1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: \begin{document}

3: 

4: 

5: \title{The chemical composition of red giant stars in four 

6: intermediate-age clusters of the 

7: Large Magellanic Cloud

8: \footnote{Based on observations obtained at Paranal ESO Observatory 

9: under proposal 072.D-0337(A), 072.D-0342(A) and 074.D-0369(A).}}

10: 

11: 

12: \author{Alessio Mucciarelli}

13: \affil{Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universit\`a 

14: degli Studi di Bologna, Via Ranzani, 1 - 40127

15: Bologna, ITALY}

16: \email{alessio.mucciarelli@studio.unibo.it}

17: 

18: \author{Eugenio Carretta }

19: \affil{INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, Via Ranzani, 1 - 40127

20: Bologna, ITALY}

21: \email{eugenio.carretta@oabo.inaf.it}

22: 

23: \author{Livia Origlia}

24: \affil{INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, Via Ranzani, 1 - 40127

25: Bologna, ITALY}

26: \email{livia.origlia@oabo.inaf.it}

27: 

28: \author{Francesco R. Ferraro}

29: \affil{Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universit\`a 

30: degli Studi di Bologna, Via Ranzani, 1 - 40127

31: Bologna, ITALY}

32: \email{francesco.ferraro3@unibo.it}

33: 

34: 

35: 

36: \begin{abstract}

37: 

38: This paper presents the chemical abundance analysis of a sample of 27 

39: red giant stars located in 4 popolous intermediate-age globular 

40: clusters in the Large Magellanic Cloud, 

41: namely NGC 1651, 1783, 1978 and 2173. This analysis is based 

42: on high-resolution (R$\sim$47000) spectra obtained with the 

43: UVES@VLT spectrograph. 

44: For each cluster we derived up to 20 abundance ratios sampling 

45: the main chemical elemental groups, namely light odd-Z, 

46: $\alpha$, iron-peak and neutron-capture elements. \\

47: All the analysed abundance patterns behave similarly in the 4 clusters and 

48: also show negligible star-to-star scatter within each cluster.

49: We find [Fe/H]=-0.30$\pm$0.03, -0.35$\pm$0.02, -0.38$\pm$0.02 and 

50: -0.51$\pm$0.03 dex for NGC 1651, 1783, 1978 and 2173, respectively.\\

51: The measurement of light odd-Z nuclei gives slightly subsolar [Na/Fe] and

52: a more significant [Al/Fe] depletion ($\sim$-0.50 dex). 

53: The [$\alpha$/Fe] abundance ratios are nearly solar, while

54: the iron-peak elements well trace that one of the iron.\\

55: s-process elements behave in a peculiar way:

56: light s-elements give subsolar [Y/Fe] and [Zr/Fe] abundance ratios, 

57: while heavy s-elements give 

58: enhanced [Ba/Fe], [La/Fe] and [Nd/Fe] with respect to the solar values. 

59: Also, the [Eu/Fe] abundance ratio turns out to be enhanced ($\sim$0.4 dex).

60: 

61: \end{abstract}

62: 

63: \keywords{globular clusters --- Magellanic Clouds --- stars: abundances --- 

64: techniques: spectroscopic}

65: 

66: \section{Introduction}

67: 

68: The Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) is the nearest galaxy with a present-day 

69: star-formation activity and it represents a formidable laboratory 

70: for the study of stellar populations.

71: Its globular cluster (GC) system

72: shows a wide distribution of ages \citep{swb,ef88,geisler97}, 

73: metallicities \citep{sp89,ols91} and integrated colors \citep{vdb81,pers83}. 

74: In particular, we can distinguish three main stellar populations:

75: an old and metal poor population \citep[$\sim$13 Gyr, see e.g.][]{broc,olsen}, 

76: the analogous of the Galactic halo GCs, an intermediate-age population 

77: \citep[$\sim$1-3 Gyr,][]{gallart, f04, m06a, m07} and 

78: a young population, with clusters younger than 1 Gyr \citep{fischer,broc03}.

79: The lack of objects with ages in the 

80: $\approx$3-10 Gyr range, the so-called {\sl Age Gap} 

81: \citep{rich01,bekki,mac06} 

82: represents one of the long-standing

83: problems related to the clusters formation history of the LMC 

84: (a similar {\sl Age Gap} is not seen in the Small Magellanic 

85: Cloud (SMC) clusters). \citet{bekki_06} discussed three possible 

86: scenarios to solve this problem: (1) after the initial burst

87: of clusters at the epoch of the galaxy formation ($\sim$13 Gyr ago) 

88: the cluster formation has been interrupted until $\sim$3 Gyr ago; 

89: (2) the cluster formation has been not suspended after the initial 

90: burst. The cluster with ages between $\sim$13 and 3 Gyr have been 

91: tidally stripped, or 

92: (3) preferentially destroyed by the LMC tidal field. 

93: The most recent theoretical investigations \citep{bekki,bekki_06} 

94: have shown that the main episodes of star formation in the LMC 

95: can be related to the close encounters with the SMC. 

96: These latter events could be also responsible for the formation 

97: of the off-center Bar and the age distribution of the LMC 

98: GC system. In particular, the first, very close 

99: encounter between the LMC and SMC ($\sim$4 Gyr ago) was able to 

100: re-ignite the cluster formation, with a rapid chemical 

101: enrichment due to this very efficient star formation 

102: activity \citep[see also ][]{pt98}. Moreover, a possible 

103: infall of metal-poor material from the SMC could be 

104: the origin of some metal-poor, young LMC clusters, 

105: observed by \citet{ols91} and \citet{aaron}.

106: 

107: The LMC GCs are ideal tracers of the chemical evolution 

108: of their host galaxy, recording in their abundance patterns 

109: the level of enrichment 

110: in the galactic environment at the time of their formation. 

111: However, our knowledge of the chemical abundances of the LMC 

112: GCs is still very sparse and uncertain.

113: Most of the information still 

114: rely on photometry \citep{jt94, pacheco, dirsch}

115: or low-resolution spectroscopy (see e.g., \citet{ols91} and \citet{aaron}).

116: Recently, \citet{aaron} derived a new, 

117: homogeneous metallicity scale for 23 intermediate-age and 5 

118: old LMC clusters based on the Ca II triplet lines, 

119: observed with FORS2@VLT. 

120: The derived mean metallicities are  

121: [Fe/H]\footnote{We adopt the usual spectroscopic notation: 

122: [A]=log$(A)_{star}$-log$(A)_{\odot}$ for each

123: element abundance A; log(A) is the abundance by number of the 

124: element A in the standard scale 

125: where log(H)=12.}=-0.48 dex (with rms=0.09) and 

126: [Fe/H]=-1.66 dex (with rms=0.27) for the 

127: intermediate-age and old clusters, respectively. 

128: 

129: Despite the new generation of 8-meter class telescopes, 

130: detailed chemical information 

131: about the LMC clusters from high-resolution spectra are limited to 

132: a few stars in a few clusters and they are insufficient to draw 

133: a global picture of the chemical 

134: properties of these objects and to constrain the timescales of the 

135: chemical enrichment.\\

136: Several studies have concerned 3 young, populous clusters, namely NGC 1818 

137: \citep{richtler, korn00}, NGC 2004 \citep{korn00, korn02} 

138: and NGC 2203 \citep{smith02}, indicating a high metallicity 

139: ([Fe/H]$>$-0.6 dex) and a mild deficiency of $\alpha$-elements.

140: \citet{hill00} presented chemical abundances of Fe, O and Al  

141: from high-resolution spectra of 10 red giant stars in 4  

142: LMC globular clusters, namely NGC 1866, NGC 1978, ESO 121 and NGC 2210,

143: spanning the entire age range of the LMC clusters system.

144: They found 

145: [Fe/H]=-0.50, -0.96, -0.91 and -1.75 dex, respectively and 

146: slightly enhanced [O/Fe] and slightly depleted [Al/Fe] with 

147: respect to the solar ratios.

148: \citet{johnson06} presented detailed abundances for 10 giant stars in 

149: 4 old globular clusters, namely NGC 1898, NGC 2005, NGC 2019 and Hodge 11, 

150: finding [Fe/H]= -1.23, -1.47, -1.37 and -2.21 dex, respectively.

151: They generally found abundance ratios comparable to 

152: those of the Galactic GCs. Exceptions are the [Ca/Fe] and 

153: [Ti/Fe] ratios, similar to the solar values, and

154: [V/Fe] and [Ni/Fe] which are significantly underabundant 

155:  (by a factor of 2-3) with respect to the solar ratio.

156: Finally, \citet{f06} reported the iron content of the 

157: intermediate-age cluster NGC 1978 based on the analysis of eleven 

158: giant stars observed with the high resolution 

159: spectrograph FLAMES@VLT. For this cluster a large metallicity 

160: dispersion has been claimed by \citet{hill00} based on 2 stars only,

161: but \citet{f06} new analysis shows no significant dispersion 

162: of the iron content.

163:  

164: 

165: 

166: On the other hand, several works have been addressed to investigate 

167: the metallicity of the LMC field. Abundances from mid-high 

168: resolution spectroscopy are available for few samples of giant 

169: and supergiant stars \citep{rb89,mcw91,hill95,smith02} 

170: and variables \citep{luck}. 

171: Furthermore, \cite{cole05} presented a spectroscopical survey 

172: for 373 red giants in the LMC

173: bar, based on Ca II triplet analysis. The derived metallicity

174: distribution function is peaked at the median value of 

175: [Fe/H]=-0.37 dex and only a small number of stars shows a 

176: metallicity [Fe/H]$<$-2.10 dex. \\

177: \citet{pompeia06} reported abundance ratios for 62 giant stars 

178: located in the inner disk of the LMC, finding an average 

179: [Fe/H]=--0.80 dex (rms=0.29 dex), 

180: roughly solar $[\alpha/Fe]$ and [iron-peak/Fe] abundance ratios.

181: They also measured s-process elements, finding a depletion

182: of [light-s/Fe] and an enhancement of [heavy-s/Fe] with respect to solar. 

183: Very recently, \citet{carrera07} analysed $\sim$500 giant stars 

184: at different distance from the LMC center; their analysis, 

185: based on Ca II triplet, confirms the previous surveys, with a 

186: mean metallicity constant until to $6^{\circ}$ from the 

187: LMC center ([Fe/H]$\sim$-0.5 dex) and a weak decrease in 

188: the outermost field ([Fe/H]$\sim$-0.8 dex).

189: 

190: The present study is the second \citep[after][]{f06} of 

191: a long-term project devoted to obtain a complete screening 

192: of the chemical abundances and abundance patterns of a 

193: sample of pillar LMC GCs. In this paper we describe the 

194: chemical abundance analysis of 27 red giant stars members of 4 

195: LMC clusters, belonging to the intermediate-age population. 

196: Future 

197: papers will be devoted to study the chemical properties 

198: of the young and old cluster populations.

199: The overall goal of this project is twofold:\\ 

200: (1) the definition of 

201: a new and homogeneous 

202: metallicity scale for the LMC GC system based on high 

203: resolution spectra of giant stars, members of a representative 

204: number of {\sl pillar} clusters, sampling 

205: different ages. 

206: This scale, combined with high-quality optical 

207: photometric datasets, will be crucial to obtain precise ages 

208: for these clusters \citep[see the recent results in][]{m07};\\ 

209: (2) a detailed comparison of the cluster populations and their 

210: chemical abundance patterns with those in the LMC fields and 

211: in other galactic environments. This is crucial to constrain 

212: the age-metallicity relation and the overall star formation 

213: and chemical enrichment of the LMC.

214:  

215: In particular, the chemical signatures of the 

216: intermediate-age LMC GCs (a class of objects still poorly 

217: studied, especially at high spectral resolution) 

218: provide information

219: about the global metallicity of the LMC (these clusters represent 

220: the majority of the entire LMC cluster population, as discussed by 

221: \citet{ols91}) and to test the level of chemical enrichment 

222: in the last 3 Gyr, after the restart of the cluster formation, 

223: according to the scenario drawn by \citet{bekki_06}. Moreover, 

224: a detailed knowledge of the whole chemistry of the GC system 

225: (both young and old clusters) is fundamental to understand 

226: the formation of the dwarf irregulars (like LMC and SMC) 

227: in the framework of the hierarchical models 

228: \citep[see the accurate review by][]{geisler}.

229: 

230: This paper is organized as follows: Sect.~2 describes the 

231: observational dataset, Sect.~3 the computation of the atmospheric parameters, 

232: the measurements of the line equivalent widths (EW) and the error budget. Sect.~4 

233: presents the results of our abundance analysis for the most important chemical elements.

234: Finally, Sect.~5 and 6 report our discussion and 

235: conclusions.

236: 

237: 

238: \section{Observational data}

239: 

240: The observations were performed by using the multi-object spectrograph FLAMES 

241: \citep{pasquini02}, mounted at the Kueyen 8 m-telescope (UT2) of the ESO Very 

242: Large Telescope on Cerro Paranal (Chile).

243: We used FLAMES in the UVES+GIRAFFE/MEDUSA combined mode for a total of 

244: 8 UVES and 132 MEDUSA fibres. 

245: Here we present the results of the UVES Red Arm survey which provides 

246: high resolution (R$\sim47000$) spectra in the 4800-6800 $\mathring{A}$ 

247: wavelength range of 6-7 stars in one shot.

248: The spectra were acquired during 3 nights allocated 

249: to the ESO Program 072.D-0342(A).

250: Additional observations were performed as back-up programmes 

251: in two Visitors Mode runs (ESO Program 072.D-0337(A) and 

252: ESO Program 074.D-0369(A)).

253: The selection of the target stars is based on our high quality near-infrared 

254: (J, H and K filters) photometric catalogs of a large sample of LMC clusters, as 

255: secured by our group \citep{f04, m06a}.

256: These catalogs have been astrometrized onto the 2MASS system.  

257: The selected stars for the spectroscopic survey belong

258: to the brightest portion of the RGB (K$<$14), whose tip is located at 

259: $\rm K_{0}\approx$12.1 \citep{cioni}, in order to minimize the 

260: possible contamination by AGB stars.

261: Fig. 1 shows the (K, J-K) CMDs of the 4 clusters

262: with marked the spectroscopic targets. \\

263: The spectra have been acquired in series of 4-6 exposures of $\approx$45min each: 

264: the pre-reduction procedure has been performed by 

265: using the UVES ESO-MIDAS pipeline \citep{mulas2002}, 

266: which includes bias subtraction, flat-field correction 

267: and wavelength calibration with a reference Th-Ar calibration lamp. 

268: 

269: All the exposures relative to a given star have been sky-subtracted, corrected 

270: for radial velocity (by using several tens of metallic lines) and 

271: average-combined together, providing a final, equivalent spectrum of

272:  total exposure time of 3-5 hrs, with a 

273: typical  S/N$\approx$30-40 at about 6000 $\mathring{A}$). 

274: The radial velocities included heliocentric corrections, calculated by 

275: using the IRAF task RVCORRECT.

276: We find  

277: $\rm v_r=$233.1$\pm$1.8 km/s (rms=3.6 km/s),  

278: $\rm v_r=$277.6$\pm$1.0 km/s (rms=2.3 km/s),  

279: $\rm v_r=$236.8$\pm$0.4 km/s (rms=1.2 km/s),  

280: $\rm v_r=$293.1$\pm$1.5 km/s (rms=3.1 km/s) 

281: for NGC~1651, NGC~1783, NGC~1978 and NGC~2173, respectively.  

282: These values 

283: are in excellent agreement with previous determinations 

284: by \citet{ols91} and \citet{aaron}.

285: Tab. 1 lists the main data for each observed star: S/N, 

286: heliocentric radial velocity, near-infrared magnitude $J_0$ and 

287: color $(J-K)_0$, right ascension and declination 

288: \citep[from the catalog by][]{m06a}.

289: 

290: 

291: \section{Analysis of the observed spectra}                             

292: 

293: This section describes the analysis of the observed spectra and the 

294: computation of the stellar parameters,  

295: providing measurements 

296: of line EWs, stellar 

297: temperatures (T$_{eff}$), gravities (log~g) and microturbulence ($v_t$)

298: and the corresponding error budget.

299: 

300: 

301: \subsection{Equivalent widths}

302: 

303: The analysis of the observed spectra and the computation of the 

304: chemical abundances (for Fe and other elements) was performed by

305: using the ROSA package \citep{g88}. 

306: The line EWs from the observed spectra have been measured by 

307: Gaussian fitting of the line profiles, adopting a relationship 

308: between EW and FWHM 

309: \citep[see e.g.][]{brag}.

310: The local continuum has been derived by applying an iterative 

311: clipping average over the points with highest counts 

312: around each line.\\

313: An empirical estimate of the internal error in the measurement of EWs 

314: can be obtained by comparing a large sample of line EWs in pairs of 

315: stars with similar physical parameters. We derived an average rms of 

316: 13.3, 8.5, 10.3 and 10.5 m$\mathring{A}$ for NGC 1651, NGC 1783, NGC 1978 and

317:  NGC 2173, respectively. 

318: Such rms estimates should be divided by $\sqrt{2}$, since

319: they are distributed in equal proportion to the two stars 

320: in each pair, thus giving final values of

321: 9.4, 6.0, 7.3 and 7.4 m$\mathring{A}$ for the 4 clusters, respectively. 

322: These errors are larger than those obtained  

323: from the \citet{cayrel} formula (which yields a typical uncertainty 

324: of $\approx$4.2  m$\mathring{A}$), since the latter neglects 

325: for example the 

326: uncertainty in the continuum location,

327: which is the dominant source of error in 

328: metal-rich, crowded spectra of rather cool giants.

329: Table 2 lists some measured EWs, the complete set being 

330: available in electronic form.

331: 

332: \subsection{Stellar parameters}

333: 

334: Stellar $T_{eff}$ were obtained 

335: from the near-infrared color (J-K), corrected for reddening  

336: by using the E(B-V) values from \citet{pers83}, 

337: and the extinction law defined by \citet{rl85}. 

338: We adopted two different color-$T_{eff}$

339: transformations, namely by \citet{m98} and \citet{alonso99,alonso01}.

340: Since the derived temperatures are well in agreement 

341: within $\le$50 K, we used the average 

342: of the two values.

343: 

344: Gravities were estimated by using the relation 

345: between $T_{eff}$, stellar mass and luminosity: 

346: $$log(\frac{g}{{g_{\odot}}})=4log(\frac{T_{eff}}{T_{eff,\odot}})+0.4(M_{bol}-M_{bol,\odot})+log(\frac{M}{M_{\odot}}),$$

347: by adopting the solar references log~${g_{\odot}}$=4.437, 

348: $T_{eff,\odot}$=5770 K and $M_{bol,\odot}$=4.75, 

349: according to the IAU recommendations \citep{ander}. 

350: For each target star $M_{bol}$ has been estimated from the K magnitude, 

351: and using $(m-M)_0$=18.5 \citep{vdb98, alves}

352: and bolometric corrections by \citet{m98}.

353: Stellar masses have been estimated by using suitable 

354: isochrones \citep{cast03,car04}, adopting ages derived 

355: from the s-parameter \citep{ef88, girardi} calibration, 

356: and an average

357: metallicity of Z=0.008 \citep{cole05}, typical of the LMC.

358: All the program stars have similar $T_{eff}$ ($\sim$3600-4000 K), 

359: and gravities log~g ($\sim$0.5-1.2 dex).

360: 

361: Microturbulent velocities were estimated by eliminating 

362: the trend of abundances with the expected line strengths, 

363: accordingly to the prescription of \citet{magain} and by 

364: using a large number (80-90) of Fe I lines for each star.

365:  

366: The model overall metallicity [A/H] was chosen as that of the 

367: model atmosphere extracted from the grid of ATLAS models 

368: by \citet{kur}, with the overshooting option switched on, 

369: whose abundance matches the one derived from  Fe I lines 

370: when adopting the appropriate atmospheric parameters 

371: for each star. The atomic parameters, line list and solar 

372: reference abundances adopted 

373: in this analysis are described in \citet{gratton03} and \citet{eu04}.

374: 

375: 

376: Fig. 2 shows, as an example of consistency check, the iron 

377: abundance log~n(Fe) from the Fe I lines as a function of the excitation 

378: potential $\chi$, expected line strength and wavelength for one of 

379: the star in our sample, together with the linear fit to each 

380: distribution (dashed lines).  The log~n(Fe)-$\chi$ relationship 

381: for each target star shows only a marginal slope ($\sim$ -0.02 dex/eV 

382: and reported in Fig. 3 as a function of the $T_{eff}$), 

383: confirming that the adopted photometric $T_{eff}$ well 

384: reproduce the excitation equilibrium. The lack of significant 

385: trends in the relationship between iron abundance and the 

386: expected line strength (Fig. 2, middle panel) supports the 

387: validity of the adopted $v_t$ values.

388: The derived iron abundances show no trend with the 

389: wavelength (Fig. 2, lower panel); this represents a good sanity 

390: check regarding the continuum placement.

391: 

392: 

393: 

394: 

395: \subsection{Error budget} 

396: 

397: 

398: We computed the total uncertainty in the derived abundances, 

399: according to the treatment discussed by \citet{mcw95}.

400: The variance of a generic abundance ratio [X] is estimated by 

401: using the following formula:

402: $$\sigma^{2}_{[X]}=\sigma^{2}_{EW}+\sigma^{2}_{T_{eff}}\cdot({{\partial [X]}\over{\partial {T_{eff}}}})^{2}+\sigma^{2}_{\log{g}}

403: \cdot({{\partial [X]}\over{\partial {\log{g}}}})^{2}+\sigma^{2}_{[A/H]}\cdot({{\partial [X]}\over{\partial {[A/H]}}})^{2}

404: +\sigma^{2}_{v_t}\cdot({{\partial [X]}\over{\partial {v_t}}})^{2},$$

405: where $\sigma_{EW}$ is the abundance uncertainty  

406: due to the error in the EW measurement, $\sigma_{i}$  

407: is the internal error related to the atmospheric parameter {\it i} 

408: and $\partial [X]\over{\partial {i}}$ indicates the differential 

409: variation of the derived abundance [X] with respect to the 

410: atmospheric parameter {\it i}. 

411: These latter terms have been computed for all the elements analysed

412: in this work by re-iterating the analysis varying each time only 

413: one parameter, by assuming variations of 

414: $\Delta{T_{eff}}$=100K, $\Delta{log~g}$=0.2 dex, $\Delta[A/H]$=0.1 dex 

415: and $\Delta{v_t}$=0.2 km/s. Tab. 3 reports 

416: the results of such an analysis for the star NGC 1783-29. 

417: The terms of covariance that measure the correlation between the 

418: atmospheric parameters are not included in the above formula.

419: 

420: 

421: The main error sources in the determination of $T_{eff}$ are the 

422: photometric error related 

423: to (J-K) color and reddening E(B-V). All the program stars 

424: are brighter than K$\sim$14 

425: and the typical photometric error for the (J-K) color is 

426: $\sim0.03$ mag; 

427: for the reddening we assumed a conservative uncertainty of 

428: $\sim20$\%. These terms translate 

429: into a $\pm$60 K temperature uncertainty.

430: In computing the uncertainty due to the stellar gravity, 

431: we took into account four main error 

432: sources: the error in $T_{eff}$, in mass ($\pm$10\%), 

433: in distance modulus ($\pm$0.1 mag) and in bolometric correction 

434: ($\pm$0.05 mag). 

435: From the quadratic sum of these uncertainties, a total error in 

436: $\log{g}$ of $\pm$0.08 dex has been obtained.

437: To estimate the error in the microturbolent velocity we repeated 

438: the analysis by changing the $v_t$ value until the 1$\sigma_{slope}$ 

439: value for the slope of the abundance - expected line strength relation 

440: has been reached. The internal error associated to $v_t$ is 

441: typically 0.10-0.17 km/s.  

442: 

443: An estimate of the error in the derived abundances due to the 

444: uncertainty in the measurement of EWs has been estimated by 

445: weighting the average Fe I line-to-line scatter 

446: (0.18 dex) with the square root of the mean number 

447: of measured lines $N_i$ for each {\sl i} element: 

448: $$\sigma_{EW}=\frac{0.18}{\sqrt{N_i}}.$$ 

449: Finally, we assumed an additional $\pm$0.1 dex uncertainty 

450: due to the choice of the best-fit model atmosphere.

451: 

452: 

453: 

454: \section{Chemical abundances} 

455: 

456: Tab. 4-9 report the abundances of all analysed elements (with the number of 

457: measured spectral lines and the corresponding line-to-line scatter) for the 

458: target stars and Tab. 10 and 11 summarize the average ratios for the 4 LMC clusters 

459: with the number of used stars, the observed star-to-star scatter ($\sigma_{obs}$) 

460: and the expected error ($\sigma_{exp}$) computed accordingly to the procedure 

461: described in Sec. 3.3.

462: For each cluster, Fig. 4-8 plot the average values of the derived 

463: abundance ratios (big grey points). For comparison, the corresponding 

464: abundance ratios of other intermediate-age stellar populations are 

465: reported, namely LMC disk giant stars 

466: by \citet{pompeia06} (empty triangles), intermediate-age LMC cluster 

467: giants by \citet{hill00}  (empty squares), Galactic thin disk 

468: dwarfs by \citet{reddy}  (small grey points) and Sgr giant stars 

469: by \citet{boni00,monaco05,monaco07,sbordone} 

470: (small black points).

471: 

472: \subsection{ Iron and Iron-peak elements}

473: 

474: The mean iron abundance of the cluster NGC~1651 results 

475: [Fe/H]=-0.30$\pm$0.03 dex with rms=0.07 dex, whereas \citet{ols91} 

476: derived [Fe/H]=-0.37$\pm$0.20 dex. 

477: Photometric determinations have been presented by 

478: \citet[][from Stromgreen photometry]{dirsch} 

479: and \citet[][from isochrones fitting]{sar02}, suggesting 

480: [Fe/H]=-0.65 dex and [Fe/H]=-0.07$\pm$0.10 dex, respectively. 

481: Recently, \citet{aaron} estimated [Fe/H]=-0.53$\pm$0.03 dex,

482: by using the Ca II triplet of 9 giant stars.\\ 

483: NGC~1783 shows a mean iron abundance of [Fe/H]=-0.35$\pm$0.02 

484: dex with rms=0.06 dex. For this cluster only photometric 

485: determinations are available : 

486: \citet{sp89} found [Fe/H]=-0.45 dex and \citet{pacheco} 

487: found [Fe/H]=-0.75 dex. \\ 

488: The results about the iron abundance of NGC~1978 

489: ([Fe/H]=-0.38$\pm$0.02 dex with rms=0.07 dex)

490: have been discussed by \citet{f06}.\\

491: The iron content of NGC~2173 turns out to be 

492: [Fe/H]=-0.51$\pm$0.03  with rms=0.07 dex. 

493: \citet{ols91} give [Fe/H]=-0.24$\pm$0.20 dex,  

494: \citet{pacheco} found [Fe/H]=-0.50 dex

495: and 

496: \citet{aaron} found [Fe/H]=-0.42$\pm$0.03 dex,

497: by using the Lick index 

498: and the Ca II triplet, respectively.

499: 

500: We also measured lines of several elements of the Fe-group, 

501: namely Sc, V, Cr, Co and Ni. 

502: Corrections for the hyperfine structure (HFS) due to 

503: non-zero nuclear magnetic moment, were applied to the ScII, 

504: V and Co lines, as in 

505: \citet[][and references therein]{gratton03}. 

506: The abundance ratios between these elements and

507: Fe is roughly solar in all the 4 clusters. In order to cross-check 

508: the abundances derived from the EW measurements, we performed 

509: a synthetic spectrum fitting for some lines of these elements, 

510: finding a negligible 

511: difference between these two determinations.

512: 

513: 

514: \subsection{Light odd-{\it Z} elements}

515: 

516: Na abundances were derived from the $\lambda \lambda$5682-88 $\mathring{A}$ 

517: and $\lambda \lambda$6154-60 $\mathring{A}$ 

518: doublets and they include non-LTE corrections computed accordingly to \citet{gr99}. 

519: The differences between LTE and non-LTE derived abundances are generally as

520: large as $\sim$0.2 dex, with a maximum discrepancy of $\sim$0.35 dex in the coolest 

521: star of the sample. Three clusters (NGC~1651, NGC~1783 and NGC~1978) exhibit 

522: mild depletion of [Na/Fe]$\le$-0.1 dex while this ratio is solar in NGC~2173, 

523: without appreciable intrinsic star-to-star scatter. \\  

524: Al abundances were derived from the $\lambda \lambda$6696-98 $\mathring{A}$ doublet. 

525: These lines do not include non-LTE corrections, following the extensive 

526: discussion by \citet{baum}. 

527: All the target clusters are characterized by a significant depletion of [Al/Fe], 

528: typically $\le$ -0.3 dex. Also for this ratio, 

529: the intrinsic star-to-star scatter is negligible. 

530: NGC 1978 was previously observed by \citet{hill00} who found 

531: [Al/Fe]=0.10 dex from the analysis of 2 giants, only. 

532: This value turns out to be $\sim$0.6 dex higher than that found here 

533: ([Al/Fe]=-0.52 dex), the discrepancy is likely due to the 

534: strong difference ($\sim$0.6 dex) in the iron content derived from the two 

535: analysis \citep[see][]{f06}. Indeed, their [Al/H] abundance is consistent with our estimate 

536: within the errors.

537: 

538: \subsection{$\alpha$-elements}

539: 

540: A number of lines for those elements formed through $\alpha$-capture, 

541: namely O, Mg, Si, Ca and Ti, were measured. For all these elements we note

542: a high level of homogeneity, with the star-to-star scatter consistent 

543: with the measured errors and without significant trends with $T_{eff}$.\\

544: The O analysis is based on the forbidden lines at $\lambda$6300.31 $\mathring{A}$ and

545: $\lambda$6363.79 $\mathring{A}$. 

546: These lines are not blended with 

547: telluric features, with the only exception of the line at $\lambda$6300.31 $\mathring{A}$ 

548: in the NGC 1978 spectra, which is blended with the telluric absorption line. 

549: For these stars this spurious contribution was removed by using the IRAF 

550: task TELLURIC and adopting as template spectrum an early type star.

551: At the UVES resolution, the $\lambda$6300.31 $\mathring{A}$ feature is well separated 

552: from the ScII line at $\lambda$6300.69 $\mathring{A}$ but contaminated by the very close

553: Ni transition at $\lambda$6300.34 $\mathring{A}$. In order to measure the correct 

554: oxygen abundance we used spectrum synthesis convolved with a Gaussian instrumental profile. 

555: 

556: To model the Ni line we used the measured abundance (see Sect. 4.1), while to model 

557: the various CN lines

558: we needed to assume C and N abundances ([C/Fe]=-0.5 dex and [N/Fe]=+0.5 dex) 

559: since not directly measurable.

560: However, it must be noted that the assumed C and N abundances in 

561: the typical range shown by RGB stars (e.g. 

562: -1$<$[C/Fe]$<$0.0 and 

563: 0.0$<$[N/Fe]$<$+1) have only a marginal 

564: impact on the derived O abundance. 

565: For the other $\alpha$-elements we cross-checked the results derived by the EW 

566: measurements, by performing a synthetic spectrum fitting for some {\sl test} lines. 

567: This sanity check confirms the reliability of the derived abundances for these 

568: elements. 

569: Furthermore, the spectral region between $\lambda$6155 and $\lambda$6167 

570: $\mathring{A}$ (used to test the Ca abundances) includes the Ca line at 

571: $\lambda$6162.17 $\mathring{A}$ with strong damping wings, that are very sensitive to 

572: the electronic pressure and to the gravity but not sensitive to $T_{eff}$, 

573: $v_t$ and non-LTE effects \citep[see discussion in][]{mishen}. 

574: We are able to well-reproduce the wings shape of this line, confirming 

575: the reliability of the adopted gravities.

576: 

577: All 4 clusters show mildly subsolar [O/Fe] ratios (-0.04 --- -0.11 dex), 

578: with star-to-star scatter less than 0.10 dex. 

579: For NGC 1978  

580: \citet{hill00}  measured 

581: [O/Fe]=0.37 dex with a star-to-star scatter of 0.10 dex,

582: clearly in disagreement with our determination ([O/Fe]=-0.11 dex),

583: but this discrepancy can be again manly ascribed to the different 

584: iron content.\\

585: For the other elements, the [$\alpha$/Fe] turns out to be roughly solar, 

586: with a mild enhancement of [Mg/Fe] ($\sim$0.10-0.19 dex) and 

587: [Ti/Fe] in NGC~2173 (0.15 dex). \\

588: 

589: \subsection{s and r-process elements}

590: 

591: Several s-process elements, namely the light Y and Zr and the heavy 

592: Ba, La, Ce and Nd have been measured, together with Eu, a r-process element. 

593: 

594: The Ba abundance was derived by measuring the EWs of 

595: three lines. 

596: We tested the possible impact of the HFS by performing

597: a spectral synthesis using both the single component line and the separated HFS 

598: components taken from the linelist by \citet{pro00}. 

599: The inclusion of the HFS 

600: has a negligible ($\le$0.5\%) effect 

601: on the derived Ba abundance, 

602: due to the strong intensity of these lines, in which 

603: all the hyperfine components in the line core are completely saturated, 

604: reducing the HFS effects \citep[see the discussion in][]{mcw95}.

605:  This finding results in 

606: agreement with the analysis of the Ba line at $\lambda$6496.91 $\mathring{A}$ by 

607: \citet{norris97}.

608: This was also verified by mean of spectrum synthesis simulations of the 

609: three lines, using both the single component line and the separated HFS 

610: components taken from the linelist by \citet{pro00}. 

611: In Tab.~\ref{tab_ba} 

612: we report the comparison between the EWs measured on synthetic 

613: spectra of Ba lines computed both with and without HFS, for some target 

614: stars with different atmospheric parameters. HFS components are from 

615: \citet{pro00}. The very small differences confirm that the 

616: effect of inclusion of HFS is negligible for these lines.

617: Ce has an even atomic number {\it Z=58} and all of the isotopes have 

618: even neutron number {\it N}, hence there is no HFS. 

619: However,

620: an isotopic splitting 

621: is possible but we did not consider it since  

622: the calculations of \citet{aoki} show that it has a 

623: negligible impact on the derived abundance.  

624: The Nd line HFS can be neglected, because the only isotopes 

625: (the odd $^{143}Nd$ and $^{145}Nd$) 

626: that show it  account for $\sim$20\% \citep{hartog}

627: of the total abundance, only. 

628: The LaII line at $\lambda$ 6390.46 $\mathring{A}$ 

629: exhibits in all the target stars EWs small enough 

630: ($\approx$70 m$\mathring{A}$) to safely ignore the HFS. 

631: Finally, Eu abundances have been derived by performing a 

632: spectrum synthesis fitting, 

633: by using the HFS parameters for the Eu at $\lambda$ 6645.11 

634: $\mathring{A}$ line by \citet{lawler}.

635: We noted as the average values of [Eu/Fe] in each cluster result 

636: very similar to the ones obtained by using the EW measurements 

637: (and ignoring 

638: possible HFS effects) but with a reduced star-to-star scatter, 

639: in agreement with the results obtained only from EWs by 

640: \citet{gratton06} and \citet{carretta07} for the Galactic GCs 

641: NGC 6441 and NGC 6338, respectively (whose metallicity is very similar 

642: to the mean metal abundance of the present sample, although based on 

643: higher S/N spectra).

644: 

645: In all the target clusters [Y/Fe] and [Zr/Fe] ratios result 

646: significantly depleted

647: ($\le$-0.30 dex) with respect to the solar value. 

648: Heavy-s elements show enhanced 

649: ($\sim$0.20-0.45 dex) 

650: [Ba/Fe], [La/Fe] and [Nd/Fe] ratios but 

651: [Ce/Fe] which turns out to be  

652: solar. Finally, all the clusters display an enhanced  

653: ($>$0.30 dex) [Eu/Fe] abundance ratio.

654: 

655: 

656: \section{Discussion}

657: 		

658: All the 4 LMC globulars analysed here, 

659: belonging to the same age population but located 

660: in different regions of the LMC disk, result to be {\sl metal-rich},

661: with a mean metallicity of [Fe/H]=-0.38 dex

662: (rms=0.09 dex). This finding confirms the previous low-resolution 

663: analysis based on the 

664: Ca II triplet by \citet{ols91} and \citet{aaron}, that showed as the 

665: young and intermediate-age LMC clusters exhibit a very narrow metallicity 

666: distribution 

667: \citep[][estimated a mean metallicity of -0.48 dex with a rms=0.09 dex from 23 intermediate-age clusters]{aaron}.

668: Our metallicities are also consistent with the mean metallicity of the 

669: LMC Bar ([Fe/H]=-0.37 dex) by \citet{cole05} 

670: and of the LMC disk ([Fe/H]$\sim$-0.5 dex) by \citet{carrera07}.

671: The theoretical 

672: scenario for the formation of the LMC and its GCs drawn by \citet{bekki} 

673: indicates as the efficient GC formation does not occur until the LMC and 

674: the SMC start to interact violently and closely ($\sim$3 Gyr ago). Moreover, 

675: also the formation of the Bar is predicted to occur in the last $\sim$5 Gyr.

676: The similar iron content between the LMC GC system and the LMC Bar 

677: seems to confirm this hypothesis. 

678: 		

679: Our chemical analysis also evidences a high degree of homogeneity for all 

680: the elements. 

681: Even the abundances of Na and Al 

682: show a low dispersion, at variance 

683: with Galactic GCs which show strong 

684: O-Na and Mg-Al anticorrelations 

685: \citep[see e.g.][ for an extensive review]{gsc}. 

686: 

687: The depletion (by a factor of 2-3) of [Na/Fe] and [Al/Fe]  

688: abundance ratios with respect to the solar and Galactic thin disk values, 

689: is consistent with the one observed in the LMC and Sgr fields.

690: These two elements are likely connected to the SNII, because 

691: their main production sites are C and Ne burning

692: \citep[see][]{pagel, matteucci03}, respectively. 

693: Another possible channel to produce Na and Al are the p-captures in the 

694: intermediate-mass AGB stars (NeNa and MgAl cycles).  

695: However,

696: the high degree of homogeneity of their abundance in the LMC clusters 

697: and the lack of clear Na-O and Mg-Al anti-correlations

698: seem to favor the SNII channel for their production.

699: Also, since the Na and Al yields depend on the 

700: neutron excess and increase with metallicity

701: \citep{pagel},  

702: under-abundant [Al/Fe] and [Na/Fe] ratios suggest 

703: that the gas from which the LMC clusters formed, 

704: should have been enriched by relatively low-metallicity SNII.

705: 

706: Also the $\alpha$-elements are produced mainly by high-mass stars 

707: which end their short life exploding as SN II, but 

708: at variance with Na and Al, their production factors are poorly sensitive 

709: to metallicity. 

710: The [$\alpha$/Fe] ratio represents a powerful diagnostics

711: to clarify the relative role played 

712: by SNII (producers of $\alpha$-elements) and SNIa (main producers of Fe) in 

713: the chemical enrichment process.

714: Indeed, there is time delay \citep{tinsley} between the explosion of SNII, 

715: occurring since the onset of the 

716: star formation event, and SNIa, which happen later on \citep{greg}.

717: The roughly solar [$\alpha$/Fe] abundance ratios measured in the 

718: LMC GCs well match those found in the LMC field and MW 

719: thin disk intermediate-age populations and

720: are consistent with a standard scenario,  

721: where SNIa had enough time to significantly enrich the gas with iron.

722: Some depletion of [Mg/Fe], 

723: [Ca/Fe] and [Ti/Fe] is observed in the Sgr stars.

724: 

725: The bulk of the iron-peak elements are produced 

726: by the SNIa, from stars with intermediate-mass progenitors and located in 

727: single-degenerate binary systems \citep{iwamoto}, 

728: or from double-degenerate binary systems \citep{it84}.  

729: Our derived abundances for these elements well trace iron, 

730: as do the LMC field and MW thin disk stars. 

731: We only note a mild discrepancy between our 

732: [Ni/Fe] solar ratio and the  

733: slightly underabundant ([Ni/Fe]$\sim$-0.2 dex) values by \citet{pompeia06}, also 

734: observed in the Sgr stars that show a significant depletion (by a factor of 2-3) 

735: of iron-peak elements.

736: It is interesting to note that the old LMC clusters analysed by 

737: \citet{johnson06} show a general depletion of the [iron-peak/Fe] ratios

738: (in particular [V/Fe] and [Ni/Fe]):

739: actually, an explanation for such a depletion for the iron-peak 

740: elements is still lacking.

741: 

742: The elements heavier than the iron-peak group are not built up from 

743: thermonuclear burning but

744: via a sequences of neutron captures on seed Fe or Ni nuclei. 

745: If the time-scale of the neutron

746: capture sequence is longer than the typical time-scale of the $\beta$-decay,

747:  the resulting

748: elements are called {\sl slow} or s-process elements, while in case 

749: of fast neutron capture, 

750: the elements are called {\sl rapid} or r-process elements.

751: The s-process elements are mainly produced by low-mass ($\sim$1-4 $M_{\odot}$) 

752: AGB stars during the thermal instabilities developing above the 

753: quiescent He-burning shell (the so-called {\sl main}-component), 

754: with a minor contribution by the high mass stars 

755: (the so-called {\sl weak}-component) \citep[see][]{busso,travaglio}.  

756: The bulk of these neutron captures are 

757: connected to the  

758: $^{13}C(\alpha,n)^{16}O$  and 

759: $^{22}Ne(\alpha,n)^{25}Mg$ reactions, which are major sources of neutrons.

760: 

761: The behaviour of the s-process elements in the LMC clusters 

762: appears to be {\sl dichotomic}, with a deficiency 

763: of light s-elements (Y and Zr) and an enhancement

764: of heavy ones (Ba, La and Nd),  with 

765: the only exception of Ce, that shows a solar [Ce/Fe] abundance ratio.

766: The [Ba/Y] abundance ratio represents a powerful diagnostic of the relative 

767: contribution of the heavy to the light s-process elements \citep[see][]{venn}. 

768: In our LMC clusters [Ba/Y] is enhanced by $\sim$0.9-1 dex (see Fig. 8): 

769: similar values have been observed also in the LMC field \citep{hill95, pompeia06} and

770: in Sgr \citep{sbordone}, 

771: but not in the MW, where the [Ba/Y] ratio is solar at most.

772: The interpretation of these abundance patterns is complicated by the 

773: complexity (and uncertainty) of the involved nucleosynthesis.

774: Theoretical models \citep{busso,travaglio} indicate that the AGB yields 

775: could be metallicity-dependent. In particular, the heavy-s elements 

776: have their maximum production factor at lower metallicities than the  

777: light-s ones. 

778: Hence, a high [Ba/Y] ratio could suggest a major pollution of the gas

779: by low-metallicity AGB stars. 

780:  Moreover, abundance patterns for [Y/Fe] and [Ba/Fe] consistent 

781: with the Galactic values have been observed in the old LMC cluster 

782: by \citet{johnson06}. Being these objects the first ones 

783: formed in the LMC, these clusters have been not contaminated 

784: by the AGB stars, because  the low-mass AGB stars had no time 

785: to evolve and incorporate completely their yields in the 

786: interstellar medium (differently to the intermediate-age 

787: clusters).

788: 

789: 

790: The [Eu/Fe] abundance ratio (see Fig.~8) measured in the LMC clusters and Sgr stars 

791: is enhanced by a factor of two  with respect to the Galactic thin disk value. 

792: This is somewhat puzzling and inconsistent with the solar $<[\alpha/Fe]>$ measured 

793: in all the three environments.

794: Indeed, Eu is a typical r-process element \citep{arl, burris}, whose 

795: most promising site of nucleosynthesis are SNII

796: (SNII with low \citep[M$<$11 $M_{\odot}$,][]{cowan} mass progenitors are  

797: interesting candidates), although 

798: other alternative sites are possible \citep[see e.g.][]{cowan}.

799: Such an anomalous high [Eu/Fe] abundance ratio seems to suggest that 

800: in the LMC clusters and Sgr the Eu

801: is not or not only synthesized in a similar fashion as the $\alpha$-elements. 

802: 

803: 

804: Finally, the ratio between the s-process elements (which are predominantly formed 

805: through slow neutron captures, with a minor contribution from rapid neutron captures) 

806: and Eu (a pure r-process element) 

807: represents a powerful diagnostics

808: to estimate the relative contribution of the different neutron-capture 

809: processes.

810: The theoretical solar [Ba/Eu] in case of pure rapid neutron captures 

811: turns out to be -0.70 dex \citep{arl}.  

812: The [Ba/Eu]$\approx$0.0 dex abundance ratios measured in the 

813: LMC clusters as well as in the Galactic thin disk  

814: and Sgr stars, suggest 

815: that s-process elements should be mainly produced by AGB stars through 

816: slow neutron captures, with a minor (if any) 

817: contribution from massive SNII through rapid neutron captures.

818: 

819: At variance, 

820: the strong [Y/Eu] ($\le$-0.7 dex) depletion measured 

821: in the LMC clusters and Sgr stars

822: is very different from the higher values 

823: ([Y/Eu]$\sim$-0.20 dex 

824: at [Fe/H]=-0.40 dex, see Fig. 8)

825: observed in the thin disk stars.

826: This may suggest that rapid neutron captures 

827: can also have a different role in 

828: the production of light and heavy s-process elements, 

829: (as suggested by \citet{venn} in order to explain similar patterns 

830: in the dSphs) but this seems to be environment-dependent.

831: Alternatively, galactic winds could have been more effective

832: in removing these elements from the LMC and Sgr  

833: \citep[see e.g.][]{matt83}.

834: 

835: \section{Conclusions}

836: 

837: We performed a detailed abundance analysis of the most 

838: important chemical elements of 

839: 27 giant stars members of 4 LMC intermediate-age clusters.

840: We compared the inferred abundance patterns with those 

841: of other intermediate age populations in different 

842: galactic environments, namely the LMC field, the Galactic 

843: thin disk and the Sgr dwarf spheroidal. 

844: Such an analysis allows us to 

845: obtain important information about the chemical 

846: properties of the intermediate-age population of the LMC:

847: 

848: (1) As unequivocally traced by both field and cluster stars,

849: the intermediate-age population of the LMC is metal-rich, 

850: with an average iron content between 1/3 and half solar. 

851: 

852: (2) The interstellar medium from which these stars 

853: formed had the time to be significantly 

854: enriched by SNIa and AGB star ejecta, as traced by the 

855: [$\alpha$/Fe] and [s-process/Fe] abundance patterns.

856: 

857: (3) An enhanced pollution of the gas (from which 

858: these clusters formed) 

859: by SNII and AGB stars with low metallicity 

860: could explain either the depletion of [Al/Fe] and 

861: [Na/Fe] and the enhancement of the [Ba/Y] abundance ratios

862: with respect to the values measured in 

863: the Galactic thin disk stars. 

864: 

865: (4) The lack of clear O-Na and Mg-Al anti-correlations seems 

866: to indicate that the 

867: studied LMC clusters did not undergo 

868: appreciable self-enrichment, as likely did the old Galactic GCs, 

869: but this has to be proven on a better 

870: statistical ground.

871: 

872: (5) The enhanced [Eu/Fe] ratios appear to be in contradiction 

873: with the solar [$\alpha$/Fe] ratio, despite the same nucleosinthetic 

874: site (massive stars). This decoupling between r- and $\alpha$-elements 

875: seems to be a distinctive feature of several extragalactic 

876: environments (LMC, SMC, Sgr, dSphs).

877: 

878: The chemical analysis of these clusters

879: provides an overall picture of the metal-rich, intermediate-age 

880: component of the LMC cluster system, remarkably

881: different with respect to the Galactic field populations of similar 

882: ages and metallicities. We found similar [$\alpha$/Fe] and 

883: [iron-peak/Fe] ratios and discrepant light Z-odd and 

884: neutron-capture elements. 

885: Moreover, the comparison with 

886: the Sgr dSph evidences some likeness ([Na/Fe], [Al/Fe] and the 

887: neutron capture elements pattern) but also several differences 

888: (as the average value of the [$\alpha$/Fe] and

889: [iron-peak/Fe] ratios).  

890: Our results point toward a scenario of 

891: chemical evolution dominated by 

892: previous generations of low-metallicity stars, able to produce 

893: the observed depletion of light Z-odd elements as well as the behaviour of 

894: the s-process elements.

895: The extension of our study to additional younger and older 

896: LMC clusters will provide new insight towards 

897: the understanding of the LMC formation and 

898: chemical enrichment history.

899: 

900: 

901: 

902: 

903: \acknowledgements  

904: 

905: This research was supported by the Ministero dell'Istruzione dell'Universit\'a 

906: e della Ricerca and it is part of the {\it "Progetti Strategici d'Ateneo 2006"} 

907: granted by the Bologna University. We warmly thank the anonymous referee for his/her suggestions.

908: Moreover, we warmly thank Elena Pancino, Angela Bragaglia and Raffaele Gratton for 

909: useful suggestions and discussions, and Elena Valenti and Elena Sabbi 

910: for their collaboration in the preparation of the observations.

911: 

912: \begin{thebibliography}{}

913: \bibitem[Alonso et al.(1999)]{alonso99}

914: Alonso, A., Arribas, S., \& Martinez-Roger, C., 1999, \aaps, 140, 261

915: \bibitem[Alonso et al.(2001)]{alonso01}

916: Alonso, A., Arribas, S., \& Martinez-Roger, C., 2001, \aap, 376, 1039

917: \bibitem[Alves (2004)]{alves}

918: Alves, D. R., 2004, New Astronomy Review, 48, 659

919: \bibitem[Andersen (1999)]{ander}

920: Andersen, J, 1999, Transactions of the IAU, Vol. XXIVA, p.36, 24, A36

921: \bibitem[Aoki et al.(2001)]{aoki}

922: Aoki, W., Ryan, S. G., Norris, J. E., Beers, T. C., Ando, H., 

923: Iwamoto N., Kajino, T., Mathews, G. J., \& Fujimoto, M. Y., 2001, \apj

924: 561, 346

925: \bibitem[Arlandini et al.(1999)]{arl}

926: Arlandini, C., Kappeler, F., Wisshak, K., Gallino, R., Lugaro, M., 

927: Busso, M., \& Straniero, O., 1999, \apj, 525, 886

928: \bibitem[Baumueller \& Gehren(1996)]{baum}

929: Baumueller, D. \& Gehren, T., 1996, \aap, 307, 961

930: \bibitem[Bekki et al.(2004)]{bekki}

931: Bekki, K., Couch, W. J., Beasley, M. A., Forbes, D. A., 

932: Chiba, M., \& Da Costa, G. S., 2004, \apj, 610, L93

933: \bibitem[Bekki \& Chiba(2005)]{bekki_06}

934: Bekki, K., \& Chiba, M., 2005, \mnras, 356, 680 

935: \bibitem[Bonifacio et al.(2000)]{boni00}

936: Bonifacio, P., Hill, V., Molaro, P., Pasquini, L., Di Marcantonio, P., \&  Santin, P., 

937: 2000, \aap, 359, 663

938: \bibitem[Bragaglia et al.(2001)]{brag}

939: Bragaglia, A., Carretta, E., Gratton, R. G., Tosi, M., Bonanno, G., 

940: Bruno, P., Cal\'i, A., Claudi, R., Cosentino, R., Desidera, S., 

941: Farisato, G., Rebeschini, M., \& Scuderi, S., 2001, \aj, 121, 327

942: \bibitem[Brocato et al.(1996)]{broc}

943: Brocato, E., Castellani, V., Ferraro, F. R., Piersimoni, A. M.,\& Testa, V.,

944: 1996, \mnras, 282, 614

945: \bibitem[Brocato et al.(2003)]{broc03}

946: Brocato, E., Castellani, V., Di Carlo, E., Raimondo, G., \& Walker, A. R., 

947: 2003, \aj, 125, 3111

948: \bibitem[Burris et al.(2000)]{burris}

949: Burris, D. L., Pilachowski, C. A., Armandroff, T. E., Sneden, C., Cowan, J. J., 

950: \& Roe, H., 2000, \apj, 544, 302

951: \bibitem[Busso, Gallino \& Wasserburg(1999)]{busso}

952: Busso, M., Gallino, R., \& Wasserburg, G. J., 1999, \araa, 37, 239

953: \bibitem[Cayrel(1988)]{cayrel}

954: Cayrel, R., 1988, in IAU Symp. 132, "The Impact of Very High S/N 

955: Spectroscopy on Stellar Physics", ed. G. Cayrel de Strobel \& M. Spite, 

956: Dordrecht, Kluwer, 345

957: \bibitem[Cariulo et al.(2004)]{car04}

958: Cariulo, P., Degl'Innocenti, S., \& Castellani, V., 2004, \aap, 421, 1121 

959: \bibitem[Carrera et al.(2007)]{carrera07}

960: Carrera, R., Gallart, C., Hardy, E., Aparicio, A., \& Zinn, R., 2007, 

961: astro-ph/0710.3076 

962: \bibitem[Carretta et al.(2004)]{eu04}

963: Carretta, E., Gratton, R. G., Bragaglia, A., Bonifacio, P., \& Pasquini, L., 2004. \aap, 

964: 416, 925

965: \bibitem[Carretta et al.(2007)]{carretta07}

966: Carretta, E., Bragaglia, A., Gratton, R. G., Momany, Y., Recio-Blanco, A., 

967: Cassisi, S., Francois, P., James, G., Lucatello, S., \& Moehler, S., 2007, 

968: \aap, 464, 953

969: \bibitem[Castellani et al.(2003)]{cast03}

970: Castellani, V., Degl'Innocenti, S., Marconi, M., Prada Moroni, P.G., Sestito, P.,

971:  2003, \aap, 404, 645

972: \bibitem[Cioni et al.(2000)]{cioni}

973: Cioni, M. R. L., van der Marel, R. P., Loup, C., \& Habing, H. J., 2000, \aap, 359, 601

974: \bibitem[Cole et al.(2005)]{cole05}

975: Cole, A. A., Tolstoy, E., Gallagher III, J. S., \& Smecker-Hane, T. A., 2005, \aj, 129, 1465

976: \bibitem[Cowan \& Sneden(2004)]{cowan}

977: Cowan, J. J., \& Sneden, C., 2004, Carnegie Observatories Astrophysics Series, Vol. 4, 

978: ed. A. McWilliam and M. Rauch, Cambridge Univ. Press

979: \bibitem[De Freitas Pacheco et al.(1998)]{pacheco}

980: De Freitas Pacheco, J. A., Barbuy, B., \& Idiart, T., 1998, \aap, 332, 19

981: \bibitem[Den Hartog et al.(2003)]{hartog}

982: Den Hartog, E. A., Lawler, J. E., Sneden, C., \& Cowan, J. J., 2003, \apjs, 148, 543

983: \bibitem[Dirsch et al.(2000)]{dirsch}

984: Dirsch, B., Richtler, T., Gieren, W. P., \& Hilker, M., 2000, \aap, 360, 133

985: \bibitem[Elson \& Fall(1988)]{ef88}

986: Elson, R. A., \& Fall, S. M. 1988, \aj, 96, 1383

987: \bibitem[Ferraro et al.(2004)]{f04}

988: Ferraro, F. R., Origlia, L., Testa, V. \& Maraston, C., 2004, \apj, 608, 772

989: \bibitem[Ferraro et al.(2006)]{f06}

990: Ferraro, F. R., Mucciarelli, A., Carretta, E., \& Origlia, L., 2006, \apjl, 133, L3

991: \bibitem[Fischer et al.(1998)]{fischer}

992: Fischer, P., Pryor, C., Murray, S., Mateo, M., \& Richtler , T., 1998, \aj, 115, 592

993: \bibitem[Gallart et al.(2003)]{gallart}

994: Gallart, C., Zoccali, M., Bertelli, G., Chiosi, C., Demarque, P., Girardi, L., Nasi, E.,

995: Woo, J., \& Yi, S., 2003, \aj, 125, 742

996: \bibitem[Geisler et al.(1997)]{geisler97}

997: Geisler, D., Bica, E., Dottori, H., Claria, J. J., Piatti, A. E., \& Santos, J. F. C. Jr., 

998: 1997, \aj, 114, 1920

999: \bibitem[Geisler et al.(2007)]{geisler}

1000: Geisler, D., Wallerstein, G., Smith, V. V., \& Casetti-Dinescu, D. I., 2007, \pasp, 119, 939

1001: \bibitem[Girardi et al.(1995)]{girardi}

1002: Girardi, L., Chiosi, C., Bertelli, G., \& Bressan, A., 1995, \aap, 298, 87

1003: \bibitem[Gratton(1988)]{g88}

1004: Gratton, R. G., 1988, Rome Obs. Preprint, 29

1005: \bibitem[Gratton et al.(1999)]{gr99}

1006: Gratton, R. G., Carretta, E., Eriksson, K., \& Gustafsson, B., 1999, \aap, 350, 955

1007: \bibitem[Gratton et al.(2003)]{gratton03}

1008: Gratton, R. G., Carretta, E., Claudi, R., Lucatello, S., \& Barbieri, M., 2003, \aap, 

1009: 404, 187

1010: \bibitem[Gratton, Sneden \& Carretta(2004)]{gsc}

1011: Gratton, R. G., Sneden, C., \& Carretta, E., 2004, \araa, 42, 385

1012: \bibitem[Gratton et al.(2006)]{gratton06}

1013: Gratton, R. G., Lucatello, S., Bragaglia, A., Carretta, E., Momany, Y., Pancino, E., \& 

1014: Valenti, E., 2006, \aap, 455, 271

1015: \bibitem[Greggio(2005a)]{greg}

1016: Greggio, L., 2005a, \aap, 441, 1055

1017: \bibitem[Grocholski et al.(2006)]{aaron}

1018: Grocholski, A. J., Cole, A. A., Sarajedini, A., Geisler, D., \& Smith, V. V.,

1019: 2006, \aj, 132, 1630

1020: \bibitem[Hill et al.(1995)]{hill95}

1021: Hill, V., Andrievsky, S., \& Spite, M., 1995, \aap, 293, 347

1022: \bibitem[Hill et al.(2000)]{hill00}

1023: Hill, V., Francois, P., Spite, M., Primas, F., \& Spite, F., 2000, \aaps, 364, 19

1024: \bibitem[Iben \& Tutukov(1984)]{it84}

1025: Iben, I. Jr, \& Tutukov, A. V., 1984, \apjs, 54, 335

1026: \bibitem[Iwamoto et al.(1999)]{iwamoto}

1027: Iwamoto, K., Brachwitz, F., Nomoto, K., Kishmoto, N., Umeda, H., Hix, W. R., \& 

1028: Thielemann, F.-K., 1999, \apjs, 125, 439 

1029: \bibitem[Jasniewicz \& Thevenin(1994)]{jt94}

1030: Jasniewicz, G., \& Thevenin, F., 1994, \aap, 282, 717

1031: \bibitem[Johnson et al.(2006)]{johnson06}

1032: Johnson, J. A., Ivans, I. I.,\&  Stetson, P. B., 2006,\apj, 640, 801

1033: \bibitem[Korn et al.(2000)]{korn00}

1034: Korn, A. J., Becker, S. R., Gummersbach, C. A., \& Wolf, B., 2000, \aap, 353, 655

1035: \bibitem[Korn et al.(2002)]{korn02}

1036: Korn, A. J., Keller, S. C., Kaufer, A., Langer, N., Przybilla, N., Stahl, O., \& Wolf, B., 2002,

1037:  \aap, 385, 143

1038: \bibitem[Kurucz(1993)]{kur}

1039: Kurucz, R. L., 1993, CD-ROM 13, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge

1040: \bibitem[Lawler et al.(2001)]{lawler}

1041: Lawler, J. E., Wickliffe, M. E., den Hartog, E. A., \& Sneden, C., 2001, \apj, 563, 1075

1042: \bibitem[Luck et al.(1998)]{luck}

1043: Luck, R. E., Moffett, T. J., Barnes III, T. G., \& Gieren, W. P., 1998, \aj, 115, 605

1044: \bibitem[Mackey et al.(2006)]{mac06}

1045: Mackey, A. D., Payne, M. J., \& Gilmore, G. F., 2006, \mnras, 369, 921

1046: \bibitem[Magain(1984)]{magain}

1047: Magain, P. 1984, \aap, 134, 189

1048: \bibitem[Matteucci \& Chiosi(1983)]{matt83}

1049: Matteucci, F.,\& Chiosi, C., 1983, \aap, 123, 121

1050: \bibitem[Matteucci(2003)]{matteucci03}

1051: Matteucci, F., " The Chemical Evolution of the Galaxy", 2003, 

1052: Astrophysic and Space Science Library, VOl. 253, Kluwer Academic 

1053: Publishers, Dordrecht 

1054: \bibitem[McWilliam \& Williams(1991)]{mcw91}

1055: McWilliam, A., \& Williams, R. E., 1991, IAUS, 148, 391

1056: \bibitem[McWilliam et al.(1995)]{mcw95}

1057: Mc William, A., Preston, G. W., Sneden, C., \& Searle, L., 1995, \aj, 109,2757

1058: \bibitem[Mishenina et al.(2006)]{mishen}

1059: Mishenina, T. V., Bienaym\'e, O., Gorbaneva, T. I., Charbonnel, C., Soubiran, C., 

1060: Korotin, S. A., \& Kovtyukh, V. V., 2006, \aap, 456, 1109

1061: \bibitem[Monaco et al.(2005)]{monaco05}

1062: Monaco, L., Bellazzini, M., Bonifacio, P., Ferraro, F. R., Marconi, G., Pancino, E., 

1063: Sbordone, L., \& Zaggia, S., 2005, \aap, 441, 141

1064: \bibitem[Monaco et al.(2007)]{monaco07}

1065: Monaco, L., Bellazzini, M., Bonifacio, Buzzoni, A., Ferraro, F. R., Marconi, G., 

1066: Sbordone, L., \& Zaggia, S., 2007, \aap, 464, 201

1067: \bibitem[Montegriffo et al.(1998)]{m98}

1068: Montegriffo, P., Ferraro, F. R., Fusi Pecci, F., \& Origlia, L., 1998, \mnras, 297, 872

1069: \bibitem[Mucciarelli et al.(2006)]{m06a}

1070: Mucciarelli, A., Origlia, L., Ferraro, F. R., Testa, V., \& Maraston, C., 2006, \apj, 646, 939

1071: \bibitem[Mucciarelli et al.(2007a)]{m07}

1072: Mucciarelli, A., Ferraro, F. R., Origlia, L., \& Fusi Pecci, F., 2007, \aj, 133, 2053

1073: \bibitem[Mulas et al.(2002)]{mulas2002}

1074: Mulas, G., Modigliani, A., Porceddu, I., \& Damiani, F., 2002, Spie, 4844, 310

1075: \bibitem[Norris(1997a)]{norris97}

1076: Norris, J. E., Ryan, S. G., \& Beers, T. C., 1997a, \apj, 488, 350

1077: \bibitem[Olsen et al.(1998)]{olsen}

1078: Olsen, K. A. G., Hodge, P. W., Mateo, M., Olszewski, E. W., 

1079: Schommer, R. A., Suntzeff, N. B., \& Walker, A. R., \mnras, 300, 665

1080: \bibitem[Olszewski et al.(1991)]{ols91}

1081: Olszewski, E. W., Schommer, R. A., Suntzeff, N. B. \& Harris, H. C., 1991, \aj, 

1082: 101, 515

1083: \bibitem[Pagel(1997)]{pagel}

1084: Pagel, B., E., J., "Nucleosynthesis and chemical evolution of galaxies", 

1085: 1997, Cambridge University Press

1086: \bibitem[Pagel \& Tautvaisiene(1998)]{pt98}

1087: Pagel, B. E. J., \& Tautvaisiene, G., 1998, \mnras, 299, 535 

1088: \bibitem[Pasquini et al.(2002)]{pasquini02}

1089: Pasquini, L. et al., Messenger, 110, 1    

1090: \bibitem[Persson et al.(1983)]{pers83}

1091: Persson, S. E., Aaronson, M., Cohen, J. G., Frogel, J. A., \& Matthews, K.,1983, 

1092: \apj, 266, 105

1093: \bibitem[Pompeia et al.(2006)]{pompeia06}

1094: Pompeia, L., Hill, V., Spite, M., Cole, A., Primas, F., Romaniello, M., Pasquini, L., 

1095: Cioni, M-R., \& Smecker Hane, T., 2006, arXiv:astro-ph/0604009v2

1096: \bibitem[Prochaska(2000)]{pro00}

1097: Prochaska, J. X., Naumov, S. O., Carney, B. W., McWilliam, A., \& Wolfe, A., 

1098: 2000, \aj, 120, 2513

1099: \bibitem[Reddy et al.(2003)]{reddy}

1100: Reddy, B. E., Tomkin, J., Lambert, D. L., \& Allende Prieto, C., 2003, \mnras, 340, 304

1101: \bibitem[Rich et al.(2001)]{rich01}

1102: Rich, M. R., Shara, M. M., \& Zurek, D., 2001, \aj, 122, 842

1103: \bibitem[Richtler et al.(1989)]{richtler}

1104: Richtler, T., Spite, M., \& SPite, F., 1989, \aap, 225, 351

1105: \bibitem[Rieke \& Lebofsky(1985)]{rl85}

1106: Rieke, G. H., \& Lebofsky, M. J. 1985, \apj, 288, 618

1107: \bibitem[Russell \& Bessell(1989)]{rb89}

1108: Russell, S. C., \& Bessell, M. S., 1989, \apjs, 70, 865

1109: \bibitem[Sagar \& Pandey (1989)]{sp89}

1110: Sagar, R., \& Pandey, A. K., 1989, \aaps, 79, 407

1111: \bibitem[Sarajedini et al.(2002)]{sar02}

1112: Sarajedini, A., Grocholski, A. J., Levine, J., \& Lada, E., 2002, \aj, 124, 2625

1113: \bibitem[Sbordone et al.(2007)]{sbordone}

1114: Sbordone, L., Bonifacio, P., Buonanno, R., Marconi, G., Monaco, L., \& Zaggia, S., 

1115: 2007, \aap, 465, 815

1116: \bibitem[Searle, Wilkinson, \& Bagnuolo(1980)]{swb} 

1117: Searle, L., Wilkinson, A., \&  Bagnuolo, W. G. 1980, \apj, 239, 803

1118: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2002)]{smith02}

1119: Smith, V. V., et al., 2002, \aj, 124, 3241

1120: \bibitem[Tinsley(1979)]{tinsley}

1121: Tinsley, B. M., 1979, \apj, 229, 1046

1122: \bibitem[Travaglio et al.(2004)]{travaglio}

1123: Travaglio, C., Gallino, R., Arnone, E., Cowan, J., Jordan, F., 

1124: \& Sneden, C., 2004, \apj, 601, 864

1125: \bibitem[van den Bergh(1981)]{vdb81}

1126: van den Bergh, S., 1981, \aaps, 46, 79

1127: \bibitem[van den Bergh(1998)]{vdb98}

1128:  van den Bergh, S., 1998,\pasp, 110, 1377 

1129: \bibitem[Venn et al.(2004)]{venn}

1130: Venn, K. A., Irwin, M. Shetrone, M. D., Tout, C. A., Hill, V., 

1131: \& Tolstoy, E., 2004, \aj, 128, 1177 

1132: \end{thebibliography}

1133:  

1134:  

1135: 

1136: \begin{figure}

1137: \plotone{f1.ps} 

1138: \caption{K, J-K color-magnitude diagrams for the upper RGB of the 4 observed LMC clusters 

1139: \citep{m06a}: the black 

1140: points indicate the target stars of the present work.}

1141: \label{f}

1142: \end{figure}

1143: 

1144:  

1145: 

1146: \begin{figure}

1147: \plotone{f2.ps} 

1148: \caption{The trend of the derived abundances from Fe I lines 

1149: for the star NGC 2173-8 as a function of the excitation potential 

1150: $\chi$ (upper panel), the expected  

1151: line strength (middle panel) and the wavelength (lower panel). 

1152: The dashed lines represent the linear fit to each distribution.}

1153: \label{f}

1154: \end{figure}

1155: 

1156: \begin{figure}

1157: \plotone{f3.ps} 

1158: \caption{The slopes of the relationship between the neutral iron abundances and the excitation potential 

1159: $\chi$ for individual stars in each cluster as a function of $T_{eff}$.

1160: Dashed lines represent the average slope for each cluster.}

1161: \label{f}

1162: \end{figure}

1163: 

1164: \begin{figure}

1165: \plotone{f4.ps} 

1166: \caption{The trend of [Na/Fe] and [Al/Fe] as a function of [Fe/H] (upper and lower panel

1167: respectively) for the 4 analysed LMC clusters (big grey points). For comparison, 

1168: previous determinations of these abundance ratios in the LMC field (empty triangles from \citet{pompeia06}), 

1169: other LMC clusters (empty squares from \citet{hill00}), 

1170: the Galactic thin disk (little grey points from \citet{reddy}) and Sgr (little black points 

1171: from \citet{boni00}, \citet{monaco05}, \citet{monaco07} and \citet{sbordone}) are also plotted.}

1172: \label{f}

1173: \end{figure}

1174: 

1175: \begin{figure}

1176: \plotone{f5.ps} 

1177: \caption{The trend of $\alpha$-elements ([O, Mg, Si, Ca, Ti/Fe]) 

1178: as a function of [Fe/H] for the 4 analysed LMC clusters (same symbols and references of Fig.

1179: 4).}

1180: \label{f}

1181: \end{figure}

1182: 

1183: \begin{figure}

1184: \plotone{f6.ps} 

1185: \caption{The trend of iron-peak elements ([Sc, V, Cr, Co, Ni/Fe]) as a function of [Fe/H] (same symbols 

1186: and references of Fig. 4).}

1187: \label{f}

1188: \end{figure}

1189: 

1190: 

1191: 

1192: \begin{figure}

1193: \plotone{f7.ps} 

1194: \caption{The trend of light ([Y,Zr/Fe]) and heavy ([Ba, La, Ce, Nd/Fe]) s-process elements 

1195: as a function of [Fe/H] (same symbols and references of Fig. 4).}

1196: \label{f}

1197: \end{figure}

1198: 

1199: 

1200: 

1201: \begin{figure}

1202: \plotone{f8.ps} 

1203: \caption{The trend of [Ba/Y], [Eu/Fe], [Y/Eu] and [Ba/Eu] as a function of [Fe/H]

1204: (same symbols and references of Fig. 4).}

1205: \label{f}

1206: \end{figure}

1207: 

1208: 

1209: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc} 

1210: \footnotesize

1211: \tablecolumns{7} 

1212: \tablewidth{0pc} 

1213: \tablecaption{Informations about the target stars.} 

1214: \tablehead{ 

1215: \colhead{Star ID}  & \colhead{$S/N$}& \colhead{$V_{helio}$}

1216:  &  \colhead{$J_0$} & \colhead{$(J-K)_0$} & \colhead{RA(J2000)} & \colhead{Dec(J2000)}\\

1217: & & \colhead{(km/s)}& &  & &  }

1218: \startdata 

1219:    1651-6 &   35     &	234.3  & 13.58  &  0.99&  69.3880040   &   -70.6012635    \\

1220:    1651-8 &   30     &  227.3  & 13.66  &  0.98&  69.3799588   &   -70.5734344 \\

1221:    1651-10 &   30    & 	232.1  & 13.87  &  0.94&  69.3844841   &   -70.5838366 \\

1222:    1651-12 &   30    &  235.7  & 14.11  &  0.86&  69.3573261   &   -70.5738910     \\

1223:    1651-16 &   25    &  236.2  & 14.49  &  0.88&  69.3824681   &   -70.5959887   \\

1224: \hline

1225:    1783-22 &   35    &  277.4  & 13.63   &  1.02&  74.7264895	&   -65.9723560    \\

1226:    1783-23 &   30    &  275.1  & 13.66   &  0.98&  74.7793127	&   -65.9862323 \\  

1227:    1783-29 &   30    &  275.2  & 13.75   &  0.94&  74.7830715	&   -65.9957701 \\

1228:    1783-30 &   30    &  281.2  & 13.79   &  0.95&  74.8010628	&   -65.9629302    \\

1229:    1783-32 &   30    &  277.9  & 13.87   &  0.93&  74.7707871	&   -65.9799639 \\   

1230:    1783-33 &   35    &  278.8  & 13.88   &  0.98&  74.8011665	&   -65.9906700   \\

1231: \hline  

1232:    1978-21 &   35    &  295.5   & 13.52   &  1.07&  82.1515305   &   -66.2322134      \\

1233:    1978-22 &   40    &  290.6   & 13.48   &  1.01&  82.2014424   &   -66.2339097   \\

1234:    1978-23 &   35    &  288.7   & 13.54   &  1.06&  82.2092677   &   -66.2568186  \\

1235:    1978-24 &   30    &  291.5   & 13.54   &  1.02&  82.1915173   &   -66.2387280 \\  

1236:    1978-26 &   30    &  296.3   & 13.69   &  1.05&  82.1751055   &   -66.2325960   \\

1237:    1978-28 &   35    &  292.3   & 13.72   &  1.05&  82.1774043   &   -66.2079169	 \\

1238:    1978-29 &   35    &  298.4   & 13.75   &  1.06&  82.1906198   &   -66.2420488 \\

1239:    1978-32 &   30    &  290.5   & 13.89   &  1.01&  82.1764751   &   -66.2351731  \\

1240:    1978-34 &   20    &  292.1   & 13.91   &  0.98&  82.2041703   &   -66.2277628  \\

1241:    1978-38 &   30    &  297.1   & 13.93   &  0.99&  82.2221112   &   -66.2352105 \\

1242:    1978-42 &   35    &  291.5   & 14.00   &  0.96&  82.1706985   &   -66.2461504     \\

1243: \hline

1244:     2173-4 &   50    & 237.6	& 12.95    &  0.86 &    89.4861621 &  -72.9749781  \\

1245:     2173-5 &   50    & 234.8	& 13.15    &  0.99 &    89.4910121 &  -72.9652585     \\

1246:     2173-6 &   40    & 237.3	& 13.47    &  1.04 &    89.5475844 &  -72.9757905   \\

1247:     2173-8 &   55    & 237.9    & 13.68    &  0.85 &    89.4955156 &  -72.9785015   \\

1248:    2173-10 &   40    & 236.3	& 14.03    &  0.94 &    89.4816674 &  -72.9815157    \\

1249: 

1250: \enddata

1251: \tablecomments{The adopted E(B-V) reddening values \citep{pers83} are 0.1 for NGC~1651, NGC~1783 and 

1252: NGC~1978, and 0.07 for NGC~2173.}

1253: \end{deluxetable} 

1254: 

1255: 

1256: 

1257: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrrrrrrrrr} 

1258: \tablecolumns{10} 

1259: \tablewidth{0pc}  

1260: \tablecaption{Equivalent widths from UVES spectra for the sample stars (in electronic form).}

1261: \tablehead{ 

1262: \colhead{El.}  & \colhead{$\lambda$}& 

1263: \colhead{E.P.}

1264:  &  \colhead{log gf} & 

1265: \colhead{1651-6}  & \colhead{1651-8} & \colhead{1651-10}  & \colhead{1651-12} 

1266: & \colhead{1651-16} & \colhead{1783-22} \\ 

1267:  & \colhead{($\mathring{A}$)} & \colhead{(eV)} &  & \colhead{(m$\mathring{A}$)} 

1268:  & \colhead{(m$\mathring{A}$)} &  \colhead{(m$\mathring{A}$)}  & \colhead{(m$\mathring{A}$)} 

1269:  & \colhead{(m$\mathring{A}$)} & \colhead{(m$\mathring{A}$)}  

1270: }

1271: \startdata 

1272:  \hline

1273:     O I &  6300.31    & 0.00 &  -9.75    &   syn       &       syn      &	syn   &    syn  &     syn      &     syn    	           \\

1274:    O I &  6363.79    & 0.02 & -10.25    &   syn       &       syn      &	syn   &    syn  &     syn      &     syn    	          \\

1275:    Na I & 5682.65    & 2.10 &  -0.67    &   0.0       &     102.7      &      129.9   &    146.0&  119.7       &    119.1   	       \\

1276:    Na I & 5688.22    & 2.10 &  -0.37    & 142.0       &     130.7      &      144.8   &    159.8&  145.1       &    142.1   	       \\

1277:    Na I & 6154.23    & 2.10 &  -1.57    &  74.1       &      41.0      &       69.7   &     74.5&   45.2       &     80.4   	       \\

1278:    Na I & 6160.75    & 2.10 &  -1.26    &  88.0       &      73.5      &       88.7   &     87.7& 88.6         &    102.1   	      \\

1279:    Mg I & 5528.42    & 4.34 &  -0.52    & 257.2       &     247.7      &      252.2   &   270.5 & 254.1	       &    227.6   	         \\

1280:    Mg I & 5528.42    & 4.34 &  -0.52    &   0.0       &	     0.0       &       0.0    &   0.0	&  0.0         &   131.9        \\

1281:    Mg I & 6318.71    & 5.11 &  -1.94    &  69.1       &      55.9      &       63.5   &     65.3&   77.3       &    0.0 	         \\

1282:    Mg I & 6319.24    & 5.11 &  -2.16    &  44.0       &       0.0      &        0.0   &     46.4&    43.8      &    43.7	         \\

1283: \enddata 												    

1284: \end{deluxetable} 

1285: 		

1286:   

1287: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc} 

1288: \footnotesize

1289: \tablecolumns{7} 

1290: \tablewidth{0pc}  

1291: \tablecaption{Sensitivities of the abundance ratios to the variation of the 

1292: atmospheric parameters ($T_{eff}$, log~g, [A/H], $v_t$), with 

1293: the corresponding average number of used lines ($<N>$) and the error 

1294: of the abundance associated to the EW ($\sigma_{EW}$), 

1295: as computed for star NGC~1783-29.}

1296: \tablehead{ 

1297: \colhead{Ratio} & \colhead{$T_{eff}$} 

1298: & \colhead{log{g}}

1299:  &  \colhead{[A/H]} & 

1300: \colhead{$v_t$} & \colhead{$<N>$} & \colhead{$\sigma_{EW}$}  \\

1301: &  \colhead{(+100 K)} & \colhead{(+0.2 dex)} & \colhead{(+0.1 dex)} &\colhead{(+0.2 km/s)} & &

1302: }

1303: \startdata 

1304:   $[O/Fe]$     &    0.028      &     0.042    &     0.040      &   -0.016    &  2    &  0.127	    \\

1305:   $[Na/Fe]$    &    0.085      &    -0.010    &     0.006      &   -0.075    &  4    &  0.090	    \\

1306:   $[Mg/Fe]$    &    0.004      &     0.001    &     0.027      &   -0.059    &  4    &  0.090	    \\

1307:   $[Al/Fe]$    &    0.069      &     0.003    &     0.005      &   -0.047    &  2    &  0.127	    \\

1308:   $[Si/Fe]$    &   -0.113      &     0.027    &     0.025      &   -0.047    &  4    &  0.090	    \\

1309:   $[Ca/Fe]$    &    0.063      &    -0.060    &    -0.032      &   -0.185    & 13    &  0.050	    \\

1310:   $[Sc/Fe]$II  &    0.018      &     0.101    &     0.093      &   -0.091    &  5    &  0.080	   \\

1311:   $[Ti/Fe]$    &    0.168      &     0.016    &     0.031      &   -0.167    & 13    &  0.050	    \\

1312:   $[V/Fe]$     &    0.156      &     0.004    &     0.024      &   -0.195    &  7    &  0.068	   \\

1313:   $[Cr/Fe]$    &    0.138      &     0.047    &     0.058      &   -0.073    & 14    &  0.048	    \\

1314:   $[Fe/H]$I    &   -0.016      &     0.019    &     0.028      &   -0.114    & 86    &  0.019	   \\

1315:   $[Fe/H]$II   &   -0.210      &     0.068    &     0.043      &   -0.063    &  2    &  0.127	   \\

1316:   $[Co/Fe]$    &   -0.033      &     0.024    &     0.026      &   -0.117    &  3    &  0.104	   \\

1317:   $[Ni/Fe]$    &   -0.040      &     0.028    &     0.028      &   -0.099    & 25    &  0.036	    \\

1318:   $[Y/Fe]$II   &   -0.016      &     0.081    &     0.034      &   -0.160    &  3    &  0.104	  \\

1319:   $[Zr/Fe]$    &    0.160      &     0.038    &     0.021      &   -0.154    &  3    &  0.104	  \\

1320:   $[Ba/Fe]$II  &    0.019      &     0.056    &     0.050      &   -0.090    &  3    &  0.104	  \\

1321:   $[La/H]$II   &    0.018      &     0.087    &     0.037      &   -0.113    &  1    &  0.180	  \\

1322:   $[Ce/H]$II   &    0.013      &     0.082    &     0.038      &   -0.062    &  1    &  0.180	  \\

1323:   $[Nd/Fe]$II  &    0.019      &     0.079    &     0.038      &   -0.166    &  2    &  0.127	  \\

1324:   $[Eu/Fe]$II  &   -0.014      &     0.083    &     0.036      &   -0.053    &  1    &  0.180	  \\

1325: \enddata 

1326: \end{deluxetable} 

1327: 

1328: 

1329: 

1330: 

1331: 

1332: 

1333: 

1334: 

1335: 

1336: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccccc}

1337: \footnotesize

1338: \tablecolumns{11} 

1339: \tablewidth{0pc}  

1340: \tablecaption{Adopted atmospheric parameters and inferred neutral and ionized iron abundances. 

1341: Adopted reference solar are log~n(Fe I)=7.54 and log~n(Fe II)=7.49.}

1342: \tablehead{ 

1343: \colhead{Star ID}  & \colhead{$T_{eff}$}& \colhead{$log{g}$}

1344:  &  \colhead{[A/H]} & 

1345: \colhead{$v_t$} & \colhead{n}  & \colhead{[Fe/H]I} & \colhead{rms} & \colhead{n} & \colhead{[Fe/H]II} & \colhead{rms} \\

1346: &  \colhead{(K)} & \colhead{(dex)} &  \colhead{(dex)}&\colhead{(km/s)}  &  &(dex) &(dex) &  & (dex) &(dex)

1347: }

1348: \startdata 

1349:      1651-6 &   3780  & 0.76 & -0.25   &  1.48    & 79   &  -0.27  & 0.19   &---& ---	&  ---      \\

1350:      1651-8 &   3810  & 0.81 & -0.40   &  1.52    & 81   &  -0.41  & 0.20   & 2	& -0.18 & 0.01    \\

1351:     1651-10 &   3890  & 0.92 & -0.32   &  1.55    & 69   &  -0.32  & 0.19   & 2	& -0.22 & 0.16  \\

1352:     1651-12 &   4035  & 1.07 & -0.31   &  1.70    & 89   &  -0.31  & 0.19   & 2	& -0.20 & 0.10  \\

1353:     1651-16 &   4010  & 1.20 & -0.20   &  1.49    & 74   &  -0.21  & 0.15   & 2	& -0.15 & 0.15  \\

1354: \hline

1355:     1783-22 &   3730  & 0.80 & -0.27   &  1.35    & 79   &  -0.26  & 0.19   & 3	& -0.35 & 0.05 \\

1356:     1783-23 &   3810  & 0.85 & -0.35   &  1.38    & 86   &  -0.34  & 0.17   &---& ---	& ---	    \\

1357:     1783-29 &   3870  & 0.91 & -0.37   &  1.32    & 101  &  -0.38  & 0.20   & 2 & -0.25 & 0.13  \\

1358:     1783-30 &   3850  & 0.92 & -0.36   &  1.37    & 79   &  -0.36  & 0.20   & 1	& -0.27 &  ---     \\

1359:     1783-32 &   3800  & 0.92 & -0.30   &  1.22    & 95   &  -0.31  & 0.19   & 3	& -0.33 & 0.11  \\

1360:     1783-33 &   3800  & 0.93 & -0.41   &  1.32    & 75   &  -0.44  & 0.13   & 1	& -0.40 &  ---     \\

1361: \hline

1362:     1978-21 &   3790  & 0.64 & -0.43   &  1.54    &  74  & -0.43   & 0.16   &---&---    &--- \\

1363:     1978-22 &   3700  & 0.55 & -0.37   &  1.50    &  78  & -0.39   & 0.17   & 7	& -0.27 & 0.19 \\

1364:     1978-23 &   3630  & 0.57 & -0.24   &  1.35    &  70  & -0.25   & 0.21   &--- & ---  & ---  \\

1365:     1978-24 &   3750  & 0.62 & -0.30   &  1.40    &  59  & -0.30   & 0.17   & 1	& -0.17 & ---\\

1366:     1978-26 &   3820  & 0.71 & -0.43   &  1.53    &  83  & -0.42   & 0.17   & 1	& -0.28 & ---\\

1367:     1978-28 &   3740  & 0.69 & -0.33   &  1.28    &  85  & -0.33   & 0.18   & 2 & -0.17 & 0.01  \\

1368:     1978-29 &   3750  & 0.71 & -0.44   &  1.58    &  89  & -0.44   & 0.21   & 4	&-0.30  &0.06 \\

1369:     1978-32 &   3700  & 0.73 & -0.40   &  1.39    &  84  & -0.41   & 0.19   & 2	&-0.30  &0.18 \\

1370:     1978-34 &   3900  & 0.83 & -0.32   &  1.49    &  84  & -0.32   & 0.20   &---&  --- & ---\\

1371:     1978-38 &   3840  & 0.81 & -0.43   &  1.59    &  72  & -0.44   & 0.14   & 2	& -0.37 & 0.11\\ 

1372:     1978-42 &   3880  & 0.86 & -0.43   &  1.55    &  92  & -0.43   & 0.18   & 2	& -0.26 & 0.17\\   

1373: \hline

1374:      2173-4 &   3850  & 0.51 & -0.49   &  1.75	  & 97   &  -0.50  & 0.18   & 9	  & -0.49 & 0.11 \\

1375:      2173-5 &   3780  & 0.52 & -0.47   &  1.73	  & 101  &  -0.47  & 0.22   & 3   & -0.37 & 0.13 \\

1376:      2173-6 &   3680  & 0.62 & -0.57   &  1.65	  & 77   &  -0.57  & 0.21   & --- &  ---  & --- \\

1377:      2173-8 &   4060  & 0.83 & -0.57   &  1.72	  & 106  &  -0.58  & 0.14   & 17  & -0.44 & 0.16  \\

1378:     2173-10 &   3880  & 0.91 & -0.42   &  1.65	  & 97   &  -0.41  & 0.18   &  2  & -0.35 & 0.12 \\

1379: \enddata 

1380: \end{deluxetable} 

1381:  

1382:  

1383: 

1384: 

1385: 

1386: 

1387: 

1388: 

1389: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccccccc} 

1390: \footnotesize

1391: \tablecolumns{13} 

1392: \tablewidth{0pc}  

1393: \tablecaption{Chemical abundances, number of measured lines and line-to-line scatter for 

1394: O, Na, Mg and Al.}

1395: \tablehead{ 

1396: \colhead{Star ID}  & \colhead{n}& 

1397: \colhead{[O/Fe]}

1398:  &  \colhead{rms} & 

1399: \colhead{n}  & \colhead{[Na/Fe]} & \colhead{rms}  & \colhead{n} & \colhead{[Mg/Fe]} & \colhead{rms} 

1400:  & \colhead{n} & \colhead{[Al/Fe]} & \colhead{rms}\\ 

1401:  & & \colhead{(dex)}

1402:  &  \colhead{(dex)} &   & \colhead{(dex)} & \colhead{(dex)} & &

1403:   \colhead{(dex)} & \colhead{(dex)}  & & \colhead{(dex)} & \colhead{(dex)} }

1404: \startdata 

1405:  $\log{N}_{\odot}$  &  & 8.79& & & 6.21& & &7.43&  & &6.23 & \\

1406:  \hline

1407:      1651-6 &   2   & -0.12 &  0.05  &   4	 & -0.14 & 0.12   & 3	& +0.16 & 0.13 & 2 & -0.42  & 0.08	  \\

1408:      1651-8 &   2   & -0.07 &  0.08  &   4 	 & -0.41 & 0.07   & 2	& +0.18 & 0.11 & 2 & -0.69  & 0.13	 \\

1409:     1651-10 &   2   & -0.05 &  0.06  &   4	 & -0.16 & 0.05   & 2	& +0.16 & 0.07 & 2 & -0.18  & 0.07	  \\

1410:     1651-12 &   2   & -0.05 &  0.06  &   4  	 & -0.03 & 0.10   & 3	& +0.12 & 0.14 & 2 & -0.28  & 0.06	  \\

1411:     1651-16 &   2   & -0.10 &  0.08  &   4	 & -0.31 & 0.12   & 3	& +0.10 & 0.16 & 2 & -0.59  & 0.02	  \\   

1412: \hline      							   		        		     

1413:     1783-22 &   2   & -0.04 &  0.06  &   4	 & -0.13 & 0.13   & 3	& +0.09 & 0.05 & 2 & -0.45  & 0.12	 \\

1414:     1783-23 &   2   & -0.12 &  0.11  &   4       & -0.12 & 0.09   & 3	& +0.12 & 0.05 & 2 & -0.43  & 0.07	 \\

1415:     1783-29 &   2   &  0.00 &  0.04  &   4       & -0.21 & 0.13   & 4	& +0.09 & 0.09 & 2 & -0.45  & 0.06	      \\

1416:     1783-30 &   2   & -0.12 &  0.07  &   4       & -0.20 & 0.13   & 4	& +0.19 & 0.15 & 2 & -0.36  & 0.08	  \\

1417:     1783-32 &   2   & -0.04 &  0.10  &   4       & +0.03 & 0.08   & 3	& +0.09 & 0.08 & 2 & -0.73  & 0.07	 \\

1418:     1783-33 &   2   & +0.01 &  0.09  &   4       & +0.00 & 0.11   & 4	& +0.17 & 0.14 & 2 & -0.55  & 0.09	 \\    

1419: \hline      

1420:     1978-21 &  2     & -0.03 & 0.06   & 4	  &-0.35 & 0.07   & 4	& +0.17 & 0.16 & 2 & -0.53 & 0.08      \\ 

1421:     1978-22 &  2     & -0.20 & 0.08   & 4	  &-0.05 & 0.13   & 4	& +0.12 & 0.12 & 2 & -0.50 & 0.01	\\

1422:     1978-23 &  2     & -0.15 & 0.07   & 4	  &+0.10 & 0.11   & 4	& +0.21 & 0.09 & 2 & -0.55 & 0.18      \\

1423:     1978-24 &  2     & -0.14 & 0.11   & 4	  &-0.24 & 0.14   & 4	& +0.19 & 0.15 & 2 & -0.41 & 0.11      \\

1424:     1978-26 &  2     & +0.02 & 0.08   & 4	  &-0.25 & 0.11   & 4	& +0.23 & 0.07 & 2 & -0.61 & 0.02      \\   

1425:     1978-28 &  2     & -0.05 & 0.05   & 4	  &-0.06 & 0.15   & 4	& +0.22 & 0.12 & 2 & -0.55 & 0.02	 \\ 

1426:     1978-29 &  2     & -0.06 & 0.08   & 4	  &-0.09 & 0.09   & 4	& +0.22 & 0.10 & 2 & -0.57 &0.05       \\

1427:     1978-32 &  2     & -0.08 & 0.07   & 4	  &-0.19 & 0.09   & 4	& +0.19 & 0.07 & 2 & -0.39 &0.08       \\

1428:     1978-34 &  1     &  0.02 & ---    & 3         &-0.36 & 0.09   & 3	& +0.19 & 0.11 & 2 & -0.56 & 0.05     \\

1429:     1978-38 &  2     & -0.02 & 0.08   & 4	  &-0.24 & 0.13   & 4	& +0.20 & 0.10 & 2 & -0.54 & 0.08	 \\   

1430:     1978-42 &  2     & -0.10 & 0.10   & 4	  &-0.21 & 0.11   & 4	& +0.11 & 0.15 & 2 & -0.55 & 0.02      \\     

1431: \hline    

1432:      2173-4 &  2     & -0.04 & 0.12   & 4	  & +0.27 & 0.11  & 4	&+0.15  & 0.08  & 2 & -0.32   & 0.03	 \\

1433:      2173-5 &  2     & -0.11 & 0.10   & 4         & +0.04 & 0.09  & 4	&+0.07  & 0.13  & 2 & -0.35   & 0.07	 \\

1434:      2173-6 &  2     & -0.07 & 0.07   & 4	  & -0.29 & 0.09  & 3	&+0.09  & 0.05  & 2 & -0.40   & 0.01	  \\

1435:      2173-8 &  2     & -0.08 & 0.07   & 4	  & +0.18 & 0.12  & 4	&+0.15  & 0.08  & 2 & -0.14   & 0.09	   \\

1436:     2173-10 &  2     & -0.05 & 0.08   & 4	  & -0.23 & 0.11  & 4	&+0.04  & 0.16  & 2 & -0.36   & 0.07	   \\

1437: \enddata 		     

1438: \tablecomments{Oxygen abundances are derived 

1439: from spectral synthesis. Sodium abundances are corrected for departures from LTE.}

1440: \end{deluxetable} 

1441: 

1442: 

1443: 

1444: 

1445: 

1446: 

1447: 

1448: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccccccc} 

1449: \footnotesize

1450: \tablecolumns{13} 

1451: \tablewidth{0pc}  

1452: \tablecaption{Chemical abundances, number of measured lines and line-to-line scatter for 

1453: Si, Ca, Sc and Ti.}

1454: \tablehead{ 

1455: \colhead{Star ID}  & 

1456: \colhead{n}  & \colhead{[Si/Fe]} & \colhead{rms}  & \colhead{n} & \colhead{[Ca/Fe]} & \colhead{rms} 

1457:  & \colhead{n} & \colhead{[Sc/Fe]II} & \colhead{rms}& \colhead{n}& \colhead{[Ti/Fe]}

1458:  &  \colhead{rms} \\ 

1459:  & & \colhead{(dex)}

1460:  &  \colhead{(dex)} &   & \colhead{(dex)} & \colhead{(dex)} & &

1461:   \colhead{(dex)} & \colhead{(dex)}  & & \colhead{(dex)} & \colhead{(dex)}}

1462: \startdata 

1463:  $\log{N}_{\odot}$  &  & 7.53 & & & 6.27& & &3.13& & &5.00&\\

1464:  \hline

1465:      1651-6  &  4  & -0.12 & 0.10 & 12 &  +0.04  & 0.16  &  5  & -0.06 & 0.12    & 15 & +0.11 & 0.14	   \\

1466:      1651-8  &  3  & +0.00 & 0.04 & 12 &  +0.00  & 0.17  &  5  & -0.11 & 0.10    & 13 & +0.11 & 0.13	  \\

1467:     1651-10  &  3  & -0.01 & 0.10 & 12 & -0.02  & 0.14   &  5  & +0.03 & 0.15    & 11 & +0.09 & 0.13	     \\

1468:     1651-12  &  4  & -0.12 & 0.10 & 11 &  +0.03  & 0.16  &  4  & -0.09 & 0.09    &  9 & +0.04 & 0.06	   \\

1469:     1651-16  &  3  & -0.12 & 0.07 & 11 & -0.07  & 0.13   &  4  & +0.00 & 0.15    & 18 & +0.15 & 0.15	      \\ 

1470: \hline     						   

1471:     1783-22 &  2  & +0.04 & 0.04 & 13 & -0.09  & 0.13    &  5  & -0.06 & 0.16    & 14 & +0.06& 0.16	      \\

1472:     1783-23 &  4  & +0.10 & 0.07 & 13 & -0.13  & 0.12    &  5  & -0.16 & 0.14    & 12 &-0.06 & 0.07	      \\

1473:     1783-29 &  3  & -0.06 & 0.04 & 12 & -0.07  & 0.13    &  5  & -0.04 & 0.16    & 13 & +0.13 & 0.09	     \\

1474:     1783-30 &  3  & -0.04 & 0.06 & 12 & -0.17  & 0.14    &  3  & -0.16 & 0.06    & 13 & +0.03 & 0.15	       \\

1475:     1783-32 &  3  & +0.05 & 0.08 & 13 & -0.17  & 0.09    &  5  & -0.01 & 0.10    & 16 & +0.00 & 0.14	     \\

1476:     1783-33 &  4  & +0.07 & 0.12& 12 & -0.15   & 0.09    &  4  & -0.10 & 0.08    & 12 & +0.01 & 0.14	      \\	   

1477: \hline    						       

1478:     1978-21 &  3  & +0.06 & 0.11 & 13 & -0.14  & 0.13    &  5  & -0.18 & 0.11    & 15 & +0.18 & 0.13	       \\

1479:     1978-22 &  3  & +0.10 & 0.02 & 14 & -0.12  & 0.18    &  4  & -0.15 & 0.06    & 13 & -0.02 & 0.09		\\

1480:     1978-23 &  4  & +0.14 & 0.07 & 14 & -0.10  & 0.15    &  4  & -0.26 & 0.06    & 14 & +0.11  & 0.17		   \\

1481:     1978-24 &  4  & +0.10 & 0.02 & 12 & -0.13  & 0.17    &  4  & -0.06 & 0.13    & 12 & +0.08 & 0.15	     \\

1482:     1978-26 &  4  & +0.05 & 0.12 &  9 & -0.17  & 0.07    &  5  & -0.18 & 0.15    & 15 & +0.16 & 0.15	       \\ 

1483:     1978-28 &  3  & +0.11 & 0.09 & 12 & -0.11  & 0.15    &  5  & -0.14 & 0.15    & 13 & +0.07 & 0.12	    \\

1484:     1978-29 & 4   & +0.14 & 0.08 & 11 & -0.10	&0.17    &  5  & +0.01 & 0.12    & 15 & +0.04 & 0.17	       \\

1485:     1978-32 & 3   & +0.17 & 0.06 & 13 & -0.11  & 0.14    &  3  & -0.23 & 0.08    & 13 & -0.09  & 0.15		\\

1486:     1978-34 & 3   & +0.05 & 0.03 & 12 & -0.08  & 0.17    &  4  & -0.15 & 0.08    & 13 & +0.08 & 0.12	     \\

1487:     1978-38 & 3   & +0.08 & 0.09& 14 & -0.08  & 0.16     &  5  & -0.09 & 0.14    & 16 & +0.00 & 0.19	      \\

1488:     1978-42 & 4   & +0.04 & 0.07 & 8 & -0.18  & 0.08     &  5  & -0.31 & 0.11    &17 & +0.06 & 0.18	     \\   

1489: \hline     

1490:      2173-4 &  4  & +0.07&  0.10 &11  & +0.00 & 0.16     &  4  & -0.11 & 0.10    & 10 & +0.18 & 0.15	\\

1491:      2173-5 &  4  & +0.04 & 0.04 &12  & -0.01 & 0.14     &  5  & -0.19 & 0.13    & 14 & +0.19 & 0.16 \\

1492:      2173-6 &  3  & +0.13 & 0.11 &11  & +0.02 & 0.14     &  4  & -0.14 & 0.09    & 17 & +0.15 & 0.15 \\

1493:      2173-8 &  4  & +0.05 & 0.07 &13  & +0.00 & 0.16	 &  5  & -0.15 & 0.09    & 19 & +0.12 & 0.09 \\

1494:     2173-10 &  4  & +0.07 & 0.10 &12  & -0.09 & 0.16     &  4  & +0.00 & 0.08    & 13 & +0.09 & 0.06 \\

1495: \enddata 

1496: \tablecomments{Scandium abundances include HFS corrections.}

1497: \end{deluxetable} 

1498: 

1499: 

1500: 

1501: 

1502: 

1503: 

1504: 

1505: 

1506: 

1507: 

1508: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccccccc}

1509: \footnotesize

1510: \tablecolumns{13} 

1511: \tablewidth{0pc}  

1512: \tablecaption{Chemical abundances, number of measured lines and line-to-line scatter for 

1513: V, Cr, Co and Ni.}

1514: \tablehead{ 

1515: \colhead{Star ID}  & \colhead{n}& \colhead{[V/Fe]}

1516:  &  \colhead{rms} & 

1517: \colhead{n}  & \colhead{[Cr/Fe]} & \colhead{rms}  & \colhead{n} & \colhead{[Co/Fe]} & \colhead{rms} 

1518:    & \colhead{n} & \colhead{[Ni/Fe]} & \colhead{rms} \\ 

1519:  & & \colhead{(dex)}

1520:  &  \colhead{(dex)} &   & \colhead{(dex)} & \colhead{(dex)} & &

1521:   \colhead{(dex)} & \colhead{(dex)}  & & \colhead{(dex)} & \colhead{(dex)}}

1522: \startdata

1523: $\log{N}_{\odot}$  &  & 3.97& & & 5.67& & &4.92&  & &6.28& \\     

1524: \hline

1525:      1651-6   &   8  &+0.09 & 0.08 & 10 & -0.14 & 0.15      & 2  &-0.02 &  0.06    &   23 &+0.00 & 0.16        \\	   

1526:      1651-8   &   8  &+0.08 & 0.13 & 13 &  0.00 & 0.14      & 2  &-0.02 &  0.05    &   24 &-0.04 & 0.13    	 \\

1527:     1651-10   &   6  &+0.05 & 0.06 & 12 & -0.16 & 0.10      & 3  &-0.01 &  0.11    &   23  &+0.07   &0.16  	\\

1528:     1651-12   &   8  &-0.05 & 0.08 & 12 & -0.04 & 0.16      & 3  &-0.06 &  0.02    &   27  &-0.02   & 0.16     \\

1529:     1651-16   &   9  &-0.03 & 0.12 & 15 & -0.08 & 0.15      & 2  &-0.03 &  0.14    &   30  &+0.06   & 0.13     \\  

1530: \hline      

1531:     1783-22   &   7  &+0.14 & 0.11 & 13 & -0.16   & 0.15     &2  &+0.07 &  0.04    &	24  &+0.00   & 0.15       \\

1532:     1783-23   &   7  &-0.13 & 0.15 & 14 & -0.21  & 0.15      &3  &-0.05 &  0.05    &	26  &-0.01   &0.16       \\

1533:     1783-29   &   7  &+0.13 & 0.14 & 13 & -0.05  & 0.16      &3  &+0.05 &  0.09    &	25  &+0.00   &0.12        \\

1534:     1783-30   &   5  &-0.04 & 0.12 & 16 & -0.19  & 0.15      &3  &+0.00 &  0.06    &	25  &-0.05   &0.16       \\

1535:     1783-32   &   7  &+0.05 & 0.15 & 14 & -0.07  & 0.15      &3  &-0.09 &  0.08    &	25 &-0.01   &0.15        \\

1536:     1783-33   &   7  &-0.01 & 0.15 & 14 & -0.05  & 0.16      &3  &+0.05 &  0.10    &	28 &+0.02  & 0.16  	 \\  

1537: \hline       						    	    

1538:     1978-21   &   9  & +0.03 & 0.16 & 15 & -0.12  & 0.16     &3  &-0.12 &  0.15    &	23& +0.02  & 0.14           \\

1539:     1978-22   &   6  &-0.09 & 0.13 & 14 & -0.17  & 0.15      &3  &-0.10 &  0.15    &  26 & +0.08  & 0.15            \\ 

1540:     1978-23   &   5  & +0.16 & 0.07 & 13 & -0.03   & 0.17    &3  & -0.13 &  0.12   &  26 & +0.11  & 0.15              \\ 

1541:     1978-24   &   6  & +0.18 & 0.13 & 14 & -0.13  & 0.16     &2  & +0.09 &  0.05   &  25 & +0.13  & 0.15            \\ 

1542:     1978-26   &   6  & +0.22 & 0.16 & 14 & -0.12  & 0.16     &3  &-0.11 &  0.11    &  25& +0.10  & 0.16             \\

1543:     1978-28   &   5  & +0.15 & 0.08 &  9 & -0.01  & 0.15     &3  & +0.04 &  0.13   &  27 & +0.01  & 0.16            \\    

1544:     1978-29   &   6  & +0.05 & 0.10 & 14 &-0.10  & 0.15      &3  & +0.00 &  0.06   &  23 & +0.04  & 0.10            \\

1545:     1978-32   &   5  & +0.13 & 0.12 & 13 &-0.14   & 0.16     &3  & +0.09 &  0.13   &  24& +0.02  & 0.14              \\

1546:     1978-34   &   6  & +0.00 & 0.17 & 12& -0.20  & 0.15      &2  & +0.00 &  0.05   &  20& +0.11  & 0.16              \\

1547:     1978-38   &   7  &-0.14 & 0.05 & 13 & -0.16   & 0.12     &3  & +0.11 &  0.15   &  31 &-0.05  & 0.15               \\

1548:     1978-42   &   7  &-0.02 & 0.17 & 11 & -0.17  & 0.16      &3  & +0.03 &  0.15   &  31&-0.02  & 0.12	   	    \\

1549: \hline      						    	  

1550:      2173-4  &  7  &  +0.04 & 0.09 & 18 &-0.08 & 0.16        &3  & -0.11&  0.13    &	30  & -0.15  & 0.16    \\   

1551:      2173-5  &  7  &  +0.09 & 0.10 & 12 & +0.03 & 0.12       &3  & +0.03&  0.10    &	27 & -0.05 & 0.1       \\   

1552:      2173-6  &  8  & -0.03 & 0.13 & 11 & -0.05 & 0.17        &3  & +0.01&  0.13    &	16  & -0.07  & 0.13    \\  

1553:      2173-8  & 11  & -0.11 & 0.16 & 17 & -0.11  & 0.14       &3  & -0.10&  0.14    &   35  & -0.04 & 0.13       \\  

1554:     2173-10  &  8  & -0.13 & 0.07 & 12 & -0.06 & 0.14        &4  & -0.20&  0.15    &	32 & -0.05 &  0.15     \\  

1555: \enddata 

1556: \tablecomments{Vanadium and Cobalt abundances include HFS corrections.}

1557: \end{deluxetable} 

1558: 

1559: 

1560: 

1561: 

1562: 

1563: 

1564: 

1565: 

1566: 

1567: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccccccc} 

1568: \footnotesize

1569: \tablecolumns{13} 

1570: \tablewidth{0pc}  

1571: \tablecaption{Chemical abundances, number of measured lines and line-to-line scatter for 

1572: Y, Zr, Ba and La.}

1573: \tablehead{ 

1574: \colhead{Star ID}  & \colhead{n}& \colhead{[Y/Fe]II}

1575:  &  \colhead{rms} & 

1576: \colhead{n}  & \colhead{[Zr/Fe]} & \colhead{rms}  & \colhead{n} & \colhead{[Ba/Fe]II} & \colhead{rms} 

1577:  & \colhead{n} & \colhead{[La/Fe]II} & \colhead{rms}\\ 

1578:  & & \colhead{(dex)}

1579:  &  \colhead{(dex)} &   & \colhead{(dex)} & \colhead{(dex)} & &

1580:   \colhead{(dex)} & \colhead{(dex)}  & & \colhead{(dex)} & \colhead{(dex)}

1581:  }

1582: \startdata 

1583:  $\log{N}_{\odot}$  &  & 2.22 & & & 2.60& & &2.22& & &1.22&\\

1584:  \hline

1585:      1651-6 &  3  & -0.39 & 0.02  &  3  & -0.53 & 0.08 & 3  & +0.44  & 0.11 & 1 & +0.19 & ---\\

1586:      1651-8 &  2   & -0.27& 0.16   & 3   & -0.41 & 0.13 & 3 & +0.49  & 0.08 & 1 & +0.34 & ---\\

1587:     1651-10 &  3  &-0.51 & 0.11  & 2   & -0.49 & 0.01 & 3   & +0.49  & 0.09 & 1 & +0.26 & ---\\

1588:     1651-12 & 2   & -0.32 & 0.08  & 2   & -0.41 & 0.07& 3   & +0.38  & 0.01 & 1 & +0.12 & ---\\

1589:     1651-16 & 2   & -0.50& 0.12  & 1  & -0.39 & --- & 3     & +0.44  & 0.04 & 1 & +0.11 &--- \\ 

1590: \hline         

1591:     1783-22 & 2   & -0.64& 0.03  & 3   & -0.38 & 0.11 & 3 &  +0.43 & 0.09 & 1 & +0.34& ---   \\

1592:     1783-23 & 2   & -0.40& 0.09  &  3  & -0.57 & 0.07 & 3 & +0.44 & 0.10 & 1 & +0.28& ---   \\

1593:     1783-29 & 2   & -0.48& 0.01  &  3  & -0.57 & 0.07 & 3 & +0.44  & 0.09 & 1 & +0.35 & ---  \\

1594:     1783-30 & 3   & -0.58& 0.14  &  2  & -0.39 & 0.02 & 2 & +0.40 &  0.12& 1 &+0.25  & ---  \\

1595:     1783-32 & 2   & -0.59& 0.02  &  3  & -0.67 & 0.06 & 2 & +0.44  & 0.13 & 1 & +0.37 & ---  \\

1596:     1783-33 & 3   & -0.43 & 0.13  &  2  & -0.64 & 0.04 & 3 &+0.37 & 0.08 & 1 & +0.31 & ---  \\	 

1597: \hline     

1598:     1978-21 &  2  & -0.42& 0.06  &  3  &  -0.29& 0.10 & 3 & +0.48  & 0.11& 1 & +0.31 &--- \\

1599:     1978-22 &  3  & -0.42& 0.08  &  3  & -0.44 & 0.07 & 3 & +0.37  & 0.11& 1& +0.10 & --- \\

1600:     1978-23 &  1  & -0.54& ---  & 2   & -0.26 & 0.07 & 3 & +0.49  & 0.09  & 1 & +0.20 & --- \\

1601:     1978-24 &  2  & -0.41& 0.05  & 2   & -0.52 & 0.06 & 3 & +0.47  & 0.10 &1  & +0.09 & --- \\

1602:     1978-26 &  2  & -0.70& 0.11  & 3   & -0.52 & 0.12 & 2 & +0.37  & 0.04 & 1 &+0.30  & ---  \\ 

1603:     1978-28 &  2  & -0.57& 0.04  & 3   & -0.32 & 0.13 & 3 & +0.52  & 0.10 & 1 & +0.28 &---  \\

1604:     1978-29 &  2  & -0.68 &0.06   & 3   & -0.56 & 0.13 & 3 & +0.34  & 0.13&1  & +0.19 & --- \\

1605:     1978-32 & 2   &-0.50 & 0.02  & 2   & -0.65 & 0.01 & 3 & +0.38  & 0.03 &  1&+0.22  & ---  \\

1606:     1978-34 & 2   & -0.65& 0.11  &  3  & -0.38 & 0.14 & 3 & +0.50  & 0.13 &1&+0.21  & --- \\

1607:     1978-38 & 3   &-0.46 & 0.12  &  3  & -0.48 & 0.05 & 3 & +0.57  & 0.09 & --- & --- & --- \\

1608:     1978-42 & 1   & -0.55& ---  &  3  & -0.55 & 0.08 & 3 & +0.41  & 0.11 & 1&+0.26     &--- \\   

1609: \hline      

1610:      2173-4 & 2   & -0.34& 0.16 &  3  & -0.37 & 0.04 & 3 & +0.44 & 0.08   & 1& +0.17 & ---\\

1611:      2173-5 & 2   & -0.35& 0.05 & 4   & -0.30 & 0.05 & 3 & +0.36 & 0.11   & 1& +0.16 & ---\\

1612:      2173-6 & 2   & -0.35& 0.13 & 3   & -0.35 & 0.07 & 3 & +0.40 & 0.08   & 1& +0.29 & ---\\

1613:      2173-8 & 3   & -0.36& 0.18 & 3   & -0.49 & 0.11 & 3 & +0.47 & 0.09   & 1& +0.19 & ---\\

1614:     2173-10 & 3   & -0.21& 0.14 & 2   & -0.44 & 0.04 & 3 & +0.42 & 0.03   & 1& +0.18 & ---\\

1615: \enddata 

1616: \end{deluxetable} 

1617: 

1618: 

1619: 

1620: 

1621: 

1622: 

1623: 

1624: 

1625: 

1626:  

1627: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccccc} 

1628: \footnotesize

1629: \tablecolumns{10} 

1630: \tablewidth{0pc}  

1631: \tablecaption{Chemical abundances, number of measured lines and line-to-line scatter for 

1632: Ce, Nd and Eu.}

1633: \tablehead{ 

1634: \colhead{Star ID}  & \colhead{n}& \colhead{[Ce/Fe]II}

1635:  &  \colhead{rms} & 

1636: \colhead{n}  & \colhead{[Nd/Fe]II} & \colhead{rms}  & \colhead{n} & \colhead{[Eu/Fe]II} & \colhead{rms} \\ 

1637:  & & \colhead{(dex)}

1638:  &  \colhead{(dex)} & 

1639:  & \colhead{(dex)} & \colhead{(dex)}  & & \colhead{(dex)} & \colhead{(dex)}

1640:  }

1641: \startdata 

1642:  $\log{N}_{\odot}$  &  & 1.55& & & 1.50& & &0.51& \\

1643:  \hline

1644:      1651-6 &  1   &   -0.03 & ---   &  2    &   +0.41&   0.15 & 1& +0.24 &---  \\  

1645:      1651-8 &  1   &   +0.03 & ---   &  2    &   +0.52&   0.08 & 1& +0.37 &---    \\

1646:     1651-10 &  1   &   +0.16 & ---   &  2    &   +0.30&   0.06 & 1& +0.34 &---    \\

1647:     1651-12 &  1   &   +0.08 & ---   &  3    &   +0.40&   0.03 & 1& +0.44 &---   \\

1648:     1651-16 & ---  &   ---   & ---   &  2    &   +0.22&   0.07 & ---& ---   & --- \\  

1649: \hline        

1650:     1783-22 &  1   &   +0.08 & ---   &  2    &   +0.29&   0.01 & 1&  +0.41& --- \\

1651:     1783-23 &  1   &   +0.00 & ---   &  3    &   +0.22&   0.07 & 1&  +0.37& --- \\

1652:     1783-29 & ---  &   ---   & ---   &  3    &   +0.30&   0.13 & 1&  +0.39& ---  \\

1653:     1783-30 &  1   &   +0.10 & ---   &  2    &   +0.40&   0.12 & 1&  +0.34& --- \\

1654:     1783-32 &  1   &   -0.13 & ---   &  1    &   +0.21&    --- & ---&  ---  & --- \\

1655:     1783-33 &  1   &   -0.08 & ---   &  2    &   +0.49&   0.05 & 1&  +0.57& --- \\  

1656: \hline            			        

1657:     1978-21 &  1   & -0.08   & ---   &  3    &   +0.56&   0.08 & 1&  +0.34& ---      \\

1658:     1978-22 &  1   & +0.05   & ---   &  3    &   +0.44&   0.13 & 1&  +0.51& ---     \\ 

1659:     1978-23 &  1   & -0.02   & ---   &  3    &   +0.39&   0.15 & 1&  +0.34& ---      \\ 

1660:     1978-24 &  --- &  ---    & ---   &  4    &   +0.41&   0.07 & ---&  ---  & ---     \\ 

1661:     1978-26 &  1   & -0.06   & ---   &  3    &   +0.36&   0.07 & 1&  +0.31& ---     \\

1662:     1978-28 &  1   & +0.10   & ---   &  2    &   +0.31&   0.10 & 1&  +0.35& ---     \\    

1663:     1978-29 &  1   & -0.13   & ---   &  3    &   +0.32&   0.14 & 1&  +0.54& ---       \\

1664:     1978-32 &  1   & +0.03   & ---   &  3    &   +0.33&   0.12 & 1&  +0.37& ---      \\

1665:     1978-34 &  --- &  ---    & ---   &  1    &   +0.22&   --- &---& ---   & ---      \\

1666:     1978-38 &  1   & +0.03   & ---   &  2    &   +0.16&   0.02 & 1&  +0.49&---  \\

1667:     1978-42 &  1   & -0.02   & ---   &  2    &   +0.35&   0.08 & ---&  ---  & --- 	 \\

1668: \hline      

1669:      2173-4 &  1   & -0.02   & ---   &  2    &   +0.31 &  0.06 & 1  & +0.37&---  \\   

1670:      2173-5 &  1   & +0.07   & ---   &  3    &   +0.42 &  0.09 & 1  & +0.39&---  \\    

1671:      2173-6 &  1   & +0.00   & ---   &  2    &   +0.21 &  0.07 & 1  & +0.56&--- \\  

1672:      2173-8 &  1   & -0.01   & ---   &  2    &   +0.36 &  0.02 & 1  & +0.49&---  \\  

1673:     2173-10 &  1   & +0.05   & ---   &  2    &   +0.20 &  0.05 & 1  & +0.54&---  \\  

1674: \enddata 

1675: \tablecomments{Europium abundances are derived 

1676: from spectral synthesis. }

1677: \end{deluxetable} 

1678: 

1679: 

1680:  

1681: 

1682: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccc} 

1683: \footnotesize

1684: \tablecolumns{9} 

1685: \tablewidth{0pc}  

1686: \tablecaption{Mean abundance ratios for NGC 1651 and NGC 1783.}

1687: \tablehead{ 

1688: & &  \colhead{NGC1651} & & & & \colhead{NGC1783}  & & \\

1689: \colhead{Ratio}  & \colhead{$N_{star}$}& \colhead{Mean}

1690:  &  \colhead{$\sigma_{obs}$} & 

1691: \colhead{$\sigma_{exp}$}  & \colhead{$N_{star}$}& \colhead{Mean}

1692:  &  \colhead{$\sigma_{obs}$} & 

1693: \colhead{$\sigma_{exp}$}  \\

1694: &  & \colhead{(dex)} &  \colhead{(dex)} &  \colhead{(dex)} & 

1695: & \colhead{(dex)} &  \colhead{(dex)} &  \colhead{(dex)}

1696:  }

1697: \startdata 

1698:     $[O/Fe]$	& 5  &  -0.07 & 0.04 & 0.14 & 6  & -0.06   & 0.08 &  0.14   \\

1699:     $[Na/Fe]$	& 5  &  -0.21 & 0.15 & 0.11 & 6  & -0.10   & 0.10 &  0.11\\

1700:     $[Mg/Fe]$	& 5  &  +0.10 & 0.04 & 0.11 & 6	 & +0.12   & 0.04 &  0.10 \\

1701:     $[Al/Fe]$	& 5  &  -0.43 & 0.21 & 0.14 & 6  & -0.49   & 0.13 &  0.14  \\

1702:     $[Si/Fe]$	& 5  &  -0.07 & 0.06 & 0.13 & 6  & +0.03   & 0.06 &  0.12 \\

1703:     $[Ca/Fe]$	& 5  &  +0.00 & 0.04 & 0.13 & 6  & -0.13   & 0.04 &  0.12  \\

1704:     $[Sc/Fe]$II & 5  &  -0.05 & 0.06 & 0.15 & 6  & -0.08   & 0.06 &  0.14 \\

1705:     $[Ti/Fe]$	& 5  &  -0.03 & 0.02 & 0.16 & 6  & +0.03   & 0.06 &  0.14 \\

1706:     $[V/Fe]$	& 5  &  +0.03 & 0.06 & 0.18 & 6  & +0.02   & 0.10 &  0.15 \\

1707:     $[Cr/Fe]$	& 5  &  -0.08 & 0.07 & 0.12 & 6  & -0.12   & 0.07 &  0.12 \\

1708:     $[Fe/H]$	& 5  &  -0.30 & 0.07 & 0.10 & 6  & -0.35   & 0.06 &  0.07  \\

1709:     $[Fe/H]$II  & 5  &  -0.19 & 0.03 & 0.21 & 6  & -0.29   & 0.06 &  0.19 \\

1710:     $[Co/Fe]$	& 5  &  -0.03 & 0.02 & 0.17 & 6  & +0.01   & 0.06 &  0.12 \\

1711:     $[Ni/Fe]$	& 5  &  +0.01 & 0.05 & 0.09 & 6  & -0.01   & 0.02 &  0.07 \\

1712:     $[Y/Fe]$II  & 5  &  -0.40 & 0.11 & 0.16 & 6  & -0.52   & 0.10 &  0.14\\

1713:     $[Zr/Fe]$   & 5  &  -0.45 & 0.06 & 0.22 & 6  & -0.54   & 0.13 &  0.16\\

1714:     $[Ba/Fe]$II & 5  &  +0.45 & 0.04 & 0.13 & 6  & +0.42   & 0.03 &  0.10\\

1715:     $[La/Fe]$II & 5  &  +0.20 & 0.10 & 0.21 & 6  & +0.32   & 0.04 &  0.20\\

1716:     $[Ce/Fe]$II & 4  &  +0.06 &	0.08 & 0.21 & 4  & +0.01   & 0.10 &  0.19\\

1717:     $[Nd/Fe]$II & 5  &  +0.37 & 0.11 & 0.14 & 6  & +0.32   & 0.11 &  0.16\\

1718:     $[Eu/Fe]$II & 4  &  +0.35 & 0.08 & 0.21 & 5  & +0.42   & 0.09 &  0.20\\

1719: \enddata 

1720: \end{deluxetable} 

1721: 

1722: \clearpage

1723: 

1724: 

1725: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccc} 

1726: \tablecolumns{9} 

1727: \tablewidth{0pc}  

1728: \tablecaption{Mean abundance ratios for NGC 1978 and NGC 2173.}

1729: \tablehead{ 

1730: &  &\colhead{NGC1978} & & &   & \colhead{NGC2173}  &  \\

1731: \colhead{Ratio}  & \colhead{$N_{star}$}& \colhead{Mean}

1732:  &  \colhead{$\sigma_{obs}$} & 

1733: \colhead{$\sigma_{exp}$}  & \colhead{$N_{star}$}& \colhead{Mean}

1734:  &  \colhead{$\sigma_{obs}$} & 

1735: \colhead{$\sigma_{exp}$} \\ 

1736: &  & \colhead{(dex)} &  \colhead{(dex)} &  \colhead{(dex)} & 

1737: & \colhead{(dex)} &  \colhead{(dex)} &  \colhead{(dex)}}

1738: \startdata 

1739:   $[O/Fe]$    & 11  & -0.11 & 0.08  & 0.14 & 5  & -0.04   & 0.03 & 0.14  \\

1740:   $[Na/Fe]$   & 11  & -0.16 & 0.13  & 0.13 & 5  & +0.01   & 0.25 & 0.11  \\

1741:   $[Mg/Fe]$   & 11  & +0.19 & 0.04  & 0.14 & 5  & +0.10   & 0.05 & 0.10  \\

1742:   $[Al/Fe]$   & 11  & -0.52 & 0.07  & 0.14 & 5  & -0.31   & 0.10 & 0.14  \\

1743:   $[Si/Fe]$   & 11  & +0.09 & 0.04  & 0.12 & 5  & +0.07   & 0.03 & 0.12  \\

1744:   $[Ca/Fe]$   & 11  & -0.11 & 0.05  & 0.15 & 5  & +0.00   & 0.06 & 0.13  \\

1745:   $[Sc/Fe]$II & 11  & -0.17 & 0.09  & 0.15 & 5  & -0.12   & 0.07 & 0.14 \\

1746:   $[Ti/Fe]$   & 11  & +0.08 & 0.07  & 0.16 & 5  & +0.15   & 0.04 & 0.16  \\

1747:   $[V/Fe]$    & 11  & +0.05 & 0.13  & 0.18 & 5  & -0.03   & 0.09 & 0.18 \\

1748:   $[Cr/Fe]$   & 11  & -0.13 & 0.04  & 0.11 & 5  & -0.05   & 0.05 & 0.11  \\

1749:   $[Fe/H]$   & 11  & -0.38 & 0.07  & 0.10 & 5  & -0.51   & 0.07 & 0.09 \\

1750:   $[Fe/H]$II  & 11  & -0.26 & 0.06  & 0.18 & 5  & -0.37   & 0.06 & 0.15 \\

1751:   $[Co/Fe]$   & 11  & -0.01 & 0.09  & 0.14 & 5  & -0.07   & 0.09 & 0.13 \\

1752:   $[Ni/Fe]$   & 11  & +0.05 & 0.06  & 0.09 & 5  & -0.07   & 0.04 & 0.08  \\

1753:   $[Y/Fe]$II  & 11  & -0.54 & 0.11  & 0.14 & 5  & -0.32   & 0.06 &0.15 \\

1754:   $[Zr/Fe]$   & 11  & -0.45 & 0.12  & 0.18 & 5  & -0.39   & 0.07 &0.18 \\

1755:   $[Ba/Fe]$II & 11  & +0.45 & 0.07  & 0.11 & 5  & +0.42   & 0.04 &0.11 \\

1756:   $[La/Fe]$II & 10  & +0.22 & 0.08  & 0.20 & 5  & +0.20   & 0.05 &0.20 \\

1757:   $[Ce/Fe]$II &  9  & -0.01 & 0.07  & 0.20 & 5  & +0.02   & 0.04 &0.21 \\

1758:   $[Nd/Fe]$II & 11  & +0.35 & 0.11  & 0.18 & 5  & +0.30   & 0.09 &0.16 \\

1759:   $[Eu/Fe]$II &  8  & +0.41 & 0.09  & 0.20 & 5  & +0.47   & 0.09 &0.21 \\

1760: \enddata 

1761: \end{deluxetable} 

1762: 

1763: 

1764: 

1765: 

1766: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc} 

1767: \tablecolumns{7} 

1768: \tablewidth{0pc}  

1769: \tablecaption{

1770: Comparison between the EWs measured on synthetic 

1771: spectra of Ba lines computed both with and without HFS, for some target 

1772: stars with different atmospheric parameters. HFS components are from 

1773: \citep{pro00}.}

1774: \tablehead{ 

1775: \colhead{Star} & \colhead{$EW_{5853 \mathring{A}}^{NOHFS}$} & \colhead{$EW_{5853 \mathring{A}}^{HFS}$} 

1776: & \colhead{ $EW_{6141 \mathring{A}}^{NOHFS}$} 

1777: & \colhead{$EW_{6141 \mathring{A}}^{HFS}$} & \colhead{$EW_{6496 \mathring{A}}^{NOHFS}$} & \colhead{$EW_{6496 \mathring{A}}^{HFS}$}\\

1778:     &  \colhead{ (m$\mathring{A}$)}  &  \colhead{ (m$\mathring{A}$)}    & \colhead{(m$\mathring{A}$)} &  

1779:     \colhead{ (m$\mathring{A}$)}  & \colhead{(m$\mathring{A}$)} &   \colhead{(m$\mathring{A}$)} }

1780: \startdata 

1781:   1651-6  & 176.3   &  172.6   &   260.5    &  258.3   & 262.0   & 259.5   \\

1782:   1651-12 & 162.9   &  162.2   &   271.4    &  266.9   & 230.9   & 228.5  \\

1783:   1783-22 & 170.7   &  168.8   &   274.0    &  272.2  & 231.0   & 227.8  \\

1784:   1783-29 & 159.5   &  154.0   &   253.9    &  250.4  & 252.1   & 248.5   \\

1785:   1978-22 & 163.4   &  161.3   &   277.4    &  275.3  & 259.5   & 254.7  \\

1786:   1978-42 & 164.1   &  162.7   &   252.9    &  249.2  & 250.4   & 247.8  \\

1787:   2173-6  &  177.6  &  175.3   &   258.4    &  255.0  & 244.3   &  238.9 \\

1788:   2173-8  &  179.1  &  176.4   &   252.7    &  250.5  & 243.0   &  240.3 \\

1789: \enddata 

1790: \label{tab_ba}

1791: \end{deluxetable} 

1792: 

1793: 

1794: 

1795: \end{document}

1796: