1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: \documentclass[10pt,preprint]{aastex}
23: %\usepackage{Times}%% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
24:
25: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
26:
27: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
28: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
29: %% use the longabstract style option.
30:
31: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
32: \newcommand {\hII} {HII\,\,}
33: \newcommand {\ha} {H$\alpha$\,\,}
34: \newcommand {\kms} {\,km\,s$^{-1}$\,}
35:
36: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
37: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
38: %% the \begin{document} command.
39: %%
40: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
41: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
42: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
43: %% for information.
44: \newcommand {\has} {H$\alpha$}
45: \newcommand{\BB}{\textit{\texttt{B}\texttt{\has}\texttt{BAR}\,\,}}
46: \newcommand{\FM}{\texttt{\textsc{FaNTOmM}}}
47: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
48: \newcommand{\myemail}{ \it olivier@astro.umontreal.ca}
49: \newcommand{\GF}{{\sc GH$\alpha$FaS}}
50: \newcommand {\Msol} {M$_\odot$}
51: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
52:
53: \slugcomment{To appear in PASP}
54:
55: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
56: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
57: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
58: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
59: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
60: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
61:
62: \shorttitle{\GF}
63: \shortauthors{Hernandez et al.}
64:
65: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
66: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
67:
68: \begin{document}
69:
70: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
71: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
72: %% you desire.
73:
74: \title{\GF: Galaxy H-alpha Fabry-Perot System for the WHT}
75:
76: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
77: %% author and affiliation information.
78: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
79: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
80: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
81: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
82:
83: %\author{O. Hernandez\altaffilmark{1} }
84: %\affil{Universit\'e de Montr\'eal, Laboratoire d'Astrophysique Exp\'erimentale, succ. centre ville, C.P. 6128, Montr\'eal, H3C 3J7, Canada}
85:
86: %\and \author{K. Fathi\altaffilmark{2}}
87: \author{O. Hernandez\altaffilmark{1},
88: K. Fathi\altaffilmark{2,6},C. Carignan\altaffilmark{1}, J.
89: Beckman\altaffilmark{2,7}, J.-L. Gach\altaffilmark{3}, P.
90: Balard\altaffilmark{3} \\ and \\ P. Amram\altaffilmark{3}, J.
91: Boulesteix\altaffilmark{3}, R.L.M. Corradi\altaffilmark{8,2}, M-M. de
92: Denus-Baillargeon\altaffilmark{1,9}, B. Epinat\altaffilmark{3},M.
93: Rela\~no\altaffilmark{5}, S. Thibault\altaffilmark{4}, P.
94: Vall\'ee\altaffilmark{1} }
95:
96: \altaffiltext{1}{Laboratoire d'Astrophysique Exp\'erimentale,
97: Observatoire du mont M\'egantic \& D\'epartement de physique,
98: Universit\'e de Montr\'eal, C.P. 6128 succ. centre ville,
99: Montr\'eal, Qu\'ebec, Canada H3C 3J7: \myemail}
100: \altaffiltext{2}{Instituto de Astrof\'\i sica de Canarias, C/ V\'\i
101: a L\'actea s/n, 38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain}
102: \altaffiltext{3}{Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille,
103: Observatoire Astronomique Marseille-Provence, Universit\'e de
104: Provence \& CNRS, 2 place Le Verrier, 13248 Marseille Cedex 4,
105: France.} \altaffiltext{4}{IMMERVISION, 2020 University, suite 2420,
106: Montr\'eal, Qu\'e., Canada H3A 2A5} \altaffiltext{5}{Dpto. F\'isica
107: Te\'orica y del Cosmos, Universidad de Granada, Avda. Fuentenueva s/n,
108: 18071 Granada, Spain} \altaffiltext{6}{Stockholm Observatory,
109: AlbaNova University Center, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden}
110: \altaffiltext{7}{Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cient\'\i
111: ficas, Spain} \altaffiltext{8}{Isaac Newton Group, Apartado de
112: Correos 321, 38700 Santa Cruz de la Palma, Spain} \altaffiltext{9}{
113: Institut Fresnel, CNRS \& Universit\'es Aix Marseille, 13397
114: Marseille Cedex 20, France}
115:
116:
117: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
118: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
119: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
120: %% affiliation.
121:
122: %\altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, WHT}
123: %\altaffiltext{2}{Society of Fellows, Harvard University.}
124: %\altaffiltext{3}{present address: Center for Astrophysics,
125: % 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
126: %\altaffiltext{4}{Visiting Programmer, Space Telescope Science Institute}
127: %\altaffiltext{5}{Patron, Alonso's Bar and Grill}
128:
129: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
130: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
131: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
132: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
133: %% editorial office after submission.
134:
135: \begin{abstract}
136:
137: \GF\, a new Fabry-Perot system, is now available at the William
138: Herschel Telescope. It was mounted, for the first time, at the
139: Nasmyth focus of the 4.2 meter WHT on La Palma in July 2007. Using
140: modern technology, with a spectral resolution of the order
141: R$\sim$15000 , and with a seeing limited spatial resolution, \GF\
142: will provide a new look at the \has -emitting gas over a 4.8
143: arcminutes circular field in the nearby universe. Many science
144: programs can be done on a 4.2 metre class telescope in world class
145: seeing conditions with a scanning Fabry-Perot. Not only galaxies but
146: HII regions, planetary nebulae, supernova remnants and the diffuse
147: interstellar medium are subjects for which unique data can be
148: aquired rapidly. Astronomers from the Laboratoire d'Astrophysique
149: Exp\'erimentale (LAE) in Montr\'eal, the Laboratoire
150: d'Astrophysique de Marseille (LAM-OAMP), and the Instituto de
151: Astrof\'isica de Canarias (IAC), have inaugurated \GF\ by studying
152: in detail the dynamics of some nearby spiral galaxies. A robust set of
153: state-of-the-arts tools for reducing and analyzing the data cubes
154: obtained with \GF\ has also been developed.
155: \end{abstract}
156:
157: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
158: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
159: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
160: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
161:
162: \keywords{instrumentation: detectors --- instrumentation:
163: spectrographs --- Galaxies: kinematics and dynamics -- Galaxies:
164: evolution --- ISM : HII regions --- planetary nebulae: individual(PN
165: M1-75)}
166:
167: \section{Introduction}
168:
169: From 2007 July 2nd to July 8th, the new private instrument \GF\ \footnote{www.astro.umontreal.ca/ghafas or www.iac.es/project/ghafas} was
170: commissioned on the Whilliam Herschel Teslecope (WHT). The acronym \GF\, stands for Galaxy Halpha
171: Fabry-Perot (FP) System, and gives an idea of the nature and the
172: prime use of the instrument. It is a new generation FP
173: interferometer, whose chief and powerful advantage is its high
174: sensitivity photon counting detector coupled to a large field of
175: view. \GF\, (which sounds like the Spanish word, "gafas", for a pair
176: of glasses) is used on the GHRIL platform of the Nasmyth focus of
177: the WHT.
178:
179: \GF\, is an improved version of the scanning Fabry-Perot system
180: FaNTOmM \citep{he2003}, which is a resident instrument at the
181: Observatoire du mont M\'egantic (OmM) 1.6 m telescope and which has
182: also been used as a visitor instrument on the Canada-France-Hawaii
183: (CFH) and ESO La Silla 3.6 m telescopes. The complete system is
184: composed of a focal reducer, a calibration unit, a filter wheel for
185: the order sorter filters, an FP etalon and a photon-counting (IPCS)
186: camera. The IPCS is composed of an Hamamatsu intensifier
187: multi-channel plates (MCP) tube which intensifies every generated
188: electron coming from the photocatode by a factor 10$^7$. Each photon
189: event, recorded on a DALSA CCD, is then analyzed by a centering
190: algorithm. With this amplification, the camera has essentially no
191: readout noise. Because of this, a zero noise IPCS is to be preferred
192: to CCDs at very low flux level \citep{ga2002}, even if the GaAs IPCS
193: has only a DQE of $\sim$26\%. Moreover, because of the fast scanning
194: capability, it can average out the variation of atmospheric
195: transmission which is not possible with the long integration times
196: needed per channel for the CCDs in order to beat the read-out noise.
197:
198: In the last 3 years, around 150 galaxies were observed with the
199: FaNTOmM system on the OMM, CFH and ESO La Silla telescopes in the
200: context of 3 large surveys: the SINGS samples (Daigle et al. 2006
201: \& Dicaire et al. 2007), a survey of barred galaxies, the \BB
202: sample (Hernandez et al. 2005) and a sample of Virgo spirals
203: (Chemin et al. 2006). While the first scientific justification was to derive high spatial resolution optical
204: rotation curves for mass modeling purposes, the data was also used
205: by IAC astronomers to constrain the role of gravitational
206: perturbations as well as feedback from individual HII regions on the
207: evolution of structures in galaxies \citep{2007ApJ...667L.137F,
208: 2007A&A...467.1117R} and by a Berkeley-Munich group, the G\'EPI
209: group at Observatoire de Paris and Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de
210: Marseille (LAM) to compare those local samples to high z galaxies.
211:
212: \GF\ comes with its own custom designed focal reducer developed to
213: be optically and mechanically compatible with the Nasmyth focus of
214: the WHT. The system has its own control and data acquisition system.
215: It has a 4 arcmin circular field with a 0.4 arcsec pixel and a
216: minimum of $\sim$5 km/s velocity resolution. Full acquisition and
217: reduction software (mainly based on IDL routines) is provided by the
218: Montr\'eal and IAC groups. The project will be done in 3 phases. For
219: Phase I (July 2007), the optical system (focal reducer, filter wheel
220: \& calibration unit) has been delivered to the WHT and used with the
221: Marseilles IPCS camera for this first run. For Phase II (beginning
222: of 2008), an improved GaAs IPCS will be added to the system. Phase
223: III (mid 2008) will provide an FP controller to replace the old
224: CS100 technology (provided by IC Optical formerly Queen's Gate) and
225: possibly a Tunable Source to calibrate the data at the observing
226: wavelength.
227:
228: \GF\ is presented in this paper. Section 2 describes the science
229: cases for the \GF\ instrument, while Section 3 discusses the
230: technical details of the instrument. In Section 4, the data
231: preparation and reduction procedures are presented while a sample of
232: the first results is shown. The conclusions are given in Section 5.
233:
234: \section{\GF\ Science Drivers}
235: Several instruments exist that provide two dimensional maps for
236: kinematical and population analysis of galaxies or other
237: astronomical objects. Those observations are mainly based on two
238: different techniques of wavelength separation: dispersive or
239: scanning. The former uses fibers (\textsc{Virus}: Hill et al. 2006, \textsc{Argus}: Kaufer et al.2003, \textsc{Integral}: Arribas et al. 1998), micro-lenses (first
240: concept done by Courtes (1982), \textsc{Tiger}: Bacon et al. 1995,
241: \textsc{Sauron} Bacon et al. 2001), image slicers (\textsc{SINFONI}: Eisenhauer et al. 2003, \textsc{MUSE}:
242: Henault et al. 2004, \textsc{WiFes}: Dopita et al. 2007,
243: \textsc{SWIFT}: Thatte et al. 2006, \textsc{FRIDA}: L{\'o}pez et al.
244: 2006, and references therein) and the later Fabry-Perot
245: etalons in a pupil (\FM\ in Hernandez et al. 2003, \textsc{Cigale}:
246: Boulesteix et al. 1984, \textsc(HIFI): Bland et al. 1990,
247: \textsc{Taurus}: Atherton et al. 1982. \GF\, is a scanning
248: instrument with the largest field-of-view (FOV) with such a spatial
249: resolution (0.4"/px in low mode and 0.2"/px in high spatial
250: resolution mode) on a 4m class telescope.
251:
252:
253: Two dimensional kinematics is a very powerful technique for studying
254: the structure and evolution of extended sources. Galaxy dynamics,
255: the distribution of dark matter, the dynamical and physical state of
256: star forming regions, circum nuclear starburst and fueling of active
257: galactic nuclei, detection of kinematically decoupled components,
258: dynamics and physical state of planetary nebulae, and
259: supernova-driven winds and feed-back mechanisms are just a few
260: phenomena which can be studied with this technique.
261:
262: Large spectral-range spectrographs are commonly used to analyze the
263: stellar population and stellar and gaseous kinematics of relatively small
264: (1 kpc) regions of nearby galaxies or entire galaxies at high redshifts
265: (e.g., de Zeeuw et al. 2002, Genzel et al. 2006, Peletier et al. 2007,
266: Emsellem et al. 2007, Marquart et al. 2007).
267: The low-redshift studies have shown that morphological methods are
268: not a sufficient tool for galaxy classification and supplementary
269: kinematical and population data are necessary for understanding
270: galaxy evolution. High-redshift, two-dimensional kinematical studies
271: have shown that galaxy disks are more disturbed at z $\sim$ 1 than
272: locally.
273:
274: Large spatial-coverage instruments have been successful at studying
275: the state and dynamics of galaxies and of the interstellar medium
276: (e.g., Zurita et al. 2004, Hernandez et al. 2005a, Chemin et al.
277: 2006, Sluis \& Williams 2006, Daigle et al. 2006a, Fathi et al. 2007a,
278: Rela\~no et al. 2005;2007, Rosado et al. 2007, Amram et al. 2007). These
279: studies have observationally confirmed the important role of
280: gravitational perturbations on evolution of galaxies, which are now
281: accepted to be the main drivers for morphological transformations.
282:
283: \subsection{HII Region Studies and Interaction of Stellar Winds with the ISM}
284: The internal kinematics of HII regions are of interest because of
285: the light shed on the evolutionary properties of the massive stars
286: which ionize them and on their interaction with the surrounding ISM.
287: A key issue here is that the velocity dispersion measured in \ha of
288: the majority of HII regions observed in external galaxies, which are
289: necessarily selected as the most luminous regions, is found to be
290: supersonic. A basic question is what is the source of input energy
291: to maintain these line widths, and the linked possibility that the
292: line widths could be used as a luminosity index and hence as a
293: distance measuring standard candle.
294: A long term debate was opened by Terlevich \& Melnick (1981) who
295: suggested that the line widths vary as the fourth power of the
296: luminosity and that this reflected virial equilibrium within the
297: regions. This was addressed in some detail by Chu \& Kennicutt
298: (1994a) in a study of 30 Doradus, and by Chu \& Kennicut (1994b),
299: who found for a large sample of bright HII regions that their line
300: profiles are broadened by turbulence as well as wind-induced line
301: splittings. i.e. that in general virialization cannot be assumed.
302: These studies are merely pointers to the wealth of physical
303: inference which will be available using \GF\, to investigate
304: how metals are distributed around galaxies by the
305: outflows from HII regions and by similar flows around galactic
306: centres, and how the ionization structure of HII regions relates
307: to their kinematic structure.
308:
309: \subsection{Planetary Nebulae and Ionized Stellar Outflows}
310: In the last two decades, the extraordinary variety of morphologies
311: of planetary nebulae (PNe) has been widely recognized (e.g.: Balick
312: \& Frank 2002). Their study is crucial in order to fully understand
313: mass loss, the physical process that governs the latest evolution of
314: low mass stars and plays a basic role in the chemical enrichment of
315: galaxies. A precise determination of the 6-D geometry and kinematics of PNe
316: requires 2-D spectroscopy, at a resolution R$\ge$30000 for
317: ``normal'' PNe (and lower for the highly-collimated, high-velocity
318: components) and in the brightest nebular emission lines (
319: [OIII], [H$\alpha$], and [NII]). \GF\, ca provide an efficient and accurate way to observe all the
320: different macro and microstructures present in the nebulae, which
321: include - often in the same object - multiple spherical shells,
322: bipolar or multipolar lobes, point-symmetrical features, symmetric
323: knots, filaments and jets. Comparison of the images and radial
324: velocity fields with sophisticated radiative-hydrodynamical
325: simulations (e.g. Garc{\'{\i}}a-Segura et al. 1999) can then
326: reveal the physical processes at work in shaping PNe.
327: By obtaining fully monochromatic images of the nebulae in different
328: emission lines, we can determine the density, temperature, and ionization degree,
329: throughout the objects. This is also essential for a proper 3-D
330: modelling of the nebulae and a correct determination of their
331: physico-chemical properties (cf. Gon{\c c}alves et al. 2006). Ultimately, the
332: most important questions to be answered are the following ones: why do
333: stars loose their spherical symmetry at the tip of the asymptotic
334: giant branch or immediately after? Can single stars do it, or is the
335: majority of the observed PNe the result of binary evolution (e.g., Moe
336: \& de Marco 2007)?
337:
338:
339: \subsection{Structure and Evolution of Nearby Spiral Galaxies}
340: The evolution of structures in galaxies is given by the interactions
341: with neighboring galaxies, gravitational perturbations, and/or winds
342: from star forming regions. The IAC, LAE and LAM groups have developed a set of
343: robust data analysis tools which were used successfully on previous
344: Fabry-Perot observations covering out to 12 kpc in the nearby
345: grand-design Sc spiral galaxy, M~74. These tools are optimized to
346: investigate the large-scale dynamics as well as feedback from
347: individual HII regions into their surrounding interstellar medium in
348: order to study the evolution of structures in galaxies using
349: two-dimensional kinematical observations (Zurita et al. 2001,
350: Hernandez et al. 2005a,b, Fathi et al. 2005,2007a,b).
351: After the careful examination of the resonance structures by
352: measuring the pattern speeds of the bars in M~100 (Hernandez et al.
353: 2005b), NGC~1068 (Emsellem et al. 2006), and NGC~6946 (Fathi et al.
354: 2007b), there is now a solid framework for kinematically studying the
355: resonant interaction in disks of galaxies.
356: The combination of these studies with the emerging theoretical foundation
357: (Maciejewski 2006, Maciejewski \& Athanassoula 2007, Athanassoula 2005)
358: has opened the possibility to add the global kinematical information to
359: the local effects at or near the Lindblad and ultraharmonic
360: resonance radii, and compare the strength and degree of symmetry of
361: the density waves. Such quantification is important to study to what
362: degree bars infer dynamical mixing of the gas and stars in their parent disks.
363:
364: \subsection{Fueling of Active Galactic Nuclei}
365: Due to the mass concentration towards the center of the
366: gravitational potential in galaxies, their nuclear region are
367: suitable environments for the formation of Super Massive Black Holes
368: (SMBH) which can become active by infall of interstellar gas.
369: Recent works (Tremaine et al. 2002 and references therein) show
370: in addition that the mass of the SMBH is proportional
371: to that of the bulge of its host galaxy. This relation suggests a
372: connection between the large-scale properties of galaxies and the
373: nuclear properties (Haehnelt \& Kauffmann 2000). The process
374: responsible for such a relation has to transfer matter and angular
375: momentum within galaxies. Pioneer works have proposed that bars can
376: trigger the mass flows to help grow and feed SMBHs in galaxies
377: (e.g., Shlosman et al. 1989), but observations have not
378: confirmed this. Thus, measuring the velocity at
379: which gas is falling from the outer parts of a galaxy towards the
380: center is imperative for constraining the links between large-scale
381: properties and activity in the nucleus of galaxies.
382: The dynamical analysis methods developed in
383: Fathi et al. (2005, 2006) have shown to be useful for quantifying
384: the kinematical effects of gravitational perturbations due to bars and
385: spiral arms. Applying these methods to high-spatial resolution data for
386: a large number of objects, delivered by \GF, will provide necessary
387: details required for linking the kiloparsec-scale kinematics with the
388: parsec-scale processes.
389:
390:
391:
392: \subsection{Dynamical Masses of the Galaxies in the Virgo Cluster}
393: The large size and homogeneity of surveys of local galaxies (SDSS,
394: 2dF, 2MASS) have yielded extraordinary advances in our understanding
395: of galaxy structure and evolution. One of the most important
396: realizations of galaxy formation studies is the recent detection
397: from SDSS and 2dF of a robust bimodality in the distribution of
398: galaxy properties, with a characteristic transition scale at stellar
399: mass $\sim 3 \times 10^{10}$ \Msol, corresponding to a halo (virial)
400: circular velocity V $\sim 120$ \kms\ (Kauffmann et al. 2003,
401: Dekel \& Birnboim 2006). However, large surveys
402: like the SDSS lack measurements of the {\it dynamical mass}, since it
403: must include coverage to luminosities below the fundamental galaxy
404: transition scale at V $\sim 120$ \kms.
405: Central to such a study, the number of galaxies per
406: unit volume as a function of halo circular velocity -- the circular
407: velocity function, N(V) -- is a robust prediction of cosmological
408: models that has never been {\it directly} tested (Klypin et al.
409: 1999, Newman \& Davis 2002). The Virgo cluster is an ideal laboratory
410: for analyzing, in depth, these processes using \GF\, observations.
411:
412:
413:
414:
415: \subsection{Kinematics of High-Redshift Galaxies}
416: In studying high-redshift galaxies, it is necessary to
417: disentangle distance effects from evolution ones (e.g.,
418: F{\"o}rster Schreiber et al. 2006).
419: Even at low redshifts, controversy may exist on the nature and on
420: the history of merging, interacting (including compact groups (CG)
421: of galaxies) or even blue compact galaxies which are suspected to
422: constitute a large fraction of the primordial building blocks
423: leading to the present-day galaxies (e.g., Kunth \& \"Ostlin 2000,
424: Amram et al. 2004, 2007). In compact groups, high spatial and spectral
425: resolution data from \GF\, allow to observe that the broader \ha\
426: profiles are located in the overlapping regions between the galaxies
427: within a group. At higher redshift such a broadening would be
428: interpreted as an indicator of rotating disk and this system
429: could have been catalogued like a rotator instead of a merger
430: (Flores et al. 2006). On the other hand, in cases when the spatial
431: resolution increases, it becomes possible to address
432: the problem of the shape of the inner density profile in spirals
433: (CORE vs CUSP controversy), which remains one of the five main
434: further challenges to the $\Lambda$CDM theory proposed by Primack (2006).
435:
436: The lack of resolution induce series of biases:
437: (i) the size of the galaxy is artificially enlarged but,
438: in the same time, the size of the galaxy is diminished due
439: to flux limitations; (ii) the inclination is lowered when the
440: spatial resolution decreases; (iii) the velocity gradient is
441: lowered along the major axis while in the same time, the
442: velocity gradient is enlarged toward the minor axis.
443: The consequence is that there is often no indication that
444: the maximum velocity of the rotation curve is reached, leading to
445: uncertainties in the TF relation determination. In addition, the
446: (fine) structures within the galaxies (bars, rings, spiral arms,
447: bubbles, etc.) are attenuated or erased and the determination of the
448: other kinematical parameters (position angle, center, inclination)
449: becomes highly uncertain.
450:
451: \section{The Real Integral Field Unit}
452:
453: \GF\, is a real Integral Field Unit (IFU): for each pixel of the
454: IPCS one spectrum is available. Integral Field Units make use of lenslet arrays, fibre bundles, or slitlets to scan the two-dimensional area of interest for observations. \GF\ omits the intermediate constructions, and delivers one unique spectrum for each IPCS spectrum. There is no cross-talk between the \GF\ spectra, and each pixel corresponds to one spectrum, as opposed to each lenslet or fibre which in reality cover more than one pixel on the CCD. In this sense, \GF\ is the real IFU. This kind of instrument is called "ecological" where no information mixing is possible between spatial and spectral information.
455:
456: \GF\, is composed of a focal
457: reducer, a filter wheel, a Fabry-Perot etalon, an Image Photon
458: Counting System (IPCS) as the detector, and a calibration arm (Neon
459: source). Data acquisition and instrument controls are done with a PC
460: computer via ethernet.
461:
462:
463: \subsection{Optical and Mechanical Design}
464:
465:
466: The Nasmyth focii of the William Herschel Telescope (WHT) offer two
467: optical modes: one with an optical derotator (in the UV/optical)
468: provides a Field of View (FOV) of 2.5' x 2.5' with a throughput of
469: 75\%, while the other, without derotator, gives access to a FOV of
470: 5'x5' with no optical throughput degradation. In the design of the
471: optical system, two cases - one with derotator and one without -
472: were studied. Taking into account the numerous scientific cases
473: exposed above, we opted to keep the FOV (5'x5') as large a possible and
474: decided not to use the optical derotator which implied that a post observation
475: alignment of the data had to be developed (see section
476: \ref{sec:prepare}).
477:
478: Optical calculations and optimisation were done using ZEMAX.
479: Table \ref{pres} presents the detailed optical prescription. The optical prescription for \GF\ is beginning at surface numbered 9. Before the ninth surface, the prescription is the one the WHT for the nasmyth focus.
480: The focal reducer stands on the optical table of the GHRIL platform at
481: the 2nd Nasmyth focus of the WHT. It has a total length of 770 mm
482: (distance from the field lens to the detector plane). The length
483: between the focal plane and the field lens is 50 mm and between the
484: field lens and the collimator lens 345 mm. The total free space of
485: the collimated beam between the collimator lens and the first
486: meniscus of the objective is 200 mm. In the collimated beam the
487: pupil has a diameter of 40 mm (angles are less than 5$^o$ on the
488: pupil) in order to use etalon with an aperture diameter greater than
489: 45 mm and avoid any vignetting (see Fig. \ref{opticallayout1}).
490:
491: Globally, as \GF\ is scanning small wavelength ranges (typically
492: the FWHM of a filter is 15\AA), it should be considered as an
493: achromatic system. The optical calculations, design and
494: manufacturing were relatively simple. This configuration allowed us
495: to use 3 commercial lenses while two custom lenses
496: had to be fabricated by BMV Optical Technologies \footnote{BMV
497: Optical Technologies 26 Concourse Gate, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K2E
498: 7T7}. The optical performances are shown in table \ref{tableoptique}
499: and the spot diagram is given in Fig. \ref{opticallayout2}.
500:
501: From left to right, the optical beam will meet (a) the focal plane, where a mask has been put to avoid any diffuse light, (b) the field lens (surface \#10 in the optical prescription in table \ref{pres}), (c) the collimator lens (surface \#12), (d) a filter in the filter wheel, (e) the Fabry Perot etalon in the pupil, (f) the first objective lens (surface \#20), (g) the second objective lens (surface \#23), (g) the last objective lens (surface \#25), to be, finally, focused on the detector. Perpendicular to the optical axis, in the plane of the optical table, between the field lens and the collimator, the calibration unit (replication of the focal plane of the telescope) is founded. The calibration unit is in place when the calibration mirror is in the optical axis.
502:
503: Finally, Table \ref{FP} presents the available Fabry Perot etalons
504: showing the ability of \GF\ to reach high ˆ resolution by
505: simply changing the etalon, operation that can be done in less than
506: 2 minutes.
507:
508:
509: \begin{table}
510: \begin{center}
511: \caption{\GF\, optical characteristics}\label{tableoptique}
512: \begin{tabular}{p{1.5in}p{1.5in}}
513: \hline
514: Detector (Low spatial resolution mode ) & CCD, 512x512 pixels @ 25$\micron$ \\
515: Detector (High spatial resolution mode ) & CCD, 1kx1k pixels @ 12.5$\micron$ \\
516: Physical FOV & 12.8x12.8mm \\
517: FOV ( HR \& LR modes) & 202"x202" \\
518: FOV (HR \& LR modes on diag.) & 285" \\
519: Focal scale (LR mode) & 0.394"/px \\
520: Focal scale (HR mode) & 0.197"/px \\
521: Pupil diameter & 40 mm \\
522: Image Quality & 50\% EE\footnote{Encircled energy} in 0.4" from 0 to 0.7FOV \\
523: & 50\% EE $<$ 1Ó everywhere else \\
524: Spectral range & 450 to 850 nm \\
525: Geometric distortion & $<$ 0.7\% \\
526: F/number in & 10.94\\
527: F/number out & 2.75\\
528: \hline
529: \end{tabular}
530: \end{center}
531: \end{table}
532:
533: \begin{table}
534: \begin{center}
535: \caption{\GF\, optical prescription.}\label{pres}
536: \begin{tabular}{lllcclcc}
537: \hline
538: Surf & Type & Comment & Radius & Thickness & Glass & Diameter & Conic \\
539: \hline
540: OBJ & STD$^a$ & & Infinity & Infinity & & 0 & 0 \\
541: 1 & STD & & Infinity & 400 & & 4193.45 & 0 \\
542: 2 & STD & & Infinity & 0 & & 4192.817 & 0 \\
543: 3 & STD & & Infinity & 7994.4 & & 4192.817 & 0\\
544: 4 & STD & & Infinity & 105.9 & & 4180.168 & 0 \\
545: %5 & & coorbreak & & 0 & & & \\
546: 5 -STO & STD & primary mirror & -20879 & -8034.961 & mirror & 4180.001 & -1\\
547: %& & & \\
548: %7 & & coorbreak & & 0 & & & \\
549: 6 & STD & secondary mirror & -6231.38 & 9969.75 & mirror & 971.8717 & -2.53287\\
550: % & & MIRROR & \\
551: 7& STD & & Infinity & 84 & & 0 & 0\\
552: 8 &STD & & Infinity & 481 & & 113.7209 & 0\\
553: 9 &STD & & Infinity & 50.39427 & & 72.51192 & 0\\
554: 10 &STD & 011-4780 & 259.5 & 7.9 & BK7 & 77.6889 & 0\\
555: 11 &STD & & Infinity & 350 & & 77.49541 & 0\\
556: 12 &STD & PAC096 & 258.954 & 11 & BK7 & 56.79739 & 0\\
557: 13 &STD & & -256.371 & 6.5 & SF5 & 55.89834 & 0\\
558: 14 &STD & & -1092.828 & 100 & & 55.25999 & 0\\
559: 15 &STD & top plate & Infinity & 19.05 & F$_{silica}$ & 37.92693 & 0\\
560: 16 &STD & & Infinity & 7 & & 35.88337 & 0\\
561: 17 &STD & bottom plate & Infinity & 35 & F$_{silica}$ & 36.86071 & 0\\
562: 18 &STD & & Infinity & 18 & & 41.64935 & 0\\
563: 19 &STD & Distance (fix) & Infinity & 18.54656 & & 45.24545 & 0\\
564: 20 &STD & PAC095 & 140.89 & 14.5 & BK7& 49.38644 & 0\\
565: 21 &STD & & -101.72 & 4 & F4 & 49.47157 & 0\\
566: 22 &STD & & -465.06 & 90 & & 49.71964 & 0\\
567: 23 &STD & Custom 1 & 87.01528 & 10 & SF6 & 49.44784 & 0\\
568: 24 &STD & & 182.7571 & 30.15954 & & 47.36752 & 0\\
569: 25 &STD & Custom 2 & 57.38259 & 10 & SF11 & 38.995 & 0\\
570: 26 &STD & & 115.5478 & 6 & & 35.35846 & 0\\
571: 27 &STD & & Infinity & 6.35 & & 32.6863 & 0\\
572: 28 &STD & & Infinity & 2 & Sapphire &29.02896 & 0\\
573: 29 &STD & & Infinity & 11.85 & & 28.39365 & 0\\
574: 30 &STD & & Infinity & 5.5 & 1.47 & 21.56853 & 0\\
575: 31 &STD & & Infinity & 0 & & 19.45602 & 0\\
576: 32 &STD & & Infinity & 2 & & 19.45602 & 0\\
577: 33 &TS$^{b}$ & DETECTOR & - & 0 & & 18.3041 & -\\
578: 34- IMA& STD & FOCUS & Infinity & & & 18.3041 & 0\\
579: \hline
580: \end{tabular}
581: \tablecomments{ a - : STANDARD, b - TILTSURF.}
582: \end{center}
583: \end{table}
584:
585: \begin{figure}[htp]
586: \begin{center}
587: \includegraphics[width=17cm]{FIG1a.eps}\\
588: \caption{ 2D optical layout of \GF. The optical design was done in collaboration with Immervision inc. Light beam from telescope comes from the left. The detector (IPCS) can been found at the right hand-side. Different colours of the optical rays represent different positions on the focal plane. }\label{opticallayout1}
589: \end{center}
590: \end{figure}
591:
592: The spot diagram (Fig. \ref{opticallayout2}) shows the optical performances of the instrument. It clearly stresses the size of the optical spot on the detector in various positions (conjugated of various positions on the sky). It is given for only a wavelength (6560\AA) as observations are typically done in \ha mode. The spot size is sampled by 1 pixel in the center and in alsmost the detector whereas 2 pixel are needed to have 50\% of the encircled energy on the edges of the detector. The instrument is able to well sampled the seeing (typically 0.6"/px to 0.8"/px) with 2 pixels.
593:
594:
595:
596: \begin{figure}[htp]
597: \begin{center}
598: %\includegraphics[width=6cm]{FIG1a.eps}\\
599: \includegraphics[width=17cm]{FIG1b.eps}
600: \caption{\label{opticallayout2} Spot Diagram of \GF\ in the detector plane for 5 different positions of the optical rays at a wavelength of 6560\AA. }
601: \end{center}
602: \end{figure}
603:
604:
605: \begin{table}
606: \begin{center}
607: \caption{\GF\, Fabry-Perot etalons characteristics at
608: \has.}\label{FP}
609: \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
610: \hline
611: Etalon & p$^{a}$ & FSR$^{b}$ & $\Im^{c}$ & $\Im^{d}_e$ &R$^{e}$ \\
612: name & & \kms & & \\
613: \hline
614: M\'egantic 1 & 765 & 391.9 & 22 & 17 &16065\\
615: OM2 & 798 & 375.7 & 25 & 12 &19950 \\
616: OM3 & 2604 & 115.1 & 15 & 9 &39060 \\
617: OM4 & 609 & 492.3 & 30 & 24 &18270 \\
618: OM5 & 1938 & 154.7 & 56 & 32 &108528 \\
619: CFHT & 1162 & 258.0 & 17 & 12 &19754 \\
620: \hline
621: \end{tabular}
622: \tablecomments{a - interference order. b - Free Spectral Range. c -
623: Finesse for a pupil point. d - Effective finesse. e - Spectral resolution.}
624: \end{center}
625: \end{table}
626:
627: The mechanical design was performed at the Universit\'e de
628: Montr\'eal. All parts are made of aluminium. The lens' cylinders
629: were painted inside to avoid any parasite reflection and included
630: different masks. Lenses have been tested with a Zygo interferometer
631: to check their quality. The optical and mechanical integration were
632: done at Montreal, whereas the IPCS / Focal reducer integration was
633: done at Marseille. Figure (Fig. \ref{meca})
634: presents a top view and a cut along the optical axis parallel to the optical breadboard of the instrument on the optical table of the GHRIL.
635:
636: \begin{figure}
637: \centering
638: \includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{FIG2.eps}
639: \caption{\label{meca}Top view and cut along the optical axis parallel to the optical breadboard at the Nasmyth focus. The optical and mechanical design of \GF\ has been especially customized for the GHRIL Nasmyth focus of the WHT.
640: The filter wheel can fit four 75 mm-size filters and like all the
641: elements of the system can be controlled remotely via ethernet
642: cables.}
643: \end{figure}
644:
645: Finally, the calibration arm, with its mirror controlled arm, has a
646: neon lamp for calibration purpose. The Ne [6598] emission is used to
647: calibrate the phase shifts of the Fabry Perot etalon. This lamp will
648: be replaced, at a later stage, by a Photon etc Tunable Source (see
649: www.photonetc.com) which is able to provide any calibration
650: wavelength.
651:
652: \GF\ is fully automated and controlled via ethernet modules. Table \ref{MV} presents a summary of all automated items in their operation modes. The filter wheel, the shutter, and the calibration arms have their own ethernet modules designed by Jean-Luc Gach and Philippe Ballard from LAM. The IPCS has its own dedicated link and network to avoid a mixing of the information between ethernet modules and data. The etalon is controlled via a RS-232 link with its CS100 controller.
653:
654: \begin{table}
655: \begin{center}
656: \caption{Summary of the \GF\ automated parts}\label{MV}
657: \begin{tabular}{lll}
658: \hline
659: Part name & Controlled by : & Operation \\
660: \hline
661: Calibration arm & ethernet module & calibration \\
662: Calibration lamp & ethernet module & calibration \\
663: Calibration mirror & ethernet module & calibration \\
664: Calibration stage & ethernet module & calibration \\
665: Fabry Perot Etalon & CS 100 via RS 232 & observation \& calibration \\
666: Filter wheel & ethernet module & observation \& calibration \\
667: \hline
668: \hline
669: \end{tabular}
670: \end{center}
671: \end{table}
672:
673:
674:
675: \subsection{Detector: state of the art IPCS}
676:
677: \subsubsection{IPCS}
678:
679: The IPCS is composed of a photocathode placed in front of a
680: commercial CCD which amplifies the photons (from a factor 10$^5$ to
681: 10$^7$, (see Gach et al. (2002) and Hernandez et al. (2003), and
682: references therein for a complete description and history of such
683: devices). It provides a system where the detection of a photon is
684: around 10$^6$ times above the readout noise of the commercial CCD.
685: Therefore, the IPCS has essentially no readout noise.
686:
687: The photocathode in the WHT camera is a GaAS type HAMAMATSU V7090-61\footnote{Useful documentation can be found directly on this web
688: site : http://www.astro.umontreal.ca/fantomm/Description/v7090u.pdf
689: .} with a quantum efficiency of $<\sim$26\% (this value includes the
690: loss due to the MCP stack). The spectral range is from 400nm to
691: 850nm and it is very flat over these wavelengths. It uses two
692: microchannel plates to provide an electron amplification (after the
693: photoelectic effect that converts photons to electrons) of 10$^7$
694: (see figure \ref{figAmpli}). Each channel is 6~$\mu m$ wide.
695:
696: \begin{figure}[htp]
697: \begin{center}
698: \includegraphics[width=0.30\textwidth]{FIG3a.eps}
699: \includegraphics[width=0.60\textwidth]{FIG3b.eps}
700: \caption{\label{figAmpli}\textbf{Left}: Principle of electron
701: amplification using micro channel plates (MCP) in an image
702: intensifier. \textbf{Right:} Details of high voltage effect on a
703: micro channel.}
704: \end{center}
705: \end{figure}
706:
707: Finally, the electrons are projected onto a P-43 phosphor screen via
708: a bundle of optical fibers and then is imaged on the focal plane of
709: a DALSA fast readout commercial CCD (Panthera 1M60) using two
710: objectives (from LINOS technology). Data are then transferred to an
711: acquisition computer using the "camera link" cable via an optical
712: hub and to a dedicated ethernet link at 1Gbits/s (Balard et al. 2006).
713:
714: \subsubsection{Cooling System : the PELTIER Effect Simplified}
715:
716: A simple commercial PELTIER effect system is used to cool down the
717: photocathode to its optimal temperature which is \( -30^{o} \)C.
718: This PELTIER effect system is also coupled with a liquid cooling
719: system to evacuate heat from the IPCS. The Dalsa CCD do not need to
720: be cooled as photons (electrons) are amplified and well above the
721: readout noise. The mean thermal noise of the cathode is 5
722: events/frame at \( -10^{o} \)C, which is equivalent to 0.7
723: photon/hour/pixel and drops to 3 events/frame at \( -30^{o} \)C.
724: This dark current should drop to 0.4 events/frame if it was due only
725: to the thermal emissivity of the photocathode. This background
726: noise, which shows no dependence on temperature, can be explained by
727: K\(^{40}\) beta disintegration, which is present in the MCP glass
728: (Siegmund et al., 1988). Recent investigations carried out in collaboration with Biospace lab company\footnote{www.biospace.fr/} showed that using intensifier input windows free of potassium decreases the minimal background noise achievable by a factor of 10.
729:
730: \subsection{IPCS Advantages}
731:
732: The read-out noise affects CCDs at low light levels when very faint
733: flux objects are observed. Classical CCDs reach nowadays high
734: quantum efficiency (up to 95\%), and very low read-out noise (down
735: to 2-3 electrons and may be 1 in a near future,
736: \cite{2003PASP..115.1068G}). With the IPCS, observations of faint
737: flux objects are splitted into several short ones (in particular,
738: this method also helps not to be severely polluted by cosmic rays).
739: Thus, the maximal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) per pixel achievable
740: by an ''ideal'' CCD is described by :
741: \begin{equation}
742: \label{snripcs4}
743: SNR=\frac{N}{\sqrt{N+n\sigma ^{2}+T}},
744: \end{equation}
745: \noindent where \( N \) is the number of photons collected per pixel
746: during the exposure time, \( \sigma \) the readout noise of the CCD
747: in electrons and \( T \) the thermal noise in electrons/pixel.
748: Although the \( T \) term is close to zero in more recent CCD or
749: IPCS devices and can be neglected, additional limitations constrain
750: the usage of CCDs. \( n \) is the number of exposures. The \( SNR
751: \) decreases dramatically when \( N \) is small and \( n \) is
752: large. This is the case in multiplex instruments (scanning
753: instruments). For an IPCS, the S/N is described by the following
754: formula:
755: \begin{equation}
756: \label{snripcs3}
757: SNR=\frac{N}{\sqrt{N+T}}\approx \sqrt{N}.
758: \end{equation}
759:
760: As IPCS, in fact, do not have readout noise, they are also less
761: affected by cosmic rays since one event is seen as one photon only,
762: a decisive advantage with respect to CCDs, where long exposures are
763: required in the case of faint objects. Although the first generation
764: of IPCS had a poorer quantum efficiency with respect to CCDs and
765: were affected by image distortion, they were still competitive in
766: multiplex instruments or in speckle interferometry because of the
767: absence of read-out noise.
768:
769: Multiplex instruments collect a large number of images. For example,
770: the scanning Fabry--Perot \FM\, uses up to 64 channels to
771: reconstruct the interferometric map of an object emission line, in
772: order to determine its velocity field, monochromatic image, and
773: velocity dispersion maps (see Hernandez et et al., 2003). The global
774: SNR of a multiplex observation (\( SNR_{m} \)) is the quadratic sum
775: of the SNRs of each channel, since there is no noise correlation
776: between channels. Neglecting thermal noise , the SNR$_{m}$ is given
777: by :
778: \begin{equation}
779: \label{snripcs2}
780: SNR_{m}=\sqrt{n\left(
781: \frac{\frac{N}{n}}{\sqrt{\frac{N}{n}+\sigma ^{2}}}\right)
782: ^{2}}=\frac{N}{\sqrt{N+n\sigma ^{2}}},
783: \end{equation}
784: \noindent where \( N \) is the number of photons expected during the
785: whole exposure, \( n \) is the number of channels and \( \sigma \)
786: is the readout noise of the CCD.
787:
788: During multiplex observations, the emission usually appears only in a
789: few channels, which could be different for each pixel according to
790: the Doppler shift. Experiences with \textit{CIGALE} and \FM\, showed
791: that, emission lines appear most of the time in only 25\% of the
792: channels. This lowers the above \char`\"{}ideal\char`\"{} \(
793: SNR_{m} \). The ''worst'' case is when the line is detected only
794: in 2 channels. This does not affect the comparison between CCD and
795: IPCS usage, but gives a more precise idea of the kind of objects
796: that could be observed with such instruments. In this ''worst''
797: case the \( SNR_{m} \) is given by:
798:
799: \begin{equation}
800: \label{ccdsnr}
801: SNR_{m}=\sqrt{2\left( \frac{\frac{N}{n}}{\sqrt{\frac{N}{n}+\sigma ^{2}}}\right) ^{2}}=\frac{\frac{2N}{n}}{\sqrt{\frac{2N}{n}+2\sigma ^{2}}}.
802: \end{equation}
803:
804: Because of the very small readout time (10 ms with the WHT camera
805: and 25ms with the \FM\, one) in the case of an IPCS, it is possible
806: to observe each channel several times during the observation, then
807: averaging the sky variations (since the first and last images may not be comparable in terms of seeing and transparency when observing with a groundbased
808: telescope). Typically, each channel is observed
809: 5 to 15 seconds, and when the last channel has been integrated, the
810: first is observed again. Each set of \( n \) channels is called a
811: cycle, the duration of which is typically 5 to 15 minutes (depending
812: on the exposure time per channel and the number of channels).
813: The cycle exposure time must be under the OH timescale variations (typically 15 minutes, see Ramsay et al. 1992). Individual cycles are then summed to obtain the S/N ratio required without any loss of events. Many short cycles are then preferred to a single cycle with sky variation. The overlay time of the data acquisition system is under 10ms, so an exposure time of, at least, 1~s per channel, e.g. 48~s per cycle, is the shortest optimal exposure time. The experience of the LAE and LAM teams lead channel exposure time to 5~s, so a cycle time of around 5 minutes. The total observation consists of several cycles. SNR$_m$ can be
814: rewritten as :
815:
816: \begin{figure}[htp]
817: \begin{center}
818: \includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{FIG4.eps}
819: \caption{\label{figSNRm}Signal to noise ratio comparison: IPCS and
820: CCD at the WHT. The red line shows the SNR for an IPCS, for a 3 hour
821: exposure of 40 cycles with 48 channels, on a 4.2m telescope with a pixel size of 0.5" assuming a trough-put of the telescope of 80\%. The blue line shows the SNR of
822: a scientific grade CCD with a QE of 90\% and a readout noise
823: ($\sigma$) of 3$e^-$ in the same exposure conditions. The faint
824: detection limit is placed at a SNR of 3. }
825: \end{center}
826: \end{figure}
827:
828: \begin{equation}
829: \label{snripcs7}
830: SNR_{m}=\frac{\frac{2N}{n}}{\sqrt{\frac{2N}{n}+2m\sigma ^{2}}},
831: \end{equation}
832: \noindent where \( N \) is the number of photons expected during the
833: whole exposure, \( n \) the number of channels, \( m \) the number
834: of cycles and \( \sigma \) the readout noise of the CCD. Meanwhile,
835: the IPCS \( SNR_{m} \)obtained is independent of the number of
836: cycles and the atmosphere-free SNR is:
837: \begin{equation}
838: \label{snripcs}
839: SNR_{m}=\sqrt{\frac{2N}{n}}.
840: \end{equation}
841: These two equations are used to generate figure \ref{figSNRm}. The
842: faint detection limit is for a SNR of 3. It can be seen on this
843: figure, that an IPCS can reach higher SNR than a classical CCDs for
844: very faint fluxes.
845:
846: The measured QE of the whole system (including MCP losses) was
847: measured to be 26\% at H\( \alpha \). The overall system presents
848: the same characteristics as the IPCS of \FM\, (Gach et al. (2002)
849: and Hernandez et al. (2003)). The system is limited by the process
850: itself. The Dalsa camera can be read with two speeds depending on
851: the binning mode (1024x1024px or 512x512px) chosen. When two events
852: occur within the same frame (16.6 ms or 10 ms ) at the same
853: location, only one event is counted instead of two. The mean number
854: M of missed photons can be evaluated assuming a Poissonian process
855: for the photon emission by the following equation :
856: \begin{equation}
857: \label{lin34} M=N\times(1-\frac{1-e^{-\lambda }}{\lambda }),
858: \end{equation}
859: \noindent where $ \lambda = N /${\it{frame per second}}, is the mean
860: number of photons expected during the resolved period of the
861: detector and $N$ the total number of photons.
862:
863: Figure \ref{linear} shows the percentage of non-linearity of an IPCS detector
864: at different possible frame rates. This shows that the system loses
865: its linearity when the flux increases. Therefore this detector is
866: used exclusively for faint fluxes. Figure \ref{linear} shows also
867: that this effect is less important for higher frame rates. The blue
868: lines (dot or continuous) represent the \FM\, GaAs system, and the
869: red one is the improved \GF\, camera.
870:
871: \begin{figure}[htp]
872: \begin{center}
873: \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{FIG5.eps}
874: \end{center}
875: \caption{\label{linear}Computed non-linearity of an IPCS detector at
876: different frame rates.}
877: \end{figure}
878:
879: \section{Data Reduction}
880: \subsection{Data Preparation}
881: \label{sec:prepare}
882:
883: As \GF\ is mounted on the optical table of the Nasmyth focus, our
884: observations are affected by the field rotation. The optical
885: derotator provided by the Isaac Newton Group (ING) of Telescopes has
886: the disadvantage of covering a field of only $2.5\arcmin \times
887: 2.5\arcmin$, which is too small for the scientific programs
888: envisaged for \GF. Our observation strategy allows us to store the
889: image of the individual channel separately, which is ideal for
890: derotating the observed cube {\em a posteriori}. Following the
891: information provided on the ING web pages, the field rotation is
892: $\approx 0.29$\arcsec, i.e., negligible, during the exposure of each
893: individual cycle ($\sim 4$ minutes).
894:
895: Most of the data reduction steps are carried out using an IDL based
896: data reduction package developed by Daigle et al. (2006). However,
897: since we do not use the optical derotator, the data are affected by
898: the rotation. In order to correct for this effect, we combine
899: Daigle's reduction package with a number of available packages,
900: KARMA\footnote{http://www.atnf.csiro.au/computing/software/karma},
901: SWARP\footnote{http://terapix.iap.fr} and
902: IMWCS\footnote{http://tdc-www.harvard.edu/software/wcstools/imwcs}.
903: The complete steps of the \GF\, data reduction are:
904:
905: \begin{enumerate}
906: \item An initial and rough estimate of the data quality by reducing the observed data cube. This step allows also a good phase calibration which we use to reduce the individual cycles.
907:
908: \item Individual reduction of each observed cycle.
909:
910: \item Creating a cube image for each reduced cycle. Investigating each of these images, we have found that for almost all the observed galaxies, the effect of the sky rotation is marginal within the 4 minutes exposure to scan one cycle. This is also confirmed by the ING web pages.
911:
912: \item The collapsed cube image of each individual cycle is then used to find the three brightest point sources. The IMWCS and KARMA tools are then used to include the appropriate keywords in the header of each image.
913:
914: \item We found that a simple rotational transformation does not provide the adequate accuracy, hence we use the SWARP package to match all cycles regardless of the complexity of the transformation required.
915:
916: \item We apply the same transformation to each individual channel within each cycle, and re-build a corrected version of the data cube.
917:
918: \item Finally, we reduce the corrected data cube following all the standard reduction procedures presented in Daigle et al. (2006).
919: \end{enumerate}
920:
921: \begin{figure}[htp]
922: \begin{center}
923: \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{FIG6.eps}
924: \caption{Examples of derotation}
925: \end{center}
926: \end{figure}
927:
928: Note that this process is made possible only because our detector has a high time resolution and has no readout noise. This reduction process does not add any excess noise to the observational data and keeps the very high overall sensitivity of the instrument.
929:
930: \subsection{Data Reduction and Derivation of the \ha Kinematics}
931: \label{sec:reduction}
932:
933: \GF\ data reduction involves the standard Fabry-Perot data reduction
934: steps: cube construction, phase calibration, sky subtraction, and
935: kinematics derivation, which is done using the software package of
936: Daigle et al. (2006) and the GIPSY package
937: \citep{2001ASPC..238..358V}.
938:
939: By construction, \GF\, covers a reasonably large field in order to
940: observe nearby extended objects and provide simultaneous sky
941: coverage to allow for reliable sky subtraction. However, some
942: galaxies extend beyond the full \GF\ field. In order to sample the
943: sky variations properly during the long observation of the object,
944: the telescope is pointed to a blank field away from the galaxy, once
945: every three cycles. The sky cubes are thereafter treated in the same
946: way as the galaxy cube. The reduced sky cube is then re-scaled to
947: the galaxy count level and subtracted from the galaxy cube. In order
948: to examine the accuracy of the sky subtraction procedure, the sky
949: cube is used in four different ways before subtraction from the
950: galaxy. All the sky spectra are then rearranged to build one
951: spectrum representative of the entire sky cube, but also fitted with
952: 1st, 3rd and 4th order polynomials to each channel image of the sky
953: cube. Subtracting each sky representation separately, we end up with
954: four different reduced galaxy cubes.
955:
956: The free spectra range FSR determines the Ç depth È of the data cube and is a function of the observed wavelength ($\lambda$) and the interference order ($p$) at this wavelength. $FSR = \lambda / p$. The number of channels is linked to the finesse of the Airy function of the etalon (in fact, the number of channel respects the Nyquist criteria : n = 2.2 $\times$ the effective Finesse) and has no relation with the FSR. To study normal galaxies, a FSR of 0.8nm (360 kms at \has) is used. If the velocity range of a galaxy (with its inclination factor) is larger than the FSR (which is not frequent), one will find in order -1 or +1 the rest of the velocity field (filters, used in front of the etalon, typically block all etalon order except $p+1, p, p-1$). So a jump in the velocity field is generally found and easily corrected.
957: This could happen with active galactic nuclei of galaxy. In that particular case, an other etalon is used to increase the FSR. Table 2 presents the FSR for different etalons.
958:
959:
960:
961: Each reduced galaxy cube is treated independently to derive the \ha\
962: kinematics by means of deriving the moment maps with consistency
963: checks by applying single Gaussian profiles to the spectra (e.g.,
964: Fathi et al. 2007a). Analyzing the kinematical maps, it was found
965: that the sky subtraction does not significantly change the derived
966: kinematics. In order to gain more field coverage, a two-dimensional
967: Voronoi tessellation method (Cappellari \& Copin 2003, Daigle et al
968: 2006) was applied on the faint regions of the observed field.
969: Finally, the maps are cleaned by removing all values which are
970: derived from spectra with amplitude-over-noise ($A/N$) less than 10
971: (the noise being the standard deviation of the parts of the spectra
972: outside the \ha\ emission line). Although this seems a strict
973: criterion, it was chosen to continue the analysis of the velocity
974: field based on spectra which are reliable not only for deriving
975: reliable velocities, but also velocity dispersion. \GF\
976: instrumental dispersion has been measured using the Neon lamp and
977: was found to be $\sigma_\mathrm{inst}=FWHM/2.35=2.5$ \kms. It was
978: then subtracted quadratically from the \ha\ velocity dispersion, and
979: the derived velocities were corrected for the Heliocentric velocity
980: drift.
981:
982:
983: To give an idea of the efficiency of the pipeline reduction, two
984: panels of results are given, representing the scientific drivers of
985: the instrument. The final kinematical maps are presented in the appendix section in
986: Fig.~\ref{fig:kinematics} for four objects while \ha monochromatic
987: images are represented in Fig~\ref{fig:mono}. Finally,monochromatic image in the [NII] line and the first order of the PNe M1-75 is presented in Fig~\ref{fig:PNe}. This is not the goal
988: of this paper to comment, analyse or derive kinematical parameters.
989: The final, complete and detailed data reduction and analysis will be
990: available in forthcoming papers.
991:
992: %Finally, a \ha image of PNe M1-175 with high spatial resolution is shown in Fig~\ref{fig:PNe} Complete detailed data reduction and analysis will be available in forthcoming papers.
993:
994:
995:
996: Finally, the status of the data reduction of the first run (17 objects
997: !) over 6 nights are presented in Table \ref{results}.
998:
999: \begin{table*}[htp]
1000: \begin{center}
1001: \caption{\label{results} Observed Objects with \GF\ during 6 nights}
1002: \begin{tabular}{lrrlccl}
1003: \hline
1004: Name& R.A. & Dec. & Vsys & Night & $\langle$Seeing$\rangle$ & Status\\
1005: \hline\hline
1006: NGC 4376 & 12 25 18.0 & +05 44 28& 1136 & 6 & 0.7 & Reduced\\
1007: NGC 4594 & 12 39 59.4 & -11 37 23& 1024 & 4 & 2.0 & Reduced\footnote{Dicaire et al 2008}\\
1008: NGC 5236 & 13 37 00.9 & -29 51 57& 513 & 5 & 0.7 & Reduced\footnote{Fathi et al 2008}\\
1009: NGC 5427 & 14 03 26.0 & -06 01 51& 2618 & 2 & 1.5 & Reduced\\
1010: NGC 5850 & 15 07 07.7 & +01 32 39& 2556 & 3 & 2.0 & Reduced\\
1011: NGC 5954 & 15 34 35.1 & +15 11 54& 1959 & 2 & 1.5 & Reduced\\
1012: NGC 6118 & 16 21 48.6 & -02 17 00& 1573 & 6 & 0.6 & Reduced\\
1013: NGC 6384 & 17 32 24.3 & +07 03 37& 1665 & 1 & 1.8 & Reduced\\
1014: NGC 6643 & 18 19 46.4 & +74 34 06& 1484 & 2 & 1.5 & In progress\\
1015: NGC 6643 & 18 19 46.4 & +74 34 06& 1484 & 2 & Imaging& In progress\\
1016: NGC 6912 & 20 26 52.1 & -18 37 02& 6968 & 3 & 2.5 & Reduced\\
1017: NGC 6912 & 20 26 52.1 & -18 37 02& 6968 & 6 & 0.8 & Reduced\\
1018: NGC 6962 & 20 47 19.1 & +00 19 15& 4211 & 4 & 1.8 & Reduced\\
1019: KPG 552 & 21 07 44.0 & +03 52 30& 7767 & 5 & 0.6 & Reduced\\
1020: KPG 591 & 23 47 01.6 & +29 28 17& 4845 & 4 & 1.5 & Reduced\\
1021: PN M1-75 & 20 04 44.1 & +31 27 24& $\ddag$3890 & 5 & 0.8 & Reduced\\
1022: Arp 278 & 22 19 28.6 & +29 23 32& 4718 & 6 & 0.8 & Reduced\\ \hline
1023: \end{tabular}
1024: \tablecomments{All objects that were successfully observed during the commissioning run of 6 nights. $\ddag$: distance measured in parsecs. Note that NGC~6912 was observed twice in order to achieve improved spatial resolution, and the planetary nebula, PN~M1-75, was observed in high-resolution mode with 0.2 arcsec/pix.}
1025: \end{center}
1026: \end{table*}
1027:
1028: \section{Conclusions}
1029:
1030: \GF\ , a new Fabry-Perot system with high spatial and spectral
1031: resolution has been presented. \GF\ offers the largest FOV of such
1032: instrument on a 4m class telescope. It is also the most versatile
1033: instrument capable to study ISM to high redshift galaxies.
1034:
1035: \GF\ provides a FOV of 202"$\times$202" with two spatial
1036: resolutions: 0.4"/px or 0.2"/px (hard-binned mode). Different
1037: spectral resolutions can be achieved simply by changing etalon in
1038: the pupil space. With the actual bank of etalon available, spectral
1039: resolution varies from 8000 to 110000. The use of tunable filters
1040: (in development both at LAE and LAM) would also improve the
1041: versatily of this instrument. The high performance no readout-noise
1042: detector, in the \GF\ version, remains the best detector to be used
1043: with faint fluxes science cases. It allows, at the same time,
1044: real-time data acquisition (astronomical object is seen in live
1045: during observation), on sky reduction and real-time OH sky lines
1046: removing. Finally, a robust reduction pipeline, for complete data
1047: reduction is available and can be obtained at
1048: www.astro.umontreal.ca/fantomm/reduction.
1049:
1050:
1051: Developing of \GF\ was formulated in the summer of 2006 by the IAC
1052: and conception, design and realization began in the beginning of
1053: 2006 December at LAE. The first lights were obtained only 6 months
1054: later in 2007 summer. This fast schedule was possible because of th=e
1055: expertise developed at LAM, Observatoire de Marseille, and LAE at
1056: University of Montreal, through the building of \FM\ and
1057: \textsc{CIGALE}. While \GF\ was constructed as a private instrument,
1058: it is expected to become a visitor instrument at WHT in less than
1059: two years.
1060:
1061: \GF\ should be considered as an high-performance instrument but also
1062: as a lab test of much more complicated instruments such as the {\sc
1063: 3D-NTT} (www.astro.umontreal.ca/3dntt), the Brazilian Tunable Filter
1064: : \textsc{BTF}i (www.astro.iag.usp.br/$\sim$btfi) and the {\sc
1065: smart} tunable Filter for the E-ELT (Moretto et al. 2006). Those
1066: instruments will use \GF\ technology but with many improved
1067: features, such as EMCCD (Daigle et al. 2007), customs large tunable
1068: filters and new Tunable filter made with Volume Phase gratings
1069: (Blais-Ouellette et al. 2006).
1070:
1071: \acknowledgments
1072:
1073: We would like to thank the staff of the WHT, where the data were
1074: obtained, for their continuing support. Special thanks also to
1075: Olivier Boissin for his help before and during the commissioning of
1076: the instrument. We also acknowledge support from the Natural
1077: Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Fonds
1078: Qu\'eb\'ecois de la recherche sur la nature et les technologies.
1079: This research has benefitted from support by the following projects: AYA2004-28251-CO2-01 and AYA2007-67625-CO2.-01 of the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science, and P3/86 of the Instituto de Astrof’sica de Canarias. Kambiz Fathi acknowledges support from the Wenner-Gren foundations, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences' Hierta-Retzius foundation, and the IAC project P3/86. Monica Rela\~no acknowledges support from the Juan de la Cierva Fellowship Program and the project AYA2004-08251-C02-00. We are grateful to Daniel Fabricant, associate editor of PASP, for helpful comments.
1080:
1081:
1082: \facility{Based on observations obtained at the 4.2mWHT telescope operated on La Palma by the Isaac Newton Group in the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias, on the island of La Palma}
1083:
1084: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
1085: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
1086: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
1087: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
1088: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
1089: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
1090: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
1091: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
1092:
1093: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
1094: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
1095: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
1096: %% copy editing. Individual instruments or configurations can be provided
1097: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
1098:
1099: %{\it Facilities:} \facility{Nickel}, \facility{HST (STIS)}, \facility{CXO (ASIS)}.
1100:
1101: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
1102: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix
1103: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
1104:
1105: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
1106: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
1107: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
1108:
1109:
1110:
1111:
1112: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
1113: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
1114: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
1115: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
1116: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
1117: %%
1118: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
1119: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
1120: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
1121: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
1122: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
1123: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
1124: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
1125: %% place of the \cite commands.
1126:
1127: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
1128: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
1129: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
1130:
1131: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
1132: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
1133: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
1134: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
1135: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
1136: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1137: \bibitem[Amram et al.(2007)]{2007A&A...471..753A} Amram, P., Mendes de
1138: Oliveira, C., Plana, H., Balkowski, C., \& Hernandez, O.\ 2007, \aap, 471,
1139: 753
1140: \bibitem[Amram et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...612L...5A} Amram, P., et al.\ 2004,
1141: \apjl, 612, L5
1142: \bibitem[Arribas et al.(1998)]{1998ASPC..152..149A} Arribas, S., et al.\
1143: 1998, Fiber Optics in Astronomy III, 152, 149
1144: \bibitem[Athanassoula(2005)]{2005CeMDA..91....9A} Athanassoula, E.\ 2005,
1145: Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 91, 9
1146: \bibitem[Atherton et al.(1982)]{1982MNRAS.201..661A} Atherton, P.~D.,
1147: Taylor, K., Pike, C.~D., Harmer, C.~F.~W., Parker, N.~M., \& Hook, R.~N.\
1148: 1982, \mnras, 201, 661
1149: \bibitem[Bacon et
1150: al.(1995)]{1995A&AS..113..347B} Bacon, R., et al.\ 1995, \aaps, 113, 347
1151: \bibitem[Bacon et al.(2001)]{2001MNRAS.326...23B} Bacon, R., et al.\ 2001,
1152: \mnras, 326, 23
1153: \bibitem[Balard et al.(2006)]{2006sda..conf..117B} Balard, P., et al.\
1154: 2006, Scientific Detectors for Astronomy 2005, 117
1155: \bibitem[Balick \& Frank(2002)]{2002ARA&A..40..439B} Balick, B., \& Frank,
1156: A.\ 2002, \araa, 40, 439
1157: \bibitem[Blais-Ouellette et al.(2004)]{2004SPIE.5494..278B}
1158: Blais-Ouellette, S., Guzman, D., Elgamil, A., \& Rallison, R.\ 2004,
1159: \procspie, 5494, 278
1160: \bibitem[Bland et al.(1990)]{1990SPIE.1235..590B} Bland, J., Tully, R.~B.,
1161: \& Cecil, G.~N.\ 1990, \procspie, 1235, 590
1162: \bibitem[Boulesteix et al.(1984)]{1984SPIE..445...37B} Boulesteix, J.,
1163: Georgelin, Y., Marcelin, M., \& Monnet, G.\ 1984, \procspie, 445, 37
1164: \bibitem[Cappellari \& Copin(2003)]{2003MNRAS.342..345C} Cappellari, M., \&
1165: Copin, Y.\ 2003, \mnras, 342, 345
1166: \bibitem[Chemin et al.(2006)]{ch2006} Chemin, L., Balkowski, C., Cayatte, V.,
1167: Carignan, C., Amram, P., Garrido, O., Hernandez, O., Marcelin, M., Adami, C.,
1168: Boselli, A., \& Boulesteix, J. 2006, \mnras, 366, 812
1169: \bibitem[Chu \& Kennicutt(1994)]{1994ApJ...425..720C} Chu, Y.-H., \&
1170: Kennicutt, R.~C., Jr.\ 1994a, \apj, 425, 720
1171: \bibitem[Chu \& Kennicutt(1994)]{1994Ap&SS.216..253C} Chu, Y.-H., \&
1172: Kennicutt, R.~C., Jr.\ 1994b, \apss, 216, 253
1173: \bibitem[Courtes(1982)]{1982ASSL...92..123C} Courtes, G.\ 1982, IAU
1174: Colloq.~67: Instrumentation for Astronomy with Large Optical Telescopes,
1175: 92, 123
1176: \bibitem[Curtis(1918)]{1918PLick..13...45C} Curtis, H.~D.\ 1918,
1177: Publ.~Lick.~Obs.; Vol.~13; Page 45-54, 13, 45
1178: \bibitem[Daigle et al.(2006)]{da2006} Daigle, O., Carignan, C., Amram, P.,
1179: Hernandez, O., Chemin, L., Balkowski, C., \& Kennicutt, R. 2006, \mnras, 367, 469
1180: \bibitem[Daigle et al.(2006)]{2006MNRAS.368.1016D} Daigle, O., Carignan,
1181: C., Hernandez, O., Chemin, L., \& Amram, P.\ 2006, \mnras, 368, 1016
1182: \bibitem[toto3(2006)]{toto3} Dekel \& Birnboin 2006, MNRAS, 368, 2
1183: \bibitem[de Zeeuw et al.(2002)]{2002MNRAS.329..513D} de Zeeuw, P.~T., et
1184: al.\ 2002, \mnras, 329, 513
1185: \bibitem[Dopita et al.(2007)]{2007Ap&SS.310..255D} Dopita, M., Hart, J.,
1186: McGregor, P., Oates, P., Bloxham, G., \& Jones, D.\ 2007, \apss, 310, 255
1187: \bibitem[Eisenhauer et al.(2003)]{2003SPIE.4841.1548E} Eisenhauer, F., et
1188: al.\ 2003, \procspie, 4841, 1548
1189: \bibitem[Fathi et al.(2007)]{fa2007} Fathi, K., Beckman, J. E., Zurita, A.,
1190: Rela\~{n}o, M., Knapen, J. H., Daigle, O., Hernandez, O., \& Carignan, C. 2007, \aap, 466, 905
1191: \bibitem[Fathi et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...667L.137F} Fathi, K., Toonen, S.,
1192: Falc{\'o}n-Barroso, J., Beckman, J.~E., Hernandez, O., Daigle, O.,
1193: Carignan, C., \& de Zeeuw, T.\ 2007, \apjl, 667, L137
1194: \bibitem[Fathi et al.(2005)]{2005MNRAS.364..773F} Fathi, K., van de Ven,
1195: G., Peletier, R.~F., Emsellem, E., Falc{\'o}n-Barroso, J., Cappellari, M.,
1196: \& de Zeeuw, T.\ 2005, \mnras, 364, 773
1197: \bibitem[Fathi \& Peletier(2003)]{2003A&A...407...61F} Fathi, K., \&
1198: Peletier, R.~F.\ 2003, \aap, 407, 61
1199: \bibitem[Flores et al.(2006)]{2006A&A...455..107F} Flores, H., Hammer, F.,
1200: Puech, M., Amram, P., \& Balkowski, C.\ 2006, \aap, 455, 107
1201: \bibitem[F{\"o}rster Schreiber et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...645.1062F}
1202: F{\"o}rster Schreiber, N.~M., et al.\ 2006, \apj, 645, 1062
1203: \bibitem[Gach et al.(2002)]{ga2002} Gach, J.-L., Hernandez, O., Boulesteix, J.,
1204: Amram, P., Boissin, O., Carignan, C., Garrido, O., Marcelin, M., \"{O}stlin, G.,
1205: Plana, H., \& Rampazzo, R. 2002, \pasp, 114, 1043
1206: \bibitem[Gach et al.(2003)]{2003PASP..115.1068G} Gach, J.-L., Darson, D.,
1207: Guillaume, C., Goillandeau, M., Cavadore, C., Balard, P., Boissin, O., \&
1208: Boulesteix, J.\ 2003, \pasp, 115, 1068
1209: \bibitem[Garc{\'{\i}}a-Segura et al.(1999)]{1999ApJ...517..767G}
1210: Garc{\'{\i}}a-Segura, G., Langer, N., R{\'o}{\.z}yczka, M., \& Franco, J.\
1211: 1999, \apj, 517, 767
1212: \bibitem[Genzel et al.(2006)]{2006Natur.442..786G} Genzel, R., et al.\
1213: 2006, \nat, 442, 786
1214: \bibitem[Gon{\c c}alves et al.(2006)]{2006MNRAS.365.1039G} Gon{\c c}alves,
1215: D.~R., Ercolano, B., Carnero, A., Mampaso, A., \& Corradi, R.~L.~M.\ 2006,
1216: \mnras, 365, 1039
1217: \bibitem[Haehnelt \& Kauffmann(2000)]{2000MNRAS.318L..35H} Haehnelt, M.~G.,
1218: \& Kauffmann, G.\ 2000, \mnras, 318, L35
1219: \bibitem[Henault et al.(2004)]{2004SPIE.5492..909H} Henault, F., et al.\
1220: 2004, \procspie, 5492, 909
1221: \bibitem[Hernandez et al.(2005)]{2005MNRAS.360.1201H} Hernandez, O.,
1222: Carignan, C., Amram, P., Chemin, L., \& Daigle, O.\ 2005, \mnras, 360, 1201
1223: \bibitem[Hernandez et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...632..253H} Hernandez, O.,
1224: Wozniak, H., Carignan, C., Amram, P., Chemin, L., \& Daigle, O.\ 2005,
1225: \apj, 632, 253
1226: \bibitem[Hernandez et al.(2003)]{he2003} Hernandez, O., Gach, J.-L., Carignan, C.,
1227: \& Boulesteix, J. 2003, SPIE, 4841, 1472
1228: \bibitem[Hill et al.(2006)]{2006SPIE.6269E..79H} Hill, G.~J., et al.\ 2006,
1229: \procspie, 6269,
1230: \bibitem[Kaufer et al.(2003)]{2003Msngr.113...15K} Kaufer, A., Pasquini,
1231: L., Castillo, R., Schmutzer, R., \& Smoker, J.\ 2003, The Messenger, 113, 15
1232: \bibitem[toto5(2006)]{toto5} Kauffmann et al. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 54
1233: \bibitem[toto6(2006)]{toto6} Klypin et al. 1999, ApJ, 522, 82
1234: \bibitem[Maciejewski(2006)]{2006MNRAS.371..451M} Maciejewski, W.\ 2006,
1235: \mnras, 371, 451
1236: \bibitem[Maciejewski \& Athanassoula(2007)]{2007MNRAS.380..999M}
1237: Maciejewski, W., \& Athanassoula, E.\ 2007, \mnras, 380, 999
1238: \bibitem[Marquart et al.(2007)]{2007arXiv0708.4134M} Marquart, T., Fathi,
1239: K., {\"O}stlin, G., Bergvall, N., Cumming, R.~J., \& Amram, P.\ 2007, \aap, 474, L9
1240: \bibitem[Moe \& De Marco(2006)]{2006ApJ...650..916M} Moe, M., \& De Marco,
1241: O.\ 2006, \apj, 650, 916
1242: \bibitem[Moretto et al.(2006)]{2006SPIE.6269E..76M} Moretto, G., et al.\
1243: 2006, \procspie, 6269
1244: \bibitem[toto7(2006)]{toto7} Newman \& Davis 2002, ApJ, 564, 567
1245: \bibitem[Peletier et al.(2007)]{2007MNRAS.379..445P} Peletier, R.~F., et
1246: al.\ 2007, \mnras, 379, 445
1247: \bibitem[Primack(2006)]{2006astro.ph..9541P} Primack, J.~R.\ 2006, ArXiv
1248: Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0609541
1249: {\bf \bibitem[Ramsay et al.(1992)]{1992MNRAS.259..751R} Ramsay, S.~K., Mountain,
1250: C.~M., \& Geballe, T.~R.\ 1992, \mnras, 259, 751}
1251: \bibitem[Rela{\~n}o et al.(2007)]{2007A&A...467.1117R} Rela{\~n}o, M.,
1252: Beckman, J.~E., Daigle, O., \& Carignan, C.\ 2007, \aap, 467, 1117
1253: \bibitem[Rela{\~n}o \& Beckman(2005)]{2005A&A...430..911R} Rela{\~n}o, M.,
1254: \& Beckman, J.~E.\ 2005, \aap, 430, 911
1255: \bibitem[Rela{\~n}o et al.(2005)]{2005A&A...431..235R} Rela{\~n}o, M.,
1256: Beckman, J.~E., Zurita, A., Rozas, M., \& Giammanco, C.\ 2005, \aap, 431,
1257: 235
1258: \bibitem[Rosado et al.(2007)]{2007AJ....133...89R} Rosado, M., Arias, L.,
1259: \& Ambrocio-Cruz, P.\ 2007, \aj, 133, 89
1260: \bibitem[Rozas et al.(2006)]{2006A&A...455..549R} Rozas, M., Richer, M.~G.,
1261: L{\'o}pez, J.~A., Rela{\~n}o, M., \& Beckman, J.~E.\ 2006, \aap, 455, 549
1262: \bibitem[Siegmund(1988)]{1988SPIE..982..108S} Siegmund, O.~H.~W.\ 1988,
1263: \procspie, 982, 108
1264: \bibitem[Shlosman et al.(1989)]{1989Natur.338...45S} Shlosman, I., Frank,
1265: J., \& Begelman, M.~C.\ 1989, \nat, 338, 45
1266: \bibitem[Sluis \& Williams(2006)]{2006AJ....131.2089S} Sluis, A.~P.~N., \&
1267: Williams, T.~B.\ 2006, \aj, 131, 2089
1268: \bibitem[Thatte et al.(2006)]{2006SPIE.6269E.113T} Thatte, N., Tecza, M.,
1269: Clarke, F., Goodsall, T., Lynn, J., Freeman, D., \& Davies, R.~L.\ 2006,
1270: \procspie, 6269
1271: \bibitem[Terlevich \& Melnick(1981)]{1981MNRAS.195..839T} Terlevich, R., \&
1272: Melnick, J.\ 1981, \mnras, 195, 839
1273: \bibitem[Tremaine et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...574..740T} Tremaine, S., et al.\
1274: 2002, \apj, 574, 740
1275: \bibitem[Vogelaar \& Terlouw(2001)]{2001ASPC..238..358V}
1276: Vogelaar M.~G.~R., Terlouw J.~P., 2001, ASPC, 238, 358
1277: \bibitem[Zurita et al.(2001)]{2001Ap&SS.276..491Z} Zurita, A., Rozas, M.,
1278: \& Beckman, J.~E.\ 2001, \apss, 276, 491
1279: \bibitem[Zurita et al.(2004)]{2004A&A...413...73Z} Zurita, A., Rela{\~n}o,
1280: M., Beckman, J.~E., \& Knapen, J.~H.\ 2004, \aap, 413, 73
1281: \end{thebibliography}
1282:
1283: \appendix
1284:
1285: \clearpage
1286:
1287: \begin{figure}[p]
1288: \plotone{FIG7}
1289: \caption{\label{fig:kinematics}Kinematical maps of 4 objects.{\bf Top left}: NGC 5427 with NGC 5426.{\bf Top rigth}: NGC 4376.{\bf Bottom Left}: NGC 6384. {\bf Botton right}: NGC 5954 with NGC 5953}
1290: \end{figure}
1291:
1292: \begin{figure}[p]
1293: \plotone{FIG8}
1294: \caption{\label{fig:mono}\ha images of 4 objects.{\bf Top left}: NGC 5427 with NGC 5426.{\bf Top rigth}: NGC 4376.{\bf Bottom Left}: NGC 6384. {\bf Botton right}: NGC 5954 with NGC 5953}
1295: \end{figure}
1296:
1297: \begin{figure}[p]
1298: \centering
1299: \plottwo{FIG9a}{FIG9b}
1300: \caption{{\bf Left}: \label{fig:PNe}[NII]658.3~nm image of Planatary Nebula M1-75 with a pixel size of 0.2". {\bf Right}: associated expansion velocity field. Range of velocity is from 76 \kms to 231 \kms}
1301: \end{figure}
1302:
1303: \end{document}