1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %%\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
3: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
4:
5: \newcommand{\sollum} {\hbox{$L_{\odot}$}}
6: \newcommand{\solmass} {\hbox{$M_{\odot}$}}
7: \def\deg{\ifmmode^\circ\else$^\circ$\fi}
8:
9: \shorttitle{Discovery of Eight Extragalactic H$_2$O Masers}
10: \shortauthors{Braatz \& Gugliucci}
11:
12: \begin{document}
13:
14: \title{The Discovery of Water Maser Emission from Eight Nearby Galaxies}
15:
16: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
17: %% author and affiliation information.
18: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
19: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
20: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
21: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
22:
23: \author{J.A. Braatz}
24: \affil{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, 520 Edgemont Rd., Charlottesville, VA 22903}
25: \email{jbraatz@nrao.edu}
26:
27: \and
28:
29: \author{N.E. Gugliucci}
30: \affil{Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904}
31: \email{neg9j@virginia.edu}
32:
33: \begin{abstract}
34: Using the Green Bank Telescope, we conducted a ``snapshot'' survey for water
35: maser emission toward the nuclei of 611 galaxies and detected eight new
36: sources. The sample consisted of nearby ($v < $ 5000 km s$^{-1}$) and luminous
37: ($M_B$ $<$ -19.5) galaxies, some with known nuclear activity but most
38: not previously known to host AGNs. Our detections include both
39: megamasers associated with AGNs and relatively low luminosity masers
40: probably associated with star formation.
41: The detection in UGC~3789 is particularly intriguing
42: because the spectrum shows both systemic and high-velocity lines indicative
43: of emission from an AGN accretion disk seen edge-on. Based on six months of
44: monitoring, we detected accelerations among the systemic features ranging
45: from 2 to 8 km s$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$, the larger values belonging to the
46: most redshifted systemic components. High-velocity maser lines
47: in UGC~3789 show no detectable drift over the same period. Although
48: UGC~3789 was not known to be an AGN prior to this survey, the presence of a
49: disk maser is strong evidence for nuclear activity, and an optical spectrum
50: obtained later has confirmed it. With follow up observations, it may be
51: possible to measure a geometric distance to UGC~3789.
52: \end{abstract}
53:
54: \keywords{galaxies: active --- galaxies: nuclei --- galaxies: Seyfert ---
55: ISM: molecules --- masers --- radio lines: galaxies}
56:
57: \section{Introduction}
58:
59: Water maser emission at 22 GHz is commonly detected toward Galactic H II
60: regions, pinpointing the locations of massive star formation. The median
61: isotropic line luminosity in these sources is 10$^{-4}$ $\sollum$ (Genzel \& Downes, 1977), although in
62: exceptional cases such as W49 the luminosity can reach $\sim$ 1 $\sollum$.
63: Analogs to the W49 maser have been observed in H II regions of several
64: nearby galaxies as well, where the combined radiation from multiple sites
65: of star formation can lead to somewhat larger luminosities. The most distant (14.5 Mpc)
66: and luminous (L$_{H_2O}$ $\sim$ 8 $\sollum$) example of this type was detected
67: toward the starburst galaxy NGC~2146 (Tarchi et al. 2002). In recent years,
68: masers in extragalactic star-forming regions have become an important tool for
69: measuring proper motions of the host galaxies, as in IC~10 and M~33
70: (Brunthaler et al. 2005, 2007)
71:
72: Extragalactic water masers are also detected toward some active galactic
73: nuclei (AGN), usually Seyfert 2 or LINER galaxies (Braatz et al. 1997).
74: These sources have been called ``megamasers'' because the isotropic line
75: luminosities exceed the median value of Galactic masers by $\sim$ 6 orders
76: of magnitude. Both galactic and extragalactic masers, however, are not
77: believed to emit isotropically so the true line luminosity is smaller in each
78: case by an unknown beaming factor. Masers in AGN accretion disks,
79: specifically, are thought to be beamed in the plane of the disk.
80:
81: High resolution imaging shows that megamasers are located within parsecs of the
82: galactic nucleus, where they are associated either with jet-cloud
83: interactions, nuclear outflows, or parsec-scale accretion disks.
84: Unlike star formation masers, which only have Doppler components detected within $\sim$
85: 200 km s$^{-1}$ of the galaxy systemic recession velocity, masers in AGN
86: accretion disks have shown velocity offsets up to $\sim$ 1300 km s$^{-1}$
87: (Kondratko et al. 2006a) owing to rotation about the central
88: black hole. In the case of NGC~4258, masers trace the accretion disk
89: 0.11 -- 0.28 pc from the black hole (Argon et al. 2007), and have been
90: used to measure the most precise geometric distance to a galaxy,
91: 7.2 $\pm$ 0.2 (random statistical) $\pm$ 0.5 (systematic) Mpc (Herrnstein et al. 1999).
92: The topic of extragalactic masers has recently been reviewed by Lo (2005).
93:
94: NGC~4258 is currently the only galaxy with a robust maser distance, but large surveys
95: are seeking additional examples of disk masers appropriate for such a measurement.
96: Most surveys target Seyfert 2 and LINER galaxies (e.g. Greenhill et al. 2003; Braatz et al. 2004;
97: Kondratko et al. 2006a, 2006b). With sensitive
98: observations using large aperture telescopes, overall detection rates
99: are $\sim$ 5\%, and several disk masers have been identified. The masers detected
100: by these surveys tend to be faint (peak fluxes of a few tens of mJy) and challenging
101: to study in detail. Candidates for new surveys are limited by the number of AGNs
102: identified in optical surveys.
103:
104: While disk masers are clearly associated with active galaxies, the luminosity of the host AGN
105: is modest in several of the most interesting cases. For example, the bolometric
106: luminosity of NGC~4258, which has been classified either as a LINER or a weakly active
107: Sy 1.9, is only $10^{42}$ erg s$^{-1}$ (e.g. Chary et al. 2000). Furthermore, Ho et al.
108: (1997) found that 43\% of a magnitude-limited sample of nearby galaxies
109: host AGN, mostly with low luminosity, demonstrating that many apparently normal galaxies in fact
110: host low luminosity AGN. We were thus motivated to conduct a new survey for H$_2$O maser
111: emission in nearby galaxies not necessarily known to host AGNs. Our intention was to identify
112: bright maser systems ($\gtrsim$ 50 mJy) conducive to detailed Very Long Baseline Interferometry
113: (VLBI) imaging and spectral line monitoring. With the GBT we can identify such masers using
114: short integrations, making it possible to observe a large sample and balance the relatively
115: low detection rate expected.
116:
117: \section{Observations}
118: We conducted observations between 2005 September 27 and 2007 April 14
119: using the Green Bank Telescope (GBT) of the National Radio Astronomy
120: Observatory. The project was observed in 31 individual sessions,
121: often assigned to fill short gaps in the telescope
122: schedule. We configured the spectrometer with two 200 MHz spectral windows,
123: each with 8192 channels, giving a channel spacing of 24 kHz corresponding to
124: 0.33 km s$^{-1}$ at 22 GHz. The spectral windows were overlapped slightly such that the
125: total bandwidth coverage was 380 MHz (5100 km s$^{-1}$). The systemic
126: recession velocity of each galaxy was typically centered in one spectral
127: window and the second window was offset to the red. For a few galaxies, the
128: spectral windows were tuned with the systemic recession velocity in the
129: overlap region, giving symmetric velocity coverage. We observed in dual
130: circular polarization using a total power nodding mode in which the galaxy was
131: placed alternately in one of two beams of the 18 -- 22 GHz K-band receiver.
132: A nodding cycle of 2.5 minutes per beam provided 5 minutes of integration per source.
133: When time permitted, we obtained longer integrations to investigate possible detections.
134:
135: We reduced and analyzed the data using GBTIDL. In order to enhance weak
136: signals, we smoothed the blank sky reference spectra using a 16-channel boxcar function
137: prior to calibration. We corrected the spectra for atmospheric
138: attenuation using opacities derived from weather data, and we applied an
139: elevation-dependent gain curve. The flux density scale uncertainty is about
140: 15\%, limited by noise tube calibration and pointing errors.
141: To remove residual baseline shapes from each 200 MHz spectrum,
142: we subtracted a polynomial (typically third order) fit to the line-free channels
143: of the calibrated spectrum. Typical rms noise levels for the 5-minute
144: observations were 6 mJy per 0.33 km s$^{-1}$ channel, after Hanning smoothing.
145:
146: Our candidate galaxies were selected from the Third Reference Catalog of Bright Galaxies
147: (de Vaucouleurs et al. 1991) using coarse criteria intended primarily to eliminate
148: galaxies without well-defined nuclei and those unlikely to host a hidden AGN.
149: The sample has (1) systemic recession velocity $v <$ 5000 km s$^{-1}$, which
150: corresponds to the distance at which the GBT could detect the NGC~4258 maser in
151: 5 minutes; (2) Hubble stage --3 $<$ T $<$ +5 to choose lenticulars and early-type
152: spirals; (3) absolute magnitude M$_B$ $<$ --19.5 to eliminate dwarf galaxies and
153: boost the likelihood of a prominent nuclear black hole; and (4) declinations north
154: of --30$\deg$, accessible to the GBT. We also eliminated galaxies previously searched
155: with the GBT. These criteria identified 1074 candidate galaxies, not all of which
156: were observed in the allotted time. We plan to observe the remaining galaxies in
157: ongoing surveys. Galaxies were finally chosen for observation based on nearest
158: neighbors, to minimize telescope slew time.
159:
160:
161: \section{Results}
162:
163: We searched for 22 GHz H$_2$O maser emission toward the nuclei of 611 galaxies
164: and detected masers in eight. Table 1 lists properties of the detected masers and
165: Table 2 lists the undetected galaxies from the survey, along with relevant observing parameters.
166: Each new maser was detected in more than one observing session except the one in NGC~1106,
167: which was not identified until the data were reexamined at the conclusion of the scheduled
168: observing. The best spectrum for each of the newly detected maser systems is shown in Figure 1.
169: Velocities quoted in this paper are heliocentric and use the optical definition of Doppler shift.
170:
171: Comments on the new masers and their host galaxies follow. For several of the
172: galaxies, we discuss the maser profile in the context of an accretion disk maser. In this
173: model, ``systemic'' emission refers to masers on the near side of the edge-on disk, along
174: the line of sight to the black hole. ``High-velocity'' emission refers to masers located
175: on the midline of the disk, rotating directly toward or away from the observer.
176:
177: \subsection {NGC 23}
178:
179: The maser detected in NGC~23 exhibits a broad profile relatively free of isolated, narrow features
180: and centered near the systemic velocity (Figure 1). The spectrum shows no evidence of high-velocity
181: lines. The isotropic luminosity of the source is 180 $\sollum$, suggesting the maser is
182: associated with an AGN. The profile resembles those from masers associated with nuclear
183: jets, such as NGC~1052 (Claussen et al. 1998) and Mrk~348 (Peck et al. 2003). However, NGC~23
184: is not known to have an AGN. With
185: log $L_{IR}$ = 11.05 $\sollum$ (Sanders et al. 2003), NGC~23 is a luminous infrared galaxy
186: (LIRG). The intense star formation associated with LIRGs might be expected to produce a large
187: number of star-formation masers whose cumulative emission could reach the observed isotropic
188: luminosity in NGC~23. However, Zhang et al. (2006) point out that the ultraluminous infrared
189: galaxy (ULIRG) Arp 220 would have been detected easily in recent surveys if the maser emission
190: were correlated with IR luminosity, yet Arp 220 has not been detected in H$_2$O.
191: Two ULIRGs have been detected in the water maser line: UGC~5101 (Zhang et al. 2006)
192: and NGC~6240 (Hagiwara et al. 2002; Nakai et al. 2002; Braatz et al. 2003). In both cases
193: the masers appear to be associated with an AGN and not star formation (Hagiwara et al. 2003;
194: Zhang et al. 2006). High resolution imaging could resolve the issue of whether
195: the maser in NGC~23 is associated with star formation or an AGN.
196:
197: \subsection {NGC 1106}
198:
199: NGC~1106 is an emission line galaxy, called a Seyfert 2 by Bonatto et al. (1996).
200: The maser detected in this galaxy contains a single, narrow (1.0 km s$^{-1}$ FWHM) component at
201: 3814 km s$^{-1}$, offset by 523 km s$^{-1}$ from the 4337 km s$^{-1}$ systemic recession velocity.
202: The large velocity offset hints that the maser may be a high-velocity line in an accretion disk.
203: The peak flux density is 74 mJy. Because the maser was not identified until all observations had
204: been completed, we did not obtain a confirmation spectrum for this source. However, the
205: maser line appears in both polarizations and in both beams of our observation. An observation of
206: NGC~1106 by Kondratko et al. (2006b) with 13 mJy rms sensitivity failed to detect the line, but it
207: would have appeared only at about 4$\sigma$ given their channel spacing of 1.3 km s$^{-1}$. We
208: also note that variability is common in narrow high-velocity lines.
209:
210: \subsection {UGC 3193}
211:
212: The maser observed toward the barred spiral galaxy UGC~3193 spans $\sim$ 350 km s$^{-1}$
213: and is localized in four distinct velocity windows. The profile shows remarkable symmetry
214: about the galaxy's recession velocity, even in the details of the inner two complexes.
215: However, no lines are detected at the systemic velocity itself. The profile thus hints that
216: the maser originates in a slowly rotating, edge-on disk, with only high-velocity features detected.
217: A spiral density pattern in an accretion disk or discrete rings could produce a pattern
218: as observed. The absence of emission directly at the systemic velocity may indicate that the
219: disk inclination or a warp prevents beaming of masers on the near side of the disk into our
220: line of sight. Alternatively, a lack of background continuum emission that would otherwise
221: provide seed emission for systemic features could account for the absence of detectable maser
222: emission near the systemic velocity.
223:
224: \subsection {UGC 3789}
225:
226: The maser detected in UGC~3789 shows a profile characteristic of emission from an edge-on nuclear
227: accretion disk. Maser lines are detected in three distinct velocity ranges (Figure 1), roughly
228: symmetric about the galaxy's recession velocity of 3325 $\pm$ 24 km s$^{-1}$. Systemic lines are
229: centered near 3275 km s$^{-1}$, offset slightly from the reported recession velocity. High velocity
230: lines span $\sim$ 1500 km s$^{-1}$, suggesting the maser disk traces rotation speeds
231: up to $\sim$ 750 km s$^{-1}$.
232:
233: Upon associating the maser in UGC~3789 with disk emission, we initiated a program to observe the
234: source at roughly 3-week intervals in order to track the velocities of systemic maser
235: components and measure the centripetal acceleration of the maser gas in orbit around the central
236: black hole. The
237: initial results of this monitoring program are shown in Figures 2 and 3. With the
238: six months of data presented here we have measured accelerations for nine individual lines
239: among the systemic features. The accelerations, listed in the Figure 2 caption, range
240: from 1.8 -- 8.1 km s$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$, with the smallest accelerations measured
241: near $\sim$ 3245 km s$^{-1}$ on the blue edge of the systemic features and the largest
242: near $\sim$ 3310 km s$^{-1}$ on the red edge. The mean of the nine accelerations
243: identified in Figure 2 is 4.0 $\pm$ 0.8 km s$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$. The wide range of measured
244: accelerations likely indicates that the systemic masers are not confined to a radially thin
245: ring, but rather are spread over a range of radial distance from the dynamical center of
246: the galaxy. The acceleration of systemic masers in NGC~4258 also varies for different
247: components, although with a smaller range (e.g. Humphreys et al. 2008). Among the
248: high-velocity features, measured accelerations are all less than 0.3 km s$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$.
249: Additional monitoring observations of UGC~3789 and a more detailed analysis of the accelerations will
250: follow in a later paper.
251:
252: A robust measurement of the mass of a black hole can be made by measuring the rotation
253: curve of a maser disk from a VLBI map. Without VLBI we can still make an estimate.
254: If we suppose that the systemic masers with the largest measured acceleration occur at
255: the same orbital radius as gas producing the largest rotation velocities among the
256: high-velocity masers and that the accretion disk is edge-on, we can approximate $M_{bh}$,
257: the mass of the black hole, by
258: $M_{bh} = rv^2/G = v^4/aG$. Here $r$ is the radius of the orbiting gas, $v$ is its
259: rotation velocity, $a$ is the centripetal acceleration, and $G$ is the gravitational constant.
260: Then $v \sim$ 750 km s$^{-1}$ and $a \sim$ 8.1 km s$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$ gives $M_{bh} \sim$
261: 9 $\times$ 10$^6 \solmass$ for UGC~3789.
262:
263: The systemic maser features in UGC~3789 are themselves split at $\sim$ 3275 km s$^{-1}$
264: by a dip in the emission (Figure 3).
265: At times, the systemic emission in NGC~4258 has shown a similar dip (e.g. Greenhill
266: et al. 1995a), although later data showed no evidence for it in that
267: galaxy (Bragg et al. 2000). Watson \& Wallin (1994) and
268: Maoz \& McKee (1998) developed models that invoke an absorbing layer of noninverted
269: H$_2$O in the maser disk to account for a dip in the emission.
270:
271: Megamaser emission is a beacon of nuclear activity. While UGC~3789 had not
272: been identified as an AGN prior to our survey, an optical spectrum of the nucleus
273: of the galaxy (Macri, private communication) reveals line flux ratios,
274: such as [O III]5007/H$\beta$ and [O I]6300/H$\alpha$, and line widths of
275: H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$ indicative of a Seyfert 2 nucleus.
276:
277: With additional observations, it might be possible to measure the distance to UGC~3789
278: using the maser method applied to NGC~4258 (Herrnstein et al. 1999).
279: We are continuing GBT monitoring and collecting sensitive VLBI observations for this
280: purpose, and the results of these studies will be presented in later papers.
281:
282: \subsection {NGC 2989}
283:
284: The weak maser emission detected in NGC~2989 spans 30 km s$^{-1}$ and is centered near the
285: systemic recession velocity of the galaxy. No high velocity lines are detected.
286: Although the isotropic luminosity (40 $\sollum$) is large compared to masers in
287: star formation regions, this galaxy has a nuclear H II region (Veron-Cetty \& Veron, 2003) and the
288: line profile is otherwise consistent with maser emission associated with star formation.
289: If confirmed as a star formation maser, this galaxy, at a nominal distance of 58 Mpc
290: (assuming H$_0$ = 72 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$) would be the most distant known source of such
291: emission. However we cannot rule out the possibility that the maser is associated with an AGN.
292:
293: \subsection {NGC 3359}
294:
295: The maser emission from NGC~3359 has several weak, narrow features spanning $\sim$ 10 km s$^{-1}$
296: with a total isotropic luminosity of 0.7 $\sollum$, comparable to the luminosity of the strongest
297: masers from H II regions in the Milky Way. No high-velocity lines are evident in the maser
298: spectrum. NGC~3359 is an H II galaxy, and the maser is consistent with star formation.
299:
300: \subsection {NGC 4527}
301:
302: In addition to containing a LINER (Ho et al. 1997), the galaxy NGC~4527 is bright
303: in the far infrared (S$_{100 \mu m}$ = 64 Jy; Fullmer \& Lonsdale 1989). Such far-infrared emission is
304: commonly associated with dust heated by young, massive stars. The galaxy has been searched for
305: H$_2$O maser emission previously by Kondratko et al. (2006b) and Henkel et al. (2005) but went
306: undetected. The rms sensitivities in their observations were
307: 12 mJy per 1.3 km s$^{-1}$ channel and 15 mJy per 1.1 km s$^{-1}$ channel,
308: respectively. The modest isotropic luminosity (4 $\sollum$) is
309: consistent with maser emission from a star formation region, but the velocity offset from the
310: systemic recession velocity (170 km s$^{-1}$) leaves open the possibility that the maser is
311: associated with the LINER. We note that NGC~4527 was host to the peculiar type Ia supernove 1991T.
312:
313: \subsection {NGC 7479}
314:
315: With a type 1.9 Seyfert nucleus (Ho et al. 1997), NGC~7479 has
316: been targeted in previous surveys for H$_2$O masers in AGNs, including those by Kondratko et al.
317: (2006b) and Braatz et al. (1996), in which the rms sensitivities were 19 mJy per
318: 1.3 km s$^{-1}$ channel and 54 mJy per 0.66 km s$^{-1}$ channel, respectively.
319: We detected the 140 mJy line at 2532 km s$^{-1}$ in the initial 5-minute integration,
320: and the deeper spectrum shown in Figure 1 then revealed a number of distinct, weaker components
321: redward of the systemic velocity. If the lines originate
322: in an edge-on nuclear disk, the implied rotation speeds range up to 280 km s$^{-1}$.
323:
324: \section{Discussion}
325:
326: Megamasers in accretion disks can play an important role in
327: cosmology. As a complement to observations of the cosmic
328: microwave background, a precise ($\lesssim$ 3\%) determination of
329: the Hubble constant would provide a strong constraint on several
330: key cosmological parameters, including the equation of state of dark
331: energy (Hu 2005; Spergel et al. 2007). Measuring distances to
332: water maser galaxies can contribute to improving the Hubble constant
333: in two ways. First, maser distances to nearby galaxies (D $\lesssim$ 30 Mpc)
334: such as NGC~4258 can be used to refine the absolute calibration of
335: Cepheid variables and replace or supplement the Large Magellanic
336: Cloud as the primary anchor in the extragalactic distance scale (Macri et al. 2006).
337: Second, maser distances to galaxies in the Hubble flow can be used to
338: measure H$_0$ directly. Because maser distances are not based on standard
339: candles and individual uncertainties should be uncorrelated, it may be
340: possible to reduce the total error in H$_0$ by measuring many such
341: distances (e.g. Greenhill 2004). So far, however, a maser distance has
342: only been possible for NGC~4258 (Herrnstein et al. 1999), and it is too
343: close to measure H$_0$ directly.
344:
345: Measuring maser distances to galaxies requires a robust model
346: of the rotation structure and geometry of the accretion disk from VLBI
347: imaging and either proper motions of maser features on the near side of the
348: disk, or centripetal accelerations measured by spectral line monitoring.
349: While proper motions ($\sim$ 30 $\mu$as yr$^{-1}$ in NGC~4258 at 7.2 Mpc,
350: Herrnstein et al. 1999) might be challenging for galaxies in the Hubble
351: flow, measuring accelerations is possible, as demonstrated here for UGC~3789.
352: We note, however, that in UGC~3789 additional monitoring will be necessary
353: to properly model the radial structure implied by the variation in
354: accelerations among different maser components.
355:
356: Prospects for mapping and modeling the disk in UGC~3789 based on VLBI
357: observations can only be assessed when that imaging is available.
358: However, it is clear from the large number of bright ($\gtrsim$ 20 mJy)
359: maser features within each of the three spectral complexes that the rotation
360: curve can be well sampled. Moreover, the mean acceleration ($\sim$
361: 4.0 km s$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$) and mean rotation velocity ($\sim$ 600 km s$^{-1}$)
362: suggest a disk radius of $\sim$ 0.09 pc. At a nominal distance
363: to UGC~3789 of 46 Mpc, this corresponds to $\sim$ 0.4 mas. Such a
364: maser disk can be resolved by VLBI at 22 GHz.
365:
366: \section {Summary}
367:
368: In this survey for extragalactic water masers we employed a ``snapshot'' strategy
369: designed to detect bright emission from nearby galaxies that may host hidden nuclear
370: activity. Although the detection rate was low (1.3\%) we observed a large
371: number of galaxies and detected eight new masers. While it is not possible
372: to assess the nature of these systems until they are imaged with interferometers,
373: several appear particularly interesting. If confirmed as a star formation maser,
374: the source in NGC~2989 would be the most distant and luminous example of that class.
375: The maser in NGC~23 has a profile that resembles those of jet masers, but it is
376: a LIRG and not known to host an AGN. In UGC~3193 the maser profile is remarkably
377: symmetric but shows no emission directly at the systemic velocity of the galaxy.
378: The most intriguing detection is in UGC~3789, which was not previously known to
379: be an AGN. Its spectral profile is characteristic of maser emission from an accretion disk,
380: and we have made a preliminary measurement of accelerations for several of its
381: systemic features. With future VLBI studies and disk modeling, it may be possible to measure
382: a geometric distance to this galaxy based on observations of its maser disk.
383:
384: \acknowledgements
385: We thank Lucas Macri for providing an optical spectrum of UGC~3789.
386: We are grateful for the many contributions from the NRAO staff in Green Bank.
387: We also thank Jim Condon, Lincoln Greenhill, Mark Reid, Fred Lo, and Christian
388: Henkel for useful discussions.
389: The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National
390: Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated
391: Universities, Inc.
392: This research has made
393: use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet
394: Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with
395: the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
396:
397: \begin{thebibliography}{}
398: \bibitem [Argon 2007]{argon07} Argon, A.L., Greenhill, L.J., Reid, M.J.,
399: Moran, J.M. \& Humphreys, E.M.L. 2007, \apj, 659, 1040
400: \bibitem [Barvainis Antonucci]{Barvainis05} Barvainis, R. \& Antonucci, R. 2005,
401: \apj, 628, L89
402: \bibitem [Bonatto 1996]{bonatto96} Bonatto, C., Bica, E., Pastoriza, M.G. \&
403: Alloin, D. 1996, \aaps, 118, 89
404: \bibitem [Braatz 2004]{braatz04} Braatz, J.A., Henkel, C., Greenhill, L.J.,
405: Moran, J.M. \& Wilson, A.S. 2004, \apj, 617, L29
406: \bibitem [Braatz et al.(1996)]{braatz96} Braatz, J.A., Wilson, A.S., \&
407: Henkel, C. 1996, \apjs, 106, 51
408: \bibitem [Braatz et al.(1997)]{braatz97} Braatz, J.A., Wilson, A.S., \&
409: Henkel, C. 1997, \apjs, 110, 321
410: \bibitem [Braatz et al.(2003)]{braatz03} Braatz, J.A., Wilson, A.S.,
411: Henkel, C., Gough, R. \& Sinclair, M. 2003, \apjs, 146, 249
412: \bibitem [Bragg 2000]{bragg00} Bragg, A.E., Greenhill, L.J., Moran, J.M. \&
413: Henkel, C. 2000, \apj, 535, 73
414: \bibitem [Brun 05]{brun05} Brunthaler, A., Reid, M.J., Falcke, H.,
415: Greenhill, L.J. \& Henkel, C. 2005, Science, 307, 1440
416: \bibitem [Brun 07]{brun07} Brunthaler, A., Reid, M.J.,
417: Falcke, H., Henkel, C., \& Menten, K.M. 2007, \aap, 462, 101
418: \bibitem [Chary 2000]{chary00} Chary, R., Becklin, E.E., Evans, A.S.,
419: Neugebauer, G., Scoville, N.Z., Matthews, K. \& Ressler, M.E. 2000, \apj, 531, 756
420: \bibitem [Claussen98]{Claussen98} Claussen, M.J., Diamond, P.J., Braatz, J.A.,
421: Wilson, A.S. \& Henkel, C. 1998, \apj, 500, L129
422: \bibitem [de Vaucouleurs et al.(1991)]{deV91} de Vaucouleurs, G.,
423: de Vaucouleurs, A., Corwin, H.G., Buta, R.J., Paturel, G. \& Fouque, P.
424: 1991, Third Reference Catalog of Bright Galaxies, (Berlin:Springer Verlag)
425: \bibitem [Fullmer 89]{fullmer89} Fullmer, L. \& Lonsdale, C. 1989, Cataloged
426: Galaxies and Quasars Observed in the IRAS Survey, Version 2, JPL D-1932
427: \bibitem [Genzel and Downes 77]{genzel77} Genzel, R. \& Downes, D. 1977,
428: \aaps, 30, 145
429: \bibitem [Greenhill (2004)]{greenhill04} Greenhill, L.J. 2004, New ARev., 48, 1079
430: \bibitem [Greenhill et al.(1995a)] {greenhill95a} Greenhill, L.J., Henkel, C.,
431: Becker, R., Wilson, T.L. \& Wouterloot, J.G.A. 1995a, \aap, 304, 21
432: \bibitem [Greenhill et al.(1995b)] {greenhill95b} Greenhill, L.J., Jiang, D.R.,
433: Moran, J.M., Reid, M.J., Lo, K.Y. \& Claussen, M.J. 1995b, \apj, 440, 619
434: %\bibitem [Greenhill et al.(1997)] {greenhill97} Greenhill, L.J.,
435: % Herrnstein, J.R., Moran, J.M., Menten, K.M. \& Velusamy, T. 1997, \apj,
436: % 486, L15
437: \bibitem [Greenhill et al.(2003)]{greenhill03} Greenhill, L.J.,
438: Kondratko, P.T., Lovell, J.E.J., Kuiper, T.B.H.,
439: Moran, J.M., Jauncey, D.L. \& Baines, G.P. 2003, \apj, 582, L11
440: \bibitem [Hagiwara 2002]{hagi02} Hagiwara, Y., Diamond, P.J. \& Miyoshi, M.
441: 2002, \aap, 383, 65
442: \bibitem [Hagiwara 2003]{hagi03} Hagiwara, Y., Diamond, P.J. \& Miyoshi, M.
443: 2003, \aap, 400, 457
444: %\bibitem [Henkel et al.(2002)]{henkel02} Henkel, C., Braatz, J.A.,
445: % Greenhill, L.J. \& Wilson, A.S. 2002, \aap, 394, L23
446: %\bibitem [Henkel et al.(2003)]{henkelbraatz03} Henkel, C. \& Braatz, J.A.
447: % 2003, Acta Astronomica Sinica Supplement Issue, 44, 55
448: \bibitem [Henkel 2005]{henkel05} Henkel, C., Peck, A.B., Tarchi, A., Nagar, N.M.,
449: Braatz, J.A., Castangia, P., \& Moscadelli, L. 2005, \aap, 436, 75
450: \bibitem [Herrnstein et al.(1999)]{herrnstein99} Herrnstein, J.R., Moran, J.M.,
451: Greenhill, L.J., Diamond, P.J., Inoue, M., Nakai, N., Miyoshi, M.,
452: Henkel, C. \& Riess, A. 1999, \nat, 400, 539
453: \bibitem [Ho (1997)]{ho97} Ho, L.C., Fillipenko, A.V. \& Sargent, W.L.W. 1997,
454: \apj, 487, 568
455: \bibitem [Hu 05]{Hu05} Hu, W. 2005, in ASP Conf. Ser. 339, Observing Dark Energy,
456: ed. S. C. Wolff \& T. R. Lauer (San Francisco: ASP), 215
457: \bibitem [Humphreys et al.(2008)]{humphreys08} Humphreys, E.M.L., Reid, M.J.,
458: Greenhill, L.J., Moran, J.M. \& Argon, A.L., 2008, \apj, in press.
459: % \bibitem [Humphreys et al.(2004)]{humphreys04} Humphreys, E.M.L., Argon, A.L.,
460: % Greenhill, L.J., Moran, J.M. \& Reid, M.J. 2004, to be published in ASP
461: % Conference Series on VLBA 10th Anniversary Meeting
462: \bibitem [Kondratko et al.(2006)]{kondratko06a} Kondratko, P.T.,
463: Greenhill, L.J. \& Moran, J.M. 2006a, \apj, 652, 136
464: \bibitem [Kondratko et al.(2006)]{kondratko06b} Kondratko, P.T.,
465: Greenhill, L.J., Moran, J.M., Lovell, J.E.J., Kuiper, T.B., Jauncey, D.L. \& Kuiper, T.B.,
466: Cameron, L.B., Gomez, J.F., García-Miro, C., Moll, E., de Gregorio-Monsalvo, I.,
467: McCallum, J. \& Jiménez-Bailón, E., 2006b, \apj, 638, 100
468: \bibitem [Lo 2006]{lo06} Lo, K.Y., 2005, \araa, 43, 625
469: \bibitem [Macri 2006]{macri06} Macri, L.M., Stanek, K.Z., Bersier, D.,
470: Greenhill, L.J.\& Reid, M.J. 2006, \apj, 652, 1133
471: \bibitem [Maoz and McKee (1998)]{maoz98} Maoz, E. \& McKee, C. 1998,
472: \apj, 494, 218
473: %\bibitem [Miyoshi et al.(1995)]{miyoshi95} Miyoshi, M., Moran, J.,
474: % Herrnstein, J., Greenhill, L., Nakai, N., Diamond, P., \& Inoue, M. 1995,
475: % \nat, 373, 127
476: \bibitem [Nakai 2002]{nakai02} Nakai, N, Sato, N. \& Yamauchi, A. 2002, \pasj,
477: 54, L27
478: \bibitem [Peck03]{Peck03} Peck, A.B., Henkel, C., Ulvestad, J.S., Brunthaler, A.,
479: Falcke, H., Elitzur, M., Menten, K.M. \& Gallimore, J.F. 2003, \apj, 590, 149
480: \bibitem [Sanders 2003]{sanders03} Sanders, D.B., Mazzarella, J.M., Kim, D.-C.,
481: Surace, J.A. \& Soifer, B. T., \aj, 126, 1607
482: \bibitem [Spergel07]{spergel07} Spergel, D.N. et al. 2007, \apjs, 170, 377
483: \bibitem [Tarchi 2002]{Tarchi02} Tarchi, A., Henkel, C., Peck, A.B. \& Menten, K. 2002,
484: \aap, 389, L39
485: \bibitem [Veron-Cetty 2003]{veron03} Veron-Cetty, M.-P. \& Veron, P. 2003,
486: \aap, 412, 399
487: \bibitem [Watson and Wallin (1994)]{watson94} Watson, W.D. \& Wallin, B.K.
488: 1994, \apj, 432, L35
489: \bibitem [Zhang 2006]{zhang06} Zhang, J.S., Henkel, C., Kadler, M., Greenhill, L.J.,
490: Nagar, N., Wilson, A.S. \& Braatz, J.A. 2006, \aap, 450, 933
491: \end{thebibliography}
492:
493:
494: \clearpage
495:
496: \begin{table}
497: \caption{H$_2$O Masers Detected During the GBT Survey}
498: \bigskip
499: \begin{tabular}{lrrrrrr}
500: \tableline\tableline
501: Source & $\alpha_{2000}$ & $\delta_{2000}$ & V$_{hel}$\tablenotemark{a} & $S_{peak}$\tablenotemark{b} & L$_{iso}$\tablenotemark{c} & Date of Observation \\
502: & (\ h\ \ \ m\ \ \ s\ )&( $\ \deg\ \ \ \arcmin\ \ \ \arcsec\ \ $) & (km s$^{-1})$ & (mJy) & ($\sollum$) & \\
503: \tableline
504: NGC~23 & 00 09 53.4 & +25 55 26 & 4566 $\pm$ 2 & 51 & 180 & 26 Nov 2006 \\
505: NGC~1106 & 02 50 40.5 & +41 40 17 & 4337 $\pm$ 19 & 74 & 8 & 20 Nov 2005 \\
506: UGC~3193 & 04 52 52.6 & +03 03 26 & 4454 $\pm$ 10 & 130 & 270 & 20 Nov 2005 \\
507: UGC~3789 & 07 19 30.9 & +59 21 18 & 3325 $\pm$ 24 & 134 & 370 & 21 Dec 2005 \\
508: NGC~2989 & 09 45 25.2 & -18 22 26 & 4146 $\pm$ 5 & 36 & 40 & 20 Nov 2005 \\
509: NGC~3359 & 10 46 36.8 & +63 13 25 & 1014 $\pm$ 1 & 40 & 0.7 & 31 Dec 2005 \\
510: NGC~4527 & 12 34 08.5 & +02 39 14 & 1736 $\pm$ 1 & 16 & 4 & 14 Apr 2007 \\
511: NGC~7479 & 23 04 56.7 & +12 19 22 & 2381 $\pm$ 1 & 138 & 19 & 30 Dec 2006 \\
512: \tableline
513: \end{tabular}
514: \tablenotetext{a}{Heliocentric recession velocity from the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic
515: Database}
516: \tablenotetext{b}{Peak flux density}
517: \tablenotetext{c}{Inferred isotropic luminosity of the maser emission.}
518: \end{table}
519:
520: \clearpage
521:
522: \begin{deluxetable}{lccclcccrcr}
523: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
524: \tablewidth{0pt}
525: \tablecolumns{11}
526: \tablecaption{Galaxies surveyed for water maser emission but not detected.}
527: \tablehead{\colhead{Source} & \colhead{$\alpha_{2000}$} & \colhead{$\delta_{2000}$} &
528: \colhead{Velocity} & \colhead{Date} & \colhead{T$_{\mbox{sys}}$} & \colhead{Time} &
529: \colhead{rms$_1$} & \colhead{V$_1$ range} & \colhead{rms$_2$} & \colhead{V$_2$ range}
530: \\ \colhead{} & \colhead{(\ h\ \ \ m\ \ \ s\ )} & \colhead{( $\ \deg\ \ \ \arcmin\ \ \ \arcsec\ \ $)}
531: & \colhead{(km~s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{} & \colhead{(K)} & \colhead{(min)} & \colhead{(mJy)} &
532: \colhead{(km~s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(mJy)} & \colhead{(km~s$^{-1}$)}
533: }
534: \startdata
535: NGC~7805 & 0 01 26.76 & +31 26 01.4 & 4850 & 2006 Jan 5 & 43.8 & 5 & 6.0 & 3464 -- 6248 & 5.7 & 5968 -- 8799\\
536: NGC~7806 & 0 01 30.06 & +31 26 30.7 & 4768 & 2006 Jan 5 & 42.2 & 5 & 5.7 & 3383 -- 6166 & 5.7 & 5885 -- 8715\\
537: NGC~7817 & 0 03 58.91 & +20 45 08.3 & 2309 & 2005 Dec 14 & 42.4 & 5 & 6.5 & 946 -- 3684 & 7.2 & 3408 -- 6192\\
538: NGC~7819 & 0 04 24.54 & +31 28 19.3 & 4958 & 2006 Jan 5 & 39.7 & 5 & 5.7 & 3571 -- 6357 & 5.3 & 6077 -- 8910\\
539: NGC~1 & 0 07 15.83 & +27 42 29.1 & 4545 & 2005 Dec 14 & 41.1 & 5 & 6.6 & 3162 -- 5941 & 7.7 & 5661 -- 8486\\
540: NGC~12 & 0 08 44.81 & +04 36 44.9 & 3940 & 2005 Oct 2 & 60.6 & 5 & 8.5 & 3802 -- 6592 & 9.0 & 1333 -- 4078\\
541: NGC~13 & 0 08 47.73 & +33 26 00.0 & 4808 & 2006 Oct 30 & 41.4 & 5 & 5.7 & 3422 -- 6206 & 5.3 & 5926 -- 8755\\
542: NGC~9 & 0 08 54.69 & +23 49 01.3 & 4528 & 2005 Dec 14 & 41.8 & 5 & 6.0 & 3145 -- 5923 & 5.9 & 5644 -- 8468\\
543: NGC~16 & 0 09 04.28 & +27 43 45.9 & 3056 & 2005 Dec 14 & 42.2 & 5 & 5.7 & 1686 -- 4438 & 5.4 & 4161 -- 6958\\
544: NGC~26 & 0 10 25.86 & +25 49 54.6 & 4589 & 2005 Dec 14 & 41.2 & 5 & 5.5 & 3205 -- 5985 & 5.5 & 5705 -- 8531\\
545: \enddata
546: \tablecomments{
547: Table 2 is published in its entirety in the electronic edition of
548: the Astrophysical Journal. A portion is shown here for guidance regarding its
549: form and content. Col (1): Source name. Cols. (2 -- 3): RA and Dec (J2000).
550: Col. (4): Recession velocity. Col. (5): Date of observation. Col. (6): System
551: temperature measured from the first spectral window. Col. (7): Integration
552: time. Col. (8): Rms noise measured for the first spectral window, after Hanning
553: smoothing. Col. (9): Velocity range covered by the first window. Col. (10):
554: Rms noise measured for the second window, after Hanning smoothing. Col. (11):
555: Velocity range covered by the second window.
556: }
557: \end{deluxetable}
558:
559:
560: \clearpage
561:
562: \begin{figure}
563: %\epsscale{.80}
564: \plotone{f1.eps}
565: \caption{Spectra of newly discovered 22 GHz water masers toward the nuclei of
566: 8 galaxies. The vertical line above each spectrum marks the systemic recession
567: velocity of the galaxy and its $\pm$ 1$\sigma$ uncertainty is indicated by the
568: horizontal bar. Each spectrum spans 1200 km s$^{-1}$ except
569: UGC~3789, which covers 2200 km s$^{-1}$. Velocities are heliocentric and use
570: the optical definition of Doppler shift.
571: }
572: \end{figure}
573:
574: \begin{figure}
575: \plotone{f2.eps}
576: \caption{The velocities of selected maser components in UGC~3789 are plotted as a
577: function of date of observation, in days since the discovery date of
578: 2005 Dec 21. The bold symbols denote prominent features with fluxes at
579: least 30 mJy above emission at nearby frequencies. Velocities
580: were determined by Gaussian fits. Only narrow components distinguished from
581: the base level of emission were fit, although in several cases we fit multiple
582: Gaussians to model blended features. The plot is split into two panels for
583: clarity. The accelerations of the emission lines identified by dashed lines,
584: measured by least squares linear fits and listed here in units of
585: km s$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$, are
586: (a) 6.6 $\pm$ 0.1; (b) 7.2 $\pm$ 0.2; (c) 8.1 $\pm$ 0.4; (d) 7.6 $\pm$ 0.2;
587: (e) 4.3 $\pm$ 0.1; (f) 3.4 $\pm$ 0.1; (g) 2.4 $\pm$ 0.2; (h) 2.6 $\pm$ 0.3; and
588: (i) 1.8 $\pm$ 0.5. The identification letters here correspond to the those
589: on the right side of each plot panel.}
590: \end{figure}
591:
592: \begin{figure}
593: \plotone{f3.eps}
594: \caption{Spectra of water maser emission from UGC~3789 near the systemic
595: recession velocity of the galaxy, spanning eleven epochs. The spectra are
596: offset for clarity. The labels at the top of the figure match individual features
597: to those identified in Figure 2.}
598: \end{figure}
599:
600: %\begin{table}
601: %\caption{Galaxies surveyed for water maser emission but not detected. This table is published in its
602: %entirety in the electronic edition of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}.}
603: %\bigskip
604: %\begin{tabular}{lrrrrrr}
605: %\tableline\tableline
606: %Source & $\alpha_{2000}$ & $\delta_{2000}$ & V$_{hel}$\tablenotemark{a} & $S_{peak}$\tablenotemark{b} & L$_{iso}$\tablenotemark{c} & Date of Observation \\
607: % & (\ h\ \ \ m\ \ \ s\ )&( $\ \deg\ \ \ \arcmin\ \ \ \arcsec\ \ $) & (km s$^{-1})$ & (mJy) & ($\sollum$) & \\
608: %\tableline
609: %NGC~01 & 00 09 53.4 & +25 55 26 & 4566 $\pm$ 2 & 51 & 180 & 26 Nov 2006 \\
610: %NGC~02 & 02 50 40.5 & +41 40 17 & 4337 $\pm$ 19 & 74 & 8 & 20 Nov 2005 \\
611: %NGC~03 & 04 52 52.6 & +03 03 26 & 4454 $\pm$ 10 & 130 & 270 & 20 Nov 2005 \\
612: %NGC~04 & 07 19 30.9 & +59 21 18 & 3325 $\pm$ 24 & 134 & 370 & 21 Dec 2005 \\
613: %\tableline
614: %\end{tabular}
615: %\end{table}
616:
617: \clearpage
618:
619: \end{document}
620: