1: \documentclass{emulateapj}
2: \slugcomment{Accepted for Publication in Astrophysical Journal}
3: \lefthead{Rau et al.}
4: \righthead{A Survey for Fast Transients in the Fornax Cluster of Galaxies}
5:
6:
7: %\documentclass[11pt,preprint2]{aastex}
8: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
9: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
10:
11: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
12:
13:
14: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
15:
16: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
17:
18: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
19: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
20: %% use the longabstract style option.
21:
22: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
23:
24: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
25: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
26: %% the \begin{document} command.
27: %%
28: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
29: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
30: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
31: %% for information.
32:
33: %\usepackage{graphicx,rotating}
34: %\usepackage{multirow,multicol}
35: %\usepackage{natbib}
36:
37: %\usepackage{latexsym,psfig}
38: %\usepackage{epstopdf}
39: %\usepackage{longtable}
40:
41: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
42: \newcommand{\myemail}{arne@astro.caltech.edu}
43:
44: % MY DEFS
45: \def\msun{M$_{\odot}$}
46: \def\lsun{L$_{\odot}$}
47: \def\rsun{R$_{\odot}$}
48: \def\asec{\ifmmode ^{\prime\prime}\else$^{\prime\prime}$\fi}
49: \def\farcs{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\prime\prime}$}} % Fractions of arcseconds
50: \def\farcm{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\prime}$}} % Fractions of arcminutes
51: \def\degs{\ifmmode ^{\circ}\else$^{\circ}$\fi}
52: \def\farcm{\hbox{$^{\prime}$}} % arcminutes
53:
54:
55: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
56:
57: %\slugcomment{}
58:
59: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
60: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
61: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
62: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
63: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
64: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
65:
66: \shorttitle{Fornax Fast Transient Survey}
67: \shortauthors{Rau et al.}
68:
69: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
70: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
71:
72: \begin{document}
73:
74: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
75: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
76: %% you desire.
77:
78: \title{A Survey for Fast Transients in the Fornax Cluster of Galaxies}
79:
80: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
81: %% author and affiliation information.
82: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
83: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
84: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
85: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
86:
87:
88: \author{A. Rau\altaffilmark{1}, E.O. Ofek\altaffilmark{1}, S.R. Kulkarni\altaffilmark{1}, B.F. Madore\altaffilmark{2}, O. Pevunova\altaffilmark{3}, M. Ajello\altaffilmark{4}}
89:
90: \email{arne@astro.caltech.edu}
91:
92: \altaffiltext{1}{Caltech Optical Observatories, MS 105-24, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA}
93: \altaffiltext{2}{Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA}
94: \altaffiltext{3}{Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, MS 100-22, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA}
95: \altaffiltext{4}{Max-Planck Institut f\"ur Extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstr.1, 80748 Garching, Germany}
96:
97: \begin{abstract}
98:
99: The luminosity gap between novae ($M_{\rm R}\le -10$) and supernovae
100: ($M_{\rm R}\ge -14$) is well known since the pioneering research of
101: Zwicky and Hubble. Nearby galaxy clusters and concentrations offer
102: an excellent opportunity to search for explosions brighter than
103: classical novae and fainter than supernovae. Here, we present the
104: results of a $B$-band survey of 23 member galaxies of the Fornax
105: cluster, performed at the Las Campanas 2.5-m Irene duPont telescope.
106: Observations with a cadence of 32\,minutes discovered no genuine
107: fast transient to a limiting absolute magnitude of $M_{\rm
108: B}=-9.3$\,mag. We provide a detailed assessment of the transient
109: detection efficiency and the resulting upper limits on the event
110: rate as function of peak magnitude. Further, we discuss the
111: discoveries of five previously unknown foreground variables which we
112: identified as two flare stars, two W~Uma type eclipsing binaries and
113: a candidate $\delta$~Scuti/SX~Phe star.
114:
115: \end{abstract}
116:
117: \keywords{surveys --- stars: flare --- (stars: variables:) delta Scuti ---
118: stars: variables: other}
119:
120:
121: % --------------------------------------------------------------------
122:
123: \section{Introduction}
124:
125: The recent findings of a number of enigmatic transients, e.g., new
126: types of novae \citep{Kulkarni:2007uq} and supernovae related events
127: \citep{Ofek:2007fj,Smith:2007qy,Quimby:2007qy,Pastorello:2007jk}, have
128: demonstrated that the phase space of eruptive transients is already
129: richer than discussed in astronomy texts. Even more discoveries,
130: especially on timescales of days to weeks, are anticipated for the
131: upcoming large-area facilities, such as SkyMapper
132: \citep{Schmidt:2005qy}, the Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid
133: Response System \citep[Pan-STARRS;][]{Kaiser:2002fk}, and the Large
134: Synoptic Survey Telescope \citep[LSST;][]{Tyson:2005lr}. However, on
135: shorter timescales (minutes to hours), their observational designs are
136: less optimal and dedicates, small experiments are more likely to lead
137: to great findings. A small number of such surveys have been performed
138: previously
139: \citep[e.g.,][]{Becker:2004fk,Rykoff:2005lr,Morales-Rueda:2006qy,Ramsay:2006lr}
140: and informed us of the difficulty of discovering genuine new classes
141: of fast transients and variables\footnote{In the following we refer to
142: an event as transient when it has no known quiescent counterpart at
143: any wavelength and to a source which shows a quiescent counterpart
144: in our images or has a catalogued counterpart as variable.}. Here,
145: the greatest challenge is to pierce the fog of known foreground
146: contaminators. Asteroids and flares from M dwarfs have been
147: established to dominate the short-timescale variable sky
148: \citep{Kulkarni:2006lr}. However, once this curtain is penetrated,
149: exciting and rare events can be found, e.g., the high-amplitude
150: optical flickering ($\sim$3.5\,mag in 6\,min) accompanying the
151: outburst of the Galactic X-ray binary Swift~J195509.6+261406
152: \citep{Stefanescu:2007fk,Kasliwal:2007qy}. The latter source was
153: brought to attention by its preceding gamma-ray flare
154: \citep{Pagani:2007fk}. Nonetheless, high-cadence optical surveys will
155: be capable of detecting similar events independently of the
156: high-energy emission.
157:
158:
159: Another, yet unidentified, bright ($R=11.7$\,mag), high-amplitude
160: candidate transient ($>$6\,mag in 2\,min) was recently discovered
161: along the line of sight to the nearby ($\sim$70\,Mpc) galaxy IC~4779
162: \citep{Klotz:2007lr}. If associated with IC~4779, the event reached a
163: staggering peak luminosity of $L_{\rm R,peak}\sim3\times10^{44}$\,erg
164: s$^{-1}$, outshined only by the brightest known supernova
165: \citep[SN2005ap;][]{Quimby:2007qy}.
166:
167: A critical component of every successful transient search is a
168: judicious target selection. This is especially relevant for
169: short-cadence experiment, where only a small number of fields is
170: repeatedly observed. Obvious targets for such a search are nearby
171: massive clusters of galaxies. Clusters contain a large stellar mass,
172: which increases the probability of finding rare events during the
173: transient phase. Furthermore, their known distance provides a direct
174: access to the absolute brightness of the events. In addition, the
175: variety of galaxy types, and thus stellar populations, may offer
176: constraints on the progenitor ages.
177:
178: In this paper we present the results of an optical survey of galaxies
179: in the Fornax Cluster designed to test the transient and variable sky
180: in a galaxy cluster environment on timescales shorter than one hour.
181: At the distance of $16.2\pm1.5$\,Mpc \citep[$(m-M)_{\rm
182: 0}=30.91\pm0.19$;][]{Grillmair:1999lr} and with negligible
183: foreground extinction \citep[E(B-V) = 0.013\,mag;][]{Schlegel:1998ul}
184: observations of the Fornax cluster allow one to probe the gap in
185: absolute peak brightness between classical novae (M$_{\rm R}>-10$) and
186: supernovae (M$_{\rm R}<-14$) already with 2-m-class telescopes. This
187: part of phase space has become particularly alluring with the
188: recognition of an emerging population of new types of explosions,
189: namely the Luminous Red Novae
190: \citep{Kulkarni:2007uq,Rau:2007kx,Ofek:2007uq}.
191:
192:
193: % --------------------------------------------------------------------
194:
195: \section{Observations and Data reduction}
196: \label{sec:data}
197:
198: Observations were obtained with the Wide Field Reimaging CCD Camera
199: (WFCCD) at the 2.5-m Irene du Pont telescope in Las Campanas, Chile.
200: The detector dimensions of 2048$\times$2048 pixels, together with the
201: plate scale of 0\farcs774, provide a circular field of view with
202: $\sim$12\farcm5 radius. Imaging was performed in the $B$-band as a
203: compromise between avoiding flares from Galactic M-dwarfs (especially
204: bright in the ultra-violet) and increasing the contrast between
205: possible transients and the predominantly early type cluster galaxies
206: (bright in the red part of the spectrum).
207:
208: For the survey, we selected ten fields covering the 23 brightest
209: Fornax~I cluster members (Table~\ref{tab:fields},
210: Figures available in printed paper). These fields were
211: imaged with a sequence of 120\,s exposures repeated up to fifteen
212: times in each of five nights in October and December 2006. Additional
213: single exposures were obtained in five nights in November 2006 (see
214: Table~\ref{tab:obslog} for a complete log). As part of a sequence, a
215: single exposure was taken at each position, after which the telescope
216: slewed to the next field. The resulting distribution of times between
217: consecutive images for each field is given in
218: Figure~\ref{fig:cadence}. Throughout the survey a mean intra-day
219: cadence of $\Delta$$t=32.25$\,min was achieved. The spread of the
220: observations between October and December 2006 allowed for the
221: possible detection of slowly evolving events with timescales of about
222: one month (e.g., supernovae).
223:
224: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
225: \begin{table}
226: \begin{center}
227: \caption{Fields.
228: \label{tab:fields}}
229: \begin{tabular}{clll}
230: \tableline\tableline
231: \# & RA$_{\rm 2000\tablenotemark{a}}$ & Dec$_{\rm 2000}\tablenotemark{a}$ & Galaxies\tablenotemark{b} \\
232: \tableline
233: A & 03:24:36.7 & -36:26:21& NGC1326, 1326A, 1326B\\
234: B & 03:22:41.1 & -37:10:54 & NGC1316, 1317\\
235: C & 03:31:04.3 & -33:36:42 & NGC1350\\
236: D & 03:36:29.5 & -34:52:28 & NGC1380, 1380A\\
237: E & 03:35:44.1 & -35:18:50 & NGC1373, 1374, 1375, 1379, 1381\\
238: F & 03:36:49.0 & -35:20:55 & NGC1379, 1381, 1382, 1387, MCG-06-09-008\\
239: G & 03:38:34.0 & -35:29:58 & NGC1399, 1404\\
240: H & 03:36:45.2 & -36:06:17 & NGC1369, 1386\\
241: I & 03:33:37.5 & -36:07:19 & NGC1365\\
242: K & 03:42:21.9 & -35:16:12 &NGC1427, 1428\\
243: \tableline
244: \end{tabular}
245: \tablenotetext{a}{Coordinates of the centers of the fields.}
246: \tablenotetext{b}{Prominent galaxies within the field of view.}
247: \end{center}
248: \end{table}
249: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
250:
251: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
252:
253: \begin{table}
254: \begin{center}
255: \caption{Observation log.
256: \label{tab:obslog}}
257: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccccc}
258: \tableline\tableline
259: Date (UT)\tablenotemark{a} & \multicolumn{10}{c}{Exposures\tablenotemark{b}}\\
260: & A &B &C &D &E &F &G &H &I &K\\
261: \tableline
262: 06/10/23 &10 &10 &10 &10 &10 &9 &8 &8 &8 &10\\
263: 06/10/24 &13 &14 &13 &12 &14 &10 &13 &13 &13 &13\\
264: 06/10/25 &\multicolumn{10}{c}{lost due to bad weather}\\
265: 06/11/17 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1\\
266: 06/11/18 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1\\
267: 06/11/19 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1\\
268: 06/11/20 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1\\
269: 06/11/21 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1 &1\\
270: 06/12/19 &14 &15 &14 &14 &14 &14 &14 &14 &14 &14\\
271: 06/12/20 &13 &13 &13 &14 &13 &14 &14 &14 &14 &14\\
272: 06/12/21 &12 &12 &12 &12 &12 &12 &12 &10 &12 &12\\
273: \tableline
274: total\tablenotemark{c}: &67 &69 &67 &67 &68 &64 &66 &64 &66 &68\\
275: \tableline
276: \end{tabular}
277: \tablenotetext{a}{UTC date of observation in the format YY/MM/DD.}
278: \tablenotetext{b}{Number of 120\,s $B$-band exposure for each field in a given night.}
279: \tablenotetext{c}{Total number of observations for each field.}
280: \end{center}
281: \end{table}
282: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
283:
284: Figure~\ref{fig:cadence} indicates that our primary sensitivity is to
285: variability on $\sim32$\,min timescales. Here, we have a total
286: exposure time of 13.7 days distributed over 616 images (neglecting the
287: once-per-day exposures in November). With a covered area of
288: 0.136\,deg$^2$ per image, this yields a total areal exposure, E$_A$,
289: of 1.86\,deg$^2$ days. We have a factor of 5 and 44 larger E$_A$ for
290: inter-night and inter-month observation intervals, respectively.
291:
292: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
293: \begin{figure}[htbp]
294: \begin{center}
295: \includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth,angle=-90]{f1.jpg}
296: \caption{Time between two consecutive images of a given pointing. The mean cadence is 32.25\,min.}
297: \label{fig:cadence}
298: \end{center}
299: \end{figure}
300: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
301:
302: Image reduction (bias subtraction, flat fielding) was performed using
303: standard {\it IRAF} routines\footnote{IRAF was distributed by the
304: National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by the
305: Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under
306: cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation}. The
307: astrometric solutions were obtained in reference to NOMAD
308: \citep{Zacharias:2005lr} with {\it ASCfit v3.0}
309: \footnote{http://www.astro.caltech.edu/$\sim$pick/ASCFIT/README.ascfit3.html}.
310: The strategy to search for transients and variables in single
311: exposures implies that Cosmic-ray removal by median combining of
312: multiple images was not applicable. Hence, we applied a Laplacian
313: algorithm \citep[{\it lacos\_im};][]{van-Dokkum:2001qy} which allows
314: the identification of Cosmic-rays in single frames.
315:
316: For absolute photometric calibration we used observations of the
317: standard star field T~Phe \citep{Landolt:1992lr} taken under
318: photometric conditions (2006 November 19). This calibration was
319: applied to the images of the ten Fornax fields obtained during the
320: same night. Exposures from the remaining nights were tied relatively
321: to these absolutely calibrated frames. Here, we selected an ensemble
322: of at least 40 local, non-saturated, non-variable ($\Delta
323: B<0.01$\,mag) reference stars for each image. The photometric offset
324: between the two observations was estimated by deriving the median
325: brightness offset of these sets of stars with respect to their
326: brightness in the reference frame. This was successively done for all
327: observations of a given field, thus providing a common photometric
328: zero-point. The resulting photometric accuracy for point sources is
329: shown in Figure~\ref{fig:deltaMag}. In a typical night a 5-$\sigma$
330: limiting magnitude of $B~\sim22$\,mag was reached. Sources brighter
331: than $B\sim15$\,mag were generally saturated.
332:
333: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
334: \begin{figure}[htbp]
335: \begin{center}
336: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=0]{f4.jpg}
337: \caption{Photometric accuracy. Shown are the combined point source measurements of three exposures obtained on 2006 Dec 19 UT. The seeing was 1\farcs4 and a 5-$\sigma$ limiting magnitude of $B\sim$22\,mag was reached. Sources brighter than $B\sim15$\,mag are saturated.}
338: \label{fig:deltaMag}
339: \end{center}
340: \end{figure}
341: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
342:
343:
344: The search for transients and variables was performed in two separate
345: steps. First we applied a point spread function (PSF)-matched image
346: subtraction using a software package based on {\it ISIS}
347: \citep{Alard:2000fk}. Reference frames for all fields were generated
348: by combining the three best quality exposures taken in November 2006.
349: Candidate transients and variables were detected in the difference
350: images using {\it SExtractor v2.5.0} \citep{Bertin:1996uq}. For a
351: typical image, this resulted in about 100 sources brighter than
352: 5-$\sigma$, out of which all but a few (see below) were subsequently
353: identified by eye as false positives (e.g., image artifacts,
354: Cosmic-ray residuals, PSF distortion, and sources near the rim of the
355: circular field of view which were in the input but not in the
356: reference frame). The PSFs of the resulting candidates were then
357: verified against those of stars in the input images.
358:
359: The efficiency, $\epsilon$, of recovering transients in the difference
360: images was modeled with Monte Carlo simulations. Here, a subset of
361: the survey data was enriched with PSF-matched artificial point sources
362: and subsequently passed through the image subtraction pipeline. The
363: efficiency was then calculated from the ratio of recovered to input
364: test sources. In total we obtained 1.9 Million efficiency points with
365: random location in the field and random magnitudes of 14$<$B$<$23. As
366: the main driver for our survey was the search for events in nearby
367: galaxies, understanding $\epsilon$ as function of the local surface
368: brightness became important. Thus, a subset of the efficiency points
369: was placed inside the extend of the bright Fornax cluster members. As
370: expected, $\epsilon$ was found to decrease with increasing background
371: flux contribution (see Fig.~\ref{fig:efficiency}a). For ``empty''
372: locations ($B\sim22.6$\,mag asec$^{-2}$) a recovery efficiency of
373: $\epsilon=0.85$ (0.7) was achieved for sources brighter than $B=20$
374: (21.3). In positions with higher surface brightness ($B\sim21.5$,
375: $20.0$\,mag asec$^{-2}$) the maximum efficiency was lower
376: ($\epsilon=0.60$, $0.40$). Fig~\ref{fig:efficiency}b shows $\epsilon$
377: as function of surface brightness for three test source magnitudes.
378:
379: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
380: \begin{figure}[htbp]
381: \begin{center}
382: \includegraphics[width=0.50\textwidth,angle=0]{f5a.jpg}
383: \hspace{-0.9truecm}
384: \includegraphics[width=0.50\textwidth,angle=0]{f5b.jpg}
385: \caption{left: Transient recovery efficiency as function of source magnitude for three levels of background surface brightness. The solid line (B=22.4\,mag asec$^{-2}$) corresponds to the efficiency away from the Fornax cluster members, while the dotted (B=21.5\,mag asec$^{-2}$) and dashed (B=20.0\,mag asec$^{-2}$) lines are representative for locations within the galaxies. Sources brighter than B=15 are generally saturated. The faint sources cutoff corresponds to the 5-$\sigma$ detection limits in the difference images.
386: right: Transient recovery efficiency as function of background surface brightness for test sources with B=21.3 (solid), 19.5 (dotted) and 18.0 (dashed). Fewer efficiency points have been obtained at high surface brightness regions, thus, these bins have the lowest statistic.}
387: \label{fig:efficiency}
388: \end{center}
389: \end{figure}
390: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
391:
392: In a second step we performed a catalog-based variability
393: search. While this method is inferior to image subtraction for sources
394: overlaying the bright cluster galaxies, it improves the detectivity of
395: low-amplitude, bright variables in the field. For these, image
396: subtraction is typically very sensitive to PSF stability, convolution,
397: and alignment, and residuals unrelated to intrinsic variability may
398: remain. The source catalogs were compiled using {\it SExtractor
399: v2.5.0} on the photometrically calibrated images (see above).
400: Objects with two or more detections brighter than $B=20$ and
401: deviations of more than $B=0.1$\,mag from their median brightness were
402: selected as candidate variables.
403:
404: A serious contamination in optical transient and variable searches can
405: come from solar system bodies. However, due to the high ecliptic
406: latitude ($\beta\approx-53$\,\degs) observations of the Fornax cluster
407: are only marginally affected. Our choice of using the B-band filter
408: further reduced the impact of asteroids, whose emission peaks at
409: longer wavelength. Moreover repetitive visits of each field
410: throughout the nights were allowing secure astrometric identification
411: of moving objects with proper motions as low as 3\asec\ per day. For
412: example, the expected parallax of a Kuiper belt object, at 100\,AU
413: from the Sun at that location and time of the year, is $\sim33$\asec
414: day$^{-1}$ and $\sim3\farcs5$\,day$^{-1}$ due to the Earth and object
415: motion, respectively. Thus, it was not surprising that only one
416: astrometrically variable was found in the survey dataset.
417:
418: % --------------------------------------------------------------------
419:
420: \section{Results}
421:
422: The search netted seven high-confidence photometric transients and
423: variables. Two, both earlier reported type Ia SNe in NGC~1316,
424: SN~2006dd \citep{Monard:2006lr} and SN~2006mr \citep{Monard:2006fk},
425: were only detected in image subtraction. The remaining five objects
426: were variable point sources found with both detection methods. None
427: of them was previously catalogued in
428: SIMBAD\footnote{http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/},
429: NED\footnote{http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/},
430: GCVS\footnote{heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/W3Browse/all/gcvsnsvars.html} or
431: detected in the {\it ROSAT}/PSPC all-sky survey \citep{Voges:1999fj}.
432: Below we provide a brief description for each of these variable
433: sources (see also Table~\ref{tab:candidates}).
434:
435: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
436: %{\rotate
437: \begin{table*}
438: \begin{center}
439: \caption{Summary of detected sources.
440: \label{tab:candidates}}
441: \begin{tabular}{lllcccl}
442: \tableline\tableline
443: \# & RA$_{\rm 2000}$ & Dec$_{\rm 2000}$ & B$_{\rm peak}$\tablenotemark{a} & B$_{\rm quiescence}$\tablenotemark{b} &Classification & D$_{\rm proj}$\tablenotemark{c} \\
444: & & & (mag) & (mag) & & \\
445: \tableline
446: FA-1 & 03:24:24.56 & $-$36:30:26.5 & 18.91$\pm$0.03 & 19.17$\pm$0.03 & M1--2 & 36\,kpc to NGC~1326\\
447: FB-1 & 03:22:31.38 & $-$37:04:01.5 & 18.48$\pm$0.02 & 18.84$\pm$0.14 & (?)$\delta$~Scuti/SX~Phe & 26\,kpc to NGC~1317\\
448: FE-1 & 03:36:18.85 & $-$35:14:58.9 & 16.07$\pm$0.01 & 16.18$\pm$0.09 & W~Uma & 29\,kpc to NGC~1381\\
449: FH-1 & 03:36:53.67 & $-$36:05:29.9 & 18.66$\pm$0.03 & 20.70$\pm$0.09 & M3--4 & 42\,kpc to NGC~1386\\
450: FK-1 & 03:42:33.73 & $-$35:18:29.0 & 15.20$\pm$0.01 & 15.42$\pm$0.20 & W~Uma & 35\,kpc to NGC~1427\\
451: SN~2006dd & 03:22:41.64 & $-$37:12:13.2 & 17.25$\pm$0.03\tablenotemark{d} & -- & SN Ia & 1.2\,kpc to NGC~1316 \\
452: SN~2006mr & 03:22:42.84 & $-$37:12:28.5 & 16.16$\pm$0.03\tablenotemark{e} & -- & SN Ia & 1.1\,kpc to NGC~1316 \\
453: \tableline
454: \end{tabular}
455: \tablenotetext{a}{Observed peak $B$-band magnitude.}
456: \tablenotetext{b}{Observed mean (for periodic variables) or quiescence (for eruptive variables) $B$-band magnitude.}
457: \tablenotetext{c}{Projected distance to center of nearest Fornax cluster galaxy.}
458: \tablenotetext{d}{Observed $B$-band magnitude on 2006 Oct 23.13 UT}
459: \tablenotetext{e}{Observed $B$-band magnitude on 2006 Nov 17.58 UT}
460: \end{center}
461: \end{table*}
462: %}
463: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
464:
465:
466: \subsection{Eruptive variables}
467:
468: Two of the variable sources were detected when they exhibited single
469: flares from their otherwise constant quiescent brightness. The first,
470: FA-1 (Figure~\ref{fig:fc}a), is a faint, $B=19.17\pm0.03$, point
471: source that showed a distinct outburst with $\Delta
472: B=0.26\pm0.04$\,mag (Figure~\ref{fig:lc}a). The rise time to peak was
473: shorter than 1\,hr (2$\times$cadence) and the decline lasted over
474: $\sim2.5$\,hrs. The source has a bright near-IR counterpart as
475: detected by 2MASS\footnote{http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/2mass/}
476: ($J=14.58\pm0.03$, $K=13.65\pm0.04$). We fitted its
477: $B-J=4.59\pm0.04$\,mag and $B-K=5.52\pm0.05$\,mag
478: colors\footnote{Here, we assume that the 2MASS observations are
479: representative of the quiescence (or median in case of the
480: non-eruptive sources discussed in \S~\ref{sec:per}) brightness.
481: This is supported by generally lower amplitudes in the near-IR
482: compared to the $B-$band.} with stellar templates
483: \citep{Pickles:1998xy} and found them to be consistent with an M1--2
484: star. The most likely explanation is a low-amplitude long-decay flare
485: of a UV Ceti type Galactic M1--2 dwarf (M$_{\rm B}\sim11.5$\,mag) at a
486: distance of $\sim350$\,pc.
487:
488: FH-1 (Figure~\ref{fig:fc}d) was detected when it underwent a strong
489: flare with $\Delta$B=2.06$\pm$0.15\,mag. It rose to peak in less than
490: 1\,hr and decayed to its quiescent brightness of $B=20.70\pm0.09$ over
491: 1.5\,hrs (Figure~\ref{fig:lc}d). FH-1 is bright in the near-IR
492: ($J=15.02\pm0.02$, $K=14.29\pm0.07$) and its colors
493: ($B-J=5.68\pm0.10$\,mag, $B-K=6.41\pm0.10$\,mag) indicate an M3--4
494: stellar classification. We suggest that this outburst was a long-decay
495: flare of an M3--4-dwarf (M$_{\rm B}\sim12.5$\,mag) at a distance of
496: $\sim$450\,pc .
497:
498: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
499: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
500: \begin{center}
501: \includegraphics[width=1\textwidth,angle=0]{f7.jpg}
502: \caption{Observed $B$-band measurements for the five candidate variables listed in Table~\ref{tab:candidates}. Shown are the lightcurves for the five nights with multiple exposures per field (2006 Oct 23, 24 and Dec 19, 20, 21 UTC). Time is given in fractional days (UTC). A compilation of all data is available in electronic form (Table~\ref{tab:data}).}
503: \label{fig:lc}
504: \end{center}
505: \end{figure*}
506: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
507:
508:
509: \subsection{Periodic variables}
510: \label{sec:per}
511:
512: Regular brightness modulations were shown by three sources. FE-1
513: (Figure~\ref{fig:fc}c) displayed a nearly sinusoidal variability
514: (Figure~\ref{fig:lc}c) with a maximum amplitude of $\Delta
515: B=0.31\pm0.05$\,mag. A Lomb-Scargle periodogram
516: \citep{Scargle:1982kx} of the heliocentric corrected lightcurve
517: revealed two possible periods, one at $0.19025\pm0.00002$\,days and
518: another at twice this value ($0.38050\pm0.00004$\,days;
519: Figure~\ref{fig:phaseE}). The latter is favored by an apparent
520: difference of $\Delta B=0.07\pm$0.02\,mag in depth of two consecutive
521: minima. Note that FE-1 was included in the overlap of two of our
522: pointings (FE \& FF) and thus has twice the data coverage (132 images)
523: compared to the remaining candidates. 2MASS detected the source at
524: $J=15.53\pm0.05$ and $K=15.16\pm0.15$, which, together with a mean
525: brightness of $B=16.18\pm0.09$, results in $B-J=0.65\pm0.10$\,mag and
526: $B-K=1.02\pm0.17$\,mag. These colors suggest a spectral type of
527: A7--F0. The source is also included in the {\it
528: GALEX}\footnote{http://galex.stsci.edu/GR2/?page=mastform}
529: \citep{Martin:2003qy} source catalog and independent photometry on
530: archival images provides magnitudes $FUV=23.4\pm0.1$ and
531: $NUV=19.04\pm0.02$.
532:
533: A likely explanation for FE-1 is an eclipsing contact binary system of
534: W~Uma type with an orbital period of $0.38050\pm0.00004$\,days. This
535: is supported by the apparent two minima in the lightcurve which could
536: indicate the phase of primary and secondary occultation.
537:
538: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
539: \begin{figure}[htbp]
540: \begin{center}
541: \includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth,angle=90]{f8.jpg}
542: \caption{Lomb-Scargle periodogram (left) for FE-1 showing that the highest power occurs for at a frequency of $(6.083\pm0.001)\times10^{-5}$\,Hz (or period of $0.19025\pm0.00002$\,days). The phase folded heliocentric corrected lightcurve (right) indicates differences in the depth of consecutive minima, suggesting that the real period is likely at twice the above value, $0.38050\pm0.00004$\,days.}
543: \label{fig:phaseE}
544: \end{center}
545: \end{figure}
546: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
547:
548: The second periodic variable, FK-1 (Figure~\ref{fig:fc}e), was
549: observed as a point source with mean brightness of $B=15.42$ and
550: regular non-sinusoidal variations with a period of
551: $0.31864\pm0.00006$\,days (Figures~\ref{fig:lc}e,\ref{fig:phaseK}).
552: The maximum photometric amplitude was $\Delta B=0.65\pm0.07$\,mag.
553: The source has a bright 2MASS counterpart ($J=13.42\pm0.03$,
554: $K=12.93\pm0.03$) and its colors ($B-J=2.00\pm0.20$\,mag,
555: $B-K=2.49\pm0.20$\,mag) resemble those of a G0-9 giant or dwarf.
556:
557: While the short modulation and lightcurve shape in principle resemble
558: also that of an RRc~Lyrae pulsator, the spectral type of G5-9 is
559: inconsistent with this classification. The most likely interpretation
560: for FK-1 is, similar to FE-1, a W~Uma type eclipsing binary.
561:
562: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
563: \begin{figure}[htbp]
564: \begin{center}
565: \includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth,angle=90]{f9.jpg}
566: \caption{Same as Figure~\ref{fig:phaseE} for FK-1. The highest power occurs at a frequency of $(7.264\pm0.002)\times10^{-5}$\,Hz (or a period of $0.15932\pm0.00003$\,days). The phase folded heliocentric corrected lightcurve again indicates differences in the depth of consecutive minima, suggesting that the real period is likely $0.31864\pm0.00006$\,days.}
567: \label{fig:phaseK}
568: \end{center}
569: \end{figure}
570: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
571:
572: The classification of the remaining variable, FB-1, is more
573: challenging. Its lightcurve displayed apparently erratic variability
574: with an rms of 0.14\,mag around the mean brightness of
575: $B=18.84\pm0.14$ and with a maximum amplitude of $\Delta
576: B=0.57\pm0.08$\,mag (Figure~\ref{fig:lc}b). A Lomb-Scargle
577: periodogram (Figure~\ref{fig:phaseB}) revealed a number of peaks, the
578: most prominent being at a period of $0.0585\pm0.0001$\,days
579: ($84.24\pm0.15$\,min). However, the folded lightcurve shows several
580: data points that deviate notably from this phasing. We also not that
581: the power spectrum shows evidence for an additional period of
582: $\sim107$\,min. Thus, the tentative timescale of modulation has to be
583: taken with caution and confirmation by observations with higher
584: sampling rate will be required.
585:
586: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
587: \begin{figure}[htbp]
588: \begin{center}
589: \includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth,angle=90]{f10.jpg}
590: \caption{Same as Figure~\ref{fig:phaseE} for FB-1. The periodogram
591: shows a large number of peaks, with the most prominent at
592: $(1.975\pm0.005)\times10^{-4}$\,Hz ($84.24\pm0.15$\,min). A second period occurs at ~107\,min.}
593: \label{fig:phaseB}
594: \end{center}
595: \end{figure}
596: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
597:
598: FB-1 has no 2MASS counterpart to a limiting magnitude of $J=17$ which
599: constrains its color to $B-J<1.84$\,mag. This, together with a {\it
600: GALEX} detection at NUV=21.39$^{+0.56}_{-0.37}$ and a non-detection
601: in the FUV filter to $>21$\,mag restricts a stellar classification to
602: A-G. A spectrum obtained with the ESO Multi-Mode Instrument (EMMI) at
603: the NTT, La Silla, shows a blue continuum with prominent Balmer
604: absorption lines (Figure~\ref{fig:spec}). A comparison with template
605: stellar spectra \citep{Pickles:1998xy} suggests an A7
606: classification. This spectral range is populated by pulsators such as
607: $\delta$~Scuti stars and RR~Lyrae. Of those, only $\delta$~Scuti
608: stars, and the phenomenologically\footnote{$\delta$~Scuti and SX~Phe
609: stars are generally distinguished by their hosting stellar
610: population and metallicity. This can not be accomplished with the
611: available data. } similar SX~Phe stars \citep{Rodriguez:1990uq},
612: exhibit modulations on timescales as short as detected for FB-1. As
613: indicated by the number of short period peaks in the periodogram, we
614: may have to consider also events with periods below 84\,mins. Some
615: white dwarf systems do show periodic pulsations below 30\,min.
616: ZZ~Ceti type sources have white dwarf temperatures
617: \citep[11--12\,kK;][]{Bergeron:2004lr} in agreement with the observed
618: colors \citep{Kawka:2006uq}. However, the lack of pressure broadening
619: of the Balmer absorption lines rules out the white dwarf scenario.
620: Awaiting further test of the periodic modulation, we find that a
621: Galactic $\delta$~Scuti or SX~Phe star appears to be the most
622: intriguing interpretation for FB-1.
623:
624: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
625: \begin{figure}[htbp]
626: \begin{center}
627: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=0]{f11.jpg}
628: \caption{NTT/EMMI spectrum (grey) of FB-1 obtained on 2007 Dec 12.19
629: UT using the low-dispersion mode (RILD) with grism\#5 (instrumental
630: FWHM=4.5\AA). The data were reduced with customized IRAF routines
631: and flux calibrated in comparison to the spectro-photometric
632: standard star LTT377 \citep{Hamuy:1992zr}. The black solid line
633: shows an A7V template spectrum from Pickles (1998).
634: Prominent spectral features are indicated.}
635: \label{fig:spec}
636: \end{center}
637: \end{figure}
638: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
639:
640: \section{Discussion}
641:
642: Here were reported the results of a dedicated search for optical fast
643: transients and variables in the environment of the Fornax~I galaxy
644: cluster. In total, the survey netted two transients and five
645: high-amplitude ($\Delta B>0.1$\,mag) variable sources. Both
646: transients have been detected as a result of the inter-month sampling
647: of our observations and have independently been reported and
648: classified as type Ia supernovae in NGC~1216
649: \citep{Monard:2006lr,Monard:2006fk}. The properties of the five
650: variables suggests that they are located in the foreground to the
651: Fornax~I cluster and belong to the Milky Way stellar population. This
652: is in agreement with the large projected distance (26--42\,kpc) of the
653: events to the nearest Fornax galaxies (see
654: Table~\ref{tab:candidates}). Two of the variables were identified as
655: flares from M-dwarfs, while other two are likely eclipsing binaries of
656: the W~Uma type. The remaining variable shows indications for a very
657: short periodicity ($\sim84$\,min), and spectroscopy suggests it to be
658: a $\delta$\,Scuti or SX~Phe star. No genuine fast transient brighter
659: than $B=21.3$ has been detected.
660:
661: Surveys, like the one presented here, can offer valuable guidance for
662: the planning and execution of the next generation of transient
663: experiments. In order to provide relevant event rates, a complete
664: identification of all sources detected with a given choice of cadence,
665: filter, depth, amplitude, and field selection, is required. This will
666: pose inevitable challenges for follow-up limited projects like
667: Pan-STARRS and LSST. However, at least for variables, multi-band
668: photometry and good temporal coverage can already be strong indicators
669: for the nature of an event, as demonstrated for the Fornax
670: sources. Indeed, automatic cross-matching with UV to near-IR source
671: catalogs with a similar depth as the surveys will be vital for the
672: success of the future large optical projects.
673:
674: \subsection{All-Sky Rate of Fast Transients}
675:
676: In the following, we will discuss the estimates and expectations for
677: transients on timescales of $\sim32$\,min and with apparent peak
678: brightness of $15<B<21.3$. We start by determining the upper limit on
679: the rate of cosmological fast transients not associated with any of
680: the Fornax cluster galaxies. As described in \S~\ref{sec:data}, the
681: areal survey exposure is $E_A=1.86$\,deg$^2$ and the efficiency for a
682: single detection of a field source brighter than $B=21.3$ is
683: $\epsilon=0.7$. As we require a candidate to be found in at least two
684: images, $\epsilon$ needs to be squared. The non-detection of fast
685: transients in the survey translates into a 95\,\% Poisson upper limit
686: of N=$3$\, events \citep{Gehrels:1986qy}. The corresponding rate
687: follows from
688:
689: \begin{equation}
690: r_A=\frac{N}{\epsilon^2\cdot E_A}
691: \end{equation}
692:
693: as ${\rm r_A} <3.3$\, events day$^{-1}$ deg$^{-2}$, or an annual
694: all-sky rate of ${\rm r_A}<5\times10^7$. Note, that these limits are
695: valid only for an event population that is homogeneously distributed
696: over the sky. In other words, the detection probability has to be
697: independent of the field selection. Under this assumption, we can
698: match our estimates with previously obtained results, e.g., from the
699: Deep Lens Survey transient search \citep[DLS;][]{Becker:2004fk}.
700: Indeed, the Fornax survey is very similar to the DLS with respect to
701: exposure (1.38 vs 1.1 deg$^2$ days) and probed timescale (32 vs
702: 22\,min). As also no genuine fast transient was found in the DLS, the
703: the event rate is comparable.
704:
705: \subsection{Rates of Fast Transients in Nearby Galaxies}
706:
707: The main motivation of our survey was the exploration of the transient
708: and variable population in a specific environment, namely in a galaxy
709: cluster with known distance and known stellar mass. For this purpose,
710: we will now calculate the specific rate of fast transients per unit
711: stellar mass, or its proxy, the $B$-band luminosity.
712:
713: As discussed above (see also Fig.~\ref{fig:efficiency}), $\epsilon$ is
714: not only a function of the magnitude of a transient, $M_T$, but
715: depends also on the underlying surface brightness, m$_{\rm SB}$.
716: Similarly, the product of the luminosity, L$_{\rm SB,i}$, enclosed in
717: a surface brightness bin, m$_{\rm SB,i}$, and the relative exposure,
718: $t$, is different for all targeted Fornax galaxies. Here, $t$ denotes
719: the time a given galaxy was probed for transients on timescales of the
720: 32\,min cadence. We start by calculating L$_{\rm SB,i}$ for each
721: galaxy listed in Table~\ref{tab:fields}, with $i$ running from the
722: saturation limit of 16.7\,mag asec$^{-2}$ to the sky background
723: brightness of 22.6\,mag asec$^{-2}$ in steps of 0.1\,mag. Next, we
724: estimate the survey exposure, $E_{SB,i}$, for each m$_{\rm SB,i}$ in
725: units\footnote{Here, we use an absolute solar $B$-band magnitude of
726: M$_{B,\odot}=5.48$} of M$_{B,\odot}$ years by summing L$_{\rm
727: SB,i}\cdot t$ for all galaxies. The rate of transients as function
728: of the brightness can then be calculated as
729:
730: \begin{equation}
731: r(M_T)=\sum_i{\frac{N(M_T)}{\epsilon(M_T,m_{\rm SB})_i^2\cdot E_{{\rm SB},i}}}
732: \end{equation}
733:
734: Formerly, the number of detected transients, $N$, also depends on the
735: peak brightness. However, here we use again the 95\,\% Poisson upper
736: limit of $N(M_T)=N=3$ events, as no event in the entire probed range
737: of $15<B<21.3$ was detected.
738:
739: The result is presented in Figure~\ref{fig:rates}, where we show the
740: upper limit on the rate as funtion of transient magnitude. As
741: expected, the brightest events (m$_B<$18.5, M$_B<-12.4$) have the
742: lowest limits ($r<10^{-8}$ events M$_{B,\odot}^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$). For
743: the Milky Way disk \citep[$M_B=-19.9$;][]{Quillen:1997} this
744: translates into $<140$ events per year, e.g., a few times more than
745: the classical novae rate. One could argue that any Galactic transient
746: population brighter than classical novae and with a comparable
747: frequency may have been discovered already. However, the short
748: timescales tested in our survey require a significantly higher cadence
749: than typically used in transient searches. Fast transients may have
750: previously been detected in single images, but simply discarded as
751: unconfirmed or spurious events. However, there have been a number of
752: planetary transit and variable star studies, which offer the required
753: high cadence \citep[e.g.,;][]{Kane:2005xx,Kraus:2007xx,Lister:2007xx}.
754: These experiments typically target dense Galactic fields and thus a
755: large stellar population. Unfortunately, results on transients, as
756: opposed to transits, are rarely recorded or published.
757:
758:
759: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
760: \begin{figure}[htbp]
761: \begin{center}
762: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=0]{f12.jpg}
763: \caption{95\,\% Poission upper limit on the rate of transients on timescales of 32\,min as function of peak brightness.}
764: \label{fig:rates}
765: \end{center}
766: \end{figure}
767: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
768:
769:
770: \section{Conclusion}
771:
772: The existence of fast transients requires further constraint with
773: specialized experiments. The most exciting facility in this respect
774: will be the Palomar Transient Factory (PTF, Rau et al., in prep.), a
775: dedicated transient survey instrument at the Palomar 48-inch telescope
776: with expected first light in Winter 2008. The PTF will use a 7.8
777: square degree field of view to perform a number of transient searches
778: on various time scales. The large field of view will allow us to cover
779: galaxy clusters with fewer pointings, thus increasing the total
780: stellar mass observed at a given cadence.
781:
782: However, we have shown that the probability of detecting a transient
783: strongly depends on the local surface brightness. While this is not a
784: surprising result, its relevance for future searches in nearby
785: galaxies needs to be understood. There will always be the need for a
786: compromise between limiting magnitude of an event to be detected and
787: galaxy fraction covered. Larger apertures or longer exposures are not
788: necessarily improving the detection probability for faint
789: events. Although more source photons will be collected, also more host
790: light is recieved and and a larger extend of the galaxy will be above
791: saturation. The main factor for success will be the image quality. At
792: a given surface brightness, a narrower PSF will increase the
793: signal-to-noise, and thus, the probability for a detection.
794:
795: % --------------------------------------------------------------------
796:
797: \acknowledgments
798:
799: We are grateful to Paul Price for providing his image subtraction code
800: and to Carrol Wainwright for his contribution to the pipeline. We
801: thank Mara Salvato, Mansi M.~Kasliwal and S.~Bradley Cenko for
802: discussion and constructive criticism. We thank the referee for his
803: stimulating comments and suggestions. This work is based on in part on
804: observations collected at the European Southern Observatory, Chile.
805: This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All
806: Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of
807: Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis
808: Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National
809: Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science
810: Foundation. This research has made use of the NASA/IPCA Extragalactic
811: Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
812: California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National
813: Aeronautics and Space Administration. This work is supported in part
814: by grants from the National Science Foundation and NASA.
815:
816: % --------------------------------------------------------------------
817:
818: %{\it Facilities:} \facility{Du Pont:WFCCD}, \facility{NTT:EMMI},
819:
820: % --------------------------------------------------------------------
821:
822:
823:
824: \bibliographystyle{apj}
825: \begin{thebibliography}{}
826: \bibitem[{Alard} 2000]{Alard:2000fk}
827: {Alard}, C. 2000, \aaps, 144, 363
828:
829: \bibitem[{Becker} et al. 2004]{Becker:2004fk}
830: {Becker}, A.~C., {Wittman}, D.~M., {Boeshaar}, P.~C., {et al.} 2004, \apj, 611,
831: 418
832:
833: \bibitem[{Bergeron} et al. 2004]{Bergeron:2004lr}
834: {Bergeron}, P., {Fontaine}, G., {Bill{\`e}res}, M., {et al.} 2004, \apj, 600, 404
835:
836: \bibitem[{Bertin} \& {Arnouts} 1996]{Bertin:1996uq}
837: {Bertin}, E. \& {Arnouts}, S. 1996, \aaps, 117, 393
838:
839: \bibitem[{Gehrels} 1986]{Gehrels:1986qy}
840: {Gehrels}, N. 1986, \apj, 303, 336
841:
842: \bibitem[{Grillmair} et al. 1999]{Grillmair:1999lr}
843: {Grillmair}, C.~J., {Forbes}, D.~A., {Brodie}, J.~P., {et al.} 1999, \aj, 117, 167
844:
845: \bibitem[{Hamuy} et al. 1992]{Hamuy:1992zr}
846: {Hamuy}, M., {Walker}, A.~R., {Suntzeff}, N.~B., {et al.} 1992, \pasp, 104, 533
847:
848: \bibitem[{Kaiser} et al. 2002]{Kaiser:2002fk}
849: {Kaiser}, N., {Aussel}, H., {Burke}, B.~E., {et al.} 2002, in Presented at the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference, Vol. 4836, Survey and Other Telescope Technologies and Discoveries. Edited by Tyson, J. Anthony; Wolff, Sidney. Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 4836, pp. 154-164 (2002)., ed. J.~A. {Tyson} \& S.~{Wolff}, 154
850:
851: \bibitem[{Kane} et al. 2005]{Kane:2005xx}
852: Kane, S.~R., Lister, T.~A., Cameron, A.~C., et al. 2005, \mnras, 362, 117
853:
854: \bibitem[{Kasliwal} et al. 2007]{Kasliwal:2007qy}
855: {Kasliwal}, M.~M., {Cenko}, S.~B., {Kulkarni}, S.~R., {et al.} 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 0708.0226
856:
857: \bibitem[{Kawka} et al. 2006]{Kawka:2006uq}
858: {Kawka}, A., {Vennes}, S., {Oswalt}, T.~D., {et al.} 2006, \apjl, 643, L123
859:
860: \bibitem[{Klotz} et al. 2007]{Klotz:2007lr}
861: {Klotz}, A., {Boer}, M., \& {Atteia}, J. 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6769, 1
862:
863: \bibitem[{Kraus} et al. 2007]{Kraus:2007xx}
864: {Kraus}, A.~L., Craine, E.~R., Giampapa, M.~S., et al. 2007, AJ, 134, 1488
865:
866: \bibitem[{Kulkarni} et al. 2007]{Kulkarni:2007uq}
867: {Kulkarni}, S.~R., {Ofek}, E.~O., {Rau}, A., {et al.} 2007, \nat, 447, 458
868:
869: \bibitem[{Kulkarni} \& {Rau} 2006]{Kulkarni:2006lr}
870: {Kulkarni}, S.~R. \& {Rau}, A. 2006, \apjl, 644, L63
871:
872: \bibitem[{Landolt} 1992]{Landolt:1992lr}
873: {Landolt}, A.~U. 1992, \aj, 104, 340
874:
875: \bibitem[{Lister} et al. 2007]{Lister:2007xx}
876: Lister, T.~A., West, R.~G., Wilson, D.~M., et al. 2007, \mnras, 379, 647
877:
878: \bibitem[{Martin} et al. 2003]{Martin:2003qy}
879: {Martin}, C., {Barlow}, T., {Barnhart}, W., {et al.} 2003, in Presented at the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference, Vol. 4854, Future EUV/UV and Visible Space Astrophysics Missions and Instrumentation. Edited by J. Chris Blades, Oswald H. W. Siegmund. Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 4854, pp. 336-350 (2003)., ed. J.~C. {Blades} \& O.~H.~W. {Siegmund}, 336
880:
881: \bibitem[{Monard} 2006]{Monard:2006lr}
882: {Monard}, L.~A.~G. 2006, Central Bureau Electronic Telegrams, 553, 1
883:
884: \bibitem[{Monard} \& {Folatelli} 2006]{Monard:2006fk}
885: {Monard}, L.~A.~G. \& {Folatelli}, G. 2006, Central Bureau Electronic Telegrams, 723, 1
886:
887: \bibitem[{Morales-Rueda} et al. 2006]{Morales-Rueda:2006qy}
888: {Morales-Rueda}, L., {Groot}, P.~J., {Augusteijn}, T., {et al.} 2006, \mnras, 371, 1681
889:
890: \bibitem[{Ofek} et al. 2007a]{Ofek:2007fj}
891: {Ofek}, E.~O., {Cameron}, P.~B., {Kasliwal}, M.~M., {et al.} 2007a, \apjl, 659, L13
892:
893: \bibitem[{Ofek} et al. 2007b]{Ofek:2007uq}
894: {Ofek}, E.~O., {Kulkarni}, S.~R., {Rau}, A., {et al.} 2007b, ArXiv e-prints, 710
895:
896: \bibitem[{Pagani} et al. 2007]{Pagani:2007fk}
897: {Pagani}, C., {Barthelmy}, S.~D., {Cummings}, J.~R., {et al.} 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6489, 1
898:
899: \bibitem[{Pastorello} et al. 2007]{Pastorello:2007jk}
900: {Pastorello}, A., {Smartt}, S.~J., {Mattila}, S., {et al.} 2007, Nature, 447, 829
901:
902: \bibitem[{Pickles} 1998]{Pickles:1998xy}
903: {Pickles}, A.~J. 1998, \pasp, 110, 863
904:
905: \bibitem[{Quillen} \& {Sarajedini} 1997]{Quillen:1997}
906: Quillen, A.~C., \& Sarajedini, V.~L., 1997, AJ, 115, 1412
907:
908: \bibitem[{Quimby} et al. 2007]{Quimby:2007qy}
909: {Quimby}, R.~M., {Aldering}, G., {Wheeler}, J.~C., {et al.} 2007, \apjl, 668, L99
910:
911: \bibitem[{Ramsay} et al. 2006]{Ramsay:2006lr}
912: {Ramsay}, G., {Napiwotzki}, R., {Hakala}, P., {et al.} 2006, \mnras, 371, 957
913:
914: \bibitem[{Rau} et al. 2007]{Rau:2007kx}
915: {Rau}, A., {Kulkarni}, S.~R., {Ofek}, E.~O., {et al.} 2007, \apj, 659, 1536
916:
917: \bibitem[{Rodriguez} et al. 1990]{Rodriguez:1990uq}
918: {Rodriguez}, E., {Rolland}, A., \& {Lopez de Coca}, P. 1990, \apss, 169, 113
919:
920: \bibitem[{Rykoff} et al. 2005]{Rykoff:2005lr}
921: {Rykoff}, E.~S., {Aharonian}, F., {Akerlof}, C.~W., {et al.} 2005, \apj, 631, 1032
922:
923: \bibitem[{Scargle} 1982]{Scargle:1982kx}
924: {Scargle}, J.~D. 1982, \apj, 263, 835
925:
926: \bibitem[{Schlegel} et al. 1998]{Schlegel:1998ul}
927: {Schlegel}, D.~J., {Finkbeiner}, D.~P., {Davis}, M., 1998, ApJ, 500, 525
928:
929: \bibitem[{Schmidt} et al. 2005]{Schmidt:2005qy}
930: {Schmidt}, B.~P., {Keller}, S.~C., {Francis}, P.~J., {et al.} 2005, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol.~37, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 457
931:
932: \bibitem[{Smith} et al 2007]{Smith:2007qy}
933: {Smith}, N., {Li}, W., {Foley}, R.~J., {et al.} 2007, \apj, 666, 1116
934:
935: \bibitem[{Stefanescu} et al. 2007]{Stefanescu:2007fk}
936: {Stefanescu}, A., {Slowikowska}, A., {Kanbach}, G., {et al.} 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6508, 1
937:
938: \bibitem[{Tyson} 2005]{Tyson:2005lr}
939: {Tyson}, A. 2005, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 339, Observing Dark Energy, ed. S.~C. {Wolff} \& T.~R. {Lauer}, 95
940:
941: \bibitem[{van Dokkum} 2001]{van-Dokkum:2001qy}
942: {van Dokkum}, P.~G. 2001, \pasp, 113, 1420
943:
944: \bibitem[{Voges} et al. 1999]{Voges:1999fj}
945: {Voges}, W., {Aschenbach}, B., {Boller}, T., {et al.} 1999, \aap, 349, 389
946:
947: \bibitem[{Zacharias} et al. 2005]{Zacharias:2005lr}
948: {Zacharias}, N., {Monet}, D.~G., {Levine}, S.~E., {et al.} 2005, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 1297, 0
949: \end{thebibliography}
950:
951: \input{tab5}
952:
953: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
954: % \begin{figure}[htbp]
955: % \begin{center}
956: % \fbox{\includegraphics[width=0.43\textwidth,angle=0]{f2a.jpg}}
957: % \fbox{\includegraphics[width=0.43\textwidth,angle=0]{f2b.jpg}}
958: % \fbox{\includegraphics[width=0.43\textwidth,angle=0]{f2c.jpg}}
959: % \fbox{\includegraphics[width=0.43\textwidth,angle=0]{f2d.jpg}}
960: % \fbox{\includegraphics[width=0.43\textwidth,angle=0]{f2e.jpg}}
961: % \fbox{\includegraphics[width=0.43\textwidth,angle=0]{f2f.jpg}}
962: % \caption{Survey fields. Prominent galaxies are marked. North is up and East to the left. Images are 25\farcm\ on each side. (for electronic version only)}
963: % \label{fig:fieldsa}
964: % \end{center}
965: % \end{figure}
966: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
967:
968: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
969: % \begin{figure}[htbp]
970: % \begin{center}
971: % \fbox{\includegraphics[width=0.43\textwidth,angle=0]{f3a.jpg}}
972: % \fbox{\includegraphics[width=0.43\textwidth,angle=0]{f3b.jpg}}
973: % \fbox{\includegraphics[width=0.43\textwidth,angle=0]{f3c.jpg}}
974: % \fbox{\includegraphics[width=0.43\textwidth,angle=0]{f3d.jpg}}
975: % \caption{Figure~\ref{fig:fieldsa} continued}
976: % \label{fig:fieldsb}
977: % \end{center}
978: % \end{figure}
979: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
980:
981: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
982: \begin{figure}[htbp]
983: \begin{center}
984: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=0]{f6a.jpg}
985: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=0]{f6b.jpg}
986: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=0]{f6c.jpg}
987: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=0]{f6d.jpg}
988: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=0]{f6e.jpg}
989: \caption{Finding charts.}
990: \label{fig:fc}
991: \end{center}
992: \end{figure}
993: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
994: \clearpage
995:
996:
997: \end{document}
998:
999: