1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \shorttitle{Dartmouth Stellar Evolution Database}
4: \shortauthors{Dotter et al.}
5:
6: %\usepackage{color}
7:
8: \newcommand{\Ms}{\mathrm{M_{\odot}}}
9: \newcommand{\Ls}{\mathrm{L_{\odot}}}
10: \newcommand{\Rs}{\mathrm{R_{\odot}}}
11: \newcommand{\Teff}{\mathrm{T_{eff}}}
12: \newcommand{\feh}{\mathrm{[Fe/H]}}
13: \newcommand{\afe}{\mathrm{[\alpha/Fe]}}
14: \newcommand{\Ks}{\mathrm{K_s}}
15:
16: \begin{document}
17:
18: \title{The Dartmouth Stellar Evolution Database}
19:
20: \author{Aaron Dotter and Brian Chaboyer}
21: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Dartmouth College, 6127 Wilder Laboratory, Hanover, NH 03755}
22:
23: \author{Darko Jevremovi\'c\altaffilmark{1}}
24: \affil{Astronomical Observatory, Volgina 7, 11160 Belgrade, Serbia}
25: \altaffiltext{1}{Homer L. Dodge Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, 440 West Brooks, Room 100, Norman, OK 73019-2061}
26:
27: \author{Veselin Kostov and E. Baron\altaffilmark{2}}
28: \affil{Homer L. Dodge Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, 440 West Brooks, Room 100, Norman, OK 73019-2061}
29: \altaffiltext{2}{Computational Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, MS 50F-1650, 1 Cyclotron Rd, Berkeley, CA 94720}
30:
31: \author{Jason W. Ferguson}
32: \affil{Physics Department, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS 67260-0032}
33:
34: \slugcomment{Accepted for publication in ApJS}
35:
36:
37: \begin{abstract}
38: The ever--expanding depth and quality of photometric and spectroscopic observations
39: of stellar populations increase the need for theoretical models in regions of
40: age--composition parameter space that are largely unexplored at present. Stellar
41: evolution models that employ the most advanced physics and cover a wide range of
42: compositions are needed to extract the most information from current observations
43: of both resolved and unresolved stellar populations. The Dartmouth Stellar Evolution
44: Database is a collection of stellar evolution tracks and isochrones that spans a
45: range of $\feh$ from --2.5 to +0.5, $\afe$ from --0.2 to +0.8 (for $\feh \leq$0) or
46: +0.2 (for $\feh >$0), and initial He mass fractions from Y=0.245 to 0.40. Stellar
47: evolution tracks were computed for masses between 0.1 and 4 $\Ms$ allowing isochrones
48: to be generated for ages as young as 250 Myr.
49: %The tracks were evolved from the pre--main sequence to either an age greater than 100 Gyr or the onset of runaway He fusion.
50: For the range in masses where the core He flash occurs, separate He-burning
51: tracks were computed starting from the zero age horizontal branch. The tracks and
52: isochrones have been transformed to the observational plane in a variety of
53: photometric systems including standard UBV(RI)$_C$, Str\"omgren uvby, the Sloan
54: Digital Sky Survey ugriz, the Two Micron All Sky Survey JH$\Ks$, and Hubble Space
55: Telescope ACS-WFC and WFPC2.
56: %Comparisons with observational data indicate that
57: %models transformed to the observational plane using synthetic color transformations
58: %perform well against data in filters equivalent to the V band or redder but perform
59: %rather poorly in bluer bands without some empirical adjustment.
60: The Dartmouth Stellar Evolution Database is accessible through
61: a website\footnote{http://stellar.dartmouth.edu/$\sim$models/}
62: where all tracks, isochrones, and additional files can be downloaded.
63: %A set of computer programs are provided to increase the utility of the models.
64: %These programs may either be downloaded along with the models and used locally or
65: %accessed through a web interface.
66: \end{abstract}
67:
68: \keywords{globular clusters: general --- open clusters: general --- stars: evolution }
69:
70: \section{Introduction}
71:
72: Recent photometric surveys such as the ACS Survey of Galactic Globular Clusters
73: \citep{sar} have substantially increased the quality and volume of data available
74: for the Galactic globular cluster system. Despite the fact that this survey focused
75: on metal poor stellar populations it was found that there was a need for stellar
76: evolution models with $\feh > $0 \citep{sieg}. Many other photometric surveys such
77: as the Two Micron All Sky Survey\footnote{http://pegasus.phast.umass.edu/} (2MASS)
78: and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey\footnote{http://www.sdss.org/} (SDSS) and extensions
79: such as SEGUE\footnote{http://segue.uchicago.edu/} underscore the need for stellar
80: evolution libraries that span a wide range of compositions and photometric systems.
81:
82: \citet{dotter} introduced a set of stellar evolution tracks, isochrones, and computer
83: programs to accompany the ACS Survey of Galactic Globular Clusters.
84: The set includes tracks with masses between 0.1 and 1.8 $\Ms$, isochrones with ages
85: ranging from 2 to 15 Gyr, [Fe/H] from --2.5 to 0 with a variety of options in $\afe$
86: and initial He content (Y$_{init}$). In this paper, that set of models is expanded to
87: include: (i) tracks and isochrones with [Fe/H]= +0.15, +0.3, and +0.5; (ii) higher
88: mass tracks and isochrones with ages as low as 250 Myr for all compositions;
89: (iii) a wider selection of photometric systems; and (iv) a web interface to three of
90: the computer programs so that visitors can easily generate specific models without downloading
91: the entire database and running the programs locally.
92:
93: Collectively, these tracks, isochrones, and supporting computer programs constitute
94: the Dartmouth Stellar Evolution Database.
95: %The database is the largest of its kind in
96: % terms of the number of distinct compositions provided.
97: The stellar evolution code used to generate these models is reviewed in $\S$2.
98: Details of the compositions and model grids are outlined in $\S$3 and the
99: color--$\Teff$ transformations in $\S$4. In $\S$5, the isochrones are compared to
100: those of comparable isochrone libraries and photometry of Galactic open clusters
101: and one globular cluster. The results are summarized and discussed in $\S$6.
102:
103:
104: \section{The Dartmouth Stellar Evolution Program}
105: The Dartmouth Stellar Evolution Program (DSEP) has been described previously by
106: \citet{bjork} and \citet{dotter}. The following is a brief description of the physics
107: employed by DSEP.
108:
109: Partially inhibited atomic diffusion and gravitational settling of both He (Y) and
110: metals (Z) are included as described by \citet{cha}. Diffusion is calculated based
111: on the formalism of \citet{thoul} but inhibited in the outer 0.01 $\Ms$ where the
112: diffusion coefficients are set to zero in the outermost 0.005 $\Ms$ and ramped from
113: zero to full diffusion in the inner 0.05 $\Ms$. This method produces results that
114: are consistent with recent observations of diffusion in NGC~6397 \citep{korn}.
115:
116: DSEP uses high temperature opacities from OPAL \citep{opal} and low temperature
117: opacities based on \citet{ferg}. The OPAL tables were obtained for each of the
118: different $\afe$ mixtures from the OPAL web interface
119: \footnote{http://www-phys.llnl.gov/Research/OPAL/} and the low temperature tables were
120: calculated by one of us (Ferguson). The low temperature opacity tables have been made
121: available via the World Wide Web\footnote{http://webs.wichita.edu/physics/opacity/}.
122: Conductive opacities are taken from \citet{hubb}.
123:
124: The basic equation of state (EOS) in DSEP is a general ideal gas EOS with the
125: Debye-H\"uckel correction \citep{chakim} and is used for tracks with M $\geq 0.8
126: \Ms$. For lower mass tracks (M$< 0.8 \Ms$), the FreeEOS equation of state
127: \citep{irwin} is used in the EOS4 configuration.
128:
129: %TABLE 4
130: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccccc}
131: %\rotate
132: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
133: \tablecolumns{11}
134: \tablewidth{0pc}
135: \tablecaption{Minimum Mass ($\Ms$) for Convective Core Overshoot\label{conv}}
136: \tablehead{\colhead{}&\multicolumn{6}{c}{Y=0.245+1.54Z}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{Y=0.33}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{Y=0.4}\\
137: \colhead{$\feh$}&\colhead{$\afe$=--0.2}&\colhead{0}&\colhead{0.2}&\colhead{0.4}&\colhead{0.6}&\colhead{0.8}&\colhead{0}&\colhead{0.4}&\colhead{0}&\colhead{0.4}}
138: \startdata
139: --2.5 & 1.6 & 1.6 & 1.6 & 1.5 & 1.3 & 1.3 & 1.5 & 1.5 & 1.5 & 1.5 \\
140: --2.0 & 1.4 & 1.4 & 1.4 & 1.4 & 1.3 & 1.3 & 1.5 & 1.5 & 1.5 & 1.5 \\
141: --1.5 & 1.4 & 1.4 & 1.4 & 1.4 & 1.3 & 1.3 & 1.4 & 1.4 & 1.4 & 1.4 \\
142: --1.0 & 1.4 & 1.4 & 1.4 & 1.4 & 1.2 & 1.2 & 1.4 & 1.4 & 1.4 & 1.4 \\
143: --0.5 & 1.2 & 1.2 & 1.2 & 1.2 & 1.2 & 1.0 & 1.2 & 1.2 & 1.2 & 1.2 \\
144: 0.0 & 1.2 & 1.2 & 1.1 & 1.1 & 1.0 & 0.9 & 1.2 & 1.1 & 1.2 & 1.1 \\
145: +0.15&\nodata& 1.1 &\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata\\
146: +0.3 & 1.1 & 1.1 & 1.1 &\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata\\
147: +0.5 & 1.1 & 1.1 & 1.0 &\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata\\
148: \enddata
149: \end{deluxetable}
150:
151: DSEP treats convection with the standard mixing length theory and a solar-calibrated
152: mixing length, $\alpha_{ML}$=1.938. The models include convective core overshoot
153: according to the scheme developed by \citet{dem}. The underlying idea is that the
154: amount of overshoot grows with the size of the convective core. The amount of core
155: overshoot is parametrized as a multiple of the pressure scale height ($\lambda_{P}$)
156: and is a function of stellar mass and composition. The minimum stellar mass receives
157: 0.05 $\lambda_{P}$ of overshooting, models with masses greater than the minimum by
158: 0.1 $\Ms$ receive 0.1 $\lambda_{P}$ of overshooting, and models with masses greater
159: than or equal to the minimum plus 0.2 $\Ms$ receive 0.2 $\lambda_{P}$ of overshooting.
160: For details on the minimum mass as a function of composition see Table \ref{conv}.
161: Convective envelope undershooting is not considered in these models.
162:
163: The surface boundary condition (BC) was derived from a grid of \texttt{PHOENIX} model
164: atmospheres \citep{phxa,phxb} covering $\Teff$=2,000 to 10,000 K and log g=--0.5 to 5.5.
165: The solar abundance scale used
166: in these calculations was that of \citet[hereafter GS98]{gs98}. \texttt{PHOENIX} model atmosphere grids were
167: computed for the full range $\feh$=--2.5 to +0.5 and $\afe$=--0.2 to +0.8 covered by the
168: stellar evolution calculations. A small number of model atmospheres with enhanced He were
169: also computed to gauge the importance of enhanced He to the physical structure and the
170: spectrum. The gas pressure (and thus the surface BC) experiences a small change with
171: enhanced He and this is accounted for in the surface BC.
172:
173: \citet{cas} atmospheres were used for $\Teff >$ 10,000 K; \citet{cas} models were computed
174: only for $\afe$=0 and +0.4. Stellar evolution models with $\afe \leq$ +0.2 made use of
175: surface BC derived from $\afe$ = 0 model atmospheres for $\Teff >$ 10,000 K.
176: For stellar evolution models with $\afe \geq$ +0.4 the $\afe$ = +0.4 boundary conditions
177: were used for $\Teff >$ 10,000 K. The transition between the \texttt{PHOENIX} and \citet{cas}
178: were always smooth regardless of the composition. The smooth transition is due to the stellar
179: evolution models being relatively insensitive to the surface BC at higher $\Teff$ coupled with
180: the reduced sensitivity of the model atmospheres to abundance variations in the transitional
181: $\Teff$.
182:
183: The surface BC was fit at the point in the atmospheric structure where T=$\Teff$ for
184: a given model. The gas pressure was extracted at T=$\Teff$ and added to the radiation
185: pressure to satisfy the surface BC. \citet{vand07} found that, at
186: least in the vicinity of 1 $\Ms$, the choice of model atmosphere boundary condition
187: fitting point (either at T=$\Teff$ or at an optical depth of $\tau$=100) has little
188: influence on the resulting evolution.
189:
190: The \texttt{PHOENIX} model atmosphere code employs its own set of physics that is
191: not identical to the physics used in DSEP, though there is some overlap. In
192: particular, the low temperature opacities of \citet{ferg} are calculated with
193: \texttt{PHOENIX} and this implies a level of consistency between the two codes.
194: \texttt{PHOENIX} employs a standard mixing length theory of convection with
195: mixing length $\alpha_{MLT}$ = 2.0 (whereas DSEP uses $\alpha_{MLT}$ = 1.938).
196: Perhaps the largest difference between \texttt{PHOENIX} and DSEP in terms of
197: stellar structure is the EOS: \texttt{PHOENIX} uses an ideal EOS that includes the
198: contributions of a large number of elements and molecules while FreeEOS (used by
199: DSEP) includes several non-ideal effects but accounts for fewer elements and only
200: molecules involving combinations of H and He.
201:
202: The nuclear reaction rates are taken from \citet{adel} for most reactions. The
203: exceptions are the $^{14}$N(p,$\gamma$)$^{15}$O reaction \citep{imbr}, the
204: triple-$\alpha$ reaction from the NACRE compilation \citep{nacre}, and the
205: $^{12}$C($\alpha$,$\gamma$)$^{16}$O reaction \citep{kunz}. Neutrino cooling rates were
206: taken from \citet{haft}.
207:
208:
209: \section{Model Grids and Supporting Programs}
210:
211: Stellar evolution models were computed using one of six different heavy element
212: mixtures with the distinguishing characteristic of each mixture being the level of
213: $\alpha$-element enhancement. Opacities were generated for each of $\afe$= --0.2, 0,
214: 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8. The heavy element mass fractions of these mixtures are given
215: in Table \ref{mix}. The mixtures were calculated starting with the solar mixture of
216: GS98 by adding the value of $\afe$ to the log(N+12) abundance
217: of each of the following $\alpha$-elements: O, Ne, Mg, Si, S, Ca, and Ti; the
218: abundance of Ar was not altered from its GS98 value in any of the mixtures.
219:
220: Overall, models were computed for 67 different X,Z pairs; the initial compositions
221: are listed in Table \ref{init}. For $\feh >$ 0 the maximum level of
222: $\alpha$-enhancement was chosen to be $\afe$=+0.2 in order to keep the total Z value
223: below 0.1 since the opacity tables do not extend above Z=0.1. The model atmosphere
224: grid included only provided scaled-solar ($\afe$=0) models at $\feh$=+0.15. The He
225: content of the models begins with Y=0.245 at $\feh$ = --2.5, consistent with
226: \citet{sper}, and a He enrichment relation of $\Delta$Y/$\Delta$Z=1.54. For
227: $\feh \leq$0, additional models were computed with Y=0.33 and 0.40 (see Table \ref{init}).
228:
229: Stellar evolution tracks were computed for stellar masses ranging from 0.1 to 4
230: $\Ms$ in increments of 0.05 $\Ms$ (between 0.1 and 1.8 $\Ms$), 0.1 $\Ms$ (between
231: 1.8 and 3 $\Ms$), and 0.2 $\Ms$ (between 3 and 4 $\Ms$). The tracks cover the
232: evolution of the models from the fully convective pre-main sequence (pre-MS) to
233: either the core He flash for M $\la$ 2 $\Ms$ or either 100 Gyr or the top of the
234: white dwarf cooling curve (whichever came first) for M $\la$ 0.5 $\Ms$. For models
235: that experience the core He flash, separate He burning tracks were evolved from the
236: Zero Age Horizontal Branch (ZAHB) using the surface compositions and He core masses
237: listed in Tables \ref{zahb} and \ref{core}, respectively. For models that either
238: transition smoothly to core He burning (M $\ga$ 2 $\Ms$) or were evolved from the
239: ZAHB, the He--burning evolution was followed until the onset of thermal pulsations
240: on the asymptotic giant branch (AGB).
241:
242: Isochrones were generated from these tracks with ages from 250 Myr to 15 Gyr in
243: increments of: 50 Myr between 250 Myr and 1 Gyr, 250 Myr between 1 and 5 Gyr,
244: and 500 Myr between 5 and 15 Gyr. The isochrones extend from the lower MS to the
245: tip of the red giant branch (RGB) or, for ages where the tracks permit it (MS mass
246: above $\sim$2 $\Ms$), at or near the onset of the thermal pulsations on the AGB
247: \footnote{Due to the mass spacing of the stellar evolution tracks and the interpolation
248: used in isochrone generation, the isochrones that include the AGB do not always terminate
249: at the `tip' of the AGB. In this case, it is recommended to examine the stellar evolution
250: tracks if the brightness of the stars at the onset of the TP-AGB stage is of interest.
251: This applies only to iscohrones with ages below 1 Gyr. Isochrones with ages above 1 Gyr
252: that include only the RGB provide reasonably accurate estimates of the RGB tip as a
253: function of age.}. The low mass
254: limit of the isochrones depends on the age: the isochrones only include masses for
255: which the models have reached the MS. The lowest mass stars considered in this paper
256: (0.1 $\Ms$) may require $\sim$1 Gyr before reaching the MS and therefore will not be
257: present in isochrones for younger ages. For example, the $\feh$=0 isochrones have the
258: following minimum masses ($\Ms$): 0.43 at 250 Myr, 0.32 at 500 Myr, 0.22 at 750 Myr,
259: and 0.11 at 1 Gyr. Evolutionary tracks are also provided and these include the pre-MS
260: evolution for all masses.
261:
262: All tracks and isochrones were transformed to the color-magnitude diagram (CMD) using
263: each of the color-$\Teff$ transformations described in $\S$4. The track files consist
264: of lines indicating age, log $\Teff$, log g, log L/$\Ls$, followed by the absolute
265: magnitude in each of the filters for a given photometric system. A theoretical track
266: file is also available, this file contains age, log $\Teff$, log g, log L/$\Ls$, log
267: R/$\Rs$, core He mass fraction (Y$_{core}$), core Z mass fraction (Z$_{core}$), the
268: surface Z/X ratio, H--burning luminosity ($\Ls$), He--burning luminosity
269: ($\Ls$), He core mass, and C/O core mass. The isochrones list stellar mass,
270: log $\Teff$, log g, log L/$\Ls$, and absolute magnitude in each of the
271: filters for a given photometric system.
272:
273: The collection of Fortran 77 programs introduced by \citet{dotter} have been updated
274: to deal with the expanded compositions and photometric systems presented in this
275: paper but are otherwise largely unchanged. See the appendices of \citet{dotter} for
276: a detailed description of these programs and their output.
277:
278: %TABLE 2
279: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}
280: \tablecolumns{7}
281: \tablewidth{0pc}
282: \tablecaption{Mass Fractions of Z\label{mix}}
283: \tablehead{\colhead{}&\multicolumn{6}{c}{$\afe$=}\\
284: \colhead{Element}&\colhead{--0.2}&\colhead{0}&\colhead{0.2}&\colhead{0.4}&\colhead{0.6}&\colhead{0.8}}
285: \startdata
286: %Li& 8.182E-07 & 6.132E-07 & 4.393E-07 & 3.025E-07 & 2.026E-07 & 1.329E-07\\
287: %Be& 1.369E-08 & 1.026E-08 & 7.348E-09 & 5.060E-09 & 3.388E-09 & 2.224E-09\\
288: %B & 3.849E-07 & 2.884E-07 & 2.066E-07 & 1.423E-07 & 9.528E-08 & 6.254E-08\\
289: C & 2.296E-01 & 1.721E-01 & 1.233E-01 & 8.490E-02 & 5.685E-02 & 3.731E-02\\
290: N & 6.726E-02 & 5.041E-02 & 3.611E-02 & 2.487E-02 & 1.665E-02 & 1.093E-02\\
291: O & 3.940E-01 & 4.680E-01 & 5.314E-01 & 5.800E-01 & 6.155E-01 & 6.403E-01\\
292: %F & 3.312E-05 & 2.482E-05 & 1.779E-05 & 1.225E-05 & 8.201E-06 & 5.382E-06\\
293: Ne & 9.044E-02 & 1.050E-01 & 1.165E-01 & 1.271E-01 & 1.349E-01 & 1.403E-01\\
294: Na & 2.773E-03 & 2.078E-03 & 1.489E-03 & 1.025E-03 & 6.866E-04 & 4.506E-04\\
295: Mg & 3.366E-02 & 3.998E-02 & 4.540E-02 & 4.955E-02 & 5.258E-02 & 5.470E-02\\
296: Al & 4.814E-03 & 3.608E-03 & 2.585E-03 & 1.780E-03 & 1.192E-03 & 7.822E-04\\
297: Si & 3.715E-02 & 4.412E-02 & 5.010E-02 & 5.468E-02 & 5.803E-02 & 6.036E-02\\
298: P & 6.493E-04 & 4.866E-04 & 3.486E-04 & 2.401E-04 & 1.607E-04 & 1.055E-04\\
299: S & 1.851E-02 & 2.199E-02 & 2.497E-02 & 2.725E-02 & 2.892E-02 & 3.008E-02\\
300: Cl & 3.900E-04 & 2.923E-04 & 2.094E-04 & 1.442E-04 & 9.656E-05 & 6.337E-05\\
301: Ar & 5.793E-03 & 4.342E-03 & 3.111E-03 & 2.142E-03 & 1.434E-03 & 9.414E-04\\
302: K & 3.045E-04 & 2.282E-04 & 1.635E-04 & 1.126E-04 & 7.539E-05 & 4.948E-05\\
303: Ca & 3.268E-03 & 3.882E-03 & 4.408E-03 & 4.811E-03 & 5.106E-03 & 5.311E-03\\
304: %Sc& 3.268E-06 & 2.449E-06 & 1.754E-06 & 1.208E-06 & 8.090E-07 & 5.309E-07\\
305: Ti & 1.519E-04 & 1.804E-04 & 2.048E-04 & 2.236E-04 & 2.372E-04 & 2.468E-04\\
306: %V & 3.080E-05 & 2.308E-05 & 1.654E-05 & 1.139E-05 & 7.625E-06 & 5.004E-06\\
307: Cr & 1.470E-03 & 1.102E-03 & 7.894E-04 & 5.436E-04 & 3.640E-04 & 2.389E-04\\
308: Mn & 1.075E-03 & 8.054E-04 & 5.771E-04 & 3.974E-04 & 2.661E-04 & 1.746E-04\\
309: Fe & 1.020E-01 & 7.641E-02 & 5.474E-02 & 3.770E-02 & 2.524E-02 & 1.657E-02\\
310: %Co& 2.766E-04 & 2.073E-04 & 1.485E-04 & 1.023E-04 & 6.847E-05 & 4.494E-05\\
311: Ni & 6.026E-03 & 4.516E-03 & 3.235E-03 & 2.228E-03 & 1.492E-03 & 9.791E-04
312: \enddata
313: \end{deluxetable}
314:
315: %TABLE 3
316: \begin{deluxetable}{cllllllllll}
317: \rotate
318: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
319: \tablecolumns{11}
320: \tablewidth{0pc}
321: \tablecaption{Initial Compositions\label{init}}
322: \tablehead{\colhead{}&\multicolumn{6}{c}{Y=0.245+1.54Z}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{Y=0.33}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{Y=0.4}\\
323: \colhead{$\feh$}&\colhead{$\afe$=--0.2}&\colhead{0}&\colhead{0.2}&\colhead{0.4}&\colhead{0.6}&\colhead{0.8}&\colhead{0}&\colhead{0.4}&\colhead{0}&\colhead{0.4}}
324: \startdata
325: --2.5 & X=0.7549 & 0.7548 & 0.7548 & 0.7547 & 0.7546 & 0.7543 & 0.6699 & 0.6699 & 0.6000 & 0.5999 \\
326: \phn & Z=4.09E-5 & 5.48E-5 & 7.63E-5 & 1.11E-4 & 1.65E-4 & 2.52E-4 & 4.85E-5 & 9.85E-5 & 4.34E-5 & 8.82E-5 \\
327: --2.0 & X=0.7547 & 0.7545 & 0.7544 & 0.7541 & 0.7536 & 0.7529 & 0.6698 & 0.6697 & 0.5999 & 0.5997 \\
328: \phn & Z=1.30E-4 & 1.72E-4 & 2.41E-4 & 3.50E-4 & 5.24E-4 & 7.97E-4 & 1.53E-4 & 3.50E-4 & 1.37E-4 & 2.79E-4 \\
329: --1.5 & X=0.7539 & 0.7536 & 0.7530 & 0.7521 & 0.7507 & 0.7484 & 0.6695 & 0.6690 & 0.5996 & 0.5991 \\
330: \phn & Z=4.10E-4 & 5.47E-4 & 7.62E-4 & 1.11E-3 & 1.65E-3 & 2.50E-3 & 4.85E-4 & 9.83E-4 & 4.34E-4 & 8.81E-4 \\
331: --1.0 & X=0.7516 & 0.7505 & 0.7487 & 0.7459 & 0.7415 & 0.7346 & 0.6685 & 0.6669 & 0.5986 & 0.5972 \\
332: \phn & Z=1.29E-3 & 1.72E-3 & 2.40E-3 & 3.46E-3 & 5.15E-3 & 7.77E-3 & 1.53E-3 & 3.46E-3 & 1.37E-3 & 2.78E-3 \\
333: --0.5 & X=0.7444 & 0.7441 & 0.7355 & 0.7270 & 0.7139 & 0.6942 & 0.6652 & 0.6603 & 0.5957 & 0.5913 \\
334: \phn & Z=4.05E-3 & 5.37E-3 & 7.44E-3 & 1.07E-2 & 1.57E-2 & 2.32E-2 & 4.82E-3 & 9.70E-3 & 4.31E-3 & 8.69E-3 \\
335: 0.0 & X=0.7174 & 0.7071 & 0.6882 & 0.6628 & 0.6247 & 0.5710 & 0.6550 & 0.6402 & 0.5866 & 0.5734 \\
336: \phn & Z=1.43E-2 & 1.89E-2 & 2.55E-2 & 3.52E-2 & 4.97E-2 & 7.02E-2 & 1.50E-2 & 2.98E-2 & 1.34E-2 & 2.66E-2 \\
337: +0.15& X=\nodata & 0.6880 & \nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata &\nodata&\nodata\\
338: \phn & Z=\nodata & 2.56E-2 & \nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata &\nodata&\nodata\\
339: +0.3 & X=0.6842 & 0.6638 & 0.6334 & \nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata &\nodata&\nodata\\
340: \phn & Z=2.70E-2 & 3.48E-2 & 4.64E-2 & \nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata &\nodata&\nodata\\
341: +0.5 & X=0.6491 & 0.6185 & 0.5792 & \nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata &\nodata&\nodata\\
342: \phn & Z=4.04E-2 & 5.21E-2 & 6.71E-2 & \nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata &\nodata&\nodata\\
343: \enddata
344: \end{deluxetable}
345:
346: %TABLE 4
347: \begin{deluxetable}{cllllllllll}
348: \rotate
349: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
350: \tablecolumns{11}
351: \tablewidth{0pc}
352: \tablecaption{Surface Compositions for ZAHB Models\label{zahb}}
353: \tablehead{\colhead{}&\multicolumn{6}{c}{Y$_{init}$=0.245+1.54Z$_{init}$\tablenotemark{\dagger}}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{Y$_{init}$=0.33}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{Y$_{init}$=0.4}\\
354: \colhead{$\feh$}&\colhead{$\afe$=--0.2}&\colhead{0}&\colhead{0.2}&\colhead{0.4}&\colhead{0.6}&\colhead{0.8}&\colhead{0}&\colhead{0.4}&\colhead{0}&\colhead{0.4}}
355: \startdata
356: --2.5 & X=0.7564 & 0.7565 & 0.7561 & 0.7549 & 0.7549 & 0.7546 & 0.6835 & 0.6828 & 0.5967 & 0.6212 \\
357: \phn & Z=3.97E-5 & 5.31E-5 & 7.40E-4 & 1.60E-4 & 1.08E-4 & 2.44E-4 & 4.63E-5 & 9.40E-5 & 8.40E-3 & 8.33E-5 \\
358:
359: --2.0 & X=0.7547 & 0.7548 & 0.7551 & 0.7541 & 0.7524 & 0.7510 & 0.6820 & 0.6810 & 0.6208 & 0.6193 \\
360: \phn & Z=1.26E-4 & 1.67E-4 & 2.33E-4 & 3.41E-4 & 5.06E-4 & 7.69E-4 & 1.46E-4 & 2.97E-4 & 1.30E-4 & 2.64E-4 \\
361:
362: --1.5 & X=0.7529 & 0.7517 & 0.7509 & 0.7491 & 0.7464 & 0.7427 & 0.6785 & 0.6763 & 0.6180 & 0.6156 \\
363: \phn & Z=3.96E-4 & 5.29E-4 & 7.37E-4 & 1.07E-3 & 1.60E-3 & 2.43E-3 & 4.64E-4 & 9.44E-4 & 4.12E-4 & 8.37E-4 \\
364:
365: --1.0 & X=0.7472 & 0.7453 & 0.7423 & 0.7383 & 0.7325 & 0.7238 & 0.6732 & 0.6698 & 0.6125 & 0.6076 \\
366: \phn & Z=1.25E-3 & 1.67E-3 & 2.33E-3 & 3.37E-3 & 5.02E-3 & 7.59E-3 & 1.47E-3 & 3.00E-3 & 1.31E-3 & 2.67E-3 \\
367:
368: --0.5 & X=0.7350 & 0.7309 & 0.7242 & 0.71485 & 0.7010 & 0.6810 & 0.6641 & 0.6600 & 0.6034 & 0.5967 \\
369: \phn & Z=3.94E-3 & 5.24E-3 & 7.27E-3 & 1.05E-2 & 1.54E-3 & 2.28E-2 & 4.67E-3 & 9.48E-3 & 4.16E-3 & 8.41E-3 \\
370:
371: 0.0 & X=0.7166 & 0.6928 & 0.6741 & 0.6497 & 0.6131 & 0.5640 & 0.6477 & 0.6303 & 0.5877 & 0.5854 \\
372: \phn & Z=1.41E-2 & 1.85E-2 & 2.50E-2 & 3.46E-2 & 4.88E-2 & 6.87E-2 & 1.47E-2 & 2.91E-2 & 1.31E-2 & 2.68E-2 \\
373:
374: +0.15& X=\nodata & 0.6737 &\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata &\nodata&\nodata\\
375: \phn & Z=\nodata & 2.51E-2 &\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata &\nodata&\nodata\\
376:
377: +0.3 & X=0.6696 & 0.6505 & 0.6204 &\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata &\nodata&\nodata\\
378: \phn & Z=2.66E-2 & 3.42E-2 & 4.57E-2 &\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata &\nodata&\nodata\\
379:
380: +0.5 & X=0.6360 & 0.6075 & 0.5734 & \nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata &\nodata&\nodata\\
381: \phn & Z=3.98E-2 & 5.12E-2 & 6.57E-2 & \nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata &\nodata&\nodata\\
382: \enddata
383: \tablenotetext{\dagger}{Y$_{init}$ and Z$_{init}$ refer to the initial Y and Z values, for the initial
384: compositions see Table \ref{init}.}
385: \end{deluxetable}
386:
387: %TABLE 5
388: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccccc}
389: %\rotate
390: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
391: \tablecolumns{11}
392: \tablewidth{0pc}
393: \tablecaption{He Core Mass ($\Ms$) for ZAHB Models\label{core}}
394: \tablehead{\colhead{}&\multicolumn{6}{c}{Y=0.245+1.54Z}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{Y=0.33}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{Y=0.4}\\
395: \colhead{$\feh$}&\colhead{$\afe$=--0.2}&\colhead{0}&\colhead{0.2}&\colhead{0.4}&\colhead{0.6}&\colhead{0.8}&\colhead{0}&\colhead{0.4}&\colhead{0}&\colhead{0.4}}
396: \startdata
397: --2.5 & 0.506 & 0.505 & 0.504 & 0.502 & 0.500 & 0.497 & 0.489 & 0.485 & 0.474 & 0.473 \\
398: --2.0 & 0.500 & 0.499 & 0.498 & 0.494 & 0.492 & 0.491 & 0.483 & 0.479 & 0.469 & 0.468 \\
399: --1.5 & 0.495 & 0.493 & 0.491 & 0.489 & 0.488 & 0.486 & 0.478 & 0.474 & 0.464 & 0.463 \\
400: --1.0 & 0.489 & 0.488 & 0.486 & 0.484 & 0.481 & 0.478 & 0.473 & 0.469 & 0.460 & 0.458 \\
401: --0.5 & 0.483 & 0.482 & 0.480 & 0.477 & 0.473 & 0.469 & 0.469 & 0.465 & 0.457 & 0.455 \\
402: 0.0 & 0.475 & 0.473 & 0.469 & 0.464 & 0.458 & 0.447 & 0.465 & 0.460 & 0.454 & 0.451 \\
403: +0.15&\nodata& 0.468 &\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata\\
404: +0.3 & 0.468 & 0.464 & 0.459 &\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata\\
405: +0.5 & 0.461 & 0.456 & 0.449 &\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata\\
406: \enddata
407: \end{deluxetable}
408:
409: \section{Color-$\Teff$ Transformations}
410: Synthetic color-$\Teff$ transformations were derived from the \texttt{PHOENIX} model
411: atmosphere grid (also used to generate surface boundary conditions in the stellar
412: evolution calculations) for $\Teff <$ 10,000 K and for all $\feh$ and $\afe$
413: combinations. The \texttt{PHOENIX} grid was supplemented by \citet{cas} models for higher
414: $\Teff$. In order to insure a smooth transition, the \citet{cas} colors were adjusted
415: to line up with the \texttt{PHOENIX} colors at 10,000 K and the two sets of tables were
416: ramped between \texttt{PHOENIX} and \citet{cas} in the temperature range of 9,000 K to 10,000 K.
417:
418: As mentioned in $\S$2, the \texttt{PHOENIX} model atmospheres used to generate
419: synthetic color--$\Teff$ transformations were computed for each of the $\feh$, $\afe$
420: pairs but not for all of the enhanced Y values. The influence of enhanced He on
421: broad-band synthetic photometry is negligible for the temperatures considered here,
422: as discussed briefly by \citet{dotter} and in more detail by \citet{gir07}.
423:
424: The \citet{cas} model atmospheres were only computed for $\afe$=0 and +0.4. In
425: constructing the color transformations the same approach was used as described in
426: $\S$2 for the surface BC. For evolutionary tracks and isochrones with
427: $\afe \leq +0.2$, colors based on \citet{cas} synthetic spectra with $\afe = 0$ were applied and
428: for tracks and isochrones with $\afe \geq +0.4$, colors based on \citet{cas} synthetic spectra with
429: $\afe = +0.4$ were applied. While this is not an ideal situation, the influence of
430: $\alpha$-enhancement, or indeed of total Z, on broad-band synthetic colors is small
431: for $\Teff \ga$ 5,000 K. The only exceptions are in the bluest bands (equivalent to U)
432: and at $\Teff \ga$ 35,000 K. Bands equivalent to U are the most uncertain in terms
433: of the synthetic photometry and very few of the evolutionary tracks (only the lowest
434: mass, metal poor He-burning tracks) presented in this paper extend beyond
435: $\Teff$ = 35,000 K.
436:
437: The synthetic colors have been tested and perform well in bandpasses equivalent to
438: V or redder (with central wavelengths longer than $\sim5000$ \AA) but the blue and
439: ultraviolet bands (with central wavelengths shorter than $\sim5000$ \AA) suffer
440: from inaccuracy of the synthetic fluxes at shorter wavelengths. In cases where
441: analysis in the bluer bands is important, empirical color transformations are
442: strongly recommended.
443:
444: \citet{cass} explored the dependence of broadband synthetic colors on $\afe$ for
445: $\afe$=0 and +0.4. Their findings indicate that U--B and B--V are
446: the colors most strongly effected by $\alpha$-enhancement and that the influence of
447: $\alpha$-enhancement on broadband colors increases with increasing metallicity
448: and decreasing $\Teff$. The color transformations derived from the
449: \texttt{PHOENIX} model atmosphere grid have a greater span of $\Teff$ and $\afe$,
450: including $\afe$ = --0.2 for the first time, and better resolution (0.2 dex) in $\afe$.
451: The comparisons performed with the \texttt{PHOENIX} synthetic colors qualitatively
452: agree with the findings of \citet{cass} though it is important to recognize that
453: \citet{cass} compared colors at constant Z while in this paper comparisons are
454: made at constant $\feh$. Hence an increase in $\afe$ represents an increase in
455: total Z and thus one expects the colors to become redder with increasing $\afe$
456: as a general rule.
457:
458: \begin{figure}
459: %\epsscale{1.0}
460: \plotone{f1}
461: \caption{The influence of $\alpha$-enhancement on broadband V--I and J--$\Ks$ colors at $\feh$ = 0. The underlying isochrones shown are all scaled-solar composition with $\feh$ = 0 at 10 Gyr. Only the color transformations include $\alpha$-enhancement. See the text for a discussion of the trends shown in the figure.}
462: \label{alpha}
463: \end{figure}
464:
465: Figure \ref{alpha} displays the changes to CMD morphology based solely on the level
466: of $\alpha$-enhancement at $\feh$=0 using a 10 Gyr scaled-solar isochrone. The
467: figure shows $\afe$ = 0, +0.4, and +0.8 colors. The comparisons were assembled using
468: a scaled-solar isochrone in order to demonstrate the effect of
469: $\alpha$-enhancement on the colors only. Two colors, V--I and J--$\Ks$ are shown
470: in Figure \ref{alpha}. The figure shows that V--I increases with $\afe$ and
471: while the difference is small near the MSTO, it grows as $\Teff$ decreases,
472: becoming largest near M$_V$ = 10. The situation in J--$\Ks$ is reversed: the
473: highest level of $\afe$ produces the bluest J--$\Ks$ color while the lowest
474: level produces the reddest color. The J--$\Ks$ result is, at first glance,
475: counter-intuitive. However, the J band is particularly sensitive to
476: absorption from water and, in the presence of enhanced oxygen (from $\afe$), substantially
477: more water is able to form. This pushes flux away from the J band and causes the
478: J--$\Ks$ color to become bluer with increasing $\afe$.
479:
480: As reported by \citet{cass}, the color differences due to variations in $\afe$
481: decrease as total metallicity decreases. However, isochrones presented in this
482: paper suggest that the separation along the lower MS in J--$\Ks$ remains noticeable
483: even at $\feh$=--2 and this feature may prove a useful diagnostic for near infrared
484: studies of metal poor systems of sufficient depth to see the lower MS.
485:
486: The remainder of this section give a brief description of the photometric systems
487: into which the stellar evolution tracks and isochrones have been transformed.
488:
489: \subsection{Johnson--Cousins UBVRI and the Two Micron All Sky Survey}
490: \citet{bes} defined filter transmission curves for the Johnson--Cousins UBV(RI)$_C$
491: photometric system. These filter curves were combined with 2MASS JH$\Ks$ filters from
492: \citet{cohen} to create a set of isochrones suitable for use with ground--based
493: photometry from the ultraviolet to the near infrared. The UBVRI magnitudes were
494: calibrated to Vega by following Appendix A of \citet{bcp}. The 2MASS magnitudes were
495: calibrated by setting the magnitudes of Vega to zero in each filter \citep{cohen}.
496:
497: \subsection{The Hubble Space Telescope}
498: \citet{bed} defined a method for generating synthetic photometry based on the
499: detailed filter transmission curves for the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Advanced
500: Camera for Surveys (ACS) and Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2) from \citet{sir}.
501: The synthetic photometry presented here are all on the Vegamag system. The following
502: filters are included for the ACS-WFC: F435W, F475W, F555W, F606W, F625W, F775W, F814W,
503: and F850LP. The following filters are included for the WFPC2: F336W, F439W, F555W,
504: F606W, F791W, F814W, and F850LP. The performance of the synthetic color transformation
505: in the ACS F606W-F814W CMD has been documented by \citet{sar,dotter,rich,sieg}.
506:
507: \subsection{The Sloan Digital Sky Survey}
508: SDSS produced (and its ongoing extensions continue to produce) vast quantities of
509: stellar photometry and spectroscopy with important implications for our knowledge of
510: galactic structure and evolution. The SDSS ugriz photometric system is based on the
511: AB magnitude system but each of the five filters has an additional offset from AB of
512: at most a few hundredths of a magnitude. The offsets, in the sense of
513: mag(SDSS)--mag(AB) are: 0.04 in u, 0.01 in g, 0 in r, --0.015 in i, and --0.03 in z.
514: The filter transmission curves and procedure for transforming synthetic fluxes to SDSS
515: magnitudes magnitudes is outlined on the SDSS Photometric Flux Calibration web page
516: \footnote{http://www.sdss.org/dr6/algorithms/fluxcal.html}.
517:
518: Typically, the synthetic colors provide good fits to SDSS data in g, r, and i.
519: Synthetic photometry in the u band is subject to the same shortcomings as other bands
520: at bluer wavelengths while problems with the underlying calibration of the SDSS
521: photometric systems persist in both u and z.
522:
523: \subsection{Semi--Empirical Transformations}
524: For general use, and comparison with the synthetic color transformations, the tracks and
525: isochrones are presented in colors based on the semi--empirical transformations of
526: \citet[hereafter VC03]{vdb} in BV(RI)$_C$. VC03 compiled a set
527: of $\Teff$--color transformations and bolometric corrections covering a wide range of
528: metallicity, $\Teff$, and log g. The VC03 colors are based on MARCS model atmospheres
529: \citep{bg78,bg89,vb85} for lower temperatures and Kurucz models (consistent with \citet{cas99})
530: for higher temperatures.
531: The color transformations are semi--empirical in the sense that VC03 began with a
532: collection of synthetic colors and then applied corrections to the colors, primarily
533: for cooler MS stars approaching and above $\feh$=0, based on observational constraints
534: from open clusters, globular clusters, and field stars.
535:
536: \citet{clem} presented color transformations for the Str\"omgren uvby photometric system.
537: \citet{clem} used a similar approach to VC03 by adopting MARCS models \citep{houd} for
538: $\Teff < $ 8,000 K and colors based on Kurucz models \citep{cgk97} for higher temperatures.
539: The uvby color transformations of \citet{clem} provide much better fits to observations
540: than any synthetic color tables (see that paper for a detailed discussion) and thus no
541: synthetic Str\"omgren photometry has been provided.
542:
543:
544: \section{Comparisons}
545: This section will compare the DSEP models to comparable models and observational data
546: from the literature. \citet{dotter} presented comparisons with old, metal--poor
547: isochrones (12 Gyr, Z=0.0001) from several groups and compared the DSEP isochrones to
548: ACS photometry of two globular clusters: M~92 and 47~Tuc from the ACS Galactic
549: Globular Cluster Survey \citep{sar}. As a result, this section will focus on model
550: comparisons at $\feh \geq 0$, along with younger, more metal rich open clusters.
551: The one exception is a comparison of SDSS photometry from M~13 and NGC~2420 to the
552: ugriz isochrones in $\S$5.2.6.
553:
554: \subsection{Comparisons with Other Models}
555: Following \citet{dotter}, comparison isochrones were drawn from \citet[hereafter
556: BaSTI]{piet,piet2,cord}, \citet[hereafter Padova]{gir00}, \citet[hereafter
557: Victoria-Regina (VR)]{vdb2}, and \citet[hereafter Yale-Yonsei (Y$^2$)]{yi2,yi}.
558: In this section, the comparison is extended to solar metallicity and above as well as
559: to younger ages. Comparisons are shown in both the log $\Teff$-log L/$\Ls$ plane and
560: the V vs. V--I color-magnitude diagram. In each case, the DSEP isochrone is shown
561: with the synthetic color transformation. A comparison of different color
562: transformations applied to the DSEP isochrones appears later in this section.
563:
564: \begin{figure}
565: \plotone{f2}
566: \caption{A plot of isochrones at $\feh \sim$+0.15 and an age of $\sim$ 625 Myr.
567: The Padova, BaSTI, and DSEP isochrones show the He burning phase but the others do
568: not. Good agreement exists among all the isochrones except for Padova that is cooler
569: and fainter around the main sequence turn off.}
570: \label{600Myr}
571: \end{figure}
572:
573: \begin{figure}
574: \plotone{f3}
575: \caption{The same as Figure \ref{600Myr} but focused on the region near the main sequence turn off.}
576: \label{600MSTO}
577: \end{figure}
578:
579: Figures \ref{600Myr} and \ref{600MSTO} show isochrones at $\feh \sim$+0.15 and an age of 625-630 Myr
580: (compatible with the the Hyades, see $\S$5.2.2). The isochrones range in initial
581: Z=0.025 to 0.03 and Y=0.28 to 0.3. In Figure \ref{600Myr}, the Padova, BaSTI,
582: and DSEP isochrones all show the AGB though the point at which the AGB terminates
583: differs: DSEP and BaSTI stop at or before the onset of thermal pulsations though
584: the BaSTI library has been updated to include extended AGB evolution \citep{cord}.
585: Fainter than log L/$\Ls$=--1, the large differences are due to different mass ranges,
586: the EOS, and low temperature opacities used by each group. The BaSTI isochrone begins
587: at 0.5 $\Ms$, VR and Y$^2$ isochrones begin at 0.4 $\Ms$, the Padova isochrone begins
588: at 0.15 $\Ms$, and the DSEP isochrone begins at 0.3 $\Ms$ at this age.
589:
590: In Figure \ref{600MSTO} the agreement is quite good among DSEP, BaSTI, and Y$^2$ isochrones.
591: The Padova isochrone is less luminous in the region of the MS and subgiant
592: branch (SGB) while the VR isochrons is more luminous in the same region. These differences
593: in luminosity are primarily due to different adopted treatment of convective core overshoot.
594:
595: Figure \ref{600Myr} indicates that the Y$^2$ isochrone extends to cooler
596: temperatures than any of the others despite the fact that it terminates at 0.4 $\Ms$
597: while DSEP and Padova terminate at considerably lower mass. This effect is almost
598: certainly due to the EOS used in the Y$^2$ calculations.
599:
600: \begin{figure}
601: \plotone{f4}
602: \caption{The figure shows solar metallicity isochrones at 4 Gyr. The Padova and
603: BaSTI isochrones include the He burning phase but the others do not. There is
604: remarkable agreement in the H--R diagram between the tip of the red giant branch and
605: log L/$\Ls$=--1. Below this point, the range of masses plotted and the adopted EOS
606: cause large differences. There is good agreement in the color-magnitude diagram
607: between M$_V$=6 and 0 but beyond this the mass range plotted, the underlying physics,
608: and the choice of color transformation cause significant discrepancies.}
609: \label{4gyr}
610: \end{figure}
611:
612: \begin{figure}
613: \plotone{f5}
614: \caption{The same as Figure \ref{4gyr} but focused on the region near the main sequence turn off.}
615: \label{4MSTO}
616: \end{figure}
617:
618: Figures \ref{4gyr} and \ref{4MSTO} show isochrones at solar metallicity and 4 Gyr (compatible with
619: M~67, see $\S$5.2.4). Each isochrone has an initial Z=0.018-0.020 and Y=0.27-0.28;
620: the adopted physics (especially the EOS and convective core overshoot prescription)
621: and solar heavy element mixture differ from one group to another. In the left panels
622: of Figure \ref{4gyr} and \ref{4MSTO}, the isochrones are in reasonable agreement for points brighter
623: than log L/$\Ls$=--1 (Padova and BaSTI isochrones include He burning stars while the
624: others do not). In Figure \ref{4MSTO}, the BaSTI, VR, and DSEP isochrones all agree well
625: on the temperature and luminosity of the MS turn off (TO) and SGB. In the right panels
626: of Figure \ref{4gyr} and \ref{4MSTO}, all isochrones agree well at magnitudes brighter than M$_V$=6
627: except for Padova that is consistently redder and brighter on the upper RGB. In Figure
628: \ref{4gyr} the DSEP isochrone includes the complete lower mass range (down to 0.1
629: $\Ms$) and the fact that the Y$^2$ isochrone is cooler and almost as faint in M$_V$ is
630: significant. Conversely, the Padova isochrone is hotter and bluer than the others for
631: points fainter that log L/$\Ls$=--1 (M$_V$=7) although the mass-luminosity relation is
632: similar to the DSEP isochrone.
633:
634: Figures \ref{600Myr}, \ref{600MSTO}, \ref{4gyr} and \ref{4MSTO} show general agreement
635: amongst the different sets
636: of isochrones. The main exceptions are the Padova isochrones that appear cooler and
637: redder near the MSTO and on the RGB but hotter and bluer on the lower main sequence.
638: Amongst the other models the largest differences occur near the MSTO where the adopted
639: core overshoot treatments differ and on the lower main sequence where the adopted EOS
640: and minimum masses differ. The DSEP models use the same EOS and opacities as the VR
641: and BaSTI models and it is reassuring that these models all lie close together aside
642: from the noted exceptions due to the included mass range and treatment of convective
643: core overshoot.
644:
645: \subsection{Comparisons with Observational Data}
646: Several papers have demonstrated the performance of the DSEP isochrones when applied
647: to HST/ACS data in two of the most popular bands for globular cluster photometry
648: (F606W and F814W) including: \citet{sar}, \citet{dotter}, \citet{sieg}, and
649: \citet{rich}. This section will focus on the ground-based photometric systems
650: presented in this paper and also compares the synthetic color transformation with the
651: VC03 transformation in B--V and V--I.
652:
653: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}
654: \tablecolumns{7}
655: \tablewidth{0pc}
656: \tablecaption{Comparison Clusters\label{clusters}}
657: \tablehead{\colhead{ID}&\colhead{DM$_V$}&\colhead{E(B--V)}&\colhead{$\feh$}&\colhead{Approximate Age (Gyr)}&\colhead{Photometry}&\colhead{Reference(s)}}
658: \startdata
659: M~37 & 11.55 & 0.27 & 0.09 & 0.5 & B V J $\Ks$ & 1,2 \\
660: Hyades &\nodata&\nodata& 0.13 & 0.65& B V I $\Ks$ & 3,4 \\
661: NGC~2420 & 12.1 & 0.05 &--0.27 & 2 & B V I $\Ks$ & 1 \\
662: M~67 & 9.65 & 0.04 & 0 & 4 & B V I $\Ks$ & 1,5,6 \\
663: NGC~6791 & 13.35 & 0.1 & 0.4 & 9 & B V I $\Ks$ & 7,8,9 \\
664: \enddata
665: \tablerefs{1--GS03, 2--\citet{kalirai}, 3--\citet{deb}, 4--\citet{pinson}, 5--\citet{mmj}, 6--{taylor}, 7--\citet{carney}, 8--\citet{stetson},9--\citet{cha3}}
666: \end{deluxetable}
667:
668: \citet[hereafter GS03]{groch} combined optical photometry of six Galactic open
669: clusters with near-infrared data from 2MASS. Similar compilations for the Hyades
670: \citep{pinson} and NGC~6791 \citep{carney} are presented along with three clusters
671: from GS03 to span a range of ages and metallicities in open clusters. These combined
672: optical and near-infrared data provide an excellent source of comparisons with the
673: DSEP isochrones.
674: Table \ref{clusters} lists the relevant parameters of the clusters featured in this
675: section.
676:
677: The adopted reddening values are listed as E(B--V). The extinction curve of
678: \citet{johnson} was used to determine the reddening in other filter combinations:
679: E(V--I) = 1.4 E(B--V), E(V--J) = 2.4 E(B--V) and E(V-$\Ks$) = 2.8 E(B--V).
680:
681: These comparisons are not meant to determine the ages of the clusters but rather to
682: demonstrate the performance of the isochrones. The ages were chosen to be consistent
683: with other published results but if the age shown is considerably different from the
684: true age of the cluster it will influence the quality of the fit.
685:
686: \subsubsection{M~37}
687: \begin{figure}
688: \plotone{f6}
689: \caption{CMDs of M~37 from \citet{kalirai} and GS03 are plotted with a $\feh$=0,
690: 500 Myr isochrone. The isochrone is shown in synthetic (solid line) and VC03
691: (dashed line) colors. The synthetic color isochrone is redder than the data in
692: B--V but a good fit in V--J and V--$\Ks$. The He burning portion
693: of the isochrones is redder than the data in all cases.}
694: \label{m37}
695: \end{figure}
696:
697: Figure \ref{m37} shows the CMD of M~37 in B--V \citep{kalirai} and V--J and V--$\Ks$
698: (GS03) along with a $\feh$=0, 500 Myr isochrone. The isochrone is plotted using the
699: synthetic (solid line) and VC03 (dashed line) colors.
700:
701: In B--V (left panel of Figure \ref{m37}), the synthetic color isochrone is redder
702: than the data by $\sim$0.1 mag throughout the CMD while the VC03 isochrone provides
703: a reasonable fit to the data from the MSTO to V=16 before drifting to the red of the
704: data. The He burning portion of the isochrone is redder than the data by 0.1 mag in
705: both color transformations.
706:
707: In V--J and V--$\Ks$, the synthetic color isochrone provides an excellent fit to the
708: data for the entire extent of the MS (the MS data cuts off at V$\sim$20 in V--J and
709: V--$\Ks$). The isochrone is redder than the data for the He burning stars in both
710: V--J and V--$\Ks$.
711:
712: We note in passing that the VC03 B--V isochrone shown in the left panel of figure
713: \ref{m37} does not match the shape of the CMD for V $>$ 17. Although M~37 and M~67
714: are both roughly $\feh$ = 0 clusters their B--V CMDs from \citet{kalirai} and M~67 \citep{mmj},
715: respectively, adjusted for distance and reddening,
716: appear to disagree somewhat for M$_V \ga$ 6 when viewed together. Since the VC03 colors are
717: based in part on the CMD of M~67, it is impossible for them to fit both clusters simultaneously.
718:
719: \subsubsection{The Hyades}
720:
721: \begin{figure}
722: \plotone{f7}
723: \caption{The Hyades in B--V and V--I from \citet{deb} along with V--$\Ks$ from
724: \citet{pinson}. Along with the data, an isochrone with $\feh$=+0.15 at 625 Myr is
725: plotted using the synthetic colors (solid line) and VC03 colors (dashed line).}
726: \label{hya}
727: \end{figure}
728:
729: Figure \ref{hya} shows the Hipparcos B--V (left panel) and V--I (center) CMDs of
730: the Hyades \citep{deb} and the combined Hipparcos and 2MASS V--$\Ks$ CMD compiled
731: by \citet{pinson}. Along with the data, a $\feh$=+0.15, 625 Myr isochrone is shown
732: in the synthetic (solid line) and VC03 (dashed line) color transformations. The
733: choice of a 625 Myr isochrone may be an underestimate of the age which is typically
734: quoted as between 650 and 700 Myr (e.g. VC03). The He abundance assumed for the
735: $\feh$=+0.15 models may also be a cause for disagreement since the adopted
736: $\Delta$Y/$\Delta$Z yields Y$_{init}$=0.2864 whereas the Hyades Y value inferred from
737: model comparisons is lower by $\sim$0.02 (see VC03 and references therein for a
738: discussion).
739:
740: In B--V, the synthetic color isochrone is redder than the data by 0.05--0.1 mag down
741: to M$_V$=7 where the slope changes and the isochrone becomes bluer than the data by
742: M$_V$=8. The VC03 color isochrone, on the other hand, is a good fit for the entirety
743: of the MS. Both isochrones appear cooler than the two He burning stars in the B--V
744: CMD.
745:
746: In V--I, the color transformations are quite similar and both perform well down to
747: M$_V$=6. At this point, the isochrones become redder than the data before matching
748: the data again at M$_V$=8.
749:
750: In V--$\Ks$, the synthetic color isochrone fits the data for stars with M$_V \geq$ 3
751: but becomes bluer than the data just below the MSTO. The discrepancy just below the
752: MSTO would be avoided by plotting a slightly older isochrone.
753:
754: \subsubsection{NGC~2420}
755:
756: \begin{figure}
757: \plotone{f8}
758: \caption{NGC~2420 from GS03 along with an isochrone interpolated to $\feh$=--0.25
759: and 2.15 Gyr. The isochrone is shown with synthetic colors (solid line) and VC03
760: colors (dashed line). Also shown is a 1.5 $\Ms$ He burning track interpolated to
761: $\feh$=--0.25. }
762: \label{n2420}
763: \end{figure}
764:
765: Figure \ref{n2420} shows the B--V, V--I, and V--$\Ks$ CMDs of NGC~2420 from GS03.
766: Plotted along with the data is an isochrone interpolated to $\feh$=--0.25 and 2.15
767: Gyr. Given the adopted distance and reddening in Table \ref{clusters}, the best
768: fit age plotted in Figure \ref{n2420} is older than the age quoted by GS03. This
769: is not surprising since ultimately the GS03 age estimate for NGC~2420 was based
770: on Padova isochrones and these were shown to be fainter and redder near the MSTO
771: than the DSEP isochrones (see Figures \ref{600Myr} and \ref{4gyr} and the
772: discussion in $\S$5.1). As a result, the best fit Padova isochrone will be
773: younger than the best fit DSEP isochrone.
774:
775: In B--V the synthetic isochrone is redder than the data, particularly on the lower
776: MS and the RGB, though it matches well near the MSTO. The VC03 color isochrone fits
777: the entire CMD well. The He burning track lies fainter than the red clump for both
778: color transformations with the color predicted correctly by VC03 but too red by the
779: synthetic color. If NGC~2420 is younger than 2.1 Gyr, then the stars in the red clump
780: will be more massive and more luminous.
781:
782: In V--I, both synthetic and VC03 colors fit the CMD well except for the synthetic
783: color on the RGB that is slightly cooler than the data. The color of the red clump
784: is correctly predicted by VC03 but slightly too red in the synthetic color.
785:
786: In V--$\Ks$, the synthetic isochrone fits the SGB and RGB and correctly predicts
787: the color of the red clump. However, the V--$\Ks$ color appears to be too blue on
788: the MS.
789:
790: \subsubsection{M~67}
791:
792: \begin{figure}
793: \plotone{f9}
794: \caption{The CMDs of M~67 in B--V and V--I \citep{mmj} and V--$\Ks$ (GS03).
795: Isochrones with $\feh$=0 at 4 Gyr are shown using synthetic (solid line) and
796: VC03 (dashed line) colors. A He-burning track with M=1.25 $\Ms$ at $\feh$=0 is
797: plotted to indicate the predicted level of the red clump.}
798: \label{m67}
799: \end{figure}
800:
801: Figure \ref{m67} shows the B--V, V--I, and V--$\Ks$ CMDs of M~67 from \citet{mmj}
802: and GS03 along with a $\feh$=0, 4 Gyr isochrone. The isochrone has been transformed
803: using the synthetic (solid line) and VC03 (dashed line) colors. A He burning track
804: with $\feh$=0 and M=1.25 $\Ms$ is shown to indicate the predicted location of the
805: red clump.
806:
807: The fit of the synthetic color isochrone to the data in B--V (left panel of Figure
808: \ref{m67}) is poor, with the isochrone redder than the data by about 0.05-0.1 mag
809: throughout the CMD while the VC03 color isochrone provides an excellent fit. The
810: He burning model has the correct V magnitude but is slightly
811: redder than the observed red clump in B--V for both color transformations.
812:
813: In V--I (middle panel of Figure \ref{m67}), both synthetic and VC03 colors match
814: the data well over most of the CMD. The only exception is that, for stars fainter
815: than V=17, the VC03 colors are redder than the data while the synthetic colors
816: follow the data closely down to V=20. The He burning model correctly predicts the
817: color of the red clump in V--I for both color transformations.
818:
819: In V--$\Ks$ only the synthetic color isochrone is plotted in the right panel of
820: Figure \ref{m67}. As with V--I, the synthetic V--$\Ks$ color is an excellent fit
821: to the data for the lower MS, the MSTO, the RGB, and the location of the red clump.
822:
823: \subsubsection{NGC~6791}
824:
825: \begin{figure}
826: \plotone{f10}
827: \caption{The B--V, V--I, V--K CMDs of NGC~6791 from \citet{stetson} and
828: \citet{carney}. Plotted on top of the data are isochrones with $\feh$=+0.36 at
829: 9 Gyr in synthetic (solid line) and VC03 (dashed line) colors. A 1 $\Ms$ He burning
830: track of the same composition is plotted to indicate the predicted location of the
831: red clump.}
832: \label{n6791}
833: \end{figure}
834:
835: \citet{carney} combined JHK photometry of NGC~6791 with optical data from
836: \citet{stetson}. The resulting CMDs in B--V, V--I, and V--K are shown in Figure
837: \ref{n6791}. The V--K CMD has been adjusted by +0.024 mag to convert from CIT K to
838: 2MASS $\Ks$ \citep{carpenter}. The isochrones shown in Figure \ref{n6791} have
839: $\feh_{init}$ = +0.36 and an age of 9 Gyr.
840:
841: The B--V CMD continues to be problematic for the synthetic colors where, using the
842: adopted E(B--V), the synthetic isochrone is $\sim$0.1 mag redder than the data. The
843: isochrone with VC03 colors is a substantially better fit to the data. This is not
844: surprising since the VC03 colors were calibrated at high metallicity with the
845: \citet{stetson} data. The V--I CMD is equally well fit by both synthetic and VC03
846: colors. The synthetic color isochrone in V--K is an excellent fit to the shape of
847: the CMD as well.
848:
849: For the isochrone used in Figure \ref{n6791}, neglecting mass loss, the mass at the
850: tip of the
851: RGB is 1.12 $\Ms$. A 1 $\Ms$ He burning track is plotted to show the predicted level
852: of the red clump in Figure \ref{n6791}. The He burning track provides a good fit to
853: the V mag of the red clump but lies a few hundredths of a magnitude redder than the
854: red clump in B--V for both color transformations. In V--I, the color of the red clump
855: is in excellent agreement with the model. In V--K, the model is bluer than the red
856: clump by a few hundredths of a magnitude.
857:
858: It should be noted that while the adopted reddening value is E(B--V) = 0.1,
859: \citet{carney} found E(B--V) = 0.14 at $\feh$=+0.4 and the \citet{schlegel} dust maps
860: yield E(B--V) = 0.155 for NGC~6791. These values are both higher than the adopted value
861: of E(B--V) and would alter the isochrone fits shown in Figure \ref{n6791}.
862:
863: If instead E(B--V) = 0.15 is adopted as the reddening then the isochrone fits require
864: either younger age or lower metallcity (or both). Using the same isochrones (with
865: $\feh_{init}$=+0.36) but with the larger reddening, a reasonably good fit is achieved
866: at 8 Gyr but with an increased distance modulus of $DM_V$ = 13.45. Reducing $\feh$ to
867: +0.2 introduces a substantial mismatch between the observed CMD and the models along
868: the MS with the isochrones becoming bluer than the data at 2 mag below the MSTO.
869:
870: Given that the adopted $\feh$ value provides a good fit to the entire CMD and agrees
871: with recent spectroscopic estimates by, for example, \citet{carr} and \citet{orig}, the
872: isochrones show a clear preference for the lower reddening value of E(B--V)=0.1 used
873: in Figure \ref{n6791}. Constraining the distance, reddening, composition, and age of
874: NGC~6791 remains a thorny problem (see \citet{cha3} for a detailed discussion). Because
875: of it high metallicity, a conclusive age determination of NGC~6791 will most likely
876: require that the models follow the detailed abundance patterns found by spectroscopy
877: and not simply match the observed $\feh$. For example, \citet{orig} found that $\afe \sim$ 0
878: but [C/Fe]=--0.35 in NGC~6791.
879:
880:
881: \subsubsection{Clusters in the SDSS ugriz system}
882:
883: \begin{figure}
884: \plotone{f11}
885: \caption{The de-reddened g--i CMDs of M~13 and NGC~2420 from \citet{lee} plotted along with
886: isochrones of appropriate age and metallicity transformed to the SDSS ugriz system.}
887: \label{sdss}
888: \end{figure}
889:
890: \citet{lee} present spectroscopically selected cluster members for stars in a sample
891: of galactic globular and open clusters for purposes of validating the SEGUE Stellar
892: Parameter Pipeline. The selected stars from M~13 and NGC~2420 are used here because
893: they represent the cleanest available data sets of clusters on the SDSS ugriz system.
894: Though these sequences are quite narrow and well--defined, they are not as deep as
895: allowed by SDSS, but are suitable for the purpose of demonstrating the performance
896: of the isochrones.
897:
898: Figure \ref{sdss} shows the g vs. (g--i)$_0$ CMDs of M~13 (left) and NGC~2420 (right)
899: along with appropriate isochrones. The photometry has been de-reddened by
900: \citet{lee} using the \citet{schlegel} dust maps. Plotted on top of the M~13 data
901: in Figure \ref{sdss} are
902: isochrones with $\feh$=-1.5, $\afe$=+0.2 at 11 and 13 Gyr assuming a distance modulus
903: of 14.4 in agreement with \citet{harris}. The isochrones follow the locus
904: of stars on the MS and RGB well. The only real discrepancy is the slope of the SGB
905: but this is a common problem with synthetic color isochrones compared to metal poor
906: systems.
907:
908: Plotted on top of the NGC~2420 data in Figure \ref{sdss} is the same isochrone as in
909: $\S$5.2.3 but now transformed to g vs. g--i plane. The agreement between the data and
910: the isochrone is excellent on the MS but the observational constraints of the sample
911: do not permit comparison with stars in the convective hook or past the MSTO.
912:
913: \subsection{Discussion}
914: Bluer synthetic colors, as represented by B--V in this section, continue to require
915: adjustments in order to match observed CMDs as Figures \ref{m37} through \ref{n6791}
916: indicate. The semi-empirical color transformation of VC03 are an improvement over the
917: synthetic B--V color but seem unnecessary for V--I when used in conjuction with the
918: DSEP isochrones. While the synthetic colors and magnitudes are suitable analysis of
919: observational data in bandpasses with central wavelengths longer than $\sim5000$ \AA,
920: empirically adjusted colors ought to be used at shorter wavelengths. In these redder
921: bands, the synthetic colors perform well throughout the CMD, including on the lower
922: main sequence where they perform better than the empirical colors.
923:
924: The optical to near-infrared comparisons in V--J (M~37 only) and V--K of the open
925: clusters are favorable for entire extent of the MS and the RGB in the older clusters
926: but larger reddening than suggested by the adopted reddening curve is needed in some
927: cases.
928:
929: The location of He burning stars in the open clusters is matched by the models in the
930: older clusters (M~67 and NGC~6791) but for the younger clusters the models predict the
931: red clump to be fainter (NGC~2420) and/or redder (M~37 and the Hyades) than the data
932: suggest. The general lack of evolved stars in the CMDs of both M~37 and the Hyades
933: makes it difficult to speculate as to whether the models are intrinsically too cool
934: or whether the colors are too red for a given $\Teff$.
935:
936: \section{Summary}
937:
938: The Dartmouth Stellar Evolution Program has been used to compute a large grid of
939: stellar evolution tracks. A subset of these tracks and isochrones were presented by
940: \citet{dotter} and are extended in this paper to include younger ages, higher
941: metallicities, and transformations to multiple photometric systems. These models
942: take advantage of the latest advances in radiative opacities, nuclear reactions rate,
943: and the equation of state.
944:
945: The Dartmouth Stellar Evolution Database comprises a set of stellar evolution
946: tracks and isochrones transformed to several photometric systems along with a
947: set of computer programs that allow for interpolation and construction of luminosity
948: functions and synthetic horizontal branch models. The database spans a wide range
949: of compositions from $\feh$=--2.5 to +0.5, $\afe$=--0.2 to +0.8 (at $\feh \leq$0) or
950: +0.2 (at $\feh >$0), and additional models with enhanced He for $\feh$=--2.5 to 0.
951:
952: The models were transformed to the observational plane using a synthetic color
953: transformation based on \texttt{PHOENIX} model atmospheres for $\Teff <$10,000 K and
954: \citet{cas} for hotter temperatures. The synthetic color transformations are
955: compared to the VC03 semi-empirical transformations in B--V and V--I. The synthetic
956: colors perform well in V--I but are consistently too red in B--V. As a general rule,
957: the synthetic colors should only be trusted in bandpasses equivalent to V or redder,
958: i.e. those with central wavelengths longer than $\sim5000$ \AA. In these bands, the
959: synthetic colors were found to perform well---and better than the empirical colors---
960: on the lower main sequence.
961: Synthetic photometry in the bluer bandpasses (those with central wavelengths shorter
962: than $\sim5000$ \AA) does not compare favorably with
963: observations. Empirically adjusted magnitudes and colors should be favored for the
964: bluer bandpasses whenever possible.
965:
966: The isochrones were compared to isochrones from other groups at $\feh$=0 and +0.15
967: as well as photometry from open clusters and one globular cluster. The isochrones
968: extend to lower mass (0.1 $\Ms$) than those of other major isochrone libraries
969: and provide reasonable fits to the MS of the clusters shown in $\S$5.
970:
971: The Dartmouth Stellar Evolution Database should prove useful in studies of resolved
972: stellar populations in the local Universe and is suitable for application to
973: population synthesis and integrated light models. The database is available through
974: a dedicated website.
975:
976:
977: \acknowledgments
978: This work was supported by NSF grant AST-0094231.
979:
980: The authors thank the anonymous referee for providing several helpful suggestions
981: that have improved the quality and utility of this paper.
982:
983: AD wishes to thank Alan Irwin for his work on FreeEOS and for making it freely
984: available, Arnold Boothroyd for sharing his subroutines to manage the OPAL Type 2
985: opacity tables, Kevin Covey for helpful discussions regarding the SDSS photometric
986: system, and Harvey Richer for advice regarding the HST photometric system.
987: Thanks also to Aaron Grocholski, Ata Sarajedini, and Jason Kalirai for sharing their
988: open cluster photometry.
989:
990: The work of DJ and EB was supported in part by by NASA grants NAG5-3505 and NNG04GB36G,
991: NSF grants AST-0307323 and AST-0707704, and US DOE Grant DE-FG02-07ER41517. This
992: research used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center
993: (NERSC), which is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy
994: under Contract No. DE-AC03-76SF00098; and the H\"ochstleistungs Rechenzentrum Nord
995: (HLRN). We thank both these institutions for a generous allocation of computer time.
996:
997: JF acknowledges support from NSF grant AST-0239590 and Grant No. EIA-0216178, Grant
998: No. EPS-0236913 with matching support from the State of Kansas and the Wichita State
999: University High Performance Computing Center.
1000:
1001: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1002: \bibitem[Adelberger et al.(1998)]{adel}Adelberger, E. C. et al. 1998, Rev. Mod. Phys., 70, 1265
1003: \bibitem[Angulo et al.(1999)]{nacre}Angulo, C., et al. 1999, \nphysa, 656, 3
1004: \bibitem[Bedin et al.(2005)]{bed}Bedin, L. R., Cassisi, S., Castelli, F., Piotto, G., Anderson, J., Salaris, M.,
1005: Momany, Y., \& Pietrinferni, A. 2005, \mnras, 357, 1038
1006: \bibitem[Bell \& Gustafsson(1978)]{bg78}Bell, R. A. \& Gustafsson, B. 1978, \aaps, 34, 229
1007: \bibitem[Bell \& Gustafsson(1989)]{bg89}Bell, R. A. \& Gustafsson, B. 1989, \mnras, 236, 653
1008: \bibitem[Bessell(1990)]{bes}Bessell, M. S. 1990, \pasp, 102, 1181
1009: \bibitem[Bessell \& Brett(1988)]{beb} Bessell, M. S., \& Brett, J. M. 1988, \pasp, 100, 1134
1010: \bibitem[Bessell et al.(1998)]{bcp}Bessell, M. S., Castelli, F., \& Plez, B. 1998, \aap, 333, 231
1011: \bibitem[Bjork \& Chaboyer(2006)]{bjork}Bjork, S. R. \& Chaboyer, B. 2006, \apj, 641, 1102
1012: \bibitem[Boesgaard \& Friel(1990)]{boes} Boesgaard, A. M., \& Friel, E. D. 1990, \apj, 351, 467
1013: \bibitem[Carney et al.(2005)]{carney}Carney, B. W., Lee, J.-W., \& Dodson, B. 2005, \aj, 129, 656
1014: \bibitem[Carpenter(2001)]{carpenter}Carpenter, J. M. 2001, \aj, 121, 2851
1015: \bibitem[Carraro et al.(2006)]{carr}Carraro, G., Villanova, S., Demarque, P., McSwain, M. V., Piotto, G., \& Bedin, L. R. 2006, \apj, 643, 1151
1016: \bibitem[Cassisi et al.(2004)]{cass}Cassisi, S., Salaris, M., Castelli, F., \& Pietrinferni, A. 2004, \apj, 616, 498
1017: \bibitem[Castelli(1999)]{cas99}Castelli, F. 1999, \aap, 346, 564
1018: \bibitem[Castelli et al.(1997)]{cgk97}Castelli, F., Gratton, R. G., \& Kurucz, R. L. 1997, \aap, 318, 841
1019: \bibitem[Castelli \& Kurucz(2003)]{cas}Castelli, F., \& Kurucz, R. L. 2003, IAU Symp. 210, ed. N. Piskunov, W. W. Weiss, \& D. F. Gray (San Francisco: ASP), A20
1020: \bibitem[Chaboyer et al.(2001)]{cha}Chaboyer, B., Fenton, W. H., Nelan, J. E., Patnaude, D. J., \& Simon, F. E. 2001, \apj, 562, 521
1021: \bibitem[Chaboyer et al.(1999)]{cha3}Chaboyer, B., Greene, E. M., \& Liebert, J. 1999, \aj, 117, 1360
1022: \bibitem[Chaboyer \& Kim(1995)]{chakim}Chaboyer, B. \& Kim, Y.-C. 1995, \apj, 454, 767
1023: \bibitem[Clem et al.(2004)]{clem}Clem, J. L., Vandenberg, D. A., Grundahl, F., \& Bell, R. A. 2004, \aj, 127, 1227
1024: \bibitem[Cohen et al.(2003)]{cohen}Cohen, M., Wheaton, W. A., \& Megeath, S. T. 2003, \aj, 126, 1090
1025: \bibitem[Cordier et al.(2007)]{cord}Cordier, D., Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., \& Salaris, M. 2007, \aj, 133, 468
1026: \bibitem[de Bruijne et al.(2001)]{deb}de Bruijne, J. H. J., Hoogerwerf, R., \& de Zeeuw, P. T. 2001, \aap, 367, 111
1027: \bibitem[Demarque et al.(2004)]{dem}Demarque, P., Woo, J.-H., Kim, Y.-C., \& Yi, S. K. 2004, \apjs, 155, 667
1028: \bibitem[Dotter et al.(2007)]{dotter} Dotter, A., Chaboyer, B., Jevremovi\'c, Baron, E., Ferguson, J. W., Sarajedini, A., \& Anderson, J. 2007, \aj, 134, 376
1029: \bibitem[Ferguson et al.(2005)]{ferg}Ferguson, J. W., Alexander, D. R., Allard, F., Barman, T., Bodnarik, J. G., Hauschildt, P. H., Heffner-Wong, A., \& Tamanai, A. 2005 \apj, 623, 585
1030: \bibitem[Girardi et al.(2000)]{gir00}Girardi, L., Bressan, A., Bertelli, G., \& Chiosi, C. 2000, \aaps, 141, 371
1031: \bibitem[Girardi et al.(2007)]{gir07}Girardi, L., Castelli, F., Bertelli, G., Nasi, E. 2007, \aap, 468, 657
1032: \bibitem[Grevesse \& Sauval(1998)]{gs98}Grevesse, N. \& Sauval, A. J. 1998, \ssr, 85, 161 (GS98)
1033: \bibitem[Grocholski \& Sarajedini(2003)]{groch}Grocholski, A. J. \& Sarajedini, A. 2003, \mnras, 345, 1015
1034: \bibitem[Haft et al.(1994)]{haft}Haft, M., Raffelt, G., \& Weiss, A. 1994, \apj, 425, 222
1035: \bibitem[Harris(1996)]{harris}Harris, W.E. 1996, \aj, 112, 1487
1036: \bibitem[Hauschildt et al.(1999a)]{phxa}Hauschildt, P. H., Allard, F., \& Baron, E. 1999a, \apj, 512, 377
1037: \bibitem[Hauschildt et al.(1999b)]{phxb}Hauschildt, P. H., Allard, F., Ferguson, J., Baron, E., \& Alexander, D. 1999b, \apj, 525, 871
1038: \bibitem[Houdashelt et al.(2000)]{houd}Houdashelt, M. L., Bell, R. A., \& Sweigart, A. V. 2000, \aj, 119, 1448
1039: \bibitem[Hubbard \& Lampe(1969)]{hubb}Hubbard, W. B. \& Lampe, M. 1969, \apjs, 18, 297
1040: \bibitem[Iglesias \& Rogers(1996)]{opal}Iglesias, C.A. \& Rogers, F.J. 1996, \apj, 464, 943
1041: \bibitem[Imbriani et al.(2004)]{imbr}Imbriani, G. et al. 2004, \aap, 420, 625
1042: \bibitem[Irwin(2004)]{irwin} Irwin, A. 2004, Technical Report (http://freeeos.sourceforge.net)
1043: \bibitem[Johnson(1965)]{johnson}Johnson, H. L. 1965, \apj, 141, 923
1044: \bibitem[Kalirai et al.(2001)]{kalirai}Kalirai, J. S., Ventura, P., Richer, H. B., Fahlman, G. G., Durrell, P. R., D'Antona, F., \& Marconi, G. 2001, \aj, 122, 3239
1045: \bibitem[Korn et al.(2006)]{korn}Korn, A.J., Grundahl, F., Richard, O., Barklem, P.S., Mashonkina, L., Collet, R., Piskunov, N., \& Gustafsson, B., 2006, The Messenger, 125, 6
1046: \bibitem[Kunz et al.(2002)]{kunz}Kunz, R., Fey, M., Jaeger, M., Mayer, A., \& Hammer, J. W. 2002, \apj, 567, 643
1047: \bibitem[Lee, Demarque, \& Zinn(1990)]{ldz} Lee, Y.-W., Demarque, P., \& Zinn, R. 1990, \apj, 350, 155
1048: \bibitem[Lee et al.(2007)]{lee} Lee, Y.~S. et al. 2007, submitted to \aj (http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.5778)
1049: \bibitem[Montgomery et al.(1994)]{mmj}Montgomery, K. A., Marschall, L. A., \& Janes, K. A. 1993, \aj, 106, 181
1050: \bibitem[Paulson et al.(2003)]{psc}Paulson, D. B., Sneden, C., \& Cochran, W. D. 2003, \aj, 125, 3185 (PSC)
1051: \bibitem[Peterson \& Greene(1998)]{peterson}Peterson, R. C. \& Greene, E. M. 1998, \apjl, 502, 39
1052: \bibitem[Origlia et al.(2006)]{orig}Origlia, L., Valenti, E., Rich, R. M., \& Ferraro, F. R. 2006, \apj, 646, 499
1053: \bibitem[Pietrinferni et al.(2004)]{piet}Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi S., Salaris M. \& Castelli F. 2004, \apj, 612, 168
1054: \bibitem[Pietrinferni et al.(2006)]{piet2}Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., Salaris, M., \& Castelli, F. 2006, \apj, 642, 797
1055: \bibitem[Pinsonneault et al.(2004)]{pinson}Pinsonneault, M. H., Terndrup, D. M., Hanson, R. B., Stauffer, J. R. 2004, \apj, 600, 946
1056: \bibitem[Richer et al.(2007)]{rich}Richer, H. B., Dotter, A., Hurley, J., Anderson, J., King. I., Davis, S., Fahlman, G. G., Hansen, B. M. S., Kalirai, J., Paust, N., Rich, R. M., \& Shara, M. M. 2007, \aj accepted; http://arxiv.org/0708.4030
1057: \bibitem[Sarajedini et al.(2007)]{sar}Sarajedini, A., Bedin, L. R., Chaboyer, B., Dotter, A., Siegel, M., Anderson, J., Aparicio, A., King, I., Majewski, S., Mar\' \i n-Franch, A., Piotto, G., Reid, I. N., \& Rosenberg, A. 2007, \aj, 133, 1658
1058: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1998)]{schlegel}Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., \& Davis, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
1059: \bibitem[Siegel et al.(2007)]{sieg}Siegel, M. H., Dotter, A., Majewski, S. R., Sarajedini, A., Chaboyer, B., Nidever, D. L., Anderson, J., Mar\'in-Franch, A., Rosenberg, A., Bedin, L. R., Aparicio, A., King, I., Piotto, G., Reid, I. N. 2007, \apjl, 667, 57
1060: \bibitem[Sirianni et al.(2005)]{sir}Sirianni, M. et al. 2005, \pasp, 117, 1049
1061: \bibitem[Spergel et al.(2003)]{sper}Spergel, D. N., et al. 2003, \apjs, 148, 175
1062: \bibitem[Stetson et al.(2003)]{stetson}Stetson, P. B., Bruntt, H., \& Grundahl, F. 2003, \pasp, 115, 413
1063: \bibitem[Taylor(2007)]{taylor}Taylor, B. J. 2007, \aj, 133, 370
1064: \bibitem[Thoul et al.(1994)]{thoul}Thoul, A. A., Bahcall, J. N., \& Loeb, A. 1994, \apj, 421, 828
1065: \bibitem[Vandenberg \& Bell(1985)]{vb85}Vandenberg, D. A. \& Bell, R. A. 1985, \apjs, 58, 561
1066: \bibitem[Vandenberg et al.(2006)]{vdb2}Vandenberg, D. A., Bergbusch, P. A., \& Dowler, P. D. 2006, \apjs, 162, 375
1067: \bibitem[Vandenberg \& Clem(2003)]{vdb}Vandenberg, D. A. \& Clem, J. L. 2003, \aj, 126, 778 (VC03)
1068: \bibitem[Vandenberg et al.(2007)]{vand07}Vandenberg, D. A., Edvardsson, B., Eriksson, K., \& Gustafsson, B. 2007, http://arxiv.org/0708.1188
1069: \bibitem[Vandenberg \& Stetson(2004)]{vdbste}Vandenberg, D. A. \& Stetson, P. B. 2004, \pasp, 116, 997
1070: \bibitem[Yi et al.(2004)]{yi}Yi, S. K., Demarque, P., \& Kim, Y.-C. 2004, \apss, 291, 261
1071: \bibitem[Yi et al.(2003)]{yi2}Yi, S. K., Kim, Y.-C., Demarque, P. 2003, \apjs, 144, 259
1072: \end{thebibliography}
1073: \end{document}