distance effect, as NGC\,4634 and
96: NGC\,4700 are roughly at the same distance, yet reveal very different eDIG
97: morphology. Combined with ground-based data for samples that span a larger range
98: of galaxy mass our results indicate that the gravitational potential also plays an
99: important role in the eDIG morphology. In low-mass galaxies the gas can be expelled
100: due to shallow gravitational potentials more easily and couple with strong
101: star formation driven outflows on a local scale. This is in contrast to the more
102: massive galaxies, which show smooth eDIG layers, unless they are powered by a
103: superwind, as in the case of nucleated starburst galaxies. The simplistic chimney
104: scenario is not confirmed from our observations, and future models need to take into
105: account the detailed physics of feedback, star formation and magnetic fields.
106:
107: \end{abstract}
108:
109: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
110: % Keywords
111: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
112:
113: \keywords{galaxies: evolution --- galaxies: halo --- galaxies: ISM --- galaxies: spiral ---
114: galaxies: structure}
115:
116: \clearpage
117:
118: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
119: % Beginning of main text
120: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
121:
122: \section{INTRODUCTION}
123: \label{s:intro}
124:
125: During the last decade considerable progress in our understanding of the
126: diffuse ionized gas (DIG) in halos of late-type spiral galaxies has been
127: achieved. The occurrence of DIG outside of classical \hbox{H\,{\sc ii}}
128: regions is firmly believed to be correlated with the star formation activity
129: in the galaxy disk.
130:
131: The fractional contribution of DIG to the total H$\alpha$ emission in
132: galaxies reaches typically values of $\approx$ 25-50\% \citep[e.g.,\,][]{
133: wal94,fer96,leh95}, and DIG is thus an important constituent of the
134: interstellar medium (ISM). Recent studies with a larger sample of galaxies
135: from the SINGG survey revealed even slightly higher fractions of $0.59\pm0.19$
136: \citep{oey07}.
137:
138: In the theoretical picture the gas, most likely driven by collective
139: supernovae, is expelled into the halos of the galaxies. \citet{nor89}
140: developed a theoretical model in which the hot gas is transported from the
141: star forming regions in the disk via {\em chimneys} into the halo, provided
142: the superbubbles created from SNe fulfill the breakout criterion. Depending
143: on the strength of the gravitational potential the gas may fall back onto the
144: galactic disk, which is described as the {\em galactic fountain} scenario
145: \citep{sha76,bre80,avi00}. Starburst driven mass loss, at least for dwarf
146: galaxies with shallower potential wells, can be an effective process, as the
147: gas can escape more easily in these systems \citep{mac99}.
148:
149: Several ground-based narrowband imaging investigations have been undertaken
150: during the past fifteen years with a boost of investigations occuring in the
151: last decade, to study the morphology of DIG in halos of non-starburst
152: {\em quiescent} spiral galaxies \citep{det90,ran90,ran92,pil94,ran96,
153: hoo99,col00,ros00,ros03b,mil03}. Not all of the studied galaxies revealed
154: extraplanar DIG (eDIG), but it was shown that extraplanar DIG is a relatively
155: common feature among actively star forming galaxies, and about 41\,\% of a
156: survey of 74 galaxies have eDIG detections. The most active ones were
157: found to possess a bright gaseous halo \citep{ros03a}. Correlations of eDIG
158: with other constituents of the ISM exist, such as radio-continuum halos
159: \citep[e.g.,][]{dah94,tul00,dah06}, the hot ionized medium (i.e. halos),
160: traced by X-ray observations \citep{str04,tul06}, and dust filaments in the
161: disk-halo interface \citep{how97,how99,how00,ros03b,ros04,tho04}.
162: Starburst galaxies and low luminosity Seyfert galaxies have been investigated as
163: well with regard to the diffuse emission \citep{leh95} and \citep{rob07},
164: respectively.
165:
166: In general, the spiral galaxies with very high SFR per unit area show a pervasive
167: DIG layer (i.e. a halo) with a typical vertical extent of $|z| \sim$
168: 2\,kpc. Individual filaments, occasionally reaching distances of up to 6\,kpc,
169: are superimposed in a few cases as well \citep{ros03b}. As there is a variety
170: of morphological features generally discernible even with low spatial
171: resolution ground-based studies (e.g.,\,filaments, plumes, bubbles, shells),
172: clearly the need for a more magnified view onto the individual SF regions and
173: DIG filaments in edge-on spirals is needed to study the small scale
174: structure and to identify the connection points between the filaments and
175: their origin within the SF regions in the midplane. Only very few previous
176: high spatial resolution investigations were targeted to address these
177: questions \citep[e.g.,][]{cec01,cec02,ros04}. For a more thorough overview on
178: the DIG topic in general and on phenomena related to these star formation
179: driven gaseous outflows we refer to the older, but still quite relevant,
180: review articles by \citet{det92,dah97} and also to the more recent review on
181: galactic winds by \citet{vei05}.
182:
183: In this study we present high spatial resolution narrowband H$\alpha$ images
184: of four actively star forming galaxies, observed with {\it HST}/ACS to
185: unravel the morphology of the gaseous outflows on both small and large scales as
186: a function of star formation activity, These data are augmented by broad-band
187: {\it HST}/ACS images, whose primary purpose was to serve for the continuum
188: subtraction. However, they are also used to study the distribution of dust
189: filaments in the disk-halo interface.
190:
191: The paper is structured in the following way. In \S~\ref{s:sample} we
192: describe how the current {\it HST}/ACS sample was selected, and in
193: \S~\ref{s:obs} we present the observations and observing strategy. In
194: \S~\ref{s:data} we describe briefly the data reduction techniques and
195: analysis of the images. In \S~\ref{s:results} the results are presented, and
196: in \S~\ref{s:discuss} we discuss the results. In \S~\ref{s:sum} we finally
197: summarize our basic results and state our conclusions.
198:
199: \section{THE EDGE-ON GALAXY SAMPLE}
200: \label{s:sample}
201:
202: The small edge-on galaxy sample presented here is a sub-sample of four
203: galaxies from our previous H$\alpha$ survey \citep{ros00,ros03a,ros03b}.
204: The basic properties of these galaxies are listed in Table~\ref{t:obs}.
205: The galaxies were selected to be observed with {\it HST}/ACS, because they
206: have very different levels of energy input into their disk ISM (expressed
207: as $L_{\rm{FIR}}/D^2_{25}$ and listed with other properties in Table~\ref{t:prop}).
208: All four targets have eDIG detections \citep{ros00,ros03a,ros03b}, but ground-based
209: imagery suggests different halo morphologies that can be further studied at the highest
210: possible resolution only by means of {\it HST}/ACS H$\alpha$ imagery. Galaxies
211: with different energy input rates were chosen to study a possible dependence
212: of the halo morphology on the level of star formation in the underlying
213: disks. Naively, one might expect galaxies with energy input levels near
214: the threshold for the creation of halos (see Figure~\ref{f:dddhst}) to
215: exhibit only individual, possibly filamentary extraplanar structures.
216: On the other hand, galaxies with widespread, high-level star formation
217: are expected to have a multitude of filaments, if they are associated
218: with individual sites of star formation in the underlying disks.
219:
220: We avoided galaxies with prominent dust lanes and those at low Galactic
221: latitudes so as to have low foreground opacities for studies of the
222: optical emission line gas.
223:
224: We note here that two galaxies in the present sub-sample, NGC\,4634
225: and NGC\,5775, have close interaction partners (within two Holmberg
226: radii), while the remaining two, NGC\,4700 and NGC\,7090, don't.
227:
228: \section{OBSERVATIONS AND OBSERVING STRATEGY}
229: \label{s:obs}
230:
231: The observations of the four actively star forming spirals were carried
232: out between June 23 and August 21 2005 with the Advanced Camera for Surveys
233: (ACS) onboard {\it HST} (GO\#10416; PI: J.~Rossa). All observations were carried out
234: using the Wide Field Channel (WFC), which yields a $202\arcsec \times 202\arcsec$
235: field of view. This is achieved by employing two SITe 2048$\times$4096 pixel CCDs
236: with a pixel scale of 0\farcs05 per pixel. For more details we refer to the ACS
237: instrument handbook \citep{gon05}. The narrowband observations using the
238: F658N filter were acquired in three {\it HST} orbits for each galaxy, and the
239: broadband images (to be used for continuum subtraction and to study the dust
240: morphology in the galaxies) were obtained with the F625W filter in one {\it
241: HST} orbit each. In total, 16 {\it HST} orbits were allocated to obtain deep
242: continuum subtracted H$\alpha$ images of the four target galaxies. The
243: observational details, including observation dates, integration times, and
244: filter characteristics, are listed in Table~\ref{t:exp}.
245:
246: The individual exposures were taken in dither mode, to allow for good
247: cosmic ray removal and to fill in the CCD gaps. We have used a different
248: dither pattern for the broadband and narrowband observations. For the
249: narrowband (F658N) observations we have used a 3-point dither pattern with
250: a 4-point sub-pattern, spread over three {\it HST} orbits for each galaxy.
251: The broadband (F625W) observations were obtained in a 2-point dither with
252: a 2-point sub-pattern. The first pattern in each configuration applies
253: a jump over the CCD gaps, and the secondary pattern is applied to allow
254: for good cosmic ray and hot pixel removal.
255:
256: \section{DATA REDUCTION AND ANALYSIS}
257: \label{s:data}
258:
259: \subsection{Data reduction}
260: \label{ss:datared}
261:
262: The {\it HST}/ACS data were calibrated using the {\it CALACS} and
263: {\it Multidrizzle} packages. The former removes the various instrumental
264: signatures, including bias correction and flat-fielding. The latter is
265: used to correct for the geometric distortion of the ACS camera and also
266: performs cosmic ray rejection and finally combines the images, obtained in
267: the specific dither pattern. For further details we refer to the ACS data
268: handbook \citep{pav05} and to \citet{koe05} for a description of multidrizzle.
269:
270: There are a few detector artifacts visible at very low intensities. Among them
271: are some faint stripes along CCD columns visible across the images. These are
272: charge transfer trails of hot pixels, cosmic rays, and other sources. However,
273: these CTE losses are well defined features, which are located at a constant position,
274: and whose pattern is repeated with a constant distance and position angle. On very
275: faint levels, when viewing the entire frame in low resolution on a computer screen,
276: effects of cross talk are discovered. They have their origin in the four CCD
277: quadrants corresponding to the four amplifiers of the detector array. The features
278: though look somewhat different from the usual cross talk features seen in
279: \citet{gia04}. The features in our images are not inverted in intensity and
280: thus can easily be mistaken for faint diffuse emission. However, the distance
281: and position angle of this feature in the continuum subtracted H$\alpha$ image of
282: NGC\,4634 mimics the shape of the galaxy at a very faint level, and its endpoint
283: coincides with the one end of the galaxy, at a position that has an offset and
284: inverted position. As an almost identical feature was detected in the image of
285: NGC\,5775 as well, which looked very reminiscent, we conclude, that this is
286: indeed related to the detector, and not a real feature of the diffuse
287: emission. At higher contrast the structure resolves and is barely visible at
288: all.
289:
290: \subsection{Calibration and Analysis of the Broadband Imagery}
291: \label{ss:broad}
292:
293: The broadband (F625W) images of our target galaxies were obtained for two
294: purposes. The primary aim was to subtract the continuum from the on-band
295: (F658N) images, which contain some continuum flux. Secondly, they allow a
296: detailed comparison of extraplanar dust features with the DIG morphology,
297: which are best seen in unsharp-masked versions of the broadband images.
298: These two physically distinct ISM phases \citep[see\,][]{how00} can be
299: studied in detail to search for possible correlations between the two
300: extraplanar ISM constituents on small scales. To enhance the contrast between
301: the dust structures and the background light from the galaxy more easily, we
302: have constructed unsharp-masked versions of our broadband F625W (SDSS $r$)
303: images. These were obtained by dividing the F625W images by a smoothed
304: version of the same images. The latter ones were created by using a
305: Gaussian filtering technique with a kernel size adopted to account for
306: the difference in distance among the sample galaxies.
307:
308: \subsection{Calibration and Analysis of the Narrowband Imagery}
309: \label{ss:narrow}
310:
311: In order to calibrate the narrowband images the broadband and narrowband
312: images were first aligned by measuring the positions of stars in the field of
313: view. After alignment the shifted broadband images were checked by blinking
314: them on a computer screen against the narrowband images. In order to obtain a
315: continuum-free H$\alpha$ image, we scaled and subtracted each combined
316: broadband F625W image from the respective narrowband F658N image. This was
317: done in a similar fashion as it was applied in our previous studies
318: \citep[e.g.,][]{ros00,ros04}. The use of individual foreground stars instead
319: proved difficult, as there were only limited suitable stars in the given
320: aperture visible. More importantly, they also showed too much color variation
321: so that the scaling factor could not be determined very accurately. Therefore,
322: we chose selected reference regions within the galaxy that were not affected
323: by emission. For this purpose we closely compared the F625W and F658N images
324: to determine suitable regions within the disk, and also relied on previous
325: ground-based images.
326:
327: Several of the continuum subtracted images show black-white point source pairs
328: which are due to slight imperfections in alignment and differences in the PSF.
329: However, they do not affect our discussion and understanding of the extended
330: emission. Due to the given FWHM of the used narrowband filter, it should be noted
331: that emission from the adjacent [\ion{N}{2}] doublet is included in the F658N
332: filter passband. For simplicity, however, we refer for the remainder of the
333: paper to an H$\alpha$ image, whenever we speak of a continuum subtracted
334: F658N filter image.
335:
336:
337: \section{RESULTS}
338: \label{s:results}
339:
340: In this section we describe in detail the morphology of the four edge-on
341: spirals as revealed from both the broadband and narrowband images.
342: Specifically, we describe the DIG morphology visible in the emission line
343: images. We also comment on the dust features visible in the broadband
344: images and on a newly detected dwarf irregular galaxy in the halo of NGC\,4634.
345:
346: The layout of the images is as follows. In \S~\ref{ss:broadimage} we present the
347: three-color images (Figure~\ref{f:colorfigures}), which show both the stellar and the gas
348: distribution for all of the galaxies. In \S~\ref{ss:narrowimage} we present the emission
349: line images (Figures~\ref{f:n4634sixpanel}, \ref{f:n4700sixpanel}, \ref{f:n5775sixpanel}
350: and \ref{f:n7090sixpanel}). Each of the four figures consists of six images. The overview
351: images are shown in the upper left corner, and the individual enlargements in the remaining
352: five subpanels. For NGC\,4700 we show an enlargement of the three-color image
353: (Figure~\ref{f:n4700acs}), revealing the central region. The unsharp-masked images (tracing
354: the dust distribution), which are discussed in \S~\ref{ss:dust}, are shown in a separate
355: figure (Figure~\ref{f:dust4}), as well as the dIrr galaxy near NGC\,4634
356: (Figure~\ref{f:dIrr}), presented in \S~\ref{ss:dIrr}.
357:
358: \subsection{ACS broadband imagery}
359: \label{ss:broadimage}
360:
361: We have combined the broadband and narrowband images to better display the
362: interplay of gas and stars in the disk-halo region. Our three-color
363: images (F625W = blue; F658N = green; continuum subtracted F658N = red) of
364: NGC\,4634, NGC\,4700, NGC\,5775 and NGC\,7090 are presented in Figure~\ref{f:colorfigures}.
365: They provide us with an overview of the disk morphology, in particular the stellar
366: distributions (i.e. star densities) within each galaxy. This information can later be used
367: to investigate potential dependencies of halo properties on the {\it local} level of disk
368: activity.
369:
370: \paragraph{NGC\,4634}
371: Star forming regions (and regions of increased stellar densities) are quite
372: wide-spread throughout the disk of NGC\,4634. The broadband image shows a
373: number of \ion{H}{2} regions shining through the galaxy's dust lane. Around
374: the high surface-brightness inner disk fainter ``emission'' is found, probably
375: from stars in outer spiral arms that may be slightly warped. No significant
376: stellar overdensities are found in these outer regions.
377:
378: \paragraph{NGC\,4700}
379: The stellar disk of NGC\,4700 looks more irregular than that of
380: NGC\,4634. The dust morphology is patchy, rather than forming a
381: continuous band along the disk plane. The most prominent star concentrations
382: are found in the central area. The northeastern peak of the stellar
383: distribution has a higher stellar density, than the southwestern peak.
384: Both regions seem to be more or less equidistant from the center of the
385: galaxy. There is one particular region located within the disk that has quite
386: prominent extinction by dust. It is also interesting to note that the patchy
387: dust lane is slightly skewed with respect to the stellar disk plane.
388:
389: \paragraph{NGC\,5775}
390: NGC\,5775 has a well-defined disk with evidence of widespread,
391: high-level star formation, as indicated by copious regions of
392: increased stellar density. Its dust lane is similar to that of
393: NGC\,4634 and more pronounced than that of NGC\,4700. The dust lane is
394: most pronounced in the outer disk regions (i.e. at large galactocentric
395: radii). However, NGC\,5775 has a relatively compact nuclear region, that
396: has the bulk of the stellar densities.
397:
398: \paragraph{NGC\,7090}
399: NGC\,7090's disk is similar to that of NGC\,4700, with a slightly more
400: prominent dust lane and an apparently wider, more amorphous overall
401: appearance. The dust lane is very filamentary. Most parts of the dust lane
402: are located in the regions above the midplane. Not much dust is present in the
403: southern part of the disk (below the midplane). The distribution of its stellar
404: component is asymmetric. The maximum is located to the southeast of the center, but
405: there are several peaks of stellar density distributions along the disk.
406:
407:
408: \subsection{ACS emission line images}
409: \label{ss:narrowimage}
410:
411: As mentioned above, these images, called ``H$\alpha$'' images,
412: include unknown contributions from the adjacent [\ion{N}{2}] lines and
413: thus trace the warm interstellar emission line gas in general. Both the
414: disk and the extraplanar gas can be studied in all four target
415: galaxies. Images showing the full extent in the ACS field-of-view are shown for
416: each galaxy in the upper left panel of Figures~\ref{f:n4634sixpanel},
417: \ref{f:n4700sixpanel}, \ref{f:n5775sixpanel} and \ref{f:n7090sixpanel}.
418:
419: In addition, close-up presentations of individual areas in the four
420: target galaxies are presented below in the five remaining sub-panels of each
421: figure. We show five individual fields for each galaxy. Comments on the observed
422: morphology are summarized in Table~\ref{t:morph}. We also include some information
423: on previous ground-based studies and related disk-halo investigations from other
424: wavelength regimes that have a direct connection to our present study.
425:
426: \paragraph{NGC\,4634}
427:
428: This Virgo cluster member edge-on spiral was previously imaged in the DIG
429: context in H$\alpha$ using ground-based data \citep{ros00}. A diffuse halo
430: was detected with an extent of 1.2\,kpc above/below the galactic plane.
431:
432: Extraplanar emission was also confirmed spectroscopically \citep{tul00a,ott02}.
433: In addition to revealing eDIG, extraplanar dust was also detected at high
434: galactic latitudes of about 1\,kpc \citep{how99,ros03b}.
435:
436: As already discussed in \citet{ros03a}, the presence of an H$\alpha$ halo
437: is almost always accompanied by a hot gaseous (X-ray) halo, as high SF rates
438: and high $S_{60}/S_{100}$ are strong indicators of halo emission. Not
439: surprisingly, a hot tenuous and far more extended X-ray gaseous halo was found
440: in NGC\,4634 in the soft energy band, making use of XMM-Newton observations
441: \citep{tul06}. A unique feature among the studied sample of nine edge-on
442: spirals is the absence of hard X-ray emission in NGC\,4634.
443:
444: Our ACS H$\alpha$ image of NGC\,4634 (see Figure~\ref{f:n4634sixpanel}) shows widely
445: distributed star formation in its disk, as already suggested by the broadband
446: image introduced above. Individual \ion{H}{2} regions are seen through gaps in
447: the dust lane. But there are no prominent H$\alpha$ bubbles visible.
448:
449: In the halo extended H$\alpha$ emission is found that is, despite
450: the superb spatial resolution of {\it HST}/ACS, unresolved (see
451: Figure~\ref{f:n4634sixpanel}). No filaments, loops or similar structures
452: are discernible, apart from a few minor exceptions at large galactocentric radii.
453:
454: \paragraph{NGC\,4700}
455:
456: This southern edge-on spiral was previously imaged by means of ground-based
457: H$\alpha$ observations \citep{ros03b}. A bright halo with superimposed filaments
458: reaching into the halo out to $|z| \approx 2-3$\,kpc was detected. The filaments
459: appear to emanate from the brightest SF regions, anchored within the disk.
460:
461: Also, a radio-continuum halo was detected \citep{dah01}, revealing similar
462: shapes and maxima at the optical SF counterparts. The extent of the
463: cosmic-ray halo is much larger than the optical halo.
464:
465: Spectra of the galaxy itself have been published by \citet{kew01}, which
466: show besides prominent H$\alpha$ and [\ion{N}{2}] emission relatively
467: strong [\ion{O}{3}] emission lines. However, \citet{kew01} do not assign
468: a classification for this galaxy, which they list as IRAS\,$12465-1108$.
469: An imaging HST survey of \citet{mal98} lists NGC\,4700 as an \ion{H}{2} galaxy.
470: Spectral classifications in the NASA Extragalactic Database (NED) range
471: from \ion{H}{2} region to Sy\,2 type, so there is not a clear-cut classification
472: available for this galaxy as of yet.
473:
474: NGC\,4700 (Figure~\ref{f:n4700sixpanel}) displays an enormous wealth of H$\alpha$
475: emitters in its disk plane with a large number of bright star forming regions
476: and many bubbles interspersed. Contrary to the rather irregular appearance
477: of its stellar disk in the broadband image (cf. \S~\ref{ss:broadimage}),
478: the H$\alpha$ emission distribution looks much more confined to what
479: looks like a thin disk. The ACS H$\alpha$ image (specifically the central
480: region displayed in Figure~\ref{f:n4700acs}) is by far the most spectacular one
481: in our sample. Given the distance of NGC\,4700, which is very similar to
482: NGC\,5775, this represents no bias in terms of resolution (i.e. proximity).
483: The H$\alpha$ image reveals a very complex morphology. There are numerous faint
484: filaments protruding into the halo region.
485:
486: The circumnuclear region does not host strong SF activity, and it seems as if
487: the bulk of the emission has been ejected into two lobe regions. These are,
488: despite the higher densities, located within the galactic plane (roughly
489: aligned with the disk plane) and not perpendicular to it. Nonetheless, considerable
490: structure (e.g.,\,filaments) is also revealed perpendicular to the disk north
491: and south of the nuclear region. Currently we do not have any kinematic
492: information of the lobe regions and the galaxy in general, so we can only
493: speculate about the possible origin of the H$\alpha$ lobes. But it seems most
494: likely as if these were created by a powerful mass and energy ejection from the
495: nuclear region, which may host an AGN.
496:
497: On top of the disk emission an equally astounding wealth of extraplanar
498: H$\alpha$ emission is found, with a large number of long, thin filaments
499: emanating vertically from the central disk plane. Several of these filaments
500: can be traced back to individual knots of H$\alpha$ emission in the central
501: part of the disk, suggesting that the gas is energized from within the disk
502: plane. The majority of the long filaments are emanating from and around
503: regions close to the nucleus. However, we note that from optical observations
504: (both R-band and H$\alpha$) no clear indication of a nucleus can be assessed.
505:
506: Instead two giant SF complexes (almost equidistant from the center) are
507: located within the disk plane, which resemble in appearance the lobe
508: regions of a radio jet (on smaller scales, though). However, no jet is visible,
509: nor is there any clear indication of a distinct nucleus. These shell-like structures
510: are located within the disk, and show a radially expanding structure within the
511: disk, where the pressure gradient is much higher as opposed to moving perpendicular
512: to it (such as the winds in nucleated starbursts). The very edges of the disk show
513: substantial amounts of SF. Many superbubbles and shells are detected, and there does
514: not appear to be an abrupt cut-off in star formation within the disk. The expanding
515: shells seem indicative of an AGN (Seyfert type), however no clear classification has
516: been established.
517:
518: \paragraph{NGC\,5775}
519:
520: NGC\,5775 is a well studied edge-on spiral galaxy in the disk-halo context,
521: which was imaged extensively by ground-based observations in H$\alpha$
522: \citep{leh95,col00,tul00,ros03b}. Extraplanar emission was imaged out
523: to $|z|\lta$\,5\,kpc above the galactic plane. It is the galaxy with the
524: highest $L_{\rm{FIR}}/D^2_{25}$ ratio in our current sample and it is a
525: starburst-type galaxy, although it is morphologically quite different from
526: that of nucleated starbursts. A gaseous halo with individual H$\alpha$ spurs or
527: filaments, associated with the X-shaped structure of the large scale magnetic
528: field, was discovered \citep{tul00}.
529:
530: EDIG has been detected spectroscopically even out to $|z|\sim$\,9\,kpc
531: \citep{ran00,tul00}. In addition, extended radio continuum emission has been
532: detected as well \citep{hum91,dur98,tul00}. A tenuous X-ray halo, spatially
533: coexistent (and more extended) than the radio continuum and H$\alpha$ halo,
534: was detected with Chandra \citep{str04} and with XMM-Newton \citep{tul06}.
535: NGC\,5775 appears to be interacting with its face-on companion NGC\,5774, which
536: was first indicated by \ion{H}{1} measurements \citep{irw94}.
537:
538: In NGC\,5775 quite a large number of prominent \ion{H}{2} regions is found
539: in its disk plane, together with a number of bubbles
540: (see Figure~\ref{f:n5775sixpanel}). The disk is surrounded by extended H$\alpha$
541: emission that is not resolved into individual structures. The extraplanar
542: H$\alpha$ emission is strongest and widest in the central area, where the level
543: of star formation in the disk is also the highest, but appears to be truly
544: diffuse. The high spatial resolution of our {\it HST}/ACS images does not allow
545: for the detection of the very faint surface emission of the filaments. Unfortunately,
546: the background artifacts discussed in \S~\ref{ss:datared} did not allow to bin the data.
547:
548: \paragraph{NGC\,7090}
549:
550: This southern edge-on spiral is the galaxy with the smallest
551: $L_{\rm{FIR}}/D^2_{25}$ in our current sample, and it was imaged in
552: H$\alpha$ before, using ground-based data \citep{ros03b}. These images already
553: revealed an inhomogeneous layer of extended DIG, which seems to correlate spatially
554: with the star formation regions within the disk. In addition to this H$\alpha$ study,
555: an extended radio continuum halo was detected as well \citep{dah01}, based on ATCA
556: observations with different configurations at frequencies of 1.43\,GHz and 2.45\,GHz.
557: The measured scale-heights for these observations range from 1.19 to 2.16\,kpc.
558:
559: The overview image of our ACS H$\alpha$ emission line image of NGC\,7090 (see
560: top left panel of Figure~\ref{f:n7090sixpanel}) confirms the asymmetry of the
561: star formation activity in its disk very clearly. To the east of the nuclear
562: region there is a big apparent gap in the H$\alpha$ emission distribution. In
563: general, the eastern half of the galaxy disk is considerably less active than the
564: western one. Part of this can be attributed to dust, which is prominently visible
565: in the broadband image.
566:
567: The image also reveals that there are not just \ion{H}{2} regions
568: (as traced by diffuse, high surface-brightness H$\alpha$ emission)
569: in the disk, but lots of individual, resolved bubbles in addition.
570: These are not only present in the more active western half, but also
571: to the east, where a few individual bubbles are found out to large
572: galactocentric radii.
573:
574: Images of individual regions in H$\alpha$ reveal the presence of a multitude
575: of conspicuous, {\it resolved} individual structures, including partial
576: loops and filaments perpendicular to the disk plane. A few of the extended
577: filaments are detected in the southern part of the galaxy. These connect
578: visibly to the bright star forming regions in the disk (see middle right panel
579: of Figure~\ref{f:n7090sixpanel}).
580:
581: It is obvious that the H$\alpha$ emission distribution is apparently
582: widest above regions with the most active star formation in the disk.
583: There are a multitude of bubbles and supershells detected (see
584: top right and middle left panels of Figure~\ref{f:n7090sixpanel}).
585:
586: \subsection{Dust features in the ACS broadband images}
587: \label{ss:dust}
588:
589: Filtering the low spatial frequencies out of the F625W broadband images,
590: one can study the smaller-scale absorption features caused by dust in front
591: of background stellar emission.
592:
593: Apart from the gaseous constituents of the ISM in galaxies, dust is also
594: present on both small and large scales. To understand the morphology of
595: the extraplanar ISM in our target galaxies, it is interesting to compare
596: the structure of extraplanar dust to that of the gaseous emission filaments.
597: For this purpose, similarly to the previously studied cases, we have created
598: unsharp-masked versions of the broadband F625W (SDSS $r$) images to enhance
599: the contrast between those absorbing high spatial frequency dust structures
600: and the smoother distribution of the background light from the galaxy's
601: stellar populations.
602:
603: Despite the fact that our target galaxies were selected to have a less dusty plane
604: than galaxies such as NGC\,891 \citep{how97,ros04}, there are still sufficient
605: numbers of small-scale dust filaments for such a comparison. Due to the fact
606: that we only obtained broadband images in one waveband (the basic reason being
607: that these are only used for the continuum subtraction), we cannot quantify
608: the physical properties of the dust. We therefore only qualitatively describe the
609: extraplanar dust content in these galaxies with respect to the eDIG morphology.
610:
611: The images are shown in Figure~\ref{f:dust4}. They reveal that the
612: distribution of the dust filaments is also quite different among the four
613: target galaxies. NGC\,4634 and NGC\,5775 show the most prominent features,
614: whereas NGC\,4700 and NGC\,7090 have the least extraplanar dust features.
615: For NGC\,4700, in particular, but also to some extent for NGC\,7090, the presence
616: of many resolved stars in the disk make an analysis relatively difficult, as the
617: smoothing process creates some artifacts around the stars, which overlap prominently
618: in the crowded field. Therefore, a direct one-to-one comparison of dust filaments
619: with emission line features (e.g., filaments) is only possible for NGC\,4634 and NGC\,5775.
620:
621: However, as presented in \S~\ref{ss:narrowimage}, there are a few large-scale
622: H$\alpha$ filaments discernible at high galactic latitudes
623: in NGC\,4634 and NGC\,5775. The distribution of dust structures in NGC\,4634
624: show both alignment parallel and perpendicular to the disk, whereas
625: generally at higher $|z|$ the dust (sometimes very filamentary) is aligned
626: perpendicular to the disk. But it should be noted that this is only true
627: for the western side of the galaxy. The distribution of dust features on
628: the other side (east of the center) is somewhat more confined to the disk and
629: oriented more parallel than perpendicular, but mostly a random mix of
630: orientations. It should also be noted that the dust features are not
631: correlated on a one-to-one basis with the H$\alpha$ filaments. This was
632: already stated earlier \citep{how99,ros03b}, based on groundbased observations.
633:
634:
635: \subsection{Dwarf irregular galaxy in the halo of NGC\,4634}
636: \label{ss:dIrr}
637:
638: With our high spatial resolution {\it HST}/ACS observations, we are able to
639: re-investigate the extraplanar blob, detected by us in the halo of NGC\,4634,
640: which was named Patch\,1 \citep{ros00}. We had concluded from our previous
641: ground-based observations that this patch may either be an extraplanar SF
642: region or a dwarf galaxy in the halo of NGC\,4634, given that the FWHM of the
643: used filter excluded the possibility of a foreground or background object.
644:
645: Our deep {\it HST}/ACS broadband and narrowband observations now clearly indicate
646: that this patch is a galaxy. The narrowband F658N observations reveal a complex system
647: composed of several knots associated with gas, reminiscent of a dwarf
648: irregular (dIrr) galaxy (see Figure~\ref{f:dIrr}). The broadband image reveals
649: several individual star associations that are resolved in this dIrr galaxy,
650: and the major morphology looks reminiscent of a satellite merger galaxy,
651: showing hints of tidal streams owing to the gravitational attraction from
652: NGC\,4634. Given the peculiar morphology, this dIrr galaxy is possibly already
653: in the early process of producing a minor merger with its parent galaxy
654: (NGC\,4634). It should be noted that the broadband image shows a very thick
655: stellar disk of NGC\,4634, unlike any of the other studied edge-on galaxies.
656: This is consistent with scenarios in which disk thickening is the result of
657: a previous interaction, possibly previous minor mergers \citep[e.g.,][]{yoa06,wys06}.
658:
659: Augmented longslit spectra (R.-J. Dettmar et al. 2008, in preparation) seem
660: to strengthen this interpretation of Patch\,1 being a dIrr galaxy, which is
661: deficient in [\ion{N}{2}] and [\ion{S}{2}], based on emission line
662: diagnostics. Henceforth, we label this galaxy as $\rm{J}124239.58$+141751.83,
663: which refers to the coordinates of the brightest H$\alpha$ emission region
664: in its central part. We will report on the physical properties and stellar
665: populations of this interesting dIrr galaxy in detail in a future paper.
666:
667: \subsection{Ancillary data}
668:
669: The {\it HST}/ACS data presented above were obtained as part of a
670: multi-wavelength observing campaign. For the galaxies presented here
671: we have other, independent measurements of various phases of the ISM
672: in their halos published by us previously, including X-ray data
673: \citep[][Ehle et al.~2008, in preparation]{tul06} and radio-continuum
674: data \citep{tul00,dah01}.
675: %
676: A correlation study of the ACS data with other tracers of extraplanar
677: gas in this sample galaxies will be presented separately, as some of the
678: observations are still pending.
679:
680:
681: \section{DISCUSSION}
682: \label{s:discuss}
683:
684: \subsection{EDIG morphology as a function of SF activity}
685: \label{ss:morphvssfprop}
686:
687: Over roughly the past decade and a half evidence has been mounting that
688: extended gaseous halos around late-type spiral galaxies are formed as a
689: consequence of the star formation activity in the underlying disks. A high
690: IRAS $S_{60}/S_{100}$ integral flux ratio $\geq 0.4$, which is a measure
691: of a high mean dust temperature in galaxies, was identified as a very reliable
692: indicator of massive star formation \citep{hec90}.
693:
694: In such a scenario, emission features in gaseous halos are expected to be
695: closely tied to the energy input rate, which is required to exceed a threshold
696: to drive outflows perpendicular to the disk plane in the first place. This
697: was first addressed by \citet{dah95} for radio data and later derived from
698: optical narrowband imagery \citep{ran96,ros03a}.
699: %
700: More recently, \citet{dah06} have shown that there is a correlation of the
701: existence of galaxy halos (detected in radio continuum and H$\alpha$
702: observations) not only with the global energy injection rate, but also with
703: the {\it local} energy input level in a galaxy and, in addition, with its mass
704: density. We will investigate in the following whether the eDIG properties of
705: the galaxies in the present sample can be explained in this context.
706:
707: The two galaxies with filamentary eDIG structures are NGC\,4700 and NGC\,7090.
708: As tabulated in Table~\ref{t:prop}, these are the two galaxies at the lower end
709: of the energy input range ($L_{\rm FIR}/D_{25}^2$). On the other hand, NGC\,4634
710: and NGC\,5775 display only unresolved extraplanar H$\alpha$ emission. These two
711: galaxies have higher energy input rates from massive star formation in their disks.
712: Accordingly, one might expect them to have a larger number of individual sites of
713: star formation and thus also a larger amount of associated halo emission.
714:
715: One might naively expect this difference to be an observational artifact,
716: based on the assumption that physically larger and more massive galaxies
717: just have more of everything. More star formation regions lead to more
718: filaments emanating from the disks, potentially leading to a quasi-diffuse
719: eDIG structure caused by the superposition of many individual filaments.
720: %
721: However, there are no indications of filaments being detected in the more
722: massive galaxies of the present sample (NGC\,4634 and NGC\,5775) and also
723: other galaxies studied previously, in areas where the spatial density
724: of star-forming regions decreases, e.g., near the radial edges of their disks.
725: The difference in eDIG morphologies is equally unlikely to be caused by a
726: distance bias, because NGC\,4700 (with a filamentary eDIG) and NGC\,5775
727: (with a diffuse eDIG) are at roughly equal distances (see Table~\ref{t:obs}).
728: Again, this makes it unlikely that the diffuse eDIG is the result of an
729: unresolved superposition of many filaments.
730:
731: A first indication at what might cause this difference can be gleaned by
732: studying various properties of the sample galaxies. NGC\,4634 and NGC\,5775
733: are the two galaxies with diffuse eDIG, one of them is also the most massive
734: galaxy in the present sample (see Table~\ref{t:prop}). From the width of the
735: \ion{H}{1} emission line we derive an estimated total mass for NGC\,5775 of about
736: $1.91\times10^{11}\,{\rm M}_\odot$. Interestingly though, in contrast, the
737: mass of NGC\,4634 is almost a factor of two below that of NGC\,7090. So this
738: complicates the interpretation that the mass alone is a sensitive indicator
739: for the morphology of eDIG.
740:
741: The general trend and the earlier work by \citet{dah06} indicate that the mass
742: (or mass density) of a galaxy is an important control parameter for the
743: morphology of the eDIG. Low mass galaxies such as the dwarf NGC\,55
744: \citep[e.g.,][]{tul03}, NGC\,2188 \citep{dom97} and the blue compact
745: dwarf galaxy IZw18 \citep[e.g.,][]{hun95} show filamentary structure, whereas
746: the more massive galaxies (with widespread star formation, not the powerful
747: nucleated starbursts; e.g., NGC\,891 \citep{ros04}) tend to have relatively
748: smooth layers of eDIG. An explanation for this could be the fact that the gas
749: can overcome the gravitational potential wells of the galaxies more easily.
750: The range of masses spanned by our sample is rather small (see Table~\ref{t:prop}),
751: so it may not be surprising that any trends with mass are less clear in our sample
752: than those observed in samples that contains both dwarf and giant galaxies.
753:
754: Of our targets only NGC\,7090 and, to a lesser degree, NGC\,4700, contain bubbles, shells
755: or supershells. In NGC\,7090 a large number of such features, of various sizes, are found.
756: Also, the SF regions in this galaxy are loosely scattered within the disk, and the major
757: outflows are confined to only one side above the disk (see descriptions of the eDIG
758: morphology in the individual regions within each galaxy listed in Table~\ref{t:morph}).
759:
760: Among our studied sample, the resolved small-scale DIG halo morphology is showing
761: a clear dependence on the star formation rate per unit area $(L_{\rm{FIR}}/D^2_{25})$.
762: That is, galaxies with $L_{\rm{FIR}}/D^2_{25} \geq 10$ (in units of
763: $\rm{10^{40}\,erg\,s^{-1}\,kpc^{-2}}$), show a smooth, diffuse DIG halo, as opposed
764: to the galaxies with values $\leq 6$, which show primarily filamentary DIG. The studied
765: galaxies thus can be arranged into a {\it sequence} of eDIG diffuseness as a function
766: of $L_{\rm{FIR}}/D^2_{25}$. More generally speaking, there is a morphological DIG sequence
767: among SF galaxies observed evolving from galaxies which reveal mostly bubbles and
768: supershells to galaxies which show filamentary emission and to cases which have smooth
769: eDIG layers (i.e. halos). Where there are bubbles (i.e. enclosed structures) the breakout
770: condition cannot have been met yet.
771:
772: \subsection{The role of the intergalactic environment}
773: \label{ss:environ}
774:
775: Although it has been established that eDIG originates from the SF regions
776: within the disk, the galactic environment in which the individual galaxies
777: reside, is of course of importance, too. It may, e.g., contribute to the
778: extent of the emission that is detected.
779:
780: Of the four galaxies studied here, two (NGC\,4634 and NGC\,5775) have nearby
781: companion galaxies (i.e. they form galaxy pairs). NGC\,4700 and NGC\,7090, in
782: contrast, are rather isolated spirals.
783:
784: Our current sample is not large enough to draw any statistical conclusions.
785: But since one galaxy from each category has a filamentary and the other a
786: diffuse eDIG morphology, the presence of a nearby companion does not appear
787: to dominate the eDIG properties in these cases. However, significant
788: exceptions may be expected in dense group environments, where galaxies
789: experience effects such as ram pressure stripping \citep[e.g.,][]{ken99}.
790:
791:
792: \subsection{Clues from observations at other wavebands}
793: \label{ss:multiwave}
794:
795: It is important to ask whether or not there seems to be a more global connection
796: between the various ISM constituents that are responsible for driving a kiloparsec
797: outflow or wind. Obviously, there is a connection linking the various ISM phases
798: as described for modest galaxy samples \citep[e.g.,][]{tul06,dah06}, but the
799: details are far from being well understood.
800:
801: From the sample of \citet{tul06}, it was concluded that the presence of a diffuse
802: ionized gas halo was always accompanied by a grand scale X-ray halo, which
803: generally revealed that the hot tenuous gas is far more extended than the DIG.
804: In those cases also a cosmic ray halo, traced by radio-continuum observations, was
805: discovered. Linking the cosmic-ray halo to the DIG halo, showed clear evidence
806: that the mass surface density was a good proxy for the presence of a gaseous halo.
807: The mass of the stellar disk ($M_{\rm K}$), derived from K-band observations, is divided
808: by the area of the optical disk ($A_{25} = \pi r_{25}^2$), which yields the mass surface
809: density.
810:
811: For NGC\,4700 a value of $M_{\rm K}/A_{25} = 17.4\,{\rm M_{\sun}\,pc}^{-2}$ was
812: determined \citep{dah06}. Despite having higher values than the more quiescent
813: galaxies, this is a rather modest number compared to local starburst galaxies
814: which can have mass surface densities of up to eight times as high.
815:
816: However, does the mass density critically control whether a galaxy has a
817: kiloparsec outflow or rather a more filament-driven DIG morphology? Our present
818: sample is certainly too small to answer this question unambiguously, as two galaxies
819: each fall into the category of either having a filamentary DIG morphology, or showing
820: a more smooth DIG layer.
821:
822: \subsection{Observations confront Theory: Where have all the Chimneys gone?}
823: \label{ss:obsvstheo}
824:
825: One of the greatest challenges any theoretical concept poses is how
826: accurately it can reflect or predict the observational details. In terms of
827: the chimney model \citep{nor89}, past observations from different wavebands,
828: both in galactic and extragalactic studies, have failed to reveal many of
829: these structures that were predicted. More specifically, the number of
830: predicted chimneys is of the order of several hundred in a galaxy of modest
831: SF activity. Yet, only very few chimneys have been detected, if any at all.
832: So the prediction falls short by at least two orders of magnitudes. Previous
833: reports include a Galactic chimney in the Perseus arm \citep{nor96} and
834: the Galactic chimney GSH\,$277+00+36$ \citep{mcg03} as well as evidence for
835: a chimney breakout in the Galactic supershell GSH\,$242-03+37$ \citep{mcg06}.
836: Extragalactic chimneys or structures identified as such so far have been
837: observed only in the starburst galaxy M\,82 \citep{wil99,gar01}. But we have
838: to carefully consider whether this is due to an observational bias or attributed
839: to certain physical contraints.
840:
841: Previously, NGC\,891 was imaged in H$\alpha$ \citep{ros04}, where no evidence
842: was found for the chimney mode. However, the situation in NGC\,891 is
843: complicated by the fact that it has a very prominent dust layer, which
844: possibly could have obscured any chimney structures (i.e. chimney walls)
845: in the lower disk-halo interface ($|z| \leq 500$\,pc). Therefore, those
846: structures could have gone undetected even if they existed. Our currently
847: studied galaxies by and large have a much less dusty galactic midplane, so
848: the effects of dust obscuration should be considerably mitigated.
849:
850: However, from our imaging studies it is obvious that there are no clear
851: indications for the chimney mode in these actively star forming galaxies.
852: In NGC\,4634 and NGC\,5775 there are no such structures observed in H$\alpha$.
853: Are there indications of other related phenomena? Evidently, there are
854: several features (e.g.,\, curved filaments) visible whose morphology show an almost
855: closed loop, indicative of the galactic fountain scenario. However, without
856: detailed knowledge of the kinematics (e.g.,\,mapping of the velocity field)
857: we cannot say what parts of the looped filament are still moving upward and
858: what parts possibly are already descending. Furthermore, multiple episodes of SF
859: driven outflows may have altered the geometry of the outflows along the line of
860: sight. Hence the chimney structures may look like sheets, or picked up more
861: complex structures generated by overlapping filaments. Nonetheless, it seems
862: obvious that these features are associated with an SF driven outflow.
863:
864: Recent models by \citet{tas06} simulated the star formation in galactic disks
865: involving feedback by SNe. The density, temperature, and pressure maps (see
866: their Figure~6) show copious amounts of warm and hot gas being driven into the
867: halo regions, extending out to a few kiloparsecs. In particular, those simulations
868: look very reminiscent to the morphology seen in our H$\alpha$ image of
869: NGC\,4700 on a global scale. More recent models of a galactic wind as seen in
870: starburst galaxies \citep{coo08} replicate very detailed structures including the
871: filamentary morphology seen as for instance in M\,82. While considerable progress
872: has been achieved in modeling even small scale structures in a magnetized ISM
873: \citep[e.g.,][]{avi05}, more refined simulations are necessary in order to
874: compare them to the high spatial resolution multi-structured eDIG observations,
875: as those presented in this study.
876:
877:
878: \section{SUMMARY}
879: \label{s:sum}
880:
881: We have observed four edge-on spiral galaxies with different levels of star
882: formation in H$\alpha$ with the {\it HST}/ACS to study the morphology of
883: their extraplanar DIG (eDIG).
884: %
885: The distribution of the eDIG is very different among the sample galaxies.
886: While the eDIG is very filamentary in NGC\,4700 and in NGC\,7090, the
887: distribution of the eDIG in NGC\,4634 and NGC\,5775 is remarkably smooth.
888: %
889: The latter two galaxies have the highest SF rate per unit area in our sample
890: and NGC\,5775 is also the most massive galaxy in the sample.
891:
892: Based on our current and earlier results, we conclude that the observed
893: differences are probably a consequence of their different levels of SF activity
894: {\it and} their total masses and/or mass densities.
895: %
896: Whereas the SF rate per unit area controls the presence (e.g., the radial
897: extent), shape and amount of eDIG in a galaxy's halo, the total mass or mass density
898: seems to be at least in part responsible for the actual shape of the eDIG. This is
899: corroborated by a comparison of the morphology of the lower-mass galaxies to those of
900: SF dwarf galaxies such as NGC\,55 or the blue compact dwarf IZw18. The more
901: massive galaxies with active SF seem to expell their gaseous outflows more
902: globally and diffusively.
903:
904: The studied galaxies can be arranged into a {\it sequence} of eDIG diffuseness
905: as a function of star formation activity per unit area. More generally speaking,
906: there is a morphological DIG sequence among SF galaxies, which evolves from
907: galaxies which reveal mostly bubbles and supershells to galaxies which show
908: filamentary emission to cases of intense SF which reveal smooth eDIG layers
909: (i.e. halos).
910:
911: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
912: % Acknowledgments
913: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
914:
915: \acknowledgments Support for proposal 10416 was provided by NASA through a
916: grant from the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the
917: Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA
918: contract NAS 5-26555. This project has been supported at Ruhr-University Bochum
919: by DLR grant 50 OR 0503. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic
920: Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute
921: of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
922: This research has made use of NASA's Astrophysics Data System Bibliographic Services.
923: We also made use of the Lyon Extragalactic database (LEDA).
924:
925: \clearpage
926:
927: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
928: % Reference List
929: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
930:
931: \begin{thebibliography}{}
932:
933: \bibitem[Bregman(1980)]{bre80}
934: Bregman, J. N. 1980, \apj, 236, 577
935:
936: \bibitem[Cecil et al.(2001)]{cec01}
937: Cecil, G., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Veilleux, S., \& Filippenko, A. V. 2001,
938: \apj, 555, 338
939:
940: \bibitem[Cecil et al.(2002)]{cec02}
941: Cecil, G., Bland-Hawthorn, J., \& Veilleux, S. 2002, \apj, 576, 745
942:
943: \bibitem[Collins et al.(2000)]{col00}
944: Collins, J. A., Rand, R. J., Duric, N., \& Walterbos, R. A. M. 2000, \apj,
945: 536, 645
946:
947: \bibitem[Cooper et al.(2008)]{coo08}
948: Cooper, J. L., Bicknell, G. V., Sutherland, R. S., \& Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2008,
949: \apj, 674, 157
950:
951: \bibitem[Dahlem(1997)]{dah97}
952: Dahlem, M. 1997, \pasp, 109, 1298
953:
954: \bibitem[Dahlem et al.(1994)]{dah94}
955: Dahlem, M., Dettmar, R.-J., \& Hummel, E. 1994, \aap, 290, 384
956:
957: \bibitem[Dahlem et al.(1995)]{dah95}
958: Dahlem, M., Lisenfeld, U., \& Golla, G. 1995, \apj, 444, 119
959:
960: \bibitem[Dahlem et al.(2006)]{dah06}
961: Dahlem, M., Lisenfeld, U., \& Rossa, J. 2006, \aap, 457, 121
962:
963: \bibitem[Dahlem et al.(2001)]{dah01}
964: Dahlem, M., Lazendic, J. S., Haynes, R. F., Ehle, M., \& Lisenfeld, U. 2001,
965: \aap, 374, 42
966:
967: \bibitem[de Avillez(2000)]{avi00}
968: de Avillez, M. A. 2000, \mnras, 315, 479
969: %Disc-halo interaction - I. Three-dimensional evolution of the Galactic disc
970:
971: \bibitem[de Avillez \& Breitschwerdt(2005)]{avi05}
972: de Avillez, M. A., \& Breitschwerdt, D. 2005, \aap, 436, 585
973: %%Global dynamical evolution of the ISM in star forming galaxies.
974: %%I. High resolution 3D simulations: Effect of the magnetic field
975:
976: \bibitem[Dettmar(1990)]{det90}
977: Dettmar, R.-J. 1990, \aap, 232, L15
978:
979: \bibitem[Dettmar(1992)]{det92}
980: Dettmar, R.-J. 1992, Fund. Cosm. Phys., 15, 143
981:
982: \bibitem[Domg\" orgen \& Dettmar(1997)]{dom97}
983: Domg\" orgen, H. \& Dettmar, R.-J. 1997, \aap, 322, 391
984:
985: \bibitem[Duric et al.(1998)]{dur98}
986: Duric, N., Irwin, J. A., \& Bloemen, H. 1998, \aap, 331, 428
987:
988: \bibitem[Ferguson et al.(1996)]{fer96}
989: Ferguson, A. M. N., Wyse, R. F. G., Gallagher, J. S., \& Hunter, D. A.
990: 1996, \aj, 111, 2265
991:
992: \bibitem[Garc\'{\i}a-Burillo et al.(2001)]{gar01}
993: Garc\'{\i}a-Burillo, S., Martin-Pintado, J., Fuente, A., \& Neri, R. 2001,
994: \apj, 563, L27
995:
996: \bibitem[Giavalisco(2004)]{gia04}
997: Giavalisco, M. 2004, Instrument Science Report ACS 2004-12,
998: (Baltimore: STScI)
999:
1000: \bibitem[Gonzaga et al.(2005)]{gon05}
1001: Gonzaga, S., et al. 2005, ACS Instrument Handbook, Version 6.0,
1002: (Baltimore: STScI)
1003:
1004: \bibitem[Heckman et al.(1990)]{hec90}
1005: Heckman, T. M., Armus, L., \& Miley, G. K. 1990, \apjs, 74, 833
1006:
1007: \bibitem[Hoopes et al.(1999)]{hoo99}
1008: Hoopes, C. G., Walterbos, R. A. M., \& Rand, R. J. 1999, \apj, 522, 669
1009:
1010: \bibitem[Howk \& Savage(1997)]{how97}
1011: Howk, J. C., \& Savage, B. D. 1997, \aj, 114, 2463
1012:
1013: \bibitem[Howk \& Savage(1999)]{how99}
1014: Howk, J. C., \& Savage, B. D. 1999, \aj, 117, 2077
1015:
1016: \bibitem[Howk \& Savage(2000)]{how00}
1017: Howk, J. C., \& Savage, B. D. 2000, \aj, 119, 644
1018:
1019: \bibitem[Hummel et al.(1991)]{hum91}
1020: Hummel, E., Beck, R., \& Dettmar, R.-J. 1991, A\&AS, 87, 309
1021:
1022: \bibitem[Hunter \& Thronson(1995)]{hun95}
1023: Hunter, D. A., \& Thronson, H. A., Jr., 1995, \apj, 452, 238
1024:
1025: \bibitem[Irwin(1994)]{irw94}
1026: Irwin, J. A. 1994, \apj, 429, 618
1027:
1028: \bibitem[Kenney \& Koopmann(1999)]{ken99}
1029: Kenney, J. D. P., \& Koopmann, R. A. 1999, \aj, 117, 181
1030:
1031: \bibitem[Kennicutt(1998)]{ken98}
1032: Kennicutt, R. C., Jr. 1998, \araa, 36, 189
1033:
1034: \bibitem[Kewley et al.(2001)]{kew01}
1035: Kewley, L. J., Heisler, C. A., Dopita, M. A., \& Lumsden, S. 2001, \apjs,
1036: 132, 37
1037:
1038: \bibitem[Koekemoer et al.(2005)]{koe05}
1039: Koekemoer, A. M., Fruchter, A. S., Hook, R. N., Hack, W., \& Hanley, C. 2005,
1040: in: The 2005 HST Calibration Workshop, eds. A. M. Koekemoer, P. Goudfrooij,
1041: L. L. Dressel, (Baltimore: STScI)
1042:
1043: \bibitem[Lehnert \& Heckman(1995)]{leh95}
1044: Lehnert, M. D., \& Heckman, T. M. 1995, \apjs, 97, 89
1045:
1046: \bibitem[Mac Low \& Ferrara(1999)]{mac99}
1047: Mac Low, M.-M., \& Ferrara, A. 1999, \apj, 513, 142
1048:
1049: \bibitem[Malkan et al.(1998)]{mal98}
1050: Malkan, M. A., Gorjian, V., \& Tam, R. 1998, \apjs, 117, 25
1051:
1052: \bibitem[McClure-Griffiths et al.(2003)]{mcg03}
1053: McClure-Griffiths, N. M., Dickey, J. M., Gaensler, B. M., \& Green, A. J.
1054: 2003, \apj, 594, 833
1055:
1056: \bibitem[McClure-Griffiths et al.(2006)]{mcg06}
1057: McClure-Griffiths, N. M., Ford, A., Pisano, D. J., Gibson, B. K.,
1058: Staveley-Smith, L., Calabretta, M. R., Dedes, L., \& Kalberla, P. M. W.
1059: 2006, \apj, 638, 196
1060:
1061: \bibitem[Miller \& Veilleux(2003)]{mil03}
1062: Miller, S. T., \& Veilleux, S. 2003, \apjs, 148, 383
1063:
1064: \bibitem[Norman \& Ikeuchi(1989)]{nor89}
1065: Norman, C. A., \& Ikeuchi, S. 1989, \apj, 345, 372
1066:
1067: \bibitem[Normandeau et al.(1996)]{nor96}
1068: Normandeau, M., Taylor, A. R., \& Dewdney, P. E. 1996, \nat, 380, 687
1069:
1070: \bibitem[Oey et al.(2007)]{oey07}
1071: Oey, M. S., et al. 2007, \apj, 661, 801
1072:
1073: \bibitem[Otte et al.(2002)]{ott02}
1074: Otte, B., Gallagher, J. S., III, \& Reynolds, R. J. 2002, \apj, 572, 823
1075:
1076: \bibitem[Pavlovsky et al.(2005)]{pav05}
1077: Pavlovsky, C., et al. 2005, ACS Data Handbook, Version 4.0 (Baltimore: STScI)
1078:
1079: \bibitem[Pildis et al.(1994)]{pil94}
1080: Pildis, R. A., Bregman, J. N., \& Schombert, J. M. 1994, \apj, 427, 160
1081:
1082: \bibitem[Rand(1996)]{ran96}
1083: Rand, R. J. 1996, \apj, 462, 712
1084:
1085: \bibitem[Rand(2000)]{ran00}
1086: Rand, R. J. 2000, \apj, 537, L13
1087:
1088: \bibitem[Rand et al.(1990)]{ran90}
1089: Rand, R. J., Kulkarni, S. R., \& Hester, J. J. 1990, \apj, 352, L1
1090:
1091: \bibitem[Rand et al.(1992)]{ran92}
1092: Rand, R. J., Kulkarni, S. R., \& Hester, J. J. 1992, \apj, 396, 97
1093:
1094: \bibitem[Robitaille et al.(2007)]{rob07}
1095: Robitaille, T. P., Rossa, J., Bomans, D. J., \& van der Marel, R. P. 2007,
1096: \aap, 464, 541
1097:
1098: \bibitem[Rossa \& Dettmar(2000)]{ros00}
1099: Rossa, J., \& Dettmar, R.-J. 2000, \aap, 359, 433
1100:
1101: \bibitem[Rossa \& Dettmar(2003a)]{ros03a}
1102: Rossa, J., \& Dettmar, R.-J. 2003a, \aap, 406, 493
1103:
1104: \bibitem[Rossa \& Dettmar(2003b)]{ros03b}
1105: Rossa, J., \& Dettmar, R.-J. 2003b, \aap, 406, 505
1106:
1107: \bibitem[Rossa et al.(2004)]{ros04}
1108: Rossa, J., Dettmar, R.-J., Walterbos, R. A. M., \& Norman, C. A. 2004,
1109: \aj, 128, 674
1110:
1111: \bibitem[Sandage \& Tammann(1990)]{san90}
1112: Sandage, A., \& Tammann, G. A. 1990, \apj, 365, 1
1113:
1114: \bibitem[Sanders et al.(2003)]{san03}
1115: Sanders, D. B., Mazzarella, J. M., Kim, D.-C., Surace, J. A., \& Soifer,
1116: B. T. 2003, \aj, 126, 1607
1117:
1118: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1998)]{sch98}
1119: Schlegel D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., \& Davis, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
1120:
1121: \bibitem[Shapiro \& Field(1976)]{sha76}
1122: Shapiro, P. R., \& Field, G. B. 1976, \apj, 205, 762
1123:
1124: \bibitem[Strickland et al.(2004)]{str04}
1125: Strickland, D. K., Heckman, T. M., Colbert, E. J. M., Hoopes, C. G., \&
1126: Weaver, K. A. 2004, \apjs, 151, 193
1127:
1128: \bibitem[Tasker \& Bryan(2006)]{tas06}
1129: Tasker, E. J., \& Bryan, G. L. 2006, \apj, 641, 878
1130:
1131: \bibitem[Thompson et al.(2004)]{tho04}
1132: Thompson, T. W. J., Howk, J. C., \& Savage, B. D. 2004, \aj, 128, 662
1133:
1134: \bibitem[T\"ullmann \& Dettmar(2000)]{tul00a}
1135: T\"ullmann, R., \& Dettmar, R.-J. 2000, \aap, 362, 119
1136:
1137: \bibitem[T\"ullmann et al.(2000)]{tul00}
1138: T\"ullmann, R., Dettmar, R.-J., Soida, M., Urbanik, M., \& Rossa, J.
1139: 2000, \aap, 364, L36
1140:
1141: \bibitem[T\"ullmann et al.(2003)]{tul03}
1142: T\"ullmann, R., Rosa, M. R., Elwert, T., Bomans, D. J., Ferguson, A. M. N.,
1143: \& Dettmar, R.-J. 2003, \aap, 412, 69
1144:
1145: \bibitem[T\"ullmann et al.(2006)]{tul06}
1146: T\"ullmann, R., Pietsch, W., Rossa, J., Breitschwerdt, D., \& Dettmar, R.-J.
1147: 2006, \aap, 448, 43
1148:
1149: \bibitem[Veilleux et al.(2005)]{vei05}
1150: Veilleux, S., Cecil, G., \& Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2005, \araa, 43, 769
1151:
1152: \bibitem[Walterbos \& Braun(1994)]{wal94}
1153: Walterbos, R. A. M., \& Braun, R. 1994, \apj, 431, 156
1154:
1155: %\bibitem[Wang et al.(2001)]{wan01}
1156: %Wang, Q. D., Immler, S., Walterbos, R. A. M., Lauroesch, J. T., \&
1157: %Breitschwerdt, D. 2001, \apj, 555, L99
1158:
1159: \bibitem[Wills et al.(1999)]{wil99}
1160: Wills, K. A., Redman, M. P., Muxlow, T. W. B., \& Pedlar, A. 1999, \mnras,
1161: 309, 395
1162:
1163: \bibitem[Wyse et al.(2006)]{wys06}
1164: Wyse, R. F. G., Gilmore, G., Norris, J. E., Wilkinson, M. I., Kleyna, J. T.,
1165: Koch, A., Evans, N. W., \& Grebel, E. K. 2006, \apj, 639, L13
1166:
1167: \bibitem[Yoachim \& Dalcanton(2006)]{yoa06}
1168: Yoachim, P., \& Dalcanton, J. J. 2006, \aj, 131, 226
1169:
1170: \end{thebibliography}
1171:
1172: \clearpage
1173:
1174: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1175: % Figures
1176: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1177:
1178: %%% FIGURE %%%
1179:
1180: \clearpage
1181:
1182: \begin{figure}
1183: \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.7,clip=t]{f1.eps}
1184: \caption{Diagnostic DIG diagram \citep[updated and expanded from][]{ros03a}
1185: with the four galaxies labeled. The horizontal line marks the division of
1186: IRAS warm galaxies ($S_{60}/S_{100} \geq 0.4$). Filled symbols denote
1187: galaxies with eDIG detections, whereas open symbols denote galaxies without
1188: eDIG detections. Note that the Milky Way was labeled with an open symbol for
1189: better visibility in this diagram, even though it reveals extraplanar
1190: emission.\label{f:dddhst}}
1191: \end{figure}
1192:
1193: %%% FIGURE %%%
1194:
1195: \clearpage
1196:
1197: \begin{figure}
1198: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=1.0,clip=t]{f2.eps}
1199: \caption{Color composite images of NGC\,4634 (top left), NGC\,4700 (top right),
1200: NGC\,5775 (bottom left) and NGC\,7090 (bottom right), as observed with {\it HST}/ACS.
1201: The spatial resolution is $0\farcs05$\,pix$^{-1}$. The red color represents the
1202: continuum subtracted H$\alpha$ image, the green color represents the H$\alpha$ image,
1203: both of which trace the emission line gas, whereas the blue color represents the continuum
1204: image (F625W = SDSS $r$), which indicates the stellar component. The orientation of the
1205: individual figures is the usual, with north to the top and east to the left.
1206: \label{f:colorfigures}}
1207: \end{figure}
1208:
1209: %%% FIGURE %%%
1210:
1211: \clearpage
1212:
1213: \begin{figure}
1214: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=1.0,clip=t]{f3.eps}
1215: \caption{{\it HST}/ACS continuum subtracted H$\alpha$ image of NGC\,4634.
1216: The orientation is with N to the top and E to the left. The labeled boxes in the
1217: overview image (top left) refer to the individual regions A, B, C, D and E, which are
1218: shown as enlargements in the subsequent panels to reveal a more detailed view. The boxes
1219: overdrawn on the image to the top left refer to the image areas shown in the following
1220: subpanels: A = top right, B = middle left, C = middle right, D = bottom left, and E = bottom
1221: right. \label{f:n4634sixpanel}}
1222: \end{figure}
1223:
1224: %%% FIGURE %%%
1225:
1226: \clearpage
1227:
1228: \begin{figure}
1229: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=1.0,clip=t]{f4.eps}
1230: \caption{{\it HST}/ACS continuum subtracted H$\alpha$ image of NGC\,4700.
1231: The orientation is with N to the top and E to the left. The labeled boxes in the
1232: overview image (top left) refer to the individual regions A, B, C, D and E, which are
1233: shown as enlargements in the subsequent subpanels to reveal a more detailed view. The boxes
1234: overdrawn on the image to the top left refer to the image areas shown in the following
1235: subpanels: A = top right, B = middle left, C = middle right, D = bottom left, and E = bottom
1236: right. \label{f:n4700sixpanel}}
1237: \end{figure}
1238:
1239: %%% FIGURE %%%
1240:
1241: \clearpage
1242:
1243: \begin{figure}
1244: \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.8,clip=t]{f5.eps}
1245: \caption{Color composite image of the central region in NGC\,4700, as observed
1246: with {\it HST}/ACS. A very complex DIG morphology is revealed, with many
1247: individual superimposed filaments protruding from the disk region far into
1248: the halo. The spatial resolution is $0\farcs05$\,pix$^{-1}$. The red color
1249: reflects the continuum subtracted H$\alpha$ image, the green color reflects
1250: the H$\alpha$ image, both of which trace the emission line gas, whereas the
1251: blue color represents the continuum image (F625W = SDSS $r$), which indicates the
1252: stellar component. The orientation is the usual way, with north to the top and east
1253: to the left.\label{f:n4700acs}}
1254: \end{figure}
1255:
1256: %%% FIGURE %%%
1257:
1258: \clearpage
1259:
1260: \begin{figure}
1261: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=1.0,clip=t]{f6.eps}
1262: \caption{{\it HST}/ACS continuum subtracted H$\alpha$ image of NGC\,5775.
1263: The orientation is with N to the top and E to the left. The labeled boxes in the
1264: overview image (top left) refer to the individual regions A, B, C, D and E, which are
1265: shown as enlargements in the subsequent panels to reveal a more detailed view. The boxes
1266: overdrawn on the image to the top left refer to the image areas shown in the following
1267: subpanels: A = top right, B = middle left, C = middle right, D = bottom left, and E = bottom
1268: right.\label{f:n5775sixpanel}}
1269: \end{figure}
1270:
1271: %%% FIGURE %%%
1272:
1273: \clearpage
1274:
1275: \begin{figure}
1276: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=1.0,clip=t]{f7.eps}
1277: \caption{{\it HST}/ACS continuum subtracted H$\alpha$ image of NGC\,7090.
1278: The orientation is with N to the top and E to the left. The labeled boxes in the
1279: overview image (top left) refer to the individual regions A, B, C, D and E, which are
1280: shown as enlargements in the subsequent panels to reveal a more detailed view. The boxes
1281: overdrawn on the image to the top left refer to the image areas shown in the following
1282: subpanels: E = top right, D = middle left, C = middle right, B = bottom left, and A = bottom
1283: right. \label{f:n7090sixpanel}}
1284: \end{figure}
1285:
1286: %%% FIGURE %%%
1287:
1288: \clearpage
1289:
1290: \begin{figure}
1291: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=1.0,clip=t]{f8.eps}
1292: \caption{Unsharp-masked images revealing the extraplanar dust distribution
1293: in NGC\,4634 (top left), NGC\,4700 (top right), NGC\,5775 (bottom left) and
1294: NGC\,7090 (bottom right). The global orientation of the dust filaments in
1295: NGC\,4634 is mostly perpendicular to the disk on both sides of the disk at
1296: high $|z|$. At lower $|z|$ the orientation of the dust filaments is random.
1297: Due to the lack of a strong dust lane in NGC\,4700 (and the general lack of
1298: patchy dust in this galaxy), the unsharp-masked image does not reveal
1299: much insight into the dust distibution. Also, the presence of many stars
1300: that are clearly resolved within NGC\,4700, complicates the interpretation
1301: of the distribution of extended dust filaments. Only the central part of
1302: NGC\,5775 is shown here for better visibility. There is a filamentary web of
1303: dusty structures revealed. The global orientation of the dust filaments are mostly
1304: parallel to the disk on the one side of the disk, whereas the other side has mostly
1305: an orientation perpendicular to the disk. Generally, though, at lower $|z|$ the orientation
1306: is random. For NGC\,7090 also only the central part is shown here. Due to the lack
1307: of a pronounced dust lane, the unsharp-masked image does not reveal much unsight
1308: into the extraplanar dust distribution. \label{f:dust4}}.
1309: \end{figure}
1310:
1311: %%% FIGURE %%%
1312:
1313: \clearpage
1314:
1315: \begin{figure}
1316: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=0.95,clip=t]{f9.eps}
1317: \caption{The tidally disrupted dIrr galaxy, $\rm{J}\,124239.58$+141751.83,
1318: in the halo of NGC\,4634, as revealed by {\it HST}/ACS. The left panel shows
1319: the broadband image (F625W), the right panel shows the continuum subtracted
1320: H$\alpha$ image. The field of view measures $17\farcs8 \times 12\farcs3$, which
1321: corresponds to 1650\,pc$\times$1140\,pc at the distance to NGC\,4634. The orientation
1322: is the usual with north to the top and east to the left. The diagonal color gradient
1323: in the broadband image is not a flatfield artifact. It reflects the increase of galaxy
1324: light from the halo region in the left side of the figure in this color stretch.
1325: \label{f:dIrr}}
1326: \end{figure}
1327:
1328: %%% END OF FIGURES %%%
1329:
1330: \clearpage
1331:
1332: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1333: % Tables
1334: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1335:
1336: %%% TABLE %%%
1337:
1338: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}
1339: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1340: \tablecaption{Basic Galaxy Sample Properties\label{t:obs}}
1341: \tablewidth{0pt}
1342: \tablehead{
1343: Galaxy & R.A. (J2000.0) & Decl. (J2000.0) & Classification & $cz$ & $D$ &
1344: $A_V$ \\
1345: & & & & (km~s$^{-1}$) & (Mpc) & (mag) \\
1346: \colhead{(1)} & \colhead{(2)} & \colhead{(3)} & \colhead{(4)} &
1347: \colhead{(5)} & \colhead{(6)} & \colhead{(7)} \\
1348: }
1349: \startdata
1350: \object{NGC\,4634} & 12 42 41.00 & $+$14 17 46.0 & SBcd & 221 & 19.1 & 0.093 \\
1351: \object{NGC\,4700} & 12 49 07.32 & $-$11 24 45.6 & SB(s)c & 1386 & 24.0 &
1352: 0.156 \\
1353: \object{NGC\,5775} & 14 53 57.60 & $+$03 32 40.1 & SBc & 1768 & 26.7 & 0.139 \\
1354: \object{NGC\,7090} & 21 36 28.61 & $-$54 33 26.2 & SBc & 642 & 11.4 & 0.076 \\
1355: \enddata
1356: \tablecomments{Col.~(1): Galaxy name. Col.~(2) and~(3): Right ascension and
1357: declination from the NASA Extragalactic Database (NED). Units of right
1358: ascension are hours, minutes and seconds, and units of declination are
1359: degrees, arcminutes and arcseconds. Col.~(4): Morphological classification
1360: given by NED. Col.~(5): Systemic velocity corrected for Virgocentric infall
1361: using the model of \citet{san90}, as taken from LEDA. Col.~(6): Distance,
1362: taken as listed in \citet{ros00,ros03b}. Col.~(7): Galactic foreground
1363: extinction \citep{sch98} in the $V$-band for $R_V = 3.1$ from NED.}
1364: \end{deluxetable}
1365:
1366: \clearpage
1367:
1368: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccccc}
1369: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1370: \tablecaption{Journal of ACS Observations\label{t:exp}}
1371: \tablewidth{0pt}
1372: \tablehead{
1373: Galaxy & Data set ident. & Obs. Date & ACS-channel & Filter &
1374: $\lambda_{\rm{cen}}$ & FWHM & $t_{\rm{int}}$ & Dither & P.A. \\
1375: & & & & & ({\AA}) & ({\AA}) & (sec) & & ($\degr$) \\
1376: \colhead{(1)} & \colhead{(2)} & \colhead{(3)} & \colhead{(4)} &
1377: \colhead{(5)} & \colhead{(6)} & \colhead{(7)} & \colhead{(8)} &
1378: \colhead{(9)} & \colhead{(10)} \\
1379: }
1380: \startdata
1381: NGC\,4634 & j95x01 & 2005 Jun 24 & WFC & F625W & 6318 & 1442 & 2308.0 &
1382: $2\times2$ & 125.596 \\
1383: NGC\,4634 & j95x01 & 2005 Jun 24 & WFC & F658N & 6584 & 78 & 6888.0 &
1384: $3\times4$ & 125.596 \\
1385: NGC\,4700 & j95x02 & 2005 Jul 30 & WFC & F625W & 6318 & 1442 & 2308.0 &
1386: $2\times2$ & 115.209 \\
1387: NGC\,4700 & j95x02 & 2005 Jul 30 & WFC & F658N & 6584 & 78 & 6888.0 &
1388: $3\times4$ & 115.209 \\
1389: NGC\,5775 & j95x03 & 2005 Aug 21 & WFC & F625W & 6318 & 1442 & 2292.0 &
1390: $2\times2$ & 101.544 \\
1391: NGC\,5775 & j95x03 & 2005 Aug 21 & WFC & F658N & 6584 & 78 & 6848.0 &
1392: $3\times4$ & 101.544 \\
1393: NGC\,7090 & j95x04 & 2005 Jun 23 & WFC & F625W & 6318 & 1442 & 2508.0 &
1394: $2\times2$ & $-$72.289 \\
1395: NGC\,7090 & j95x04 & 2005 Jun 23 & WFC & F658N & 6584 & 78 & 7496.0 &
1396: $3\times4$ & $-$72.289 \\
1397: \enddata
1398: \tablecomments{Col.~(1): Galaxy name. Col.~(2) Data set identifier in the
1399: {\it HST} Data Archive. Col.~(3): Date of observations. Col.~(4): ACS-aperture
1400: (WFC: Wide Field Channel). Col.~(5), (6) and (7): Filter properties, namely
1401: the identifier, central wavelength and full width at half maximum,
1402: respectively. Col.~(8) Total exposure time, which is the sum of the individual
1403: dithered images. Col.~(9) Used dither pattern (primary- and sub-pattern).
1404: Col.~(10): Orientation angle at which the observations were performed.}
1405: \end{deluxetable}
1406:
1407: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
1408: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1409: \tablecaption{Selected Specific Galaxy Properties\label{t:prop}}
1410: \tablewidth{0pt}
1411: \tablehead{
1412: Property & NGC\,4634 & NGC\,4700 & NGC\,5775 & NGC\,7090 \\
1413: }
1414: \startdata
1415: $M_{\rm tot} [\rm{M}_{\sun}]$ & $2.72\times10^{10}$ & $1.91\times10^{10}$ &
1416: $1.91\times10^{11}$ & $4.52\times10^{10}$ \\
1417: Disk morphology & regular? & irregular & regular & asymmetric \\
1418: eDIG morphology & diffuse & filamentary & diffuse & filamentary \\
1419: %e-dust morph.??? & & & & \\
1420: Interaction & yes & no & yes & no \\
1421: SF distribution & extended & extended & extended & part disk \\
1422: $SFR_{\rm tot} [\rm{M}_{\sun}\,\rm{yr}^{-1}]$ & 1.08 & 1.00 & 9.86 & 0.58 \\
1423: $S_{60}/S_{100}$ & 0.3720 & 0.5074 & 0.4240 &0.4129 \\
1424: $L_{\rm{FIR}}/D^2_{25} [10^{40}\,\rm{erg\,s^{-1}\,kpc^{-2}}]$ & 11.9 & 5.0
1425: & 29.6 & 2.4\\
1426: X-ray halo & yes & ... & yes & yes? \\
1427: Radio halo & extended disk & yes & yes & yes \\
1428: $B_{\perp}$ & ... & ... & yes & yes \\
1429: \enddata
1430: \tablecomments{The total galaxy mass $M_{\rm tot}$ in units of solar masses,
1431: listed in Row~(1) was calculated from \hbox{H\,{\sc i}} measurements using the
1432: relation $M_i = 3\times10^{4}*A(0)*(\Delta v_0^i)^2$. A(0) is calculated
1433: either from $D_{25}$ or D[\hbox{H\,{\sc i}}] and has units of kpc, and $\Delta
1434: v_0^i$ is the inclination corrected full width W[\hbox{H\,{\sc i}}] in units
1435: of km/s. Row~(2) describes the disk morphology and Row~(3) is the eDIG
1436: morphology. Row~(4) describes whether the galaxy is interacting or not.
1437: Row~(5) lists the SF distribution. Row~(6) lists the star formation rate. The
1438: SFR's are calculated based on FIR data and using the relatation given by
1439: \citet{ken98}. Row~(7) is the IRAS flux ratio at $60\mu$m and $100\mu$m. These
1440: are based on the newly calibrated data from \citet{san03}. Row~(8) lists the
1441: SFR per unit area, expressed as FIR luminosity ($L_{\rm{FIR}}$) divided by the
1442: diameter of the optical 25th magnitude isophote diameter squared. Row~(9) and
1443: (10) list whether the galaxy has detections of extended emission in the X-ray
1444: and radio regime, respectively. The preliminary X-ray analysis of shallow
1445: XMM-Newton data of NGC\,7090 shows the indication of an X-ray halo. This has
1446: to be confirmed by deeper observations, which are already scheduled. For
1447: NGC\,4700 X-ray observations are still pending. No radio halo was detected in
1448: NGC\,4634, but based on low-resolution data obtained with the 100m Effelsberg
1449: radio telescope at 2.8\,cm, at least an extended disk is revealed (J. Rossa,
1450: unpublished). Finally, Row~(11) lists measured magnetic field vectors
1451: perpendicular to the disk.}
1452: \end{deluxetable}
1453:
1454: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
1455: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1456: \tablecaption{Description of the Observed DIG Morphology\label{t:morph}}
1457: \tablewidth{0pt}
1458: \tablehead{
1459: Galaxy & Region & Morphology & Ref. Figure \\
1460: \colhead{(1)} & \colhead{(2)} & \colhead{(3)} & \colhead{(4)} \\
1461: }
1462: \startdata
1463: NGC\,4634 & A & mostly diffuse & Figure~\ref{f:n4634sixpanel}b\\
1464: & & many compact SF regions & \\
1465: & & few shells SF regions & \\
1466: & B & mostly diffuse & Figure~\ref{f:n4634sixpanel}c\\
1467: & & dIrr galaxy to the SW & \\
1468: & C & mostly diffuse & Figure~\ref{f:n4634sixpanel}d\\
1469: & & bright shells/supershells interspersed with dust clouds & \\
1470: & D & mostly diffuse & Figure~\ref{f:n4634sixpanel}e\\
1471: & & bright SF region (top) & \\
1472: & & small-scale filaments surrounding bright shells & \\
1473: & & prominent dust cloud & \\
1474: & E & two isolated shells/SF regions & Figure~\ref{f:n4634sixpanel}f\\
1475: & & off-planar feature (to the SW) & \\
1476: \hline \\
1477: NGC\,4700 & A & many superbubbles & Figure~\ref{f:n4700sixpanel}b\\
1478: & & filaments protruding from bright shells & \\
1479: & B & superbubbles & Figure~\ref{f:n4700sixpanel}c\\
1480: & & very filamentary & \\
1481: & & bright supershell (to the SW) & \\
1482: & C & spectacular central ``radio lobe'' structure & Figure~\ref{f:n4700sixpanel}d\\
1483: & & filaments protruding from central region & \\
1484: & & compact SF regions scattered (mostly off-planar) & \\
1485: & D & southern extension of central structure & Figure~\ref{f:n4700sixpanel}e\\
1486: & & filamentary + bright shells & \\
1487: & E & superbubbles & Figure~\ref{f:n4700sixpanel}f\\
1488: & & few filaments & \\
1489: \hline \\
1490: NGC\,5775 & A & mostly diffuse & Figure~\ref{f:n5775sixpanel}b\\
1491: & & several bright SF regions of various sizes & \\
1492: & B & mostly diffuse & Figure~\ref{f:n5775sixpanel}c\\
1493: & & few bright SF regions of various sizes & \\
1494: & C & bright SF regions & Figure~\ref{f:n5775sixpanel}d\\
1495: & & patchy dust regions interspersed & \\
1496: & D & faint diffuse emission & Figure~\ref{f:n5775sixpanel}e\\
1497: & & few bright SF regions of various sizes & \\
1498: & E & very bright and complex SF region & Figure~\ref{f:n5775sixpanel}f\\
1499: & & diffuse surrounding breaking up into filaments & \\
1500: \hline \\
1501: NGC\,7090 & A & few bright filamentary SF regions & Figure~\ref{f:n7090sixpanel}f\\
1502: & & many smaller SF regions interspersed & \\
1503: & B & complex filamentary SF region around bright star & Figure~\ref{f:n7090sixpanel}e\\
1504: & & few smaller SF regions interspersed & \\
1505: & C & very bright SF regions & Figure~\ref{f:n7090sixpanel}d\\
1506: & & copious filaments emanating from SF regions & \\
1507: & & few compact off-planar SF regions & \\
1508: & D & mainly bubbles and superbubbles & Figure~\ref{f:n7090sixpanel}c\\
1509: & & faint diffuse DIG superimposed & \\
1510: & E & few bright SF regions & Figure~\ref{f:n7090sixpanel}b\\
1511: & & bubbles, superbubbles, complex filaments & \\
1512: \enddata
1513: \tablecomments{Col.~(1) lists the galaxy identifier. Col.~(2) lists the specific
1514: region under study within each galaxy (labeled by identifiers A,...,E), and with
1515: the described morphology in Col.~(3) as revealed in the corresponding figures,
1516: indicated by Col.~(4). The reference figure labeling refers to the following subpanel
1517: positions within the individual figures: b = top right, c = middle left, d = middle right,
1518: e = bottom left, f = bottom right.}
1519: \end{deluxetable}
1520:
1521:
1522: %%% END OF TABLES %%%
1523:
1524: %%% END OF DOCUMENT %%%
1525:
1526: \end{document}
1527:
1528:
1529:
1530: