1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2004 January 9
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19: \documentclass{emulateapj}
20: \usepackage{apjfonts}
21: \usepackage{amsmath}
22:
23: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
24:
25: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
26:
27: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
28:
29: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
30:
31: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
32: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
33: %% use the longabstract style option.
34:
35: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
36:
37: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
38: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
39: %% the \begin{document} command.
40: %%
41: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
42: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
43: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
44: %% for information.
45:
46: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
47: \newcommand{\myemail}{kmurase@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp}
48:
49: \def\mr#1{\mathrm{#1}}
50: \def\mathvec#1{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
51: \newcommand{\pd}{\partial} %¢ß
52: \newcommand{\rd}{\mathrm{d}} %d
53: \newcounter{ichi}
54: \setcounter{ichi}{1}
55: \newcounter{ni}
56: \setcounter{ni}{2}
57: \newcounter{san}
58: \setcounter{san}{3}
59:
60: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
61:
62: \slugcomment{Submitted}
63:
64: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
65: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
66: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
67: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
68: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
69: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
70:
71: \shorttitle{Cosmic Rays and Neutrinos from Clusters of Galaxies}
72: %Prospects for Detecting Cluster Neutrinos}
73: \shortauthors{Murase, Inoue, \& Nagataki}
74:
75: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
76: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
77:
78: \begin{document}
79:
80: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
81: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
82: %% you desire.
83:
84: \title{
85: Cosmic Rays Above the Second Knee from Clusters of Galaxies\\
86: and Associated High-Energy Neutrino Emission}
87: %Prospects for Detecting High-Energy Neutrinos with $\rm{km}^3$ Neutrino Telescopes
88:
89: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
90: %% author and affiliation information.
91: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
92: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
93: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
94: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
95:
96: \author{Kohta Murase$^{1}$}
97: %\email{kmurase@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp}%
98: \author{Susumu Inoue$^{2,3}$}
99: %\email{inoue@th.nao.ac.jp}%
100: \author{Shigehiro Nagataki$^{1}$}%
101: %\email{nagataki@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp}
102:
103: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
104: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
105: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
106: %% affiliation.
107:
108: \altaffiltext{1}{YITP, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Oiwake-cho,
109: Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan; \myemail}
110: \altaffiltext{2}{Division of Theoretical Astronomy,
111: National Astronomical Observatory of Japan,
112: %Osawa 2-21-1,
113: Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan}
114: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Oiwake-cho,
115: Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan}
116:
117: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
118: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
119: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
120: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
121: %% editorial office after submission.
122:
123: \begin{abstract}
124: Accretion and merger shocks in clusters of galaxies are potential accelerators of high-energy protons,
125: %sources of high-energy cosmic rays as well as nonthermal radiation,
126: which can give rise to high-energy neutrinos through $pp$ interactions with the intracluster gas.
127: We discuss the possibility that protons from cluster shocks make a significant contribution
128: to the observed cosmic rays in the energy range between the second knee at $\sim {10}^{17.5}$ eV
129: and the ankle at $\sim {10}^{18.5}$ eV.
130: The accompanying cumulative neutrino background above $\sim$PeV
131: may be detectable by upcoming neutrino telescopes such as IceCube or KM3NeT,
132: providing a test of this scenario as well as a probe of cosmic-ray confinement properties in clusters.
133: \end{abstract}
134:
135: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
136: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
137: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
138: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
139:
140: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
141: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so in the
142: %% subject header. Objects should be in the appropriate "individual"
143: %% headers (e.g. quasars: individual, stars: individual, etc.) with the
144: %% additional provision that the total number of headers, including each
145: %% individual object, not exceed six. The \objectname{} macro, and its
146: %% alias \object{}, is used to mark each object. The macro takes the object
147: %% name as its primary argument. This name will appear in the paper
148: %% and serve as the link's anchor in the electronic edition if the name
149: %% is recognized by the data centers. The macro also takes an optional
150: %% argument in parentheses in cases where the data center identification
151: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper.
152:
153: \keywords{acceleration of particles --- cosmic rays --- galaxies: clusters --- neutrinos}
154:
155: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
156: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
157: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
158: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
159: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
160: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
161: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
162: %% each reference.
163:
164: \section{\label{sec:level1}Introduction}
165: Clusters of galaxies (CGs) represent the largest gravitationally bound objects in the universe \cite[e.g.,][]{V05}.
166: According to standard, hierarchical scenarios of cosmological structure formation,
167: they are the latest systems to virialize and continue to grow
168: through merging and accretion of dark matter and baryonic gas,
169: thereby generating powerful shock waves on Mpc scales.
170: In particular, accretion shocks with high Mach numbers are expected on the outskirts of massive CGs,
171: potentially leading to efficient acceleration of high-energy particles \citep[e.g.,][]{Mea00,Rea03}.
172: Here ``accretion'' signifies not only infall of diffuse intergalactic gas,
173: but also minor merger events that induce sufficiently strong shocks near the virial radii.
174: Moderate Mach number shocks arising further inside the CG could also be
175: important in certain situations \citep[e.g.,][]{Rea03}.
176: Predictions for the associated nonthermal radiation, notably high-energy gamma-rays,
177: have been discussed by a number of authors \citep[e.g.,][]{VAB96,BBP97,CB98,LW00,IAS05,AN08}.
178:
179: Cosmic rays (CRs) are observed over 11 decades of energy
180: from $\sim 10^9$ eV to $\gtrsim 10^{20}$ eV,
181: and their origin is under intense debate.
182: The all-particle spectrum is characterized by broken power-laws with a number of breaks:
183: the knee at $\sim 10^{15.5}$ eV where the spectral index changes from $\sim -2.7$ to $\sim -3.0$,
184: the second knee at $\sim 10^{17.5}$ eV where it changes from $\sim -3.0$ to $-3.2$,
185: and the ankle at $\sim 10^{18.5}$ eV where it changes from $\sim -3.2$ to $\sim -2.7$ \cite{NW00}.
186: Galactic supernova remnants (SNRs) are widely believed
187: to be responsible for CRs at least up to the knee,
188: and probably up to somewhat higher energies %the second knee
189: \citep[and references therein]{H05}.
190: In contrast, ultra-high-energy CRs (UHECRs) with energies above the ankle
191: are generally thought to be extragalactic \citep[e.g.,][]{NW00,GS06,BB07}.
192: The Pierre Auger Observatory has revealed an anisotropy
193: in the arrival directions of UHECRs that supports this view
194: (Abraham et al. 2007; 2008; see however Abbasi et al. 2008)
195: %\cite{PAO07,PAO08} \cite[see however][]{Aea08},
196: but the actual identity of the sources remain unknown \citep[e.g.,][]{K08,I08}.
197: %\cite{UHECRCG,UHECRth}.
198: The origin of CRs with energies between the second knee and the ankle is even more controversial,
199: and both extragalactic and Galactic viewpoints have been advocated.
200: The sources may be the same as those for UHECRs \cite{BGG06,Aea07},
201: or something entirely different such as
202: specific types of supernovae,
203: %or neutron stars,
204: hypernovae, Galactic winds, etc \citep[][and references there in]{GS06,BB07,WRMD07,Bea08}.
205:
206: %Some authors have suggested Galactic sources such as
207: %supernovae in dense circumstellar winds \Red{[Correct?]},
208: %magnetars, Galactic hypernovae and Galactic winds %\cite{VHECRthG},
209: %But recent HiRes data the transition from heavy nuclei to light nuclei around the second knee,
210: %which may suggest that $\gtrsim {10}^{17.8}$eV cosmic rays all come from extragalactic
211: %while others have advocated extragalactic sources such as
212: %active galactic nuclei (AGN) or extragalactic hypernovae
213: %\cite{VHECRthEG}.
214:
215: In this letter, we discuss high-energy neutrino emission from CGs
216: in light of the possibility that accretion and/or merger shocks in CGs
217: are important sources of CRs with energies between the second knee and the ankle.
218: The observability by near future telescopes such as IceCube \cite{Aea04} or KM3NeT \cite{K06} is addressed.
219: %broken-power law spectra.
220: %possibly combined with initial acceleration
221: %by supernovae and/or active galactic nuclei (AGNs).
222: %The consequent high-energy neutrinos from $pp$ interactions inside CGs
223: Note that this view is different from scenarios in which
224: cluster shocks are the main sources of UHECRs above the ankle \cite{NMA95,KRJ96,KRB97,ISMA07}.
225: More detailed discussions including the accompanying hadronic gamma-ray emission
226: will be presented in a subsequent paper.
227: We adopt the $\Lambda$CDM cosmological parameters
228: $\Omega_b=0.04$, $\Omega_m=0.3$, $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.7$ and $h=0.7$.
229:
230: \section{Cosmic-Ray Production}
231: We first estimate the maximum energy of the accelerated CRs.
232: The virial radius of a CG with mass $M=10^{15} M_{15} {\rm M_\odot}$ is
233: $r_{\rm{vir}} \simeq 2.4 \, {\rm{Mpc}}\, M_{15}^{1/3} F(z,\Omega_m) {(h/0.7)}^{-1} {(1+z)}^{-1}$,
234: where $F(z,\Omega_m)$ is a factor of order unity that depends weakly on redshift $z$ and $\Omega_m$ \cite{V05}.
235: %{\left[ M_{15} \frac{\Omega_m^z \Delta (1,0)}{\Omega_m \Delta (\Omega_m,z)} \right]}^{\frac{1}{3}} $,
236: %where $\Delta(\Omega_m,z)$ is the density contrast of dark matter halos virializing at redshift $z$,
237: %and $\Omega_m^z=$... \cite{Rev}. \Red{[Need definition!]}
238: We write the shock radius as $r_{\rm{sh}} \equiv \lambda_{\rm{sh}} r_{\rm{vir}}$,
239: with $\lambda_{\rm{sh}} \sim 1-10$ expected for accretion shocks \citep[e.g.,][]{Rea03}.
240: The typical shock velocity $V_{\rm{sh}}$ should be comparable to the velocity of the infalling gas
241: $V_{\rm{ff}} \simeq 2000 \, {\rm{km} \, \rm{s}^{-1}} \, M_{15}^{1/2}
242: {(r_{\rm{sh}}/1 \, \rm{Mpc})}^{-1/2}$ \cite{IAS05}.
243:
244: The typical shock acceleration time for CRs with energy $\varepsilon$ and charge $Z$ is
245: $t_{\rm{acc}} \approx 20 \kappa_{\rm{sh}}/V_{\rm{sh}}^2=(20/3) (c \varepsilon /Z e B V_{\rm{sh}}^2)~\xi$
246: %, assuming a parallel shock
247: \citep[see, e.g.,][for reviews]{BE87}.
248: Here $B$ and $\kappa_{\rm{sh}}$ are respectively the magnetic field and diffusion coefficient at the shock,
249: and $\xi \equiv {(B/\delta B)}^{2}$ where $\xi \rightarrow 1$ in the Bohm limit.
250: Although the magnetic fields at cluster shocks are uncertain,
251: we take $B \sim 1 \, \mu$G, as supported by recent X-ray observations
252: of diffuse radio relics near $r_{\rm{vir}}$ for several CGs \cite{FN06,Hea08,Nea08}.
253: We also postulate $\xi \sim 1$, as observed to be the case for some SNRs \cite{Uea07},
254: and which can be expected if the fields are generated locally at the shocks
255: by mechanisms such as the CR streaming instability \cite[see, e.g.,][]{BL01,B04,VEB06,BDD08}.
256:
257: The maximum energy of the accelerated CRs $\varepsilon_{\max}$ can be estimated
258: by equating $t_{\rm{acc}}$ with various limiting time scales,
259: such as the diffusive escape time from the shock
260: $t_{\rm{esc}} \approx r_{\rm{sh}}^2/6\kappa_{\rm{sh}}$,
261: and the energy loss time due to photohadronic and/or photodisintegration interactions %$t_{p \gamma}$
262: with the CMB and the infrared (IR) background \cite{KRB97,ISMA07}.
263: %which are important at sufficiently high energies
264: %the adiabatic loss time $t_{\rm{ad}} \sim 3 t_{\rm{dyn}}$
265: When the shock is due to a transient merger-like event,
266: the lifetime of the shock may also be relevant,
267: which can be estimated by the dynamical time $t_{\rm{dyn}} = r_{\rm{sh}}/V_{\rm{sh}}$.
268: In the latter case, $\varepsilon_{\max}$ would generally be determined by $t_{\rm{dyn}}$ so that
269: ${\varepsilon}_{\max} \simeq 1.6 \times 10^{18} \, {\rm{eV}} \, Z {\xi}^{-1} M_{15}^{2/3} B_{-6}
270: \lambda_{\rm{sh}}^{1/2}$, where $B= B_{-6} \mu$G. Hence, we expect
271: that cluster shocks can accelerate at least protons up to around the ankle \cite{NMA95}.
272: %Although the magnetic field strength is not convincing,
273: %neutrino detection could give us some clues to it.
274:
275: Next we consider the energetics.
276: %Nonthermal particles would be injected into the Fermi acceleration process from
277: %the thermal pool by cluster shocks and/or shocks of SNRs/AGN.
278: Assuming a total mass accretion rate $\dot{M} \approx 0.1 V_{\rm{ff}}^3/G$
279: and gas fraction $f_g =\Omega_b/\Omega_m \sim 0.13$,
280: the dissipation rate of infalling gas kinetic energy through the accretion shock
281: of a CG with mass $M$ is estimated to be
282: $L_{\rm{ac}} \approx f_g G M \dot{M}/r_{\rm{sh}} \simeq 7 \times
283: 10^{45} {\rm{erg}} \, {\rm{s}^{-1}} \, (f_g/0.13) M_{15}^{5/3}$ \cite{KWL04}.
284: %f_{g,-1}
285: Taking the local density of massive CGs $n_{\rm{CG}} (M \gtrsim M_{15})
286: \sim 2 \times 10^{-6} \, \rm{Mpc}^{-3}$ \cite{Jea01}
287: and a CR injection efficiency $\epsilon_{\rm{acc}} \sim 0.2$,
288: the CR power from CGs per logarithmic energy interval at $\varepsilon =10^{18} \, {\rm{eV}}$ is
289: $\varepsilon^2 (d \dot{n}/d\varepsilon)
290: \simeq {10}^{45}\, {\rm{erg} \, \rm{Mpc}^{-3} \rm{yr}^{-1}} \, {(R/50)}^{-1}$.
291: Here $R(\varepsilon) \equiv
292: \left(\int_{\varepsilon_{\min}}^{\varepsilon_{\max}} d \varepsilon^{\prime} \,
293: \varepsilon^{\prime} (d N/d\varepsilon^{\prime}) \right)
294: / (\varepsilon^2 d N/d\varepsilon)$
295: depends on the injection CR spectrum;
296: in the case of a single power-law with index $p$ and minimum energy $\varepsilon_{\min} = 1$ GeV,
297: $R \sim 25$ for $p=2.0$, and $R \sim 300$ for $p=2.2$ \cite{MISN08}.
298: %and $R \sim {10}^{4}$ for $p=2.4$.
299:
300: In comparison, the observed CR spectrum for $10^{17}$ eV $<\varepsilon<$ $10^{18.5}$ eV
301: is $\Phi \simeq 9.23 \times {10}^{-28} \, {\rm{eV}^{-1} \rm{cm}^{-2} \rm{s}^{-1} \rm{sr}^{-1}} \,
302: {(\varepsilon/6.3 \times {10}^{18} \, \rm{eV})}^{-3.2}$ \cite{NW00}.
303: The implied CR source power and spectrum depend on evolution effects
304: and the uncertain CR composition at these energies .
305: Here we assume that they are proton-dominant as in some extragalactic scenarios \cite{BGG06},
306: %consistent with our $\varepsilon_{\max}$ estimate above;
307: and cases with a more general composition will be discussed in the future work.
308: The required CR power at $\varepsilon =10^{18} \, {\rm{eV}}$ is then
309: $\varepsilon^2 (d \dot{n}/d\varepsilon) \sim
310: {10}^{45} \, \rm{erg} \, \rm{Mpc}^{-3} \rm{yr}^{-1}$,
311: % whose value slightly depends on evolution models,
312: crudely accounting for energy losses during diffusive intergalactic propagation \cite{BGG06}.
313: As long as $R \lesssim 100$, the two powers would be comparable and CGs energetically viable.
314: However, since intergalactic propagation should steepen
315: the spectral index from the injection value $p$ by $\sim 0.5-0.8$ \cite{BGG06},
316: %depending on the source $z$ evolution and the CR composition.
317: the observed index of -3.2 requires $p \sim 2.4-2.7$
318: %\cite{VHECRthEG,NeuGZK}.
319: and hence $R \gg 100$ for single power-law spectra extending down
320: to $\varepsilon_{\min}=1$ GeV.
321: Avoiding excessive energy demands
322: motivates a broken power-law form with break energy $\varepsilon_b$:
323: $dN/d \varepsilon \propto {\varepsilon}^{-p_1}$
324: %\exp(-(\varepsilon/\varepsilon_{\max}))$
325: for $\varepsilon < {\varepsilon}_b$ and
326: $dN/d \varepsilon \propto
327: {\varepsilon}^{-p_2} \exp(-(\varepsilon/\varepsilon_{\max}))$ for
328: $\varepsilon \geq {\varepsilon}_b$ \cite[see also][]{Aea07}.
329:
330: We consider two possibilities as to how such spectra may actually occur.
331: One is through the superposition of hard spectra ($p_1 \sim 2.0$)
332: with a distribution of $\varepsilon_{\max}$ \cite{KS06},
333: which can be related to accretion shocks with a distribution of $M$.
334: It was seen that $\varepsilon_{\max} \propto M^{2/3}$
335: if the relevant condition is $t_{\rm acc} \approx t_{\rm dyn}$
336: and if the $M$-dependence of $B$ is not strong.
337: A realistic CG mass function $n_{\rm{CG}}(>M) \propto M^{-1} \exp(-(M/ 1.8 \times {10}^{14} M_{\odot}))$
338: can be approximated over a limited range of $M$ as a power-law $n_{\rm{CG}}(>M) \propto M^{-\alpha}$ \cite{Jea01}
339: %with $\alpha \sim ?? - ??$, \Red{[value?]},
340: so that $dN/d\varepsilon \propto {\varepsilon}^{-\frac{3 \alpha}{2}-\frac{1}{3}}$ for $\varepsilon > \varepsilon_b$.
341: This could allow $p_1 \sim 2.0$ and $p_2 \sim 2.0-3.3$.
342:
343: Another possibility is a two-step acceleration process,
344: a first source providing a seed CR population with hard spectra ($p_1
345: \sim 2.0$) up to $\varepsilon_b$,
346: which is then picked up by a second source and accelerated further
347: with softer spectra to $\varepsilon_{\max}$.
348: %It will be possible when the CRs are accelerated by two shocks with different Mach numbers,
349: %$\mathcal{M}_1 > \mathcal{M}_2$.
350: Since CRs with sufficiently low energies are likely to be confined in the intracluster medium (ICM)
351: for very long times \cite{VAB96,BBP97},
352: the seed population can come from a number of sources, all accumulated over the history of the CG:
353: the low energy portion of accretion shock CRs,
354: supernova-driven galactic winds (GWs),
355: %SNRs in member galaxies escaping into the ICM,
356: and the jets of radio-loud active galactic nuclei (AGNs).
357: %that can deposit CRs directly on ICM scales.
358: %For SNRs,
359: %The observed SN rate per CG of $\sim 30 M_{15}\, \rm{yr}^{-1}$ \cite{Mea08}
360: %and kinetic energy per SN $E_{\rm{SN}}=10^{51} {E}_{\rm{SN,51}}\, {\rm{erg}}$
361: %imply a kinetic energy input rate per CG of $L_{\rm{SN,CG}} \sim
362: %10^{45} {E}_{\rm{SN,51}} M_{15}{\rm{erg}} \, {\rm{s}^{-1}}$.
363: %Part of this energy can be conveyed outside the SN host galaxies as GWs
364: %and deposited into the ICM, accompanied by shock acceleration of high-energy CRs.
365: Their relative importance can be estimated through their contributions to the heating of the ICM,
366: which should be roughly proportional to their CR output as long as the relevant shocks are sufficiently strong.
367: In the absence of GWs or AGNs,
368: high Mach number accretion shocks are expected to contribute $\sim$10\% of the heating of the ICM,
369: while the remainder is mediated by low Mach number merger shocks \citep[e.g.,][]{Rea03}.
370: GWs are unlikely to play a significant role in ICM heating
371: due to severe radiative losses during their formation \cite[e.g.][]{KY00}.
372: (Note that CRs of supernova origin escaping from within the host galaxy will also suffer heavy adiabatic losses).
373: %For AGNs, CGs typically host 1-3 bright objects with kinetic luminosities
374: %$L_{\rm{AGN}}=10^{45} L_{\rm AGN,45} {\rm{erg}} \, {\rm{s}^{-1}}$ \cite{MMK07},
375: %so that the corresponding energy input rate per CG is
376: %$L_{\rm AGN,CG} \sim 2 \times 10^{45} L_{\rm{AGN},45} {\rm{erg}} \, {\rm{s}^{-1}}$ \cite{EW}.
377: In contrast, AGN jets can contribute 1-2 keV per baryon of heat input directly to the ICM \cite{IS01}
378: \cite[see also][]{Eea97,Eea98}.
379: For massive clusters with temperatures $\sim$10 keV,
380: this implies that CRs from AGNs can be energetically comparable to those from accretion shocks,
381: and may be even higher for less massive clusters.
382: %Compared with the accretion power $L_{\rm ac}$,
383: %we see that AGNs and possibly GWs can contribute somewhat less but comparable power.
384: Subsequent acceleration of these seed CRs to $\varepsilon_{\max}$ may be achieved
385: through merger and/or accretion shocks with moderate Mach numbers
386: $\mathcal{M} \sim 2.5-5$, leading to $p_2 \sim 2.2-2.7$.
387: %The available power in merger shocks should be at least as large as accretion shocks, if not larger
388: %\citep[e.g.,][]{Mea00,Rea03}.
389: The break energy $\varepsilon_{b}$ may correspond to
390: %either to the maximum accelerated energy of the seed CRs (e.g. $\sim Z_1 {10}^{16.5}$ eV for SNRs),
391: the confinement energy $\varepsilon_{\rm{diff}}$
392: above which CRs begin to escape diffusively out of the ICM.
393: Under Kolmogorov-like turbulence, ${\varepsilon}_{\rm{diff}}
394: \simeq 1.8 \times {10}^{17} \, {\rm{eV}} \, Z
395: {(r/1.5 \, \rm{Mpc})}^{6} \kappa_{\rm{CG},30}^{-3}
396: {(\Delta t/1 \, \rm{Gyr})}^{-3}$,
397: where $\kappa_{\rm{CG}} = 10^{30} \kappa_{\rm{CG},30} {\rm \ cm^2
398: {s}^{-1}}$ is the diffusion coefficient in the ICM at $\varepsilon=1$ GeV,
399: and $\Delta t$ is the time elapsed after injection \cite{VAB96,BBP97}.
400: %Although $\kappa_{\rm{CG}}$ is quite uncertain,
401: %here we posit that CRs $\gtrsim 10^{17}$ eV are not confined in the ICM.
402: Within the uncertainties, we see that CGs could be a viable source of CRs
403: with energies between the second knee and the ankle.
404:
405: \section{Neutrino Production}
406: We now evaluate the spectra of associated gamma-rays and neutrinos,
407: which are inevitably generated through $pp$ interactions with the ambient ICM gas \cite{VAB96,BBP97,CB98}.
408: In view of the above, we assume that CRs with a broken power-law spectrum is realized
409: with $p_1=2.0$ and $p_2=2.4$. We choose $\varepsilon_b={10}^{16.5}$ eV or ${10}^{17.5}$ eV,
410: giving respectively $R \simeq 78$ or $35$.
411: The spatial distribution of the thermal ICM gas is
412: generally well-constrained from X-ray observations \cite{PE04}.
413: However, that for the CRs is uncertain, and we consider the following four models.
414: \textit{Model A}: CRs are uniformly distributed within $r_{\rm sh}$,
415: with $\lambda_{\rm{sh}}$ chosen such that $t_{\rm{dyn}}=1$ Gyr.
416: \textit{Model B}: CRs are uniformly distributed within $r_{\rm vir}$,
417: giving a conservative estimate compared to other models.
418: \textit{Isobaric}: CRs at each radii have energy density
419: proportional to that of the thermal gas with ratio $X_{\rm{CR}}$ \cite{PE04,AN08}.
420: \textit{Central AGN}: CRs are distributed as
421: $dN/d \varepsilon \propto r^{-1} {\varepsilon}^{-p-\frac{1}{3}}$
422: for $\varepsilon \geq {(r_c^2/6 \kappa_{\rm{CG}} \Delta t)}^{3}$
423: and $dN/d \varepsilon \propto {\varepsilon}^{-p}$ for $\varepsilon <
424: {(r_c^2/6 \kappa_{\rm{CG}} \Delta t)}^{3}$,
425: corresponding to CRs diffusing out from a central source such as an AGN
426: as discussed in \cite{BBP97,CB98};
427: here accretion or merger shocks may not be involved.
428: But, in the two-step acceleration scenario, this model could be more realistic
429: below the break energy.
430: %(from a stationary solution of the diffusion equation),
431: We perform numerical calculations of the neutrino spectra %\cite{PE04},
432: using formulae based on the SIBYLL code at high energies \cite{KAB06}.
433: %For simplicity we assume that CRs are all protons.
434: %Generally, we should take into account heavy nuclei for more realistic calculations.
435:
436: \begin{figure}[t]
437: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Individualiso}
438: % Here is how to import EPS art
439: \caption{\small{\label{Fig1} Expected event rates for
440: muon neutrinos ($\nu_{\mu} + \bar{\nu}_{\mu}$) in IceCube-like
441: detectors from five nearby CGs: Virgo, Centaurus, Perseus, Coma and Ophiuchus.
442: Broken power-law CR spectra with $p_1=2.0$, $p_2=2.4$ and $\varepsilon_b={10}^{17.5}$ eV
443: is assumed, and the \textit{Isobaric} model with $X_{\rm{CR}}=0.029$ is used.
444: Note that IceCube and KM3NeT mainly cover the northern and southern celestial hemispheres,
445: respectively. Neutrino oscillation is taken into account.}}
446: \end{figure}
447: \begin{figure}[t]
448: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{NBGBPL}% Here is how to import EPS art
449: \caption{\small{\label{Fig2} Cumulative neutrino ($\nu_{e} +
450: \bar{\nu}_{e} + \nu_{\mu} + \bar{\nu}_{\mu} + \nu_{\tau} +
451: \bar{\nu}_{\tau}$) background from CGs for broken
452: power-law CR spectra with $p_1=2.0$ and $p_2=2.4$.
453: The break energies are $\varepsilon_b={10}^{17.5}$ eV (thick lines) and
454: $\varepsilon_b={10}^{16.5}$ eV (thin lines), respectively.
455: The CR power is normalized to
456: $\varepsilon^2 (d \dot{n}/d \varepsilon) = 2 \times {10}^{45} \, \rm{erg} \,
457: \rm{Mpc}^{-3} \rm{yr}^{-1}$ at $\varepsilon={10}^{18}$ eV,
458: as required to account for CRs above the second knee. For \textit{isobaric},
459: the corresponding $X_{\rm{CR}}$ is 0.029 and 0.067. For \textit{central AGN},
460: Kolmogorov-like turbulence is assumed with
461: $\kappa_{\rm{CG}}={10}^{30}\, \rm{cm}^{2} {s}^{-1}$. We take
462: $t_{\rm{dyn}}= \Delta t = 1$ Gyr and $z_{\max}=2$.
463: WB represents the Waxman-Bahcall bounds \cite{WB98}.}}
464: \end{figure}
465:
466: The neutrino and gamma-ray fluxes can be estimated
467: analytically via the effective optical depth for the $pp$ reaction
468: as $f_{pp} \approx 0.8 \sigma_{pp} n_{\rm{N}} c t_{\rm{int}}$,
469: where $n_{\rm{N}}$ is the target nucleon
470: density in the ICM, $\sigma_{pp}$ is the $pp$ cross section and
471: $t_{\rm{int}} \sim t_{\rm dyn}$ or ${\rm{max}}[r/c,t_{\rm{diff}}]$ is the
472: $pp$ interaction time.
473: Because $n_{\rm{N}} \sim {10}^{-4.5} \, \rm{cm}^{-3}$ at $r \sim 1.5$
474: Mpc \cite{CB98,PE04} and $\sigma_{pp} \sim {10}^{-25} \, \rm{cm}^{2}$ in the $100$ PeV range \cite{KAB06},
475: we obtain
476: \begin{eqnarray}
477: f_{pp} &\sim& 2.4 \times {10}^{-3} n_{\rm{N},-4.5}
478: (t_{\rm{int}}/1 \, \rm{Gyr}). \label{pp}
479: \end{eqnarray}
480: Roughly speaking, high-energy neutrinos from charged-pion decay have
481: typical energy $\varepsilon_{\nu} \sim 0.03 \varepsilon$
482: (true only in the average sense, because charged particles have wide
483: energy distributions
484: and high multiplicities as expected from the KNO scaling law) \cite{KAB06}.
485: Hence, neutrinos $\gtrsim$ PeV are directly related to CRs above the
486: second knee.
487: %\begin{figure}[t]
488: %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{NBGSPL}% Here is how to import EPS art
489: %\caption{\small{\label{Fig3} Same as Fig. 2, but for a single
490: %power-law CR spectrum with $p=2.2$.
491: %The CR power is normalized to $\varepsilon^2 (d \dot{n}/d \varepsilon)
492: %= 2 \times {10}^{45} \, \rm{erg} \, \rm{Mpc}^{-3} \rm{yr}^{-1}$ at
493: %$\varepsilon={10}^{18}$ eV.
494: %For \textit{isobaric}, the corresponding $X_{\rm{CR}}$ is $0.27$.}}
495: %\end{figure}
496:
497: First we obtain numerically the neutrino spectra and expected event rates from five nearby CGs,
498: utilizing the $\beta$ model or double-$\beta$ model description
499: in Tables. 1 and 2 in Pfrommer \& En{\ss}lin 2004 for the thermal gas profile of each CG (Fig. 1).
500: Our gamma-ray fluxes for single power-law spectra agree with the results of Pfrommer \& En{\ss}lin 2004.
501: As is apparent in Fig. 1, the detection of neutrino signals from
502: individual CGs could be challenging even for nearby objects.
503: It may be achievable, however, through a detailed stacking analysis.
504:
505: More promising would be the cumulative background signal.
506: A rough estimate of the neutrino background is \citep[e.g.,][]{M07,WB98}
507: \begin{eqnarray}
508: \varepsilon_{\nu}^2 \Phi_{\nu} &\sim&
509: \frac{c}{4\pi H_{0}} \frac{1}{3} \mr{min}[1,f_{pp}]
510: \varepsilon^2 \frac{d N}{d\varepsilon dt} n_{\mr{CG}}(0) f_{z} \nonumber\\
511: &\sim& 1.5 \times 10^{-9} \, {\rm{GeV cm^{-2} s^{-1} str^{-1}}} \,
512: f_{z} \nonumber\\
513: &\times& \left(\frac{f_{pp}(\varepsilon={10}^{18} \, \rm{eV})}
514: {2.4 \times {10}^{-3}}\right)
515: {\left(\frac{\varepsilon_{\nu}}{10 \, \rm{PeV}} \right)}^{-p+2.1}, \label{bkg}
516: \end{eqnarray}
517: where CGs are assumed to be the main sources of CRs from the second knee to the ankle.
518: Here, $n_{\rm{CG}}(0)$ is the local density of massive CGs
519: and $f_z$ is a correction factor for the source evolution \cite{M07,WB98}.
520: For detailed numerical calculations of the background,
521: we treat more distant CGs following \cite{CB98}, adopting the mass function of \cite{Jea01}.
522: The results for the broken power-law case are shown in Fig. 2.
523: With $\varepsilon_b = {10}^{17.5}$ eV,
524: the expected event rates above 0.1 PeV in IceCube \cite{Aea04}
525: are $\sim2 \ {\rm yr^{-1}}$ for \textit{model A}, $\sim1 \ {\rm yr^{-1}}$ for \textit{model B},
526: $\sim5 \ {\rm yr^{-1}}$ for \textit{isobaric} and $\sim 3 \ {\rm yr^{-1}}$ for \textit{central AGN}.
527: %For comparison, we also show results for single power-law spectra
528: %with $p=2.2$ in Fig. 3.
529:
530: Hence, upcoming telescopes may be able to find multi-PeV neutrino signals from CGs,
531: providing a crucial test of our scenario.
532: From Eq. (\ref{bkg}), we can also estimate the corresponding gamma-ray background
533: from $\pi^0$ decay, which is $\varepsilon_{\gamma}^2 \Phi_{\gamma} \sim
534: ({10}^{-9}-{10}^{-8}) \, \rm{GeV} {cm}^{-2} {s}^{-1} {str}^{-1}$ for
535: the broken power-law case.
536: This is only $(0.1-1)$\% of the EGRET limit,
537: consistent with the nondetection so far for individual CGs.
538: %Such low gamma-ray fluxes do not conflict with observations in the radio band \cite{UHECRCG}.
539: Note that the expected gamma-ray background flux would increase
540: if $\varepsilon_b$ can be decreased, requiring larger CR power from CGs.
541:
542: \section{Implications and Discussion}
543: To test the CG origin of second knee CRs,
544: high-energy neutrinos should offer one of the most crucial multi-messenger signals.
545: Unlike at the highest energies, CRs themselves in the $10^{18}$ eV range
546: offer no chance of source identification
547: as they should be severely deflected by Galactic and extragalactic
548: magnetic fields. Moreover, due to magnetic horizon effects,
549: extragalactic CRs $\lesssim 10^{17}$ eV may not reach us at all \cite{L05,KL07},
550: so even the broken power-law spectral form will not be directly
551: observable. Gamma-rays are unaffected by intervening magnetic fields,
552: but those at $\gtrsim$ PeV energies relevant for the second knee
553: are significantly attenuated by pair-creation processes
554: with the CMB and cosmic IR backgrounds \citep[e.g.,][]{K08}.
555: In constrast, neutrinos in the PeV-EeV energy range should be unscathed during propagation
556: \citep[][and references there in]{BS00}.
557: Consequently, such neutrinos may also constitute a unique tool
558: for probing the uncertain CR confinement properties of CGs
559: through the dependence on $\varepsilon_{\rm diff}$.
560:
561: AGNs can complicate the cluster shock neutrino signal,
562: either by emitting PeV-EeV neutrinos themselves,
563: or injecting CRs that produces neutrinos without the intervention of cluster shocks.
564: In principle, cross correlation of the detected events with known CGs and AGNs
565: should be an effective discriminant.
566: In the former case, AGNs inside as well as outside CGs should correlate,
567: whereas in the latter, CGs with powerful AGNs should correlate stronger than those without.
568: For cluster shock neutrinos, correlation with all sufficiently massive CGs is expected.
569:
570: %It is important to distinguish cluster neutrinos from those from other
571: %potential sources such as AGN. Taking the correlation of detected
572: %neutrinos with known CGs would be important,
573: %although enough neutrino signals are required.
574:
575: Gamma-ray observations at GeV-TeV energies would also be crucial.
576: In combination with $\gtrsim$ PeV neutrino observations,
577: they can probe the CR spectrum over a broad energy range
578: and test our broken power-law assumption.
579: By providing information on the spatial distribution of sub-PeV CRs,
580: they would also help to distinguish among our different models,
581: and to constrain the AGN contribution of CRs and neutrinos.
582: However, if $\varepsilon_b$ is sufficiently high, their detection may not be
583: trivial except for a few nearby CGs such as Virgo.
584: Other emission processes may also be at work \citep[e.g.,][]{LW00,IAS05},
585: complicating the extraction of the $\pi^0$ decay component.
586: More details on the gamma-ray emission will be given in a following paper.
587:
588: Note that high-energy neutrinos can also be produced by photomeson interactions
589: with the IR background \citep[e.g.,][]{TMNS07}, which may possibly be enhanced
590: inside CGs \cite{MHSB06}. The effective optical depth for this process
591: is roughly $f_{p \gamma} \sim {10}^{-3}-{10}^{-1}$.
592: These neutrinos become important above $\sim 0.1$ EeV,
593: where detection by IceCube or KM3NeT is relatively more difficult.
594: We defer the study of such photomeson-induced neutrinos in CGs to the future.
595:
596: Our neutrino predictions were based on simplified models for the CR distribution in CGs.
597: More realistic evaluations need to include the inhomogeneous structure of accretion and merger shocks,
598: the magnetic field distribution inside and outside CGs,
599: and the associated CR acceleration and propagation processes.
600: The CR confinement properties are especially crucial.
601: Although somewhat extreme,
602: if CR confinement in CGs is more efficient than we have assumed,
603: the contribution to the CR flux would decrease while the relative neutrino flux would increase.
604: Confinement may possibly be effective even on larger scales such as filaments or superclusters,
605: in which case the CR contribution could increase relative to the neutrino flux,
606: as our Galaxy resides in the local supercluster.
607:
608: %Although no CGs have been firmly detected in gamma rays,
609: %many authors have discussed possibilities. One is the
610: %inverse-Compton (IC) emission by up-scattering the cosmic microwave
611: %background (CMB) and the nonthermal bremsstrahlung, which could
612: %contribute to $\lesssim 20$\% of the diffuse
613: %gamma-ray background observed by EGRET \cite{Rev,Gammath1}. The other is the
614: %hadron-originated gamma-ray emission due to neutral-pion decay as well
615: %as synchrotron and IC emission by secondary pairs from charged pion
616: %decay \cite{Rev,Gammath2,Method}.
617: %Cosmic rays in CGs could be accelerated even up to ultra-high energies
618: %\cite{UHECRCG}. Then, secondary pairs can be generated due to the
619: %Bethe-Heitler process, which leads to very high-energy gamma-ray emission.
620:
621: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,
622: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments
623: %% command.
624: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the
625: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]
626: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,
627: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the
628: %% text to be printed in the second.
629: \acknowledgments
630: K.M. and S.I. thank the referee, T. Kitayama, R. Blandford,
631: F. Takahara and H. Takami for useful comments.
632: K.M. is supported by a JSPS fellowship.
633: S.I. is supported in part by
634: Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of E.C.S.S.T. (MEXT) of Japan,
635: Nos. 19047004 and 19540283.
636: S.N. is likewise partially supported by Nos. 19104006, 19740139 and 19047004.
637: Support also comes from the Grant-in-Aid for the Global COE Program
638: "The Next Generation of Physics, Spun from Universality and
639: Emergence" from MEXT.
640: %This work is supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
641: %of the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science,
642: %and Technology 18740147 (S.N.).
643:
644: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
645: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
646: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
647: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
648: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
649: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
650: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
651: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
652:
653: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
654: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
655: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
656: %% copy editing. Individual instruments can be provided in parentheses,
657: %% after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
658:
659: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
660: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix
661: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
662:
663: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
664: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
665: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
666:
667: %%\appendix
668:
669: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
670: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
671: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
672: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
673: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
674: %%
675: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
676: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
677: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
678: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
679: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
680: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
681: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
682: %% place of the \cite commands.
683:
684: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
685: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
686: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
687:
688: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
689: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
690: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
691: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
692: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
693:
694: \begin{thebibliography}{}
695: \bibitem[Abbasi et al. 2008]{Aea08}
696: Abbasi, R. U. et al. 2008, arXiv:0804.0382
697: \bibitem[Abraham et al. 2007]{PAO07}
698: Abraham, J., et al. 2007, Science, 318, 938
699: \bibitem[Abraham et al. 2008]{PAO08}
700: --- 2008, Astropart. Phys., 29, 188
701: \bibitem[Ahrens et al. 2004]{Aea04}
702: Ahrens, J., et al. 2004, Astropart. Phys., 20, 507
703: \bibitem[Aloisio et al. 2007]{Aea07}
704: Aloisio, R., et al. 2007, Astropart. Phys., 27, 76
705: \bibitem[Ando \& Nagai 2008]{AN08}
706: Ando, S., \& Nagai D. 2008, MNRAS, 385, 2243
707: %\bibitem[Becker 2008]{B08}Becker, J. 2008, Phys. Rep., 458, 173
708: \bibitem[Bell 2004]{B04}
709: Bell, A.R. 2004, MNRAS, 353, 550
710: \bibitem[Bell \& Lucek 2001]{BL01}
711: Bell, A.R., \& Lucek, S.G. 2001, MNRAS, 321, 433
712: \bibitem[Berezinsky et al. 1997]{BBP97}
713: Berezinsky, V.~S., Blasi, P., \& Ptuskin, V.~S. 1997, ApJ, 487, 529
714: \bibitem[Berezinsky et al. 2006]{BGG06}
715: Berezinsky, V.~S., Gazizov, A.~Z., \& Grigorieva, S.~I. 2006, Phys. Rev. D, 74, 043005
716: \bibitem[Bergman \& Belz 2007]{BB07}
717: Bergman, D.~R., \& Belz, J.~W. 2007, J. Phys. G. 34, R359
718: \bibitem[Bhattacharjee \& Sigl 2000]{BS00}
719: Bhattacharjee, P. \& Sigl, G. 2000, Phys. Rep. 327, 109
720: \bibitem[Blandford \& Eichler 1987]{BE87}
721: Blandford, R.D., \& Eichler, D. 1987, Phys. Rep., 154, 1
722: \bibitem[Budnik et al. 2008]{Bea08}
723: Budnik, R., Katz, B., MacFadyen, A. \& Waxman, E. 2008, ApJ, 673, 928
724: \bibitem[Bykov et al. 2008]{BDD08}
725: Bykov, A.M., Dolag, K., \& Durret, F. 2008, Space Sci. Rev., 134, 119
726: \bibitem[Colafrancesco \& Blasi 1998]{CB98}
727: Colafrancesco, S., \& Blasi, P. 1998, Astropart. Phys., 9, 227
728: \bibitem[De Marco et al. 2006]{MHSB06}
729: De Marco, D., Hansen, P., Stanev, T., \& Blasi, P. 2006, Phys. Rev. D, 73, 043004
730: \bibitem[En{\ss}lin et al. 1997]{Eea97}
731: En{\ss}lin, T.~A., Biermann, P.~L., Kronberg, P.~P., \& Wu, X.-P. 1997, ApJ, 477, 560
732: \bibitem[En{\ss}lin et al. 1998]{Eea98}
733: En{\ss}lin, T.~A., Wang, Y., Nath, B.~B. \& Biermann, P. L. 1998, A\&A, 333, L47
734: \bibitem[Ferreti \& Neumann 2006]{FN06}
735: Feretti, L., \& Neumann, D.~M. 2006, 2006, A\&A, 450, L21
736: \bibitem[Gaisser \& Stanev 2006]{GS06}
737: Gaisser, T.K., \& Stanev, T. 2006, Nuc. Phys. A, 777, 98
738: \bibitem[Hillas 2005]{H05}
739: Hillas, A.~M. 2005, J. Phys. G., 31, R95
740: \bibitem[Hubert Chen et al. 2008]{Hea08}
741: Hubert Chen, C.~M., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 383, 1259
742: \bibitem[Inoue 2008]{I08}
743: Inoue, S. 2008, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 120, 062001 (arXiv:0809.3205)
744: \bibitem[Inoue et al. 2005]{IAS05}
745: Inoue, S., Aharonian, F.~A., \& Sugiyama, N. 2005, ApJ, 628, L9
746: \bibitem[Inoue \& Sasaki 2001]{IS01}
747: Inoue, S. \& Sasaki, S. 2001, ApJ, 562, 618
748: \bibitem[Inoue et al. 2007]{ISMA07}
749: Inoue, S., Sigl, S., Miniati, F., \& Armengaud, E. 2007, preprint (arXiv:astro-ph/0701167)
750: \bibitem[Jenkins et al. 2001]{Jea01}
751: Jenkins, A., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 321, 372
752: \bibitem[Kachelrie{\ss} 2008]{K08}
753: Kachelrie{\ss}, M. 2008, preprint (arXiv:0801.4376)
754: \bibitem[Kachelrie{\ss} \& Semikoz 2006]{KS06}
755: Kachelrie{\ss}, M., \& Semikoz, D.~V. 2006, Phys. Lett. B, 634, 143
756: \bibitem[Kang et al. 1996]{KRJ96}
757: Kang, H., Ryu, D., \& Jones, T.~W. 1996, ApJ, 456, 422
758: \bibitem[Kang et al. 1997]{KRB97}
759: Kang, H., Rachen, J.~P., \& Biermann, P.~L. 1997, MNRAS, 286, 257
760: \bibitem[Katz 2006]{K06}
761: Katz, U.~F. 2006, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A, 567, 457
762: \bibitem[Keshet et al. 2004]{KWL04}
763: Keshet, U., Waxman, E., \& Loeb, A. 2004, ApJ, 617, 281
764: \bibitem[Kelner et al. 2006]{KAB06}
765: Kelner, S.~R., Aharonian, F.~A., \& Bugayov, V.~V. 2006, Phys. Rev. D, 74, 034018
766: \bibitem[Kravtsov \& Yepes 2000]{KY00}
767: Kravtsov, A. V. \& Yepes, G. 2000, MNRAS, 318, 227
768: \bibitem[Kotera \& Lemoine 2007]{KL07}
769: Kotera, K., \& Lemoine, M. 2007, Phys. Rev. D, 77, 023005
770: \bibitem[Lemoine 2005]{L05}
771: Lemoine, M. 2005, Phys. Rev. D, 71, 083007
772: \bibitem[Loeb \& Waxman 2000]{LW00}
773: Loeb, A., \& Waxman, E. 2000, Nature, 405, 156
774: %\bibitem[Mannucci et al. 2008]{Mea08}
775: %Mannucci, F., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 383, 1121
776: %\bibitem[Martini et al. 2007]{MMK07}
777: %Martini, P., Mulchaey, J.S., \& Kelson, D.~D. 2007, ApJ, 664, 761
778: \bibitem[Miniati et al. 2000]{Mea00}
779: Miniati, F., et al. 2000, ApJ, 542, 608
780: \bibitem[Murase 2007]{M07}
781: Murase, K. 2007, Phys. Rev. D, 76, 123001
782: \bibitem[Murase et al. 2008]{MISN08}
783: Murase, K., Ioka, K., Nagtaki, S., \& Nakamura, T. 2008, Phys. Rev. D, 78, 023005
784: \bibitem[Nagano \& Watson 2000]{NW00}
785: Nagano, N., \& Watson, A.~A. 2000, Rev. Mod. Phys., 72, 689
786: \bibitem[Nakazawa et al. 2008]{Nea08}
787: Nakazawa, K. et al. 2008, PASJ, submitted
788: \bibitem[Norman et al. 1995]{NMA95}
789: Norman, C.~A., Melrose, D.~B., \& Achterberg, A. 1995, ApJ, 454, 60
790: \bibitem[Pfrommer \& En{\ss}lin 2004]{PE04}
791: Pfrommer, C., \& En{\ss}lin, T.~A. 2004, Astron. Astrophys. 413, 17
792: %\bibitem[Rordorf et al. 2004]{RGD04}Rordorf, C., Grasso, D., and Dolag, K. 2004, Astropart. Phys. 22, 167
793: \bibitem[Ryu et al. 2003]{Rea03}Ryu, D., et al. ApJ, 593, 599 (2003)
794: \bibitem[Takami et al. 2007]{TMNS07}
795: Takami, H., Murase, K., Nagataki, S., \& Sato, K. 2007, preprint (arXiv:0704.0979)
796: \bibitem[Uchiyama et al. 2007]{Uea07}
797: Uchiyama, Y. et al. 2007, Nature 449, 576
798: \bibitem[Vladimorov et al. 2006]{VEB06}
799: Vladimirov, A., Ellison, D.~C., \& Bykov, A. 2006, ApJ, 652, 1246
800: \bibitem[V\"{o}lk et al. 1996]{VAB96}
801: V\"{o}lk, H.~J., Aharonian, F.~A., \& Breitschwerdt, D. 1996, Space Sci. Rev., 75, 279
802: \bibitem[Voit 2005]{V05}Voit, G.~M. 2005, Rev. Mod. Phys., 77, 207
803: \bibitem[Wang et al. 2007]{WRMD07}
804: Wang, X.~Y., Razzaque, S., M\'esz\'aros, P., \& Dai, Z.~G. 2007, Phys. Rev. D, 76, 083009
805: \bibitem[Waxman \& Bahcall 1998]{WB98}
806: Waxman, E., \& Bahcall, J. 1998, Phys. Rev. D, 59, 023002
807:
808: %P. Blasi, S. Gabici, and G. Brunetti, arXiv:astro-ph/0701545
809: %S. Gabici and P. Blasi, Astrophys. J. 583, 695 (2003).
810: %C. Pfrommer et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 378, 385 (2007)
811: %H. Kang et al., Astrophys. J. 669, 729 (2007)
812: %P. Blasi and S. Colafrancesco, Astropart. Phys. 12, 169 (1999);
813: %S. Gabici and P. Blasi, Astropart. Phys. 19, 679 (2003);
814: %F. Miniati, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 342, 1009 (2003);
815: %U. Keshet et al., Astrophys. J. 585, 128 (2003)
816: %H. Kang, D. Ryu, and R.W. Jones, Astrophy. J. 456, 422 (1996);
817: %A. M. Hillas, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. {\bf 22}, 425 (1984);
818: %D. F. Torres and L. A. Anchordoqui, Rep. Prog. Phys. {\bf 67}, 1663 (2004).
819: %J.R. Jokipii and G. Morfill, Astrophys. J. 290, L1 (1985);
820: %V. Zirakashvili, et al., Astron. Astrophys. 311, 113 (1996);
821: %A. R. Bell and S. G. Lucek, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 321, 433 (2001);
822: %J. Arons, Astrophys. J. 589, 871 (2003);
823: %S.~Inoue, G.~Sigl., F.~Miniati and E.~Armengaud, Phys. Rev. D, submitted [arXiv:astro-ph/0701167].
824: %K.~Nakazawa et al., in prep.
825: %T. Kitayama, Ph.D. Thesis (1997)
826: %T.~Antoni et al., Astropart. Phys. 24, 1 (2005)
827: %T. A. En{\ss}lin et al., Astron. Astrophys. 473, 41 (2007).
828: %K. Mannheim, R. J. Protheroe, and J. P. Rachen, Phys. Rev. D 633, 023003 (2000).
829: %P. L. Biermann and P. A. Strittmatter, Astrophys. J. 322, 643 (1987);
830: %J. P. Rachen and P. L. Biermann, Astron. Astrophys. 272, 161 (1993);
831: %E. Waxman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 386 (1995);
832: %M. Vietri, Astrophys. J. 453, 883 (1995);
833: %K. Murase et al., Astrophys. J., 651, L5 (2006);
834: %V.S. Berezinsky and A.I. Smirnov, Astrophys. Space. Sci. 32, 461 (1975);
835: %Fujita et al. 2003; Brunetti 2004; Pfrommer et al. 2007
836: %E. Waxman and J. Bahcall, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 2292 (1997)
837: \end{thebibliography}
838:
839: \clearpage
840:
841: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
842: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
843: %% To embed the sample graphics in
844: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
845: %% \includegraphics commands
846: %%
847: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
848: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
849: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
850: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
851: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
852: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
853: %%
854: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
855: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
856: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
857: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
858: %% journal to journal.
859:
860:
861: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
862: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
863: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
864: %% available in the electronic journal.
865:
866:
867:
868:
869:
870:
871: %% If you are not including electonic art with your submission, you may
872: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the
873: %% User Guide for details.
874: %%
875: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
876: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
877: %% after every seventh one.
878:
879: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
880: %% that appears after it.
881:
882: \end{document}
883:
884: %%
885: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
886:
887: % LocalWords: tex AASTeX markup
888:
889:
890:
891:
892:
893:
894: