1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: % INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING %
3: % %
4: % `Preparing an article for publication in an Institute of Physics %
5: % Publishing journal using LaTeX' %
6: % %
7: % LaTeX source code `ioplau2e.tex' used to generate `author %
8: % guidelines', the documentation explaining and demonstrating use %
9: % of the Institute of Physics Publishing LaTeX preprint files %
10: % `iopart.cls, iopart12.clo and iopart10.clo'. %
11: % %
12: % `ioplau2e.tex' itself uses LaTeX with `iopart.cls' %
13: % %
14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15: %
16: %
17: % First we have a character check
18: %
19: % ! exclamation mark " double quote
20: % # hash ` opening quote (grave)
21: % & ampersand ' closing quote (acute)
22: % $ dollar % percent
23: % ( open parenthesis ) close paren.
24: % - hyphen = equals sign
25: % | vertical bar ~ tilde
26: % @ at sign _ underscore
27: % { open curly brace } close curly
28: % [ open square ] close square bracket
29: % + plus sign ; semi-colon
30: % * asterisk : colon
31: % < open angle bracket > close angle
32: % , comma . full stop
33: % ? question mark / forward slash
34: % \ backslash ^ circumflex
35: %
36: % ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
37: % abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
38: % 1234567890
39: %
40: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
41: %
42: \documentclass[12pt]{iopart}
43: \newcommand{\Jpsi}{$J/\psi$ }
44: \newcommand{\pT}{$p_T$ }
45: \newcommand{\xT}{$x_T$ }
46: \newcommand{\sNN}{$\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ }
47: \newcommand{\pp}{$p+p$ }
48: \newcommand{\cucu}{Cu+Cu }
49: \newcommand{\raa}{$R_{AA}$ }
50: %Uncomment next line if AMS fonts required
51: \usepackage{iopams}
52: \usepackage{graphicx}
53: \begin{document}
54:
55: \title[\Jpsi production at high \pT in \pp and $A+A$ collisions at STAR]
56: {\Jpsi production at high \pT in \pp and $A+A$ collisions at STAR}
57:
58: \author{Zebo Tang\footnote{The author was supported in part by
59: the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No.
60: 10610285, 10610286, 10575101 and the Knowledge Innovation Project
61: of Chinese Academy of Sciences under Grant No. KJCX2-YW-A14.} (for
62: the STAR collaboration)}
63:
64: \address{Dept. of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China,
65: Hefei, Anhui, China, 230026; Brookhaven National Laboratory,
66: Upton, NY, 11973, USA} \ead{zbtang@mail.ustc.edu.cn}
67:
68: \begin{abstract}
69: %\Jpsi spectra at high transverse momentum with $5<p_T<14$ GeV/c in
70: %\pp and \cucu collisions at \sNN = 200 GeV are reported.
71: %$J/\psi$-hadron correlations in \pp collisions are studied to
72: %understand \Jpsi production mechanism at high-$p_T$. We observed
73: %an absence of charged hadrons accompanying \Jpsi on the near-side,
74: %in contrary to the strong correlation peak in the di-hadron
75: %correlations. Yields in minimum-bias \cucu collisions are
76: %consistent with those in \pp collisions scaled by the underlying
77: %binary nucleon-nucleon collisions in the measured \pT range. The
78: %nuclear modification factor is measured to be $0.9\pm0.2$.
79: %Implications of \Jpsi production mechanism and possible \Jpsi
80: %dissociation mechanism in QGP at high-\pT are discussed.
81: The preliminary results of \Jpsi spectra at high transverse
82: momentum ($5<p_T<14$ GeV/c) in \pp and \cucu collisions at \sNN =
83: 200 GeV are reported. The nuclear modification factor is measured
84: to be $0.9\pm0.2$ at $p_T>5$ GeV/c. The correlations between \Jpsi
85: and charged hadrons are also studied in \pp collisions to
86: understand the \Jpsi production mechanism at high $p_T$.
87: \end{abstract}
88:
89: %Uncomment for PACS numbers title message
90: %\pacs{00.00, 20.00, 42.10}
91: % Keywords required only for MST, PB, PMB, PM, JOA, JOB?
92: %\vspace{2pc}
93: %\noindent{\it Keywords}: Article preparation, IOP journals
94: % Uncomment for Submitted to journal title message
95: %\submitto{\JPA}
96: % Comment out if separate title page not required
97: %\maketitle
98:
99: \section{Introduction}
100: \Jpsi dissociation from color-screening of Quantum Chromodynamics
101: (QCD) in a Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP) is one of the major signatures
102: of QCD de-confinement in relativistic heavy-ion collisions.
103: %Predictions from string theory applying AdS/CFT technique suggest
104: %\Jpsi dissociation at high-\pT in a hot-wind QGP when the
105: %effective \Jpsi dissociation temperature decreases with \Jpsi \pT
106: %as $1/\sqrt{g}$ \cite{adscft}. This requires a measurement of
107: %\Jpsi extending to $p_T>5$ GeV/c.
108: Recent calculations which assuming the AdS/CFT duality is valid
109: for QCD expect that a heavy fermion pair bound state (an analog of
110: quarkonium in QCD) will have an effective dissociation temperature
111: decreasing with $p_T$ \cite{adscft}.
112: %Calculations based on string theory application
113: %of AdS/CFT technique considering $c\bar{c}$ having a significant
114: %velocity with respect to hot fluid produced in heavy ion
115: %collisions, predicts decrease of the effective \Jpsi dissociation
116: %temperature with its \pT as $1/\sqrt{\gamma}$.
117: This requires a measurement of \Jpsi extending to $p_T>5$ GeV/c
118: where the effective \Jpsi dissociation temperature is expected to
119: decrease to the temperature reached at RHIC ($\sim$ 1.5 $T_c$) .
120: %A good understanding of the \Jpsi
121: %production mechanism is necessary to assess whether \Jpsi is
122: %produced from fragmentation of gluon or heavy-quarks, decay
123: %feed-down or direct production from a color-octet or color-singlet
124: %state.
125: %Understanding of \Jpsi production mechanism has gone
126: %through several cycles in last decades. There is no convincing
127: %model explaining all the major features of the existing data in
128: %$e^++e^-$ and hadron-hadron collisions. The color-singlet model
129: %(CSM) underpredicts the \Jpsi spectra by an order of magnitude in
130: %$\bar{p}+p$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=1.8 TeV measured by CDF. The
131: %color-octet model (COM) was proposed to explain the yields, but it
132: %fails to explain the recent measurements of large spin alignment
133: %from the same experiment.\cite{cdf} In addition, \Jpsi is found to
134: %be dominantly associated with open-charm pair production in $e^+ +
135: %e^-$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=10 GeV.\cite{ee} These later
136: %findings suggest that yields calculated from leading-order pQCD
137: %may not be the dominant contribution to the \Jpsi production.
138: In this paper, we report the \Jpsi spectra at high transverse
139: momentum ($5<p_T<14$ GeV/c) in \pp and \cucu collisions at \sNN =
140: 200 GeV. In addition, we performed an analysis of $J/\psi$-hadron
141: correlations in \pp collisions to understand the \Jpsi production
142: mechanism at high $p_T$. The technique is similar to that used by
143: UA1 \cite{UA1} and dihadron correlations analyzed by STAR
144: \cite{fuqiang}.
145: %UA1 simulated $J/\psi$-hadron correlations and
146: %attributed the \Jpsi from $\chi_c$ decays without near side
147: %correlation while \Jpsi from $B$-hadron decays with strong near
148: %side correlation.With large coverage of STAR detectors of
149: %Time-Projection Chamber (TPC) and barrel electromagnetic
150: %calorimeter (EMC) \cite{stardetector}, STAR is an ideal detector
151: %for such analyses.
152:
153: UA1 simulated $J/\psi$-hadron correlation and found two cases:
154: When a \Jpsi originated from $\chi_c$ there as no visible
155: near-side correlation, whereas $J/\psi$'s originating from $B$
156: meson decays showed a strong near-side correlation. The large
157: acceptance of STAR Time Projection Chamber (TPC)
158: \cite{stardetector} and the Barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter
159: (BEMC) \cite{stardetector} covering $|\eta|<1$ are very well
160: suited for such analyzes.
161:
162: \section{Data analysis and Results}
163:
164: At STAR, both the TPC and BEMC can provide electron
165: identification \cite{stardetector}. At high $p_T$, the BEMC is
166: very powerful for electron identification and can also be used to
167: set up a fast trigger to enrich the electron sample. At moderate
168: $p_T$, the TPC can identify electrons efficiently. In this
169: analysis, the high \pT \Jpsi was reconstructed through the
170: dielectron channel, one electron at high \pT identified by combing
171: the BEMC and TPC and the other electron at lower \pT identified by
172: the TPC only. We used the BEMC triggered data in \pp and \cucu
173: collisions at \sNN = 200 GeV. The integrated luminosity is $\sim$
174: 2.8 (\textit{11.3}) $pb^{-1}$ for \pp collisions collected in year
175: 2005 (\textit{2006}) with transverse energy threshold $E_T>$ 3.5
176: (\textit{5.4}) GeV, and $\sim$ 860 $\mu b^{-1}$ for \cucu
177: collisions collected in year 2005 with $E_T>$ 3.75 GeV.
178:
179: %inv mass
180: \begin{figure}[th]
181: %\begin{minipage}[c]{0.333\textwidth}
182: %\includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{eps/invm_pprun5.eps}
183: %\end{minipage}
184: \begin{minipage}[c]{0.5\textwidth}
185: \centering
186: \includegraphics[width=0.75\textwidth]{eps/invm_pprun5.eps}
187: \end{minipage}
188: %\begin{minipage}{0.1\textwidth}
189: %\end{minipage}
190: \begin{minipage}[c]{0.5\textwidth}
191: \centering
192: \includegraphics[width=0.75\textwidth]{eps/invm_cucu.eps}
193: \end{minipage}
194: \caption{The dielectron invariant mass distributions in \pp
195: (\textit{left}) and \cucu (\textit{right}) collisions at \sNN= 200
196: GeV.
197: % the solid and dashed lines represent the distribution of un-like sign and
198: %like sign pairs distribution individually.
199: } \label{invmass}
200: \end{figure}
201:
202: Figure \ref{invmass} shows the high \pT \Jpsi signal in \pp
203: (\textit{left}) and \cucu (\textit{right}) collisions at \sNN =
204: 200 GeV. The background is represented by the dashed lines from
205: like-sign technique. We applied a cut of \pT $>2.5-4$ GeV/c to the
206: EMC triggered electrons and the cut of \pT $>1.2-1.5$ GeV/c for
207: lower \pT electrons. This ensured clean \Jpsi identification. The
208: signal/background (S/B) ratio in the analysis is 22/2
209: (\textit{40/14}) in \pp collisions using year 2005 (\textit{2006})
210: data and 17/23 in \cucu collisions. The \pT coverage in \pp and
211: \cucu collisions taken in year 2005 is $5<p_T<8$ GeV/c, while in
212: \pp collisions taken in year 2006, the \Jpsi \pT can reach 14
213: GeV/c due to higher recorded luminosity and full BEMC coverage.
214: The \Jpsi invariant cross section
215: %times the dielectron branching ratio
216: $B_{ee}\times Ed^3\sigma/dp^3$, after efficiency correction, are
217: shown as symbols in Figure \ref{xsection} (\textit{left}).
218:
219:
220: %spectra and scaling
221: \begin{figure}[th]
222: \begin{minipage}[c]{0.33\textwidth}\centering\mbox{
223: \includegraphics[width=0.98\textwidth,height=0.98\textwidth]{eps/xsection_STAR.eps}}
224: \end{minipage}
225: \begin{minipage}[c]{0.33\textwidth}\centering\mbox{
226: \includegraphics[width=0.98\textwidth,height=0.98\textwidth]{eps/scaling.eps}}
227: \end{minipage}
228: \begin{minipage}[c] {0.33\textwidth}\centering\mbox{
229: \includegraphics[width=0.98\textwidth,height=0.98\textwidth]{eps/raa.eps}}
230: \end{minipage}
231: \caption{Left: \Jpsi invariant cross section
232: % times the dielectron branching ratio
233: as a function of \pT in \pp and \cucu collisions at \sNN = 200
234: GeV. Errors shown are statistical only. Middle: \xT scaling of
235: pions, protons and $J/\psi$s. The data from other measurements can
236: be found in references
237: \cite{CDF,FNAL,ISR,phenixpp,scalingpi,UA1,UA2}. Right: \Jpsi
238: $R_{AA}$ as a function of $p_T$. The dot-dashed line represents
239: the fit by constant to all the data points at $5<p_T<10$ GeV/c.
240: The boxes on the right show the normalization uncertainty.}
241: \label{xsection}
242: \end{figure}
243:
244:
245: The invariant cross section of inclusive pion and proton
246: production in high energy \pp collisions have been found to follow
247: the \xT scaling law:
248: $E\frac{d^3\sigma}{dp^3}=\frac{g(x_T)}{\sqrt{s}^n}$, where
249: $x_T=2p_T/\sqrt{s}$. The value of the power $n$ depends on the
250: quantum exchanged in the hard scattering and is related to the
251: number of point-like constituents taking an active role in parton
252: model. It reaches 8 in the case of a diquark scattering and
253: reaches 4 in more basic scattering processes (as in QED). Figure
254: \ref{xsection} (\textit{middle}) shows the \xT scaling of
255: $J/\psi$, pion and proton. The power $n$ was found to be $6.5 \pm
256: 0.8$ for pion and proton \cite{scalingpi} and $5.6 \pm 0.2$ for
257: $J/\psi$, which indicates that the high \pT \Jpsi production
258: mechanism is closer to parton-parton scattering.
259:
260: Figure \ref{xsection} (\textit{right}) shows the \Jpsi nuclear
261: modification factor \raa as a function of \pT in 0-20\% and 0-60\%
262: \cucu from PHENIX \cite{phenixcucu} and STAR measurements. \raa
263: tends to increase from low to high $p_T$, although the error bars
264: currently do not allow to draw strong conclusions. One can
265: nevertheless do a combined fit to all the high-pt data and find
266: that $R_{AA}=0.9\pm0.2$. This result is in contrast to the
267: expectation from AdS/CFT-based models \cite{adscft} and from the
268: Two-Component model \cite{tca} which predict a decreasing \raa
269: with increasing $p_T$. This result could indicate that other \Jpsi
270: production mechanisms such as virtual photons or formation time
271: \cite{csmraa} play a role at high $p_T$.
272:
273: With large S/B ratios, the $J/\psi$-hadron correlations were also
274: measured in \pp collisions. Figure \ref{corr} (\textit{left})
275: shows the azimuthal angle correlations between high \pT \Jpsi
276: ($p_T>5$ GeV/c) and charged hadrons. No significant near side
277: correlations were observed, which is in contrast to the dihadron
278: correlation measurements \cite{fuqiang}. Since the Monte Carlo
279: simulation results show a strong near side correlation if the
280: \Jpsi is produced from $B$-meson decay, these results can be used
281: to constrain the $B$-meson contribution to \Jpsi production.
282: Figure \ref{corr} (\textit{right}) shows the associated charged
283: hadron \pT distribution on the near side and away side with
284: respect to \Jpsi triggers and charged hadron triggers.
285: %The results with respect to charged hadron triggers were also shown \cite{fuqiang}.
286: On the away side, the yields of the associated charged hadrons
287: with respect to both kinds of triggers are consistent with each
288: other, which indicates that the hadrons on the away side of \Jpsi
289: triggers are from light quark or gluon fragmentation. On the near
290: side, the associated charged hadron yields with respect to \Jpsi
291: triggers are significantly lower than those with respect to
292: charged hadron triggers. This indicates that the $B$-meson is not
293: a dominant contributor to the inclusive high \pT $J/\psi$.
294:
295:
296: %correlation
297: \begin{figure}[th]
298: \begin{minipage}[c]{0.5\textwidth}
299: \includegraphics[width=0.79\textwidth]{eps/dphi.eps}
300: \end{minipage}
301: \begin{minipage}[c]{0.5\textwidth}
302: \includegraphics[width=0.79\textwidth]{eps/corr.eps}
303: \end{minipage}
304: \caption{Left: $J/\psi$-hadron correlations after background
305: subtraction in \pp collisions at \sNN= 200 GeV. Right: Associated
306: charged hadron \pT distribution on the near and away side with
307: respect to \Jpsi triggers and charged hadron triggers.}
308: \label{corr}
309: \end{figure}
310:
311: \section{Summary}
312:
313: We reported the STAR preliminary results of \Jpsi spectra from 200
314: GeV \pp and \cucu collisions at high \pT ($5<p_T<14$ GeV/c) at
315: mid-rapidity through the dielectron channel. The high \pT \Jpsi
316: production was found to follow the \xT scaling with a beam energy
317: dependent factor $\sim$ \sNN$^{5.6\pm0.2}$. The \Jpsi nuclear
318: modification factor \raa in \cucu increases from low to high $p_T$
319: which challenges some models. The average of \raa at \pT$>$ 5
320: GeV/c is $0.9\pm0.2$, consistent with no \Jpsi suppression. It
321: implies that high \pT \Jpsi may be produced from virtual photon or
322: formed outside of the hot interaction region \cite{csmraa}. The
323: $J/\psi$-hadron correlations were also discussed. We observed an
324: absence of charged hadrons accompanying high \pT \Jpsi on the near
325: side which indicates that the $B$-meson is not a dominant
326: contributor to the inclusive high \pT $J/\psi$.
327:
328: \section*{References}
329: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
330: \bibitem{adscft} H. Liu, K. Rajagopal and U.A.Wiedemann, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 98}
331: (2007) 182301.
332: %\bibitem{cdf} xx
333: %\bibitem{ee} xx
334: \bibitem{UA1} UA1 Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 256}
335: (1991) 112.
336: \bibitem{fuqiang} J. Adams, {\it et al.}, (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.
337: {\bf 95} (2005) 152301.
338: %\bibitem{tpc} TPC
339: %\bibitem{emc} EMC
340: \bibitem{stardetector} M. Anderson, {\it et al.}, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A
341: {\bf 499} (2003) 659; M. Beddo, {\it et al.}, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.
342: A {\bf 499} (2003) 725; B.I. Abelev, {\it et al.}, (STAR
343: Collaboration) Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 98} (2007) 192301.
344: %\bibitem{starelectron} Non phtonic electron
345: %\bibitem{likesign} xx
346: %\bibitem{scalinglaw} \xT scaling
347: \bibitem{scalingpi} J. Adams, {\it et al.} (STAR Collaboration),
348: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 616}, (2005) 8; J. Adams, {\it et al.}, (STAR
349: Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B {\bf 637} (2006) 161.
350: \bibitem{phenixcucu} A.Adare, {\it et al.}, (PHENIX Collaboration),
351: arXiv:0801.0220.
352: \bibitem{tca} X. Zhao and R. Rapp, arXiv:0712.2407, private
353: communication for Cu+Cu.
354: \bibitem{CDF} F. Abe, {\it et al.}, (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev.
355: Lett. {\bf 69} (1992) 3704; D. Acosta {\it et al.}, (CDF
356: Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D {\bf 71} (2005) 032001.
357: \bibitem{FNAL} D. Abtreasyan, {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 19}
358: (1979) 764.
359: \bibitem{ISR} B.Alper, {\it et al.}, (British-Scandinavian Collaboration)
360: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 100} (1975) 237; C. Kourkoumelis, {\it et al.},
361: Phys. Lett. {\bf 91B} (1980) 481.
362: \bibitem{UA2} M. Banner, {\it et al.}, (UA2 Collaboration), Phys.
363: Lett. B {\bf 115} (1982) 59.
364: \bibitem{phenixpp} A.Adare, {\it et al.}, (PHENIX Collaboration),
365: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 98} (2007), 232002.
366: \bibitem{csmraa} F. Karsch and R. Petronzio, Phys. Lett. B {\bf
367: 193} (1987), 105; J.P. Blaizot and J.Y. Ollitrault, Phys. Lett. B
368: {\bf 199} (1987), 499
369:
370: \end{thebibliography}
371:
372: \end{document}
373: